We are still missing explanation on why in 20y there will be no questions needed on sustainability of medicine. I suppose two solutions may come handy: technological progress making things cheaper and nuclear (or any other sort) holocaust making human medicine obsolete. The first one is unlikely. Not because technology will stop progressing but because the property rights will not allow to spread of wealth gained from that progress, at least not in the way which would allow to provide medicine to all. There is also this little problem that all natural beings provided with means will expand - procreate till the end of the petri dish is reached. The ones that do not die out. Works for bacteria and for nations and empires.
Fortunately there is a cure for almost everything these days including aging. The only thing needed is young blood. Seems like dream come true and there is already a company providing the appropriate service. As always the ones getting service are people with thick wallets. So the only problem there is then is population size.
Not all have ability, will and chance to do any of these things. I recall office space ending was exactly about this - why bother ? You can get philosophical on this too. The point in life, reason we exist. All this BS that we are forced to do directly or by indirect pushing over by parents or powers that be. The guy did not get in situation where he had to run the rats mill yet or maybe he is stuck in cashier job and cannot get out for his mill. I play reversi before and directly after sleep because my daily job is debilitating (I do QA and troubleshooting in some industrial settings). I do not play reversi because it is so challenging (I reached max level long time ago) but because it gives peace of mind. I could have used the nursery rhyme instead. Maybe the cashier had similar problem and just played the game instead. Or maybe this was just a way to kill time we have here. Cheaper than drugs and women in any case. Who are we to judge. Much better than blowing people up because the sun in the desert was so hot.
bacteria survived longer. Their existence is as pointless as yours, mine, that of the cashier here and of Einstein too. Aliens if they exist and manage to get over here do not have point in their existence either. The only perspective where there is a point in our existence is our own. Cashier saw point in his endeavor. Some people thought that interesting. You do not. Fair enough. Why bring aliens into this?
They do? Only if they have means to either rent or buy property. There used to be an alternative - work on farm of other people but that seems to be less and less needed thanx to automation (or whatever that is called in farming).
There used to be other jobs but if one is believe this than there is much less summer jobs now than in the past.
Not sure if I get you as I am not a fun of people in latex clothing unless they are busty females. So you say that there was one Clark Kent a journalist writing stories for a major newspaper? You see by rejecting everything there exists about the story of Jesus you become one of the people who believe instead of knowing. The same problem seen in most people fighting faith anywhere in the West. This does not mean you are a bad person it just means you are no different from people believing in fictional characters that you seem so dislike. I do not care either way but both sets of people i.e. individuals believing in odd stories and ones denying anything happened at all belong firmly to the same category of individuals that are difficult to deal with unless one accepts their version of reality.
Not sure that helps but you need a proper identification to buy prepaid cards in Germany. German government may install spyware on your computers so your permission is irrelevant here. OC Germans will not hang you (or whatever they do in China) so at least this should comfort you if you live in Germany. This may change however. If Germany does it how many other Western countries does it too?
How many christians and/or jews did actually follow this because of their religion last year?
How many women have been stoned for adultery last year in muslim countries?
Compare and come back.
So it was a fault after all - after all the denials? Or was it closed as 'no fault' sort of way that we know from designers who are incapable to admit failure? Either way it is a mess. We laughed and coursed m$ for the same nonsense. Now we have this shit here. I still do not understand the reason why we had to go trough this transition in this particular way - dig in shit because it tastes so good?
I suppose this means what we all have known or at least suspected already - all parties do it.
It also means that instead of trying to prevent further damage by technical and organisational measures we invest in revenge. The fact that leaks for instance would not be so damaging for Clinton if she were honest and less corrupt is just another thing that is being missed.
This is OT but if main powers have not been engaged in acts of sabotage or at least espionage yet then the current authorization to do so against Russia combined with the hostile atmosphere will ensure the conflict in interwebs will continue and possibly escalate.
I wonder where does that ends. It may be that we come to the point that not pressing big red button by Trump will be considered a treason.
When German Green party says something then it is usually exactly the opposite of one should do if one were to use reason and facts.
That is the sorry state of affairs in Germany these days. It means that this recommendation should be looked at carefully before deployment.
Not sure about the society you live in in mine the religious congregation of christian variety indeed go down. But hey we have lots of newcomers who are strong believers. They call the thing religion of peace. According to the Pew Research Center, Islam is set to equal Christianity in number of adherents by the year 2050. Islam is set to grow faster than any other major world religion, reaching a total number of 2.76 billion (an increase of 73%).
As for Christanity, the biggest of them now this is what Pew research says (in 2015) about their demise : by 2050, the Christian population is expected to exceed 3 billion.
Whether this is a good or bad development(*) may be a subject of heated debate. Yet talking religion being in decline is a bit premature, is it not? Educate or if that is impossible at least inform yourself before you speak.
* - I left the church some time ago. I was not much of a good church goer anyway. Maybe I was a good christian or maybe not. Who is there to judge. I do not care all that much, if I did I would not have left, or? However the research on the subject shows that for instance the gated communities in US last longer if they are based on religious principles. Other research shows that social cohesion especially in times of turmoil is higher for societies that observe some common religion. That is important because it helps them survive. Then there is religious zealotry that humans without regular faith show. This has all signs of bigotry and hatred that is biggest problem that all religion have. Then you mentioned hope - what is wrong with hope being given to people? I have not much hope of anything especially after looking into the news box. Yet there are others who prefer to have hope and get it whatever way possible. I do not subscribe to any religion but if any is going to give hope to the people this may be a good thing. People that lost hope may be extremely dangerous if their believes conflict with existence of humanity. But that is OT, the fact of the matter is: religious observance contrary to your observation is growing in the world.
What you have attempted to prove is that it may have been unreasonable to do certain thing in this case killing a man to prevent alg. from being propagated. This however does not prevent any misguided individual from doing so. Some of such individuals may have even possessed skill, tools and other resources to do what was required. It is the same trap the economists always fall - they think that agents (representing humans) know all relevant information, an process it and act reasonably - these assumptions are wrong most of the time.
Just look around at your colleagues or (which is more difficult) at yourself and ask this one question: was it reasonable person you look at just did?
German schools are obviously so bad that cheaters did a really bad job here. I work in Germany for 20y now and I can only confirm that Germans cannot count properly and only move stuff from place to place. This seems to be a common practice at least in SW domain.OC some Germans can count. These run away because of taxes and other disastrous policies of their government. These are not the only feats of engineering Germany can be proud of. I was driving over Rhine recently and was surprised to see a set of signs and special traffic arrangements to remove heavy lorries from bridge traffic. I investigated this a bit and found out that the bridge was in a such a bad shape that the heavy vehicles could not be safely allowed on it. Instead of fixing it the highway on the bridge got (sophisticated) weight restrictions. Few years back an archive of old manuscripts was ruined in Cologne because subway works were messed up and caused collapse of many buildings - something that did not happen decades before when other line of subway were built. A street in front of my house has a section farther away that is closed for ore than a year because its surface fell apart - this happened after they tried to fix it 3 times in a row. Now they gave up. I suspect the roads that Romans built 2kya were a little bit more robust. The art of engineering went up and down and up again since. Now we observe significant decline and in many different areas. But we have soft science to hold us right and state run media to tell us the truths here. Why do you think I am not surprised at all about these developments? Because I had an occasion to see the schools and their pupils at work. There are good ones everywhere but as one can see - not that many of them anymore...
You realize of course that there are such things like private cloud as well as public clouds whose owners do as you please with regard to redundancy and reliability but possibly better. Choice is yours and usually cloud or not if things go wrong you always find a reason.
I may agree that there are subjects that are questionable at work because they have ability to heat up emotions like they did with you now. I can agree then to limit such discussions to small groups where everybody agrees on principle that it is ok to discuss them. If not the leave it. Yet I do not see a reason why such discussions in general are reprehensible. Is only male sexuality and way of males around it evil and disgusting and we all have to follow the way of mellow or do you think there are different allowed ways of behaviour as long as all agree on basic principles?
As for drugs use I do not know. We all know origins of IT were obscured by sweet smoke. If you can cope with work and use whatever you consume I do not care. I used to drink a glass of whine to a Friday meal with colleagues - considering my drinking habits back then it was microdosing too. I got older and for years now do not do it anymore because it disturbs me. There are situations where this is absolutely not OK to have even small doses of whatever substance one consumed in the system, there are others where you should leave it to responsibility of the crew members. If they cannot hold it - a supervisor knows what to do (I would hope at least that they do).
As for subjects discussed at lunch - well I rarely if at all eat at the premises so it is only business of mine what I discuss. I do understand a notion of a business lunch but if it is a real business lunch then there are business rules to be followed.
Most of these things can be discussed. I have impression neither side wants to.
I am fuel agnostic because I do not believe the electric cars currently fix any problems that I care about - there are 7.5b of us. The most effective planet saving measure is condom. Everything else is maybe necessary if improvement to the point of proven helping issues at stake AND being feasible for common man.
As for the vehicle, charging network etc - I do not quite understand the excitement. When Tesla or whoever fixes the problem bespoken above and in the subject then it can move on to fixing the price of a vehicle. When it becomes affordable for a common man I will think about buying one. Till then I will use a vehicle that burns oil, gas or whatever. As long as it is affordable and gets things to move where I want. Good however that other people get excited to the point of parting with the money. Development needs its supporters. Whether this is the solution of our problems I doubt. In any case I look at it be the iteration that solves two problems indicated.
And it did not pretend to be solving some issue which it could not etc. By 3rd watching the war is evil message gets a little annoying - I mean we have all the tech not because we are peace loving animals with a tick for sick humour and brutality. Sadly we exaggerate at latest getting eventually in senseless violence. Still that is what made us conquer all there is on earth. We destroy it at the end of course. The movie was fun to watch and then again. Perfect - I cannot say it about many other movies from last decade.
It may or not be personal but I do not think Chappie belongs here - it is s-f all right but of rather questionable quality. This is besides your point but I Think Ex Machina is an outstanding classic now even if they say this is a modern version of Frankenstein - I did not think about it when I saw it but then indeed there are quiet some similarities. There are also significant, not negligible differences and novelties. The ending were a little weak but then again what is perfect. I would add The Road too - it made me feel sick and I still watched till the end. Here again it is a bit weak at ending.
I do not understand the 'no space' limitation. It may be that we never reach other stars. But then this is a nice entertainment and Interstellar was still one of masterpieces of S-F while touching the time travel - that is a feat considering how hairy and impossible that is.
Discrimination exists and does influence outcomes of certain activities. AI will detect that some groups for whatever reason have lower chance of paying back the loan. If that however is caused in part by existing discrimination it does not really help that AI will not get to know factor X (skin colour, religion etc). It is also not meant to do so I would imagine and it is counter-productive to make it do so. If monitoring systems detect such a bias maybe we should be acting on factors that cause discrimination? Or maybe these factors are natural in a sense - they have been chosen by affected group? Say women prefer to stay at home with kids (this is not to say no men would want to do that or that all women do). The effect is that they earn less on average. Is this discrimination or not? There is already a hierarchy of values discussion needed to make a proper decision here and no AI is gonna help us in that. So in a sense you are right. Some biases are accurate. Some are not and this all is not really helping the machine to make a proper decision because we do not even know what proper decision means.
I guess what it all means we 'need' AI to replace us all. Only then we will ensure that there is no discrimination by humans and against humans.
There is also another interesting thing that I wonder about. Assuming AI works perfectly and contrary to what I discussed above there is no discrimination in the world.At some point all will have the position in a society that they deserve. A new kid is born in a poor family of underachievers. It is 8th. Maybe it is born into its proper environment but maybe it is a genius - if the kid is in fact a genius (something that happens sporadically but it does happen) its chances of achieving anything matching his ability are like standing in front of a flat high wall one has to climb with no tools. No tools because why give the kid any if its chances are so small? It is a waste?
I find it funny how we humans want to replace our sweat and misery trough the tools we make and in a process we cause another different wave of misery. I wonder if indeed AI will cause the world collapse as some say. In any case revolutions were started by individuals that either had roots in higher parts of society or were at least supported into success by such parties. Now imagine what happens if AI eventually gets to control not only our security and military systems but government too - I mean most of members of governments in the West today do not even have own ideas - they have experts delivering them these. Raplcing experts trough AI is a good idea. It removes BIAS as we know. The questions such AIs have to answer are a bit more complex than - how to close on target that modern Air-to-Air missiles have to make. In fact so complex that I cannot imagine AI making a better judgment than humans can. I wonder only if we are smart enough to accept them and make them to support us. Judging on the way world is today I doubt. We will just have ore efficient ways of controlling humans. Now where would that get us if done really well???
I am really excited about these developments but the reasons for bias AI cannot remove. I just do not think so. Unless as said there will be no humans to be discriminated against. Being excited is ok I guess. I somehow do not feel however that this world will be a good one for my kids. Can AI fix it?
Slashdot Mirror
We are still missing explanation on why in 20y there will be no questions needed on sustainability of medicine. I suppose two solutions may come handy: technological progress making things cheaper and nuclear (or any other sort) holocaust making human medicine obsolete. The first one is unlikely. Not because technology will stop progressing but because the property rights will not allow to spread of wealth gained from that progress, at least not in the way which would allow to provide medicine to all. There is also this little problem that all natural beings provided with means will expand - procreate till the end of the petri dish is reached. The ones that do not die out. Works for bacteria and for nations and empires.
Fortunately there is a cure for almost everything these days including aging. The only thing needed is young blood. Seems like dream come true and there is already a company providing the appropriate service. As always the ones getting service are people with thick wallets. So the only problem there is then is population size.
Not all have ability, will and chance to do any of these things. I recall office space ending was exactly about this - why bother ? You can get philosophical on this too. The point in life, reason we exist. All this BS that we are forced to do directly or by indirect pushing over by parents or powers that be. The guy did not get in situation where he had to run the rats mill yet or maybe he is stuck in cashier job and cannot get out for his mill. I play reversi before and directly after sleep because my daily job is debilitating (I do QA and troubleshooting in some industrial settings). I do not play reversi because it is so challenging (I reached max level long time ago) but because it gives peace of mind. I could have used the nursery rhyme instead. Maybe the cashier had similar problem and just played the game instead. Or maybe this was just a way to kill time we have here. Cheaper than drugs and women in any case. Who are we to judge. Much better than blowing people up because the sun in the desert was so hot.
bacteria survived longer. Their existence is as pointless as yours, mine, that of the cashier here and of Einstein too. Aliens if they exist and manage to get over here do not have point in their existence either. The only perspective where there is a point in our existence is our own. Cashier saw point in his endeavor. Some people thought that interesting. You do not. Fair enough. Why bring aliens into this?
They do? Only if they have means to either rent or buy property. There used to be an alternative - work on farm of other people but that seems to be less and less needed thanx to automation (or whatever that is called in farming). There used to be other jobs but if one is believe this than there is much less summer jobs now than in the past.
Not sure if I get you as I am not a fun of people in latex clothing unless they are busty females. So you say that there was one Clark Kent a journalist writing stories for a major newspaper? You see by rejecting everything there exists about the story of Jesus you become one of the people who believe instead of knowing. The same problem seen in most people fighting faith anywhere in the West. This does not mean you are a bad person it just means you are no different from people believing in fictional characters that you seem so dislike. I do not care either way but both sets of people i.e. individuals believing in odd stories and ones denying anything happened at all belong firmly to the same category of individuals that are difficult to deal with unless one accepts their version of reality.
Not sure that helps but you need a proper identification to buy prepaid cards in Germany. German government may install spyware on your computers so your permission is irrelevant here. OC Germans will not hang you (or whatever they do in China) so at least this should comfort you if you live in Germany. This may change however. If Germany does it how many other Western countries does it too?
From what we know he may have existed actually. The story about bouncing job is another pair of shoes however.
How many christians and/or jews did actually follow this because of their religion last year?
How many women have been stoned for adultery last year in muslim countries?
Compare and come back.
Maybe this is another version of phantom at the opera or other piece with a monster in it?
So it was a fault after all - after all the denials? Or was it closed as 'no fault' sort of way that we know from designers who are incapable to admit failure? Either way it is a mess. We laughed and coursed m$ for the same nonsense. Now we have this shit here. I still do not understand the reason why we had to go trough this transition in this particular way - dig in shit because it tastes so good?
I suppose this means what we all have known or at least suspected already - all parties do it.
It also means that instead of trying to prevent further damage by technical and organisational measures we invest in revenge. The fact that leaks for instance would not be so damaging for Clinton if she were honest and less corrupt is just another thing that is being missed.
This is OT but if main powers have not been engaged in acts of sabotage or at least espionage yet then the current authorization to do so against Russia combined with the hostile atmosphere will ensure the conflict in interwebs will continue and possibly escalate. I wonder where does that ends. It may be that we come to the point that not pressing big red button by Trump will be considered a treason.
I use tab to produce spaces i.e. I use both. I suppose project given settings for preferred editor + coding guidelines may make some difference.
When German Green party says something then it is usually exactly the opposite of one should do if one were to use reason and facts. That is the sorry state of affairs in Germany these days. It means that this recommendation should be looked at carefully before deployment.
Not sure about the society you live in in mine the religious congregation of christian variety indeed go down. But hey we have lots of newcomers who are strong believers. They call the thing religion of peace. According to the Pew Research Center, Islam is set to equal Christianity in number of adherents by the year 2050. Islam is set to grow faster than any other major world religion, reaching a total number of 2.76 billion (an increase of 73%).
As for Christanity, the biggest of them now this is what Pew research says (in 2015) about their demise : by 2050, the Christian population is expected to exceed 3 billion.
Whether this is a good or bad development(*) may be a subject of heated debate. Yet talking religion being in decline is a bit premature, is it not? Educate or if that is impossible at least inform yourself before you speak.
* - I left the church some time ago. I was not much of a good church goer anyway. Maybe I was a good christian or maybe not. Who is there to judge. I do not care all that much, if I did I would not have left, or? However the research on the subject shows that for instance the gated communities in US last longer if they are based on religious principles. Other research shows that social cohesion especially in times of turmoil is higher for societies that observe some common religion. That is important because it helps them survive. Then there is religious zealotry that humans without regular faith show. This has all signs of bigotry and hatred that is biggest problem that all religion have. Then you mentioned hope - what is wrong with hope being given to people? I have not much hope of anything especially after looking into the news box. Yet there are others who prefer to have hope and get it whatever way possible. I do not subscribe to any religion but if any is going to give hope to the people this may be a good thing. People that lost hope may be extremely dangerous if their believes conflict with existence of humanity. But that is OT, the fact of the matter is: religious observance contrary to your observation is growing in the world.
What you have attempted to prove is that it may have been unreasonable to do certain thing in this case killing a man to prevent alg. from being propagated. This however does not prevent any misguided individual from doing so. Some of such individuals may have even possessed skill, tools and other resources to do what was required. It is the same trap the economists always fall - they think that agents (representing humans) know all relevant information, an process it and act reasonably - these assumptions are wrong most of the time. Just look around at your colleagues or (which is more difficult) at yourself and ask this one question: was it reasonable person you look at just did?
German schools are obviously so bad that cheaters did a really bad job here. I work in Germany for 20y now and I can only confirm that Germans cannot count properly and only move stuff from place to place. This seems to be a common practice at least in SW domain.OC some Germans can count. These run away because of taxes and other disastrous policies of their government. These are not the only feats of engineering Germany can be proud of. I was driving over Rhine recently and was surprised to see a set of signs and special traffic arrangements to remove heavy lorries from bridge traffic. I investigated this a bit and found out that the bridge was in a such a bad shape that the heavy vehicles could not be safely allowed on it. Instead of fixing it the highway on the bridge got (sophisticated) weight restrictions. Few years back an archive of old manuscripts was ruined in Cologne because subway works were messed up and caused collapse of many buildings - something that did not happen decades before when other line of subway were built. A street in front of my house has a section farther away that is closed for ore than a year because its surface fell apart - this happened after they tried to fix it 3 times in a row. Now they gave up. I suspect the roads that Romans built 2kya were a little bit more robust. The art of engineering went up and down and up again since. Now we observe significant decline and in many different areas. But we have soft science to hold us right and state run media to tell us the truths here. Why do you think I am not surprised at all about these developments? Because I had an occasion to see the schools and their pupils at work. There are good ones everywhere but as one can see - not that many of them anymore...
You realize of course that there are such things like private cloud as well as public clouds whose owners do as you please with regard to redundancy and reliability but possibly better. Choice is yours and usually cloud or not if things go wrong you always find a reason.
I advocated all this that you wrote? Wow.
I may agree that there are subjects that are questionable at work because they have ability to heat up emotions like they did with you now. I can agree then to limit such discussions to small groups where everybody agrees on principle that it is ok to discuss them. If not the leave it. Yet I do not see a reason why such discussions in general are reprehensible. Is only male sexuality and way of males around it evil and disgusting and we all have to follow the way of mellow or do you think there are different allowed ways of behaviour as long as all agree on basic principles?
As for drugs use I do not know. We all know origins of IT were obscured by sweet smoke. If you can cope with work and use whatever you consume I do not care. I used to drink a glass of whine to a Friday meal with colleagues - considering my drinking habits back then it was microdosing too. I got older and for years now do not do it anymore because it disturbs me. There are situations where this is absolutely not OK to have even small doses of whatever substance one consumed in the system, there are others where you should leave it to responsibility of the crew members. If they cannot hold it - a supervisor knows what to do (I would hope at least that they do).
As for subjects discussed at lunch - well I rarely if at all eat at the premises so it is only business of mine what I discuss. I do understand a notion of a business lunch but if it is a real business lunch then there are business rules to be followed.
Most of these things can be discussed. I have impression neither side wants to.
Value is not bad but the price is just silly.
I am fuel agnostic because I do not believe the electric cars currently fix any problems that I care about - there are 7.5b of us. The most effective planet saving measure is condom. Everything else is maybe necessary if improvement to the point of proven helping issues at stake AND being feasible for common man.
As for the vehicle, charging network etc - I do not quite understand the excitement. When Tesla or whoever fixes the problem bespoken above and in the subject then it can move on to fixing the price of a vehicle. When it becomes affordable for a common man I will think about buying one. Till then I will use a vehicle that burns oil, gas or whatever. As long as it is affordable and gets things to move where I want. Good however that other people get excited to the point of parting with the money. Development needs its supporters. Whether this is the solution of our problems I doubt. In any case I look at it be the iteration that solves two problems indicated.
And it did not pretend to be solving some issue which it could not etc. By 3rd watching the war is evil message gets a little annoying - I mean we have all the tech not because we are peace loving animals with a tick for sick humour and brutality. Sadly we exaggerate at latest getting eventually in senseless violence. Still that is what made us conquer all there is on earth. We destroy it at the end of course. The movie was fun to watch and then again. Perfect - I cannot say it about many other movies from last decade.
It may or not be personal but I do not think Chappie belongs here - it is s-f all right but of rather questionable quality. This is besides your point but I Think Ex Machina is an outstanding classic now even if they say this is a modern version of Frankenstein - I did not think about it when I saw it but then indeed there are quiet some similarities. There are also significant, not negligible differences and novelties. The ending were a little weak but then again what is perfect. I would add The Road too - it made me feel sick and I still watched till the end. Here again it is a bit weak at ending.
I do not understand the 'no space' limitation. It may be that we never reach other stars. But then this is a nice entertainment and Interstellar was still one of masterpieces of S-F while touching the time travel - that is a feat considering how hairy and impossible that is.
Discrimination exists and does influence outcomes of certain activities. AI will detect that some groups for whatever reason have lower chance of paying back the loan. If that however is caused in part by existing discrimination it does not really help that AI will not get to know factor X (skin colour, religion etc). It is also not meant to do so I would imagine and it is counter-productive to make it do so. If monitoring systems detect such a bias maybe we should be acting on factors that cause discrimination? Or maybe these factors are natural in a sense - they have been chosen by affected group? Say women prefer to stay at home with kids (this is not to say no men would want to do that or that all women do). The effect is that they earn less on average. Is this discrimination or not? There is already a hierarchy of values discussion needed to make a proper decision here and no AI is gonna help us in that. So in a sense you are right. Some biases are accurate. Some are not and this all is not really helping the machine to make a proper decision because we do not even know what proper decision means.
I guess what it all means we 'need' AI to replace us all. Only then we will ensure that there is no discrimination by humans and against humans.
There is also another interesting thing that I wonder about. Assuming AI works perfectly and contrary to what I discussed above there is no discrimination in the world.At some point all will have the position in a society that they deserve. A new kid is born in a poor family of underachievers. It is 8th. Maybe it is born into its proper environment but maybe it is a genius - if the kid is in fact a genius (something that happens sporadically but it does happen) its chances of achieving anything matching his ability are like standing in front of a flat high wall one has to climb with no tools. No tools because why give the kid any if its chances are so small? It is a waste?
I find it funny how we humans want to replace our sweat and misery trough the tools we make and in a process we cause another different wave of misery. I wonder if indeed AI will cause the world collapse as some say. In any case revolutions were started by individuals that either had roots in higher parts of society or were at least supported into success by such parties. Now imagine what happens if AI eventually gets to control not only our security and military systems but government too - I mean most of members of governments in the West today do not even have own ideas - they have experts delivering them these. Raplcing experts trough AI is a good idea. It removes BIAS as we know. The questions such AIs have to answer are a bit more complex than - how to close on target that modern Air-to-Air missiles have to make. In fact so complex that I cannot imagine AI making a better judgment than humans can. I wonder only if we are smart enough to accept them and make them to support us. Judging on the way world is today I doubt. We will just have ore efficient ways of controlling humans. Now where would that get us if done really well???
I am really excited about these developments but the reasons for bias AI cannot remove. I just do not think so. Unless as said there will be no humans to be discriminated against. Being excited is ok I guess. I somehow do not feel however that this world will be a good one for my kids. Can AI fix it?