Let's say I bought a piece of software that worked great, the company closes their doors or the developer dies... should I be deprived the use of said application I paid for and still works for what I need because the developer hasn't submitted a bug fix in 12 months?
Considering that Doom 3 natively supported Linux and Mac, the premise of it running on another *nix variant with some extra libraries for cross platform compatibility doesn't mean much to me.
All those signs say "texting while driving is dangerous and illegal". Where are all the signs saying "playing Candy Crush Saga while driving is dangerous and illegal" or the "playing Fallout 4 with the Vault Builder expansion pack while driving is dangerous and illegal"? This sounds like a failure on the part of a Department of Transportation Marketing Person to me.
You're saying that all IT work isn't completely fungible and a question of appreciation for having the opportunity to sit in the chair? Please hold on, I'm just going to put in an unrelated call to HR followed by one to Security, but I assure you there's nothing wrong. Have a seat in fact, and can you please close the door?
If I would have known that I could obtain a bachelors degree in only 3 years... oh wait, I already did that by doing 18-21 credit hours a semester instead of the usual 12, otherwise known as benefitting from the fact that credits per dollar in that range reduced the cost of my education. Silly me for caring about my education's cost instead of viewing it as a time to goof off.
I look at it like//most// crowdfunding campaigns... it will probably end with someone running off with the money and those who fronted the money ending up with nothing, or at best a picture of someone sitting on the beach.
You're implying that they are offering preferential treatment at others expense... how could giving away your pet service for free to whomever will listen, or other incentives like free travel and ice cream to motivate people to play possibly be deemed preferential?
The problem here is that people with an existing and loyal fan base who trusted and respected them decided to create said gambling platform and mislead their viewers to believe they "found it" versus "founded it" and were using it to win money. As such, there might be a case of fraud (in the literal letter of the law) by anyone who acted upon said claims by these YouTubers.
Youâ(TM)ll be back, soon youâ(TM)ll see
Youâ(TM)ll remember you belong to me
Youâ(TM)ll be back, time will tell
Youâ(TM)ll remember that I served you well
Oceans rise, empires fall
We have seen each other through it all
What about the odd time of double references? I feel like we're going to need a flowchart before too long defining who said what, when, and the dependency trees of their arguments.
I get that math is scary, but do we really need to subpoena someone who knows how to effectively calculate mirror images? Surely this is an overreach of their power and they could find a local math professor if they truly have no one on salary who has taken an intro to calculus course.
The person in question is a composer. Further a large amounts of their music is in wav versus compressed audio formats to serve as a master of their work.
Haven't you heard? Math is fucking scary! He might have been preparing a pop quiz for people in every third row whose birthdays are divisible by a mersenne prime. Think about how many people could have died!!!
Slashdot Mirror
Let's say I bought a piece of software that worked great, the company closes their doors or the developer dies... should I be deprived the use of said application I paid for and still works for what I need because the developer hasn't submitted a bug fix in 12 months?
But will you make them pay for what they've done?
Considering that Doom 3 natively supported Linux and Mac, the premise of it running on another *nix variant with some extra libraries for cross platform compatibility doesn't mean much to me.
I hear goobolboxes, flooblecranks and gloobleyanks are an effective means of power generation and ensuring subservience.
All those signs say "texting while driving is dangerous and illegal". Where are all the signs saying "playing Candy Crush Saga while driving is dangerous and illegal" or the "playing Fallout 4 with the Vault Builder expansion pack while driving is dangerous and illegal"? This sounds like a failure on the part of a Department of Transportation Marketing Person to me.
You're saying that all IT work isn't completely fungible and a question of appreciation for having the opportunity to sit in the chair? Please hold on, I'm just going to put in an unrelated call to HR followed by one to Security, but I assure you there's nothing wrong. Have a seat in fact, and can you please close the door?
If I would have known that I could obtain a bachelors degree in only 3 years... oh wait, I already did that by doing 18-21 credit hours a semester instead of the usual 12, otherwise known as benefitting from the fact that credits per dollar in that range reduced the cost of my education. Silly me for caring about my education's cost instead of viewing it as a time to goof off.
Just because Trump asked Russia to do this, and Russian hackers did this doesn't mean there's a causal relationship.
80% or the time, it works every time. Obviously.
I look at it like //most// crowdfunding campaigns... it will probably end with someone running off with the money and those who fronted the money ending up with nothing, or at best a picture of someone sitting on the beach.
Satellite Imagery is regularly edited to obscure sensitive information before uploaded to Google Earth.
That's because it enables the camera by default and can be used to exfiltrate data. Confidential or Classified information stops for no Rhyhorn.
You're implying that they are offering preferential treatment at others expense... how could giving away your pet service for free to whomever will listen, or other incentives like free travel and ice cream to motivate people to play possibly be deemed preferential?
When life gives you melons, you may have dyslexia.
The problem here is that people with an existing and loyal fan base who trusted and respected them decided to create said gambling platform and mislead their viewers to believe they "found it" versus "founded it" and were using it to win money. As such, there might be a case of fraud (in the literal letter of the law) by anyone who acted upon said claims by these YouTubers.
I was going to check, but Google got rid of their "I'm Feeling Lucky" button on mobile. They must be hiding something...
I take it Google's lawyers were out sick in middle school when they discussed the concept of imaginary numbers.
Finance has been tech for quite a while now... The idea of one tech company displacing another is a way of life.
Youâ(TM)ll be back, soon youâ(TM)ll see Youâ(TM)ll remember you belong to me Youâ(TM)ll be back, time will tell Youâ(TM)ll remember that I served you well Oceans rise, empires fall We have seen each other through it all
You're implying they still remember numbers that small.
What about the odd time of double references? I feel like we're going to need a flowchart before too long defining who said what, when, and the dependency trees of their arguments.
Well, if I could just beg your indulgence for a few seconds more, sir, the old 345 takes a little time to warm up.
I get that math is scary, but do we really need to subpoena someone who knows how to effectively calculate mirror images? Surely this is an overreach of their power and they could find a local math professor if they truly have no one on salary who has taken an intro to calculus course.
The person in question is a composer. Further a large amounts of their music is in wav versus compressed audio formats to serve as a master of their work.
Haven't you heard? Math is fucking scary! He might have been preparing a pop quiz for people in every third row whose birthdays are divisible by a mersenne prime. Think about how many people could have died!!!