Just looked at the page, it's bundled with internet service. I see no place to buy just TV service, and I already have smoking fast cable so this doesn't add a thing for me. https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/browse/-/13295274011
Don't worry - the new Vizio fills the room with a soothing radiation which wirelessly charges the remote and anything else with a round conductive shape. It's kind of fun to watch my coffee cup with the metallic ring arc playfully as I browse YouTube with my giant remote. Just make sure you remove your wedding ring.
Also any piercings in sensitive areas... Unless you're into that slow cooked junk feeling...
People aren't that stupid. They'll get the 10% back on two $50 games so that they get $10 to pay for a new game. Then they'll buy another $50 game to replace the second game they sold back.
I'm sure the instant someone can make more selling electrons generated from orbit than it costs to produce them (without siphoning tax dollars off of the rest of us clods), you'll see such a business materialize, the world will be a better place, oceans will stop rising, etc.
Until then, let's continue with the research but utilize what's the most cost effective now.
Fer God's sake, fusion energy is just around the corner...:)
Yes, there's a Latin-Asian fusion place around the corner that helps produce methane... Refried beans and Kimchi... No candles allowed!
For "a client-side vulnerability" to work, the data (the email address and if available the location) had to be served to the volunteer map from the server, right? It just makes me wonder if the "client-side vulnerability" was something super tricky like "View Page Source"...
Then the program would get suckered repeatedly, just like novice players are... Knowing when to do it and when not to is not a binary state, it depends on which player(s) you are pushing against and how strong your actual cards are along with a (sometimes very) educated guess as to when you are being sucked in... Daniel Negreanu is very good at that technique and finished 11th of 6,420 (for $526,778) in last years WSOP Main Event. If it was easy to figure out, thousands of people would not be "dead money" on day one of that event. Many of these players are highly educated and well versed in game theory, in fact the top players are an astounding array of professionals including programmers and analysts... along with thousands of people who believe they are really good at poker. In a game of imperfect information logic can be a liability if it is predictable...
I agree. Being strong in chips lets you bully weaker opponents, something that would be hard to program in a realistic manner. Last year 6,420 people paid $10,000 each to play in the WSOP Main Event. Most of these players are wiped out on the first round of play, and are referred to as "dead money". That group includes some top players, sometimes being a bully bites you in the ass... again, hard to program optimally. Due to a rule change, the top 1000 players now finish "in the money", as in they won at least a bit more than the $10,000 buy in. Wikipedia did a nice write up, including how well past Main Event winners did this year. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_World_Series_of_Poker
Oh, so now it's not OK for a grandmother to be a software pirate kingpin? (queenpin?) Or would that be a {king/queen}pin software pirate? Now I'm confused, but it's starting to look like it's got Broadway potential... Granny Queenpin, Software Pirate!
Poker is called a "game of imperfect information" and just calculating the odds will not make you a winner. Like Go, interaction with the players is important in that you may be getting false or misleading information. This 2015 heads up match was an interesting contest: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claudico
Shhhh, maybe IoT will distract them from F'ing with the Firefox UI, like throwing a dog a bone so that he doesn't maul the cat.
OK, first off there is no mauling, it seems the dog has been humping the cat for some time... But I agree if it gets them to quit missing with the browser then anything would be good. I have given up hoping they would go back to innovating, now I just wish they would do maintenance only.
I did not see 5% efficiency mentioned in TFA, just 6 watts per gram of solar cells. Checking elsewhere, I still can't find a 5% efficiency. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cell_efficiency. With a material so thin and light, I can't see just using the roof of anything, I would cover every exposed surface as the exposure angle would constantly be changing. If you are already driving an EV, every free watt you can pick up while moving will only extend your range. And with something so thin and light, I would use two layers to cover gaps in the film as seen in TFA photos... More people will be driving EVs at some time in the future, why not grab every free electron at that point.
I know you were trying to troll, but this doesn't threaten oil companies... the applications for this kind of cell are mainly restricted to those where weight is a more important factor than strictly just the cell's efficiency, which is generally limited to things that are either space or near-space bound.
I don't know, something that can rest on a soap bubble could be worked into the top coat of vehicle paint and that's quite a bit of square footage. If you could pick up an extra 10% of power while driving your EV I would think that would make long hauls a bit more feasible. In places with a lot of sunshine it would be great to always be pulling down extra power during daylight. And I wonder what kind of wattage you could get by covering a couple hundred railroad cars with the stuff. Ultra light aircraft might also be able to do fossil fuel takeoff and then use electric propulsion... that's more of a use the power now, don't charge heavy batteries application, but still doable.
OK, I don't know what you've heard, but my gal is just big boned... not repeat NOT "canoe class" at all!
though your comment may shed some light on those hip waders under the bed...
I can never find that thing...
Wait, Stimulating What?
...However, I would personally never stay somewhere with a shared bathroom! That's a bit _too_ "European" for my tastes :-)
As in "European", and so is the strange guy standing next to you?
Just looked at the page, it's bundled with internet service. I see no place to buy just TV service, and I already have smoking fast cable so this doesn't add a thing for me.
https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/browse/-/13295274011
Don't worry - the new Vizio fills the room with a soothing radiation which wirelessly charges the remote and anything else with a round conductive shape. It's kind of fun to watch my coffee cup with the metallic ring arc playfully as I browse YouTube with my giant remote. Just make sure you remove your wedding ring.
Also any piercings in sensitive areas...
Unless you're into that slow cooked junk feeling...
+1
People aren't that stupid. They'll get the 10% back on two $50 games so that they get $10 to pay for a new game. Then they'll buy another $50 game to replace the second game they sold back.
Oh, wait ...
Microsoft.
Digging you a bridge to the future!
Refried beans and Kimchi...
And here i was thinking I was the only person who mixed shit like that together...
Try avocado chunks and diced green chili in oatmeal, one of my breakfast favs...
no sugar needed and it's actually healthy, it just sounds terrible.
I'm sure the instant someone can make more selling electrons generated from orbit than it costs to produce them (without siphoning tax dollars off of the rest of us clods), you'll see such a business materialize, the world will be a better place, oceans will stop rising, etc.
Until then, let's continue with the research but utilize what's the most cost effective now.
Fer God's sake, fusion energy is just around the corner... :)
Yes, there's a Latin-Asian fusion place around the corner that helps produce methane...
Refried beans and Kimchi...
No candles allowed!
We are now intentionally polluting space.
Now?
http://pics-about-space.com/nasa-space-junk?p=1
and Randall will get to re-release a cartoon...
https://xkcd.com/713/
For "a client-side vulnerability" to work, the data (the email address and if available the location) had to be served to the volunteer map from the server, right?
It just makes me wonder if the "client-side vulnerability" was something super tricky like "View Page Source"...
Not to mention what this will do to my plans for 3D printed Ocean Liners and Yachts...
Damn
Then the program would get suckered repeatedly, just like novice players are... Knowing when to do it and when not to is not a binary state, it depends on which player(s) you are pushing against and how strong your actual cards are along with a (sometimes very) educated guess as to when you are being sucked in... Daniel Negreanu is very good at that technique and finished 11th of 6,420 (for $526,778) in last years WSOP Main Event. If it was easy to figure out, thousands of people would not be "dead money" on day one of that event. Many of these players are highly educated and well versed in game theory, in fact the top players are an astounding array of professionals including programmers and analysts... along with thousands of people who believe they are really good at poker. In a game of imperfect information logic can be a liability if it is predictable...
I agree. Being strong in chips lets you bully weaker opponents, something that would be hard to program in a realistic manner. Last year 6,420 people paid $10,000 each to play in the WSOP Main Event. Most of these players are wiped out on the first round of play, and are referred to as "dead money". That group includes some top players, sometimes being a bully bites you in the ass... again, hard to program optimally. Due to a rule change, the top 1000 players now finish "in the money", as in they won at least a bit more than the $10,000 buy in. Wikipedia did a nice write up, including how well past Main Event winners did this year.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_World_Series_of_Poker
Granny Queenpin, Software Pirate!
Perhaps she's doing it to fund her cancel treatments and her compulsion to provide the very best pirated software versions.
The finest copies of Lotus 1-2-3!
Oh, so now it's not OK for a grandmother to be a software pirate kingpin? (queenpin?)
Or would that be a {king/queen}pin software pirate?
Now I'm confused, but it's starting to look like it's got Broadway potential...
Granny Queenpin, Software Pirate!
Poker is called a "game of imperfect information" and just calculating the odds will not make you a winner. Like Go, interaction with the players is important in that you may be getting false or misleading information. This 2015 heads up match was an interesting contest:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claudico
Nice Philip J. Fry ref., but it was an interstellar truck stop...
http://www.cc.com/video-clips/c47926/futurama-wormy-discovery
Do we really need an artificially intelligent app to tell us not to eat the comp'd seafood?
Next you'll be saying I should avoid the gas station sushi that I got free with a fill up!
Shhhh, maybe IoT will distract them from F'ing with the Firefox UI, like throwing a dog a bone so that he doesn't maul the cat.
OK, first off there is no mauling, it seems the dog has been humping the cat for some time...
But I agree if it gets them to quit missing with the browser then anything would be good.
I have given up hoping they would go back to innovating, now I just wish they would do maintenance only.
Right! Make it a standard.
https://xkcd.com/927/
I did not see 5% efficiency mentioned in TFA, just 6 watts per gram of solar cells. Checking elsewhere, I still can't find a 5% efficiency. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cell_efficiency. With a material so thin and light, I can't see just using the roof of anything, I would cover every exposed surface as the exposure angle would constantly be changing. If you are already driving an EV, every free watt you can pick up while moving will only extend your range. And with something so thin and light, I would use two layers to cover gaps in the film as seen in TFA photos... More people will be driving EVs at some time in the future, why not grab every free electron at that point.
I know you were trying to troll, but this doesn't threaten oil companies... the applications for this kind of cell are mainly restricted to those where weight is a more important factor than strictly just the cell's efficiency, which is generally limited to things that are either space or near-space bound.
I don't know, something that can rest on a soap bubble could be worked into the top coat of vehicle paint and that's quite a bit of square footage. If you could pick up an extra 10% of power while driving your EV I would think that would make long hauls a bit more feasible. In places with a lot of sunshine it would be great to always be pulling down extra power during daylight. And I wonder what kind of wattage you could get by covering a couple hundred railroad cars with the stuff. Ultra light aircraft might also be able to do fossil fuel takeoff and then use electric propulsion... that's more of a use the power now, don't charge heavy batteries application, but still doable.
Evolving life and evolving nerds may not be the same thing.
I wonder if there is not a "galactic basement" out there somewhere...
Well, no matter which way you are looking at the rest of the universe, from here it's always up...
Sorry but this IS the basement...