It's sad when usually-well informed people don't seem to know about this common practice in the business world. Why are they working on feature X instead of feature Y? Because X and Y are two different teams.
True, but in my case, I had built the computer requiring a IDE card that didn't have 64-bit drivers. Despite the fact I got new SATA hard drives for it a week later, Windows was already installed, and I wasn't reformatting. I finally moved it over to 64-bit last month and haven't had a driver problem with my current hardware.
Well, why does it require the hardware extensions? Prior versions of Virtual PC, and VMware, certainly don't require it. I can only assume it's safer to the host, and faster, but it's certainly not mandatory in the operational sense.
It surprised the heck out of me when I found I could run 64-bit guests on a (32-bit host OS, 64-bit hardware) with hardware virtualization, at least on my AMD.
Sometimes it is indeed a good deal, both B&N and FYE (not a bookstore, but they offer a card) have good cards, but I only buy something from either store twice a year, so it's not worth having to deal with it.
If you look deep into it, Portal is amazing for the fact that so little story is 'told', yet there are so many questions raised about what's really going on and who Chell is/may be.
I think you meant Charter, they had the same problem where there was some sort of limit on upstream, but they wouldn't tell anyone what it actually was.
Slashdot Mirror
This is more like changing the car battery.. while driving.
It's sad when usually-well informed people don't seem to know about this common practice in the business world. Why are they working on feature X instead of feature Y? Because X and Y are two different teams.
He just said he was using Debian, not Gentoo!
True, but in my case, I had built the computer requiring a IDE card that didn't have 64-bit drivers. Despite the fact I got new SATA hard drives for it a week later, Windows was already installed, and I wasn't reformatting. I finally moved it over to 64-bit last month and haven't had a driver problem with my current hardware.
Well, why does it require the hardware extensions? Prior versions of Virtual PC, and VMware, certainly don't require it. I can only assume it's safer to the host, and faster, but it's certainly not mandatory in the operational sense.
It surprised the heck out of me when I found I could run 64-bit guests on a (32-bit host OS, 64-bit hardware) with hardware virtualization, at least on my AMD.
Yeah, a bunch of people that know they shouldn't go to the school.
Ssh, just let him have his fun.
My Radeon will get up to 200C before it manages to hard-reboot my computer.
And another set of commands on the same disk can be just as distructive! (see rm -rf / and dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/sda)
Why can't we just have a CMOS setting that sets the BIOS flash read-only, and can only be changed from the boot menu?
Sometimes it is indeed a good deal, both B&N and FYE (not a bookstore, but they offer a card) have good cards, but I only buy something from either store twice a year, so it's not worth having to deal with it.
If you look deep into it, Portal is amazing for the fact that so little story is 'told', yet there are so many questions raised about what's really going on and who Chell is/may be.
fast-cgi, I believe, supports per-directory php.ini's.
I don't care, as long as they fix all these inconsistencies and everything everyone else complains about, then they can take their time.
+/-1 groaaan
Ooh, can we just criminalize feeling insulted by something you read on the internet, instead?
If he's smart enough to steal the database, he's probably smart enough to proxy when creating/using that account.
Why on earth would dentists be against soda pop? Without it, they'd be out of a job!
but the LAN was connected to one with direct Internet access.
Internet enabled machine got infected, and bridged over to the closed-off network. Why SMB was enabled on the embedded systems is a better question.
Only AOL users ... will fall for this.
Ironically they're probably the only ones that'll see this 'freezing'. Maybe no more than usual, though..
At this rate, the ISPs'll be charging us as much per megabyte as SMSes cost!
I think you meant Charter, they had the same problem where there was some sort of limit on upstream, but they wouldn't tell anyone what it actually was.
Besides, JavaFX has distinct advantages over Flash and Silverlight. It integrates seamlessly with server-side Java code.
So does Silverlight with ASP.NET code, doesn't it?
If they're telling the truth, and not monitoring the data itself, just the endpoints.. then what good does encrypting do?