So when you say "won't do" you mean "won't do for the same price as illegal workers." That's not quite the same thing. Some AC has been making the same point, but it's wrong.
And even still, some Americans on welfare will take very low paying side-jobs (unreported income) as well.
If companies stopped hiring illegal aliens to do those jobs (like, you know, they're supposed to), then those jobs would get done. Some people act like they wouldn't. That's bullshit. *Legal* citizens would fill the void.
I don't care who you are or where you're from. The statement that "there are some jobs Americans won't do" is bullshit. They may expect more money but they'll do the job. Americans risked their lives for work during the great depression doing hard manual labor. I'm sure if necessary they would do it again.
That's the rub then isn't it? Whether the compiler simply "doesn't recognize" AMD's chips and treats them as generic 586, or whether there's a "if (amd_cpu) { generate_extra_crappy_code() }" routine in there somewhere.
If it is as you describe it, then it sounds like AMD whining. Why would I buy an Intel compiler and expect it to work well for an AMD/Cyrix/Transmeta CPU?
The single best thing about the original TA was the *fantastic* score used for the soundtrack. The only game I've ever ripped the audio from to listen to alone.
Are you saying it's justified that we also start a very visible war (in this case in Iraq), with all of the death and destruction that entails (both against combatants and civilians), in order to make the public "feel better"?
I think you have a limited view on the war if that's all you can see. I think that we've been trying the covert stuff for a *long* time and it's been limited in effectiveness. I think adding in the 'visible' war is a change in tactics. We've now elevated the private behind-doors world of international terrorism to the fore-front of politics. What once was personal is now political.
I believe the idea of attacking Iraq is to get the leadership of terrorist sympathetic nations to think twice. "Shake up the bee hive" so to speak.
But now that I've carefully avoided your question... No. I don't think war "just to make people feel better" is necessarily justified. But I don't think that's all it's done.
Wow. I.. Er. Jeez, I don't know quite what to say. I mean, sure you may disagree with the guy. But to believe that he would sacrifice thousands of his own citizens lives, and have the ability to cover it all up *perfectly*, to do what now? Pass a few laws?
I think I can rule it out. Unless, of course, you have compelling evidence that doesn't include paranoid rantings, coincidences and assumptions?
Perhaps both are being done? Making the public "feel good" is definitely important when it comes to terrorism. And as you point out there really is no way to know if there are any 'covert' operations going on. I'd be surprised if there were none.
Signatures don't encrypt the data now do they? So you would certainly be able to read them.
The revocation would be used 'going foreward' and thus would be from $DATE on-ward that the old key would no longer be valid. So validity in the past would be fine - just make sure a date appears in the document (perhaps part of the standard signature?) so it can be verified that you signed it while the key was still valid. You could even be requested to re-sign the documents with your new key.
Sure, not perfect. But do we really have anything 'better' today?
Slashdot Mirror
You mis-spelled 'free' as 'poor'.
And no, showing me ads does not make a browser free.
So when you say "won't do" you mean "won't do for the same price as illegal workers." That's not quite the same thing. Some AC has been making the same point, but it's wrong.
And even still, some Americans on welfare will take very low paying side-jobs (unreported income) as well.
Wow! this screenshot looks remarkable!
If companies stopped hiring illegal aliens to do those jobs (like, you know, they're supposed to), then those jobs would get done. Some people act like they wouldn't. That's bullshit. *Legal* citizens would fill the void.
I don't care who you are or where you're from. The statement that "there are some jobs Americans won't do" is bullshit. They may expect more money but they'll do the job. Americans risked their lives for work during the great depression doing hard manual labor. I'm sure if necessary they would do it again.
I wonder if Quebec knows that it's not a part of Europe...
Because Americans sure won't do those jobs that the illegal aliens do.
That's utter bullshit based on negative stereotypes and you know it.
Yes, 666 % 666 would be 0.... Or are you being sarchastic somehow?
And if you're *really* unlucky, they use aalib
"String theory" matches that same description (can't be proven). It's being researched and taught in colleges though.
That's the rub then isn't it? Whether the compiler simply "doesn't recognize" AMD's chips and treats them as generic 586, or whether there's a "if (amd_cpu) { generate_extra_crappy_code() }" routine in there somewhere.
If it is as you describe it, then it sounds like AMD whining. Why would I buy an Intel compiler and expect it to work well for an AMD/Cyrix/Transmeta CPU?
perhaps not enough people realized that happiness==success. not money.
I would love to have enough money to test this hypothesis of yours...
What's bad is when they use this plus provisions in the PATRIOT act to allow them to tap it without that ever-important authorization.
Which provisions is that? Do you have a link to the passage?
And how many cures for Aids, the common cold, and cancer have these countries provided so far?
The single best thing about the original TA was the *fantastic* score used for the soundtrack. The only game I've ever ripped the audio from to listen to alone.
Mmmm. I love AC responses to my posts...
Are you saying it's justified that we also start a very visible war (in this case in Iraq), with all of the death and destruction that entails (both against combatants and civilians), in order to make the public "feel better"?
I think you have a limited view on the war if that's all you can see. I think that we've been trying the covert stuff for a *long* time and it's been limited in effectiveness. I think adding in the 'visible' war is a change in tactics. We've now elevated the private behind-doors world of international terrorism to the fore-front of politics. What once was personal is now political.
I believe the idea of attacking Iraq is to get the leadership of terrorist sympathetic nations to think twice. "Shake up the bee hive" so to speak.
But now that I've carefully avoided your question... No. I don't think war "just to make people feel better" is necessarily justified. But I don't think that's all it's done.
who was retaliating? At this point is it even clear who was the 'original' aggressor? Does it even matter anymore?
Wow. I.. Er. Jeez, I don't know quite what to say. I mean, sure you may disagree with the guy. But to believe that he would sacrifice thousands of his own citizens lives, and have the ability to cover it all up *perfectly*, to do what now? Pass a few laws?
I think I can rule it out. Unless, of course, you have compelling evidence that doesn't include paranoid rantings, coincidences and assumptions?
Perhaps both are being done? Making the public "feel good" is definitely important when it comes to terrorism. And as you point out there really is no way to know if there are any 'covert' operations going on. I'd be surprised if there were none.
Sure, why not? It would keep with convention. It would probably confuse those who don't know about leap seconds though.
But the extra day added to a "leap year" is called "leap day."
See .sig. The title and article are misleading though.
A bit sensitive are we?
I believe he was comparing Balmers past screams and such to the Howard Dean scream.
Signatures don't encrypt the data now do they? So you would certainly be able to read them.
The revocation would be used 'going foreward' and thus would be from $DATE on-ward that the old key would no longer be valid. So validity in the past would be fine - just make sure a date appears in the document (perhaps part of the standard signature?) so it can be verified that you signed it while the key was still valid. You could even be requested to re-sign the documents with your new key.
Sure, not perfect. But do we really have anything 'better' today?