Slashdot Mirror

Having played in that "casino" for over 30 years, I'll call BS. Unemployment has always been a lagging indicator of the direction of the overall economy, while the markets are forward looking. You can certainly approach it that way by placing your money on more risky companies, but that's entirely up to the individual investor. There are plenty of lower risk investment vehicles...S&P500, utilities (I have my own anecdote on that one above), etc. where you can put money down long term, and expect a decent rate of return. Take a look at the historical returns on just the S&P. There have been a total of 2 periods when you would have lost money over a ten year period, the first was during the Great Depression, and the second was 2008-2009. Don't believe me?...look at:

http://financeandinvestments.blogspot.com/2012/06/historical-annual-returns-for-s-500.html

The idea that women need to be treated as equals is outdated?

There is no equality in this world, and just because people should be equal in the eyes of the law does not mean we should pretend WOMAN = MAN through some mathematical property. The genders are different.

Here's one: an Average Man is stronger than 99% of Women:
http://charltonteaching.blogspot.com/2013/09/how-much-stronger-are-men-than-women-in.html

You know where ignoring this is causing all types of havok? The military. Among other things, you are in a company of women on the front lines. Do you trust her to carry 100lbs of gear or to carry you if you get wounded? But no, equality trumps all. So what if many female sailors get pregnant during voyages or during a tour of duty to get out of combat duty and go back home and collect benefits. So what if they affect unit cohesion, we have your fweelings on equality to consider.

Jackass.

Just because the system isn't producing the results you want, doesn't mean you get to make accusations of unfairness without even examining the dynamics at play. Go play social justic warrior elsewhere where you'd do less damage.

This is what happens when you let a bunch of musicians run things.

"concern surrounds the Swedish detention facility, where Mr Assange would be held incommunicado upon arrival. Similar treatment can be seen in the case of Gottfrid Svartholm, founder of The Pirate Bay, who was held in solitary confinement for months without being officially charged."

From the ruling of Stockholm's Tingsrätt: “Åklagaren får inte tillstånd att meddela beslut om restriktioner.” ("The prosecutor is not allowed to impose restrictions."). The prosecutor is legally *banned* from imposing restrictions on Assange while in custody. So this is a complete red herring excuse, and they know it. The prosecutor has elaborated in more detail, that he will have no restrictions on ability to mingle, use the phone, use the computer, etc.

Moving on...

see "Assange is willing to return to Sweden but prosecutors can also question him in the UK." [nicholasmead.com]

See my previous comment.

or dropping them as looks increasingly likely [firedoglake.com]

Assange and his followers have been making this claim since day one - yet one of the list of, well, essentially everything that Assange has said about his case and Manning's that's turned out to be flatly wrong (Manning will be convicted of aiding the enemy, it's all a show trial, they'll lock Manning up for life and throw away the key, there's a secret indictment against me, I'm going to win 15% of the Australian vote, become a senator, and then they'll have to drop the case.... etc). The line about Ny being forced out is also a lie that could have been debunked with a simple phone call. As is the no DNA line.

The reality is that the case is in a holding pattern. There's literally nothing being done with it, and nor will anything be done until he's in custody. The entire case against him has been built and they have an appeal-upheld probable cause finding against him by a full court hearing in which all evidence was reviewed and Assange's own attorney testified. There's literally nothing more they need except Assange.

For most of human history people lived under the social systems these people are advocating. Enlightenment civilization, of which democracy and free markets are only two components, is less than 400 years old, and in that time we've seen a flowering of technological and cultural growth that dwarfs everything else that happened in the previous millennia of human civilization. Coincidence? Perhaps. But I think it more likely the neo-reactionaries are analogous to the cranks who write papers claiming to disprove quantum physics and then post them to the world using tools which depend upon those physics to function.

Science fiction author and Enlightenment champion David Brin has a blog post exploring some disadvantages of neo-feudalism. In that article he links to the Anti-reactionary FAQ with detailed criticisms of their arguments and goals.

I recently finished a book where the author analyzes the entire process of getting a PhD in physics. For various reasons, it's not at all worthwhile. You will never be in a position to realize your dream of doing interesting research or becoming a professor. I'll let others describe the various problems, but they're fairly self-evident.

So let's think out of the box. Is there a way to do interesting research without the PhD?

It turns out there's a ton of interesting things being done by home experimentation nowadays. Actually, this used to be common - a gentleman scientist was someone with an independent income who tinkered with home research. Many had quite elaborate laboratories and discovered useful things.

If you want to be a researcher, you could approach the problem intellectually. Establish a steady income from which you can support yourself and family, allocate some time and money to setting up a lab, and do your own research.

Ben Krasnow built an electron microscope (!), and is experimenting with vapor-phase deposition of conductive traces. Robert Murray Smith makes graphene and conductive ink, Brad Graham built a rock disaggregator (which is, incidentally, totally frightening), Lindsay Wilson built an untrasonic drill, Timothy Ferriss is scientifically studying of nutrition, I am trying to detect dark matter (no link - sorry)

... the list goes on and on.

Lots of people are doing interesting research at home with a modest budget. If you can give up the big questions (Higgs Boson, Penicillin replacement, Egyptian archaeology), there's a wide swath of interesting areas just waiting to be explored.

Any new form of government that brings back more boobies has got to be good!

So it is written, so let it be done.

The chart's hosted on the National Republican Congressional Committee's website. I would take it with a heaping tablespoon of salt, if I were you. It's say to say that chart was designed to look as scary and confusing as possible.

No, this chart is designed to look as scary and confusing as possible. The one I posted is a pretty straight-forward description of the basic site architecture. I have a pretty good understand of information design, and I don't see how the chart I first posted is artificially enhanced to make it look worse than it is.

It's a useful trait for good and for evil.

The German man on the bus in the story below may have been a psychopath. He was able to yell abuse at a crying woman. On the spur of the moment, he was able to manipulate the authorities superbly. He saved her life:

http://wordhavering.blogspot.com/2010/07/stranger-on-bus.html

Ah yes, coney dogs

you should learn about alot

I came up with that about five years ago. Thanks. http://mdsolar.blogspot.com/2008/03/lux-lucis-tepida.html

It should be easy enough for someone here to harvest phonebook or other records from 70 years ago, refresh and randomize birth dates, and begin to flood the identity theft market with fake personalities and random government identity records.

I get what you're saying here, and perhaps it could have some benefits.

For years I've promoted "camouflage" rather than invisibility. I now think the reason it has not taken off (disappearance of AntiPhorm?) is that it's equally a threat to Google, Bing, and advertising-based search engines. We can be less careful of our "identity needles" if we construct bigger "digital haystacks".

See article on digital haystacks and cookie camouflage http://retroworks.blogspot.com/2010/09/simpler-ideas-cookie-camouflage-digital.html

I'm less clear about how your proposed ideas work in practice when I read your link.

I understand how it might serve to hide and distort data about your searching and browsing habits if your computer randomly searched and browsed for other things in the background. But it has some pitfalls.

For one, I would never consider using such a system unless it had definitely solved the "child porn problem." What happens if your computer goes surfing on some "bad" sites in the background, and naughty stuff ends up on your computer? I'd really love to hear try to defend yourself when law enforcement comes knocking -- "But it wasn't me! My computer was surfing for kiddie porn!"

And while that may be the worst problem, there are other places on the internet that could potentially get you in trouble if you frequent them too much. That's always the problem with the "if everyone has drunken photos on Facebook, nobody will care" arguments. Yes, maybe that will eventually be true in few decades, but for now, people who want to use such things against you won't care about what other people do. Someone who wants to "get you" or maybe just find a way to throw you out of the resume pile for job applications will only care about the bad stuff that they can find. Whether it's representative of you or not, it won't matter. It's just like cops and the thousands of random laws on the books -- chances are that you're committing some breach of the law right now in some obscure statute. Having too many laws doesn't obscure those: it makes them all the more problematic because any one of them might be held against you at some point. Similarly, if your data is "camoflaged" well enough on your hard drive, law enforcement will probably claim that any of that mess might belong to you... including any weird, naughty, or potentially illegal places your "computer" may have decided to visit randomly.

Now, I suppose you might say that you have some sort of "key file" somewhere that shows your legitimate personal search history. First, I think that you'd be hard-pressed to explain that to law enforcement, but even if you could, it introduces a significant vulnerability in your system. Anyone with access to that file knows your real search history, making your system useless. You might as well just use an encrypted drive or directory for your searches, with that sort of failure point.

Finally, your solution sounds possible if you just want to keep companies from tracking random browsing habits, but I'm not really sure what that has to do with avoiding identity theft. It's not like your computer will randomly log into fake bank accounts in the background or something. If someone's going to steal personal data that's critical to identity theft, they're going to be looking for your access to particular sorts of sites (banks, retailers, etc.), and you won't have "fake access" to those sites to disguise your real transactions.

So how exactly do you "camouflage" any of your legitimate significant financial transactions: the ones that any ID theft person might actually b

It should be easy enough for someone here to harvest phonebook or other records from 70 years ago, refresh and randomize birth dates, and begin to flood the identity theft market with fake personalities and random government identity records. That would greatly increase the amount of work for identity thieves, who actually benefit from passwords (which provide evidence it's bonafide identity they are stealing). For years I've promoted "camouflage" rather than invisibility. I now think the reason it has not taken off (disappearance of AntiPhorm?) is that it's equally a threat to Google, Bing, and advertising-based search engines. We can be less careful of our "identity needles" if we construct bigger "digital haystacks".

See article on digital haystacks and cookie camouflage http://retroworks.blogspot.com/2010/09/simpler-ideas-cookie-camouflage-digital.html

Oh, by the way, I'm not really Retroworks. I find I get higher mods if I steal a /. identity rather than to submit AC

There are larger genetic differences between different groups of the same "race", than between individuals of "different race".

This is called "Lewontin's fallacy" and has been debunked far and wide.

I believe that'd be "assholes". But do we really need more of these?

Oh, I'm sorry... is your bastardised version of the language causing confusion again? Learn to fucking spell you American twat.

You might have forgotten, but then again you might still be expecting this link. I wish Slashdot had a private message system. It even tangentially relates to this story.

http://newamericandeal.blogspot.com/

Then it's your own fault for making stupid statements.

Not really. Linux is still the least likely OS to contain backdoors and the most likely community to find and out them.

http://bits-n-bytes-tech.blogspot.com/2013/09/can-linux-be-trusted-linus-confirms-nsa.html

Did Senator Schumer really get a perfect 1600 SAT score?

The first one is a NAS for about 10 TB of USB drives: http://things-linux.blogspot.com/2013/07/delicious-raspberry-pi.html

The second one is part of my home entertainment system running XBMC: http://things-linux.blogspot.com/2013/07/a-second-helping-of-pi.html

The third one is just for playing around with.

The first one is a NAS for about 10 TB of USB drives: http://things-linux.blogspot.com/2013/07/delicious-raspberry-pi.html

The second one is part of my home entertainment system running XBMC: http://things-linux.blogspot.com/2013/07/a-second-helping-of-pi.html

The third one is just for playing around with.

As for myself? I would like to see falsifiable predictions.

How moderate and scientific of you to say, well spoken. But that would completely upset the most popular 'canard' (great word) of devastating sea rise that is being sold and re-told. It's the most effective way to terrify small children who are instinctively afraid of being drowned.

The data is there but gets lost in the noise. Sea level rise is 4-8 in/century, no evidence of acceleration but some land subsidence (land height changes) accounting for regional difference.

Now there is a gentleman in the Philippines who is on hunger strike because he is convinced that we -- the carbon emitting 'others' -- have sent them this killer typhoon.

This is our doing. James Hansen (I am so glad he left NASA) was chided by weather forecasting professionals and climate scientists alike for putting out his own view that hurricanes (from Katrina onwards) have this statistically significant blame factor. In our time, right now. This increasingly pissed off NASA because not only was he out on a scientific limb, but his hurricane musings were far out-pacing any news coverage of NASA's other endeavors. Talk about mission creep.

To those seeking carbon taxation and treaties, There is no time even to wait for even short-term falsifiable hypotheses. We must skip directly to the conclusions to achieve maximum panic right now.

Maybe they just sent a special agent in?

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-1v2INlx_JGI/UDHf4L11h_I/AAAAAAAAJwo/4jmjixbkO_A/s1600/SECRET+SQUIRREL+PARACHUTE+COLOR.jpg

"But why can't high-voltage lines be run underground?"
Don't you think someone would have done it by now if it were feasible?

Glad you asked. I'm trying to convince people not only is it feasible, it is high time to get on with it.

Air isn't a very good dielectric and in wet weather it gets even worse, see this list of insulator breakdown voltages. Glass has 40-100 times the dielectric strength of air, so yes, HVDC conduits ARE possible in standard sized trenches.

You have to realize that when most of the country was spanned, suspended cable on tall pylons in their wide right-of-way corridors was the cheapest and fastest way to do it. In many areas the real estate presently used for these, some of which is very valuable, can be reclaimed as it moved below ground.

Here is one company with a design for trench-able electric pipes that could handle 15 gigawatts at 800kv. That's 2.5 times Las Vegas summer peak load. No superconductors or refrigeration, just lots of aluminum. You'll also see a sad note at the bottom, "I have so far found that US-based venture capital investors will not take an interest in the elpipe because it is "too big, too long term."

This "too big, too long term" dismissal is symptom of serious problems. Venture capital investors, some who already have great-grandchildren, are refusing to even approach infrastructure repair and re-build projects in North America. What do they think the world will be like in 50 years if these things are not done?

Another company working on HVDC circuit breaker (check that photo, looks like fun). Also check out Roger W. Faulkner [2005]: Electric Pipelines for North American Power Grid Efficiency Security for some calculations on how much aluminum we're talking about.

Although you'll see a lot of talk about HVDC helping to make wind and solar 'renewables' more practical, I don't think so, because for base load power they are too expensive at any price.

Neither wind nor solar would save us from extinction in the case of a long harsh Winter or a climate disrupting global dust cloud event. On that point alone I believe every penny spent on big wind and big solar is wasted. I want my children to survive.

For the big picture on how I believe HVDC pipelines and reliable scalable base load power is the way to go, see

My letters on energy:
To The Honorable James M. Inhofe, United States Senate
To whom it may concern, Halliburton Corporate

Please. Would you retrofit a car and test it? Air bags wouldn't keep the cabin from collapsing in on the driver, they would only keep the driver from bouncing around inside a cabin in some state of "intact". My Chevy Volt has 10 airbags, including knee airbags and ceiling rail bags that extends back into the rear seat. But they would be near useless in a decent crash without help from the huge pillars and crumple zones. Also, the 430 lbs of battery right between the wheels makes the car neigh unto untippable - and heavier where it counts than most other cars. Unfortunately for some. http://insideevs.com/video-owner-testimonial-shows-how-safe-chevy-volt-actually-is/ http://brightonhovehub.blogspot.com/2013/08/fatal-crash-occurs-in-brighton-twp-with.html

I guess next he needs to put up a Liquid State Physics class? I agree that we'll need grid storage. One aspect that is not all that well appreciated is that the electric cars sold now are going to shed some batteries that are still pretty useful starting in the next several years. I've calculated that fully converting our passenger auto fleet to electric provides about half a day's worth of storage for our entire use of electricity from the aftermarket batteries alone, no V2G complexities, just stationary storage. http://mdsolar.blogspot.com/2007/08/roof-pitch.html

I received an unsolicited email from Amazon letting me know about the exciting opportunity for a systems engineer position for this project (I'm only presuming, I don't know for sure). Not exactly my cup of tea, but the SSBI requirement along with '+1 years' in all of the technical requirements scared me off. (i.e. they're throwing out a really wide net for "talent"). Also, shift work? No thanks!

The really interesting part of this to me is that the requirements for clearance imply that first tier engineers will be potentially exposed to sensitive data. Has Amazon learned nothing from the Snowden exposures? If not, here's a summary:

* Encrypt your data
* Compartmentalize access
* First tier pizza box coroners shouldn't have access to sensitive data. They don't need it, they shouldn't have it. If they do, its because your system isn't design to be secure. Simply creating a 'new' separate cloud only compartmentalizes the risk.

I'll even go as far to make a joking assert that it'd probably be more secure in the existing AWS cloud since attackers would have to sift through petabytes of crap before they found anything interesting.

There should be technology in place to ensure that a non-cleared engineer (or even a bad actor http://mikedaisey.blogspot.com/ could be hired for this role.

My name is XXXXXXXXXX, and I am a recruiting coordinator with Amazon Web Services. We recently reviewed your profile and our hiring team is interested in speaking with you about a new project that we are working on. We are looking for candidates who are interested in obtaining and maintaining a US Government Security Clearance and we feel that your background and skills are a good fit for the role and would like to schedule a phone interview with you. Please be aware that because AWS runs in a 24x7 environment, all System Engineer and Support Engineer candidates will need to be open to shift work if hired.

I have included a high level job description below to give you a general idea about the roles we have in AWS. For more specific information about Amazon Web Services and our teams, please visit: http://aws.amazon.com/. Please note, we have other positions available, so if this role doesnâ(TM)t pique your interest, please let us know what you are interested in and we can find a more suitable opportunity.

These roles would require you to relocate to the Seattle, WA or Herndon, VA area. Please let us know what your location preference is so that we may find an appropriate team. We will provide relocation assistance and more information will be available further into the process.

If you are interested in learning more and talking with a member of the team, please send me your availability for a phone interview (between 10:00am-4:00pm PST) for the next two weeks, as well as the best phone number to use for this conversation. Please keep in mind that phone interviews can take up to 75 minutes to complete. We are looking to fill this position as soon as possible, so please let me know if you have any questions or concerns that I can address.

Thank you for your time and we look forward to hearing from you soon.

Amazon Web Services is a dynamic and rapidly growing business within Amazon.com. We are building some of the largest and most complex distributed systems in the world, and we need world class people to help us implement and operate them.

We provide organizations with building block web services that allow them to innovate faster and operate their software more cost-effectively. These services-in-the-cloud include on-demand compute capacity, storage, content delivery, querying of structured data, message queuing, and more.

We have high standards for our computer systems as well as our employees: our systems are highly secure, highly reliable, highly available, and must function at massive scale; our employees are super smart, driven to serve customers, and

What? Do you mean 2.6.0 RC1? 2.6 looks to be more of a clean up of the 2.5.1 stuff rather than anything new. If anything the main thing that 2.6 brings is that they brought Java 7 into the picture. I wouldn't say that Google *has* abandon GWT, but they sure are making the common gestures of getting ready for a good old fashion keelhauling.

Now for just my opinion, GWT sucks. It's a messy looking API and lacks a ton of flexibility. For example, trying to implement custom UI for your web page is painful and totally unpleasant. More so than say making the same customer UI in Java Swing (which is pretty painful in of itself). In my opinion, and you my mod me down for it, is that anything that is worst to do in (insert framework here) than it is in Java should not exist.

Your description is a bit off... it is already known what the internet looks like... so it is logical the kill button would be on it.

The Internet

Funny you would bring that up because, the opposite is actually a great example of the point in question.

http://barkgrowlbite.blogspot.com/2012/07/dea-stole-big-semi-in-sting-operation.html

thought his Truck 793 - a big red Kenworth T600 semi â" was being repaired in Houston. Unknown to Craig Patty, the owner of the $90,000 rig, the DEA was using it to transport a load of marijuana in a sting operation.

The DEA had paid Lawrence Chapa, one of Pattyâ(TM)s drivers, to haul a load of marijuana from the Mexican border

So far so good. DEA bribed one of his own drivers to steal the truck from his employer to be used in the operation..... long story short, truck gets shot up, driver killed. Insurance company and DEA both refuse to pay for any damages.

Now this isn't over, I assume there will be court battles but, his case is different. This case involves physical evidence and facts that can't be just denied out of hand....and they are still refusing to do anything and making him sue. This is how they act when caught red handed and unable to deny the facts.... there is no chance of getting anything from a secretive org that can declare the facts national security interests.

This blog spam quotes The Verge's Report from a Blog post from Google which is summaried in this post on slashdot...

How much info is summarized from google? 3 sentences:

1) Google and HP are pausing sales of the HP Chromebook 11 after receiving a small number of user reports that some chargers included with the device have been damaged due to overheating during use.
2) We are working with the Consumer Product Safety Commission to identify the appropriate corrective action, and will provide additional information and instructions as soon as we can.
3) In the meantime, customers who have purchased an HP Chromebook 11 should not use the original charger provided with the product.

GDP per capita is a boring, irrelevant statistic when we're talking about quality of life for the masses.

So quality of life in Chad ($885 GDP per capita, economic freedom index 45.2) is better than Sweden ($55,244, economic freedom index 72.9)?

How about the relationship between economic freedom and life expectancy then?

>> insulin remains low, and fat is burnt.
>
>And you become lipoprotein lipase's bitch

It's all fun and games until your leptin falls off a fucking cliff.

http://itsthewooo.blogspot.com/search/label/Leptin

>found the soylent concoction particularly tasty

Or found it particularly not tasty and upped the FIAF instead: http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/2007/12/fiaf-whos-fat-is-it-anyway.html

The solution would be to host it with a commercial host instead of using the univervisities systems.

I guess you didn't bother to look at the link to the blog: http://csufacultyvoice.blogspot.com/

blogspot.com is not the universty's server.

As already mentioned, you might know about the company making Google Drive. And you might recognize a few other products from this list.

There is also Intel VTune about which I learnt completely accidentally, so who knows which other major companies use it without advertising it.

I wonder if it would have been as easy for GCHQ to get away with it if HTTPS on Slashdot weren't a subscriber-only perk. Facebook and Twitter have gone all HTTPS all the time; why can't Slashdot? If ads are the problem, Google recently opened AdSense to HTTPS sites.

http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/05/wifi-data-collection-update.html

Also, they impeded US investigation over that matter.

http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/374095/google-fined-for-impeding-wi-fi-data-investigation

Finally, they lied again about having already deleted the data.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/google/9432518/Google-we-failed-to-delete-all-Streetview-data.html

menguraikan info ItuPoker.Com Agen Poker Online Indonesia Terpercaya. Karena disinilah kesempatan saya untuk menguji kemampuan seo saya seberapa dalam ilmu seo yang aku miliki. http://myblogfit.blogspot.com/2013/10/ituPoker.com-Agen-Poker-Online-Indonesia-Terpercaya.html

ItuPoker.Com Agen Poker Online Indonesia Terpercaya Berikut ini website ItuPoker.Com Agen Poker Online Indonesia Terpercaya http://myblogfit.blogspot.com/2013/10/ituPoker.com-Agen-Poker-Online-Indonesia-Terpercaya.html

There's a guy who does an excellent job of reviewing serious health and nutrition research and explaining it. He's covered many of the statin studies. His web site is most useful here because I can point to explanations that point to real studies, rather than pointing to real studies and writing a bucket load of explanations.

Here we go...

Lower LDL post heart attack predicts an higher chance of being dead in the next 3 years:
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20heart%20attack%20survival

Statins give cancer to men who respond well to statins
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20the%20J-LIT%20study

If you're in the lowest cholesterol group as a result of taking statins, you have a 600% increase in the risk of a cardiovascular death
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20the%20J-LIT%20update

10 year all cause mortality in low dose statins is lowest at 250 mg/dl. Higher at lower and higher levels. Dramatically so for cardiac events.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20Son%20of%20J-LIT

A little bit on statins fixing the wrong properties of LDL and HDL. I.E. total volume rather than size and number.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20Son%20of%20J-LIT

A 50% increase in being dead on Crestor, courtesy of the JUPITER study, buried in the data so as not to cause embarassment.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20heart%20attacks%20and%20JUPITER

A more complete review of the JUPITER study with fewer difficult words.
http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2008/11/when-news-sounds-too-good-statins-new.html

Lets hope you don't have Familial hypercholesterolemia and take this drug.. 1000% increased chance of stroke or heart attack. Yay for statins!
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20pacitimbe%20and%20ACAT

Oh dear. Statins increase the oxidation of LDL. No wonder they kill so many people.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%3A%20statins%20and%20oxLDL

The traditional piss taking of Ancel Keys massaging of saturated fat data to get the wrong result, extended to statins.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20presentation%3A%20Between%20countries

Lowering of LDL does not correlate with atheroma volume decrease. Whoops. Where did my hypothesis go?
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%3A%20ASTEROID%20destroys%20lipid%20hypothesis

Killing more unsuspecting patients with torcetrapib in the RADIANCE1 and RADIANCE2 studies.
http://high

There's a guy who does an excellent job of reviewing serious health and nutrition research and explaining it. He's covered many of the statin studies. His web site is most useful here because I can point to explanations that point to real studies, rather than pointing to real studies and writing a bucket load of explanations.

Here we go...

Lower LDL post heart attack predicts an higher chance of being dead in the next 3 years:
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20heart%20attack%20survival

Statins give cancer to men who respond well to statins
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20the%20J-LIT%20study

If you're in the lowest cholesterol group as a result of taking statins, you have a 600% increase in the risk of a cardiovascular death
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20the%20J-LIT%20update

10 year all cause mortality in low dose statins is lowest at 250 mg/dl. Higher at lower and higher levels. Dramatically so for cardiac events.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20Son%20of%20J-LIT

A little bit on statins fixing the wrong properties of LDL and HDL. I.E. total volume rather than size and number.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20Son%20of%20J-LIT

A 50% increase in being dead on Crestor, courtesy of the JUPITER study, buried in the data so as not to cause embarassment.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20heart%20attacks%20and%20JUPITER

A more complete review of the JUPITER study with fewer difficult words.
http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2008/11/when-news-sounds-too-good-statins-new.html

Lets hope you don't have Familial hypercholesterolemia and take this drug.. 1000% increased chance of stroke or heart attack. Yay for statins!
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20pacitimbe%20and%20ACAT

Oh dear. Statins increase the oxidation of LDL. No wonder they kill so many people.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%3A%20statins%20and%20oxLDL

The traditional piss taking of Ancel Keys massaging of saturated fat data to get the wrong result, extended to statins.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20presentation%3A%20Between%20countries

Lowering of LDL does not correlate with atheroma volume decrease. Whoops. Where did my hypothesis go?
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%3A%20ASTEROID%20destroys%20lipid%20hypothesis

Killing more unsuspecting patients with torcetrapib in the RADIANCE1 and RADIANCE2 studies.
http://high

There's a guy who does an excellent job of reviewing serious health and nutrition research and explaining it. He's covered many of the statin studies. His web site is most useful here because I can point to explanations that point to real studies, rather than pointing to real studies and writing a bucket load of explanations.

Here we go...

Lower LDL post heart attack predicts an higher chance of being dead in the next 3 years:
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20heart%20attack%20survival

Statins give cancer to men who respond well to statins
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20the%20J-LIT%20study

If you're in the lowest cholesterol group as a result of taking statins, you have a 600% increase in the risk of a cardiovascular death
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20the%20J-LIT%20update

10 year all cause mortality in low dose statins is lowest at 250 mg/dl. Higher at lower and higher levels. Dramatically so for cardiac events.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20Son%20of%20J-LIT

A little bit on statins fixing the wrong properties of LDL and HDL. I.E. total volume rather than size and number.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20Son%20of%20J-LIT

A 50% increase in being dead on Crestor, courtesy of the JUPITER study, buried in the data so as not to cause embarassment.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20heart%20attacks%20and%20JUPITER

A more complete review of the JUPITER study with fewer difficult words.
http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2008/11/when-news-sounds-too-good-statins-new.html

Lets hope you don't have Familial hypercholesterolemia and take this drug.. 1000% increased chance of stroke or heart attack. Yay for statins!
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20pacitimbe%20and%20ACAT

Oh dear. Statins increase the oxidation of LDL. No wonder they kill so many people.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%3A%20statins%20and%20oxLDL

The traditional piss taking of Ancel Keys massaging of saturated fat data to get the wrong result, extended to statins.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20presentation%3A%20Between%20countries

Lowering of LDL does not correlate with atheroma volume decrease. Whoops. Where did my hypothesis go?
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%3A%20ASTEROID%20destroys%20lipid%20hypothesis

Killing more unsuspecting patients with torcetrapib in the RADIANCE1 and RADIANCE2 studies.
http://high

There's a guy who does an excellent job of reviewing serious health and nutrition research and explaining it. He's covered many of the statin studies. His web site is most useful here because I can point to explanations that point to real studies, rather than pointing to real studies and writing a bucket load of explanations.

Here we go...

Lower LDL post heart attack predicts an higher chance of being dead in the next 3 years:
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20heart%20attack%20survival

Statins give cancer to men who respond well to statins
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20the%20J-LIT%20study

If you're in the lowest cholesterol group as a result of taking statins, you have a 600% increase in the risk of a cardiovascular death
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20the%20J-LIT%20update

10 year all cause mortality in low dose statins is lowest at 250 mg/dl. Higher at lower and higher levels. Dramatically so for cardiac events.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20Son%20of%20J-LIT

A little bit on statins fixing the wrong properties of LDL and HDL. I.E. total volume rather than size and number.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20Son%20of%20J-LIT

A 50% increase in being dead on Crestor, courtesy of the JUPITER study, buried in the data so as not to cause embarassment.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20heart%20attacks%20and%20JUPITER

A more complete review of the JUPITER study with fewer difficult words.
http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2008/11/when-news-sounds-too-good-statins-new.html

Lets hope you don't have Familial hypercholesterolemia and take this drug.. 1000% increased chance of stroke or heart attack. Yay for statins!
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20pacitimbe%20and%20ACAT

Oh dear. Statins increase the oxidation of LDL. No wonder they kill so many people.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%3A%20statins%20and%20oxLDL

The traditional piss taking of Ancel Keys massaging of saturated fat data to get the wrong result, extended to statins.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20presentation%3A%20Between%20countries

Lowering of LDL does not correlate with atheroma volume decrease. Whoops. Where did my hypothesis go?
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%3A%20ASTEROID%20destroys%20lipid%20hypothesis

Killing more unsuspecting patients with torcetrapib in the RADIANCE1 and RADIANCE2 studies.
http://high

There's a guy who does an excellent job of reviewing serious health and nutrition research and explaining it. He's covered many of the statin studies. His web site is most useful here because I can point to explanations that point to real studies, rather than pointing to real studies and writing a bucket load of explanations.

Here we go...

Lower LDL post heart attack predicts an higher chance of being dead in the next 3 years:
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20heart%20attack%20survival

Statins give cancer to men who respond well to statins
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20the%20J-LIT%20study

If you're in the lowest cholesterol group as a result of taking statins, you have a 600% increase in the risk of a cardiovascular death
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20the%20J-LIT%20update

10 year all cause mortality in low dose statins is lowest at 250 mg/dl. Higher at lower and higher levels. Dramatically so for cardiac events.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20Son%20of%20J-LIT

A little bit on statins fixing the wrong properties of LDL and HDL. I.E. total volume rather than size and number.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20Son%20of%20J-LIT

A 50% increase in being dead on Crestor, courtesy of the JUPITER study, buried in the data so as not to cause embarassment.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20heart%20attacks%20and%20JUPITER

A more complete review of the JUPITER study with fewer difficult words.
http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2008/11/when-news-sounds-too-good-statins-new.html

Lets hope you don't have Familial hypercholesterolemia and take this drug.. 1000% increased chance of stroke or heart attack. Yay for statins!
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20pacitimbe%20and%20ACAT

Oh dear. Statins increase the oxidation of LDL. No wonder they kill so many people.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%3A%20statins%20and%20oxLDL

The traditional piss taking of Ancel Keys massaging of saturated fat data to get the wrong result, extended to statins.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20presentation%3A%20Between%20countries

Lowering of LDL does not correlate with atheroma volume decrease. Whoops. Where did my hypothesis go?
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%3A%20ASTEROID%20destroys%20lipid%20hypothesis

Killing more unsuspecting patients with torcetrapib in the RADIANCE1 and RADIANCE2 studies.
http://high

There's a guy who does an excellent job of reviewing serious health and nutrition research and explaining it. He's covered many of the statin studies. His web site is most useful here because I can point to explanations that point to real studies, rather than pointing to real studies and writing a bucket load of explanations.

Here we go...

Lower LDL post heart attack predicts an higher chance of being dead in the next 3 years:
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20heart%20attack%20survival

Statins give cancer to men who respond well to statins
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20the%20J-LIT%20study

If you're in the lowest cholesterol group as a result of taking statins, you have a 600% increase in the risk of a cardiovascular death
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20the%20J-LIT%20update

10 year all cause mortality in low dose statins is lowest at 250 mg/dl. Higher at lower and higher levels. Dramatically so for cardiac events.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20Son%20of%20J-LIT

A little bit on statins fixing the wrong properties of LDL and HDL. I.E. total volume rather than size and number.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20Son%20of%20J-LIT

A 50% increase in being dead on Crestor, courtesy of the JUPITER study, buried in the data so as not to cause embarassment.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20heart%20attacks%20and%20JUPITER

A more complete review of the JUPITER study with fewer difficult words.
http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2008/11/when-news-sounds-too-good-statins-new.html

Lets hope you don't have Familial hypercholesterolemia and take this drug.. 1000% increased chance of stroke or heart attack. Yay for statins!
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20pacitimbe%20and%20ACAT

Oh dear. Statins increase the oxidation of LDL. No wonder they kill so many people.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%3A%20statins%20and%20oxLDL

The traditional piss taking of Ancel Keys massaging of saturated fat data to get the wrong result, extended to statins.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20presentation%3A%20Between%20countries

Lowering of LDL does not correlate with atheroma volume decrease. Whoops. Where did my hypothesis go?
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%3A%20ASTEROID%20destroys%20lipid%20hypothesis

Killing more unsuspecting patients with torcetrapib in the RADIANCE1 and RADIANCE2 studies.
http://high

There's a guy who does an excellent job of reviewing serious health and nutrition research and explaining it. He's covered many of the statin studies. His web site is most useful here because I can point to explanations that point to real studies, rather than pointing to real studies and writing a bucket load of explanations.

Here we go...

Lower LDL post heart attack predicts an higher chance of being dead in the next 3 years:
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20heart%20attack%20survival

Statins give cancer to men who respond well to statins
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20the%20J-LIT%20study

If you're in the lowest cholesterol group as a result of taking statins, you have a 600% increase in the risk of a cardiovascular death
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20the%20J-LIT%20update

10 year all cause mortality in low dose statins is lowest at 250 mg/dl. Higher at lower and higher levels. Dramatically so for cardiac events.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20Son%20of%20J-LIT

A little bit on statins fixing the wrong properties of LDL and HDL. I.E. total volume rather than size and number.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20Son%20of%20J-LIT

A 50% increase in being dead on Crestor, courtesy of the JUPITER study, buried in the data so as not to cause embarassment.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20heart%20attacks%20and%20JUPITER

A more complete review of the JUPITER study with fewer difficult words.
http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2008/11/when-news-sounds-too-good-statins-new.html

Lets hope you don't have Familial hypercholesterolemia and take this drug.. 1000% increased chance of stroke or heart attack. Yay for statins!
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20pacitimbe%20and%20ACAT

Oh dear. Statins increase the oxidation of LDL. No wonder they kill so many people.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%3A%20statins%20and%20oxLDL

The traditional piss taking of Ancel Keys massaging of saturated fat data to get the wrong result, extended to statins.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20presentation%3A%20Between%20countries

Lowering of LDL does not correlate with atheroma volume decrease. Whoops. Where did my hypothesis go?
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%3A%20ASTEROID%20destroys%20lipid%20hypothesis

Killing more unsuspecting patients with torcetrapib in the RADIANCE1 and RADIANCE2 studies.
http://high

There's a guy who does an excellent job of reviewing serious health and nutrition research and explaining it. He's covered many of the statin studies. His web site is most useful here because I can point to explanations that point to real studies, rather than pointing to real studies and writing a bucket load of explanations.

Here we go...

Lower LDL post heart attack predicts an higher chance of being dead in the next 3 years:
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20heart%20attack%20survival

Statins give cancer to men who respond well to statins
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20the%20J-LIT%20study

If you're in the lowest cholesterol group as a result of taking statins, you have a 600% increase in the risk of a cardiovascular death
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20the%20J-LIT%20update

10 year all cause mortality in low dose statins is lowest at 250 mg/dl. Higher at lower and higher levels. Dramatically so for cardiac events.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20Son%20of%20J-LIT

A little bit on statins fixing the wrong properties of LDL and HDL. I.E. total volume rather than size and number.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20Son%20of%20J-LIT

A 50% increase in being dead on Crestor, courtesy of the JUPITER study, buried in the data so as not to cause embarassment.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20heart%20attacks%20and%20JUPITER

A more complete review of the JUPITER study with fewer difficult words.
http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2008/11/when-news-sounds-too-good-statins-new.html

Lets hope you don't have Familial hypercholesterolemia and take this drug.. 1000% increased chance of stroke or heart attack. Yay for statins!
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20pacitimbe%20and%20ACAT

Oh dear. Statins increase the oxidation of LDL. No wonder they kill so many people.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%3A%20statins%20and%20oxLDL

The traditional piss taking of Ancel Keys massaging of saturated fat data to get the wrong result, extended to statins.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20presentation%3A%20Between%20countries

Lowering of LDL does not correlate with atheroma volume decrease. Whoops. Where did my hypothesis go?
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%3A%20ASTEROID%20destroys%20lipid%20hypothesis

Killing more unsuspecting patients with torcetrapib in the RADIANCE1 and RADIANCE2 studies.
http://high

There's a guy who does an excellent job of reviewing serious health and nutrition research and explaining it. He's covered many of the statin studies. His web site is most useful here because I can point to explanations that point to real studies, rather than pointing to real studies and writing a bucket load of explanations.

Here we go...

Lower LDL post heart attack predicts an higher chance of being dead in the next 3 years:
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20heart%20attack%20survival

Statins give cancer to men who respond well to statins
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20the%20J-LIT%20study

If you're in the lowest cholesterol group as a result of taking statins, you have a 600% increase in the risk of a cardiovascular death
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20the%20J-LIT%20update

10 year all cause mortality in low dose statins is lowest at 250 mg/dl. Higher at lower and higher levels. Dramatically so for cardiac events.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20Son%20of%20J-LIT

A little bit on statins fixing the wrong properties of LDL and HDL. I.E. total volume rather than size and number.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20Son%20of%20J-LIT

A 50% increase in being dead on Crestor, courtesy of the JUPITER study, buried in the data so as not to cause embarassment.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20heart%20attacks%20and%20JUPITER

A more complete review of the JUPITER study with fewer difficult words.
http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2008/11/when-news-sounds-too-good-statins-new.html

Lets hope you don't have Familial hypercholesterolemia and take this drug.. 1000% increased chance of stroke or heart attack. Yay for statins!
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20pacitimbe%20and%20ACAT

Oh dear. Statins increase the oxidation of LDL. No wonder they kill so many people.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%3A%20statins%20and%20oxLDL

The traditional piss taking of Ancel Keys massaging of saturated fat data to get the wrong result, extended to statins.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20presentation%3A%20Between%20countries

Lowering of LDL does not correlate with atheroma volume decrease. Whoops. Where did my hypothesis go?
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%3A%20ASTEROID%20destroys%20lipid%20hypothesis

Killing more unsuspecting patients with torcetrapib in the RADIANCE1 and RADIANCE2 studies.
http://high

There's a guy who does an excellent job of reviewing serious health and nutrition research and explaining it. He's covered many of the statin studies. His web site is most useful here because I can point to explanations that point to real studies, rather than pointing to real studies and writing a bucket load of explanations.

Here we go...

Lower LDL post heart attack predicts an higher chance of being dead in the next 3 years:
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20heart%20attack%20survival

Statins give cancer to men who respond well to statins
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20the%20J-LIT%20study

If you're in the lowest cholesterol group as a result of taking statins, you have a 600% increase in the risk of a cardiovascular death
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20the%20J-LIT%20update

10 year all cause mortality in low dose statins is lowest at 250 mg/dl. Higher at lower and higher levels. Dramatically so for cardiac events.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20Son%20of%20J-LIT

A little bit on statins fixing the wrong properties of LDL and HDL. I.E. total volume rather than size and number.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20and%20Son%20of%20J-LIT

A 50% increase in being dead on Crestor, courtesy of the JUPITER study, buried in the data so as not to cause embarassment.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20heart%20attacks%20and%20JUPITER

A more complete review of the JUPITER study with fewer difficult words.
http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2008/11/when-news-sounds-too-good-statins-new.html

Lets hope you don't have Familial hypercholesterolemia and take this drug.. 1000% increased chance of stroke or heart attack. Yay for statins!
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20pacitimbe%20and%20ACAT

Oh dear. Statins increase the oxidation of LDL. No wonder they kill so many people.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%3A%20statins%20and%20oxLDL

The traditional piss taking of Ancel Keys massaging of saturated fat data to get the wrong result, extended to statins.
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%20presentation%3A%20Between%20countries

Lowering of LDL does not correlate with atheroma volume decrease. Whoops. Where did my hypothesis go?
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/search/label/Cholesterol%3A%20ASTEROID%20destroys%20lipid%20hypothesis

Killing more unsuspecting patients with torcetrapib in the RADIANCE1 and RADIANCE2 studies.
http://high