Domain: debian.org
Stories and comments across the archive that link to debian.org.
Comments · 7,134
-
Re:I don't like it - how to get rid of it?
You can get it here. But be careful. Any spyware attempting to install itself on your machine will fail, and subsequently report you to the Department of Microsoft HomeLAN security as an unamerican, cancerous commie who stifles innovation.
-
Re:But will they be less secritive?If it's not Apple hardware then it's Microsoft software lock in. The entire argument in this paragraph is ridicules - "so in the future when Apple sucks again", so you're implying that PC hardware has NEVER sucked? Ever? Apple hardware dating back to the Mac SE are still in use today. It has a GUI and can connect to the web WITH NO MODIFICATIONS! Can *you* run Windows 95 on a 286 today? No, even if you could you'd be cheating because Win95 was not available when the 286 came out. If I am correct, the ONLY way to run a webserver on 286 hardware is to use the Minix web server, created by Andrew Tanenbaum - Linus Torvalds TEACHER!
See:
Mac SE Server
Webserver Mac SE
Another Mac SE Server( The SE is a 68000 Motorola running at 8mhz on 4MB of ram. So if you can *avoid* clicking the last link directly *today* I'm sure the owner would appricate it. )
As for short life cycles - oh please. I've was using a G4 single CPU then a G4 dual CPU for 3 yrs before the G5 came out. The G4 was a VERY long life cycle for a CPU.
As for getting parts, in my 20+ yrs with Apple hardware I have NEVER replaced anything other than hard drives which have ALWAYS been stock (and NOT made by Apple). OMG this is a pointless argument. Where do you misinformed twats come from anyway? It's a never ending story with you WinTel people is it?
-
Re:Grsecurity is for real?While I agree that security issues must be taken seriously, I feel the need to point out that Brad isn't exactly a paragon of virtue himself. In the past he's threatened to withhold information on vulnerabilities in competing projects, in order to make his own project more attractive... a bit of googling will turn up other examples.
Personally, I switched from grsecurity to SELinux shortly after the incident linked above. While Brad may in fact be quite skilled, I've simply lost trust in him and, by extension, his project.
-
Re:Is that so?
Well, lets see... debian runs on all these different platforms. That's not "frothing groupthink", that's FACT. Windows runs on 2 of them, and 1 of those only recently (IA32 and IA64).
I'm just sick of this "Windows is less stable because they can't control the hardware they run on" crap. Linux supports more, and more varied forms of hardware, hands down. -
Re:Hard To Do
-
Re:Licensing
Different portions of the package are intended for use in different ways. It doesn't make much sense to license a work based on content, rather than on functionality, under the (L)GPL; this is the point of the GFDL. The software freedoms don't really make sense for the documentation.
Please, please, please don't continue to perpetuate that myth. Freedom is essential for documentation just as it is for code. Furthermore, consider that you might want to copy between the two. The GFDL is a colossal step backward for Freedom. For more information on why you *shouldn't* use the GFDL for documentation or anything else, see Nathaniel Nerode's "Why You Shouldn't Use the GNU FDL", and Manoj Srivasta's draft position statement for Debian.
There is some hope, however: there is currently a Debian group engaged in private (to avoid public flamewars) discussions with a group from the Free Software Foundation, regarding the Freeness of the GFDL. Their initial goal is to remove all the issues with the GFDL other than Invariant Sections and Cover Texts, so that GFDLed documentation without Invariant Sections and Cover Texts will be unambiguously DFSG-Free, albeit GPL-incompatible. -
Actually the next release is Sarge
Sarge, aka Debian 3.1, is the codename of the next release... and like the other child poster said, they're named after characters in Toy Story.
For example, the development branch is called Sid, because Sid was the kid next door who broke the toys.
If you look at the Debian Archive you'll see old distributions included bo, buzz, hamm, rex and slink.
Ciao,
TSK (611371). -
Linux is soo insecure... *sigh*It is surprising that, even though we are constantly finding local security vulnerabilities in Linux, some people still claim it is a relatively secure operating system.
These are exploits in the most basic portions, against which a sysadmin can do nothing other than keep on patching things. It's not like you could have tunned this system to make it very secure, no, no matter how carefully you (or your distributor) set it, bang, a local exploit seems to be found every month or two.
I'm seriously considering going back to BSD (maybe Debian GNU/NetBSD?), which seems to have a much much much better security track.
-
Re:Itanic hits Iceberg. News at 11.This may not be the end of the line for it, though. MS has only dropped their workstation version, not their server version.
The really interesting question is: will Linux be able to carry Itanic, now that MS is starting to leave it behind?
Another question is: now that MS is dropping Windows for Itanium, will Intel contribute more free development tools for ia64 Linux and make more "investments" in Linux for Itanium? Since 1998, Intel has made many contributions to Linux for x86 and Itanium - I'm assuming much more than Alpha and MIPS have.
But even if they do, will enough Linux developers choose to develop for expensive Itanium workstations when cheap x86 workstations are "good enough." I think we'll see a lot more Itanium-specific Linux investments from Intel, but I don't know if Linux developers will invest more time in Itanium.
For the near future, it looks like Itanium workstations have Debian 3.0 and Red Hat Enterprise WS.
-
Re:vga=791 & foolprofness
-
Re:vga=791 & foolprofness
-
Re:No way
Well, their website has a decent amount of information about it. It's being actively developed and Debian is providing a binary distrobution of it right now. I don't know whole lot about it, but it seems like an interesting project.
-
Re:No way
Well, their website has a decent amount of information about it. It's being actively developed and Debian is providing a binary distrobution of it right now. I don't know whole lot about it, but it seems like an interesting project.
-
Re:Netcraft now confirms: Debian is obsolete
-
Re:testing?!
Sarge seems to be lagging because they wanted to include gnome 2.8
Gnome 2.8 is now in testing, according to the last release update. The main delay is the security update infrastructure for testing.
Security updates are done ASAP on unstable too, so it's also an option if you don't want to wait for security updates to migrate into testing.
-
Re:A serious issue with old packages
The PHP issue was complex due to initially there being a lot of issues reported and ID's given which were later retracted.
All this was muddled by the PHPBB2 worm which the PHPBB people claimed for a long time was a flaw in PHP itself being exploited not a hole in their software.
Few people seemed to care to look into the situation carefully, had they done so they'd have released that woody wasn't vulnerable to several of the isses, eg these two.
-
Re:Not to troll but..
You shouldn't abondon a platform because of a one bad tool for which there are alternatives.
-
Re:Not to troll but..Ever looked at alternatives like aptitude?
Not so long ago there was a discussion on the development mailing-list about dselect. There are still many people using it on a daily bases and don't want it changed or removed. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/11/msg0
0 629.html -
Re:Not to troll but..Ever looked at alternatives like aptitude?
Not so long ago there was a discussion on the development mailing-list about dselect. There are still many people using it on a daily bases and don't want it changed or removed. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/11/msg0
0 629.html -
Re:That's not just unix. :P
I will concur that we may be somewhat quick to bite off the heads of those who would read the documentation if they knew what they were looking for in it. I don't think that the channel is as vicious as you think that it is: it just takes a little adjustment of what you're expecting. There was a discussion of these issues with the channel on the debian-user list the other day, you might want to have a read.
In any case, if you find yourself on #debian and see examples of what you describe, I'd be interested to have them pointed out to me to see if we agree on what defines an asshole.
-
Re:That's not just unix. :P
For a really good time, try going into #debian on freenode and asking any question, no matter how esoteric. You're bound to get about three or four RTFMs, and one guy who will pmsg you with more helpful information.
You might want to try the mailing lists instead, I suspect they have a higher S/N ratio. The general-purpose "questions" list is debian-user (at) lists.debian.org, and it has a web archive at lists.debian.org/debian-user so you don't even have to be subscribed to use it.
-
Re:Finally - make it an impulse purchaseSpeak once and it shall be revealed:
One potater, two potater, three potater four. All as healthy and mature as any linux distribution, but it's not like most would ever buy a Mac just to run linux.
Unless this is another of those "just cause I can" things.
:-) -
Re:That's not just unix. :P
If you'd spent slightly longer in #debian, you'd know that we're absolutely flooded with people who aren't prepared to learn things, and just want those who already know to do everything for them. When questions are asked by someone who is having troubles which the documentation (which they have read) does not solve, they do generally get helpful and correct answers quickly. I got struck down repeatedly when I first started going there, and was not a complete "n00b" either. However, I'm not so thin-skinned as to take it personally, and now I'm more at home with reading things for myself, which is the right way to be.
In any case, with regard to your grandma, you ought to send her to the Debian Reference instead
;-) -
Re:8-bit UI unusable in a 32-bit worldWith all due respect, your proposed fixes either miss the point (i.e. they aren't the fault of UNIX) and/or the resolutions to these problems are already completed or well underway.
1) Make filenames and command flags case-insensitive. The few cycles you spend doing case comparisons will quickly pale in comparison to the time savings you experience in tech support situations where a touch typist accidentally hits space too soon and types "emacS."
If this were a problem, it would be a UI problem, not a UNIX problem. But who are you fixing this for anyway? GUI users never types in filenames at all -- they just click on them. The CLI user has tons of resources at his or her disposal to alleviate mistyped filenames -- tab completion and filename globbing are available in bash alone.if you feel you'd like to use ambiguous, case-insensitive filenames, you should be using a UI which handles that re-mapping for you. i want my tools to know that file abcde is different from file ABCDE. Please don't "fix" that feature!
2) Several files that do not have extensions usually have some information about their default parser in line #1. Either parse it, or start using file extensions in *NIX.
This is also best done by userland utilities, so that people can decide what mapping scheme they want to use for themselves. In fact, it already is implemented in userland utilities, for everything from konqueror and nautilus (on the GUI side) to simpler, old-school CLI tools like file and the mailcap handlers. GNOME and KDE (the two major GUI subsystems which run on top of X11) are now both committed to using a shared MIME-type database in their next releases (actually, GNOME already uses it in 2.8, and KDE will use it soon).But don't make this a part of UNIX, please! Sometimes you need to dig into a file's guts with a different tool than the one "associated" with that file type. Any sort of tight binding would be anathema to the flexibility and power that UNIX represents.
3) Start making UI's that only initially expose the 20% of the UI that 80% of people will use. There's no reason for a CD-burning package to have a checkbox on the main screen about verifying post-gap length for 99% of the people in the world.
This recommendation is the closest to being on-target, but again, it's not the fault of UNIX, it's a question that needs to be resolved by system layers much closer to the user. it's a UI problem, and it is actively being worked on. Both GNOME and KDE have made leaps and bounds in streamlining their interfaces -- under certain conditions. They don't want to remove all the options for everyone, but to enable a "non-power user mode".Here's an example from GNOME's Human Interface Guidelines. If you find a gnome app that doesn't meet that spec, you should file a bug against it (or fix it, if you have the skills/tools to do so!). For KDE, you might want to read relevant sections from their User Interface Guidelines as well.
Let's clean up the UI so that people who want a Windows- or Mac-style interface can have it, yes! but please don't take that as a shortcoming of UNIX. If it's a problem, it's a problem of the GUI layers that have been built on top of it. But whatever you do, please please please don't sacrifice the flexibility and power that undergirds the whole system!
-
Re:8-bit UI unusable in a 32-bit worldWith all due respect, your proposed fixes either miss the point (i.e. they aren't the fault of UNIX) and/or the resolutions to these problems are already completed or well underway.
1) Make filenames and command flags case-insensitive. The few cycles you spend doing case comparisons will quickly pale in comparison to the time savings you experience in tech support situations where a touch typist accidentally hits space too soon and types "emacS."
If this were a problem, it would be a UI problem, not a UNIX problem. But who are you fixing this for anyway? GUI users never types in filenames at all -- they just click on them. The CLI user has tons of resources at his or her disposal to alleviate mistyped filenames -- tab completion and filename globbing are available in bash alone.if you feel you'd like to use ambiguous, case-insensitive filenames, you should be using a UI which handles that re-mapping for you. i want my tools to know that file abcde is different from file ABCDE. Please don't "fix" that feature!
2) Several files that do not have extensions usually have some information about their default parser in line #1. Either parse it, or start using file extensions in *NIX.
This is also best done by userland utilities, so that people can decide what mapping scheme they want to use for themselves. In fact, it already is implemented in userland utilities, for everything from konqueror and nautilus (on the GUI side) to simpler, old-school CLI tools like file and the mailcap handlers. GNOME and KDE (the two major GUI subsystems which run on top of X11) are now both committed to using a shared MIME-type database in their next releases (actually, GNOME already uses it in 2.8, and KDE will use it soon).But don't make this a part of UNIX, please! Sometimes you need to dig into a file's guts with a different tool than the one "associated" with that file type. Any sort of tight binding would be anathema to the flexibility and power that UNIX represents.
3) Start making UI's that only initially expose the 20% of the UI that 80% of people will use. There's no reason for a CD-burning package to have a checkbox on the main screen about verifying post-gap length for 99% of the people in the world.
This recommendation is the closest to being on-target, but again, it's not the fault of UNIX, it's a question that needs to be resolved by system layers much closer to the user. it's a UI problem, and it is actively being worked on. Both GNOME and KDE have made leaps and bounds in streamlining their interfaces -- under certain conditions. They don't want to remove all the options for everyone, but to enable a "non-power user mode".Here's an example from GNOME's Human Interface Guidelines. If you find a gnome app that doesn't meet that spec, you should file a bug against it (or fix it, if you have the skills/tools to do so!). For KDE, you might want to read relevant sections from their User Interface Guidelines as well.
Let's clean up the UI so that people who want a Windows- or Mac-style interface can have it, yes! but please don't take that as a shortcoming of UNIX. If it's a problem, it's a problem of the GUI layers that have been built on top of it. But whatever you do, please please please don't sacrifice the flexibility and power that undergirds the whole system!
-
This is just nutsThe comments on this thread (A lot of which have been modded all the way up to +5) goes a long way to show how little even the average slashdotter understands what Free Software and Open Source really are.
Free Software - This is software which is Free, as in speech. As in the wind. As in thought. This software gives the users four basic freedoms -- Freedom 0) The freedom to run the program, for any purpose.
- Freedom 1) The freedom to study how the program works, and adapt it to your needs.
- Freedom 2) The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor.
- Freedom 3) The freedom to improve the program, and release your improvements to the public, so that the whole community benefits. Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
The Free Software movement is about Freedom to use my programs without restrictions (read your EULA, folks), Freedom to give copies of the program(s) to others (sorry, can't give you a copy of photoshop even if you're going to use it only once), Freedom to modify the programs (This program is close to what we need but does not suit our businesses' needs. I'll have my IT boys fix it.), and the Freedom to create a community working together to create great software. More information can be found on GNU's philosophy pages.
Open Source - While the Open Source definition mirrors the Free Software definition in many ways, the two are far from the same in theory and are almost totally different in practice. Real world experience shows that the Open Source movment is far more interested in bug checking than freedom - insert the "many eyes" statement here. This is more development model than philosophy, while FS focuses on the "why", OS focuses on the "how". This is what gets Free Software fans in arms - we worry more about what the software will let us do than about how the software was made. An excellent explination of this is "It's Time to Talk About Free Software Again", written by Open Source co-founder and Debian guru Bruce Perens (/. profile).
Since this post is getting very wordy, I'll close with something I've noticed over the past year or so - When a lot of slashdotters talk about Open Source they're really talking about the freedoms that the Free Software philosophies have given them. Look around at the stories and comments and keep in mind what both movments really are, you'll be quite amazed.
(Please forgive my terse presentation - this can be a very deep subject and I wanted to keep it as brief as possible.) -
Two related things you might want to consider1) I'm guessing you may have some role other than 'the IT guy' at your office, or that you're the only tech they have for an operation that size. Switch your userbase to Firefox if you haven't already. It can save you unbelievable amounts of time you'd otherwise spend cleaning spyware/adware off your workstations. You can help smooth the trasition from IE using the IEView and Googlebar extensions in Firefox. Get them hooked on the extensions and they'll never look back. There are some truly useful tools there that have no analog in IE.
2) Check to see if your local university or community college has a Linux Users Group (LUG). You'll meet other people with an interest in Linux who may even be willing to help you with design and implementation. They can also help you choose a Linux distro appropriate for what you are doing. I personally like Debian, if for no other reason than dselect, its package management system. You can get Samba, Sendmail, CUPS, Bind, Apache, etc. for it as mentioned above in other posts.
Good luck!
-
Re:digital signatures
What do you mean ? Your distro doesn't provide digitally signed upgrades ? (well Debian doesn't really sign packages but they do sign the list of packages wich contains md5sums of said packages which are checked at installation)
-
Specifica nos instalación
Bono los servicios mi nia kuniatera interior? On a gremos escouta et thalio y preferencias de particionamiento. Anaconda (http://rhlinux.redhat.com/anaconda/, la grado pik mit la fumbo) configurar las particiones e coco a coupa automático. Entente cordiale el "hardware probing" concordia del Detect les Debian, o Kudzu les RedHat?
Nikko fuerto tippo magico mucho scorchio. Mi volta nos molto kinagraphos y deep massago MoLinux sportsero.
-
Re:Give credit where credit is due.
all the OSI did was write their rules for license acceptance such that they could place the GPL on a list of approved licenses
Surprisingly enough, they didn't even write the rules themselves. The original OSD is actually straight from Debian's Free Software Guidelines, although now it is modified. -
Re:debian security advisories?Actually, it looks like this was patched in debian sid/unstable on on 18 November 2004 with urgency=high.
And from my logs, it looks like it propagated into sarge/testing some time before 23 Nov 2004. if you can't bring yourself to track the debian packages themselves, i recommend installing something like cron-apt and have it mail you when new packages are ready to be installed.
If you maintain any sort of servers that are on the 'net, please keep them patched. It's common courtesy for the rest of us who use this incredible shared resource.
-
Re:debian security advisories?Actually, it looks like this was patched in debian sid/unstable on on 18 November 2004 with urgency=high.
And from my logs, it looks like it propagated into sarge/testing some time before 23 Nov 2004. if you can't bring yourself to track the debian packages themselves, i recommend installing something like cron-apt and have it mail you when new packages are ready to be installed.
If you maintain any sort of servers that are on the 'net, please keep them patched. It's common courtesy for the rest of us who use this incredible shared resource.
-
Apache wants to make sure people upgrade because..
they want to make sure everyone is nice and compliant about upgrading when they decide to take httpd over to java like all the other java kool-aid they are selling --- Maven is Jonestown, lets all program in XML because its standard! Cultures breakdown when there is too little disent and questioning of authority, the apache foundtion is headed in that direction.
Lets move on, SOA and all that, most people don't need any of this mod_* crap and could use:
thttpd he has other servers there, too and http_load.
lighttpd I'm moving to this sweet little server for most apps and the home site runs ea php and ruby on rails
AOLServer like OpenACS runs on
Boa
fnord from our boy who did the (in)famous benchmarks
Cherokee I root for this one for some reason.
gatling
cthulhu
yaws in erlang, should support more simul. connections than the unlying OS can support.
dhttpd
Litespeed check out their php benchmarks
thy
roxen
mini-httpd never tried this one
xitami I have a intranet server running for 5 yrs (without upgrading xitami) on xitami Solaris, simple, small, easy to admin, never dies max uptime was 1000 days+.
eddiefor complex load bal and geographic distribution
hiawatha
And for the love of god, please at least design your sites to get their images from images.mysite.com if possible so that you can use a non-bloatware web server to server the images, reserving horsepower on your apache server for stuff that actually _requires_ some features of apache.
http://www.hcsw.org/awhttpd/ updated on 12-06-2004
http://www.norz.org/zawhttpd.html
http://cr.yp.to/publicfile.html -
Re:What we need--installation/uninstallation API
Try running a Linux binary from two years ago.
I run Debian stable, you insensitive clod! -
Re:FreeBSD has it figured out
What about Debian GNU/kFreeBSD? Isn't that the Debian distro of FreeBSD? Just because FreeBSD is still relatively obscure doesn't mean that its not going to end up in the same boat as Linux. Give it a couple more years. -
Reject on SMTP.
RBL (list.dsbl.org : bl.spamcop.net : blackholes.mail-abuse.org : sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org : multihop.dsbl.org : cbl.abuseat.org) + greylistd == average 0 spam in inbox/day.
What I like best about this approach is that you reject most of the spam at SMTP-time without accepting it. If I could I'd add spam-assassin-on-SMTP to the end of the chain, but my server is tight on memory
:-((Unfortunately there's a bug somewhere between the debian greylistd and python whereby the daemon shuts down on me all the time, but I've lodged a bug report and hope to get some help tracking it down.)
-
Re:Knoppix
I'll never touch jigdo
Here are your Debian torrents.
Why do you hate jigdo so much? I think all distro's should publish torrents and jigdo files & templates. Torrents save mirrors the network load and jigdo saves them the storage expenses. Of course, I heard about a 200GB drive for $90 today, so storage is getting awfully cheap.
More importantly, I think DistroWatch should add torrent enclosures to their RSS feeds. That would go a LONG way towards improving torrent d/l performance of Linux distros. Some are awesome, but others just bite from time to time. -
quick question
how about videos in impress presentations?
-
quick question
how about videos in impress presentations?
-
Cedega
Cedega is a non-free version of wine with directx capabilities. You can browse their supported games here.
Of course not all games now-a-days require wine or cedega in order to run on linux. Games like unreal tournament and doom III include fully functional linux versions.
There are several open source games developed for but not limited to linux. torcs, flightgear, tuxracer are some examples.
Projects like libsdl are making cross-platform game development easier.
Probably the biggest problem you'll encounter is building drivers for your video card. I've heard it argued both ways but as I understand it, both nvidia and ati drivers are ass-pains in linux. Nvidia's drivers are free as in beer, not speech. If you don't really care about free-software principles and philosophy then this is not a problem for you. ATI's drivers I understand to perform less than ideally. If you haven't already purchased your video card, I would encourage you to do extensive research beforehand.
In reality, linux distributions have few differences. Any recent, major distribution should be able to accomodate gameplay. I myself use debian unstable for amd64.
As far as performance, it really boils down to hardware. My advice is to install the linux distribution of your choice. Once you get glxgears to run, give ut2004demo a try, and if you like the way it works, then stick with linux. -
What? No Privacy Policy?
The site has no privacy policy and requires your address before you can register. Not quite ready for primetime.
I will say that someone offering a .deb download and .ogg and .flac audio files with no DRM is absolutely amazingly right on! Now just tack up a legal page where you explain that you'll never ever, unless required by subpoena, turn over my personal information, and we can do business.
I hate to gripe more, but I'd like to know how the player/preview app is licensed before installing it. Apparently it's not under an OSI-approved license or they haven't got a Debian developer packaging it because you can't apt-get install mindawn from the main Debian repository. -
Re:"serverless messaging" compatible w/ Apple iCha
The last time I heard of this, someone said it was disabled because it is broken and never worked anyway. See
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=2 81042
for more information. -
GNU HurdDoes the expensive development of this provide a significant advantage over GNU Hurd project (including Debian Hurd)?
Will this hardware development bring quantum computing any closer to reality?
-
Re:And then the obvious question rises...
-
Re:Python
-
Re:Python
-
Re:Python
-
Will this work with BSD?
IMPORTANT UPDATE: Please show your support for Ceren in this poll of Geek Babes!
Is it any wonder people think Linux users are a bunch of flaming homosexuals when its fronted by obviously gay losers like these?! BSD has a mascot who leaves us in no doubt that this is the OS for real men! If Linux had more hot chicks and gorgeous babes then maybe it would be able to compete with BSD! Hell this girl should be a model!
Linux is a joke as long as it continues to lack sexy girls like her! I mean just look at this girl! Doesn't she excite you? I know this little hottie puts me in need of a cold shower! This guy looks like he is about to cream his pants standing next to such a fox. As you can see, no man can resist this sexy little minx. Don't you wish the guy in this pic was you? Are you telling me you wouldn't like to get your hands on this ass?! Wouldn't this just make your Christmas?! Yes doctor, this uber babe definitely gets my pulse racing! Oh how I envy the lucky girl in this shot! Linux has nothing that can possibly compete. Come on, you must admit she is better than an overweight penguin or a gay looking goat! Wouldn't this be more liklely to influence your choice of OS?
With sexy chicks like the lovely Ceren you could have people queuing up to buy open source products. Could you really refuse to buy a copy of BSD if she told you to? Personally I know I would give my right arm to get this close to such a divine beauty!
Don't be a fag! Join the campaign for more cute open source babes today!
$Id: ceren.html,v 9.0 2004/08/01 16:01:34 ceren_rocks Exp $ -
Hey Hey Hey I deserve the credit here :-)
I did the first make-based boot system, IBM did it later
:-) -
No security holes in Ceren!
IMPORTANT UPDATE: Please show your support for Ceren in this poll of Geek Babes!
Is it any wonder people think Linux users are a bunch of flaming homosexuals when its fronted by obviously gay losers like these?! BSD has a mascot who leaves us in no doubt that this is the OS for real men! If Linux had more hot chicks and gorgeous babes then maybe it would be able to compete with BSD! Hell this girl should be a model!
Linux is a joke as long as it continues to lack sexy girls like her! I mean just look at this girl! Doesn't she excite you? I know this little hottie puts me in need of a cold shower! This guy looks like he is about to cream his pants standing next to such a fox. As you can see, no man can resist this sexy little minx. Don't you wish the guy in this pic was you? Are you telling me you wouldn't like to get your hands on this ass?! Wouldn't this just make your Christmas?! Yes doctor, this uber babe definitely gets my pulse racing! Oh how I envy the lucky girl in this shot! Linux has nothing that can possibly compete. Come on, you must admit she is better than an overweight penguin or a gay looking goat! Wouldn't this be more liklely to influence your choice of OS?
With sexy chicks like the lovely Ceren you could have people queuing up to buy open source products. Could you really refuse to buy a copy of BSD if she told you to? Personally I know I would give my right arm to get this close to such a divine beauty!
Don't be a fag! Join the campaign for more cute open source babes today!
$Id: ceren.html,v 9.0 2004/08/01 16:01:34 ceren_rocks Exp $