Slashdot Mirror

CNN HQ Stormed By Elite GNAA Operatives, Classified 9/11 Information Broadcast

CNN HQ Stormed By Elite GNAA Operatives, Classified 9/11 Information Broadcast

pagga (GNAP) - Manchester, Afghanistan

Following a covert infiltration of their Tel-Aviv headquarters by a crack
team of elite GNAA agents, Zionist news organization CNN today publicly
declassified top-secret information regarding the September 11 2001 attacks on
the World Trade Center, information which was until now actively supressed by
the Zionist Occupied Governments of the West. Thousands of jewish viewers
across America choked on their evening halvah (muslim babies) as, in a
primetime broadcast, Paula Zahn (herself a latent jew) was forced at dongpoint
to reveal the awful truth behind the 9/11 attacks which the rest of the
civilized (read: non-judaic) world has long suspected: Jews Did WTC.

Fast-forwarding past the 1080p CP on the greasy HD-DVD handed to them by
bedpan, the CNN production team played back the devastating GNAA-compiled
footage whilst Paula Zahn held back a rectal prolapse to present their
findings. Irrefutable proof from highly credible sources (such as regarded
public information portals jewsdidwtc.com & Encyclopedia Dramatica) was
disclosed in order to finally put an end to the debate. In the interests of
equal representation, a token jew was present for the post-footage discussion,
together with a panel of gay niggers.

In the unlikely event that you missed this historic broadcast, it has been
archived at JewTube [youtube.com].

Want to know more? See the proof for yourself @ http://www.jewsdidwtc.com and Encyclopedia Dramatica.

About CNN:

Trolled

About GNAA:

GNAA (GAY NIGGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) is the first
organization which gathers GAY NIGGERS from all over America and abroad for one
common goal - being GAY NIGGERS.

Are you GAY ?

Are you a NIGGER ?

Are you a GAY NIGGER ?

If you answered "Yes" to all of the above questions, then GNAA (GAY NIGGER
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) might be exactly what you've been looking for!

Join GNAA (GAY NIGGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) today, and enjoy
all the benefits of being a full-time GNAA member.

GNAA (GAY NIGGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) is the fastest-growing
GAY NIGGER community with THOUSANDS of members all over United States of
America and the World! You, too, can be a part of GNAA if you join
today!

Why not? It's quick and easy - only 3 simple steps!

• First, you have to obtain a copy of GAYNIGGERS FROM OUTER SPACE THE MOVIE and watch it. You can download the movie [idge.net] (~130mb) using BitTorrent.
• Second, you need to succeed in posting a GNAA First Post on slashdot.org, a popular "news for trolls" website.
• Third, you need to join the official GNAA irc channel #GNAA on irc.gnaa.eu, and apply for membership.

Talk to one of the ops or any of the other members in the channel to sign up
today! Upon submitting your application, you will be required to submit
links to your successful First Post, and you will be tested on
your knowledge of GAYNIGGERS FROM OUTER SPACE.

If you are having trouble locating #GNAA, the official GAY NIGGER
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA irc channel, you might be

You mean like This?

Psh. Goatse is sooo beyond tired. I'm surprised the Slashdot trolls haven't picked up on Tubgirl yet.

I've watched every episode.

The trashy humour relaxes me.

And the primitive political messages humour me.

I'm not sure whether Parker and Stone are pro-libertarianism or just trolling libertarians by giving them a warped sense of legitimacy while everyone else regards them as political neonates. Every "message" in South Park is cringingly simplistic and formulaic.

http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/0/06/Extremes_mouse.jpg

It was less than spectacular.

http://encyclopediadramatica.com/FLAC

I wonder how one might start a competitor of Wikipedia, which was [u]explicitly inclusionist[/u]?

There is one already

That only works with some trolls, usually those that simply post out of ignorance. True haters, or politically motivated trolls actually gain traction the more you pile on. No publicity is bad publicity. You can't argue with a drive by shooting.

Sure you can. You just need a bigger gun. Trouble is firing a volley is risky for you, and a troll has nothing to lose.

That's why it's not about feeding the troll or defeating them - it's not about the troll at all.. It's about not allowing their ideas to stand and ruin your forum.

I've not seen any evidence that your approach has been particularly effective against a real Troll. One need only look to the years and years of slash dot being trolled by that GNAA troll. Nothing works with that troll, because the motivation is simply to troll.

The moderation system here gets abused, but when used properly (and it almost always is against this kind of troll) it is made clear that what they are saying is not of value. Again, it's not about defeating the troll themself. It's about protecting your board for from becoming their voice.

You should feed trolls...with poison. Always calmly and rationally point out every hole in their logic until the ridiculousness of it is clear...and here's the challenging part...do it without losing your cool or resorting to personal insults. Just point out how stupid what they are saying really is.

That only works with some trolls, usually those that simply post out of ignorance. True haters, or politically motivated trolls actually gain traction the more you pile on. No publicity is bad publicity. You can't argue with a drive by shooting.

I've not seen any evidence that your approach has been particularly effective against a real Troll. One need only look to the years and years of slash dot being trolled by that GNAA troll. Nothing works with that troll, because the motivation is simply to troll.

Well... (from the angle of the only word in the world which is absolutely politically correct; also, don't miss writings of Securityemo here; and note how I'm mostly just having a laugh from across the Baltic... though I do look a bit like a stereotypical Viking, if with undone hair and too long from last shaving)

You're linking to the wrong wiki for information on Moot.

Ben Schumin's very own page

I found a rather informative article about Ben Schumin

http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Ben_Schumin

The key to solving this is appreciating that Wikipedia is not a machine where you put in good information and get out the encyclopedia you want to see, it's about actually dealing with human beings on a large-scale collaborative project which has differences of opinion.

In fact, Wikipedia is not an encyclopedia at all. Wikipedia is in fact a game, specifically its an MMORPG--[NSFW].

This isn't just the opinion of the internet diplomacy bridage of encyclopedia dramatica. It's also shared by the former editor of Encyclopedia Britannica. He also gave this opinion more explicitly in a documentary about the influence of the web, which I can't find at the moment.

So Wikipedia is essentially a game. For the players, the stakes are not exactly high. Ultimately nobody cares how much "WP:EXP" they ammass, or how high they rise on the "WP:SCALE".

But for the rest of the world, the stakes are currently enormous. The reality is that Wikipedia is becoming the world's foremost gateway to knowladge. The end result of these players, their petty squabbles, cliques, and infighting, are the pages which the majority of the world is being directed to when it seeks information and learning. Needless to say, this is a disaster.

The dreadful fallout from so much politics and melodrama leaves pages that are essentially babbling and incoherant. I've ranted about this before, so I'm not going to repeat myself here, except to say that in my opinion, the Wikipedia pages on mathematics are actively damaging the future of mathematics, probably turning many budding mathematicians off the subject before they discover anything about it. Wikipedia shows mathematics in its worst possible light, because no mathematician is allowed near those pages. As an expert, I know this is true of mathematics, but I suspect it's the same for many other subjects.

Our discussion here are of no avail. Ultimately the only solution to the Wikipedia Question will be to remove it from the control of Jimbo et al and place it in the hands of an international, cross institutional, academic body. People who could actually run a depository of knowladge, instead of playing games with it.

The Jobs fanboys and girls would buy the thing if it was a block of wood with a paper screen and keyboard glued on.

you mean like the P-p-p-powerbook?

Since the press release was released by someone unknown, it was correctly released by Anonymous.

Surely you of all people should know this, Anonymous.

~ Anonymous

Anonymous disagrees with you.

- Anonymous

Heh, quoting yourself an awful lot, Mr. Same-Fag?
Oh, wait... d'oh. Where are my pills?

Yes, you'd think Muskegon MI Prosecutor Tony Tague has got a full plate, what with a serial killer on the loose in his county, eh?

I'd imagine that good ol' Tony wasn't too happy about his ongoing failures appearing on television every night, but the Evan Emory case buys him a nice little reprieve, never mind if it distracts law enforcement resources from finding a serial killer. If your feeling frisky, I'd suggest calling his office to tell him that his little stunt isn't fooling anyone.

I'd expect the internet vigilantes will eventually start harassing the parents who complained. As the police are involved already, I foresee the /b/ tards proceeding by giving anonymous tips that various involved parents are the Muskegon county serial killer, or running a meth lab, or simply reporting a domestic dispute.

Imho, the /b/ tards will actually do less damage to Evan Emory's case by pranking the police about the parents rather than prank calling the parents directly because the police won't involve the news media when they get pranked. I hope his lawyer asks for a change of venue irregardless of the internet shit storm of course.

Worse, I doubt anonymous cares about Fred Phelps. heh

Anonymous must fundamentally be about the lolz. You're welcome to credit anonymous if you get even bigger lolz by inciting Fred Phelps. Yet, I'm not sure that's possible, meaning any normal reaction will already involve lolz. Don't let me stop you from trying! Just please make sure your shit is actually funny before you take on the anonymous label.

If otoh you're just looking for some good ol' internet vigilantly action, may I humbly suggest Muskegon MI Prosecutor Tony Tague. Our dear public servant Tony has clearly got a full plate what with a serial killer on the loose in his town. Yet, he find ample time to prosecute a youtube comedian for tasteless editing. Yes, that right, he's sending some poor kid with a guitar up the creek for 20 years over bad taste in editing.

I'd never call harassing Tony Tague, or the parents that put him up to it, an Anonymous action, well no epic here, maybe if the kid was a funner singer, but meh. I'm confident however that many people feel rather annoyed by grandstanding prosecutors and retarded paranoid parents. And clearly this prosecution goes beyond the pale. So here's your chance to vent some frustration and take a stand against stupidity. Just call Tony Tague's office tell his secretary what an ass hat he is for abusing due process like this.

I'm sure they'll be posting the complaining parent's telephone numbers all over /b/ too, but honestly I doubt America's breeders will gain any collective intelligence just because some get bitch slapped by /b/, something awful, etc.

That's not going to help, now we have this Anon: http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/b/b0/DogproofAnonymous.jpg

Pretty much every Western culture requires women to cover their breasts while men can leave theirs bare. I'm not sure of the anthropological history of this particular example, but I wouldn't be surprised if it had Judeo-Christian roots. All cultures have screwy social norms. Most members of that culture can't recognize them.

Yeah seriously, check out what the Chinese used to do to girls.

If you want REALLY weird, check out the Mormons and their Magic Underwear. These freaks also practice "baptism by proxy", wherein they "baptize" dead people using a "stand-in" so that every "family member of a Mormon" gets a "Mormon Baptism"... turns out every few years, some German Mormon nutter gets it into their head to baptize Hitler, then they excommunicate him, then the cycle repeats.

Jehovah's Witnesses believe that "consumption, storage, and transfusion" of blood is 100% verboten. They won't even pre-donate their own blood if they have to go in for a surgery where there may be extra blood needed.

As for the whole deal about cultures and what they will sexualize... I hereby direct you to Rule 34. Or Rule 34. Or Rule 34. Rule 34. In other words, Rule 34.

Clear?

I take Computer Science III, I know what I'm talking about.

Fixed that for you Mike.

If they are over 9000 (*sigh*) years old

Really not sure why you are sighing

I'm guessing that it's a sigh related to the meme of [POWER LEVEL] OVER 9000!!!!!11!!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiMHTK15Pik
http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Over_9000

Not "A" hero... "An" Hero.

You don't internet much, do you?

http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/0/0c/911truth.jpg

NO EXCEPTIONS. Also obviously NSFW.

Pretty much. In this day and age, it surprises the hell out of me that he thought he could get away with something as easily noticeable as hacking a presidential candidates email...unless he knew he wouldn't get away with it, and didn't care.

Oh, he was dumber than that. He was dumb enough to leave identifying information in the screencap (screencap is SFW, some of the ads are NSFW) he took.

By leaving the URL visible, it didn't matter how many proxies he was behind. There was a clear chain of evidence linking him to The Incident. Unsurprisingly, the Party Van showed up, and the rest is history.

Anonymous is legion, but on occasion, some Anonymous are very, very stupid. When Anonymous ceases to be anonymous, Anonymous thinks it's pretty funny.

EC2's power doesn't come from the individual pieces of consumer grade hardware it utilizes... it comes from the vast parallelization of thousands of pieces of such hardware, all linked together through an API layer exposed to anyone with a credit card.

hey i know you, you're that nigger with a hundred slashdot accounts. "you are NOTHING" and all of that typical Internet Tough Guy bullshit. you talk tough on Slashdot because in reality you're just a little ineffectual bitch who can't stand up for himself in person. you got something to prove. the rest of us don't, bitch.

besides, how would anybody ever know if the name and address you claim actually belongs to you or some guy you don't like? you never heard of the Joe job before? if that is your real info then you're an idiot with no respect for his own privacy. if that is not your real info then you're just another piece of shit, a NOTHING as you like to say it. so which one is it. are you an idiot or another piece of shit?

no sane person would both have multiple Slashdot accounts so he can escape the consequences of being a trolling douchebag (namely, a starting score of -1), but then post his real name and home address so he can fail to escape identification. you see they are not compatible. if you are not afraid to put your name behind your speech in REAL LIFE then why do you run away from consequences of putting your account behind your speech in Slashdot? if you are such a manly man then pick one slashdot account and stick to it and take the consequences of getting downmodded all the time like a man. if you don't have the balls to do that then quit pretending like you're so brave for giving out what is probably a fake address. got it?

you cower worse than any AC you have ever judged as inferior to yourself. don't ever forget that. cover it all up with false bravado since that's easier than admitting how much of a failure you are.

Bing Cache

I for one welcome our new robotic overlords, especially for sexual applications. And so does this guy.

I like the encyclopedia dramatica take on the Wikipedia beggar ads:

http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Main_Page

How clever. Posting a section of an encyclopedia dramatica entry with /b/ changed to the board name you post to might work on those other boards. But.

I prefer this more accurate definition: http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Cougar

I have a distinct feeling I've heard about thisrecently.

Slashdotters,

Anonymous is not a secret hacker organization. It is the literal definition of the word. It is not a proper noun. It is just individuals acting without large-scale coordination, all pissed off for their own reasons, acting in semi-cohesion, and participating in groupthink. It is people either trolling for lulz, or lulzing for lulzing.

People downloading music are like anonymous. There is not a collective group organizing the individual downloaders. They just do it. The people "at the other end of the stick" view it as us against "them", and to have a proper OMGSCANDAL, you need a perpetrator, so they made one. And if they didn't cognitively make one for the purposes of degrading freedom on the internet, then it's more lulz for us and more idiot points for you.

I'm not so sure of this. Long-term members or not, the term "Anonymous" is being used by the media to refer to the collective group of individuals who (anonymously) participate, at any given point in time, in attacks claimed under the pseudonym. To claim that "Anonymous" is not an organization is disingenuous. They have a website, a common cause, and some degree of leadership involved in coordination. Just because leadership, members, and activities are impromptu and decentralized doesn't mean that the tag is invalid. It refers to exactly what it should refer to: the coordinated goals, members, and efforts, however temporal, of people who rally under that banner. And hey, if it's informal, it's as good a name as any.

People on the other end don't just view it as "them". They, including news agencies, generally know exactly what "Anonymous" refers to. If someone posts a sign in the dead of night calling for a rally, the collective group of people who join the rally, despite a lack of formal affiliation and leadership, can rightfully be referred to as "those guys who rallied" or "the rallyers". In this case, rather than "the Wikileaks DDoSers", participants have chosen anonymity and the pseudonym "Anonymous" as an identity, and the press is well within its rights to follow suit. Furthermore, just like any organization, there is leadership, however, informal. Someone makes the software, someone rallies participation, someone fans the flames of anger, someone chooses the target, and someone keeps the weapon honed and pointed in a meaningful direction. Just because these individuals are not defined, known, or consistent doesn't make them any less real. Those operating as "anonymous" are a full-fledged structured organization at any given point in time.

There are differing levels of legal culpability. I feel sorry for those who don't understand that their willing participation in the DDoS is being logged and likely will be used against them. DDoS, by its very nature, is not something that can be anonymous. If you filter it through a proxy or anonymizing network, your offensive capability is constrained by that of the network. To be effective against any serious target, the DDoS must be direct, which means that your anonymity is completely forfeit (these obvious facts pointed out very vividly in a previous Slashdot article). The packets are traceable, there are permanent records, and you will be prosecuted. This isn't a revolution of the people, where, ultimately, citizens can rely on the fact that one's government cannot (generally) kill or arrest a majority and remain functional. There is no implicit safety, and there are no hard limits to prosecution. You're vandalizing a sign by writing your name and address on it.

Slashdotters,

Here is a case-in-point (rather old) showing that mainstream US media just doesn't get it. Anonomous and Lulz


U.S. Media,

Anonymous is not a secret hacker organization. It is the literal definition of the word. It is not a proper noun. It is just individuals acting without large-scale coordination, all pissed off for their own reasons, acting in semi-cohesion, and participating in groupthink. It is people either trolling for lulz, or lulzing for lulzing.

People downloading music are like anonymous. There is not a collective group organizing the individual downloaders. They just do it. The people "at the other end of the stick" view it as us against "them", and to have a proper OMGSCANDAL, you need a perpetrator, so they made one. And if they didn't cognitively make one for the purposes of degrading freedom on the internet, then it's more lulz for us and more idiot points for you.

Sincererely

The Lulz.

(Calm down, this is what I refer to) :-D :-D :-D

Automated and multiple choice "tests" are bane and cancer of education process. If schools will be prevented from using them, students would have to actually solve problems, and teachers will have to ask meaningful questions instead of inventing plausible but wrong answers to trick students into revealing how little they understand.

Honestly? http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Anonymous You are not them.

Take a look at LOIC (Low Orbit Ion Cannon). The sourcecode is on sourceforge and everything=). An encyclopedia dramatica page on the subject can be found here

My botnet's version is over 9000!

If the above is not true, then why do women choose to date assholes while they want all nice guys to die alone? Something to think about before you idealize them.

Because most self-described "nice" guys are nothing of the sort. They're just boring guys without a personality whose only positive virtue is this so called "niceness"... a pretense that is quickly dropped once the girl they're trying to get with starts dating someone else.

Read this and behold your lack of understanding.

You have broken a commandment of not being a douchebag: THOU SHALT NOT SPEAK OF THINGS ABOUT WHICH YE KNOW NOTHING.

Our nameless comrades in the clown car industry presents it better than I ever could: http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Security_Faggots

thought I would bring up swirl face link. In short these things can be reversed so some creep can get cheap nude pics. This is just a second order panacea, the first being the scanners themselves.

word was "demands". kinda fitting

What you suggest is Communism. It works *IF* everyone plays nice together. When they dont you end up with Stalinism. Also there is always one bight bulb that figures out you dont have to do much to get by. So you end up with 'do it our way or pay major penalty'.

See
http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Internet_Fuckwad_Theory

Living in a commune sounds good at first. Until you realize that not everyone is driven to help others. In fact most people are douchbags...

So there might be some truth in this?

Actually, it looks like this is just a crazy old lady with a blog.

Wait, so June is not a guy!?

Sample quote

Jailbird?

In December 2000, "The Queen of Foster Flats Road" was convicted and sentenced to 9 1/2 months in jail for harassment of her neighbours.

After serving 17 days in jail during a span covering Christmas 2000 and New Years Day, a judge with troller's remorse finally set bail on Jan 4 2001. Maxam appealed, of course, claiming jury and evidence tampering and that her conviction was a retaliation for her articles criticising Chestertown NY public officials.

In her lawlsuit she named virtually every judge in her county as not having legal authority to jail her - forcing them to recuse themselves. She was later released on a stay, but was forced to serve another six months in 2003 after her appeal was denied.

She was released early for good behaviour, and eventually won her trial in 2005 on a technicality.

-- Barbie

Sadly... no.

http://encyclopediadramatica.com/June_Maxam

Actually, it looks like this is just a crazy old lady with a blog. Here's what Encyclopedia Dramatica says:

June Maxam (b. 1948) is a troll in the classical sense that she's a miserable old hag who lives under a bridge. As co-publisher of the failed Empire Journal, publisher of the failed "Twisted Web" book, publisher of the failed free community newspaper (est. 1981), and now the always failing pay-per-click infested blog North Country Gazette, her expertise in Internet Lawl as resulted in her issuing several baseless cease and desist orders to anyone who dares give her blog free publicity, claiming her site is exempt from all Fair Use laws.

Maxam swipes news from legitimate sources, rewords them, posts them on her blog, and claims each as her own. She expects people to pay to visit her blog, recently stating that she will sue non-paying website visitors who read more than one post.

Maxam previously filed a string of failed state and federal lawsuits, and was labeled a "frequent filer" by a Warren County court employee.

Maxam resides in Chesterbrook, New York, has no friends, is hated and despised by her neighbors, and is known locally as the "Queen Of Foster Flats Road." Maxam feels the need to surround her home in the tiny village with "No Trespassing" signs.

A Warren County New York law enforcement officer described Maxam to Bad Cop News:

"Look, that woman says a lot of things, yeah she's a real talker, but it comes down to a lonely old lady with something screwy upstairs sitting in front of a computer, with few friends, making enemies."
 

The real shocker here is that Encylcopedia Dramatica actually has useful content.

A textbook example of samefag

http://encyclopediadramatica.com/File:Samefag_Matrix.jpg

A textbook example of samefag

http://encyclopediadramatica.com/File:Samefag_Matrix.jpg