Slashdot Mirror


WP7 Predicted To Beat iPhone By 2015

WrongSizeGlass writes "InformationWeek is reporting that Windows Phone 7 will overtake Apple's iPhone by 2015 according to IDC. IDC predicts 2015 will bring: Android 45.4%, WP7 & WinMobile 20.9%, iOS 15.3%, RIM 13.7%, Symbian 0.2%, and 'Others' 4.6%. These numbers would move WP7 into 2nd place and leave iOS in 3rd place with a slightly smaller piece of the smart phone pie than they current hold (15.7%). The author of the InformationWeek story isn't buying IDC's forecast, because of WP7's anemic sales to date and Microsoft's recent stumbles with its first two updates. I have to wonder if WP7 will still be Microsoft's smartphone OS in 2015 or if they'll have moved to WP8."

377 comments

  1. Obligatory XKCD by taktoa · · Score: 5, Insightful
    1. Re:Obligatory XKCD by Life2Death · · Score: 0

      Parent has the right idea. Not like anything better will come along and shake up things. I'm sure the market looked far different before android was out...

    2. Re:Obligatory XKCD by Penguinisto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No kidding.

      IDC tries to justify it by throwing the word "Nokia" around a lot, but honestly, Nokia will (at least IMHO) be lucky to remain in the smartphone business by 2015.

      There's something else that screams "bullshit!" at IDC's predictions: while next quarter's marketshare stats (e.g. Canalys, ComScore, etc) may say differently, Microsoft's share of the mobile market is still dropping like mad. Even though WinMo 6.5 still has some mass to blow off, one would think that nearly 6 months of WP 7 would have at least slowed down the fall a little bit.

      The final elephant in an already heavily pachyderm-populated room is Microsoft's utter silence on sales numbers. They almost always trumpet and trot out numbers, even if it's just channel-related. We all heard the big, bad 'two millionz0rz since launch!!!111' figure back in January, even though those were only channel shipments. Now, Microsoft's marketing department has nothing but the sound of crickets when it comes to mobile licensing sales (or even shipments).

      Taken all together, it spells a whole lot of potential fail, and IDC needs to do a hell of a lot more than shout Nokia's name, like it were some sort of talisman that defies all logic.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    3. Re:Obligatory XKCD by Relayman · · Score: 2

      Just find out who paid for the study and you will know everything.

      --
      If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
    4. Re:Obligatory XKCD by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      No kidding.

      Who else read this headline in their RSS feed and had the first thought of "aw jeez, this is gonna be a bloodbath in the comments section"?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:Obligatory XKCD by Ant+P. · · Score: 5, Funny
    6. Re:Obligatory XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's less ridiculous than it sounds. What the authors did was simple take the current Symbian numbers and move them to WP7, assuming no growth at all, e.g., all Nokia phones have WP7 in 2015 rather than their current OS.

      It assumes, however, that Android and iOS growth is basically limited which seems unlikely, but for Nokia to merely hold its own for three years isn't totally insane. Just unlikely.

    7. Re:Obligatory XKCD by Lokitoth · · Score: 1

      Actually, my first thought was "nice, something to entertain myself while compiling."

    8. Re:Obligatory XKCD by cptdondo · · Score: 2

      It also ignores Nokia's steady market drop. If you take the intersection of WP7 market trends and Nokia's market trends, they will intersect somewhere near 0 in about 2013.

    9. Re:Obligatory XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      IDC tries to justify it by throwing the word "Nokia" around a lot, but honestly, Nokia will (at least IMHO) be lucky to remain in the smartphone business by 2015.

      Nah, more likely Nokia will eventually dominate again. Either with a Windows phone or Android. You can bet on it. They make arguably the best hardware of any phone manufacturer and that won't change, they just need to get their OS/software act together.

      There is a chance that phones running Windows will at least be able to compete. Look at what Microsoft has done with the Xbox. If that fails Nokia can always fall back and release an Android phone which no doubt would quickly spring them back as the top dog.

      I mean their main competitor is HTC with its Chinese designed and built junk^H^H^H^Hhardware.

    10. Re:Obligatory XKCD by Culture20 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nokia will (at least IMHO) be lucky to remain in the smartphone business by 2015.

      Nokia will be lucky to remain in the smartphone business by Qt4 2013. They're betting on WP7 with no safety net.

    11. Re:Obligatory XKCD by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They make arguably the best hardware of any phone manufacturer

      For the low end phones, that's true. I'm a Linux geek, and I'm in a love/hate relationship with my iPhone, but I purposefully didn't buy an n900 after seeing what a clunky, hugemongonormous piece of cheap plastic it was. If they had spent just 50 euro more per phone for a nice solid case and a thin form factor, I would have spent 100 euro more and been happily running UQM or Firefox on my phone.

    12. Re:Obligatory XKCD by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe they were but not anymore.

      The N8's a decent piece of hardware, don't get me wrong, but, they lost the lead. The N8 is the first Nokia phone to have Multitouch. In 2010. Late 2010 at that, after massive delays.

      Nokia has no product vision for the future. Add to that the lag of having to actually release WP7 phones. They're sitting ducks.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    13. Re:Obligatory XKCD by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Actually, my first thought was "nice, something to entertain myself while compiling."

      You mean compiling isn't entertaining enough?

      Are you sure you're in the right place?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    14. Re:Obligatory XKCD by vlueboy · · Score: 1

      Who else read this headline in their RSS feed and had the first thought of "aw jeez, this is gonna be a bloodbath in the comments section"?

      Actually, my first thought was "nice, something to entertain myself while compiling."

      Haha. I guess someone could write a firefox plugins that does like googlefight.com but in 3D, and overlays it on the comment pages and acts something out based on scores differences and relative UID powers.

      Add randomness and move AI to make it less-repetitive if you refresh, and throw in HTML "bloodbath" sim a-la mortal kombat, and visualilze fun things for events like 'this comment was rated troll!' appearing and so on...

    15. Re:Obligatory XKCD by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well to be fair, and while personally I think it will be Android/iOS neck and neck with WP7 or WebOS third, the key to whether or not MSFT can pull this off will be bundle deals. if MSFT gets Nokia to put out a WinPhone with a kick ass GPU by holiday season AND manage to tie Halo in, like say having a Halo Phone Game that boosts your characters and earns achievements for the game at home? THEN they might be able to pull this off.

      Because to be fair Windows 7 plays REAL nice with the X360. I've set up the Win 7/X360 combo for a couple of customers and it really is butt simple to make it a kick ass multimedia setup, so if they can "pull an Apple" and tie everything together, so say your WinPhone can watch anything you have at home by using the WinPC as a slingbox, while tying gaming between X360 and WinPhone together? Then yes I can see MSFT taking second place, especially if their successor to the X360 kicks ass.

      But that is gonna be a hell of a big IF and will depend on the suits at MSFT not cocking things up. MSFT has a history of screwing the pooch and not "getting it", see Zune, Kin, Vista, etc, but the basic parts they need are there, the question is can they bundle them together in a smooth and easy to use package. While they do have a shot, and Android proves you can come along and change the game if you are in the right place with the right product, I frankly wouldn't bet the farm on it.

      My personal prediction is thus: Android will burn enough folks with CCC (Cheapo Chinese Crap) that they won't be able to hold first, and Apple's traditionally high prices will make a nice opening for someone in the middle, but if HP can keep from screwing the pooch WebOS could be the one to take that slot, at the very least with their rep with businesses they could be the one to finish off RIM and take over the business phone market. So final call...Apple and Android, followed by either WebOS or WinPhone with Blackberry DOA.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    16. Re:Obligatory XKCD by guruevi · · Score: 1

      People got bitten by Windows Phone/Mobile/CE on plenty of devices that the word Windows together with phone is synonymous to 'crappy battery hoarder that crashes' now in the market and the lackluster performance of v7 is not helping.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    17. Re:Obligatory XKCD by mug+funky · · Score: 2

      and you'll find the stats flooded by that kristopeit fucker's thousands of userID's.

    18. Re:Obligatory XKCD by d6 · · Score: 1

      I believe this could turn out very well for both Nokia and Microsoft.

      Nokia nails the hardware (and then totally fscks the user experience from about the time you first turn the phone on.)
      MSFT has experience in easy, user friendly GUIs and even more experience marketing the hell out of them.
      Put these things together _correctly_ (Nokia hardware + W7 optimized for the product + the MSFT marketing monster) and you have a winner.

      or it might turn out like zune... time will tell.

    19. Re:Obligatory XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XKCD is never obligatory.

      Please enjoy XKCD in the privacy of your own home and stop spamming fora with links to it.

    20. Re:Obligatory XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely.

      I'm a sales person in the industry. I get multiple requests for Android and iPhones in a day (my store does not carry iPhones).

      If I sell one windows mobile phone in a week, it's the exception.

    21. Re:Obligatory XKCD by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Taken all together, it spells a whole lot of potential fail, and IDC needs to do a hell of a lot more than shout Nokia's name, like it were some sort of talisman that defies all logic.

      Indeed; especially with Nokia's own developers lashing out at the point of announcement of the new corporate strategy, as well as their shareholders. And that's Microsoft's *strongest* bet the coming years. I look at that deal more like a deal made in panic. Both for Nokia (for obvious reasons), and Microsoft (due to everything but a speedy adoption of WP7). It honestly looks like two losers joining forces more than anything else to me.

      Microsoft's main competitor isn't even the iPhone, but the Android. The Android was first to gain foothold in the kind of open development market that Microsoft is interested in, and has strived to be in all the way since Windows 1.0. I consider that the worst problem for Microsoft. I think Android is the platform that is going to hurt Windows Phone platform adoption so bad that they won't get the traction to beat the iPhone anytime soon.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    22. Re:Obligatory XKCD by lennier1 · · Score: 1
    23. Re:Obligatory XKCD by biglig2 · · Score: 2

      What do you sell to the people wanting iPhones? Android devices? Or do they leave and go to a store that stocks iPhones? This fascinates me, because I suspect it may be a significant distortion to the US smartphone but I can't figure out how big. If you manage to sell them on Android, then now that Verizon has iPhone and T-Mobile is shortly going to go away, you'd expect to see a drop. Except Android devices having lower ticket prices might keep them in the game. Or maybe the "normals" do something else we geeks can't understand...

      (I'm assuming you're based in the US, of course, apologies in advance if I'm wrong, but since you're AC and won;t get notified of this reply my question is largely hypothetical anyhoo.)

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    24. Re:Obligatory XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, when staying in the smartphone business by Qt4 alone didn't help, I can't see what difference would Qt4 2013 make...

    25. Re:Obligatory XKCD by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      MSFT has experience in easy, user friendly GUIs

      Ah yes: Microsoft Bob.

    26. Re:Obligatory XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The prediction is also bad for Nokia - it is stating that they will lose marketshare by 2015 (although as the smartphone market is growing too, that might still mean higher overall sales). Even so, the stats are assuming that current Nokia Symbian customers will happily keep on using Nokia WP7 devices on their next upgrade, but history has shown that people do look at alternatives when assessing their next phone (otherwise the iPhone and Android would not have taken off), so you cannot assume that a current Nokia customer == a future WP7 customer. In addition will other WP7 OEMs keep on making devices when the OS vendor is in bed with a competitor?

      You have to assume that Microsoft will sort out WP7's flaws in fairly short order, but Android, WebOS (conveniently forgotten about in this prediction) and iOS are continually improving too.

    27. Re:Obligatory XKCD by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      The only problem with the N900's build quality is the ez-break USB port. Apart from that it's at least on par with all the other high-end PDA-phones I've owned. You definitely missed out by avoiding an N900, it still has the best software on a phone by far, and will continue to have the best software for the foreseeable future.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    28. Re:Obligatory XKCD by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Multitouch isn't purely a good thing right now. Right now, multitouch means a capacitive screen, which means switching to a screen that only works with your finger and has the accuracy you'd expect from a kid's toy. For now I still prefer resistive touch, soon multitouch resistive screens will be on the market and you can have a good touchscreen with multitouch. But right now it's EITHER a good touch screen OR multitouch. Nokia made the right decision until the N8.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    29. Re:Obligatory XKCD by nik_qc · · Score: 1

      Oh my...LOL! :)

    30. Re:Obligatory XKCD by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Agreed, and they better not act surprised.

      "Switching to a Microsoft OS has been a fast-track death sentence for every mobile manufacturer in history, but maybe we'll be different" - the people at Nokia who get paid the big bucks.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    31. Re:Obligatory XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only problem with the N900's build quality is the ez-break USB port. Apart from that it's at least on par with all the other high-end PDA-phones I've owned. You definitely missed out by avoiding an N900, it still has the best software on a phone by far, and will continue to have the best software for the foreseeable future.

      [citation needed]
      Opinions are not facts. They can intersect and both be true sometimes but there is a difference.

    32. Re:Obligatory XKCD by Grizzley9 · · Score: 1

      Do you have any articles to back this up? This is the first time I've heard of a possible future for resistive screens. But they'll all be gone as soon as we do away with screens altogether and get the corneal display and mind reading.

    33. Re:Obligatory XKCD by RobbieThe1st · · Score: 1

      I think they must have fixed the usb issue - I've dropped mine a number of times and had it hang by it's usb cord without ill effect; kind of amazing, really.

      Oh, and yes, the software is awesome. It's nice having a /computer/ in your pocket instead of a /phone/ like an Android or iCrap. Seriously, having /no/ limit to what you can do is really nice.

    34. Re:Obligatory XKCD by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      and you'll find the stats flooded by that kristopeit fucker's thousands of userID's.

      Damn, that guy's a prick. He's got absolutely nothing to say but somehow manages to make a great deal of noise in doing so..

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    35. Re:Obligatory XKCD by npsimons · · Score: 1

      If they had spent just 50 euro more per phone for a nice solid case and a thin form factor, I would have spent 100 euro more and been happily running UQM or Firefox on my phone.

      Making it thinner probably would have involved removing the keyboard, and you can't use Emacs with an onscreen keyboard (at least not that I've seen).

      Quite frankly, I don't see what the big deal about the thickness of the N900 is; it's not any thicker than my Treo 650, and it's not like it's thicker for no good reason (see keyboard comment above). Heck, to me, the thickness is good; makes it easier to grab. I've tried holding some of the iPhones pre v4, and they felt very dainty and hard to hold.

    36. Re:Obligatory XKCD by cyberfin · · Score: 1

      Yeah I got my armor on before hitting the link... xD

      --
      "I'm taking this loop off." - Jack O'Neill
    37. Re:Obligatory XKCD by Zeek40 · · Score: 1

      There aren't really that many cheap crap android phones out there though, and the 'flagship phones' of several carriers are pretty damn awesome android phones. Sprint's HTC EVO is a great piece of hardware, the Motorola droid series have been really popular. I think the fact that the Nexus series (The Android reference device) phones are decent pieces of hardware, and available for a reasonable price on any carrier sets the bar for entry into the market high enough to keep most of the real crap from ever seeing the light of day and ruining Android users experience.

    38. Re:Obligatory XKCD by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      Yeah I got my armor on before hitting the link... xD

      At least it wasn't your robe and wizard hat.

    39. Re:Obligatory XKCD by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Please hand in you Linux geek card on your way out ;)

      Seriously though, it is not a fair comparison. The N900 is thicker, but then it also has a QWERTY keyboard underneath. It also has a regular Linux distro with root, X11, Gtk, Qt, Glibc etc. so you can do anything you could on a desktop distro. AFAIK, it is the only such phone that is widely available, and the closest alternative would be something like the OpenMoko models, which are not easy to find, and not nearly as powerful hardware.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    40. Re:Obligatory XKCD by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

      The closest to "Chinese piece of crap Android device" I've experienced, other than the noname Android tablets, has been my Huawei S7. It's not a piece of crap, but it definitely has its issues and is proving to be mostly unsupported by the manufacturer. (Docking connector but no dock, somewhat buggy firmware, GPL noncompliance for a while, etc.)

      However, while I've seen a lot of reports of people returning S7s due to being unhappy with them, it didn't sour them on Android. Most of them were saying, "Ditch this and get a Galaxy Tab", not "Ditch this and get an iPad".

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    41. Re:Obligatory XKCD by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      Hey, look at it this way: if someone ever does make a 'Slashdot fight' game, he'll have some great win quotes:

      "Why do you cower?"

      "You're completely pathetic!"

      Instead of "You must defeat Sheng Long to stand a chance!"

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    42. Re:Obligatory XKCD by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 1

      I would like to see the data behind this statement... But there probably isn't any what they do have is likely 5 or more years old which doesn't include anything about smartphones.. That or he was reviewing data while he was sleeping..

      --
      Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
    43. Re:Obligatory XKCD by node+3 · · Score: 1

      It's worse than that even. I don't see how Microsoft can out-geek or out-commodifyAndroid, or out-polish Apple. There are very few markets where MS can possibly get any traction whatsoever. Gaming? That's controlled by The DS, PSP, and iPod touch. Windows integration? That's too nerdy to be mainstream, and once you've hit that level of nerdiness, you don't want Windows on your phone anyway. Business? There's no compelling case here.

      The best MS and Nokia can hope for is to get people to buy their phones out of apathy, by being the ubiquitous phone that is offered free and looks nice enough, and Android already has that market locked up. Even still, I think that's their best hope for now. They aren't going to lure tinker geeks from Android or common folk and "just works" geeks from iOS.

    44. Re:Obligatory XKCD by juasko · · Score: 1

      My prediction is that WP7 will cut most of the fragmented Android Platform, not so much from iOS users. As for me there is a huge mountain between me using Apples and me using MS products. That mountain is huge. But no doubt I'm more curious over WP7 than android.

    45. Re:Obligatory XKCD by hazydave · · Score: 1

      The problem with this arrangement is that, now with the Nokia deal, they're in a special position. Thus, every other hardware vendor is second tier in the Windows 7 Phone world. Sure, Google picks favorites, but only for a single new software release (Xoom with Android 3.0, Nexus One for 2.1, Droid for 2.0, etc).

      This is similar to the "strategy" Microsoft and Toshiba used to rule the market with HD-DVD. Oh, wait, Toshiba's special position there kept all other hardware people away. Maybe MS was slight smarter, waiting until they had a few other companies signed up for W7P before the Nokia deal was announced. But I really question whether those guys will stick around in the long term. Even if W7P amounts to little more than a software port and name change for the Android phone the companies were going to build anyway.

      --
      -Dave Haynie
    46. Re:Obligatory XKCD by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Capacitive touch screens are only bad when your OS has UI elements that are obscenely small.

      Why was the N8 the time for capacitive touch? symbian^3 didn't do anything particularly new.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    47. Re:Obligatory XKCD by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      The N8 wasn't the time for capacitive touch. That's when Nokia made a bad decision.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    48. Re:Obligatory XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I could mod you "Exactly the same as me"...

    49. Re:Obligatory XKCD by sh00z · · Score: 1

      (yeah, I know it's offtopic) the 3D actually works on this one. Cool!

  2. inb4 shill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no.

    1. Re:inb4 shill by homey+of+my+owney · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Really... If ever a story reeked of being purchased. I guess we know where those "expert" house's crystal balls are made.

    2. Re:inb4 shill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the Microsoft development are so much FUN to develop in! Did I mention how much of a please using MICROSOFT development tools is? ::rolls eyes::

    3. Re:inb4 shill by the+linux+geek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Looking at it purely from tools, I'd rather develop for WP7 than iPhone or Android. WP7 has a proper visual layout designer, while iPhone is tied to Xcode and ObjectiveC and Android has the awful XML layout system, in all of its buggy and inconsistent glory. (try putting a ListView in a ScrollView sometime!)

      On the other hand, the niceness of the tools is offset by the fucking shameful cripplings in the library. The nastiest thing I can think of in this regard is lack of sockets, which makes a huge portion of modern software - you know, pretty much anything that isn't HTTP - impossible to write. There was some hope that this would end up in the NoDo update, but there's still no sign of it.

    4. Re:inb4 shill by LDAPMAN · · Score: 2

      What the heck is a a "proper visual layout designer" if Interface Builder doesn't qualify? It's by far the most powerful gui builder I've seen on any platform.

  3. Nokia Sales by Moderator · · Score: 4, Informative

    "The new alliance brings together Nokia's hardware capabilities and Windows Phone's differentiated platform. We expect the first devices to launch in 2012. By 2015, IDC expects Windows Phone to be number 2 operating system worldwide behind Android."

    Not so fast...the author seems to base WP7's success on the success of Nokia, which is uncertain at best.

    Yes, Nokia sells more cellphones than most other cellphone manufacturers COMBINED...however, a large majority of those sales are S40 devices, simple dumbphones that can't do much more than call and receive texts, but have a week plus battery life.

    Nokia has, since mid-February, doubled-back on their future strategy. First, it was WP7 ONLY...then they were going to continue to release Symbian and Meego, now, Symbian is dead as of 2010.

    It sounds to me like Nokia has no clue what they are going to do. At best, their explanation for the smartphone market has been murky; at worst, they still haven't addressed how they are going to make up the marketshare currently held by 600 million S40 dumbphones. Mostly people who do not want a dataplan or a smartphone. WP7 will not sweep into the low-end and take that market share. It's like Ford giving up making Fords, and deciding that they will only make high-end Lincolns to suit everyone.

    I said it before, Samsung seems to have figured this out. They will use Bada on the low end, and Android on the high end. In this case, I would take a lot away from WP7's percentage, and bump up the "Others" category significantly.

    --
    The World is Yours.
    1. Re:Nokia Sales by Moderator · · Score: 0

      Symbian is dead as of 2010.

      Typo, should have read 2012, although I'm sure some would agree with the original statement.

      --
      The World is Yours.
    2. Re:Nokia Sales by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      For the period 2010-2012, correct "dead" to "walking wounded".

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    3. Re:Nokia Sales by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Yes, Nokia sells more cellphones than most other cellphone manufacturers COMBINED...however, a large majority of those sales are S40 devices, simple dumbphones that can't do much more than call and receive texts, but have a week plus battery life.

      But they do have a huge share of the smartphone market, it all fluctuates pretty quickly but they may still have the biggest share of that market.

      It sounds to me like Nokia has no clue what they are going to do. At best, their explanation for the smartphone market has been murky; at worst, they still haven't addressed how they are going to make up the marketshare currently held by 600 million S40 dumbphones. Mostly people who do not want a dataplan or a smartphone. WP7 will not sweep into the low-end and take that market share.

      They aren't discontinuing S40, that will continue to be the dumb-phone platform.

    4. Re:Nokia Sales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was the IDC Report sponsored at all? Interestingly IDC reported on Virtualisation with similar results favoring Microsoft.
      http://www.mikedipetrillo.com/mikedvirtualization/2008/10/idc-microsoft-g.html

    5. Re:Nokia Sales by bazorg · · Score: 1

      Yes, Nokia sells more cellphones than most other cellphone manufacturers COMBINED...however, a large majority of those sales are S40 devices, simple dumbphones that can't do much more than call and receive texts, but have a week plus battery life.

      Interesting point this one. The photo on Wikipedia shows a Nokia 6300 as an example of hardware running S40. It clearly shows the "Apps" button, and since I used to have one of these phones, I know it also has a built in media player, web browser, navigation, and photo+music+video files gallery. It may not have multitasking and a big touchscreen but it certainly is more than just a dumb phone. Were Nokia+MS to sell this kind of product with a sticker "Runs on Windows Mobile x" from this day on, why should it not count towards the smartphone market share figures that TFA is trying to guess?

    6. Re:Nokia Sales by iampiti · · Score: 1

      Nokia aren't gonna stop making s40 dumbphones. They just said they would stop making s60 smartphones and start making WP7 ones. So, they have the low end covered. What I don't see clearly is what they're gonna do with the midlevel (hardware-wise) phones. They could run s60 quite happily since is not resource intensive but if I'm not mistaken WP7 requires pretty powerful hardware to run.

    7. Re:Nokia Sales by lennier1 · · Score: 1

      2010-2012: Rotting corpse
      2012-2013: Zombie stage

    8. Re:Nokia Sales by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      S40 started out in the category of dumb phones. Now it's used for feature phones. They are certainly not, and will never be smartphones. The difference between a feature phone and a smartphones provide a platform for third party native applications. With native here meaning written with the same API as the built in applications, such that the user doesn't perceive a difference.

      Feature phone's are only capable of running interpreted languages in a limited sandbox - such as Java MIDP.

      The "Apps" button is actually a giveaway that it's not a smartphone. If it were a smartphone, third party apps would be icons at the same level as the built in apps, not items within a MIDP sandbox labeled "Apps".

    9. Re:Nokia Sales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I was a phone manufacturer I would be putting some money into developing a range of cheap-ass phones (that carriers sell for $0 with a cheap contract) with S40/S60 levels of functionality, in the assumption that Nokia is throwing away a major steady revenue stream with their WP7 business plan.

      Samsung has BADA. I'm sure that Android is adjustable into a feature phone with a simper UI too. There's Linux options too.

      Cheap-phone-on-a-chips are exceeding the hardware specs of smart phones from a few years ago now, so they'll be able to handle smaller screens and a simpler UI just fine.

    10. Re:Nokia Sales by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Not so fast...the author seems to base WP7's success on the success of Nokia, which is uncertain at best.

      Two financial analysts from InformationWeek go out on a duck hunting expedition. The guide running the boat stops in a bay where he says ducks take off and land often.

      Pretty soon a duck takes off straight into the air at high speed, and with an expert shot, one of the analysts nails it with his shotgun. The duck stops flapping and some feathers fly, but the dead duck is still climbing. Then the other hits it again, but the duck's corpse is still ascending. They quickly put two more shots into the duck and it's torn to shreds in midair.

      The guide asks "Why'd you shoot it so many times? It was dead after the first hit."

      One of the analysts responds "Dead or not, I wasn't going to let that duck escape into space!"

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    11. Re:Nokia Sales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      S40 are not _only_ simple dumbphones for voice and receiving(!) texts, you can also have camera, music player, web browser, Adobe FlashLite, touchscreen etc. on an S40 phone. Even download apps and games from their Ovi store. Not real smart phones, but definitely Nokia's game plan in the lower segments, although I suppose S40 will have tough time competing against the increasingly lower priced Androids.

  4. I wonder something else by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have to wonder if WP7 will still be Microsoft's smartphone OS in 2015 or if they'll have moved to WP8.

    I have to wonder whether, in 2015, Microsoft will be in the phone software business at all.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:I wonder something else by Kjella · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sure they will... they go in, they don't back out and admit it's a failure unless it's horribly obvious. I wager somewhere between Zune (extremely low) and Xbox (in the game, but not a huge winner) in popularity, probably more like the Zune being fourth after Android, iOS and RIM in some order. See, the people that have dumbphones aren't interested in smart phones, and for those that want smart phones - particuarly a new generation of teens - WP7 is never going to get cool. RIM holds the business market, iOS has Apple's cult following, Android is a bit jack-of-all-trades and WP7 is... nowhere in particular.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:I wonder something else by aztektum · · Score: 1

      Now that they bought Nokia, the worlds largest handset maker, I'm sure they will.

      (this is a sardonic comment. i realize they did not actually *buy* the company.)

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    3. Re:I wonder something else by Motard · · Score: 1

      I have to wonder if WP7 will still be Microsoft's smartphone OS in 2015 or if they'll have moved to WP8.

      I have to wonder whether, in 2015, Microsoft will be in the phone software business at all.

      Microsoft is not known for strong initial offerings. The original IE was awful. The original Windows was unusable. They tend to stay in and fight, and sometimes win.

    4. Re:I wonder something else by rsborg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sure they will... they go in, they don't back out and admit it's a failure unless it's horribly obvious. I wager somewhere between Zune (extremely low) and Xbox (in the game, but not a huge winner) in popularity, probably more like the Zune being fourth after Android, iOS and RIM in some order.

      Perhaps the GP comment

      I have to wonder whether, in 2015, Microsoft will be in the phone software business at all.

      is really more about questioning Microsoft's future, not just the future of Microsoft's phone business. Recently, they just killed Zune... not because they didn't want to stay in, but because they're tightening their belt. Microsoft is facing mounting pressure from the Googles, Apples and Facebooks of this world, who are hungry and execute well. It may come time at some point that they really are forced to focus on what they do best... business desktop software. This could mean the (forced) abandonment of WP software, Bing, etc.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    5. Re:I wonder something else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They will as Nokiosoft phones!

    6. Re:I wonder something else by dimeglio · · Score: 0

      So if they didn't buy Nokia, which they didn't, MS will fail? MS has to overtake both Apple and the band of Android sets. However, I think there's a large enough market for everyone with quality products. If Microsoft is makes a quality product, it will sell. My predictions at this time are not like IDCs which smell of insider influence from MS.

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
    7. Re:I wonder something else by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is not known for strong initial offerings. The original IE was awful. The original Windows was unusable. They tend to stay in and fight, and sometimes win.

      With P/E chronically below 12, the market is clearly betting against Microsoft winning anything significant in the foreseeable future.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    8. Re:I wonder something else by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 2

      Nekrosoft?

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    9. Re:I wonder something else by hedwards · · Score: 1

      A typical P/E for companies in general is 16, the tech sector tends to have unreasonably high P/E ratios, if you actually look at the fundamentals, MS is a much better buy than Apple or Google, it just isn't buzz worthy anymore. Tech shares sell as much on ones dreams as anything about the company, which is why MS is selling for so much less despite being in a stronger position, they are dull as dirt.

      And at a certain point traders decide that a stock is only worth a certain amount of money and won't pay any more than that. Regardless of the profits that might be available. And for better or for worse, neither Apple nor Google have been called to account for their antitrust violations yet. Something that MS has to be mindful of even if they did escape with a slap on the wrist.

    10. Re:I wonder something else by whoever57 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It may come time at some point that they really are forced to focus on what they do best... business desktop software. This could mean the (forced) abandonment of WP software, Bing, etc.

      Microsoft can't afford to do this. In the past, Microsoft's success was enabled by owning the complete flow, from the proprietary exchange formats to the proprietary office document formats.

      But now, the "must have" is the smartphone. Hence Microsoft is playing on the other foot -- the Office and Windows have to play nice with the smartphones. But if Office and Windows play nice with smartphones, then other tools can interact with Office and Wndows, dramatically reducing the value of Microsoft's proprietary format lock-in.

      The personal computing landscape has shifted and Microsoft has yet to catch up -- and, indeed, may never catch up.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    11. Re:I wonder something else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Microsoft: Hello, IDC! Will we be in the smartphone business in 2015?

      IDC: I don't know.

      Microsoft: Oh right... here's $20,000

      IDC: No, you won't be

      Microsoft: Ok... $50,000

      IDC: Yes... you will be number one and everyone will love you.

      Microsoft: Thanks! Now let's go tell Steve B. and alert the media!

    12. Re:I wonder something else by SCPRedMage · · Score: 1

      Can I use it to raise an army of undead to do my bidding?

      And by bidding, I mean the dishes...

      --
      My sig can beat up your sig.
    13. Re:I wonder something else by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, microsoft only won once: DOS. After that, they just used that marketshare alongside some really shady business practices to push windows as the #1 OS. After they became filthily rich, their strategy has been fairly simple ... they push OEM manufacturers to bundle windoze with new computers, so that average joe considers windoze part of the computer, the default, and doesn't even consider anything else, they keep certain missfeatures, bugs, and some awful design issues in order to keep the huge fix-windows industry alive (overcrowded IT departments, anti virus/malware/spyware/whateverware, and the shitload of motherfuckers that make a living out of charging joe six pack 50 bucks to remove all the crapware he installed while trying to download porn), sliding money under the table for some high-level managers at fortune 500 companies, etc, etc.

      That's it. Everything m$ has done after that (that wasn't directly related to windows on x86) has failed.

      Microsoft has never had any kind of success in any new market. This will not be an exception.

      People is afraid to migrate, afraid to change, therefore they are still relevant in the x86 OSs business. Anything else is brand new and fair game for everyone, and m$ just can't compete on that, competition hasn't ever been one of microsoft's strongest points.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    14. Re:I wonder something else by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I have to wonder whether, in 2015, Microsoft will be in the phone software business at all.

      I have to wonder whether, in 2015, Apple will be in the personal computer business at all.

      And while we are being forced to wonder, I wonder what the IDC-predicted 3 to 1 market advantage of Android over iOS will do to the people who base their world-view on such things.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    15. Re:I wonder something else by AppleOSuX · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      LOL. SQL Server. Office. Exchange. You lose.

    16. Re:I wonder something else by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      See, the people that have dumbphones aren't interested in smart phones..

      .. but will end up with one anyway, because they don't really cost all that much more to make. Android has already reduced the software cost to $0.00. Please don't tell me you're betting on electronics(!) staying expensive. Today's $600 widget is $50 tomorrow and free with every box of Count Chocula the day after that.

      Dumbphones will go the way of word processing machines and PDAs. There just won't be a reason to make them, even if many people are satisfied by them, because the smartphone can serve both markets.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    17. Re:I wonder something else by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      iOS has Apple's cult following

      The problem with "cult followings" is that they are by definition limited in broader appeal. They also tend to be rather mutable. The world is littered with ideas and products that once had "cult followings".

      Apple's place in the history of handheld consumer electronics is certainly secure and quite rightly celebrated, but ongoing success is based on a complex set of variables. It is a mistake to believe that there will be no non-Apple innovation. If bringing a unique and innovative product to market first in its category guaranteed ongoing success, Apple computers would be on a much larger share of desktops today.

      In other words, it's pretty impossible to predict what the market share of anything will be four years from now.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    18. Re:I wonder something else by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      But if Office and Windows play nice with smartphones, then other tools can interact with Office and Wndows, dramatically reducing the value of Microsoft's proprietary format lock-in.

      Unless Office is interacting with Office on the smartphone. Some numbers somewhere say that they're making something like $20/handset for WP7. They could easily get that and more if they were to sell Word, Excel and Powerpoint Mobile for iPhone, Android and Blackberry. It would probably be much less of an effort than designing a phone OS, too.

    19. Re:I wonder something else by Drishmung · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Microsoft is not known for strong initial offerings. The original IE was awful. The original Windows was unusable. They tend to stay in and fight, and sometimes win.

      I find this statement telling. Because, a few (three?) years ago, I believe it would have been something like:

      "They stay in and fight, and always win in the end."

      Once, Microsoft was perceived as invincible. Once, if Microsoft entered your market you either tried to get them to buy you or else just gnawed your own leg off first (e.g. Novell and NetWare) because Resistance Is Useless.

      Now, Microsoft is not perceived as invincible. The world has indeed changed...

      --
      Protoplasm. Quiet Protoplasm. I like quiet protoplasm.
    20. Re:I wonder something else by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1
      Gee, I wonder if the "7" means there have been other MS smartphones...

      Were they any good?

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    21. Re:I wonder something else by sarhjinian · · Score: 1

      And this is the problem: no one cared that you could run Word or Excel on a smartphone. Heck, people barely cared that you could hack your Win32 code to run on WinCE that cost as much as a PC and ran a quarter as well. The Windows/Office ecosystem the extended neatly across desktops and servers doesn't work on phones.

      Microsoft, to their credit, finally got this in WP7. The question is: why choose WP7 over anything else? I mean, the only reason WM sold at all was that it had captive vertical-market buyers who needed to run Windows apps, or that it was free with your contract. For WP7, and in the era of Android, that isn't the case.

      --
      --srj/mmv
    22. Re:I wonder something else by markov_chain · · Score: 1

      The Windows/Office ecosystem the extended neatly across desktops and servers doesn't work on phones.

      How do you figure? If they had official Word/Excel/Powerpoint apps that let you edit (even in a limited way) they would be a hit. Just because it doesn't work now it doesn't mean it's not possible.

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    23. Re:I wonder something else by Crazy+Taco · · Score: 1

      RIM holds the business market, iOS has Apple's cult following, Android is a bit jack-of-all-trades and WP7 is... nowhere in particular.

      I have to disagree with that assessment.

      1. RIM does NOT hold the business market. RIM is very rapidly losing market share. In the first half of this decade, anybody who was somebody had a Blackberry (at least that was the perception, because Blackberry's were cool). Now, I see few people at work with a Blackberry, and the few that are left are just waiting for their two year contracts to be up. The same goes for most Win5.x or 6.x users, the other huge corporate player of yesteryear.
      2. Apple has more than a cult sized following in the phone market, although the rabidness of some fanboys does turn people off.
      3. Android is succeeding for a few reasons: a) free OS to vendors, b) being the latest, coolest thing, c) people are turned off by Apple fanboys, but perhaps most importantly, d) price and features. Android has some innovative ideas (swipe keyboard anyone), excellent voice recognition (thanks to GOOG411), and can be purchased on phones with bigger screens than iPhones, or lower priced devices than iPhones, etc.
      4. Microsoft may manage to succeed despite the odds against it. You say it is nowhere in particular, but I can think of a few advantages: who better to integrate the phone with entertainment devices than Microsoft, considering they already have XBoxes all over the place? I could see the phone being an XBox remote control, input device, or who knows what else. Also, who better to integrate with the enterprise than Microsoft, which has their software everywhere? Every time an Android update comes out I have to re-setup my corporate email because some security policy or something messes it up, but I bet Microsoft would not have that problem. And Microsoft ALSO has the best software development platform by far, which would encourage a lot of app writing if it can just gain some market share to go with it. So I think Microsoft has a real shot at this, as long as they get their butt in gear and make the most of their advantages.
      --
      Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
    24. Re:I wonder something else by mlts · · Score: 1

      Depending on how evil MS could be, they could make it where Exchange would have a bevy of new security features... but they would only work with WP7 and iOS phones. Doing this would effectively shoot Android's chances from ever getting a toehold in the enterprise. Most businesses rely on Exchange, and even Apple came crawling to Microsoft to make their devices compatible. All it would take is having a new server to mobile protocol, and that effectively would end any chance of any device MS doesn't allow in most businesses.

      Reverse engineering of the protocol? Patent laws to squash the commercial guys and DMCA laws to squash everyone else.

      Microsoft makes the rules with Exchange, and a significant majority of businesses out there toe the line. MS could take advantage of this and pretty much say its WP7 or the highway when it comes to the enterprise.

    25. Re:I wonder something else by sarhjinian · · Score: 1

      They had Word/Excel/PowerPoint on phones for seven or so years. It wasn't a hit because people will, at most, just use them to view existing documents, and you could have done that on a BlackBerry and gotten a better device in every way.

      People don't edit and create content on phones, by and large, or at least not the kind of content that's authored in Microsoft Word: Lobotomized Edition.

      --
      --srj/mmv
    26. Re:I wonder something else by Crazy+Taco · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Dumbphones will go the way of word processing machines and PDAs. There just won't be a reason to make them, even if many people are satisfied by them, because the smartphone can serve both markets.

      I would wholeheartedly agree with you, except for one thing: battery life. Unless that gets fixed, dumb phones will never go away. Most dumb phone users like the fact that their batteries last a week, and smartphones cannot fill that void at this time, nor do they appear likely to any time in the next few years. I'm betting that dumb phones, albeit with more features and possibly even running a bare bones version of Android under the hood, will continue for the next few years.

      --
      Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
    27. Re:I wonder something else by Crazy+Taco · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Visual Studio, .Net, IIS (which has become better than Apache after years of being worse), X Box, Office, SQL Server, Exchange, and probably many more. I should also like to point out that their keyboards and mice are some of the best around, especially the Microsoft Natural 4000. Is that as exciting as an iPhone? Maybe not, but I get more use out of it than my smartphone, and it is an excellent product.

      --
      Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
    28. Re:I wonder something else by Rufty · · Score: 2

      Word and Excel predate Windows. SQL server was from Sybase. And Exchange? Nope.

      --
      Red to red, black to black. Switch it on, but stand well back.
    29. Re:I wonder something else by pedropolis · · Score: 1

      At a P/E ratio of just over 10, Microsoft is historically low. Likely priced into that is the relative dearth of upcoming, impact product revenue streams. Windows 7 has peaked. Windows 8 is still a year or so out. Nextgen consoles are years away. The first fruit from the Nokia partnership, still to be determined. The P/E ratio reflects this. They are an entrenched company, large and powerful, but without mushrooming, new product lines - save the Kinetic.

      Apple has a P/E ratio of around 19. Still historically low from the perilous heights of the dot.com bubble and roughly in-line with a growth company (with upside to a ratio of 25). Their EPS are booming each quarter. They have potent new product cycles that are impacting bottom lines every 6 months (if the iPhone 5 launches in September, which would improve product spacing). They are currently searching for a way to leverage the popularity of iOS into the desktop environment and retain great margins across all product lines.

      Like Intel, Microsoft has flatlined. The growth is in area where Microsoft doesn't hold any substantial footprint, yet.

    30. Re:I wonder something else by Locutus · · Score: 1

      yes, it was a surprise when they finally killed MS Money, MS FlightSimulator, Kin, Zune and probably a few others which they have been willing to keep dumping billions into for years. Those moves showed that Microsoft is starting to find it hard to move money around and still make it look like Windows(desktop and server) and MS Office are not the only profit streams they have. We already know that $1.5 billion for the Nokia deal is just a start and it'll probably be another 2-3 billion over the next 2 years to shove WP7 into everyones face and maybe a few pockets. And it does not help one bit that now we're seeing standard news outlets like The Today Show talking about how the smartphone and tablets are replacing all kinds of devices including a desktop/laptop computer. This isn't a tech journalist with a GNU/Linux slant saying it, it's the GP news people. Microsoft does not sell upgrades or new software when people are looking outside of the Windows box for their solutions.

      Things like BING are costing them billions annually and they are going to be expected to produce a new Xbox before 2015 so we could very well see WPx canned before 2015 and see their revenue start dropping. IMO

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    31. Re:I wonder something else by fatwilbur · · Score: 1

      I'm also going to throw SharePoint in the list of MS products you've never heard of but are wildly successful. Having worked with a number of major corporate IT departments over the last few years, I've rarely seen such a fast adoption rate of a platform.

    32. Re:I wonder something else by AppleOSuX · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      > SQL server was from Sybase.

      And? Mac OS X was from NeXT was from BSD. Your point?

      Microsoft wins in more areas than just Windows.

    33. Re:I wonder something else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lower P/E actually means the company isn't over priced. For instance Amazon is over priced at 69 P/E. I would always put my money on a company with a reasonable price to earnings rather than an overpriced piece of crap that would lose it's value when investors realize the price isn't justified.

    34. Re:I wonder something else by yuna49 · · Score: 2

      Don't forget Outlook/Exchange. I still think the biggest draw for MS is making a phone that works seamlessly with Exchange. Word/Excel/PP is nice and all, but staying in sync with mail, calendars, etc., in the office while traveling is where MS will get the most leverage. From what I can tell Exchange is nearly ubiquitous in large and mid-sized enterprises. In terms of providing lock-in, it's more powerful these days than Office.

    35. Re:I wonder something else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Parent is right.

      No, microsoft only won once: DOS. After that, they just used that marketshare alongside some really shady business practices to push windows as the #1 OS.

      How to Get Your Platform Accepted as a Standard - Microsoft Style

    36. Re:I wonder something else by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 2

      Lower P/E actually means the company isn't over priced.

      Not really. Low P/E normally means a company is not expected to grow quickly.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    37. Re:I wonder something else by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      if you actually look at the fundamentals, MS is a much better buy than Apple or Google

      If you really think that then mortgage your house and load up with Microsoft shares, it's your funeral.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    38. Re:I wonder something else by yuna49 · · Score: 1

      I suspect the real target for Win7 phones is the Blackberry for exactly the reasons you state. A seamless, and as you suggest probably proprietary, handheld messaging device for business users on the Exchange platform is probably the last thing RIM wants to see come down the pike.

    39. Re:I wonder something else by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      younguns love the Xbox 360.

      Live is their in. If they can offer something compelling that ties in with Xbox, they will get people I bet.

      They have the start to wedge their way into an ecosystem, and since they are not a monopoly in web services, phones, or consoles, they can use that leverage without intervention.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    40. Re:I wonder something else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > But now, the "must have" is the smartphone.

      No, that was last year's 'must have', and Windows Mobile 6.x missed out because MS said that WP7 would be out 'any day now' all year.

      This year's 'must have' is a tablet. WP7 will never run on a tablet, MS guaranteed that. Windows8 is for tablets (and phones and PCs apparently). Who is going to buy a WP7 (WinCE based) phone when it is a dead end to be replaced by a completely new thing in a year (or two) and there will not be a compatible tablet (until the all new thing in a year or two).

      iOS is compatible with phone, tablet and PC. Android is phone and tablet, netbook and PC. Windows 8 will be all that and more in a year or two (or so claimed). Kin and WP7 are/were orphaned dead ends.

    41. Re:I wonder something else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not afraid of change and I think Linux on the desktop sucks. Most geeks I know feel the same way. Now mod me down.

    42. Re:I wonder something else by judeancodersfront · · Score: 1

      Xbox, Visual Studio, Sharepoint, Office, peripherals.

    43. Re:I wonder something else by kullnd · · Score: 1

      I have a work provided MS phone, on my second one. (granted not WM7) It crashes at least once per week, sometimes just drains my battery for no good reason at all, and is generally an annoying piece of crap... If those "features" were not enough, I can only sync with one of the two exchange servers that I use on a regular basis. Now lets look at my (cheaper) Android phone --- it runs well, doesn't do the equivalent of a BSOD when I try to answer a call, can sync to both of my exchange servers, as well as my goggle accounts (all with full calendar, contacts, and email), and still provides the needed wipe capability and forced time out password requirements. I don't find Microsoft's ability to make a phone that can work with exchange a feature lacking in other phones, hell, other phones do it better! I loose my windows phone this week, I can't wait --- and I will NEVER buy another WM phone --- I don't care what they promise... This comes from a person that uses MS products for almost everything I do.

      --
      +++ATH0 NO CARRIER
    44. Re:I wonder something else by judeancodersfront · · Score: 1

      And yet after all that Apple can somehow sell computers without Windows for over $1000. Have you considered the possibility that Linux is the problem and not M$?

    45. Re:I wonder something else by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Visual Studio, .Net, IIS (This bit needs to be fixed), X Box, Office, SQL Server, Exchange, and probably many more. I should also like to point out that their keyboards and mice are some of the best around, especially the Microsoft Natural 4000. Is that as exciting as an iPhone? Maybe not, but I get more use out of it than my smartphone, and it is an excellent product.

      Out of all of those, the only one not directly related to the Windows OS is the Xbox and it took six years of haemorrhaging cash to do that, with Nintendo proving that MS going after the "hardcore" (sorry I cant call console gamers that) wasn't where the money was this future is in doubt because they cant support their existing audience whilst going after the casual audience.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    46. Re:I wonder something else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      xbox was a success as well.

    47. Re:I wonder something else by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      Also, what happens when Steve J dies? Would Apple fanbois have followed Sculley wherever he would have led them?

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    48. Re:I wonder something else by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Dumbphones will go the way of word processing machines and PDAs. There just won't be a reason to make them, even if many people are satisfied by them, because the smartphone can serve both markets.

      That would highly depend on the price of the cheapest smart phones. Dumbphones are ridiculously cheap, my parents gone some with no carrier lockin for less than 30$ each. They dial, they text and beyond that they don't desire any features except clear sound and a good battery life. Sure, if you can get an Android phone for that but I don't think we're there yet...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    49. Re:I wonder something else by Dynamoo · · Score: 1
      I've been saying for a couple of years that RIM are in serious trouble, but that the problems have been masked by continuing strong sales figures.. it looks healthy on the surface, but underneath there has been very little real innovation until the introduction of QNX with the Playbook. Even basic things like introducing 3G take forever with RIM devices (e.g. the first BlackBerry Pearl with 3G was introduced last year.. I have one. It's crap).

      Now, clearly the biggest driver with WP7 is going to be whether Nokia can make a success of the new platform. Remember that Nokia's future depends on this, so they have no option but to pull their collective fingers out and show that market what they can do.

      --
      Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
    50. Re:I wonder something else by Dynamoo · · Score: 1
      Successful? Perhaps. Useful? No.

      I think it's very common that Sharepoint is set up by corporations and then largely ignored by actual users who see it as difficult to use and clunky. To be fair, other products have the same issue.. even "sexier" ones like Google Wave which sank without trace..

      --
      Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
    51. Re:I wonder something else by Dynamoo · · Score: 2
      First IBM seemed invincible with their mainframes.
      Then DEC seemed invincible with their minicomputers.
      Then Apple and Commodore seemed invincible with their microcomputers.
      The IBM seemed invincible with THEIR microcomputer.
      Then Microsoft seemed invincible with their operating system and applications.
      Then Yahoo seemed invincible with their web portal.
      Then Google seemed invincible with their search engine.
      Then Myspace seemed invincible with their social networking site.
      Then Apple seemed invincible with their smartphone.
      Then Facebook seemed invincible with THEIR social networking site.

      If one thing is certain, empires like this rise and fall. Sic transit gloria mundi.

      --
      Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
    52. Re:I wonder something else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple has more than a cult sized following in the phone market, although the rabidness of some fanboys does turn people off.

      Actually it's the emotional display that turns people off.

      You could technically define 'rabidness' by enthusiasm divided by product quality. So a statement like 'WinCE 6.5 is not that bad' might actually be more indicative of a 'rabid fanboy' then 'iPhone 4 is just fantastic!'.

    53. Re:I wonder something else by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Yep. I actually liked WM2003 and WM6.1

      WM2003 was quite powerful for its time, way better than anything Palm made, along with real multitasking and easy development in Visual Studio .NET
      WM2003SE was basically the same as WM2003 with nicer icons and VGA support, but felt not as stable as the previous Windows Mobile.
      WM5 was bad. Really bad. Only AKU3.5 was usable, but by then the WM6 beta was out and it was better.
      WM6.1 felt a bit dated, but still rocked in some aspects - the Microsoft Bluetooth stack in WM6.1 was way better than pretty much anything else. Even modern Android phones have it worse, not to speak of desktop Windows or iPhone.
      WM6.5 was superfluous and I don't care about Windows Phone.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    54. Re:I wonder something else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a WP7 user my initial thought was why would people want something that was basically useless that bad. But then I was prompted to think about WP8 and trends. If WP8 is as useless compared to WP7 as WP7 is compared to 6.5 then you'd have to be brain dead to want it. I'd have to think that unless they do something to make WP7 useful to business users or find a toe-hold in the iPhone/Android market then there is no future for MS in the phone business.

    55. Re:I wonder something else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time an Android update comes out I have to re-setup my corporate email because some security policy or something messes it up, but I bet Microsoft would not have that problem.

      For a long time now MS Exchange email has been working very well on iPhone, even after a software update would you believe. WP7 will need to offer more than that.

      And Microsoft ALSO has the best software development platform by far..

      Respectfully disagree completely (after 12 years of MS desktop development).

    56. Re:I wonder something else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know.. Sharepoint is a total disaster, which our devs are trying to boycott. Actually we have. Sharepoint installation is a great barometer of how idiotic an organisation is.

    57. Re:I wonder something else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have MS made back that $7,000,000,000 sunk into it? Only they could afford that.

    58. Re:I wonder something else by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Legally difficult: a) they have licensed ActiveSync, they don't give it away, so there are contracts in place. And b) probably breaks competition laws to exclude Android by name.

      Also competitively risky: smartphones have become a huge hit in the enterprise not because sysadmins like them (we like Blackberry much more because of BES) but despite our protests. If I go to my boss and say "I want to deploy Exchange 16. BTW, it'll break your iPhone and iPad" then I'm gonna get sent away with a flea in my ear.

      Oh, and of course, you do realise that Android has awful, awful Activesync support? They only started supporting enough of the existing security features in 2.3 for me to let people connect them to my Exchange server.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    59. Re:I wonder something else by SomeStupidNickName12 · · Score: 1

      "crashes at least once per week, sometimes just drains my battery for no good reason at all, and is generally an annoying piece of crap" sounds a lot of like my current iphone 3Gs

      "I can only sync with one of the two exchange servers that I use on a regular basis." sounds a lot of like my HTC desire running Android

      I can't believe you are actually trying to compare a windows mobile 5/6 device with a model equivalent.

    60. Re:I wonder something else by Laurence0 · · Score: 1

      What if you took a cheap Android phone and ripped out a good portion of the UI and massively underclocked the processor? You could call it a dumbphone and yet it would be exactly the same hardware at the cheap smartphone. Even better, you could have this as a software option, so you could use your phone as a smartphone most of the time, and flick it to dumbphone mode when you needed more battery life, but didn't care about the smartphone features.

      I don't know how much the underclocking and so forth would increase the battery life though... What are the main things that eat the battery when the screen's off? Whatever they are, I'm sure most of them could optionally be turned off.

      This assumes that the "cheap android phone" comes down in price to the same level as the generic dumbphone, which I think is still some way off.

    61. Re:I wonder something else by Laurence0 · · Score: 1

      I've noticed Blackberries becoming a lot less popular with the business drones (taken over by iPhones, as was said upthread), but where I have seen a lot of Blackberries is with teenage girls. Some of them are /really/ cheap with contracts these days (cheaper than Android phones, massively cheaper than iPhones) and a lot of them have keyboards, and given the amount teenage girls text, that works perfectly for them.

      Oh, and they've all got Blackberry Messenger accounts these days, despite the user IDs being something like 5876ISUD234...

    62. Re:I wonder something else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Facebook is working with MS, not opposed to them. But most other companies are opposed to MS.

    63. Re:I wonder something else by Vectormatic · · Score: 1

      don't know how much the underclocking and so forth would increase the battery life though... What are the main things that eat the battery when the screen's off?

      my HTC desire claims that since this morning, 70% of the battery usage was because of cell standby and background tasks (and only 3% because of the 20 minutes of angry birds on the tram), now this includes running google talk, whatsapp and mail/calendar synching. With this usage pattern i can probably go 36-40 hours between charges.

      Take a phone with a smaller screen (wouldnt need a 3.7 inch 800*480 screen on a low end android "dumbphone", think of the 2.4" 240*320 on the wildfire), and turn of the 3G radio and all synching/app functions, and your android phone should last a whole lot longer

      --
      People, what a bunch of bastards
    64. Re:I wonder something else by mlts · · Score: 1

      They wouldn't have to exclude Android by name; they just license their new and improved secure ActiveSync protocol only to Apple and no others.

      The PHB types tend to go for iPhones and Blackberries. BES handles the backend for those devices, so MS excluding everyone else from the game but themselves and Apple.

      You are completely right about Android's lack of Exchange support (especially security profiles, encryption, and such.) Apple's devices encrypt all the data, while Android devices tend to lie to the Exchange server about capabilities. Of course, this would be easy to solve -- EncFS+FUSE is one way because this allows for file by file encryption. LUKS is another way, and completely encrypting the SD card would provide more than adequate protection.

      Of course, Android's Exchange support (or lack thereof) is somewhat easily worked around -- apps such as NitroDesk TouchDown fully supports encryption, profiles, remote wipes, and the other items needed for enterprise security.

    65. Re:I wonder something else by Grizzley9 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Outlook/Exchange. I still think the biggest draw for MS is making a phone that works seamlessly with Exchange.

      My gmail/calendar/contacts seem to work fairly well on my iPhone using exchange...
      Google Sync

    66. Re:I wonder something else by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      I've noticed Blackberries becoming a lot less popular with the business drones (taken over by iPhones, as was said upthread),

      You must be seeing CXOs. They want the iPhones for board room bling (Protip: Try to get them to settle for a BB Torch) but for the most part Blackberries don't seem to be going anywhere in businesses, which now with the threat of having to administer iPhones looming, I'd say is a very good thing.

      Blackberry's strong point in the teenage girl market is that BB Messenger is the second most important thing to Facebook for maintaining a social life.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    67. Re:I wonder something else by john82 · · Score: 1

      What was the last thing from M$ that was going to eat Apple's lunch? That's right, the Zune! How's that working out for them?

    68. Re:I wonder something else by Laurence0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that was pretty much my thought. I get about 36 hours out of my Desire too, but I wouldn't trust the battery usage thing, it keeps blaming it all on Google Maps, even when I've not been using it.

    69. Re:I wonder something else by Vectormatic · · Score: 1

      do you have GPS enabled? google maps might be running in the background constantly updating your location etc...

      --
      People, what a bunch of bastards
    70. Re:I wonder something else by AppleOSuX · · Score: 0

      > Microsoft have not done well where they cannot use the Windows lock-in.

      Utter bullshit. Office is selling like hotcakes on the Mac platform now that Apple is selling more computers. (Oh and Apple purchased a ton of technology from other companies in order to continue developing them in house. For shame! They must be talentless hacks!)

      > which Microsoft purchased from others...

      Can you guys pick the point that you're trying to make please? You start off talking about how Microsoft purchased technology from others (GASP! nobody does that!) and then you go on to say how _it's only because of Windows hegemony that any of their products do well_. Can you say non-sequitur?

      Besides that...you say they purchased Word and SQL Server fairly early on...Why don't we go over the feature list of each of those products back when they were purchased and then see how much Microsoft has added to them to make them the products they are today. These products are excellent by their own right and if there were no Windows, they'd be kicking ass regardless of what OSes were available. If you think otherwise then you've probably never used them for anything serious.

    71. Re:I wonder something else by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      But if Office and Windows play nice with smartphones, then other tools can interact with Office and Wndows, dramatically reducing the value of Microsoft's proprietary format lock-in.

      I don't necessarily see how this follows -- it feels like you skipped a ???? step and went on to profit.

      That being said, the APIs for interacting with Office and for writing plugins etc. for Office have been pretty good for a few years now, so maybe what you're waiting for already happened and no one outside of the custom business application world cared that much.

    72. Re:I wonder something else by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      I didn't even mention GNU/Linux, bad troll, 0/10.

      Also, you appear to suffer from Judaism, what a horrible, horrible disease.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    73. Re:I wonder something else by AGoldenEagle · · Score: 1

      In 2015, Microsoft will enter the Tablet OS race with Win14 Tablet edition and IDC will predict microsft to be the leading tablet OS by 2020.

    74. Re:I wonder something else by node+3 · · Score: 1

      iPhone supports Exchange. I assume Android does also.

    75. Re:I wonder something else by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the GP's claim was that MS only ever won with DOS, and everything else stems from that, including Windows and the rest.

      Also, he said "new market". If MS buys a successful product, they aren't winning a new market. Seriously, go back in time and erase DOS from history and MS becomes just another standard software company, on par with modern day Corel or Adobe.

    76. Re:I wonder something else by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Windows -> DirectX -> Xbox.

    77. Re:I wonder something else by node+3 · · Score: 1

      I have to wonder whether, in 2015, Microsoft will be in the phone software business at all.

      I have to wonder whether, in 2015, Apple will be in the personal computer business at all.

      Only an idiot would wonder this. Macs are very profitable, and Apple isn't just going to abandon its users (which includes Apple itself) to Windows.

      Apple will only ever stop making PCs when people stop buying them. Mac sales have been increasing for years now, ahead of overall industry growth (sometimes even growing while the rest of the market contracts).

    78. Re:I wonder something else by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Mac sales have been increasing for years now

      Their desktops? I'm not talking about portables now, but actual desktop computers that can be used for making stuff. Not PDAs.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    79. Re:I wonder something else by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Mac sales have been increasing for years now

      Their desktops? I'm not talking about portables now, but actual desktop computers that can be used for making stuff. Not PDAs.

      iMac sales are strong. But I'm not sure what your distinction has to do with anything. MacBook Pros are very useful for "making stuff" and aren't PDAs. You really are an idiot.

    80. Re:I wonder something else by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      MacBook Pros are very useful for "making stuff" and aren't PDAs.

      I agree. I'm an owner of a 17" Macbook Pro and a Mac Pro (my third).

      My concern is that Apple will choose to place their desktop and laptop computers behind the same walled garden at the iPhone/iPad. A year ago, I believed that would never happen. Today, I believe it will absolutely happen. In fact, I'm convinced that the next major revision of the Mac OS (OSXI) will be severely restricted in the ways you can get software. It will be done in the name of making it a "better user experience".

      I don't believe Apple is serious about the professional computing market at all any more. How old is OSX now? What was the last major innovation Apple has brought out for their professional computers (and I mean "professional" in application, not in quality). I produce music for films for example, and by axing Firewire, Apple took a large portion of their computer catalog off the table for me. If you look at the pro-quality AD/DA converters like the Apogee line, you'll see they only make Firewire. I teach as well and used to recommend Mac laptops for my students. I can't do that as easily any more. It's the same for video producers. Sure, they kept it on their "Pro" stuff, but by creating these tiers they're starting to say "These computers are for making stuff and these aren't so much". And the Mac Pro is just not a big money-maker for Apple any more.

      There was a time that you'd find a Mac in every single professional music studio, and it would be running Pro Tools (or Logic). Today, you are much more likely to see PCs in studio control rooms and editing suites talking to Windows or Linux boxes in racks back in the server room.

      I realize that musicians and video producers are a small part of the computer market. It's not that I blame Apple for deciding that focusing on consumer stuff is more profitable. And the handheld, walled garden stuff is most profitable of all. Fair enough, but they'd be walking away from a sector that put them on the map to begin with, in artists. It's a similar situation with the education sector. Apple used to be everywhere, with reps on campus and people from Cupertino involved in all sorts of innovative efforts to be involved with education from K-12 to higher ed. I'm on the technology steering committee at my institution and have been for 15 years. The change in Apple's attitude toward higher ed is marked.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    81. Re:I wonder something else by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Apple hasn't "axed FireWire". They only sell three computers (MacBook and the two MacBook Airs) without FireWire. They just updated their Pro notebooks with Thunderbolt, which can actually *replace* FireWire, and they all include FireWire 800 as well. Lack of FireWire does not make a computer unsuitable for creative work.

      Your posts always show a sense of exaggerated self-importance. Just because *you* can't use a computer professionally without FireWire does not mean that's universal. Also, just because Apple sells *some* models without FireWire (actually, FireWire only became universal on Macs around the time when the iPod was FireWire only and when consumers used video cameras with FireWire. The former hasn't been the case for many years now, and the latter is almost irrelevant). Even Apple's cheapest computer has FireWire 800.

      Apple is not going to lock down Mac OS X, nor will they axe it in favor of a notebook/desktop version of iOS. They can't and it doesn't make any sense. The Mac, with a proper desktop OS, will exist for as long as people want them. The day they announce that Macs will *only* run software from the Mac App Store is the day millions of Mac users will leave the Mac. Apple just simply can't do that.

      There are a lot of things that have to happen between now and then that haven't happened. If that changes, then your fears can have some merit. Until then, it's just senseless fantasy.

    82. Re:I wonder something else by Laurence0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I don't really understand why BB Messenger caught on to quite the extent it did - what does it offer that any of the alternatives (texting, MSN, Facebook chat, etc) don't? There just seems to have been a sudden mass adoption of it, and that rarely happens...

    83. Re:I wonder something else by juasko · · Score: 1

      Lets hope they wont.

    84. Re:I wonder something else by juasko · · Score: 1

      You fail to realize that companies running Windows, will want windows phones. No matter if there is a better option out there. But If they get office integrated the enterprise market will just swallow the win mobiles.

      But yes before that you need the basics to work also.

    85. Re:I wonder something else by Laurence0 · · Score: 1

      No, I checked into that when it first started happening... I thought it might have been an app I'd installed recently, but it carried on doing it even after I'd uninstalled it.

      I've just checked again, actually, and it's now saying "25% cell standby, 25% bluetooth, 25% wifi, 25% phone idle", which sounds much more reasonable, so I think it must have been fixed in an update. That's in just over 4 hours and it's used 3% of the battery. I've not really used it at all today so far, but even that can't really explain the projected >100 hours battery life. I don't think the battery indicator is entirely linear.

    86. Re:I wonder something else by AppleOSuX · · Score: 0

      OK. Go back in time and erase the Mac from Apple, erase Linux from Linus and erase the American Revolution from the United States of America and see where all of them would have been.

      What an idiotic argument. Of course DOS gave Microsoft the push they needed to get started. That doesn't mean that Microsoft has not kicked ass in many markets since DOS.

    87. Re:I wonder something else by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Back in the early days when mobile Internet was a new thing and only a few early PDA-phones used it, BB messenger was integrated into the phone's OS and free (because RIM made deals with the carriers for free traffic to the BB messenger server) while SMS was even more insanely expensive than today. And now, like Windows, poeple are still stuck on BB messenger while better alternatives exist.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    88. Re:I wonder something else by judeancodersfront · · Score: 1

      It's a Monty Python reference.

    89. Re:I wonder something else by node+3 · · Score: 1

      His point is that MS's DOS success built the rest of MS. For comparison, Apple could have completely failed with the Mac and still succeeded immensely with iPod. The US needed a revolution, the same way MS needed DOS. Remove Walkman and PlayStation from Sony and they are still successful.

      Are you starting to get it yet?

      Without DOS, MS would still be around today, but they would not be the huge company they are now. If you can't grasp this, by all means call it "idiotic" and continue in your ignorance.

    90. Re:I wonder something else by AppleOSuX · · Score: 0

      Apple would NOT have succeeded immensely with the iPod because they wouldn't have had the money to do the R & D on it you fool.

      LOL Microsoft was already successful writing software for other platforms before and after DOS. I know you really want to keep exploring this fantasy because it gets your rocks off to imagine a world without Microsoft, but please, lets not throw out the common sense.

  5. Word Perfect 7? by kharchenko · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who thought this was an odd comparison?

    1. Re:Word Perfect 7? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, me too. I'm feeling old right about now. :)

    2. Re:Word Perfect 7? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      Word Perfect vs iPhone ... it's like Mohammed Ali vs anti-lock brakes, or Johnny Matthis vs Diet Pepsi...

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    3. Re:Word Perfect 7? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

      How is that even valid!? Diet Pepsi would totally kick the living snot out of Johnny Mathis!

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    4. Re:Word Perfect 7? by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who thought this was an odd comparison?

      When I first saw WP7 that's what I thought too. Word Perfect 7?

      Falcon

    5. Re:Word Perfect 7? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Johnny Matthis vs Diet Pepsi...

      Who is this Johny Matthis?

      More over, who is Diet Pepsi?

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    6. Re:Word Perfect 7? by mcn · · Score: 1

      windows phone is a silly name... i rather they call windows mobile

    7. Re:Word Perfect 7? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      Diet Pepsi? Nah, not a chance; Mathis would annihilate the Diet Pepsi. Now, if it were Crystal Pepsi, it might be a fair fight. And if it were Crystal Pepsi poured onto a bowl of Mr T Cereal, that would be an infinite win of awesome that would send poor Mr Mathis right to the funny farm.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    8. Re:Word Perfect 7? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

      And if it were Crystal Pepsi poured onto a bowl of Mr T Cereal, that would be an infinite win of awesome that would send poor Mr Mathis right to the funny farm.

      Unless he just had a can of Billy Beer that combo would even subdue Chuck F. Norris. Well, for a second

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    9. Re:Word Perfect 7? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      Billy Beer I'm not familiar with. If it was Camo Malt Beverage, though, I would run for the hills. That shit is so vile it would strip the paint right off of Chuck Norris's car and then drop kick him into the 19th level of hell. Really the can it is sold in is a wiser consumption choice, and that is after it has been emptied, reused as a urinal, drained, puked on, abandoned outside a 7/11 for a week, and then crushed in the hands of a homeless man who was looking to turn it in for scrap.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    10. Re:Word Perfect 7? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

      Billy Beer was a beer endorsed by Billy Carter, Jimmy's ne'er do well brother :-)

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    11. Re:Word Perfect 7? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I neglected to mention that I looked it up right after reading your message about it. Maybe my good friend will come over now and claim that I can't use wikipedia, either... :)

      For my own amusement I then checked to see if conservapedia had an entry for it; what I surprise when one of the returns from a search for "billy beer" was an entry called "liberal hate speech".

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  6. 2015? Why not 2050? by immakiku · · Score: 1

    As the summary mentions, 4 years is a long time range to be making such predictions. Who knows if there'll be a killer platform to come out or if Windows will scrap WP7 altogether?

    1. Re:2015? Why not 2050? by Solandri · · Score: 1

      2015? Why not 2050?

      Well duh. Because when they put their ruler on the chart and extended the line out all the way to 2050, it said Windows Mobile would have 200% of the market by then. Even they knew there was something fishy about that number.

  7. Netcraft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Going to need a confirmation from Netcraft before I believe that iOS is dying.

    1. Re:Netcraft by matt_gaia · · Score: 1

      Didn't Netcraft already confirm that BSD is dying though? By extension, you could say that iOS is dying, with the kernel being derived from BSD.

  8. Then in 2016 .... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Then in the year 2016, this forecaster will return to Earth from whatever planet he is in, once what he is smoking wears off.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Then in 2016 .... by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      "Wait! I saw you drop the dice! Why'd you pick them up right away?"
       
      "Well they kinda gave off another reading...Something about the world ending in 2014...not important heh heh these things aren't known for accuracy...you know how it is..."
       

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    2. Re:Then in 2016 .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then in the year 2016, this forecaster will return to Earth from whatever planet he is in, once what he is smoking wears off.

      AWESOME!!! Totally Agree!!!!

    3. Re:Then in 2016 .... by access_denied79 · · Score: 1

      Priceless.... Love this comment!

  9. Sillyness on both sides of WP7 fence. by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There's no reason to think it will overtake iOS at this point, in fact it's not doing all that well. Conversely - it's amusing people think MS has no chance in the smartphone market now (same way people mocked Kinect not too long ago). Never count someone with that much money out completely.

    1. Re:Sillyness on both sides of WP7 fence. by dstyle5 · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I heard about some silly 'Wii' thing Nintendo is coming out with, that thing will never catch on. Who would buy something where you wave a remote around to play and is called 'Wii'.

    2. Re:Sillyness on both sides of WP7 fence. by mangu · · Score: 1

      it's amusing people think MS has no chance in the smartphone market now (same way people mocked Kinect not too long ago).

      Where they the same people who mocked Zune?

  10. Is Informationweek owned by Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would explain this story!

    1. Re:Is Informationweek owned by Microsoft? by icebraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Uh, it's IDC who predicts that, not InformationWeek. The IW guy actually doubts the prediction.

      Further, Microsoft has stumbled badly with the first two system updates for its smartphone platform. First by delaying it for nearly two months, and second by bungling the actual delivery of the updates. Things are not going so smoothly for Microsoft. Heck, WP7 champion Joe Belfiore actually wrote a public apology to its WP7 customers about the whole update debacle.

      This is the platform IDC thinks is going to own 20.9% of the market in four years?

      I say fiddlesticks.

  11. Re:Thats balmer's pipe dream by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    What is he smoking in his pipe . . . ?

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  12. Naah I disagree by Haedrian · · Score: 1

    Let me tell you my prediction. Let me just grab my 10-sided dice, roll the numbers a bit and get back to you.

    I'm sure I'd get results which are just as precise.

    1. Re:Naah I disagree by jheath314 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They are so precise they even give the percentages down to the first decimal place... they're that good! I'd be impressed if they even got the ordinal rankings right over that stretch of time (1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc), even moreso if they could ballpark the percentages (30-ish %), but then again i suppose that's why I don't have people paying me to predict things.

      --
      Procrastination Man strikes again!
    2. Re:Naah I disagree by JonySuede · · Score: 1

      I will use my d100 and have estimate 10 times more precises than you ;)

      --
      Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
  13. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I have to wonder if WP7 will still be Microsoft's smartphone OS in 2015 or if they'll have moved to WP8."

    I wonder if iOS 4 will still be Apple's smartphone OS or if Android 3.x will still be Google's smartphone OS in 2012.

    Seriously, all operating systems go through major revisions. Microsoft just seems to make it more prominent in their branding.

  14. Crystal balls? by Tigger's+Pet · · Score: 1

    How can they possibly even attempt to make this sort of prediction and be taken seriously? In four years time there may be a totally new, undreamt of technology that has made mobile phones redundant. There may be a new vendor on the market who has come from nowhere with a proper Linux-based O/S and taken over everything. Who knows?

    Is it a seriously slow news day today or something? It's not April 1st for another 48 1/2 hours, so they're not playing us for April Fools.

    I especially like the line of "I love how even the "Others" category has 23 times more users than Symbian, which has been the dominant smartphone platform for the better part of a decade.". WTF else does he expect, as reported here - http://news.slashdot.org/story/11/03/28/0256210/Nokia---No-More-Symbian-Phones-After-2012 - if Windows phones are the replacement for Symbian, then it's fairly obvious Symbian will be no more - hands up if you keep a mobile for 4 years?

    1. Re:Crystal balls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do keep my cellphones for 3-4 years (nokia so far).

    2. Re:Crystal balls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There may be a new vendor on the market who has come from nowhere with a proper Linux-based O/S and taken over everything.

      You might as well add, "and flying cars" to that one.

    3. Re:Crystal balls? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      hands up if you keep a mobile for 4 years?

      A true computer geek never throws anything away. I've got PCMCIA Token Ring cards, ISDN cards with no drivers and enough Ethernet cables to reach to the Moon. I can't swing a dead cat around my head in our apartment without hitting some useless, outdated technology. But I could never throw any of that away. That's what landed Hans Reiser in the the slammer:: he told the cops that he threw away the back seat from his car. The cop smartly said, computer geeks never throw anything away. Case closed.

      Oh, and I have two Nokia cell phones from the Dark Ages that still work. I lend them out to folks who come on business to visit me. Those Nokias have been kicked, droped, folded, spindled and mutilated. But they still work.

      So keeping something, doesn't mean that you still actually use it.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    4. Re:Crystal balls? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I do keep my cellphones for 3-4 years (nokia so far).

      I've got you beat, at least through this week. I'm still using the Motorola V600 I got in 2004.

      I did finally overcome inertia over this past weekend, though, so I'll be retiring that old reliable in a few days.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  15. True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They can beat iphone 4 in year 2015

    1. Re:True by dimeglio · · Score: 1

      That's a certainty. Not sure MS will take over the iPhone 6 with their WP7. The iPhone 6 is due around then and WP 7 should be obsolete by 2015.

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
  16. IDC by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is a ridiculous speculation by IDC. From this article:

    IDC also hugely underestimated Android growth (again), predicting 24.6 percent market share by 2014. But Android already exceeded the projection in 2010 -- just months after IDC's forecast.

    Seems like they're pulling numbers out of a hat to me.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:IDC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Seems like they're pulling numbers out of a hat to me."

      I don't think so. I'm pretty sure they have to twist and lean to one side to reach the place where they're pulling their numbers from.

    2. Re:IDC by Americium · · Score: 1

      Seems like they're pulling numbers out of a hat to me.

      I'm pretty sure they are pulling numbers out of their ass.

    3. Re:IDC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like they're pulling numbers out of a hat to me.

      Look again, that ain't no hat...

    4. Re:IDC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a ridiculous speculation by IDC. From this article:

      IDC also hugely underestimated Android growth (again), predicting 24.6 percent market share by 2014. But Android already exceeded the projection in 2010 -- just months after IDC's forecast.

      Seems like they're pulling numbers out their ass to me.

      There - FTFY. ;)

    5. Re:IDC by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Like the lowest drawer of their desk? You're not making any sense!

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    6. Re:IDC by moonbender · · Score: 2

      Why would they be storing them in their donkey? You're not making any sense.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    7. Re:IDC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoever IDC is, how can you claim their prediction of 24.6 percent Android market share in 2014 is incorrect until 2014 actually rolls around? Who knows, Android might decline significantly in popularity, increase in growth spectacularly, or not even be around due to patent lawsuits.

    8. Re:IDC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole idea about predictions is how they *think* the market will react. They are not consulting with time travellers. Just because the market reacted better than expected doesn't mean they were completely wrong.

    9. Re:IDC by Starteck81 · · Score: 1

      Note to self, DO NOT shake hands with people from IDC.

      --
      "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed H
    10. Re:IDC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys do realize that IDC is a marketing firm which is funded in part by Microsoft. It could be that it is completely funded by Microsoft. Take whatever these guys say with a heaping cup of salt. Same goes for Gartner Group and many other "research" groups. Follow the money. Ever notice that Editor's Choice in magazine's are also the ones with full page ads? IDC and Gartner are the same, they just hide it better.

    11. Re:IDC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like they're pulling numbers out of a hat to me.

      Seems to me like they're pulling numbers out of somwhere else....

    12. Re:IDC by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Of course. Four years ago - early 2007 - no-one would have predicted ANY market share for Android. After all this OS was revealed to the public only in November of that year.

    13. Re:IDC by gmack · · Score: 1

      Seems like they're pulling numbers out of a hat to me.

      That's about normal for IDC. Just check out their Itanium predictions

    14. Re:IDC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting read:
      http://searchmobilecomputing.techtarget.com/news/1220209/BlackBerry-vs-the-world

      This is the predictions from 2006 about what today ought to look like. IPhone and Android are not mentioned. The predicted winner is Windows Mobile.
      So much for their predictions. :)

    15. Re:IDC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're both right. IDC are asshats.

  17. So, It'll only have taken 19 years. by Seumas · · Score: 1

    Word Perfect 7 came out in 1996. So by 2015, that'll mean it only have taken 19 years to overtake iPhone! Though, I don't really know how one is related to the other and I'm pretty sure they didn't foresee an "iPhone" even existing, as early as 1996.

  18. You know with enough forecasters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ..you'll get predictions for everything. Some of them will even be *correct* predictions...

  19. How much will they spend by isorox · · Score: 1

    Microsoft have a lot of cash reserves. If they spend it on buying companies like nokia, then yes, windows mobile will have a large part of the market on "I just want to make a call" phones.

    They'd have been better off buying RIM

    1. Re:How much will they spend by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Rim is now using QNX. They have a real grownup OS and no need for Microsoft. Unless you mean actually buy them unlike the bribing they did to nokia everyone is calling buying them.

  20. Utter Rubbish! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After all, everyone knows the world ends in 2012!

  21. History repeats itself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So it's going to follow the same path Zune took in overtaking iPod players?

  22. Zune Rules! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea, Windows Phones will overtake iOS and Android just like Zune killed the iPod and the original PCs sold like hot cakes... Sell your IDC stock while you're at it.

  23. Seems pretty accurate... by shish · · Score: 1

    ... if you're talking about the number of models of handset, and not about number of users

    --
    I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
  24. I love my WP7 by danparker276 · · Score: 1

    Just got my update today. Nothing can beat getting Xbox Cheevos on your phone.

  25. Re:Nokia/Walking by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 0

    Win7 phonez....

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  26. Last Mover by hhawk · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has one major advantage that they have used again and again. It's not their money, their technology but rather last mover advantage. They know how make bundles of technology introduced while other players have dominate market shares and take away those shares. They did it search, in word processing, spreadsheets, servers and they are working their way on gaming systems and others.

    They have the time and the money to get it right and the money to get out there. People are only locked into phones for a few years and that gives MS and their partners plenty of time to improve and extend their offering.

    Android will always suffer (in a VERY GOOD way) from being open source.. but not all will see that as a virtual. Apple is a closed garden. MS will walk the middle path more open that Apple but not as "open" as Android. They will integrate completely with all their services from Hotmail to office. This type of integration they have thought about and planned for years and they will make small marginal improvements until they win.

    That's assuming it do Zune.. or any of the other products they have canceled along the way. Can you say, "Bob."

    --
    http://www.hawknest.com/
    1. Re:Last Mover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are actually a first mover in this space. 97 I think was one of the first wince phones.

      Now one thing that could happen is apple falls out of favor. It plays on people liking fads. Android is filling the 'not apple' crowd very nicely. MS may get what you are speaking about and let others flesh out more of the market for them.

      Also Zune is basically canceled. They are not working on any new iterations. Makes some sense. The market for music only devices is going to get crippling smaller as more people start using smart phones.

    2. Re:Last Mover by fwarren · · Score: 2

      WTF Search?

      With up around 70% of the market is Google. With Yahoo at less than 20% and Bing at less than 10%. Microsoft has bought themselves in as the search engine for Yahoo and are still less then 25% of the market. How exactly did they beat the dominate technology company in search?

       

      --
      vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
    3. Re:Last Mover by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      They have the time and the money to get it right and the money to get out there.

      Time works against Microsoft as their engineering culture sinks further and further into dysfunctionality. Who cares about trying to achieve great things, much less hard slogging debugging work, when midyear review has no correlation between engineering success and career advancement? When rank and file employees are forced into a zero sum mutual backstabbing game trying to avoid that dreaded A/10? When the top management does the opposite of inspire by example?

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    4. Re:Last Mover by Microlith · · Score: 1

      Android will always suffer (in a VERY GOOD way) from being open source

      Google and the hardware vendors will always benefit from Android being selectively open source, but it's a black hole of open source that detracts from platforms that are far more open, diverse, compatible, and don't have so many elements of the OS controlled by a single organization that happily treats the open source community as second class citizens, allowing devices to ship with admitted rush job software they won't give to the AOSP for flaky reasons.

      Sadly, it's stolen time and interest from other platforms and left us with people posting ROM images on file sharing websites and confusing and poorly documented processes on forums.

    5. Re:Last Mover by tsm_sf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ballmer: "I want a Zune you can make calls from."

      Jobs: "I want a fucking star trek datapad, but awesomer."


      THAT is the problem with Microsoft.

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    6. Re:Last Mover by Drishmung · · Score: 1
      And the last time they did this successfully was...?

      By my reckoning, they did it with OS, Office and almost Servers. Almost because their servers never quite achieved the absolute dominance that OS and Office did.

      None of the others have dominated. None of the others have made any money. If, as a company, you measure success financially, then I can't think of anything else that they've done that has repaid the initial investment; certainly nothing like the OS/Office cash cow.

      In the 11 years since Ballmer became CEO, MSFT has declined from $56 (Jan 14 2000) to $25 (today); over the last 10 years the NASDAQ rose 30%---and MSFT fell 25%. Based on the last ten years of Microsoft's history then, your justification for predicting that they will dominate is...?

      --
      Protoplasm. Quiet Protoplasm. I like quiet protoplasm.
    7. Re:Last Mover by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I was willing to give them the benefit of the doubt with this one, but they just cancelled the Zune. Too bad really, the Zune HD was a nice piece of hardware. That was a failure on the sales front, not on the engineering front.

      So I think what happens is Microsoft is really good at marketing to businesses, but when it comes to marketing to average consumers, they have no idea what they are doing.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:Last Mover by cgenman · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting that all Google services, from Gmail to Google Voice, integrate well with Android. And there are a lot more people on Gmail these days than Hotmail. Plus while Office online compatibility is basically miserable, Google Docs has the potential to integrate with phones very well.

    9. Re:Last Mover by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      That was just awesome. I applaud you, sir.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    10. Re:Last Mover by hhawk · · Score: 1

      I'm a total Google Fanboy and yes I agree, but the article had Google still in the lead which I agree with.. it just has MS ahead of Apple..

      --
      http://www.hawknest.com/
    11. Re:Last Mover by hhawk · · Score: 1

      Eeek, meant to say Browsers...

      --
      http://www.hawknest.com/
  27. I wonder... by Rimbo · · Score: 1

    ...if the IDC "study" takes into account the effect of the AT&T - T-Mobile merger. Because if that occurs and there isn't a deluge of customers from T-Mobile to Sprint as a result, then the iPhone would be available for ... well, basically everyone except for Sprint customers in the USA, and you'd have to think that could only help the iPhone's market share.

  28. Microsoft projected to have 20% share -- by micheas · · Score: 1

    The assumption that the author seems to have made is that most phones will be smart phone in three years.

    If that holds true, and Nokia holds on to a 20% market share the "study" seems like reasonable speculation.

    Of course the assumption has a lot of issues, but it is not really assuming that iOS loses any share in the mobile phone industry, just that the mobile phone industry and smart phone industry will merge. If that happens, and that is a big IF, and Android is at over 40% other Linux phones at 20%, and Windows phone at 20% and iOS having half of the high end at 10% of the over all market seems like not too crazy of speculation. But, I wouldn't call that a win for Microsoft.

    1. Re:Microsoft projected to have 20% share -- by Junta · · Score: 1

      I suspect it's more likely that Apple would hold share as they release an 'iphone nano' or similar device for the 'coming from dumbphone' world than Nokia transforming *all* of their Symbian base to WP7.

      IDC seems to presume that Nokia is somehow bulletproof. This isn't logically reasonable. If Nokia is so secure, they accept such a drastic measure as the MS pact. We see a combination of some amount of desperation in the face of falling share to Apple/Android and MS trojan executives dictating that Nokia is going to bet their future on the last-place contender even though #1 would let them on for free. WP7 is not making inroads in the market, and combining an already declining Nokia with a non-starter MS platform seems like the worst of both worlds.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  29. We are predicting four years out? by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 2

    We are predicting four years out on a category of product that scarcely existed four years ago? And we say a product that has been out for six months should be in second place in four years? I am confident that the predictions are right, after all that website gives us three significant digits saying Windows 7 will have 20.9% of the market-share.

  30. The URL of the IDC "forecast" is by Jerry · · Score: 1

    here.

    All that is is missing is the Microsoft PR logo, like the one Gartner forgot to remove from one of their "reports" that MS paid for.

    From their "estimates" it appears that the Win Phone 7 will have to rise in marketshare as fast as the Symbian will drop. Not much chance of that happening since the WinP7 market share is reported on March 8th as "taking a dive": http://vista.blorge.com/2011/03/08/microsofts-windows-phone-7-market-share-takes-a-dive/

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  31. Information Week also said that by Phizzle · · Score: 1

    the year 2015 will be The Year of the ZUNE!

    --
    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
  32. My prediction by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 1

    My prediction (which is only slightly less speculative) is that Microsoft will buy RIM (maker of Blackberry) to keep themselves in the mobile phone game.

    1. Re:My prediction by Ironix · · Score: 1

      I doubt the Canadian government would allow that. Under the Investment Canada Act, a foreign purchase of a domestic company must provide a “net benefit” to the country. I somehow doubt Microsoft buying out RIM would benefit Canada in any way shape or form.

      --
      Still #1 -- Lonely Gay Geek
    2. Re:My prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If RIM isn't doing so well they'll probably allow it. Just keep it in Canada, which won't be a problem as I think Microsoft recruits a lot out of Waterloo.

    3. Re:My prediction by greed · · Score: 1

      You're confusing "benefit Canada" with "benefit the politicians who approve the purchase".

      OK, so sure, the former is the law and the latter is what would actually happen.

  33. Re:Ms Abandonment by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    They can't abandon WP7 THAT quickly, that would thoroughly trash the 18 month (random guess) dev cycle for win phones. I'd give them abandoning it in 2014 after a couple of crazed christmas attempts - but that still makes the article a joke.

    Oh wait - that's the point - the article is not supposed to be right, it's supposed to be a recursive mindshare generator. "Look, WinPhone7 is good because some article says so!".

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  34. This is definitely true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because InformationWeek is the pinnacle of accurate information.

  35. Re:Thats balmer's pipe dream by dimeglio · · Score: 1

    This just in: Steve Jobs leaves Apple to replace Ballmer as CEO of Microsoft.

    There, that should help MS' market share a little.

    --
    Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
  36. Re:Thats balmer's pipe dream by sltd · · Score: 2

    Mod grandparent down - that's goatse.

  37. Coincidentally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On that day, Satan will be skating to work.

  38. This is ridiculous by fredmosby · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows the world is going to end in 2012.

  39. Excellent by toadlife · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Also, see this.

    --
    I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    1. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying WP7 users are maggots?

    2. Re:Excellent by toadlife · · Score: 1

      Most people are.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
  40. WP7=Nokia by ylleKnaD · · Score: 1

    All they did was move the current world-wide market share of Symbian over to WP7. This means they are making two assumptions:

    1) Nokia will maintain its current smartphone market share in spite of WP7
    2) Nobody else will provide WP7 on their phones. Or if they do, new adopters will cancel out market share losses by Nokia

    1. Re:WP7=Nokia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize you're two assumptions are mutually exclusive, right?

  41. And in other predictions by rossdee · · Score: 1

    The world will end in Dec 21, 2012

    1. Re:And in other predictions by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, we'll have a service pack for the Mayan calendar before then.

  42. In cell phone years that is several lifetimes by Moof123 · · Score: 1

    Need we ask what the pundits predicted for the iphone looking 4 years out this early in it's life? Sure seems to me that in the technology arena that 4 years is WAY too early to make big predictions, heck in 4 years MS could be bankrupt and Apple could have been split up over antitrust issues.

    Oh well, anything to fill the pages in between the ads of you magazine...

  43. Color me shocked by metalmaster · · Score: 1
    Do these predictions really surprise anyone anymore?

    Lets break it down a bit
    • There are maybe 10 manufacturers that produce 1-5 phone models using Android OS. 2 or 3 manufactures are gearing up to produce tablets intended to compete with the iPad
    • A wikipedia article shows a list of devices present and future developed by 4 manufacturers
    • Apple has 3 devices of past and present generations that utilize iOS

    Im pretty sure I can go find a kid in grade school who can show you that Android > Windows Phone > iOS. Do we really need these predictions every other week?

    1. Re:Color me shocked by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      Just be careful not to use the same one IDC hired...

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  44. Re:Thats balmer's pipe dream by vivek7006 · · Score: 1

    That link has now been altered to goatsex. Do NOT click! Mod Parent Down

  45. Wat by atari2600a · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one that noticed that they're both 2nd-rate next to the 45% android prediction?

  46. Check out IDC's recent predictions by Tangential · · Score: 1

    I don't pay a lot of attention to IDC's forecasts. In mid 2010 IDC gave an authoritative forecast of 7.6M tablets sold worldwide for 2010. http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS22345010 They completely missed that. Why should they be any more accurate on the Windows phone (or anything else for that matter?)

    --
    Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But then I repeat myself. -- Mark Twain
    1. Re:Check out IDC's recent predictions by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe your post would be more powerful if you actually listed the number of tablets sold instead of leaving us googling for it, wondering if it was lower or higher and by how much. Yeah, I googled for it, took a few minutes since I needed the correct terms to hit upon it. 20 million tablets sold in 2010.

    2. Re:Check out IDC's recent predictions by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Which is kind of right, actually, since the 7.6 million number was considered completely ridiculous at the time.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  47. They wish by khraz · · Score: 1

    Yes, WP7 AND WinMobile at 20%... including 0.5% WP7 and 19.5% WinMobile.

  48. Re:Ms Abandonment by Jerry · · Score: 3, Informative

    They abandon Kin six weeks after launch.

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  49. Oh come on now! by vorlich · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows that 2015 is already earmarked as the year of the Linux Desktop!

    --
    Posts, MyBio or Sig, may contain satire, sarcasm, bolded nouns be sardonic or even witty & be Church of SD
    1. Re:Oh come on now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone knows that 2015 is already earmarked as the year of the Linux Desktop!

      Because in 2015 only hopelessly out of touch luddites will still be using desktops

      /me ducks

    2. Re:Oh come on now! by judeancodersfront · · Score: 1

      Luddites and people that edit photos, type papers, use tax prep software, use business software. Basically everyone who uses a desktop today.

  50. Re:Ms Abandonment by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Nah,

    I think it's on the Zune track.

    Just enough to be able to say random things for three years and annoy Paul Thurrott.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  51. Re:Please don't link to xkcd "comics". by taktoa · · Score: 1

    They're not original. They're not funny. They're not even particularly insightful in any way. Please don't think that they are.

    Funny is subjective. Please don't think it isn't.

  52. Kinect Phone by w0mprat · · Score: 3, Funny

    As soon as Microsoft puts Kinect-like functionality in a phone or tablet, Android, iOS and others will have nothing to counter it. .

    WP7 was a great attempt and was very slick and new which briefly made iOS and Android look old news at the time. But it was too little too late into a saturated smartphone market.

    Kinect sold ten million in a few months - outselling all ipods iphones and ipads and being extremely impressive for any new technology release. But we're all still so obsessed over shiny smartphones that we're ignoring Microsoft's meteoric sucess with Kinect and failing to talk about the obvious next move from MS. Kinect is, quite frankly, is a real revolutionary change in interfaces. Something which it owns and it's competitors don't. Multi-touch was more an evolutionary gimmick wrapped in masterful marketting hyperbole. It's cute, but touch screens have been around a long time and are stupendously overrated: ultimate your hands are in the way of the display.

    This is all if Microsoft actually gets it's shit together of course, something it's competitors have been doing better the last 9-10 years. If it does, it suddenly makes Windows mobile getting more market share entirely plausible.

    One things for sure, gaming on smartphones is underwhelming - Apple sure isn't doing it right. Microsoft has proven sucess with gaming.

    (Grips his android phone a little tighter)

    --
    After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    1. Re:Kinect Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      How does motion control work for portable electronics? Does proud Johnny Doe stop walking, put the phone down in the middle of the sidewalk, take 10 paces, and then start waving his arms before screaming across to his phone?

    2. Re:Kinect Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What exactly is "Kinect-like functionality" that could be put in a phone or tablet? They're devices you hold in your hand - they're tactile, driven by touch. Why would Microsoft having a gaming system that is driven without touch have any affect on phone sales? Why would most consumers clamor for it? How on earth would you drive a device in your hands without your hands?

      Kinect sold in those numbers because Microsoft has an obscenely large number of Xboxes in homes already. The attach rate (number of games bought with Kin) is horrifyingly low. Sure, it's because there aren't many games OUT yet for it. But the point is, Microsoft better get more titles out for it soon, or Kinect becomes shelfware in consumer homes. Kinect was rumored to cost over $150 to make, and sold for, yes, $150. Meaning Microsoft had to sell way more than one game per unit to recoup their sunk costs... that hasn't happened. Yet. Just 1. That's how many games were sold on average with each Kinect. That's not meteoric success.

      Windows Mobile. Danger. Massive. Kin. You're assuming, of course that there is any sort of real strategy at Microsoft these days other than, "throw another couple billion on the fire and see if you can come up with another Office or Windows."

    3. Re:Kinect Phone by Devil · · Score: 1

      Although Microsoft wasn't the first to market with motion-controlled games (see: Nintendo Wii), they did capture the market by building a next-generation motion control system. Have we seen any hints in WP7 that Microsoft has created anything but an also-ran in the smartphone space?

    4. Re:Kinect Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As soon as Microsoft puts Kinect-like functionality in a phone or tablet, Android, iOS and others will have nothing to counter it.

      Microsoft didn't develop the technology behind Kinect, they've licensed it from a company called PrimeSense, who is offering the same deal to anyone else who wants to come along and take it.

      And IMO, a 3d screen with stereoscopic cameras front and back is more attractive as a smartphone or tablet feature than any of the Kinect functionality.

    5. Re:Kinect Phone by Jackmon · · Score: 1

      Obviously you hold the phone with your penis.

    6. Re:Kinect Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "As soon as Microsoft puts Kinect-like functionality in a phone or tablet, Android, iOS and others will have nothing to counter it. .

      WP7 was a great attempt and was very slick and new which briefly made iOS and Android look old news at the time. But it was too little too late into a saturated smartphone market"

      Really...? Well, truth be told, I have all three devices in various form factors and I recently acquired the Galaxy Tab after I traded in my Win7 phone for it. Frankly the 'slick and new' interface was just plain irritating and had altogether put me off. When I wanted to trade it in, most places would not even accept the phone as the demand and the hype about the OS had long since evaporated...I predict a fairly quick and very painfully public death for the OS, another 'failed venture' for the software giant, that its PR machine would quickly cover up. It has lost its 'cool factor' even before it really gained any foothold in the smartphone market...and nobody wants to seem like a dork holding one of these.

      Not only that...most development environments (besides those of its parent company, obviously) are shunning the platform or not developing for it. iOS and Android are currently all the rage, as far as developers are concerned.

      Finally, I was initially very excited about Kinect, but I eventually did not purchase it...it is revolutionary no doubt, but ultimately a novelty. I debated long and hard about this, but I have yet to be convinced that it too would not start gathering dust, just like my Wii. But truth be told, if it does catch on, I can just guess that while MS would develop it, others - Apple, Google, Sony, Nintendo - would ultimately perfect the technology - again, probably not for smartphones.Think about what you are saying...Kinect for the phone and tablet? C'mon...what kind of tool would prance up and down in front of a 4 inch phone? interact with a phone a la Kinectmals...while on the subway/metro?

      IDC will say anything you demand as long as you sponsor them. I mean, truly, its 'you pay, you dictate'. simple as that. By 2015? That's convenient...why not predict the demise of iOS or Android altogether by 2020?

    7. Re:Kinect Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because a Kinect-equipped device, with a real 3D projector would finally put a head around my dick while I masturbate. And no turtleneck coolness can beat that.

    8. Re:Kinect Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely not full-body kinect, but something which can recognise particular hand gestures might be kind of neat.

      If only because it'd be cool to get on a train and see a dozen people playing air-saxophone to their phones.

    9. Re:Kinect Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. The amount of processing power required to perform "Kinect" like features won't be on a 1W phone for at least a 5 years, if not more.
      2. A lot of people bought the connect (including me). How many are actually using it (not me). How many would buy it again (not me!)
      3. Games on apple- they seem to be doing something right. Their sales are way above anyone else by a large margin. I'd love to fail at business and become that rich

  53. Re:Ms Abandonment by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

    it only took, what? 1 month? to abandon Kin.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  54. Forecast Benchmarking by mevets · · Score: 1

    I found a reference where IDC claims that their forecasts are right 70% of the time - without any clear definition of right. In general weather forecasting is about 61%.

    Does anybody do actual vs forecast benchmarking for these guys? I know the register had a long running gag about IDC's itanium forecasts http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/02/17/itanic_oracle_idc/page1.html is a good example. Is it because it feels like bullying to roll them over on this?

    1. Re:Forecast Benchmarking by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Well, if that claim is one of their forecasts... it could be wrong, you know ;)

  55. IDC are morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, WP7 & WinMobile will have a market share of 20.9% four years ahead. Not 21%, not around 20% or ca. one fifth, not 20.90%. Nope, IDC can accurately predict with an precision of +/- 0.1 percent. Around here you would fail high school with such a claim.

  56. Iphone beaten by Windows Phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iDoubtIt

  57. WP7 predicted to beat iPhone by 2015 by carbonUnit42 · · Score: 1

    At what - checkers??

  58. Re:Please don't link to xkcd "comics". by SCPRedMage · · Score: 2

    That would most certainly NOT be funny.

    Now, if you were wearing a clown suit...

    --
    My sig can beat up your sig.
  59. Bring Clippy Back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe MS will have better luck with that.

  60. Why predict +4 years? by kirkb · · Score: 2

    Most people here are focusing on what this prediction claims (great market share for WP7 in four years), but can anybody explain why they're making this prediction?

    I understand that in various industries, long-term projections are a valuable tool for suppliers, investors, and more. But in a business with 6-month product cycles, what's the value in predicting so far out? Who uses this information? How? When you consider that each and every cycle brings uncertain results, there's a huge accumulation of uncertainty when you're predicting what will happen 7 or 8 cycles from now.

    I'd love to hear a statistician or researcher's thoughts on this.

    --
    Slashdot: come for the pedantry, stay for the condescension.
    1. Re:Why predict +4 years? by konekoniku · · Score: 2

      From having worked with similar data and consulted companies that purchase similar data, I can tell you that no one in the business seriously relies on IDC's (and Datamonitor, iSuppli, DisplaySearch, etc.'s) precise long-range forecasts at face value. However, these forecasts are still developed for several reasons.

      1) Firms have to take a long-term view with regards to certain investments. I don't know this particular business well-enough, but e.g. firms may have to make go-no-go decisions on expanding existing manufacturing capacity or breaking ground on new factories. These could easily amount to $300mm decisions, which require some idea of the long-term growth trend. However, you don't need that much precision in these long-term forecasts -- typically for long-term forecasts like this, corporate strategy teams would be interested primarily in the overall trend and the order-of-magnitude only (e.g. will the market be $300M in 5 years? $3B? or just $30M?). Most large firms that use this data will have internal strategy teams developing similar forecasts based on internal sales data (which IDC will rarely have access to, and have to estimate), their own corporate intelligence (competitor channel checks, etc.), data on competitors' manufacturing capacity build-outs, etc. to provide a sanity-check, and they are aware that any data in the tech industry past 2-3 years out is (at best) useful for order-of-magnitude estimates only.

      2) Even if this particular industry doesn't rely as much on long-term forecasts (e.g. I don't see why a factory churning out Android phones can't be quickly reconfigured to churn out WP7 phones), these data providers typically have long-term contracts that require them to provide forecasts out X years for Y number of product categories, to a Z level of detail. So if they're providing 5-year forecasts for semiconductors or LCD demand by manufacturer, for example (very reasonable considering the large capital investments and high retooling costs in those sectors), for the sake of consistency they'll also develop 5-year forecasts for smartphones by operating system. Similarly, mobile phone manufacturers will want at least a 5-year forecast for the overall smartphone market (to know how much total smartphone capacity to build out), and for the sake of consistency they'll also provide a breakdown out to that 5-year period.

      In short, no one who really works with the data needs the level of precision implied by the article, but to generate any forecast you need some quantitative model that will provide a "best" estimate, so that's the estimate these firms are reporting. The fact that error bars get (exponentially) larger the farther out you go is already well-understood by any serious user.

    2. Re:Why predict +4 years? by konekoniku · · Score: 1

      If anything, Datamonitor is the most egregious -- they'll provide forecasts out to 2030 (!!) or something ridiculous like that.

    3. Re:Why predict +4 years? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what's the value in predicting so far out?

      To persuade people to "exploit" the prediction. If Platform X is the future, a developer hears "you should develop for Platform X because that's where the users are" and a user hears that's where the future apps will be.

    4. Re:Why predict +4 years? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > in a business with 6-month product cycles

      Microsoft is working to a 3 year product cycle, just as it has for all its products, and still thinks that it can stall the market, as it did through the 80s and 90s, with vapourware announcements about what they will have in a year's time (or two).

    5. Re:Why predict +4 years? by cgenman · · Score: 1

      I'm not a statistician or current researcher, though I did usability research (and some market research) for years.

      IDC Sells reports about markets to Managers who need "facts" to convince boards to go with their impulses. WAG predictions like this grab headlines, and therefore sell more reports. It's marketing, pure and simple.

      Most paid market research houses are actually pretty accurate about the stuff they charge for. If there was any accuracy or value to the information, they wouldn't have given it away as self-promotion.

      - C

    6. Re:Why predict +4 years? by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      Because in 6 months people would remember the forecast while in 4 years nobody will give a shit.

    7. Re:Why predict +4 years? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      2) Even if this particular industry doesn't rely as much on long-term forecasts (e.g. I don't see why a factory churning out Android phones can't be quickly reconfigured to churn out WP7 phones),

      I don't think it's that easy to switch. The factory is of course not the problem: they just solder components together and install software on it.

      The organisation behind it, that's the problem. It will take significant time and effort to switch software engineers from Android to WP7. They have to learn a new environment, with its specific quirks and features. They will probably also have to switch to a new programming language. They may pick it up fast, it's still not instant or easy. And for many years the company will have to continue to support the legacy system. There may be a six-month cycle in this market, many models remain for sale for much longer than that (this cycle's high end is the next cycle's mid end), and remain in use for years after having been sold.

      The market place is also an issue, nowadays mobile phones live or die with the availability of third-party apps (partly what keeps Windows alive too). If a market share is too small, it may fail to get enough critical mass.

      And finally IP rights may be an issue. Google I understand is very liberal in its licensing, Microsoft tends to be pretty restrictive.

      All in all switching operating systems is not that easy, even if it doesn't really matter for the factory itself. So choosing which one to go for is a strategic decision that should not be taken lightly.

    8. Re:Why predict +4 years? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? They are still using a crystal bill.

  61. No problems here by Trogre · · Score: 2

    I see no problems with this happening, so long as both are close to irrelevant and Android has the biggest market share. I would call that a likely scenario at this stage.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    1. Re:No problems here by spinkham · · Score: 1

      If I had to make a prediction, the iPhone will go up in numbers in use, but down in total smartphone marketshare, as Android gobbles up the low end. At the high end, iOS will still have a large market share.

      Personally, I'm invested enough in iOS software that I'm not switching anytime soon, even if Android hardware became 4x faster then Apple hardware tomorrow..

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
    2. Re:No problems here by jimicus · · Score: 1

      That's a possible scenario but I don't think it's a desirable one.

      We've seen what happens to technology when there's no serious competition for years. It's called Internet Explorer 6. It's called Windows XP. It's called Office versions 97-2003.

      None of these would have remained so strong for so long if there had been serious competition - Office only started to see some serious work going in when lots of large organisations started to publicly announce plans involving OpenOffice; IE only started to see serious improvement when Firefox gained traction and Windows only started to see serious work when it became apparent that Microsoft couldn't ignore Apple forever.

      The biggest difference in the mobile phone market is that it's a much more fickle one - people update their handsets fairly often, expect to have to get used to a new UI with a new handset and don't really care too much about interoperability with other handset users. With any luck, this will be enough to prevent another monopoly appearing.

  62. Re:Thats balmer's pipe dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Psh. Goatse is sooo beyond tired. I'm surprised the Slashdot trolls haven't picked up on Tubgirl yet.

  63. WP7 to beat ANYTHING? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, and in which universe will that take place, kind Sir?

  64. but... by laktech · · Score: 1

    there won't be a need for WP7 in 2015 since we'll have reached singularity by that time. nice try though.

  65. Their oldest smartphone is from 1996 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah. Because Nokia's haven't been making smartphones with a web browser and email for 15 years now... You could install apps too. People were using it for web, email and telnet (maybe ssh too?) way back then!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia_9000_Communicator

  66. Do they believe Apple will stick with iPhone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By 2015 Apple will have something much diferent than iPhone. While WP7 will be a better iPhone.

  67. Mmhmm by devnull17 · · Score: 1

    And I'm going to have sex with Natalie Portman tonight.

    There, now that's been predicted, too. Now it's practically guaranteed to happen.

  68. Re:Please don't link to xkcd "comics". by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

    Overrated is a better way to describe xkcd.

  69. Biggest problem is thinking W7 will still be 2015 by gsgriffin · · Score: 1

    I'm not an MS basher, so go ahead and bash me. I love Outlook and use all the features. I wish MS would get its act together and make a really good phone OS. Can any phone out there sync as nicely as an MS based phone to Outlook? They all have programs and adapters, but do any of them simply plug in a sync everything? If they do, then I think MS is going to have a hard time. If MS still owns the sync, I would think that many like me will easily adopt a Win Mobile 8 phone that syncs well and works well. It's possible. I'm using and loving Win7x64. Took them a couple decades, but they can get it.

    --
    jsut athnoer menagiensls ltitle psrhae for you to dcoede. Why do we wtsae our tmie dnoig tihs?
  70. Didn't they learn last time? by Tridus · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is what happened when Gartner tried to predict the mobile market a few years out: http://www.asymco.com/2010/09/12/

    They were so far off that it's hillarious today.

    --
    -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
    1. Re:Didn't they learn last time? by m50d · · Score: 1

      So far off? They were predicting that windows mobile would beat symbian, and it looks like it has.

      --
      I am trolling
    2. Re:Didn't they learn last time? by sincewhen · · Score: 1

      Gartner are arseclowns. They are never right, except in the same way that a stopped clock is right twice a day.

      --
      -- Braden's law of data: All data spends some of its lifetime in an excel spreadsheet.
  71. Assumes 100% of Nokia users go to WinPhone7 by david.emery · · Score: 1

    The Nokia share of 20.9% in 2011 happens to match the 20.9% attributed to WinPhone7 in 2015.
    And just how likely is that, independent of the relative merits of the competition?

    What appalls me is that people get PAID to produce this bovine effluent !!

    1. Re:Assumes 100% of Nokia users go to WinPhone7 by Ossifer · · Score: 1

      It bothers me more that before PAY to receive it.

  72. Landfill? by Ossifer · · Score: 1

    This probably includes the number of WP7 phones relegated to landfills by their manufacturers...

    (Hope this doesn't bankrupt you, Nokia...)

  73. Fallacy of 'unstoppable' Microsoft by Junta · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Every damn time that MS makes any significant move in a market they do not currently dominate, I am bombarded with people presuming the eventual *domination* of MS (whether they like it or not) to the exclusion of all others. MS has really only done that *twice*, desktop OS and Office suite, and *that's it*. They have not 'done it' in search and servers. They came closer in game consoles, closer than either search or server space, but they have not acheived near-monopoly status anywhere else or even become #1 in any of these markets.

    MS is simply not the beast it used to be and/or the competitive landscape is a bit more competent. In OS space the only viable competitor at the time dominance was established was Apple, which MS successfully outmaneuvered in volume by managing to get cloning companies going and getting hardware companies to destroy each others' margins to deliver more volume to MS. My opinion is the office market was lost by simple business and/or technical inadequacies depending on which company you are talking about. Apple has learned how to be price competitive if it *has* to, while at the same time successfully marketing themselves so they don't have to. Google is going much further than MS did in enabling 'cloning' whilst mostly keeping integration with Google services very much intact.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    1. Re:Fallacy of 'unstoppable' Microsoft by chowdahhead · · Score: 1

      The XBox is the reason that I think Microsoft has a slim chance at the smartphone market. How many companies can spend billions of US dollars on hardware subsidies over a period of years? We could see 'buy one, get one' deals for a long time to come. Or perhaps a free Windows smartphone with the purchase of a Windows laptop. Unlike Android handset manufacturers and Apple, Microsoft doesn't have to make a profit on WP7. They can lose money hand over fist, but if they are slowly increasing their marketshare, then Microsoft can declare success.

    2. Re:Fallacy of 'unstoppable' Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the case of browsers, MS achieved monopoly dominance, but in recent years have been steadily losing market share.

    3. Re:Fallacy of 'unstoppable' Microsoft by Junta · · Score: 1

      They already have the carriers doing that with Android phones today. The upfront cost of a phone is near irrelevant and carriers will and do cut costs down to zero depending on success of a phone without sweating too much because almost all the cost is in the data plan.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    4. Re:Fallacy of 'unstoppable' Microsoft by jbolden · · Score: 1

      A few others:

      a) Programmable small databases (i.e. Access) (this used to be a huge market and things like Filemaker pro were major players)
      b) Programming language IDEs. Visual Studio is really the only one left.
      c) Programming languages, the victory of BASIC / C++ (died with Java revolution and the rise of dynamic languages like Perl/PHP).
      d) Browsers (though this is slipped after 6 years of total control).
      e) Small business systems. Death of the mini computer to be replaced by the Windows client/server model.
      f) Death of dumb terminals
      g) Ubiquity of the Microsoft/Intel/Western Digital architecture for consumer systems. (Possibly collapsing with the rise of Arm).
      h) Embrace / extend for email -- Exchange
      i) SQL server pushing large databases into smaller niches, an attack from below
      j) Microsoft Dynamics ERP (gaining share very rapidly, with an excellent offering).
      k) Viseo -- Flowcharting
      l) Project management

      etc..

  74. News Flash! by rogerdugans · · Score: 1

    From a report co-authored by IDC and Gartner:

    Pigs to Fly in 2013!

    --
    Linux computers, watercooled, photography
  75. Oh Please. by Killer+Eye · · Score: 1

    The iPhone arrived in 2007. Before that, anything even called a smartphone was so unadvanced it was a different market. This means that for all practical purposes, the entire market that this article is referring to has only EXISTED for under 4 years, and they feel capable of telling us where it will be 4 years from now?

    Microsoft is essentially a NON player so far, so the only prediction I feel comfortable making is that Microsoft cash somehow funded these "predictions".

    --
    "Microsoft killed my company, I hold a personal grudge. I don't use Microsoft products and neither should you."-JWZ
    1. Re:Oh Please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you're going to quote someone at least try to get it right:

      Microsoft killed my company, and I hold a personal grudge. I don't use any Microsoft products and neither should you.

    2. Re:Oh Please. by vlueboy · · Score: 1

      The sentence you quoted comes chained to this false preduction:

      There is no Windows version of xscreensaver, and there never will be. Please stop asking

      Thank God for open source: Someone else did port his Xscreensavers to Windows as 'MetaSavers',
      OT post from here on:
      though it is buggy to the point of discouraging XP users (Vista seems somewhat OK.) Googling was useless, so I worked around two of the bugs and run it happily, thanking the creator/predictor with gritted teeth and a sidelong glance since he DID write the original code at least. Here's my fixes so I can land here when I google them years later: ;)

      1) Your XScreensaver choice gets reset whenever you click OK anywhere in the XP display control panel even if you changed nothing and didn't look at the screensaver section. IIRC you have to right-click the installed metasavers exe and pick install from your admin account; then open the display control panel's Screensaver page, checking that Metasavers [plu 119 individual bundled savers, annoyingly] are there. Don't go closing the control panel screen. Use regedt32.exe to remove the write permissions from the current Windows acount for just this item: HKCU\Control Panel\Desktop\SCRNSAVE.exe. At the Control Panel's Screensaver page click on OK now. You need to bookmark the above registry location so that it's easier to return there for any undo, since further changes to Display.cpl's tabs are silently locked out. That is including changing wallpapers, colors, DPI or switching off the metasavers... you'll have the chore of going back in from an admin account to give yourself the registry permissions that were removed earlier.
      2) The Savers sometimes start and immediately quit, leaving you with a sleepless monitor and PC. Solution #1 fixed that, but it's tricky for multi-account PC's.
      3) The Savers silently disable your monitor's sleep mode [only] in XP. Before altering the permissions in step #1, find what your Windows Energy saver countdown is, and for Metasavers' config for 'rotate every x minutes' pick a much larger number so that your PC can sleep, forcibly sleepel-ing the beatiful xscreensavers and when a respite is expected.
      4) The savers ported are *very* dated, and "Juggle" plus one of the two 3D gear savers are spoiled by nigh cringe-worthy jitters --no fix, but the others are OK on my NVidia 8400GS card. Under Vista SP2 + integrated intel card the savers sometimes fail to cover the Windows Sidebar and Start Menu.

      All that high-maintenance is worth the effort if you want a better OpenGL screensaver variety in Windows and are tired of having only 10 savers when away from your linux partition. The metascreensaver config lets you enable a rotation of win32 screensavers so you don't need to return to the regedt32. However, when choosing to turn down the savers or when any program trying to install custom screensavers will need your review of step 1 instructions.

    3. Re:Oh Please. by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Four years ago Android didn't exist, now they are at, what is it, 40% or so? Anything can happen.

  76. uh what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know anyone who owns a shitty windows phone wtf? This is a stupid ass prediction, does anyone honestly believe this? If anything iphone and RIMM will have bigger market share, microsoft is in decline because they don't have a clue. MS has no hope of competing in this market, and windows phones have ALWAYS sucked.

  77. Nokia rebrands Symbian as 'WP7 Classic' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is about the only way they can shift numbers like that.

  78. Oh gosh. Shhh. They might hear you. by symbolset · · Score: 1

    Oh yes this is a brilliant plan that will decimate the fandriod army. Don't tell them or they might do it. That would lead to WP7 dominance with Exchange, Windows and Office stronger than ever. We definitely don't want them to think of this foolproof plan. Wink, wink.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  79. IDG or Gartner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just some PR companies
    not so useful comments from them
    XD.....2015......we don't even know M$ is still in mobile biz.....

  80. Just to draw clicks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These guys write this garbage just to draw clicks. Not worth commenting further.

  81. IDC is probably right. by Sean · · Score: 1

    Don't bother looking at sales data, just look at Visual Studio 2010 and Expression. Microsoft's development tools are getting really, really good. It's a pretty big learning curve to get a feel for the enormous surface area of the new APIs, but the fact that you can target desktop, web, and mobile with the same framework is very, very powerful. Microsoft could really dominate if they opened up Silverlight more. Doing that might cost them some Windows desktop sales, but probably not many. And it would force Apple into another situation similar to what happened with Adobe, only this time the applications iOS users would miss out on would be far superior to anything they missed out on for lack of Flash.

    Even if you're a diehard *nix or Apple type get a buddy with MSDN to hook you up with those tools and check it out. It's very cool.

    1. Re:IDC is probably right. by LDAPMAN · · Score: 1

      I've had a full MSDN subscription for over a decade. I don't see what your talking about. I find XCode and Cocoa Touch far more polished and powerful.

    2. Re:IDC is probably right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've used MS tools since 1994, hate them.

    3. Re:IDC is probably right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dev tools don't drive mobile phone adoption.

  82. WP7 still makes me think of... by slasher999 · · Score: 1

    WordPerfect 7. It was horrible, sure. The beginning of the end really for WP since 6.1 was truly the best. Anyhow I digress, seeing "WP" still makes me think WordPerfect, not Windows Phone. Just like PS2 makes me think of the IBM PS/2 and not Playstation.

  83. IDC, I remember them! by reybrujo · · Score: 2

    They are the ones who said Wii was going to sell less than 15 million units in USA by 2010, while both the PS3 and Xbox 360 would each sell over 20 million units. A pity they missed Wii sales for, say, over 100%. http://vgsales.wikia.com/wiki/File:IDG_chart.png

  84. I.D.O.C. by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    I think they left the "O" out of the company initials. it's better phonetically at least.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  85. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  86. $_ by md65536 · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has paid IDC one billion dollars to make that prediction, and also promised that it would pay customers one billion dollars to buy their phones.

  87. Every year I predict also by Nyder · · Score: 1

    It's spring time, and my prediction, like last year, is the Mariners will win the world series. Don't make it so. Never gets on the front of slashdot.

    WP7 will beat the iphone. WP7 will sell way less then the iphone, which will make it the winner of the crappiest phone OS ever.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  88. Re:Please don't link to xkcd "comics". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, no, no. You have no sense of humor. It would be funnier if the mother was in the clown suit.

  89. Re:Thats balmer's pipe dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for a bunch of shock sites.
    Strangely none of these really shock me even though I didn't see any but goatse.
    Tubgirl seems interesting, I probably try it for a while.

    Also I know that there is the 2 girls one cup, I didn't yet see that video, but I know what it about.
    I though about using it, but I think that tricking someone to watch a video isn't that easy

  90. disco record sales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you know that record sells have gone up 400% since the year ending 1976? If these trends continue ....... ayyyy!

  91. Mobile Word by Compaqt · · Score: 1

    The thing is, if you could use a phone edition of Word to (most of) your document creation work, the question arises: what need is there for the bloated desktop version? And what exactly is it that a mini Word will be able to do that a pared-down OpenOffice or Abiword won't? I'm assuming you won't be creating multi-column books with table of contents, indexes, and hanging indents, etc. on your phone.

    --
    I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
  92. Re:Please don't link to xkcd "comics". by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    YMBGFAP.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  93. 45.4% by multi+io · · Score: 2

    So, they're expecting Android to have a 45.4% market share in 2015. Not 45.3, not 45.5. That means that they think that their predictions have a relative error of less than 0.3% over a period of 4 years. OR, it means that they are a market research company that doesn't employ anyone who ever took a statistics 101 course.

  94. no clue what they are going to do by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 1

    It sounds to me like Nokia has no clue what they are going to do.

    Oh, they know all right. They're getting their synergies leveraged by Microsoft. Over and over again. For money.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
    1. Re:no clue what they are going to do by gtall · · Score: 1

      "They're getting their synergies leveraged by Microsoft."

      Hi, I'm from the Microsoft Department of Marketing. We feel you have what it takes to be part of our team. Please contact us for a bright future.

  95. Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on guys, we know this is a good prediction because the Microsoft Music Players followed the same trajectory. Out of no where to a stunning success.

  96. My prediction (conditional) by S3D · · Score: 1

    Libya scientific output will overtake US by 2015. I predict, by 2015 share of scientific papers published by country will be: China 17% Libya 15.7%% US 15% UK 5% But that will happen only if Windows Phone 7 will overtake Apple's iPhone by 2015.

  97. Ooh, the forecast game. by symbolset · · Score: 1

    We can all play. Can you to better than IDC? I'll start.

    Global smartphone OS share of sales (not installed base) for calendar year 2015:

    • Android (including 10% RIM): 65%
    • iOS (three concurrent models): 22%
    • RIM Classic: 5%
    • WebOS: 3%
    • Other (mostly OEM branded spins of Linux as "Plan B"): 5%
    • Symbian: 0%

    Nokia will be in receivership having never shipped a single Windows Phone at retail. They will sue Microsoft, but the court will hold them to the clause in the contract that says if they go bankrupt Microsoft gets all their cellphone intellectual property. Steve Ballmer greets the sad news of his partner's demise gracefully: "It's a contract. You should read it before you sign it."

    Intermediate events:

    June, 2011: At the launch of Angry Birds for Windows Phone 7 Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer appears in a green pig costume and facepaint to be pelted by Angry Birds plush toys for a press event. Rovio CEO Mikael Hed is heard cackling and gasping for breath as he's carried to his private jet, which was formerly Steve Ballmer's Gulfstream V.

    In a joint press conference in August 2011 Larry Page and Tim Cook announce that between Apple and Google they are now shipping one million phones per day. The delivery is a bit awkward given the fierce competition, but the two give a convincing argument for fierce competition driving rapid progress.

    March 2012: Apple, Inc. becomes the world's largest public corporation by market capitalization, surpassing Exxon Corp. They trade places back and forth for a few weeks until an Exxon tanker runs aground in the mediterranean, when Apple takes the lead for good.

    December, 2012. Apple opens an eBay store, directly selling their products for whatever the market will bear. Prices for iPads normalize at 150% of suggested retail.

    October 2013, another Microsoft Office refresh is released. The most widely read review begins: "All the same features, but they moved the buttons and changed the file formats again!" On launch day over seven billion specially targeted versions of malware plugins are available, so Microsoft includes a malware sorting interface that allows users to see how their documents are being stolen, and by whom - but it's unreliable and exposes some additional compromise interfaces and so is deprecated immediately.

    At RTM in November 2013 Windows 8 for ARM and Intel officially named Windows# is widely panned. The usually verbose Anandtech review consists solely of the text "Breaks app compatibility." Mary Jo Foley just displays the Twitter fail whale without further comment. Others are less kind. HP announces that they're surrendering maintenance of Windows drivers for their vast armada of PCs, laptops, servers and printers to Microsoft as "not worth the trouble - let them deal with it." Dell and Acer go the other route, fully embracing the new features and benefits with multibillion dollar cobranded advertising campaigns. The ARM x86 emulator VM in the product will induce Intel to sue Microsoft for theft of intellectual property the following day, with successful petition to the ITC for an injunction against the products.

    December, 2013 Microsoft announces their "Hardphone," for Christmas. Supposedly made from a "recycled" depleted Uranium frame and completely indestructible. FCC testing reveals that the Uranium it's made of, refined from Fukushima Corium, is not fully depleted and the product is banned in 135 nations as fatally toxic.

    In January 2014 in Helsinki, one Sven Olafson becomes the first recorded death from exposure in an iPad queue, having lined up several months before the anticipated release of iPad 5. In consideration his family will receive a pre-release version and Apple will move the release date for subsequent versions to August. In its press release Apple states "We don't know what we can do here. We've enlisted all the available manpower of Southeast Asia, and we still can't meet demand for our products." Pundits prop

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  98. Android dominating is the significant forecast by georgesdev · · Score: 1

    The important analysis is Android dominating the market, and Symbian sinking. But really, that's easy to guess, even Nokia has announced they're stopping Symbian around 2012!
    IOS share at 15.7 going down to 15.3 in 2015. that's too many digits to forecast the market in 4 years. It could just as well be at 10% or 20%.
    And if Apple introduces an "iphone Nano" in the mean time, then the numbers could be totally different.

  99. IDC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same ppl that predicted in 98 that Linux would NEVER amount to anything in the server space against Windows. My prediction is that MS was paid again by MS.

  100. rofl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    early april fools!

  101. More MS BS by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    How many more stories are we going to see where the publisher,author, who ever is being paid to help push this BS to the masses.
    If anyone has seen the iPhone and what it is capable of , they would know that by iPhone5, the iphone will outnumber all others 4 to 1, simply because they are coming out with some HDMI connector to view what you see on your iphone unto your tv, just that alone replaces dvd players, etc....imagine that, netflix to your iphone and unto your tv, just that alone is worth a mint, never mind all the other bells and whistles they are planning.

    The only down side i see to iphone is the lack of backup , in a way where apple could offer a service where you pay to backup your phone to a apple server location, then if you lose your iphone or want to restore a backup point, the phone comes back exactly as it was at the time of that restore point....only draw back to that is it would need to be encrypted to secure that data you have.

  102. Profit! by slapout · · Score: 1

    1. Let A = current hot technology
    2. Let B = new upcoming technology
    3. Let X = random number less than 5
    4. Write headline "B will overtake A in X years"
    5. Split article into multiple pages
    6.
    7. Profit!

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  103. Yes, if you compare it to active original iPhones. by PinchDuck · · Score: 1

    There will still be a few of those things floating around out there, and there _might_ be more active WP7 handsets than active iPhone 1's. Maybe. Of course, the number of both will be dwarfed by the number of active iPhone X's.

  104. How quickly people forget. Prediction NOT crazy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's look at the market leaders (Windows on the desktops of the past (present?), Symbian on the phones of the past/present, and Android on the phones of the present/future. Why are the market leaders, what they are?

    It's very easy to get through life now without ever seeing a Windows machine, but try to think back to when you used to see them -- or maybe you're in a situation where you still do. Where did Windows come from, how did people end up running that? How is the general public (I'm not talking about you, developers) ending up with Android phones?

    You still don't get it? Ok, how about this: why do almost all iPhone users run iOS?

    It's all about preloads. Joe Customer buys based on price and "bullet point features" of the total package (hardware or applications), and also a little bit of brand loyalty. He's generally not thinking too hard about what OS he'd like his phone to run.

    Microsoft has shown in the past that they were very capable of getting hardware manufacturers to preload their OS; if it weren't for that, they probably wouldn't even be around today. And the Nokia deal clearly shows they intend to at least try that strategy again.

    Who in 1986 or 1991 (or even 1996!!), from only looking at the products' virtues, and compared to its competitors, would have guessed Microsoft would still be in business the next year? Nobody. And yet, Microsoft's OS was obviously not destined to immediately die, and I don't mean that as a statement of hindsight. If you want to predict the future, quit worrying about whether iOS or Android or WP7 is "better" by human standards, and look at which is "better" by natural selection standards.

    Saying Microsoft will fade out because their products generally suck, is like saying cockroaches are about to go extinct because they're icky.

    Microsoft's strengths are in getting computer manufacturers to preload their software, and in creating network effects so that people who use their software end up "punishing" people who don't (e.g. "here, I'll just email you this proprietary-format document..."). This is what you need to watch out for. I don't yet see how they plan to network-effect their way to victory (is it silverlight?), but the Nokia move speaks for itself. When it comes to these kinds of moves, the company we're talking about is a jaw-droppingly-awesome history-making world leader who has made pretty much everyone their bitch at some time or another. Saying Microsoft can't manipulate the market is like saying Stalin can't muster troops.

    When you look at it this way, WP7 passing iOS is a reasonably sane prediction. It all depends on the deals Microsoft makes, not WP7 itself. All those same people who accepted a Windows desktop will accept a Windows phone. Everything that you consider to be a strength of iOS is largely irrelevant to them, because iOS only comes preloaded on one particular phone, out of the dozens on the market.

  105. Riiiight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And, for your next report, cows can fly, too.

  106. Wishful Thinking. by pubwvj · · Score: 0

    Wishful Thinking. Windoze is dead.

  107. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  108. Why apple will win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is my apple will win:
    When you buy an Apple phone, what do you get? An Apple phone
    When you buy an Samsung Galaxy from AT&T, what do you get? AT&T apps that you can't remove. AT&T apps that start themselves up at random times without you asking... or being asked.... or being notified in any way! AT&T apps that suck your battery life and cause your phone to use all of it's charge in 10 hours unless you start the special kill application (not installed by default, paid for by in-app advertisements) that allows you to kill those stupid applications but which require you to run it every couple of hours! I'm ready to take my damn phone to the gun range and get an Iphone, but I have to pay full price for it.
    I'm told that I can jailbreak it and remove those apps, but I keep hearing stories of phones being bricked by the carrier. I'd rather have my stupid razor back than this.

  109. perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first iPhone came out 4 years ago.

  110. won't happen for two reasons ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. where nokia is strong, developing nations, folks can't afford smartphones

    2. windows phone 7 doesn't run on feature phones

  111. Win7 phone included in every Windows 8 OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You heard it here first. And they will argue (successfully) in court that it can't be separated from the operating system.

  112. Re:Please don't link to xkcd "comics". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry pal, you're in the minority here. Most of us happen to think that posting links to XKCD and quoting the Simpsons is a perfectly valid substitute for a sense of humor!

  113. MS vs. Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went to the Microsoft store in Mission Vejo and the store was empty, tablets on display weren't turned on and the ones that were didn't work. No one asked if I needed anything. I then went down to the Apple store and it was jammed, everything was working - just the opposite from the MS store. If the store is any reflection on where MS is heading, well, they look like the next Radio Shack.

  114. Re:Ms Abandonment by juasko · · Score: 1

    --
    Running with mac for over 24 years!

  115. Bwaaaaaa-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just read the headline and burst out laughing. 2015. Whoopee.

    Microsoft needs to get rid of that idiot Ballmer. Until then, they are fscked.

  116. prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Prediction does not always come true. Seeing is bleaving. We should wait and see, who will come with the most sophisticated phones and software.