Slashdot Mirror

It seemed easier for me to organize things into classes for a poker program because anthropomorphizing the methods made sense in that case.

In what way did you impute human characteristics to the poker code? My guess is you didn't truly anthropomorphize, but rather used some form of intentional stance or design stance.

IMHO, Vaillant (not having studied philosophy of mind) is a bit confused about intentionality, which is actually totally inescapable in programming.

And your response now to my calling you out for posting spam... is to spam a different topic with unrelated garbage? Are you even sentient? Or are you just so scared of being called out that you hope if you try to harass me, I'll go away? [Rujiel, 2015-01-02]

You didn't call me out for posting spam. You repeatedly told me to kill myself. There's a difference. Once again:

Look, all this isn't remotely believable. You clearly compounded that account's massive spamming attempts by needlessly quoting obscenely huge chunks of his nonsense. [Rujiel, 2014-12-28]

Needlessly? How else should I debunk his baseless claim that I was "rude and insulting" when Jane/Lonny Eachus was actually just projecting his own obscene insults onto me? And if you have a better approach in mind, why not just suggest that better approach rather than repeatedly suggest that I kill myself?

Are they hiring you losers while still in high school these days? The bar for paid oil trolls sure is a low one--any stupid thing to prevent the discussion of the oil cartel's impunity. Do the world a favor and kill yourself. [Rujiel, 2014-11-20]

He's a paid shill and so are you--no amount of verbose whining on your part could hide the role of spamming you were playing in that thread. [Rujiel, 2014-12-28]

Once again, Rujiel accuses me of being a paid oil shill. But once again, why would the oil industry pay me to debunk the same baseless accusations they're helping to spread? I've been debunking misinformation about climate from Jane/Lonny Eachus and many others for 5 years now. Again, why would the oil industry pay me to do that?

... Save our collective unconscious from your fevered ego--kill yourself. your net sum contribution to society is at a negative. [Rujiel, 2014-11-26]

Really? Among other things, I've contributed open source software to estimate mass changes on the surface of the Earth using GRACE satellite data. Here's my dissertation which explains the methods. Does that count for anything, or should I kill myself?

Your response is akin to someone who has just spent the last hour rolling in his own shit and flinging it at passers-by, standing up all at once and asking the surrounding crowd what's wrong. You're seriously so bad at this. Even your employer would be better off if you killed yourself. [Rujiel, 2014-11-30]

I really don't understand why people like Jane/Lonny Eachus and Rujiel are filled with so much hatred. However, sociology research suggests that people are less likely to hurl abuse at other people after seeing their faces. So here I am at JPL's open house explaining that our CO2 emissions are melting ice sheets. And here's a clip from the Weather Channel where I explained (at 19m36s

I'd take a hyperloop if it had cost parity with flying.
A top speed of 760mph would be fscking awesome.

Planes typically fly around 550mph.
Strangely enough, consumer GPS sometimes works in-flight, even in airplane mode.
Something like this should do the trick.

https://www.google.com/search?q=disable+auto+rotate

all auto rotate oses support disabling it. this doesn't help with the narrow field of bifocals but that was already covered by other readers. as to the pressure to get bifocals you should have suggested separate reading Rx glasses there is such a thing and it is easier and more useful than the +1 to +4 option at the local discount store. as it is possible to need 'negative' prescription and reading glasses which everyone else ignored.

Some things we just can't segregate, such as the name cache. Shared locks only modestly improve performance but it's still a whole lot better than what you get with an exclusive lock.

What is the challenge with the namecache, specifically? If its due to being LRU then there are approaches to mitigate the lock. A buffering approach like this Java cache batch updates to avoid lock contention. Another technique is to take a random sample to be probabilistically LRU, like Redis does.

Your wife calls wire frames BCD's?

BCD's or BCG's are not wire frames by any stretch, See here .

The phrase might be true, but we're seeing the effects of insufficient eyes. In reality, how many sets of eyes are actually reviewing these libraries at a source code level? I rather strongly suspect that in most cases they are simply used under the assumption that "well, everyone uses it, it must be okay".

You don't even need source code level. Look at the mess Perl is with CGI and lists,

http://perldoc.perl.org/CGI.ht...

And since the undocumented feature is to return a list of parameters as "single value" if you get multiple instances of parameters, you can produce various fun in perl code that expects single values, not lists.

https://plus.google.com/+Krist...

with a nice link on how to use a 20-year-old holes in Perl core libraries to generate CVE in tons of software using perl. And no, I have not checked if slash is vulnerable.

So please, how many eyes do you need in this case? Bugs that can be exposed by unit tests by end users, yet, here we are, 20 years later.

Bluetooth is not supported for printing on ChromeBook.

There is an Android app that allows printing via "Wi-Fi or Bluetooth", but it appears not to have been ported to ChromeOS.

Bluetooth is not supported for printing on ChromeBook.

There is an Android app that allows printing via "Wi-Fi or Bluetooth", but it appears not to have been ported to ChromeOS.

The primary methods of detecting IMSI-Catchers and Fake BTS's is described here (pdf), and due to the variety of manufacturers' baseband interfaces, there wasn't an easy way to uniformly detect these devices.

IMSI-Catcher doesn't seem to work on my old, non-GSM Android, but I've also found OsmocomBB to be interesting; it's an open source GSM broadband implementation that seems to work on some older, cheap phones, like some motorola candy bars; check out Catcher Catcher for more info.

In terms of the IMSI Catcher devices themselves, I've seen estimations of $20 to $1500 to make one, from using cheap RTL-SDR devices to a full SDR (~$400-1500) to run a full fake GSM BTS.

The legal usage of IMSI-Catchers doesn't seem clear to me. It is essentially a MiTM attack, which at least android devices seem to go out of their way to ignore. The law enforcement usage seems worded in ways that would just confuse 50+ year old judges. And they have to go far out of the way to make sure that you don't notice an interruption in service, by forwarding any on-going communications to their intended recipients and tunneling them back, if they go are run over time and don't disassociate.

I haven't seen any estimation on how often these things are used. Besides, hacked femtocell's are probably also responsible for a lot of these rogue BTS's; I wonder if that would be discovered with such detection methods?

What country are you talking about? South Africa?

Has to be:

Our president believes that having a shower after sex will prevent him from getting HIV and is unable to read numbers with more than 5 digits (seriously, check youtube).

president+zuma+aids+shower

-AC

And watch print jobs use 23 MB of valuable data quota: 10 MB to send it to the Butt and 10 MB to get it back, plus 15% for framing overhead.

It's actually really easy to print from a Chromebook or Android device, it just needs you to have the printer connected to Google Cloud Print somehow. The OP's specific issue is that his father wants to use 3G, and thus only the Chromebook is connected to the internet and not the printer.

I would suggest getting a 3G modem/router. Then the Chromebook and the printer can both connect to it, as well as any other devices his father decided to get in the future like a tablet or set-top box. Then it is a simple matter of using Google Cloud Print with a compatible printer.

List of compatible printers: http://www.google.com/cloudpri...

I was actually looking at several of these boards recently, trying to find all the multi-core options at/below about $100. I put together a Google Docs spreadsheet comparing various specs (#/type/speed of cores, RAM, Flash, network, SATA, USB, RTC), I've got 18 on the list so far. Looks like I have a few more to add...
https://docs.google.com/spread...

The easiest way is probably to simply get a Cloud Print-ready printer, and a wifi router. Printer and Chromebook connect via wifi. No messing with card/sticks...
https://www.google.com/cloudpr...

"Attack of the 50-foot woman" might be interesting. The problem is that the copyright holder is not showing this movie anywhere - going public domain would fix that.

Here is the movie on Google Play, and here it is on Amazon streaming. By "not showing this movie anywhere", maybe you meant "not showing this movie anywhere for free"?

Look, all this isn't remotely believable. You clearly compounded that account's massive spamming attempts by needlessly quoting obscenely huge chunks of his nonsense. [Rujiel, 2014-12-28]

Needlessly? How else should I debunk his baseless claim that I was "rude and insulting" when Jane/Lonny Eachus was actually just projecting his own obscene insults onto me? And if you have a better approach in mind, why not just suggest that better approach rather than repeatedly suggest that I kill myself?

Are they hiring you losers while still in high school these days? The bar for paid oil trolls sure is a low one--any stupid thing to prevent the discussion of the oil cartel's impunity. Do the world a favor and kill yourself. [Rujiel, 2014-11-20]

He's a paid shill and so are you--no amount of verbose whining on your part could hide the role of spamming you were playing in that thread. [Rujiel, 2014-12-28]

Once again, Rujiel accuses me of being a paid oil shill. But once again, why would the oil industry pay me to debunk the same baseless accusations they're helping to spread? I've been debunking misinformation about climate from Jane/Lonny Eachus and many others for 5 years now. Again, why would the oil industry pay me to do that?

... Save our collective unconscious from your fevered ego--kill yourself. your net sum contribution to society is at a negative. [Rujiel, 2014-11-26]

Really? Among other things, I've contributed open source software to estimate mass changes on the surface of the Earth using GRACE satellite data. Here's my dissertation which explains the methods. Does that count for anything, or should I kill myself?

Your response is akin to someone who has just spent the last hour rolling in his own shit and flinging it at passers-by, standing up all at once and asking the surrounding crowd what's wrong. You're seriously so bad at this. Even your employer would be better off if you killed yourself. [Rujiel, 2014-11-30]

I really don't understand why people like Jane/Lonny Eachus and Rujiel are filled with so much hatred. However, sociology research suggests that people are less likely to hurl abuse at other people after seeing their faces. So here I am at JPL's open house explaining that our CO2 emissions are melting ice sheets. And here's a clip from the Weather Channel where I explained (at 19m36s and 26m34s) how NASA measures these ice sheets from space.

Rujiel, now that you've seen my face, do you still hate me so much that you still think I should kill myself? Or would you like to retract those odious statements?

Google can provide privacy

But they don't. They violate your privacy themselves, even when they're not cooperating with the government.

Like when? Automatically marking incoming emails as spam? Unlike your credit card, hotel, etc., Google keeps any data they collect to themselves, which is better than everyone else. Because they offer a lot of services they may collect too much data for your taste, but there are all sort of things they are accused of doing but don't do, such as rigging Chrome to send data back to them, Google glass always recording, etc.

The only cases I can find are a rogue employee using root powers to read someone's gmail (fired), and at a stretch you might be referring to PRISM. If you are, I have a lot to say on that subject.

Why are you fighting against the people who are fighting for privacy?

They aren't fighting for privacy in any meaningful sense. Occasionally they fight back as a PR move, but they've allowed all sorts of egregious privacy violations, and violate your privacy themselves.

Fighting back falls in two categories: legal and technical. Note that we need to fight on both, but the bad guys can win on whichever is weaker. I'm not a lawyer. Google published this video. My attitude is that we should fix the technical issues and hope that the lawyers will also fix the legal issues. We know that the NSA chose to bypass legal process, so there must be at least some things they want but can't get.

Google is working on end point security with Project zero, ChromeOS (secure boot + remote management), bug finding tools like afl and asan, etc. Google is working on transit security, they're upranking SSL sites, killing off SSL 3.0, killing off SHA-1, marking plain http as insecure, they invented and deployed Channel ID, Certificate pinning (which caught an intelligence agency they didn't know was attacking!). Their own networks were being snooped and they claim they now encrypt all traffic in and between data centers, but we only have their word on that. They also claim they were already planning to add encryption but reprioritized it when it was revealed that the NSA was already taking advantage of it. They're pushing for larger RSA keys, and for newer crypto entirely with features like forward secrecy. It could be argued that the newer crypto is more likely to have back doors, but as it stands there is no evidence that the NSA had any breakthrough technique for decrypting either new or old, they would just break into machines that have keys, or possibly factor smaller (1024 and less) RSA keys. Google deployed OTP and invented the U2F system which is better than OTP. As far as I'm aware, Google isn't doing much for DNS security (besides running Google DNS which has cache poisoning protection) or IP routing security (besides running Google Fiber), but perhaps they think those become irrelevant unless the attacker can also forge TLS keys.

All of those are security issues, which are tightly intertwined with privacy in that if your security can be penetrated then you lose your privacy. They also created "incognito mode", a pure privacy feature with no security implication

Google can provide privacy

But they don't. They violate your privacy themselves, even when they're not cooperating with the government.

Like when? Automatically marking incoming emails as spam? Unlike your credit card, hotel, etc., Google keeps any data they collect to themselves, which is better than everyone else. Because they offer a lot of services they may collect too much data for your taste, but there are all sort of things they are accused of doing but don't do, such as rigging Chrome to send data back to them, Google glass always recording, etc.

The only cases I can find are a rogue employee using root powers to read someone's gmail (fired), and at a stretch you might be referring to PRISM. If you are, I have a lot to say on that subject.

Why are you fighting against the people who are fighting for privacy?

They aren't fighting for privacy in any meaningful sense. Occasionally they fight back as a PR move, but they've allowed all sorts of egregious privacy violations, and violate your privacy themselves.

Fighting back falls in two categories: legal and technical. Note that we need to fight on both, but the bad guys can win on whichever is weaker. I'm not a lawyer. Google published this video. My attitude is that we should fix the technical issues and hope that the lawyers will also fix the legal issues. We know that the NSA chose to bypass legal process, so there must be at least some things they want but can't get.

Google is working on end point security with Project zero, ChromeOS (secure boot + remote management), bug finding tools like afl and asan, etc. Google is working on transit security, they're upranking SSL sites, killing off SSL 3.0, killing off SHA-1, marking plain http as insecure, they invented and deployed Channel ID, Certificate pinning (which caught an intelligence agency they didn't know was attacking!). Their own networks were being snooped and they claim they now encrypt all traffic in and between data centers, but we only have their word on that. They also claim they were already planning to add encryption but reprioritized it when it was revealed that the NSA was already taking advantage of it. They're pushing for larger RSA keys, and for newer crypto entirely with features like forward secrecy. It could be argued that the newer crypto is more likely to have back doors, but as it stands there is no evidence that the NSA had any breakthrough technique for decrypting either new or old, they would just break into machines that have keys, or possibly factor smaller (1024 and less) RSA keys. Google deployed OTP and invented the U2F system which is better than OTP. As far as I'm aware, Google isn't doing much for DNS security (besides running Google DNS which has cache poisoning protection) or IP routing security (besides running Google Fiber), but perhaps they think those become irrelevant unless the attacker can also forge TLS keys.

All of those are security issues, which are tightly intertwined with privacy in that if your security can be penetrated then you lose your privacy. They also created "incognito mode", a pure privacy feature with no security implication

Correct, except for the part about the US. Not sure why you're misinformed about that. It's been declining for six years now, and is at an all-time low.

Google for 'speed 85th percentile'

A good explanation of setting speed limits at the 85th percentile. This is by a pro-motorist group, so you could claim bias. The other results on that google search are from government pages, both state and federal, and should be trusted.

For those too lazy to follow the links, countless studies have shown that the safest place to set a speed limit is the 85th percentile of vehicles on a given road. Going too slow has an increased chance of accident, and exceeding the 90th percentile also shows an increased chance of accident.

Brain chains

Brain hostile offices

Brain chains

Brain hostile offices

the problem is the solder balls on bga chips break and the oven reflows them, this has been a problem with many laptop motherboards that use those types of chips. Most notably the hp dv6000 from 2006ish.

https://www.google.com/search?...

Even monks tended to have private monastic cells where they went throughout the day to pray alone.

My point is that it has been "news" several times already over the last 5-6 years, so why exactly should it appear on an alleged news website? ...

Everyone's missing a significant point here: the airlines severely penalize anyone who travels in this fashion. Yes, there are insanities about their pricing models that make it possible to actually save money this way. But the first time you do it, you will get a nastygram from the airline...and if you continue to do it, they will actually ban you. Furthermore, if you're doing this on the first half of your trip, you'll find that your return flights have all been canceled; even worse, the airline will NOT be sympathetic to your plight when you call them up to try and get back home.

I wish I could remember the industry term for this practice, but suffice it to say that a database of flight options that allow you to do this is essentially useless anyways. Google it...type in "skipping the last leg of a flight" and see what you find.

Don't get fooled by the "small shop" illusion. Look at GW Pharmaceuticals, which has a market cap of 1.3 billion.

https://www.google.com/finance...

This is big business. If you have Netflix look at the documentaries there's a bunch of them (Green rush, etc.).

Actually, chromium (chromes main lib) is open source. So you can change it!

https://code.google.com/p/chro...

Maybe they just REALLY don't like Inbox.

It is a fairly well known problem that men and minorities are underrepresented in the teaching profession, particularly in the lower grades. If you were paying any attention at all to the teaching community, you would know that teacher education programs are trying to recruit and retain more men. A quick Google search to get you started...

Look, all this isn't remotely believable. You clearly compounded that account's massive spamming attempts by needlessly quoting obscenely huge chunks of his nonsense. [Rujiel, 2014-12-28]

Needlessly? How else should I debunk his baseless claim that I was "rude and insulting" when Jane/Lonny Eachus was actually just projecting his own obscene insults onto me? And if you have a better approach in mind, why not just suggest that better approach rather than repeatedly suggest that I kill myself?

Are they hiring you losers while still in high school these days? The bar for paid oil trolls sure is a low one--any stupid thing to prevent the discussion of the oil cartel's impunity. Do the world a favor and kill yourself. [Rujiel, 2014-11-20]

He's a paid shill and so are you--no amount of verbose whining on your part could hide the role of spamming you were playing in that thread. [Rujiel, 2014-12-28]

Once again, Rujiel accuses me of being a paid oil shill. But once again, why would the oil industry pay me to debunk the same baseless accusations they're helping to spread? I've been debunking misinformation about climate from Jane/Lonny Eachus and many others for 5 years now. Again, why would the oil industry pay me to do that?

... Save our collective unconscious from your fevered ego--kill yourself. your net sum contribution to society is at a negative. [Rujiel, 2014-11-26]

Really? Among other things, I've contributed open source software to estimate mass changes on the surface of the Earth using GRACE satellite data. Here's my dissertation which explains the methods. Does that count for anything, or should I kill myself?

Your response is akin to someone who has just spent the last hour rolling in his own shit and flinging it at passers-by, standing up all at once and asking the surrounding crowd what's wrong. You're seriously so bad at this. Even your employer would be better off if you killed yourself. [Rujiel, 2014-11-30]

I really don't understand why people like Jane/Lonny Eachus and Rujiel are filled with so much hatred. However, sociology research suggests that people are less likely to hurl abuse at people after seeing their faces. So here I am at JPL's open house explaining how our CO2 emissions are causing ice sheets to melt. And here's a clip from the Weather Channel where I explained (at 19m36s and 26m34s) how NASA measures these ice sheets from space.

Rujiel, now that you've seen my face, do you still hate me so much that you still think I should kill myself? Or would you like to retract those odious statements?

YouTube has a standard DMCA complaints procedure. I recommend that Yoon Mi-rae and the label follow that process, partly because it actually works which is great in this case, and partly to give Sony a taste of their own medicine.

Here is the link: https://support.google.com/you...

(Note that I have a bunch of experience with the take-down process, including participating in an EFF lawsuit ~10 years ago; see https://www.eff.org/document/d... .)

Just because it's "strictly business" doesn't mean that North Korea wasn't involved. They probably know how to short stocks too.

The broken english used in the threats is a match to a google translation from gramatically correct Russian. That doesn't seem like a coincidence to me. Since the Russians hacked the NASDAQ as recently as July 2014, maybe they had something to do with it. And Russians are known to enjoy manipulating stocks

Mind you, I don't think this has anything to do with manuipulating stocks. I think it is far more likely that it was some person who didn't like Sony very much and the deflection onto the DPRK was just a red herring. But if shorting stock WAS the angle, the Russians have a lot of experience doing it.

Open up a map and check out where Qatar is. It's kind of smack dab in the middle of the Eastern Hemisphere's inhabited landmasses. This makes for a really nice hub-and-spoke model air service.

You're not kidding about Etihad! You get three %$#@! floors! There's like a living room/entry, a private en-suite bath/shower, and finally a double-bed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Still, that's a bargain compared to Justin Bieber's new 60 million dollar Gulfstream 6, with at least $3000 an hour operating costs, not counting the pilot.

Hey, I'll bet you can pick up a cheap used Gulfstream 5 from Bill Cosby soon for the right price.

Complaints are better when you also tell us what the answers should be. How do you call a number when its square is negative?
0.645793919 != 2/3, but it's reasonably close.

I get the geek/gamer stereotype, but have you seen any of the big esport teams? Sure, there are a few heavy-set gamers; but for the most part they are pretty skinny or at least average looking at the professional level. Check out the team portrait for Na'Vi (one of the top DOTA2 teams), the several LCS teams, or Bajheera (one of the most viewed WoW streamers). Geek shaming should be a thing of the past.

I get the geek/gamer stereotype, but have you seen any of the big esport teams? Sure, there are a few heavy-set gamers; but for the most part they are pretty skinny or at least average looking at the professional level. Check out the team portrait for Na'Vi (one of the top DOTA2 teams), the several LCS teams, or Bajheera (one of the most viewed WoW streamers). Geek shaming should be a thing of the past.

I already have an app that catalogues the books I own by reading the bar code (which contains the ISBN in most cases). It takes a couple of seconds on my cheap phone (Moto G) to scan each bar code - it takes longer to look them up in a DB.

The example they show takes a snapshot of 25 books at once, looking at the spines on a shelf, and then claims to identify all of them by doing OCR on the spine text combined with a database lookup. If that works, it will be quite a bit faster than anything that requires scanning individual books.

That's the theory, anyway. Looking at the reviews, it doesn't actually work well enough yet to bother.

Olympics is for sports. Not games. Sport is "activity involving physical exertion and skill" google. And no, pressing keys or buttons doesn't count.

Did you bother to look? Google: police kill camera shut off

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

Did you bother to look? Google: police kill camera shut off

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

Did you bother to look? Google: police kill camera shut off

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

Did you bother to look? Google: police kill camera shut off

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

Did you bother to look? Google: police kill camera shut off

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

Did you bother to look? Google: police kill camera shut off

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

Did you bother to look? Google: police kill camera shut off

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

Did you bother to look? Google: police kill camera shut off

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

Did you bother to look? Google: police kill camera shut off

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t...