Domain: pcw.co.uk
Stories and comments across the archive that link to pcw.co.uk.
Comments · 21
-
Re:I want one...
> There was one reviewed on the register a little while ago.
Maplin currently sell a MIPS netbook running Linux for 170UKP:
http://www.maplin.co.uk/Module.aspx?ModuleNo=225532&TabID=1&source=3&C=RSS
But the battery life is only 3 hours and it runs some form of ``locked-down'' OS; not entirely sure what that means:
http://labs.pcw.co.uk/2008/09/maplin-replies.html
Specs here:
-
Soul catcher
Here's a link to a copy of the article in Personal Computer World magazine, November 1996 which describes the research work done by Chris Winter and others at British Telecom's Martlesham Heath research labs on such a device.
http://www.pcw.co.uk/personal-computer-world/features/2045102/cutting-edge-futures-brain-drain -
relative is ... well ... relativeThe engineers and IT people become redundant as Yahoo moves over to a Microsoft-based back end. (For those who think that's impossible, remember that Microsoft moved Hotmail from BSD to Windows 2k with relative efficiency.)
Never happened. Each time M$ tried, they got their noses rubbed in the pathetic insufficiency of their cruftware publicly :
http://www.pcw.co.uk/vnunet/news/2113313/hotmail-finally-move-windows x
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/12/12/microsoft_hotmail_still_runs/
http://www.geek.com/ms-and-unisys-dont-use-unix-except-now/M$ set the server identification strings to say IIS and beyond that stopped trying to fool people about that years ago and hopes everyone just forgets.
Though just maybe the weasel word there is "relative". So yeah, on an absolute level it had its pants pulled down and was pushed over in front of a bunch of laughing girls, but relatively speaking (for M$) it went well.
-
Re:A sensible idea.
Here is a Tom's Hardware Guide article that shows how to do it: http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/01/09/strip_out_
t he_fans/index.html By the way, perhaps PCW wrote about this Very-PC oil submerged server on on 4 Apr 2007. "First oil submerged server to go on sale" http://www.pcw.co.uk/personal-computer-world/news/ 2187185/first-oil-submerged-server-sale This article also contains a link to a home enthusiast oil submerged PC. -
Re:Remember QDOS?
MSDOS was originally a clone or CP/M with copyright problems of its own.
"Bill Gates saw the business opportunity of a lifetime. He obtained rights to a cloned design of CP/M, QDOS, from Tim Paterson of Seattle Computer products, licensed it to IBM, and MSDOS/IBMDOS was born. Later, IBM discovered that Gates' operating system could have infringement problems with CP/M, contacted Kildall, and in exchange for a promise not to sue, made an agreement that CP/M would be sold along with IBMDOS when the IBM PC was released. The price set by IBM for CP/M was $250 and for IBMDOS it was $40. IBM's decision to source its primary operating system from Microsoft was the beginning of the end of Digital Research's days as the world's largest manufacturer of software for microcomputers."
http://labs.pcw.co.uk/2006/11/microsoft_bows_.html -
Re:Look on the bright side
Silicon based life forms?
Not yet. Non-aqueous solvent life looks more promising in the Xenochemistry field, FWIW.
Tricorders?
Holidecks?
Deanna Troi android?
More or less, although it looks more like Keiko Ishikawa O'Brein.
And, of course, there's Hawking's remark about the Warp Core when touring the set of TNG's Engineering: "I'm working on that." And the resemblance between TOS communicators and modern cell phones.
Aren't you glad Star Trek had a generally utopian view of the future, instead of the common dystopian views? =)
-
Re:Microsoft will not be unseated
Or even internet access. Value for £13.97 a month, Finest for £24.97 a month, and ordinary services for prices in between.
-
Re:OLED?
Yep, Siemen tech is probably using OLED
http://www.pcw.co.uk/personal-computer-world/news/ 2043277/paper-scroll -
Alternative reviews
Here are some alternative reviews and piccies while the site is slashdoted: dutch site, uk site, toms hw, japan.
ok its a google search, but usefull -
A Joke, Apparently
-
Re:Wow
another website
:
http://labs.pcw.co.uk/2005/05/computex_zalman.html
just the picture :
http://vnuuk.typepad.com/.shared/image.html?/photo s/uncategorized/zalman_fan_1.jpg
But it seems quite real (just 3 or 4 times higher compared to regular coolers) so it's maybe not the same we are speaking of. I can't tell, the link and coral links are /.ed -
Re:and everyone is still using floppies : )
From what Ive HEard And Read (http://www.pcw.co.uk/news/1161455) The Blu-Ray Disks are scratch resistant. I also read something about this in Maximum PC a few months ago.
-
Re:"Mostly" Backward Compatible?
For what it's worth, the PlayStation 2 was incompatible with a handful of games for the PlayStation 1. Likewise, the Sony PSX and slim PlayStation 2 introduced hardware incompatibilities. Even the later revisions of the larger PS2 dropped the little-used FireWire port.
-
Other factors
LCD panels, to me, have much higher contrast than any CRT I've ever looked at. The brightness and color purity also seem to be much higher overall.
Health benefits aside, LCD panels pull about a third of the power that a CRT monitor uses. This equates to an immediate savings in terms of less electricity used by the monitor, and (over the longer term) reduced air conditioning needs because of the reduced heat load. I suppose one could also make the connection that less electricity burned means less air pollution, assuming a fossil-fuel fired power plant.
All those government agencies who made the switch a few years back are probably getting to the point where the cost of energy saved more than made up for the higher cost of the initial crop of flat-panels.
I'm on my second LCD panel now. My first was an 18" Acer, the most recent one a 19" Samsung. Very nice stuff. I have not the slightest desire to change back to CRT.
Keep the peace(es).
-
Re:Good qualityThere's BBC Motion Gallery. Here you can view and download watermarked preview files of BBC archive content. This site is primarily aimed at commercial stock footage buyers.
There's also the BBC's Creative Archive, which is not yet launched.
iMP is just entering the second round of closed Beta testing I believe. It's not available for public Beta testing at this time.
I'd also recommend checking out some of the excellent historical footage on the British Pathe site. This archive is now represented by ITN.
-
Big systems, big problems
To give you an idea of "How this can happen"
UK's NATS has had its share of problems. Their air traffic control system was supposed to go operation in 1996. Instead, the £623m Swanwick centre opened in 2002 - six years late and £180m over budget.
And the kicker at the end of the article, is that this brand new system is dependent upon an ancient mainframe! (the point of the article I linked to is that the mainframe is the bottleneck and problems bringing it online rippled out)
Of course, the US isn't any better. This one made Slashdot and I think the issue was that a technician forgot the reboot a windows pc (I SWEAR TO GORD I'm not making that up!).
The moral is; monolithic systems are hard. and not cheap. -
But Microsoft already fixed all buffer overflows
Jim Allchin, a VP at Microsoft said so.
-
Re:Ad-Hoc Networking Mode?
Hi, thanks for the reply, but there will be WiMax notebooks. A Google search on Wimax laptop brings up an article saying:
Intel plans to release WiMax laptop chipsets by 2006.
From what I've read think WiMax uses adaptive antenna technology to increase range and throughput, even in densely populated areas (the antenna actually is several antennae DSP to track a user). But from all I've read about it, there is just no mention of ad-hoc mode. Quite frustrating.
-
Reviewed by PCW UK
You can read a (very favourable) review of Ability Office here. In their monthly "best buys" guide, they actually rated it above Microsoft Office 2002.
-
CorrectYou are mostly correct. The whole SCO vs. IBM case is based on a contract dispute, not on any copyright or patent rights. SCO's CEO, Darl McBride, said in a teleconference that "we don't have any issues with copyright or patent with respect to any claims that we have made" regarding the IBM suit.
And in this article he mentions "contract" 12 times, but only mentions copyright once, and that's only in regard to removing copyright statements. It's almost as if he is being coy -- making it sound as if there is copyright infringement without ever directly saying it. In other interviews, he also avoids the word, choosing instead words such as "infringing" and "Intellectual Property". The SCOvsIBM page makes a similar observation:
Uncertainty is sown by much discussion of the case in terms of vague or broad terms such as "intellectual property" or "all rights", rather than addressing specific contractual, copyright, patent, or trademark claims. On specific grounds, Caldera/SCO's complaint seems quite limited.
An important thing to remember is that you cannot be sued over the contract that SCO has with IBM. Third parties cannot be held liable for contracts that they did not agree to. So if you have no contract with SCO, they can only sue you on the basis of copyright infringement. And you can only be sued for copyright infringement if you have copied or distributed something.Do you really want to give SCO a new avenue by which to sue you? Given that SCO has not shown any evidence that anyone has infringed their copyrights, I don't see why you'd want to do that. SCO hasn't been exactly acting in good faith recently; I don't know if I'd trust any contracts they write up. Here's what Darl McBride says about SCO's use of contracts against their partners and customers:
Contracts are what you use against parties you have relationships with. From a legal standpoint, contracts end up being far stronger than anything you could do with copyrights.
If I were you, I wouldn't even let them know that you use Linux. Why give them any evidence to use against you later? Try to stay off their radar. -
The claim is not misleading - it's artfulArgumentation and Rhetoric is a fascinating subject. The tools of rhetoric were applied skillfully in the caption of this ad. The key clain in the text of the ad is
Microsoft software is carefully designed to keep your company's valuable information in, and unauthorised people and viruses out.
This statement has a factual basis. Any reasonable person would agree that any software company would attempt to secure it's products and that any forward-thinking company would design their procucts with security in mind. The rest of the caption is an interpretation of the meaning of the above statement, and is fraised as such, the key stanza being Which means that...
Any logical person would conclude that what follows will be a conclusion presented by the advertiser, based on the afore-mentioned fact.
I have no doubt that some will argue that Microsoft software designers do not take security into consideration when designing software, or that Microsoft intentionally introduces security holes, so as to promote the purchase of upgrades to it's products (although msot security patches are distributed freely, think SUN and their policy of many years ago, requiring that companies wanting a bug fixes in Solaris were required to pay for the patch to be created).
The other issue is code change. The products to which the advertisement refers MUST be based on new code, because we know that in the past Microsoft did not design software with security in mind, because Craig Mindie said so:"Many of the products we designed in the past have been less secure than they could have been because we were designing with features in mind rather than security," - Craig Mundie
For this reason, IF the products are all based on new code, and IF you think that Microsoft would act in it's own best interest to sell more software and IF you believe that designing security in mind is likely to sell more product, then the ad is not misleading at all.
The key here is to see that Microsoft is NOT CLAIMING that their software IS SECURE they are claiming that they try to design it so that it is secure, and then draw the conclusion (however ridiculous it may be) that it is in fact more secure than a vault, but this is a conclusion, not a statement of fact.
--CTH