Domain: rian.ru
Stories and comments across the archive that link to rian.ru.
Comments · 171
-
Better than Russia's idea
anyone remember when this came out last year? http://en.rian.ru/russia/20070530/66362712.html
-
Re:Russia just can't tell the truth.
Russian news avoids mentioning the Russian satellite and just refers to the ISS dodging a "cluster of garbage."
-
Re:did georgia
In this century, almost all the international news in my country's newspaper is about death and destruction brought about by USA. The Iraq war, the Afghanistan war, the tortures at Guantanamo bay (refusal to adhere to the internationally agreed upon code for treatment of prisoners of war by inventing a new "enemy combatant" terminology). They are actively working to create unrest in Iranian territory. Nothing much is reported about Russia. Compared to USA's hegemonic goals, Russia will pale into insignificance. And it is really strange that Americans talk about "moral authority" about respecting other nations sovereignty, while having invaded and occupied 2 countries! Isn't that a little bit hypocritical? America has ceased to be a role model for developing nations in this century.
But America need not go down this path of destruction, occupation and generally an imperialistic approach. And that can happen only if Americans make a real choice in their elections. If their choice is only between Republican and Democratic parties, then it is not really a choice. I can see that both these parties are the same. They differ in a very minute details. Americans need to look at political parties like Green Party or other alternative parties, who promise to stop the Iraq war and Afghanistan war, who promise to bring single-payer health care, and who would make policies in an environment friendly manner. When Americans are truly ready for change, then, and only then can America be saved. Otherwise, they will go down this path and into war, and by doing so will drag many other countries in their perilous adventure.
Already the arms race has started. They are already discussion about nuclear weapons in space.
-
Russians cyberwarfare? How is it that
the Russian state news agency (RIA Novosti) web site is out since this morning? Their two DNS servers (her.rinet.ru, her.rian.ru) seem to have dropped off the face of the earth. Seems someone is might be engaged in cyberwarfare against them, doesn't it?
-
Re:Lopsided == BadI wouldn't actually want to nuke anyone. That was more or less absurdity. Understood. But if China really did do something hostile over the trade imbalance it could escalate into war so it bears some discussion. Russia wouldn't be able to afford the fuel necessary Huh? Have you read anything at all about the Russia starting up all of its old Soviet-era air force exercises? Heres's one example and you can Google for more (BBC had a good story on this a couple of months ago, this is just the first one Google news brought up). Not exactly the sort of thing a country with no fuel reserves would be doing... more or less irrelevant in today's global economy Russia's now one of the world's biggest energy producers/exporters. Europe buys a lot of energy from them these days. And much of what Russia doesn't produce, it controls, since many of the pipelines to Europe run through the former soviet block. Plenty of Russians live in such poverty and in ruins, it looks like they were just recently bombed. Please don't mistake a lack of civilian comfort for national poverty. They're still running an economy that's very similar to what they had in the Soviet days. Back then in many cities the power would go out at 11PM. It wasn't that the plant shut down, it's just that the electricity was all diverted to munitions plants because they were an economic priority. Today resources are being diverted into the exploitation of strategic resources (like energy).
Oh, and keeping the Soviet-style economy in mind, Russia wouldn't have to "buy" anything to sustain a war effort. They'd simply order their people to build it - and that would work because the Russian mentality is nothing like ours is here. For one thing ultra-patriotic nationalism is normal and encouraged in Russia, rather than a silly notion as it is here. For another, not much time has passed since the bad old days when you did as you were told or you simply vanished in the night. People remember that too, and they have no illusions about their leaders not resorting to that kind of pressure in a time of war. -
Fear
According to this article (note the
.ru TLD) USA has a bigger bomb. It's funny how every state makes its population fear the other state. -
probably not
The U.S. has a 14-ton super bomb more destructive than the vacuum bomb just tested by Russia, a U.S. general said Wednesday.
The statement was made by retired Lt. General McInerney, chairman of the Iran Policy Committee, and former Assistant Vice Chief of Staff of the Air Force.
http://en.rian.ru/world/20070913/78518873.html -
Re:uh oh?
How about some further thoughts on conspiration?
;)
http://en.rian.ru/world/20070720/69340886-print.ht ml
http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/ -
Russia To The Rescue: +1, Helpful
Finally, a country to counter U.S. Imperialism.
Sincerely,
K. Trout -
Re:I've always wondered..
Well, off the top of my head, it's up to 5 years in prison, and further penalties for telling anyone that you gave up the keys. So if you were running a car chopping ring, for example, where you might get 3 years, giving up the keys would be a better idea, as you might even get found not guilty (unless they force you to plead guilty in return for a lighter sentence - but then you get a lighter sentence anyway...) Hiding the data in a rock in a Moscow park might be the best way, though.
-
Re:hum
It's a broken translation. The original quote means something like: "There will be less launches next year than this year". The direct translation from Russian looks like: "The next year is going to see less launches than this year".
The original article is here: http://rian.ru/analytics/20061215/56977055.html -
In related News...
Late in June, speaking at the Farnborough aerospace show, the Roskosmos leadership suddenly announced that they were suspending the tender and would instead adopt a multi-stage program of creating a space transport vehicle [the kliper]. Now the main emphasis is on the time-tested orbital workhorse, the Soyuz spacecraft.
From here.
It seems that the Russians are having a few problems with their new space program. *shock*
-
Re:Fight your own battles.
Like say, the artificial influence voters have over the government?
Stop trying to break my perfectly prettyful metaphor. Voter's don't have "artificial" control over the government - there's that little think called a constituition, in which that "voter" idea was designed around. Lobbyists have artificial influence over the government - they're the unions of the political world. A tiny group of people gets together to bend things to their favor, at the expense of everyone else.
HA! You think there's such a thing as a free market? Tell you what. Start an oil company. Then come back and tell me all about the "free market."
You so totally could start an oil company if you so wished; there's nothing stopping you. In fact, the of petroleum and exploration IPOs. Considering that OPEC's office in Vienna determines the price of crude oil, and federal red tape in America has prevented new refineries from being built for decades, the American side of the petroleum biz is pretty free market. Prices rise in times of high demand (labor day) and uncertainty (hurricane Katrina, the war in Iraq), fall in times of added supply (release of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve), and fall in times of lesser demand (right after "driving holidays", in spring, etc.)
Oil companies are large because there are definite economies of scale - i.e., a bigger refinery lets you refine more oil more efficiently for less money than a small one. There are numerous oil companies that do business in America, all competing against each other as much as possible (given OPEC and regulation.) The "windfall profits" come from that whopping 9 cents a gallon those evil oil companies make selling gasoline.
it's an awfully selfish way to get job security
Awwww dats too bad. You know, a mortgage is an awfully selfish way for a bank to make money too. You don't really believe this shit do you?
Yup; you cut out the relevant part of my quote. Unions get job security by denying it to everyone else; by controlling who's hired - and limiting who's hired - unions make each individual worker more valuable because each individual workers is now, more or less, irreplaceable. (Especially true in "closed shops", which exist in every state without a right to work law.) In other words, unions provide job security to a few by excluding everyone else. If actively denying people jobs for your own personal gain isn't selfish, I don't know what is.
no one is left unable to feed their family
Except the 50% of people with no full-time job, but thanks for playing.
I hope you were exaggerating. Between workmen's comp, unemployment, food stamps, school lunches, and an economy at full employment, you have to work pretty hard to starve in America. Not that nobody does, but if you believe 50% of the unemployed do, your head is in the sand, not mine, sir.
-
Re:rock and a hard place
I'm just wondering if Congress is only giving a bullshit reason to prevent Russia from joining the WTO. Maybe they'd just say anything that will hold up in the international arena to prevent Russia from joining. After all, as a major power, Russia would have considerable influence in the highly undemocratic, supranational organization, and the United States always tries to do what it can to keep its influence and to not share its power with anyone else. Hell, Russia has already opened 4,000 cases and fined 2,000 people regarding piracy.
Of course, the excuse concerning intellectual property might have been created by generous donations from the RIAA (I haven't looked, and this is just speculation), but I'm not convinced that Congress' hesitation to allow Russia to join the WTO is actually about the RIAA or intellectual property.
Read some Russian editorials, and you might find entirely different viewpoints from what you're getting in the US. -
Same fault line
Major earthquake exercise under way in Russian Far East
According to research conducted by the International Institute of Earthquake Prediction Theory and Mathematical Geophysics, there is at least a 30% probability of an earthquake with a 7.2-magnitude or higher in the area of Kamchatka and the Kuril Islands before mid-December.
The ministry's regional forces have been on alert since early August.
In looking at the map on the IRIS Seismic Monitor web site, it appears that the Kamchatka peninsula and the volcanic activity in Oregon may have something in common: both regions lie along the same fault line. The Indonesian tsunami, quakes near Taiwan and Japan, and recent earthquakes in Alaska and California all seem to lie along the same fault line. -
Re:Meanwhile in Russia...
-
Re:Americans are different
Really, should we consider these to be statements without facts to back them up?
On point 1. Some European countries do allow firearms, and in fact in some cases mandate ownership, these are typically the nations with lower crime rates. Evidence also does not support that restricting firearms reduces crime.
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-02/cft a-rfn020805.php/
On Point 2, here is a list of European articles that do not support the huge Global Warming scare industry. All European articles from this month. Should you want more citations I can gladly supply them.
Natural climate change may be larger than commonly thought
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-02/src -ncc020905.php/
Discounting global warming, and more importantly the costs of fighting it even if it is true. http://www.lomborg.com/index.html
And before people say, as they always do, "wasn't he discredited?" No, those that tried to discredit him were in fact told to "put up or shut up" and since they had no facts that proved him wrong they had to shut up.
Prometheus: A Climate of Staged Angst Archives (English reprint of German article)
http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheus/archi ves/climate_change/000343a_climate_of_staged_.html
UK Anti-global warming Blog
http://greenspin.blogspot.com/
Polar bears defy extinction threat
http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/international.cfm? id=143012005
RUSSIA SHOULD DENOUNCE KYOTO PROTOCOL IMMEDIATELY
http://en.rian.ru/rian/index.cfm?prd_id=160&msg_id =5377079&startrow=1&date=2005-02-04&do_alert=0
ILLARIONOV CRITICIZES CENSORSHIP BIAS AT CLIMATIC CONFERENCE
http://en.rian.ru/rian/index.cfm?prd_id=160&msg_id =5371407&startrow=1&date=2005-02-02&do_alert=0
In all the cry of Big Warming is "Everyone knows its true" Which only holds when you discount those that do not hold it is true, those that do not hold its true include the majority of climatologists.
And since when is the European opinion the end all be all in the discussion? How does "The Europeans believe it so it must be true!" statement work. Regardless the majority of Big Warming is here in the States, not in Europe, so your statement makes no sense, because the Majority of GW BS is domestic, not imported.
It should also be noted that the scientists that discovered the flaws, and poor science, in the infamous "Hockey Stick" data are Canadians, McIntyre and McKitrick. -
Re:Americans are different
Really, should we consider these to be statements without facts to back them up?
On point 1. Some European countries do allow firearms, and in fact in some cases mandate ownership, these are typically the nations with lower crime rates. Evidence also does not support that restricting firearms reduces crime.
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-02/cft a-rfn020805.php/
On Point 2, here is a list of European articles that do not support the huge Global Warming scare industry. All European articles from this month. Should you want more citations I can gladly supply them.
Natural climate change may be larger than commonly thought
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-02/src -ncc020905.php/
Discounting global warming, and more importantly the costs of fighting it even if it is true. http://www.lomborg.com/index.html
And before people say, as they always do, "wasn't he discredited?" No, those that tried to discredit him were in fact told to "put up or shut up" and since they had no facts that proved him wrong they had to shut up.
Prometheus: A Climate of Staged Angst Archives (English reprint of German article)
http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheus/archi ves/climate_change/000343a_climate_of_staged_.html
UK Anti-global warming Blog
http://greenspin.blogspot.com/
Polar bears defy extinction threat
http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/international.cfm? id=143012005
RUSSIA SHOULD DENOUNCE KYOTO PROTOCOL IMMEDIATELY
http://en.rian.ru/rian/index.cfm?prd_id=160&msg_id =5377079&startrow=1&date=2005-02-04&do_alert=0
ILLARIONOV CRITICIZES CENSORSHIP BIAS AT CLIMATIC CONFERENCE
http://en.rian.ru/rian/index.cfm?prd_id=160&msg_id =5371407&startrow=1&date=2005-02-02&do_alert=0
In all the cry of Big Warming is "Everyone knows its true" Which only holds when you discount those that do not hold it is true, those that do not hold its true include the majority of climatologists.
And since when is the European opinion the end all be all in the discussion? How does "The Europeans believe it so it must be true!" statement work. Regardless the majority of Big Warming is here in the States, not in Europe, so your statement makes no sense, because the Majority of GW BS is domestic, not imported.
It should also be noted that the scientists that discovered the flaws, and poor science, in the infamous "Hockey Stick" data are Canadians, McIntyre and McKitrick. -
Italy too
RIAN reports (Russian) that in 2006 Italian passports will have RFIDs too.
-
Re: ReciprocityBut the Russians surely got something in return. It's a difference in magnitude but look at how when we began with our (justified) War on Terror thing, we also conveniently shut up about Russia breaking pretty much every international regulation when they "cleaned up" Chechnya. Or play the game with Georgia today.
Hail to whoever has the bigger guns.
-
Private mini-station requires state permissionAs reported by Russian Information Agency Novosti (News):
In Russia, priority is assigned to the state federal programme of space research and meeting goals of the national Defense Ministry. As to other projects, Rosaviakosmos can consider them and submit for government approval only if these projects are expedient, economically feasible and rely on financial backing.