Slashdot Mirror


RIAA Sets Their Sights on Russia

Conor Turton writes to tell us that the RIAA has set their sights on Russia for their newest push into anti-piracy. A recent bill was sponsored in the Senate to deny Russia's entrance into the WTO (among other things) if they did not take major action against piracy. From the press release: "The effective protection of American intellectual property has been sorely lacking in Russia. This resolution is significant because it expresses the will of the U.S. Congress that Russia must take effective action against those who would steal America's knowledge-intensive intellectual property-based goods and services. We must not enter into political arrangements with countries ill-prepared to adequately protect our greatest economic assets."

485 comments

  1. In Soviet Russia.... by jollyroger1210 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ERussia sets its sights on the RIAA!

    --
    Purple, because ice cream has no bones.
    1. Re:In Soviet Russia.... by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If they aren't careful, the Russian Mafia will set their sights on the RIAA. Their extortion tactics won't fly over there.

    2. Re:In Soviet Russia.... by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's why they want the U.S. government to do their dirty work.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  2. Someone's gotta... by mister_llah · · Score: 2, Funny

    In soviet Russia, files share YOU!

    --
    MoM++ - A Classic Expanded - [Master of Magic 1.5]
    http://mompp.sourceforge.net/
    1. Re:Someone's gotta... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, Slashdot posts on fucking idiots.

    2. Re:Someone's gotta... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stopppp!!! please!!! i can't take these soviet russia jokes anymore!!!

    3. Re:Someone's gotta... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, jokes can't take you anymore!

    4. Re:Someone's gotta... by ENIGMAwastaken · · Score: 2, Funny

      In Slashdot, Soviet Russia makes jokes about you!

    5. Re:Someone's gotta... by Kattana · · Score: 1

      Oh really? so the ads have gotten worse over the holidays have they.

    6. Re:Someone's gotta... by einexile · · Score: 1

      I love you.

  3. Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by Crashmarik · · Score: 5, Funny

    Amazing how much they have in common. Hopefully the RIAA has as much success as the first two.

    1. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by Justin205 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I hope they have less success than Hitler and Napoleon, personally, or we could be in for a dark few years... :-/

      --
      "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
    2. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by drsquare · · Score: 0

      Dark years is not being able to buy pirated CDs from Russia? You can't really argue with the RIAA here, Russia is the home of piracy. You can't even cry 'fair use' as that doesn't even come into it.

    3. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think he was referring to the dark years of the RIAA conquering much of continental Europe.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    4. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by User+956 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not to mention complete, balls-out arrogance as to their own importance:

      We must not enter into political arrangements with countries ill-prepared to adequately protect our greatest economic assets.

      So the RIAA did $12 billion in sales last year (link) That's *total* of all sales, including sales of downloads. In comparison, General Motors had $193 billion in revenue. (link)

      You tell me which one's the real "great economic asset".

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    5. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by Amouth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can't be reading this.. if this is right.. that means wait.. arn't all their cd's made in china.. wait.. we might just get some jobs back in the US.. go RIAA shoot your self in the foot

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    6. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by HardCase · · Score: 4, Funny

      Blammo, Godwinned right off the bat!

    7. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by Cyberax · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Napoleon lost his war in little more than 5 months. So don't be afraid :)

    8. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by c_forq · · Score: 1

      Ha ha! You fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders! The most famous is never get involved in a land war in Asia...http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0093779/quotes

      And Goldwin'd on the second comment, wasting no time.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    9. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dark years is not being able to buy pirated CDs from Russia?
       
      Yes...

    10. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by Catbeller · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Godwinning": Calling cliche and quits on any comparison, valid or invalid, to either the ramp-up to power or the actual government of the Nazi party in post-Weimar Germany, and the ascension of fascism in both the U.S. and Russia.

      Usefulness: shutting off discussion of actual similarities between the fascist takeovers of Italy and Germany to the fascist takeovers of Russia and the United States. Takes away the most powerful arguments of those who must use the comparison to bring home the fact that Americans gravitate naturally towards a superpowerful, unconstitutional dictator coupled with hypermilitarism, suppression of dissent, and directed fear against a faceless adversary. Oh, like in the last five years.

      Godwin! 9-11! Terrorism! War! 9-11! Muslism with nukes! Crazed enemies without provocation! Godwin! Must take out the treacherous Poles, er, Iraqis, before they strike first! No similarities between the Nazi's methodology and the current admin's. Nothing to see here, move along, Godwin, 9-11. Thank you, and 9-11.

    11. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by darkat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe Russia is the home of piracy but the US are the home of the bullying over other countries and people. US people should fight the greedy corporations that would enslave the world.

    12. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by AoT · · Score: 1

      if you count 1796 to 1814 as 5 months then, sure, you're right.

    13. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Napoleon lost his war in little more than 5 months. So don't be afraid :)

      Sure, but I'd compare RIAA to the other guy's achievements ;) If Britney Spears really is one of the greatest economic and intellectual assets of USA, I think the guys in the congress are ready to go quite far. That's what they did with the less important asset: oil.

      Both USA and Russia have nukes and the MAD doctrine should still be in effect. I just got a great idea how to end the world: Start using proxies from Russia when you dowload your daily dose of RIAA's fun.

      Assistant Priest, Children of the RIAA

    14. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by shlaf · · Score: 0, Informative

      Napoleon's invasion of Russia started on June 24, 1812 and ended on November 28, 1812.

    15. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      We must not enter into political arrangements with countries ill-prepared to adequately protect our greatest economic assets.



      This coming from a country that stole IP property like say railways and a major plethora of industrial related technologies from Britain.

    16. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      I'm speaking about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patriotic_War_of_1812 when Napoleon directly invaded Russia.

      France was at the state of war with Russia in 1805 (during Austerlitz campaign) and in 1812-1814 (during Russian and European campaigns).

    17. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by Baki · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Russia is a home of "piracy", that is one of the last areas in the world offering resistance against the evil *AA organizations that are buying laws and corrupting democracy all over the world.

      Our only chance for survival of a civilisation is that this criminal industry is sucked empty, their sources of money must be undermined so they can no longer afford to buy laws and politicians all over the world.

      I hope Russia stands firm and does not fall for this ongoing WTO blackmail (if you want to join you have to betray your civilians by introducing law such and such).

    18. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by PatrickThomson · · Score: 5, Funny
      So the RIAA did $12 billion in sales last year


      You're forgetting, that's before the adjustment for piracy. $120,000 per track, times lots of numbers, especially downloads from russia, means that the RIAA's turnover if russia complied would be $5 gazerbaijuhullion per year.

      --
      I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    19. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      Oh, they'll agree to do all sorts of things to stop piracy, just like the Chinese did. And like the Chinese, they will then do sod all about it. After all, if you are a Russian govt. official who is tasked with stamping out piracy while being paid sod all, would you:

      a) Come down like a ton of bricks on the heads of people who have a known talent for making those who annoy them appear on the ingredient lists of dog food cans, or

      b) Raid a few places that you know are occupied by some dweebs who downloaded a Madonna song to show that you're doing your job, while leaving the really serious (i.e. life-threatening) pirate gangs alone.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    20. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by Cal+Paterson · · Score: 1

      Russia is the home of piracy.

      They don't see it like that. Neither does Sweden. Some countries just don't agree with IP. The RIAA are gonna have to get over that; I've seen polls that say Sweden is 80% in favour of Pirate Bay. They seem to think that the same tired approach to bullying through prohibitive trade agreements will work again and again.

    21. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by zerocool^ · · Score: 1, Informative


      Yeah, arrogance was the first thing I thought of - "We must not enter into political arrangements with countries ill-prepared to adequately protect our greatest economic assets."

      Dear United States and RIAA: Fuck you, we're still trying to feed and shelter our people and curb mob violence and create jobs to fight unemployment. We respect your copyrights; it's just that we have a lot more shit going down that we need to address at the moment.

      --
      sig?
    22. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by the_REAL_sam · · Score: 1

      >"So the RIAA did $12 billion in sales last year (link [cirpa.ca])
      >That's *total* of all sales, including sales of downloads. In
      >comparison, General Motors had $193 billion in revenue."
      >
      >You tell me which one's the real "great economic asset".

      Revenue is not an indicator that the industry is an asset; revenue is (part of) what the industry COSTS.

      --
      "Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us." -Jesus Christ The Lord's Prayer
    23. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a Godwin 9-11 to you, too!

    24. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually its $150,000 per track. Google it you can find where they've said it. It also says it on the riaa home page.

    25. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by octopus72 · · Score: 1

      That "we" is really arrogant. RIAA don't represent whole USA, although mentality and arrogance of G.W.Bush is on the same level. And Russia is not another piece of cake state, it is still a great power. They don't give a pi** about USA nor some non-government organisation like RIAA. No one can dictate anything to them. Who cares about US-dictated WTO these days, anyway?

    26. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by temcat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, actually even non-Soviet Russia seems to be pretty good at bullying other countries.

      Dude, I suggest that you look at a map sometimes, OK? Checnya isn't a fscking country. It still is a part of Russian Federation, no matter how I oppose the war. And Chechen oil resources are pathetic.

    27. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Informative

      Let's not forget stealth fighter tech.

      Our stealth aircraft tech depends on Russian research paper.

      Mebbe Moscow should start demanding some royalties.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    28. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by HardCase · · Score: 1

      "Humor, Sense of": What you seem to be missing.

    29. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia Will Dunn goats FUCK YOU!!!

    30. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the fact that Americans gravitate naturally towards a superpowerful, unconstitutional dictator coupled with hypermilitarism, suppression of dissent, and directed fear against a faceless adversary.

      HEY!

      Only fifty-one percent of Americans gravitate towards such a state, thank you very much.

      The reason why Godwin's Law (someone will say Hitler) and it's Corollary (that means Game Over) are useful is that regardless of the merits of the comparison, mentioning the Nazis invariably provokes an emotional reaction. Emotion is the enemy of thoughtful, reasoned debate.

      There very well are some valid comparisons between the American state today and the German state 70 years ago, but please, if you wish to engage in rational discourse, try not to use language that suggests a party to the debate wants to kill 5 million Jewish people.

    31. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      After all, if you are a Russian govt. official who is tasked with stamping out piracy while being paid sod all, would you: a) Come down like a ton of bricks on the heads of people who have a known talent for making those who annoy them appear on the ingredient lists of dog food cans, or

      Not to mention that if you are a russian gov't official there's strong chance you are yourself already a member of group a).

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    32. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      If RIAA don't like the way things are done in Russia, they are free not to sell any of their products in Russia, I mean, nobody is forcing RIAA to sell in Russia. They have the choice to leave and don't sell if they don't like it.

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    33. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Russia is a home of "piracy", that is one of the last areas in the world offering resistance against the evil *AA organizations that are buying laws and corrupting democracy all over the world.

      Of course, Russia is the last bastion of democracy and corruption is unheard of over there.

      Our only chance for survival of a civilisation is that this criminal industry is sucked empty

      Yes, selling CDs is criminal. I don't see how civilians are 'betrayed' or how it will cause the downfall of civilisation if people have to buy CDs legally rather than pirating them. Sounds like the whining of 12 year olds with no sense of responsibility to me.

    34. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by toddestan · · Score: 1

      So, in summary, we cannot discuss Nazi Germany in a thoughtful, reasonable manner because it provokes an emotional reaction? I guess that means a lot of other topics are off limits, like abortion, religion, 9/11, the death penalty, the Palestinian/Isreali conflict, SUVs, PETA, Terri Schiavo, and child porn - amongst others.

      Like the grandparent, I'm quite sick of Godwin's Law. There is a lot that can be learned from WWII Germany, if the lessons can be heard over the "OMGWTF GODWIN!!11!!1" crowd.

    35. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by spudgun · · Score: 1

      not the Jewish people ....

      How About This

      --
      Type unto others as you would have them type unto you.
    36. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      However much you may despise the RIAA, they do have a point. But the point doesn't just apply to music and movies. We have to protect our intellectual property across all industries - nano, bio, chem, manufacturing, weapons, etc. That IP is what gives us our edge nowadays. And it's that IP that is worth more than the RIAA's $12B or GM's $193B ... because it is involved in every aspect of our economy. You could probably value it in the trillions of dollars. We're no longer a manufacturing country. We are a technology country. And if we don't protect that edge, we may continue slipping all together. I think the RIAA is on the right track, however I would not trust the RIAA to do the IP work with Russia for all of us. Obviously their only interest will be ensuring they receive royalties for music and movies from Russia, not ensuring that Russia takes an IP enforcement stance on all varieties of IP. And I'm not talking stuff like Amazon's 1-click BS. I'm talking about things like new molecules, new manufacturing techniques, mechanical designs, etc ... truly innovative and patentable ideas.

      Having said that, I don't think we should be able to gridlock every technology we develop. Just like any company within the United States needs to be a good national citizen, we need to be good global citizens and release technology into the world after we reap the benefits for a while. In the end, hopefully the world will just become one huge global economy that works identically in every nook and cranny in the world. So companies no longer go to China to produce circuit boards because of lackluster ecological and labor laws. A company just starts wherever they start, and they only move because of additional opportunity, not to escape restrictions like IP law, eco law, or labor law.

    37. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Or if not actually a member, are receiving "incentives" from them.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    38. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Point, Making a": What you in this case seem to ignore or devalue, or both.

    39. Re:Well Napoleon, Hitler and now the RIAA by Firefly1 · · Score: 1

      Bravo!
      As yet someone else who holds Godwin's 'Law' and its spawn in utter contempt, I tip my hat do both you and the grandparent poster for so eloquently driving stakes into its proverbial heart.
      It is noted elsewhere in this thread that yes, the Russian authourities do have far more pressing concerns than the RIAA's gripes (the 'Dear USA/RIAA' letter is definitely worth a chuckle). Which leads me to yet another post which asks 'how necessary is the RIAA these days, really?'
      On a related note: how many artists - as opposed to RIAA middlemen - regularly speak out against bootlegging (again, I refuse to call it 'piracy' because that word is associated with far graver criminal activity)...

      --
      - White Knight of the Order of Mihoshi Enthusiasts
  4. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    No Soviet Russia jokes yet?!?!

    1. Re:What? by TeknoHog · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'll think of something as soon as I stop laughing at the notion of "American intellectual property".

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:What? by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      Of course not. They're only appropriate when the subject has absolutely nothing to do with Russia.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    3. Re:What? by Omnieiunium · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sorry, but "In Soviet Russia..." jokes are a copyrighted material by the RIAA.

    4. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pick any two.

  5. So this is it? by Orgazmus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    THIS is a valid reason for the US to not co-op with russia?
    Major corruption? Bah
    A weak if existant democracy? Bah I say!
    But piracy? Close the borders, its war!

    I knew the policymakers had deep pockets, but damn!

    --
    The system had the verbosity of HTML combined with all the readability of compiled assembly viewed as bitmap images
    1. Re:So this is it? by shark72 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "But piracy? Close the borders, its war!"

      Yes, you are correct. Whether we like it or not, intellectual property is one of the USA's biggest exports, if not the biggest export. It's one of the reasons why we're one of the richest nations on the planet, and it's a major factor in the quality of life we enjoy. It's no coincidence that countries which don't pay much bother to the Berne Convention and other similar international agreements are by and large shitty places to live.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    2. Re:So this is it? by Orgazmus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So..
      Bad govt + Money == Good
      Good govt - Money == Bad
      Is this it?

      I feel like quoting the last lines of your national anthem, since must have forgotten

      --
      The system had the verbosity of HTML combined with all the readability of compiled assembly viewed as bitmap images
    3. Re:So this is it? by stubear · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah, considering this the World Trade Organization. Did you honestly think the WTO handled human rights abuses? Their mission is to facilitate trade and open markets worldwide, not to police the actions of governments based on their human rights records.

    4. Re:So this is it? by shark72 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm not sure how you read that into my post. I am stating a fact: whether we like it or not, our country makes a hell of a lot of money on intellectual property. Whether this is a good thing or a bad thing is, as the math texts say, an exercise left to the reader.

      The countries that are not signatories to the Berne Convention do not generally have what I consider to be "good" governments, either. If I were to try to come up with a list of five countries in the world that I consider to have "good" governments (and this would be difficult), all of them happen to be signatories.

      For reference, the latest list of non-signatories that I could find is: Afghanistan, Bhutan, Ethiopia, Iran, Iraq, Nepal, Oman, San Marino, Tonga and Yemen. I would not want to live in any of these countries, and the ability to pirate music to my heart's content would not make up for the other issues. Others may feel differently.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    5. Re:So this is it? by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So..
      Bad govt + Money == Good
      Good govt - Money == Bad
      Is this it?


      No, that's not it.


      Liberty + Rule Of Law + Market Economics == Good
      Communist Baggage + Pirate Mentality + Too Much Vodka == Bad

      If the Russian government won't recognize and grapple with the huge, nearly China-like, economy-wide house of cards that is their disregard for intellectual property rights, it's sure as hell a good sign that we don't want to recognize them as economic peers.

      I feel like quoting the last lines of your national anthem, since must have forgotten

      Let's see... "the land of the free, and the home of the brave" that you'd be thinking of right? That's not been forgotten. Freedom includes freedom from being another economy's entertainment, software, and industrial process slaves. Brave means having the backbone to be so rude (in traditional diplomatic terms) to actually call international piracy what it is, and make rational trade negotiations based on fact, not Global Whining about how we're mean when we object to having our work ripped off.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    6. Re:So this is it? by lilmouse · · Score: 1
      Did you honestly think the WTO handled human rights abuses?
      No, of course not - the WTO is a tool for the multi-nationals; what do *they* care about rights abuses? They have privaledge; they don't need to worry about rights.

      Of course, the Senate would never stoop to introducing anything about Russia's human right's policies. After all, they're one of our allies in the War on Terror (tm). Rights can get trampled on and no one acts. Money? Ha - can't lose export business, now can we?

      </bitter>

      --LWM
    7. Re:So this is it? by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      This is funny because the US only recently joined Berne after about a century of staying out of it, and still is not in compliance with it. We've been successful without Berne, and I think we'd be more successful if we stayed the hell away from it, like the bad idea it is.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    8. Re:So this is it? by Husgaard · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The countries that are not signatories to the Berne Convention do not generally have what I consider to be "good" governments, either.
      Please remember that the US refused to sign the Berne Convention for 103 years, and didn't sign it until March 1th 1989.
    9. Re:So this is it? by suezz · · Score: 1

      "I would not want to live in any of these countries, and the ability to pirate music to my heart's content would not make up for the other issues. Others may feel differently."

      you do live in a country where you have the ability to pirate to your hearts content.
      just because you live in the US doesn't mean you can't pirate stuff. What the RIAA is doing doesn't do a thing to catching pirates. The only thing they are doing is limiting the legitmate buyers and how/where they play music. And now spyware is a legitimate business model all in the name of protecting IP.

      your remarks are so off base here I don't know where to start.

      RIAA are nothing but greedy middleman. the artists don't need them and I buy music from artists that do not use them. I don't pirate music but it isn't because my government tells me not to it is because it is ethically wrong and I will not do it.

      What the RIAA is doing is an embarrassment to this country and I hope they go bankrupt and just basically disappear. With the internet I see that happening eventually I just hope I live long enough to see it.

      I boycott the RIAA and I hope other americans do the same because of what they are doing is unconstitutional. I am glad the article named senators. At least I know who not to support next election.

    10. Re:So this is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I don't know how many of you have actually been to Russia so this might not make as much sense...

      Russia has so many other problems going on right now that they couldn't give a crap about IP law. How can you have IP law when you have police who shake down people because they look like they're "foriegn" and they KNOW they can get cash from them easily. How can anyone care about IP law when you can buy immigration papers in ANY train station or from a vendor in the subway (yes, believe it or not, there are millions of people TRYING to get into Russia).

      Plus, with the economic conditions the way they are, you aren't going to get a Russian Citizen to pay $20 for a CD. They'd rather eat or spend that $20 bribing someone so they can live their life without someone giving them crap.

      The media companies inside of Russia accept this as fact and they've learned how to work within the system. They add features and price their product competitively with the pirated stuff - and people buy it believe it or not.

      What the Cartels like the MPAA and the RIAA need to learn is that the market isn't going to be restrained by their cartel. The Black Market will always win - especially in Russia.

    11. Re:So this is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "whether we like it or not, our country makes a hell of a lot of money on intellectual property."

      I wonder if that has anything to do with the heavy handed enforcement of IP on their own citizens and the bullying of other countries.

      It's like a lunch-money shakedown.

    12. Re:So this is it? by magarity · · Score: 1

      the WTO is a tool for the multi-nationals
       
      The WTO is as despised by large corporations as it is by the economic education challenged. Barriers to trade mean little to a multinational corporation that has their entire chain from factories to sales in multiple countries. Barriers to trade mean everything to special interest groups of much small producers. Take for example the most vocal group who hates the WTO: farmers in advanced western nations and Japan. Cutting their subsidies would shave a good 25% off the tab at the grocery store in the USA and in certain European countries the savings would be astronomical. But the farmers would have to run market efficient operations and not get big time handouts. So forget it. And they've got extremely slick FUD campaigns to make you think the WTO is in it for the faceless multinational corps. The WTO is in it for the consumer and the honest working producers.

    13. Re:So this is it? by AndyElf · · Score: 1

      And when was the last time you were to Russia? Or is this "second-hand" experience that Western media likes to recite so much?

      --

      --AP
    14. Re:So this is it? by lysergic.acid · · Score: 2, Informative

      Taiwan isn't on the list of signatures to the Berne Convention either. While Taiwan's government is far from perfect, I think we're doing a lot better than countries like China, Turkey, South Africa, etc.

    15. Re:So this is it? by slavemowgli · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I can understand not wanting to live in Afghanistan, or Ethiopia, or Yemen, but.. San Marino? What's wrong with *that* one?

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    16. Re:So this is it? by MavEtJu · · Score: 1

      For reference, the latest list of non-signatories that I could find is: Afghanistan, Bhutan, Ethiopia, Iran, Iraq, Nepal, Oman, San Marino, Tonga and Yemen.

      Tonga? Count me in!

      --
      bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
    17. Re:So this is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel like quoting the last lines of your national anthem, since must have forgotten

      "Play ball!" ?

    18. Re:So this is it? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      Taiwan isn't on the list of signatures to the Berne Convention either.

      Is Taiwan able to sign? Is it recognized by enough countries?

    19. Re:So this is it? by EzInKy · · Score: 2, Insightful


      If the Russian government won't recognize and grapple with the huge, nearly China-like, economy-wide house of cards that is their disregard for intellectual property rights, it's sure as hell a good sign that we don't want to recognize them as economic peers.


      What's with the "we"? You aren't talking about recognizing them as economic peers, you're talking about making them economic slaves. I certainly don't care if some poor Russian who only makes $100 a month buys a movie he would otherwise be unable to see for a buck.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    20. Re:So this is it? by kesuki · · Score: 5, Interesting

      First off lets go myth busting your arguments.

      1. IP the biggest export.

      http://www.ita.doc.gov/td/industry/otea/usfth/aggr egate/H04t02.html

      Fact, IP was the Number 4 export for the united states in 2004.

      and at about 7.5% of our total exports, it wasn't aa huge a player as you made it out to be.

      2. It's one of the reasons why we're one of the richest nations on the planet

      BS, we're rich because a. america had vast untapped resources and still widely under utilized natural resource bases b. america stole virtually every piece of technology they could to 'build' their industrial base and c. no major wars rased any of our industrial complexs.

      3. it's a major factor in the quality of life we enjoy.

      Actually the ammount of profit made off 'ideas' has almost no correlation to qquality of life what so ever. there are a lot of important factors, but frankly ip centric societies (the UK) have managed to prosper with tight IP laws, and 'historically lax' IP nations as the US have also prospered... IP laws come in so late in the equasion that they can't really change a whole lot about an economy...

      4. It's no coincidence that countries which don't pay much bother to the Berne Convention and other similar international agreements are by and large shitty places to live.

      others called BS on this already, for 103 years the US refused to sign said convention. the entire decade 'of greed' occured before said convention was signed in the US.

    21. Re:So this is it? by HardCase · · Score: 2, Informative

      Please remember that the US refused to sign the Berne Convention for 103 years, and didn't sign it until March 1th 1989.

      It wasn't so much that the US refused to sign as that the government couldn't sign. The Berne convention was incompatible with US law until 1988. The US has been a member of UCC for over 50 years, though.

      -h-

    22. Re:So this is it? by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Other countries recognize intellectual property rights? What does that mean? Intellectual property is NOT a natural right and has never been considered as such by law. Under law, IP is an ARTIFICAL right set up to give only temporary rights for a limited time, and only so far as it PROMOTES the advancement of the arts/sciences. NOT promotes an economy.
      Again - NOT a natural right, but rather a temporary PRIVELEGE designed to promote advances... in this way not much different than enterprise zones, tax breaks, etc. As such, as an artifical construct, it is not something that we can say crosses political boundaries, as we can say human rights do.

      What right do we have to demand that other countries fall in line with OUR economic or social development policies? Countries look after their own interests. in creating the temporary and artifical "intellectual property rights" we were looking after our interests - in IGNORING our policies, they may be looking after their own.

      House of cards? You know what is a house of cards? Trying to base an entire nation's economy on this artificial "property" and then demanding that all other countries and cultures - often cultures where the entire concept is anathema, follow suit, play along and hand us their money simply because its what WE want.

      --
      This space available.
    23. Re:So this is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why single out Russia?

      Copied CDs (music or software) and DVDs are widely available in China, who recently joined WTO and with whom the US does quite a lot of trade. Of course, the US are applying pressure and Chinese authorities are making some noises about the issue and taking some actions, but nothing very effective.

      Nor are China by any means alone. Thailand, for example, has even more "pirate" material than China. When I lived in Singapore 20 years ago there were shops with stack of LPs. Give them your list, come back next day for your custom-made cassette tape.

    24. Re:So this is it? by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Real property is recognized universally. Psuedo property is recognized after F-16s have killed those who would dare say aloud, "the emperor is naked."

    25. Re:So this is it? by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 0, Troll

      your link goes to "U.S. TRADE IN SERVICES BY MAJOR CATEGORY", where it seems that our total services balance is 48.5 (Billions of Dollars), with 28.5 being the balance from Royalties and License Fees. that makes it 58.763% of our total U.S. TRADE IN SERVICES. That is more that half, dude.

    26. Re:So this is it? by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      "Barriers to trade mean little to a multinational corporation that has their entire chain from factories to sales in multiple countries."

      huh?

      These are *exactly* the people who *do* care about eliminating trade barriers. Farmers from developed countries want to maintain trade barriers. Both care, big time.

    27. Re:So this is it? by lysergic.acid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's irrelevant. Taiwan hasn't signed the Berne Convention either because they choose not to, or they are not allowed to. But the Taiwanese government still isn't nearly as bad as some of the the countries which are included on the list. Also, economically speaking, Taiwan isn't doing too poorly either. Plus, they have universal healthcare. So whether a country has signed the Berne Convention is a pretty poor indicator of the quality of government/living in that country.

    28. Re:So this is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silly rabbit you still think the government runs the country? Well the business leaders_own_America.

    29. Re:So this is it? by kesuki · · Score: 1

      'services' is not ip royalties is ip. 'servicees' is everything from making beds, to cooking tacos, basicially anything that isn't manufacture or royalties or agraculture...

      Now i realize some IP winds up being sold as a 'service' or winds up being reproted as a 'manufactured good' because the person who owns said ip isn't selling or renting it to others... but the 'services' category IS not the same thing as IP. and MOST of that category is stuff that Has Almost Nothing To do with IP.

    30. Re:So this is it? by c_forq · · Score: 2, Informative

      He is about correct. Last time I was in the area I picked up a boot-leg Lord of The Rings. The bootlegs were everywhere, the actual movie was not. There were some movies priced comparatively, and people seemed to be willing to pay an extra $2 for the quality guarantee of the real one and extra features (some of the bootlegs are of very poor quality).

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    31. Re:So this is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are talking about advances in technology, Boeing aircraft wing design, CPU chips, HP RPN calculators, etc. etc. then yes we need to protect our IP, but the RIAA is talking about what? Lousy music, worse movies?

      Big business and not so big business is selling out to China as fast as they can. The flow of foreign science students is being throttled back because of irrational fears of terrorism. Americans are busy studying to be lawyers, I guess to protect IP values?

      Someone once said that the intinerant Yankee traiders would sell the paint off their wagons given a buyer, the present yankees traitors, pun intended, have long ago sold the wagon.

    32. Re:So this is it? by owlnation · · Score: 4, Informative
      For reference, the latest list of non-signatories that I could find is: Afghanistan, Bhutan, Ethiopia, Iran, Iraq, Nepal, Oman, San Marino, Tonga and Yemen. I would not want to live in any of these countries, and the ability to pirate music to my heart's content would not make up for the other issues.


      Not sure what anyone could have against San Marino or its government. Or why anyone wouldn't want to live there, it's a very beautiful little collection of villages. You do know where it is, right?

      Unless of course if you were Swedish, since the longest state of war (technically speaking) in European history existed between San Marino and Sweden, only to end in about 1992.

      I've always loved this imagery, a tiny group of villages in the mountains of Italy fighting a country of 8 million famous for their very safe cars, social democracy, Abba and nice pine furniture.

      Hail Freedonia!
    33. Re:So this is it? by ibbey · · Score: 1

      For reference, the latest list of non-signatories that I could find is: Afghanistan, Bhutan, Ethiopia, Iran, Iraq, Nepal, Oman, San Marino, Tonga and Yemen. I would not want to live in any of these countries, and the ability to pirate music to my heart's content would not make up for the other issues. Others may feel differently.

      What a wonderfully fallacious argument! Obviously, the fact that those particular government's have not signed the Berne Convention is the only reason that they are less then ideal places to live. There's clearly no other possible explanation for the correlation other then causation.

    34. Re:So this is it? by DiscoFreq · · Score: 1

      They do that with several conventions.

      The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: the United States and Somalia are the only countries in the world that have failed to ratify the Convention (and Somalia didn't have a government the last few years).

      Incompatible with ...?
      (religious extremists?)

    35. Re:So this is it? by dapyx · · Score: 1

      San Marino? It's a bit to expensive to live there, but you get to see a Formula 1 race each year from your balcony. :-)

      --
      I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is an imaginary number. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and dial again.
    36. Re:So this is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must understand the wider picture.

      We are reinventing ourselves as an information society who keeps know-how and culture tightly controlled and sells it (at a high price) to cultures seen as lesser developed. Think about manufacturing, a job that has forever moved to countries of cheaper labour. The economic circustances are such that this trend isn't going to stop, and with manufacturing eventually fully gone, what remain are the intanglible goods. The western world is struggling to establish an information stranglehold over the rest of the world, because this is what we got left. Our pop culture is one export, and so are all those patents and copyrights (which we try to get enacted worldwide) part of this information ownership campaign.

    37. Re:So this is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to play the devil's advocate (OK, that's a lie), but in what way are international treaties (and for that matter, domestic laws) *not* artificial constructs? Taking the devil's argumentation to the limit, aren't *all* law's artificial constructs? The only true law is that of nature, and that is one of survivial of the fittest. Now, we have governments so that the rights of the weak can be preserved for the benefit of all, which is, IMHO, a Good Thing (TM) (pun intended).

      But to say that artificial constructs don't cross international boundaries is (to put it mildly) a little behind the times.

    38. Re:So this is it? by MasterofVoid · · Score: 1

      Ehh, no. Youre thinking of Monaco.

      --
      *You are not allowed to read this*
    39. Re:So this is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Buggrit - anything sounding this good has to turn out as a myth.

      http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=47 2835

    40. Re:So this is it? by Al_Maverick · · Score: 1

      The list is not a very charming one...
      But, do you even know where San Marino is?

    41. Re:So this is it? by skahshah · · Score: 1
      I understand for the other countries, but why wouldn't you want to live in San Marino ?

      http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ sm.html
      http://www.visitsanmarino.com/defaulte.asp

    42. Re:So this is it? by ben0207 · · Score: 1

      San Marino has a Grand Prix too.

      --
      cmd-q.co.uk - some sort of stupid fucking internet bullshit
    43. Re:So this is it? by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

      I don't think he meant that the IP laws aren't real or true laws, but he meant that they're not a right. If another country improves the human rights in their country, then the populace is better off, but if they improve IP rights, then mostly American corporations benefit. So this RIAA demand could be summed up as "We demand Russia gives tax breaks to IP companies." because that's what it essentially is.

    44. Re:So this is it? by jweatherley · · Score: 1

      The San Marino Grand Prix isn't in San Marino.

      --

      --
      Reverse outsourcing: it's the future
    45. Re:So this is it? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      So, you'd have no problem ripping off the work of a bunch of Indian programmers?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    46. Re:So this is it? by temcat · · Score: 1

      Writing this from St. Petersburg, Russia, as a Russian citizen. Would you please point out inaccuracies in the GP post?

    47. Re:So this is it? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Other countries recognize intellectual property rights? What does that mean? Intellectual property is NOT a natural right and has never been considered as such by law.

      Careful how vigorously you pursue the success of only "natural" systems. I was watching a perfectly natural Red Shouldered Hawk eat a very natural Mourning Dove outside my window this morning. All laws, treaties, trade agreements, and systems that allow people to produce things with their brains without simply being ripped off are: artificial. Just like currency, constitutions, graduate degrees, and calendars. We produce cultural frameworks (like ownership of your work) because it's civilizing, and improves the standard of living, and encourages a marketplace full of ever more creativity. That's artificial, but so are antibiotics, refridgeration, and the underwear you have on.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    48. Re:So this is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right. Demanding compensation money from a country which as a sovereign nation choses to declare that there exists no copyright, but all information is free, is very narrow minded, because you don't respect their local culture nor their choice to have state, laws and rights they want to have.
      As long as they don't invade others, it should be OK to peacefully coexist with such country.

      But no, greedy americans want "their" money. Well f*ck off yanks, no one owes you anything but revenge for all the misery and death you create!

    49. Re:So this is it? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      I have no quarrel with Taiwan. I consider it a country, and from what I can tell it's a fine place to be. Heck I even play golf with the coach of the ping pong team, and if he's any indication of Taiwanese people, well, they're OK with me.

    50. Re:So this is it? by HardCase · · Score: 1

      The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: the United States and Somalia are the only countries in the world that have failed to ratify the Convention (and Somalia didn't have a government the last few years).

      Incompatible with ...?
      (religious extremists?)


      I've done a little research to help you out, since you couldn't do it for yourself. Again, compatibility with US law, but in this case, with state law. Of course, if we had a much stronger Federal government, the feds could just bulldoze the state laws that are in conflict with the Convention and Congress could ratify the treaty. But that pesky Constitution keeps getting in the way.

      I'll leave it as an exercise for you to find out what the problem is with certain state laws that conflict with the Convention. I'm not saying that they're right - just that they conflict.

      -h-

    51. Re:So this is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well duh! Of course it isn't! Why would anyone ever think it was?!?!

    52. Re:So this is it? by DiscoFreq · · Score: 1

      I heard there was also opposition people who think they have the right to punish their children in a way that's not compatible with children's rights...

      But there's also Kyoto, landmines,...? :p

    53. Re:So this is it? by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      Well, of course. But he was arguing that by not following OUR system and beliefs re: intellectual property that they are somehow immoral, bad, violating our rights, etc.

      If we want to try to get a treaty where they recognize our laws on IP, and they think it's in their interest or to our mutual benefit, then fine - but if they decide its not in their interest and/or that its incompatible with their social structure, then its just too effing bad for us, and to act like they are violating some natural law is stupid.

      --
      This space available.
    54. Re:So this is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the richest nations? Quality of life you enjoy? I don't know what you've been sniffing, but without the support of Asia, China in particular, the USA's economy would've been on its ass by now.
      The USA is bankrupt! "You guys" are borrowing $18.000 per second from the rest of the world to sustain your mass consumption. That's 3 billion dollars a day. When Asia pulls the plug, you're done for, and lots of other countries will also face some major difficulties, which is the only reason things still are as they are. The RIAA with their umpteenth bs story is the least of your concerns.

    55. Re:So this is it? by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      Right here, right now in China, Shenyang to be exact (city of 7 million, in the northwest), there's been a bit of a clampdown in DVD sales.

      This means new releases are no longer available to folks who want to buy them, as there is not one single seller in this city who sells originals.

      Or at least, it meant the new releases were off the market for almost one full week. Then the SMS's went around alerting the regular customers of the new location.

      They don't do custom work here, but they generally have such a good mix of old movies, new movies and high quality box sets of TV shows that custom items are unnecessary.

      So, yeah, some efforts being made, but the general response here has been minor complaining and then mocking of the efforts.

      It's also worth noting that the average price of a TV box set (Extremely high quality, with a shop guarantee) comes to 5 yuan a disk (6 if you're not a regular), which translates as approximately 60 cents (Eurocents that is) per DVD.

      The *AA have a long, unwinnable battle ahead of it. I would wish them a slow death, but for the benefit of everyone I'll hope they give it up soon and move with the times.

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    56. Re:So this is it? by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Kyoto- hmmm, given the fact that the US Senate would have to ratify a treaty, I don't see many calls in the Senate for the president to bring them Kyoto to sign. So that's a non-starter, nevermind Russia gets to use the pre-fall of the Soviet Union as their carbon amounts or that China and India get a free pass, so the West can send their manufacturing there, it's not like we are all on the same planet. Then there is the cute accounting games the other signers will play to claim they are meeting their quotas.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    57. Re:So this is it? by shmlco · · Score: 1

      As we don't export "making beds" and "cooking tacos" (the category we're discussing) your examples are somewhat less than useful. (Actually, they're completely useless.) So unless you have another major "service" we're EXPORTING...

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    58. Re:So this is it? by AndyElf · · Score: 1

      This is *exactly* the point, though. You *have* picked up a bootleg -- why? Aren't you concerned that this is morally wrong?

      As for "actual" movies -- you can pick them up "normal" stores -- not open markets and street stalls (I remember quite well "discount" Rolex watches on sale in NYC just a few blocks away from Bloomingdales -- spread out on a blanket).

      --

      --AP
    59. Re:So this is it? by c_forq · · Score: 1

      This is *exactly* the point, though. You *have* picked up a bootleg -- why? Aren't you concerned that this is morally wrong?

      In my case I already owned the boxed extended edition, I picked up the bootleg as a conversation piece for my shelf in America (with the cover and such being in Russian, and the movie being dubbed in Russian). And I would like to note that I did buy it in a "normal" store (four walls, filled with shelves and products, a cashier and a manager). Russia is not America.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    60. Re:So this is it? by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1
      but the RIAA is talking about what? Lousy music, worse movies?

      No kidding...When, obviously, they should be pressuring the Russians to deal with that guy in the baseball cap that kept getting up to get popcorn during the 'filming' of King Kong. Sheesh, where are their priorities?

    61. Re:So this is it? by DiscoFreq · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's true... but a lot of countries who signed that treaty also try to do something about pollution. The USA is the biggest polluter and doesn't do a lot to change that.

    62. Re:So this is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been there enough times in the past 5 years to fill my passport. AND you'd be surprised, I'm a conservative who KNOWS America is the best place on Earth to live. (that's why I'm posting as AC - because I don't like to be associated with Slashdot)

      I also know that the RIAA has no idea how to conduct itself in a free market. It only knows how to operate as a cartel.

      So, When was the last time you left this hemisphere?

      One thing I "love" about Slashdot... it's a microcosm of the Internet. The largest collection of idiots can all get together and pretend they are experts on everything.

    63. Re:So this is it? by booch · · Score: 1

      Use the links at the top of the page to go to the Goods page, and you'll see that manufactured goods, agricultural goods, and travel (on the services) page are larger than the royalties category. Hence, IP royalties are #4.

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    64. Re:So this is it? by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      Troll? Troll? I follow the link, and apply simple math, and I get trolled? Try suggesting that the data (which I was replying to) is wrong, or find an error in my simple division. Troll? Good God.

    65. Re:So this is it? by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      I looked, but couldn't find the "Goods page". Also, consider that I was presenting a balance. In terms of travel, the numbers (on the page posted) are:

      Exports:74.7 Imports:64.6 Balance:10.0, whereas for Royalties and icense Fees the numbers are

      Exports:51.1 Imports:22.6 Balance:28.5

      and thus, while the export amount for travel is a higher number, in terms of trade balance IP is almost three times that of travel.

      I surely don't vouch for the numbers, but in terms of the numbers provided, it is true that IP is over half of the service balance, even though I agree it is #4 in the terms you present it in.

    66. Re:So this is it? by booch · · Score: 1

      Here's the Goods page.

      I don't think it makes sense to look at the trade balance for a category when trying to determine which category is the "most important". Otherwise, you'd conclude that we "lost money" on most of our trade. But there are a lot of industries that made a lot of money on exports in those categories. Should we "give up" on the categories we're "losing" in?

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    67. Re:So this is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ever heard of McDonald's? no? so why are they in tokyo, london, paris, and countless other cities around the world? if they're owned by corprate all the profit from those stores is 'exported' to the us. there are a lot of ways a service can be 'exported' or 'imported'

    68. Re:So this is it? by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't make sense to "give up on" something where you are making money. However, that highlights the difference in perspective. If I am make money exporting widgets, yet as a country we import more widgets than we export, then in terms of these widgets our net balance is negative. Of course I shouldn't stop exporting, since I'm making money doing it, and if I did stop, our net balance would be more negative. In terms of which perspective is "the most important", it depends on what question is being asked, which perspective gives you a better view. If one is talking about balance of trade, then it is true that in terms of Services, IP makes up over half of our net postive balance. This is only useful when discussing the importance of IP vs. other services in terms of trade balance. It might also explain why Free Software is having trouble getting mindset traction in certain circles, however.

    69. Re:So this is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i feel your pain but there is no -1 'wrong' moderation. you were wrong, and so people thought 'hey you're a troll, because you were Wrong!' it happen, this is slashdot...

  6. This wouldn't have anything to do with... by MacDork · · Score: 5, Insightful

    these guys would it? Nah, they pay royalties to some other russian front who pays to ... well ... not the RIAA.

    1. Re:This wouldn't have anything to do with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      AllOfMp3.com is, arguably, completely legal within Russian law; which is how it survived a police investigation.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allofmp3

    2. Re:This wouldn't have anything to do with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Nah, they pay royalties to some other russian front who pays to ... "

      the russian mafia. they'll show the riaa the real definition of racketeering.

      hey, riaa, file a lawsuit in russia...if your lawyers aren't too afraid.

    3. Re:This wouldn't have anything to do with... by Vadim+Makarov · · Score: 1

      You lag a bit. I live in Russia. There has been NO mafia the last few years. We have law, order, and mostly civilized legal disputes (within OUR national laws, as properly noted), believe it or not. Businesses do not have to pay to mafia any more, there isn't one. The mafioso that mushroomed en masse in the past turmoil are now either dead, behind the bars, or have become legal business owners.

      --
      17779 eligible voters in a district, 17779 'vote' as one. This is Russia.
    4. Re:This wouldn't have anything to do with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear that bribes are also a good way to survive a police investigation.

  7. rock and a hard place by revery · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We must not enter into political arrangements with countries ill-prepared to adequately protect our greatest economic assets.

    I don't know which is sadder, that the RIAA has such influence over Congress, or that this might be true.

    1. Re:rock and a hard place by shark72 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "I don't know which is sadder, that the RIAA has such influence over Congress, or that this might be true."

      It's extremely true -- intellectual property is one of the US's biggest exports. This is quite clear to people who've left the US and seen the impact of US culture. American movies are popular worldwide, American pop stars are popular all over, and Windows is the #1 operating system worldwide. The taxes paid on the revenue earned by US producers of intellectual property are a major reason that we enjoy the quality of life that we do.

      Sorry to have to break the news to you.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    2. Re:rock and a hard place by EzInKy · · Score: 2, Insightful


      It's extremely true -- intellectual property is one of the US's biggest exports. This is quite clear to people who've left the US and seen the impact of US culture. American movies are popular worldwide, American pop stars are popular all over, and Windows is the #1 operating system worldwide. The taxes paid on the revenue earned by US producers of intellectual property are a major reason that we enjoy the quality of life that we do.


      Well we better start preparing for less quality lives then because there is no way this model can be maintained without strongarming the rest of the world and, in case you haven't noticed, we aren't making many friends at our attempts to do that thus far.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    3. Re:rock and a hard place by revery · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My comment has to do with the subject of the Slashdot article: RIAA sets their sights on Russia. So I'm reading (slightly toungue in cheek mind you) "greatest assets" as those objects which the RIAA protects, namely music. The music of the RIAA: our greatest economic assets... </shudder>

      On a more serious note, I do think it is somewhat fitting that the primary message and image sold by the entertainment industry for the past I'm-not-going-to-even-take-a-stab-at-a-number years has been one of general lawlessness, yet they are surprised that people act in such a manner.

      As far as your comments go, beyond the context of the article, I agree completely.

    4. Re:rock and a hard place by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I guess the Americans won't be getting into any real wars (with equal opponents). Sounds like all your enemy would have to do is simply not allow you to tell them what laws they should enact and it would totally ruin your economy.

      If you greatest asset is so intangible that it requires foreign laws to protect it, you have a problem. Actually, it has some interesting parallels to an issue that a certain tea party was protesting, in a certain north eastern US city, in the 18th century.

    5. Re:rock and a hard place by svtdragon · · Score: 1

      I agree with everything you've said, except you need an update on the article you posted: http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2005/12/ 24/students_tall_tale_revealed/ The kid made it up. It was all a hoax.

    6. Re:rock and a hard place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the press release:

      "Its mission is to foster a business and legal climate that supports and promotes our members' creative and financial vitality."

      While considering this important mission statement, think about Britney Spears.

      I think that just about sums it up for America's leadership in the technology marketplace.

    7. Re:rock and a hard place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is true, and it is the reason why the US economy is strong. All engineering is IP.

    8. Re:rock and a hard place by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      Well, from my postings you'll see which side of this fence i sit on...but in terms of "getting into any reall wars (with equal opponets)", I have to ask: what does this mean? There are no equal opponets. My position is that being the only superpower left is no excuse to try to steal via fiat. Power only corrupts when you have no ethics.

    9. Re:rock and a hard place by Fx.Dr · · Score: 1
      We must not enter into political arrangements with countries ill-prepared to adequately protect our greatest economic assets.

      Umm... does that mean that Lindsay Lohan is now in indispensable part of the US economy? If so, what would the exchange rate be against the Yen?

    10. Re:rock and a hard place by rebelguys9 · · Score: 1

      I'm just wondering if Congress is only giving a bullshit reason to prevent Russia from joining the WTO. Maybe they'd just say anything that will hold up in the international arena to prevent Russia from joining. After all, as a major power, Russia would have considerable influence in the highly undemocratic, supranational organization, and the United States always tries to do what it can to keep its influence and to not share its power with anyone else. Hell, Russia has already opened 4,000 cases and fined 2,000 people regarding piracy.

      Of course, the excuse concerning intellectual property might have been created by generous donations from the RIAA (I haven't looked, and this is just speculation), but I'm not convinced that Congress' hesitation to allow Russia to join the WTO is actually about the RIAA or intellectual property.

      Read some Russian editorials, and you might find entirely different viewpoints from what you're getting in the US.

    11. Re:rock and a hard place by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      So, our movies, pop-stars, and Windows are our greatest assets? Wow, now I'm REALLY scared!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    12. Re:rock and a hard place by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      If you put all the rest of the world together you'd probably have a reasonable opponent. Say if the world community got tired of all the treaty breaking and invasions and imposed sanctions. But yeah, I agree, when you're the most powerful you should try really hard not to go around bullying.

    13. Re:rock and a hard place by temcat · · Score: 1

      I'm just wondering if Congress is only giving a bullshit reason to prevent Russia from joining the WTO.

      Well actually most people here are even not sure if they need this WTO in the first place.

    14. Re:rock and a hard place by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      Yes, but if you put all of the US together, we wouldn't be doing the stuff that fractioning off into factions allows strong interests to push through. Which more likely, that we get together, or the rest of the world resolves their differences?

  8. b.s. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a load of crap. RIAA is powerless. The US has Nukes to worry about, not pirated Britney Spears albums.

    Grow up RIAA.

  9. Cannot legislate morals... by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You cannot legislate away theft. If you want to curb it, you have to remove the economic incentive to steal. For music/video, you do that by making it easier/cheaper to buy the content from a legitimate distributor than to copy it. The "man" thinks they can also do this by limiting the quality of the output from illegitimate sources (using onerous copy protection systems that probably won't work anyway). They need to believe this if they have any hope of maintaining their rather excessive markups on their product. I am of the opinion that they'll kick and scream some more and eventually mostly give up and use pricing to fight piracy. But we'll see....

    1. Re:Cannot legislate morals... by LukeWink · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You cannot legislate away theft
      Are you serious? It is legislation that keeps theft to a minimum. If it were perfectly legal download copyrighted music/video, then what reason would anyone have to pay for it? You say that distributors need to make it easier/cheaper to buy the content than to copy it. This is not possible to do if there is no legislation against sites/programs which allow you to download the material with the click of a mouse. Now I would agree with the conclusion that legislation alone cannot combat theft, but to imply that lawmaking doesn't play a big part of the solution is silly.

    2. Re:Cannot legislate morals... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is legislation that keeps theft to a minimum.

      What? It is legislation that defines and creates theft. Without legislation, there is no such thing as property law, and no such thing as theft.

      If it were perfectly legal download copyrighted music/video, then what reason would anyone have to pay for it?

      I'm sorry, but what does that have to do with theft?

    3. Re:Cannot legislate morals... by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You cannot legislate away theft. If you want to curb it, you have to remove the economic incentive to steal

      Uhm...that's what legislation does. It reduces the economic incentive by raising the cost of theft. Surely you don't think the direct cost to buy something is the only economic cost, do you?

    4. Re:Cannot legislate morals... by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      You say that distributors need to make it easier/cheaper to buy the content than to copy it. This is not possible to do if there is no legislation against sites/programs which allow you to download the material with the click of a mouse.

      I'm not knocking your premise, but these laws already exist. Copyright law protects them already. The DMCA, etc. protect their interests more than at any point in history. What new law do they need to protect themselves against something that is already illegal? "It's not illegal! It's now SUPER-illegal!" Criminalize it? Check. They did that already. (Read the "Warning" on DVD movies recently?) Make the punishments very harsh? Check. Been there for quite some time. Make the copyright nearly perpetual with the help of the government? Check. So where are our cheaper, less cumbersome downloads that the market has been demanding since the internet age became mature enough to handle the bandwidth?

      Seems like they've got all their ducks in a row, yet they refuse to make it easier/cheaper. Wonder why that is?

      Could it be that their intent was never to do this, but to thwart any advancement of technology that makes their job obsolete? Do you still get milk in glass bottles delivered by a milkman? Do you still use a horse and buggy to get to work? If not, where was the legislation that protected milkmen and horse & buggy whip makers?

      The *AA's are using legislation not to "protect their content", but to prop up their aging, dying, decomposing business model. Pure and simple. And our bought-and-sold legislators are more than happy to do it.

      So, I don't care if Russia or China thumbs their nose at our copyrights. Let them. We are in the same position Great Britain was at the time of the Revolutionary War. We are the old economy, and China/Russia are the new economies who are going to make us pretty irrelevant since our own laws do nothing but cripple our ability to adapt to a changing world market, simply to satisfy a bunch of rich fuckers who can't accept their demise gracefully.

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    5. Re:Cannot legislate morals... by mcrbids · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You cannot legislate away theft.

      No, but you can reduce theft by first defining what a theft is, and then enforcing the penalties thereof. In Russia, what we call copyright violation they call "legal".

      If you want to curb it, you have to remove the economic incentive to steal.

      Anything of value has an economic incentive to steal. There's tremendous economic incentive to steal diamonds, but the threat of jail time, combined with the difficult problem of breaking into maximum security safes, outweighs the benefits to stealing them.

      Removing economic incentive is but one way to reduce crime.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    6. Re:Cannot legislate morals... by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      If it were perfectly legal download copyrighted music/video, then what reason would anyone have to pay for it?

      People pay for lots of things they don't have to. It's free to go run in the park, yet people pay to join a gym and use the treadmill. Because it's convenient and well presented. People go to restaurants and pay a premium for someone else to cook and serve them.

      The point at which I would pay to download music is definitely well above zero. It's also definitely well below 99 cents a song. And that's the real problem that the RIAA et al refuse to see.

    7. Re:Cannot legislate morals... by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      What you are leaving out is the disconnect between Law and the percieved fairness. If people really percieved sharing as "theft", we wouldn't have this issue. Passing laws that escalate the issue only aggravates the disconnect. We live in a culture that admires the ideal of Rule of Law, yet the actual state is so biased that good men can't defend it. The peversion of law in pursuit of the ends of greed isn't in the best interests of the Rule of Law.

    8. Re:Cannot legislate morals... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      They don't want to legislate away theft.

      They want to legislate away the totally legal russian music services where americans can buy music for a fraction of the inflated US prices.

      It's a loophole the RIAA is itching to close, because there's no one they can sue. Their only option is to somehow try to change Russian law.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    9. Re:Cannot legislate morals... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You cannot legislate away theft.

      Yes, you can. When King Stephanus I founded Hungary, my country 1005 years ago, he made a law that any person who stole more than the value of a chicken be hanged promptly . The punishment was more severe for theft than murder!

      This was necessary, as tribal hungarians did not have a sense of private property or any property for that matter in their traditional society based on extended families. The king knew fully well his country can survive only if he makes it in the shape of most modern governmental principle known at the time, which was the feudalism. So he had to make sure people learn about property in the hard way. He also forced hungarians to convert to catholicism from animism, since christianity also respected property. It worked, the country of Hungary still exists.

    10. Re:Cannot legislate morals... by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      Good point. The truth is, infringement isn't theft by any stretch of the word, and should not be treated as such. Not that the average Joe Sixpack has any idea what that means, but having the *AA's shove their party line down his throat at every step is bound to get some backlash. I'm shocked that the *AA's are surprised when it happens. Tell someone they are a thief long enough, and they will push back. This is precisely where we were at the founding of the country. The Rule of Law v. Fairness and equal representation under the law. It's been quite some time since we've actually had equal representation under the law, when corporations are allowed to line the coffers of candidates without much oversight.

      The very concept of Copyright has been hijacked by a small minority of holders (not creators) who insist that their way of life (making money off perpetually renewed copyright at the expense of the Public Domain) should be guaranteed. Simply put, they want to have their cake and eat it too. And Congress allows, enables, and encourages it. "For a Limited time" is not, and never has been, Life+90 years. The Supreme Court erred in their determination that Congress can perpetually extend copyright at the expense of the Constitution. We have lost legislative, Executive, AND Judicial in this fight. We no longer feel represented. And if we don't speak up, we will lose what little fair use we have left.

      Why? Because a few privileged individuals feel entitled to perpetual revenue? How much of the *AA's label catalogs exist to purchase? Given the history of it all and the amount of music/radio/drama/etc recorded, it's most likely a minimal amount. They simply sit on the copyrights of music, movies, and TV. They no longer make any money off of them. Baffling.

      I for one have taken my fair use back by backing up my DVDs, using my computer to rip my CDs, and whenever I want "new" items, I buy them used or not at all. I deprive them of their revenue. So they call me a pirate. I really don't care. What matters is that I refuse to go along with their way of doing things. Their precious "content" is nothing more than entertainment. It won't be missed. Their overestimated self-importance will be their undoing.

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    11. Re:Cannot legislate morals... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      So, I don't care if Russia or China thumbs their nose at our copyrights. Let them.

      The reason the RIAA has a problem with this is that it's completely legal for US users to import music from russia for personal use for a small fraction of the price.

      I hope Russia tells them to fuck off. This copyright cartel shit has gone far enough.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  10. China? by orkysoft · · Score: 5, Insightful

    China has a rather severe ``piracy'' problem as well, yet you don't hear the USA motioning to deny China access to the WTO...

    --

    I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    1. Re:China? by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      The prospect of sparking off World War III probably has a lot to do with that.

    2. Re:China? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that China's recent history of human rights abuses is every bit as bad as Soviet Russia's(no pun intended).

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    3. Re:China? by caller9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the elephant in the room is that they own a majority share in US debt. Don't forget that one.

    4. Re:China? by wirefarm · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've been to both China and Russia and I must say that it was *far* more apparent in Russia.
      There were shops along Nevsky Prospekt in St. Petersburg, the main shopping area, that openly sold pirated movies, software and music. Every underground crosswalk had kiosks selling CDs full of stuff and the police neither noticed or cared. I heard that at that time, 2001, there were no real laws against it.
      (This may have changed in the last few years, I'm sure someone could confirm.)

      In Beijing, I saw one seller of what I assumed were pirated movies. Just one at an open market on the east side, along side the people selling tiger claws and other horrifying animal parts for traditional medicines.

      I really saw nothing to indicate that they had nearly as broad a culture of "piracy" as Russia did.

      --
      -- My Weblog.
    5. Re:China? by Urusai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, the Chinese yuan is supposedly overvalued 40% versus the dollar, thanks to Chinese monetary policy. They could float the yuan and cause riots in the US when people find they can't even afford to shop at Walmart.

    6. Re:China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because they have us on the debt leash, oh, and they seem to have quite a large army.

    7. Re:China? by charlesesl · · Score: 0

      Trying to pick another fight with us? If you want a promise for fighting piracy from the Chinese government you will get it. Not that it will do anything.

    8. Re:China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but the army is so short...

    9. Re:China? by zogger · · Score: 1

      Might be a good idea for it (your scenario) to happen sooner rather than later, why we still have a slim chance of rebuilding the manufacturing sector.

    10. Re:China? by arlandbayes · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean the yuan is undervalued?

    11. Re:China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been to china as well. I saw LOTS of folks selling illegal movies on the side of the road, and At one place I saw 2 seperate shops selling tons of illegal movies in their shops for $1 each.

      Beijing isn't so bad-but pretty much everywhere else was free game.

      I was near the soviet border in estonia and saw nothing, maybe next trip I will get into Russia and be able to compare, but I can't imagine more piracy then what I saw in china. again-outside of beijing which was fairly on the up and up other then the occasional seller on the street.

    12. Re:China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut the fuck up, chink.

    13. Re:China? by Nohbdy001 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I spent six weeks in Russia this summer. Pirated movies, software and music are indeed rampant throughout the country, certainly not just in the big cities like Moscow or St. Petersburg. Perhaps most interesting is just how accepted this is. It is in fact very difficult to find legitimate movies or music, the upscale video and software shops only sold pirated material.

      As common place as piracy is in Russia, I imagine this would be impossible to enforce and likely just ignored.

    14. Re:China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously have not spent much time in China. Not only are pirated movies everywhere but so is pirated music and software. Maybe where you were "encouraged" to go in Beijing you didn't see it but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

      In most Chinese cities, it is very difficult to find legitimate software, music or movies.

    15. Re:China? by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

      Well, there is the whole common ownership philosophy from communism. Think that makes a difference? By the way, do you think the police buy this pirated stuff?

    16. Re:China? by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 1

      "There were shops along Nevsky Prospekt in St. Petersburg, the main shopping area, that openly sold pirated movies, software and music. Every underground crosswalk had kiosks selling CDs full of stuff and the police neither noticed or cared. I heard that at that time, 2001, there were no real laws against it."

      Dont be too surprised. You can see the same thing on Canal street in New York.

      But I do not think that China actually prevents piracy. There are large parts of the chinese population that do not have dvd players or computers and do not care much about consuming western culture pirated or not. So presumably there will be markets which are targeted for those people and those markets will not have much pirated stuff.

      So there is no significant difference in how russia/china governments treat piracy. I think the difference is much to do with geo-politics.

      The west (especially the US) is very cold towards Russia, while being warm towards China. You can see it in everything. So there is some reason for that, although i am not exactly sure what. Maybe it is because they recognize that russia is still quite a viable military power. Maybe it is because China is more willing to accept foreign ownership within its borders, so that the "free trade" between china and the US is actually mostly performed by US companies and their own subsidiaries.

    17. Re:China? by globalar · · Score: 1

      It was actually the U.S. that accelerated Chinese WTO membership (well, entrance at least), allowing for what were effectively special provisions - notably letting China to enter as a non-market economy when it is in fact a huge (though incredibly backward) market economy. The timetable for tariff reduction and other government cleanup was very ambitious as well, meaning that the U.S. basically hoped the "invisible hand" and some good diplomacy would patch up problems (like currency valuation). Well, that was the plan then at least.

      Incidentally, if China was not an authoritarian government, they never would have been able to meet an agreement, because a lot of Chinese tariffs were considerably reduced from ridiculous highs. There is, unfortunately, no way to prevent copyright infringement and so tariffs are meaningless for IP goods.

      The temporary solution to this is to ignore massive Chinese "piracy" at the street-level and cut off the U.S. consumer from other loophole markets where large businesses operate safely, like Russia. As yet, Chinese exports are easily controlled because the Internet and basically all markets are pretty well controlled (in the big sense; huge discontinuities in some places).

    18. Re:China? by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      You are correct that it is undervalued, but the grand poster's point that "they own a majority share in US debt" is certainly relevant. God help U.S. if the world decides to dump US Treasury bonds. Well, God help the world...it wouldn't be pretty.

    19. Re:China? by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      Why should the police care if the actions are legal?

    20. Re:China? by Chemical+Serenity · · Score: 1

      If you mean "Asian Central Banks" when you say "The World", that's already happening. If you take a look at recent purchases of 10 year and 20 year federal bonds, those banks are slowing their uptake (ie. reducing their holdings), with the slack taken up by private investors and odd little financial groups that magically materialized in the carribean.

      The credit card is running dry. The dependable, long-view institutions are closing the purse and leaving the bulk to be handled by the short-view private investor. And this year alone, debt has grown by $300 billion beyond GDP, increasing for the 5th year in a row the debt/GDP ratio. It's nearly at WW2 levels now.

      When you have an economy 70% fueled by consumer spending and the credit cards are running dry due to massive debt buildup and leverage of overpriced real estate... well, the ultimate results don't sound terribly appealing.

      --
      "People will pay big bucks for the luxury of ignorance."
    21. Re:China? by arlandbayes · · Score: 1

      Sounds like there is a lot of high level manipulation going on.
      So when the the yaun gets floated can we expect our manufacturing and tech jobs to come back home?

    22. Re:China? by a_n_d_e_r_s · · Score: 1

      China are a market with 1 billion people - all potential customers. With Chinas growing economy no one wants to be left out of that market. So they all kiss up to a un-democratic country based on pure economics.

      Russia has much smaller population and not many of them are potential customers. Many are poor and thus the potential are less.

      Money talks.

      --
      Just saying it like it are.
    23. Re:China? by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

      I don't know which sounds more insane, China starting a WW because they can't get into the WTO, or USA starting a WW because China doesn't respect Intellectual Property.

    24. Re:China? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      For the same reason why this will all go away once some member of Congress reminds their peers of Russia's oil reserves.

    25. Re:China? by Vadim+Makarov · · Score: 1
      This may have changed in the last few years, I'm sure someone could confirm.

      No, it hasn't changed. It has even become better: there are whole store chains now that sell software and media (e.g. "555" store chain). They are all legal, uh, civilized businesses. When you buy a disk, you get a warranty, business address for returns, etc. Taxes are paid from the sales. You can even complain in an improbable case the kleygen included on the disk doesn't work.

      Never ming that you've just bought, for example, the entire Adobe Professional Creative Suite CS for $6.

      By the way, the local stores DO carry properly licensed software IF the price set by the rights holder is low enough to be competitive. I've bought some licensed games (e.g. HOMM3) at the same place I get pirated software.

      --
      17779 eligible voters in a district, 17779 'vote' as one. This is Russia.
    26. Re:China? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      nah, at least in the near term that would also choke off a big portion of China's income, they need t expand their market in south america & south asia (they've started) before they can afford to lose us.

    27. Re:China? by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      Many think that it's economic incentives that keep China and the US from entering into war.

      It's not going to war over the economic move, it's that the economic move is part of a larger diplomatic effort to prevent the war.

    28. Re:China? by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

      I disagree with that, I think China's nuclear arsenal has more to do with preventing an US invasion than anything else; I know it can't reach US soil, but I wouldn't be surprised if the Chinese used them to destroy invading forces. And I also disagree with the thought of diplomats using economy to prevent war, I would believe it's the other way round.

    29. Re:China? by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      It's not about preventing us from invading them, it's about preventing them from going to war with us.

      We extend some support to prevent them from making a first strike. We also used them to help bargain North Korea down.

      Also, yes, we use economic incentives all of the time to prevent wars. We've been limiting Cuba's growth for decades over the Soviet Union parking missiles there while JFK was in office. We attack them economically, rather than with bullets. Using economics like this is an old tactic.

    30. Re:China? by wirefarm · · Score: 1

      You obviously have not spent much time in China. Not only are pirated movies everywhere but so is pirated music and software. Maybe where you were "encouraged" to go in Beijing you didn't see it but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

      About 2 weeks, so, yeah, not a lot.
      Nobody "encouraged" me to go anywhere, except to buy overpriced tea.
      I rented a bicycle and went wherever I felt like going. I did see lots of bootleg stuff (watches, bags, sunglasses, etc) being sold, just not much digital media of any kind, though I did poke through a very legitimate media store on Wanfujing - nothing seemed to be pirated there.

      In most Chinese cities, it is very difficult to find legitimate software, music or movies.

      Again, I can only speak for what I saw of Beijing, but I don't think you'd really have much trouble, unless you're commenting on the lack of localized software and subtitled movies, but I don't think that's got anything to do with piracy, as Tokyo has the same availability problems for legitimate media, though there is virtually no "retail piracy" where you can go to an area and buy bootleg discs.

      --
      -- My Weblog.
    31. Re:China? by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

      The thought of China starting a war against the US/NATO is pretty ridiculous. Even though they have some force projection capability and might be able to do some limited damage to US interests, it's pretty far from being able to take on the combined forces of NATO. For now, China is only a regional superpower, though at the rate their defence expenditures are growing that will change. This isn't going on unnoticed though, as evidenced by the Japanese efforts to change their constitution to allow for a larger military.

      I don't think Cuba is a good example of economic incentives, as incentives usually is more of a carrot than stick. But you have a point though, sometimes economics is used as a weapon of war; I just don't think that is the case in China. In fact, China is using it as a weapon, by keeping their currency at an artificially low exchange rate, thus making their workers and products much cheaper for foreign companies and consumers. Some countries have tried to impose import quotas and tariffs on Chinese products, usually on textiles and such, but the ones who usually suffer are the consumers. This will also become more difficult if China enters WTO, as they would then have to be treated equally with other WTO members. Time is on their side, an US invasion would have to happen within a decade if a Chinese rise to superpower status is to be prevented.

      Personally, I don't think that will happen, and as long as the US and EU stay as a counterweight to Chinese power, everything will pan out. And as economic growth cannot be sustained without improving human rights, Chinese citizens will also be better off in the long run.

    32. Re:China? by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      The thought of China using short range nukes against US troops is ridiculous. We'd hit them with ICBMs.

      Certainly, China is using economics as a weapon against the US. What bothers me, at the moment, is that nobody really seems to care. Those in positions to destroy the US economic position are more than willing to do so in order to put a few dollars in their pockets.

      Here's the rub though. The US is helping China to enter the WTO, which is against US interests. The only rationale that I can think of is to prevent Chinese military action, and to balance the other communist interests at work. China was the force that neutralized North Korea, and the balance of China's interests against the US was largely Clinton's work, if I recall, and was purely economic.

      I don't think that the idea of China striking at the US is ridiculous at all. If they manage to destroy our economy, then strike at us with a ground invasion, it seems quite possible. I don't think that they would win the war, but perhaps the threat is enough for politicians who don't want to be responsible for an undoubtably bloody conflict.

      That'said, all of my education is in computer science, perhaps you understand the situation at some angle that I don't, but this is what I've gathered. Then again, I have friends who are the children of Chinese government officials. It seems odd to send your kids to American schools, making American friends, with the end result being attacking the US, and they've been here since before Clinton.

    33. Re:China? by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

      You're right, the US would retaliate against a Chinese nuclear attack, but I don't think a strategic nuclear attack would be diplomatically acceptable, a tactical nuclear retaliation on the other hand would be possible. But if it would give the Chinese a tactical advantage, they would likely do it. Tactical nuclear attacks are easier to stop than ICBMs, as you can always shoot bombers and cruise missiles down, or take out ships and artillery. I don't agree that China neutralised North Korea, as they're the ones who prevented North Korea from losing in the Korean war, fearing that the US would use Korea as a base in an land invasion into Chinese territory.

      If the Chinese succeeded in devastating the US economy, I don't believe they would invade, as their interests would be served by merely getting free reign in Asia. But don't worry, your government isn't completely ignoring the problem, as evidenced by the diplomatic pressure to float the Chinese currency, the Iraq invasion and other measures to prevent a deficit crash, and the encouraging of Japanese military reform to name a few. The Chinese exchange student phenomena is pretty common in all western countries, most of those students will go back to China and work at or start businesses, and some will even become teachers themselves, thus increasing the level of knowledge in China.

      My education is also of the computer variety so I can't speak authoritatively on the subject, but I am somewhat of a history/international politics buff, and I like to know why and how things work. :)

    34. Re:China? by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      China talked N. Korea down from their nuclear missile program. They were instrumental.

      As for the economy... I'm not much worried about invasion after my homeland is leveled economically.

      As for Chinese exchange students, I'm talking about a girl who has barely ever set foot in China. She's even planning on working in the US.

      I certainly hope that the US does something to fix all of this, it's quite a mess.

    35. Re:China? by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

      Be that as it may, but it still is in Chinese interests to preserve North Korea as a buffer against the US. But I sense you don't want to discuss the topic further, so I'll leave it at that. Thanks for the chat though, it's always nice to discuss such things, as a way of gaining new points of view to international happenings.

    36. Re:China? by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      I'm game. You seem to have your thoughts on the issue composed. Most of the time, on Slashdot, I fail to learn anything from those that I chat with. You, on the other hand, seem to have this well thought out.

      If I seem brief, it's merely because I'm working on the last few applications for fellowships and such. I'm a graduate student, and it's a busy time of year for that.

    37. Re:China? by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      Ah, "slowing their uptake" is *not* "reducing their holdings". Rather it means that they are increasing their holdings slower than they were, but still increasing their holdings. Doesn't sound like the card is quite "dry". Debt is way way way beyond WWII levels, by the way. They are even beyond the levels of Ronald Regan, who made WWII look like nothing.

    38. Re:China? by Chemical+Serenity · · Score: 1

      Actually, slowing uptake DOES reduce holdings. Old 10 and 20 year bonds all come due (in either 10 or 20 years, not coincidentally ;). Instead of turning those over directly into new bonds, they're turning over some and taking the payout on others. It's not a huge amount, but it's an overall 'negative growth'.

      And when I say debt is back to WW2 levels, I'm talking debt-to-GDP ratio, not actual dollars. Debt-to-GDP is a (somewhat) more reliable gauge of actual debtload in terms of ability to repay the debt.

      --
      "People will pay big bucks for the luxury of ignorance."
  11. I dunno... by lilmouse · · Score: 1

    Russia isn't exactly a place I'd want to meddle in business, even if it's on an international-agreements scale.

    --LWM

    1. Re:I dunno... by Escogido · · Score: 1

      You must be not the gambling kind then. :) Risks are high, but so are rewards here, since working people are very underpaid here.

  12. China and WTO by mikejz84 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hummm.....Why did this never come up when China was being admitted into the WTO???

    1. Re:China and WTO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because American corporate interests (and especially the RIAA and MPAA) need China as one of the greatest growing markets in the world. As usual, American corporate entities show just how hypocritical and amoral they truly are.

      (Yeah, I realise the question was probably rhetorical)

  13. RIAA Sets Their Sights on Russia? by Chaffar · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Quick, somebody crack a in Soviet Russia joke before it's too late!

    On a more serious note: So, the **IA wants to blackmail Russia into providing protection of intellectual property rights or risk not being accepted into the World Trade Organization... Like that will work.. 'cause in Soviet Russia, YOU blackmail music... no wait, that's not right...

    1. Re:RIAA Sets Their Sights on Russia? by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Quick, somebody crack a in Soviet Russia joke before it's too late!

      In Post-Soviet Russia, the WTO organizes YOU!

    2. Re:RIAA Sets Their Sights on Russia? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, when it's too late, jokes crack you!

  14. Russia has more important things to worry about by LordZardoz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Given the huge number of social and security issues that Russia faces at the moment (corruption, poverty, keeping track of its nuclear arsenal) I expect that they will put this item pretty low on their list of priorities.

    If the RIAA really wanted this to happen, they would pretty much have to offer to pay for the enforcement and prosecution. I would not be suprised if Russia would accept an offer that involved the RIAA paying for the police salaries, especially since the police would also server more useful functions.

    Then again, I dont really like the ramifications of a corporate funded police force that had the full backing and authority of the state.

    Good thing that I am basically talking out my ass then, I suppose.

    END COMMUNICATION

    1. Re:Russia has more important things to worry about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The idea is that you pay the senators (cheap, really) and the public (your taxes and mine) pays for enforcement.

      Neat, huh?!

    2. Re:Russia has more important things to worry about by LordZardoz · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was thinking more along the lines of how Russia's space tourism got started. Someone asked, and Russia said something like "No, it would cost hundreds of thousands of dollars just to do the study". So the rich guy paid for the study, and that eventually led to that first space tourist.

      If Russia says "No, we cannot afford to have police enforcing this", it may be that the RIAA may be willing to kick in the difference.

      END COMMUNICATION

    3. Re:Russia has more important things to worry about by S3D · · Score: 3, Informative
      Then again, I dont really like the ramifications of a corporate funded police force that had the full backing and authority of the state.
      However coprporates already running prisons in US and some other contries in the world.
      The private prison industry in the United States is in the hands of four huge companies that make billions in profits every year ($2.3 billion in 2004 alone) and is in a state of constant growth. The living conditions in those prisons, such as population density, health and the severity of punishment, are disgraceful. Guards with low levels of training are employed by manpower agencies at starvation wages, with a high turnover rate in employment. The violence in those prisons is on a constant rise, as are escapes and drug abuse. Experts who examined the privatized prisons over long periods of time even argue that handing over the prisons to private hands did not make it any cheaper for the state, and that it is difficult, if not impossible, to guarantee proper supervision of such institutions. All this is dwarfed by the most worrisome fact of all: The companies who own the prisons spend millions of dollars every year lobbying for stricter legislation. They say that some 2,000 legislators around the country "work" for them, and make sure to initiate harsher minimum sentences, define new crimes and monstrous punishments (such as the "three strikes and you're out" law in California that sends a person to life in prison if they are convicted of three crimes, even if they are light), promote the appointment of tough prosecutors and cancel state-run rehabilitation plans. They do everything they can to guarantee more profits for the franchise holders.
      from Google cache
    4. Re:Russia has more important things to worry about by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

      it's good to see i'm not the only one who can't type serve without typing server :)

  15. Holy oxymoron Batman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The RIAA wants to protect: "America's knowledge-intensive intellectual property-based goods and services". 'Scuse me but what the RIAA wants to protect is anything but that. The people of the world need to be protected from the crud the RIAA is trying to protect.

  16. Hahahahaha by sockonafish · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even if Russia passes DMCA look-alike laws, they don't have any resources for enforcement.

    1. Re:Hahahahaha by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm sure the RIAA could hire some of the Soviet-era thugs who've been desperate for work. Although, if the thugs want to feel good about themselves in the morning, I hear there's a large organized crime industry in Russia as well.

    2. Re:Hahahahaha by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      There's a large organized crime industry in the US too. It's called the music industry.

      Before you boo me off the stage, recall that the music industry has been convicted of price fixing, which is, yes, a crime!

    3. Re:Hahahahaha by DrMrLordX · · Score: 1

      What I wonder is, what sort of piracy is the RIAA really going to fight against? I don't know how wide-spread profiteering is in Russia when it comes to music piracy. It's one thing for the government to ignore file leechers, but it's another thing when the local music stores are all stocked to the brim with bootlegs and other cheapo knock-offs that were burned somewhere down the street last week.

      If organized crime syndicates in Russia are actually making money off piracy, the RIAA may find itself in deep, deep trouble if they try actually pushing copyright enforcement there. Russian gangsters are not stupid, nor are they afraid of killing people who stand in the way of their business.

    4. Re:Hahahahaha by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      You're right, file sharing is not very popular in Russia, mostly because Internet connection is EXPENSIVE (I pay about 5 cents for 1 MEGABYTE of data). So it will cost me about $30 just to download files.

      Most of music piracy is bootleg disks ('extra' printed copies of officialy licensed disks). They cost only about $3-$4, so NOBODY is going to buy $15-$20 legal disks. It's funny that most European labels understand that and now I can buy legal copies of most of European albums just for $4-$5.

    5. Re:Hahahahaha by gothfox · · Score: 2, Informative

      Exactly right. You foreigners probably don't know, but we already had our share of "wars against piracy". Discs bulldozed on national TV and whatsuch.

      There actually was a time (about 7-8 years ago) when pirated discs disappeared from the retail for several months. Unsurprisingly, it didn't stick. Piracy is a big business here, controlled by OUR mobs, it's not just some pop and mom CD-RW operation. So our government will generate some hogwash for RIAA and GW Bush and everything will stay the same.

    6. Re:Hahahahaha by Mixel · · Score: 1

      RIAA would mostly be concerned about the commercial pirates who set up CD sales on the streets. Not for the small $$$ that those pirates make, but for the culture of copying it supports (though I'm sure that the culture will live on just fine anyway). This pirate trading happens in cities, and mostly in Moscow. And lately, the govt _has_ been cracking down on them. Police raids, higher police bribes and rents. If the Russian govt really wanted to get rid of them, they could do so in a day.

      Enforcing restrictions against personal copying would, on the other hand, be impossible. They'd have to put in jail so many people... there would not be enough left to keep things running. Scare tactics such as taking 1000 people to court would not work there; Russians tend to take their losses and get on with it.

  17. Knowledge Intensive eh? by Kawahee · · Score: 4, Funny

    Knowledge Intensive Intellectual Property? Please.

    Here's some knowledge intensive U2 lyrics for you:

    WoooAoo! WoooAoo! WoooAoo! WoooAoo!
    Yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah,
    Yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah.
    I can feeeeEEEEEEeeeeeel.

    --
    I'll subscribe to Slashdot when I see a month without a dupe, a typo, or an article the "editors" didn't read.
    1. Re:Knowledge Intensive eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Can't come up with your own jokes huh? http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=11 worst

    2. Re:Knowledge Intensive eh? by maztuhblastah · · Score: 0, Redundant

      The irony of course, is that here's some more.

    3. Re:Knowledge Intensive eh? by Bluetick · · Score: 2, Funny

      Considering this whole thread is about intellectual property being stolen, I think it's pretty appropriate.

    4. Re:Knowledge Intensive eh? by MyIS · · Score: 1

      Er, U2 is an Irish band, as far as I know. Maybe they're represented by a US-based RIAA member, but the joke still doesn't work.

      --
      http://zero-to-enterprise.blogspot.com/
    5. Re:Knowledge Intensive eh? by consonant · · Score: 0

      Excuse me? +5 Funny?!

      Because it was so original?

  18. Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Any more these days, the feds represent companies. Why are we in Iraq? Is it WMD, that the admin KNEW was not there? Was it for the downtrodden citizens who were treated bad,but still better than many other nations? Was it to search for Al Qaida there BEFORE they got there (keep in mind, that OBL hated sadaam as much or more than America)? Of course, when we went into to talk to the individual leaders and they asked if we would kick out Sadaam and leave, we told them no. It could not be about oil and business.

  19. of course by know1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    in communist russia...
    slashdot cliches you

  20. Good Luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    There is one legal copy of Windows in Russia. The rest are copies.

  21. Cool your jets... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
    I don't know which is sadder, that the RIAA has such influence over Congress, or that this might be true.

    A recent bill was sponsored in the Senate. If you give enough money to your senator, you can have a bill sponsored too. Doesn't mean it will pass...

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  22. Does it strike anyone else as strange... by laughingcoyote · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...that any country can "steal" something considered "property" of the other country-without committing an overt, forceful act that would normally be considered an act of war?

    Something seems very wrong with this definition of "property", and every attempt to shoehorn it into that box seems to be more of a stretch then the last.

    --
    To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.
    1. Re:Does it strike anyone else as strange... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something seems very wrong with this definition of "property"

      Yes. It's the definition that the RIAA use, but that no government on Earth uses.

      Seriously. Here's a challenge to all you Slashdot trolls. Find me one single law in any country on Earth that refers to copyright as property, or to copyright infringement as theft. Remember: the names of bills don't actually form part of the law, they are just a dumb slogan.

    2. Re:Does it strike anyone else as strange... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      North Korea 1968 or 69 taking the USS Pueblo.
      Cambodia taking some ship in the mid to late 70's.
      Iran taking hostages 1979.
      Iraq invading Kuwait 1990-1991.

      We the US has not been involved in a war since Japan bombed Pearl Harbor.
      Remember foks the only way we can be in war is if the Congress declares war.

    3. Re:Does it strike anyone else as strange... by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      All of the events you listed seem like much larger national crises than Russians pirating music.

      Seriously, this is like shoeing away hobos picking scraps out of a dumpster. Sure, they didn't pay for it, but it's certainly a stretch to call it stealing. Most working-class Russians probably couldn't afford to pay $19.99 for a CD every 3 weeks, so the potential revenue that the RIAA is really losing (not the theoretical value of the music pirated) isn't likely to be significant compared to all of the evenue they are already making off of legitimate CD sales, shows, merch sales, etc. in Russia. Heck, the money they are pouring into fighting piracy is probably magnitudes higher than their revenue losses to piracy

    4. Re:Does it strike anyone else as strange... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think they are really bitching about the guys who download music on p2p instead of buyings CDs. RIAA fights this at home, but not there. What they probably don't like is that the guys who do shell out money to get CDs are not buying original ones, but fake CDs.

      I can't really talk for russia, but I guess the situation is similar to china (where i have lived), and there, it is harder to find a real CD than a copy. Most shops only sell fake CDs. Those CD are not burned on the shop owner's PC, though. These are pressed CDs, with a cover and all. But just not pressed by people who pays royality.

      There is a whole industry making and selling CDs by millions, and they don't give a shit about the copyright holders. And from a customer point of view, there is little reason to buy anything else. One CD is around 1$ for the cristal-boxed version, or 0.5$ for plastic bag version. And they often have added value compared to the original. for example, you if you buy the a single, there is still room on the CD. If you buy the same single in china, there is a "best of" the same artist in that free room. Or complete collection of his former works in mp3 on a data track. Any single released since the last album? they will usualy be added at the end of that album. Buy a DVD? there are subtitle for more languages in the fake than in the original. And no DRM, no zone restriction, by the way. Do you think chinese or russian citizens care so much for the wellfare of american economy that they will go and pay ten times the price to buy original CDs under the circumstances? I guess that is why the RIAA is bitching. Not about p2p.

      I have mixed opinions on this. On the one hand, this is indeed spoiling authors and producers, and governements ought to do something about it. On the other hand, it shows that it is kind of possible to build a profitable industry buy sellings CDs around 1$. Sure, not having to produce artists or pay royalities reduces the costs. but even then, the difference is striking. They still have the whole production facilities for zillions of different songs, they do edit the contents (for "added value"), they create translations, then there is the whole distribution network and all... I am not asking for chinese prices in europe, but once again it make me wonder if the price we pay in europe or america is really justified.

    5. Re:Does it strike anyone else as strange... by lysergic.acid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, I'm sure they're going after the people selling the pirated discs, not the consumers, but those people aren't reaping huge profits either. They're often only working class people themselves. Taiwan and China are examples of unregulated and unrestrained capitalism that the WTO is pushing for all around the world. It's people doing whatever they can to make a buck. Except in the case of the WTO supported corporations, these people are making billions of dollars doing things that hurt working class people, and the lower class. Whereas, the people selling pirated goods in Russia, China, Taiwan, etc. are poor working class people "exploiting" these megacorporations.

      And yea, considiring the cost of living in these countries, the prices that the RIAA & MPAA wanna charge for their goods is simply unrealistic. Most people in these countries would sooner stop buying american DVDs and CDs than to start paying these exorbitant costs. In any case, it's still millionare CEO's going after impoverished people for relatively insignificant sums to the American recording industry.

    6. Re:Does it strike anyone else as strange... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This "printing press" will destroy my hand-copied book company, it must be outlawed!

    7. Re:Does it strike anyone else as strange... by farble1670 · · Score: 0

      nobody said "property", they said intellectual property, and it's a pretty widely accepted and understood definition. really, if you can't understant the idea of non-physical property, you have no business using a computer.

    8. Re:Does it strike anyone else as strange... by laughingcoyote · · Score: 1

      nobody said "property", they said intellectual property,

      Please read what you just said one more time. Very carefully.

      As to the rest-the fact that ideas -don't- fit very well into the "property" mold is exactly what I'm trying to demonstrate here! Or is believing that an idea can be property a requirement for a Computer Users' License now? Personally I'd rather see there be a basic understanding of how to spell words like "you" and demonstration of an ability to use and update antivirus/firewall...but that's just me.

      --
      To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.
  23. yeah, right... by qzulla · · Score: 2, Funny
    This resolution is significant because it expresses the will of the U.S. Congress that Russia must take effective action against those who would steal America's knowledge-intensive intellectual property-based goods and services. We must not enter into political arrangements with countries ill-prepared to adequately protect our greatest economic assets.

    "knowledge-intensive intellectual property-based goods"

    Hey! Wait! I know those three chords - D-A-G.

    "our greatest economic assets."

    Hey! Wait! I know those... never mind

    In Soviet Russia the music listens to YOU!

    qz

    1. Re:yeah, right... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I think that's the best Soviet Russia joke I've ever heard. And I've been here a while.

  24. Talk about two faced liars. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is the same USA that ignores any rulings handed down from the WTO that it doesn't like?

    1. Re:Talk about two faced liars. by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Informative

      They recently agreed to remove all agricultural (export?) subsidies by 2013 or something like that.

      http://news.google.com/news?q=wto+remove+agricultu ral+subsidies+2013

      So, yes, they like to ignore the WTO, but when the threatened sanctions were large enough, even the U.S. caved.

      BTW, this is considered a fairly significant win for the WTO

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Talk about two faced liars. by ClamIAm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem with the WTO is that there's less oversight than even the US government (scary). They're not accountable to anyone, and the incestuous relationship that the World Bank and the WTO have is disgusting, serving rich nations while keeping poor ones poor. And the US generally doesn't ignore the WTO.

    3. Re:Talk about two faced liars. by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      Who exactly runs the WTO, and how is it operated? From what I've seen, the WTO seems to promote globalization in the interest of transnational corporations and international conglomerates. In a lot of 3rd world countries which the WTO has jurisdiction over, they simply tear down protectionist policies to open up new markets for these transnationals to exploit. So why would any country want to be the WTO? or is it mainly the large Russian corporations which want Russia to gain admission into the organization?

    4. Re:Talk about two faced liars. by globalar · · Score: 1

      The Wikipedia article on the WTO is pretty good. International trade is very complex and it's really a big administrative nightmare. It can take years to work out agreements and codify them. Sometimes they just end up getting thrown away when politicians change their mind.

      The WTO is basically a cooperative of all countries which meet general and case-specific standards for trade barrier reduction. These standards are often implemented as timetables whereby tariffs and subsidies are gradually reduced. It is common to have a 10-year timetable for every country on reducing their largest tariffs, for example.The org is dominated by the largest economies (they can afford not to trade), but incorporates many poorer countries as well.

      "In a lot of 3rd world countries which the WTO has jurisdiction over..."

      Not sure what you mean. There is no jurisdiction in the WTO. It's more like a club of countries which use trade to benefit from one another. Rulings from the WTO are basically created from previous negotiations or precendents and are only binding in the sense that if a country breaks them, they risk their trade status in the organization and with member states.

      "...they simply tear down protectionist policies to open up new markets for these transnationals to exploit."

      I think you mean the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, which operate in tandem by providing conditional loans that require government spending changes for endebted countries. The WTO is voluntary - countries try to get in. I'm not ready to defend the WB/IMF, but lets just say a lot of poor countries have really bad governments that make really bad decisions about their spending habits (which, unlike say the U.S., they can't afford to make). The WB/IMF are concerned primarily with infrastructure, market development, and exploiting (i.e. making use of) underdeveloped markets. Countries opt into these programs, which almost always advocate liberal trade policies (read: comparative advantage). if the governments take the WB's advice, they try to get into the WTO, because in modern economies the only good status as a market economy is growth.

      "So why would any country want to be the WTO?"

      Comparative advantage.

      "or is it mainly the large Russian corporations which want Russia to gain admission into the organization?"

      No, its probably the Kremlin. Russian companies have to behave in Russia, else they fall into tax trouble. There are a host of possibilities whereby the Russian government can exert influence on foreign governments via their open markets. Plus, the Russian market has some really poorly performing sectors.

    5. Re:Talk about two faced liars. by sl3xd · · Score: 1

      First off: The subsidies removed are quite paltry in comparison with the total amount. In other words: Much ado about nothing. The agreements made are little more than token gestures, and will have very little real impact.

      And the US doesn't cave because the sanctions are large enough; the view is that the WTO will help the US more than it can hurt it, so it's generally better to simply comply with the rules when possible.

      For instance, the US still holds that genetically modified foods cannot be labeled (or sold) as such under WTO regulations, and has a fair chance of winning that case.

      Another example of where the US feels it is being wronged is the massive subsidies given to Airbus by various European governments (in addition to lucrative military contracts that Airbus receives), whereas the US competitor, Boeing, doesn't receive any government subsidy (although it also receives military contracts). In the case of both Airbus and Boeting, the military contracts aren't enough to keep the companies afloat; both make the vast majority of their income from bulding commercial airliners; only Airbus gets nearly all of their development costs subsidized by various governments throughout the EU.

      So, like in most things, it's felt that the benefit of the one outweighs the possible loss of the others. The US (like most governments) generally disobeys WTO rules when it feels they are unjust.

      IIRC, the US is still voluntarily eating the sanctions imposed due to its protection of its steel industry, and I doubt that's going to change, as most Americans feel it's very important to have a steel industry capable of providing self-sufficiency in this strategic resource.

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
  25. Ell Oh Ell by mofomojo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think this article itself proves the corporate stronghold on American Politics.

    "greatest economic assets."

    Such a statement is ill-worded. The world wide record industry, according to the RIAA site , is a mere 40 billion dollars. Now, this may seem grand, but on the scale of the entire United States GDP, it's only...

    ...subtract the one...

    ...carry the two...

    ...that's really only about 8.5% of the US economy, which totals at about 11 trillion.

    If that's bad math, which I have a rousing suspicion that it is, then please be a good samaritan and fix it.

    I would also consider it good samaritan-ship to be generous and share music, isn't that what they teach us to do in school? To share? It's not as if a bucaneer would ripping it directly off their site w/o permission, they'd really only be sharing music with their friends?

    Is their really any difference between lending a CD to friend and sharing music via online?

    1. Re:Ell Oh Ell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      40 billion as a fraction of 11,000 billion (11 trillion) is only 0.36%.

      So they are so small as to be inconsequential to the American economy, if your figures are correct. Kinda makes you wonder how they get so much say in American political arenas.

    2. Re:Ell Oh Ell by shobadobs · · Score: 2, Informative

      40 billion is 0.363636 % of 11 trillion. I don't think they were talking about the record industry alone, though.

    3. Re:Ell Oh Ell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah...on the math... that makes the recording industry more like 0.36% of the US economy, right? Since we're talking about a $40 billion worldwide recording industry we should really count in at least the EU GDP, which is another $10-12 bn, so the recording industry is probably considerably less than 0.2% of the economy. Heck, that's almost visible, if you look hard! I don't really understand why they've been able to cause so much trouble with so little basis.

    4. Re:Ell Oh Ell by shark72 · · Score: 1

      They are speaking of intellectual property in general, not the music industry in particular. The US also exports a lot of movies and software. I don't know how much software and DVD content is pirated in Russia, but it's probably significant as well. This would put your calculation off by a significant amount.

      "I would also consider it good samaritan-ship to be generous and share music, isn't that what they teach us to do in school? To share? It's not as if a bucaneer would ripping it directly off their site w/o permission, they'd really only be sharing music with their friends?"

      Yes -- please do share the music of those musicians, authors and programmers who want you to share their work... and there are plenty of them. There's a ton of Creative Commons, shareware, freeware, and public domain media out there. Otherwise, another concept you may have learned in school applies: treat others as you would like to be treated. This is often called the "golden rule."

      "Is their really any difference between lending a CD to friend and sharing music via online?"

      Yes: volume. Ripping a CD and putting it into your Kazaa directory creates the potential for it to be on 10,000 other people's hard drives in a matter of days. I can guess that you would never pirate something as an alternative to buying it (you probably download something, listen to it, and buy a copy if you like it), but, sadly, many people use P2P to save money. And, while I'm sure we all agree that the real artists have day jobs, that trying to make money in music is evil and sinful and wrong, etc. etc., the fact remains that there are many artists, writers, composers, software engineers and the like who rely on the sale of their work to feed their families.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    5. Re:Ell Oh Ell by TheoB · · Score: 1
      Is their really any difference between lending a CD to friend and sharing music via online?

      Pragmatically, there's a difference in scale. If you're typical, you probably have under a hundred "friends," only a handful of which are even interested in the same music as you. Through filesharing, you could be supplying copies of the CD to thousands or even tens of thousands of individuals, nearly none of whom you've ever met.

      Legally, it's a matter of duplication. You're well within your rights to lend a CD to a friend, because you can't technically play the CD while your friend is borrowing it.

      RIAAly, you can't lend CDs to friends. Our rootkits have transmitted your contacts lists to our servers, and they'll be hearing from our lawyers shortly.

    6. Re:Ell Oh Ell by Rickler · · Score: 1

      40 billion / 11.75 trillion = 0.00340425532 0.34%

      --

      The human race is artificial intelligence created using object orientated programming.
    7. Re:Ell Oh Ell by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      8.5% of the US economy is RIAA music? Seriously? So how much is Britney, NSync and the Backstreet Boys? They really are national treasures! :D

      I guess you guys outsourced everything else though, hey? No, wait, does all that work done by those guys in India and wherever else count in your GDP too? How does that work? If it DOES count, how big is Britney's percentage of the product actually generated in the USA?

    8. Re:Ell Oh Ell by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1
      Exactly. So WTF is RIAA lumping themselves in with everyone else?

      You think they may be trying to confuse?

      Or, are they just desperate and trying to justify their existence?

      Maybe it's just both.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  26. who lost Russia? by bzipitidoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why is this cartel being allowed to speak for the US, with Senators as mouthpieces? I'd trust them with diplomacy about as much as I'd trust Enron's stock. If they manage to impose their poisonous interpretations of intellectual property law, maybe we'll have the answer to the question "who lost Russia?"

    --
    Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    1. Re:who lost Russia? by m1tk4 · · Score: 1

      thay are allowed to speak for the US through Senators because they pay the lobbyists and you don't.

  27. Knowledge-Intensive RIAA Products Not Found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Russia must take effective action against those who would steal America's knowledge-intensive intellectual property-based goods and services.

    So Russia should be able to continue to pirate music with impunity, apparently.

  28. In Soviet Russia... by SilverspurG · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The rules made by the US dictate you

    --
    fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
  29. Allofmp3.com ... by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    ... may the force be with you :-/

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  30. "...protect our greatest economic assets" by oDDmON+oUT · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That ephemeral, rather than concrete, goods are now being touted as Americas most valuable possessions is nothing short of depressing.

    A nations ability to manufacture real goods is the true measure of its vitality.

    Which is why we should all consider learning Cantonese as a second language.

    --
    Some days it's just not worth
    chewing through my restraints.
    1. Re:"...protect our greatest economic assets" by Qzukk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      That ephemeral, rather than concrete, goods are now being touted as Americas most valuable possessions is nothing short of depressing.

      My vorpal sword +10 vs left-handed dragons is my most valuable possession!

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    2. Re:"...protect our greatest economic assets" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Wouldn't Mandarin be a better choice?

    3. Re:"...protect our greatest economic assets" by fireboy1919 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That ephemeral, rather than concrete, goods are now being touted as Americas most valuable possessions is nothing short of depressing.

      Why? You've heard the old saying "give a man a fish...?" Part of the point there is that the knowledge of fishing is more valuable than the actual fish, or the actual fishing is.

      Similarly, consider the atomic bomb. What would happen if the US had had two of them bestowed upon us by an alien race, rather than made by scientists? The fact that we could at any time make more was the thing that really clinched the decision to end WWII.

      If we export mostly ideas then it is quite possible that we've got more ideas than we have people to handle them, and need to export the work to make them happen. Don't get me wrong: there's certainly lots of laziness and of living off of the squalor of other parts of the world to blame for why we're doing all that exporting of ideas only. But that's not all of it.

      Ideas can be precious and highly valuable things, and those who produce them are sometimes the most productive people in the world.

      Of course, I'm willing to admit I'm wrong, but you're going to have to do more than make claims without backing them up with facts or even examples.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    4. Re:"...protect our greatest economic assets" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See how valuable your fishing knowledge is when you are starving in the middle of a desert. Knowledge is nothing if you can not take advantage of it.

      It also does not easily lend itself to the concept of a possession. Consider that the US was built upon the "pirated" knowledge of the UK. Why shouldn't other countries do the same thing to the US?

    5. Re:"...protect our greatest economic assets" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why? You've heard the old saying "give a man a fish...?" Part of the point there is that the knowledge of fishing is more valuable than the actual fish, or the actual fishing is."

      No. That's where you've proved how utterly seduced you are by the faux concept of 'intellectual property'.
      When you are starving what will you prefer Roast Ideas or Idea Soup?

    6. Re:"...protect our greatest economic assets" by Mspangler · · Score: 1

      "A nations ability to manufacture real goods is the true measure of its vitality.

      Which is why we should all consider learning Cantonese as a second language."

      True for the next 20-30 years, then some other cesspit trying to pull itself up will take over the low-end from the Chinese, who will have upgraded their quality in the mean time. Like Japan did in the 60's and Taiwan in the 70's. This is actually the way it is supposed to work.

      What I haven't heard is what comes after the information age? The robotic age? Once a robot can pick apples, (a benchmark I use because once they can do that, they can do most of the other low-end jobs as well) what happens next? Does everyone sink into poverty until the revolution comes (and the inventors of the robots are first against the wall) or do we end up so awash in everything that we get a annual check like that Alaskan fund that pays people a cut of the oil revenues?

      We live in interesting times. Therefore someone cursed us. I wonder who?

    7. Re:"...protect our greatest economic assets" by duffahtolla · · Score: 2, Informative
      Not Cantonese,

      You want Mandarin. My wife and I will be taking such a course this January.

    8. Re:"...protect our greatest economic assets" by EzInKy · · Score: 1


      Why? You've heard the old saying "give a man a fish...?" Part of the point there is that the knowledge of fishing is more valuable than the actual fish, or the actual fishing is.


      Yes, but once you teach that man to fish he will naturally want to share that knowledge with his community to end their hunger too. There is nothing worse than watching another human being die when you have the power to save him within your grasp.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    9. Re:"...protect our greatest economic assets" by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      There is nothing worse than watching another human being die when you have the power to save him within your grasp.

      Sure there is. Not being "fairly compensated" for your life-saving wisdom, even if the guy DOES have to sell his home and sell his family into slavery to afford it.

      *removes tongue from cheek*

    10. Re:"...protect our greatest economic assets" by teknomage1 · · Score: 1

      The problem is it's easy to transmit knowledge and short of executions, damn impossible to halt its transfer. There is no humane way to keep "subscribers" of knowledge from seeking other sources or reselling there knowledge, therefore an economy built on exporting knowledge is inherently unsustainable.

      --
      Stop intellectual property from infringing on me
    11. Re:"...protect our greatest economic assets" by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      That is an interesting issue I've talked about before.

      Logically, there seems to be a finite amount of work needed to be done in the world. The day the equivelent of the replicator becomes available, when physical production becomes as easy and cheap as digital production currently is, it seems to me that capitalism will fail.

      At that point, there seem to be enough phianthripists that money would become irrelevent. There would seem to be no need to buy anything save land. That would likely put us back to some sort of fudalism...

      When the only thing that is scarce is space, then that would have to become money ...

      Anyway, beyond that - if you could get anything physical you wanted with the same effort many slashdotters can get music or movies today, then there will be a major shift.

      But worse, there are more and more people being born all the time - but the productivity enhancements keep multiplying as well. One person can (using modern technology) easily do the job of 5 or more people of 50 years ago. This is not even taking into consideration the robotic issue above, where machines make human workers unnecessary. When say 1,000 people plus machines can do all the work needed to provide anyone anything they want (save land I would think) then how does capitalism function?

      What do you do when there is no work that needs to be done?

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    12. Re:"...protect our greatest economic assets" by Stonehand · · Score: 1

      Intellectual property includes the designs being sent to the manufacturing plants -- be they patented pharmaceuticals or trademarked vehicles.

      If there's no IP protection, then what stops somebody from operating a plant somewhere with minimal labor and regulatory cost, and trying to clone your products? Heck, what would stop, say, Pfizer from doing that to Merck?

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    13. Re:"...protect our greatest economic assets" by Admiral+Burrito · · Score: 1

      We are far past that point already. The industrial revolution has made it possible to produce far more stuff than we really need. Marketing as an industry sprung up in order to manufacture demand to support the supply. Billions of dollars are spent every year convincing people to spend more money than they need to.

      The real problem is resources. You mentioned space, but I'd worry more about energy. The ridiculous levels of consumption that keep our economy growing at a steady rate are going to run up against that problem very suddenly.

    14. Re:"...protect our greatest economic assets" by tres · · Score: 1

      Yep.

      Although other dialects are far more prevalent in China, Mandarin is what is used by the government.

      Learning the language is sound advice for anyone who wants to invest in an economy that has the potential to burgeon far beyond the capaciy of the US and EU; but learning the wrong dialect will have you talking with farmers living in the stone age rather than the elite few with the power to create wealth.

      --
      Notes From Under *nix: blas.phemo.us
    15. Re:"...protect our greatest economic assets" by ultranova · · Score: 1

      The problem is it's easy to transmit knowledge and short of executions, damn impossible to halt its transfer.

      Executions failed to stop christianity, protestantism and the heliocentric worldview back when carrion pigeons were the ultimate in high-tech communication and being tortured to death was the rule, not the exception; so I really don't think that they'd do much in the age of Internet, except make RIAA even more hated than it already is, if that's even possible...

      There is no humane way to keep "subscribers" of knowledge from seeking other sources or reselling there knowledge, therefore an economy built on exporting knowledge is inherently unsustainable.

      An economy built on exporting knowledge is sustainable ; every scientist earns his bread that way, and so do lawyers and all expert consultants. An economy built on collecting license fees on songs for 70 years after the composer died, however, is unsustainable. There's a big difference between creating (or gathering) and selling knowledge, and trying to resell the same piece of entertainment ad nauseaum.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    16. Re:"...protect our greatest economic assets" by Al_Maverick · · Score: 1

      I think that what forced Japan to surrender was the fact that Russia was invading its northern islands. In fact, some of the bombardments in Tokio caused more damage (I'm not talking about the residual damage, caused by radioactivity, but the one caused by the explosion) than the nukes in Nagasaki and Hiroshima. When the Russians turned from the war in Germany and started to invade Japan, the Japanese decided they would be much better surrendering to the Americans, and not suffering the same as the German prisoners in Russia.

    17. Re:"...protect our greatest economic assets" by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

      "Give a man a fish; you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish; and you have fed him for a lifetime."

      Let's tweak it a bit, shall we?

      "Sell man a fish; and you can sell him another fish tomorrow. Teach a man to fish; and you will never sell a fish to him again."

    18. Re:"...protect our greatest economic assets" by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Why? You've heard the old saying "give a man a fish...?" Part of the point there is that the knowledge of fishing is more valuable than the actual fish, or the actual fishing is."

      You're confusing copyrights with patents. Members of the RIAA don't produce any practical information, it is at best art.

      "ZOMG! We can't let the Chinese get a hold of the lyrics of the latest Ashlee Simpson song! It's a matter of national security!"

    19. Re:"...protect our greatest economic assets" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You've heard the old saying "give a man a fish...?" Part of the point there is that the knowledge of fishing is more valuable than the actual fish, or the actual fishing is.
      And that's exactly where your argument falls down !

      The point of that is that you give that knowledge away. You cannot expect them to pay you indefinite IP royalties for teaching them a skill.

      If your greatest assets are "intellectual", then you are fucked !

      I remember in the UK we had something called "the brain drain", where lots of clever people, ie, the ones with the good ideas, left this country for the USA, because they got paid more money there. Are you suggesting that the UK is somehow "owed" recompense for the IP that left our shores ?

      If you want to capitalise on the IP that your country owns/produces, then you have to make physical use of that knowledge at home, not export the knowledge to third world countires for production, because of its "cheaper" work force. That just leads to the third world countries saying, "hang on, why are we paying these bastards for something we now know ?"

      In conclusion, if you want to be an IP based economy, then you need to produce more IP at a prodigous rate, to make up for the inevitable leeching of other countries you share that IP with. That is why your patent system is fucked, and why the ??AA have to fight the consumers.

      You have nothing else to rely on, so you're fighting for payment for old ideas.

      (posted as AC because I already modded on this discussion)

    20. Re:"...protect our greatest economic assets" by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      What do you think the first language is supposed to be?

    21. Re:"...protect our greatest economic assets" by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I think you should consider Mandarin before Cantonese.

      China and India are a about generation away from turning lazy like we did, like the japanese did, etc.

      You can't maintain depression era work ethic once you live in a rich society. The next generation won't see the point in working as hard as the current one.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    22. Re:"...protect our greatest economic assets" by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Ideas can be precious and highly valuable things, and those who produce them are sometimes the most productive people in the world.

      Not only that, but they are a renewable resource. An idea can't be "used up". Indeed, putting an idea into use often is the impetus for MORE NEW ideas to come into existence.

      The same can't be said about all physical resources. When all the oil under Kuwait has been pumped, or all the rainforest in Brazil cut down, what wealth will those countries have to rely on?

    23. Re:"...protect our greatest economic assets" by hurfy · · Score: 1

      Everyone gets paid for running on a treadmill to power the robots obviously.

    24. Re:"...protect our greatest economic assets" by teknomage1 · · Score: 1

      An economy built on exporting knowledge is sustainable ; every scientist earns his bread that way, and so do lawyers and all expert consultants.

      But those bread winning scientists,lawyers, and consultants have to stay sufficiently ahead of scientists, lawyers, and consultants elsewhere. It's much harder to break new ground than it is to understand other people's ground breaking work, which means fairly soon (within a decade or two) a country that is currently only able to consume information will have 'caught up' and be able to either feed another country's info void or sell new discoveries back to the original knowledge provider, which makes it hard for the original counry to maintain it's info export economy.

      Now whie this is arguably good for us as a species, I think it's bad for America as a nation, because if we stake our fortunes on selling research, we don't have a viable fallback for when we're no longer the smartest country.

      --
      Stop intellectual property from infringing on me
    25. Re:"...protect our greatest economic assets" by ultranova · · Score: 1

      But those bread winning scientists,lawyers, and consultants have to stay sufficiently ahead of scientists, lawyers, and consultants elsewhere. It's much harder to break new ground than it is to understand other people's ground breaking work, which means fairly soon (within a decade or two) a country that is currently only able to consume information will have 'caught up' and be able to either feed another country's info void or sell new discoveries back to the original knowledge provider, which makes it hard for the original counry to maintain it's info export economy.

      Assuming the other country can and will build the labs required for this research. Things like particle physics aren't exactly cheap to research; a nuclear accelerator with a 30 kilometer radius is expensive. Some countries specialize on producing food, some information; isn't that the very basis of international trade ?

      It should also be noticed that simply gathering information available elsewhere into a single place and making a coherent whole out of it carries value. That's what expertise ultimately is.

      Finally, while it is true that you cannot maintain an economy based on exporting information forever, that is true for an economy based on exporting any product. In fact, all economic models fail given long enough. You will never reach a situation where you can just say "I'll export this thing and profit endlessly".

      Now whie this is arguably good for us as a species, I think it's bad for America as a nation, because if we stake our fortunes on selling research, we don't have a viable fallback for when we're no longer the smartest country.

      No matter what you stake your fortunes on, the stake will ultimately fail. You aren't going to stay on top forever, you better get used to it. No empire lasts forever; the only question is, how gracefully will the USA step down when it is time to ?

      Will you step down peacefully, keeping your country strong and allowing the possibility that you might recapture the spotlight after recovering; or will you go down in a desperate n-front fight with pretty much every industrial power of the world ? Currently, I'd bet the latter - option 1 would be smarter, but your current leadership doesn't appear to be very shrewd.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  31. In Soviet Russia... by Ruff_ilb · · Score: 1

    The RIAA Pirates YOU!

    I mean, America.

    Screw it.

    --
    http://www.TheGamerNation.com/Forums
  32. Hold on a second... by Kutsal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From TFPR: "The effective protection of American intellectual property has been sorely lacking in Russia ". (Emphasis mine..)

    Why should the RUSSIANS (or insert your favorite country here) care for "protection of AMERICAN intellectual blahblah.."?... When first and foremost, they're supposed to be caring for their own "intellectual blahblah"...

    And this will somehow pass, and we'll go on trying to get countries to uphold US Law in their own land, and more and more and more people will get to love us, don't you think?...

    Geez...

    --
    Karma: Bad (but who really cares anyway?)
    1. Re:Hold on a second... by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Russia should consider 'protecting' other people's IP, because it's a tit for tat system.

      The issue in Russia isn't that they aren't protecting music, etc.
      It is that they don't have (m)any laws that either make the practice illegal, or they do, but are not enforced.

      FYI - Russia and other Eastern European countries have their own music industries too. Don't think that the entire world would fall into silence if the USA stopped producing music.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Hold on a second... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they signed the Berne Convention. All the signatories pledged to mutual;y respect the IP of other member nations.

    3. Re:Hold on a second... by Noxal · · Score: 1

      "Don't think that the entire world would fall into silence if the USA stopped producing music." On the contrary. There might be DECENT music if the USA music industry died! At least, the popular labels.

    4. Re:Hold on a second... by slashjunkie · · Score: 0, Informative

      I lived/worked in St Petersburg for almost a year (I'm originally from .NZ). On the main street in St Petersburg, there are shops that are just like any other music/video store, totally professional shop fittings and overall image - except everything they sell in there is pirated. And it's extremely well pirated - the Russians are masters at copying things, and some of their pirated CDs are hard to distinguish - I'm talking professionally pressed (not burned) CDs, colour CD inlays that have been professionally printed (not colour-photocopied). If you didn't know about the piracy issue in Russia, you could be forgiven for thinking these were legit products.

      Anyway, getting back to the topic of the parent post, I can also vouch for a fairly strong anti-American feeling in Russia (among other places I've been), and resentment at America's foreign policy. I don't think the average Russian is just going to set down and let corporate America steamroll their way of life. Russia already is trying to clamp down on piracy, but with a corrupt government infrastructure, all it takes is the bribing of some official, and the problem gets ignored. At any rate, if the piracy problem is to be stamped out, it has to come from within. I'd expect a very large backlash if it was seen to be America imposing their laws on Russian people.

    5. Re:Hold on a second... by EzInKy · · Score: 1


        Because they signed the Berne Convention. All the signatories pledged to mutual;y respect the IP of other member nations.


      If the majority of Russians want to ignore copyrights then it wouldn't be very democratic for their governemnt to enforce them.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    6. Re:Hold on a second... by soma_0806 · · Score: 1

      Other countries MUST care about the intellectual property of countries other than just their own because of several international agreements that have been signed by a large number those countries. There's the Berne Convention and TRIPS to name a two. These agreements require either national treatmnent (the same treatment for the citizens of signatory countries) or reciprocity (the treatment of the two countries must be equal). Violation of these treaties distrupts trade and leads to less than optimal earnings for both countries (and their people).

      Anyone who thinks we're still working with separate national economies is largely fooling themselves. It's a world economy anymore and IP does provide significant fuel. There are still good ways to protect it (the EU's patent system seems to work better than our own) and bad ways (see RIAA and Sony tactics), but good or bad protection is still important.

      I certainly don't like how it's being done (for the most part), but I see that's some system is necessary.

      AC
    7. Re:Hold on a second... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Why should the RUSSIANS (or insert your favorite country here) care for "protection of AMERICAN intellectual blahblah.."?... When first and foremost, they're supposed to be caring for their own "intellectual blahblah"...

      One hand washes the other. If Russia's not serious about protecting the rights of Americans doing business in Russia, then what incentive is there for America to give any protections to Russians doing business here? I think it's safe to say that Russia would like to keep trade channels with the United States open, and even open those channels further as their infrastructure allows them. They can't stay open if all the value is leaking out one end.

      And this will somehow pass, and we'll go on trying to get countries to uphold US Law in their own land, and more and more and more people will get to love us, don't you think?...

      You somehow seem to think that reciprocal copyright protections were an American creation foisted upon a recalcitrant Rest Of The World. Yet the Berne Convention, to which the United States and the Russian Federation are both signatories, was developed by an international coalition and has been in effect for over 35 years.

      It's not US law that the RIAA is trying to have enforced here, though they are a US organization and are looking out for US interests. It is INTERNATIONAL law. Russia agreed to it, the RIAA wants them to enforce it.

  33. SONY's new trick by PaulG1837 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I just picked up a VAIO, and was reading the new license agreement. It now includes verbiage that SONY has the right (or a third party) to monitor the system. I have HIPAA covered data on my network, and can not allow anyone access to this data whatsoever, even if they are saying that they are looking for something else. Even a hint of a leak could cause a penalty to be triggered. I guess SONY has lost this sale. For anyone else, I would advise you ALL to look carefully at the license agreements, and think twice about SONY.

    1. Re:SONY's new trick by gellenburg · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm sorry, but there's no such thing as a EULA to a piece of hardware.

      Now, there might be with Windows, and with certain Sony specific add-ons they add to Windows, but this is all the more reason to not run Windows and either run OS X (a'la iBook or PowerBook), FreeBSD, or Linux.

    2. Re:SONY's new trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Can you cite the relevant section of the Vaio EULA?

    3. Re:SONY's new trick by duffahtolla · · Score: 1
      If you don't want to be monitored, buckle down and put a different OS on it. With XP, your always going to be risking something when you install a game or play a CD.

      My wifes Thinkpad's going to get OpenSuse as soon as I can get from her.

    4. Re:SONY's new trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You linked to linux-laptop: Just so you know, VAIO is a line of desktops as well as laptops, not just laptops.
      Linky

    5. Re:SONY's new trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, buying a laptop to put another proprietary OS (osx) on it is a good idea.

      it's not like apple even has a eula...

      if you want freedom, go for the best you can not a half-assed attempt at it while getting a vendor lock-in on future products (apple).

      get linux or even FBSD but don't bother with proprietary garbage. they may just work but they also have EULAs to keep reminding you that you have no rights over your own property.

      eula = illegal (immoral for sure). now lets find some judges who have half a brain and some congressmen who aren't bribed up the wazoo.

    6. Re:SONY's new trick by TractorBarry · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's a Sony. What do you expect ?

      The company that brought the single worst piece of DRM crap (their abortion of a rootkit) yet introduced.

      Don't want any of this crap ? don't buy Sony. It's that simple.

      --
      Sky subscribers are morons. They pay to be advertised at !
    7. Re:SONY's new trick by pembo13 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What if there is a 'trojan' in the hardware itself?

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    8. Re:SONY's new trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      From the Apple EULA:
      4. Consent to Use of Data. You agree that Apple and its subsidiaries may collect and use technical and related information, including but not limited to technical information about your computer, system and application software, and peripherals, that is gathered periodically to facilitate the provision of software updates, product support and other services to you (if any) related to the Apple Software. Apple may use this information, as long as it is in a form that does not personally identify you, to improve our products or to provide services or technologies to you.

    9. Re:SONY's new trick by lilmouse · · Score: 1

      DRM...DRM...DRM...

      There isn't a EULA now that you're aware of - but with DRM they can control what runs on the computer. Don't forget that - it's not about piracy, it's about control!

      --LWM

    10. Re:SONY's new trick by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      And what happens if you install Linux?

  34. How sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The RIAA has decided to be the instigator of an attempt to lay down the law in a country with a serious organized crime problem. As an annoying presence on the internet, they are brave to take such action despite past precedent:
    http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/07/25/174 5212&from=rss

    I truly hope that they do not find themselves at the recieving end of Russian Mob retaliation.

  35. I love this country! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Russia, Violin player shoot you with musket if you whistle his song!

  36. Wow by Agarax · · Score: 1

    Holy crap, an intelligent and thought provoking thread that doesnt follow the usual group think.

    I salute you, sir!

    --
    Remember folks, slashdot doesn't have a -1 "disagree" moderation!
  37. well said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    biting-off-more-than-you-can-chew dept.

    I would say way way way more thank you can chew RIAA.

  38. I have one by peope · · Score: 0, Redundant

    To the RIAA: In sovjet russia we screw YOU!

  39. Wait I'm confused.... by rune2 · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that the Russians sue the RIAA?

  40. How much does legislation cost these days? by Proudrooster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was wondering if anyone knows how much money it costs to buy a piece of legislation. It is a well established fact that our elected officials are addicted to contributions, gifts, and other quid pro quo from special interest groups. I suspect it only costs around $5,000 to $10,000 to get a piece of legislation introduced.

    If that is the case, we could start the Slashdot Political Action Committee and bury the RIAA/MPAA with some really interesting legislation. Just a thought.

    1. Re:How much does legislation cost these days? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends on the politician.

      Bush charges a few oilfields and 100,000+ lives.

      Orin Hatch is $183,428 http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/indus.asp?C ID=N00009869&cycle=2004

    2. Re:How much does legislation cost these days? by click2005 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "An honest politician is one who, when he is bought, will stay bought." - Simon Cameron

      --
      I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
    3. Re:How much does legislation cost these days? by blaberski · · Score: 1

      You are an idiot

    4. Re:How much does legislation cost these days? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats the most insightful reply I've seen evar!

    5. Re:How much does legislation cost these days? by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      Hastert got about $120,000 from Abramoff to make sure that he got a "right of way" on the Indian Gambling.

      So, for a top tier politician, I'm guessing it is about $20k per "incident". Maybe just $5k for a lower Congressman per vote -- if the "leaders" can't get enough to votes. Beyond just committees, I'm guessing actual votes cost more -- and then if you get into onerous issues like the Bankruptcy Reform Bill, you have to hire a few flunkies like Neal Boortz to tell everyone how toxic sludge is good for you (I think that became a book or a movie, right?). So, it kind of depends upon scale. But $5k to $20k sounds about right to me -- per incident. Multiply that by the number you need to buy and whether it is an election year (X4 for election year on a bad vote). Still, pennies on the dollar for the profits that a corporation makes from buying a Politico or two. About 1,000 to 1 ROI.

      If only I could "invest" and buy a percentage of the Republican Party -- not a whole Senator or anything, just a portion. In the last 5 years, stock in the RP must have gone up like 2000 %. Best investment going, if you ask me.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
  41. an emerging issue by ZoneGray · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >> We must not enter into political arrangements with countries ill-prepared to adequately protect our greatest economic assets.

    And exactly why should Russia give a hoot about protecting the RIAA's assets? This continues to emerge as a huge issue in international relations.

    In the Internet age, the only way to make copyrights & patents work is to enforce them wordwide. And agreements can be made, as long as both involved countries have IP to protect. France, Germany, UK, Japan, I can see why they'd cooperate. But most of the world's nations don't have much commecial IP to protect. I don't see how IP can be protected worldwide without bullying the crap out of a lot of little countries. In fact, I don't think even that will work.

    Sure is gonna be messy over the next few decades.

  42. Geez, this is so insane on so many levels by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    • Russia got nothing better to do at the moment then go after filesharers. America wanted the soviet union gone, well this is what you get.
    • Odd the same claim is not made about china. China would feel a trade ban far worse, or could it be that such a ban would be bad for america?
    • The US stands alone in the war on terror. Russia has its own war against pretty much the same enemy. Logical US diplomatic action? Upset Russia every chance you get.
    • WTO is already being seen as an american puppet. If this succeeds then it will be confirmed.

    No, this is clearly insane. Those who voted for the senators involved should be shot for being a waste of good air.

    On the other hand if the russians want to show the US up all they have to do is announce that they are a P2P safeheaven. Nah, I think this is one of those fantasie ideas that show why the RIAA is such an obsolete organisation.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  43. Good Luck with that by olddotter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I really don't think this will go very far in Russia. The Russian's might play lip service to protecting US IP rights, as the Chinese did earlier this year, but the Russian's have too many real problems for this to be a priority.

    The music industry is desperate, because the fat profits are drying up. And if that "problem" weren't enough they are being faced with disruptive technologies that almost make them obsolete. Face it, big music labels are only needed for marketing. With a few thousand dollars worth of equipment you can put together a good home studio, make your own CD, and sell your music online. And if you are good enough to get some grassroots buzz, you will probably make as much that way as signing with the big label. As someone said "last throws."

    1. Re:Good Luck with that by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Then why do people still flock to iTunes instead of emusic.com ?
      I had a trial of emusic some time back.
      Some of the tracks were good. Most were not.
      Finding the good ones from the bad ones took a lot of time.
      Brands DO matter. Artist names DO matter.
      Hype DOES matter.
      Hence music labels will continue to exist.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    2. Re:Good Luck with that by Brother+Seamus · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "...the Russian's have too many real problems for this to be a priority."

      So do the Americans.

    3. Re:Good Luck with that by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      This won't dry up. Winning the IP war is too important for this government. It isn't about Music or Movies -- it's about OWNERSHIP being more important than LABOR. You can work for a living and starve and not educate your kids,... but darn anyone who gets in the way of dividend profits.

      Patenting genes and outlawing seeds is the future. You may not even have RIGHTS to your memories or parts of your body. No, expect the strongest political pressure to come from the US government to get Russia to adopt the RIAA rules. A lot of taxpayer money will be used as a carrot for Russia to accept this. The RIAA will not be allowed to go bankrupt.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
  44. Fill in the blank... by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    War on _____

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    1. Re:Fill in the blank... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      War on penis

      (five letters)

    2. Re:Fill in the blank... by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      Humanity.

  45. Is the WTO relevant? by bogaboga · · Score: 1
    > A recent bill was sponsored in the Senate to deny Russia's entrance into the WTO

    What does belonging to the WTO bring in advantages to a country? China, which until very recently, did not belong to the body, was not doing badly at all. I guess we all know the surpluses it's running with the US. Russia, despite its not-so-good organization, is in a better financial state than the US mainly because of [quality] arms exports and oil revenues.

    What does a country get from belonging to the WTO? Could educated folks enlighten a slashdotter?

    1. Re:Is the WTO relevant? by rolypolyman · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly. Seems like not being in the WTO is a boon for income equality.

    2. Re:Is the WTO relevant? by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      The World Trade Organization (WTO) is a multinational rules based and membership oriented organization which oversees international agreements between members defining the rules of trade, or more precisely the rules governing access to markets, tariffs, quotas, subsidies and the like. It is the successor to the older General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) which was signed following WWII in 1947 as part of the Bretton Woods meetings, which took place in Bretton Woods New Hampshire beginning in 1944. The famous economist John Maynard Keynes headed the British delegation and was influential in the drafting of the final agreement. The power of the WTO, at least in theory, comes from the ability of the organization to expel members who do not follow the rules although in practice this would seem unlikely as evidenced by all of the rule bending which China gets away with. There are articles on Wikipedia covering the WTO, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, and other issues of International trade for interested readers. The Commanding Heights series, available online at PBS featured a segment with audio selections from Keyne's speech at the Bretton Woods conference as well.

      Chapter 6: Worldwide War - Keynes at Bretton Woods

  46. Had to say it... by hackstraw · · Score: 3, Funny


    In Soviet Russia, the ecording Industry Association of America owns you!

    1. Re:Had to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they don't own a capital 'R'.

  47. Has everything to do with it!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AllofMP3.com is a serious threat.

    1. Re:Has everything to do with it!!! by rbrugman · · Score: 1

      I love AllofMP3.com! Anything you want, even the old stuff that isn't available is on there. I can also stuff my computer full of Russian music for two cents per meg. You can't beat that anywhere! As far as legality: Underage drinking is illegal, radar jammers are illegal, downloading music off P2P programs is illegal, and yet I don't seem to care ;-)

    2. Re:Has everything to do with it!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      That's probably because you're a complete cunt.

    3. Re:Has everything to do with it!!! by rbrugman · · Score: 2, Funny

      A cunt maybe, but at least not an anonymous coward.

    4. Re:Has everything to do with it!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're incomplete even as a cunt.

  48. From Russia to RIAA: by imperious_rex · · Score: 1

    Tvayu Maht

    1. Re:From Russia to RIAA: by BCW2 · · Score: 1

      For those who don't speak Russian:

      Tvayu Maht = fuck your mother!

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
    2. Re:From Russia to RIAA: by Escogido · · Score: 1

      Not quite true. It means just "your mother", implying the obvious though.

      The expression you might be looking for is "Yob tvayu maht".

    3. Re:From Russia to RIAA: by temcat · · Score: 1

      It's not really an adequate answer, since it basically expresses anger, surprise, or vexation. More appropriate would be "Otyebis'!" ("Fuck off!").

    4. Re:From Russia to RIAA: by BCW2 · · Score: 1

      You're right, I missed that part. Obviously I'm not to good at Russian either!

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  49. MOD PARENT UP. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    "...protect our greatest economic assets"...."That ephemeral, rather than concrete, goods are now being touted as Americas most valuable possessions is nothing short of depressing."

    +1 - Definition of Insightfull.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  50. what did they do? by dmitrygr · · Score: 1

    http://www.riaa.com/default.asp

    their site.
    look at the news:

    RIAA Lauds Senate Passage Of Measure To Stop Russian Intellectual Property Theft
    RIAA Targets Retail Establishments Hawking Pirated CDs
    RIAA Brings New Round Of Lawsuits Against 751 Online Music Thieves
    MPAA/RIAA Offer Tips To Help Holiday Shoppers Steer Clear Of Counterfeit CDs, DVDs
    DiMA and RIAA Beckon Holiday Shoppers to Give the Gift of Legal Online Music This Holiday Season!
    RIAA Praises Department of Justice, FBI and Nashville Police Department for Efforts Resulting in Recent Indictment of Music Pirate
    Music Industry Files New Lawsuits In Ongoing Enforcement Against Online Theft

    what did they do before all this? why do we need them now?
    Artists? where is a single mention of artists? I see "illegal" "theft" "money", and now "congress", but no "artists"

    and the news item: "we own the congress" is also missing..

    america america land of the free.... oh wait....

    --
    -------
    1. Enjoy your job
    2. Make lots of money
    3. Work within the law

    Choose any two.
  51. I think they're forgetting something. by Noxal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The RIAA stands for Recording Industry Association of AMERICA. Last time I checked, Russia wasn't in either of the American continents. "The effective protection of American intellectual property has been sorely lacking in Russia." That's because it's RUSSIA! Not America, you ignorant turdbrains!

  52. Here's Why The WTO Thinks They Are by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Informative
    What does a country get from belonging to the WTO? Could educated folks enlighten a slashdotter?
    From the horse's mouth
    http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/10ben _e/10b00_e.htm
    The ten benefits

    1. The system helps promote peace
    2. Disputes are handled constructively
    3. Rules make life easier for all
    4. Freer trade cuts the costs of living
    5. It provides more choice of products and qualities
    6. Trade raises incomes
    7. Trade stimulates economic growth
    8. The basic principles make life more efficient
    9. Governments are shielded from lobbying
    10. The system encourages good government
    Follow the link, because each point goes to a page which expands on the short blurb.
    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Here's Why The WTO Thinks They Are by nagora · · Score: 1

      11. Get to be slaves to US policies, laws, and culture.

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    2. Re:Here's Why The WTO Thinks They Are by Maljin+Jolt · · Score: 1

      1. The system helps promote peace
      2. Disputes are handled constructively
      3. Rules make life easier for all


      That sounds just like imperial propaganda from Warhammer 40000.

      --
      There you are, staring at me again.
  53. Bootlegs outside USA ?-dream on by speedlaw · · Score: 1

    After a trip to Mexico city, I saw every single sort of software, from Word to esoteric engineering programs, on sale for USD $5. I saw every sort of music, every sort of video. Every video game you can imagine, for almost every platform. All bootlegs, for $5 each, before negotiation. We should encourage the **AA A-holes to go to town in other countries. They'll spend a bloody fortune as the "foreigners" take their money to do not much, the **AA will divert attention from USA extortion schemes, and generally spin their wheels. Meanwhile, my young child thinks music comes out of a computer, knows how to rip a CD, and swaps songs (real, not virtual world) with all of her friends. Outside the USA, Canada and the EU, they **AA has ZERO chance of any actual progress (from their Point of View...and that leaves only about 85% of the planet. If they don't lock us all down with DRM (recalling that other 85% of the planet) they are totally doomed, and another way to distribute will come around, probably a compensated version of P2P. Where's the first musical hit outside the current scheme ?

  54. From America with love by Kuxman · · Score: 1
    (From A View to a Kill)

    "The Order of Lenin, for Comrade Bond. The first time ever awarded to a non-Soviet citizen."
    "I'd have expected the KGB to celebrate if Silicon Valley had been destroyed."
    "On the contrary, Admiral...Where would Russian research be without it?"

    That's IP rights for ya...

    --
    http://www.asti-usa.com
    1. Re:From America with love by BCW2 · · Score: 1

      If you look at what the Russians succeeded in getting during the cold war, this rings very true. Fortunately by the time they figured out how to build what the stole, it was two generations behind.

      1976 - 1980 USN Submarine Service

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  55. Cover-up for a huge US failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To your surprise Russia has tight copyright laws and they are enforced rather strictly. Why you [Americans] do not know about such laws? Because they are used only to protect Russia's own music industry. Never heard about music played and produced in Russia? Believe me there are tons of such music but it is never advertised outside the country. Here is the story: after Russia opened in early 1990-s western recording companies did not bother to promote they products in Russia. As a result Russia's music market was lost to local music production with the western music sales being infinitesimal.

    Now if western recording companies are not able to compete in the market, they want to pull out a legislation to be able to make a few bucks on a marginal market after loosing it in mid-90s.

    That's the gist of the problem. Russian music is crap, Russia's music industry is controlled by mafia but that won't change until US recording companies spend money to promote US music in Russia.

    P.S.: In 90-s Russia had its own kind of copyright protection (for its own music of course, not western). There were no FBI warning on CDs or mention of prison terms for copying. The copyright message just said: "Copying this CD is dangerous for your life". That's it! (Translation: "if you copy this CD mafia will take care of you").

  56. In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    AllOfMp3.com is legal.

    gotcha ;-)

  57. Obligatory by Digitus1337 · · Score: 1

    In Russia, music pirates YOU!

  58. Well thats bloody rich I must say. by thephydes · · Score: 3, Insightful

    US companies are the best (worst) at pillaging other countries intellectual property and claiming it for themselves. Just look at native uses for various plants that have been patented by a rotten system, with the original traditional "owners" being denied access to any benefits. Maybe some of these pirating companies and countries see you greedy cunts as fair game. Call me a troll or whatever the hell you want to - I actually dont give a flying fuck either way - but its only a matter of time before other rapidly developing countries - India and China two name two will tell the US to get stuffed, and they'll have the economic clout to do so.

    1. Re:Well thats bloody rich I must say. by shiftless · · Score: 1

      As an American, I agree. It's pathetic.

  59. I hope the RIAA members enjoy... by thesandtiger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    .... being fed their own testicles before being stuffed in a trunk.

    I have a hard time imagining that Russian piracy rings would be filled with nice-nice people who would be scared of a few lawsuits or even Russian "law enforcement."

    --
    Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    1. Re:I hope the RIAA members enjoy... by melikamp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To you and all others who dragged in the "Russian Mafia". It is irrelevant, and not just because the godfather lives in the Kremlin. It is irrelevant mostly because there is virtually no "piracy" in Russia. The distribution that takes place is entirely legal and is carried out by legitimate businesses.

  60. That's funny by DanThe1Man · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's funny because I proxy all my peer-to-peer traffic through a server in Russia. I wonder if my mass downloading has anything to do with this?

  61. Such hubris by petrus4 · · Score: 2, Funny

    As I recall, Hitler's fatal mistake was to attempt to conquer Russia, as well.

    I wonder if this parallel is symbolic of anything? ;)

    (To the lemmings who will doubtless now pour out of the woodwork screaming about Godwin's Law, please go back to sleep. That law refers to gratuitous overuse of references to Hitler or the Nazis...it doesn't say they should not be mentioned at all. Although even if it did, personally I'd hardly care...so don't bother.)

    1. Re:Such hubris by Ullric · · Score: 2, Funny

      well,if it is,hopefully within 1 or 2 years the RIAA president will shoot himself in an undergroud bunker. :P

  62. As a Russian, by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    I can only say that "effective action" on pretty much anything is something simply inconceivable under the existing regime in this country. In this-day, almost-Soviet-again Russia, "effective" is an oxymoron.

  63. China by opencity · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One way China is ahead of the game is their artists / music industry have given up on CD sales revenue. The artist makes money, or tries to, by selling concert tickets and with marketing tie-ins. In India bootlegs are available the day they are released. It won't come as much of a suprise to \.ers that, as the US moves toward this model, it is corporate profits and support staff who seem to be taking the heat / losing the livelyhood.

    As a career sideman, I feel no pain for the old industry passing (especially the lawyers), but the job of recording engineer is going the way of the hatmaker. Actually that analogy breaks down: The job of recording artist and recording engineer are being merged and will not pay very well. There used to be more work for painters, too.

    OT: There's a bigger issue here about labor and specialization - the best singer I've ever knew (hits in the 60s) was taking an occasional plumbing job in the 80s and wasn't bitter: The way he put it was: $30 an hour. This while commanding $2-$4k for 20 - 40 oldies shows a year. I didn't quit playing during the 90s net boom and still work a lot now. I also stay buzzword compliant - this year: AJAX(ugh) and psych-folk(cool).

    --
    Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it.
    1. Re:China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue is this: Some artists can't make their money from concerts. Thomas Dolby alway lost money on concerts--he made his money on album sales. I like Dolby's music. Piracy makes it harder to have artists like Dolby stay in the music industry.

    2. Re:China by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      Alot of these American artists make way too much money anyways.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    3. Re:China by opencity · · Score: 1

      > Piracy makes it harder to have artists like Dolby stay in the music industry.

      Learn to play live or try your hand at TV commercials. There's less money around for Dolby, but the gear's now cheap enough for and endless stream of Dolbys (see: Reason)

      --
      Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it.
  64. There's a more obvious one... by hackwrench · · Score: 2, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, Russia sets their sights on the RIAA!

  65. Now they speak for everyone who creates stuff? by ToxicBanjo · · Score: 1

    The Intellectual Property of American's doesn't start and end with the RIAA. So how can they lobby to introduce a bill that has ramifications outside their own industry?

    Shouldn't there be checks for overstepping one's bounds? Or is it just their money talking again. Funny that, with all the money they have spent on lawsuits and trying to buy laws it's no wonder they are losing profits.

    The %AAs can kiss my ass. Their desire to "Protect American's Hard Earned Intellectual Property" has F*CK all to do with American's Intellectual Property and everything to do with the executive's wallet.

    There was a time I may have actually started to buy CDs/DVDs again. Real standardized media, not pieces of round plastic that may or may not work with my "shit". Then the %AAs has to go and start all this overstepping of bounds that is so far beyond their business mandate it's in the vacinity of the Pleiades.

    The %AAs have shown they care nothing for consumers and nothing for their clients (artists). I just wish the politicians (even the good ones) would actually take a serious look at what they have been paid to endorse. I think we would see most of the proposals defeated with little resistance. Wishful thinking though I know but there it is.

    --
    There are only 10 kinds of people in the world. Those that understand binary and those that don't.
  66. USSRIAA by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

    i can understand a common standard when it comes to things like human rights and environmental. but we have gotten to the point where we make other governments submit to our standards when it comes to IP? that's like me telling my neighbor that he must paint his interior walls the color of my choosing. i say choosing, because i don't like the color, my wife does. i don't need to tell u who the wife is in this analogy

  67. Solving the system of equations... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Substitute in for good:
    Bad govt + Money = govt - Money
    illustrating a truth that bad governments are soon without money and wind up raising taxes to get more.

    Second Corollary:
    The best way to keep a government good is to deprive it of money.

    1. Re:Solving the system of equations... by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually you bias is showing: gov is bad. Starve your govenment to death, and then live in a land run by corporate power. Shareholders don't care about human rights. Governments are the only form of "checks and ballances" strong enough to stand up to corporations. Kill governments, and you kill your "inalienable" rights.

    2. Re:Solving the system of equations... by NormalVisual · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Governments are the only form of "checks and ballances" strong enough to stand up to corporations.

      Governments are also the means by which the aforementioned corporations come into being, and through which they get their power. Government also was responsible for the "legal person" fiction corporations enjoy, without the pesky responsibility to follow the laws that real people have. Heaven forbid the shareholders might actually held responsible for the company's actions...

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    3. Re:Solving the system of equations... by Xyleene · · Score: 1

      Yea, lets get rid of the governments. Hell, Sicily tried it. And they just got one big family... Perfect

      --
      Give them the illusion of choice and they will blindly follow for they choose not to make one.
    4. Re:Solving the system of equations... by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      I wasn't suggesting that governments be eliminated, but rather to point out that corporations are a construct of said government. Eliminating the government is no doubt a bad idea, but overhauling the legal framework in which corporations exist and operate might be something worth looking into.

      The original poster implied that corporations would have unchecked power without the government to limit them, apparently not noticing that corporations derive most of their power from the government to begin with.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    5. Re:Solving the system of equations... by penguin-collective · · Score: 1

      It doesn't necessarily follow that wanting to deprive government of money is the same as wanting to do away with government.

      With carefully designed laws, good democratic government might not require more than a small police force. And it certainly seems like our current governments are wasting a lot of taxpayer money on unreasonable subsidies and military spending.

    6. Re:Solving the system of equations... by darjen · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that governments do care about human rights? Is it a human right not to get killed in war? How many humans would you say have been killed by governments vs. corporations? Call this a wild guess, but I'd say it's not even close. Governments are not a "check and balance". Their sole existance from their inception (including the U.S. gov.) has been to protect the assets of the rich. They wage war against other governments not to protect democracy or human rights, but to secure foreign markets for big business.

    7. Re:Solving the system of equations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >...corporations derive most of their power from the government to begin with.

      Really? And here I thought that that their power was derived from their money. How silly of me.

    8. Re:Solving the system of equations... by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Yes, how silly of you. Corporations are able to amass vast sums of money mostly because they aren't held responsible to society's laws in the same manner that an individual is, and the risk to individual shareholders in a corporation is generally limited to their investment, regardless of what the corporation may do. That grant of immunity from liability comes from the government, and no one else.

      When charters start getting revoked and assets seized, then maybe I'll start shifting more of the blame towards the corporate world, but as it is they're just taking full advantage of the situation that was handed to them by the government.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    9. Re:Solving the system of equations... by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      Some would rather do away with the police force, and let citizens go armed, than do away with investment in human capital (such as education, welfare, etc...).

    10. Re:Solving the system of equations... by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      I'm suggesting that in a democratic forum it is possible for people to have a say, to provide input, be a part of the loop, in the determination of policies that matter to them. I'm not suggesting that corporations don't have an extreme level of influence. This is occuring, however, because voters allow it to occur. In this regard, yes, I still state boldly that governments are a "check and balance" against powers, foreign and domestic, that theaten the citizenry. Currently, Fox "News" is most effective at spreading propaganda, and the citizen's are getting what they voted for...it just might be what they are told they voted for, and it might not be what is happening. Still, we are getting what we voted for...and that matters. This is like seatbelts, in that they won't work if you don't bother to use them.

    11. Re:Solving the system of equations... by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      Indeed, what you say appears to be true to me, too. However, I never meant to suggest that *all* citizens have the same ideals, or motives. My government did engineer the legal fictions of corporate existence, as well as psuedo property. In a democracy, you can't assume that all citizens will have the best interests of all the citizens in their hearts at all times. Hell, you can't even assume that good people won't watch propaganda and *know* that their were WMDs, or even that "WMD where found!", etc..., ad nausem.

      Still, what other avenue is there? Sheer raw power, which is money and other forms of means, versus what? This is why I can't fathom Libertarianism. The playing field is not even. When has it ever been? Democracy is a chance for the Pen rather than the Sword to protect Us from Them. Maybe.

  68. Greatest assets by matt_martin · · Score: 1

    Yup. Britney.

      Its the best we've got to offer these days...

    --
    Lurking in the desert
  69. This is the RIAA trying to shut down allofmp3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the RIAA trying to shut down All of mp3. Basically, the RIAA contacted the Russian authorities about allofmp3; the response they got was that allofmp3 was legal under Russia's copyright laws. So now the RIAA is trying to get the US in to changing Russia's laws. It would be wise for the US to remember that Russia still has all of those nukes from the cold war before thinking about doing an invasion of the country the way the US invaded Iraq.

    1. Re:This is the RIAA trying to shut down allofmp3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be wise for the US to remember that Russia still has all of those nukes from the cold war

      Correction: Russia has some of the nukes left over from the cold war. When the empire fell, many of the nukes kept in various former Soviet sattelite states have become unaccounted for.

  70. Poor metaphor by Hao+Wu · · Score: 1
    "RIAA Sets Their Sights on Russia"

    Are they aware that the Russian mafia will likely do the same -- and not in some wordy, lawyerly way...

    --
    I suggest you read Slashdot
  71. More like World War V by tepples · · Score: 1

    The prospect of sparking off World War III probably has a lot to do with that.

    World War III was the Cold War. World War IV is the War on Terra'.

    1. Re:More like World War V by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      What about the War against the People that Nixon started? Wasn't the War against Popular Culture the 3rd war?

  72. Talk about two faced liars.-Individuals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " This is the same USA that ignores any rulings handed down from the WTO that it doesn't like?"

    The RIAA isn't the US. You all don't like charges of hypocrisy when slashdotters are the one's being accused, but you see no problem doing the same to a nation.

  73. But then where will I go? by c640180 · · Score: 1

    I'll miss walking down the streets of St. Petersburg, with their retail stores selling repackaged "warez" and movies. I don't remember the name of the chain, but there's a chain of warez stores that even advertises in subway stations....

    1. Re:But then where will I go? by temcat · · Score: 1

      That would be "505" or "Titanic" :-D

  74. life in Russia by SmallOak · · Score: 1

    http://www.exile.ru/ A lot of it seems to be written after drinking way too much alchool. A lot of it seem to be written by Americans in exile that don't seem to like America all that much. But give the links a try.

  75. The RIAA and I have something in common. by evildogeye · · Score: 1

    I have my eyes set on an 18 year old Russian bride. I'll make sure she doesn't listen to any pirated mp3s for them.

  76. Sarin Gas by mosel-saar-ruwer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I hope the folks at the RIAA have a good supply of gas masks:
    Gas attack on DIY stores hits dozens of shoppers
    Tue 27 Dec 2005

    DOZENS of Russian shoppers collapsed when a mysterious gas was released in an apparent attack by criminal gangs on four DIY stores in St Petersburg yesterday...

    The attacks revived concerns about the city's mafia connections. In the 1990s, St Petersburg was known as the "gangster capital" of Russia because gangland murders eclipsed those of any other city, including Moscow. Back then, a "hostile takeover" often meant what it said, with business rivals killing each other and taking control of their markets...

    http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/print.cfm?id=24625 12005

    1. Re:Sarin Gas by WebCrapper · · Score: 1

      Thats actually the first thing I thought of when I saw this story. The gangs and mobs in Russia have been known to do some very interesting stuff. You add someone else in the mix that thinks they can get more money out of someone elses pocket, legal or not, its going to cause more problems.

    2. Re:Sarin Gas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry about that! Christmas dinner didn't agree with me this year.

  77. Before you look to shit in another's yard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google: A Patriot's Letter

  78. ROFLMAOBBQTART by TheNoxx · · Score: 1

    Wait, wait... The corporate pansies are going to challenge piracy in Russia? Does anyone with any sense in the RIAA understand that the Russian Mob runs that? Along with a huge portion, something like 1 in 3 or more, of businesses in general?

    Holy crap, I needed a good laugh. They have a hard enough time with college programmers, but they think organized crime in a country brutalized by totalitarian communism will be a peice of cake. Hoo boy, it was hard enough to take the recording industry serious before... are they trying to turn their organization in a farce? Come on. Well, then again, the world could use some comic relief. Keep it up, RIAA, you're lifting spirits everywhere. By making asses of yourselves.

    --
    Ex nihilo nihil fit.
  79. I find it...disturbing...that "IP" is... by Svartalf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...the US' greatest asset, or more appropriately the rubbish that the bulk of the RIAA and MPAA members produce.

    C'mon, now, if that stuff is all our greatest asset, then we're pretty much done for as a country and an economic power. And it's as disturbing that Congress views it that way too.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  80. Funny how you don't see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't see America upholding Russian copyright law, either.

    If they did, everything created more than 30 years ago, including most of the Beatles' catalogue and a certain popular mouse, would be public domain.

  81. Greatest Econimic Assets? by SQLz · · Score: 1
    We must not enter into political arrangements with countries ill-prepared to adequately protect our greatest economic assets.

    Of course he is talking about 50 Cent's album 'Guess Who's Back?'. with such titles as 'F*ck You','Whoo Kid Freestyle', and the ever popular 'Get out the Club'.

  82. one day by akhomerun · · Score: 1

    one day legislators will realize that just because the RIAA has an official sounding almost government-like acronym doesn't actually make them an important organization.

  83. What the hell? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    We must not enter into political arrangements with countries ill-prepared to adequately protect our greatest economic assets.

    Let's see ... what is the nation with which America has the largest trade deficit in its history, that has been ripping off our "intellectual property" and high technology with impunity, and has the willing collusion of our elected leaders and most powerful corporations. Never mind the fact that that nation just happens to the greatest totalitarian state on the planet at the moment, and arguably should receive very little from a nominally more-principled nation such as the United States. If the **AA's of the world want a good place to start protecting their oh-so-valuable "intellectual property", I'd say forget about a has-been like Russia and start worrying about China.

    And the very best of luck with that, Mr. Sherman. Let me know how it works out.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  84. Do we even need Agents, RIAA? by HumanCarbonUnit · · Score: 1

    My solution to getting rid of the RIAA ( or at least making it less needed ) thought out in 15 min. And yes, I have googled it and found groups out there already trying this, problem is that you have to get some mainstream well known music service in on the act for those to be fully effective.

    Why does the RIAA and promoters exist? To promote music, people, etc, to the general public? Do away with the RIAA and use iTunes, Napster, whatever to promote new music, artists, etc. When you have a large enough base of users that use music service XYZ, then you have a large number of people that can be quickly and easily reached. How?

    + Reach them by researching what kind of music the person purchases, then giving them free downloads of singles that are related to their preferences.
    + Make these free sample singles auto-download into their music libraries (opt out of course). I think Tivo already does something like this unless you tell it not to.
    + On the start page of music service XYZ, put banner ads for new bands.
    + They can tell if a band is popular or sufficiently popular by the number of downloads, feedback, clicks the band gets.
    + If very popular, then bring in a promotion company to arrange concerts, etc for them.
    + Thus fixed costs for promotions go down, research costs go down, RIAA is largely not needed, and prices of music can go down and thus much less music piracy

    Problems:
    -- Many people are still not in the digital age, so some CD stores must still exist, although even those are now much cheaper
    -- DRM; hey, it's a digital age, take a look at how much DRM crap is stuffed into the ipod, DRM is so heavy because they have yet to figure out a good way of doing it that doesn't treat everyone like criminals.
    -- Must still handle the costs of the promoters, making CDs, paying artists, etc.

    I thought this whole thing out in like 15 min; any other ideas on how to render RIAA null or reduce the need for it?

  85. Well I guess that's what happens by mikek3332002 · · Score: 1

    when you allow any tom, chuck and *AA the right to bear arms and form an Malitia

  86. Guess The title of the next...... by codecracker007 · · Score: 1

    Josef Boobsucksky Thriller .. .. ofcourse it would be 'From RIAA With Love'

    --
    7-8-9-10-0
  87. What's the flip-side? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    If you don't enforce non-tangible property rights, then what are we left with?

    Tangible property (essentially raw resources and finished goods) and labor. Labor is getting normalized to its global value of, what? A few $USD a day? There are more laborers every day and less real estate (resources). That means stuff is getting more valuable and labor less so - simple supply and demand.

    But this isn't what we see in the real world (yet).

    Seems to me, a lot of the wealth in the world is just "made-up". This made up stuff is "intellectual property". Trade makes both parties better off. The more stuff there is to trade, the better off everyone is.

    If you reduce the worlds economy to (only) tangible items everyone will be worse off.

    As long as everyone (or at least enough) plays nice and repects intellectual property, you have a larger economy with more trade and more people end up materially better off than without the extra trade. Using intellectual property without paying for it may not have direct costs to anyone, but it aguably makes the overall economy smaller.

    People need food and shelter. Those are real resources. Nobody needs music.

    Do you really want a world economy based entirely on supply and demand for food and shelter?

    I think I will go look into some real-estate investments in farm country now... I have no idea what I am talking about.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:What's the flip-side? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you look little above, there is a post which compares music industry with military industry (and another company) - then you would see that the economy size increase that music industry can account for is insignificant.

  88. Time for a gratuitous... by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Union, music pirates YOU!

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  89. Big bills by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

    How much money does the RIAA spend on these crusades? Maybe if they spent a little less they could lower prices. Nothing combats piracy better than a low price.

  90. Depends how far out you go by MMaestro · · Score: 3, Informative

    For the most part, China does a good job at funneling tourists and foreigners into certain areas. I haven't been to Russia, but after visiting China I can tell you that you'll be shut out of most areas simply because you look differently, ESPECIALLY if you can't speak the language/local dialect. I've been to shopping areas in the Beijing area where mini-mall sized areas sold bootleg/pirated movies, software, music and hacked video game consoles with uniformed police officers standing around these kiosks openly.

  91. Don't forget our #1 export by penix1 · · Score: 1

    Military exports tops them all...

    http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/mil_us_mil_exp

    TOTAL: $10,661,802.00 thousand

    or

    $10,661,802,000.00

    I think 10 trillion tops anything the RIAA can do.

    B.

    --
    This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
  92. in other news.. Slashdot stories set their sights by austinpoet · · Score: 1

    Slashdot, in a move heralded by the sounding of trumpets has decided that along with more cowbell, many of their headlines must include the phrase "sets their* sights"

    "their" will be replaced by the appropriate descriptive pronoun

  93. Disreguard that post... by penix1 · · Score: 1

    Damn I need better drugs...

    That is Billion not trillion like I thought. Too many damned digits...

    B.

    --
    This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
    1. Re:Disreguard that post... by octopus72 · · Score: 1

      I was already concerned with military exports being as big as whole US economy :) 10 Billion isn't a big sum, I'd expect it to be much more (US military budget is >40 times as big). If it wasn't for those arab marionettes, whole sum would be miserable.

  94. "Intellectual" property? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's NOTHING intellectual about American intellectual property if we're talking about the so-called "music" that RIAA is so desperately trying to "protect". If fucking Kenny Chesney is intellectual property, I better just go fucking off myself with a shotgun right now. Jeezus motherfucking christ!. What has this country become? I'm fucking serious. This is goddamn depressing...

  95. That takes balls by Ryosen · · Score: 2, Informative

    knowledge-intensive intellectual property-based goods and services

    Since when does Britney Spears and the rest qualify as this?

    --

    Ryosen
    One man's "Troll, +1" is another man's "Insightful, +1".
  96. learn the definition of piracy, people. by ltwally · · Score: 1
    "This resolution is significant because it expresses the will of the U.S. Congress that Russia must take effective action against those who would steal America's knowledge-intensive intellectual property-based goods and services."
    Piracy is not the same as stealing.

    Piracy
    piracy

      • Robbery committed at sea.
      • A similar act of robbery, as the hijacking of an airplane.
    1. The unauthorized use or reproduction of copyrighted or patented material: software piracy.

    I'm not condoning piracy. But I am very tired of everyone assuming that piracy and theft are the same thing. Theft actually deprives someone of something, costing them a loss. Piracy might be depriving the creator of sales, but only if the pirate would have actually bought the product. At worst, piracy deprives a company of sales but does not cost them a loss in any other form. As often as not, however, piracy probably deprives the owner/creator of the product nothing (because the pirate does not feel the product is worth the price, or because the pirate cannot afford the cost of the product (as is the case in Russia and many other impoverished countries)).

    --



    /dev/random
  97. Compare Singapore and Russia by metamatic · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It's no coincidence that countries which don't pay much bother to the Berne Convention and other similar international agreements are by and large shitty places to live.

    Singapore didn't sign on to the Berne Convention until 1998. That was after they had transformed a largely agrarian society into a technological powerhouse in the space of less than a century.

    It's not a coincidence, in the sense that the USA pressures any country that wishes to trade internationally to implement copyright protection.

    Singapore did the right thing, and built a strong economy first before implementing copyright--like the USA did. Russia made the mistake of implementing copyright as part of the "market reforms" that the west told them would transform their country, and look at their economy now. So now we're going to tell them that the problem is they haven't tried it hard enough...

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  98. here's an idea by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    how about the usa give away it's music and movies away for free outside the usa (as if it doesn't already in many spots unintentionally)

    why?

    because american cultural influence, i think, is more important than a couple tens of billions here and there

    the usa is currently spending billions fighting negative impressions of this country, including propaganda

    additionally, there is a lot of propaganda being spewed by various vested interests around the world painting the usa in a very ogrish way (this is in addition to any actions the usa is actually doing that paints it in a very ogrish way)

    what better pro-american propaganda and propaganda which counteracts foreign vested interests (valid or invalid) then that which hollywood produces?

    how much money and many lives are saved if a movie conquers a country instead of an army?

    someone get this meme in a congressman's ear quick, the riaa and mpaa will be out of business (foreign country-wise) in a week

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  99. It works fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The biggest herpes on the music world is ClearChannel who makes Microsoft seem quaint and U2 is ClearChannels biggest commodity from concert booking to promoting and touring, you name it.

    That u2 was directly involved with the big Clearchannel Live8 scam this summer which served only to give Blair an Bush a big hummer for the whole world to see is fitting.

    The fact that they are Irish, doesnt change anything.

  100. Sanctions? by Gadzinka · · Score: 1

    And who will exactly back US sanctions against Russia? US doesn't sell much to Russia. C'mon, with this trade deficit, does US actually sell anything abroad? And Russia doesn't sell much to US, so the actual sanctions could be funny... ;)

    As for American cronies in Europe... Just watch them sanction Russia and lose all the cheap natural gas from Russia. In Western Europe when Russia says "jump", every politician asks "how high?", whether he is from left, right or center.

    I just can't wait to see Putin curl up and die of fear after hearing "protect our intelectual property or else..." from America.

    Robert

    --
    Bastard Operator From 193.219.28.162
  101. our greatest economic assets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess the RIAA thinks Britney Spears is one of "...our greatest economic assets."

  102. If that's their ultimatum... by fragmer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I honestly don't see how piracy can be rooted out in Russia any time soon. I lived in Zheleznodorozhnyj (near Moscow) for 15 years and the amount of "intellectual property" flowing around is humongous. Out 2000-odd local area network had a dozen local ftp servers filled to the rim with hundreds of gigabytes DVD rips, albums, software and what not. I myself shared 50 gigs or so (shh! don't tell anyone...) It is practically impossible to find legitimate copies of CDs and DVDs, no matter how many tons of pirated discs they publicly crush with bulldozers every week! And, as many people previously commented, it is most rediculous to prevent such a large and influential country to enter WTO because of IP.

    --
    09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3 5b d8 41 56 c5 63 56 88 c0
  103. Reminds me of that old David Letterman joke. by hullabalucination · · Score: 1

    Letterman (paraphrased): "Despite all the problems that we face in this great country of ours, I think we can all be proud that America is still the world's largest exporter of Amy Fischer TV movies."

  104. RIAA = Russian Industry? by MikeSty · · Score: 0

    Recording Industry Association of America.

  105. The freedom point by Quiberon · · Score: 1

    The 'freedom point' is where people sing their own songs, and write their own software. From there, you can vary so that some buy songs that others sing, and some buy software that others write. When the RIAA stop trying to change Berne Convention ... 50 years after the artist's death, his/her songs become free ... and start respecting the other 'fair use' points, then they will have more success at getting everyone else to repect Berne. It cuts both ways.

  106. Have you seen the Russian Tax Police??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In case you haven't heard the Russian Tax Police is not your average CPA... They wear skimasks and carry machineguns to work!

    1. Re:Have you seen the Russian Tax Police??? by temcat · · Score: 1

      FYI Tax Police doesn't exist anymore in Russia.

  107. Nukes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does Russia need to be in the WTO anyway? sell some of them nukes to Iran or Syria for $$$ and Oil.

    Or... simply imply it.

  108. Right by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows that Russia can't get enough American English music. Russians aren't spending nearly as much on American music as Americans, so they must be pirating the difference, unless perhaps some of them are pirating Russian music which the RIAA has little or no interest in.

  109. Re:Doubtful by SolitaryMan · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Given the huge number of social and security issues that Russia faces at the moment (corruption, poverty, keeping track of its nuclear arsenal) I expect that they will put this item pretty low on their list of priorities.
    It is sad to say this, but these items are lower than anything in Russia's list of priorities. (I live in Russia, btw)
    --
    May Peace Prevail On Earth
  110. Precisely. RIAA is abusing human rights by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    Yep. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that the RIAA is deliberately abusing human rights here. They're still fighting to get the insane laws they want enacted in countries where rights are foremost, and so they take their fight to countries where rights are less well established, but economics are more vital. I'm sure they've never taken the time to really consider the morality of it, but I think anyone who does will realise it's blackmail at best, and simply sickening at worst.

  111. America's knowledge-intensive intellectual propert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm feeling sick. Pass me the bucket, please.

  112. seen those movie kiosks showing american movies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone seen those movie kiosks showing pirated american movies in Russia? I came across a couple movie review sites listing which movies were available in kiosks, theatres. I was wondering where all those pre-2000 internet kiosk companies' hardware was sold to... hehehe, no really has anyone seen these kiosks? What do they look like? What software do they run? I think kiosks showing licensed movies would be a great idea for the U.S., and remember watching cartoons this way for 25 cents as a kid.

  113. Freedom of speech by ncurtain · · Score: 0

    After a lifetime of severe repression, in a country -or rather in an empire, where those that could get access to copying machines and were willing to produce banned works of art and publish them illegally despite counter-measures that were the equivalent of capital punishment and ostracism for all the members of the publisher's family...

    I imagine it will be difficult for the Russian government to effect any measures that a foreign power might insist on in order to turn back that particular clock.

    If they were willing to do all that just for the sake of art, they are going to show a lot more spine when anyone can do it and where there is money involved and NO government reprisal. The US recording industry must have a poorer grasp of human psychology and world history than the fool on the hill.

  114. Mod me up by ncurtain · · Score: 0

    In Russia the mods come to you.

  115. Funny little people, these RIAA are. by Escogido · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is Russia, guys. They don't probably realize what that really means...

    First of all, 'Russia' and 'property' are mutually exclusive. Russian society has always been based on the concept of common ownership of assets and the traditional 'obshchina' (~ commonship) values dating back to the pre-Viking times are still as strong here as ever. You don't own anything here, you work for the good of all and add whatever you produce to the common pool, from which you are entitled a share. When Forbes starts to count the money in the Russian richest guys' pockets, I can't help smirking. They don't understand that nobody really owns anything here. Tomorrow your friends may decide that you have too much and gone too far and they come along and say, hey, do you know that things are not done like that? To share is the law!

    Yeah, to share is the law. If the concept of 'property' which has always been alien to Russians is somewhat unapplicable here, then the concept of 'intellectual property' is almost an oxymoron here. You don't even 'own' anything in the western meaning here, why would anyone respect rights to something intangible?

    Now this might sound somewhat of an exaggeration, but, you have to live here to understand. (Although many of you would rather not live here, depending on how strong your feelings about being able to truly own anything and have certain rights are.)

    Now you see where that brings us to. There is no respect for IP here and there won't be any at least for a couple of generations more. There is no moral objection against sharing software, songs or movies at all. There are pirated copies of pretty much everything sold openly in certain specialized markets, and they only way for the legal owners to compete is to ask for the same price as pirates do, which is 70-100 roubles (2.5 to 3.5 USD) for a CD.

    And if anyone is going to try to change this... I'd just say, good luck, suckers. You will need a lot of it, and it wouldn't help you either.

  116. Peronally, I'd like to keep russia out of the WTO by JimXugle · · Score: 0

    FIRE ZE MISSILES!!!1!!!1!1!!ONE!!!!!~!

    --
    -jX

    Don't you just love politics? It's like a comedy of errors.
  117. Forcefield... by In+Fraudem+Legis · · Score: 1

    Good luck for RIAA breaking through that communism forcefield.

    --
    Per Aspera Ad Astra.
  118. The landed go free. by ncurtain · · Score: 0

    There was a great big sign
    That said private property
    And on the other side it didn't say nothing
    That's the land for you and me

    From the USA's alternative national anthem. The one that corporate middle class US America hasn't rammed down the throats of children for the last 70 or so years.

    Some alternatives:

            This land is your land, it once was my land,
            Before I sold you Manhattan Island;
            You banished my nation, to the reservation,
            This land was stole by you from me.

            This land is my land, it isn't your land
            I got a shotgun, and you ain't got one
            If you don't get off, I'll blow your head off
            This land was made for only me

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/This_Land_Is_Your_Lan d

    Anyone care to translate this for a Brit?

    And where is that band who so vauntingly swore
    That the havoc of war and the battle's confusion
    A home and a country should leave us no more?
    Their blood has wiped out their foul footstep's pollution.
    No refuge could save the hireling and slave
    From the terror of flight, or the gloom of the grave:
    And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave
    O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.

    http://www.bcpl.net/~etowner/anthem.html

  119. Give 'em what they want! by whoppo · · Score: 1

    If the RIAA *wants* to be a world super-power with the muscle to dictate international political behaviour, let let's treat them like the "super-power" their actions define them as... ...which of course means it's time for some RIAA carpet bombing ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H er.. "police actions".. We can justify it.. they ARE a weapon of mass destruction.

    --
    chown -R us /base
  120. W will Veto by Danathar · · Score: 1

    Why? Because Putin and W are buddy pals. One phone call from Putin to W will have that Veto pen out and ready to trash the bill. Guaranteed.

  121. $5 gazerbaijuhullion! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $5 gazerbaijuhullion? That would be the entire gross national product of Chechnobyl!

  122. Cute phrasing by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    "it expresses the will of the U.S. Congress"

    Whatever happened to expressing the will of the people?

    1. Re:Cute phrasing by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

      I'm still trying to figure out why RIAA would have the gall to mention "America's knowledge-intensive intellectual property-based goods and services", and if they actually consider themselves to be relevent to "our greatest economic assets".

      Somebody's doing too much coke.

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

  123. Re:Sarin Gas (no way) by hughk · · Score: 2, Interesting
    According to the BBC, it was Methyl Mercaptan. This is an extremely smelly substance which amongst other things is used to add the pong to the otherwise odourless natural gas (on the principle, that if you can smell it, something is wrong).

    It isn't Sarin, it isn't a CBW agent (although it could be used for temporary area denial). Just think of a very, very powerful stink bomb. It probably was used during a shake down by a rival outfit offering "security services".

    I'm following this with more than a little interest as I'll be staying a few klicks away from their next week (Moscow district in St Petersburg). Back to the subject, the cheap CDs were still available from a nearby market.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  124. Making them slaves? They already ARE. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

    I certainly don't care if some poor Russian who only makes $100 a month buys a movie he would otherwise be unable to see for a buck.

    Do you care if some poor Russian who only makes a $100 a month will ever benefit from an economy as productive as ours? Say he decides to start making his living writing software, or developing specialized business processes that can make him and his company more prosperous, raising the Russian standard of living. Do you think it will help him or hurt him if the prevailing economic framework in his country is built around him having no recourse when someone decides to rip him off? Don't you understand that it's a two way street? You're suggesting that the poor Russian guy will never have what it takes to work with systems, processes, creative material - his brain - and thrive the way that the rest of the western world does, so you're willing to throw that poor dumb guy a bone in the form of cheap, ripped off western entertainment?

    What if he's the guy that dreams up an important process that would make other people want to invest in him and his partners? If you don't think that the Russian government should enforce the rule of law that would make such investments worth considering, then you don't think that him or his country should be anything but a bunch of cheaply entertained peasants. Right now, the only entrepeneurs thriving in Russia are fake ones: the Russian mafia. They are parasites, not creators, and they don't have a vested interest in anyone (Russian citizens, programmers in India, screenwriters in California, novelists in Romania, or Korean elevator control chip programmers) being able to make a living from the work of their own minds. Not putting diplomatic/trade pressure on their system means thinking it should stay that way. Incredibly short sighted.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re:Making them slaves? They already ARE. by EzInKy · · Score: 1


      Say he decides to start making his living writing software, or developing specialized business processes that can make him and his company more prosperous...
      ...and then finds out he can't because some US company has locked him out of the market with a patent.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    2. Re:Making them slaves? They already ARE. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      ...and then finds out he can't because some US company has locked him out of the market with a patent.

      OK, I get it. You don't want anyone else to be the first guy to think of something, or find a more efficient way to do it. Hey, I'd prefer that every industrial genius, bio-sciences rock star, designer of whatever is each year's new iPod, etc., lived in the US and made this economy that much stronger. But that's not going to happen. That guy might live in Russia, and you don't want his government to feel any pressure to engage in multi-lateral treaties and trade agreements that actually call for the same protection of that Russian designers's work that Steve Jobs gets for an iPod, or that Honda gets for the code that makes some new hybrid run smarter than Toyota's. I don't know why you don't want that for the poor Russian engineering student that you think should get free copies of Lord Of The Rings, but that's your tune. At least whistle it out loud and admit it... maybe even try to justify it. But carping pointlessly that everything that ever can be dreamt up, patented, and put to work by someone has already been done, and thus the Russians should be on permanent entertainment life support to make them feel better about what you seem to think is their intellectual inferiority... well, fine. But please be a little more honest about it, at least. Admit that it's not just movies we're talking about, here, but some patronizing sense on your part that less-developed economies speaking other languages will never produce anything you might want, so you're going to get a warm fuzzy feeling by not minding if people there rip off what hundreds of people at, say, Pixar just spent several years and millions of dollars producing.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    3. Re:Making them slaves? They already ARE. by EzInKy · · Score: 1


      OK, I get it. You don't want anyone else to be the first guy to think of something, or find a more efficient way to do it.


      No, obviously you don't. In order for someone to "think" of something he has to have previous somethings to build on and intellectual property laws lock out those who can not afford to pay for the knowledge necessary to do so.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    4. Re:Making them slaves? They already ARE. by shmlco · · Score: 1
      By that logic we should close all of the colleges and universities as well. Imagine, having to pay someone to teach you something! What a way to lock out those who can't afford to pay for the knowledge.

      And really, it's not as if teachers and professors need shelter or food or clothes...

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
  125. Re:Sarin Gas (no way) by temcat · · Score: 1

    Back to the subject, the cheap CDs were still available from a nearby market.

    And will be in a foreseeable future. I tell you as a Russian.

  126. Empty noise by Vadim+Makarov · · Score: 1
    I, for one, would choose the existing model of music, film and software distribution here in Russia over any cooperation with the USA and whatever "world trade" thing. Any time. We thumb our collective noses at your threats.

    Seriously, the best the USA can get from us would be a lip service and maybe a showcase crackdown for a few days. After that it will be back on the track. It takes much more than external demand to change buyer's culture.

    --
    17779 eligible voters in a district, 17779 'vote' as one. This is Russia.
    1. Re:Empty noise by chawly · · Score: 1

      I don't think that the RIAA is going to get too far with this one. We can all relax. I have it from a reliable source that a certain V. Putin downloads Mariah Carey singles. I'm trying to interest Chirac in this same idea. The RIAA - the hell with them - Hitler didn't manage it, so it is not too likely that they will. We just had a vote here in France, where everybody voted against the goverment on this issue. Its election year here -'nuff said. And Mariah Carey didn't look to me like she had any money worries the last time I looked - I have the feeling that M. Putin can therefore continue his downloading. The RIAA would be better to continue doing what it does best - prosecuting (persecuting) poor American children.

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  127. Re:SW patents - the real problem by octopus72 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It isn't copyright which is questionable part of US business, nor their right to protect it (or seek protection);

    Problem is USA tries to proactively protect IP by using software patents, and even tries to enforce patents(and laws like DMCA) outside of it's borders (preventing infringing companies from doing business in USA even if it isn't connected to actual "infringement", or arresting people for doing something what is legal in their countries). For every sane person copyright is more than enough to protect software. Important is what happened in Europe, it was the turning point of sw patents not only in Europe, but in the whole world. Directive was, luckily, rejected because public didn't buy the patent hype, but rebelled. If it was accepted, many world countries would probably follow.

    US patent office grants trivial patents, not because they are incompetent, but because it is a policy with a goal to prevent non-US companies from competing, even if they are fully capable. And since most other countries don't implement anything simmilar, US patent holders can compete there, while domestic companies can't compete back in US because of patent law. This is called protectionism. Hopefully, it isn't working. See Creative vs. Apple case which is coming. Shitty US patent directives used directly against US company, it is the only way current situation can ever be changed. Since many foreign companies care to file patents in USA system, it's primary purpose(keeping tech advantage) is obstructed.

    Similar bull**it happens with drug patents and/or patenting genome. Can you imagine, hepatitis C genome (created by natural evolution, not some research group) is patented by US company, so noone is allowed (without paying a license) to use it to develop drugs/detection methods/vaccines! Obviously, greed is what describes US legislators.

  128. Here's the problem with fishing... by CrankyOG · · Score: 1

    "If you teach a man to fish...", he'll sit in a boat and drink beer all day.

    --
    [ ]Clever sig [X]Lame sig
  129. hypocritical? by ZhuLien · · Score: 1

    Well, we all know what the US and Australia do to other sovereign nations they don't like. Take Iraq as an example... All we can hope is that Russia puts up a better fight (not that Iraq didn't try). US and Australia are so hypocritical it isn't funny - ie: ok to be a sovereign nation as long as you do it our way...

  130. Hype matters by olddotter · · Score: 1

    I can't stand the music that is hyped today in the US. Yes there is a lot of bad music out there. But thats where friends come in. When I was in college we did have CDs, but not MP3s, and I could afford a CD-ROM or enough hard drive space to store a ripped album. (40MB was about $200!)

    But there was plenty of music swapping going on in the dorms. You go to someone's room and listen to a bunch of music. The stuff you really liked you would buy, the stuff you kind of liked would get put on a cassette tape (are you old enough to remember those?). I sorted through lots of music that way.

    You expose yourself to new music, and then hunt for more by the people you liked in the past.

  131. Off Topic- by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

    My Wife is from Russia (St. Petersburg) and we discuss this topic from time to time.

    Since you still live there, what do you see as the current priorities Russia has at the moment?

    At one time I thought (one of them was) their naval power, but then Kursk happened...

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    1. Re:Off Topic- by SolitaryMan · · Score: 1

      Well, you have access to the internet and I presume your wife can speak russian, so I have not much to add actually, since I don't work for government :)

      I'm afraid the only priority for current overcorrupted goverment is to keep it's power and find a way to stay there after 2008. Since now government directly controls all major broadcasting corporations and most popular printed media it won't be too hard :(
      If you want some unbiased source of news from here -- I suggest kommersant.ru (Russian) or kommersant.com (English).

      --
      May Peace Prevail On Earth
  132. Entrepreneurship in a Post "Garage Band" World by Matarick · · Score: 1

    Who would stop from a sound technician going to community college, get an associates in Bussiness and start his or her own studio service? The artist and or band pay for the use of the studio for a per session fee and use of the sound equipment. The artist/performer/band would still have the copyright but the cost of recording equipment and acoustics would be covered. The money won't be as lucrative as working for the label but the money would be decent if the person sets shop in the right area.

    I don't think having an iMac and a mic would be a good subsitute for an actual studio with the right acoustics since most people's homes aren't designed for acoustics and the cost of building an acoustic shed and a pc would be rather pricey for people who already plunked down for intruments and spent time writing the music.

    1. Re:Entrepreneurship in a Post "Garage Band" World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The artist/performer/band would still have the copyright but the cost of recording equipment and acoustics would be covered.

      The way this worked in the past the label loaned the artist the money. Figure a recording engineer at ($) $20 an hour, an assitant at $10 an hour = $300 for 10 hours / a half day in audio / before any rent is paid and gear paid off.

      >>I don't think having an iMac and a mic would be a good subsitute for an actual studio with the right acoustics since most people's homes aren't designed for acoustics and the cost of building an acoustic shed and a pc would be rather pricey for people who already plunked down for intruments and spent time writing the music.

      Not to mention rent on the room. So what happens is the artist gets enough gear to do lots of the work at home / g5 mbox microphone preamp(s) 1 or 2 good mikes / and only goes into a dedicated room for drums and mixing. Cutting the need for an outside engineer by 75 - 90%. Result: Outside engineers need other jobs.

      The harsh reality is the 'music business' is no longer a good job. Being a musician is great, might end up being better in this brave new world, and you may hit. If you're an engineer, or a musician, you'll mostly need other ways of making money.

  133. It was a warning. by mosel-saar-ruwer · · Score: 1

    It isn't Sarin, it isn't a CBW agent (although it could be used for temporary area denial). Just think of a very, very powerful stink bomb. It probably was used during a shake down by a rival outfit offering "security services".

    I think most people are interpreting it as a warning: "This time something harmless, next time - who's to say?"

    1. Re:It was a warning. by hughk · · Score: 1

      They might leave incendiary devices to go off overnight, but there is no way that the criminals would want to cause casualties amongst civilians. The KGB^h^h^h, sorry FSB might take an interest because of the possible terrorism aspects. They are not famous for taking prisoners.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  134. Hang in there. by mosel-saar-ruwer · · Score: 1

    And will be in a foreseeable future. I tell you as a Russian.

    Hang in there, dude.

    Putin's liberal economic adviser resigns, saying Russia 'not free'
    Dec 27 8:09 AM US/Eastern

    President Vladimir Putin's outspoken liberal economic adviser Andrei Illarionov announced his resignation to protest what he said was an end to political freedom in Russia. "It is one thing to work in a partially free country, as Russia was six years ago. It's another when the country has stopped being politically free," Illarionov, 44, was quoted as saying by ITAR-TASS news agency on Tuesday...

    http://www.breitbart.com/news/2005/12/27/051227130 907.obcu6uet.html



    1. Re:Hang in there. by temcat · · Score: 1

      Yep, I've read this today on Echo Moskvy. And how is this relevant to the question at hand?

  135. how about china? by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    Maybe Russia should ask the question "How is Walmart^H^H^H China dealing with this rule?"

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  136. Execution of Minors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh so high and mighty, and me as an AC found the same wikipedia article you did :P

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_on_the_Rig hts_of_the_Child

    The convention says a child is a child until 18.

    State laws on executions have a minimum age of 16.

    There was a 2005 supreme court case that may have ruled that executions under 18 are unconsitutional, but state laws have not been updated yet.

    So while yes we aren't enforcing the treaty yet, we are taking steps in that direction. The whole federation system tends to take a while to work in cases where the states do indeed have rights, as it should.

    two hundred years ago states disagreed on who was and wasnt a human being, now they agree on that but disagree on who is a child, so it seems we are progressing.

  137. riaa by ralph1 · · Score: 0

    How do you like that russia more free than america. nuf said.

  138. And even so by kimvette · · Score: 1

    I'm going to be buying Roger Waters' Ca Ira from a Russian source - because that is the only way I can rest assured knowing that not one single dime from that purchase will go into the pockets of Sony, the single most evil member of the RIAA.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  139. There are no such things as "natural rights" by Garwulf · · Score: 1

    I hate to point this out, but there are no such things as "natural rights." There are certainly rights that are morally positive to maintain and fight for, but none of them are "natural."

    Quite frankly, the only rights you have are the ones you earn by fighting for them - a lot of people have died to preserve these rights for those of us in democratic countries, but that's the way it has to be. If history teaches us one thing, it is that rights are very easily taken away from those who don't stand up and fight for them.

    Just wanted to make certain that the distinction was drawn.

    --
    Robert B. Marks
    Author, Demonsbane in Diablo Archive
    1. Re:There are no such things as "natural rights" by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      "we hold these truths to be self-evident..."

      --
      This space available.
  140. When will RIAA learn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sad to hear that RIAA seriously think they can get rid of piracy...As long as the internet is here there will be piracy its possible to get rid of some pirates but they will never get rid of all

  141. i forgot what does RIAA stand for? by crashelite · · Score: 1

    last time i checked it stood for Recording industry association of america... not Real Itchy Assholes are Annoying.. or Retarded Idiots Asinine Actions .... but seriously do their lawers really thing that US laws will hold up over seas? or do they thing that if they boycot russia by not selling their cd's there that it would make it so they would stop downloading? pretty much any action they take (except for selling CD's for resonable prices) would cause people to download more... oh well it is their funeral what has been long over dew

    --
    (yes i know i suck at spelling fell free to correct my grammar and/or spellin i dont care, im still not going to change
  142. Interesting Freudian Slip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Note that the RIAA press release speaks about expressing "the will of the U.S. Congress."

    Whatever happened to the "will of the People" in the United States?

    Oh, that's right, I forgot, the will of the People is irrelevant, now that corporations can buy Congressional votes.

    It's an interesting Freudian slip, and speaks volumes about how groups like the RIAA see government's role (kowtowing to them and their corporations, the public be damned).

  143. Gateway got away with hardware license by Tangurena · · Score: 1

    Gateway managed to get away with a license for their Gateway Tenth Anniversary System. Hidden inside the box was a piece of paper that denied your right to sue, and compelled you to use the abritration service of Gateway's choice (without mentioning the $2000 fee for arbitration). This happened in 1996.

  144. Woot! by pertelote · · Score: 1

    I just want a ringside seat with popcorn and beverage of choice!

  145. RIAA and Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do they think that Russia, the worlds second largest Oil Producer, has no bargaining chips or that they don't know how to bargain. Are these not the guys who bargained 70% of Europe from Uncle Sam after the second world war???

    Headline from todays News: "Russia, the world's second-largest oil producer, sees energy as a key foreign policy tool." We will see what the US government really values, or whose rear end they will have to kiss when there is a recession because of energy shortages.

  146. In soviet russia by Cymeth · · Score: 1

    music pirates you!

    --
    Can anyone recommend a good therapist for me.. er.. my schizophrenic network card?
  147. XFD by LupusCanis · · Score: 1

    They can't even deal with America and they're going for Russia too? lol They're already fighting an uphill battle, with fewer people than the other side, and less opportunities to strike than the other side (they can only release more DRM software when they release something, hackers can break the software any time) - how is going to Russia, a place which doesn't exactly have a shortage of pirates, going to help?