Slashdot Mirror

http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/holocaust. asp

Not only is this 'story' over a month old, but it is 95% bullshit. Snopes, though, has you covered.

Quoting: 'There are no plans to stop teaching the Holocaust. Indeed, the education department's plan seems to be ensuring that it is taught everywhere. A spokesman for the Department of Education and Skills (DES) maintained that "The Adjegbo report on citizenship [a different report authored by Sir Keith Adjegbo and released in January 2007] said key British historical events must be taught" and that while "the national curriculum is a broad framework and there is scope for schools to make their own decisions, teaching elements including the Holocaust and key British events will be compulsory."'

http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/holocaust. asp

Prefer their equivalent of CNN then? http://education.guardian.co.uk/schools/story/0,,2 048161,00.html Or, if you like: http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-2339118 8-details/Teachers+drop+the+Holocaust+to+avoid+off ending+Muslims/article.do But really, let's cut straight to the point: http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/holocaust. asp

This is really about knocking back linux's control of the embedded market through a generalized attack.
Fuel prices have radically altered the economics, and some of the patents involved will be used in a new invention that will revolutionize the transportation industry.
Details here:
http://www.snopes.com/autos/business/carburetor.as p
When you read that link, remember: False is the new True!

> I mean, we only use something like 10% - 15% of our brain, what does the rest do?

That's a frequent misunderstanding: http://www.snopes.com/science/stats/10percnt.htm

The best part: Have you ever heard a doctor say, ". . . But luckily when that bullet entered his skull, it only damaged the 90 percent of his brain he didn't use"? Of course not.

Proposition B: A high proportion of the human race, if you print an orange dot in a newspaper and tell them touching it will make their dreams come true, will take it *very seriously indeed*.

I think you'll agree the latter proposition is simply ludicrous

Considering the multitude of people who believe the moon was never landed on, or even that the UK dead fairy hoax is real ( http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/hoaxes/deadfairy.asp ), I find proposition B is the more logical one.

Fact is, most people WANT to believe. UFOs, supernatural events, miracles, they go by many names but it's difficult to find people who don't believe in something along those lines.

Don't believe all the chain email letters you get http://www.snopes.com/politics/taxes/pensions.asp

This story reminds me of the classic tale, legend or not, of NASA engineers spending millions of dollars to create a pen that could write in zero gravity.

Legend. Snopes

That anecdote is false.

I've heard of it happening with older cordless phones (my sister claiming it happened to her back around 1997 at my aunt's house) and I found this on snopes to back it up. I suppose it isn't out of the realm of possibility that a corded touch tone phone with poor quality components could short in just the right way to sound the 911 tones if bumped to the floor as well. I don't know how a rotary phone could do it though.

Yeah. Not all photos get you exiled for life, though. In the case of the photo I linked to, it's quite unfortunate.

And it really makes us all safer. After all, Joe Foss has indeed admitted to various acts of aircraft related violence.

OK. Number one, your link is broken. Here is a working one

Number two, snopes says that this little tidbit is false.

Number three, snopes says that this bit of misinformation started out in the 50s in a list of common insect misconceptions, and was used in the early 90s in an experiment of fake facts on the internet to show how gullible people are.

Yeah, you got lucky THAT time. You know the average person swallows a handful of spiders in their sleep every year, right?

Here's the source, if you're interested: http://www.snopes.com/science/stats/spiders.htm/

Actually, my understanding is that the old "they're putting stuff in the food so I can't get it up" myth is a result of stress. It's not at all uncommon that a soldier in basic or combat to be so physically and emotionally stressed that they are unable to preform. This is quite normal, however, the male ego refuses to believe this, so it clearly must be the result of outside interference, like the REMFs putting something in the food.

And a quick search shows my memory serves me: http://www.snopes.com/military/saltpetr.htm

You're probably being being facetious, but I'll be a stick in the mud anyway: that's an urban legend.

Dan East

Have you ever heard the term "Mad as a Hatter"? Maybe, but you probably do know who the Mad Hatter is.

Mad as a Hatter is a term that stems from "Hatters" (hat makers) using Mercury in the formation of hats. It was used in the process of removing hair from animal hides. All the hatters ultimately went insane or had the other symptons of mercury poisioning.

That's where the term comes from, and that's where the idea for the "Mad Hatter" came from for Alice in Wonderland. What does this have to do with the article? Nothing really, just trying to spread some random information.

According to: Mad As a Hatter at snopes.com, this is but one possibility. Here is some of what I found there:

In the 18th century, mercury salts were used to make felt for fancy hats. The process required copious amounts of the element, a substance then not known to be as dangerous as we now know it to be.

Hat makers who day after day handled mercury-soaked fabric risked mercury poisoning, a condition that affects the nervous systems. Those so exposed would in time develop uncontrollable twitches and trembles, making them appear demented to the casual observer.

Even though there exists a strong tie between mercury poisoning and strange behavior in those long-ago hatters, it's still more than likely the term we now toss about so casually did not spring from this combination.

Even though there exists a strong tie between mercury poisoning and strange behavior in those long-ago hatters, it's still more than likely the term we now toss about so casually did not spring from this combination.

Whether Carroll meant his "hatter" as a caricature of a known crackpot, a play on mad as a March hare, as a bit of tomfoolery about venomous vipers, or as a combination of all three, it seems clear that the only relation his use of the term had to mercury-maddened hat makers was that of coincidence.

Have you ever heard the term "Mad as a Hatter"? Maybe, but you probably do know who the Mad Hatter is.

Mad as a Hatter is a term that stems from "Hatters" (hat makers) using Mercury in the formation of hats. It was used in the process of removing hair from animal hides. All the hatters ultimately went insane or had the other symptons of mercury poisioning.

That's where the term comes from, and that's where the idea for the "Mad Hatter" came from for Alice in Wonderland. What does this have to do with the article? Nothing really, just trying to spread some random information.

According to: Mad As a Hatter at snopes.com, this is but one possibility. Here is some of what I found there:

In the 18th century, mercury salts were used to make felt for fancy hats. The process required copious amounts of the element, a substance then not known to be as dangerous as we now know it to be.

Hat makers who day after day handled mercury-soaked fabric risked mercury poisoning, a condition that affects the nervous systems. Those so exposed would in time develop uncontrollable twitches and trembles, making them appear demented to the casual observer.

Even though there exists a strong tie between mercury poisoning and strange behavior in those long-ago hatters, it's still more than likely the term we now toss about so casually did not spring from this combination.

Even though there exists a strong tie between mercury poisoning and strange behavior in those long-ago hatters, it's still more than likely the term we now toss about so casually did not spring from this combination.

Whether Carroll meant his "hatter" as a caricature of a known crackpot, a play on mad as a March hare, as a bit of tomfoolery about venomous vipers, or as a combination of all three, it seems clear that the only relation his use of the term had to mercury-maddened hat makers was that of coincidence.

Snopes has the story: http://www.snopes.com/food/warnings/bananas.asp

From the desk of the millions of normal people who play games:

Much like you, we were deeply disturbed by the actions of the shooter at Virginia Tech and feel terribly for the families of the lost. However we deeply resent the fact that you have totally bypassed the issue at hand and chosen instead to scapegoat the electronic entertainment industry. Perhaps instead of blaming videogames (which are clearly not your area of expertise) we should instead delve a little deeper in order to find what causes these depraved/deprived individuals to take such drastic measures. Your "proof" of a link to video game violence is tenuous at best - equivalent to such joke statistics as bread creating murderers. Statistical correlation is not proof of cause and effect but beyond that, you have failed to even show a statistical correlation, instead bringing up the specific examples where the statistics say what you want to prove.

Like naysayers for the past several centuries, you see the advent of a new form of entertainment as the downfall of society. Novels, the waltz, radio and television have all been targetted in the past and so far civilization has emerged unscathed (but not unchanged).

Perhaps this is the issue; you (and millions of right-wing conservatives) are afraid of what the future may bring. Who knows what changes the liberalization of the West may bring?

In short, we feel that you are doing nobody any good - you are attempting (and luckily failing) to take the attention away from the actual issues (which in the case of the VT shooting are as of yet indetermined).

Signed,

Gamers of the world.

P.S. While we harbour you no malice, I wouldn't suggest you attempt any retribution - we have all been trained on "murder simulators" . . .

Hey! I remember that guy...
How's it hanging? Hehe..

There was corn syrup in it before the New Coke thing. New Coke was an attempt to taste like Pepsi because Pepsi was winning taste tests. Check out the Urban Legends Reference Page's entry: http://www.snopes.com/cokelore/newcoke.asp

Like most urban legends, Snopes debunks this one too. The truth is actually more interesting. Coca-Cola Inc. had just introduced Diet Coke, which was a runaway smash hit. It also happened to be based on a different, sweeter formula. With Diet Coke such a hit, it became natural to wonder if their flagship product, which had lost marketshare to rival Pepsi (which also featured a sweeter formula) might also benefit from a switch to this popular new formula. That's right, "New Coke" is actually Diet Coke + calories. Most interesting of all, Coca-Cola Zero is a diet cola based on the "Classic Coke" formula, and it is delicious.

Coke first used corn syrup in World War Two.

In 1980 - five years before the introduction of New Coke - half the cane sugar in Coke had been replaced by corn syrup. Six months before New Coke - all the cane sugar had been replaced by syrup.

Syrup was cheaper. Diet drinks were cutting deep into sales and profits. Knew Coke

That's strange, I did a quick search on Snopes... http://www.snopes.com/cokelore/newcoke.asp

I think the switch happened much earlier than the "New Coke" switch. It's just an urban legend.

Glurge.

like the flaming mouse,

off the top of my head comes this:

http://www.snopes.com/crime/dumdum/gunshop.asp

Nope.

Shigeru Miyamoto, the game's inventor and the one person who unquestionably knows the origins of the name he chose, has repeatedly affirmed that he used the word "donkey" to convey a sense of stubbornness and the name "Kong" to invoke the image of a gorilla.

Dick Wolf, the man behind TV's Law & Order, is neither a penis nor a lupine. Likewise, Donkey Kong is not a donkey. The name "Donkey", which could be a derivative of Duncan, carries a connotation of stubbornness. See also Snopes: Donkey Wrong.

For donkeys, see Kicking Ass: The Democratic Party's Blog and History of the Democratic Party.

Además de sin cables, también te da alas!

Red Bull te da alas
IPv6 in the head falling down?

I guess the E.T. cartridge solution was ruled out on environmental grounds?

http://www.snopes.com/computer/internet/iloo.asp

For what it's worth, snopes.com says the legend of the boiling frog is false. But I do wonder sometimes if we should just get it over with and start fucking things up ASAP. :)

You're not thinking of this case, are you? A woman in the UK gave birth to twins: one white and one black. They both had the same mixed-race father, and the genetic lottery gave one child "white" genes from the father, and the other "black" genes. (Yes, I'm oversimplifying.)

This joke is not, and has never been funny, and the whole incident was a smear campaign in the first place.

http://www.snopes.com/critters/wild/frogboil.asp

The accusations are untrue. However it was a popular urban legend. A debunking of the list is available here. I never believed he killed any of those people. My only point in making the statement was I don't think Bush has ever been accused of having someone shot, except of course as a matter of war. Clinton has, although unjustly. However, accepting an urban legend as true, is better than making up some baseless accusation.

Now I could be wrong, there could have been rumors of mysterious deaths related to Bush, but I've yet to hear them.

Will snopes.com suffice?

http://www.snopes.com/language/notthink/deserts.ht m

If not, try this one:

http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/just-deserts.ht ml

First its Y2K then killer asteroids, Unix timestamp running out in 2038 now this. Whats next?

My money is on the Giant Rabbits.

You'll see. They will kill us all.

Super bowl Sunday is also one of the top days for spousal abuse.

No

Well, it's probably in the top few hundred.

And what the hell does "my" team loose? Their bowels?