Domain: triggur.org
Stories and comments across the archive that link to triggur.org.
Comments · 29
-
Budget learning for kids!
Ahhh, and here I was going to comment that perhaps they were part of a budget learning collection, possibly sold near the sections of the supermarket where they have "Dr Skipper" cola and "Spritz Up" (actually the "Dr Skipper" isn't too bad though).
I wonder what a Dr Susus book would look like. It might be a fun exercise to come up with one as a parody, something like these -
Johnny goes to Dahlmer's for dinner
Haven't heard of those ones, but these are along perhaps a similar meme
-
Humble Suggestion.
As we know worker moral is important, and considering the traditional living arrangements of your standard computer geek, it stands to reason that they should build their data center in the most awesome basement ever built! Hey, one can dream can't he? To the batcave!
-
Re:the cats are behind it
How could anyone suspect the cute fluffy kittens?
-
Yeah well..
It's still not as cool as this...
Triggur's Mech (Triggur, forgive me!) -
Dream home
Some links for the interested:
A real estate agent specializing in Missile Bases [missilebases.com]
A virtual tour made by some tresspassers. [triggur.org]
I was fascinated about the chance to own one of these properties. Doing some research, I found some ceveats though. First, the base had to be de-commissioned prior to 1965. After that, there were new treaties which required the complete destruction of the base after de-militarization. Second, being underground can lead to some health hazards, i.e. Radon. Third, missile bases aren't ever located in easy to reach places, and I like to be able to go to the store without a bunch of planning beforehand.
I'd still love to own this monstrosity though. The Titan 1 sites are the most elaborate and extensive. Kind of makes me sick to think about the money spent of this thing when it was built only to be decomissioned ~5 years later. mrh -
Dream home
Some links for the interested:
A real estate agent specializing in Missile Bases [missilebases.com]
A virtual tour made by some tresspassers. [triggur.org]
I was fascinated about the chance to own one of these properties. Doing some research, I found some ceveats though. First, the base had to be de-commissioned prior to 1965. After that, there were new treaties which required the complete destruction of the base after de-militarization. Second, being underground can lead to some health hazards, i.e. Radon. Third, missile bases aren't ever located in easy to reach places, and I like to be able to go to the store without a bunch of planning beforehand.
I'd still love to own this monstrosity though. The Titan 1 sites are the most elaborate and extensive. Kind of makes me sick to think about the money spent of this thing when it was built only to be decomissioned ~5 years later. ch -
Real Pics...
Here's a "tour" [triggur.org] of a missile complex for those yearning for a bit more than a small sketch on a web page...
tar -
Here's a couple of photo's....
... of a tour inside a similar missile silo [triggur.org], by underground explorers. Maybe it's the same, I didn't check that. But at least it gives you an impression of what is under there. sgw
-
Here's a couple of photo's....
... of a tour inside a similar missile silo [triggur.org], by underground explorers. Maybe it's the same, I didn't check that. But at least it gives you an impression of what is under there. sen
-
Dream home
Some links for the interested:
A real estate agent specializing in Missile Bases [missilebases.com]
A virtual tour made by some tresspassers. [triggur.org]
I was fascinated about the chance to own one of these properties. Doing some research, I found some ceveats though. First, the base had to be de-commissioned prior to 1965. After that, there were new treaties which required the complete destruction of the base after de-militarization. Second, being underground can lead to some health hazards, i.e. Radon. Third, missile bases aren't ever located in easy to reach places, and I like to be able to go to the store without a bunch of planning beforehand.
I'd still love to own this monstrosity though. The Titan 1 sites are the most elaborate and extensive. Kind of makes me sick to think about the money spent of this thing when it was built only to be decomissioned ~5 years later. gxk -
Real Pics...
Here's a "tour" [triggur.org] of a missile complex for those yearning for a bit more than a small sketch on a web page...
rzq -
So Elena is fake...try this...
It's a tour of an abandoned missile silo. Pretty kool. Don't try this at home (well unless your home IS a missile silo).
-
Dream home
Some links for the interested:
A real estate agent specializing in Missile Bases
A virtual tour made by some tresspassers.
I was fascinated about the chance to own one of these properties. Doing some research, I found some ceveats though. First, the base had to be de-commissioned prior to 1965. After that, there were new treaties which required the complete destruction of the base after de-militarization. Second, being underground can lead to some health hazards, i.e. Radon. Third, missile bases aren't ever located in easy to reach places, and I like to be able to go to the store without a bunch of planning beforehand.
I'd still love to own this monstrosity though. The Titan 1 sites are the most elaborate and extensive. Kind of makes me sick to think about the money spent of this thing when it was built only to be decomissioned ~5 years later. -
Real Pics...
Here's a "tour" of a missile complex for those yearning for a bit more than a small sketch on a web page...
-
Here's a couple of photo's....
... of a tour inside a similar missile silo, by underground explorers. Maybe it's the same, I didn't check that. But at least it gives you an impression of what is under there.
-
Nothing very strange about this.
It just seems like an example of phrenology at work. Now maybe those naysayers, who have cast dispersions at this science, will see the error of their ways. -
Re:Trespassing
They do, but who would report it?
Here is a tour of a 'top secret' nuclear missile silo from some people with too much time on their hands.
-
Re:Underground mystery, US version
I can't shake the feeling that some of the photos on that site were photoshopped... The graffiti, for example, looks like it was added on after the fact. This, for example. Is it just an artifact from the GIF conversion? I suppose someone would have debunked this if it has been around since 1996 and was faked.
-
Re:Underground mystery, US versionmmm...nice quote from the intro page
we were violating federal trespassing laws by visiting this installation, and we were risking our health/lives in the process. we also were caught... this was second degree criminal trespass.
don't say much more though, wonder if the cops were just waiting for them when they came out or something -
Underground mystery, US versionAnother very strange site--not that I recommend anyone follow in these guys' footsteps, but the results are fascinating:
http://triggur.org/silo/site.html
World's weirdest site--exploring an abandoned missile silo. -
FOR SALE: Titan-1 Site, Colorado (Must Sell)
Selling a 3 Silo, 65k sq/ft 1 Mile Nuke Rated site, Near Denver... a Tour of a site 5 miles away Missle Silo Tour This site is the same design except that it hasn't been vandalized, has power, and is not flooded (except silo's) Comes with complete Plans Serious Inquiries Only misslesilo@lasers.org Must be sold before end of September, 2002 also 15k sq/ft underground storage at another hardened facility $2.50/ sqft.
-
What one looks like before it's all dressed up
Here is a pretty interesting photo tour that was made by some guys who, by their own admission, "violated federal law" to get inside and tour around one of these silos, when it was just a bunch of abandoned cold war concrete. It's nice to compare the this with the eBay photos...makes that 1.5 million opening bid seem a bit more reasonable. Oh, and you'd better hurry...there's only an hour left to bid on it.
Incidentally, I lived in Topeka for some time, and I got to go to one of these abandoned silos, back around 92 or 93...there was a freaky survivalist dude living there, surrounded by all his guns and barrels of water...and I got to go stand where, at one time, there was a ICBM, ready to go...remembering the cold war dominated world that I grew up in, it was very, very surreal. -
What one looks like before it's all dressed up
Here is a pretty interesting photo tour that was made by some guys who, by their own admission, "violated federal law" to get inside and tour around one of these silos, when it was just a bunch of abandoned cold war concrete. It's nice to compare the this with the eBay photos...makes that 1.5 million opening bid seem a bit more reasonable. Oh, and you'd better hurry...there's only an hour left to bid on it.
Incidentally, I lived in Topeka for some time, and I got to go to one of these abandoned silos, back around 92 or 93...there was a freaky survivalist dude living there, surrounded by all his guns and barrels of water...and I got to go stand where, at one time, there was a ICBM, ready to go...remembering the cold war dominated world that I grew up in, it was very, very surreal. -
Re:Funny: Todays UFi is right on topic:> See here and enjoy. - I assume the "forbidden hole leading west" then is write support for UDF
:).I've been looking for an excuse to post a link to the abandoned missile base VR tour all week. Thanks
;-)> POST LINK
The URL gets posted to Slashdot. There is a moderator here, holding a crack pipe.
> SCORE
Your score is 2 out of a possible 5.
-
Re:Problem with US missile silos.The water leaking in and flooding the place (through seeping walls, half-open missle doors or what have you) isn't what bothers me. The potential for radiation contamination does, however. Someone has already posted a link to the now-infamous Abandoned Missle Base VR Tour. I suggest people take the time to go and read it. It is very neat (I have an affinity for exploring old buildings/etc, they provide a neat window into the past). At one point not long after "entering" the VR tour you will see the author's comment that even though there were lots of ways for things (wildlife, people) to get in, there didn't seem to be ANYTHING living down there (spiders, rats, etc). That is just a little creepy, to me. The person who explored the missle site (and got caught doing so) also remarked on the immense piles of asbestos laying around the place, the stagnant flooded water and the sharp pieces of rusted metal waiting to cut you and give you tetnus (or more). Not exactly a healthy place to be poking around.
I can see how this place MIGHT be okay if a huge amount of money was sunk into it for reconditioning; if you pump out all the water, seal the walls, decontaminate (radiation AND asbestos), remove all the rusted metal, remove all the abandoned/vandalized/destroyed/obsolete equipment, scrape the lead-based paint off the walls, repaint it, repair the spring-mounted floors (to absorb the shock of nuclear blast), put lighting in and in general spend an exorbiant amount of cash you could have something that would serve passably well as a hidey-hole for a group of "survivalists". But the rooms in these places don't seem very large, and they weren't meant to be... they were meant to protect the missle crew in the event of nuclear attack long enough to let them launch their missles in a counterstrike. No thought was given beyond that point, and the design shows. I would NOT want to live in there, and frankly I wouldn't want to put all my eggs in one basket by hosting all my machines there without having some sort of redundant backup located somewhere else geographically. If you're going to spend the money to have machines placed there, you must have enough money to have a redundant site, I would think....
Final analysis: As a data center it's high on the novelty scale, but on the usability factor (cost of implementing/maintaining versus actual usefulness/probability your work is justified) it's mighty low. As a home? No thanks. I can think of better ways to spend half a million dollars (minimum) on my house.
-Da cat
-
Re:A dangerous world
Nuclear war is only less dangerous if you think of it as 1 bomb taking out a town as opposed to the reality of the situation: 1 Sub in our ballistic missle fleet has over 200 independant warheads. (aren't MIRV's a bitch ?). How many subs do we have ? How many silos do we have ? How many things do we have that the public doesn't even know about ?
According to this article in Scientific American Magazine, "In sum, the two nuclear superpowers remain ready to fire a total of more than 5,000 nuclear weapons at each other within half an hour." The other numbers in the article add up to somewhat more than this though.
Btw, you can find a nice abandoned missle silo tour at this site.
Acutally, if the attack mechanism is something thats "alive" or acts alive, then it can be killed or thwarted (eventually, and with enough research). While 95% of earths population might rot and spontaneously explode, there'd probably be enough people randomly unaffected to survive and figure out a "cure" or an antigen.
Perhaps, perhaps not. Some natural diseases like rabies kill higher percentages of some species infected. But if something kills even much less than 95% of humans at random, there would likely be a total collapse of civilization. Too many essential services and technologies would be lost. Not only the GM weapon, but natural diseases would become deadly as medicine regressed, aided by famine and civil violence.
On the other hand, short of a metric assload of lead sheilding, theres nothing you can do about a neutron bomb. You're just fucked if you happen to be nearby.
True. But enhanced neutron radiation weapons only kill over a small area. Inverse-square law assures isn't enough neutron flux at greater distances.
A fun excercize if we were allowed to know the numbers involved would be "how many nukes do we have per square mile of 1% or lower survivability fallout levels".
Good question. Probably an order of magnitude or two more than the number that exists. The Chernobyl explosion released an immensely larger amount than would be formed by a missle-mountable nuclear weapon, and few larger bombs exist. Cancer would be more common, but again most deaths would be caused by natural disease and other factors related to anarchy. -
Re:A dangerous world
Nuclear war is only less dangerous if you think of it as 1 bomb taking out a town as opposed to the reality of the situation: 1 Sub in our ballistic missle fleet has over 200 independant warheads. (aren't MIRV's a bitch ?). How many subs do we have ? How many silos do we have ? How many things do we have that the public doesn't even know about ?
According to this article in Scientific American Magazine, "In sum, the two nuclear superpowers remain ready to fire a total of more than 5,000 nuclear weapons at each other within half an hour." The other numbers in the article add up to somewhat more than this though.
Btw, you can find a nice abandoned missle silo tour at this site.
Acutally, if the attack mechanism is something thats "alive" or acts alive, then it can be killed or thwarted (eventually, and with enough research). While 95% of earths population might rot and spontaneously explode, there'd probably be enough people randomly unaffected to survive and figure out a "cure" or an antigen.
Perhaps, perhaps not. Some natural diseases like rabies kill higher percentages of some species infected. But if something kills even much less than 95% of humans at random, there would likely be a total collapse of civilization. Too many essential services and technologies would be lost. Not only the GM weapon, but natural diseases would become deadly as medicine regressed, aided by famine and civil violence.
On the other hand, short of a metric assload of lead sheilding, theres nothing you can do about a neutron bomb. You're just fucked if you happen to be nearby.
True. But enhanced neutron radiation weapons only kill over a small area. Inverse-square law assures isn't enough neutron flux at greater distances.
A fun excercize if we were allowed to know the numbers involved would be "how many nukes do we have per square mile of 1% or lower survivability fallout levels".
Good question. Probably an order of magnitude or two more than the number that exists. The Chernobyl explosion released an immensely larger amount than would be formed by a missle-mountable nuclear weapon, and few larger bombs exist. Cancer would be more common, but again most deaths would be caused by natural disease and other factors related to anarchy. -
This is the nicest one I know...
A tour through an abandoned missile base: Abandoned missile base
How to make a sig
without having an idea