Slashdot Mirror


Discarded AT&T Microwave Bunkers For Sale

InitZero writes "American Tower is selling nearly 2000 old AT&T Long Line microwave locations that are no longer needed thanks to fiber. These towers -- spaced about 50 miles in every direction -- and their associated bunkers were designed to withstand World War III. The average location (find one near you) has two acres of land, 1,800 square feet worth of bunker and a tower of 200 feet. Some locations still have their hardware (60KW generator, microwave feedlines, equipment racks, feed horns, etc.) All this for an average price of just $25,000. If you're a ham radio operator, building a data center or just looking for a place to put your wireless access point, these locations look awesome."

333 comments

  1. Slashdotted? by Phroggy · · Score: 2

    No replies yet, and it's slashdotted already?!?

    This sounds pretty cool. Who here has an extra $25,000 lying around?

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    1. Re:Slashdotted? by HappyPhunBall · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      " No replies yet, and it's slashdotted already?!?"

      Well, I tried to post a reply several times before there were any comments and was confronted with failure as slashcode seemed unable to realize that I did have both a Subject Line and Body to my post. I suspect others were trying to post too and got shut down by some bit of flakiness in slashcode. Oh well. Wonder what kind of condition these things are in what it would take to make them livable?


    2. Re:Slashdotted? by rmohr02 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If I had it, I'd buy one. That is, if I knew where they were. I guess the site was preemptively /.ed.

    3. Re:Slashdotted? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "No replies yet, and it's slashdotted already?!?"

      Wouldn't most people read the article before replying? ::eyeroll::

      Okay, getting back on topic, is it possible to aim these things? I have a noisy neighbor that I'd like to ...uh.. provide free heating to.

    4. Re:Slashdotted? by TheKey · · Score: 1

      This happens with nearly every page, yet people continue to be amazed when there are no comments but the site is /.ed. Really, it happens all the time. Let's move on? :D

      --
      My Journal - 1,337 fans and countin
    5. Re:Slashdotted? by brad3378 · · Score: 2

      > No replies yet, and it's slashdotted already?!?

      It appears slashdot has also been slashdotted.
      Take note of your 10:04 EST post and the 9:38 posting of the story.

      I'd like to see one of these towers put to better use with some bungi cords :-)

      --

    6. Re:Slashdotted? by sporty · · Score: 2

      What do I look like, a .com millionaire? *snicker*

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    7. Re:Slashdotted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wouldn't most people read the article before replying?

      On Slashdot? Are you kidding?

    8. Re:Slashdotted? by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

      Slashdot has been acting wierd all day.
      Perhaps that is due to the dynamic banner ads being disabled?

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    9. Re:Slashdotted? by packeteer · · Score: 2

      i think the idea is to buy several... the good thing about this offer is that you can get a lot of em that are all withing range of each other... so really we need hundreds of thousands of dollars which might not be too much for some of the crazy hams out there...

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    10. Re:Slashdotted? by G-funk · · Score: 2

      This sounds pretty cool. Who here has an extra $25,000 lying around?

      I wish I did.... I think I'd cut the top of the tower down, and build a nice little open plan shelter on the strong platform that holds the bigger dishes. Keep the bunker for amenities and (really) bad-weather sleeping quarters, and have myself a nice elevated living area with a great view!

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    11. Re:Slashdotted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a rule created by 18-century grammarians who wanted English to be more like Latin. It provides no communication benefit, in fact it may make a sentence harder to understand. So why do you repeat it?

    12. Re:Slashdotted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't most people read the article before replying? ::eyeroll::

      It shouldn't take 28 minutes for people to read the article and reply...

      But I suppose because it's a funny-cute smackdown, people are willing to ignore the truth and mod it up. Such are the times we live in.

    13. Re:Slashdotted? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "Ending a sentence in a preposition is not proper."

      Sorry, I'd be proper but I can't type with my pinky raised in the air.

    14. Re:Slashdotted? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "But I suppose because it's a funny-cute smackdown, people are willing to ignore the truth and mod it up. Such are the times we live in"

      Maybe I'm just tired, but did anybody make sense of that?

    15. Re:Slashdotted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That is a form of pedantry up with which I will not put." -- Winston Churchill

      "Can you tell me where the library's at, ASSHOLE?" -- Classic joke.

    16. Re:Slashdotted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I installed linux recently but the keep rejecting my story ;)

    17. Re:Slashdotted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a noisy neighbor that I'd like to provide free heating to, asshole.

    18. Re:Slashdotted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After you clean my suit, cook me up some Kung Pao chicken and I want chicken, none of that dog you nasty yellow fuckers eat. Oh yeah, and bring your sister, I want an afternoon knobber. chop, chop slope-san.

    19. Re:Slashdotted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazing, designed to withstand WWIII, but against a horde of clicking /.-ers, it's defenseless...

      (Posting as anonymous geek...)

  2. first post and more... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a damn good deal. 200 feet towers cost about 25000 by themselves, not just the materials, but the labor in erecting one... on a 200 foot tower, at 5 watts, in the 2 meter band, you are looking at 100 mile range on a homemade 1/4 wave clothes hanger antenna.... Not bad at all.

  3. microwaves kick ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    In many parts of the US, it gets very cold in the winter. The cold is even worse if you're working on a tower - they tend to be in high, exposed places due to their nature. This means more wind, lower temperatures, etc. Legend has it that tower crew would sometimes crawl into the microwave horns for a few seconds/minutes to warm up (for the same reasons you use a microwave to heat your dinner). That was all well and good, until one day a tech fell asleep in the warm, cozy horn.

    oops.

    1. Re:microwaves kick ass by chamenos · · Score: 1

      the news article i read was that this security guard in charge of one such tower had a habit of sitting above the dish to heat up during the winter. the problem was that during new year's eve, all the new year greetings that people make requires the power of the microwave dish to be increased a few times over, and the security guard had no clue and sat at his usual spot as per normal.

      the security guard taking the next shift reported that he smelt "barbecued meat" just before he discovered the cooked corpse of the other security guard with his cup of coffee long evaporated by the heat.

    2. Re:microwaves kick ass by Geek_in_Marketing · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on, guys! This 'story' was an unsubstantiated 'Urban Myth' in the Darwin Awards a couple of years back! FWIW, though, when I was in the Royal Navy, we never were given any warnings about microwave radiation. They did, though, bang on and on about HF being capable of frying a human being! If I had a sig it would be funny. . .

      --

      "This is your life - and it's ending one minute at a time" - Narrator, Fight Club
  4. damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not one near me :-(

  5. Land? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That doesn't include the land, does it?

  6. This is sad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to picnic next to these microwave towers so I could have a hot meal. Now I can't. Well at least my skin rash isn't as bad now.

  7. Nah.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The freeloaders here would rather continue wardriving and mooching off other people's wireless access.

    Oh, and FP.

  8. Shopping for the hard to buy geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that is a great weekend retreat for the /.'er who has everything!

  9. Google cache by diesel66 · · Score: 1

    slashdotted already?!

    http://216.239.39.100/search?q=cache:lletWv9j9h8 J: www.americantower.com/OASISPublic/SiteSearchADO/de fault.asp+%22%2Bwww.americantower.%2Bcom/OasisPubl ic/SiteSearchADO/%22&hl=en&start=1&ie=UTF- 8

    --



    eleven plus two / twelve plus one
  10. Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a great place to set up a new "Lone Justice" squad!

  11. Survive WW3, but not a good slashdotting... by victim · · Score: 0, Informative

    Some google cache hunting reveals that you can get the complete list in Excel format from... http://atcsdmaftp01.americantower.com/excelReports /NationalSiteList.xls. Now that "I got Mine!" I'll share the URL with you. :-)

    WTF? Slashdot says I'm missing a subject or a body? I suppose that is the lameness-required filter that made me add this stupid paragraph.

    1. Re:Survive WW3, but not a good slashdotting... by mjpaci · · Score: 2

      My high-school has a tower on that list. WOW. There is also one right around the corner from my parents. Pretty cool. However, this looks like the active list as my high school is at Row # 7350 in the Excel spreadsheet and the story says there are 2000 for sale.

      --Mike

  12. dead link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the "find one near you" link is dead. either slashdotted or otherwise.

  13. EMP Hardening by davidstrauss · · Score: 1

    I don't think the electronics of such a complex system, especially one designed to capture signals, could withstand the EMP effect of a nuclear explosion 5 miles away. Vacuum tubes are some of the only "advanced" electronics that can withstand anything, let alone transistors. The EMP effect was only well understood in the 1960s and later, a bit after these towers were built.

    Oh, and imagine a nationwide Beowulf cluster of these. [Ducks moderators]

    1. Re:EMP Hardening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think there already is a cluster of them. Didn't read the article did you

    2. Re:EMP Hardening by Phasedshift · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to the page that is linked in the summary http://www.drgibson.com/towers/ It mentions:

      The buildings supporting the towers were hardened against a nuclear blast, and some of them in high-danger areas were underground. The towers themselves were engineered to withstand all but a close (within 5 miles) blast. The microwave horns were covered with a protective shield to keep out not only the elements, but also radioactive fallout. The buildings were shielded with copper to protect the equipment against the Electromagnetic Pulse associated with a nuclear explosion. Foot-thick concrete walls protected the vital electronics and people inside the base installations of these towers. Thick copper grounds went deep into the bedrock beneath each tower. Fallout showers, backup generators, sleeping facilities all existed to keep the network up in times of war.

      So while the equipment itself is likely hardened, the building is shielded.. It doesn't say how much shielding, etc there is however :)

    3. Re: EMP Hardening by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2


      > Oh, and imagine a nationwide Beowulf cluster of these.

      Actually, it might be a good way to set up a disaster-resistant beowulf cluster. One node per bunker, interconnect via the towers. Keep those protein-folding analyses running even after the species is extinct...

      Well, at least it would give the alien archaeologists something interesting to puzzle over. And introduce them to the idea of beowulf clusters, so the joke could infect their civilization as well.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    4. Re:EMP Hardening by davidstrauss · · Score: 1

      You can't shield against EMP with a conductor unless it completely encloses the entire system. A communication tower MUST have cables going to unsheilded equipment. Shielding communication equipment would cause the equipment to malfunction, and I didn't see a giant copper shield around the towers in the pictures.

    5. Re:EMP Hardening by djupedal · · Score: 1

      I worked on some of these (underground bunker types), as an Inspector (concrete/steel), during the early '70s. I recall at least one had to be abandoned due to several batches of concrete that failed strength testing in the lab. They simply covered it with dirt and moved over several hundred yards to begin again.

      They were heavily compartmented, and built much like a bank vault, where you have a box inside a box inside a box. There was at least one central cavity that was meant to be home for worst case attacks.

    6. Re:EMP Hardening by puppet10 · · Score: 1

      The connection to the tower was by waveguide (from what I read in another bit posted from the /.'ed site anyway). Since the outside conductor is ground and only a small range of frequencies is tranmitted efficiently the broad spectrum EMP may not cause a problem, but I'm not a microwave engineer, however it seems like a possibility.

      --
      -------- This space intentionally left blank --------
    7. Re: EMP Hardening by dillon_rinker · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can see the alien's posting now...

      +4 Hrarfug

      Kruig chxofp lnyuvtezna en BEOWULF CLUSTER boj plorndles? %&)

    8. Re:EMP Hardening by afidel · · Score: 2

      another site listed it as -80db for signals above 10khz

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    9. Re:EMP Hardening by sphealey · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You can't shield against EMP with a conductor unless it completely encloses the entire system. A communication tower MUST have cables going to unsheilded equipment. Shielding communication equipment would cause the equipment to malfunction, and I didn't see a giant copper shield around the towers in the pictures.
      Yeah, those guys at Bell Labs and Bell Systems Engineering were real boneheads. I doubt they had any understanding of EMP, despite having designed the only working anit-ballistic missle system and having done extensive work in the effects of the warheads of those missles. Nor did they know the first thing about the effects of magnetic fields and radiation on telephone systems - they just managed to build a worldwide voice network over the course of 100 years. Yep, a bunch of nincompoops wasting their time.

      sPh

    10. Re:EMP Hardening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you've got it. With enough shielding and filtering, you can design a communications system that withstands a good deal of EMP.

      As you say, the trick is to limit the bandwidth that actually gets into the system. Less bandwidth means less energy.

    11. Re: EMP Hardening by Harold+Kellogg · · Score: 1

      http://coldwardc.homestead.com/files/Buckingham/ check out the security you have cctv 10ft fences you don't need someone to guard them

  14. GeekNet by ni5mo · · Score: 1

    Awesome! If we all got one of these we cauld create and independet microwave network. Of course you'd have to get transmitter licences and stuff, but it would be kewl. Oh yeah, and I'd have to move to the States too :)

    1. Re:GeekNet by CrackersnSoup · · Score: 1

      You could run in any number of bands and not need any kind of HAM license. You will need FFA license and the like.

    2. Re:GeekNet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Future Farmers of America?

      I didn't know that Bush had given the spectrum into their oversight. . .

    3. Re:GeekNet by nick_with_a_z · · Score: 1

      Even better - we could build the world's largest scarecrow or MechWarriors as per http://www.mentalwardfilm.com/falcon1.htm

      But what I'd really like to do is put my maibox on top of the tower, and sit in a deckchair to watch the mailman deliver stuff every morning.

  15. Let me get this straight ... by RimmerExperience · · Score: 1

    The internet (and swelling need for bandwidth) kills off the old technology, making old bunker locations obsolete.

    Meanwhile, the internet (and swelling need for bandwidth) makes bunker technology highly desirable.

    Thousands of years of evolution and we still can't get this predilection holes in the ground.

    1. Re:Let me get this straight ... by RimmerExperience · · Score: 1

      Thousands of years of evolution and we still can't get this predilection holes in the ground. Thousands of hours of education and I still can't proofread.

    2. Re:Let me get this straight ... by Mage+Powers · · Score: 1

      bunkers spaced 50 miles apart with microwave towers isn't really economic, personally I think these things are a neat piece of history. Hopefully one is kept intact for boring little kids.

    3. Re:Let me get this straight ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thousands of hours of education and I still can't proofread.

      Thousands of hours of speaking English and I still can't take a wild guess at what he meant.

    4. Re:Let me get this straight ... by dohcvtec · · Score: 1
      Meanwhile, the internet (and swelling need for bandwidth) makes bunker technology highly desirable.

      Actually, you're referring to two different parties. The bunkers are obsolete to the industry, but highly desirable to hobbyists. Same thing with computer hardware: those big Vaxen and other minis and workstations are long since obsolete to the industry, but desirable to hobbyists that can now get them for next to nothing.
      --
      -- Never hit a man with glasses. Hit him with a baseball bat.
    5. Re:Let me get this straight ... by BattyMan · · Score: 1

      Actually, you're referring to two different parties.

      Right.

      I recall when they were scheduling the "de-orbiting" of the Iridium constellation. It's totally unprofitable. Yet the hobbyists covet it. This is more of the same.

      Too bad the map / location server is _still_ "down" (perhaps taken town to avoid a sort of geek land-rush?). I got a 9M .xls out of it, let's see if SC can handle that......

      {tries StarCalc on downloaded xls ... ... SUCCESS! Thank you,SMI}

      oO0Oo... There's one - within a coupe of _blocks_ of my apt!
      And another... and ANOTHER. And another within spitting distance of work!
      Maybe it's time to make that housing purchase....

      --
      Exceeding the recommended torque is not recommended.
  16. yes maybe but... by neo8750 · · Score: 1

    Sure. they may be a good place for a wireless accesspoint but hell for 25k you could probly work out a way to get more locations.

  17. /.ed Already by Honig+the+Apothecary · · Score: 1

    Its fried and there is not even a comment...so here is the Google Cache. Sorry no link to the list of sites :(

    Google Cache

  18. No kidding... I remember these well. by djupedal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was an Inspector on these in Northern Calif. I monitored the construction for a private firm. Concrete pours and steel, etc.

    They are hell-for-stout, no doubt. You could wipe out everything above ground in the US, and still get a dial tone. Most are in remote locations, naturally, and include fuel storage tanks (propane) and blast shielding. Just the ticket for anyone looking for the ultimate private bomb shelter.

    1. Re:No kidding... I remember these well. by muffel · · Score: 5, Funny
      You could wipe out everything above ground in the US, and still get a dial tone.
      Yeah, if everything above ground in the US was wiped out, it would really suck to not get a dialtone.
      --

      bla
    2. Re:No kidding... I remember these well. by djupedal · · Score: 4, Interesting

      These were built by ITT, under contract to Uncle Sam, who didn't feel like bothering ground troops with terrestrial communications. The usual method of out-sourcing, only on a very large scale.

      The dialtone joke is just that...how can any govt. think it is doing the populace good by keeping the phonelines up when they won't be seeing daylight for a generation or two.

      Ok, I'll answer my own Q...they were spending cold war $$ while providing 'make work' for the communications industry. 'money' is the key word in why these were built, not concern for the American way.

    3. Re:No kidding... I remember these well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, who might be able to afford such protection want to buy said protection? Released just as we start the pounding the war drum??? Hmm...

    4. Re:No kidding... I remember these well. by marauder404 · · Score: 1

      Maintaining lines of communication is key in any kind of operation. If the US was to be hit by a nuclear attack, whoever was left would have to be able to communicate in order to effective recover, regroup, and retailiate. When an invasion is planned, the highest priority targets are command, communication, and detection (radar). If you take out the command or deprive the ability of command to talk to its constituent units, you end up with a disorganized enemy that can't fight. If you can't talk to your rescue workers, you can't work effectively.

    5. Re:No kidding... I remember these well. by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

      won't be seeing daylight for a generation or two.

      More NUCLEAR BULLSHIT. In reality, the radioactive fallout from a nuke blast decays in a few weeks. The fear and ignorance about nuclear energy, mostly propaganda promulgated by the excessively fearmongering, lying 'no nuke' crowd, is astounding, expecially when facts are readily available for anyone who want to look into the matter and find the truth.

      You people REALLY need to get a counter and measure things, instead of brainlessly parroting stuff from equally brainless entertainers on a political power trip that you see on the boob toob who don't know what they're blabbing about in the first place.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    6. Re:No kidding... I remember these well. by Rand+Race · · Score: 1
      Sure, Iodine-131 has a half-life of a week or so, but the iodine-129 that is made in the same explosion has a half-life of 15.7 MILLION years. Plutonium dioxide has a half-life of 24,000 years, Cobalt-60 a decade or so, Strontium-90 and Cesium-137 30 years or so...

      And the danger period is 10 times the half-life, so even I-131 is dangerous for three months.

      Which is all incidental to the original point which seemed to be addressing nuclear winter -caused by particulate matter ejected into the atmosphere by the explosions- not fallout.

      --
      Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
    7. Re:No kidding... I remember these well. by Zen+Mastuh · · Score: 2
      If the US was to be hit by a nuclear attack, whoever was left would have to be able to communicate in order to effective recover, regroup, and retailiate.

      If the U.S. was hit by a nuclear attack your conjecture will be out the window. They didn't bother to tell you this in ROTC, but at some point America will just have to go away. Hell, in an all-out nuclear war, the entire species (or most of it) will just have to go away. The few survivors will probably be interested in a lasting peace.

      Fantasize all you want about your "Highest Priority Targets", "Chain of Command", "Rules of Engagement", and other shop expressions, but when the shit goes down our culture and your military culture will only be confusing memories in the minds of the survivors.

      --
      "What is the sound of one belly slapping?"
    8. Re:No kidding... I remember these well. by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

      You can probably tell from my post that those Anger Mgmt Seminars are really paying off :))

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    9. Re:No kidding... I remember these well. by jefflinwood · · Score: 2

      http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/12/international/eu rope/12MOSC.html

      Here's some fear mongering for you - in Russia, atomic inspectors must certify all produce sold in Moscow to be free of atomic fallout from chernobyl. I bet they're glad they went with nuclear!

    10. Re:No kidding... I remember these well. by merriam · · Score: 1

      'money' is the key word in why these were built, not concern for the American way.

      There's a difference?

    11. Re:No kidding... I remember these well. by Cramer · · Score: 1

      ONE nuke isn't going to end the world -- the hundreds of nukes everybody is likely to sling at the first sight of that one nuke will. And it's not the force of the explision, the initial radiation, or fallout that ruins everything for decades. There's a small problem of tons of stuff being blown into the atmosphere.

      And to be fair, we don't know exactly how powerful our modern nukes are -- we aren't supposed to be test detonating any of them. So, we only have a theory of how big a boom they will make (and we're currently missing an Atol due to one of those theoretical yeilds.)

      Oh and since plutonium is present in the fallout, the radiation really is a moot point... Plutonium is very highly toxic.

    12. Re:No kidding... I remember these well. by operagost · · Score: 1
      Actually, I bet they wish they hadn't hired a thousand Homer Simpson clones to run the place.

      They did EVERYTHING wrong!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    13. Re:No kidding... I remember these well. by RandomFactor · · Score: 1

      Things that decay slowly (15.7 million years, GMAFB) aren't the problem, they don't hurt you unless they do so chemically.

      Intermediate halflife products are the dangerous stuff.

      --
      --- Mercutio was right.
  19. Sadly... by descentr · · Score: 5, Funny

    It appears these bunkers will NOT protect you from the fury of Slashdot.

  20. World War III... really? by Devil's+BSD · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Assuming there was a nuclear holocaust/World War III, how would a 500 ft microwave tower resist being blown down by a nuclear blast? Even if there is the bunker, the transmission effectiveness will be effectively zero without the tower.

    --
    I'm the Devil the Windows users warned you about.
    1. Re:World War III... really? by descentr · · Score: 2

      Err, that's a 200 foot tower, buddy.

    2. Re:World War III... really? by garcia · · Score: 2

      the tower could be re-erected (sounds like pr0n I know) quickly in the event that it was actually hit by the shockwave or direct blast. The important part is that the actual bunker remains intact.

    3. Re:World War III... really? by Janitor · · Score: 1

      Thats when you break out the backup plan. Go down to the supply cabinet and get the sticks, blanket, book of matches, and pamphlet on how to send smoke signals.

    4. Re:World War III... really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all of them you FUCKING RETARD

    5. Re:World War III... really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most of them you FUCKING RETARD

  21. Thats a lot of pixels... by DrShaggy · · Score: 1

    Am I going to need that 3840x2400 monitor just to view these pics? How convienient that they were announced so close together...

  22. This brings back fond memories. by Gumber · · Score: 2

    I have fond memories of spending a strange summer night in the vicinity of one of these situated on a mountain pass when I was in high school. I'm just glad my fiends didn't climb the tower durring the gathering thundersorm.

    1. Re:This brings back fond memories. by sconeu · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm just glad my fiends didn't climb the tower

      I'm sure Satan is too... He hates to lose fiends in electrical storms!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  23. Not useful, is it? by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 1

    Even if someone were to get their hands on one of these sites, wouldn't the upkeep cost outweigh the benefits of stronger ham radio signals?

    Also, wouldn't there be some kind of FCC regulation regarding what you could do with these towers?

    It sounds like a moneysink to me.

    1. Re:Not useful, is it? by Cubeman · · Score: 0

      The FCC has *nothing* to do with the towers, only the transmission equipment. You'd have to get a license to be able to transmit with the microwave equipment, but otherwise you could just cook really big TV dinners :)

    2. Re:Not useful, is it? by CrackersnSoup · · Score: 1

      FCC no, FAA yes, Any tower, 200ft or taller, has to be registered with the FAA, Also if its within flight path's ectera Crackers`n`Soup

  24. terror by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    oh no! Terrorists have attacked the slashdot comment system!

  25. Fiber + Microwaves by messiertom · · Score: 1

    Seems to me it's best to have them both:

    Let F = Food high in fiber. Let M = Microwave.

    F = Bad

    F + M = Good

    1. Re:Fiber + Microwaves by NanoGator · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      Let F = Food high in fiber. Let M = Microwave.

      F = Bad

      F + M = Good


      Just start your BASIC class there, buddy? :)
      --
      "Derp de derp."
  26. Pink MW Horns? by lhaeh · · Score: 0

    One of the links shows the microwave horns painted pink. Anyone know why this would be done? The site (http://www.drgibson.com/towers/frank_schmid.html) suggests cosmetic reasons, which might not be far off as I've seen cell towers made to look like trees in suburban neiborhoods.
    Could it have been to block/filter fallout?

    1. Re:Pink MW Horns? by CheapEngineer · · Score: 1

      They're not *intentionally* pink. That's the color that Tower Red fades to after 5-6 years of UV exposure. AT&T stopped painting those towers, and replaced the red obstruction-at-night lighting with a top mounted strobe 24hrs. It's a lot cheaper to put a strobe on a tower than paint it every 4-5 years - why do you think that *none* of those 15 million new cellular towers ar painted anymore?

  27. Idea! by Com2Kid · · Score: 2

    1800 square feet? Larger then many studio apartments. Heck larger then most studio apartments.

    I say setup a decent 'net connection and become a digital hermit. (e-hermit?)

    1. Re: Idea! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 0, Offtopic


      > I say setup a decent 'net connection and become a digital hermit.

      Yeah, you could download a lot of porn over one of those receivers!

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Idea! by settonull · · Score: 1

      Studio Appartments? That is more than twice the size of my old 3 bedroom!

      --
      -chris (gandalf@darkcorner.net)
    3. Re:Idea! by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      1800 square feet? Larger then many studio apartments. Heck larger then most studio apartments.
      But chickenshit compared to the redneck ranches typical of the area around those remote tower sites...
    4. Re:Idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1800 square feet? Larger then many studio apartments. Heck larger then most studio apartments.

      About the size of a medium sized house. Studios are usually around 300 square feet.

    5. Re:Idea! by antisocial77 · · Score: 1

      Hell, it's bigger than the 2 bedroom I live in now, and 25k for living quarters is pretty cheap. My first thought was "I wonder if these things have running water."

    6. Re:Idea! by Kredal · · Score: 2

      Make sure Amazon and Thinkgeek will deliver there first. (:

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    7. Re:Idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      studio? shit thats my 1 bedroom apartment times 3.

      i wouldn't want that though because then my wife would go buy more stuff to fill it.

    8. Re:Idea! by operagost · · Score: 1

      They definitely have kickass broadband connections.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    9. Re:Idea! by jonbrewer · · Score: 2

      1800 square feet? Larger then many studio apartments. Heck larger then most studio apartments. 1800 sq. feet is twice my two bedroom apartment in Boston, and six times a Studio...

    10. Re:Idea! by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      1800 sq. feet is twice my two bedroom apartment in Boston, and six times a Studio...


      Oh wow. East coast must suck. . . .

      1800sq feet is like dismal here in Seattle, heh. A 2500sqft+ house goes for 250k-300k, so. . . . err. . . heh.

  28. Cool... by Mikeydude750 · · Score: 1

    Interesting. I'd like to put my house on one of those things. Think about it...a bomb shelter, and a radio tower to boot! All for only 25 G's. Nice deal.

  29. take that, SIGINT sattelites! by cygnus · · Score: 3, Funny

    AT LAST! a location for my echelon spoofing site. ;)

    --
    Just raise the taxes on crack.
    1. Re:take that, SIGINT sattelites! by cygnus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      whoever modded that down doesn't know dukey about SIGINT or Echelon or the security failures of line-of-sight microwave telco transmissions.

      your cluelessness shouldn't result in my punishment.

      --
      Just raise the taxes on crack.
  30. Um, laws? by VTg33k · · Score: 0

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't there laws against Joe Schmoe owning something capable of generating signals like that? The bunker and land, sure, but doesn't the FCC have a problem with some weirdo buying a tower and broadcasting Eminem on all frequencies?

    1. Re:Um, laws? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Partially right. The FCC only has laws regulating White music. If you want to broadcast Nigger music your are allowed to use as much spectrum and as many channels as you want.

    2. Re:Um, laws? by jbrians · · Score: 1

      I'm just guessing, but likely the FCC says you can't broadcast, but you can own the hardware.

      --
      "Faith strikes me as intellectual laziness." -Robert A. Heinlen
    3. Re:Um, laws? by shepd · · Score: 1

      >I'm just guessing, but likely the FCC says you can't broadcast, but you can own the hardware.

      If only. I'm sitting in Canada with an el-cheapo Radio Shack scanner than won't pick up cell phones as it happens to be an American model, and ownership of anything that can receive these frequencies is illegal. I don't doubt anything that can broadcast on them is illegal to own too. Bummer.

      Now remember: Listening to idiots in the city broadcast their personal information in the clear -- BAD. Using a radar detector so you can break the speed limit -- GOOD. :-)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    4. Re:Um, laws? by evilempireinc · · Score: 1

      " I don't doubt anything that can broadcast on them is illegal to own too" What, you mean like cellphones?

      --
      we can rebuild this sig. we have the technology
    5. Re:Um, laws? by shepd · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I forgot to mention I was only talking about items designed for non-private, unauthorized (by the originator/owner of equipment originating the signal) receiving/transmitting equipment.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  31. nevermind by victim · · Score: 3, Informative

    Someone please mod the parent into oblivion. I believe that is the active site list, not the surplus site list.

  32. that's hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    can anyone corroborate this?

    1. Re:that's hilarious by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Only to say that I'v heard a strikingly similar story. I'd not heard that the tech fell asleep.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    2. Re:that's hilarious by mjpaci · · Score: 2

      I've heard similar stories of sailors standing watch on the ship's tower and keeping warm in the RADAR wash.

      --mike

    3. Re:that's hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      can anyone corroborate this?

      No.

  33. a thought by sstory · · Score: 1

    I suppose it would make a cheap nerd house. perfect if you're the kind of guy who supposes that women are turned on by Darth Vader t-shirts. Not awfully practical, though. If you want a house in the middle of nowhere, find a 500-resident ghost town, in, say, South Dakota, where they go for $6k. Think about it--a vacation home on a grad student's salary. :-)

    1. Re:a thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, a town for $6ooo!

    2. Re:a thought by geekindustries · · Score: 1

      Heh...exactly! I live right in the middle of nowhere, South Dakota. I can find ya a perfect vaction home!

      The country air (that smells like cow pies for some odd reason), the wonderful breeze (that spreads those sewage gasesa around), etc. And, if you need a high speed internet connection for your *fancy* compoter thingy mabobber we have that too! You get this dish thingy and you can connect anywhere! Its super fast but the upstream is really slow...is that a problem?

      Just send $6,000 to Geek Realestate c/o......

      --
      Hard work usually pays off over time, but procrastination pays off now.
  34. When in the market, also consider.. by tedDancin · · Score: 1

    Something like this, a UK nuclear bunker which was auctioned in July. No better place to store important information, might have some problems with the wireless transmission though. (:

    --

    Ladies, form queue here -->
  35. Awesome and cheap.. by mcraw · · Score: 1

    ...but still more than I can afford. Plus, who wants to sit in there getting cancer? I suppose you could set up an ISP business and hire someone else to watch the servers for you.

    --
    -Miles
    Fuzzy
    1. Re:Awesome and cheap.. by rodgerd · · Score: 2

      Why would you get cancer? They can take a nuclear blast. I doubt the microwave is going to bug anyone in the bunker.

      If you have a hankering for a wee plot o' land and can telecommute, 2 acres and a 200' radio mast would be a bargain for $25k.

  36. These sites are awesome! by Newer+Guy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been inside of several of them and they're simply awesome and must have cost a fortune to build and maintain. They have living quarters and water tanks. The equipment mostly ran off of banks of single cell (2 volt) batteries that were kept charged by utility power and generator. They used klystron transmitters I understand. Another cold war relic made obsolete I guess..but I can't help but be nostalgic for just a bit.. Can you?

    1. Re:These sites are awesome! by Nate+B. · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm too young in the business to know, but I've been told by some of the elder techs in the company (we maintain a private microwave system) that the AT&T sites were laid out so identically to each other that a tech who knew his way around one could be blindfolded and taken into any site and would be able to work on the equipment. AT&T and the Bell System were big on standards so I don't doubt the accuracy of this claim.

      Even as careful as we are to try to maintain a standard layout, each of the sites I maintain all have their own quirks. But then, we have auxillary equipment that varies from site to site so that screws up the attempt at standardization.

      --

      "Insanity is doing the same thing over again expecting a different result."
    2. Re:These sites are awesome! by Mt._Honkey · · Score: 2

      Klystron, like they use at Fermilab to accelerate protons?

      --

      Don't Bogart the fish sticks
    3. Re:These sites are awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy who came up with this idea probably works for Wal-mart now. I could find my way around any Wal-mart!

  37. More Long Lines information by ISAKMP · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mark Foster has another really nice Long Lines site that includes a table that lists many Long Lines facilites in many states, describes the equipment installed there and has photos of some of the facilities. He also provides the technical specifications for the construction of these sites, as well as photos from tour he took of a still-operating one.

    1. Re:More Long Lines information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, the L4 (underground coaxial cable) system as documented on Mark's site is only tangentially related to the microwave LD system discussed here, but it's still good reading.

    2. Re:More Long Lines information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      BELL SYSTEM NUCLEAR DESIGN CRITERIA (1969)
      EXTREMELY HARD DESIGN (50 PSI)

      Design Assumptions:


      - 2 1/2 miles from 20 megaton blast
      - 1000 Miles per hour wind
      - 40 G shock wave
      - high velocity debris
      - Intense radiation, heat and electromagnetic effects

      Design Criteria


      - Below grade construction with 2 ft concrete walls and a minimum of 4 ft of earth over cover
      - Shock mounting on communications equipment to reduce excelleration to 8 g's
      - Metal shield completely enveloping structure (-80 db at freqs above 10 Khz)
      - Provisions for flexing of incoming cables at entrance points
      - Above ground structure (microwave and troposcatter antennas) require at least two thirds of the structure to be below grade to prevent tilting or rotation
      - Microwave antennas require tilting to shed debris, beryllia window to resist over pressure, flame sprayed aluminum finish to reflect heat and concrete filling for weight.

      Typical structures:


      - Buried cable 4 ft deep i.e.: L-4
      - Military locations with troposcatter and line of site microwave
      - L-3 and L-4 main stations less than 5 miles from a potential target
      - L-3 and L-4 repeater and equalizing stations (18" earth over cover)

      Happy transmitting, Luke

  38. blast pressure by rebelcool · · Score: 5, Informative

    is measured in lb/sq. inch. The reason the blast is so damaging to buildings is because of wall size magnifies the force to a few tons of pressure on the side of the wall. The towers if you notice, are open, thin bars that present little surface area for the blast to contact. What is exposed is well anchored.

    --

    -

    1. Re:blast pressure by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      what about amu/au^2?

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
  39. Slashdotted Already? by MoodyLoner · · Score: 5, Informative

    Guess I'm not the only one to dream of owning a nuke-resistant bunker.



    Here's the Google cache of the site map to salivate over...



    Good news if you're back east or in the Bay Area, bad news otherwise.



    Say, wonder if Mrs. Moody would mind running a home daycare out of one of these?



    --
    No Longer a Menace to Society.
    Alexandria Morrigan born 2/22/01 l. 20.5in wt. 7 lbs. 5 oz.
    1. Re:Slashdotted Already? by no+soup+for+you · · Score: 5, Informative
      Here's the Google cache [216.239.51.100] of the site map to salivate over...
      google does not cache images. You really could have just linked to this picture of the states' tower locations

      I appreciate the effort, but I think we should all know google's capabilities.
      --
      If you blog it...
    2. Re:Slashdotted Already? by justsomecomputerguy · · Score: 1

      From looking at the map of locations, it occurs to me that these might be great places to set up new, upstart and possibly, just possibly good FM radio stations...

    3. Re:Slashdotted Already? by MoodyLoner · · Score: 1

      Considering all the "Cat got your tongue?" messages I got trying to post it before I gave up, I'm surprised to see it at all.

      Google doesn't cache images. Yeah.

      --
      No Longer a Menace to Society.
      Alexandria Morrigan born 2/22/01 l. 20.5in wt. 7 lbs. 5 oz.
    4. Re:Slashdotted Already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, is this map not showing the major population centres ie Towns and cities? Or did AT&T service the Mexico City area

    5. Re:Slashdotted Already? by per+unit+analyzer · · Score: 2
      Here's the Google cache of the site map to salivate over...

      American Tower Corp. (ATC) is in the business of buying/building towers so they can lease them to the wireless telecom and broadcast industries. (Many times they end up leasing them back to the folks they bought them from...) The map in the aforementioned link is a map of ALL of ATC's sites, which number somewhere around 14,000... The majority of the towers depicted on that map are NOT the ex-AT&T sites, rather those that ATC built themselves or obtained from other organizations. The non-AT&T towers are ATC's bread-and-butter and subsequently not for sale.

      When American Tower bought the sites from AT&T a few years ago, the number of AT&T sites was only about 2,700 IIRC. Of the 2,700, ATC kept the best sites for their purposes and put 1000-1500 for sale. Since the ex-AT&T sites have been for sale for a couple of years now, they've been pretty well picked over and the best locations are long gone... So in other words: the above map shows almost two orders of magnitude more towers than what's for sale... don't get your hopes up.

      --zawada

      --
      In Soviet Russia, the Beowulf cluster imagines you!
    6. Re:Slashdotted Already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the list of all of ATCs sites. Not just the ATT sites for sale.

    7. Re:Slashdotted Already? by psych031337 · · Score: 2
      google does not cache images. You really could have just linked to this picture [americantower.com] of the states' tower locations


      Did any of the people modding this post up bother to check the link in question? It is a link to a google-cached site, alrite, but it sure gives me fancy-schmancy graphics (read: i-m-a-g-e)

      --
      +++ath0
  40. Made for parties by fiori · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just fill the microwave horn with popcorn and fire-up that 60kW generator.

    1. Re:Made for parties by the+way,+what're+you · · Score: 1
      Just fill the microwave horn with popcorn and fire-up that 60kW generator.

      Another hint for the frugal: forget expensive lighting, just bring a bunch of CDs and party until the crack of... well... the CDs.

      And don't forget the numerous other party tricks you could do...

      --
      example.org - powered by Linux!
  41. Built to withstand World War 3? by cperciva · · Score: 2

    What's the point behind having bunkers here which can withstand nuclear attacks?

    The obvious answer would be that they wanted to ensure that the communications infrastructure would survive, but that doesn't make sense -- the towers would be destroyed quite easily, and without the towers, all the equipment protected in the bunkers would be useless anyway.

    Am I missing something here?

    1. Re:Built to withstand World War 3? by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

      It's probably a lot easier to rebuild the tower after nuclear holocaust than to rebuild the tower and all the delicate equipment hooked up to it.

      If I could read the article, for all I know there could be an entire extra in pieces inside the bunker.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    2. Re:Built to withstand World War 3? by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Yes you are, according to a previous post.

      To quote rebelcool:
      (Blast Pressure) is measured in lb/sq. inch. The reason the blast is so damaging to buildings is because of wall size magnifies the force to a few tons of pressure on the side of the wall. The towers if you notice, are open, thin bars that present little surface area for the blast to contact. What is exposed is well anchored.

      -Build your own community. Free and powerful. Demo Site-

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    3. Re:Built to withstand World War 3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The EMP shockwave from an undirected nuclear explosion is enough to distrub electronics, sure enough. However, the damage radius is much smaller than that of a device specifically designed to attack electronic equipment. The result is thus: You might manage to wipe out a few bunkers with a direct attack (either by vaporizing it, or making the elecronics inside useless), but you would not take down the whole network infrastructure in a given area.

      Thats' the idea behind the towers, in thoery. Tis much like APRANET, no?

    4. Re:Built to withstand World War 3? by afidel · · Score: 2

      The most fortifies of sites were designed to be 2.5 miles from a 20 megaton nuke strike and survive, these were sites near prime military targets, then there were slightly less hardened ones for withing 5 miles, and then basically non hardened site for anything further. More info here

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    5. Re:Built to withstand World War 3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The info link included specifically states that the towers themselves were designed to survive all but a blast that was closer than 5 miles. You seriously thought a company that built a nation-wide network of these bunkers would overlook that? Yikes...

  42. Not just microwave by Nate+B. · · Score: 2, Informative

    It seems AT&T had a considerable investment in long distance buried coaxial cable. Apparently there was a pair of these cable laid a few miles away from here as a contractor was going through a few years back digging them back up and recovering them.

    As I recall from the local paper's article the cables were probably 4 to 6 inches in diameter and were then encased in lead. I also recall that they were buried several feet deep, at least deeper than water lines and regular phone cable gets buried around here.

    From my youth I recall an AT&T Long Lines bunker a few miles south of US 36 on US 75 north of Topeka, KS. I believe these cables went through there as they were on an east/west run through northern Kansas. Where the ultimate terminating points were would be a good exercise.

    Many old microwave sites are still standing around these parts. The tower lights and painting are still maintained. It's interesting that it apparently cost more to disassemble them than to leave them stand.

    --

    "Insanity is doing the same thing over again expecting a different result."
  43. build a giant tesla coil by fleps · · Score: 1

    on top of the bunker instead of a dull microwave tower. You can power the coil off your bonus 60kW generator, and lurk in the bunker.

    Good for isolationists, not many visitors will get past the flaming lightning bolts of doom. Or invest in a network of coils (one every 50 miles) and see if you can block out Seinfeld with the RFI.

    I'd link to Lightning on Demand/Electrum Project (in NZ, raay) (http://www.lod.org) but they seem to be broken.

  44. Broadband 2 boonies by CrazyDuke · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Am I the only one thinking of the possibility of buying 2 within signal distance of each other, one in a city where broadband is actually affordable, and one out in the boonies or small cities where at best people get 53K dialup and using it to set up a broadband ISP? $50,000 initial investment + permits is pretty steep still, though.

    Hell, or get paid for offering an alternative route for congested hops.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
    1. Re:Broadband 2 boonies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're forgetting that the microwave towers are very inefficient at transmitting data. If it were possible to support an entire ISP over these links, then Ma Bell would already be doing it, instead of selling them off at a loss.

    2. Re:Broadband 2 boonies by shepd · · Score: 1

      >If it were possible to support an entire ISP over these links, then Ma Bell would already be doing it, instead of selling them off at a loss.

      If only that were true, ISDN would be totally dead.

      Ma Bell doesn't care about efficiency. They ran over 500 pairs of copper to my area from a CO 15 km away, and now they'll run another 1000 with a new subdivision opening up. Yup, that's _far_ cheaper than running a small remote CO in my area (and no, space sure isn't a priority and is not expensive in my area).

      I guess in the long run it'll save them money since they can't offer money-losing DSL in my area to the 75% (my estimate) of customers here than want it (95% of my area subscribes to satellite service, so I'm extrapolating here).

      For an area with only 500 houses, I still regularly see Bell trucks in my area, and every one of my neighbours has called in complaints about dead lines more than once.

      Oh well, sorry to burst your bubble.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    3. Re:Broadband 2 boonies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The technology deployed at these installations was not designed for digital information. It would be entitely possible to retrofit the tower and the comm bunker with everything you need to supply thousands with broadband. Hook the other side to OC-[insert huge number here], and whatta ya got?

      Reference ventures for wireless broadband, notably from Sprint, for more information.

    4. Re:Broadband 2 boonies by adolf · · Score: 5, Informative

      These things aren't in cities, for the most part.

      The one I'm familiar with is near Mount Cory, Ohio, and is situated in the middle of a corn field (or is it soybeans, this year?). It consists of a man-made hill, twenty-or-so feet tall, with a couple of small buildings on top. The tower itself is as other posters have described - not terribly tall (less than 200 feet), with an incredibly wide base. Giant feedhorns flow gracefully from it. I'm told by people who've been into it that the space below ground is much more expansive.

      High-tension transmission lines live nearby to supply power. It has its own substation.

      It would be a very poor choice as a location from which to which to distribute massive amounts of bandwidth.

      For one thing, a wireless ISP set up their NOC in an abandoned local telco building about a quarter-mile down the road from there. They constructed a rather monstrous, more modern-looking tower. I'd estimate height at 600' - it positively dwarfs the AT&T relay station.

      For another thing, it must have made more sense to build new, than buy the little relay station, or lease tower space, or whatever. Else, they wouldn't have done it. And if a couple-hundred feet would've been OK for this ruler-flat Ohio landscape, I doubt they'd have gone as far up as they did.

      And ironically, I had a conversation that went something like this when I had the comwavz installers at my house, not long after service rollout:

      Him: So, the DS-3 should be up Real Soon Now, after AT&T gets their head screwed on straight. For now, all we have is a T1.

      Me: Well, that's fine. What's the holdup on the DS-3?

      Him: I guess they can't figure out how to sell it to us via microwave.

      Me: This is the same AT&T with the relay station right over there [/me points], right?

      Him: Yeah. Strange, huh?

      It's -hard- to get bandwidth out in the sticks, even if you've got a cold war microwave relay within spitting distance. I doubt things would improve much by owning one or two instead of just being near one.

    5. Re:Broadband 2 boonies by CrackersnSoup · · Score: 1

      I happen to have T1's from AT&T for my wISP. The problem with AT&T roilling out DS3's is not that they can not figure it out. Its that they don't want to. Period. They can't make much money on selling 1 or 2 DS3's out in BFE. They would rather pull a OC3 in and sell 5-10 DS3's. Yea, AT&T over sell's a 155mb line by 3-5 times. Take SBC, Im 1000 feet from there CO. They want 17K/mo for a DS3 loop, NO transport. Ok, fine, Let me put in a nice proxim wireless link. NO? Why not.. SBC wants a 13million insuance policy incase my hardware some how fry's theies. If i DO manage to become a CLEC and afford that insurance i can get the port in the CO(transport) for 2000/mo. Still no joy on a wireless link OR a resionable priced DS3 loop.
      Point is, Telco's dont give a damn about data. They didnt 25 years ago nad they still dont because they have no clue how to do it right.
      Crackers`n`Soup

    6. Re:Broadband 2 boonies by adolf · · Score: 1

      What does this fine example of antiparagraphical prose have to do with microwave relay towers?

      I'm a bit lost as to what point you might be attempting to make. Please clarify.

    7. Re:Broadband 2 boonies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was replying to a specific comment in the parent post referring to AT&T and DS-3 rollouts. But thank you for so zealously guarding the sanctity of the off-topic posting guidelines.

    8. Re:Broadband 2 boonies by AX.25 · · Score: 1

      I remember that tower. Used to drive by it in the late 80's while headed up to ks8s's place in Henry county.

      --
      What is pirate software? Software for inventory of stolen treasure?
    9. Re:Broadband 2 boonies by jhines · · Score: 2

      There is/was one near Chicago, it was along I-294 north to Milwaulkee. It got remade, and the towers removed, and was used for AT&T something or another, as it still had a AT&T sign on last time I saw it, which was years ago.

    10. Re:Broadband 2 boonies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These sort of things are Line Of Sight. A taller tower would be needed if it were built from level ground level...but a tower on a hill surrounded by fields would need far less height (due to the lack of obstructions...forests, tall buildings, taller hills).

      A wireless internet company just set up a receiver on an radio tower the place I work for wasn't using for anything. Since our town doesn't have any tall buildings and the surrounding terrain is flat (mostly farms) we have LOS to a relay set up on a grain elevator about 15 miles away. Total height of our tower...less than 200 feet. So if you could get a LOS (from the top of the towers) between two or more of these points you could easily pull off transferring the data between them. Beaming it to the surrounding locals would depend mostly on the number of obstructions between your tower and your customers, then a taller tower might make sense if there are a lot of taller structures to work around.

  45. Call me one of no faith but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "associated bunkers were designed to withstand World War III.."

    How was this ever tested?

  46. not only by Gavitron_zero · · Score: 1, Redundant

    would this make a great fallout shelter, but you could heat up all of your cans of food with all that microwave goodness.

    1. Re:not only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you moron. To stop rec'ing microwave signals you only have to either toss the receiving feeds, or put lead plugs in the waveguides.

  47. World War III? by thelinuxking · · Score: 2

    World War II involved the dropping of "The Bomb". The destructive force of the atomic bomb completely destroyed entire cities.

    World War III (for those not in the know, it hasn't started yet...) will probably involve much more powerful weapons than even the atomic bomb. Chances are this structure won't be able to withstand the force of this kind of weaponry.

    And if it does still stand after a bomb, chances are no one in your 50 mile area will be alive to hear your ham radio station.

    1. Re:World War III? by be-fan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Umm, World War III was planned to happen back in the 60's. That's what these things were built to withstand.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    2. Re:World War III? by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

      > Umm, World War III was planned to happen back in the 60's. That's what these things were built to withstand.

      Sigh. Another project way over deadline, and with massive scope changes.

      A quote from an early-80's British TV skit comedy show:

      "Experts have finally understood American foreign policy. Having been late for the last two world wars, they want to make sure they're really prompt for the next one."

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    3. Re:World War III? by passion · · Score: 2

      World War III (for those not in the know, it hasn't started yet...)

      A bit off topic, but not entirely... What defines a "world war"? A war to end all wars? Armageddon? Or just a large number of countries banded together to fight another large group of countries banded together?

      One year ago today may very well be seen in distant history texts as the beginning of WW3, just not the one that we were told would happen when we were growing up. This war will be fought over the cultural divide of the haves vs. the have-nots. If/when Bush snipes Saddam, and marches into Baghdad, the Arab nations will be PISSED, and not only withhold oil, but unleash their wrath upon us. This could very well mean chemical, biological, or nuclear attacks.

      Isreal will be one of the major fronts, and fighting (as we've seen already) will not be limited to the fronts, but will happen everywhere, even with legislation in our government.

      That's how I view WW3... and it started a long time ago.

      --
      - passion
    4. Re:World War III? by kasparov · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nope. WWIV was around during the '80s. I dialed up to several BBSs that ran it.

      --
      There's no place I can be, since I found Serenity.
    5. Re:World War III? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whats more powerful than an A-Bomb?

      A bigger A-Bomb?

      The US and Russia have 100MegaTon Nukes. That completely flattens & kills everything within a 30 mile radius not to mention decimating most things beyond that and leaving a big mess behind.

      I reckon about 10 would take out the USA:

      Los Angeles
      New York
      Chicago
      Philadelphia
      Washington
      Detroit
      Houston
      Atlanta
      Dallas
      Boston

      That wipes out about 100 Million people leaving about 180 million.

      It would take about 2 to take out the UK. 1 on London and the other somewhere in the center of England.

    6. Re:World War III? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are close but I would bet there will be more trouble in the "haves vs. have-nots", for example India and China and Indonesia vs. Europe. Oh, and most of Africa vs. a few of their cities; Central and South America vs. North, etc. you get the idea.

    7. Re:World War III? by afidel · · Score: 2

      It cannot mean nuclear attacks as no arab nation has or is likely to have in the near future nuclear capabilities. We would probably turn large chunks of desert into glass before we allowed an arab state to have nuclear weapons. There is one muslim state with nukes and that is pakistan, but they have their own problems on their hands to the south and want all the support they can get from us.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    8. Re:World War III? by Darth_brooks · · Score: 2

      A 100 megaton nuke wouldn't do much to detroit. it's already a barren wasteland.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    9. Re:World War III? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I figure a coup will happen and the current Saudi leadership will disappear. The replacement will tell Europe, "Keep the US out of Israel and you can have oil". The US can cope with out Middle East Oil. Europe can't.

    10. Re:World War III? by passion · · Score: 2

      you're ruling out all those Russian suitcase nuclear bombs. sure, they may not fly in on a missle, nor have the biggest blast, but they could easily wipe out a population.

      --
      - passion
    11. Re:World War III? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a coup happens in Saudi Arabia, they will turn that country into another Taliban-ruled Afghanistan.

      Besides, how is Europe going to "keep the US out of Israel?" A trance "music" embargo?

    12. Re:World War III? by bluGill · · Score: 2

      Not nessicarly. WWI was mainly chemical weapons (mustard gas). After all seeing what those weapons did to people, niether side in WWII was willing to be first to use them (even though both sides had more descructive chemical weapons) first because of they didn't want retaliation.

      I belive that WWII with bigger weapons helped to prevent a neculear war in the 60's. The last act of WWII was neculear weapons, and the descruction was a roll model. Both sides in the 60's knew that the other could take them out if they started a war, and niether was willing to risk it. (Mutually assured destruction works so long as nobody crazy is in charge)

      Current military thinking is to destroy only targets. In the gulf war the military braged about their ability to get one building in a city without bothering others. (though in truth they didn't succede, that was the goal)

      WWIII won't be faught for a few years anymore. WWI was building in Europe for years, people actually danced in celebration of war being declared. I've encountered many europeans who think that WWI was a good thing, the world NEEDED a war then! Right now nobody thinks need a war. (Though perhaps the terrorist thing could be considered that - I optimisticly hope not)

    13. Re:World War III? by operagost · · Score: 2

      So are the the oil-rich, Rolls-Royce driving Arabs the haves or the have-nots?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  48. mod up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because it's funny

  49. Too Much of a Good Thing by Stephen+VanDahm · · Score: 2

    To quote Strong Bad, "too much of a good thing is an awesome thing. But too much of an awesome thing is ... umm ... really, really dumb."

    This is almost too much of an awesome thing. But it's awesome nonetheless.

    1. Re:Too Much of a Good Thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Please do not quote StongBad. He is really, really dumb.

    2. Re:Too Much of a Good Thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. That wasn't worth quoting.

  50. Yeah right .. reminds me of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    a story my teacher told me back in school about a tech at the Tokamak Fusion Chamber in Princeton, nj.. guy went in, someone (oops) turned it on, ridiculously strong magnetic field (used to drive fusion process of hydrogen and isolate fusioned material from metal walls) took all this guy's hemoglobin right out through his pores. stupid liar

    1. Re:Yeah right .. reminds me of.. by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 2

      True Story - a guy at work has a small piece of steel embedded just above his eyelid, but below his eyebrow. It's been in there a few days and the wound isn't healing up as it should. He was working with a framing hammer and a chunk of nail or hammer head flew back at him (remember kids, always wear safety glasses!). I told him that I had some powerful magnets back in my cubicle (NIB rare earth magnets, the most fun money can buy, check here if you want some).

      He held two of the magnets (product #2, see above site) up near his eyelid and that little piece of steel pulled that loose skin out about an inch! The guy yelped and immediately pulled the magnet away. Of course, a bunch of people heard the yelp and came to see what it was, and he had to repeat the stunt a few times to make everybody happy.

      Tugging a visible chunk of steel is one thing, but I seriously doubt that you could pull the hemoglobin out of your body, or at least any significant portion of it, even if they did say so on ST:TNG.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    2. Re:Yeah right .. reminds me of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Most of these magnets are surplus from computer hard drives."
      I thought so. Took apart a drive a couple years back and played with the magnets inside quite a bit and could not believe how strong they were.

  51. Build a house! by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 2

    Heck, 2 acres is a decent plot of land for a house. Plus you got a generator! How can you lose? Use the tower to put an access point up and you can have wireless all over your land, and charge neighbors for access :-)

    --
    There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    1. Re:Build a house! by jsimon12 · · Score: 1

      Do you have any idea how much diesel a 60kW generator uses in an hour? Hope you own lots of Shell stock ;) Heck if you are gonna run off a 60kW generator I think I am gonna buy Shell stock ;)

    2. Re:Build a house! by focuss · · Score: 1

      'Cept that you are probably on a mountain top with a crummy driveway and won't have many (any?) neigbors. But yeah sounds like a good place for a cabin nonetheless.

      --
      burnt sig
    3. Re:Build a house! by clovis · · Score: 1

      I really don't know, having never owned one, so I looked it up on google (Diesel gph) and got this:

      http://www.northerndiesel.com/aggreko/specs.html

      The web is a wonderful thing for finding stuff.

      It looks like 60kW would use ~6-7 gallons per hour, somewhat more than my present electrical bill as a 60 kilowatt hour unit would cost about $4.00 from the local powerco. Maybe you could open a used oil/cooking oil "recycling" center and make people pay you to burn it.

    4. Re:Build a house! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Put up a windcharger on that tower. Sell the surplus electricity to the utility company.

    5. Re:Build a house! by evil_one · · Score: 1

      It's for backup use and charging batteries.
      You certainly wouldn't use this all the time, that's what the grid is for.

      --
      Desperation is a stinky cologne
    6. Re:Build a house! by afidel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I just realized how small a 60kW generator is. Our backup generator has a 500 gallon tank and would only run for about 42 hours on a tank. So it must be able to do at least 120kW (this was for a recent summer power outage, running a datacent, 180 person office and A/C for the datacenter.) This generator is big don't get me wrong (about the size of a small semi) but something half that size is not what I invisioned when I heard 60kW.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    7. Re:Build a house! by erc · · Score: 1

      Exactly! For those who have never done such a thing, just think they know how it's done, you don't run a site off the generator. You use the generator to charge the batteries that power the inverters or whatever - it's *far* cheaper that way, and you don't have to run the generators for long - just long enough to bring the batteries back up.

      --
      -- Ed Carp, N7EKG erc@pobox.com PGP KeyID: 0x0BD32C9B What I'm up to: http://intuitives.mine.nu
    8. Re:Build a house! by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      my 6kW generator, for home use as backup power during outages (very popular in hurricane prone regions), is 4'x3'x3' and I can easily move it around by myself. I imagine 60kW wouldnt be much larger than 9'x6'x6'

    9. Re:Build a house! by turbod · · Score: 1

      The generator you see there in the pics was engineered to literally run indefinitely. Even the "good stuff" outside of the walls of many a data center now is cheap crap compared to the way heavy equipment used to be built.

      Even the best Generacs can't compete without hefty service contracts and routine maintenance, mainly because almost all standby generators are diesels now (piston engines wear much much much faster than gas turbines).

      TurboD

    10. Re:Build a house! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those fire crane choppers like Elvis, could be used decapitate the towers, then build a steel frame house atop.
      PCB Contamination would be worth looking for first, though.

  52. Me too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I reported the error on Sourceforge. Damn slashcode ;)

  53. die of boredom by SlugLord · · Score: 1

    Well it's good to know that I can continue playing Quake 3 after nuclear winter kills off all other life. With all that space I can live for a long time, and I wouldn't want to die of boredom.

  54. Friend bought one by Lewie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A friend who owns a paging company just bought one of these. I tagged along during the negotiation and purchase. They are indeed, as a previous poster put it, "hell for stout." The scale of the tower, building and microwave cones makes the whole thing seem like a toy. It's just that weird. The towers are huge, this one is a 100 ft free-standing, 30 ft on a side IIRC with 25 foot tall microwave cones at the peak and associated waveguide down into the concrete buildings. This is a smaller installation, but still has huge power service and infrastructure, neat-o VW diesel inline 6 backup generator and enormous battery supply (the size of a truck or so), later added hardline to the top, it was a hell of a deal (more so considering how difficult towers are to get up these days).

    What really boggles my mind is the BILLIONS and BILLIONS of dollars that went into building these things in the 60's. They are truly incredible, inside and out. Someone decided that there WOULD be long distance (and there was).

    --
    This sig washed every five years whether it needs it or not!
    1. Re:Friend bought one by djupedal · · Score: 4, Informative

      I worked on some of these (underground bunker types), as an Inspector (concrete/steel), during the early '70s. I recall at least one had to be abandoned due to several batches of concrete that failed strength testing in the lab. They simply covered it with dirt and moved over several hundred yards to begin again.

      They were heavily compartmented, and built much like a bank vault, where you have a box inside a box inside a box. There was at least one central cavity that was meant to be home for worst case attacks.

      As I recall, this was pre ATT, and they were built for ITT, under a government contract to provide domestic communications if WWW III (as stated) broke out. And yes, there was considerable money invested.

  55. The Dust Puppy Walks at Midnight by doublem · · Score: 2

    Now I and my friends can LARP the userfriendly.org story arc where they moved into a missile silo!

    Yes!

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    1. Re:The Dust Puppy Walks at Midnight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're just trying to infect me with the productivity virus by making me look through the UF archives again, aren't you?

    2. Re:The Dust Puppy Walks at Midnight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Productivity virus? You mean the UF cartoons will bore you so much, you'd have no choice but to go back to work?

      Juuust kidding, I felt like trolling.

  56. Re:OT Survive WW3, but not a good slashdotting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so can i post yet?.. oooh ,I get to choose what format this is it.. thats a start...

  57. Imagine the possibilities by eviljolly · · Score: 0, Redundant

    So could I hook them all up, then focus them at a single point to cook my hot pockets in a matter of a few seconds?

  58. Arr! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yee scurvy sea dogs are no match for yee slashdot effect.

    please mod me a troll, because instead of posting something about the article, i like to talk bout how a server will be temporary unavailable due to overwhelming traffic.

  59. Anyone actually seeing the site? by jsimon12 · · Score: 2

    I have been trying since before there were even replies in the comments section and I have yet to see anything more then the splash page sans images (via Google Cache). Anyone have any idea where these towers are? Are there any in Texas? The wife and I are looking for a country house and this would make a hell of a start. ;)

    1. Re:Anyone actually seeing the site? by djupedal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I worked on ones built in Northern Calif. To my knowledge, they were normally placed in the middle of no where, frequently without improved access roads, etc. The locations were generally picked with a bias towards line of site to the next tower, etc. Scenery and bubbling brooks were never on the shopping list. Just the occasional oak tree and rattle snake. But if you're living below the horizon, I guess the view from the kitchen is always uninspiring.

      I did concrete and steel inspection. One batch of concrete samples failed about a month after the main ceiling was poured (hot day and the cement trucks were waiting in line)...the result was that the contractor was held responsible, with the 90% completed structure being abandoned. They buried it and moved over a bit and built again. If you can find that site, you can get two-for-one. Look north east of Sacramento....about two hours out.

    2. Re:Anyone actually seeing the site? by ZPO · · Score: 1

      Here are the sites in Texas:
      (neg longitude means W)

      89122 BULVERDE BULVERDE TX
      Long: -98.4031
      Lat: 29.7275
      Site Acres: 2.54
      Bunker sqft: 22,088
      Land Status: Own
      Built: 1964

      89178 MIDLOTHIAN MIDLOTHIAN TX
      Long: -97.0270
      Lat: 32.4370
      Site Acres: 1.53
      Bunker sqft: 5,863
      Land Status: Own
      Year Built: 1969

      89200 RIO MEDINA RIO MEDINA TX
      Long: -98.8401
      Lat: 29.4333
      Site Acres: 19.40
      Bunker sqft: 18,310
      Land Status: Own
      Year Built: 1966

      89204 ROSENBERG ROSENBERG TX
      Long: -95.8497
      Lat: 29.5529
      Site Acres: 10.00
      Site sqft: 18,310
      Land Status: Own
      Year Built: 1964

      89217 VEGA VEGA TX
      Long: -102.2604
      Lat: 35.1294
      Site Acres: 5.89
      Bunker sqft: 18,658
      Land Status: Own
      Year Built: 1966

    3. Re:Anyone actually seeing the site? by kernel_panic · · Score: 1

      I'm down along the Rio Grande Valley, next to Mexico, and after seeing pics of the feedhorns, I know of one possible remote location that I happened to come acroos about 4 weeks ago on my way to McAllen. E-mail me for more info.

  60. Another example of why IIS, ASP and VB suck by jsimon12 · · Score: 1

    When will people learn? Don't get me wrong I am not saying a *nix box can not magically handle more load then it is designed for, but why is it ALWAYS these crappy IIS boxes that have intersting things on them and then get /.'d? Oh well, they will probably just beef up the site with even more Winblows boxes from their friendly Winblows distributer. Not to mention the page code, crappy ASP and VB script, give me an f/cking break.

    1. Re:Another example of why IIS, ASP and VB suck by sqldude · · Score: 1

      it usually has nothing to do with server software, its a pure bandwidth issue. The things that will /. a site are the [tens-| hundreds-] thousands of requests for images and stuff. Size of Image X number of requests = req'd bandwidth. This site would have gotten /.'d just as fast if it had been on a nix platform.

    2. Re:Another example of why IIS, ASP and VB suck by jmorris42 · · Score: 2

      Yup, when a *NIX site gets the /. effect it goes away, but differently. The *NIX site goes when the bandwidth is totally soaked and you just can't contact the victim anymore. NT sites fail sooner because they can still deliver up error pages just fine, but the system is overloaded.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
  61. I could use one of these bunkers by clovis · · Score: 1

    with tower and generator for my Tesla coil experiments.

  62. Re:microwaves kick ass. I smell a ham... by saskboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why would the power need to be turned up? Signals are signals right? We don't turn the power up on our Cat 5 because we're talk to Slashdot and eBay at the same time...

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  63. yeahbut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    complying with all the faa regs will cost ya, and don't ever let the blinky lights burn out. plus - greedy local municipalities see a revenue source in towers, they're starting to tax them. they think every tower belongs to a rich cell company.

    1. Re:yeahbut by thefalconer · · Score: 1

      Who gives a darn about the tower. We're talking 1800 square feet of reinforced bunker here. Just like those missle silos they were selling a year or so back. Can't knock it. You could lock yourself in and nobody could get you out. :) If worse came to worse, I'd just knock the blasted tower down or sell it to someone who could come in and just haul it away. Geez, that alone would pay for the place. :) That little bugger would be cozy in the winter and cool in the summer too.

    2. Re:yeahbut by knisa · · Score: 1

      I'd have to leave the tower up and mount a wind powered electric generator up top. Maybe toss on a few solar panels. Oh yeah, free juice for my super secret bunker.

      --
      This space for rent.
  64. Re:Thats a lot of pixels...imax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Luckily my IMAX monitor is arriving tomorrow.

  65. THE REAL QUESTION by buswolley · · Score: 1

    Could a structure like this be benificial in any reasonable way to set up an independant network to preserve the flow of information between slashdotters by hosting slashdot.. if the corporatized net bans /.

    --

    A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

  66. Read previous post and THINK !!!! by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 0, Troll

    So, we all hear about Wifi, local bands, high speed internet connection not available in most parts of the US....

    And now we see offered something we could use...

    Somebody makes the caculations for me, but a 60KW generator,equipment racks, feed horns, etc. could be used to make... a WIFI Internet Coverage, nation wide...

    Now, a 60KW transmitter could cover some range...

    If not WIFI, their is definetly the possibility to use another tech to spread the signal... and to use cheap transmiters to connect to the net wherever you are....

    So, It's 50 Million US$ for the towers, say another 50 millions to re-equip them all with blastingly powerfull WIFI transmitters and radar cupollas to catch users signals...

    I seem to remember that people used to invest Billions in Internet backbones... and not even for a national one...

    OK, I hereby Copyright this idea !!! You can join me in this joint venture, I bring the Ideas, U bring the capital, and we'll offer the US a decent national High Speed connection network in the Go ...8)

    Please contact me under this message if you have 100 Millions US in capital, and a wish to strike it richer 8)

    See me on Fortunes, Guys 8)))

    --
    It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
    1. Re:Read previous post and THINK !!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How would the nodes respond to the tower with all the wattage it would need to throw for this? I honestly don't think they could. I think that the tower wouldn't be able to hear individual nodes, and for that reason, this is impractical.

  67. Re:microwaves kick ass. I smell a ham... by ArcticChicken · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    We don't turn the power up on our Cat 5 because we're talk to Slashdot and eBay at the same time...

    Damn! So that's what I've been doing wrong!

  68. Security ex post facto by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

    Come to think of it, did these microwave transmissions have any encryption over the decades they were in operation? Were people able to sit on a ridge and collect credit card numbers and other dirt from the hundreds of phone calls flying through the air?

    1. Re:Security ex post facto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All you needed was a $1k Icom R7000 and some time.

    2. Re:Security ex post facto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recall reading backin the 80's that it was a well known fact that it was possible to sniff the "lines" and it was assumed that it often occured.

    3. Re:Security ex post facto by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      I recall a story floating around the nascent Silicon Valley back in the early 1980's that the primary telephone link between SV and the rest of the world was on a uwave link through SF. One of the side lobes of this uwave signal reached over to Nob Hill. The Soviets had a house there, and inside they had a sophisticated system monitoring telephone numbers. Any time they caught a number of interest, the recorded the call and transmitted it (via satellite in the house?) to Moscow. This provided a substantial amount of early high-tech business and technology data. They were supposedly eventually discovered and booted from the country. Don't know if this is true or not.

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
  69. Re:Call me one of no faith but . Microsoft had a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    World War III Simulator but had to take it off the market due to the present geopolitical climate.

  70. pedantry by MenTaLguY · · Score: 0, Troll

    I preffer my pressure in kg/m^2 thanks!

    Don't you mean N/m^2? kg are a measure of mass, not force.

    --

    DNA just wants to be free...
    1. Re:pedantry by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1
      Don't you mean N/m^2? kg are a measure of mass, not force.

      He should at least; the N/m^2, also known as the Pascal (Pa) is the SI unit for pressure.

      Since it is often impractially small, engineers will often talk about Mega Pascals instead (MPa) which translates nicely into N/mm^2.

      I still remember some of the values from school; plastic yield strength (don't know proper English term) of lowly 1311/1312 steel, 220 MPa...

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
  71. Building &/or Living UNDERGROUND by ivi · · Score: 1


    From local (Aussie) reports, as well as those
    from a remote centre (Coober Pedy, SA -
    also in .au), living underground can be GREAT!

    Just blow in some air (for life support); a lot
    of your heat will come up from the Earth...
    some claim to be enjoying 20 degrees (Celcius)
    all day - even in the Winter!

    Sell the 60 KWh generator, invest in a com-
    bination of wind & solar energy systems.

    Sounds great for Radio Hams as well as
    would-be wireless I'netters!

    Why not buy them & fix them up for use as
    affordable Geek Hostels (where is the IYH
    &/or AYH when we need 'em? ;-)

    New organisation: IGH - Int'l Geek Hostels

    1. Re:Building &/or Living UNDERGROUND by Ehldas · · Score: 1

      >From local (Aussie) reports, as well as those from a
      >remote centre (Coober Pedy, SA - also in .au),
      >living underground can be GREAT!

      Well, they don't have much of a choice in Coober Pedy : the temperature ranges from -4C to +55C, and underground it's 24C all the time. So, unless you want to spend an absolute fortune on heating and cooling, you pretty much have to live underground.

      Ehldas

  72. Ham radio clubs lining up... by LinuxHam · · Score: 2

    Seems like a perfect opportunity for amateur radio clubs to line up to purchase new facilities. In addition, these things seem great for building out a high-bandwidth microwave infrastructure to give hams VOIP.

    Great place for an APRS node, ATV repeater, or even just a regular old 2m or 440 repeater.

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
    1. Re:Ham radio clubs lining up... by ivi · · Score: 1


      And, to help bring in the $'s to keep
      the projects in the black, they could
      -also- build & use some cabins on the
      2 acres of land below as Geek Hostel
      residences &/or ham radio mini-camps!

    2. Re:Ham radio clubs lining up... by SteakandcheeseUm · · Score: 1

      Yeah Im sure they would enjoy the extra RF radiation that they will be absorbing from the repeater too!

  73. There's a good thing in this... by Newer+Guy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Back in the olden days of satellite communications, all satellites operated on the "C" band. The bane of C band was "TI". TI stood for terrestrial interference...and these towers were the culprits! As a secondary service (these towers were the primary service), satellites were limited to very low powers (5-10 watts), so C band dishes had to be very large to pick up such feeble signals from space. Now that these are being decommissioned, maybe, just maybe, C band's potential can finally be realized. I can think of many uses of this slice of 2-4 Ghz spectrum...though the Govt. is probably already salivating at the prospect of another spectrum auction.

    1. Re:There's a good thing in this... by evil_one · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not a chance pal.
      With DTH providers like Dish & DirecTV in the states (destined to be one company?) and Starchoice and Bell ExpressVu in Canada, C-Band is only for hobbyists. Having worked as a C-Band tech for years, I say this from experience, not conjecture.
      C-Band satellites have 24 transponders, Ku (what they use for DTH) have more, 30, 32 are not uncommon. Ku satellites can also be much more powerful. Anik F1, the Starchoice bird is capable of 120 watts. Most importantly, using MPEG compression on the DTH services lets one satellite carry what C-Band saw on 20 satellites, requiring C-Band customers to have an actuator arm, and usually a polarizer motor in the 'nose' of the dish.

      Customers are switching to 'little dish' because it's less of a set-up fee, lower maintaince, lower visibility. C-Band customers that cling to their big ugly dish have to maintain it and buy more expensive gear for it. (Here, a C-Band digital receiver runs 4 times the cost of a little-dish receiver)

      --
      Desperation is a stinky cologne
    2. Re:There's a good thing in this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. I find it hard to comprehend how the old AT&T microwave system could have been the "culprit" in C-band interference. The microwave emissions are on very narrow beams; any "interference" would be present only along a very narrow corridor directly between the towers. I could be wrong, but it doesn't seem to me that this could account for the widespread C-band interference that you described.

    3. Re:There's a good thing in this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, most people I know have no use for C-Band dishes because all the signals are scrambled...

    4. Re:There's a good thing in this... by mangu · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Ku-band satellites have more power and transponders because they are bigger, the limitation is in solar panel size, not in the frequencies used. Also, those transponder power figures are misleading. The newer satellites have big *maximum* power per transponder, but they cannot use all the transponders at full power at the same time, there simply isn't enough capacity at the solar panels.


      Ku is fine for broadcasting TV, in regions where there isn't too much rain. A good rainstorm will knock off Ku where C-band keeps going. One usually needs up to 8dB margin for rain attenuation alone in Ku-band, which means a 120 watt Ku transponder actually has as much useful power as a 20 watts C-band.


      For links with less bandwidth than video, where one can use smaller antennas, C-band is still the best.

    5. Re:There's a good thing in this... by evil_one · · Score: 3, Informative

      First off, you have not come close to touching my point - C-Band is no longer the mainstream for home satellite reception. That is now Ku-Band. Circular Ku for DBS satellites, and Linear Ku for wackos like StarChoice.

      As for the difference in satellites? Telesat has been launching dual C/Ku band satellites for a while now. Its latest bird, Anik F1, has 48 Ku and 36 C-Band transponders. Cool eh? 90% of the C-Band equipment installed in North American homes can only pick up 24 of those C-Band transponders.

      Anik F1's Ku can be reliably picked up with an 18" dish (I know through experience) and C-Band still needs a 6'er.

      As far as rain fade goes, yes. It is an issue with Ku band. the 5 minute breaks I've suffered 3 times in the past year have been horrible. I had to go read slashdot instead.

      None of this changes the fact that C-Band is becoming used less and less for home tv reception. Anik F1 is a prime example - All its C-Band transponders are currently in use are for commercial use, or use by the CBC, for cross-country satellite interviews, or for sending live feeds from one part of the country to another.

      --
      Desperation is a stinky cologne
    6. Re:There's a good thing in this... by mangu · · Score: 2
      I know a little bit about Anik-F1, Telesat outsources spectrum monitoring services to my company and we are just finishing installing an antenna to monitor that satellite.


      I agree that TVRO is mostly Ku these days, but that's due only to the smaller (and cheaper) reception antenna. The downside is that a more powerful transmitter is needed at the satellite to compensate for rain attenuation, and therefore a bigger and more expensive satellite, which takes longer to manufacture.


      Larger solar panels have another disadvantage: the satellite has to be a "three-axis" model, instead of a spinner. Being in a fixed position with relation to the sun means that electric charges accumulate and may eventually spark over, damaging the equipment. Spinning satellites are, by far, more reliable than three-axis.

    7. Re:There's a good thing in this... by evil_one · · Score: 1

      That's actually pretty interesting.
      Reminds me of something actually.
      Nimiq had just gone live for ExpressVu customers, and at that time, the company I was working for had one of the customer repoint contracts. I was taking a break in our office, watching starchoice, and suddenly our receiver starts cutting in and out. I thought that I had a receiver problem, and I wandered out into the store to grab another unit, but hey, our ExpressVu was doing it too... isn't that weird...
      So I make a phone call, turns out that telsat lost control of E2 and she was spinning.

      Well boys, break is over, you've got to do as many nimiq repoints as you can today...

      --
      Desperation is a stinky cologne
  74. Re:microwaves kick ass. I smell a ham... by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

    We don't turn the power up on our Cat 5 because we're talk to Slashdot and eBay at the same time...

    You aren't transmitting over 200 miles of free space either.

    More calls, more modulation, possibly *MUCH* higher average power.

  75. Ahem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thr Google cache *does* have the picture and working links. The only problem with using the links is the paret site is overloaded.

    Maybe you need to update yourself on what Google provides now.

  76. Heres the "real" story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.snopes.com/horrors/techno/cooked.htm

    Enjoy

    1. Re:Heres the "real" story. by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      The snopes article rightly points out that the 'cooked to death' story is bunk. Like the rocket car there is simply no way anything close to that could happen without leaving an indelible media trail.

      There is a considerably more likely story that predates the 'cooked' story by several years, I heard it in the 1980s. I strongly suspect that the cooked story is simply the result of successive embelishment.

      The story I heard was that a bunch of radar technicians out in Alsaka decided to play some sort of game (football?) on the patch of grass where the snow had melted in front of the microwave horn. Afterwards some of the men started to complain about eye problems and it appeared that the radiation had damaged their eyesight by slightly cooking their eyeball.

      This is actually quite believable since it does not take that much to dislodge gunk from the retina, iris etc causing it to float in the aqueous humour and disrupt vision. It can be caused by drinking too much strong coffee - as I discovered during my 2nd year exams.

      It is possibly apocriphal but I heard it in the radiation saftey lecture of a pretty well known radiation research lab as an example of what can happen if you do not treat all radiation sources with respect. I suspect that the cooked to death story is simply the result of successive tellings.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  77. anyone have price confirmation? really $25K avg? by gc2488 · · Score: 1

    Just wondering if anyone had more links and info about the microwave sites actually being for sale.

  78. Abandoned bell sites by aaronsb · · Score: 2, Informative

    Somebody posted an XLS document listing all their sites, both active and inactive. I graphed the data out and listed the geographical location of the inactive sites. Go to http://aaron.cyberfreakout.com/inactivebell.htm to view it.

    I would imagine that they're trying to sell the inactive ones...

  79. You're understating the bureacratic idiocy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The FCC won't grant a license for anything on an unregistered tower. If it's got a transmitter, the FAA will regulate it. Depending on where things are tower and airport-wise, silly things have to be lit according to the geniuses at the FAA. Things like a 20-foot pole surrounded by 50-foot trees, with a 30-foot streetlamp 40 feet away. And a 30-foot water tank surrounded by 60-foot trees, situated 100 yards away from 4 150-foot lit towers. And then there's the painting requirements. I'm sure they make sense to somebody with severe brain damage somewhere. And then there's the EPA and the environmental impact statements required for adding anything to the site, like an antenna. And if you're near a populated area, the professional worry-worts will sue you for imagined ailments caused by the nasty RF radiation. And the local tax man will expect you to help fill the coffers, after all, you've gotta be a rich cellular company if you have a tower. RF used to be fun.

  80. Canada? by psyconaut · · Score: 1

    I've been quite interested in abandoned missile silos for some time...and microwave sites seem equally as appealing. However, I live in Canada (eh?) and not the U.S. Anyone know of any leads for similar properties up here in the Great White North?

    TIA.

    -psyco

    1. Re:Canada? by satterth · · Score: 1

      I don't think there are many Silo sites is Canada, but there are more than a few Radar Sites. Check out the DEW Line projects around the 60's. The drawback of these sites are location. Who wants to go to Cambridge Bay, Nunavut or even Nudluardjuk Lake, Nunavut?

      --
      Being called a dork on Slashdot must be like being called the retard in special ed.
    2. Re:Canada? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, there are plenty of ex-radar sites in the southern half of Canada. Just go to http://www.pinetreeline.org/ to see exactly where these were. There's also ex BOMARC missile sites at North Bay, Ontario and La Macaza, Quebec.

    3. Re:Canada? by satterth · · Score: 1

      Has anyone seen stuff like this for SALE in Canada? I've seen stuff in the USA, but nothing up here.

      --
      Being called a dork on Slashdot must be like being called the retard in special ed.
  81. FOR SALE: Titan-1 Site, Colorado (Must Sell) by rMuD · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Selling a 3 Silo, 65k sq/ft 1 Mile Nuke Rated site, Near Denver... a Tour of a site 5 miles away Missle Silo Tour This site is the same design except that it hasn't been vandalized, has power, and is not flooded (except silo's) Comes with complete Plans Serious Inquiries Only misslesilo@lasers.org Must be sold before end of September, 2002 also 15k sq/ft underground storage at another hardened facility $2.50/ sqft.

  82. great for parties... by Tex+Bravado · · Score: 1

    Back in the old days at Tech, we'd fill up the picnic jugs with beer from Bob's keg, and go drive the back roads until we got stuck or ran out of beer. Sometimes we'd park by the fences of these places, climb over, and climb the tower.
    The best one was just north of Truth or Consequences; it was two towers,
    about 150 feet tall, about 20 feet apart, connected by a catwalk. We were all too afraid to walk across (only 2 jugs, and 3 or 4 of us) but we did crawl across. The perspective of looking down from up there at a Datsun pickup (I did say, old days) was truly boggling.

  83. See for yourself by evilempireinc · · Score: 1

    Technically an H-bomb, which uses fusion instead of fission, is more powerful. If you are curious about what would happen if your city was nuked, PBS has a blast mapper page.

    --
    we can rebuild this sig. we have the technology
  84. correction by djupedal · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry...north west of Sacto. Located just outside Dunnigan, in Yolo County, north of Woodland, Calif. At that time, it was really in the boonies, but today, I'm sure civilization has closed the gap.

  85. B.A.S.E. jump! by CvD · · Score: 1

    200 ft... cool... you could have your own personal BASE jump tower!

  86. Secret Nuclear Bunker by oniony · · Score: 1

    There's actually one of these jobbies in the UK that someone has bought and opened to the public. I visited two years ago and it's really fascinating. This particular one is diguised as a cottage (with a suspicious looking free-standing antenae in the garden. There were still the old computers (severely old), gas masks etc.

    I wouldn't fancy living there though. The water tanks and sanitation system looked questionable and it lacked any kind of homeliness. The prime minister's quarters was the best in there and was still rank.

    --

    Powered by onion juice.

    1. Re:Secret Nuclear Bunker by Memetic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not a micorwave relay site, that's just part of it!

      It was to be the seat of government for a post WWIII UK.

      The Bunker Website here has loads of info.

      Nice fact, all the defenses were designed to keep the general public out in times of strife and the one time it was fully stocked and ready to be buttoned up.... during our miners strike in the 1980's

  87. ::rolls eyes:: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ::bends over, pulls down pants::

  88. Hah! by wiredog · · Score: 2
    Wouldn't most people read the article before replying?

    Remember, you're at Slashdot.

  89. Iran, Libya... by wiredog · · Score: 2
    no arab nation has or is likely to have in the near future nuclear capabilities

    Read "The Making of the Atomic Bomb" by Rhodes. The hard part is getting ahold of weapons grade uranium or plutonium. I wouldn't be at all surprised if Iran or Libya had atomic bombs.

    1. Re:Iran, Libya... by arkanes · · Score: 2

      Actually, the even harder part is the delivery.

    2. Re:Iran, Libya... by TKinias · · Score: 1

      no arab nation has or is likely to have in the near future nuclear capabilities

      Read "The Making of the Atomic Bomb" by Rhodes. The hard part is getting ahold of weapons grade uranium or plutonium. I wouldn't be at all surprised if Iran or Libya had atomic bombs.

      Guys, repeat after me:

      Iran is not an Arab country.

      Iran == Persia; they speak Farsi (Persian).

      --
      In principio creauit Linus Linucem.
  90. Was This Public Property? by N8F8 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since AT&T/Bell used to be a monopoly, did the government help pay for and construct these sites? If so, how does a private company end up selling these?

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:Was This Public Property? by CrosseyedPainless · · Score: 2

      Monopoly != public.

  91. Re:microwaves kick ass. I smell a ham... by Nate+B. · · Score: 1

    Actually, the power to the feed horn remains constant whether there is one circuit in use or the system is at capacity. The radios used for analog microwave utilize Frequency Modulation, FM. The output power of an FM transmitter does not change as modulation is applied. The carrier deviation depands on two factors of the modulating signal, its amplitude and its frequency. The amplitude of the modulating signal determines how far above or below the center frequency the FM carrier will swing. In 2-way radio this is allowed to be a maximum of +- 5kHz. The frequency of the modulating signal determines how fast the FM carrier will swing between these two extremes.

    In an analog microwave system the transmitters are setup in such a way so as to take varying channel usage into account and so they will not exceed the allowed bandwidth when operating at capacity. Therefore adjustments of signal levels on the baseband frequencies is critical. Now, if you look at the baseband (which is nothing more than an evenly spaced set of single sideband AM signals stacked from 4kHz to some design extreme) as more channels come into use the envelope of the baseband gains in amplitude (power) for each channel that comes into use. The result is that the FM carrier in the microwave transmitter deviates more and its frequency of deviation will increase as well.

    The effect is that the power density of the RF envelope will decrease as the baseband reaches channel capacity, but this is already accounted for in the initial setup of the radio and design of the RF path between sites. Now, given that AT&T was using up to 50 mile (80 km) paths and our system is using paths about 30% to 60% of that figure, it's quite possible AT&T's system employed variable RF power to maintain a certain power density.

    With the equipment in use by the company I work for the output power of the radios is constant, typically 1 or 5 Watts at 6 GHz depending on the path. Also, our system is designed for a maximum of 600 channels considerably less than the AT&T Long Lines system, I believe.

    --

    "Insanity is doing the same thing over again expecting a different result."
  92. Fiber huh? by msheppard · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe some of that fiber should be run to whatever machine is hosting the website.

    M@

    --
    Krispy Cream is people
  93. Long Line Information by jwilhelm · · Score: 3, Informative

    AT&T Long Lines Places and Routes contains a list of Maps, Diagrams and Lists relating to the AT&T Long Line Bunkers.

  94. Buying it in the MA area by McFly69 · · Score: 1

    I am actually considering to purchase some property. Any idea if these bunkers could be lived in? If so, to whom or which department I talk about buying them? I tried to use the site, but it friggin hosed!!! Any idea/input would be appricated. Thanks

    --



    NO! NO! Please don't mod me, I'm too young to die a troll. *click* Oh the pain, the pain...
  95. drgibson cache with images .... by Carbon+Unit+549 · · Score: 1

    http://web.archive.org/web/20010606162657/www.drgi bson.com/towers/

    --

    nohup rm -rf ~/. >& zen &

  96. How can you even say that? by jsimon12 · · Score: 1

    Let me give you a little VB example, say a little VB script to take customer data and run a search, probably going to be at least 1 meg, while the equiv in perl is probably going to be at most 2k. They are going to use about the same in system resources. VB is a resource PIG, perl is no where near the PIG VG is. So if the system gets 1000 users and mister VB proggy requires 1 meg of memory but mister computer only has 512 meg, well you will be swapping something fierce. I agree a lot has to do with the sheer number of users, but take it from someone who works with web computers daily, Windows/IIS/VB/ASP they royally suck they are not really appropriote in the whole web sector (but if you want to belive all your Microsoft propoganda feel free), they are not even remotely effcient. Just go take a look at the size of a simple VB program then write the same thing in perl or C.

    1. Re:How can you even say that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I usually don't reply to such comments but this one needs it. As a person who works with web stuff daily myself, VB/IIS/ASP has its place. I personally know of a site that earns about 45K a month that is all VB/IIS/ASP. It handles thousands of users during the day and runs enterprise level web apps on it. The box is only a dual 550Mhz with 1G of RAM.

      Use what works for you. Who cares about a /. effect when your box can earn you 45K/month. /.'s don't happen every day to your machine.

      At least you can compile VB, Perl is interpreted and needs to load a PIG of a runtime also. Sure use PerlISAPI, but its just a big DLL that gets loaded like the vb runtime also. So in the end, it doesn't really matter there. Just use what works for you.

  97. That depends by wiredog · · Score: 2

    on where you're delivering it. Iran and Libya (and Israel) already have missiles that can reach most of the mid-east (and in the case of Libya, Europe). They also have aircraft that can carry the weapons. They may not have intercontinental capability, but then they don't particularly need it.

    1. Re:That depends by biohazard99 · · Score: 1

      Not Europe, France, Spain, Italy, and Portugal. If you speak a romance language as your primary, your world value drops several points in my book. They might hit Switzerland, by why would anyone want to attack the Swiss? Perhaps the French will enjoy the fact that it wasn't the Germans who lead to their demise and I'm sure the US Army would love to get even with Italy for that bastard of a pistol, the M92.

  98. Re:Was This Public Property? With that kind of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    logic I could have been going up in every shuttle mission since 1981.

  99. Better link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A better ham radio link for amateur radio types:

    www.rac.ca

  100. How serendiptous... by FatSean · · Score: 1

    Pardon the spelling. I just started Grad school at the university of new haven. As I walked to the 50's building that my class is in, there was a door on the back that said AT&T "Long Line"...I wondered what that meant. And here is Slashdot telling me about it. Wish that website was up so I could find out if that building is really next to one of these things.

    --
    Blar.
    1. Re:How serendiptous... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got a copy of the site before it was /.ed and it looks like there is something in Bethany CT.

  101. WRONG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's iHermet, dummy!

  102. Sounds pretty cool..... by jsimon12 · · Score: 1

    I always wanted something like this since I was a little kid and saw people moving into the abandoned Atlas missle silos or people living in caves. In the middle of no where would be cool, I have been living in the city for decades and it is getting old. I wanna get back to nature Green Acres style.

    1. Re:Sounds pretty cool..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look into Monolithic Domes.
      monolithicdome.com

  103. Diesels run for ever.... by jsimon12 · · Score: 2

    Hey I got a diesel VW car and a diesel generator at my country house, both have been running for YEARS with nothing more then a regular oil change. Diesel engines are built for that crap, to basically run forever with minimal maintance (hence they have no spark plugs and don't need tune ups like crappy gas powered gensets).

    1. Re:Diesels run for ever.... by operagost · · Score: 2

      Modern gas engines don't really need tuneups anymore either, except for the spark plugs you mentioned. They have electronic, integrated ignition. No points or spark plug wires. You still need to change air and fuel filters, bet they have those on diesels as well.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    2. Re:Diesels run for ever.... by turbod · · Score: 1

      Diesels don't run forever -- I define forever in terms of gas turbines, and to those, a diesel doesn't compare. Most gasoline car engines can last as long or longer than diesel car engines nowdays, save spark plugs. It's all about the software and the reduction of the mechanics down to the bare minimum to push valves and reciprocate pistons. Gasoline doesn't work as well in large trucks because gasoline engines can't grunt as long as a diesel (cylinder heating, spark knock, premature engine failure, that order). Diesels just aren't that useful in cars though, besides, they are slow and boring.

      Gas turbines probably have the biggest and most important jobs in our world, because they can develop peak hp continuously, 24x7, ie. look at a nice 747 or 737. Turbines! And before turbines, they used gasoline for airplane motors.

      Each motor has its place -- diesels in grunt work, gasoline in small, quick & zippy cars, and jet turbines, when you just have to have a 4000hp in a relatively small place with 100% availability (also, very small turbines are not very efficient).

      David

  104. Looks like a bargain to me by torklugnutz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This sounds even better than a Missile Silo

    First off, it's cheaper.
    Secondly, these are more conveniently located
    Lastly, it looks like there's a lot more of these than missile silos.

    For $25k, it's a cheap way to get a couple of acres with some improvments.

    --
    Often in Error, Never in Doubt.
  105. My Bust, Poorly Stated by N8F8 · · Score: 2

    I stated my question poorly. What I meant was that like the railroads, private companies were given a lot of assistance by the government. In many cased entire projects are funded with public money.Many under govenment contract. If this is the case with any of these hardened structures, shouldn't the public get somthing back?

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
  106. WTF? You have no clue. by jsimon12 · · Score: 1

    I am talking about compile perl buddy, it is a HUGE memory pig, and a space PIG with all those VB runtime libraries. VB is for people who can't program who want to do web stuff. The fact that a successful site runs on IIS/VB/ASP means nothing other then the site designers weren't thinking ahead adn wanted a quick fix, it is the site content that is making the money. My whole point isn't IIS/VB/ASP won't make money on the web, my point is it isn't a GOOD web solution (can we say security issues, performance issues etc etc etc), and compiled VB makes for some HUGE executable memory hogs. And why would you run perl on a IIS box? run it native buddy, in Unix.

    As for /.'s not happening everyday, you are right, but you SHOULD be prepared for them and the number one thing to do is NOT RUN IIS ;)

    1. Re:WTF? You have no clue. by InnovATIONS · · Score: 1

      The fact is that the majority of slashdotted sites are intentionally taken down in order to conserve bandwidth.

    2. Re:WTF? You have no clue. by jsimon12 · · Score: 1

      I don't know what errors you are getting on this AmericanTower.com site, but the ones I am getting are MSQL errors and Error 500 "Server Busy" errors. Pointing to a system deficency, not an intentional take down.

  107. I6 VW diesel with batteries? by hpulley · · Score: 1

    Sounds like 1/3 of a U-boat's engine room!

    --
    $#!^ happens, but why does it always have to happen to me???
  108. Mmmmmmm.... by warrior · · Score: 1

    congested hops

    congest-ed hopppppppssss ... argle,argle

    --
    Intel transfer the difficult from Hadware to software, for get more power, programmer need more technology. -- chinaitn
  109. Good thing they can work on them blind... by hpulley · · Score: 1

    If a tech. was brought in after some nukes had been dropped, he might well BE blind!

    --
    $#!^ happens, but why does it always have to happen to me???
  110. Somebody screwed up the list... by iforgotmyfirstlogon · · Score: 2

    I took the Excel list of all of the sites and pushed it into a data mapping program based on latitude and longitude. The following results I thought odd:

    - There are 15 in the middle of the Atlantic
    - There are 5 in Mauritania
    - There's even one in northern Mali

    Talk about your far-reaching communications network!

    - Freed

    --
    "Coffee should be black as hell, strong as death, and sweet as love." -Turkish Proverb
  111. CYIaBCoEAC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you imagine... a Beowulf cluster of extinct alien civilizations leaving behind Beowulf clusters?

  112. nuclear blast design criteria by mlas · · Score: 3, Interesting
    While browsing some of the supplied links, ran across this page, which is a summary of the design criteria the engineers used for these sites. The site vary in "hardness"-- that is, their ability to withstand a nuclear blast-- but the top level sites were designed to withstand:
    • 2 1/2 miles from 20 megaton blast
    • 1000 Miles per hour wind
    • 40 G shock wave
    • high velocity debris
    • Intense radiation, heat and electromagnetic effects

    Given that wind resistance for a given surface area increases exponentially (I think... been a long time since physics class), that 1000mph figure is astounding.

    Also this: "Above ground structure (microwave and troposcatter antennas) require at least two thirds of the structure to be below grade to prevent tilting or rotation". Does that mean these 200ft towers are rooted 400ft deep?
    --
    "Luck is the residue of design" --Branch Rickey
    1. Re:nuclear blast design criteria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With those winds, I could fly my house as if it were a big box kite. Just need to find a suitable anchor and rope.

  113. I have the list of sites and the info on them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are trying to get a list of sites, please feel free to contact me at sites@americantower.com. Thanks JR

  114. Fed Ex... by MountainLogic · · Score: 2
    Fed Ex. When you absolutely, positively have to deliver over night.

    Or for that matter a shipping container on a ship works just fine and leaves no return address.

  115. band together! by boskone · · Score: 1

    What if we all purchased them all, and used them to create our own backbone, then not have to deal with junk.

    sure, it's a huge undertaking, but an interesting thought. A philanthopist could do a lot for net privacy if they purchased these and held them so that we can build out the technology to have our own private, non snooped backbone.

    1. Re:band together! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you saying you want to open source them like that crazy save iridium movement (mirror) tried to do?

  116. talked to rep at american tower and... by spidah · · Score: 0

    there are only about 200-300 towers for sale, and they are the ones that have been designated as "surplus" towers. the list that was posted in one of the comments on here listed some several thousand towers. that list is all the towers nationally, but like i said there are only about 200-300 for sale.

  117. IMPORTANT INFORMATION by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 3, Informative

    After expressing interest in two sites, I received this email response:

    From: Ross Elder
    To: 'John Hoffman'
    Subject: RE: Sites of interest
    Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:44:03 -0400

    Please note that the message posted yesterday on Slash Dot is incorrect.
    American Tower Corporation has only a limited number of Surplus towers for
    sale that can be accessed by clicking "Sites For Sale" on our home page.
    These are the only towers that are for sale. Please also note that these
    Surplus sites are sold on a strictly "as is-where is", all cash basis.

    If the site you are inquiring about is not on the "Sites For Sale" list,
    then it is not for sale.

    If you are interested in a Surplus site, please contact me via email.

    If you are having difficulty accessing our website, please try again later
    as we were experiencing technical difficulties earlier today.

    Thanks,

    Ross Elder
    Senior VP/Development
    American Tower Corporation

    The actual list of available sites can be downloaded at:
    http://www.americantower.com/acweb/ATCSDMAREP02/Pu blic%20Reports/Marketing/AvailableSitesList.xls

    1. Re:IMPORTANT INFORMATION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some sites are listed as Leased and some as Owned.

      Does this change the nature of the sale?

    2. Re:IMPORTANT INFORMATION by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 2

      In that case, it's a ground lease. They will assign the lease to you on purchase.

    3. Re:IMPORTANT INFORMATION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks.

  118. Re:Slashdotted? - including their mail server!! by R2.0 · · Score: 1

    The following is a reply (auto-generated, I think) when I sent an e-mail to the inquiries address.

    "Please note that the message postedyesterdayon Slash Dot is incorrect. American Tower Corporation has onlya limited number of Surplus towers for sale that can be accessed by clicking "Sites For Sale" on our home page. These are the only towers that are for sale. Please also note that these Surplussites are sold on a strictly "as is-where is", all cashbasis.

    If the site you are inquiringabout is not on the "Sites For Sale" list, then it is not for sale.

    If you are interested in a Surplus site, please contact me via email.

    Ifyou are having difficulty accessing our website, please try againlateras wewere experiencing technical difficulties earlier today.

    Thanks,

    XXXX XXXXX
    Senior VP/Development
    American Tower Corporation

    Keep in mind that I DID NOT mention /. in my original email.

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  119. These Microwave towers operated BIG power.... by Newer+Guy · · Score: 2

    These towers ran with main beam ERP's (effective radiated powers) in the tens of thousands of watts. C band satellite transponders run 5-10 (yes that's five to ten) watts. The satellites were about 30,000 miles away as the crow flies compared to one of these towers being maybe 10-20 miles away. Trust me, there's enough RF scatter from one of these towers to make C band satellite reception almost impossible even if you're 180 degrees off the main beam.

  120. It helps giving the right information by jtara · · Score: 1

    They probably would not have been slashdotted if the original poster had given the right information.

    Only a small number of those sites are for sale. The map and search is for ALL sites. It appears that they rent space and/or offer other services at the other sites.

    If you look down toward the bottom of the page, there is a link for "Sites for Sale". However, that doesn't work right now, nor do most of the features on this page.

    Probably because they got slashdotted by people wanting to know how to buy sites that aren't for sale...

  121. think: total cost of ownership... by I'm+a+fscking+genius · · Score: 1

    i hate to rain on your parade, but...

    if you find a bargain from american tower and you seriously considering buying one of these wonderful structures for something like a ham radio or broadband isp site, make sure you know what you'll be paying every year after the sale.

    even if you pick one of these beasts up extraordinarily cheap, like for say, $25,000, your local tax assessor may still value it for a quarter million because other cell towers in the county may have recently sold for that amount. that may mean you're on the hook for a couple/few thousand a year in taxes.

    then think about insurance... what will you do when some drunken idiot climbs your 250-ft tower, falls off, and kills himself? (believe me, these remote places are the types of place that high schoolers seek out for their weekend activities...) when the family sues you into next year, you had better been paying your premiums on a $2,000,000 liability insurance policy... there's another couple thousand a year.

    then think about maintenance... that strobe at the top of the tower needs to be monitored on a daily basis and maintained... the tower will need to be inspected every few years... etc...

    sure, one could try to offset his costs by finding a lessee, but if these suckers were money makers, american tower wouldn't be selling one to you on the cheap...

  122. Galbraith by Max+the+Merciless · · Score: 1

    Public spending on technologically advanced systems, is necessary to the continuation of advanced industrial society. The "Defence" excuse is the easiest to make.

    It's all in The New Industrial State - J K Galbraith.

    --
    * * Always question "the National Interest" - 9 times out of 10 it is a cover for evil
  123. I grew up next to an AT&T cold war bunker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember growing up near a mysterious building off of Rt. 206 in Roxbury New Jersey. Acutally all we could see was the top of the concrete roof. We called it the "bunker" because nobody really knew what it was. Well...it turns out to be a former backup operations site for AT&T and a presidential relocation facitly. Check out this link: http://users.shore.net/~mfoster/Roxbury.htm for more information. I knew people that lived next to the site and they reported seeing armed guards partolling the fence (circa 1988).

  124. I still wait for something better.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A decommissioned missle silo, wish they come with free microwave tower

  125. Re:think: total cost of ownership...RealityMan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    strikes again.
    Damn good points brought to you by RealityMan.
    Now all I need to do is BAN tort cases and property taxes. Looks like its going to be a busy winter.

  126. Re:yeahbut^^^^ Super Secret with a 200 foot tower? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does that work?

  127. Errors in original Post-American Tower Correction by Joe+Ryan · · Score: 1

    Please note that the information posted Wednesday regarding sites American Tower has for sale is not accurate. American Tower Corporation has a limited number of surplus towers for sale. The list of sites can be accessed through our sites for sale list at http://www.americantower.com/mainweb/SitesForSale. asp. These are the only towers that are for sale. Please also note that these Surplus sites are sold on a strictly "as is-where is." If the site you are inquiring about is not on the "Sites For Sale" list, then it is not for sale.

  128. ATT selling these? by jpostel · · Score: 2

    Is the original poster sure it is ATT selling these? When I worked for Lucent, (right after it was spun off) someone told me a story about how ATT had sold all their microwave towers several years before because of the fiber network being in place. The person that sold them caught nine kinds of hell (and supposedly lost her job) because ATT was about to outfit them with cell station equipment.

    I think ATT sold them a while ago, but the company that bought them has to decided to sell them on the open market.

    --
    Ummm, Jon, aren't you supposed to be dead...? - Otter(3800)
  129. Last post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did I make it?