Slashdot Mirror


Japan Displays Prototype Robot Suit

anaesthetica writes "A project at Tsukuba University has produced a battery-powered robot suit designed to aid the wearer in strength-related tasks, like lifting heavy objects. The suit also has the capability of propelling itself, which is potentially useful for helping the handicapped or elderly walk. The optimistic professor who lead the project stated, 'Humans may be able to mutate into supermen in the near future.'"

239 comments

  1. We all saw what happened to the X-Men by NitsujTPU · · Score: 2, Funny

    Humans may be able to mutate into supermen in the near future

    This might be a problem for the humans involved though... We all saw what happened to the X-Men.

    1. Re:We all saw what happened to the X-Men by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but these will help us when the Neosapiens on Mars start to take over...

      Down with Phaeton!

    2. Re:We all saw what happened to the X-Men by DarthMAD · · Score: 2, Funny

      X-men? X-men nothing! What about "Khaaaaaaaaaaaaan!!!!!!!!!!!!!" ?

    3. Re:We all saw what happened to the X-Men by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

      X-Men? What about Family Guy where Peter would turn himself into a big pair of breasts...

      wait a minute.. HAIL JAPAN IN ALL OF ITS GLORY

    4. Re:We all saw what happened to the X-Men by njcoder · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "Humans may be able to mutate into supermen in the near future.'"

      Yeah... just like remote controls were able to mutate us into being able to control electronic equipment with our minds.

    5. Re:We all saw what happened to the X-Men by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      As Don Rickles would say, "Let me put it to you another way!"

      Your ass is grass, monkeys. This exoskeleton is nothing compared to what nanotech enhancements will allow.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    6. Re:We all saw what happened to the X-Men by nounderscores · · Score: 1

      Oh is that so JC? Well I guess Gunther and I will go and sit out on the scrap heap to rust then.

    7. Re:We all saw what happened to the X-Men by abuthemagician · · Score: 0

      "I feel like I have the strength of a bear who has the strength of two bears!" -- Marco Rodrigo Diaz de Vivar Gabriel Garcia Marquez

    8. Re:We all saw what happened to the X-Men by NitricEster79 · · Score: 1

      and I look forward to the day that I can command my nanobots to carry my shit to the tolite for me without ever getting up off my fat ass...because without a war...such things are likely to be used for equally as stupid things in our day to day life. Just wait, the second we start modifying the human body for the sake of becoming better than who or what we are....will be the second every church goer on the face of the planet writes his/her congressman stopping you and I from prolonging our life beyond what "god" has intended. But don't think for a second that will stop us geeks...we'll just do it in our basements anyway :-)

    9. Re:We all saw what happened to the X-Men by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      Actually the appropriate response is:

      "Yes, Master. I pledge myself to your teachings."

      (I just saw Star Wars.)

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    10. Re:We all saw what happened to the X-Men by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      Actually the nanobots will disassemble your shit IN your bowels and recycle the component chemicals to cure the cancer in your bowels as well...:-)

      That is, until you're transmogrified into a Transhuman who doesn't shit - because he doesn't eat - at all.

      Drexler said he'd be describing nanotech applications in contexts that would in fact be rendered obsolete by nanotech. Few people noticed that sentence.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  2. That's a transformer by udderly · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or does he look like a Transformer?

    1. Re:That's a transformer by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

      If by transformer you mean douchebag, yeah, he kind of does.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:That's a transformer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's a Centurion.

      Remember? They yell "CENTURIONS!" and plastic arms and weapons and things lodge themselves in the sockets on their arms.

    3. Re:That's a transformer by LordHugeMongus · · Score: 1

      OT but

      i believe that was "POWER EXTREME" with a nice echo.. and YES i wish i did not know this.

    4. Re:That's a transformer by BigJStudd · · Score: 0

      More like a nebulon component that turns into a he.. Nevermind.

    5. Re:That's a transformer by Rod.Dorman · · Score: 1
      Perhaps this model does but if you contemplate this phrase from the article
      detects muscle movements through electrical-signal flows on the skin surface and then amplifies them.
      You'll notice that this is a first step towards creating a Gundam.
  3. Handicapped people won't be helped by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It works by enhancing muscle movements. You move a muscle a little, the exoskeleton translates that into a much larger movement.

    Handicapped people (paras, quads) do not have muscle control in their handicapped limbs, so this exoskeleton can't help them.

    1. Re:Handicapped people won't be helped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not every handicapped person is a paraplegic or quadraplegic! I'm considered handicapped, but I can walk very short distances at a time.

      Some people, like you, seem to be mentally handicapped by choice.

  4. Rise of the Suits?! by ilyanep · · Score: 2, Funny

    It can also move on its own accord, enabling it to help elderly or handicapped people walk, developers said.

    Coming soon to theatres, Terminator 4: Rise of the Suits

    --
    ~Ilyanep
    To get message, take amount of carrier pigeons at each stage mod 2. Then decode binary.
    1. Re:Rise of the Suits?! by crymeph0 · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have extra arms than this suit. If that kind of thing pans out, we could create our own custom limbs.

      --
      It should be illegal to say that freedom of speech should be limited.
    2. Re:Rise of the Suits?! by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Now that you mention it, they call themselves Cyberdyne Corp. on the official webpage for an earlier model.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    3. Re:Rise of the Suits?! by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      That's pretty silly, but it says "Cyberdyne Inc." you moron. I'm just kidding! Please mod parent up -- I would myself, but I've already posted in this thread.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    4. Re:Rise of the Suits?! by The+Desert+Palooka · · Score: 1

      I thought we already had that premise in Terminator 3.

    5. Re:Rise of the Suits?! by goneutt · · Score: 1

      I thought the suits already controlled everything.

      --
      Bacardi + slashdot = negative karma.
    6. Re:Rise of the Suits?! by indifferent+children · · Score: 1

      What, you think you've got a shot at professional ski boxing?

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    7. Re:Rise of the Suits?! by Phil06 · · Score: 1

      What about The Ambushers, a 1967 Dean Martin Matt Helm movie. Jose Ortega, Big O arch-enemy, had robot assisted workers moving barrels around the XXXX brewery.

      --
      "...and yet, I blame society" Duke - Repo Man
    8. Re:Rise of the Suits?! by zmollusc · · Score: 1

      No, he just wants to play washboard and tour with Beck.

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  5. Obviously... by soupdevil · · Score: 5, Funny

    This optimistic inventor is not familiar with The Wrong Trousers.

    1. Re:Obviously... by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

      Funny, that was the very first thing that came to my mind when I read this item.

    2. Re:Obviously... by nsaneinside · · Score: 3, Informative

      For those who aren't familiar with it either, this is a Wallace and Gromit movie.

  6. First Generation Technology... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think I'll wait until they come out with the Ultraman power suit model.

    1. Re:First Generation Technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I consider this the optimal form-factor, personally. Ultraman is such a wussy.

  7. Using this technology for warfare. by CyricZ · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    How soon until various nations around the world start using technology such as this during attacks on other sovereign nations? Something like this could come in very handy when struggling against freedom fighters who employ roadside explosives and other such guerilla tactics.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:Using this technology for warfare. by Tyler+Durden · · Score: 1
      How soon until various nations around the world start using technology such as this during attacks on other sovereign nations? Something like this could come in very handy when struggling against freedom fighters who employ roadside explosives and other such guerilla tactics.

      How? The only things I can think of that help against such guerilla tactics are good armor and staying alert. Anyhow, who needs super strength when you have good ol' firepower?

      --
      Happy people make bad consumers.
    2. Re:Using this technology for warfare. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      The military been looking at this technology for years. With the open framework model featured in the article, handling explosives or doing hand-to-hand combat wouldn't be a good idea.

    3. Re:Using this technology for warfare. by westlake · · Score: 4, Funny
      Something like this could come in very handy when struggling against freedom fighters who employ roadside explosives and other such guerilla tactics

      the combat environment is more complex and demanding than the loading dock and you won't find power-ups hidden behind every crate.

    4. Re:Using this technology for warfare. by AZhun · · Score: 2, Informative
      Alright class, in ancient history there was this Science Fiction writer, Robert A. Heinlein...

      Besides the novella about the rise to power and eventual defeat of a despotic religious political movement in the US in REVOLT IN 2010, he wrote many other works.

      Unlike the movies and animated TV series adopted from the original work. Heinlein's original book, STARSHIP TROOPERS, had Johnny Rico wearing his Mobile Infantry Power Suite leaping over the enemy city with rocket assisted steps, looking at his heads-up display and tossing 25-second bombs ("I'm a 25 second bomb, I'm a 25 second bomb...") into crowded movie theatres. The Power Suite was what made the Mobile Infantry different from previous ground pounders

      It also went into a whole explaination of a new social order of Citizens and Residents left out of the recent entertainment video releases.

      Initial use in "hot areas" could happen in weeks or months.

      Two other fun reads from 60-70's and his younger reader phase are THE MOON IS A HARSH MISTRESS for computer assisted revolution and JOB: A DIVINE COMEDY to teach not taking things too seriously.

      --

      AZhun
      a bright tomorrow comes by new mistakes not by repeating the old ones
    5. Re:Using this technology for warfare. by Ian+Action · · Score: 1

      Handy against Freedom Fighters?

      --
      Why am I not rapping? I am rapping with you in a way.
    6. Re:Using this technology for warfare. by CyricZ · · Score: 1

      Yes, freedom fighters. Fighting against a despotic, occupying force, perhaps.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    7. Re:Using this technology for warfare. by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      They were working on somthing like this a while ago.

      Last I heard, it was a little buggy. I don't know if they ever rolled it out.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    8. Re:Using this technology for warfare. by rodgerd · · Score: 1

      ITYM "Revolt in 2100".

      But yes, certain of the themes could be interesting today.

    9. Re:Using this technology for warfare. by bm_luethke · · Score: 1

      the combat environment is more complex and demanding than the loading dock and you won't find power-ups hidden behind every crate.

      Maybe not, but if you carry your trusty crow bar not only can you silently off some guards but I bet you could even bust some crates and find ammo or a new weapon (maybe even more powerful than your old one)!

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
    10. Re:Using this technology for warfare. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Mobile Infantry (MI) suits from the Starship Troopers book was based on the stimulus from the person inside moving, which is what this device sounds like. It's a viable idea, and what I immediately thought of when I read the article.

      I wonder if the designers were able to make the suit work like the book. In the book, doing things in the suit, with the exception of jumping with the jet assist, was just like doing activities outside the suit. There was no learning to run the suit - it was natural. Although, in the book, Johnny said if he could find a suit that would allow him to scratch the spot between his shoulders, he'd marry it. I can see how trying to scratch your back with machine assistance might be a little problem.

    11. Re:Using this technology for warfare. by WillAdams · · Score: 1

      While I agree Heinlein's _Starship Troopers_ should be front and center in any such discussion, todays high-tech battlefield may not be very appropriate for such given advancements in sensor gear and weaponry &c. A Barrett XM-109 25mm sniper rifle would probably wreck the day of a guy wearing a powered suit.

      An interesting counter-example was Timothy Zahn's excellent book, _Blackcollar_ about a group of soldiers developed in lieu of using ``walking tanks''.

      William

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    12. Re:Using this technology for warfare. by AgentSmith · · Score: 1

      Mods: I left the topic back at Mars. Feel free to mod accordingly.

      To CyricZ,

      Freedom Fighters?

      More like Stupid Fighters.

      Lemme see. Totalitarian regime is toppled through
      a well meaning albeit severely decieved miltary force. Miltary force sets up government designed for and by the people freed from the Totalitarian regime. Miltary rebuilds destroyed infrastructure. Military force goes home.

      Simple right. No.

      Freedom Fighters who don't like the military force want them gone. So they start delaying the process for the miltary force to go home. SO THE MILITARY FORCE HAS TO STAY LONGER! DUH! Thus Stupid Fighters.

      The US miltary/Executive Branch wants this:

      Rebuild Iraqi infrastructure.
      Setup stable democratic government.

      That's it. Yes, yes I know. I live in a fantasy world which believes the military would ever leave Iraq. Well, I'm a US citizen. When these goals are accomplished. I and ever other US citizen who is sick of this war is going to diplomatically go screaming apeshit to the Executive and Legislative Branches (cause you can do that in a Democracy/Constitutional Republic or whatever you want to call it) and demand that every one of our soldiers is pulled from Iraq, since it is no longer necessary for them to be there.

      Yea, the US military invaded Iraq under false pretenses. Yes, the US military is currently occupying Iraq. Why would you halt the process that removes the US military from your country unless you are a former member of Saddam Hussein's regime, an Al-Queda operative, or someone with a bone to pick with the US military. When the military is gone, then do whatever the heck you want, since you have a stable government that yours!

      As a US citizen I understand that the war in Iraq whether justified or unjustified is a moot point. We are required to stay there until the two afored mentioned goals are met. The alternative is leaving behind a great many empty promises to the Iraqi people (even more empty than the ones now) and create and unstable environment in which even more vitrol filled anti US terrorist organizations will be created to be thrown against us. Having alot of people jobless, angry and without utilties or food distribution is not a way to leave anyone.

      As US citizen (if I haven't mentioned it numerous times before), a terrorists is someone who . . I dunno , SMACKS SOME PLANES INTO SOME OF BUILDINGS! **Haaaahhhh** okay got that off my chest.

      I don't know what you relative perspective is, but mine is that the majority of our armed forces over there want to genuinely help people out. Aside from those assholes in Abu Ghraib. Notice this.
      If the US military is such as despotic occupying force then why is it that we actually punished those abuses instead of letting them go on like the former Totalitarian regime did?

      Why are we as a nation concerned about that? Maybe because some people might actually give two shits? I mean even in this war for oil travesty, isn't the US military doing a better job? Albeit, if the miltary was doing a great job there wouldn't be any abuses what so ever.

      I'm sure if you are in the knee jerk Anti-Bush viewpoint that you'll schluff this off and go on with your life. But I don't like Bush or his administration either. If you are in rational disagreement with what I have said I'm curious to hear your opinion and justification. I've barely mentioned many confirmed facts, so feel free to post any contrary credible information.

    13. Re:Using this technology for warfare. by CyricZ · · Score: 1

      I never said anything about America or Bush. You did. Why are you going on such an anti-American rampage?

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  8. Discussed Previously by heli0 · · Score: 1
    --
    Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
    1. Re:Discussed Previously by mboverload · · Score: 1

      Stop it! You are going to make Slashdot Slashdot itself!

    2. Re:Discussed Previously by Dan+East · · Score: 1

      The photos are quite different from those shown by New Scientist. This newer suite also reinforces the arms, where the New Scientist model is only legs and torso. Also the motors in this new suite are much smaller and don't stick way out the sides.

      Dan East

      --
      Better known as 318230.
  9. Why dont the use EAPs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    All this stuff is based on motors ... why not use EAP's instead (electro activated polymers)? I understand we have very good ones now that are superior to even human muscles and more weight / power efficient than motors. Would make the system less bulky and more fluid/without rigid parts.

    1. Re:Why dont the use EAPs by bobbyw · · Score: 1

      I think it's fair to say we know more about motors, and they are less expensive :)

    2. Re:Why dont the use EAPs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that had everything to do with power. IIRC, those things are now working pretty good but have fairly high amp demands; whereby motors make a smarter choice.

      Seems like we have so many technologies just waiting in the wings for power breakthoughs....

    3. Re:Why dont the use EAPs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, they suck, they are nowhere comparable to real muscles. I haven't checked their strength, but they have long cycles (contract, stretch, contract) and need a lot of power.

      I'm far from an expert in the matter, though. I like air muscles, they are neat :)

  10. I dunno... by ScentCone · · Score: 5, Funny

    If that guy can't pick up that small Japanese woman anyway, then that suite better do a lot of other stuff, too.

    But since she's not that much of a payload, the pictures might as well be of a guy wearing a Stormtrooper costume doing deep knee bends.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re:I dunno... by terrab0t · · Score: 2, Funny

      My thoughts exactly. I want to see the samll Japanese woman put on the suit and pick him up. Better yet, I want to see her pick up a car, or a 16 foot tall egg-laying alien queen.

    2. Re:I dunno... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Funny

      If that guy can't pick up that small Japanese woman anyway, then that suite better do a lot of other stuff, too.

      Have you not seen Japanese anime before? The dorky guy always gets his butt kicked by the schoolgirls. The dorky guy needs a power suit to protect himself when tangling with the opposite sex.

    3. Re:I dunno... by Gonarat · · Score: 1

      I was wondering when someone would bring up Aliens. This is the first thing I thought of until I read the article. Ripley used an industrial version of this type of suit in that movie. The "suit" was a cross between this type of device and a forklift, and was used (when not fighting aliens) to move freight on the ship. Although the suit in the article is much smaller, it looks like it could be used for loads that are too heavy for a normal human, but too small for a fork lift.

      --
      Beware of Sleestak
    4. Re:I dunno... by Archades · · Score: 0

      and a whole new era of hentai was born

    5. Re:I dunno... by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      my problem with the picture is that everything is strapped to the guys torso/arms/legs.....and the leg/arm assistant components only reach to his ankles/wrists.

      show me the loading dock exo-skeleton from 'aliens' and I'll be impressed. This guy is going to break his ankles if he dates larger women... maybe if they put some feet on it, he'll be able to carry his woman across the threshold with more than stumpy nubs left at the ends of his legs.

      And who would dare fight the alien queen in any color other than caution-tape yellow?

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    6. Re:I dunno... by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

      If it takes a robotic suit for a geek to pick up women, then a robotic suit it is, regardless of strength and weight.

      --
      EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    7. Re:I dunno... by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 1

      But since she's not that much of a payload, the pictures might as well be of a guy wearing a Stormtrooper costume doing deep knee bends.
      It's not quite a stormtrooper, but it's close

    8. Re:I dunno... by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      That's good.

      Thanks to those herbal pills I just ordered from that e-mail, I'll soon have loads too heavy for a normal human.

    9. Re:I dunno... by magetoo · · Score: 1

      The demonstration makes more sense when you consider that the Japanese have been looking into this kind of technology for the purpose of health care. Even if you are perfectly able to lift a "small Japanese woman" with only moderate effort, doing that maybe 10-20 times a day, five days a week for 15 years is a different thing altogether.

      I believe that is why we see the references to "an aging population" and "technology geared toward the elderly" at the end of the article as well.

      And that's why he's lifting a person, and not a heavy crate. For the "Alien" scenario we already have forklifts. (And they work now.)

    10. Re:I dunno... by magetoo · · Score: 1

      If you look closely at the larger size version of the right hand photo, you can see that it appears to disappear down into hos shoe; so it makes sense to assume it would already have feet. Either that, or it's attached to his heel, which isn't likely.

      (Show me the loading dock exo-skeleton from "Aliens" and I'll say "Well, I can get a forklift for 1/1000th of the price...")

    11. Re:I dunno... by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      You're right, of course. But there's just something about the general atmosphere of almost any Japanese technology demo that seems to bypass any normal industrial sensibilities, and goes right into Anime-land. I'm not from that culture, so I Don't Get It sometimes, I think.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    12. Re:I dunno... by mink · · Score: 1

      Watch Roujin Z for a movie about the elderly and the introduction of a "bed" that takes the place of a traditional nurse.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  11. scary by Eric+Smith · · Score: 5, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new geriatric and quadriplegic robot-suit overlords.

    1. Re:scary by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      Many years ago, back when the Sci-Fi channel had Anime Saturdays, they would run an anime movie or two in the morning. One movie, which I no longer can remember, featured a sophisticated robotic 'nanny' type device for geriatrics. It was a bed that could roll, walk, get food, etc. thanks to an AI. All I remember about the plot was that the bed of some old man either thoughut it was his wife, or it was his wife's brain or something and it took him through the city - destroying it in the process - to the beach.

      Anyone have any idea what that movie was? I thought it was great at the time...

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    2. Re:scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like Roujin Z.

    3. Re:scary by tb3 · · Score: 1

      I think you're looking for Roujin Z.

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    4. Re:scary by GrievousMistake · · Score: 1

      Oh, yeah. From the article:
      It can also move on its own accord

      Spooky! :|

      --
      In a fair world, refrigerators would make electricity.
    5. Re:scary by mink · · Score: 1

      In Roujin Z (the film you describe) the Military was using the elder care program to experament with features they planed on using in robotic weapons systems. The fight as the bed was trying to take him to see the ocean was when the military decided to pit one of their combat prototypes against the bed after it had displayed use of some of the advanced military features (melding withthe forklift as I recall).

      My favorate thing in that film is the group of elderly geeks/hackers inthe old folks home.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  12. for men by warrior_s · · Score: 0

    never pee while wearing that suite ;)

    1. Re:for men by juaja · · Score: 1

      I would be much more worried if someone wears it while, uhm, satisfying him/herself

      --
      I HAVEN'T OWNED A TELEVISION SINCE 1967 AND ONLY WATCH MOVIES ABOUT LEFT-HANDED ALEUT LESBIAN PIPEWELDERS! FUCK HOLLYWOO
  13. Mod Parent (-1, Lack of Reading Comprehension) by merreborn · · Score: 4, Informative

    It works by enhancing muscle movements. You move a muscle a little, the exoskeleton translates that into a much larger movement. Handicapped people (paras, quads) do not have muscle control in their handicapped limbs, so this exoskeleton can't help them.

    FTA:

    The 15-kilogram (33-pound) battery-powered suit, code-named HAL-5, detects muscle movements through electrical-signal flows on the skin surface and then amplifies them. It can also move on its own accord, enabling it to help elderly or handicapped people walk, developers said.

    Thanks for playing.

    1. Re:Mod Parent (-1, Lack of Reading Comprehension) by King_of_Prussia · · Score: 1

      Do you really think that most tetraplegic people are that way because their muscles just stopped working? It's because the electrical signals aren't getting there in the first place, not selective muscle death.

      --

      Making the moon less necessary since 1998.

    2. Re:Mod Parent (-1, Lack of Reading Comprehension) by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 1

      Woot KoP

      --
      "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
    3. Re:Mod Parent (-1, Lack of Reading Comprehension) by King_of_Prussia · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Do I know you sir? Or are you an inhabitant of the USian town I (unwittingly) named myself after?

      --

      Making the moon less necessary since 1998.

    4. Re:Mod Parent (-1, Lack of Reading Comprehension) by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 1

      A inhabitant of a borough near you that begins in Narb... :)

      --
      "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
    5. Re:Mod Parent (-1, Lack of Reading Comprehension) by King_of_Prussia · · Score: 1
      Perhaps you misunderstand. I used the word "unwittingly" in parenthicals to indicate that I had no knowledge of the town King of Prussia before choosing it as my online name. I am also unaware of any locations near to my physical location that begin with Narb.

      --

      Making the moon less necessary since 1998.

    6. Re:Mod Parent (-1, Lack of Reading Comprehension) by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected.

      --
      "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
  14. Stephen Hawking by wattersa · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Stephen Hawking by springbox · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, The Onion is into the business of making accurate predictions about as well as a lightbulb factory is at making hard drives.

    2. Re:Stephen Hawking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GE makes hard drives?!?

    3. Re:Stephen Hawking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, after a bit of research Matsushita (also known as Panasonic in the United States) makes light bulbs and hard drives. Although it appears that while they do make these items, their major business is in making parts for them.

      As I understand, they have a fairly strong vertical monopoly, although not as strong as the one Mitsubishi is famous for. When Mitsubishi makes products, they really don't have to contract anything out. Let's examine a mitsubishi TV: Mitsubishi mines the metals and drills the oil. They produce the machines to do the mining and drilling. Mitsubishi provides the hospitals which their employees go to when sick. Mitsubishi sets up the schools and education facilities to train employees and their children. Mitsubishi runs the real estate agency which they purchase land to mine and set up factories on. Mitsubishi runs an insurance company, which they no doubt use for internal coverage. Mitsubishi has it's own IT company to coordinate all these divisions. Employees have to eat: Mitsubishi has a foods division. Mitsubishi runs chains of hotels, and guess where Mitsubishi execs stay when traveling. Warehousing, travel and recreation, banking, commerce research, elderly care, pulp and paper for packaging and internal paperwork. Guess who runs the powerplants that run the whole thing? Guess who does all the repairs and service at all levels... I'll give you a hint... it's a division of Mitsubishi. Chemicals, glass, transportation. Hell, they're even in nano and bio technologies just to keep ahead of the game. It seems that the only thing Mitsubishi doesn't have a hand in is the creation of media: They don't have the vast music and movie libraries that, say, Sony does. Oh, but somehow I couldn't find mention of Mitsubishi making hard drives, although they do make light bulbs of all different types.

    4. Re:Stephen Hawking by magetoo · · Score: 1
      Didn't The Simpsons also make that particular prediction?

      Anyway, according to Wikipedia:Motor_neurone_disease, ALS affects the nerve cells so this particular technology wouldn't help Hawking anyway, it seems.

  15. Be careful, though. by Eric+Smith · · Score: 4, Funny

    Make sure the inhibitor chip is well-protected.

  16. Fogeys in Robot suits by sssmashy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Japan has seen a growing market for technology geared toward the elderly, who are making up an increasing chunk of the population as fewer younger Japanese choose to start families.

    A government report last week showed that pensioners made up a record 19.5 percent of the country's population in 2004 and that the ratio will grow rapidly, surpassing 35 percent in 2050.

    Did anyone else shudder at the image of senior citizens ambling down the street in robot suits? Just imagine the damage potential.

    1. Re:Fogeys in Robot suits by forkazoo · · Score: 1
      Did anyone else shudder at the image of senior citizens ambling down the street in robot suits? Just imagine the damage potential.


      Bah, don't worry about it. They won't make it past ten miles an hour, regardless of what the suits can do. I'm more worried about the damage potential of a kid of the punk-ass variety.
    2. Re:Fogeys in Robot suits by Mephiska · · Score: 1

      In 50 years they will have one million Centarians (economist.com).

    3. Re:Fogeys in Robot suits by rubycodez · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've already barely survived decades of them ambling down streets and highways inside of their 3 to 4 ton Cadillacs, how is this worse? And even more fearsome are impatient young male Chicago bus drivers in 15 ton WMD.

    4. Re:Fogeys in Robot suits by Lord_Breetai · · Score: 1
      Did anyone else shudder at the image of senior citizens ambling down the street in robot suits? Just imagine the damage potential.

      They're way ahead of you: http://carnage.fanfic.org/roujinz.html

      --
      "You are only young once, but you can be immature forever." -www.animemusicvideos.org
    5. Re:Fogeys in Robot suits by dangitman · · Score: 2, Funny
      Did anyone else shudder at the image of senior citizens ambling down the street in robot suits? Just imagine the damage potential.

      Yeah, and they're always walking too slowly in front of you, with the turn indicator stuck on.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    6. Re:Fogeys in Robot suits by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I saw a documentary about this once. Pretty frightening stuff.

    7. Re:Fogeys in Robot suits by sandmaninator · · Score: 1

      At right I read that as "ambling down streets and sidewalks" ... which would be about right.

  17. I'll take two... by rivaldufus · · Score: 1, Interesting

    We're moving this weekend, and this will certainly help on moving the washer, dryer, fridge, and couch.

    1. Re:I'll take two... by HermanAB · · Score: 3, Funny

      There is an easier way - divorce - the wife will keep the house and all the crap and you can just walk to your new pad...

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    2. Re:I'll take two... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Well, Honey, I wanted to give you a gift, but I wasn't planning on spending much!"

  18. Aliens by Spoonito · · Score: 1

    As long as next they invent a queen alien so that you can wear the robot suit and say "get away from her, you bitch!"

    --
    "show me all the blueprint show me all the blueprint show me all the blueprints"
  19. Bubblegum Crisis? by kusanagi374 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That sounded to me pretty much just like the kind of hardsuits that the Knight Sabers wore in Bubblegum Crisis. You'll know what I'm talking about if you've watched the anime.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bubblegum_Crisis

    1. Re:Bubblegum Crisis? by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Indeed, even parts of the real hardsuit looks like they were designed by Kenichi Sonoda (The character designer/mecha designer of Bubblegum Crisis). Maybe the engineers got the inspiration from Bubblegum Crisis itself.

      --
      Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
    2. Re:Bubblegum Crisis? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      Yes, but those hardsuits actually LOOKED good. I won't accept "suits" that give you strength by hindering your mobility.

    3. Re:Bubblegum Crisis? by mink · · Score: 1

      Unless these are to be used to combat rampagin boomers, they will be more like the care beds in Roujin Z.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  20. It Should Be Popular.... by Steve+B · · Score: 4, Funny

    It demonstrably helps the wearer pick up women.

    --
    /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
  21. Finally by MrNonchalant · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now I can be stronger and look more like a dork at the same time! Woohoo! Booyah.

    On a related note, check out the Japanese booth babes on the slide show.

    (Just kidding honey, if you're reading this.)

  22. Uses... by Jambon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sweet! So does this mean I will finally be able to do the robot right? Domo arigato, Mr. Roboto....

  23. In related news... by bobcat7677 · · Score: 2, Funny

    In related news... The creators of the HAL-5 mechanical suit mentioned their upcoming upgrade codenamed "HAL-9000". Possible new features included artificial intelligence taking care of the user's every need with voice activation...

    1. Re:In related news... by NeuroManson · · Score: 2, Funny

      Open my fly please, HAL.

      I'm sorry Dave, I can't do that.

      C'mon HAL, I really gotta go!

      I'm sorry Dave, you should have thought of that before we left.

      HAL, you're really starting to piss me off.

      And so on and so forth, until Dave is electrocuted when he finally loses control of his bladder ("My God, it's full of sparks!").

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  24. Using this technology for police work by nounderscores · · Score: 2, Interesting

    On the other hand, you could put heavy polycarbonate armour on it and make your riot cops safer.

    1. Re:Using this technology for police work by x3ro · · Score: 1

      How would that make riot cops any safer? Surely they would way more dangerous with such suits.

      --
      [ UNSIGNED NOT NULL ]
    2. Re:Using this technology for police work by Dr.+GeneMachine · · Score: 1
      Thank you Sir, for clearly stating your affiliation. Please stay calm and wait for the black helicopters to pick you up for an extended... interview. Thank you for your cooperation.

      Dept. of Homeland Security

      --
      This comment does not exist.
    3. Re:Using this technology for police work by EnderWigginsXenocide · · Score: 1

      Or, you could arm the cops with rail guns

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups. -- 0 1 My two bits
    4. Re:Using this technology for police work by Chrontius · · Score: 1

      Or, face-hardened RHA steel, or ceramic plates, or... Hey, maybe we could call it the Mjolnir Mk.1?

  25. Semi-useful by cavemanf16 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But this isn't going to be intuitive enough for many tasks I think. What we need is something similar to the "power suit" in Aliens, but without having it so directly attached to the wearer of the suit. In other words, my muscular motions should be interpreted within microseconds and the suit responds accordingly. To me it would only feel natural if walking around in a 2-ton suit of metal parts felt exactly the same as walking around in 2-pounds worth of clothing.

    1. Re:Semi-useful by GameMaster · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not sure if you RTFA but they don't explain it quite as well in this one as they do in the last one slashdot posted about this suit. They mention that this suit measures the slight magnetic field generated on your skin when your brain tells your muscles to do something. In the previous article slashdot posted about this suit they mentioned that using this interface they can actually make the suit respond faster than your own muscles can respond to the message being sent by your brain. At that point they should have no problem making the suit feel non-existant as you wear it.

      -GameMaster

      --

      Rules of Conduct:
      #1 - The DM is always right.
      #2 - If the DM is wrong, see rule #1
    2. Re:Semi-useful by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but I guess I forgot to mention how I don't like how basically it's still the human's feet touching the ground, the humans hands touching the objects, etc. So stomping on an ant with the force of Mack truck powered by this suit would do you no good as it liquified every bone in your foot from the impact force. I'm just trying to point out the fact that this is Good For Old People or disabled people, but not good enough for every slashdotter's Mechwarrior wet dreams.

    3. Re:Semi-useful by GameMaster · · Score: 1

      Its hard to tell in the picture, but I would assume that the exoskeleton is attached to metal soles embedded into the soles of the sneakers the guy is wearing in the picture. Thus, the force of any weight would be transferred to that artificial foot instead of his foot. At least, this is how the exoskeleton legs designed at UC Berkley work. As for the hands, this was brought up by someone else here and I have to agree with that assessment. Without Some sort of mechanical hand/gauntlet he wont be picking up cars with his hands. On the other hand, pun intended, he can carry extremely heavy loads in his arms or on his back.

      As was mentioned in this article, and past articles, the primary intention of this suit is for elderly individuals. As long as that person wasn't suffering from something like osteoporosis (which, unfortunately, excludes a decent number of elderly people) this suit will still let them overcome simple lack of muscular strength.

      What I want to know is whether this suit will be useful for people suffering from degenerative neurological disorders like Parkinson's disease. My grandfather is suffering with Parkinson's which means that his brain is getting worse and worse at sending control messages to what muscles he has left. There is a long shot that this suit might be able to pick out the actual intended signal coming from the brain of the person wearing it and ignore the noise coming from the Parkinson's. That might allow my grandfather, and any other family members that end up inheriting the Parkinson's, to continue walking once the disease starts to really set in.

      -GameMaster

      --

      Rules of Conduct:
      #1 - The DM is always right.
      #2 - If the DM is wrong, see rule #1
  26. Lift "heavy loads" by Ghostgate · · Score: 5, Funny

    I like the picture caption that says the robot suit will help you lift "heavy loads", while the picture shows the guy carrying a woman. I'm sure she will be thrilled to find herself described in such a way. ;)

    1. Re:Lift "heavy loads" by albieomoss · · Score: 1

      I think a 5 year old child would be considered a 'heavy load' for the average Japanese man. I'm just going by the size of their penises though.

      --
      DankLogic - There is a system to everything.
    2. Re:Lift "heavy loads" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, at least there wasn't a translation fudge and she ended up getting called a "wide load" :D

    3. Re:Lift "heavy loads" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROTFL! ... Not even an AC. I'll be smiling for days. Thanks. :)

    4. Re:Lift "heavy loads" by fbjon · · Score: 1
      Japanese penile material is supposedly harder though.

      Disclaimer: no personal experience, female hearsay, turn right at third crossroads.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    5. Re:Lift "heavy loads" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid comments...

      The point is you can carry thing more than 40kg without any power.
      You just need to try to move your hand upward.

  27. Saving lives would a nice use.... by erick99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That article says that the suit can "move on it's own." I wonder if such a thing could eventually be used to get, for example, an unconscious firefighter out of a burning builder, etc. Now that would be a great use of technology.

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
    1. Re:Saving lives would a nice use.... by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      I just hope that it can push the elderly down stairs. With the elderly becomming a larger sgement of the Japanese population, SOMETHING needs to be done.

    2. Re:Saving lives would a nice use.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is the builder on fire, and what was the unconscious firefighter doing in him to begin with?

      This is all sounding very fishy...

    3. Re:Saving lives would a nice use.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doubtful, it would need a computer dedicated to maintaining balance, which would be unnecessary whenever a human used it (we have one included, and we call it 'brain'). Frankly I think cyborgs are the way to go. Think 7 of 9.

    4. Re:Saving lives would a nice use.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      move on it's own

      "its".

  28. The tide is turning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...a whole new chapter in the jocks vs. nerds war.

  29. elders by thenewcloo · · Score: 1

    Why is it that all Japanese inventions are intended "to help the elderly"?

    1. Re:elders by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Because Japan is going to have more old people than young people. It's a serious problem since two-third of the nation will be retired in the near future. It's very unlikely that elderly Japanese citizens are going to put aside their attitudes towards other ethnic groups to allow non-Japanese workers around them. Thus, all technology is being devoted to the elderly.

    2. Re:elders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Korea, only old people are as fat as fucking land whales.

    3. Re:elders by sturat · · Score: 1

      It must be a cultural thing. In Japan, people appreciate the wisdom and experience that comes with age. In Canada, an invention such as this is seen more for its potential in the area of bear-wrestling:

      http://www.cbc.ca/stories/2001/12/11/bear_suit0112 11

    4. Re:elders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only a retard picks on fat people. Don't you think you need to grow up?

    5. Re:elders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only fatties pick on retards. Don't you think you need to grow up?

    6. Re:elders by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Hey! It's my fan club! I was starting to miss you! :P

  30. I just hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hope the suit is not able to execute a virus that forces one to punch himself repeatedly or jump out a window and run down the road like Steve Austin.

  31. Crazy japanese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can it take upskirt photos on subways?

  32. Supermen? by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 5, Funny

    Humans may be able to mutate into supermen in the near future

    Ironicly, I just got Viagra Spam that used that exact same phrasing...

    --
    "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
    1. Re:Supermen? by grimJester · · Score: 1

      Humans may be able to mutate into supermen in the near future
      ---
      Ironicly, I just got Viagra Spam that used that exact same phrasing...


      Reality is getting closer to hentai anime than science fiction. A frightening thought, yet strangely compelling.

    2. Re:Supermen? by slcdb · · Score: 1

      Ironically? No. Coincidentally? Yes.

      What is ironic is how many people, like you, use the word "irony" incorrectly.

      --
      Despite what EULAs say, most software is sold, not licensed.
    3. Re:Supermen? by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 1

      Dude, I can't even spell it correctly, you want me to use it correctly, too? Sheesh!

      --
      "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
  33. Handicapped people don't have those signals by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Unless it's tapping directly into their brains (which it isn't), those signals aren't getting transmitted to the point where handicapped people will be allowed to walk.

    I suppose if you expanded the group of "handicapped" to include those suffering from polio and other diseases that result muscular dystrophy, then I can see this argued, but paraplegics and quadraplegics are not going to be helped, despite the claims of the article.

    And I'll take -1 Offtopic again for saying so.

    1. Re:Handicapped people don't have those signals by Adrilla · · Score: 1

      From TFA: It can also move on its own accord, enabling it to help elderly or handicapped people walk, developers said.

      I take this to mean that it doesn't need to receive electric-signals to move. I'd guess that it has a joystick or breathing tube type movement control or something like that, maybe even tracking head or eye movement. My guess is that its secondary movement is one that would be used by a para or quadraplegic's wheelchair. But it's clear that the electric-signal movement is not its only control structure.

      --

      "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
    2. Re:Handicapped people don't have those signals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's hardly the handicapped person walking, then. Perhaps carried is a better word. Even motiled maybe a better word.

      Walking, it ain't.

    3. Re:Handicapped people don't have those signals by John+Hasler · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > I suppose if you expanded the group of
      > "handicapped" to include those suffering from
      > polio and other diseases that result muscular
      > dystrophy...

      It's strange definition of 'handicapped' that excludes those people.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    4. Re:Handicapped people don't have those signals by circusboy · · Score: 1

      perhaps we might revisit the meaning of the word 'handicapped'?

      despite a tendency for it to be taken the wrong way, due to long periods of misuse, and misapplication. it is still just a synonym for 'disabled' or 'given assistance.' the thing is, I have met people with physical... 'inhibitions(?)' on both sides of the argument. some who get really ticked off at "handicapped" and some who get ticked off at anything else.

      I think I'm too much of a language pedant to keep reading here... (or perhaps not enough...(I'm too wishy-washy...))

      --
      -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
    5. Re:Handicapped people don't have those signals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "motiled"??? I just imagined Gramps with cilia...

      hahaha thanks.

    6. Re:Handicapped people don't have those signals by Adrilla · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's hardly the handicapped person walking, then. Perhaps carried is a better word. Even motiled maybe a better word.

      Walking, it ain't.


      Semantics. Clearly they wouldn't be walking in the classic sense of the word, but they'd be repeating the same action, bipedal movement. They just wouldn't be triggering the movement with their own legs, but via another source. I assure you that everyone doing it will refer to it as 'walking' as opposed to "being carried" or "motiled". People want to focus on what they can do, not what they can't, so they'll want to use the most positive term, which in this case would be, walking.

      --

      "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
    7. Re:Handicapped people don't have those signals by Tekzel · · Score: 0

      How awfully politically correct of you to bag the guy for being correct. God I hate PC twits.

    8. Re:Handicapped people don't have those signals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah c'mon, if you were ESR you would try and play sematics with your defects as well.

    9. Re:Handicapped people don't have those signals by geek_xyu · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to pretend I'm a doctor or anything here. But if this suit is used to amplify signals you are sending through your nerves then might it be possible that it can relay the signal if the body can't naturally send the signal? If someone has a spinal injury and can't use his legs might this technology possibly help him communicate with his lower body. If that be the case then they might be able to move themselves with the assistance of this suit.

  34. Wait till you see what happens.. by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... when you put five of these together!!

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Wait till you see what happens.. by panaceaa · · Score: 1

      Are you proposing a beowulf cluster???

    2. Re:Wait till you see what happens.. by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      TESTING...Testing...Testing...

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
  35. Advanced features? by rlp · · Score: 1

    Yes, but can you control it with your mind using the Wing Zero System?

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
  36. Sheesh - a geek alright... by HermanAB · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh man, he needs a robot suit to carry his girlfriend. That sure won't earn him any Brownie points...

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  37. Robot suit=halloween costume? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    From the pictures, I'd swear there's no motors or anything in that suit.. I'd bet that the 'prototype' is just a mock-up of the real suit that doesn't exist yet. I mean, the woman look all that heavy to me. It's certainly possible for a man of his stature and age to be able to lift a woman of her size with both arms and her arm around his neck relieving some of the weight. Lemme know when he can pick up fifteen scuba cylinders or something.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  38. I have a simple question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is wrong with the Japanese?

    1. Re:I have a simple question... by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      A fucked up society of techno weenies: The adults are getting old and their children are committing suicide...

      Well, someone had to say it.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    2. Re:I have a simple question... by fearspooky · · Score: 1

      thats so stereotypical. that was kinda offending to me because im from japan...

    3. Re:I have a simple question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no they didn't

    4. Re:I have a simple question... by ImagistTD · · Score: 1

      But that's not true. The older adults are the ones committing suicide, mostly.

    5. Re:I have a simple question... by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      The suicide thing is inevitable, due to the improvements in medical care. Many people reach a point where they just don't want to carry on with the struggle and the doctors do not want to let them go.

      In larger countries, many people purposely retire in little towns and villages, where they can die one day in peace, without danger of ending up in a hospital, hooked onto some machine. Japan, being small, has good hospitals pretty much everywhere, making the 'natural death' option impossible.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
  39. good way to lose a hand... by saleenS281 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I see that there are no gloves for this suit. So... in theory, you have arms that can lift 800lbs, with hands and fingers that will tear off your body at ~500lbs (assuming it's fragile little thing like that guy).

    Remind me again why you would want to be able to have superhuman strength when all it's going to do is cause you to smash a body part if not amputate yourself by accident.

    1. Re:good way to lose a hand... by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1
      Yeah, thats just what I was thinking. If you ever played Cyberpunk, you would know why you couldn't just pick up a car and throw it at people.

      Yet, applied to ways that your fingers aren't integral in your actions this is great. Like carrying loads of wood, or iron rebar. This suit could theoretically re-enable the unskilled laborer by making them a financially viable substitute for some types of heavy machinery.

      Example:
      Tree rooting machine cost = X Thousand dollars
      Power suit cost = X HUNDRED dollars
      Tree Rooting Machine Operator cost = X/hr.
      Bracero worker cost = x - 10/Hr.

      Do the math.

      You would have to alter the hands to be machine grips, but hey - thats the cost of progress.
  40. Holy crap! by ninja_assault_kitten · · Score: 4, Funny

    He actually had the strength to lift an asian woman!

    1. Re:Holy crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the real question is: does the suit come standard with a small asian woman?

      For... uhh... demonstration purposes--you perverts!

  41. What about cars? by janolder · · Score: 2, Interesting
    And you find senior citizens of advanced age cruising down the street in their caddy at 50 miles an hour any less scary?

    Note: I have no beef with 99.9% of the senior population but my car was totaled by a member of the remaining 0.1% a few years back by him pulling onto a main street with blinders on. Daylight too. Luckily the old man survived without permanent injury. However, he'd have been better off letting someone else drive.

  42. Obligitory by psychgeek · · Score: 1

    In Korea, only old people use robot suits...

  43. And how does this help Programmers? by daviq · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    And how does this help programmers?

    --
    Go to the w3.org and put Slashdot.org through the validator.
  44. Because they are nowhere near as powerful by Ogemaniac · · Score: 2

    as human muscle at the moment. Even the best ones get absolutely wasted by little girls in arm-wrestling competitions.

  45. "Robot"? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    Why do you persist in calling these sorts of things robots? They are waldos of one sort or another (this one seems to be simply a powered suit).

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:"Robot"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can walk on its own.

      In other news, it took me three tries to get this CAPTCHA. vpyfqzy

  46. not exactly news by oringo · · Score: 1

    Ok...it's an improvement on size. But this is already demonstrated by UC Berkeley on a heavier scale

  47. Steve Austin? by game+kid · · Score: 1

    So the virus will make the wearer kick himself in the nuts and yank his chin into his own shoulder?!?

    ...oh, that Steve. I love that weird slo-mo sound effect. As long as I don't have to hear it every time I flex my leg muscles...

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  48. 7of9 by cdc179 · · Score: 0, Troll

    So when does this mean there will be a 7of9 to fuck!

  49. Ok by Mina · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else read that as 'Japanese Robot SLUT'?

    --
    I'm out of my mind, leave a message.
    1. Re:Ok by megrims · · Score: 1

      Nope, just you.

    2. Re:Ok by chawly · · Score: 1

      Naw - I gotta admit that I also read "slut" instead of "suit". But then I blinked - can't have eveything.

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  50. It looks like we're getting closer to... by idontgno · · Score: 1
    powered labor suits.

    Why, yes, as a matter of fact, I am an anime otaku.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    1. Re:It looks like we're getting closer to... by mink · · Score: 1

      Seems more like Roujin Z (in relation to elderly care aspects).

      Want to go see the ocean?

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  51. What I'm trying to figure out is..... by Ogre332 · · Score: 1

    If Stephen Hawking is so damn smart, how come he didn't invent something like this?

    --
    Shut up brain or I'll stab you with a Q-Tip. - Homer Simpson
    1. Re:What I'm trying to figure out is..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ehrm, he couldn't get out of the wheelchair to make it to the whiteboard?

  52. Alien by thorgil · · Score: 0, Redundant


    Bah... wake me when they have something like the exoskeleton Ripley uses to throw out the big bitch in space.

    --
    Warning: This sig contains a small bug. ==> *
  53. Anyone read them halo books? by neonenergy · · Score: 1
    Well in "fall of reach", the civilians create the mjonir suits, the suits which the master chief etc uses, and it basically amplified the "basic movements of the body".

    This however, with the normal human body, caused the user to move slightly, causing mjonir to change position so fast that it broke the bones inside the body, then causing spasm which further increased the damage. Only the genetically enhanced humans could take the strain because of their strong skeletal and muscular systems.

  54. yea, yea, yea by brickballs · · Score: 1

    'Humans may be able to mutate into supermen in the near future.'
    been there, done that, got the t-shirt.
    --
    "What does slashdotting mean?"
    "You've never heard of slashdot?"
    "I know it makes websites not work."
    1. Re:yea, yea, yea by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but accidentally putting on your underpants over your trousers doesn't qualify...

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
  55. i saw this on tv by fearspooky · · Score: 1

    i saw the guy picking up either 3 bags of rice or 3 bags of sand on international tv in the morning. it was pretty amazing...

  56. oh goody... by jwind · · Score: 1

    'Humans may be able to mutate into supermen in the near future.'" Well, that makes it all worth it then. Hundreds upon hundreds of bionic "supermen" is just what this world needs...

  57. It best run on linux.. by qyiet · · Score: 0

    Or blue screen of death is going to take on a whole new meaning.

  58. Ex Wife by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boy, I sure wish I had that suit when I had to carry my ex across the threshhold. That just about broke my back. (picture that dude carrying three of those asian women . . .)

  59. "Robot suit?!" by mbrother · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is called an exoskeleton, not a "robot suit!"

    Sheesh.

    --
    Professor of Astronomy, Author of Spider Star & Star Dragon (Tor)
  60. no no no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Safe from protestors.

  61. Old people? Bad move. by Dpaladin · · Score: 1

    The elderly can't use anything more technologically advanced than a refridgerator without maiming someone. This can only end in tears.

    --
    Bad puns gave me bad karma. =(
  62. HAL-5? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    The 15-kilogram (33-pound) battery-powered suit, code-named HAL-5

    Are they TRYING to make killer robots?

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  63. and here's a picture by weighn · · Score: 1

    1st thing I thought was "what's an obv. wrong trousers quote?"
    can't think of one, so here's a picture

    --
    Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
    1. Re:and here's a picture by Grab · · Score: 1

      Come on, man...

      "It's the Wrong Trousers, Gromit!!!"

  64. HEV suit? by homeobocks · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of Half-Life . . .

    --
    MOUNT TAPE U1439 ON B3, NO RING
  65. robosuit by khadibakh · · Score: 1

    Neighbor buys robo suit to combat bullies.. 30,000 Hospital bill for bullies... 15,000 2 new double-A batterys for your garage door control that makes him breakdance.....priceless

    --
    good credit is the worst thing that ever happened to me.
  66. Yeah well.. by InsideTheAsylum · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's still not as cool as this...

    Triggur's Mech (Triggur, forgive me!)

  67. Great! by shigelojoe · · Score: 1

    Now all we need is a group of angsty teenagers and we'll have ourselves a live-action anime!

  68. Minovsky Fusion Reactor by blackwing0013 · · Score: 0

    Now all we need is for one to create a Minovsky Fusion Reactor so that we can have a war in space involving Mobile Suits! ;)

  69. RE: Brownie points by bobbagum · · Score: 2, Funny

    not unless it's vibrating

  70. A Little Bit about Tsukuba University by Burning*Cent · · Score: 1

    I'm currently finishing up a year-long exchange study at Tsukuba University, so it's nice to hear something good come out from here.

    There's five Ss about Tsukuba that everyone should know:
    1. Science
    2. Study
    3. Sports
    4. Sex
    5. Suicide

    There's so little to do where the college is located that this school has a bad reputation for suicides. I guess it's gotten better since it gained that reputation because I haven't heard any stories about people killing themselves while I've been here.

    As for myself, I've been doing 3 and 4, and occasionally number 2.

    1. Re:A Little Bit about Tsukuba University by trongey · · Score: 1

      ...There's five Ss about Tsukuba that everyone should know: 1. Science 2. Study 3. Sports 4. Sex 5. Suicide ...As for myself, I've been doing 3 and 4,...

      Don't lie. You're posting on slashdot. Everyone knows you haven't been doing either #3 or #4.

      --
      You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
    2. Re:A Little Bit about Tsukuba University by Burning*Cent · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't know if it counts, but I've been House dancing with a circle here called Real Jam. Here's me with my team (I'm the white guy.) http://windmill.nce.buttobi.net/04Mel(W)/denim.htm And recently I've been dating a malaysian girl. If I could get pictures off my camera, I could show them. Ah what the hell. This is the first time I've looked at /. in months. I was just surprised that my university was mentioned.

  71. I'll Be Impressed by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Funny


    when I see this guy pick up an AMERICAN girl instead of a tiny Japanese girl! A FAT American girl!

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  72. Repliee Qi by thomasa · · Score: 1

    If you go through the pictures there is a Humanoid robot Repliee Qi covered with skin-like substance. She "moves her mouth". I wonder what for?

  73. That was the plot of an anime called PATLABOR by nounderscores · · Score: 1

    the idea was that robot suits called LABORs were used for general, well, labor. Since they were ubiquitous and easy to use, it was only a matter of time before criminals simply walked down to the nearest hardware dealer and bought one to rob a bank with.

    So the police buy some, paint them blue and strap big guns to them and call them PATROL LABORs (which nobody says because it takes too long).

    Queue anime fun.

  74. Any stats? by Timberwolf0122 · · Score: 1

    How long does the batt last?
    Charging Times?
    Maximum walking/runing speed?
    Max Lifting power?
    Can you call out the AA (AAA to your colonial cousins) if it wont start?

    And finaly are there force limmiters to prevent joint damage from over exersion?


    If the stats are good I'm signing up with Exo-Squad!

    --
    In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.
  75. The question is, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does it run Linux?

  76. I can see one use for this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The 15-kilogram (33-pound) battery-powered suit, code-named HAL-5, detects muscle movements through electrical-signal flows on the skin surface and then amplifies them."

    Now where was that Paris Hilton video ;-)

  77. Robot suits in the uk by zmollusc · · Score: 1

    Here in the uk they will be banned, as they will be 'dangerous'. Only military, police and criminals will have them.

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  78. Well, that's the WHOLE point by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "How? The only things I can think of that help against such guerilla tactics are good armor and staying alert. Anyhow, who needs super strength when you have good ol' firepower?"

    Which is exactly why and what for: to enable soldiers to carry more armour and dish out more firepower.

    Don't think for a moment that military applications of super-strength will mean Superman-style punching villains in the face. It won't. Ever.

    However a major topic throughough the last century has been the weight of ammo and equipment a soldier has to carry. It's a real issue. That's one of the reasons (among other factors) why we've moved to smaller calibres.

    Put some powered armour on those soldiers and suddenly they can carry a lot more heavy weaponry and ammo.

    Individual armour has also been discarded precisely because of weight considerations: you _could_ make a breastplate that could stop a rifle round, but it was impractically heavy.

    Now think the other way around: if you have an armoured exo-skeleton, you can carry enough armour at least over the vital organs to stop even a 7.62mm round or shrapnel from hand grenades and pipe bombs. _And_ this time it's without a mobility penalty.

    You've just made life harder for the enemy soldiers, because now they need to lug around bigger weaponry to take you out, which limits _their_ mobility.

    But perhaps more importantly, and this is really what makes it a wet dream for the military is: enabling soldiers to carry more electronics and a sattellite connection. Giving at least one soldier per squad enough electronics to know exactly where the enemy is, what's happening, where is the squad needed, what should they avoid, etc, is something that can give a _huge_ advantage.

    Nations have been defeated before because basically their chain of command didn't react fast enough. E.g., that's why large armies like those of France or Poland crumbled in the face of Blitzkrieg in WW2. They just weren't prepared to react at that speed.

    Or the USSR in WW2 was massively handicapped by their lack of radios on their tanks.

    Now picture giving each squad a direct link to their officers _all_ the time. Bidirectional. You can know _exactly_ what's happening at each point, in real time, and the soldiers can know exactly what's expected of them. You can instantly see when your troops are being pinned and flanked, and how, and you can tell them exactly how to counter it. Better yet they too can see a bigger picture and react in a more intelligent manner.

    It's something that can really make or break a battle.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Well, that's the WHOLE point by mdarksbane · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Anyone who thinks powered armor is a silly battle-mech style idea needs to read Heinlein's Starship Troopers. The ability to give every individual soldier such increased mobility, comm, and firepower pretty much makes our current military obsolete.

    2. Re:Well, that's the WHOLE point by Bender0x7D1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not to nitpick... well, OK, I am nitpicking...

      First, it isn't so much about the weight that someone needs to carry to handle these weapons, it is the recoil. The reason a .50 cal machine gun wasn't mounted on standard Jeeps was they caused them to tip over when fired sideways. Only the HMMWV, (Humvee), can get away with it because of their wider wheel base. Also, way too much ammunition is wasted uselessly. If you don't shoot unless you can see what you are aiming at, you don't need 10,000 rounds for your M-16. This is why they took away the "automatic" setting on the M-16 after Vietnam. Shooting more bullets LOWERED the chance of a hit. Not just per round, but overall. Finally, if you can hit someone with a 5.56mm round, they are going to be dead or very injured. A 7.62 round or even a .50 caliber round isn't required.

      More electronics = better chance of detection.
      Infantry is supposed to be invisible. That's why they put all that fancy makeup on their faces - so they blend in. If they radiate a lot in the EM spectrum, someone is going to detect it and drop a few white phosphorus artillery rounds on them. Also, (as someone else pointed out earlier), there aren't power-ups behind every tree, and batteries weigh a LOT. Infantry is also great because they don't need much in the way of logistics. They can walk out with a heavy pack and be fine for 2 weeks. They might come back tired, dirty and hungry, but they don't need a fuel truck every 2 days to keep moving.

      I agree with you that situational awareness is incredibly important, and that the best plans fall apart upon enemy contact. However, there is also a thing called information overload. If a squad leader is worried about what the rest of the platoon is doing, they aren't focused on what their squad is doing. If they are paying attention to what the individual squad members are doing, they aren't using their fire team leaders. It is a delicate balancing act. Too much info can mean the important details are missed. Not enough info can also hurt.

      Personally, I think powered armor of some sort is a great idea for a Military Operations in Urban Terrain (MOUT) environment. Since there is fighting house-to-house and block-to-block, the logistics are much simpler. Also, with heavier armor, a "standard" bullet can be ignored. BTW - There is body armor out there that will stop a 7.62mm round from an AK-74 at close range (less than 10 meters), and they are pretty heavy, but not when compared to a full load on an infantryman. The real risk is keeping the wearer cool enough since no air can circulate around the torso. When considering ambient temperature during training exercises, the presence of a standard flak jacket is considered to be a +15 degree fahrenheit modifier.

      For those who care, I was in the US Marine infantry for 4 years, as a rifleman and as a member of their Fleet Antiterrorism Security Team. I graduated from the Marine Security Forces school and from the Designated Marksman School (similar to a SWAT team sniper) and I graduated 3rd in my class at the Advanced Infantry School at Camp Pendelton. While I don't think I am an expert in all things military, or even infantry combat, I think I know what I am talking about.

      --
      Reading code is like reading the dictionary - you have to read half of it before you can go back and understand it.
    3. Re:Well, that's the WHOLE point by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      Very good points, and well taken. And before I go any further, I must say I'm an ex-AAA guy, so definitely less qualified in infantry tactics. (We did train to shoot an assault rifle too, but, well, not as much as the real infantry, and of course not up to USMC standards.) Still, just to clarify what I had in mind:

      1. About the heavy weaponry, I wasn't really thinking of a .50 machinegun. (Well, ok, the thought did cross my mind, but so did the thought about recoil.)

      There is, however, IMHO other stuff that could be fired pretty accurately when you're weighing 500 pounds together with the exo-skeleton and have more than your own muscles strength to hold it pointed that-a-way. E.g., an M-60. Of course, you're just as dead when hit by a 5.56mm round, but higher calibres tend to cause more suppression for some reason.

      Another use that comes to mind is AT or AA missiles. They're heavy, and recoil isn't a problem.

      2. The point about the 3 round burst is well taken, but AFAIK it was originated in the M-14.

      The problem with the M-14 is that the NATO 7.62mm cartridge is too powerful. It's a lot larger and contains more powder than the Soviet 7.62mm round. It's practically the same size as what the Soviets used in the SVD (Dragunov sniper rifle) or in belt-fed medium machineguns. Using that in an assault rifle, yeah, will make it shake like hell on full auto without a bipod. I.e., that needed that 3 round burst limit badly.

      The M-16 or the SAW IMHO aren't _that_ horribly in in need of it, though.

      And either way, when you have them fixed on a heavy exo-skeleton, IMHO they should shake a lot less.

      3. About information overload, well, that's why I've said one soldier per squad. And if anyone actually went to the extreme of having all squad members on the screen, they'd probably be just points on a map anyway.

      Basically I'm not proposing that someone micro-manages every soldier, because, yeah, I do realize that it's not even possible. I do trust they will find a way to filter just as much information as they need.

      4. About the EM radiation, you do make a valid point. Still, uni-directional broadcasts are also possible. When anyone wants their infantry to keep radio silence, I can imagine that the suits will have that option. In the meantime, they can still transmit maps, orders, whatever, _to_ that infantry.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    4. Re:Well, that's the WHOLE point by patio11 · · Score: 1

      >>Infantry is supposed to be invisible. That's why they put all that fancy makeup on their faces - so they blend in. If they radiate a lot in the EM spectrum, someone is going to detect it and drop a few white phosphorus artillery rounds on them.>> I'm just nitpicking, because its clear you "get it" from the later comments on urban operations, but infantry doesn't have to be invisible anymore. In fact, its probably better to maximize their visibility a lot of the time, given that a) no one we're likely to be fighting has access to real-time on-target artillery, b) if they did, we'd blow the stuffing out of it and c) our main threats are comparitively small explosive devices, small arms fire, and friendly fire in urban actions. Given the profile of the missions dismounted infantry is generally engaged in at the moment (excepting special ops), I don't mind letting The Bad Guys know we're coming if it helps keep The Good Guys and The Not-Quite-Bad-Or-Good-but-At-Least-Not-Shooting-At -Us-So-We'll-Take-What-We-Can-Get Guys safe.

  79. We're All Supermen? by Jondaley · · Score: 1

    "When everyone's super, no one will be!"

  80. Two words ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    power fucking.

  81. Batteries ;-) by Dwonis · · Score: 1
    Due to the limitations in battery technology, if the unit is unplugged, it can only run 1 minute at full power, or 5 minutes otherwise.

    Apparently, they also can only be piloted by 14-year-olds. On top of that, these things have a mind of their own, so be careful!

  82. Wait a minute....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't Hitler have a robot suit back in the 40's

    If it was in Wolfenstein 3d, it must be true

  83. wtf? this is a ripoff! by hjf · · Score: 1

    this is a ripoff from a jackie chan movie! http://imdb.com/title/tt0290095/

  84. Thank God, just in time... by airship · · Score: 2, Funny

    This invention has come along just in time. I was at the practical limits of being able to move my fat ass around by the meager power of my wimpy atrophied geek muscles alone. Now I can quit worrying about gaining more weight! Time to sit back down at my computer and order another delicious cheesy pizza!

    --
    Serving your airship needs since 1995.
  85. Heh, not true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >E.g., that's why large armies like those of France or Poland crumbled in the face of Blitzkrieg in WW2. They just weren't prepared to react at that speed.

    Actually no, Poland lost because they sent
    horsemen with swords against the German tanks
    and assault rifled soldiers. :-D

  86. Alternate Application by Log+from+Blammo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You could have the exoskeleton partially resist every muscle movement. Then it becomes an exercise suit.

    --
    "This quote is a product of the Frobozz Magic Quote Company."
  87. Slashdot stealing news from dslreports - WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is it that Slashdot is stealing news from dslreports?

    When DSLREPORTS gets a news story from slashdot, they provide a link.

    When Slashdot gets a story from DslReports, they get no link - not even a mention of the story, even though dsl reports had it there for an hour or more *BEFORE* slashdot!

    Why is that?

  88. American Version by G.+Waters · · Score: 1

    While Japan wastes their time building robotic slaves to assist and augment their citizenry, we in America use "willing workers" to accomplish the same.

    Place the citizen on the shoulders of two undocumented workers, they are the "legs". Now, stand one undocumented worker behind the perched citizen, the feet firmly positioned onto the outer shoulders of the "legs". He is the "arms". Insert another undocumented worker if reproductive functionality will be required.

    Diversity is our strength!

  89. reminds me of Aliens by MegaFur · · Score: 1

    /(taken from some site from (theoretically) the script, then modified a bit to match what I remember of the movie version)/

    RIPLEY: I feel like a fifth wheel here. Is there anything I can do?
    APONE: I don't know. Is there anything you can do?
    RIPLEY: (pointing) Well, I can drive that loader. I've got a Class Two rating.

    (Apone turns. A SECOND POWER LOADER sits unused in an equipment bay.

    (TWO SHOT APONE AND HICKS skeptical. Considering. TIGHT ON POWER SWITCH as Ripley's finger punches it on. A RISING WHINE of power. TIGHT ON THE HYDRAULICS as the massive machine stirs to life.

    (FULL, as the loader starts. Ripley is strapped into the safety cage, her arms and legs inserted in the servo-sensor assemblies. She takes a step. BOOM! Two tons of hardened steel takes a step.

    (Ripley spins the wrist servos. The huge claws swing, open...slide smoothly into lifting brackets on a cargo module, nearby. She raises it deftly.)

    RIPLEY: (mock sexy voice) Where do ya want it?

    (Hicks and Apone chuckle and smile at her joke)

    APONE: Bay 12, please.

    --
    Furry cows moo and decompress.
  90. No, that's false by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    "Actually no, Poland lost because they sent
    horsemen with swords against the German tanks
    and assault rifled soldiers. :-D
    "

    Actually, no, that stupidity was mentioned only once, by the Italians, in a propaganda piece. Even the Germans (i.e., the ones who actually fought there) did _not_ claim that.

    And even in the Italian propaganda piece it was cavalry charges vs tanks yes, but _not_ swords vs tanks.

    The actual accounts of that war showed the Polish army doing actually pretty well, considering that Germany had one helluva lot more tanks.

    E.g., the new 37mm Polish AT-gun was _feared_ by the Germans. It caused tank crews to smear mud over the white cross on their turrets, because to the Polish AT guns it meant "shoot here."

    E.g., the Polish tanks were actually pretty modern. A lot more modern than what the French had later. They just had way too few of them. But where they were used, they caused higher casualties to the Germans than they took.

    And, oh, "assault rifled soldiers"? While the Germans did invent the assault rifle (against Hitler's explicit orders to drop that "useless" research), in '39 it was still _years_ before that. And contrary to Hollywood movies where every German soldier had a SMG, in reality very few did. Most German soldiers had bolt action rifles, and for close combat they were liberally issuing as many pistols as they could get even to soldiers.

    The reason is one of doctrine. The Germans saw the machinegun (in Poland, the MG-34) as the centre piece of the squad, and the rest of the platoon was there more or less to support it.

    Basically: no offense, but learn thy history before shooting thy mouth.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  91. Next Step.. true cybernetics/Bionics. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey, joking aside this will help alot of people, nanotech, is cool, but way, way away.It is light, under 40 lbs. I wish they would of stated it is strength factor.