Domain: userstyles.org
Stories and comments across the archive that link to userstyles.org.
Comments · 92
-
Re:OT: Anyone have a link to the old /. CSS?
Just whipped this up this morning: Comment Tweaks
-
Re:Tags
Screenshot:
http://userstyles.org/styles/3202 -
firefox extension + script for facebook users
People with Firefox can install the "stylish" extension (for controlling CSS), and, along with the "De-MySpacify" script, block all appearances of facebook apps in their browser. ( http://userstyles.org/styles/3681 ). It's about 15 lines long and incredibly helpful (not to mention aptly-named).
-
Re:Version 4 is still useful
-
Re:Slashdot
Well, you can do it with http://userstyles.org/stylish/
Just redesign it and then put it up for other people to use, like http://userstyles.org/styles/search/slashdot -
Re:Slashdot
Well, you can do it with http://userstyles.org/stylish/
Just redesign it and then put it up for other people to use, like http://userstyles.org/styles/search/slashdot -
Re:Why.
It's actually extremely easy to get rid of all that crap: http://userstyles.org/styles/3681
Just add a {display: block;} for any application you actually want to see, and you are all set. -
Re:So do tags ever deprecate?
-
Re:You aren't a designer
I hate Arial with a passion, and wish my Mac would substitute Helvetica, since Arial was actually designed as a Helvetica clone that cost less to license.
You can set the font you wish used as the default for sans type, serif type, etc. in the preferences of Firefox and forbid websites from displaying other fonts. Better yet, get the Stylish extension so you can further customize your websites' styles (website specific options).
I like setting all left aligned text to left-right justify, for instance, but your imagination is the limit. I've never liked the way most websites choose their fonts anyway. And for Linux, where the only fonts which exist are "Sans", "Monospace", and "Serif" practically speaking, it's best not to let websites use their own fonts, or you might end up seeing some of the terribly fuzzy stuff that are supposedly fonts. -
css
http://userstyles.org/ has a bunch dark google styles (and for other sites)
-
When will companies wake up?
We do not want to see pages full of advertisement. Especially not when they move around. This was already clear with the tag.
I even hate it when movies I want to see start playing before I pressed start.
I myself use several different methods to avoid seeing spam.
1) http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm (Update the hosts file once per month with a cron job)
2) Adblock
3) http://www.privoxy.org/
4) Adblock
and for some sites that I want to see without the stoopid ads all over or where I do not like the standard layout (like slashdot or Toms hardware) I use http://userstyles.org/
OK, perhaps I am overactive, but I am now unable to watch the internet on an other computer, because of all the ads that are trown to me.
All this should be a hint to companies that people do niot want this. Ebay should look at who its base customers are and serve them. Ignore the extra money you can make. It pisses people off.
But as it is a company, the management will be only there for three years, or so, so as long as they can milk it, who cares, right? -
Re:Nameless Firefox Bookmarks
Or just use the 'Bookmarks toolbar - icons only' style sheet.
-
Re:3 was the last worthwhile version.
Speaking of which: does anyone know of any project for standardizing re-scheming of remote sites? With enough people behind it you could really make sites stop clashing with the rest of your screen and become a lot more usable with nothing more than usercontent.css preferably, or at worst some javascript courtesy of greasemonkey
A lot of the people using userstyles.org seem to share your interest in applying a standard theme to all sites, matching Google to their custom skins, etc -- moreso than Greasemonkey users, anyway, who mostly seem into tweaking single sites one at a time, in my experience.
So if you want to try to get something going, that would probably be the best place to start..
-
Yahoo! Mail ad remover
If you use Yahoo mail beta and Firefox, just add this userstyle --> http://userstyles.org/style/show/616 into the Stylish extension to remove ads. Also, I find that Adblock Filterted.G blocks Yahoo mail beta ads as well.
-
Stylish and CSS ad blocking...
My solution in situations like this is to build custom Stylish rules for sites like that. Even if they change the id a whole bunch, they're pretty much constrained to a certain number of xhtml structures, and I doubt they'll be changing that a lot. So do something like: #ad_space div>div{display: none;} (replacing the selectors with an actual path to the frustrating elements). There are also lots of scripts for stylish at http://www.userstyles.org/
-
Re:Don't like 2.0
-
Re:I was hoping Firefox 2.0 would bring change.
-
Re:New version
They are still called extensions, Add-ons is the name of the new manager for both extensions and themes. I think it comes from the Firefox Add-ons site.
I am a bit disappointed about how tabs work now too, but the changes are probably for the best. Scrolling the tab strip with my mouse-wheel was I nice discovery. Too bad it's still not easier for non-developers to customize the interface. Opera lets you change the preferences through a user-friendly dialog, but in Firefox you're required to manually type in about:config, then "browser.tabs" and then not be confused with various programming terms.
For myself, I changed browser.tabs.tabMinWidth to something small so it behaves like before 2.0 and browser.tabs.tabCloseButtons to 0 (only ever displays a close button on the active tab). I'm also thinking of adding some CSS to my userChrome.css to have tabs with system appearance again. -
Re:Opera still feels more responsive, uses less RA
^^(Shit, wrong formatting!)
My Firefox on WinXP has been open about 8 hours and is using only 129 MB so far. I have 16 extensions loaded right now.
Generated: Sat Oct 07 2006 00:57:46 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061004 BonEcho/2.0
Build ID: 2006100403
Enabled Extensions: [16]
- All-in-One Sidebar 0.7 RC 4: http://firefox.exxile.net/aios/
- ChatZilla 0.9.75: http://chatzilla.hacksrus.com/
- CoLT 2.2.1: http://www.borngeek.com/firefox/colt/
- Console 0.3.6: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=3181 02
- DOM Inspector 1.8.1: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/inspector/
- FoxyTunes 2.0.2.1: http://www.foxytunes.com/
- Gmail Manager 0.5.3: http://www.longfocus.com/firefox/gmanager/
- Greasemonkey 0.6.5.20060727: http://greasemonkey.mozdev.org/
- MR Tech Local Install 5.3: http://www.mrtech.com/extensions/local_install/
- Saved From URL 1.2: http://www.google.com/search?q=Bon%20Echo%20Saved% 20From%20URL
- Stylish 0.4: http://userstyles.org/stylish/
- Tab Mix Plus 0.3.0.61001: http://tmp.garyr.net/
- Talkback 2.0: http://talkback.mozilla.org/
- Update Channel Selector 1.0.1: http://users.blueprintit.co.uk/~dave/web/firefox/u pdatechannel/index.html
- userChrome.js 0.7: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=3977 35
- XPather 1.0.1: http://xpath.alephzarro.com/
Disabled Extensions: [1]
- Free Download Manager plugin 1.0: http://freedownloadmanager.org/
Total Extensions: 17
Installed Themes: [3]
- Firefox (default): http://www.mozilla.org/
- Halloween 1.9.5: http://edhume.googlepages.com/home
- QuBranch 1.0.20060929: http://www.schrade.com/firefox/themes/
Installed Plugins: (10)
- Java(TM) 2 Platform Standard Edition 5.0 Update 8
- Microsoft® DRM
- Mozilla Default Plug-in
- OpenOffice.org Plug-in
- QuickTime Plug-in 7.1
- RealPlayer Version Plugin
- RealPlayer(tm) G2 LiveConnect-Enabled Plug-In (32-bit)
- Shockwave Flash
- Shockwave for Director
- Windows Media Player Plug-in Dynamic Link Library -
Re:Opera still feels more responsive, uses less RA
My Firefox on WinXP has been open about 8 hours and is using only 129 MB so far. I have 16 extensions loaded right now. Generated: Sat Oct 07 2006 00:57:46 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061004 BonEcho/2.0 Build ID: 2006100403 Enabled Extensions: [16] - All-in-One Sidebar 0.7 RC 4: http://firefox.exxile.net/aios/ - ChatZilla 0.9.75: http://chatzilla.hacksrus.com/ - CoLT 2.2.1: http://www.borngeek.com/firefox/colt/ - Console 0.3.6: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=318
1 02 - DOM Inspector 1.8.1: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/inspector/ - FoxyTunes 2.0.2.1: http://www.foxytunes.com/ - Gmail Manager 0.5.3: http://www.longfocus.com/firefox/gmanager/ - Greasemonkey 0.6.5.20060727: http://greasemonkey.mozdev.org/ - MR Tech Local Install 5.3: http://www.mrtech.com/extensions/local_install/ - Saved From URL 1.2: http://www.google.com/search?q=Bon%20Echo%20Saved% 20From%20URL - Stylish 0.4: http://userstyles.org/stylish/ - Tab Mix Plus 0.3.0.61001: http://tmp.garyr.net/ - Talkback 2.0: http://talkback.mozilla.org/ - Update Channel Selector 1.0.1: http://users.blueprintit.co.uk/~dave/web/firefox/u pdatechannel/index.html - userChrome.js 0.7: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=3977 35 - XPather 1.0.1: http://xpath.alephzarro.com/ Disabled Extensions: [1] - Free Download Manager plugin 1.0: http://freedownloadmanager.org/ Total Extensions: 17 Installed Themes: [3] - Firefox (default): http://www.mozilla.org/ - Halloween 1.9.5: http://edhume.googlepages.com/home - QuBranch 1.0.20060929: http://www.schrade.com/firefox/themes/ Installed Plugins: (10) - Java(TM) 2 Platform Standard Edition 5.0 Update 8 - Microsoft® DRM - Mozilla Default Plug-in - OpenOffice.org Plug-in - QuickTime Plug-in 7.1 - RealPlayer Version Plugin - RealPlayer(tm) G2 LiveConnect-Enabled Plug-In (32-bit) - Shockwave Flash - Shockwave for Director - Windows Media Player Plug-in Dynamic Link Library -
Re:Accessible Content
Then I must not understand the point of this line the typical approach is just to set a cookie that lets the server know that it should include a body { font-size: whatever; } rule.
You do understand what "typical" means, don't you? You said:
Wait... are you saying that they had an entire seperate page that they made simply made the font larger?
In actual fact, nobody does what you imagine to happen. They use the approach I described. Just because I described the approach, it doesn't mean that I approve of it or that I think it's the best way of doing things. It's not. You and I both agree on that, and this is the third time I've said so. If you look back through my posting history, you'll see that websites messing with the font size annoy me. I even wrote a user stylesheet when Slashdot fucked up the fonts in the redesign.
-
Re:Tags
This will work: http://userstyles.org/style/show/414
-
The best way to read that site
http://userstyles.org/style/show/490 in combination with https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/2108/
Can be usefull for other sites as well that you read often. -
Re:On a related note (well, not really)
-
Re:On a related note (well, not really)
-
Re:Nice adds on Tom's HWOK, I looked an there is something like it:
http://userstyles.org/
I have entered into Stylish the following that seems to be working:@namespace url(http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml);
Most likely others will be able to do it much nicer and better. For now this works for me. It can also be used to edit
@-moz-document domain(tomshardware.com) {
#footerx, .rightCol, .pad, .info
{
position: absolute;
top: -10000px;
}
} /. -
Re:I'm trapped in /.'s CSS theme & I can't get
I need to switch to a serif font, at least. What's the easiest way to do this?
If you are using Firefox, install the Stylish extension and use this user stylesheet. It changes the font size, the font family and the line-height back to normal (i.e. what is configured in your browser as the default, which is what Slashdot used to use).
-
Re:is slashdot broken?
-
Re:is slashdot broken?
-
Re:is slashdot broken?
-
Re:Article is FUD and flamebait
-
Re:Article is FUD and flamebait
-
Re:Article is FUD and flamebait
-
Re:get yourself a userstylesheet, fixes it for me
Ah - thanks very much.
Figures that I use Mozilla so wasn't aware of it. Looks like I'll be installing Sylish.. I see there's a decent Slashdot style posted on userstyles.org too :
http://userstyles.org/style/show/266
This new style has got to go... the front page *looks* cool, but the usability is awful, especially once you get past the front page to read the comments. -
Re:get yourself a userstylesheet, fixes it for me
Pretty much all the major browsers support user stylesheets.
- Internet Explorer: Tools | Internet Options | Accessibility | Format documents using my style sheet
- Opera: Tools | Preferences | Advanced | Content | Style Options
- Konqueror: Settings | Configure Konqueror | Stylesheets
- Safari: Preferences | Advanced | Style Sheet
- Firefox: Edit ~/.mozilla/firefox/*/chrome/userContent.css
Firefox is pretty awful in this respect, but it gets a lot better if you install the Stylish extension. Opera makes it easy to switch between stylesheets. Konqueror has a nice, user-friendly interface for building simple user stylesheets.
-
Re:Thank you for your opinion - now here's mine.
if you don't like it then tell us some specifics on why you don't like it!
The typography is absolutely awful. It reduces the font size by 18% and increases the line-height by 50%, making it way harder to read.
If you are using a Gecko-based browser like Firefox, there's a user stylesheet to fix things on userstyles.org
-
Re:I have to say
Agreed, but I like the current layout with these mods I made better. Makes it more consistent and sharp.
-
Re:Tell people how to do it right...
This user style removes most crap on myspace.
-
Re:a plea
This user style I wrote removes the italics, and changes the font to Georgia, justifies it, and does some other stuff to make articles look better.
-
Re:User-specific CSS as entries?
How can I make firefox use a custom style sheet on a per-site basis?
You can do that with Stylish. -
Re:Nice Idea, but No Thanks
It also doesn't mention Stylish, which provides a very easy interface to customize websites using CSS code. Its like Greasemonkey, but with CSS.
-
Re:DUH
A couple of people seem to have misinterpreted me, I am in no way condoning <font> . In fact I wrote a user stylesheet to kill <font> completely. I'm pointing out that even <h1> coupled with <font> is better than using <div> elements everywhere.
.foo h1 {foo: bar; baz: bat;}This doesn't style <h1> elements of class foo. It styles <h1> elements that have an ancestor of class foo. To do what you want, you need something like:
h1.foo {foo: bar; baz: bat;}
Although, as you say, it's better to use context than explicit classes in most cases.