Slashdot Mirror


IE Sends Cake to Firefox 2 Team

GDI Lord writes "The Microsoft Internet Explorer Team sent the Firefox team a cake for the release of Firefox 2! "P.S.: No, it was not poisoned" " That they know of anyway.

362 comments

  1. The firefox team was gonna send a cake too... by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 5, Funny

    but they didn't have time, seeing how they were too busy building a better browser! Good night, everybody!

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:The firefox team was gonna send a cake too... by mnmn · · Score: 5, Funny

      Isnt it obvious? They since they just released IE7 they want a cake back.
      Only to include a file in it for the developers at Redmond.

      --
      "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    2. Re:The firefox team was gonna send a cake too... by LifesABeach · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Beware of Geeks, Bearing Gifts" - Casandra

    3. Re:The firefox team was gonna send a cake too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually from The Aeneid by Virgil </pedantry>

    4. Re:The firefox team was gonna send a cake too... by iced_773 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not only that, it was Laocoon who said "Whatever it is, I fear Greeks bearing gifts."

    5. Re:The firefox team was gonna send a cake too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and Cassandra is spelt wrong, too! (Although, maybe it's the first 's' that is missing.)

    6. Re:The firefox team was gonna send a cake too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Timeo danaos (ursi rubri?) ut dona ferentes

    7. Re:The firefox team was gonna send a cake too... by Atilla · · Score: 3, Funny

      How can Firefox be a better browser? It's only version 2! IE is like, version 7 already!

      *g*

      --
      --- sig moved for great justice.
    8. Re:The firefox team was gonna send a cake too... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I wasn't aware that the Aeneid said anything about geeks in it, either the chicken-head-biting or the computer-hacking kind. Maybe I'll have to give it a read, it can tell me something about ancient computing history.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:The firefox team was gonna send a cake too... by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      The smart thing for the FF team to do in return would be to send the MS guys a pie instead, preferably one that is super messy with lots of whipped cream.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    10. Re:The firefox team was gonna send a cake too... by Red+Alastor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now that it's released and they have some free time, they should send one to the IE team on their deployment day (next patch Tuesday if I'm not mistaken). But in the spirit of open source, they should include the recipe.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    11. Re:The firefox team was gonna send a cake too... by drsquare · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Maybe they could get busy making it so Firefox doesn't freeze on flash sites like youtube?

    12. Re:The firefox team was gonna send a cake too... by NuclearDog · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Beware of geeks, bare in GIFs."

      --
      This statement is forty-five characters long.
    13. Re:The firefox team was gonna send a cake too... by 7Prime · · Score: 1

      Actually, a purist could theoretically call Firefox 2, "Netscape 7", since Mozilla was theoretically Netscape 5, and Firefox was basically Mozilla 2.

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    14. Re:The firefox team was gonna send a cake too... by ZzzzSleep · · Score: 1
      How can Firefox be a better browser? It's only version 2! IE is like, version 7 already!
      And Opera is up to version 9 now... so that must be EVEN BETTER!
    15. Re:The firefox team was gonna send a cake too... by funfail · · Score: 1

      My installation of Firefox never freezes or slows down on YouTube. Is that a common problem?

    16. Re:The firefox team was gonna send a cake too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Timeo danaos et dona ferentes

    17. Re:The firefox team was gonna send a cake too... by miro+f · · Score: 1
      But in the spirit of open source, they should include the recipe.


      it would be more fitting if they just sent them the ingredients and instructions on how to compile...
      --
      being vague is almost as cool as doing that other thing...
  2. Obligatory comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They can't have their cake and eat it too!

    1. Re:Obligatory comment by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 5, Funny

      the real obligatory comment is:

      Nice cake...but what's with all the bugs? ;-)


      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    2. Re:Obligatory comment by andphi · · Score: 5, Funny

      Bugs are a good source of protein. They're features!

    3. Re:Obligatory comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      those are not called bugs. They are features.

    4. Re:Obligatory comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, less funny than the same post directly above yours, and it only took you an extra 11 minutes to think of it! Good effort!

    5. Re:Obligatory comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our new cake-bearing browser team overlords!

    6. Re:Obligatory comment by anotherzeb · · Score: 1

      Maybe you do, but does the cake run linux and can you have a beowulf cluster of them?

      --
      Good luck sometimes arrives disguised as bad
  3. itsatrap by Kuciwalker · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think this is the poster child for the "itsatrap" tag.

    1. Re:itsatrap by SilentChris · · Score: 1

      Great. Now I have a mental image of a fish jumping out of a cake burned into my head. Thanks a lot you bastard.

    2. Re:itsatrap by Hawkxor · · Score: 1

      mmm fishcakes

    3. Re:itsatrap by Ryan+Monster · · Score: 1

      There's your answer, fishbulb.

      --
      Change your name to Homer Junior! Your friends can call you Hoju
    4. Re:itsatrap by nacturation · · Score: 4, Funny

      Most controversial stories get tagged either "food" or "notfood".

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    5. Re:itsatrap by jZnat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Pretty much every Microsoft story that involves someone outside of Microsoft as well has been tagged "itsatrap". I've been keeping track: all but one of the itsatrap articles have been Microsoft-related.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    6. Re:itsatrap by shadowcode · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't believe this guy, itsatrap!

    7. Re:itsatrap by dr_dank · · Score: 3, Funny

      Focus your fire on that strawberry shortcake. May the frosting be with us all.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    8. Re:itsatrap by BeeBeard · · Score: 1

      The frosting layer is gone, commence attack on the shortcake filling!

    9. Re:itsatrap by zobier · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Forum et infos sur les réactiOns Dues aux aliments?

      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
  4. The Browser Wars by BRUTICUS · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...just got a whole lot friendlier

    1. Re:The Browser Wars by the_humeister · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's a lot better than in the past when we had drive-bys from the IE and Firefox gangs.

    2. Re:The Browser Wars by theMerovingian · · Score: 2, Funny


      Yeah, I was really glad when Microsoft's hit man got busted and all those shootings came to an end.

      --
      "If you think you have things under control, you're not going fast enough." --Mario Andretti
    3. Re:The Browser Wars by forgetmenot · · Score: 5, Funny

      Obviously, you didn't read the part where a naked Ballmer jumped out of the cake throwing gobs of it at everyone and screaming "I'll f***** destroy You!"

    4. Re:The Browser Wars by AlecLyons · · Score: 5, Funny

      Browser Wars 2: This time it's amicable

    5. Re:The Browser Wars by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 5, Funny

      > Obviously, you didn't read the part where a naked Ballmer jumped out of the cake throwing gobs
      > of it at everyone and screaming "I'll f***** destroy You!" ...followed by five minutes of him jumping around screaming "Confectioners! Confectioners! Confectioners! Confectioners! Confectioners!".

    6. Re:The Browser Wars by CCFreak2K · · Score: 1

      So, did he throw party chairs?

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
    7. Re:The Browser Wars by Gadgetfreak · · Score: 1

      2 damage! 2 damage! 2 damage! *Miss*

      --
      "No fair, you changed the outcome by measuring it!" - Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth
    8. Re:The Browser Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ITYM This Time It's Edible

    9. Re:The Browser Wars by Kelson · · Score: 4, Funny
      Browser Wars 2: This time it's amicable

      Would that make it a "civil" war?

    10. Re:The Browser Wars by kchrist · · Score: 1

      Well, there was one famous drive-by by the IE team a few years back. Pity it didn't turn out exactly how they expected.

  5. Something like they did to Netscape? by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Reminds me of the prank they pulled on the Netscape team long time back. Not that this is another prank, but well...

    1. Re:Something like they did to Netscape? by JacksBrokenCode · · Score: 1
      Hours earlier at Fort Mason, Microsoft had released Explorer 4.0, the next version of its browser. A browser is software that finds and displays Web pages.

      I barely remember back when the media had to describe what a browser was to the uninitiated.

    2. Re:Something like they did to Netscape? by jZnat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, it seems like only yesterday people thought the blue e was the internet and had no idea what a web browser is.

      Oh wait...

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    3. Re:Something like they did to Netscape? by Tokerat · · Score: 1

      At the risk of being redundant, here is another link.

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  6. Pie? by BeeBeard · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are they sure it wasn't just humble pie? :)

    1. Re:Pie? by robyannetta · · Score: 5, Funny

      The Firefox team couldn't eat it because of all the ActiveX ingredients... [ducks]

      --
      - Just my $0.02, take with a grain of salt, your mileage may vary.
    2. Re:Pie? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I bet it had a file in it.

      Regards,
      --
      *Art

    3. Re:Pie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      ActiveX is made of ducks?

  7. Eww by yoyhed · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Nobody likes black frosting. Consider it an obscene gesture.

    --
    WHO NEEDS SHIFT WHEN YOU HAVE CAPSLOCK/ DAMN1
    1. Re:Eww by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

      I was wondering why it was black also. Blue would have made more sense.

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
  8. So the IE team... by bodger_uk · · Score: 0, Redundant

    So the IE team prove that firefox can have their cake and eat it!

  9. An improvement from the IE/Netscape days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Better than the big IE logo they left back when IE4 shipped, although the cake surely didn't provide as cool of http://home.snafu.de/tilman/mozilla/mozilla-ie-car d.jpgpictures. (It is sad seeing the guy placing the marketshare number there, however.)

  10. You have to admit by captnitro · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That was pretty classy. (Even if ultimately it was intended as a bit of good-natured competitive ribbing, which it doesn't look like.)

    I have to say, often times we're prone to think that large organizations such as Microsoft are just a big, faceless entity. As a whole, this may or may not be true, but either way, they're only made up of people. The IE team only wants to ship the best software possible given their resources, as does Mozilla.

    The best to both teams -- let the competition continue!

    1. Re:You have to admit by CastrTroy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      If they wanted to ship the best product possible, why wouldn't they just fork Firefox, or Konquerer? At least then they'd have better CSS/standards support, as well as better security.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:You have to admit by waif69 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is awesome! It shows that at least some of the team members of the IE development team have some self-respect and can appreciate quality work. This shows that just because a group of developers work for the giant doesn't mean that they are disrespectful and bad sports.

    3. Re:You have to admit by dknj · · Score: 0

      go use Mac OS X then.

      yea thats right, i took the bait.

    4. Re:You have to admit by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I got modded troll, but I'm being serious. After 6 years of IE6, they finally release a new version. What they gave us a bunch of copied features from other browsers(firefox,opera) that have been available for years, and from what i've heard, nothing that really makes it better than the competition. And they have worse standards support than everybody else. You would think that in 6 years that they could produce something at least on par with the competition, if not many times better.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:You have to admit by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Good points, but look at it this way: the IE folks owe everything to Firefox. Really. The fact that their offices no longer smell of mothballs is a direct consequence of Firefox's rise. Microsoft was able to keep an open and evolving cross-platform development platform at bay (i.e., the web), but the fact that their strategic product wasn't a profitable product kept development in the dark ages until Firefox came along. IE will always improve (and indeed, will only improve) if it has this competition. As one of the co-creators of Firefox said recently:

      Firefox brought Microsoft back to the table, but they make no guarantees how long they'll stick around. I can't imagine why any individual--let alone an IT department--would bet on a company with a proven track record of gross abandonment.

      IE people should be very glad there's a Firefox, and pray it has staying power. And should keep sending cakes to the Mozillers.

    6. Re:You have to admit by the_wishbone · · Score: 1

      Agreed, however, I still think the cake should have been shaped like a chair.

    7. Re:You have to admit by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

      Yeah it's surprising that Microsoft teams would send cakes... I was expecting more a Ballmer-o-gram or something.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    8. Re:You have to admit by cnettel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, the previous IE team was basically disbanded, with people going to work on Office, Visual Studio and WPF/Avalon/XAML. Two of these are very popular and can, in their own way, surely be considered on par or superior to the competition. (Visual Studio is a nice IDE even for non-Windows development.) It's not a matter of trying for six years and failing, but rather starting quite late, with a team that's still smaller than it was when Trident was first developed. This of course only shifts the blame within MS, from developer incompetence to management incompetence, or arrogance.

    9. Re:You have to admit by eck011219 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I agree -- I have a couple of friends who work in Redmond and are just as fed up with the corporate BS as any Slashdotter. But they're working on things that deeply interest them, and they (as yet) believe that they and the other very sharp people on their teams can produce better stuff than Microsoft has in the past (besides, it's apparently a great place to work, if you can get past the corporate sellout thing that so many of us have a problem with). So I'm not at all surprised about the cake -- you have to figure that the IE folks and the Firefox folks are in contact from time to time and are watching each other carefully all the time, and the IE team at MS is going to be just as interested as Firefox in getting something cool out for the public.

      The problem with Microsoft is not bad coders. I'm sure they have some, but I bet the percentage is no different from other companies. The problem is when upper management starts making coding decisions based on shareholders' concerns, or when marketing starts making standards decisions and passing them down to coders. One of the friends at MS said that pretty much all the coders he knows would much rather be working with accepted standards instead of hackneyed MS pseudo-standards.

      Anyhow, I agree completely that this was a classy move. I would still have some marketing intern taste it before the whole team digs in (lest today be remembered as the day Firefox development froze forever at 2.0!), but I think most in-the-trenches coders would be happy to pat a rival on the back for something cool.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    10. Re:You have to admit by PenguinGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And why did it take 6 years to get a new version of IE? Because MS had "won" the browser war so they didn't have to upgrade anything..

      The joys of Microsoft and the campaign to control all of computing.

      --
      Computers are like Old Testament gods; lots of rules and no mercy.
    11. Re:You have to admit by public+transport · · Score: 1

      ...should keep sending cakes...

      Now, come on, have everyone forgotten that French Scientists Link Higher BMI with Lower IQ. Itsatrap!

    12. Re:You have to admit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it was a classy move. I'm as anti-Microsoft as the next guy, but as a developer I can appreciate all the work the IE team puts into their product, even if I don't care for that product. It's nice to see them acknowledge Firefox. Microsoft has done this before (e.g. for Adobe and Apple), so it's even more impressive for an open-source project like Firefox to receive similar kudos from 'the enemy'. It's an acknowledgment that the Firefox team has done a good job and that the (unexpected) competition has pushed IE to improve also. Really, I prefer this kind of friendly attitude from Microsoft, I hope we see more of that. Props to the IE team for this.

    13. Re:You have to admit by EggyToast · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yeah, exactly. A good programmer will be able to write whatever code they're told to write. To them, it's not a question of whether it presents good UI guidelines or doesn't conform to the OS; they make it work with the guidelines provided. If they're not hearing any problems, they're going to assume they're doing a good job.

      It's the managers and designers who are deciding what things will look like and how functionality will work. The managers for Word will say "We need to have this integrated into IE." The programmers aren't the ones to say "That's stupid; no one's going to use that." That's the manager's responsibility to understand what projects are important and which ones should go back to the drawing board.

      And when you hear conflicting things from management, it just makes you want to do what you're told, rather than try to figure out "which way is right" on such a subjective decision.

    14. Re:You have to admit by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Well, the previous IE team was basically disbanded, with people going to work on Office, Visual Studio and WPF/Avalon/XAML

      Thanks for the warning. Now I know to avoid Office, Visual Studio and WPF/Avalon/XAML for anything important.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    15. Re:You have to admit by WeAreAllDoomed · · Score: 1
      I have a couple of friends who work in Redmond and are just as fed up with the corporate BS as any Slashdotter. But they're working on things that deeply interest them, and they (as yet) believe that they and the other very sharp people on their teams can produce better stuff than Microsoft has in the past

      that's no excuse for working for a company that actively strives to make the internet proprietary and patent everything in sight. this "deeply interesting" "better stuff" is going to end up property of microsoft. why in the world would they want to do that?

      --
      free software, open standards, open file formats, no software patents.
    16. Re:You have to admit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm....after 6 years of IE 6 it's upgraded in 2006. I think I'm seeing a pattern here...

    17. Re:You have to admit by eclectro · · Score: 1

      but either way, they're only made up of people.

      New product just announced from Microsoft - Soylent Cake!

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    18. Re:You have to admit by iamacat · · Score: 1

      A good programmer will be able to write whatever code they're told to write.

      That's just like saying a good heart surgeon will implant a plush toy in a patient's chest if he/she or the hospital manager asks. A good programmer understands computer's abilities and limitations as well as psychology of a user interacting with it. Just tell those people your chest hurts or you want a convenient way to publish a word document on the web and leave details to knowledgeable exports.

      Microsoft programmers remind me of those doctors giving lethal injections in prisons.

    19. Re:You have to admit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      why in the world would they want to do that?

      To make a living.

      I hope this message reaches you all the way up in your tower.

    20. Re:You have to admit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be a stupid and ultimately-uncompetitive move on your part, because VS2005 is actually pretty nice. Certainly the Linux world has nothing like it.

    21. Re:You have to admit by Miseph · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Indeed. It often strikes me that many of our colleagues in geekdom have a tendncy to get quite wrapped up in what employees of certain companies (Microsoft, Symantec, SCO, etc.) are or aren't doing, and the relative ethicality of those actions and inactions. So wrapped up, in fact, that they seemingly forget that those employee's are people too, real ones, with bills, and lives, and stomachs, and that given the choice between doing something we dislike and eviction, most people are going to suck it up and put food on their tables. When you're ready to give full employment with equal pay and benefits to what they make now, then go ahead and tell us that they should all quit working for Microsoft because you don't like their business practices... until then, you're just blowing smoke. Too bad the parent felt he had to post AC. Good thing I'm so damned apathetic.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    22. Re:You have to admit by MosesJones · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Nope and Nope.

      1) Visual Studio is a very poor IDE, the testing framework just doesn't work, the positioning for the layout is woeful. It has no stats and metrics and the available plug-ins are either expensive or rubbish.

      2) XAML/WPF/Avalon are proprietary versions of other much better standards based technologies. Go and take a look at IBM's WebSphere Integration developer and the likes of SCA and SDO and truly claim that MS are even close to matching Big blue on ease of use.

      Developer friendly Microsoft is a myth... except for people who think that a VB app is the top of the shop.

      --
      An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    23. Re:You have to admit by WeAreAllDoomed · · Score: 1
      So wrapped up, in fact, that they seemingly forget that those employee's are people too, real ones, with bills, and lives, and stomachs, and that given the choice between doing something we dislike and eviction, most people are going to suck it up and put food on their tables. When you're ready to give full employment with equal pay and benefits to what they make now, then go ahead and tell us that they should all quit working for Microsoft because you don't like their business practices... until then, you're just blowing smoke.

      the OP said these people are researching and working on cutting-edge technologies at microsoft, and therefore presumably well-skilled. they're not working there because the only alternative is eviction or starvation.

      we all have to make choices in life. it appears these people have done so.

      i reject your criticism.

      --
      free software, open standards, open file formats, no software patents.
    24. Re:You have to admit by WeAreAllDoomed · · Score: 1
      I hope this message reaches you all the way up in your tower.

      i wasn't aware that considering the ethical implications of your professional work put you in a "tower".

      --
      free software, open standards, open file formats, no software patents.
    25. Re:You have to admit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>>Good points, but look at it this way: the IE folks owe everything to Firefox. Really. The fact that their offices no longer smell of mothballs is a direct consequence of Firefox's rise.

      Good points, but look at it this way: the Firefox folks owe everything to IE. Really. The fact that IE blew chunks (past tense?) led directly to the need and creation of Firefox.

    26. Re:You have to admit by 7Prime · · Score: 1

      So, what you're REALLY saying is that the real enemy is Coorporate... now you're speaking my language!

      —disgruntled Clear Channel employee
      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    27. Re:You have to admit by EggyToast · · Score: 1
      Well, not exactly apt. A heart surgeon is the one making the decisions. Their assistants, though, are expected to do what the surgeon tells them, not offer advice -- unless something is really wrong.

      For programmers, if they're in a good environment, management could tell them to write X app to do X thing. And they'd be able to do it. But rarely are they concerned about whether it conforms to the standards guidelines that they haven't even read because they're different between each department, and ultimately, if a manager says "I don't care if it might look different than [application], I want it to work," I can't imagine a programmer would make such a stink over it.

      Coding apps is rarely a life or death situation, especially for Microsoft.

    28. Re:You have to admit by eck011219 · · Score: 1

      Hm ... perhaps because fighting the "good fight" means working with no backing, no funding, and no support. Maybe, just maybe, Microsoft employees want to develop things from within Microsoft, allowing them to break down some of the barriers. I know my two friends think that way.

      This is the kind of nose-in-the-air statement that gets me frothing (and, when I respond to it, gets me tagged as flamebait, kind of proving my point). It's not black and white -- Microsoft is not simply big and evil, despite the fact that they might not do things the way you think they should be done. But for sake of argument, let's pretend they ARE evil. They're still the biggest show in town and, from a practical standpoint, unbeatable. Apple has thrown millions of dollars and thousands of great developers and deeply talented designers at the task of cutting them down and has hardly made a dent. If you want Microsoft to play ball, you need to work with them, not against them. They are too powerful to take down if you fight them -- you can get them to soften up if you work with them and within them. This, by the way, is the way to change government, too. I think the correlation is quite clear.

      But that's the argument if MS is uniformly evil. I don't think they are. I think they used to be closer to evil, but that they've changed. But I think the insular, must-smother-all mentality just doesn't work anymore, and I think they know that. OpenXML is one attempt at working with the larger world (I know, the standards fight is in high gear and MS can look like the same old mess, but I don't recall them wasting any time on standards organizations before except perhaps the w3 Consortium, and that was grudgingly at best). Apparently there are other projects involving extending VirtualPC that are getting a lot of support from MS management that allow for other OS options -- an interesting new idea that admits the existence of other OS's, considering how hard it has been in the past to even get a boot manager to play nice with Windows (and from a business standpoint, an admission that the Mac and Linux dual-boot options are getting harder and harder to ignore). Baby steps, but steps. So I think they're seeing the world coming, and they have enough people working there who want to be part of the world and not king of the world that it may just work.

      Just my .02 -- obviously I have access to only a few MS people, and I have no access to management types. But having been to Redmond and seen what a lot of very smart people are working very hard to accomplish, I get a bit tired of the constant, ivory tower (as phrased by another poster) attitudes around here. It sells everyone there short -- if MS came out with some statement about being a directionless geek living in your mother's basement if you work with Linux, we'd all be outraged. But apparently such broad strokes can be made in the other direction all the time.

      Let's all be calm for a bit, and see what this next flavor of Microsoft has to offer. I afford you the right to say "I told you so" if they continue to screw up. I'm not thrilled with Vista so far, but it's stability stuff more than basic stuff (in fact, I very much like the new interface -- takes a lot of getting used to, but it's more generally intelligent than the piecemeal stuff from XP). Anyhow, stability gets fixed, and I can wait (it's still in RC form now, anyway).

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  11. The link by Klaidas · · Score: 3, Insightful
    1. Re:The link by Evro · · Score: 4, Informative

      Looks like it should have really been http://www.flickr.com/photos/jollyjake/278562314/ - their server is apparently better equipped to handle the load.

      --
      rooooar
  12. Yum, Cake by GiggidyGiggidy · · Score: 5, Funny

    When the cake was opened, the Firefox team found it was not quiet finished and full of bugs.

    1. Re:Yum, Cake by StevoJ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      and it only worked with one particular fork

      --
      That didn't really make sense. But I'm going to post it anyway.
    2. Re:Yum, Cake by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Funny

      "When the cake was opened, the Firefox team found it was not quiet finished and full of bugs."

      The FireFox team decided to return the favor and make them a cake to congratulate them on their recent release of Internet Explorer 7. It is expected to be completed in about four years and have some of the same details in the icing that Opera's cake had already.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    3. Re:Yum, Cake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > and it only worked with one particular fork

      Oh god, don't talk about forks! Every anti-Linux guy on Slashdot is reading this discussion! ;)

    4. Re:Yum, Cake by Chris_Jefferson · · Score: 5, Funny

      The firefox team sent back a plain sponge with a note saying "If you would perfer a more exciting cake, there are a large number of extensions you can get."

      --
      Combination - fun iPhone puzzling
    5. Re:Yum, Cake by nacturation · · Score: 1

      When the cake was opened, the Firefox team found it was not quiet finished and full of bugs.

      Indeed. The icing is the shrinkwrap license. Underneath it's actually quite bland.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    6. Re:Yum, Cake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BAM!

    7. Re:Yum, Cake by Schnapple · · Score: 1

      The Firefox team sent the IE team a cake in return - it consumed most of the milk and just about all of the eggs from the local grocery store. When the grocery store complained about it, the Firefox team told the grocery store to move to a bigger location so they could hold more milk and eggs.

    8. Re:Yum, Cake by Epeeist · · Score: 3, Funny

      Unfortunately the cake they sent had red icing in a large square over the top of it with a black and yellow stripe and a few other bits of coloured icing scattered here and there.

      The cake itself was pretty acid too.

    9. Re:Yum, Cake by spiderbitendeath · · Score: 1

      Which, thanks to the DRM, can only be used to hold the cake in your mouth for a limited amount of time, and can not be used by anyone else with out purchasing another seat license.

      --
      Sometimes when I'm working on projects things disappear, I suspect gremlins.
    10. Re:Yum, Cake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      and it only worked with one particular fork
      And the fork turned out to be a spoon, made of wood.
  13. Of course it wasn't poisoned by roystgnr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If it wasn't for the Firefox team, we'd all still be stuck with IE6 and the Internet Explorer team would have had to look for new jobs.

    1. Re:Of course it wasn't poisoned by IdahoEv · · Score: 4, Funny

      The best comment I heard was "Yeah, but did the IE team include the recipe?"

      --
      I stole this sig from someone cleverer than me.
    2. Re:Of course it wasn't poisoned by mmmiiikkkeee · · Score: 0

      they probly bought the cake from a 3th party and are too scared to release the recipe due to fear of legal consiquences

    3. Re:Of course it wasn't poisoned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I guess it was only free as in "free cake".

    4. Re:Of course it wasn't poisoned by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "If it wasn't for the Firefox team, we'd all still be stuck with IE6..."

      Stuck? Nah. Opera's been around all this time.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    5. Re:Of course it wasn't poisoned by darkuni · · Score: 1

      No, we'd all be using Opera as we should be :)

    6. Re:Of course it wasn't poisoned by AdamKG · · Score: 1

      But for much of this time it was adware.

      --
      groupthink: It's good for self-esteem.
    7. Re:Of course it wasn't poisoned by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "But for much of this time it was adware."

      So?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    8. Re:Of course it wasn't poisoned by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that sentence stands alone for anyone but an Opera fanboy.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    9. Re:Of course it wasn't poisoned by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "I'm pretty sure that sentence stands alone for anyone but an Opera fanboy."

      I don't deny being an Opera fanboy. However, I stand by my question. "So?" I'd remind you and the original poster that we're currently using an ad-supported site to have this discussion. So do you have an actual rebuttal or should I just point at you and say "FireFox fanboy!!!" and assume victory?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    10. Re:Of course it wasn't poisoned by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      But I use Camino, Firefox, Safari, and IE on a near equal basis. It's hard to call me a fanboy of any one browser.

      Also, what ads? I don't see any on this site.

      To the main thrust: I didn't really rebut your point, because you didn't really make one. You just brushed off the OP's statement. I wasn't really contributing to the discussion, as it were, I was just pointing out that your fanboyism was showing.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    11. Re:Of course it wasn't poisoned by blugu64 · · Score: 1

      Slight difference between adware and adsupported sites. Not saying that Opera was or was not adware, but you'd be a fool to not recognize the difference.

      --
      "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
    12. Re:Of course it wasn't poisoned by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "It's hard to call me a fanboy of any one browser."

      I use FF and Opera frequently, yet you called me one.

      "Also, what ads? I don't see any on this site."

      Uh huh. I suppose you'll tell me you don't use an ad-supported search engine, either.

      "To the main thrust: I didn't really rebut your point, because you didn't really make one."

      I wasn't trying to. I was challenging him to complete his thought. It's ad-supported. BFD, so's a lot of other things we use daily.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    13. Re:Of course it wasn't poisoned by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "Slight difference between adware and adsupported sites. Not saying that Opera was or was not adware, but you'd be a fool to not recognize the difference."

      Um, okay. I'm a fool, then. Opera used Google Text Ads in a small area at the top of the screen. Google uses the same text-ads in their searches. Slashdot uses both flash and animated .gifs covering a good deal of screen real estate. Slashdot's being used to bitch about Opera using Text ads 2 years ago. No, I don't get it. I apologize for being a fool.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    14. Re:Of course it wasn't poisoned by bubkus_jones · · Score: 1

      The last time I used an ad-supported version of Opera (granted, it was a while ago, but I don't like using ad-supported programs, especially when there are several ad-free alternatives out there), they were full colour image ads, quite often animated, and took up a lot of screen real estate. Firefox (Phoenix/Firebird/whatever)never had that. Not only did it not have ads in the browser, there's been an extension available for quite a while now that will block out ads from sites. Opera only got that (and still, it's not as nice as AdBlock/Adblock Plus, in my opinion) in the last couple 9.* releases. Would they have incorporated one if they didn't see the popularity of Firefox's AdBlock? I really doubt it.

    15. Re:Of course it wasn't poisoned by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      Opera used full 80x40 banner ads, the google text ads wern't until much later.
      I've never looked into the means of the text ads, but they are targeted which means its spying on every page you load much the same way most spyware would do. Again, Don't know enough about the mechanism to say for sure its "evil", but certainly ads targeted based on every page you you have loaded is a lot worse than ads on a single site tied just to your current search.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    16. Re:Of course it wasn't poisoned by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "The last time I used an ad-supported version of Opera (granted, it was a while ago, but I don't like using ad-supported programs, especially when there are several ad-free alternatives out there), they were full colour image ads, quite often animated, and took up a lot of screen real estate."

      I agree with you about early version's ads. For a while there was an ad that was Flash based that had audio. You couldn't stop it from talking! However, Opera responded by banning that sort of ad with their service. Still, I can totally understand that turning people off. Heck, I damn near dropped it over that.

      However, in version 7 they switched to the Google text ads. That was back in... oh.. I want to say 2003, but I don't recall too clearly. Opera had all the functionality on screen as Firefox, but the toolbar still only took the same number of pixels that FF and IE both used.

      To be honest, I liked the idea that they were generating revenue from the browser. It encouraged them to keep making interesting releases, plus Opera has had a really good track record when it comes to exploits. I wouldn't argue with the rationale that Opera's obscurity has helped with that. In my experience, though, I've read a few times now where there were exploits that Opera was immmune to. For example, there was a way to form an FTP url that hid the true domain name from the navigation bar. When attempted on Opera, it would display a message saying "This might be an exploit, here's where you're realy going..." Their dev team stayed on top of that.

      In any event, simply being ad supported is not a strong argument, in my opinion. We all use ad supported stuff we love. You like FF's adblock better? Great reason. Google Maps works better in FF than in Opera? Good reason. FF has extensions I use a lot. Great reason. 3 years ago, Opera was ad supported... Huh?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    17. Re:Of course it wasn't poisoned by zobier · · Score: 1

      the Moz ppl should send back a recipe and tell them they can "compile" the cake themselves.

      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
  14. New cake; old ingredients by spookymonster · · Score: 5, Funny

    While the IE team touted the cake as 'new and innovative', after further investigation, the Firefox team discovered that Microsoft had used ingredients that originally appeared in Mozilla cakes several years earlier.

    --
    - Despite popular opinion, I am not perfect.
    1. Re:New cake; old ingredients by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While the IE team touted the cake as 'new and innovative', after further investigation, the Firefox team discovered that Microsoft had used ingredients that originally appeared in Mozilla cakes several years earlier. ... and the Mozilla team were inexplicably inspired after a night at the Opera.

  15. Of course it isn't poisoned... by kid_oliva · · Score: 1

    since when is Exlax considered poison...

    --
    I eat Karma for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. That's why I don't have any.
  16. It takes time.. Give it another year or two by iOsiris · · Score: 5, Funny

    Then the FF team will slowly start disappearing from mysterious causes

    1. Re:It takes time.. Give it another year or two by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      and then a strange product appears on the market ..
      http://www.msfirefox.com/

  17. And she said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Let them eat cake."

  18. Happy to have a job again! by EggyToast · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Remember, Microsoft disbanded the IE team shortly after 6 was released. The IE team sends a cake not just for a "birthday," but as thanks for giving them jobs!

    1. Re:Happy to have a job again! by onion2k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They still had jobs, just not working on IE. You don't get rid of developers just because the project finishes. Similarly, you don't keep a team together when they've got nothing to do. That would be a waste of some valuable assets. They'd just gone to other parts of Microsoft.

    2. Re:Happy to have a job again! by Fortyseven · · Score: 1
      You don't get rid of developers just because the project finishes.
      Unless you work in the game development industry. :P
  19. Talk about a much-improved quote.. by T-Ranger · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Explorer team also left a greeting card with the picture of a grumpy baby with the note: ``It's just not fair. Good people shouldn't have to feel bad. Best wishes, the IE team.'' [an error occurred while processing this directive] A helium-filled balloon taped to the logo reads, ``We love you.'' How history changes in 9 years.

    1. Re:Talk about a much-improved quote.. by karolgajewski · · Score: 1

      [an error occurred while processing this directive]

      Oh, those directives... I wonder what browser they recommend using to avoid that.

      --
      - .k. -
  20. Southpark Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sally Struthers: No! This is my cake!
    Cartman: Sally Struthers, you give me that cake!
    Sally Struthers: You can't have any!

  21. I would do the same by javilon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Should mozilla not exist, there would be no IE7 team. The IE7 team must be glad that mozilla keeps releasing new versions so they can keep their jobs. Without competitive pressure M$ left 5 years pass without a IE release.

    --


    When his defense asked, "Which computer has Jon Johansen trespassed upon?" the answer was: "His own."
    1. Re:I would do the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conspiracy theories:

      Step 1:

      Developers from IE work on Mozilla on week-ends, so they can keep their jobs.

      Step 2:

      Developers involved in Windows security write exploits on the week-ends, so they can keep their jobs

      Step 3:

      Developers of DRM write breaking codes on their week-ends, so they can keep their jobs

      Step 4:

      Consultants hired to fix problems introduce others, so they can keep their jobs.

      Step 5:

      Bangalore outsourcing firm make empty promises and don't deliver, so they can keep their jobs.

      Step 6:

      US military intelligence foment wars so they can keep their jobs.

      Step 7:

      Law enforcment officials break windows on week-end so they can keep their jobs

      Step 8:

      Lawyers make complex and inconsistent laws so they can keep their jobs

      Pick the ones you like

  22. giving back by jmyers · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who says Microsoft does not give back to the open source community?

    1. Re:giving back by Reverend528 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Unfortunately, the license forbids the firefox team from redistributing the cake.

    2. Re:giving back by kevin.fowler · · Score: 1

      good luck getting them to share the recipe

      --
      Bury me in mashed potatoes.
    3. Re:giving back by dominator · · Score: 5, Funny

      Like it or not, they'll be distributing "derivative works" of the cake in the next few hours...

      *ducks*

    4. Re:giving back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The license also forbids sharing it with other people and slicing it because doing so the internal parts would be exposed. So in order to eat it you must swallow it in one piece, and if you die in the process nobody can sue the chef because of the EULA you signed.

    5. Re:giving back by lostboy2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Heh. Doesn't that qualify as reverse engineering?

    6. Re:giving back by numbsafari · · Score: 3, Funny

      Only if they've been drinking heavily or have the flu.

    7. Re:giving back by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1

      Like that will even slow you and your filthy cake pirating buddies. You are just lucky the internet is made of tubes instead of wire and glass.

      --
      Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
    8. Re:giving back by Tokerat · · Score: 1

      ...proving once again that, no matter how you modify them, Microsoft products tend to clog even a well built network.

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  23. I was hoping Firefox 2.0 would bring change. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been trying to use Firefox 2.0 for the past few days. I never got around to using any of the release candidates, but I had kept reading that there were a lot of improvements and that it was going to be a great release.

    That's not what I've found. The memory consumption issues of Firefox 1.5.x have still not been dealt with. The Firefox process I'm using right now has been running since yesterday afternoon. Using the Task Manager, I can see that Firefox is taking up 593 MB of RAM. I've heard that this can be caused by bad extensions, so I didn't install any. Furthermore, I heard that Firefox's caching sometimes uses a lot of memory, so I completely disabled it.

    I've also tried IE7, and I've been really pleased. They've gotten their act together and their product works very well. I've been using Firefox 1.0.x for a long time now, but I think I might just switch to IE7. I was hoping that I could take the Firefox 2.0 route, but based on my experiences so far, that won't be happening.

    I hope the Firefox developers enjoy the cake the IE7 team sent them. They should eat it, and then get to work on fixing Firefox for 3.0. I'm hoping Firefox 3.0 finally gets around to lowering the memory consumption to a reasonable level.

    1. Re:I was hoping Firefox 2.0 would bring change. by Cyphertube · · Score: 1

      I'm a big fat Firefox fanboy, and yes, it's still a memory hog. Now I do have extensions installed, and it's not so bad if I shut off Firefox occasionally, but then again, I find that shutting down my machine occasionally is good for my Windows box anyway. (Due to space issues, my Linux box is currently in the closet so haven't tested there yet.)

      I loaded up IE 7 on this machine, checked out some sites that had been kludged to work in IE 6 and Firefox and Opera, etc. (standards, followed by kludge) and watched them look like crap. That's to be expected. I noticed that Google's Web Accelerator worked with IE 7, which it doesn't with FF 2.0. But, otherwise, it wasn't impressive. It was.... expected?

      And, everyone should go and meta-moderate, because this parent post clearly is not Troll. I hate fanboy moderators getting mod points because people (including me) don't meta-moderate.

      --
      Linux - because it doesn't leave that Steve Ballmer aftertaste.
    2. Re:I was hoping Firefox 2.0 would bring change. by Ramble · · Score: 0
      I'd highly recommend something like Opera to you.

      It has everything Firefox has and more, but with none of the downsides.

      --
      "Oh boy"
    3. Re:I was hoping Firefox 2.0 would bring change. by arevos · · Score: 1
      It has everything Firefox has and more, but with none of the downsides.

      It doesn't have the broad range of functionality Firefox gets from its extensions. That's a fairly big downside for me.

    4. Re:I was hoping Firefox 2.0 would bring change. by Apotekaren · · Score: 1

      Hmm, something wrong with your box? I'm at 68mb, with 11 add-ons running.
      Haven't been running it since yesterday afternoon, since I shut down my XP computer for the night.
      But I have had it on for some 7 or 8 hours now.
      And yes, I had some memory problems with 1.5, but nothing drastic enough to bother me.

      --
      She: Hey, are you a traitor? Me: No, I'm atheist.
    5. Re:I was hoping Firefox 2.0 would bring change. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've actually heard that they've actually got them under control now. The last time I had issues with an upgrade, I started a new profile (didn't need to delete the existing one) and it fixed the issues. Might be worth a shot.

    6. Re:I was hoping Firefox 2.0 would bring change. by arevos · · Score: 4, Interesting
      That's not what I've found. The memory consumption issues of Firefox 1.5.x have still not been dealt with. The Firefox process I'm using right now has been running since yesterday afternoon. Using the Task Manager, I can see that Firefox is taking up 593 MB of RAM. I've heard that this can be caused by bad extensions, so I didn't install any. Furthermore, I heard that Firefox's caching sometimes uses a lot of memory, so I completely disabled it.

      I'm always intrigued by these comments. There's barely a time at work when a Firefox window isn't open in the background, I have numerous extensions installed, and having over two dozen tabs open is not particularly unusual for me; however, Firefox has never even come close to using up that much RAM on any machine I've worked on, even when I have that amount of memory to spare. Even the huge pages the new Slashdot comment system produces doesn't raise my RAM usage very far over the 100M mark, and the majority of that is likely caching.

      I wonder why Firefox seems to use up so much memory for some people, whilst others get away with relatively little. Did you have any plugins installed that might have been the cause of this problem?

    7. Re:I was hoping Firefox 2.0 would bring change. by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 1

      I have been toying with both myself, when I am on my Vista machine, and you are correct that Firefox 2.0 still has memory problems.

      IE7 seems to have some rendering issues. Half of the comments here, using the "New Discussion Style" view, are split in half by their subject line. Haven't gotten around to looking into that yet.

      The good thing is that we can all be pretty sure that that both the Firefox memory issues and the IE rendering flaws will actually be fixed, because both teams have to continue to develop now that they are faced with having an actual realistic competitor. It makes me want to start working on Gimp again.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    8. Re:I was hoping Firefox 2.0 would bring change. by gavri · · Score: 1

      Assuming that you aren't trolling, why did you pick IE 7 over Opera? It's a lot faster.

    9. Re:I was hoping Firefox 2.0 would bring change. by bunratty · · Score: 1
      I wonder why Firefox seems to use up so much memory for some people, whilst others get away with relatively little.
      That's what we all wonder. Without these people giving a clue as to how to see the problem, there's no way it can be investigated. Thankfully, it's only a very small percentage of Firefox users seeing memory problems this severe.
      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
    10. Re:I was hoping Firefox 2.0 would bring change. by SquareVoid · · Score: 1

      I am one of those users that has the memory issue both at home and at work. At home I have more or less the same extensions and with roughly 40 tabs open it eats up about 400MB of RAM (that is more then most games). Yes I did the cache trick where it empties it from RAM when you minimize, but anyone who has done this can see the RAM just slowly consume it all up again. If you see anything obvious let me know, but I pretty much have surrendered to this goliath of a memory hog.

      Currently I have the following extensions installed:
      DOM Inspector 1.8.0.7
      Talkback 1.5.0.7
      IE Tab 1.0.9
      Tab Mix Plus 0.3.0.5
      StumbleUpon 2.78
      VideoDownloader 1.0
      Adblock .5

      Currently has 20 tabs open. I wont list the sites but they include several msdn sites, several developer sites like donetjunkies, codeproject, one or two blogs, slashdot etc etc. Nothing too exotic.

      Firefox version 1.5.0.7

    11. Re:I was hoping Firefox 2.0 would bring change. by dkasak · · Score: 2, Informative

      I really don't get it. I've *never* had problems with Firefox memory usage (I started using it a few versions prior to 1.0; I can't remember which), be it on Linux or Windows. I'm currently using the final release of Firefox 2.0 with 15 extensions installed (including one listed as a problematic extension - IETab, for sites which impose restrictions on browsers) and a couple of Java applets opened in separate tabs. The process has been running for 4 days now, during which I had opened over a 100 tabs, with about 20 tabs being the simultaneous maximum. The current memory usage of Firefox is 82,072 KB, with the peak memory usage being 91,042 KB.

      This is a serious matter that needs discussing in order to isolate the reasons for the enormous memory usage some people seem to generate. As it's extremely unlikely that everyone is lying about this (and I'm not either), there's obviously a quite concrete reason why this happens. I find it very surprising that no one has been able to clearly outline it. It would be really great if we could figure out what exactly is going on so it can be fixed once and for all.

    12. Re:I was hoping Firefox 2.0 would bring change. by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

      It does have the broad range of functionality built in, without the bloat of FF.

      What exactly do you need?

    13. Re:I was hoping Firefox 2.0 would bring change. by phantomlord · · Score: 1

      Firefox 1.5.0.7 on linux
      DOM inpsector, Bookmarks Synchronizer, FlashGot, Flashblock, Adblock, Image Zoom

      Started my browser about 18 hours ago. I've been to slashdot a few times, newegg and a couple other sites.
      top shows 105m SWAP, 135m RES, 21m SHR.

      Granted, I don't see some of the 400 or 500 meg marks that some people claim to see but I'd say 240 megs is rather excessive for 18 hours of being loaded (and considering I was asleep for a good chunk of that).

      --
      Don't leave your mind so open that your brain falls out. Don't close it so much that you cut off the blood.
    14. Re:I was hoping Firefox 2.0 would bring change. by arevos · · Score: 1

      The key thing is ad-blocking functionality that automatically downloads effective rules. I don't have the time to maintain a list of regular expressions, so Filterset.G is a significant timesaver for me. I'd be interested to know if anything like that has been developed for Opera; last I checked, it hadn't. Another set of functionality I use in Firefox is the various web developer extensions, such as Firebug and EditCSS. Also PasswordMaker, which again isn't available for Opera, and TorButton, when I'm feeling paranoid.

      Those are all the things I can think of currently, though I'm sure there's a few more. Whilst Opera no doubt suits some people down to the ground, Firefox has the edge in features and (because I use GNOME) desktop integrations. Another problem with Opera is that the Linux version had some smooth scrolling issues back with version 8.0, though they may have sorted that out in 9.0.

    15. Re:I was hoping Firefox 2.0 would bring change. by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1
      Well - on my box with its 15 extensions installed, the memory usage is now less then *half* of what it used to be. It did drop what was known to be a memory leaker and that is probably a good part of it, but at the moment with 10 tabs - 68M, not bad at all.

      Sera

      --
      Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
    16. Re:I was hoping Firefox 2.0 would bring change. by orangeacid · · Score: 1

      You do realize that such blasphemy is likely to get you lynched around here? P.S. I have never had one of these much griped about leaks, and I.E. 7 (at least on my machine) feels clumpy at best compared to any version of Fx

    17. Re:I was hoping Firefox 2.0 would bring change. by aitan · · Score: 1
      I wonder why Firefox seems to use up so much memory for some people, whilst others get away with relatively little. Did you have any plugins installed that might have been the cause of this problem?

      Not only plugins, other people have found that programs like WindowBlind can make Firefox use more and more memory, so there are lots of things to check in order to understand why some people has a particuliar problem, because it's very possible that the problem isn't in Firefox itself

    18. Re:I was hoping Firefox 2.0 would bring change. by Digana · · Score: 1

      You can tell Firefox to be smarter about memory usage in about:config (type that into the address bar). Create a key called browser.cache.memory.capacity of type integer and set it equal to -1. Also set browser.cache.memory.enable of type boolean to true. This should drastically reduce your Firefox's memory usage, at least by 50%-60%. Granted, this setting should be more obvious from the main prefs instead of being so hackish, but it can be done. More details on this and other tweaks in the link below:

                http://www.tweakguides.com/Firefox_8.html

    19. Re:I was hoping Firefox 2.0 would bring change. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      68 meg for browser? Seriously...

      More than 5-10 for a browser and I too would ask 'hey what is it doing?' Really is 64 meg needed for a browser? Oh sure there is the 'but machines come with 2 gig these days argument. But still sounds like something is wrong... It sounds sloppy to me. Course then again being an embedded kind of guy where if something is using 64k I am thinking 'hey whats wrong.

    20. Re:I was hoping Firefox 2.0 would bring change. by bunratty · · Score: 1

      Making the changes you mention should not affect memory usage, because those are the default settings. You can try setting browser.cache.memory.capacity to a low number like 4096 to save memory.

      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
    21. Re:I was hoping Firefox 2.0 would bring change. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC adblock is a known memory leaker. Try Adblock Plus instead?

    22. Re:I was hoping Firefox 2.0 would bring change. by Digana · · Score: 1

      Hm. In 1.5 in Debian I had to specifically make those changes, and I did see the aforementioned memory reduction. It wasn't default, for some reason. I don't know if this doesn't hold for Windows, however.

    23. Re:I was hoping Firefox 2.0 would bring change. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    24. Re:I was hoping Firefox 2.0 would bring change. by bunratty · · Score: 1

      If that's true, you should file a bug report so the problem can be fixed.

      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
    25. Re:I was hoping Firefox 2.0 would bring change. by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1

      While Firefox 2.0 might have a small memory foot print reported in task manager (100mb for me) when I open many tabs with memoy images, my swap space usage goes up to over 2g suddenly. What is with all this unreported memory being used??? (When I exite firefox, the page file usage goes back to normal.) The system is unusable in this 2g page file state; looks like it's back to Opera for me.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  24. The Cream by jlebrech · · Score: 0

    Isn't Real Cream ;)

    1. Re:The Cream by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Burma Shave!

  25. Thanks for the ideas by Anon-Admin · · Score: 1

    Looks like Micro$oft is just thanking them for the great ideas, which they will add to the next version of IE. They always were a step behind.

    1. Re:Thanks for the ideas by le0p · · Score: 3, Funny

      So I guess Firefox is just going to forward the cake to Opera then?

      --
      "I think that God in creating Man somewhat overestimated his ability."-Oscar Wilde
    2. Re:Thanks for the ideas by Duct+Tape+Jedi · · Score: 1

      Yes Firefox does have a lot of things that were in Opera first. For me, and I'm sure some other people as well, the reason I use Firefox, despite its large memory footprint, is the extensions. Give me a way to disable ads, flash, and js easily in Opera as well as a simple way to move all my bookmarks and I would switch to Opera in an instant.

  26. What they didn't tell you... by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Developers later found that they were unable to open the box containing the cake. When attempting to do so, they kept getting a message from WGA telling them that it was attempting to verify that theirs was in fact a Genuine Windows Cake, then their connection to the server would time out.

    --
    What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
  27. Icing on the cake... by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 5, Funny

    reads "Thank You for tabbed browsing."

    --
    There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    1. Re:Icing on the cake... by Zigg · · Score: 2, Funny

      "...to Opera."

    2. Re:Icing on the cake... by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

      Cool, it only took 7 minutes for someone to get it. ;-)

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    3. Re:Icing on the cake... by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Too bad opera borrowed Tabbed Browsing from NetCaptor... (www.netcaptor.com)

      --

      The Digital Sorceress
    4. Re:Icing on the cake... by gordo3000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      haven't there been entire 200 comment discussions about who first came up wtih tabbed browsing? I'm sure, in the end, we will all find out it was actually Al Gore

    5. Re:Icing on the cake... by darkuni · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They should have sent the cake to Team Opera then. Credit where credit is due.

    6. Re:Icing on the cake... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      "...to Opera."

      Okay then, make that: "Thank You for GOOD tabbed browsing."

      Tabbed browsing, which jumps to the last window you were looking at, is utterly useless. Seperate browser windows work just as well.

      Mozilla got it right the first time. Opera, sadly, still doesn't even make sane tabbed browsing a selectable OPTION.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  28. It's the least they could do... by Red+Samurai · · Score: 0

    After they ripped off so much shit from Mozilla.

  29. Secret Ingredients by organgtool · · Score: 2, Funny
    P.S.: No, it was not poisoned

    However, it did contain the pubes of every person on the IE team. The Firefox team plans on retaliating by baking a cake using the dismembered appendages of family members of the IE team. You can thank South Park for that grisly idea. :)
    1. Re:Secret Ingredients by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      The Firefox team plans on retaliating by baking a cake using the dismembered appendages of family members of the IE team. You can thank South Park for that grisly idea. :)

      Yeah, you know, or Shakespeare...

  30. Give Me A Break... by beringreenbear · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For a change, Microsoft's IE team was showing a bit of class and acknowledging that without the competition and innovation from Mozilla Firefox, there (probably) wouldn't have been an IE 7 project. It also hints that there might be some subtle changes in Microsoft's old Cult of Bill approach. At the end of the day, software developers are just people, and political football aside, there really is no reason for animosity. Kudos to Microsoft's IE 7 team for being good sports.

    1. Re:Give Me A Break... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is so true... On one of my first days helping to deliver packages with UPS (I was in IT, it was Christmas, *everyone* delivered packages), there was a UPS guy and FedEx guy parking in a gas station. Stupid me thought they'd be antagonistic to each other.. But no, they chatted for a few seconds, mentioned how busy things were, then went on their way. They're just people trying to earn a living, and that's cool.

      Except that Microsoft is evil incarnate, and those sad minions don't know they rocky road to hell that's in store for them, but for now, they're human...

      Just like the American's applauding that British ship that escaped that WWII battle...

      Like the top runner stopping to help a fallen competitor..

      Gosh, I'm weepy.

    2. Re:Give Me A Break... by tfinniga · · Score: 1

      Except for the suspicious morse code border, I'd say you're right. But at least it's friendly competition. I imagine none of the ie developers were happy that they all got taken off of the ie team once netscape was crushed, and I'm sure they're happy to be allowed to work on it again, thanks to Firefox.

      --
      Powered by Web3.5 RC 2
    3. Re:Give Me A Break... by trifish · · Score: 1

      that without the competition and innovation from Mozilla Firefox, there (probably) wouldn't have been an IE 7 project

      It's good to see the word "probably" in this context. Because, it's highest time to wake up to reality.

      1) There was a new major version of Internet Explorer released each time a new major version of Windows was released. Vista + IE7. Simple. Right. I hope it was the last time I've seen the nonsense that without Firefox there would be no IE7.

      2) As for inovation: It would be great if someone told us at last what exactly Mozilla/Firefox inovated. They certainly didn't invent tabbed browsing, which was invented by Opera.

  31. Maybe It's Just a Gift? by Secret+Agent+Man · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe while us users squabble in our own browser war, the development teams actually don't care all that much. Maybe they truly are just glad of how everyone is advancing (as opposed to just trying to one-up each other). I'm not saying that everyone in both companies feel that way, but instead of reading stuff into this surprise present, maybe it was just a good gesture.

  32. Overheard on IRC by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 4, Funny

    "But did they include the recipe?"

    1. Re:Overheard on IRC by gh5046 · · Score: 0

      The Firefox team should send a cake back to them, a higher quality and better tasting one, and include the recipe with it.

  33. Obvious question. by Honest+Olaf · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Were there any bugs in the cake?

  34. Need more details by Linker3000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Was the icing #FF6666, #6600FF or something else?

    Was there a nice #FF0000 cherry on the top?

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
    1. Re:Need more details by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 1

      Amuzingly, it seems to be in grey scale. I guess the baker didn't have a 256 color option. See the Flikr link someone posted below.

      --
      What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
    2. Re:Need more details by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      It was mostly #F0F0F0 with #101020 highlights.

      At least that's what it looked like to me, but who knows, I never bother with colour correction.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    3. Re:Need more details by lostboy2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, it probably wasn't a cake.

  35. Satan's birthday party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Was it a Ferrari cake, or an Acura cake?

    1. Re:Satan's birthday party by Giometrix · · Score: 1

      "But I wanted an Opera caaaaaaaaake"

      --
      Download free e-books, lectures, and tutorials at bookgoldmine.com
  36. To be a bit cryptic... by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

    The Cake Is A Lie...

    1. Re:To be a bit cryptic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just to say that someone else here gets that reference oooooo

      very nice

  37. To honor General Ackbar... by Bros · · Score: 0

    "It's a trap!"

  38. Microsoft lives out an episode of The Simpsons by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 5, Funny

    P.S.: No, it was not poisoned

    Montgomery C. Gates: Look at them stuffing their faces, never knowing they're getting closer to the poisoned part of the cake... There IS poison in the cake, right?
    Smithers Balmer: Uh, no sir, our lawyers said that's considered murder.
    Montgomery C. Gates: Damn their oily hides!

    1. Re:Microsoft lives out an episode of The Simpsons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There has to be a way to get a chair joke in there somewhere...

    2. Re:Microsoft lives out an episode of The Simpsons by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      I'll give you the benefit of the doubt/artistic license and all, but for the record, it was a poisoned donut.

    3. Re:Microsoft lives out an episode of The Simpsons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know that Smithers is not Waylon Smithers' first name?

    4. Re:Microsoft lives out an episode of The Simpsons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is poison but it will take longer time, it is slow poison.
      The ideal plan keep FF as long it doesn't take over IE :).
      The time needed by FF to get major percent usage that is how we will know the poison incubation period.
      Job security for as long as possible ;) (You know you can be fired for for two reasons, nothing left to do or not doing it right)

  39. Cake or Death? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems Death wasn't an option

  40. Big Black E? by Diamon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Seems even the IE team knows that IE is dead.

    As for the ex-lax, bugs, pubes in the cake of course none of that is true. Those things would only be possible if someone at Microsoft actually made the cake, and that's not how MS does things. They knew they couldn't make a good cake so they just went out and bought a cake from someone who already knew how to make one and then stuck their logo on it and called it theirs.

    1. Re:Big Black E? by Mike89 · · Score: 1
      so they just went out and bought a cake from someone who already knew how to make one and then stuck their logo on it and called it theirs.
      Ofcourse, but when Google does the same thing they're 'innovating' ;)
    2. Re:Big Black E? by corychristison · · Score: 1
      They knew they couldn't make a good cake so they just went out and bought a cake from someone who already knew how to make one and then stuck their logo on it and called it theirs.
      Of course, we all know programmers can't bake/cook! That's why Pillsbury (Pizza Pops) and Hostess (Twinkies) are very wealthy companies. ;-)
  41. STUPID MODS by kurokaze · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    How is this a troll? he is completely correct about the memory usage of FF, granted mine is only using 228MB with no extensions its still way too high!

    1. Re:STUPID MODS by falcon5768 · · Score: 1
      fanboi mod. I just started using Firefox again after using Camino for a while and even with 2 there is a memory usage problem.

      Granted I have 2 gigs so I dont care, but still

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    2. Re:STUPID MODS by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      I have 2 gigs and I still care. If all apps feel free to eat as much of it as they want then it limits the number of said apps you can run. When firefox and your torrent client are both at 600+ mem, you have no room for loading a game that wants >1gig of mem.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
  42. And being the nerds they are... by krell · · Score: 4, Funny

    ""The Microsoft Internet Explorer Team sent the Firefox team a cake for the release of Firefox 2!"

    And being the nerds they are, it was baked into the shape of Counselor Troi. The Firefox nerds, now trendy Galactica fans, merely laughed at the nerds who were so out of it as to still love "Star Trek".

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
    1. Re:And being the nerds they are... by Control+Group · · Score: 1

      With mint frosting!

      [wasting time until the 20 second mark...18 one thousand, 19 one thousand, 20... SUBMIT!]

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    2. Re:And being the nerds they are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice nerd-fu, but do you remember the episode name?

    3. Re:And being the nerds they are... by Control+Group · · Score: 1

      No...no, I didn't.

      To be honest, until I read the G4 bit, I had forgotten what was actually going on in that episode aside from Data's dreaming.

      But it's having the line to hand when it counts that matters, and that part I pulled off just fine, if I do say so myself.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
  43. Non-slashdotted picture by jsoderba · · Score: 5, Informative

    The picture is hosted on flickr.

  44. A cake? by zeromorph · · Score: 5, Funny

    Shouldn't it have been cookies?

    Ok, maybe they were afraid they don't accept cookies.

    --
    "Hannibal's plans never work right. They just work." Amy/A-Team
    1. Re:A cake? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Shouldn't it have been cookies?

      With some Java...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:A cake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody knows that the option to prevent 3rd party cookies was removed in Firefox 2. :-)

  45. Not poisoned??? by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

    IE developer: What? The cake wasn't poisoned? But... but... then what did we just eat?!?

    --
    "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    1. Re:Not poisoned??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I recall, Ballmer's reasoning was that he could clearly not eat the cake in front of him.

  46. Cake, or a free trip to Australia? by spookymonster · · Score: 3, Funny

    I heard Microsoft was originally going to book the entire Firefox dev team on Oceanic flight 815....

    --
    - Despite popular opinion, I am not perfect.
    1. Re:Cake, or a free trip to Australia? by filterchild · · Score: 1

      Well, I heard they were going to be on Pacific Air Flight 121.

    2. Re:Cake, or a free trip to Australia? by bloobloo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Cakes on a Plane?

    3. Re:Cake, or a free trip to Australia? by gbobeck · · Score: 1
      Cakes on a Plane?

      Obligatory quotes:
      Everybody listen up! We have to put a barrier between us and the cakes! ...
      Enough is enough! I have had it with these motherf***ing cakes on this motherf***ing plane!
      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
  47. Piece of cake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So IE vs. Firefox is a piece of cake? For whom?

  48. Sounds like an hold highschool trick. by Lethyos · · Score: 1

    I recall stories of cheerleaders from my highschool making brownies with laxative mixed in and sending them to the cheerleaders of a rival school. Maybe this is a similar gesture? I would hope, at least, the cake was magical .

    --
    Why bother.
    1. Re:Sounds like an hold highschool trick. by krell · · Score: 1

      " recall stories of cheerleaders from my highschool making brownies with laxative mixed in and sending them to the cheerleaders of a rival school. Maybe this is a similar gesture?"

      Yeah, because nothing beats the flying hershey squirts as halftime entertainment.

      --
      Where were you when the voynix came?
  49. Unbelievable! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "P.S.: No, it was not poisoned"


    Damn! Those idiots at Microsoft can't get anything right!
  50. Made on a PC by suso · · Score: 1

    That cake looks like it was made on a PC.

  51. So... by chemindefer · · Score: 1

    Was there a file in it?

  52. It's only right. . . by Iridium_Hack · · Score: 3, Insightful

    After all, Firefox has probably caused more updates and work on IE than anything else. Those IE developers are probably quite thankful seeing as their budget increased quite a bit, partially because there is now some decent competition on the field.

    1. Re:It's only right. . . by DigitlDud · · Score: 1

      The IE team was doing work on WPF (Avalon) prior to work on IE7, which was much more ambitious. WPF will have a large effect on the Web in the future, like it or not.

  53. Firefox team sends IE a cake: by DrugCheese · · Score: 2, Funny

    Congratulations on fixing Internet Explorer 3!

    --
    *DrugCheese rants*
  54. I wonder by hurting+now · · Score: 1

    what it looked like... was it a "#1" - or was it the bird? Or even better, was it a picture of a fox pissing on an "e"

  55. Is it up to standard? by jackharrer · · Score: 1

    I wonder if it was CSS (Cake Sweetness Standard) 2.0 compliant?
    Knowing Microsoft probably not...

    --

    "an experienced, industrious, ambitious, and often, quite often, picturesque liar" - Mark Twain
  56. Of Course They Sent A Cake by fuzznutz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They are grateful to the Firefox team for doing all their R&D for them.

  57. In a related story. by krell · · Score: 1

    In a related story, 2 days after the MSIE team sent the Firefox team "Cake 1.0", some important discoveries were made. A package was sent and the FF team was instructed to take the cake to the kitchen for more work. Turns out that the MSIE team forgot the sugar and flour.

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
  58. Well why not? Rivalry makes life more fun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I used to work for Major Cell Phone Company 1. Our competitor, MCPC2, was based in the same town as we were. The best lunch hours where when "my guys" and "their guys" wound up at the same place. We'd taunt each other mercilessly, but we'd also share information as well. "You guys planning any expansion south of Richview? Good, we could use the roaming when our new site goes online in June. Oops, did I say that out loud?"

    Sure they were "the enemy" but because of their competition we always had job security. And the fact is that they were just people who did the same job as us. We had a lot in common, and knowing what their jobs consisted of, a LOT of mutual respect. Just don't tell any of them that I said so, I'd hate for their heads to get too big to fit into the door of that crappy old shed they call a MTSO...

  59. I'm going to burn for this, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did the cake say "Congratulations" or "Qu'ils mangent de la brioche"?

  60. CAKE OR DEATH! by TerranFury · · Score: 2, Funny

    We know the how the Firefox team answered that question.

    When Microsoft runs out of cake, the Opera team will have to politely ask for the chicken.

    1. Re:CAKE OR DEATH! by Ekhymosis · · Score: 2, Informative

      For those who didn't get the reference, it's from Eddie Izzard's Dressed to Kill comedy. Brilliant he is.

      --
      Fighting over religion is like seeing whose imaginary friend is best.
    2. Re:CAKE OR DEATH! by teh_chrizzle · · Score: 1

      death... i mean CAKE!!!

      --
      sarcasm:
      -noun
      1. harsh or bitter derision or irony.
    3. Re:CAKE OR DEATH! by spiderbitendeath · · Score: 1

      "Uh, death, please. No, cake! Cake! Cake, sorry. Sorry..."

      --
      Sometimes when I'm working on projects things disappear, I suspect gremlins.
  61. But the question is... by Yvanhoe · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... did they accept the cookie ?

    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    1. Re:But the question is... by stunt_penguin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well since it was free...... as in cake I guess they did :D

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    2. Re:But the question is... by MyEyesTheyBurn · · Score: 1, Funny

      Beer would have been more appropriate. I'll accept beer for almost any occasion. :-)

    3. Re:But the question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, it was made by a bakery, and they don't accpet 3rd party cookies.

  62. Microsoft Strikes Again by dahwang · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just as they did with the Nintendo Wii and Xbox360, Microsoft is getting free publicity.

    With Firefox just releasing their new version, it has eclipsed the launch of IE7. By sending a cake, which is sure to getting bloggers and slashdot to post, Microsoft directs the attention back on them. Also, it's good publicity. But we all know, no publicity is bad publicity.

    SLASHDOTTERS YOU TOOK THE BAIT!

    1. Re:Microsoft Strikes Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're only upset because you didn't get any cake.

  63. cake or death? by Fishstick · · Score: 1


    "Cake or death?"
    "Eh, cake please."
    "Very well! Give him cake!"
    "Oh, thanks very much. It's very nice."
    "You! Cake or death?"
    "Uh, cake for me, too, please."
    "Very well! Give him cake, too! We're gonna run out of cake at this rate. You! Cake or death?"
    "Uh, death, please. No, cake! Cake! Cake, sorry. Sorry..."
    "You said death first, uh-uh, death first!"
    "Well, I meant cake!"
    "Oh, all right. You're lucky I'm Church of England!" Cake or death?""
    </eddie izzard>

    sorry, first thing I thought of

    --

    There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
    Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  64. Did they.... by Cinquero · · Score: 1

    ... send congratulations for their first efficient internal database implementation??? Mozilla used text databases to store information which is for Firefox not a big problem, but it is for the Mozilla suite, ie. Thunderbird which uses that dumb db to store usenet article topics completely in memory!

  65. It's a piece of cake... by yams69 · · Score: 1

    ...to bake a pretty cake.

  66. Hey isn't that frosting in morse code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The frosting around the edge of the cake looks like morse code - hmmm - my morse is a bit rusty. I think it says "Cancel release and we'll tell you where the antidote is".

  67. They have the cake, but by ezzzD55J · · Score: 1

    do they get to eat it?

  68. Ob: W.S. Gilbert by hey! · · Score: 1

    Sergeant:When a felon's not engaged in his employment -
    Police: [His employment,]
    Sergeant:Or maturing his felonious little plans -
    Police: [Little plans,]
    Sergeant:His capacity for innocent enjoyment -
    Police:['Cent enjoyment]
    Sergeant:Is just as great as any honest man's -
    Police:[Honest man's.]

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  69. Cake for Bill Gates??? by dniq · · Score: 1

    I hope they didn't intend the FireFox team to use the cake to.... Oh, never mind :) ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkA6JZqwc3w )

  70. Overheard at Microsoft before sending... by jdreyer · · Score: 1

    "Let them eat cake!"

  71. Funny yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yet insightful. If they wanted to do anyone a gift, they should have concentrated on making a browser that doesn't suck. They [willingly] hardly improved DOM/CSS support at all even though it needed it badly (that's what their browser needs the most), still no xhtml mime type support, still insecure (already 2 exploits for it), a stupid GUI (the menu bar below the address bar instead of immediately under the title bar where it belongs and tons of little things), a broken zoom feature (hyperlinks are messed), a totally brainded and retarded installer (they've disabled the switches to integrate it into an installation CD, and you MUST have WGA installed for it to install [don't want that spyware on my PCs TYVM], they've disabled unattended installation of the extracted packages too - anything that was useful was intentionally crippled! Only IEAK makes half-decent installers), they've dropped support for Win2000 (which lots of people/businesses still use), and it's slower and more of a memory hog than firefox 2. And it does break several apps (there's patches for AutoCAD products because of it namely, and I noticed my DB2 installer which worked perfectly pre-IE7 install now doesn't anymore).

    Yeah, it has tabs, and it finally supports the html4 abbr tag, but that's not exactly new stuff.

    IE is Microsoft's single biggest failure. Worst than Windows ME, Clippy and MS Bob together. I very much like most of thier stuff (windows, visual studio, sql server, etc), but IE is such crap, I feel sorry for people who use it. There are so many good browsers out there (not just firefox), there's just NO excuse to use that piece of junk (unless you're stuck with some ActiveX-using app, in which case I'd look into replacing that - and ActiveX can be made to work on FF AFAIK, not that I'd want to do that)

  72. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 1

    Cake in Firfox?

    Can someone fax me a slice?

  73. Perhaps this is common. by LoudMusic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lots of comments about how the IE team is happy to be empoyed, a friendly gesture, poking fun, etc etc. But I think this sort of thing is more common place than most of us imagine. Big companies that spend a lot of their time working on similar products follow eachother's progress very closely and are aware of the same difficulties they're both having. They may not be on the same team, but they're fighting the same battle. Even physical wartime battles have been known to halt to celebrate a common holiday, together.

    I know that Terminix (a client of my company) congratulated Orkin (the evil competitor) on one of their recent anniversaries. It's a way of saying "We know what you're up against, and we know it kinda sucks. Hang in there."

    My wife and I watched an episode of Dharma & Greg last night (TiVo, don't know the air date) where they're entering a dancing competition. Dharma's parents were against it claiming competition makes people mean and greedy. I see that a lot in society, and it doesn't have to be that way. Competition is to make us better individuals. Without competition we'd never progress to the next level. And because of that we should thank our competitors for putting up a good measure of excellence.

    Even in sports like track and cross country where you can effectively compete against yourself, where's the push to keep getting a faster mile time, higher polevault, or longer long jump if you have nothing to compare it against? At the end of high school track meets I remember walking around and shaking the hands of everyone I competed with. If it weren't for them I wouldn't have been "in the top three" regularly. I'd have just been a dude running crappy lap times on the weekend.

    Here's to competition! The evolver of our modern society. Thank your competitors, for they are what bring us a better life.

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    1. Re:Perhaps this is common. by iSlappy · · Score: 1

      The ACTIVE ingredient in the cake is X.

    2. Re:Perhaps this is common. by LearnToSpell · · Score: 1

      I know that Terminix (a client of my company) congratulated Orkin (the evil competitor) on one of their recent anniversaries. It's a way of saying "We know what you're up against, and we know it kinda sucks. Hang in there."

      Ah yes, Orkin. The only company with more bugs than Microsoft.

    3. Re:Perhaps this is common. by jdgeorge · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, Orkin. The only company with more bugs than Microsoft.

      It it ridiculous insinuate Orkin is similar to Microsoft. One of those companies is actually capable of keeping bugs out of your computer.

    4. Re:Perhaps this is common. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Here here!

    5. Re:Perhaps this is common. by mandos · · Score: 1

      Another example: I saw the end of the recent Escape from Alactraz triathelon. The winner hugged the second place guy, and all of them high fived like the top 10 finishers. Yeah, they all wanted to win, but they all know how hard it is and that it's an accomplishment just to finish. I wish more things were like this. Maybe this is why I don't care for team sports and their fans. Mostly their fans.

      --
      Mike Scanlon
    6. Re:Perhaps this is common. by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, Orkin. The only company with more bugs than Microsoft.

      You clearly haven't had to work with some of the products I've had to work with - like pretty much anything that CA has anything to do with.

  74. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 1

    Microsoft Cake?

    Finally, my Microsoft Bob has been hungry for years now, maybe i can finally raise him a level.

  75. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  76. Inconcievable! by edmicman · · Score: 1

    FF: All right. Where is the poison? The battle of wits has begun. It ends when you decide and we both eat, and find out who is right... and who is dead.
    IE7: But it's so simple. All I have to do is divine from what I know of you: are you the sort of man who would put the poison into his own cake or his enemy's? Now, a clever man would put the poison into his own cake, because he would know that only a great fool would reach for what he was given. I am not a great fool, so I can clearly not choose the cake in front of you. But you must have known I was not a great fool, you would have counted on it, so I can clearly not choose the cake in front of me.
    FF: You've made your decision then?
    IE7: Not remotely. Because iocane comes from Australia, as everyone knows, and Australia is entirely peopled with criminals, and criminals are used to having people not trust them, as you are not trusted by me, so I can clearly not choose the cake in front of you.
    FF: Truly, you have a dizzying intellect.
    IE7: Wait til I get going! Now, where was I?
    FF: Australia.
    IE7: Yes, Australia. And you must have suspected I would have known the powder's origin, so I can clearly not choose the cake in front of me.
    FF: You're just stalling now.
    IE7: You'd like to think that, wouldn't you? You've beaten my giant, which means you're exceptionally strong, so you could've put the poison in your own cake, trusting on your strength to save you, so I can clearly not choose the cake in front of you. But, you've also bested my Spaniard, which means you must have studied, and in studying you must have learned that man is mortal, so you would have put the poison as far from yourself as possible, so I can clearly not choose the cake in front of me.
    FF: You're trying to trick me into giving away something. It won't work.
    IE7: IT HAS WORKED! YOU'VE GIVEN EVERYTHING AWAY! I KNOW WHERE THE POISON IS!
    FF: Then make your choice.
    IE7: I will, and I choose - What in the world can that be?
    IE7: [IE7 gestures up and away from the table. FF looks. IE7 swaps the cakes]
    FF: What? Where? I don't see anything.
    IE7: Well, I- I could have sworn I saw something. No matter.First, let's eat. Me from my cake, and you from yours.
    FF, IE7: [they eat]
    FF: You guessed wrong.
    IE7: You only think I guessed wrong! That's what's so funny! I switched cakes when your back was turned! Ha ha! You fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders! The most famous is never get involved in a land war in Asia, but only slightly less well-known is this: never go in against a Sicilian when death is on the line! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha...
    IE7: [IE7 stops suddenly, and falls dead to the right]
    Opera: And to think, all that time it was your cake that was poisoned.
    FF: They were both poisoned. I spent the last few years building up an immunity to iocane powder.

  77. If I were the FF Team... by Siberwulf · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would have sent a cake back to the IE team. Except I would have included the recipe on exactly how the cake was made along with it.

  78. And some will say... by happyrabit · · Score: 1

    And some will say that Microsoft can't ship on time!! at least cakes they can

    --
    I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by.
  79. That proves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that Firefox has taken the cake for best browser!

  80. That they know of anyway. by SydShamino · · Score: 5, Funny

    It secretly contained chopped-up bits of the IE source code. Having ingested it, the entire Firefox team is now legally disqualified from working on open source competitors.

    Or something like that. It's early still.

    --
    It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    1. Re:That they know of anyway. by benplaut · · Score: 1

      Well that would make them sick!

  81. baked goods by thoolihan · · Score: 1

    After seeing Van Wilder, I wouldn't accept any baked good delivered to me.

    --
    http://unmoldable.com W:"No one of consequence" I:"I must know" W:"Get used to disappointment"
  82. Windows Internet Explorer by eealex · · Score: 1

    Just for information. IE7 is now named "Windows Internet Explorer" instead of "Microsoft Internet Explorer"

  83. The cake is a lie!!!!! by Pharmboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Quick, before someone sees me! Go to my secret website and type LOGIN. Then use my login, Pharmboy. My password is "portal" (without the quotes). At the prompt, type "thecakeisalie" at the prompt without the quotes to activate the hidden camera inside Microsoft! The cake is a lie and this proves it!!!1!

    ;)

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  84. But where did they send it. by BarneyRubble · · Score: 1

    Where did they sent the cake to?

    Will all firefox developers be able to get a slice?

    I submitted a bug report once - does that deserve a slice?

    Free Food is the best.

  85. An attempt in corporate sabotage :-) by Amitz+Sekali · · Score: 1

    I bet that the IE team plant small and sophisticated mechanical bugs inside the cake, which will activate themselves after the bugs are exposed to stomach acid. They will cling to intestine walls and record all conversations by the firefox team. Periodically, the bugs will transmit the data to redmond.

    If any of the bug is exposed to x-ray radiation, it will self-destruct, but only after sending self-destruct code to to all other bugs.

    --
    If you delay pleasure infinitely, the pleasure will be infinite. (YM)
  86. Know your enemy by Programmer_In_Traini · · Score: 1

    At least its proof that they know who their enemy is, I wasn't sure they had figured that one out yet.

    --
    If you look like your passport photo, you're too ill to travel. - Will Kommen
  87. Something to consider... by petrus4 · · Score: 1

    Human nature being what it is, people only tend to play the bully when they're at the top of the heap. Microsoft are not a completely undisputed monopoly any more; Apple have regrouped, Linux is continuing to make in-roads, and I've just downloaded FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE...it's great.

    In other words, Microsoft are having to compete on a more level playing field. Given that, some people at least within the company have probably realised that they have nothing to lose and everything to gain from being nice. I'm sure there are some who've been around long enough to have noticed a massive change in IBM's behaviour in the last ten years, compared to when they were a monopoly...they're not king of the hill any more either.

    Another thing worth remembering is that in nearly any conflict, the brass are primarily to blame. It was high ups within Microsoft who would have been responsible for killing Netscape...my guess is that the IE 7 team are more or less rank and file in Microsoft's heirarchy. Some of you probably know the story about at least one Christmas Day during the first world war...some lower level soldiers from both sides gave each other presents, sang carols together, and played soccer...which made the officers furious.

    It's only officers or politicians who tend to want conflict...aside from self-defense, the little guy has nothing whatsoever to gain from it.

    1. Re:Something to consider... by Shados · · Score: 1

      That is true. That is why even those of us who will keep using Microsoft products, are thankful for things like Linux, Firefox, OpenOffice, Java, etc. All these things made Microsoft products better :)

  88. Figures It Would Be A Cake... by tds67 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...because Bill Gates fears having pies around him.

  89. Its a good thing... by Traegorn · · Score: 1

    ...that Firefox 2.0 has zero problems running on my machine that has only 160 megs of RAM for days at a time.

    I keep hearing about these memory problems from people - but *I* don't see it... and I've got at least 7 tabs open at any given time...

    I doubt IE7 would perform so well on my 366MHz machine though.

    1. Re:Its a good thing... by afedaken · · Score: 1

      At a nonprofit recycler I volunteer at, I routinely install firefox on machines with as little as 128mb of ram. Most of the folks run into the processor or connection speed wall long before they can get to the point where firefox memory utilization becomes an issue. But in general we don't install the dozen or so extensions that slashdotters seem so fond of.

      That said, your average user doesn't open 40+ tabs for a sesson. I'd be curious to see the statistics on tabs for your average slashdotter.

      --
      If there's a castle floating upside down in the sky, then there's a castle floating upside down in the sky.
  90. Obligatory Star Wars comment by jpellino · · Score: 1

    "That's no cake...."

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  91. Extended standard cake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like a extended standard cake to me.

    1. Start cooperate with a competing bakery.
    2. Get competitor's recepy.
    3. Break of cooperation.
    4. Profit!

  92. ITSATRAP!!! by acidrain69 · · Score: 1

    Don't eat it!

    I remember a certain scene from a movie. There is a picture of the IE team farting on the cake at the bottom.

    --
    -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
  93. Ugly. by antdude · · Score: 1

    The cake seems ugly looking. Or am I just crazy?

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:Ugly. by lunaticLT · · Score: 0

      It is ugly looking. And think about the colors: black and white. Usually that's for funerals.

      I mean, if you went to a confectioner you would have to explicitly ask for the pie to be black&white instead of pink, yellow, red, blue, whatever.

      IE logo is blue, Microsoft logo is blue, but not black. And "Love" is most commonly written in red/pink.

      So... apart from the funeral hyphothesis the other explanaition that I can think of is that M$ team didn't have enough money to buy a color version of the cake... ;)

  94. Nah... by rubberbando · · Score: 1

    It just shows a bit of symbolism that the FF team can now have their cake and eat it too...

    --
    DEAD DEAD DEAD DELETE ME
  95. The Cake never made it by Plutonite · · Score: 1

    The blue delivery van crashed on the way.

    *ouch sorry

  96. Sigh... by comrade+k · · Score: 1

    Even their cake isn't fully compatible with iCSSing.

    --
    "Every vision is a joke until the first man accomplishes it; once realized, it becomes commonplace." -Robert H. Goddard
  97. Alternatively... by abaddononion · · Score: 1

    FF: All right. Where is the exploit? The battle of wits has begun. It ends when you decide and we both eat, and find out who is right... and who is dead. IE7: But it's so simple. All I have to do is divine from what I know of you: are you the sort of man who would put the exploit into his own cake or his enemy's? Now, a clever man would put the exploit into his own cake, because he would know that only a great fool would reach for what he was given. I am not a great fool, so I can clearly not choose the cake in front of you. But you must have known I was not a great fool, you would have counted on it, so I can clearly not choose the cake in front of me. FF: You've made your decision then? IE7: Not remotely. Because this ActiveX exploit comes from AJAX, as everyone knows, and AJAX is entirely peopled with criminals, and criminals are used to having people not trust them, as you are not trusted by me, so I can clearly not choose the cake in front of you. FF: Truly, you have a dizzying intellect. IE7: Wait til I get going! Now, where was I? FF: AJAX. IE7: Yes, AJAX. And you must have suspected I would have known the exploit's origin, so I can clearly not choose the cake in front of me. FF: You're just lagging now. IE7: Connecting... IE7: Connecting... IE7: Connecting... IE7: Waiting... IE7: You'd like to think that, wouldn't you? You've beaten my buffer overflow, which means you're exceptionally strong, so you could've put the exploit in your own cake, trusting on your security to save you, so I can clearly not choose the cake in front of you. But, you've also bested my Zero-Day Exploit, which means you must have studied, and in studying you must have learned that browser is mortal, so you would have put the exploit as far from yourself as possible, so I can clearly not choose the cake in front of me. FF: You're trying to trick me into giving away something. It won't work. IE7: IT HAS WORKED! YOU'VE GIVEN EVERYTHING AWAY! I KNOW WHERE THE EXPLOIT IS! FF: Then make your choice. IE7: I will, and I choose - What in the world can that be? IE7: [IE7 gestures up and away from the table. FF looks. IE7 swaps the cakes] FF: Javascript console: Missing Parameter IE7: Well, I- I could have sworn I saw something. No matter.First, let's eat. Me from my cake, and you from yours. FF, IE7: [they eat] FF: You guessed wrong. IE7: You only think I guessed wrong! That's what's so funny! I switched cakes when your back was turned! Ha ha! You fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders! The most famous is never get involved in a land war in Asia, but only slightly less well-known is this: never go in against Microsoft when profit is on the line! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha... IE7: [IE7 stops suddenly, and falls dead to the right] Opera: And to think, all that time it was your cake that was poisoned. FF: They were both poisoned. I spent the last few years building up an immunity to ActiveX.

  98. Exploding Cake by AnyThingButWindows · · Score: 1

    "The Microsoft Internet Explorer Team sent the Firefox team a cake"

    And they let it past airport security?

    --
    When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. - Jefferson
  99. And you guys wonder how windows won the desktop by MickDownUnder · · Score: 1

    Did you check out the balmer video on the blog ?

    "Un-be-lievable! It comes with Write and Reversi and runs bla-zing-ly fast on a 286! And all that for only 99 Dollars! (Except in Nebraska)"

  100. What are they trying for? by Tarlus · · Score: 1

    First, Microsoft invites the Mozilla team over so that they can help them integrate it more tightly with Vista. Now they're congratulating them with a cake.

    It begs the question... Are they plotting something? Or are they buttering the Mozilla guys up for some kind of buyout? Or could the IE team really be good sports about all of it?

    --
    /* No Comment */
  101. So? Then the firefox folk should send them cookies by quarkie68 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...when the IE people manage to handle them properly and safely :-) .

  102. Did it say... by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

    Did it say: C:\>ONGRTLNS.FF2

    (Apologies to Apple)

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  103. Not poisoned? by samj · · Score: 1

    How can you be so sure? Many MS bugs have taken years to surface.

  104. Re: Accounting Code for sending a cake? by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    (( Heard from a low level admin))
    "Accounting called. They want to know the cost code for Sending Cakes to Competitors".

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  105. Re:Leaky extensions by bunratty · · Score: 2, Informative
    Adblock .5
    Adblock is one of the most infamous of all the memory hogging extensions. Update to Adblock 0.5.3.042 or later, or use version 0.7.0.2 or later of Adblock Plus.
    --
    What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
  106. Not entirely analogous but... by bigmaddog · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the time when John Smedley sent 1200 Krispy Kreme donuts to Penny Arcade. Arguably he was trying to give them diabetes and put an end to their assault on SOE, but it's entirely possible that bitter hatred and its lesser cousins, disdain and irritation, are no obstacle to having a sense of humour.

    --

    Even as you read this, your pants are strangling your loins! Aaa!

  107. I think they missed the joke by KillerB · · Score: 1

    I think it was less "Congratulations to you" and more "Let them eat cake"...

    --
    the KillerB
  108. Cake by umbrellasd · · Score: 1

    How very Marie Antoinette of them. "Let them eat cake," indeed.

  109. actually from microsoft? by Loconut1389 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has anyone actually verified that the cake is in fact from Microsoft?

    I can hear the phones ringing....

    Mozilla secretary: Mozilla- home of Firefox and Thunderbird, how many I help you?
    Microsoft secretary: This is Ursula from Microsoft's browsers division- we didn't send a cake...
    *phone drops*
    ****DON'T EAT THE CAKE!****

    Or perhaps upon closer inspection, there were flakes of white powder on the bottom of the cardboard...

    I'd be wary of food items being dropped off anonymously.

    Did an IE rep physically hand over the cake and show real ID?

  110. To Be Followed By Job Offers by littlewink · · Score: 1

    Another example of FUD, followed by a buy-out of developers.

  111. FF = on by Fallen+Mongoose · · Score: 1

    FF deaths are the worst.

  112. Shouldn't they have sent... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cookies?

  113. Mod me offtopic if you want... by gzerphey · · Score: 1

    ...but I think this... ummm... takes the cake for the most posts modded funny I have ever seen!!

    Its ok, I'll go flog myself for the bad pun.

    --
    I don't have a microwave. I do, however, have a clock that occasionally cooks shit.
  114. Was it a Ferrari Cake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that's the obligatory joke of the day.

  115. What I want to know is... by Kelson · · Score: 3, Funny

    Did Opera send them a singing telegram?

  116. The firefox cake to the IE team... by enc0der · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...should read like this:

    All your browser market are belong to us!

    -firefox team

    :)

  117. Irony by FlynnMP3 · · Score: 1

    "Now you can have your cake and eat it too".

    All in good fun of course. Good show Microsofties.

  118. The Godfather by WeAreAllDoomed · · Score: 1

    i would interpret this as analogous to the horse's head placed on the bed in The Godfather.

    --
    free software, open standards, open file formats, no software patents.
  119. thanking Moz team for the feature spec for IE7? by Locutus · · Score: 1

    It might look like a FF2 lauch cake but really they were thanking the Mozilla team for providing Microsoft with a browser feature specification list they could work from while attempting to 'improve' their product.

    Sending a previously heated pile of flour, water, sugar and eggs is the LEAST they could do. But then again, Microsoft has NEVER been any good at giving credit where credit is due. ;-) But maybe there's another Halloween document inside...

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  120. Nice marketing by Joebert · · Score: 1

    Mirosoft just scored not only publicity from the release of IE7, but they suckered the Firefox gang into advertising it as well for the price of a fucking cake ?!

    Brilliant !

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  121. Since TFA has been /.ed by jeremyclark13 · · Score: 1

    Did the cake read
    "Congrats for releasing a product that actually made us get up off our asses and do some work around here. The IE team."
    Of course that would be a lot of cake real estate that could otherwise be decorated with pretty flowers and pictures of slain foxes.

    --
    Don't you hate glorious self-promotion? Visit my Blog
  122. The revolution is well under way by Vince8016 · · Score: 1

    Let them eat cake! The open source movement will still take the IE7 Bastille.

  123. Enraged Firefox staff beheads IE Team... by bodland · · Score: 1

    After being told to "Let them eat cake."

  124. A friendly way to say what they think about FF: by kan0r · · Score: 1

    Piece of cake!

  125. Mozilla sent a cake to the Debian team. by LeedsSideStreets · · Score: 2, Funny

    They scraped the logo off and replaced it before they ate it.

  126. Equo ne credite, Teucri.. by msslc3 · · Score: 1

    It was Laocoon, not Cassandra. In John Dryden's translation of Virgil's Aeneid:

    "Laocoon, follow'd by a num'rous crowd,

    Ran from the fort, and cried, from far, aloud:

    'O wretched countrymen! What fury reigns?

    What more than madness has possess'd your brains?

    Think you the Grecians from your coasts are gone?

    And are Ulysses' arts no better known?

    "This hollow fabric either must inclose,

    Within its blind recess, our secret foes;

    Or 't is an engine rais'd above the town,

    T' o'erlook the walls, and then to batter down.

    Somewhat is sure design'd, by fraud or force:

    Trust not their presents, nor admit the horse.'"

  127. Blatant AdSense Violation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice that the 'free as in beer' mozilla folk seem to think it's ok to violate AdSense's policies. Asking visitors to click on your ads in a direct violation. The site owner should try being honest like the rest of us.

    *Shot snapped and sent off to Google*

  128. Re:EULA under the cake by Psykechan · · Score: 3, Funny

    Underneath the cake is the EULA that starts with:

    By consuming this cake, you agree to the following terms in the cake end user license agreement (EULA)...

  129. Microsoft has addressed the issue. by davermont · · Score: 1

    Don't worry, the Microsoft employee responsible for the incent has already been fired and blackballed.

  130. Firefox reply by Y-Studios · · Score: 0

    Firefox needs to send a bunch of burritos to the IE team.

    --
    Not A Troll!
  131. What kind of cake? by sivartis · · Score: 1

    Since someone already noted that cookies would have been more appropriate, I'll just offer my guess that it was a cellular peptide cake. With mint frosting. Mmmm... Troicake...

    --
    "Even pirates like chocolate chip cookies." www.youtube.com/musecast5
  132. Unfortunately, the cake cost over $20 by r_jensen11 · · Score: 1

    which ment that the Firefox team could not accept it, as it was worth more than the total value of gifts per year they can receive from their clients, err, I mean competition....

  133. And when the Firefox team was sleeping.. by Sloosh13 · · Score: 2, Funny

    thousands of frosted miniature Microsoft employees came streaming out of the cake and took the office...

  134. It seems to be an elusive problem... by Stealth+Potato · · Score: 1

    I've never had huge memory issues on my primary desktop, but on my notebook I've had Firefox 1.5 push the 1 gigabyte memory consumption mark, after several hours of normal browsing. I think I have mostly the same plugins installed on both, but I'll admit I haven't investigated rigorously.

    Interestingly, I tried disabling Firefox's memory cache, and that fixed the memory problem, but then random websites started loading as blank pages...

  135. CARBOS FTW by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    The IE team is trying to kill off the Firefox team using carbs!

    but seriously, I think the IE team just appreciates the competition. Having a browser war really does drive innovation. Now Firefox team needs to come up with a gift, that is better than a cake. although wasn't IE7 released a while ago?

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:CARBOS FTW by mikek3332002 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I think the IE team just appreciates the competition.Having a browser war really does drive innovation.


      Probably they sent it as thanks because they could code something other then security holes/fixes.
    2. Re:CARBOS FTW by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      Well there can only be one for the 'let them eat cake' reference, a suitably sharpened guillotine with simple instructions for it's use.

      Why not let the M$ talking heads become suitably preserved in glass jars. Either that or a tray of BSOD buns.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    3. Re:CARBOS FTW by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      but seriously, I think the IE team just appreciates the competition
      yeah from what i've heared the IE team was rather neglected by MS until firefox started gaining prominance, firefox probablly made MS give the IE team the budget to actually start improving the browser again rather than being on minimal maintinance.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  136. Alt(-tab) historical reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quoth Marie AntoiBallmer: "Let them eat cake."

  137. Cheap b@stards! by VinB · · Score: 0

    A sheet cake!? . A budget the size of Kentucky and all they can muster up is a sheet cake!?

  138. Colour of the cake by j.a.mcguire · · Score: 1

    I think there's a subliminal message in the colour of the cake. Black and white? Stone age? Old Tv? i.e. (get it i.e.) firefox is crap?

  139. It's nice to know that I'm not the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That does not have any problems with Firefox and memory use. I have Firefox open all day long with multiple tabs, always. I use about a dozen extensions too. Even when working on ajax interfaces while using FireBug to debug I still not have memory issues. I'm running on Ubuntu dapper. Does that make the difference? Previously Suse without issues, also.

    I also have my son's computer running dapper as well. They use it mostly for playing Java based games in Firefox online. No memory issues there either.

    Just lucky? I don't know.

  140. Firefox team return the favour... by ozbird · · Score: 1

    ... cream pies.

  141. Or could this be ... by cybrzndane · · Score: 1

    Microsoft's way of saying, "Let them eat cake!"

  142. The perfect greeting card by Jinjuku · · Score: 1, Funny

    How about this, Microsoft stole all our browser ideas and all we got was this lousy cake?

  143. A cake?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are those Micro$oft engineers?

    Sissies?

  144. It was black by kahrytan · · Score: 1

    The cake was black because of the teams black hearts. "We will crush you Firefox like ants!" IE Team. P.s Send the blog poster couple bucks for surviving the /. effect.

    --
    \
  145. Class by dr00g911 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This might be the classiest thing I've ever heard of MS doing. No in-joke, no sarcasm, here's your non-pretentious cake, you deserved it.

    It's how the rest of the world works. Healthy businesses acknowledge competition and inspiration. Their workers even go out for drinks with rivals now and again. $giantcorporateentity != $employee and all that.

    I'm not exactly heralding the coming of a kinder, gentler MS that consistently behaves like a grownup, but baby steps like this are the beginnings of a change in corporate culture and should be encouraged.

    Props to the IE 7 team, you guys showed some serious class and also delivered a great upgrade (minus a few bizarre interface choices) recently.

    Now who do I have to send a cake to to get my menus back in IE without hitting alt?

    I kid!

    (mostly)

  146. I thought it as assimilating the Borg. by NRAdude · · Score: 0

    I didn't watch enough Star Trek "The Next Generation." Did the Borg ever try to assimilate another by letting itself be assimilated into them first? I suppose this is like submitting an empty bag of "integrity" just so they could get their bag full of someone else's integrity.

    Metaphorically speaking: Did Micros^Hx6 the Borg give any forks with the cake, or did they decide to walk away with the forks?

    What people try to criticize Microsoft Internet Explorer as having poor HTML standard adherence, is actually not HTML but their own in-house standard independent to that of another. Don't forget that just because there is a Board of said standard to confer it upon a company, doesn't mean they can't just grow their own similarities independent and unique down to the verry grain. If intellect moved independently, then isolated forms of untracable intellectual inductance are the cause of reprove.

    --
    without prejudice
  147. How do you justify 90 MB of RAM consumption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You obviously have never used Opera. I'm running 9.01 on i386 Linux right now. This current process has been running for 17 days. I know it has been that long because that's when I last booted my system, and I always open Opera immediately after logging in. I've probably opened thousands of tabs by this point. I read about 75 blogs each day, plus checking my web-based email, reading the news, reading Slashdot, and checking other sites. Even now, with 27 tabs open (I just counted them), the Opera process is only consuming 31 MB of RAM.

    31 MB of RAM over 27 pages makes sense. First there's the overhead of Qt, since I'm using the statically linked build of Opera. Then there's the overhead the browser itself, including its JavaScript interpreter, email client, protocol support, HTML parsing and rendering code, and so forth. The pages each likely contain between 75 KB and 400 KB of HTML, JavaScript and images. So adding the overhead of the DOM and perhaps some cached data, 1 MB per tab seems reasonable.

    Frankly, I don't see how the same justification can be applied to Firefox. 80 MB to 90 MB is just unreasonable. We're talking 3 MB per tab with 20 tabs open, and that's allowing Firefox itself an overhead of 20 MB. Opera offers what amounts to be the same features as Firefox. Yet Opera manages to keep its memory consumption within understandable and justifiable limits. Even in the best of cases, Firefox uses three or more times as much memory than Opera does, even when Opera is being pushed far harder.

    1. Re:How do you justify 90 MB of RAM consumption? by bunratty · · Score: 1
      Even in the best of cases, Firefox uses three or more times as much memory than Opera does, even when Opera is being pushed far harder.
      That's not what I find. Opera seems to use about as much memory as Firefox for me, at least on Windows. When Opera is pushed hard, memory use can skyrocket, but Firefox's memory use stays low.
      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
  148. Maybe no poison, but.... by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    ...I bet there were worms in it! ;-)

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  149. I think the question we all want answered is this: by MayorDefacto · · Score: 1

    Was is a Ferarri cake or just an Acura cake?

  150. The cake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but either way, they're only made up of people.

    The cake is too.

  151. Very appropriate by HuguesT · · Score: 1

    Because without firefox and its 20% market share or so, there wouldn't be a IE7 team at Microsoft. No need to.

  152. Public posturing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not classy, it's public posturing.

  153. cool by willCode4Beer.com · · Score: 1

    That was very nice of them.

    --
    ----- If communism is a system where the government owns business, what do you call a system where business owns govern
  154. I hope they sent something back in return... by Halster · · Score: 1

    I hope they sent something in return... maybe this! ;)

    --

    "How much truth can advertising buy?" - iNsuRge - AK47