Domain: victoriassecret.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to victoriassecret.com.
Comments · 28
-
Re: US election
Okay i can see your tanks and stuff and raise you by https://www.victoriassecret.co...
-
Re: its about time.
i would put odds that https://www.victoriassecret.co... was on the supplies list for this hack (or some similar store)
-
Re:I can't believe we're afraid of these assholes
It's like they WANT to remain in the 8th Century. Why is it exactly that we're afraid of them?
Because while they're eager to keep an 8th century moral code (and dress code for women), they seem decidedly more modern in their choice of military forces and interest (but not yet attainment of) nuclear weapons.
Because, you know, when you're the Grand Ayatollah, some "Bikinis" are OK but definitely not others.
-
Re:You know you want to
See this guy?
He owns this company.
Which owns this company.
Feeling sick? -
Re:Wait...
Does this count as a "porn site"?
I suppose that depends on whether "Photoshop" is an erogenous zone.
-
Re:Wait...
Does this count as a "porn site"?
Not so much anymore: http://xkcd.com/751/
-
Wait...
Does this count as a "porn site"?
-
Re:Who is IPEX?
I've always been a fan of IPEX: http://www2.victoriassecret.com/images/prodpri2/V267700_RC093.jpg
-
Re:Protected classes
Not a lot of flaming skulls and roses painted on those bodies of the ladies at Victoria's Secret, eh?
They actually don't care if models have a small tattoo or two anymore. They just 'shop it out later, when they're already tweaking other stuff.
-
Re:Protected classes"Suing for discrimination agains that would be perfectly valid, unless you can also show an inverse link between people with tattoos, and skills required to do the job."
Well, I'd guess that high end lingerie model isn't a good career for you if you are covered in tattoos.
Not a lot of flaming skulls and roses painted on those bodies of the ladies at Victoria's Secret, eh?
-
But you can...
...get plenty of hardcore Mormon porn from here.
;-) -
Re:1984 is not a howto!
Tell your politicans that 1984 is NOT a howto!
While you're at it, tell your teenage son that the free Victoria's Secret catalog is not a porno mag.
- -
why .xxx will never workI personally can see the benefits of a
.xxx domain. It's actually a good idea in principle, but IMHO needed to have been put in place as one of the original TLDs in order to be effective. Plus, I like the idea of .xxx a helluva lot better than some of the other completely useless TLDs that ICANN has actually approved, like .biz, .museum, and .aero! WTF?!?!The main reason that we'll never see a
.xxx TLD is for these reasons:- The box is already open. P0rn site operators have operated for years with
.coms, and there's no way you're going to get every single one of them to voluntarily transfer their registrations to .xxx (and pay a higher fee for additional maintenance and additional rules). If you want this to happen, someone has to actually force them to go there and automatically transfer their .coms over to .xxxs. - The problem with #1 is that if you actually force these people to go to
.xxx, who gets to decide? The U.S. government has no right or jurisdiction to force Russian or Albanian p0rn site operators to move to .xxx. And if the Christian "Right" (I have a hard time calling them the "Christian Right," when 99.9% of the time, they are wrong) is in charge of this, they're going to force all sorts of people to move over there. Sites like Victoria's Secret, Sports Illustrated, and even Wikipedia are going to be forced to register as .xxx sites! Heck, somebody's probably going to force McDonald's to register as a .xxx site because their hamburgers are "damaging" to the children (remember, it's all about the children, folks).
So today, we've basically got a huge can of worms with this situation, that no one wants to touch. Sure, if
.xxx existed originally, I think most p0rn site operators would have registered in that domain (it makes sense). But nobody's going to go back. - The box is already open. P0rn site operators have operated for years with
-
Re:Great Idea
What about sites like the Online Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition or the Online Victoria's Secret Catalogue go? They're not porn, but they're definately in that grey area. Most people would consider them fine for a regular
.com, but you gotta figure that there'll be a vocal minority of people who'll be like "All boobies must be XXX, won't somebody PLEASE think of the children? I'm old and stodgy, get off my lawn, blah blah blah" .XXX is something that is a good idea, but there's definately some areas that need to be hashed out still. -
Re:Of Course
I'm actually interested in the girl wearing these.
Don't really care if she's shy or not as long as she rocks the hot boyshorts. -
Where is Ms-WI ?
What? I can't believed they dropped the Ms-WI (Microsoft Wife Licnense)
Restrictive license for Wives/Girlfriends that only allows online purchases from Victorias Secret, Flora Lee, and Think Geek!
The Nerve!! -
Vista Wife Edition?
Can I get one customized for my wife... pre-bookmarked with links designed to spend my money
Or maybe one pre-bookmarked with sites I wished she would visit more often.
Victoria's Secret... I approve
Flora Lee... Get smelling good and soft.
Think Geek... Gift ideas for me... -
Re:MOD UP
I almost died when I saw him do those horrible Klein commercials. Or was it the GAP?
Worse. -
AngelsWal-Mart? Wouldn't you put the Victoria's Secret on the 2,756,234th floor?
-
Fireworks... let me think...
Fireworks shmireworks. I find this Disney merchandise much more worthy of my undivided attention. Oh well... Priorities, I guess.
-
Re:Obligatory Bob Dylan QuoteHe's the guy on the knickers advert, of course.
Any fule kno that!
-
$100 Worth Of Good LoveHow about $100 of gear from here.
Better than any gadgets I can think of.
-
Re:What is Mac OS X?
-
That's not eyecandy...
THIS is eyecandy!
Anyone know who this is? -
Since most people here probably don't know
Here's the link to Victoria's Secret Web site. I mean, come on, you post a link to a newspaper article withouth actually linking through to this fine site?
-
Re:Timesharing on remote mainframes vs the PC
Well, IBM will fail once again.
Yeah, just like we (yeah, I work for IBM) 'failed' with the whole e-business thing? We're fucking kicking our competitors asses! Only reason our stock price is low is because of the economy overall. Wake up, dude - IBM is not going to fail anytime during my lifetime.
We have some customers who make $10 USD per second at IBM hosting facilities. In case you're wondering, Vickie's Secret made $3,000 USD profit in the time it took me to write this reply...
-
Re:Ultra Bra
Doesn't look very ultra to me
-
a bug
Follow this link
Right click on your mouse button on the main text area to the right of the picture so that the back menu pops up. The menu appears on the left side of the page instead than where your mouse is.
P.S Do actually try the link before moderating this post down as a troll.