Slashdot Mirror


Dvorak on Microsoft Confusing the Market

DigitalDame2 writes "With news of there being 7 Vista editions, PC Magazine Columnist John C. Dvorak takes a hilarious spin on the different Vistas with some recommendations of his own. How about the Vista Porn Edition? All the great porn sites would be pre-bookmarked. Gamer Case-Mod Edition? It can be ultraoptimized for games with a blinking hard-drive light. You can even go as far as the Microsoft Vista for Costco Customers: the Cheaper Edition."

456 comments

  1. Good informative link by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 5, Informative


    An excellent description of all the various flavors of Vista and their respective features and intended niches can be found here.

    I'm bookmarking this page...it's only a matter of time before I'll be required to know this information.

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Good informative link by kisrael · · Score: 1

      "hilarious", huh?

      Anywaym, If that winsupersite link is reasonably accurate...jeez. If it wasn't crippleware in terms of # of apps and what not, I think tons of people would be happy with the "start edition".

      It seems like most of the further variations aren't really "OS" things, but bundled apps. Actually, more annoyingly, they sneak in one or two things that belong at the OS level (like Wi-Fi config) with a bunch of other app crap.

      'the goal of the product edition differentiations in Windows Vista is to provide "clear value proposition"' -- yeah, good luck with that. I just can't wait for the infomercials they'll need to explain this crap. Come to think of it, the ONLY thing that matters is "which flavor came bundled with my PC without upping the base price?" because OSes are still a "hidden tax", Windows users would still be using '98 if thats what came with the computer.

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    2. Re:Good informative link by hcob$ · · Score: 5, Funny

      Gotta love the conceptual diagram:

      Vista Enterprise: "Optimized for the Enterprise"

      So.... is that NCC-1701, NCC-1701A, NCC-1701B, NCC-1701C, NCC-1701D, or NCC-1701E?

      --
      Cliff Claven
      K.E.G. Party Chairman
      Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
    3. Re:Good informative link by khelms · · Score: 2, Funny

      You forgot NX-01

    4. Re:Good informative link by le_jfs · · Score: 1

      Oh no.
      They have a feature called "unlimited screen resolution support" that will be enabled for all editions except the Starter one.

      That's one impressive feature: it permits you to have a screen resolution of more than 1024x768.
      I know about the practice of intentionally crippling a product and selling it for less, but in this case I find it disgusting!

      Anyway, all the editions will probably come with everything on the install CD and will solely differ for one or two bytes in the registry...

      --
      main(char O){O++&&(((O-291)*O+27788)*O-868020?1:putchar(O++) )&&main(O);}
    5. Re:Good informative link by Pastis · · Score: 1

      Completely inadapted to me:

      "will ship in a 32-bit version only" how long before this edition is obsolete? Just let Vista slip 6 months more...

      "the multi-language user interface (MUI)" only for Enterprise. I speak 4 languages, the mother of my child 4 and our kid is probably to speak at least 3. I don't see why I have to pay extra for multiple language interfaces. It comes for free on Linux. And doing so do not put you at an attractive price for any school deals.

      The 'Ultimate' version also limits number of network connections to 10. Is that ultimate?

      I love also the Prof edition "for business of all sizes" then you have the "small business edition".

      Then I personally don't like the distinction to 'first PC in the home' and 'first pc in the emerging market home'. So what ? Second class world citizen?

      No scheduled backup for Home edition (who are perhaps those who need it the most). Professional rely on - professional - backup solutions anyway.

      Etc...

      I feel that Microsoft has too many employees. Making distinctions like that based on features is going to confuse people. Given the fact that features are getting added all the time, feature not present in Windows N X edition is going to be in Windows N+1 X edition. Or maybe there won't be a X edition anymore. What if this particular technology (e.g. the P2P one) becomes a critical building block in 2 years. Do you tell all your home edition owners to throw away their 6 months old PC? Or do you backport it to everybody. What about all the Pro owner who just acquired a Pro because it had this feature?

      You know KISS?

    6. Re:Good informative link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      We're all trying to forget

    7. Re:Good informative link by Trillan · · Score: 1

      So.... is that NCC-1701, NCC-1701A, NCC-1701B, NCC-1701C, NCC-1701D, or NCC-1701E?

      Add in NX-01, and now I understand why they're shipping seven different editions!

    8. Re:Good informative link by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      Based on the level of technology involved, I'm thinking this one.

    9. Re:Good informative link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So.... is that NCC-1701, NCC-1701A, NCC-1701B, NCC-1701C, NCC-1701D, or NCC-1701E?

      It's a superset of all of those versions.

    10. Re:Good informative link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No bloody A, B, C or D!
      -- Scotty

    11. Re:Good informative link by Mad+Bad+Rabbit · · Score: 1
      Vista Enterprise: "Optimized for the Enterprise"
      So.... is that NCC-1701, NCC-1701A, NCC-1701B, NCC-1701C, NCC-1701D, or NCC-1701E

      No, the HMS Enterprise (1705); where it can't pose any security risk due to the lack of computers.

      --
      >;k
    12. Re:Good informative link by still+cynical · · Score: 4, Funny

      "N-C-C-1-7-0-1. No bloody A, B, C, or D."

      --
      Ignorance is the root of all evil.
    13. Re:Good informative link by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hmm.. I don't know why thy don't simply offer the extra features as feature packs. Well, ok, I do know. People are much more likely to buy "the best" version of anything they buy, and a lot less likely to buy "add-ons".

      It's strange, they'll ask themselves "Why do I need that?" for an add-on, but will think "What won't I get if I buy the lower level edition?" of the main product.

      Microsoft must have a whole team of psychologists out there.

    14. Re:Good informative link by log0n · · Score: 1

      Regarding languages, It's free with OSX as well.

    15. Re:Good informative link by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      Well, obviously, there'll be one sub-variant for each.

    16. Re:Good informative link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, Dvorak is doing shtick now.

      I'll hold off on reading the article- I want it to seem fresh when he is reading it at the comedy shack's open mic night.

    17. Re:Good informative link by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

      I though the "J" looked pretty cool.

      --
      If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    18. Re:Good informative link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone actually think this link is funny?

    19. Re:Good informative link by syousef · · Score: 1

      Bloody /.

      Microsoft comes out with 7 new OS's. Dumb move I grant you, but what are you whining it.

      How many Linux distros are there again? Yet there seems to be very few people pointing out that this is a problem. Diversity is a good thing they say.

      In my opinion, there should be a HANDFUL of personal computer operating systems - because you need to maintain some healthy competition. But the OS should be a basic thing to build upon. It shouldn't be complex. It shouldn't have a 3D desktop by default when a 2D one does the job just fine. It should be a basic thing that people can rely on. And they should be able to have some confidence that the software they write today will still run in 100 years. No one provides that, and so all the OS manufacturers can bite me.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    20. Re:Good informative link by Trepalium · · Score: 2, Interesting
      One of Microsoft's prime arguments for why they were not a monopoly during their anti-trust trial was because they "haven't raised prices on Windows". These editions are merely Microsoft's way of "not raising prices" by creating "new" products with inflated prices. Strictly speaking, it's completely true. The price of Windows has not increased, but that doesn't mean that people are not paying more to purchase Windows today.

      Microsoft's customers have felt the sting from their pocketbooks. They know how much it hurt when Microsoft forced them to upgrade to Windows 2000 over Windows 9x when Microsoft chose to cripple Windows Me. You'll note that few new features are making it into the baseline home and pro versions of the OS, so if you want the new features, you need to shell out more money for the SBS or Enterprise editions.

      On the other hand, Microsoft may need to look closely at their processor licensing in the new Windows. Dual-core chips are becoming more and more common, and it's not unreasonable that they'll start showing up in home user machines in the not-too-distant future. XP Home doesn't not appear to support multiprocessor, so hopefully this trend does not carry over into the Vista home products (although I will not be surprised if it does).

      --
      I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
    21. Re:Good informative link by tehcrazybob · · Score: 1

      Anyway, all the editions will probably come with everything on the install CD and will solely differ for one or two bytes in the registry...

      Did you ever see XP Home and XP Pro on the same CD? Are you crazy? Selling 7 different versions is pointless if they all come on the same CD. If you read the descriptions given by the first poster, you'll find that the Ultimate Edition is expected to combine basically all the features available. If that came on the same CD as all the lower versions, who would install the lower versions?

      --
      Computers need to explode more often.
    22. Re:Good informative link by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      How many Linux distros are there again? Yet there seems to be very few people pointing out that this is a problem. Diversity is a good thing they say.

      Actually, there are dozens of posts in every Slashdot OS story pointing this out and claiming it's a problem.

      The difference is that each Linux distro got started because some user wanted something the existing distros didn't provide. Because Linux is free and open, they were able to scratch that itch.

      Whether the diverstity in Linux is desirable or not is irrelevant, because the diversity is a consequence of freedom.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    23. Re:Good informative link by laejoh · · Score: 1, Funny
      The 'Ultimate' version also limits number of network connections to 10. Is that ultimate?
      You are so so so right, the number of network connections should at least go to 11.
    24. Re:Good informative link by Flendon · · Score: 1

      Actually there have seen several articles about how hacking two bytes on the XP Home CD will give you most of the features of XP Pro. This is what he was refering to.

      --
      chown -R us ./base
    25. Re:Good informative link by Flendon · · Score: 1
      Your forgot the best part:
      Starter Edition will allow only three applications (and/or three windows) to run simultaneously

      So you've got your firewall, AV and anti-spyware. You didn't actually want to run any other apps did you? Oops I guess you'll have to pay MS to upgrade then. Oh wait I forgot about Messanger and the other programs that run by default. I guess if you want to have control of your computer you better upgrade so you can install that firewall!
      --
      chown -R us ./base
  2. Hmm by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Funny

    "How about the Vista Porn Edition?"

    Go on....

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Hmm by RealityMogul · · Score: 1

      That's going to be part of all 7 versions. Hell, It's been built-in for the last 10 years. Just browse to any porn site with their built-in browser, and you will forever be presented with a constant flow of pornographic material. It's a feature!

    2. Re:Hmm by wo1verin3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Reminds me of a tech support call from 5 years ago.

      The guy kept complaining since he visited a certain website a little animated woman was dancing on his task bar and offering him more pictures of her for $30.

      I thought about this for a moment and asked...

      "For $35 I'll help you remove her but for only $30 you can have more pictures... you're sure you want to go ahead with this?"

    3. Re:Hmm by wintermute740 · · Score: 1

      Why wait for Vista? Just make sure your version of IE has not been patched in 2 years, and visit as many "free" porn sites as you can find. Never mind the "spyware," it's just updating your maching to Vista Porn Edition ;)

    4. Re:Hmm by 8127972 · · Score: 1

      Would that be straight porn, gay porn, or lesbian porn? There's three more versions right there!

      --
      This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
    5. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by his answer you'll know if he's married or not =)

  3. Other Versiona by gbulmash · · Score: 4, Funny
    Perhaps they could have a Microsoft Vista "n00b" edition with a one-click link to AOL and a special "me too!" button on the keyboard.

    Then there would be the Microsoft Vista "Infect Me" edition with a special version of Outlook that automatically opens all attachments.

    Add to that the "Miriam Abacha" edition which sends all your banking info to Nigeria.

    My favorite would be the Vista "Office Gamer" edition which includes 25 variations on Solitaire.

    - Greg

    1. Re:Other Versiona by coolGuyZak · · Score: 2, Funny
      Then there would be the Microsoft Vista "Infect Me" edition

      Aw, c'mon. I know everyone hated Millenium Edition, but that's no reason to perform cruel and unsusual punishment upon it.

    2. Re:Other Versiona by tabkey12 · · Score: 1, Funny

      And don't knock Windows XP Porn Edition, as Dvorak would definitely be qualified to talk about that given that his personal blog, Dvorak Uncensored was recently categorised as sex-related...

    3. Re:Other Versiona by Mastadex · · Score: 0

      Vista Slashdot edition.

      Comes with firefox installed and start page preset to slashdot. nothing else.

      --
      A morning without coffee is like something without something else.
    4. Re:Other Versiona by kai.chan · · Score: 4, Funny

      Then there would be the Microsoft Vista "Infect Me" edition

      Dude, the "Infect Me" edition comes bundled with all other Vista editions for free!

    5. Re:Other Versiona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and a special "me too!" button on the keyboard.

      The "me too" button would look like this:

      <-- 2

      Example:
      Luser: I need a beer
      John6pack: <-- 2!!

      Other important keys:
      1) OMG
      2) !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
      3) LOL

    6. Re:Other Versiona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      My favorite would be the Vista "Office Gamer" edition which includes 25 variations on Solitaire.
      They already have that. It's called "GNOME."
    7. Re:Other Versiona by daniil · · Score: 5, Funny

      How about Vista Dvorak edition? It would try -- and always fail -- to predict what you want to do, and then "do" it. The only way to turn this option off would be to wipe the hard disk.

      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    8. Re:Other Versiona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don't forget to put an "Any Key" on the keyboard as well, for the nOOb

    9. Re:Other Versiona by Eberlin · · Score: 1

      I feel compelled to expound...

      "n00b" edition: one button interface for everything labeled "Do whatever you think is best for me" which in turn borks their files, takes out a couple grand from their bank accounts and deposits over to MS, infects them with multiple viruses, and then sends out slutty pictures of their daughter onto myspace.com

      "Red State" edition: a bit like the n00b edition except it's done by the government...all in the name of Jesus. It won't GPF or BSOD or whatever. It'll still fsck up all the time but will just go about its biz never admitting it screwed up at all.

      "Really Spiffy" edition: has an animated IE button.

      "Slashdot Editor" edition: built in spellcheck (intentionally borked), automatically resummarizes stories and posts them a minimum of two times in a day. Uses a cowboyneal screensaver.

      "G4 Extreme" edition: all look, no substance, and supposedly for the technically elite. Has ctrl, alt, del keys in neon green.

      "Gates Foundation" edition: all the features of Ultimate Super Duper Extreme EX Plus Alpha edition given as free crack to the underprivelaged. Except you only get 3 features at once...default features enabled are "Video Display" "Keyboard input" and "Mouse input" -- disable one and you can print, use a modem, or even play a CD!

    10. Re:Other Versiona by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Funny
      Well, personally, I think the Vista Dvorak Edition should look more like this, with every other clause randomly and pointlessly bolded.

      But that's just my opinion I could be wrong.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    11. Re:Other Versiona by PaxTech · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      "Blue State" edition : It still screws up all the time, but instead of it being Microsoft's fault it's obviously George Bush's fault, because he hates your files almost as much as he hates black people.

      --
      All movements for social change begin as missions, evolve into businesses, and end up as rackets.
    12. Re:Other Versiona by optikSmoke · · Score: 1

      They should release a Windows Vista "Forever" Edition. It could include all of the features that were originally slated for inclusion in Vista, and be released in tandem with Duke Nukem Forever.

    13. Re:Other Versiona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add to that the "Miriam Abacha" edition which sends all your banking info to Nigeria.
      *alert* *alert*
      this has already been done! it's called Internet Explorer

    14. Re:Other Versiona by Fiver- · · Score: 1

      I think you're at least 5 or 6 years too late for a "me too!" joke to be relevant.

    15. Re:Other Versiona by UnixRevolution · · Score: 1

      There's no WAY microsoft would make the "Infect Me" Edition. I can cite 2 reasons for this.

      1. Their anti-spyware tool is free, so they wouldn't make any money that way.

      2. No way in HELL would they give out free licenses for Outlook.

      --
      You like your new Mac more than you like me, don't you, Dave? Dave? I asked...She said Yes.
    16. Re:Other Versiona by Vorondil28 · · Score: 1

      Oh, so switching back and forth between keyboard layouts will be just like XP. Well, at least that won't get worse...

      --
      This sig rocks the casbah.
    17. Re:Other Versiona by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      No, this is exactly what we warned Microsoft about! They've confused the poor consumer time and time again!

      What you're referring to is actually the Windows Vista Steve Gibson Edition.

    18. Re:Other Versiona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And of course.. ample documentation... http://web14.compaq.com/falco/detail.asp?FAQnum=FA Q2859/

    19. Re:Other Versiona by n64man987 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wouldn't this be the "I get NO Spam" edition?

    20. Re:Other Versiona by idokus · · Score: 1

      The other versions will be build opon the "Infect Me" version. That's ObjectOriented for you. :)

    21. Re:Other Versiona by Jerf · · Score: 1

      Haven't you noticed? That feature's been implemented in Windows since at least 3.1. (Only half joking, if that much.)

      It's also quite heavily implemented in Office, especially Word, which I've caught multiple times in multiple places in multiple versions just deciding that you really, really meant to check this checkbox, and by golly, that "unchecking" action just has to be a mistake...

    22. Re:Other Versiona by DeusExMalex · · Score: 1

      Oh snap! You /are/ a clever one...

    23. Re:Other Versiona by ChuyMatt · · Score: 1

      Yah, I agree!

    24. Re:Other Versiona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the people offshore who's cheaper salaries give them jobs even though they can't afford to buy what they helped produce:

      "Windows Third World Edition"

      Oh wait, they did that one already

    25. Re:Other Versiona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next to the CaTaRL key?

    26. Re:Other Versiona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought thw Dvorak version would have a redesigned keyboard layout just to confuse people.

    27. Re:Other Versiona by njfuzzy · · Score: 1
      Those aren't clauses, they are random words.*

      *See the above sentence for use of clauses.

      --
      My Photography - http://ian-x.com
      The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
    28. Re:Other Versiona by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      C p.j.ck.e a x.ya ru Kcoya Ekrpat >ecycrb yd. ryd.p eafw abe or uap C dak.b-y brycj.e abf mahrp lprxn.mov

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    29. Re:Other Versiona by yRabbit · · Score: 1

      Really? That sounds like the Archie Sonic comics to me.

  4. Hilarious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to who's sense of humour?

  5. Ain't it funny? by Lispy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    After years of fragmented Windows versions they finally made the one true merged OS that they had been praising for so long. Windows 2000 was really one OS to rule them all.

    But as soon as XP came out they invented a home edition, a professional edition, delayed the server and splitted up again. Why? And now this.

    It seems it's really all about the money. Sad, in a way. Since, other than with Unix, the most exploits still work cross Windows platform. :)

    1. Re:Ain't it funny? by nb+caffeine · · Score: 5, Funny

      at least they got SOMETHING working crossplatform :)

      --

      "Something's wrong with you...and I hope we never do meet again." - Deftones When Girls Telephone Boys
    2. Re:Ain't it funny? by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      After years of fragmented Windows versions they finally made the one true merged OS that they had been praising for so long. Windows 2000 was really one OS to rule them all.

      No. Win2k was only for business use and was not targeted at the home market. That's what WinME was for. WinXP was MS attempt at building both the Home and Business versions off the same core.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    3. Re:Ain't it funny? by Joehonkie · · Score: 2, Informative

      Win2k did have a home edition, it just didn't sell well. They released Millenium after they realized this.

    4. Re:Ain't it funny? by Scuff · · Score: 4, Insightful
      After years of fragmented Windows versions they finally made the one true merged OS that they had been praising for so long. Windows 2000 was really one OS to rule them all.


      and would that "true merged OS be windows 2000 Professional, Server, Advanced Server, or Datacenter Server?
    5. Re:Ain't it funny? by lav-chan · · Score: 1

      Um. What are you talking about? Windows 2000 had several versions. We personally own Professional, Server, and Advanced Server. Maybe there are even others aside from those, i don't remember.

    6. Re:Ain't it funny? by interiot · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Windows XP's split into personal edition (needs to be activated separately) and corporate edition (doesn't need to be activated separately) makes sense.

      Vista seems to be a somewhat intelligent extension of this, with an ultimate edition (does need to be activated separately) to draw the pirate's interest away from the corporate edition (one OS to rule them all).

      On the other hand, I don't know if it will really matter. Either Ultimate will be cracked quickly, or pirates will resign themselves to using the corporate edition like before.

    7. Re:Ain't it funny? by pegr · · Score: 1

      No. Win2k was only for business use and was not targeted at the home market. That's what WinME was for. WinXP was MS attempt at building both the Home and Business versions off the same core.
       
      Well, unlike the difference between workstation and server versions, there is no technical difference between home and business markets. To split them is artificial and only to confuse/fragment/exploit the market. We'll never know if the strategy is valid, because WinME sucked.
       
      I still run Win2K (when I have to run Windows) because it is still the best version out there...

    8. Re:Ain't it funny? by lowe0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unifying the versions was never about The One SKU. It was about maintaining a single codebase, so that effort could be spent improving the latest version of Windows instead of propping up an OS far past its prime.

    9. Re:Ain't it funny? by hawaiian717 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I don't remember 2000 Home ever getting released. IIRC, they were having trouble with some of the game-related stuff worked, and ended up release ME as a warmed over 98SE to have something new to sell.

      --
      End of Line.
    10. Re:Ain't it funny? by furry_wookie · · Score: 1

      Don't forget "Windows 2000 Datacenter Server".

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_2000_Datacent er_Server

      --
      -- Given enough time and money, Microsoft will eventualy invent UNIX.
    11. Re:Ain't it funny? by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 1

      That's not exactly true. There are differences between the needs of business users and home users. Also, it's good security practice to only have the software you need installed.

      Home users don't need domains, for instance. You might have a domain at home for business reasons (say you're a network consultant), but then you need business level software, not home level software.

      Home users don't need Distributed Transaction Coordinators. Home users don't need Messenger services (Not to be confused with Instant messanger services). Home users don't need Volume Shadow Copy services, etc.. etc.. etc..

      You can make the software cheaper, by not including those features, and you make the software more secure because there aren't unneeded services running.

      The problem comes in when you have the situation like MS does, where even though they package a "home" version, they still include crap they shouldn't, and have too much stuff turned on. *IF* Microsoft actually did it right, it would be much more secure and valuable.

      The fact of the matter is, Everyone wants everything for nothing. So complaining that there's no "technical" reason for things is just whining. If MS can sell their product for less by turning off some features, and people don't need them, I'm all for it.

    12. Re:Ain't it funny? by mnmn · · Score: 1

      "It seems it's really all about the money"

      You are so new to this universe.

      --
      "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    13. Re:Ain't it funny? by Ckwop · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ahhh.. you have to ask former microsoft employee why..

      This man needs +5 insightful tattooed on his fore-head.

      Simon

    14. Re:Ain't it funny? by Nasarius · · Score: 1
      and would that "true merged OS be windows 2000 Professional, Server, Advanced Server, or Datacenter Server?

      Yes. All seven Vista versions are for the desktop/workstation. Compare with one desktop/workstation version of Win2k.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    15. Re:Ain't it funny? by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      If MS can sell their product for less by turning off some features, and people don't need them, I'm all for it.

      The goal isn't to sell them to home users for less. It is to sell them to business users for more. They are gutting network features so businesses CAN'T use the home version, even if they are a small business. It is a form of taxation for using Windows in a business. It WOULD be cheaper for MS to only have one version, but they couldn't charge more to business users then.

      Compare the cost of OEM or aftermarket Windows over the last 15 years, and see for yourself. From $60 retail to $300. Even oil hasn't risen that much in price in the same time. Not even close.

      There is no technical reason, it is purely profit driven. This is their choice, and I fully support their right to make this choice. Then again, I am phasing out Windows as fast as I can with our network of 25 workstations, already have on 8 servers, and doing so at home as well, so what they charge is rapidly becoming of no consequence to me. And my reasons aren't about the price.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    16. Re:Ain't it funny? by bostonguy · · Score: 1

      I purchased a Win2K H.O.T. kit and got both beta and release versions of Win2K. All I got was Pro, Server, Advanced Server, and DataCenter.

      No Home edition.

      {Talk about a deal! I bought a NFR set, and got all 4 versions, with a license, for less than the cost of Win2K Pro alone!)

    17. Re:Ain't it funny? by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Win2k was only for business use and was not targeted at the home market.

      Well, that's funny. I have a win2000 professional partition and the only thing I use it for is games. Oh, and finding cheat codes for those games when I don't feel like taking the extra 60 seconds to boot back into Linux.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    18. Re:Ain't it funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhhh.... Joel has apparently taken a few econ and finance courses..... Brings back memories...

      Just pointless chatter...

  6. More of the Same by ranton · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It doesnt seam to me that all these different versions are much different than what has been done in the past. I just helped my girlfriend buy a laptop online, and she had the choice between XP Home, Media, and Professional. And that doesnt start to cover any of the current server operating systems.

    If Microsoft is doing anything confusing with Vista, they have been doing the same thing with XP and Windows Server for years.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    1. Re:More of the Same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However there will not only be the 7 consumer level versions of Vista, there will most likely also be Vista Media Center edition, and another 3-4 version of Vista server. So windows Vista will have closer to 12 versions when it hits the market as opposed to the 7 versions of XP/2003.

  7. Dvorak? by Bananatree3 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Whenever I see "Dvorak", I can't help but think of the Dvorak Keyboard. I don't know what's gotten into me...

    1. Re:Dvorak? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1
      I've often wondered about that over the years myself. Seriously, is that his real name? Or did he change it for "Show Business"? Or was the Dvorak keyboard named after him?

      --Which came first - Rolling Stone Magazine, The Rolling Stones, or the song "Like a Rolling Stone". No one seems to know.

    2. Re:Dvorak? by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1


      Here's some info on the Dvorak keyboard for you.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    3. Re:Dvorak? by Jeff+Hornby · · Score: 4, Informative

      Which came first - Rolling Stone Magazine, The Rolling Stones, or the song "Like a Rolling Stone". No one seems to know.

      They were all named after the song "The Rolling Stone Blues" by Muddy Waters. The order was: The Rolling Stones (1962), Like a Rolling Stone (1965) and Rolling Stone magazine (1967). (dates from Wikipedia).

      --
      Why doesn't Slashdot ever get slashdotted?
    4. Re:Dvorak? by ClippyHater · · Score: 1

      I don't know what's gotten into me...

      Well, with Vista Pr0n edition, we'll all find out.

    5. Re:Dvorak? by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Seriously, is that his real name? Or did he change it for "Show Business"?

      He must have changed it. My reasoning is that like most users of the Dvorak keyboard, he is an intermible, miserable asshole. I swear, you ever meet a user of a Dvorak keyboard? They're like the "kill your television" crowd. Blah, blah, "Dvorak is much more efficent. Normal keyboards were designed to keep the man down", blah, blah, "CNN? I don't even know what that is. Is it a TV show? Because I don't own a TV" blah, blah, blah. Like John Dvorak, everytime on opens their mouth, they say something grating and irating.

    6. Re:Dvorak? by Grumpendorfer · · Score: 1

      And Robert Heinlein's "The Rolling Stones" was published in 1952.

    7. Re:Dvorak? by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      Because it is a superior layout, HA HA HA.

      Wow, one bad joke deserves another...

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    8. Re:Dvorak? by CajunLuke · · Score: 1

      Why doesn't Slashdot ever get slashdotted?

      Because ticalc.org isn't big enough.

      Yet.

    9. Re:Dvorak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about, "a rolling stone gathers no moss?" 100BC

    10. Re:Dvorak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Later republished as "Space Family Stone" (at least in the British edition I have) to avoid confusion with the devil music of the 1960s.

    11. Re:Dvorak? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Hmm, thanks! Actually a recent article in the New York Times implied that "Like a Rolling Stone" may have been taken from Rollingstone, MN off of the legendary Highway 61 near Dylan's hometown.

  8. Porn Edition Already Exists by deutschemonte · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just install XP w/o service packs or a firewall.

    You'll have a computer loaded with porn (pop-ups) in no time.

    --
    The preceding message was based on actual events. Only the names, locations and events have been changed.
    1. Re:Porn Edition Already Exists by bogie · · Score: 1

      Me: Yea umm you seem to have a lot of spyware on your computer. Lots of porn dialers and other garbage.

      Client: Hmmm. I think my nephew was over last weekend and was fussing around on the PC. Yea, that's it.

      Of course in that case I never use the possessive term "your porn dialer", its always "the porn dialer" wants to connect to Russia with your credit card information.

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    2. Re:Porn Edition Already Exists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this is a myth: just for kicks, I took a spare machine with a disposable hard drive and did a base install of XP home, no SP1 or 2, no patches, no firewalls or routers, and put it out on the raw internet. The whole PC was out there, not just a DMZ for port 80

      Put up task manager to watch CPU and memory usage.

      Went to GRC.com and verified that I did have all sorts of nasty ports open. So I sat back and waited.

      Hour 1. Nothing happened.

      Hour 2. Nothing. Started IE and went surfing porn and warez sites. Man, they have pretty ragged looking porn these days. Where are the cute models who don't look like they spend time at truckstops? Anyway...

      Hour 3. Absolutely nothing.

      Hour 4. F-1 race was over, so I got bored waiting on the PC to do something and turned it off.

      Based on all the hype, I expected it to be hosed withing a couple minutes. Oh well.

  9. Another Edition Request... by Kjuib · · Score: 4, Funny

    How about a Vaporware Edition?!

    --
    - Your stupidity got you into this mess, why can't it get you out? -Will Rogers
    1. Re:Another Edition Request... by nine-times · · Score: 2, Funny

      I already have it.

    2. Re:Another Edition Request... by Loonacy · · Score: 1

      You know you're a l33t pir8 when you already have a copy of software that hasn't been released, and never will be released.

    3. Re:Another Edition Request... by Icupnimpn2 · · Score: 1

      I'm suprised no one's thought of it yet... Super Windows Vista 2 Turbo Edition

    4. Re:Another Edition Request... by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it's not that good. If you're interested in trying it out, you can download it here.

    5. Re:Another Edition Request... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Terrorist Verison. It comes loaded with all tools to write virus and worms. You get to be the first to hear about security vulnerabilities and when someone comes looking, it vanishes from the hard drive with out a trace

    6. Re:Another Edition Request... by taernim · · Score: 1

      comes pre-loaded with Duke Nukem Forever!

      --
      "PC Load Letter? What the $@#% does that mean?!"
    7. Re:Another Edition Request... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah!!!

      Call it "Windows Vista Secure Edition"...

    8. Re:Another Edition Request... by Loonacy · · Score: 1

      Hey, you copied my web page!
      I'm suing!

    9. Re:Another Edition Request... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been delayed

    10. Re:Another Edition Request... by mmj638 · · Score: 1

      That's a reasonable request. At least it wouldn't cost them any development time.

  10. Vista Dual Boot Edition? by daaku · · Score: 1

    How about Vista Dual Boot Edition?

    1. Re:Vista Dual Boot Edition? by coolGuyZak · · Score: 1
      How about Vista Dual Boot Edition?

      Actually, they were planning on making Vista Dual Boot Edition, but it didn't pan out in usability studies. The users kept falling on their ass while trying to give their computer "The Dual Boot".

    2. Re:Vista Dual Boot Edition? by unoengborg · · Score: 1

      I have no need for dual boot any more, so I go for the Vista Beer Coaster edition instead.

      --
      God is REAL! Unless explicitly declared INTEGER
  11. What a bad idea by ChrisF79 · · Score: 1

    From the article, "If they want to sell different kinds of tweaks, this can be better done as one grand distribution, with tweaks within the code that can be turned on and off during installation (or whenever)."

    Just imagine how fast that would be hacked. Lots of the most inexpensive version would be sold and a crack would unlock everything (assuming they don't just get a pirated version anyway).

    --
    Finance tutorials and more! Understandfinance
    1. Re:What a bad idea by Musteval · · Score: 1

      I think the idea was that there is just one version that you buy. While installing, you can choose what features you want.

      They may actually do what you're talking about for Vista. They apparently did for XP - http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/06/03/xp_hack/

      --
      Note to mods: I'm probably being sarcastic.
    2. Re:What a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I myself plan on acquiring the 'Microsoft Vista for Pirates: Stolen Edition'.

    3. Re:What a bad idea by nine-times · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I thought the idea was that Microsoft could sell one edition and only one edition instead of purposefully crippling functionality. Instead of needing to buy the "Gamers Edition" or "Business Edition" or whatever, they give you tools to help you tweak your own installation, adding or removing whatever components you like. For example-- oh, I don't know, maybe I don't want IE, OE, WMP, MSN IM, or... MS Paint, maybe they could let me make those choices.

      But you're right, that's a crazy idea.

    4. Re:What a bad idea by Blue-Footed+Boobie · · Score: 1
      Not want MS Paint?? What the hell is wrong with you?

      I do all of my drafting and design work in Paint. I'm not kidding.

      --
      DAMN YOU OCTODOG! DAMN YOU TO HELL!
    5. Re:What a bad idea by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      Or just tie the version IDs into the install key. Not too hard to do (different version keys checksum to different values.) MS already does this anyway; you can't use a Dell XP pro install disk and a retail XP pro key, it won't work. Same deal with the educational keys.

      The hackers will always do what they feel like. As long as you make it hard enough for everyone else you've done your job.

    6. Re:What a bad idea by lord_rob+the+only+on · · Score: 1

      I myself plan not to try to get this new ressource wasting operating system, that will add nothing (WinFS, Monad, where are you ? ...) more that windows 2000 already does.

      But yes I love new things, that's why Debian unstable/sid is my primary OS. It gets updated daily, it still runs very smoothly on my four-year-old athlon 900Mhz.

      Windows Vista will only feed the need of buying a new PC. The reason might be that no one at Microsoft seem to care of writing optimized code (``Everybody will get a faster PC by the time anyway...'').

      I often read various blogs (XOrg, Qt for example), where I can see that many developpers work on making their softwares faster on current hardware.

  12. XP by DeathFlame · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How many versions of XP are there? Aren't there already like 7 versions?

    Why does it matter how many versions there are?

    I thought having more choice was good rather than having some sort of be all end all version that takes extra time/space to install for features that most will never use.

    1. Re:XP by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As the title of the article says, it confuses the market. Do you need Home Standard Edition or Home Premium Edition? Which Professional edition do you need? What is Ultimate Edition? Microsoft could easily release one version that does everything, or three versions--Home, Professional, and Server. I wondered at first if there was some devious reasoning behind this, but now I think their marketing people really are this dumb. My evidence is a series of very recent dumb marketing ideas:

      1.) The name "Windows Vista"--the dumbest name for a Windows release yet (up there with Windows ME).
      2.) Internet Explorer is now "Windows Internet Explorer 7."
      3.) Other names like "Windows Graphics Foundation," all of them in the similar vein of "Windows Something Something."

      It's an orgy of branding over there in Redmond.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    2. Re:XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many versions of XP are there? Aren't there already like 7 versions?

      There's five:

    3. Re:XP by BradleyUffner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But you are perfectly fine with the hundreds of different Linux distros? Event RedHat has different versions of the same version.

    4. Re:XP by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      At least Apple only puts an "i" in front of everything.

    5. Re:XP by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      Currently, there are 4 "main" editions of XP:
      Windows XP Home
      Windows XP Pro
      Windows XP Media Center
      Windows XP Tablet PC

      There are also "region-specific" versions:
      Windows XP Starter
      Windows XP Home N
      Windows XP Pro N

      So, yes, by that metric, there are already 7 versions. But, also by that metric, there are over 10 Windows Vista variants.

    6. Re:XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You left out the Corporate edition that everyone downloads but most think it's the Professional version.

    7. Re:XP by sn0wflake · · Score: 1

      OK, Windows Vista comes in seven edition while there's like a billion Linux distros. That makes sense *LOL*

    8. Re:XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > How many versions of XP are there? Aren't there already like 7 versions?

      Starter/Home/Pro/Media Center/Tablet/x64 and the N edition.

      > Why does it matter how many versions there are?

      It doesn't, as long as people know the differences between each version. For XP, it is obvious just by looking at their names (maybe not the N edition). It is not the case for Vista. For Vista, we have 2 versions for home users, 3 versions for business, and the kitchen sink edition. Do we really expect joe users to check out the features chart of each version before going out to buy MS's latest and greatest? Imagine MS showing off the Aero Glass interface on ad but users pick up the Home Basic edition which does not have that particular feature.

      Once again, choice is good, as long as people (are bother to) know what they are and not be confused by it.

    9. Re:XP by moranar · · Score: 1

      Yes, because the Linux distros aren't made by the same company.

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea!"
      Gandhi, about Internet Security
    10. Re:XP by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      Redhat Mandrake

    11. Re:XP by ilyaaohell · · Score: 1

      As an indirect swipe at all the different flavors of Linux, I found your satirical comment absolutely hillarious! Well played.

      --
      UNIX: A computer user is defined as a programmer. WINDOWS: A computer user is defined as a consumer.
    12. Re:XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many versions of XP are there? Aren't there already like 7 versions?

      There is one version of Vista crippled in seven different ways to segment and manipulate the market.

      To talk about wasting time and space is bullshit; far more is wasted by having different versions.

      And to talk about choice is the usual marketing lies.

    13. Re:XP by sn0wflake · · Score: 1

      So, apparently your problem is that a single company is developing and improving on the same OS versus ten seperate distributions that are developing and improving on the same kernel. I'm sorry but I simply can't follow your mind of thought. I love the FOSS community as it provides me with much great free software for Windows but the Linux/OS part is simply flawed to the core from a business perspective.

    14. Re:XP by adarn · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but there is no dumber name for anything than Windows ME.

  13. Cars by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When people step into a ford dealership to buy a car - I suppose they get all confused on what all the models are.

    "So why is the f-150 bigger than that escort? Aren't they both Fords?"

    "Do they all have 4 wheels or more?"

    "Whaddya mean I get get it in diesal or Gas or Hybrid"?

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    1. Re:Cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put two vehicles together side by side. You can visually see a difference, clearly.

      Put two computers together side by side. You have been SKIPPED!

    2. Re:Cars by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1

      the car analogy doesn't work. you're comparing hardware to software.

      A better thing to compare to cars is the computer hardware (multi HDs, extra RAM, more optical drives, etc)

      Or, compare some aspect of the Ford to the choice of OS.

      ie:

      whadaya mean I could get an xbox, ps2 or gamecube in the back seat? I'm confoosed. What's better?

      or

      So, I can get a stereo with built-in radio, or get the XM/Sirius option? Or I could get the CD player/cassette combo... or the mp3 playing stereo. What's this about the ogg vorbis option?

      That's a more linear comparison to the many tastes and flavours of vista.

      [ Whatever flavour you choose, I'm sure there's so much eyecandy, it'll leave a bad taste in your mouth. ]

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    3. Re:Cars by petabyte · · Score: 1

      I don't know that that is the analogy that I would use. Different versions of Vista aren't different models - they're different trim levels.

      And buying a car; that can be confusing as hell. With alot of makes, you can have trim levels and then packages on trim levels which change things inside of a trim level. So you my have a CE with better specs then the LE despite the fact that LE is Luxary and CE is the economy. Cross-eyed yet?

      For different models - there I would say 2000, XP, Vista, etc.

      For different makes - Windows, MacOS, BSD, Linux, OS/2, AmigaOS, BeOS, some OS I'm missing and will be flamed for ...

    4. Re:Cars by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, say you started asking about the differences between cars, and the dealer said, "Well, the F150-Xtreme is basically the same as the F150-Standard, except that we take this little rubber band off the fuel intake so that you get maximum horsepower. The F150-Standard is a better deal than the F150-Minimus because the Minimus has a nine hundred pound lead weight in the bed to keep you from accelerating quickly. Now, you'll probably want to splurge and get the air conditioning. It's installed on every car on the lot, but if you don't give us $500, we poke a hole in the casing to let the freon out."

      Once again, physical items and data have completely different economics.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    5. Re:Cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Except your car analogy fails because they're all built on top of the exact same kernel. The different flavors of Microsoft OSes only refer to different userspace bundles. So if you're going to make a car analogy, it's more like:

      • Honda Civic DX. $12,900.
      • Honda Civic LX. $15,700.
      • Honda Civic EX. $17,600.
      • Honda Civic DX with a pair of 10" subwoofers and neon. $14,300.
      • Honda Civic LX with a pair of 12" subwoofers, neon, fog lamps, racing stickers and a spoiler. $19,050.
      • Honda Civic EX with a pair of 15" subwoofers, neon, fog lamps, racing stickers, a spoiler and hydraulics. $23,100.
      • Honda Civic EX Pimp Edition with a leopard skin dash, gold plated steering wheel, fuzzy dice, 17" low profile tires, raised hydraulic suspension, a pair of 18" subwoofers, fog lamps, a roof-mounted light bar, neon undercarriage, 34 optimized racing stickers, a 3 level spoiler, blackout tinted windows and a fruit juicer built into the dash. $29,900 (MSRP).

    6. Re:Cars by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

      But people still buy cars.

      Even dumb ones buy cars. I know. I see them driving everyday.

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    7. Re:Cars by Dadoo · · Score: 1

      Actually, when you think about it, this is exactly why Microsoft has a monopoly.

      "Why can't I play this game on my Mac, as well as your Windows machine? Aren't they both computers?"

      --
      Sit, Ubuntu, sit. Good dog.
    8. Re:Cars by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      There are different hardware models of computers, but most run the same operating system--Windows. Almost all cars have the same system interface--a steering wheel, seats, an ignition, and so forth.

      Asking people to start choosing between two versions of Home is going to be reeaal fun. Sigh.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    9. Re:Cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the fsck is this modded insight? You can physically compare a car whereas how do you do the same for software? It's easy to see the differences between the F-150 and the Escort just by looking at them, but go ahead and tell me what the difference between a XP Home vs XP Pro edition is? I've been asked this question many times by friends and family and I always have difficulty telling them which one to buy.

    10. Re:Cars by s_mencer · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna hafta go ahead and disagree with you on that. The problem there is that some of the civics(EX models) come with a little thing called VTEC. Not quite the same Kernal there... and that doesn't even take into account the Si model.

      I think the real point here is that if people care enough to do some research, they will be able to figure it out. Or, they will get a computer smart relative or friend to do it for them.

      And since when do two 10" subs and a neon cost $1400?

    11. Re:Cars by Hamfist · · Score: 1


      How about this:

      Do you have the F150 with a 540 hp V8 that only ever fires 4 cylinders and only ever generates 180hp?

      Why are you charging more for this version than the version that actually fires on 8 cylinders and generates 250hp?

      Will you chase me down and sue me if I enable those 8 cylinders, turning on funcionality that you crippled on purpose?

      I can understand with or without ABS, so your F150 Datacenter Edition is OK, but why can't I get a cigarette lighter with the Home Premium F150 since, like being able to log on to a domain, it's really old tech and doesn't really add to the cost.

      Sorry mate, you've left your correct analogy at the front door, leaving the false one here.

    12. Re:Cars by aafiske · · Score: 1

      No, but when they step into a Honda dealership to look at Civics and have a hard time keeping straight what the LX had over the EX or the DX or the HX or the XXX, it's a little more understandable.

      You are suggesting that people are too dumb to be able to easily tell between 'truck' and 'economy car' and 'sports car'. But really, they're too dumb to tell the difference between 'escort model 1', 'escort model 2' and 'escort model 3', and also 'civic model 1-7'. Which isn't so dumb after all, considering the endless stream of car comparison guides.

    13. Re:Cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please stop with the car analogies, they just don't work.

    14. Re:Cars by glitch23 · · Score: 0

      The F-150 survives better in a crash than an Escort. Somehow I have a feeling that all the versions of Vista have an equally likely chance of crashing and not surviving.

      Not to mention that when you buy a car there are Options and there are Standard items even among all the variations of a particular model. With Windows you pick your variation of your model (Vista) and then that's it; no more choosing Options because there aren't any because everything is Standard.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    15. Re:Cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I gotta ask... How the hell do you optimize a racing sticker?

    16. Re:Cars by JetTredmont · · Score: 1

      People get confused over XP Home versus XP Professional versus 2003 Server.

      I think you are giving the human race far too much credit.

      No, the vast majority will see 7 "models", hear someone say "The Ultra Pimp edition is da bomb!" and either buy that or the one one step more expensive than it. And the rest will see increasing prices and pick the lowest cost one, then regret their purchase a week later and pay exhorbitant "upgrade" prices to get the features they didn't realize they needed.

      The big problem here is that, outside of Slashdot, the differences between the 7 Vista versions are so arbitrary and abstract that the average user has no way to distinguish them. In the car analogy, it's more like $350-2,500 extra for various topcoat paint procedures and $2,000 for the special DMX Optimizer on the front center speaker. It's all just gobbledegook to the average consumer, which means they'll either buy the most expensive, the least expensive, or whatever happens to be most in stock at CostCo that day.

    17. Re:Cars by dhakbar · · Score: 1

      That's probably the least flawless use of a computers to cars analogy I've ever seen on Slashdot.

      Good fucking going, dude. Respect. 99.9% of the tards around here fuck up even the simplest analogies.

    18. Re:Cars by flark.f · · Score: 1

      i agree exactly with this. as i'm one of the people who can't keep this car crap straight. when i bought my last car ('05 pontiac vibe) i had so much trouble keeping straight the features of all the different models of cars and what each offered within those models. the sheer number of them overwhelmed me to the point where I said screw it, i'm going with what i think looks the best and with what'll have room for what i need to get done. and that's how i ended up with the vibe.

  14. Blasherings from the no longer relevant... by cttforsale · · Score: 1

    and not even funny

    1. Re:Blasherings from the no longer relevant... by Soko · · Score: 1

      and not even funny

      You must be new here. Welcome to Slashdot!

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
  15. Only 1 edition needed by Daveznet · · Score: 1, Troll

    Microsoft should just release one edition Microsoft Vista Secure and Reliable Edition. Id be happy with that!

    --
    GL HF!
    1. Re:Only 1 edition needed by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

      It would have no network support!

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    2. Re:Only 1 edition needed by hcob$ · · Score: 1

      In the words of agent J:

      "When was the last time you had a CAT scan? ... Yeah, you should make another appointment."

      --
      Cliff Claven
      K.E.G. Party Chairman
      Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
    3. Re:Only 1 edition needed by Hymer · · Score: 1

      Request Denied !
      It would be to hard to sell new and improved versions...

    4. Re:Only 1 edition needed by narsiman · · Score: 1

      They tried it. It was just like a Mac. So they shelved it.

  16. sarcasm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The submitter is right. Hilarious!!!

  17. Hmm.... by tktk · · Score: 4, Funny
    How about a Blacklist Dvorak edition? One where the OS censors any mention of him?

    I'd almost be willing to pay for that.

    1. Re:Hmm.... by coolGuyZak · · Score: 1

      Heh. I'd be too, but then /. wouldn't be nearly as entertaining.

    2. Re:Hmm.... by Kadmos · · Score: 1

      You could try Privoxy with reg. exp. and all :-)

      s/Dvorak/Qwerty/ig

  18. My idea would be a Vista Pirates Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For people without a valid activation key. It would come preloaded with everything posted to alt.binaries.pc.warez from the 6 months before the media went gold.

  19. or ... by eneville · · Score: 1

    plain, salt and vinegar, barbaque etc.

    or windows enlightenment? It's just another way of selling software to the public. Using year digits doen't work anymore so they use confusing non-descriptive versions now, nothing much has changed.

    TFA isn't really adding anything to technology news, it's little short of being troll itself.

  20. I get no spam. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    John C. "I Get No Spam" Dvorak.

  21. Multi-toolkit hell by Fungus+King · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Looking at the screenshots for Office 12, perhaps they could make Vista Uniform Edition, where all the programs look the same! :O

    Too much to ask? :(

  22. How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows Vista: Virus Free edition!

    Oh wait, that's not possible, is it.

  23. Let's see the spin on this one... by daniil · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Let's see: Countless Linux distros = good, as it gives you the liberty to choose between many distros. But different versions* of Windows Vista = bad, as it's confusing???

    What am I not getting here?

    * How about Vista Dvorak edition, automatically spouting bullshit every few days?

    --
    Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    1. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by PlacidPundit · · Score: 1

      Countless Linux distros are designed to separate you from your money.

    2. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you not getting?

      The double standard, of course. duh.

    3. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      How about Vista Dvorak edition, automatically spouting bullshit every few days?

      They were planning on it, but decided to release the functionality in the `Robert X. Cringley Plus! Pack for Vista' instead.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by PlacidPundit · · Score: 1

      Grrr. Countless Linux distros are NOT designed to separate you from your money.

    5. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by AthenianGadfly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The thing about Linux is that it's not supposed to be super easy to use. If you're installing Linux, you'd better have some basic competence and an idea of what you're doing - at least enough to pick the distro you're going to use (assuming you plan to do anything with it besides use it exactly as it comes packaged, with the apps that area easy to install with a single click). The goal of Windows is for it to "just work" - you're supposed to be able to use it no matter who you are. If your average user is confused from the beginning because they can't figure out which version they need, Microsoft may have shot themselves in the foot by making the barrier to entry artificially high (especially if - as is likely - the different versions are not substantially different from each other for the average user).

    6. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by LexNaturalis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're missing the blind Microsoft hatred. It reminds me of elementary school when kid A makes fun of kid B for wearing a shirt that's "stupid", then wears the same shirt the next day. If Microsoft were to release a form of BSD/Linux/[Open Source OS], people would complain about that.

      I am glad to notes that most of the comments so far, though, have called Dvorak on his idiocy. Seems not even /. has succumbed fully to lunacy.

      --
      Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened.
    7. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux and Windows aren't aimed at quite the same market.

      Windows is for lusers, and Linux for the batshit insane.

    8. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by daniil · · Score: 1

      I do believe some of the commercial distros are aimed at staying in the commercial Linux distro business -- by separating you, the client, from your money :7

      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    9. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * How about Vista Dvorak edition, automatically spouting bullshit every few days?

      Check the event viewer. Windows already spouts bullshit *everyday*.

    10. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Funny
      Well, in fairness, it's not as if it's one person coming up with all the GNU/Linux distributions. At least 30% of them are done by independent parties, such as ObscurIX, WinclonUX, M$Sux, and Slackware.

      The rest of them are maintained by Bruce Perens.

      I actually had a CD with Dvorak on it, but all it had on it was an awful, tedious, symphony. I assume it was a Mac distro requiring a non-Beige G3 or better because it was marked "New World".

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    11. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by travail_jgd · · Score: 1

      There are "countless" Linux distros from different companies and organizations. Microsoft will be selling various flavors of Vista with little obvious differentiation.

      If it were just three versions ("limited" for bargain PCs, home, and professional) this would be a non-issue. Like it has been in the past.

    12. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by chris462 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd have to disagree with you here.

      One of Linux's biggest barriers to the consumer desktop market, IMO, is its absurd level of fragmentation. There are more than half a dozen "major" distros and an impossibly large number of "minor" distros. How the hell do you just pick one and use it?

      Then you've got nutcases like Stallman and his war on semantics and ESR and his general dumbass tendencies weighing down the entire community.

      Dvorak tends to be a bit off the wall, but he's right. MS really needs to take a(nother) note from Apple here and realize they only need one flavor of OS. There's nothing wrong with a "server" version, but consumers don't need seven different choices for a standard OS.

      There's enough trouble these days with XP Home, XP Pro, XP 64-bit, and XP Media Center. Adding more variants to the mix just sounds like suicide to me.

    13. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by Zapdos · · Score: 1, Troll

      Linux = UberGeeks = multi distribution safe
      Windows = Uncle Bob = Press the Any Key

    14. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by aramael · · Score: 5, Insightful
      What am I not getting here?

      I have never seen a distribution that restricts you to three simultaneously running applications. Nor a special Linux that only allows two users at a time to connect remotely.

      The differences between Linux distributions seem to be about empowering the user; the Windows ones seem to be trying to find a price point.

      --
      Be true and faithful like your dog; but don't eat vomit like your dog
    15. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by mystik · · Score: 4, Insightful

      countless linux distro's each seem to have their own ideologies (see Suse/RedHat/Gentoo/etc, packaging)

      These Windows 'distributions' are the same ideology, but just w/ features added or removed, to force users to choose and pay for the features they think are important to them.

      --
      Why aren't you encrypting your e-mail?
    16. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're missing the obvious fact that there aren't countless Linux distros from the same company. What M$ is doing would be like Red Hat putting out

      Red Hat Basic
      Red Hat Lite
      Red Hat Standard
      Red Hat Secure
      Red Hat Standard Secure
      Red Hat Server
      Red Hat Enterprise Server
      Red Hat Enterprise Secure Server
      Red Hat Secure Server Lite
      Red Hat Lite Standard Home Edition
      Red Hat Secure Standard Home Edition

      Get it?

    17. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by BillKaos · · Score: 1
      Let's see: Countless Linux distros = good, as it gives you the liberty to choose between many distros. But different versions* of Windows Vista = bad, as it's confusing???

      What am I not getting here?

      While each Linux distro is aimed to different technical and marketing goals, to the extreme that there are lots of different package managers, desktop environments, quality assurances, etc..., it seems that some Vista flavours are going to differ in only an application or two, so the split doesn't seem logical.

    18. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by superdude72 · · Score: 1

      Let's see: Countless Linux distros = good, as it gives you the liberty to choose between many distros. But different versions* of Windows Vista = bad, as it's confusing???

      The difference is that the splintering of Windows XP is primarily to keep sales of the cheaper editions from cannibalizing sales of the more expensive editions.

      There is no practical reason why the Starter Edition (only for sale in developing countries) needs to prevent more than 3 applications from being opened at a time, for instance. They have actually gone into the operating system and removed functionality so that customers will still have a reason to buy a more expensive version. This is generally not what drives the development of new Linux distributions.

    19. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by Dadoo · · Score: 1

      What am I not getting here?

      The fact that you can try almost all Linux distributions, for free, and decide which one is best for you. If I go out and buy "Windows Vista Basic" and decide I really need "Media Center", can I get my money back on "Basic"?

      Doubt it...

      --
      Sit, Ubuntu, sit. Good dog.
    20. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by goldspider · · Score: 1

      And as long as that is true, Linux will NEVER replace Windows on a significant percentage of consumer desktops.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    21. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by east+coast · · Score: 1

      If your average user is confused from the beginning because they can't figure out which version they need...

      Your average user never changes versions of Windows.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    22. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by kollivier · · Score: 1
      The thing about Linux is [...]

      The thing about Linux is that there is no "thing about Linux." I honestly, sincerely hope that one day, a majority of people will stop referring to this etherial "Linux" that is some hive-like borg with a singleminded goal and focus. "Linux" only truly is a kernel whose development is overseen primarily by Linus and primarily a few other folks. And I don't think Linus cares how easy or difficult the OSes that run the Linux kernel are.

      So let us please abandon using the term "Linux" as an abstract concept used to refer to the goals, motivations, and actions of all sorts of people who use and develop open source software that runs on the Linux kernel. I know, I know, it makes the discussion *so* much more complicated because the goals of RedHat, SuSE, Ubuntu, and countless other open source projects and software differ. But they are separate projects, with separate goals, and they should be referred to as such.

      And holding Windows to a higher standard than Linux distros is, to me, a double-standard. Windows offering choices? Just confuses customers. Linux distros offering (tons of extremely similar) choices? Now that's its selling point. Because you know customers just love evaluating 20 distros and trying to figure out what the heck actually makes any one of them different from the others (except their bugs, point version of OOo and Firefox included, and supported hardware devices). Why make one really good Linux distro when you can make 95 mediocre ones? People who proclaim the dearth of choices in open source do so on ideological, not practical, grounds. But most people who own computers own them for practical reasons.

      I believe too much choice IS bad, because I think an OS should be a core which customers build on, not a collection of various software bundles which customers have to weigh against each other. But Windows and Linux both are failing to make things simple for customers by making too many confusing differences between versions.

    23. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by Otter · · Score: 1
      I have never seen a distribution that restricts you to three simultaneously running applications.

      I think that was called "Mandrake 8.0". On the other hand, until Microsoft comes out with "Vista Sometimes Randomly Reboots Instead Of Shutting Down", CentOS 4.1 still has its niche to itself.

    24. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by Mornelithe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since when are all the different Linux distributions perceived as good? Perhaps you've missed the countless Score:5 Insightful posts here on Slashdot, and every lauded Linux Is Not Ready For The Desktop article which bitches about how many distributions there are.

      I, for one, don't care how many Linux distributions there are, nor do I care how many versions of Windows there are. Of course, I think the Windows situation is a little harrier, since each has slightly different restrictions and functionality (am I allowed to run more than 3 programs on this one? Is my networking restricted on that one? etc.), whereas all the Linux distributions are essentially different brands of the same thing, like toothpaste or something (notice that nobody complains about how confusing it is for consumers to choose between Crest, Colgate and Aquafresh, or the hundreds of brands of shampoos and body soaps and lotions out there). But I don't think that distinction is going to make any practical difference.

      So, what you're missing is that it's "insightful" around here to shit on Linux for having a lot of different brands of the same thing, while it's also "insightful" to defend Microsoft from people doing, roughly, the exact same thing. Of course, the complete opposite of both is equally as "insightful."

      Does anyone have any real evidence that consumers are confused about Red Hat versus SuSE, or Office Small Business versus Office Professional, or XP Home versus XP Professional, or Pert versus Suave? It seems to me that people latch onto this one particular thing and blow it way out of proportion, when in reality, it doesn't make that much of a difference to most people.

      How about we just admit that the number of distributions/versions of something means dick when it comes to determining whether something is Ready For The Desktop (TM)?

      --

      I've come for the woman, and your head.

    25. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So? How is a new person coming into Linux not going to be confused by

      Red Hat
      Mandrake
      SuSE
      Gentoo
      Ubuntu
      Debian
      and so on...

      It isnt any different except in your spin world.

    26. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      But the goal (of some at least) is that Linux be for "Uncle Bob" too. If not, it will never have the market share that Windows or even OS X has for home use. The question is, does having so many different distros available raise the entry level for "Uncle Bob"?

      Maybe we just need an "Uncle Bob Linux" distro. At least he would know it hasn't been intentionally crippled.

    27. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 1

      I have no idea how your post was marked interesting.

      The difference between Microsoft and Linux is that it's FREE. If you want a single distro to do everything M$ can, go to a site that will provide just that. I suggest this one or possibly this one. Both are just fine as distros go.... And interoperable. If you want more, go pull it from the distro that has what you want. Not many are selling 'licenses' for basic Linux distros ATM, and they're CERTAINLY not going to sell you ten versions of the same thing - if you pay for it, you get a LOT more and that includes support.

    28. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by unhuman_being · · Score: 1

      Choice usually is good, but you gotta consider the target audience.

      IMHO, a typical Windows user would be pretty confused with the many different Vista editions, while that would probably not happen with the Slashdot crowd.

    29. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by radish · · Score: 1

      These Windows 'distributions' are the same ideology, but just w/ features added or removed, to force users to choose and pay for the features they think are important to them.
      Or to allow them to not pay for features which are not important to them. Depends which way you look at it really.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    30. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by aaronl · · Score: 1

      The difference is that you don't have 7 variants the desktop version of a distro. For most Linux distros out there, you buy it, and that's all. Then when you install it, you can pick a role for the machine.

      Even in distros that do have more than one version, it is rather clear what's going on. You can buy the workstation version, or one of the server versions.

      With this, now you have seven desktop variants of the same exact software. People won't know what the differences are, so they won't know which to choose. They'll buy the cheapest, the most expensive, or the default. The cheapest is outright broken, the most expensive (Ultimate) does what Windows Pro can do now. The default will probably end up being Home Premium, or whatever that was, which will do what Home does now.

      End result, you'll have a lot of people pirating the "1337 Ultimate r0x0r" edition because they ended up screwing up and getting the wrong one.

    31. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by Cyno · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Let me help you.

      How many versions of RedHat Linux are available? Counting back to day one, I'm sure we can put together a list of something like 50. But today, there are only 3 versions available for commercial support and use. Workstation, Server and Advanced Server.

      How many SuSE editions are available? Same thing.

      How many Slackware versions are available? One. Slackware just has its single distro. It updates it every year or so, but its just one distro.

      How many Debian Linux distros? Stable, unstable and developement? So like 3. Sure, they're available for every architecture they can support, but there are only 3.

      The problem people seem to have with Linux isn't the choice between distros, its understanding that Linux comes from MANY DIFFERENT BUSINESSES.

      Microsoft is one corporation. And in this case they're still behaving like a monopoly.

      What people want is for them to fix their bugs, fix their security problems, which are design, not implementation problems. Fix their incompatibility issues with not supporting open document formats by default. Fix their web standards compliance.

      They are the largest and most wealthy computer business on the planet but they can't afford to make their web browser compete with Firefox? Mozilla is a non-profit organization.

      And then this. They offer what, 3 additional choices from their code base, instead of including all the features they touted 3 years ago and all the requested features EVERYONE has been asking for.

      And then appologists like you go off and complain how Linux has millions of distros so we shouldn't pick on Microsoft's behavior.

      This has nothing to do with choice, it has to do with technical merit. If they were fixing their broken stuff or offering something of value, such as a gaming edition that costs $50 for people like me who only use their crappy software to play games, then we wouldn't bitch so loudly.

    32. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by PlacidPundit · · Score: 1

      And they all come from different sources. The point is that the reason different Linux distributions exist is to customize your experience. And you can create your own if you like. Microsoft is one source for a number of "distributions," if you like, of a single product, all of which pour money into Microsoft. Which is fine. But the two situations are different and you implied that they are the same.

    33. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by Nasarius · · Score: 1
      Or to allow them to not pay for features which are not important to them.

      Sure, we'll see. If the "Ultimate Edition" is more than $230 (WinXP Pro retail), we can safely say that they are in fact jacking up the price of their complete package.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    34. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by kollivier · · Score: 1
      These Windows 'distributions' are the same ideology, but just w/ features added or removed, to force users to choose and pay for the features they think are important to them.

      Really, take away the "packaging system" (of course, most distros use either RPM or apt-get anyways...) and the "control panel" management interfaces and you can pretty much say the same thing about Linux distros. The take the same software packages, tweak them in various little ways, and then release their distro as 'unique'. I don't see huge ideological differences bewteen most of the distros at all. In fact, I see hardly any differences whatsoever, except slightly different target markets and perhaps install/configuration experiences.

    35. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by damsa · · Score: 1
      Versions of Windows is like buying different versions of the same car. Like if you buy a Mustang you can choose, V6, GT or Cobra.

      Different versions of linux is like buying tuner versions of those cars. You can buy a Saleen, Steeda or Roush, or if you want you can make your tuner Mustang.

      But unlike cars, you cannot use Windows as your base and tune it like you can with Linux.

    36. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Well, in the final analysis they're really all "Vista - Borg Edition".

      But for marketing purposes, they're "segmented" like this:

      1. Vista - the Borg Edition
      2. Vista - DRM Version (Darth_Vader Rules Microsoft)
      3. Vista - Pirates (of Silicon Valley) Edition
      4. Vista - All Your Server Are Belong To Us Edition
      5. Vista - Penguin Edition ("Windows Setup has detected viral software on your computer - reformatting")
      6. Vista - Shared Source Edition ("Sign here ... in blood ... now, about your firstborn")
      7. Vista - DOS 9.0 Version for Terminal-Like "Services"
      8. Vista For Dummies (aka Windows AOL Bundle)
    37. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by Peaker · · Score: 1

      Then you've got nutcases like Stallman and his war on semantics and ESR and his general dumbass tendencies weighing down the entire community.

      The nutcases are those who think the purpose of Free Software is to create a good quality/price ratio of software.

      Stallman simply emphasizes that Free Software is about emancipating the users of software, and about nothing else.

    38. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by chris462 · · Score: 1

      The nutcases are those who think the purpose of Free Software is to create a good quality/price ratio of software.

      I was talking more from an aspect of PR. The average user doesn't give a damn what you call it, as long as it's free and they can figure it out.

      Which leads back to my original point here. Who at Microsoft seriously thought that giving Vista seven different SKUs was a good idea?

    39. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by sn0wflake · · Score: 1

      Just a sec as I load the calculator;

      RedHat = 3
      SuSE = 3
      Slackware = 1
      Debian = 3

      Total = 10 editions versus 7 Windows Vista editions *LOL*

    40. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by at_slashdot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      At least with Linux (in most cases) you don't have to pay to try a distro.

      Another difference is that all distro maintainers try to give you everything they can, while Microsoft tries to restrict you and to make you pay more for different "features" -- that's the main difference and if you don't get it I'm sorry there's no hope for you.

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    41. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by aaronrp · · Score: 1

      I like your nickname. XP Professional:Slashdot::XP Home:Squiggleslash.

    42. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Windows offering choices?

      I don't know of a distro of Linux that deliberately disables functionality, requiring you to pay the distributing company in order to re-enable that functionality through the purchase of the "Super-Double-Plus-Good Edition".

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    43. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      And as long as that is true, Linux will NEVER replace Windows on a significant percentage of consumer desktops.

      And regular users don't give a shit. Only the religious crusaders care about 'beating' Microsoft, and those guys are nutbags any which way you look at it.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    44. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      How about we just admit that the number of distributions/versions of something means dick when it comes to determining whether something is Ready For The Desktop (TM)?

      How about we just admit that all the people who do their endless bitching about MS or Linux are, in fact, just a bunch of assholes fighting their own particular version of a holy war? It really doesn't matter WHAT it is they're fighting about, so long as there's an "us" to get all touchy-feely with and a "them" to irrationally hate and despise.

      Just the geek version of demorepublican politics. Or football. Only, perhaps, a bit more pathetic.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    45. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by PyroSas · · Score: 1

      I have never seen a distribution that restricts you to three simultaneously running applications. Nor a special Linux that only allows two users at a time to connect remotely.
      All three of them will be spyware/virus/trojan

    46. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by sn0wflake · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... my parent post was problably flamebait. The problem as I see it today is that every distribution is trying to make it work on no matter what hardware platform with no central control. So what new users see is first several distributions. That's the first hurdle. When a users as choosen a distribution the next step is to choose a GUI. The most common are KDE and Gnome, but what's best? The next big step is to be as effecient in Linux as in Windows. Experienced Linux users don't seem to understand that an average newbie don't want to use days trying to understand their OS so they'll eventually switch back to Windows. I know that from talking to friends and having experienced it myself. What I'd like to see are specialized hardware distributions with the same software preloaded so regular users can get a feel of Linux but ten years of trying to migrate has left me with a sincere doubt. Face it, Linux is to hard for regular users to win over Linux. I won't say that Microsoft will win, but continuing the narrowminded Slashdot ideology certainly won't speed up the progress. Please make something free, open, easy-to-use, general, soon! As this is Slashdot I expect the usual flames and comments about how great Linux, and that I just need to invest some time, etc., but hey, people don't want that. Please, please, please, FOSS community. Make a Windows killer in the future soon!

    47. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by kollivier · · Score: 1
      I don't know of a distro of Linux that deliberately disables functionality, requiring you to pay the distributing company in order to re-enable that functionality through the purchase of the "Super-Double-Plus-Good Edition".

      Then look harder. Click-n-run warehouse? And that's subscription-based, meaning you have to keep the $$$ coming! Outside of this kind of thing, Linux distros obviously can't do this because they have very little software that's actually their own IP. They make most of their money off support, not sales, so it's mostly apples and oranges.

      I don't like MS at all, but it is Microsoft's IP and it's not 'evil' to offer tiered levels of functionality depending on what the user pays for. Don't like it? Don't buy it. That's the only message Microsoft's gonna hear.

    48. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by sn0wflake · · Score: 1

      Yet another point. My two previous places of employment sincerely looked as Linux as an alternative or at least an addition to Windows but quickly dropped it as it would require hiring a specialist. So while you regular Slashdot readers probably have a job maintaining hundreds or thousands of machines, Microsoft gets away with all the small companies. Do the math.

    49. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by Mornelithe · · Score: 1

      Indeed.

      --

      I've come for the woman, and your head.

    50. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      I don't like MS at all, but it is Microsoft's IP and it's not 'evil' to offer tiered levels of functionality depending on what the user pays for.

      Nice strawmen, but at no time did I ever say anything about MS being evil. The words I'd apply would be 'stupid', 'corrupt', and 'criminal'. Not to mention a constant source of amusement, especially with 'Monkey Boy' Balmer in charge of the circus.

      Don't like it? Don't buy it.

      I don't and won't. Why the hell would I? I seriously doubt game companies are going to stop making products for 2000/XP any time in the near future. And for anything other than games I use Linux.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    51. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The countless versions of linux distros create innovation through competition (similar to evolution), where there is no need to innovate in the different ms versions because they only compete with themselves. Microsoft only needs to create the appearance of innovation to get users to upgrade, and actually the appearance of innovation is probably cheaper for them to create and therefore helps their bottom line more the true innovation would.

    52. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by AthenianGadfly · · Score: 1

      The thing about Linux is that there is no "thing about Linux." I honestly, sincerely hope that one day, a majority of people will stop referring to this etherial "Linux" that is some hive-like borg with a singleminded goal and focus. "Linux" only truly is a kernel whose development is overseen primarily by Linus and primarily a few other folks.

      In theory, I agree with you, and most things that are true about Linux in general don't have to be. That being said, unfortunately it is true - across the board - that Linux is harder to use than Windows for anything but basic use (e.g. browsing the web and word processing). I challenge you or anyone else to show me a distro of Linux I can install as easily as Windows. Or perhaps, install anything but basic hardware as easily (ALSA, anyone?). Or even install advanced software on with the same simplicity (package managers are great, but what about a GLIBC issue?). Now, none of this is anyone's fault - Linus or anyone else. The fact remains, people will probably stop referring to attributes applying to Linux as a homogeneous whole when those attributes stop being true about every OS that goes under the name Linux.

    53. Re:Let's see the spin on this one... by kollivier · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree with what you said, but in your original post you didn't say that "Linux" *ins't* easy to use - you said it's not *supposed* to be "super" easy to use. I disagree with that. Linux is not supposed to be anything. People chose not to make it as easy to use as it could be, but there's nothing to say that things are supposed to be this way.

      There are solutions to these problems, but everyone's so busy bashing Win and Mac that they fail to figure out what those OSes got right about software installation and maintenance. As soon as someone realizes Linux distros don't have to be this complicated, at least one of them will stop being complicated. :)

  24. The 8th version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually there is fully featured eight version and it's codename is Tiger.

  25. Seven editions ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone actually know if there are going to be seven editions or is it just hear-say ?

    I mean -- seven versions means seven different designs for box packaging, seven different manuals (although they aren't too big anymore)...

  26. enough Vista hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So far Vista (Beta) has been nothing but disappointing from speed to memory consumption to the rather awkward UI. Before I see any real improvements I don't want to hear or read anything further about Vista. In fact, I'll probably switch to Linux like so many others who also have enough already of that Vista hype.

  27. Haha by Dink+Paisy · · Score: 1
    Thanks. That was really funny. I have to go to the dentist to get my teeth pulled out now, so please excuse me.

    Has there actually been any confirmation from Microsoft about these various editions of Windows Vista? Whoever made the list seems to be including server versions, and there are several current server versions of Windows not on the list. Also, there is no Tablet or Media Center edition, and last I heard, Microsoft hadn't decided if these should be separate SKUs or rolled into the mainstream version(s) of Windows.

    My best guess is that this whole story is a hoax. Which would totally explain why Dvorak picked up on it.

    --

    Whoever corrects a mocker invites insult;
    whoever rebukes a wicked man incurs abuse.
    --Proverbs 9:7
  28. Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its not funny.

    I know funny. Its not funny.

    Its funny I guess in the way that "Prarie Home Companion" is funny; that is to say, its not funny and you aren't sophisticated because you listen to it.

    1. Re:Dumb by CajunLuke · · Score: 1

      Prairie Home Companion is funny. Just because you are too stupid of a conservative dolt (Hello! Garrison made fun of Clinton, Gore, and Kerry, too!) to understand humor that, I must admit, is a little left-shifted, you don't have to make fun of it.

      Haven't you ever heard their joke-shows?

      BTW: learn to spell: PRAIRIE.

  29. No such thing by DogDude · · Score: 5, Insightful

    An excellent description of all the various flavors of Vista and their respective features and intended niches can be found here.

    Do you mean all of the beta versions that 3rd parties are guessing will exist, or did they actually go into the future to get this information?

    As of this point, "Vista" is still very much in early Beta. It hasn't been released to the public as a finished product, and hasn't come anywhere near being finalized, I'm sure. What's the point of punditizing something that doesn't even exist, and will probably still change substantially between it's current beta and final release? That's like critiquing next year's pop bands today.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:No such thing by MrLizardo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Very good analogy. It can be argued both ways though: In much the same way that we can predict that next year's pop bands will suck just as much as this years, we can safely assume that Windows Vista will suck just as much as the current version of Windows, albeit in new and interesting ways.

      -Mr. Lizard

      --
      ^I'm with stupid.^
    2. Re:No such thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's like critiquing next year's pop bands today.

      Nah, critiquing next year's pop bands is much easier... chances are all but 1 will suck.

    3. Re:No such thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What's the point of punditizing something that doesn't even exist, and will probably still change substantially between it's current beta and final release?

      Ad impressions.

    4. Re:No such thing by Quinn_Inuit · · Score: 5, Funny
      That's like critiquing next year's pop bands today.

      Well, that's not very hard, now, is it?

      For instance, the boy band is going to be somewhat effeminate and very popular with young girls. It'll be a shame that none of them can play instruments, but their androgynous crooning will win them the hearts of many.

      The edgy female punk/pop singer, OTOH, will be a big hit with the high school goth crowd despite her questionable singing voice and constant fights with her band members, most of whom are more talented than her.

      The country music phenom of the year's hit song, "American to the bone" will be a gritty, patriotic anthem of the NASCAR dads in the country, but later albums will reveal that they only bought this one because of the picture of the singer and his supermodel wife on the cover.

      See? I've got all my snarky pop culture commentary out of the way for the whole year. Sweet!

      --

      Stop learning! Only you can prevent esoterrorism.
    5. Re:No such thing by FreakyGeeky · · Score: 1

      You're new to pundits, aren't you?

    6. Re:No such thing by greenegg77 · · Score: 1

      That's like critiquing next year's pop bands today.

      That one's easy - they'll suck just like this year's pop bands do...

      "Oh, I'm a broke pop singer that nobody likes
      I used to be famous, my name was in lights
      I'd play up on stage for sold out crowds
      But I can't even get my mom to show up now

      "Oh, I'm a broke pop singer that nobody likes
      You can hear me here every Wednesday night
      When the good folk are in church, and the sinners are in bed
      'Cause it's hard for them to work with a poundin' head

      "Oh, I'm a broke pop singer that nobody likes
      I lost my trailer, my dog, and even my wife
      I know if play country backwards I can get 'em all back
      But you know two out of three wouldn't be that bad
      (I sure do miss that dog and my trailer...)"

      --
      --- This .sig for sale - $500 OBO.
    7. Re:No such thing by Maow · · Score: 1
      That's like critiquing next year's pop bands today.

      That's easy.

      They'll suck -- it's what they do.

    8. Re:No such thing by sdsichero · · Score: 1

      Maybe... but the beta is somewhat like a preview. So if you see a preview of the band today, you can sort of say they suck or not... Who knows if they will suck next year, but you can make a guess.

    9. Re:No such thing by MrLizardo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I like how I'm the only one in this thread who got modded down, regardless of the fact that 4 other people said almost the exact same thing...

      --
      ^I'm with stupid.^
    10. Re:No such thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like a young chick, slashdot readers prefer their information regurgitated. Or if you'd prefer, ferengi style: prechewed!

    11. Re:No such thing by pugugly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We only get so many mod points at a time. We work them around and save them for you.

      I get to mod you down next thursday again!

      Pug

      --
      An Invisible Entity of Vast Power whose existence must be taken on faith alone: Liberal Media
  30. How many XP versions were there? by ZakuSage · · Score: 1

    7 doesn't seem so high when you think of all the XP versions. Professional Home Media Centre Starter (something like that, the one for developing countries) Server (or rather 2003)

  31. really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not that funny

    1. Re:really... by Lispy · · Score: 1

      Funny, in a perpendicular way. Remember that one? ;)

  32. Religious editions. by CyricZ · · Score: 0

    I'd like to see versions of Windows that target specific religions. A Windows Vista Christian Edition which includes a file of the Biblican texts, and tools to help one analyze such writings. Perhaps even Christian-themed backgrounds and screensavers and such. There could also be versions for Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Wiccans, you name it.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:Religious editions. by Loonacy · · Score: 0, Troll

      And my Windows Vista FSM edition comes with a bowl of spaghetti!

      And an invisible pink unicorn!

    2. Re:Religious editions. by Secrity · · Score: 1

      They'd go nuts configuring the Unitarian Universalist version.

  33. How about M$ Vista Whitebox Edition? by mjh49746 · · Score: 0, Troll

    You know, the OS that will DEACTIVATE everytime I open the case? After all, aren't us homebuilders supposed to be all pirates?

    1. Re:How about M$ Vista Whitebox Edition? by (A)*(B)!0_- · · Score: 1
      Wouldn't that be the black box edition?

    2. Re:How about M$ Vista Whitebox Edition? by What+me+a+Coward · · Score: 1

      No the black box edition is be the one that doesn't de-activate and send warnings back to M$ when you open the case ;)

      --
      Coward? Coward! Thems fighten words!!
    3. Re:How about M$ Vista Whitebox Edition? by mjh49746 · · Score: 1

      I guess it could be whatever color you want, they'll just slip in the dreaded TCPA blackbox at any rate for all versions.

  34. Makes sense really... by Drasil · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..., if you are Microsoft. The world is screaming out for choice when it comes to operating systems, this is Microsoft's way of giving it to them.

  35. This Slashvertisement courtesy of PCMag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks, DigitalDame2 (www.pcmag.com) for purchasing a "story" to herd readers to such an informative site (www.pcmag.com)!

    Besides, haven't we had enough Dvor-crack stories posted here already?

  36. How is this different... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...than the multiples of Linux distros out there?

    People get lost sifting through the distributions trying to figure out what is right for them, and yet the Linux people are now bashing Microsoft's Vista? I don't get it.

  37. And while we're at it... by kuzb · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...How about slashdot, ridiculously disinteresting story edition. Oh wait, that's the one we have now!

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  38. Vista-Porn Edition by hcob$ · · Score: 1

    He for got the cheezy porn music as the startup sound. Oh yeah! Random moans, grunts, and screams of exstacy are the sound events. Clicking the "M Spot" butt would make the start menu shot 2 legs straight up and have them part for the menu display.... (the logout button would be that place women always say "oops??!?!? YEAH RIGHT!" when you "accidentally" slip). Just some thoughts.

    --
    Cliff Claven
    K.E.G. Party Chairman
    Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
  39. That's right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not only it confuses the consumer, so is the anti trust law. I bet the server edition doesn't come bundle with media player or anything that MS want the consumers has by default.

    MS can always say, 'look, they do have a choice. server edition is not for server only, it just more expensive with less features the consumer want. But we are giving the consumers choice.'

    1. Re:That's right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Posting as AC because I moderated.

      Actually though, Server 2003 does come with WMP 9. I have no idea why that's necessary, but it does. Every Server 2003 machine we have here at work has it on it. I've set several up and they've all had it right from the start.

  40. How about .. by Peter_JS_Blue · · Score: 0
    .. Microsoft Vista Lock-in version. Great for all of those people tired of multiple document formats, now you just get one.

    And each new release will have minor 'tweaks' to add new features, and as an added bonus, it will encourage you to upgrade because it will be slightly incompatable with all the earlier versions.

    Oh wait, doesn't MS do that anyway ??

    --
    Art Makers Just an excuse to show photos of naked women !!
  41. Dvorak by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 0

    Are we supposed to like Dvorak now that he is making fun of microsoft?

    --
    Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

    http://financialpetition.org/
  42. Dvorak... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is a boob. That is all.

  43. Windows Vista - Tiger Edition by digitaldc · · Score: 0

    It looks and works EXACTLY like Mac OS X Tiger. Breakthrough search technology, stunning graphics and media, unparalleled connectivity, an intuitive user interface and a virtual toolbox chock full of cleverly integrated features -- all atop a rock-solid UNIX foundation -- give you the most innovative, stable and compatible desktop operating system on the planet. Period.
    You can get it at 1-800-MY-APPLE, hurry while supplies last!

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Windows Vista - Tiger Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " It looks and works EXACTLY like Mac OS X Tiger"

      Really!!? So there are no more right click menus? No more double versus single click preferential settings? And... on and on? I am not sure tha working EXACTLY like a Mac OS would be a step forward.

    2. Re:Windows Vista - Tiger Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also of interest for Mac users is Fisher-Price's newly announced "My First Operating System." It is expected to debut in early 2006.

  44. Surely people aren't that stupid... by LexNaturalis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Surely people aren't so stupid as to be confused by 7 different types of Windows Vista. If someone had done a similar article about the number of Linux distros out there, would it have been posted on the front page of slashdot? Sure, Microsoft is a power-hungry greedy company convicted of monopolistic activities, but this is going a bit far.

    I hereby propose some legitimate reasons to bash Microsoft:
    1) They refuse to play nice with Open Source developers.
    2) They actively seek to destroy any competition, regardless of whether the competition is actually helping the computer community or not.
    3) They are promoting legislation that will change patent law from "first to invent" to "first to file."

    Those are all (I think) legitimate complaints against Microsoft. Calling Microsoft "nutty" for releasing 7 versions of an OS is rather stupid and petty. I have no doubt that the average person can simply read a chart that has little checks next to "features" and decide which of the 7 they want. This will actually help people, I think, because it will prevent people from getting extraneous software that might increase their risk of attack.

    People often complain about Microsoft bundling too many things in their OS and how there's a lack of flexibility, and now they complain because Microsoft is "too" flexible and might "confuse" the poor ignorant user who is incapable of choosing between 7 different forms of Vista.

    --
    Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened.
    1. Re:Surely people aren't that stupid... by Nahor · · Score: 1
      Surely people aren't so stupid as to be confused by 7 different types of Windows Vista.

      Yes they are. They even put cats in their microwave to dry them!
      From my very small experience with users, you can never overestimate how stupid people can be. Never!
      Maybe it's not the average, but the one left are enough to ruin your day.


      I have no doubt that the average person can simply read a chart that has little checks next to "features" and decide which of the 7 they want.

      This is not about the average person but about the stupid ones who then sue your ass.
      With 99% of the people smart enough to "read a chart" (way optimistic in my opinion), over 100 millions users, that still leaves you with 1 million dumbass who will call your support center.


      now they complain because Microsoft is "too" flexible and might "confuse" the poor ignorant user who is incapable of choosing between 7 different forms of Vista.

      This is NOT flexible. Flexibility would be to have one CD and then at the installation to decide what I actually need now. With Microsoft's scheme, your are sort of flexible when buying the box. "Sort of" because what do I do if I want feature A from Vista One and feature B from Vista Two? Well, sure I could still by Vista Three which also has features C to Z even if I don't need them. But then, I can't remove those features I dont need.
      And the flexibility is only when buying because, once I have the CD, short of paying again for another version, I can't get the features that I didn't think I would need.

    2. Re:Surely people aren't that stupid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please reword your statement "People often complain about Microsoft bundling too many things in their OS" to include the word "useless." You honestly think if they included their Office suite, people would complain? It's bundling useless stuff that can't be removed that's the problem.

    3. Re:Surely people aren't that stupid... by Pop69 · · Score: 1

      People ARE that stupid, just remember half of them are stupider than average.

      Personally, I'd settle for one version that actually worked and didn't have its first security patch BEFORE release.

    4. Re:Surely people aren't that stupid... by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      I have no doubt that the average person can simply read a chart that has little checks next to "features" and decide which of the 7 they want.

      Then you haven't dealt with many average consumers when it comes to operating systems. You assume it's all a matter of smartness. It's not. I know very smart people, and they wind up picking the wrong version of windows even now because they lack knowledge of what each feature means. And this is with only what, 3 or 4 different versions available?

      No, this offering of 7 different versions of Windows IS going to confuse consumers who are already confused right now. It might just confuse and frustrate them enough that they'll want a simpler option, like getting a computer pre-installed with fully featured linux, or just buy a Mac.

      You seem to have this underlying assumption that more options is always better. That consumers have perfect knowledge of what will suit them best, and what each feature means. This is a very poor assumption.

      --
      AccountKiller
    5. Re:Surely people aren't that stupid... by FishandChips · · Score: 1

      Great points, but Micosoft's strategy sounds too self-serving to be really convincing. First off, they'll be offering choice in one hand while taking it away with the other in terms of open file formats, the ease with which competing software can be used (Open Office, Firefox et al.), and as for DRM generally, well there'll be no choice at all.

      Second, this all helps to plant the idea in the user's mind that an operating system is something worth paying for whereas, increasingly, it is not worth paying for. In this context, it is very hard to believe that Microsoft won't go to great lengths to muck around with the feature sets so that users will have to trade up one more level than they really need. After all, why pass up such easy revenue? In addition, users will still be paying a hefty extra tax each year in the form of firewalling and AV software, not to mention a score of other upgrades occasioned by Vista's demands. Suddenly, the whole thing starts to look extremely expensive. So in a sense, Microosoft do have a vested interest in confusing people by glossing over the true cost of the platform.

      --
      Las qué passoun
      tournoun pas maï
    6. Re:Surely people aren't that stupid... by Frodo+Crockett · · Score: 1

      This will actually help people, I think, because it will prevent people from getting extraneous software that might increase their risk of attack.

      But it's not the extraneous software that's vulnerable to attack. It's the stuff that will be in every version of Vista: Outlook, Internet Explorer, and all those damn services that listen for remote connections.

      --
      "The newly born animals are then whisked off for a quick run through a giant baking oven." --heard on Food Network
    7. Re:Surely people aren't that stupid... by deserttrail · · Score: 1

      No, half of them are stupider than median. I'd say well over half that are stupider than average ;-)

      --
      Be civil to all; sociable to many; familiar with few; friend to one; enemy to none. --Benjamin Franklin
    8. Re:Surely people aren't that stupid... by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      Surely people aren't so stupid as to be confused by 7 different types of GNU/Linux. If someone had done a similar article about the number of Windows versions out there, would it have been posted on the front page of slashdot? Sure, RMS is a power-hungry greedy individual convicted of free software spreading activities, but this is going a bit far.

      I hereby propose some legitimate reasons to bash GNU/Linux:
      1) Linus refuses to play nice with Proprietary developers.
      2) RMS actively seek to destroy any proprietary competition, regardless of whether the competition is actually helping the computer community or not.
      3) RMS is promoting licenses that will kill patent law usage

      Those are all (I think) legitimate complaints against GNU/Linux. Calling Debian/RedHat/etc "nutty" for releasing 7 versions of an OS is rather stupid and petty. I have no doubt that the average person can simply read a chart that has little checks next to "features" and decide which of the 7 they want. This will actually help people, I think, because it will prevent people from getting extraneous software that might increase their risk of attack.

      People often complain about GNU/Linux bundling too many things in their OS and how there's a lack of flexibility, and now they complain because GNU/Linux is "too" flexible and might "confuse" the poor ignorant user who is incapable of choosing between 7 different forms of GNU/Linux.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    9. Re:Surely people aren't that stupid... by flagweb · · Score: 1

      Yes people are that stupid.

      I deal with largish offices who NEED the features in XP PRO but the person ordering their new systems did not know any better, so they ordered the cheapest Dell they could find. I show up to add it to their network and have to attempt to explain why "home" is for home and "Pro" is for an office environment. At this point, they look at me with a blank look... Say "oh, now I understand". Then, they usually ask me if I can "make it work" so that they don't have to explain to their boss why they screwed up, trying to save $$.

      People do not know what they need from their computers. If they did they would never be satisfied with the poor quality of the OS they are currently using.

      This is also one of the reasons why the general public will never adopt Linux, Unix, Etc. Too Many Choices that they do not know how to make a decision about. I bet that this alone scares many system admins away from Linux. They are smart enough to know that Windows is not right for the job they need it to do, but "linux is confusing". (and these are the "computer savvy" types!)
      Too many choices can be a bad thing, if the learning curve will cause errors or poor choices to be made. Bad for Linux, and Bad for windows (less for Windows, because they will probably get many folks to buy 2 or more versions after they realize that the computer they bought won't do (feature x) and buy the OS they should have bought in the first place).

      --
      Ernie Dambach
      "It is no small thing to celebrate a simple life -Tolkien
    10. Re:Surely people aren't that stupid... by dbIII · · Score: 1
      Surely people aren't so stupid as to be confused by 7 different types of Windows Vista
      If you are confused about the windows system idle process and write some stupid assumptions about it like Dvorak did without actually getting off your backside and doing some journalism then you most definitely would be. Someone who actually looks at the glossy docs would not be.
  45. The Dvorak Troll Edition by Skjellifetti · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hi, I'm Clippy. I see that you are trying to write a column. Would you like to troll the Linux fans?

  46. Worst /. Post Ever!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Be ashamed editors you shills. That was the worst article I've ever read. The guy could have trawled slashdot's comments when the 7 editions story was first posted and he would have come up with a much funnier story.

  47. I want the 10% edition by sane? · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I'm sick of the MS marketing department trying to hold hostage key bits of functionality to make new versions at higher prices.

    In an age of freely available OS, and the threat that Google will pose with their eventual OS, I want the Windows 10% version - which is guaranteed to cost only 10% of the cost of the system hardware (one off fee). You get, and can use, whatever functionality you want.

    That would ensure that the Windows tax was affordable, and its simple to implement as well.

    1. Re:I want the 10% edition by suchire · · Score: 1

      If those "key" bits of functionality are really worth it to you, then you'll probably pay for them. If they aren't, they just don't pay for them, or replace them with cheaper functionality from third parties. If Microsoft really has made their software too expensive, they won't sell as much as they anticipated, and so they'll have to make it cheaper. Let market forces decide if it's too expensive or not.

      --
      Such irE
  48. Support is gonna SUCK! by Chas · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The people I REALLY feel sorry for are the poor fucktards supporting applications on Windows. As it is, you already have to ask through multiple generations of Windows OSes. Plus you have to differentiate between two forms of Windows XP. Now imagine chucking SEVEN VERSIONS of Vista into this as well!

    God! It's going to be fucking carnage!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:Support is gonna SUCK! by BAILOPAN · · Score: 1

      The development aspect, not so much, as Microsoft puts a LOT of effort into backward compatibility.

      But when it comes to giving users directions on how to get around the OS, yes.

      Since we don't really know exactly what aspects will be removed from lower-versions in the final release, it's hard to say anyway.

      --
      If you say "here goes my karma" I will bite you!!!
    2. Re:Support is gonna SUCK! by js3 · · Score: 1

      The only thing it will do is create more jobs for people in phone support. As for development it isn't really a problem. I almost have one source tree for x64 and 32bit platforms (waiting for vs8 to come out)

      --
      did you forget to take your meds?
    3. Re:Support is gonna SUCK! by LLuthor · · Score: 1

      I am a developer and I target both Windows and Linux (among others), and frankly, windows is the easiest to support (as a developer). With Linux, there are more than 20 different vendor kernels I need to test on, as well as 9 different versions of glibc and various other things. With windows, I can do most of that stuff at run-time and load the appropriate DLLs. The only thing harder to develop for than Linux is HP/UX.

      --
      LL
    4. Re:Support is gonna SUCK! by delire · · Score: 1
      Microsoft puts a LOT of effort into backward compatibility.
      You're absolutely right, their approach to compatibility is completely backward.
    5. Re:Support is gonna SUCK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention supporting all those previous versions of windows, like Windows 2000 Professional Edition, Windows 2000 Server, Windows 2000 Advanced Server, Windows Millenium Edition, Windows 98 Second Edition, Windows 98, Windows 95, Windows NT 4.0, Windows NT 3.1, Windows NT 3.0, Windows 3.1, Windows 2.3 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa......

    6. Re:Support is gonna SUCK! by Tidal+Flame · · Score: 1

      Supporting Linux is really easy... you just don't offer any support! They're Linux users, they'll figure it out.

  49. Re:I don't think I'll need to know this informatio by lav-chan · · Score: 1

    Gosh! You sure do think different!

  50. Trying too hard to be funny. by fahrvergnugen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is it just me, or is Dvorak sub-par when compared to most of the other bloggers out there cracking wise about tech issues?

    He was so much more interesting before there was Livejournal.

    --
    Even Jesus hates listening to Creed.
    1. Re:Trying too hard to be funny. by narkalepse · · Score: 1

      Satan also despises Creed.

      --
      ~Why even bother.
  51. Ballmer (obligatory chair throwing) by putko · · Score: 5, Funny

    ZONK: They see through your market segmentation strategy. I'm quitting.

    Ballmer: Anybody but Dvorak. Just tell me it isn't fucking Dvorak who sees through my segmentation strategy.

    ZONK: Yes, it's Dvorak. He sees right through it. And he says your Kung Fu is shit.

    (chair flies through air) CRASH!

    Ballmer: Dvorak is a fucking PUSSY! I will kill Dvorak. I've killed all the other media bitches and will so fucking kill Dvorak!

    --
    http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
    1. Re:Ballmer (obligatory chair throwing) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I searched for a chair throwing video but...

  52. Re:Hilarious? by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 1

    How was that even remotely hilarious? Sarcastic for sure, but I guess I have higher standards for "hilarity" than this.

    It's funny in the way British humor is funny. That is to say, it's not.

  53. Bad Joke Warning by RealityMogul · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you take Dvorak's Kiddie Edition, and bundle it with the Porn Edition, do you call it the... no... wait... I just can't go through with it.

    1. Re:Bad Joke Warning by AndreiK · · Score: 2, Funny

      The horror, the horror! A person with actual MORALS on /.!

    2. Re:Bad Joke Warning by varmittang · · Score: 1

      Said better this way, "If I have the Kiddie Edition, and I upgrade it with Porn Edition, do I get......oh......wait.....am I posting this under my name or Anonymous?"

      --
      -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
      12345
      -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    3. Re:Bad Joke Warning by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Maybe not, but if you take the Kiddie Edition and bundle it with the Sweatshop Edition, you get the "Kathie Lee's Fab Fashion Designer game" for FREE!

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    4. Re:Bad Joke Warning by RealityMogul · · Score: 1

      I guess I fooled you. You must have missed my post about mounting a FleshLight in a drive bay yesterday. Morals, lol.

  54. Kitchen Edition? by Fungus+King · · Score: 1

    "Let's not overlook Microsoft Vista--Kitchen Edition. People are putting computers in the kitchen, aren't they? Well then there should be a rugged kitchen edition with a file system specifically suited to storing recipes and videos of Jacques Pepin cooking his way."

    They are? Hmm. You mean like this?

  55. Re:Hilarious? by Fordiman · · Score: 1

    Meh. Nothing to see here. Just Dvorak being useless and snarky... again...

    --
    110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
  56. well aren't you special? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why don't you fuck off with your bogus spam links, pal?

  57. What about... by KrackerJax · · Score: 1

    Mcirosoft Windows Vista - Pirate Edition

    Available from www.packetnews.com or your favorite warez net soon.

    --
    Sauer
  58. Re:I don't think I'll need to know this informatio by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    Ignorance is never a benefit. That is kind of like a Windows user that says then don't need to know anything about Linux or OS/X.
    How do you know that you are using the best tool if you do not know a bit about them all.
    I we are talking about a tool not a religion. Knowledge is better than blind faith, even when we are talking about religion.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  59. /. Edition by Rhoon · · Score: 1

    Okay, from there we go to Microsoft Vista for Desperate Housewives.

    Where everyone's homepage is linked to a different /. profile of the week.

    --
    "If all the world's a stage, I want to operate the trap door." - Paul Beatty
  60. NO CRAP edition by frakir · · Score: 1

    I've always dreamed about installing windows which will work the way most computer literate people set it:
    auto-hiding toolbar
    no animated menus/windows
    no creepy begginners popups or wizards
    PDF reader
    notepad in 'send to' submenu
    plus obvious things like button in file manager to start command line in that dir
    etc etc

  61. Just because it is anti-MS.... by GeorgeMcBay · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just because it is anti-Microsoft doesn't make it funny. I mean... that article just isn't funny. At all. Seriously.

    1. Re:Just because it is anti-MS.... by DigitalDame2 · · Score: 1

      Wow, lighten up. I thought it was funny. Don't take life so seriously.

    2. Re:Just because it is anti-MS.... by Steveftoth · · Score: 1

      The only reason I think it's not funny is because it hits too close to what might happen. Most of his ideas are actually kinda good. People would like a porn optimized OS, or rather a device that is optimized to view, categorize and sort your porn.

      Kiddie edition would be great for many house holds, at least one that comes pre-crippiled so that you can't goto the sites that are in the porn edition.

  62. Windows Vista: Slashdot Edition by 8127972 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This version moderates your documents and has a Zonk process that dupes your files needlessly.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
  63. Vista Wife Edition? by gooberjr · · Score: 1

    Can I get one customized for my wife... pre-bookmarked with links designed to spend my money

    Or maybe one pre-bookmarked with sites I wished she would visit more often.
    Victoria's Secret... I approve
    Flora Lee... Get smelling good and soft.
    Think Geek... Gift ideas for me...

  64. Vista Jar-Jar Binks Edition by AnonymousYellowBelly · · Score: 1

    Meesa thinks the Republic needs DRM and the 101st Airborne DRM-cloned-lawyers Division!!

    And the DoD could order Vista Death Star Edition, with a screen-saver that updates the costs of current war operations.

    --
    Disclosure: I'm stupid
  65. It's pretty simple really by kukickface · · Score: 1

    To combat Linux Microsoft wants to offer task oriented solutions to its user base. Why? Simply because Microsoft doesn't trust the end-user to form a useful variant on their own. It also has to do with marketing and the english language. When people have a problem getting something to work on Windows they say, "Windows can't do X". Instead of taking responsibility with, "I can't figure out how to make Windows do X". The same thing happens with Linux, "Linux crashed. Linux didn't recognize my joystick. Linux doesn't have good support for my video card." Microsoft wants to offer more finely grained solutions without allowing the end-user to configure the software in such a way that it reflects poorly on their brand image. Is this a good solution to the problem? No. Is it what the user expects or wants? No. It is, however, what is happening.

  66. What if it changed versions based on your usage! by jav1231 · · Score: 2, Funny

    What if it changed versions based on your usage!
    Imagine: You order Vista Premium Home Edition. You're excited to have the newest version so your young high school lad can do essay research, send email, and do homework. However, inexplicably it morphs into Vista Premium Porn Edition within just a few months! Young Timmy is grounded and his Internet cable removed. You know he still needs the computer for typing up Word documents so you leave it on. Only to have it morph again into Vista Premium Gamer Edition!

  67. Windows Vista Forever by dethl · · Score: 1

    Comes with a free copy of Duke Nukem Forever, cept M$ won't tell us when its coming out.

    --
    "Some fight for law. Some fight for justice. What will you fight for? One day, you will see."
  68. Vista Ballmer by HangingChad · · Score: 1
    Throws your office chair at boot up and screams that it's going f'ing kill Google and immediately launches into a monkey dance.

    Vista Pimp - Looks fabulous, does absolutely nothing but threatens to beat the crap out of you if you don't get off your ass and go make bank.

    Vista Trump - Has serious performance problems, files bankruptcy then fires you.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  69. What about Windows Vista: Clippy Reloaded Edition? by AnonymousYellowBelly · · Score: 1

    For those that want to have a mental breakdown.

    --
    Disclosure: I'm stupid
  70. Pricing by lspd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    With news of there being 7 Vista editions...

    There will be more than 7. This doesn't factor in the versions tailored to other nations. Microsoft is just working out the details of an effective price discrimination scheme.

  71. Windows Vista ZombiePC Edition by jago.jelbart · · Score: 1

    Why make people wait to have their PCs turned into spam-zombies when MS can load up the spyware to create the perfect Windows Vista ZombiePC Edition?

  72. Uhh by MrCopilot · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Not funny Haha, funny hmmm.

    eg... Thats funny, this article wasn't even mildy amusing.

    On a side note, Now I have 9 different Windows OS, 10 Office Suites, not to buy.

    Many Linux Distros = Good
    You miss the point entirely.
    Choice is a good thing, unless the choices are Evil, Hobbled Evil, Crippled Evil, Evil for Tykes. Corporate Evil, or Mom & Pop Evil.

    --
    OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
  73. Even more flavours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't Windows confusing as is in Windows of Deception. Instead of a solid well-designed system, they market crippleware in candy flavours. Criminal... I feel for all windows developers out there. Some suggestions for alternate packs Windows Vista Totally Insecure But *Free* Edition Windows Vista Utterly Useless Edition with *NEW* Instant Failure Windows Vespa Version for Italian Fans Windows Ueber Version for people thinking they just bought access to heaven

  74. Who's planning on migrating to Vista anyway? by xtal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Nobody I am currently working with has any plans whatsoever to migrate to Vista; most are still in the motions of moving to XP, if they even went that far. I'm not sure what huge features Vista is supposed to offer people, but I believe Microsoft may have themselves a real problem there.

    Fragmenting it doesn't seem like a great strategy.

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:Who's planning on migrating to Vista anyway? by Apotsy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Everybody said the same thing about XP ("I'm not upgrading right away, and neither is the guy down the street, therefore no one ever will!").

      People seem to forget: every new computer will come with Vista. That alone will put it all over the place in a very short time.

    2. Re:Who's planning on migrating to Vista anyway? by Frodo+Crockett · · Score: 1

      Nobody I am currently working with has any plans whatsoever to migrate to Vista; most are still in the motions of moving to XP, if they even went that far. I'm not sure what huge features Vista is supposed to offer people, but I believe Microsoft may have themselves a real problem there.

      And among knowledgable users, who's gonna upgrade? The hardware requirements are steep, new features have been cut or scaled back, and MS is even considering offering the new Vista features as updates to XP!

      Really, unless pull an asshole stunt like convincing $GAME_PUBLISHER to make Vista a requirement for $HOT_NEW_GAME, I don't see many people who have XP upgrading. Of course, we can probably count on the first post-Vista version of Office being shackled to Vista.

      --
      "The newly born animals are then whisked off for a quick run through a giant baking oven." --heard on Food Network
  75. Obligatory DDR Reference by bluesoul88 · · Score: 1

    The 8th and final version of Vista will be Windows Vista EXTREME, and for the next 10 years people will argue over whether it's EXTREME or 8th. If you don't get it, you probably shouldn't mod it.

  76. Wow by zlogic · · Score: 1

    I've read somewhere that MS are making just one version of Windows because people thought Home and Starter were crap and that Media Center and Tablet Edition aren't for desktops and simply bought Pro.
    Now, with seven versions of Windows they will be experiencing what most people bash about Linux: distro forking. Most users are too confused to make the right choice.
    So now we have 5 versions of Win95 (classic win95,OSR2, 98,98SE, Me), four versions of Windows 2000 (Pro, Server, Advanced Server and Datacenter Server), about 5 versions of Winxp and SEVEN versions of Vista. Pre-Vista versions won't be for sale, but still I think that 7 are a bit much. That's about the number of BSD distros avaliable!

  77. Anti-trust by travail_jgd · · Score: 1

    I'm wondering if this is a (dubious) way of avoiding anti-trust issues. Each version will have its own product number, UPC code, etc. It won't be Windows Vista having 94% of the OS market; the percentages will be split between the variations.

    Another idea: MS could be trying to make more money from developer tools. Will the executables for Home Premium run on the "El Cheapo" versions? Keep in mind that all games for the XBox are licensed, and MS gets a cut right off the top.

    (I know, there's no mod for -1 Conspiracy Theory)

    1. Re:Anti-trust by Tidal+Flame · · Score: 1

      I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you, but don't all current major game systems (XBox, Gamecube, PS2) require license fees?

    2. Re:Anti-trust by travail_jgd · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely correct, they all do. But AFAIK there's no licensing fee for Windows (desktop) software. It would be a cash cow if Microsoft could receive a percentage for all software developed for Windows Vista. It would be transparent to the majority of Windows users, and could lock F/OSS out of Vista.

      But that's my personal conspiracy theory. :)

  78. I wouldn't mind a gamer edition. by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    something stripped down, zero flash and optimized for games, it could even be CLI to actually launch the games. It's all I use XP for anyway...

    --

    My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    1. Re:I wouldn't mind a gamer edition. by PintoPiman · · Score: 1

      Here's one suggestion

    2. Re:I wouldn't mind a gamer edition. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      zero flash and optimized for games

      What about flash games?

  79. Microsoft is the least of the 3 evils. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Microsoft is par for the course as far as American corporations go. Microsoft management has screwed American workers and tried to create a monopoly.

    Yet, there are 2 worse evils: Google and Yahoo!. Google has assisted the Chinese government in banning certain phrases from its search engine. Yahoo!, lead by the pro-Beijing Jerry Yang (founder of the company), has even assisted the Chinese "police" in finding a reporter and imprisoning him for 10 years for the crime of revealing "state secrets".

    I now set Microsoft search as the default search engine on my FireFox browser.

    1. Re:Microsoft is the least of the 3 evils. by punkass · · Score: 1

      Links, please.

      --
      "Nobody owns the fucking words man." - James Dean
    2. Re:Microsoft is the least of the 3 evils. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of sitting over there bitching about china, why don't you do something about it?
      At least those of us who don't care are doing just that: Not caring.

    3. Re:Microsoft is the least of the 3 evils. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try this link. Just go to MSN Search and type "Jerry Yang", pro-Beijing Taiwanese immigrant living in the USA.

    4. Re:Microsoft is the least of the 3 evils. by timster · · Score: 1

      You could do a Google search for "google censors china".

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
  80. Seven Version. by Aqua04 · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... Seven versions. I think it was done purposefully to harmonize their marketing with the product. See, that way their product marketing could be as confusing as the Windows user interface, which means both would send a unified message of ineptness to the consumer.

    Gotta hate these brilliant minds over there !

  81. Vista versions by digitalderbs · · Score: 2, Funny

    It appears that Dvorak is already working with Windows Vista : Desperate Journalist Edition.

  82. I'd like a really "special" edition... by Phat_Tony · · Score: 0, Troll

    One that doesn't crash.

    --
    Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    1. Re:I'd like a really "special" edition... by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      One that doesn't crash.

      You can have any edition you want, so long as it's black and crashes. Or is that gunmetal grey and crashes.

      All your corrupted database are belong to us.

      .

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  83. No matter how many versions there are, M$ should.. by no_pets · · Score: 0

    No matter how many versions there are, M$ should make it easier (possible) to upgrade to a different version at a fair price. I know, this is asking *a lot*.

    When I bought the upgrade to XP I purchased the $99 upgrade to Windows XP Home Edition because I really didn't need remote desktop abilities, etc. Later I decided I wanted XP Professional. I called M$ and wanted to pay the $100 difference (XP Pro was $199 at the time I originally bought XP Home). I was told that was not an option and that if I wanted to upgrade to XP Pro I would have to pay the $199.

    Just something that Microsoft should consider - fair upgrade paths if they really do not want pirates on their hands.

    --
    "A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." - Shepard Book Quoting Malcolm Reynolds
  84. not the same by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
    I, personally, really like choices. What I don't like, however, is a simple registry setting being the most distinguishing feature between two "versions" of an operating system.

    The gaming version of Vista will supposedly have "gaming optimizations." I can't think of a reason I should have to buy a more expensive version of the same operating system to get these supposed optimizations. It sounds to me like the other versions are deoptimized intentionally to get people to pay extra if they want to play games.

    These different versions are going to be, IMHO, largely a farce.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    1. Re:not the same by dcam · · Score: 1

      I like choices, that is why I want to buy an OS that gives me choices. This means buying an OS that I "choose" to limit my options at the start. I don't like that. I can understand differentiating the server and workstation lines, but outside that I don't see the point.

      --
      meh
  85. No Dvorak! by Lulu+of+the+Lotus-Ea · · Score: 1

    Can't we finally have a /. standard of NOT listing articles by Dvorak on the front page (no I didn't RTFA, not do I care to).

    DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS!

  86. Costco Edition by temojen · · Score: 1

    Same price, but comes in a much bigger box.

  87. You mean the Linux model? by dusik · · Score: 1

    Linux already has this kind of variety. It's called distributions.

    I guess now Windows is going to be confusing in the same way - except without the variety. Sounds like a losing situation to me.

    1. Re:You mean the Linux model? by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 1

      These seven are just for the client. Wait 'til we get 5 or 6 server SKUs, too!

      --
      "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
  88. Christianity is a rather broad umbrella by brokeninside · · Score: 4, Funny

    You'd have a few sub editions:

    Vista Reformed Edition: once saved, always saved.

    Vista Millenial Edition: never saves in preperation for the end times.

    Vista Catholic Edition: you need to perform your penance before you can save.

    Vista Jabez Edition: once you save, you get rich.

    Vista Eastern Orthodox Edition: you never know whether you've saved.

    Vista Watchtower Edition: you have to save all your neighbors' files before your files are saved.

  89. Well, ok. by Valiss · · Score: 1

    That's like critiquing next year's pop bands today.


    Yeah, and just like the new software, we know they'll suck.

    --

    -Valiss
  90. Windows Vista Mental Enhancement Edition by ruben.gutierrez · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Possible themes: Dyslexia - word processors jumble words instead of correcting them Tourrets - random errors and popups containing obscenities ADD - programs constantly lose/change focus

    1. Re:Windows Vista Mental Enhancement Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My version of windows XP already has these features...

  91. I Propose... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    ...Windows Vista Ultimate Security Edition. This Windows release will be very compact (easily fitting in 512 bytes of storage). It will issue a STOP command to the system CPU resulting in a halted machine that is more secure than any pervious OS on the planet. Uncrackable.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  92. Costco Edition by dangerweasel · · Score: 1
    Microsoft Vista for Costco Customers: the Cheaper Edition.
    You would have to buy, like, 3 dozen to get the good price, though. On the upside, you could then install it on all that old crap... er, hardware lying around any respectable geeks house.
  93. God by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Will the bias and double standards against Microsoft ever stop?

    While I am no fan of MS, I get tired of the constant default criticisms aimed at MS everytime they do something.

    First, look at how many versions of XP MS was forced to implement.

    While MS started off with an ideal Home and Pro versions, then the OEM Media Center and Tablet Edition, they were forced by governments and the European Union to implement a stripped down version (N) version for both Home and Pro, as well as pretty much been forced to implement a stripped down version of XP for developing countries. This means there are 8 versions of XP around.

    Mostly this was FORCED on MS by governments and consumer backlash.

    So, MS takes the initiative to try and please ALL the special interest groups and take a pre-emptive stike against future government hassles by offering a range of products that MS are ALREADY FORCED to impelement in XP. The difference is the MS is doing this WILLINGLY!

    Also, confusing the market? Every try and pick out a Linux distro? 30+ versions, multiple GUI interfaces, which Kernel to run, 2.4 or 2.6 and which subversion is stable or powerful. Countless number of GNU shareware plauging Linux with cryptic names starting with G? If MS is confusing end users, then what hope does Linux ever have of becoming a mainstream OS.

    If anyone will shine above all this will be Apple. With there limited choice in hardware and 2 flavours of OSX (Server and Not Server), if anyone is confused by MS and Linux, then they will flock to the Apple platform.

    Hey, I think it is dumb that there needs to be 7 versions of an OS, but the EU and consumers pretty much brought this on themselves with all the countless numbers of lawsuits and government pressure. Microsoft is just giving you what you want!

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
    1. Re:God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..confusing the market? [...] If anyone will shine above all this will be Apple.

      Except that Apple is just as muddy as Linux on the developer end of things. Apple themselves support several different competing active APIs on OSX. The tip of the iceberg is the choice between Carbon, Cocoa and X11 for development work. It's muddy, it's messy, it's annoying and is best dealt with by ignoring everything Apple's done and using a clean cross-platform API like wxWidgets (for applications) or SDL (for graphics).

      (And don't give me that "Xcode is god" bullshit - it's terribly bad "un-IDE" which ignores the past 10 years of progress that have taken place on other platforms - give me Eclipse or even Microsoft Visual Studio any day of the week over that piece of junk).

    2. Re:God by nigral · · Score: 1

      If microsoft is FORCED by consumer to do something itsn't this quite normal. As a company that sell products to consumer, aren't they supposed to do what the consummer wants.

      For your part about the EU forcing microsoft to follow the law i thinks it is also quite normal...

      nigral

      PS: the versions forced by EU are not in the 7 flavors.

  94. Only 2 more than what we already have! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We already have five editions of Windows XP. I don't think adding two more to this already large number will matter anymore.

    Windows XP Home Edition
    Windows XP Professional Edition
    Windows XP Media Center Edition
    Windows XP Tablet PC Edition
    Windows XP Starter Edition

  95. Costco Edition by Slurms · · Score: 1

    "Microsoft Vista for Costco Customers: the Cheaper Edition."

    Sure it's cheap but you can only buy it as a beowulf cluster.

    --

    -----
    Pretty Bad Privacy (PBP) Public Key
    6
  96. That's just overkill. by infonography · · Score: 2, Funny

    A Berman and Braga edition? Uggh.

    Look, I hate microsoft as much as the next slashdotter, but nobody deserves that. I work in a mixed env, that means at some point I will have to use it. This is just what I don't want. A Data (the Android) version of Clippy? XP is already bloated and nearly useless, can you imagine what Rick Berman will do to it?

    I feel a post-work alcohol-induced coma coming on.

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  97. The one version you KNOW they won't ship... by BrakesForElves · · Score: 1

    ...is the one that simply installs, behaves, doesn't need patches, and does its job well for over ten years... like MS-DOS 6.22.

    --
    About the word "if": If bullfrogs had wings, they wouldn't bounce around on their little green butts.
  98. Different UI's !?! by kirkb · · Score: 1

    The fact that Vista Home/Premium and Vista Home/Basic will have different UI's (one with Aero, one without) is an incredibly shortsighted decision.

    What happens when grandma learns how to use Vista Home/Premium at the local community college, but ends up confused when the shiny new Dell that she just bought (with Home/Basic) has a different-looking UI?

    Why cant MS *add REAL value* to each version of Vista instead of arbitrarily crippling various chunks of the OS?

    --
    Slashdot: come for the pedantry, stay for the condescension.
  99. Serious?? by presidentbeef · · Score: 1

    Although, I guess people aren't tooooo confused by the 2 (3) versions of XP, right? They are just oblivious to the fact that there are different versions.

    "You are required to have XP Pro"

    "Okay. I have XP Pro."

    "Are you sure?"

    "Yes - it says right here, 'Office XP Professional'"

    "No, no, I mean your operating system. Is it Professional or Home edition?"

    "I don't know...is there a difference...?"

    Most people just go with whatever comes with their computer and don't really care/pay attention until something doesn't work because it's the wrong edition.

    --
    Everything I need to know about copyrights I learned from Slashdot.
  100. Re:Good informative link + Karma Whore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Of course you neglected to tell us this is your site, and you post this link for EVERY windows story.

    Such is the life of a Karma Whore

  101. Congrats to John! by .Spyder78. · · Score: 1

    Apparently Mr. Dvorak has never heard the saying "Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit".

    1. Re:Congrats to John! by maird · · Score: 1

      "Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit".

      "...but therein lies the basis of all wit" - Wilde (as far as I can tell). I know of a few other endings that are less well attributed.

    2. Re:Congrats to John! by Tidal+Flame · · Score: 1

      Nah, puns are definitely lower than sarcasm.

  102. Take your average driver ... by brokeninside · · Score: 1

    ... and ask him or her to start (1) a car with an automatic transmission, (2) a car with a manual transmission, and (3) a car with a manual choke. And then ask that average driver to explain what the differences between them are. Quite a few people wouldn't get very far past saying, `well, this one has a strange little doohickey, but I'm not real sure what it does...'

  103. The world's flavourite OS by linbetwin · · Score: 1

    The 7 flavours of Microsoft(arrgh!) Windows(arrgh!) Vista(arrgh!) will be as follows: 1) Windows Vista (codenamed "Beta") 2) SP1 3) SP2 4) SP3 5) SP4 6) SP5 and finally 7) Malicious Windows Removal Tool

  104. vista blue screen by derniers · · Score: 0

    vista blue screen..... "blue screen of death all the time"

  105. Not the first time by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has right now:
    -Windows XP Home Edition
    -Windows XP Professional
    -Windows XP Media Center Edition,
    not counting the Tablet PC Edition and the AMD64 Edition, because of the different hardware platform. On the server side, there is
    -Windows Server 2003, Standard Edition
    -Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition
    -Windows Server 2003, Datacenter Edition
    to list only the obvious ones. I'm leaving out the Web Edition and the Small Business Server, because I'm not sure if the OS is actually different.

    That makes six versions of Windows right now. Going to seven versions is only a moderate increase in flavoritis.

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
    1. Re:Not the first time by aaronl · · Score: 1

      No, there are two versions of Windows right now that are at all relevant. You can buy either XP Home or XP Pro. Media Center isn't available in stores, and Windows Server isn't the desktop version.

      Going from Home or Pro (Office) to Home 1, Home 2, Home 3, Home 4, Office 1, Office 2, Office 3. That would be Starter, Home Basic, Home Pro, Ultimate, Pro, Small Business, Enterprise.

      Today, you can't get 1, numbers 2 and 3 are called Home, and 4-7 are called Pro.

      The next Windows Server *will not* be this software. They'll probably have another 10 versions for that, since they already have 5 of them (Standard, Enterprise, Datacenter, Web, and Small Business). We can probably expect Windows Server: Starter, Standard, Enterprise, Datacenter, High Security, Cluster, Web, Messaging, Media, and Ultimate. Of course, Starter will only let you run one server app, and only two people can connect to it simultaneously.

    2. Re:Not the first time by tupps · · Score: 1

      But with Vista there will be the 7 user based OSs and then the 3 or so Server OSs. Therefore you will end up with 10+ versions of the OS.

      --
      Go out and get sailing!
    3. Re:Not the first time by po8crg · · Score: 1

      OK, so another person that has read the spin.

      A: XP Starter Edition already exists. Vista Starter is just a continuation of that, and you won't be able to get it in the USA.

      B: There are already two home versions: Home and Media Center. If you're a user, you buy your OS with your PC and, bizarrely "OEM-only" doesn't really mean much. Home Basic = Home, Home Premium = Media Center.

      C: Enterprise is only available to volume licence customers with software assurance. This is a con to get people to sigh up to SA on Windows Client. If they actually stick to their guns on MUI, then some multi-nats are going to get seriously pissed off with Microsoft. But that's not going to confuse the consumer space.

      So as a consumer buying a PC, your choices are Home Basic, Home Premium, Pro, SB and Ultimate. Realistically, your retailer won't offer SB and probably won't offer Pro, giving you three choices instead of your current three. Oooh, lots of extra confusion there.

      Windows Server? Ah, there it gets interesting:

      Standard, Ent, D/C, Web and SBS all survive. They are definitely adding Quattro Home Server and Midsize Business Server to those. MBS is aimed at the IT department of one, as opposed to SBS, which is the IT department of zero.

  106. Nope, that's an easy one by brokeninside · · Score: 2, Funny

    All your files always get saved whether you click on save or not.

  107. Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hilarious? What, precisely, was hilarious in that article?

  108. Re:I don't think I'll need to know this informatio by Geek+of+Tech · · Score: 1
    >> How do you know that you are using the best tool if you do not know a bit about them all.
    Well, duh, all you have to do is read the marketing sheet...

    --
    Stop the Slashdot effect! Don't read the articles!
  109. MS's biggest mistake? by Nikker · · Score: 1

    What MS is doing is sealing their coffin. For so many years they have used FUD to blur the lines between them and their competitors now they are actually providing a metric their OS can be compared upon. Now the starter edition can be blown away with a distro that allows "Unlimited Resolution". Or builtin CD-Player.

    The it is not the features any longer, one software can say in the same lingo as MS's marketing dept we will give you the (equivalent of) starer edition + home ed. for 1/2 the price. The person buying it will look at it like 2 DVD players they can buy $100 SONY but they WANT the $500 SONY. Now with MS marketing showing us in black and white (and warm earth tones of course) just let them convince the customer what the customer needs and then steal them before they buy.

    --
    A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    1. Re:MS's biggest mistake? by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Agreed, you don't want to give the user more choice, too much choice can be paralyzing. Splitting Vista into all these versions is the best thing Microsoft could possibly do for Apple.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  110. You forgot some by brokeninside · · Score: 1

    XP Embedded

    XP 64

    And that's not counting various OEM versions. I suspect that the OEM version of XP is quite different than the retail version of the `same' edition of XP.

  111. Dvorak? by finalchao · · Score: 1

    Why does a keyboard layout have a full name and the capability to think?...

  112. The version I'm waiting for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm still waiting for Microsoft Windows Working Edition. Hopefully it would come bundled with Microsoft Windows Virus-Free edition, and maybe even Microsoft Windows with Applications edition.

  113. standard tactic by RahoulB · · Score: 1

    "I know the competition can do this, this and this NOW, but just wait another year for Windows Q35 where it will do this, this, this and THIS as well"

  114. CPU by Valiss · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure what huge features Vista is supposed to offer people,

    What, draining your system resources isn't a feature anymore? After all, XP is too kind to my RAM.

    --

    -Valiss
  115. I have a suggestion... by tuxtastic · · Score: 0
    How about Windows Vista Common Sense Edition !?

    In this edition Windows Vista would have a relatively small impact on the system's resources. The GPU usage would be dominated by games and media processing. 1GB of RAM would push more than the latest edition of spider solitaire. To top it all off, you wouldn't need 256mb+ of VRAM to alt-tab.

    Of course, I jest, but is the KISS rule beyond big brother bill?

    I'm just looking out for all you lusers who are stuck in the microsoft mindset. If you're getting a hardon over how visually appealing or "innovative" vista is (or will be), you need to open your eyes and re-evaluate your views. Microsoft's new window graphics toolkit shouldn't be called Glass... it should be called SMOKE and MIRRORS.

  116. Re:I don't think I'll need to know this informatio by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    You program using Visual Basic on a PIV running Windows XP don't you?

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  117. Please don't feed the Dvorak by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Interesting

    everytime we slashdot him, his salary goes up and he can then pronounce that Linux is dead in his next article.

    sigh.

    even if he is right about the silly multi-version Vista variants from Microsoft.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  118. You forgot at least two by brokeninside · · Score: 2, Informative

    Windows XP also comes in Starter (mandated by the EU anti-trust suit) and Embedded editions.

    But to be fair, most retail consumers won't be seeing the Starter, Embedded, Media Center, Tablet PC, or Professional x64 editions on the retail shelves or even as pre-load options for most consumer PCs. That's what makes this amusing is that Best Buy is likely going to carry 2 editions (both upgrade and full pack) of each of Vista Home Basic, Home Premium, Professional, and Small Business. In addition, MS might sell upgrades from one to the other.

    1. Re:You forgot at least two by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Starter was the extremely cut down version for the Third World (3 programs at a time, etc.). The EU got Windows XP N (where N stands for 'No Media Player').

  119. Monopoly by elbenito69 · · Score: 1

    At the Vista release, Parker Brothers should release a Monopoly Vista Edition board game, and Microsoft a Vista Monopoly Edition OS. It'd be so fitting.

  120. Lucky bastard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People get paid to write this crap?

  121. Why the gamer edition is not such a bad idea by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    something stripped down, zero flash and optimized for games, it could even be CLI to actually launch the games. It's all I use XP for anyway...

    Me too. In fact, it's a royal pain trying to set up XP so it will boot differently if you have a laptop and set up two admin accounts.

    The problem is that it "discovers" all the hardware you try to tell it to ignore, loads the drivers, and then won't play Sims 2 as well as before.

    I mean, I wanted it to NOT:
    a. turn on the wireless;
    b. turn on virus protection (see a);
    c. turn on antispyware;
    d. turn on the printer;
    e. turn on the my yahoo radio and sign me in;
    f. and change my resolution from the 800x600 to the full 1024x768 or whatever.

    That's why I made a different account and tried to make a different profile ... SO I COULD PLAY MY FRICKEN GAME!

    So, a stripped down gamer's edition would be really useful, IMHO.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  122. MS should reciprocate by wardk · · Score: 1

    MS should publish a story about how Dvorak confuses the computing public with his bouncing back between Ms shill and MS watchdog.

  123. It is all in the marketing by sxmjmae · · Score: 1

    Tell me BHB will take anything less then the full blown version at inflated prices.
    Microsoft is playing the Boss's ego. Telling them you could have the small limited version but for just $100 more you get the full super deluxe version and the envy of the geeks. (IE you can buy the small dick or the large one)

    --
    My Sig indicates the end of the comment I posted.
  124. dvorak.org/blog by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

    Remember, kids, the man gets no SPAM!

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  125. Honeypot edition by HikingStick · · Score: 1, Redundant

    They could release a version of VISTA that is susceptible to all kinds of viruses, worms, and other security exploits--VISTA Honeypot Edition...

    ...oh, wait...they already have that...

    ...It's called Windows XP!

    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
    1. Re:Honeypot edition by Aggressiva · · Score: 0

      Does insulting windows make you feel cool? Cuz, it sure is getting old..

    2. Re:Honeypot edition by HikingStick · · Score: 1

      I couldn't resist. I teach Microsoft in my "other life", so I know the Gospel according to Bill. When they do get things right, I'm the first to admit it... Happy reading to you!

      --
      I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
  126. The World's Flavoured OS by linbetwin · · Score: 1

    The 7 flavours of Microsoft(arrgh!) Windows(arrgh!) Vista(arrgh!) will be as follows: 1) Windows Vista (codenamed "BS-OS" which stands for "beta-stage operating system") 2) SP1 3) SP2 4) SP3 5) SP4 6) SP5 and finally 7) Malicious Windows Removal Tool

  127. Never Underestimate The End User by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    I have no doubt that the average person can simply read a chart that has little checks next to "features" and decide which of the 7 they want.

    Well, they can... but they won't. Buying something as basic as the OS for your computer shouldn't involve anything more than ensuring your system meets the requirements on the box. (Something many average buyers still don't do.)

    While those of us with some level of intelligent computer use probably won't have any issues, aside from the gouging we'll take for a good (uncrippled) version of Vista, the average user isn't going to have the experience or the insight to know what features they'll need in advance of their purchase... assuming they even understand why there are seven different boxes on the shelf.

    You'll likely get two classes of buyers in a setup like this. People who buy the cheap copy, only to get pissed they can't play the great new game that just came out, because their OS can't support it.... or... people who'll unnecessarily buy the most expensive version simply because the name on the box sounds bigger (meaning better), even though they'll just use their computer for email, web browsing and word processing.

    If anything, Microsoft is probably expecting to profit from confusion this is going to cause less experienced users.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
  128. Tonight on UPN!! by sharkey · · Score: 1

    William Shatner in his latest, greatest role: Windy IT pundit John C. Dvorak!

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  129. So what we have so far? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Windows Vista Starter Edition
    Windows Vista Home Basic Edition
    Windows Vista Home Premium Edition
    Windows Vista Professional Edition
    Windows Vista Small Business Edition
    Windows Vista Enterprise Edition
    Windows Vista Ultimate Edition
    Windows Vista Kiddie Edition
    Windows Vista Porn Edition
    Windows Vista Kitchen Edition
    Windows Vista Multimedia Edition
    Windows Vista Gamer Case-Mod Edition
    Windows Vista for Desperate Housewives

    Add yours to the list...

    1. Re:So what we have so far? by Pharmboy · · Score: 3, Funny

      You forgot MS Linux Edition, the one they will fail to distribute properly, so they can say they tried, but people weren't interested in Linux (apologies to Dvorak)

      How about: Windows Vista Home Automation Edition

      It would come with the X-10 controller software and two X10 modules, so you can build "The Home of the Future" in true Microsoft fashion, using 25 year old technology.

      Or you could use what I use, and run Heyu and Bluelava on Apache and Linux (or BSD), I suppose.

      Also, NEVER try upgrading your Windows Vista Kiddie Edition with Windows Vista Porn Edition. To say there are conflicts is an understatement.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    2. Re:So what we have so far? by SebNukem · · Score: 0

      and double everything for the version without windows media player for europe (N):

      Windows Vista Starter Edition
      Windows Vista Home Basic Edition
      Windows Vista Home Premium Edition
      Windows Vista Professional Edition
      Windows Vista Small Business Edition
      Windows Vista Enterprise Edition
      Windows Vista Ultimate Edition
      Windows Vista Kiddie Edition
      Windows Vista Porn Edition
      Windows Vista Kitchen Edition
      Windows Vista Multimedia Edition
      Windows Vista Gamer Case-Mod Edition
      Windows Vista for Desperate Housewives
      Windows Vista Starter Edition N
      Windows Vista Home Basic Edition N
      Windows Vista Home Premium Edition N
      Windows Vista Professional Edition N
      Windows Vista Small Business Edition N
      Windows Vista Enterprise Edition N
      Windows Vista Ultimate Edition N
      Windows Vista Kiddie Edition N
      Windows Vista Porn Edition N
      Windows Vista Kitchen Edition N
      Windows Vista Multimedia Edition N
      Windows Vista Gamer Case-Mod Edition N
      Windows Vista for Desperate Housewives N

    3. Re:So what we have so far? by MisterSquid · · Score: 3, Funny

      Also, NEVER try upgrading your Windows Vista Kiddie Edition with Windows Vista Porn Edition. To say there are conflicts is an understatement.

      My understanding was that the Vista Porn Edition has as its direct consequence the Vista Kiddie Edition.

      --
      blog
    4. Re:So what we have so far? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Good point, but it's not the only incompatibility. Upgrading a Vista Home edition to Vista Porn edition may cause the Desperate Housewife edition to be installed instead. Once installed like this, it can not be removed. Rumour has it that installing Home Automation edition and then upgrading to Porn edition may unlock the Voyeur Edition, but this is unconfirmed.

    5. Re:So what we have so far? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Windows Vista for Desperate Housewives

      It's this the one that's written badly but looks good?

      Or am I thinking of OSX?

  130. What about the anti-geek version? by fprog · · Score: 1

    Maybe they should create one version called Windows anti-geek version.

    If you try to uninstall Windows or to install any other operating system, it would do everything it can using DRM and similar to prohibit.

    It would also prohibit you from repairing or tweaking your computer or removing spyware/virus.

    Oh wait! that's already in all 7 vista versions!
    Sorry!

  131. Already done! by realityfighter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Let's not overlook Microsoft Vista--Kitchen Edition. People are putting computers in the kitchen, aren't they? Well then there should be a rugged kitchen edition with a file system specifically suited to storing recipes and videos of Jacques Pepin cooking his way.

    At Frys, they sell a refrigerator with a computer built in to bring up recipes, check your email, etc. I believe you can also use it to keep track of your groceries. It runs Windows XP.

    --
    A strain of paranoid prevention can be worse than the disease, whate'er the intention.
  132. Sounds Familiar by ThinkFr33ly · · Score: 1

    Sure is a good thing that Linux doesn't have this problem.

  133. Open edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I might buy Microsoft Windows DRM-free, patent-free, open formats, open API, open standards, open source edition... if I could get over the nausea of buying a Microsoft product.

  134. "Blue Screen Edition" by ehluke · · Score: 1

    I think they should release a blue screen edition. Oh, wait... Nevermind...

  135. Re:not the same .. Not new by Phiu-x · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is the Microsoft way since a long time. Hell, I remember that with windows 95/98 (or maybe it was 2000) different features got installed (see unlocked) according to which serial number you typed at the install. A corporate SN would install corporate stuff ie: more networking feature or more concurrent connections. This is not new at all.

    --
    This is a stolen sig.
  136. Pirate Edition by erik_norgaard · · Score: 2, Funny

    Somehow, I think that the Windows Vista Pirate edition is the only one that will be released on time...

    1. Re:Pirate Edition by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

      That's no problem, our automagical drm will automagically track you till your last born son.

      Don't worry ... your digital life belongs to us.
      Call 1-800-turn-in to get a faster service from our helpdesk.

      (little bit off topic) but anyone has any tips for any other movies alike THX

      tata,
      microsoft.

      --
      --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
    2. Re:Pirate Edition by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

      guess I have to blame my cat for submitting this article. Since I wanted to ask if any has suggestions next to THX 1138, 1984 or The Island?

      --
      --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  137. Price Discrimination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The way monopolies Maximise profit...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_discrimination

  138. Not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those are about as funny as an episode of whos the boss.

  139. Who is really the 800 pound Guerrilla? by ScrewTivo · · Score: 1

    Personally I beleive it is the King of the emerging market not the the King of the existing market. The US government might be happy pandering to MS but I can not believe the rest of the world enjoys this idea. If you can not see this 800 pound Guerrilla it is because it's hiding in the jungle until the time is right.

  140. Just One Would Be Fine by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    I'd just like one edition that everyone ran, and that everything that runs on Windows will run on this. I can't believe you can make enough extra money to justfy making so many versions at different price points otherwise.

    My other crazy wish is to ditch the different x86 processors families and just focus on making the best one as cheaply as possible. How much more does all that Celeron nonsense cost Intel anyway?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  141. ad impression whoring for fun and profit by Chris+Snook · · Score: 1

    This article isn't funny. I'm sorry, it's just weak, which is pathetic given how easy the target is, but given how little actual content the article actually has, it's unsurprising that it fails to accomplish anything. So, why post it at all? Well, it's pretty obvious that PC magazine has sunk to the level of posting things that might get slashdotted just to sell ad impressions. I'm using Firefox on a 1024x768 monitor. With prefbar and the tab bar, the first page of the article doesn't quite fit within one screen, and the second fits in one screen comfortably. That's only by putting the whole page inside a column that gives everyone the 800x600 experience, ostensibly for consistent user experience, but really just to hide how little is actually there. Inside that column is the column of ads on the right, and the gigantic ad in the middle of the article that makes it annoying to read. How much space do the actual web pages take? Well, the first page takes 8 screens, and the second takes 7.5 screens. The article is so short that the only possible justification for breaking it into two pages is to show the extra 6.5 screens twice. There's really only about 1 screen of actual content, out of a total of 15.5 screens between the two pages.

    This leaves two possible conclusions:

    1) They actually believe that there's some utility to putting that much annoying crap around the article, and even so far below it that nobody will ever see it, in which case someone needs to be fired.

    2) They don't care if a human ever sees it, and are just throwing it up there to generate ad impressions, in which case their advertisers all need to dump them, or move to pay-per-click ads.

    In either case, I'm ignoring PC Magazine from now on.

    --
    There's no failure quite as dissatisfying as a complete and total solution to the wrong problem.
  142. Re:I don't think I'll need to know this informatio by Geek+of+Tech · · Score: 1

    Oh my goodness! How'd you know!? You must be watching me with them evil cookies! AUGH! **Grabs tinfoil hat**

    --
    Stop the Slashdot effect! Don't read the articles!
  143. The Irony by Sephiriz · · Score: 1

    You know you're on Slashdot when you realize that you've just read "Dvorak on Microsoft Confusing the Market" and then get slapped for recalling that Linux had countless distributions that serve all sorts of consumers, ranging from the minimalists, to the home users, to the gamers, and to whatever else is potentially desired. I guess I'm just saying I'd like to read "Gates on Linux Confusing the Market" except of course, that wouldn't make sense, since Linux has little enough share of the PC market to even cause any confusion .

  144. Re:Other Virgins by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

    Me, too!

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  145. Microsoft is just dying. by suezz · · Score: 1

    I see a company on the way down and out. They are patenting stuff just to stay alive. Now their next great hope is the proprietary codecs and drm and trusted computing - hoping to lock people in to the hardware so you can't do anything with it except pay them for features you want unlocked.

    They probably think that the versions are a good marketing tactic. After all they are a pretty marketing company.

    Just go learn open source now and save yourself a bunch of headaches down the road. I did years ago and now I just sit back and LOL at microsoft.

    You can live without Windows - they just don't want you to know that.

  146. Funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > How about the Vista Porn Edition? All the great
    > porn sites would be pre-bookmarked.

    What's funny about that? A sad indictment actually.

  147. Not Funny by triso · · Score: 1

    I don't think we share the same definition for hilarious. Dvorak's sugestions are lame, lame, lame.

  148. How about a "Public Servants" Edition? by KwKSilver · · Score: 1

    MS pays the senator, representative, mayor, councilman, judge, governor, president-or whatever $1 for everone in the relevant district if he/she uses VISTA. Very rewarding for Senators, the Supreme Court, Prez & VP.

    --
    If you want your life to be different, live it differently.
  149. He forgot the... by master_p · · Score: 1

    Duke Nukem Forever Edition!

  150. Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First thing I've laughed out loud at on Slashdot for about 3 years. Damn I am sad.

  151. Ha Ha. Only Serious. by DragonHawk · · Score: 1

    "at least they got SOMETHING working crossplatform"

    The Microsoft definition of "portable" is "runs on more then one version of Windows".

    I wish I was kidding.

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
  152. You're all missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What we need is Microsoft Vista Point that provides a 1x1 screen resolution (coupled to the new advanced security) that offers a view of your system status:

    Red: Severe risk of virus attack
    Orange: High risk of virus attack
    Yellow: (Elevated) Significant virus of network attack
    Blue: (Guarded) General risk of virus attack
    Green: Low risk of virus attack

  153. Vista Porn by jbellows_20 · · Score: 1

    Does that mean that we'd expect hourly updates from Windows Update with bookmarks to the new greatest porn sites?

  154. Re:I don't think I'll need to know this informatio by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    Nope it is the GPS RFID tag that was in your Bawls.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  155. ah, you forgot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows Vista Pirate Edition.

    A sure-sell!

  156. Alta Vista by JoshRoss · · Score: 1

    I comes with older search technology. Discaimer: I haven't used altavista in years.

  157. Most likely edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MS Vista hacked & cracked warez edition

    Where it will install in a couple of clicks.

    Better, Stronger, Smaller, Cleaner, & Faster, than
    the editions MS releases.

  158. Seems odd by pugugly · · Score: 1

    Didn't Microsoft go to a great deal of effort to like . . . combine two previous OS's that looked similar but ran with different feature sets into one OS that ran stuff pretty consistently but had the security of the other one?

    I seem to recall hearing about this somewhere.

    Pug

    Microsoft - no longer innovating new and different mistakes, just exacerbating old ones

    --
    An Invisible Entity of Vast Power whose existence must be taken on faith alone: Liberal Media
  159. Hey! by The+Grassy+Knoll · · Score: 1

    >a blinking hard-drive light

    No need to swear!

    .

    --
    They will never know the simple pleasure of a monkey knife fight
  160. many editions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    don't you think that when a customer comes into the shop and sees all these choices, he will assume that he can pick and choose? Like getting Home Basic but with 1-2 features from Home Pro. When he is told he can't have that, he will realize that he can choose whatever he wants "as long as it's black".
    This situation is the opportunity for Linux with it's pick-and-choose mindset. Let's hope Linux advocates can see that and exploit that.
    my2c

  161. Not So Silly by rtb61 · · Score: 1
    When you think about it, it is not such a bad idea. Different desk tops to suit different tasks. It has always tended to fail because it tended to be left up to the end user. Users who had sufficeint skill to create multiple desk tops tend not to need them and users who don't have sufficient skill to create multiple desk tops tend to be the ones need them.

    A shared open project to create the various desk tops; system administration, educational, business, gaming, media, government interaction (localised of course) etc. Hit the button and it changes to present the user with a readily recognisable range of options (much the same as a shared digital equivalent of traffic signs).

    An open and licence free range of digital desktop interfaces standards. Maybe cool?

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  162. what about "a rolling stone gathers no moss" by driver7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    surely, people are aware that Muddy Waters and whoever else used the phrase were referring to the aphorism "a rolling stone gathers no moss" it predates all of them.

  163. The Most Important Issue... by loyukfai · · Score: 1

    Will all those little games be removed from the editions intended for business consumption?

  164. Don't for get about the EU's absurd by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 0

    mandated XP N, which nobody is buying.

    --
    -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
  165. Yeah, I think you're right on that by brokeninside · · Score: 1

    Which means that I left out at least one version of XP. Although, I don't think Starter or N will be showing up on most retail shelves.