Slashdot Mirror

OK, Facebook sucks but then so do Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Apple, Oracle, etc.. We're supposed to believe that the internet is a revolutionary force for good and that it's making the world a better place. Yeah, right. Keep drinking the cool-aid https://youtu.be/4tLvzyb3_Uc?t...

So apparently there's a mod out there that doesn't know that you can actually do ray-traced audio propagation.

Here's a bit of light viewing on how it's been used in one field since the 80's: https://youtu.be/ZY1Kiih8sTU

Level 3 is fine if there is plenty of warning to take over, say a minimum of 30 seconds. Time to put away your phone, pack away the sandwich and slip your shoes back on.

Unfortunately what we have is crap like this from Audi: https://youtu.be/WsiUwq_M8lE

Note the way it disengages suddenly and the guy has to instantly take over. That's dangerous and unacceptable.

So far as I can see, Zuckerberg was born with a short cluestick on certain matters, and this will never change.

Google Founders Talk Montessori

That's from 2010 (weren't we just talking about 2010?) and the era vibe just makes your skin crawl.

So if Mark hasn't got the Montessori edge, what has he bot?

He transferred to the exclusive private school Phillips Exeter Academy, in New Hampshire, in his junior year, where he won prizes in science (math, astronomy, and physics) and classical studies.

In his youth, he also attended the Johns Hopkins Center for Talented Youth summer camp.

On his college application, Zuckerberg stated that he could read and write French, Hebrew, Latin, and ancient Greek. He was captain of the fencing team.

Guess you don't learn much about privacy reading Hebrew, Latin, or Greek.

Waymo CEO John Krafcik says he is confident its cars would have performed differently

Really? I'll believe him when I see him in this.. Strongly suggest you waste 30s viewing this -- I wish a lot MORE people would stand behind (or in front of ) their work.

Actually, I take that back. Forget golive! The bridge was still being constructed. See this video for an explain:

https://youtu.be/Q2A1wS09p0k?t...

reminded me of this clip:

https://youtu.be/VDJehCXMKwI?t...

There are videos on Youtube showing this road to be much better lit than the Uber video lets on. This one even has pedestrians on the side of the road at almost the same site of the accident, and the driver has no problems seeing them in advance.

Videos that are just as misinterpreted (by you, for example) as the Uber video. The pedestrians in this video are on the same side of the road as the lights, in the Uber video the ped comes from the other side and is in the darkest spot between lights. This driver is also specifically looking for peds, not your typical driver. There is no fair comparison.

The other part of this is, you could take a hundred human drivers and put them in the same conditions, and you may find one drunk or inattentive enough to kill the same pedestrian. But most would have seen her in time to at least slow down (for a non-fatal accident) or avoid her entirely.

A million dead pedestrians (and counting) from human drivers would disagree with you. The video you linked shows several drivers going 10 to 20 miles over the speed limit, driving recklessly past other vehicles and no doubt changing lanes, listening to the radio or on the phone etc. You may be the supreme driver you think, but even you would not handle every pedestrian situation perfectly. Most drivers are not so supremely focused (again ask the million dead).

But you could take a hundred Uber vehicles with the same condition and most would have killed the same pedestrian, because they would share the same design flaw.

In the same exact spot under the same conditions most Uber cars would have failed, but most safety drivers would not have if the conditions were as ideal as you think. Not to mention that the Uber AV might have done far better than the average human in conditions that were slightly different. A ped coming from the right in a better lit area might get detected by Uber 99.9% vs. only 95% for humans. The same ped coming in the same light would have been flattened by the majority of those SUVs going 60 mph in the left lane, that is the fair comparison to the Uber. Not you going 38 mph in the right lane and totally focused on this one moment.

The big difference between AVs and humans is that the next version of Uber's car will handle this situation much better (as will all other AVs too, I imagine). Whereas humans don't get any better, they make the same mistakes year after year.

Nope. Still a hard nope.

There are videos on Youtube showing this road to be much better lit than the Uber video lets on. This one even has pedestrians on the side of the road at almost the same site of the accident, and the driver has no problems seeing them in advance.

The other part of this is, you could take a hundred human drivers and put them in the same conditions, and you may find one drunk or inattentive enough to kill the same pedestrian. But most would have seen her in time to at least slow down (for a non-fatal accident) or avoid her entirely. Even very large vehicles can stop quickly with good brakes.

But you could take a hundred Uber vehicles with the same condition and most would have killed the same pedestrian, because they would share the same design flaw.

... but if you ain't made of paper nor trying to break into my house you have nothing to fear from me.

My feelings exactly.

And yet, though most of us are fairly reasonable, well behaved, and start off with good intentions, it's hard to predict the future ... I was thinking of a line from "Chinatown".

you left out "Bourgeoisie" and "class warfare". I'm sure you'll get around to it at some point.

Your smarmy avoidance is noted.

That AC was just trying to do the best he could in the system which exists.

He volunteered to be an imperial occupier, which is much worse than being a mere contractor.

Something weird is definitely going on with facebook likes and post engagements. Veritasium made some observations: https://youtu.be/oVfHeWTKjag
Bottom line: buying facebook promotions can have a negative impact.

Forget the Lidar, or lack of (they were testing cameras?). Forget the dude (heh, the first 12 hours thought he was a she. That's gotta hurt). Had I been driving that car, full alert, I would have killed that chick. I'd have felt bad, even knowing it was her fault. But the fact is, this dumbass walked in front of a fast moving car, at night, when she had no illumination, and the car had headlights. Her best hope of survival was a 100% functioning self driving car, anything less and she's dead.

First, the fact that the woman did something wrong doesn't mean that the car did nothing wrong. The Uber system is supposed to employ infrared cameras and a Laser radar, both of which are unaffected by "no (visible spectrum) illumination".

Second, the Uber video seems to be underexposed. A guy on Youtube drove the same road, also at night, here. The spot where the accident occurred (33 seconds into the video) is illuminated enough that the cyclist should have been visible.

Re: "Except one is extrapolation from direct measurement and the other is, in your words, a 'short leap of imagination' which I think is being very generous about how long a leap it is."

"Eighty-four distinct high-energy-density Z-pinch categories have been identified in petroglyphs, nearly all of which belong to the archaic [50] class. Only a small percentage of these petroglyphs, or petroglyph patterns, do not fall into any of these categories."

I've created a graphic here which I think reduces the confusion of this paper. It lays out the surprising correspondence between laboratory-generated plasma instabilities in high-intensity electric discharges and common abstract petroglyph forms.

"40% of petroglyph types can be accounted for."

Re: "I think if you read up a bit more about Gerald Pollack you'll see that the folks who are co-opting his work are other crackpots extrapolating from his book and work to make bizarre claims about magic water which he never made."

You made this up. I am talking about mainstream researchers. There is nothing at all bizarre about structured water. It has been extensively studied in the laboratory. It can be observed to accumulate at the top of a typical cup of water as a reaction to casting a very specific frequency of infrared light onto it. The experiment is not complicated. Since the structured and bulk water are actually two different molecular arrangements, they exhibit differing net charges. And if you actually hook up a resistor to these two different regions of your typical glass of water, you can actually measure an electric current. You might consider that you don't actually know what you are arguing against.

Re: "The problem isn't a lack of rigor in dismissing bizarre claims, it's a lack of rigor in the claims themselves."

This is a stunning display of irony -- for you've arrived at this conclusion without any actual process for learning or tracking the claims.

Re: "Lastly there is no such thing as 'settled science'."

By "settled science", I am referring to the idea that we can assume that some questions are settled, without any need to track them for vindications over time. It is clear from your own comments that settled science is very real.

Re: "The areas you cite (with the exception of Pollack) don't even bother to make predictions, they're just folks jumping up and down yammering 'acknowledge my theory, acknowledge my theory'."

Some of our most important ideas in the sciences today originated in just this manner, actually. And in fact, pet theories are actually quite common amongst even academics.

Not even if you paid people a huge salary to remain fully attentive, would you get an attentive driver.

It can be done. This situation is hardly unique, and there are lots of tried and tested solutions.

GM has gaze tracking technology for their hands-off Supercruise system, and if it notices you are not looking out of the window at the road it starts demanding your attention and eventually shuts down. Uber could have used that tech and fired anyone who didn't have a 99% attentive rate.

In Japan they use a system where the operator has to point to things they are checking and sometimes say the name of that thing. It forces them to be attentive. Train drivers use it, but also people like security and safety check staff.

https://youtu.be/9LmdUz3rOQU (skip to 0:30 for a demo)

Limiting drivers to one hour shifts and banning distractions like mobile phones would be a good idea too. If they need to make notes just use a voice recorder.

You could at least put in a link so the youngins know what you are on about.

https://youtu.be/tM0sTNtWDiI

I am noticing this too. Any story on bitcoin sends the low UID accounts into fits of rage.

We've seen several "this will change the world" financial trends. We gave into "#FOMO" in our time as well, back in the dot-com days of 1998-2003, the housing craze of 2006-2008, the gold rush of 2009-2012, and so on.

We've seen the road already, and try to convince others not to go down it (as our elders did with us). I don't expect you to believe us any more than we believed our elders. It's the circle of life.

It's their way of rationalizing missing the boat on, what might be, the greatest wealth transfer in history.

I've watched Bitcoin shed over half its value in 30 days. I've seen Ethereum lose ~2/3 of its value in 90 days. I'm quite comfortable passing up that action.

Do as you will; it's your money. Just remember to periodically ask yourself the same question all of us need to ask from time to time: Am I willing to ride the bomb all the way down?

> Most other work is Java and C++, for both a simple editor like vi/vim (even with ctaggs) is completely unsuited. But I guess you hate both such languages :)

Out-of-the-box Crap++ is a complete clusterfuck of over-engineering.

I personally use C++ with ctags -- I will clarify that in a moment.

When even a C++ committee member admits that they write in a sub-set of C++ you know the languages is b-l-o-a-t-e-d.

Myself, like many other game developers, such as John Carmack, use something called "Super C" or "Embedded C++" -- basically C++ without all the bloated features.

* No exceptions
* No RTTI
* No References (use pointers)
* Minimal usage of templates
* Const everywhere
* Shallow Class Heirarchy
* Polymorphism when it makes sense
* Inheritance when it makes sense

CppCon 2014: Nicolas Fleury "C++ in Huge AAA Games"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

And when _another_ person on the committee officially recognizes iostreams' performance is crap and hates it: ... and not so much interest in fixing or somehow superseding iostreams which I hate in all its forms. you quickly realize iostreams' slow performance and over-engineered design will never be fixed.

In case you didn't notice those C++ morons are STILL trying to add a 2D graphics library -- which would have been fine 20 years ago -- but everyone is either using Direct3D, OpenGL, Vulkan, or some other proprietary piece-of-shit 3D library. We don't need Yet-Another-Graphics library.

Title: A Proposal to Add 2D Graphics Rendering and Display to C++
Date: 2018-02-1
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/s...

**facepalm**

There is no _standardized_ name-mangling -- something that would help solve _today's_ real problems.

Gee, when are packages coming to C++? You know, something Pascal had 30 years ago???

I could go on but that's enough.

Java is an even crappier language. I wrote some CRC32 in version 7 2 years ago -- it was one of the worst programming experiences I've ever had.

* It took _eight_ revisions to add support for a native unsigned type???
* Any language that _forces_ only one class per file is brain dead
* The compiler was brain dead -- it was unable to cast an int to a boolean and short-circuit an IF clause
* Let me know when there is a way to make the GC _100% deterministic_ AND give it a _hard_ millisecond deadline, or even disable the dam thing. Ignoring memory management doesn't magically make it go away.
* The extra/long/verbose/path/to/my/source is crap,
* The gradle/maven build system sucks
* Verbose languages, like Java and COBOL, suck.

There is a reason the stereotypical Java-weenie exists.

.

> Most other work is Java and C++, for both a simple editor like vi/vim (even with ctaggs) is completely unsuited. But I guess you hate both such languages :)

Out-of-the-box Crap++ is a complete clusterfuck of over-engineering.

I personally use C++ with ctags -- I will clarify that in a moment.

When even a C++ committee member admits that they write in a sub-set of C++ you know the languages is b-l-o-a-t-e-d.

Myself, like many other game developers, such as John Carmack, use something called "Super C" or "Embedded C++" -- basically C++ without all the bloated features.

* No exceptions
* No RTTI
* No References (use pointers)
* Minimal usage of templates
* Const everywhere
* Shallow Class Heirarchy
* Polymorphism when it makes sense
* Inheritance when it makes sense

CppCon 2014: Nicolas Fleury "C++ in Huge AAA Games"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

And when _another_ person on the committee officially recognizes iostreams' performance is crap and hates it: ... and not so much interest in fixing or somehow superseding iostreams which I hate in all its forms. you quickly realize iostreams' slow performance and over-engineered design will never be fixed.

In case you didn't notice those C++ morons are STILL trying to add a 2D graphics library -- which would have been fine 20 years ago -- but everyone is either using Direct3D, OpenGL, Vulkan, or some other proprietary piece-of-shit 3D library. We don't need Yet-Another-Graphics library.

Title: A Proposal to Add 2D Graphics Rendering and Display to C++
Date: 2018-02-1
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/s...

**facepalm**

There is no _standardized_ name-mangling -- something that would help solve _today's_ real problems.

Gee, when are packages coming to C++? You know, something Pascal had 30 years ago???

I could go on but that's enough.

Java is an even crappier language. I wrote some CRC32 in version 7 2 years ago -- it was one of the worst programming experiences I've ever had.

* It took _eight_ revisions to add support for a native unsigned type???
* Any language that _forces_ only one class per file is brain dead
* The compiler was brain dead -- it was unable to cast an int to a boolean and short-circuit an IF clause
* Let me know when there is a way to make the GC _100% deterministic_ AND give it a _hard_ millisecond deadline, or even disable the dam thing. Ignoring memory management doesn't magically make it go away.
* The extra/long/verbose/path/to/my/source is crap,
* The gradle/maven build system sucks
* Verbose languages, like Java and COBOL, suck.

There is a reason the stereotypical Java-weenie exists.

.

Plus, The Onion literally makes the news up. The British equivalents would be The Daily Mash and News Thump.

Private Eye is an excellent weekly magazine. I think it's funny because if it weren't, then you'd be crying when reading some of the corruption and hypocrisy they uncover.

It's editor, Ian Hislop is also pretty damn funny, not only on TV shows (Have I got news for you), but also in enquiries:
https://youtu.be/qgTQbmEmaXk

First of all, Obama's campaign used Facebook data LEGALLY and with EXPLICIT APPROVAL of Facebook users.
And they were so nice, they asked for it twice.

From TFA which you haven't read, cause you can only just copy/paste what other people feed you, sad creature that you are:

They started with a list that grew to a million people who had signed into the campaign Web site through Facebook.
When people opted to do so, they were met with a prompt asking to grant the campaign permission to scan their Facebook friends lists, their photos and other personal information.
In another prompt, the campaign asked for access to the usersâ(TM) Facebook news feeds, which 25 percent declined, St. Clair said.

Once permission was granted, the campaign had access to millions of names and faces they could match against their lists of persuadable voters, potential donors, unregistered voters and so on.
"It would take us 5 to 10 seconds to get a friends list and match it against the voter list," St. Clair said. They found matches about 50 percent of the time, he said.

I.e. Obama campaign explicitly asked for permission, openly stating what the data will be used for - then took only names and photos and matched that data to existing voter lists.

But the campaignâ(TM)s ultimate goal was to deputize the closest Obama-supporting friends of voters who were wavering in their affections for the president.

Did you get that numbnuts?
They were looking for known Obama voters who may have for any reason decided not to vote in 2012.
It was a RE-ELECTION campaign! Get it?! They were digging through data the voters already gave them back in 2008!
They were digging through public records looking for who's missing this time around!

Let's compare that to Cambridge Analytica scum...

When the Psychometrics Centre declined to work with the firm, Mr. Wylie found someone who would: Dr. Kogan, who was then a psychology professor at the university and knew of the techniques.
Dr. Kogan built his own app and in June 2014 began harvesting data for Cambridge Analytica.
The business covered the costs â" more than $800,000 â" and allowed him to keep a copy for his own research, according to company emails and financial records.

All he divulged to Facebook, and to users in fine print, was that he was collecting information for academic purposes, the social network said. It did not verify his claim.
Dr. Kogan declined to provide details of what happened, citing nondisclosure agreements with Facebook and Cambridge Analytica, though he maintained that his program was âoea very standard vanilla Facebook app.â

He ultimately provided over 50 million raw profiles to the firm, Mr. Wylie said, a number confirmed by a company email and a former colleague.
Of those, roughly 30 million â" a number previously reported by The Intercept â" contained enough information, including places of residence, that the company could match users to other records and build psychographic profiles.
Only about 270,000 users â" those who participated in the survey â" had consented to having their data harvested.

I.e. Data was gathered without permission.
Data was gathered under false pretenses.
Data was far more extensive than just names and photos.
There was no prior relationship between the people whose data was mined and built into psychographic profiles - and the campaign.
These weren't old Trump voters - Cambridge Analytica was pushing scare ads to DISSUADE voters from voting.
I.e. VOTER SUPPRESSION!

Were any laws broken? If it's illegal to hire non-citizens to do campaign research, how does the Hillary campaign paying Christopher Steele get a pass?

Here, let the lawyer advising Cambridge Anal

First of all, Obama's campaign used Facebook data LEGALLY and with EXPLICIT APPROVAL of Facebook users.
And they were so nice, they asked for it twice.

From TFA which you haven't read, cause you can only just copy/paste what other people feed you, sad creature that you are:

They started with a list that grew to a million people who had signed into the campaign Web site through Facebook.
When people opted to do so, they were met with a prompt asking to grant the campaign permission to scan their Facebook friends lists, their photos and other personal information.
In another prompt, the campaign asked for access to the usersâ(TM) Facebook news feeds, which 25 percent declined, St. Clair said.

Once permission was granted, the campaign had access to millions of names and faces they could match against their lists of persuadable voters, potential donors, unregistered voters and so on.
"It would take us 5 to 10 seconds to get a friends list and match it against the voter list," St. Clair said. They found matches about 50 percent of the time, he said.

I.e. Obama campaign explicitly asked for permission, openly stating what the data will be used for - then took only names and photos and matched that data to existing voter lists.

But the campaignâ(TM)s ultimate goal was to deputize the closest Obama-supporting friends of voters who were wavering in their affections for the president.

Did you get that numbnuts?
They were looking for known Obama voters who may have for any reason decided not to vote in 2012.
It was a RE-ELECTION campaign! Get it?! They were digging through data the voters already gave them back in 2008!
They were digging through public records looking for who's missing this time around!

Let's compare that to Cambridge Analytica scum...

When the Psychometrics Centre declined to work with the firm, Mr. Wylie found someone who would: Dr. Kogan, who was then a psychology professor at the university and knew of the techniques.
Dr. Kogan built his own app and in June 2014 began harvesting data for Cambridge Analytica.
The business covered the costs â" more than $800,000 â" and allowed him to keep a copy for his own research, according to company emails and financial records.

All he divulged to Facebook, and to users in fine print, was that he was collecting information for academic purposes, the social network said. It did not verify his claim.
Dr. Kogan declined to provide details of what happened, citing nondisclosure agreements with Facebook and Cambridge Analytica, though he maintained that his program was âoea very standard vanilla Facebook app.â

He ultimately provided over 50 million raw profiles to the firm, Mr. Wylie said, a number confirmed by a company email and a former colleague.
Of those, roughly 30 million â" a number previously reported by The Intercept â" contained enough information, including places of residence, that the company could match users to other records and build psychographic profiles.
Only about 270,000 users â" those who participated in the survey â" had consented to having their data harvested.

I.e. Data was gathered without permission.
Data was gathered under false pretenses.
Data was far more extensive than just names and photos.
There was no prior relationship between the people whose data was mined and built into psychographic profiles - and the campaign.
These weren't old Trump voters - Cambridge Analytica was pushing scare ads to DISSUADE voters from voting.
I.e. VOTER SUPPRESSION!

Were any laws broken? If it's illegal to hire non-citizens to do campaign research, how does the Hillary campaign paying Christopher Steele get a pass?

Here, let the lawyer advising Cambridge Anal

Thank you for stealing my joke. :)

I can't wait to get a delicate, sensitive robotic probe up my backside. I imagine it'll go something like this .....

Please pull down your pants and bend over. You have twenty seconds to comply

Looks clean shaven, possibly mute though.
Security footage here

I was also offline when you posted your message, so I'm going to save it and read it offline.

p.s. Obligatory Parks and Rec: I typed your symptoms into the thing up here, and it says you could have ...

When I played GTA V, it took a lot less than 2 months for me to start acting like my hero, Trevor Philips. I don't know what it was about that guy, but I found him a rather touching tragicomic character.

The scene after he gives Patricia Madrazo back to her Mexican gangster husband after kidnapping her and he's driving away from the exchange and "If You Leave Me Now" by Chicago starts playing in the car had me laughing and crying at the same time. Except for the credits sequence in Saints Row IV, I don't think anything in a video game has ever affected me so profoundly.

https://youtu.be/bPADGxsf8a8

It's their favourite tactic. Try to paint you as some kind of monster.

I really recommend this series of videos:

https://youtu.be/4xGawJIseNY
https://youtu.be/CaPgDQkmqqM
https://youtu.be/wmVkJvieaOA

TL;DR ignore them, make your compelling case. Don't apologise or try to defend against their accusations, because it's a losing proposition. I actually screwed up by doing that in my post above, although at least I didn't engage too much with their nonsense directly.

It's their favourite tactic. Try to paint you as some kind of monster.

I really recommend this series of videos:

https://youtu.be/4xGawJIseNY
https://youtu.be/CaPgDQkmqqM
https://youtu.be/wmVkJvieaOA

TL;DR ignore them, make your compelling case. Don't apologise or try to defend against their accusations, because it's a losing proposition. I actually screwed up by doing that in my post above, although at least I didn't engage too much with their nonsense directly.

It's their favourite tactic. Try to paint you as some kind of monster.

I really recommend this series of videos:

https://youtu.be/4xGawJIseNY
https://youtu.be/CaPgDQkmqqM
https://youtu.be/wmVkJvieaOA

TL;DR ignore them, make your compelling case. Don't apologise or try to defend against their accusations, because it's a losing proposition. I actually screwed up by doing that in my post above, although at least I didn't engage too much with their nonsense directly.

As to "alt right"... ban the communists as well and I'm on board.

But they are not equivalent. Communists don't want to create an ethnically pure state, don't want to murder people, don't think that some people are inherently superior to others. You could argue that Stalinists or Maoists do see murder as a legitimate tool perhaps, but it's not something communist ideology is generally associated with.

But yeah, if they say "Hitler/Stalin/Mao did nothing wrong" then okay.

Things that were acceptable 50 years ago are not now and things that weren't then are now.

Is that a bad thing though? I mean, do we really want Cartoon Network showing those old quite unbelievably racist cartoons from the 1930s? Or those films where a guy in blackface tries to rape a white woman and gets lynched by the "heroes"?

That material still exists, in fact some of it is on YouTube as part of videos discussing it (can't post the whole thing due to copyright I guess). It's not censored, but equally when kids search for Disney clips it's not promoted either.

Have a look about 16 minutes into this, for example: https://youtu.be/_-P9_oUV9Gw

Sound reasonable for your internet censorship concept?

I have no such concept.

I guess you are talking about Nitrogen Triiodide.

https://youtu.be/Atr8iFcc0qQ

https://youtu.be/KtiTm2dKLgU

Which returns to the facts that the superchargers are only available along narrow corridors,

Huh? Where are you getting that? There's only a couple places in the world where I'd describe Superchargers as forming a narrow "corridor" rather than a dense grid - Trondheim to Tromso (but there's nothing really to go to to the east of that route, and to the west is the ocean); Beijing to Harbin; maybe the route from Vancouver to Edmonton (although it has some branching); the Australian coast (but that's where people live); etc. But in general it's highly branched / meshlike, with a typical spacing in the countryside of 50-150km, which is way less than the ranges of the vehicles.

Model X isn't towing the kind of loads that pickups are capable of these days either

What
world
are
you
living
in?

https://youtu.be/KtiTm2dKLgU Seems there was a construction flaw , sounds likely!

radical left-wing puppet.

No Puppet. No Puppet. You’re the Puppet!

https://youtu.be/UaVWRetR4jg

"Sit perfectly still. Only *I* may dance"

I am shocked... https://youtu.be/NUV54XBidzU

It's not flied lice. It's fried rice, you plick!!!

How would this be a conspiracy? He is investigating facts. We know that Russia sought to influence our elections and we can be quite sure that Russia doesn't respect US campaign laws.

Your not-facts are the conspiracy theory. Again: none of Mueller's indictments have anything to do with Russian hacking or colluding with Trump to do so. This is nothing more than an excuse from partisan Democrats to explain their loss to the 2nd worst candidate in history, and so they don't have to change their corrupt corporatist money whore ways (that led to Trump in the first place).

We know that Russia sought to influence our elections

With Twitter trolls looking to suck people in with clickbait of all kinds and then make money from the add revenue, same as TMZ and countless other sites? And step back and look at this whole storyline for two seconds: why would Russia try to tip the election one way or the other when both parties have been extremely hostile to Russia for over a century. Nancy Cordes (who is unlikely to ever be invited on TV any time soon) asked John Podesta how Russia was able to swing an election with a few thousand dollars by focusing on purple states while the $1.2 BILLION Clinton campaign did not.

Many companies (i.e Facebook, Twitter) have publicly disclosed Russion interference activities.

Ever hear the expression "hiring you was like losing three good men"? That's what your "activities" do to the Russiagate theory. The first time people lost their damn minds over $5000 in Facebook ads (in a race where Trump got $6 BILLION in free media coverage), it turned out that many of them came after the election and were ads for puppies, Obama memorabilia or a documentary critical of Trump's golf course in Scotland.

Worst. CT. Ever.

Rare footage of Chris before his IT career.

I don't think they'll play nice with the drone taxis.

Also, don't forget to participate in Team Creimer YouTube poll about being in favor of a 2 to 3 weeks government shutdown so help desk can install patches and vote yes.
--
Team Creimer for a 3 weeks government shutdown.
$700 For A Vacuum Cleaner -- Are You #%@$ Nuts?!

Also, don't forget to participate in Team Creimer YouTube poll about being in favor of a 2 to 3 weeks government shutdown so help desk can install patches and vote yes.
--
Team Creimer for a 3 weeks government shutdown.
$700 For A Vacuum Cleaner -- Are You #%@$ Nuts?!

Also, I have updated my sig yet one more time! I am now selling vacuum cleaners, going door to door while picking up second-hand lottery tickets at the same time!

Now, talk about efficiency! We will see who gets the last laugh when I collect all those royalties.
--
$700 For A Vacuum Cleaner -- Are You #%@$ Nuts?!

If you are not happy about it, complain to management by clicking on "Flag as inappropriate". There is no point in bitching in the comments.

The other day, I got a comment about "making fascism great a..." removed from the main thread so there you go!

Proof? See comment here and try to go to the main thread, it isn't in the main thread anymore. Slashdot management removed it!
https://slashdot.org/comments....

That happened to me several times but there is no way Slashdot is going to block me since I threatened to sue them to violate my constitutional rights and discrimination.
--
$700 For A Vacuum Cleaner -- Are You #%@$ Nuts?!

If you are not happy about it, complain to management by clicking on "Flag as inappropriate". There is no point in bitching in the comments.

The other day, I got a comment about "making fascism great a..." removed from the main thread so there you go!

Proof? See comment here and try to go to the main thread, it isn't in the main thread anymore. Slashdot management removed it!
https://slashdot.org/comments....

That happened to me several times but there is no way Slashdot is going to block me since I threatened to sue them to violate my constitutional rights and discrimination.
--
$700 For A Vacuum Cleaner -- Are You #%@$ Nuts?!

If you are not happy about it, just complain to management by clicking on "Flag as inappropriate". There is no point in bitching in the comments.

The other day, I got a comment about "making fascism great a..." removed from the main thread so there you go!

Proof? See comment here and try to go to the main thread, it isn't in the main thread anymore. Slashdot management removed it!
https://slashdot.org/comments....

That happened to me several times but there is no way Slashdot is going to block me since I threatened to sue them to violate my constitutional rights and discrimination.
--
$700 For A Vacuum Cleaner -- Are You #%@$ Nuts?!

If you are not happy about it, complain to management by clicking on "Flag as inappropriate". There is no point in bitching in the comments.

The other day, I got a comment about "making fascism great a..." removed from the main thread so there you go!

Proof? See comment here and try to go to the main thread, it isn't in the main thread anymore. Slashdot management removed it!
https://slashdot.org/comments....

That happened to me several times but there is no way Slashdot is going to block me since I threatened to sue them to violate my constitutional rights and discrimination.
--
$700 For A Vacuum Cleaner -- Are You #%@$ Nuts?!