Slashdot Mirror

How they make Raspberry Pi in the UK: Video from 2013

G_N_A_A (G.A.Y NIG.GER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) is the first organization which
gathers G.A.Y NIG.GERS from all over America and abroad for one common goal - being G.A.Y NIG.GERS.

Are you G.A.Y ?
Are you a NIG.GER ?
Are you a G.A.Y NIG.GER ?

If you answered "Yes" to any of the above questions, then G_N_A_A (G.A.Y NIG.GER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) might be exactly what you've been looking for!
Join G_N_A_A (G.A.Y NIG.GER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) today, and enjoy all the benefits of being a full-time G_N_A_A member.
G_N_A_A (G.A.Y NIG.GER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) is the fastest-growing G.A.Y NIG.GER community with THOUSANDS of members all over United States of America. You, too, can be a part of G_N_A_A if you join today!

Why not? It's quick and easy - only 3 simple steps!

First, you have to obtain a copy of G.A.Y NIG.GERS FROM OUTER SPACE THE MOVIE and watch it.

You can watch G.A.Y NIG.GERS FROM OUTER SPACE on Youtube.

Second, you need to succeed in posting a G_N_A_A "first post" on slashdot.org , a popular "news for trolls" website

Third, you need to join the official G_N_A_A irc channel #G_N_A_A on EFNet, and apply for membership.
Talk to one of the ops or any of the other members in the channel to sign up today!

If you are having trouble locating #G_N_A_A, the official G.A.Y NIG.GER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA irc channel, you might be on a wrong irc network. The correct network is EFNet, and you can connect to irc.secsup.org or irc.easynews.com as one of the EFNet servers.
If you do not have an IRC client handy, you are free to use the G_N_A_A Java IRC client by clicking here.

If you have mod points and would like to support G_N_A_A, please moderate this post up.

This post brought to you by Penisbird , a proud member of the G_N_A_A

G_____________________________________naann_______ ________G
N_____________________________nnnaa__nanaaa_______ ________A
A____________________aanana__nannaa_nna_an________ ________Y
A_____________annna_nnnnnan_aan_aa__na__aa________ ________*
G____________nnaana_nnn__nn_aa__nn__na_anaann_MERI CA______N
N___________ana__nn_an___an_aa_anaaannnanaa_______ ________I
A___________aa__ana_nn___nn_nnnnaa___ana__________ ________G
A__________nna__an__na___nn__nnn___SSOCIATION_of__ ________G
G__________ana_naa__an___nnn______________________ ________E
N__________ananan___nn___aan_IGGER________________ ________R
A__________nnna____naa____________________________ ________S
A________nnaa_____anan____________________________ ________*
G________anaannana________________________________ ________A
N________ananaannn_AY_____________________________ ________S
A________ana____nn_________IRC-EFNET-#G_N_A_A________ ________S
A_______nn_____na_________________________________ ________O
*_______aaaan_____________________________________ ________C
Gary Niger gary_niger@G_N_A_A.us G_N_A_A Corporate Headquarters 143 Rolloffle Avenue Tarzana, California 91356
Enid Al-Punjabi enid_al_punjabi@G_N_A_A.us G_N_A_A World Headquarters No.33 Kyutei Bld. 2F, Shinjuku 2-11-7, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan ????????2??11-6
Copyright (c) 2003-

Make your own EpiPen clone, the EpiPencil.

Sounds familiar. :D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

The 2015 documentary "Under the Dome" was produced by a CCTV presenter whose unborn baby developed a tumor in the womb. She tries to find out why there is so much pollution in China, and why nothing is being done about it. The Communist Party's publicity department banned the film three days after release, which should tell you it's something you need to see. (Like how the Democratic National Committee told everyone not to read the leaked emails). When powerful people tell you to do something, you do the opposite. Under the Dome is available on Youtube, which is of course blocked in China. Worth a watch. No relation to the CBS TV series.

How's it exciting? What a dumb question.

Tower sucky sucky. Tower love you long time.

Any air pollution, from cigarettes to coal-fired power plants, shortens lives. Here's a video of Dr. C. Arden Pope telling the story of how we found out that there is a linear relationship to pollution and health impacts: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Fine, I'll bite here and here. If you need a larger pool of examples you can find them here.

Fine, I'll bite here and here. If you need a larger pool of examples you can find them here.

Apparently he was streaming when he was arrested (police arrives at 7:00): https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

I don't buy Apple shit because of their choices that would cost me more than comparable products that are just as good if not better.

Oh, you mean like that SLOW-ASS Galaxy Note 7 "Fireball Edition" (which feature they have apparently kept on the "non-fireball" version), that > costs as much or more as an equivalent-storage Unlocked iPhone 7?

Yeah, good choice!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

More phone makers should make super-resistant phones like the Moto X Force.

Password Cracking - Computerphile

In fact is indestructible https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Second, many of the things you have written are pants-on-fire false, and now when presented with direct evidence that contradicts your statements, you chose to ignore the evidence, and double down on your fact-free views. So, if you don't want you ignorance pointed out in public, don't put it on display.

You have provided no evidence, You have only asserted your own opinion, that of a fanatical eco-loon. It is I who provided the archeological treatise - but you are so fanatical that deny it. You will cling to ANYTHING just so you can deny the satellite observations that show the IPPC's computer simulations are WRONG - even though they adjust the effect downward with every revision (not that someone with a goldfish-memory like you has noticed their sleight-of-hand that they don't bring to your attention).

How come you know so little about glaciers? the greatest rate of glacier loss at most sites around the World was in the late 19th century. Go and look at the photographs some time instead of repeating the hysterical propaganda of eco-loons with their anti-scientific agenda.

You still have not explained how the viking graves in Greenland are now under permafrost when it must have been warmer there in the past. Instead of accepting that the narrative of CAGW has been falsified by paleoarcheology and satellite observations (which show the warming rates predicted by the CAGW hypothesis is falsified with observational data) you cling to the failed computer models - and you are so scientifically illiterate that you don't understand that computer models are 'hypothesis' and not 'empirical data'. The real empirical data shows the computer simulations are WRONG - because the modellers don't understand Bode's model of feedbacks (as well as some other fundamental flaws).

Frankly, I wonder how you think you are applying the scientific method here.

I have a PhD in Physics. What do you have? you can wonder all you want, but these guys with a NOBEL PRIZE in Physics, the world's greatest aviation engineer, and a physicist who literally wrote the (graduate) textbook on atmospheric physics all think you are very, very WRONG:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Now perhaps I'm being too harsh on you. Perhaps you intend to not be a fanatical eco-loon. In that case, you MUST use the Scientific Method and seek and understand all the evidence and arguments that climate realists put out (and I've given you some videos to start with). You must hear their arguments from their own mouths and not the disinformation and distortions put out by the anti-scientific eco-loons.

The fanatics are not the climate realists, but the climate alarmists who cling to CAGW which was plausible in the 1990s but is falsified by the observed rate of mostly (but not entirely) ***NATURAL*** warming shown in satellite observations today. If you want to understand the intend of the fanatical collectivists who are trying to use concern about the environment as a way to gain money from and control over the global then you should read their words from their own mouths:
http://green-agenda.com/

Second, many of the things you have written are pants-on-fire false, and now when presented with direct evidence that contradicts your statements, you chose to ignore the evidence, and double down on your fact-free views. So, if you don't want you ignorance pointed out in public, don't put it on display.

You have provided no evidence, You have only asserted your own opinion, that of a fanatical eco-loon. It is I who provided the archeological treatise - but you are so fanatical that deny it. You will cling to ANYTHING just so you can deny the satellite observations that show the IPPC's computer simulations are WRONG - even though they adjust the effect downward with every revision (not that someone with a goldfish-memory like you has noticed their sleight-of-hand that they don't bring to your attention).

How come you know so little about glaciers? the greatest rate of glacier loss at most sites around the World was in the late 19th century. Go and look at the photographs some time instead of repeating the hysterical propaganda of eco-loons with their anti-scientific agenda.

You still have not explained how the viking graves in Greenland are now under permafrost when it must have been warmer there in the past. Instead of accepting that the narrative of CAGW has been falsified by paleoarcheology and satellite observations (which show the warming rates predicted by the CAGW hypothesis is falsified with observational data) you cling to the failed computer models - and you are so scientifically illiterate that you don't understand that computer models are 'hypothesis' and not 'empirical data'. The real empirical data shows the computer simulations are WRONG - because the modellers don't understand Bode's model of feedbacks (as well as some other fundamental flaws).

Frankly, I wonder how you think you are applying the scientific method here.

I have a PhD in Physics. What do you have? you can wonder all you want, but these guys with a NOBEL PRIZE in Physics, the world's greatest aviation engineer, and a physicist who literally wrote the (graduate) textbook on atmospheric physics all think you are very, very WRONG:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Now perhaps I'm being too harsh on you. Perhaps you intend to not be a fanatical eco-loon. In that case, you MUST use the Scientific Method and seek and understand all the evidence and arguments that climate realists put out (and I've given you some videos to start with). You must hear their arguments from their own mouths and not the disinformation and distortions put out by the anti-scientific eco-loons.

The fanatics are not the climate realists, but the climate alarmists who cling to CAGW which was plausible in the 1990s but is falsified by the observed rate of mostly (but not entirely) ***NATURAL*** warming shown in satellite observations today. If you want to understand the intend of the fanatical collectivists who are trying to use concern about the environment as a way to gain money from and control over the global then you should read their words from their own mouths:
http://green-agenda.com/

Second, many of the things you have written are pants-on-fire false, and now when presented with direct evidence that contradicts your statements, you chose to ignore the evidence, and double down on your fact-free views. So, if you don't want you ignorance pointed out in public, don't put it on display.

You have provided no evidence, You have only asserted your own opinion, that of a fanatical eco-loon. It is I who provided the archeological treatise - but you are so fanatical that deny it. You will cling to ANYTHING just so you can deny the satellite observations that show the IPPC's computer simulations are WRONG - even though they adjust the effect downward with every revision (not that someone with a goldfish-memory like you has noticed their sleight-of-hand that they don't bring to your attention).

How come you know so little about glaciers? the greatest rate of glacier loss at most sites around the World was in the late 19th century. Go and look at the photographs some time instead of repeating the hysterical propaganda of eco-loons with their anti-scientific agenda.

You still have not explained how the viking graves in Greenland are now under permafrost when it must have been warmer there in the past. Instead of accepting that the narrative of CAGW has been falsified by paleoarcheology and satellite observations (which show the warming rates predicted by the CAGW hypothesis is falsified with observational data) you cling to the failed computer models - and you are so scientifically illiterate that you don't understand that computer models are 'hypothesis' and not 'empirical data'. The real empirical data shows the computer simulations are WRONG - because the modellers don't understand Bode's model of feedbacks (as well as some other fundamental flaws).

Frankly, I wonder how you think you are applying the scientific method here.

I have a PhD in Physics. What do you have? you can wonder all you want, but these guys with a NOBEL PRIZE in Physics, the world's greatest aviation engineer, and a physicist who literally wrote the (graduate) textbook on atmospheric physics all think you are very, very WRONG:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Now perhaps I'm being too harsh on you. Perhaps you intend to not be a fanatical eco-loon. In that case, you MUST use the Scientific Method and seek and understand all the evidence and arguments that climate realists put out (and I've given you some videos to start with). You must hear their arguments from their own mouths and not the disinformation and distortions put out by the anti-scientific eco-loons.

The fanatics are not the climate realists, but the climate alarmists who cling to CAGW which was plausible in the 1990s but is falsified by the observed rate of mostly (but not entirely) ***NATURAL*** warming shown in satellite observations today. If you want to understand the intend of the fanatical collectivists who are trying to use concern about the environment as a way to gain money from and control over the global then you should read their words from their own mouths:
http://green-agenda.com/

Second, many of the things you have written are pants-on-fire false, and now when presented with direct evidence that contradicts your statements, you chose to ignore the evidence, and double down on your fact-free views. So, if you don't want you ignorance pointed out in public, don't put it on display.

You have provided no evidence, You have only asserted your own opinion, that of a fanatical eco-loon. It is I who provided the archeological treatise - but you are so fanatical that deny it. You will cling to ANYTHING just so you can deny the satellite observations that show the IPPC's computer simulations are WRONG - even though they adjust the effect downward with every revision (not that someone with a goldfish-memory like you has noticed their sleight-of-hand that they don't bring to your attention).

How come you know so little about glaciers? the greatest rate of glacier loss at most sites around the World was in the late 19th century. Go and look at the photographs some time instead of repeating the hysterical propaganda of eco-loons with their anti-scientific agenda.

You still have not explained how the viking graves in Greenland are now under permafrost when it must have been warmer there in the past. Instead of accepting that the narrative of CAGW has been falsified by paleoarcheology and satellite observations (which show the warming rates predicted by the CAGW hypothesis is falsified with observational data) you cling to the failed computer models - and you are so scientifically illiterate that you don't understand that computer models are 'hypothesis' and not 'empirical data'. The real empirical data shows the computer simulations are WRONG - because the modellers don't understand Bode's model of feedbacks (as well as some other fundamental flaws).

Frankly, I wonder how you think you are applying the scientific method here.

I have a PhD in Physics. What do you have? you can wonder all you want, but these guys with a NOBEL PRIZE in Physics, the world's greatest aviation engineer, and a physicist who literally wrote the (graduate) textbook on atmospheric physics all think you are very, very WRONG:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Now perhaps I'm being too harsh on you. Perhaps you intend to not be a fanatical eco-loon. In that case, you MUST use the Scientific Method and seek and understand all the evidence and arguments that climate realists put out (and I've given you some videos to start with). You must hear their arguments from their own mouths and not the disinformation and distortions put out by the anti-scientific eco-loons.

The fanatics are not the climate realists, but the climate alarmists who cling to CAGW which was plausible in the 1990s but is falsified by the observed rate of mostly (but not entirely) ***NATURAL*** warming shown in satellite observations today. If you want to understand the intend of the fanatical collectivists who are trying to use concern about the environment as a way to gain money from and control over the global then you should read their words from their own mouths:
http://green-agenda.com/

Second, many of the things you have written are pants-on-fire false, and now when presented with direct evidence that contradicts your statements, you chose to ignore the evidence, and double down on your fact-free views. So, if you don't want you ignorance pointed out in public, don't put it on display.

You have provided no evidence, You have only asserted your own opinion, that of a fanatical eco-loon. It is I who provided the archeological treatise - but you are so fanatical that deny it. You will cling to ANYTHING just so you can deny the satellite observations that show the IPPC's computer simulations are WRONG - even though they adjust the effect downward with every revision (not that someone with a goldfish-memory like you has noticed their sleight-of-hand that they don't bring to your attention).

How come you know so little about glaciers? the greatest rate of glacier loss at most sites around the World was in the late 19th century. Go and look at the photographs some time instead of repeating the hysterical propaganda of eco-loons with their anti-scientific agenda.

You still have not explained how the viking graves in Greenland are now under permafrost when it must have been warmer there in the past. Instead of accepting that the narrative of CAGW has been falsified by paleoarcheology and satellite observations (which show the warming rates predicted by the CAGW hypothesis is falsified with observational data) you cling to the failed computer models - and you are so scientifically illiterate that you don't understand that computer models are 'hypothesis' and not 'empirical data'. The real empirical data shows the computer simulations are WRONG - because the modellers don't understand Bode's model of feedbacks (as well as some other fundamental flaws).

Frankly, I wonder how you think you are applying the scientific method here.

I have a PhD in Physics. What do you have? you can wonder all you want, but these guys with a NOBEL PRIZE in Physics, the world's greatest aviation engineer, and a physicist who literally wrote the (graduate) textbook on atmospheric physics all think you are very, very WRONG:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Now perhaps I'm being too harsh on you. Perhaps you intend to not be a fanatical eco-loon. In that case, you MUST use the Scientific Method and seek and understand all the evidence and arguments that climate realists put out (and I've given you some videos to start with). You must hear their arguments from their own mouths and not the disinformation and distortions put out by the anti-scientific eco-loons.

The fanatics are not the climate realists, but the climate alarmists who cling to CAGW which was plausible in the 1990s but is falsified by the observed rate of mostly (but not entirely) ***NATURAL*** warming shown in satellite observations today. If you want to understand the intend of the fanatical collectivists who are trying to use concern about the environment as a way to gain money from and control over the global then you should read their words from their own mouths:
http://green-agenda.com/

That's not how it works. What you need to do is provide better data that negates the stalactite record around the globe that match the Greenland record. The computer models predicted heating in the lower tropical troposphere. This has NOT been observed and the 'predictions' you claim match the observations are always hindcasts and the forecasts are never right.

Because you have the memory of a goldfish you have not noticed that every successive IPCC report has to downgrade their estimate of the TCS and ECS. Do you know what the TCS is ? if we eliminate natural warming such as El Nino effects do you know what the TCS is then?

This guy has a Nobel Prize in Physics and thinks you are an anti-scientific muppet:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

The great Freeman Dyson also thinks you are hysterically anti-scientific:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

The greatest aviation (and aviation-space hybrid) engineer on the planet is Burt Rutan, and he applied engineering analysis and points out how the data shows your position is plain WRONG:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Here is Professor Murray Salby who literally wrote the (graduate) textbook on Atmospheric Physics who also proves your position is WRONG:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Salby has given several lectures, I've chosen the one with the least math so that you might have a chance of following the very basics of the subject.

Michael Mann, James Hansen and Gavin Schmitt are all WRONG - and they refuse to use the Scientific Method and accept their hypothesis has been falsified.

So, I have a PhD in Physics, and have supplied video lectures by a NOBEL PRIZE WINNER IN PHYSICS as well as graduate-level atmospheric physics textbook writers and you want to regurgitate the empirically debunked nonsense by eco-loons like *****psychologist***** John Cook ?

What is your qualification in Physics ? with your arrogance you must be able to trump a Nobel Prize, right?

You are being fed disinformation. I and simply telling you the truth about the rich globalists (who promote fear of various climate catastrophes so they can siphon taxpayer money from the poor) and their political allies are lying to you - and many scientists go along because they get $29 BILLION in funding to go along with this scam.

Stop being a douche and an ignoramus who demonstrates the Dunning-Kruger Effect perfectly..

That's not how it works. What you need to do is provide better data that negates the stalactite record around the globe that match the Greenland record. The computer models predicted heating in the lower tropical troposphere. This has NOT been observed and the 'predictions' you claim match the observations are always hindcasts and the forecasts are never right.

Because you have the memory of a goldfish you have not noticed that every successive IPCC report has to downgrade their estimate of the TCS and ECS. Do you know what the TCS is ? if we eliminate natural warming such as El Nino effects do you know what the TCS is then?

This guy has a Nobel Prize in Physics and thinks you are an anti-scientific muppet:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

The great Freeman Dyson also thinks you are hysterically anti-scientific:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

The greatest aviation (and aviation-space hybrid) engineer on the planet is Burt Rutan, and he applied engineering analysis and points out how the data shows your position is plain WRONG:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Here is Professor Murray Salby who literally wrote the (graduate) textbook on Atmospheric Physics who also proves your position is WRONG:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Salby has given several lectures, I've chosen the one with the least math so that you might have a chance of following the very basics of the subject.

Michael Mann, James Hansen and Gavin Schmitt are all WRONG - and they refuse to use the Scientific Method and accept their hypothesis has been falsified.

So, I have a PhD in Physics, and have supplied video lectures by a NOBEL PRIZE WINNER IN PHYSICS as well as graduate-level atmospheric physics textbook writers and you want to regurgitate the empirically debunked nonsense by eco-loons like *****psychologist***** John Cook ?

What is your qualification in Physics ? with your arrogance you must be able to trump a Nobel Prize, right?

You are being fed disinformation. I and simply telling you the truth about the rich globalists (who promote fear of various climate catastrophes so they can siphon taxpayer money from the poor) and their political allies are lying to you - and many scientists go along because they get $29 BILLION in funding to go along with this scam.

Stop being a douche and an ignoramus who demonstrates the Dunning-Kruger Effect perfectly..

That's not how it works. What you need to do is provide better data that negates the stalactite record around the globe that match the Greenland record. The computer models predicted heating in the lower tropical troposphere. This has NOT been observed and the 'predictions' you claim match the observations are always hindcasts and the forecasts are never right.

Because you have the memory of a goldfish you have not noticed that every successive IPCC report has to downgrade their estimate of the TCS and ECS. Do you know what the TCS is ? if we eliminate natural warming such as El Nino effects do you know what the TCS is then?

This guy has a Nobel Prize in Physics and thinks you are an anti-scientific muppet:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

The great Freeman Dyson also thinks you are hysterically anti-scientific:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

The greatest aviation (and aviation-space hybrid) engineer on the planet is Burt Rutan, and he applied engineering analysis and points out how the data shows your position is plain WRONG:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Here is Professor Murray Salby who literally wrote the (graduate) textbook on Atmospheric Physics who also proves your position is WRONG:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Salby has given several lectures, I've chosen the one with the least math so that you might have a chance of following the very basics of the subject.

Michael Mann, James Hansen and Gavin Schmitt are all WRONG - and they refuse to use the Scientific Method and accept their hypothesis has been falsified.

So, I have a PhD in Physics, and have supplied video lectures by a NOBEL PRIZE WINNER IN PHYSICS as well as graduate-level atmospheric physics textbook writers and you want to regurgitate the empirically debunked nonsense by eco-loons like *****psychologist***** John Cook ?

What is your qualification in Physics ? with your arrogance you must be able to trump a Nobel Prize, right?

You are being fed disinformation. I and simply telling you the truth about the rich globalists (who promote fear of various climate catastrophes so they can siphon taxpayer money from the poor) and their political allies are lying to you - and many scientists go along because they get $29 BILLION in funding to go along with this scam.

Stop being a douche and an ignoramus who demonstrates the Dunning-Kruger Effect perfectly..

That's not how it works. What you need to do is provide better data that negates the stalactite record around the globe that match the Greenland record. The computer models predicted heating in the lower tropical troposphere. This has NOT been observed and the 'predictions' you claim match the observations are always hindcasts and the forecasts are never right.

Because you have the memory of a goldfish you have not noticed that every successive IPCC report has to downgrade their estimate of the TCS and ECS. Do you know what the TCS is ? if we eliminate natural warming such as El Nino effects do you know what the TCS is then?

This guy has a Nobel Prize in Physics and thinks you are an anti-scientific muppet:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

The great Freeman Dyson also thinks you are hysterically anti-scientific:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

The greatest aviation (and aviation-space hybrid) engineer on the planet is Burt Rutan, and he applied engineering analysis and points out how the data shows your position is plain WRONG:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Here is Professor Murray Salby who literally wrote the (graduate) textbook on Atmospheric Physics who also proves your position is WRONG:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Salby has given several lectures, I've chosen the one with the least math so that you might have a chance of following the very basics of the subject.

Michael Mann, James Hansen and Gavin Schmitt are all WRONG - and they refuse to use the Scientific Method and accept their hypothesis has been falsified.

So, I have a PhD in Physics, and have supplied video lectures by a NOBEL PRIZE WINNER IN PHYSICS as well as graduate-level atmospheric physics textbook writers and you want to regurgitate the empirically debunked nonsense by eco-loons like *****psychologist***** John Cook ?

What is your qualification in Physics ? with your arrogance you must be able to trump a Nobel Prize, right?

You are being fed disinformation. I and simply telling you the truth about the rich globalists (who promote fear of various climate catastrophes so they can siphon taxpayer money from the poor) and their political allies are lying to you - and many scientists go along because they get $29 BILLION in funding to go along with this scam.

Stop being a douche and an ignoramus who demonstrates the Dunning-Kruger Effect perfectly..

That's not how it works. What you need to do is provide better data that negates the stalactite record around the globe that match the Greenland record. The computer models predicted heating in the lower tropical troposphere. This has NOT been observed and the 'predictions' you claim match the observations are always hindcasts and the forecasts are never right.

Because you have the memory of a goldfish you have not noticed that every successive IPCC report has to downgrade their estimate of the TCS and ECS. Do you know what the TCS is ? if we eliminate natural warming such as El Nino effects do you know what the TCS is then?

This guy has a Nobel Prize in Physics and thinks you are an anti-scientific muppet:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

The great Freeman Dyson also thinks you are hysterically anti-scientific:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

The greatest aviation (and aviation-space hybrid) engineer on the planet is Burt Rutan, and he applied engineering analysis and points out how the data shows your position is plain WRONG:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Here is Professor Murray Salby who literally wrote the (graduate) textbook on Atmospheric Physics who also proves your position is WRONG:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Salby has given several lectures, I've chosen the one with the least math so that you might have a chance of following the very basics of the subject.

Michael Mann, James Hansen and Gavin Schmitt are all WRONG - and they refuse to use the Scientific Method and accept their hypothesis has been falsified.

So, I have a PhD in Physics, and have supplied video lectures by a NOBEL PRIZE WINNER IN PHYSICS as well as graduate-level atmospheric physics textbook writers and you want to regurgitate the empirically debunked nonsense by eco-loons like *****psychologist***** John Cook ?

What is your qualification in Physics ? with your arrogance you must be able to trump a Nobel Prize, right?

You are being fed disinformation. I and simply telling you the truth about the rich globalists (who promote fear of various climate catastrophes so they can siphon taxpayer money from the poor) and their political allies are lying to you - and many scientists go along because they get $29 BILLION in funding to go along with this scam.

Stop being a douche and an ignoramus who demonstrates the Dunning-Kruger Effect perfectly..

That's not how it works. What you need to do is provide better data that negates the stalactite record around the globe that match the Greenland record. The computer models predicted heating in the lower tropical troposphere. This has NOT been observed and the 'predictions' you claim match the observations are always hindcasts and the forecasts are never right.

Because you have the memory of a goldfish you have not noticed that every successive IPCC report has to downgrade their estimate of the TCS and ECS. Do you know what the TCS is ? if we eliminate natural warming such as El Nino effects do you know what the TCS is then?

This guy has a Nobel Prize in Physics and thinks you are an anti-scientific muppet:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

The great Freeman Dyson also thinks you are hysterically anti-scientific:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

The greatest aviation (and aviation-space hybrid) engineer on the planet is Burt Rutan, and he applied engineering analysis and points out how the data shows your position is plain WRONG:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Here is Professor Murray Salby who literally wrote the (graduate) textbook on Atmospheric Physics who also proves your position is WRONG:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Salby has given several lectures, I've chosen the one with the least math so that you might have a chance of following the very basics of the subject.

Michael Mann, James Hansen and Gavin Schmitt are all WRONG - and they refuse to use the Scientific Method and accept their hypothesis has been falsified.

That's not how it works. What you need to do is provide better data that negates the stalactite record around the globe that match the Greenland record. The computer models predicted heating in the lower tropical troposphere. This has NOT been observed and the 'predictions' you claim match the observations are always hindcasts and the forecasts are never right.

Because you have the memory of a goldfish you have not noticed that every successive IPCC report has to downgrade their estimate of the TCS and ECS. Do you know what the TCS is ? if we eliminate natural warming such as El Nino effects do you know what the TCS is then?

This guy has a Nobel Prize in Physics and thinks you are an anti-scientific muppet:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

The great Freeman Dyson also thinks you are hysterically anti-scientific:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

The greatest aviation (and aviation-space hybrid) engineer on the planet is Burt Rutan, and he applied engineering analysis and points out how the data shows your position is plain WRONG:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Here is Professor Murray Salby who literally wrote the (graduate) textbook on Atmospheric Physics who also proves your position is WRONG:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Salby has given several lectures, I've chosen the one with the least math so that you might have a chance of following the very basics of the subject.

Michael Mann, James Hansen and Gavin Schmitt are all WRONG - and they refuse to use the Scientific Method and accept their hypothesis has been falsified.

That's not how it works. What you need to do is provide better data that negates the stalactite record around the globe that match the Greenland record. The computer models predicted heating in the lower tropical troposphere. This has NOT been observed and the 'predictions' you claim match the observations are always hindcasts and the forecasts are never right.

Because you have the memory of a goldfish you have not noticed that every successive IPCC report has to downgrade their estimate of the TCS and ECS. Do you know what the TCS is ? if we eliminate natural warming such as El Nino effects do you know what the TCS is then?

This guy has a Nobel Prize in Physics and thinks you are an anti-scientific muppet:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

The great Freeman Dyson also thinks you are hysterically anti-scientific:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

The greatest aviation (and aviation-space hybrid) engineer on the planet is Burt Rutan, and he applied engineering analysis and points out how the data shows your position is plain WRONG:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Here is Professor Murray Salby who literally wrote the (graduate) textbook on Atmospheric Physics who also proves your position is WRONG:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Salby has given several lectures, I've chosen the one with the least math so that you might have a chance of following the very basics of the subject.

Michael Mann, James Hansen and Gavin Schmitt are all WRONG - and they refuse to use the Scientific Method and accept their hypothesis has been falsified.

That's not how it works. What you need to do is provide better data that negates the stalactite record around the globe that match the Greenland record. The computer models predicted heating in the lower tropical troposphere. This has NOT been observed and the 'predictions' you claim match the observations are always hindcasts and the forecasts are never right.

Because you have the memory of a goldfish you have not noticed that every successive IPCC report has to downgrade their estimate of the TCS and ECS. Do you know what the TCS is ? if we eliminate natural warming such as El Nino effects do you know what the TCS is then?

This guy has a Nobel Prize in Physics and thinks you are an anti-scientific muppet:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

The great Freeman Dyson also thinks you are hysterically anti-scientific:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

The greatest aviation (and aviation-space hybrid) engineer on the planet is Burt Rutan, and he applied engineering analysis and points out how the data shows your position is plain WRONG:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Here is Professor Murray Salby who literally wrote the (graduate) textbook on Atmospheric Physics who also proves your position is WRONG:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Salby has given several lectures, I've chosen the one with the least math so that you might have a chance of following the very basics of the subject.

Michael Mann, James Hansen and Gavin Schmitt are all WRONG - and they refuse to use the Scientific Method and accept their hypothesis has been falsified.

That's not how it works. What you need to do is provide better data that negates the stalactite record around the globe that match the Greenland record. The computer models predicted heating in the lower tropical troposphere. This has NOT been observed and the 'predictions' you claim match the observations are always hindcasts and the forecasts are never right.

Because you have the memory of a goldfish you have not noticed that every successive IPCC report has to downgrade their estimate of the TCS and ECS. Do you know what the TCS is ? if we eliminate natural warming such as El Nino effects do you know what the TCS is then?

This guy has a Nobel Prize in Physics and thinks you are an anti-scientific muppet:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

The great Freeman Dyson also thinks you are hysterically anti-scientific:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

The greatest aviation (and aviation-space hybrid) engineer on the planet is Burt Rutan, and he applied engineering analysis and points out how the data shows your position is plain WRONG:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Here is Professor Murray Salby who literally wrote the (graduate) textbook on Atmospheric Physics who also proves your position is WRONG:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Salby has given several lectures, I've chosen the one with the least math so that you might have a chance of following the very basics of the subject.

Michael Mann, James Hansen and Gavin Schmitt are all WRONG - and they refuse to use the Scientific Method and accept their hypothesis has been falsified.

Obligatory: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

And I'm just suppose to click on a link...

I wouldn't be so sure about that.

I wouldn't be so sure about that.

G_N_A_A (G.A.Y NIG.GER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) is the first organization which
gathers G.A.Y NIG.GERS from all over America and abroad for one common goal - being G.A.Y NIG.GERS.

Are you G.A.Y ?
Are you a NIG.GER ?
Are you a G.A.Y NIG.GER ?

If you answered "Yes" to any of the above questions, then G_N_A_A (G.A.Y NIG.GER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) might be exactly what you've been looking for!
Join G_N_A_A (G.A.Y NIG.GER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) today, and enjoy all the benefits of being a full-time G_N_A_A member.
G_N_A_A (G.A.Y NIG.GER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) is the fastest-growing G.A.Y NIG.GER community with THOUSANDS of members all over United States of America. You, too, can be a part of G_N_A_A if you join today!

Why not? It's quick and easy - only 3 simple steps!

First, you have to obtain a copy of G.A.Y NIG.GERS FROM OUTER SPACE THE MOVIE and watch it.

You can watch G.A.Y NIG.GERS FROM OUTER SPACE on Youtube.

Second, you need to succeed in posting a G_N_A_A "first post" on slashdot.org , a popular "news for trolls" website

Third, you need to join the official G_N_A_A irc channel #G_N_A_A on EFNet, and apply for membership.
Talk to one of the ops or any of the other members in the channel to sign up today!

If you are having trouble locating #G_N_A_A, the official G.A.Y NIG.GER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA irc channel, you might be on a wrong irc network. The correct network is EFNet, and you can connect to irc.secsup.org or irc.easynews.com as one of the EFNet servers.
If you do not have an IRC client handy, you are free to use the G_N_A_A Java IRC client by clicking here.

If you have mod points and would like to support G_N_A_A, please moderate this post up.

This post brought to you by Penisbird , a proud member of the G_N_A_A

G_____________________________________naann_______ ________G
N_____________________________nnnaa__nanaaa_______ ________A
A____________________aanana__nannaa_nna_an________ ________Y
A_____________annna_nnnnnan_aan_aa__na__aa________ ________*
G____________nnaana_nnn__nn_aa__nn__na_anaann_MERI CA______N
N___________ana__nn_an___an_aa_anaaannnanaa_______ ________I
A___________aa__ana_nn___nn_nnnnaa___ana__________ ________G
A__________nna__an__na___nn__nnn___SSOCIATION_of__ ________G
G__________ana_naa__an___nnn______________________ ________E
N__________ananan___nn___aan_IGGER________________ ________R
A__________nnna____naa____________________________ ________S
A________nnaa_____anan____________________________ ________*
G________anaannana________________________________ ________A
N________ananaannn_AY_____________________________ ________S
A________ana____nn_________IRC-EFNET-#G_N_A_A________ ________S
A_______nn_____na_________________________________ ________O
*_______aaaan_____________________________________ ________C
Gary Niger gary_niger@G_N_A_A.us G_N_A_A Corporate Headquarters 143 Rolloffle Avenue Tarzana, California 91356
Enid Al-Punjabi enid_al_punjabi@G_N_A_A.us G_N_A_A World Headquarters No.33 Kyutei Bld. 2F, Shinjuku 2-11-7, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan ????????2??11-6
Copyrigh

First, you have to obtain a copy of G.A.Y NIG.GERS FROM OUTER SPACE THE MOVIE and watch it.

You can watch G.A.Y NIG.GERS FROM OUTER SPACE on Youtube.

Second, you need to succeed in posting a G_N_A_A "first post" on slashdot.org , a popular "news for trolls" website

Third, you need to join the official G_N_A_A irc channel #G_N_A_A on EFNet, and apply for membership.
Talk to one of the ops or any of the other members in the channel to sign up today!

If you are having trouble locating #G_N_A_A, the official G.A.Y NIG.GER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA irc channel, you might be on a wrong irc network. The correct network is EFNet, and you can connect to irc.secsup.org or irc.easynews.com as one of the EFNet servers.
If you do not have an IRC client handy, you are free to use the G_N_A_A Java IRC client by clicking here.

If you have mod points and would like to support G_N_A_A, please moderate this post up.

This post brought to you by Penisbird , a proud member of the G_N_A_A

G_____________________________________naann_______ ________G
N_____________________________nnnaa__nanaaa_______ ________A
A____________________aanana__nannaa_nna_an________ ________Y
A_____________annna_nnnnnan_aan_aa__na__aa________ ________*
G____________nnaana_nnn__nn_aa__nn__na_anaann_MERI CA______N
N___________ana__nn_an___an_aa_anaaannnanaa_______ ________I
A___________aa__ana_nn___nn_nnnnaa___ana__________ ________G
A__________nna__an__na___nn__nnn___SSOCIATION_of__ ________G
G__________ana_naa__an___nnn______________________ ________E
N__________ananan___nn___aan_IGGER________________ ________R
A__________nnna____naa____________________________ ________S
A________nnaa_____anan____________________________ ________*
G________anaannana________________________________ ________A
N________ananaannn_AY_____________________________ ________S
A________ana____nn_________IRC-EFNET-#G_N_A_A________ ________S
A_______nn_____na_________________________________ ________O
*_______aaaan_____________________________________ ________C
Gary Niger gary_niger@G_N_A_A.us G_N_A_A Corporate Headquarters 143 Rolloffle Avenue Tarzana, California 91356
Enid Al-Punjabi enid_al_punjabi@G_N_A_A.us G_N_A_A World Headquarters No.33 Kyutei Bld. 2F, Shinjuku 2-11-7, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan ????????2??11-6
Copyright (c) 2003-2015 G.A.Y NIG.GER Association of America

Ich Bindawalross (London) - G_

G_N_A_A (G.A.Y NIG.GER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) is the first organization which
gathers G.A.Y NIG.GERS from all over America and abroad for one common goal - being G.A.Y NIG.GERS.

Are you G.A.Y ?
Are you a NIG.GER ?
Are you a G.A.Y NIG.GER ?

If you answered "Yes" to any of the above questions, then G_N_A_A (G.A.Y NIG.GER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) might be exactly what you've been looking for!
Join G_N_A_A (G.A.Y NIG.GER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) today, and enjoy all the benefits of being a full-time G_N_A_A member.
G_N_A_A (G.A.Y NIG.GER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) is the fastest-growing G.A.Y NIG.GER community with THOUSANDS of members all over United States of America. You, too, can be a part of G_N_A_A if you join today!

Why not? It's quick and easy - only 3 simple steps!

First, you have to obtain a copy of G.A.Y NIG.GERS FROM OUTER SPACE THE MOVIE and watch it.

You can watch G.A.Y NIG.GERS FROM OUTER SPACE on Youtube.

Second, you need to succeed in posting a G_N_A_A "first post" on slashdot.org , a popular "news for trolls" website

Third, you need to join the official G_N_A_A irc channel #G_N_A_A on EFNet, and apply for membership.
Talk to one of the ops or any of the other members in the channel to sign up today!

If you are having trouble locating #G_N_A_A, the official G.A.Y NIG.GER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA irc channel, you might be on a wrong irc network. The correct network is EFNet, and you can connect to irc.secsup.org or irc.easynews.com as one of the EFNet servers.
If you do not have an IRC client handy, you are free to use the G_N_A_A Java IRC client by clicking here.

If you have mod points and would like to support G_N_A_A, please moderate this post up.

This post brought to you by Penisbird , a proud member of the G_N_A_A

G_____________________________________naann_______ ________G
N_____________________________nnnaa__nanaaa_______ ________A
A____________________aanana__nannaa_nna_an________ ________Y
A_____________annna_nnnnnan_aan_aa__na__aa________ ________*
G____________nnaana_nnn__nn_aa__nn__na_anaann_MERI CA______N
N___________ana__nn_an___an_aa_anaaannnanaa_______ ________I
A___________aa__ana_nn___nn_nnnnaa___ana__________ ________G
A__________nna__an__na___nn__nnn___SSOCIATION_of__ ________G
G__________ana_naa__an___nnn______________________ ________E
N__________ananan___nn___aan_IGGER________________ ________R
A__________nnna____naa____________________________ ________S
A________nnaa_____anan____________________________ ________*
G________anaannana________________________________ ________A
N________ananaannn_AY_____________________________ ________S
A________ana____nn_________IRC-EFNET-#G_N_A_A________ ________S
A_______nn_____na_________________________________ ________O
*_______aaaan_____________________________________ ________C
Gary Niger gary_niger@G_N_A_A.us G_N_A_A Corporate Headquarters 143 Rolloffle Avenue Tarzana, California 91356
Enid Al-Punjabi enid_al_punjabi@G_N_A_A.us G_N_A_A World Headquarters No.33 Kyutei Bld. 2F, Shinjuku 2-11-7, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan ????????2??11-6
Copyright (c) 2003-2015 G.A.Y NIG.GER Association of America

Ich Bindawalross (

As least link to the guy who made that video (a great channel BTW), not the repost.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

As least link to the guy who made that video (a great channel BTW), not the repost.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

If they're having trouble finding donors, I suggest they try Hoxton ... there's plenty of wankers there to choose from

I'm afraid they're dickheads not wankers.

Anybody remembers the TV ad song? I just came through my mind, it went like:

"I adore my sixty-four, my Commodore sixty-four"

Heck, I just googled for it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

So, build a simple HEPA grade filtration unit.
You need a cartridge HEPA filter, and cartridge activated carbon filter + inline fan. Clap in some speed adjuster for the fan.
That thing is cheaper and works better than expensive air purifiers from some producer, becouse there are more charcoal to filter out all the gases, and the motor is stronger.

Something like this, but clap the activated carbonl filter to air outlet.
Homemade HEPA air cleaner
Homemade DIY HEPA air cleaner test

So, build a simple HEPA grade filtration unit.
You need a cartridge HEPA filter, and cartridge activated carbon filter + inline fan. Clap in some speed adjuster for the fan.
That thing is cheaper and works better than expensive air purifiers from some producer, becouse there are more charcoal to filter out all the gases, and the motor is stronger.

Something like this, but clap the activated carbonl filter to air outlet.
Homemade HEPA air cleaner
Homemade DIY HEPA air cleaner test

Because then we wouldn't have gems like this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

If you hire and M&M https://www.youtube.com/watch?..., to do the job, don't be surprised when it's brain melts under the pressure. There was likely some good reasons why the M&M was demoted at Google.

Accidentally washed my Samsung phone in my Samsung washing machine

We snuck out the video of the failure mode of the new Samsung Washing machines. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Around Houston, we know geeks.
http://www.chron.com/news/arti...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Nevertheless, once turned on Siri is much the same privacy sucking nightmare Cortana and Google are.

Nope, sorry. That is incorrect.

Siri on MacOS (and also Siri on iOS 10) does its level-best to do as much as it can "client-side", directly on your Mac/iDevice. This is VERY different from Cortana an Google's "voice assist" stuff, which take every opportunity to send every utterance to their respective motherships.

If you would bothered to have watched the WWDC keynote, Apple talked at length about the lengths they have gone to make Siri, Dictation, and Spotlight do as much as they possibly can directly on the Mac itself, and when it is necessary to push something to their servers, they do it in an anonymized fashion using an technique known as "Differential Privacy". See the WWDC Keynote at Time Index 1:40:00 for a quick explanation of the measures that Apple is taking both on macOS and iOS 10 in the name of Privacy. Here's another article on Differential Privacy, and why it is pretty damned cool.