Slashdot Mirror


Commodore C64 Survives Over 25 Years Balancing Drive Shafts In Auto Repair Shop (hothardware.com)

MojoKid writes: One common gripe in the twenty-first century is that nothing is built to last anymore. Even complex, expensive computers seem to have a relatively short shelf-life nowadays. However, one computer in a small auto repair shop in Gdansk, Poland has survived for the last twenty-five years against all odds. The computer in question here is a Commodore C64 that has been balancing driveshafts non-stop for a quarter of a century. The C64C looks like it would fit right in with a scene from Fallout 4 and has even survived a nasty flood. This Commodore 64 contains a few homemade aspects, however. The old computer uses a sinusoidal waveform generator and piezo vibration sensor in order to measure changes in pressure, acceleration, temperature, strain or force by converting them to an electrical charge. The C64C interprets these signals to help balance the driveshafts in vehicles. The Commodore 64 (also known as the C64, C-64, C= 64) was released in January 1982 and still holds the title for being the best-selling computer of all time.

290 comments

  1. dust by phantomfive · · Score: 2

    I don't know how the disks are still readable with all that dust.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:dust by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Disks? It probably uses cassettes!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:dust by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      There's a 1541-II right there on the desk with it. Newer model Commodore 64-C. I can still smell it.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:dust by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      I repaired a PC that was primarily used in an automotive repair facility. That's not dust. It's soot from the exhaust. Unsurprisingly, the CD-ROM drive in the machine that I was repairing was nonfunctional because the lens was dirty.

      You're right, though. I have no idea how that floppy drive is still operational after 30+ years.

    4. Re:dust by Lisandro · · Score: 2

      The 1541-II was (is) surprisingly rugged. It didn't have the overheat and head alignment issues that plagued the original 1541.

    5. Re:dust by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Because it is a very low density magnetic storage. I wouldn't expect it to be as sensible to dust as modern drives - specially when everything is optical these days.

    6. Re:dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're comparing a floppy drive to a CD and wondering why it works when dirty?

    7. Re:dust by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Informative

      The 1541 floppies were definitely not as sensitive as later 3 1/2 floppies (which got corrupted if you looked at them funny), but they weren't invincible, dust and fingerprints could still cause problems.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:dust by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Looks like the disk in that drive hasn't been removed in 25 years as well. If that's the case it wouldn't really surprise me why it still works.

      The only thing, in my experience, that would reliably kill 5 1/4 floppies were magnets, even small ones. You could bend them and, as long as they wouldn't crease they would still work fine.

    9. Re: dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 1541 floppies were definitely not as sensitive as later 3 1/2 floppies (which got corrupted if you looked at them funny), but they weren't invincible, dust and fingerprints could still cause problems.

      Oh BS.

      That cleaning fluid that made you high was like a magic wand.

      Many a 5.25 I've repaired by transplanting it into a new soft shell with a good dunking in alcohol.

    10. Re:dust by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      I guess the disk is never removed. The grime has to penetrate about 3 inches into a narrow slot to cause problems.

    11. Re:dust by pahles · · Score: 1

      I still remember glueing the axel that moved the head with some super glue and having the casing open in order to let the heat out... :)

      --
      Sig?
    12. Re:dust by pahles · · Score: 1

      Not axel of course, but axle... :(

      --
      Sig?
    13. Re:dust by nicomede · · Score: 5, Funny

      I still have the pinch I used to make these floppies double sided cutting the notch on the side. When I explained my daughters what this was for, they looked at me like if I just explained them how I squashed rocks to make fire...

    14. Re:dust by pahles · · Score: 1

      Since the handle of the disk drive is open, the question is, is it used at all? I guess it does since there is no cassette player in the picture, but still...

      --
      Sig?
    15. Re: dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How many times do you think you'll get away with that trick over 25 years and the same disk? Not to mention natural degradation of the media itself. Don't hurt yourself with that knee-jerk.

    16. Re:dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      penetrate about 3 inches into a narrow slot to cause problems.

      Yur mom.

    17. Re:dust by Lisandro · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hell, i've recently explained the concept of "dial up" to a millennial. Got the exact same reaction in response.

    18. Re:dust by ravenshrike · · Score: 2

      Pity, much more amusing to imagine a miniature Axel Foley glued to the head shouting encouragement.

    19. Re:dust by m.alessandrini · · Score: 1

      I guess today it would be quite cheap to build your own ROM cartridge. It would be a nice experiment, apart from the fact that you should convert the program to assembly (or maybe you can put a basic program in the cartridge?)

    20. Re:dust by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      well it only have to be used once per boot and who sais that this machine has ever been turned off?

    21. Re:dust by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      There's plans online for SD card readers for them and such. Its a solved problem.

    22. Re:dust by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Informative

      That likely wasn't soot from exhaust, it was brake dust. Automotive exhaust unless it's diesel has a very low soot footprint, you're talking 20 PPM or less in counts even back in the 90's. I was an apprentice in the 90's when the switch over from non-metallic aka full asbestos to semi-metallic happened. And you'd find that shit everywhere, and I do mean everywhere. The vic20 we used for alignments was full of it, it would get into tool cabinets, into air lines if they'd been hug for a while, it would even clog your compressor air-intake. Exhaust was almost always vented outside(or with the doors opens) since you have a CO hazard in enclosed spaces.

      Until the real dangers of asbestos were known, simply knocking the brakes loose was the standard practice even into the late 90's. Meaning when you broke them loose you were kicking asbestos and other particulate into the air, and of course breathing it in. Then we started spraying down the drums and rotors to mitigate the dust problem. I go for chest x-rays every 3-4 years to check for mesothelioma and for good reasons.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    23. Re:dust by m.alessandrini · · Score: 1

      Yes I saw something, I mean it's cheap to actually build one, too.

    24. Re:dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You think Poland has had 25 years of consistent electrical power? They haven't even had 25 years of consistent government.

    25. Re:dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The things only 25 years old. When people say crap like this it's easy to separate the n00bs from the knowing.

    26. Re:dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could still do this by hand with a pair of sharp scissors. :D I probably did tens of thousands of them in my life.

    27. Re: dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you even point to Poland on a map you ignorant bastard? As a former soviet prisoner Poland has shown the most resilience courage ingeniuity and economic growth of all european nations. So stfu with your ignorant posts which you believe is funny. In addition look up the best IT engineers and programers they're Polish

    28. Re: dust by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Funny

      You've never heard of isopropol alcohol?

      No, and neither have you. Isopropyl alcohol on the other hand...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    29. Re:dust by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      That would make YOU the grime.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    30. Re:dust by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Informative

      Uhhhh dude? Yeah did you not see where this C64 is? Wanna guess what the main vehicle was before the wall fell in that area of the world? A little hunk of shit known as the Trabant which was a 2 stroke smoke generator.

      Remember friend it was an area controlled by Soviet Russia, where soot generates YOU!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    31. Re:dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3 1/2" floppies were much more likely to die if they were disk n-1 of a set of a spanned pkzip archive, where n > 3.

    32. Re:dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think most millennials would have had dial-up if they had internet in their household when they were growing up. We really need a different term for the folks born post 1990. I figure by the strict definition that I'm a millennial but I started with 28.8 and later 36.6k and playing the 3 Stooges Game on a Commodore Amiga and reader rabbit off 5.25" floppy disks on a 486 system.

    33. Re:dust by The+Conductor · · Score: 1

      The internal layout of those ROM cartridges is really simple. I knew a guy back in the 90's who would whip up embedded systems by burning a 27256 EPROM chip (the ones with windows on them so you can erase with UV light) and popping it into a DIP socket. The way I remember it, the BASIC interpreter is available in C=64 assembly language, but the BASIC ROM uses up some of the address space (blocking access to some RAM), so most programs bank-switch it off. My guess is you would have to have a stub of assembly to invoke the interpreter, and then have the BASIC code as a hunk of data. Another way to do it is to just write a BASIC program and use an "Action Replay" (a simple in-circuit emulator) to make a snapshot of the machine's state, and then burn that to ROM.

    34. Re:dust by mysidia · · Score: 1

      With a fixed program like driveshaft balancing: you could have programmed it to a PROM chip, and put it on a board to load through the C64's ROM cartridge slot

    35. Re:dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I just love this image

    36. Re: dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what you say has absolutely nothing to do with what he said. I don't think it's exactly a big secret that ex-Soviet eastern European states didn't have the best build-out of infrastructure when the Soviets packed up and left town.

      Also, European Nationalism gave rise to the bloodiest conflict the world has ever seen, so tone it down.

    37. Re:dust by Dins · · Score: 1

      I can still smell what my power supply smelled like when it blew. Was not a pleasant smell.

    38. Re:dust by Dins · · Score: 1

      I used razor blades. But yeah, I could probably eyeball it without flipping another one over for reference...

    39. Re: dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still have mine, as well; however, it didn't work as well as I remembered when I tried to used it on my SSD. I must have punched the wrong corner ...

    40. Re:dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hell, i've recently explained the concept of "dial up" to a millennial. Got the exact same reaction in response.

      Plenty of "millenials" remember dial-up and floppies very well. Really the lower bound for "millennial" needs to be moved much higher, to being born somewhere in the late 1990s. rather than the mid-80s.

    41. Re:dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My guess is you would have to have a stub of assembly to invoke the interpreter, and then have the BASIC code as a hunk of data.

      ROMs can be mapped at different areas, the $8000 one should be safe both from BASIC ROM ($A000 if I recall correctly) and BASIC, as long as you lower the amount of memory available for BASIC programs (which might even happen automatically when the $8000 ROM area is used).

    42. Re:dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 3.5" DD ones weren't so bad, but the HD ones were terrible.

    43. Re:dust by Mr0bvious · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it not used (and may not work).

      It's possible it's running from cartridge (remember those!!) and the 1541 is just sitting collecting dust.

      --
      Never happened. True story.
    44. Re:dust by Mr0bvious · · Score: 1

      Hmm, actually looking at the picture there's no way a cartridge could be there (drive is in the way).

      But you can also see that the 1541 drive door is not closed (it's the twist down type).. Is someone pulling some shenanigans on this one?

      --
      Never happened. True story.
    45. Re:dust by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 2

      Hehehe, yeah, taking that concept back a few years to 1999, my (at the time) 11 year old son and I were playing the game Driver that had just come out.
      I got the same reaction from him during a cutscene that showed Tanner using a rotary phone. I had to explain what he was doing as my son had never seen one before.
      After that I'm certain he believes we made fire with sticks and wrote on clay tablets in school.

      --
      Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
    46. Re:dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Next, try to explain the concept that work (for most people anyway) doesn't involve derping on your phone all day to a millennial. It is so strange seeing them in meetings, useless, eyes glazed, texting and snapchatting the day away.

    47. Re: dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, as someone born in the 80s, I hate being lumped in with the jobless slobs from the mid-late 90s

    48. Re:dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking back at the concept of double sided floppy disk, I'm really surprised that work.

    49. Re:dust by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Next, try to explain the concept that work (for most people anyway) doesn't involve derping on your phone all day to a millennial. It is so strange seeing them in meetings, useless, eyes glazed, texting and snapchatting the day away.

      The ones who worked with me considered Facebook to be a critical job skill. The smartphone addiction is so bad that they go through withdrwal worthy of a heroin addict if they can't have their phone for a minute.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    50. Re:dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My father-in-law actually used waxed tablets in school (the first part of his first year in school) - but that was in the sixties, I think.

    51. Re:dust by operagost · · Score: 1

      The purported unreliability of former Soviet bloc power grids?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    52. Re: dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for mixing Poland into the European (?) nationalism. Let's put it straight: it was German nationalism which started the war (NSDAP = NATZIONALSozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei). Ever heard about Fall Weiss? Not really a Polish code name, is it.

    53. Re:dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 1541-II was (is) surprisingly rugged. It didn't have the overheat and head alignment issues that plagued the original 1541.

      And one of the biggest attributes: no whiskers. Computers built after that damn application of the RoHS law to solder have made it so that computers built nowadays will develop shorts at unpredictable times.

    54. Re:dust by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I actually used punched cards. Taking a Fortran class at a local Jr College in HS. Late 70s.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    55. Re:dust by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Try explaining what a 400 MB "hard drive" was, and that you could actually service the internals. Or that early computers didn't even come with hard drives, but ROM cartridges or tape or floppy disk drives.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    56. Re:dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My bet is the dust is from grinding and cutting steel. I do a bit of that from time to time. We use abrasive cutoff wheels and that dust looks very familiar. I would tent that poor computer, or at least blast it with shop air from time to time.

    57. Re:dust by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      The 1541-II was (is) surprisingly rugged. It didn't have the overheat and head alignment issues that plagued the original 1541.

      The disks themselves spin inside a cleaning cloth (the inside of a floppy sleeve). There's no fan to suck dirt in, so...plausible.

      I'm more surprised that the monitor still works.

      --
      No sig today...
    58. Re:dust by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      I noticed that as well but I figured it was just for the photo-shoot. The handle isn't clean enough for it to be raised/lowered very often and they have to be loading the BASIC from somewhere.

      --
      No sig today...
    59. Re: dust by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Also, European Nationalism gave rise to the bloodiest conflict the world has ever seen, so tone it down.

      Thanks for mixing Poland into the European (?) nationalism. Let's put it straight: it was German nationalism which started the war (NSDAP = NATZIONALSozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei). Ever heard about Fall Weiss? Not really a Polish code name, is it.

      So basically you're agreeing with him...

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    60. Re:dust by David_Hart · · Score: 2

      I repaired a PC that was primarily used in an automotive repair facility. That's not dust. It's soot from the exhaust. Unsurprisingly, the CD-ROM drive in the machine that I was repairing was nonfunctional because the lens was dirty.

      You're right, though. I have no idea how that floppy drive is still operational after 30+ years.

      I used to work for an oil company. It takes less than a year for a computer to go from shiny new to looking like this. Even less time in a garage. The biggest problem isn't brake dust or exhaust but the combination of those plus oil and grease from mechanics. The grease and oil gets on the case and then everything else just sticks and builds up layers.

    61. Re:dust by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

      Well, the shrieking of a 1541 going dead could hit the same high notes as Axel Rose...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    62. Re:dust by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1
      Meh, I started with 300baud. And liked it.

      Sadly I'm not old enough to have ever used an acoustic modem but I did buy one recently on ebay to complete my collection. I don't have a phone line. My 35 year old computer still works fine and is more fun than any of my windows computers,

    63. Re:dust by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      What happens when they get in a position of authority and results are expected?

    64. Re:dust by Maritz · · Score: 1

      You seem well-adjusted, AC.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    65. Re:dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Trabant wasn't common in Poland. They did have plenty of other crappy cars though...

    66. Re:dust by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      It's the smell of the magic blue smoke that makes all electrical things work.

    67. Re:dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BASIC was in ROM, turn the machine on and it loads - no disk needed. A program, on the other hand...we'll assume you're not typing in the program every time you need it!

    68. Re:dust by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Uh dude, did you not pay attention to what the GP was saying? It wasn't in context of the article, it was their *own* experience. Much like mine. Also, those weren't common there. Just a FYI.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    69. Re:dust by CWCheese · · Score: 1

      An aeronautical engineer at my first job once told me that smoke is the most vital component of all devices, thus our job was to ensure the smoke didn't get out otherwise the device would stop working.

      --
      Have a Day!
    70. Re:dust by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      When I was a kid, we ran an entire small business on one server with a 460 MB drive and 50 diskless workstations. And we liked it.

      First hard drive I saw was 10 MB.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    71. Re:dust by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Was that a common thing to do in the 80s? (or rather, cost effective?) I don't see a cartridge in the picture.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    72. Re:dust by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      Important to note it's a C-64C, not an original C-64. The original C-64 had inadequate ventilation and tended to burn out with a few years of heavy use.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    73. Re:dust by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      What happens when they get in a position of authority and results are expected?

      They never actually made it that far. We had two who were worth anything, and one took a new job in another city, and the other one went on to get an advanced degree. Both young women by the way, and both excellent co-workers.

      The vast majority discovered that you don't get a promotion for showing up on time, and unlike your parents, the older people at work weren't there to serve them, and they burnt out - and I kid you not - moved back in with Mom and Dad, in once case Grandma.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    74. Re:dust by andrewa · · Score: 1

      My 1541 overheated in spectacular style when I accidentally put the "Dolphin DOS" chip in the 1541 in the wrong orientation.
      ME: "What's that smell.....?"
      1541: "*Pop* *fizz* *pffft....*"
      ME: "Oh......"

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    75. Re:dust by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      My personal first hard drive was 40 MB, you could hold it in your hand, and required special drivers just to access the whole thing. I didn't have to deal with those drum drives, thank goodness. People that I knew did, and that didn't sound like any fun whatsoever.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    76. Re:dust by davester666 · · Score: 1

      A 1541 drive would have been long-dead if they had any EA games...they would 'reset' the drive head position [running it into the bump-stop] multiple times while loading as part of their copy protection.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    77. Re:dust by trevc · · Score: 1

      Dad, is that you?

    78. Re:dust by trevc · · Score: 1

      They type the program in each time they power up. It's printed on a piece of paper that they had laminated.

    79. Re:dust by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Currently that generation is called iGen. It will probably change as times goes on. As what we call millennials now use to be gen Y.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    80. Re:dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The internal layout of those ROM cartridges is really simple.

      They can be simple, they don't have to be.
      Just like in the NES or MSX it is just a bus connector.
      I have a cartridge with an FPGA that sniffs the bus for video chip accesses and replicates a VGA signal from it.
      The cartridge is also capable of emulating the drive and/or the entire computer depending on settings.

    81. Re:dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reliability problems of 3 1/2 floppy drives are apparently related to a flaw in the controller ASIC used in the drives. Apparently many companies cloned this one original ASIC design including the flaw! The original ASIC was eventually corrected but none of the clones were. (The flaw being a logic race condition that caused invalid data to be written every so often.) If you do some digging you can find the details.

    82. Re:dust by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      A cartridge is mounted in the back.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    83. Re:dust by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      The back is up against the hard drive and the monitor. I neither see a cartridge, nor space for one (unless they ordered some kind of super-small one)

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    84. Re:dust by Scarletdown · · Score: 2

      I used razor blades. But yeah, I could probably eyeball it without flipping another one over for reference...

      No need for that when a paper punch works just as well. All you had to do was place a second floppy face down over the one you wanted to notch and use its notch as the guide for making your punch.

      I remember some derpy kid here in my little home town trying to claim that notching your single sided disks to make them double sided was illegal and that the overpriced disk notchers were also illegal. I wonder if he was related to the sales rep at Western Auto who tried to convince my dad that the viertical turntables they were pushing had a truer sound than traditional record players, because allegedly records were recorded on vertical turntables. That of course set off his bullshit meter, and although he humored the guy, he did not believe a word of it.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    85. Re:dust by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      Oooh that's a very nice little cartridge! I don't have the C64 anymore though, but I do still have my A500 with 512KB expansion pack, 10MB harddisk and original monitor (and 1 joystick, the 2nd having died) and an external floppydrive.

      I'm thinking of buying a raspberry pi to replace the whole shebang, because it's taking up rather a lot of space and the 3,5" disks are becoming difficult to read.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    86. Re:dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The C64 3-1/2" disks (used in the 1581 drive) were pretty decent as far as I recall. You could even partition them. The drive felt so huge with 800KB (as I recall).
      I played around with formatting over capacity on MS-DOS 3-1/2's but got burned as they failed soon after.

      Back to the grease and dust, I wonder if the 1541 disk drive wizards of the day could have had the same part of the disk show up after each program load and leave that strip of disk unused. That way only that one strip would get dirty. They did some damn amazing things with the 1541. I miss my 25x speed booster (Warp 25 on the Super Snapshot cartridge). Definitely do not miss the cassette drive! I always saved everything 2-3 times on cassette just to be sure.

    87. Re:dust by jrmcferren · · Score: 2

      The interface to the balancing system would be mounted in the expansion (cartridge) port (direct bus access) or the user port (Serial at TTL level as well as parallel of some kind).

      --
      sudo mod me up
    88. Re:dust by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      I actually had the gear to align 1541s - the big issue is the hammer when going to zero would misalign the unit. You could fake it by moving the stepper a bit till it worked again

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    89. Re:dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, the fun of fortran and punch cards. If I remember correctly, you had to tab to the 7th position to start your the code in each line ?

      And lots of fun carrying a stack of the cards, if you dropped them, you had to go thru and re-order them.

      You submit your job, and then discover there is an error in it, and have to re-do the wretched mess.

      I think it was WAT4 or WAT5 version of fortran ?

    90. Re:dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The overheating is caused by a banana in the tailpipe.

    91. Re:dust by Megane · · Score: 1

      You smug Apple II and Commodore guys, the rest of us that had systems that used real floppy disk controller chips had to cut an index hole too. At first, I would carefully wedge a hole punch in there, then I later just cut out a rough hexagon with an x-acto knife.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    92. Re:dust by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      And it would make 91degrees the problem...

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    93. Re:dust by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      The C64's soundcard is in this drive. Even if they aren't using floppies anymore (and hadn't just taken this picture inbetween swapping disks) they probably still leave the drive connected and on just so they can hear the stock software sound effects.

    94. Re:dust by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Well, there are many different ways they could fly, technically; they could have mounted the program board out of sight. They could have a boot cartridge that loads a program into ram, and then directs the user to remove the cartridge and attach interface to their industrial systems.

      They might have a cassette, disk, or printout that the program needs to be typed in from every time the system boots.

      They might have kept the system continuously powered for 50 years, such that a cold start was never necessary.... who knows.

    95. Re:dust by Eric+Green · · Score: 1

      Err, no. The SID chip is on the motherboard of the Commodore 64 (the schematic is even in the technical manual -- want to see my copy?) and is mixed with the television signal out the RF port on the back, or is available as a pin on the 8-pin round audio-video connector on the back of the Commodore 64, from whence it can go into a 1702 monitor (via an 8-pin to 8-pin cable) or broken out and sent to a powered speaker (via an 8-pin to RCA breakout cable, which also allowed hooking to a normal composite monitor). The 1541 has nothing to do with sound.

      --
      Send mail here if you want to reach me.
    96. Re:dust by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Well, then... if they've got a directed interface card to the balancing system; then it's possible they included a ROM chip on the interface card itself.

      Not necessarily; it could've been on a floppy, but someone had to develop this software and this system for such special use case, heh, heh.....

    97. Re:dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, you must have dementia or something.

    98. Re:dust by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      The 3.5" DD ones weren't so bad, but the HD ones were terrible.

      Agreed. The 1.44 MB format was EXTREMELY unreliable. I kept trying different brands, and they all sucked.

      I started reformatting them to down 720 KB to make the "bits fatter'.

      In general with floppies, I always tried to make backups on 2 different disks for anything important. It became a habit. It's probably good advice for any backup medium. Shit happens.

    99. Re:dust by Megane · · Score: 1

      I've got to agree with this. Maybe when 3.5" HD floppies were new they were okay, but once you could buy them in boxes of 25, they were crap. The 3.5" DD floppies were only bad when they were still new (mid '80s). Of course most PC manufacturers didn't put 3.5" drives in until HD was already a thing, so most PC users never got to use the 720K versions.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    100. Re: dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you never turn it off, you don't need to load anything.

    101. Re:dust by swalve · · Score: 1

      I found that it was the drives that were shit. The media can't really be blamed.

    102. Re:dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm technically a millennial.
      My first computer was a Tandy Color Computer 2 with 64K of RAM, hooked up to a TV. I had a tape drive and a 5 1/4" floppy (don't remember the storage capacity, but probably slightly larger than the RAM). For those unfamiliar with this system, here is a basic run down:

      OS had a built in BASIC interpreter.
      Everything had to be loaded via a cartridge slot.
      The cartridges could be ROMs similar in concept to an old ATARI or NES (if a ROM was inserted the computer booted off the ROM and ran whatever program was on the ROM, this was primarily used for games, though I did have a music synthesizer that plugged into the cartridge slot)
      The floppy drive and tape drive both connected to the the cartridge slot.
      If no ROM was present, the computer booted to a green background and simple prompt. From here you either had to manually write a program in BASIC to do anything, or manually load a program off tape/disk into RAM to be run (I think there were some disks that had some sort of executable files on them, we did have a very simple productivity suite and I think it worked that way, but it's been 30 years so my memory may be a bit fuzzy).

      My first modem was 300 baud. I still remember measuring download speeds in "characters per second" and watching text slowly download on my screen when connecting to a BBS (note the modem was used with my later PC's, both Tandys, one was 8086 based, the other 80286 based, as I worked my way up from those PCs into 386 and 486 land we naturally upgraded and I got to transition from talking about baud to kbps, with a few modems referred to by both, probably around the 9600 to 14400 days).

      My first hard drive was 20 MB.

      I was coding at the age of 5 (BASIC, and no they were not good programs, but thats not the point) (the color computer mentioned above)

      I spent my childhood tweaking config files (autoexec.bat and config.sys for my fellow DOS homies) just so I could play games after I moved to the x86 world.

      The point of all this? While as stated above, I'm technically a millenial, I really hate getting lumped in with a group of people who have never had the joy of juggling interrupts as a child.

    103. Re:dust by antdude · · Score: 1

      Magnets too!!

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    104. Re: dust by BlytheBowman · · Score: 1

      I was born in 1976, but I remember taking typing class in HS back in 1991. With typewriters.

    105. Re:dust by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      its one of the newer models closer to the look of the 128. All i see is a floppy drive .. melancholy , cutters to doubleside, press play on tape, drive to the next town to get an issue off Zzap, come back get a coffee and start playing
      i never shoulda sold it. Quite amazing though

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
    106. Re:dust by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      If I were going to implement a system like that I'd try to make the software fit in a ROM cartridge. No moving parts and no susceptibility to dust or magnetic fields, much more reliable.

    107. Re:dust by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      I'll go ahead and date myself... the first hard drive I saw held 2 million BCD digits of data. It was used with an IBM 1620, which was a decimal computer rather than binary. It was nearly the size of a washing machine. Next up was the cartridge drive used with the IBM 1130, which held 512K 16 bit words - in other words, a megabyte. That's right; both of those hard disks had less capacity than a high density floppy.

      The first hard drive I ever personally owned was a 40 megabyte drive connected to an AT clone. The 20 megabyte ST-225 was still very popular at the time but I scraped up the extra money for the larger and faster drive, helped by the discount I got because I was working at a computer store.

    108. Re:dust by BrianMahoney1357 · · Score: 1

      Is the disk fully inserted in the pic? The lock isn't down but I might be forgetting how the drive works. If they push the disk in and out, I can see the dust being a major problem.

    109. Re: dust by doccus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, as someone born in the 80s, I hate being lumped in with the jobless slobs from the mid-late 90s

      What? You don't have a skateboard with you at all times?.. IS millenial the term for those 26 year olds who still walk around with their skateboards and even take them into their job interviews?? Or are they Gen X'rs. I don't know who's who anymore ! Me , I'm just a "late boomer"..

    110. Re:dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I asked about buying a disk notcher at TEAM Electronics, the salesman told me making my floppies flippy would ruin them, because there's a gauze layer inside the sheath that sweeps up any dislodged oxide particles, and reversing the rotation of the disk would dislodge the particles and corrupt my data.

      I thanked him for the warning and proceeded to notch my floppies by hand, with no ill effects.

    111. Re:dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHen I was in college taking electronics we had the opportunity to build a computer from a school supplied kit, and I had always drooled over the heathkits in popular mechanics mag so I was thrilled to build one. A pretty useless blinkenbox, though. Like, no monitor or connection for one.. I do vaguely recall we had the option to make an attachment to the home TV set. Also one day he brought a "harddrive" into class for us to see. it must have weighed a TON! You'd never have fit it into even the biggest computer enclosure, I can't recall exactly, it was over 40 years ago, and I think it was maybe 8 inches square and must have weighed 50 pounds. again i don't recall exactly, it was 4 Mb? Anyone familiar with this type of HD?

    112. Re:dust by JargonScott · · Score: 1

      I found a Youtube clip of a 56K dialup squeal to play for my kids. This was the harshest "back in my day" I could come up with so far.

      --
      Nuke Gay Whales for Jesus.
    113. Re:dust by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Um, yes. That's what the disk would be for.

      The screen shows "BREAK AT LINE 1050".

      We can assume that the program is more than ten lines long.

      --
      No sig today...
  2. Floppy drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How that thing is still running is a miracle.

    1. Re:Floppy drive by cfalcon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It is exactly what we should expect from solid state components. Demand no less!

    2. Re:Floppy drive by freeze128 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's not the solid-state components that I'm worried about. It's the capacitors in the power supply, and the mechanism in the floppy drive. Either this machine has regular maintenance (and several spare power supplies on hand), or it has an amulet of +20 Luck.

    3. Re:Floppy drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, so Muhammad kept this computer running in a Polish auto shop for 25 years?

    4. Re:Floppy drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Most electrical strain comes from power-on.

      If the unit runs 24/7 (which there is little to no reason to think this system could not do), and the program read from the disk stays in memory the entire time (because the system is never turned off), then the mechanical parts in the drive wont wear down because they are only used when the program is initially loaded, and the capacitors in the PSU dont have much stress on them, because they dont get power cycled all the time.

    5. Re:Floppy drive by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Is that the two guys from the cell repair shop down the road? They do C64s too?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Floppy drive by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Even so , 8 bit machines were still built to a price - the components were hardly top of the range. I'd be amazed if its been running continuously for 25 years with no issues whatsoever. Also eastern europeans brought up in soviet times tend to be pretty good at repairing stuff for obvious reasons so I wouldn't be surprised if the are plenty of engineers around the area who could sort out the analogue electronics, even if the digital side would be too much.

    7. Re:Floppy drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me, there's a CRT monitor right there as well. Also, I though the new definition of "solid state" was "no moving parts", so the CRT is solid-state now, and but there's a floppy drive there...

    8. Re:Floppy drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      those power supplies, especially the ones that were true 'bricks' and didn't have an angled top (i.e. the earliest ones), were solid af... inefficient as hell (something around 20-25% iirc vs today's 80-85% for a decent atx), but they would go, and go, and go, and go. sealed and unvented, they would not be affected by a layer or two of dust. they also waaaaay predate the capacitor scandal that hit computers and cheap chinese electronics ~15ish years ago. the 64c power supplies probably the most reliable electronics made in china in my lifetime.

    9. Re:Floppy drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but that's a 64C, with the newer chips that use less power. And just how much "analogue" electronics do you think there is in a 64? And why would you think the digital side would be too much? Think the Poles are dumbasses? Think the Soviets, who beat the US into space and scared them into a Cold War for decades were somehow too dumb to understand SSI logic gates?

    10. Re:Floppy drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also caps from that era generally only break in cold storage. Regular use, not to mention that the C64 never was much of a cap rot prone board, will likely keep it running an extra year or two.

    11. Re:Floppy drive by Viol8 · · Score: 0

      The power supply is analogue you clown and so are the video and audio feeds. As for the digital side - yes I doubt the local TV repairman would be too well versed with figuring out logic errors on a 6510 busline, but he could easily sort a blown electrolytic.

    12. Re:Floppy drive by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be surprised if a TV repairman could sort that out too, at least at a coarse level. He'll at least understand the principle of electrical signals, and if a chip is dead, it's easy to replace.

    13. Re:Floppy drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This, power-on, spin-up and others are very quick ways to kill machines.

      Case in point, I've ran a DELL machine constant for 12 years.
      It never turned off. The HITACHI drive in it was from the start. 12 years.
      I never knew modern-ish shit would last that long, especially with semi-heavy use, like occasional torrenting and "modern" web browsers that can write 20/40 gigs of data a day to a drive.
      Thanks spyware and retarded session restore features. Couldn'ta done it without ye.

      The one time I turn it off for a holiday, come back, it doesn't get past boot-screen.
      DON'T TURN YOUR SHIT OFF. THAT'S HOW THEY GET YE!

    14. Re:Floppy drive by sad_ · · Score: 1

      those floppies are tough as nails. stuck one between the door, still worked. my floppies were all around the place, on the ground (being walk on, chairs put on them), continued to work. just got me some old c64 drives from storage somewhere for free, put a disk in them, it still works.

      --
      On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    15. Re: Floppy drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There ar every little muzzies in Poland. Stfu ignorant moron

    16. Re:Floppy drive by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      To an extent you are correct, but for power supply capacitors in particular simply keeping the power on slowly wears them out. If you look at the datasheets for the capacitors used in power supplied (typically electrolytic), they give life expectancy with a given ripple current. The more ripple, the shorter their life will be.

      For a consumer product with commonly available parts from the 80s, 8000 hours (~ 1 year) at the rated ripple is typical for a quality capacitor. They will have over-specified it, but even so 20+ years of 24/7 operation is definitely pushing it.

      My guess is that they only turn the machine on when they need it. The software might be on ROM cartridge rather than disk. In any case, it's quite remarkable.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    17. Re: Floppy drive by limaxray · · Score: 1

      You typically can't have inefficient and sealed/unvented in the same design - that (usually) results in overheating and other such problems. Of course there are ways to pull heat out of a sealed product, but that's not the case with the C64.

      Anyway, electrolytic capacitors always had a limited life span since the electrolyte in them doesn't last forever. I think the problem we see today is more the result of miniaturization - the energy density of capacitors has increased significantly and designers are building circuits with capacitances closer to design minimums to save space. This usually means fewer parallel capacitors in a design, each taking more abuse, and since many products ship with circuit capacitances already at design minimums, any capacitance losses due to degradation or environmental conditions quickly result in unstable circuits. This is especially true in power supplies which depend on high capacity and low ESR capacitors to ensure stability - this is best done with multiple large caps in parallel, but everyone wants their power bricks small, light, and cheap so corners are often cut.

      (This is especially true on consumer grade kit where cheap and pretty are always more important than function and reliability).

    18. Re:Floppy drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The power supply is external, and probably has been replaced a long time ago. The original power supply didn't last long, the voltage regulator was way underspecced, and tended to die. The first generation power supply even had a habit of killing the computer when it died.

      It was so bad that if you bought a RAM Expansion Unit, it came with a larger power supply. Imagine that, needing a new power supply because you bought a RAM block.

      But this computer is already used with custom hardware, likely running on 5v dc like all electronics at the time, so pulling another 5v cable from the power supply would have been easy. The computer needs 5v dc and 9v ac, but it will run without the 9v ac, as far as I recall, only the sound and the real time clock (which isn't used anyway) stops working without the 9v ac.

    19. Re: Floppy drive by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      The original C64 black brick PSU was indeed sealed solid with epoxy and it got warm as hell during normal operation.

      It's design was also very simple: http://www.zimmers.net/anonftp/pub/cbm/schematics/computers/c64/c64extps.gif.

    20. Re:Floppy drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. That horrible black clunk of shit is the single most unreliable part of the C64 system, and it fails regularly as it overheats. When it fails, it allows unregulated 8VDC on the 5V line, thus immediately destroying DRAM chips and cooking whatever else will pop.

      You will find that every 64 system sold on eBay "as is" will end up dead as the users inevitably plug it in before checking the power supply, so please stop spreading your rumors.

    21. Re:Floppy drive by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      My 8-bit computer still works fine despite being stored in an Arizonan attic for 30 years where I would expect the temperatures to exceed 340K for extended periods of time.

    22. Re: Floppy drive by limaxray · · Score: 1

      Just to clarify, my point was that it couldn't be both sealed (via encapsulating in epoxy) and inefficient. Since it is sealed and has a limited capacity to continually dissipate heat, it must be somewhat efficient. The claim was that it's only 20 to 25% efficient, which means that at the maximum output on the 5V rail, the brick is dissipating over 100w. There is no fracking way that brick can dissipate anywhere near that much power - even at half of its rated output power, the brick would quickly become hot enough to melt plastic and burn flesh.

      I guess I'm just being pedantic - as a guy who designs boxes and the PCBs that go in them, how much power I waste vs how I get that wasted power out of the box is a major part of any design.

    23. Re:Floppy drive by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Despite the grime. If you leave the disk in, and use the drive it more or less keeps the internals clean. I had worked at factories, where the PC's have been running for decades, when I open them up the area where they are fans are grubby, however places where there is limited airflow they are like new.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    24. Re:Floppy drive by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Even so , 8 bit machines were still built to a price - the components were hardly top of the range. I'd be amazed if its been running continuously for 25 years with no issues whatsoever. Also eastern europeans brought up in soviet times tend to be pretty good at repairing stuff for obvious reasons so I wouldn't be surprised if the are plenty of engineers around the area who could sort out the analogue electronics, even if the digital side would be too much.

      Doesn't sound like something they would spend big bucks on a person with an electrical engineering degree to maintain. I'm sure those guys have more lucrative activities to do with their skills. They probably just hire some regular electronics guy to do it instead.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    25. Re:Floppy drive by Eric+Green · · Score: 1

      The capacitors are easy to replace. The chips are fat and happy NMOS that are somewhat static sensitive but otherwise pretty indestructible. The big problem with the chips is the 6526 CIA, which is the parallel port chip that is likely interfaced with the balancer machine. Those tend to pop if you stare at them wrong because the raw digital lines go directly from the CIA pins to that port on the back with no (zero) buffering, and it's been quite a while since they were manufactured. I used to pop them all the time when interfacing my wire-wrapped gadgets to my Commodore 64 and our local Commodore repair center knew me by name and when I came in the door immediately went in the back and got a 6526 out of his tubes of spares to sell to me. That was, of course, thirty years ago. Today they can still be found on eBay as pulls from recycled machines, but with the normal caveats of buying recycled components from eBay -- i.e.,. most of the time the seller has no way of testing them, so what you get may or may not work.

      --
      Send mail here if you want to reach me.
    26. Re: Floppy drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're also stupid.

      " it couldn't be both sealed (via encapsulating in epoxy) and inefficient."

      Why the fuck not? That's exactly what the black brick is.

      "which means that at the maximum output on the 5V rail, the brick is dissipating over 100w. T"

      LOL, what??? The load on the 5V rail is 7.5W at maximum. That would make 40W for the brick. You also fail at math, it seems.

  3. If it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't fscking touch it - which applies to code as well as tools.

    1. Re: If it works by stealth_finger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't fscking touch it - which applies to code as well as tools.

      .

      And if it breaks, throw it out?

      What happened to this world?

      It used to be a badge of honor to repair things. Now days everything is disposable.

      Kind of like what happened to Slashdot.

      You repair it when it it stops working, not while it's working. Seriously, read and comprehend the comment before going off on one.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    2. Re: If it works by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      If it breaks, repair it. Hello? East bloc? Trust me, these guys know how to repair EVERYTHING.

      I'm not kidding. I was on a bike tour around Europe. The only repair to my bike that lasted was done in Romania, with no fitting spare parts and tools from the stone age (ok, from the Soviet times, which is not that different). It was by some margin the cheapest repair, too.

      I'd absolutely sure, if you happen to have a broken iPhone, they'll come with crowbars and arc welders and miraculously make it work again. WITHOUT any spare parts.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re: If it works by Ash-Fox · · Score: 2

      Hello? East bloc? Trust me, these guys know how to repair EVERYTHING.

      Trust me, the new generations don't really know how anymore.

      I'd absolutely sure, if you happen to have a broken iPhone, they'll come with crowbars and arc welders and miraculously make it work again.

      ERROR 53

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    4. Re: If it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you just deny the antecedent to come up with a completely nonsense conclusion, then go off on a rant complaining about the conclusion that you yourself just invented?

      Weird.

    5. Re: If it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Communism produces a more educated and efficient workforce. In technical fields, people were promoted and awarded very much according to merit. It is a shame politics were so corrupt, because after moving to the West I find most people are very ignorant and not willing to learn.

      Maybe one day we shall have Communism again but with American style checks and balances.

    6. Re: If it works by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Communism produces a more ingenious, crafty workforce that can think outside the box, simply due to necessity because of shortages in materials and spare parts. People who could keep your plastic car running with shoestring and rubber band (provided that's available, if not, substitute) were highly sought after and could actually make a comfortable living for communist conditions.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re: If it works by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      'if it ain't broke, don't fix it' was one of the first lessons taught in engineering school.

    8. Re: If it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Previous generations of New Zealanders and Australians were also known for their knack of thinking outside the box to get things fixed and solve problems with string and some fencing wire. You couldnt wait weeks or months for something to be shipped out from the US or UK, nor afford it. You had to fix it.

    9. Re: If it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Following on from that, people are only as smart as they have to be. No one will waste time finding some other way of fixing something if you can just goto a parts store or whatever and get the thing you need to make it good again, or pay someone else who's time is less valuable than yours vs the time you'd waste on it your self to do it for you.

    10. Re: If it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jim Crow produced innovation too. Some of the early Blues men built their own guitars. They used things like screen door wire for strings, broom handles, etc. These men were also highly sought after and able to make a comfortable living under adverse conditions. So yeah, let's go back to the golden age of Jim Crow and the USSR to spark innovation. /sarc.

    11. Re: If it works by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      You repair it when it it stops working, not while it's working. Seriously, read and comprehend the comment before going off on one.

      Ooh, let me guess... You are from the 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it' school of thought?

      Congratulations, precious snow flake.

      For reference, in my days, you would actually maintain things so they didn't break...

      Yeah, maintenance is different to repair, that's why they have two completely separate words.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    12. Re: If it works by TJHook3r · · Score: 1

      More ingenious than the system that gave us the Commodore 64 in the first place?

  4. Ahh, the good ole' days... by Lisandro · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...when things were built to last. I tried my C64 about two months ago, which had been collecting dust on a bin for over 20 years and it worked just like the day my parents got it for me. Including the datasette and 1541 disk drive.

    1. Re:Ahh, the good ole' days... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The 1541 disk drives were quite unreliable, even when they were new. If yours is still working you are very lucky.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Ahh, the good ole' days... by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Mine was a brown box 1541, but i have to say the later generations (like the 1541-II) were much more reliable.

    3. Re:Ahh, the good ole' days... by JMZero · · Score: 1

      The first thing I usually saw fail was the power supply (or at very least it would need some after-market cooling, like a tiny fan).

      But yeah, the core processor stuff was crazy durable. I guess that makes sense when you imagine what it looks like compared to a modern processor - with oceans of empty space between every gargantuan wire and transistor.

      --
      Let's not stir that bag of worms...
    4. Re:Ahh, the good ole' days... by chiefnerd · · Score: 1

      Well, the "good old days" are here again! If you were one of the countless BBSers back in the day and want to relive some memories, head on over to Citadel 64 BBS on telnet at:

      citadel64.thejlab.com:6400

      For the full Commodore color graphics experience, I recommend Novaterm 9.6 if running real Commodore gear, else CGTerm if using Windows.

      Running Color64 BBS v8 on a real C64, 1541, 1581, 1702, and a Turbo232 interface cartridge.

      Cheers!

      --
      SYS64738
  5. Commodore engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The management of Commodore was pretty incompetent in the later years, but they always had top notch engineers. The C64 and the Amiga have lived far beyond many of the other computers from their eras, which is a testament to the engineers. The MOS 6581 (MOS was owned by Commodore) is still in high demand today because of its unique sound quality. As I understand it, the MOS 6581 was an unfinished product and was being designed to have far greater capability than what it ended up with. There's no substitute for great engineers who develop a great product, but so many businesses today do a half assed job with that. And that's why things don't last anymore.

    1. Re:Commodore engineers by lapm · · Score: 1

      Sad that none has secured manufacturing rights for these old chips... With modern process they would get grazy high yeilds from chip manufacturing, considering those wide (by todays standards) line widths...

    2. Re:Commodore engineers by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      That's what spelled death for Commodore, their engineers were too good. They built stuff that didn't break and hence you only sold once.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Commodore engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      6581 is semi analogue, it wouldn't be at all the same built on a different process.

    4. Re:Commodore engineers by F.Ultra · · Score: 3, Informative

      No that was not why they died. The whole management was corrupt and Irving Gould used the company as his personal check book.

    5. Re:Commodore engineers by Shinobi · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not just Irving Gould. Ali Mehdi was just as greedy personally, and penny-pinching in running the company. When engineers proposed the A3000 with a 68030, he personally called them up to ask whether the 68030 was truly necessary, if there weren't cheaper components that could be used

    6. Re:Commodore engineers by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That works/worked* in the car industry where a car that's twenty five years old isn't typically much less advanced than one twenty years old. But in our industry?

      Commodore's problem was more that they took an age to substantially improve the Amiga and make those improvements available. The A500 was more or less an A1000 in a keyboard case and was still being sold as one of TWO Amiga models five years later. And the A2000, the other model, wasn't more powerful than the A1000 (or A500), it was just more expandable. In the same year they finally relented and released the A3000, a 32 bit Amiga, but priced it way out of consideration for most people.

      None of this was the engineers' fault it should be pointed out. While it took a while to come up with a better base chipset to replace OCS/ECS, the engineers were still belting out some fantastic designs, most of which were squished by upper management. Commodore Management's response to the increasing obsolescence of their low end model wasn't to replace it with something better, it was to replace it, at the same price, with the A600, a machine that was worse in almost every respect (well, it did have an IDE interface...), and which had been designed as a replacement for the Commodore 64.

      Had the A3000 replaced the A2000 in 1990, with a similar upgrade given to the A500, I think Commodore might have stood a chance.

      * OK, there's a reason I put 20 years there and "worked" - the car industry is genuinely going through a development phase which is nice to see.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    7. Re:Commodore engineers by Danathar · · Score: 3, Informative

      Irving Gould and Mehdi Ali can both rot in h*ll as far as I am concerned. I will NEVER forget those names. They took a company that had a successful product and great engineers and squeezed it for every last penny purposely skimping on re-investment and new products for the express purpose of greed.

    8. Re:Commodore engineers by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That's what spelled death for Commodore, their engineers were too good. They built stuff that didn't break and hence you only sold once.

      What spelled death for Commodore was Jack Tramiel.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Commodore engineers by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      The A500 was more or less an A1000 in a keyboard case and was still being sold as one of TWO Amiga models five years later.

      Twice the RAM, twice the RAM expansion, kickstarter in ROM... At least it had meaningful differences.

      And the A2000, the other model, wasn't more powerful than the A1000 (or A500), it was just more expandable.

      Now that's true. The A500 really is just an A2000 with a video connector and more slots.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Commodore engineers by dave420 · · Score: 1

      I like how you put the asterisk in "hell", but then proceeded to judge the ever-loving shit out of some people, including knowing their inner motivation. You're terrible at this.

    11. Re:Commodore engineers by Danathar · · Score: 1

      Did you own a commodore product at the time? I judge by their actions and by the interviews of former employees and by what they said.

    12. Re:Commodore engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a way to miss the point.

      You use the asterisk to make a big huge stinking conspicuous point that you have a psychological aversion to using the word "hell." This pathology is associated (very strongly linked) to a notoriously infamous malicious memeplex called "Christianity", where the victims/hosts are taught that it's a sin to think about whether other people are good or evil, because if Santa Claus catching you committing the crime of thinking, He will punish you after you die.

      And then in the same breath you throw all the mystic bullshit away and act like a sane person: by judging evil people as evil. Because you're not really a fucking moron.

      Dude, you're 90% sane. Come the rest of the way and drop the fucking asterisk and other mystical nonsense. Just as it was ok to judge Gould and Ali for their evil (without judgement, we would all be totally stupid), it's ok to name the place where evil people are punished in all our fantasies of a universe with justice.

      It's called Hell. Your fantasy involves Hell, not H*ll. And we're all right here with you, cheering you on that those bastards would rot in Hell.

    13. Re:Commodore engineers by Jeremi · · Score: 2

      While it took a while to come up with a better base chipset to replace OCS/ECS, the engineers were still belting out some fantastic designs, most of which were squished by upper management.

      The above was a really good case study in business ecosystem dynamics.

      When the Amiga 1000 came out, it was alien technology -- probably 10 years ahead of its time. The Amiga OCS chipset's graphics and sound hardware of its contemporary competitors look like historical artifacts, and it's OS was an actual pre-emptive multitasking operating system, not just a glorified disk loader.

      However, any company in the world could design, build, and sell a new PC sound card or a new PC graphics card, any many of them did. The PC sound and graphics cards continued to suck (relative to the Amiga) for quite a while, but simply due to the fact that so many different companies had hired so many engineers to work on developing them, they improved every year, and eventually surpassed the capabilities of the Amiga sometime in the mid-90's.

      Amiga's engineers were undoubtedly some of the most talented on the planet, but their small team eventually couldn't compete with the sheer numbers of PC-based engineers. By the time AGA came out, the writing was on the wall: An open system that gains traction will eventually outgrow and out-innovate a small, closed system, no matter how awesome the skills of the closed systems' engineers.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    14. Re:Commodore engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are missing his point. You censor a harmless word like hell out of some strange sense of morals, but commit the much greater sin of judging others. You think you are a good person.

    15. Re:Commodore engineers by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 2

      Jay Miner was one of my idols.

    16. Re:Commodore engineers by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      No matter what commodore did, they were still doomed.

    17. Re:Commodore engineers by lgw · · Score: 1

      They built stuff that didn't break and hence you only sold once.

      About 1/3rd of the early C-64s sold were returned as defective. Stores had great piles of returns. The first-gen disk drives were crap. The SID chips burnt out regularly. Survivor bias is not the same as reliable.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    18. Re:Commodore engineers by Danathar · · Score: 1

      ummm....sure.

    19. Re:Commodore engineers by jcfandino · · Score: 2

      I found these two videos about Jack Tramiel and the history of Commodore very interesting:
      Part 1
      Part 2

    20. Re:Commodore engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coming from the idiot that wrote " it seems to me the way to save the planet is to develop space and other worlds so that people can leave and take the stress off of the planet."... you're in no position to "ummm....sure" anyone.

      Take your pills.

    21. Re:Commodore engineers by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      Commodore badly ran their engineering. No doubt about that. They were hardly unique there though. You could argue the same for IBM in the early days of the PC. The reason IBM's PC platform is still around and Commodore's is not isn't because IBM were marketing and engineering geniuses. It was because the IBM platform ended up open, so one company (IBM) making stupid decisions didn't kill it.

    22. Re:Commodore engineers by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      Yep, Kim Justice have a lot of good videos about the old companies in computing and gaming history. Worth checking out.

    23. Re:Commodore engineers by tgrigsby · · Score: 1

      Irving Gould and Mehdi Ali can both rot in h*ll as far as I am concerned.

      Irving Gould is dead (2004), and while Mehdi Ali is busy whitewashing his reputation, perhaps you can let go of the hate a little?

      --
      *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
    24. Re:Commodore engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jack Tramiel leaving?

    25. Re:Commodore engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally knew a few engineers at C= from that time and I can tell you that management absolutely crashed the company. The only question is whether it was incompetence, or on purpose. If they didn't do it on purpose, the golden parachutes they bailed out with must have just been a coincidence...

    26. Re:Commodore engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The A600 had one vertical segment that made sense: Signage. As a cheap signage machine, you couldn't ask for much more. Cheap IDE hard drive, a (COLOR!) composite out, a small size - easily hidden in a kiosk display case, etc.

    27. Re:Commodore engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All Amigas were 32-bit. Even A1000 with 68000 CPU. Instructions and data registers were 32-bit. Only data bus was 16-bit. Amiga 3000 was first to have cpu with proper memory management, of course only versions with full 68030, and not 68030EC cpu's.

    28. Re:Commodore engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As much as this may touch a sensitive spot for some Amiga fans out there, but the worst thing that happened to the Amiga platform was its purchase by Commodore, that was the platforms' death sentence.

        Atari with Jack Tramiel at the helm could have been a much better spot for the Amiga to end up. Imagine a game system being released that would put a Super Nintendo to shame, then being told your PC could have the same power, back in 1985. Imagine AmigaOS designed the way it was intended (with the capability for memory protection, a better device abstraction layer and virtual memory) - this was kiboshed when Commodore made cuts and had TRIPOS patched in as AmigaDOS. Although short of crossing into an alternate universe, it can't be stated for sure - but these things could have came to be under Atari, and definitely didn't happen under Commodore. (Of course, even more ideally- Tramiel (without Gould, and perhaps with Jay Miner being his tech adviser) would have bought out Atari and the original Amiga Inc while with Commodore (maintaining direct access to MOS Technologies))

        The Amiga was definitely ahead of its time, and even today seeing efforts like AROS out there gives me a warm fuzzy (particularly since these efforts are open source and may start wandering into the realm of what could have been). The Amiga was intended to embrace everything that the state of the art was - had development kept at the pace it set, it is nearly impossible to imagine where we'd be today (somehow I imagine a bunch of ancillary FPGA-like circuits in addition to GPGPU coprocessors, running an OS that interfaces directly with the brain)

        It wasn't the alien technology factor that killed it, it wasn't even the price that killed it - it was turned into ammunition for a personal war between Gould and Tramiel and therefore it was never placed in its originally intended market by a company that had a name and background in that market.

    29. Re:Commodore engineers by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I'm going to dissent on the memory protection thing for three reasons: first, technical: CAOS probably wouldn't have been as efficient, expandable, and pleasant as AmigaOS assuming it made a serious attempt to implement memory protection. AmigaOS was those things because it had a message passing architecture that relied upon each process being able to see each other process's data. This worked throughout the entire system, device drivers passing disk blocks to file systems ("handlers"), in turn passing that data to running programs.

      The first Amiga designs also barely supported memory protection. The A1000 had hardware in it (which I don't believe was part of the core Amiga chipset) to write protect a block of memory, but that was it.

      The second problem is that CAOS was ditched for AmigaOS with Tripos for a very good reason that would have also hit Atari - it was too big a project, and they had a deadline to meet.

      The third is we kinda know what choice Tramiel would have made to deal with the deadline issue, because we know what he did for his own Amiga rival: he would have said "We don't need some Unix like system, people are using PCs, they're happy with single tasking and 8.3 filenames. Let's see what Microsoft's rival Digital Research can sell us"

      And the Amiga would have run TOS - essentially a first draft of DR's DOS Plus operating system, with GEM.

      I do agree that Atari's management would have worked better for it in the longer term, but I think Atari's Amiga A1000 would have been a whole lot worse than Commodore's.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    30. Re:Commodore engineers by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      It would have worked great at $200 (which was the intention, it was supposed to replace the C64, not A500+), at $400-700 (depending on country), it was absurdly overpriced.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    31. Re:Commodore engineers by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      The 68000 presented a 32 bit ABI, but was internally a 16 bit CPU and presented a 16 bit data bus. The 68000 Amigas (1000, 500, 2000, "1500", etc) used a 16 bit data bus, even when they had a "real" 32 bit 68xxx CPU card installed. As a result, it is reasonable to talk about the 68000 range of Amigas as 16 bit.

      Technically, you could also call the A3000 a 16/32 bit hybrid, as the ECS side (complete with chip RAM) was still accessed via a 16 bit pipe.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    32. Re:Commodore engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hard to say that that is the cause. Commodore fed their money into profits / executives and trying to compete in the PC market (with a large loss per PC) instead of investing in the Amiga. It is impossible to say what would have happened if they had invested; I suspect they'd still be around but be a niche player, kind of a smaller variant of Apple. But I don't know.

    33. Re:Commodore engineers by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Commodore's problem was more that they took an age to substantially improve the Amiga and make those improvements available.

      They had difficulty with backward compatibility. The design was fairly kludgy to keep the machines cheap (which was their main selling point). The side-effect is that upgrades had to match the original kludge for kludge, making a mess of any newer model.

    34. Re:Commodore engineers by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      The Amiga's design? One of the most beautiful, non-kludges, ever designed. Frankly, the only thing C= could have done that would have kludged it (a little) would have been to add a chunky pixel mode - which I believe is what they were trying to do with the 32 bit chipset they started working on before moving over to AGA.

      AGA was exactly what you'd expect a 32 bit, faster, version of OCS/ECS to look like, and the best part was that it delivered an amazing advance over ECS without either being a kludge or sacrificing reverse compatibility. In part that was because the Amiga chipset's design was, from the start, inherently scalable.

      I'm not saying they could have continued indefinitely - while it scaled up well, it was never going to be as efficient at processing 32 bit pixels as an architecture designed with 32 bit pixels from day one. That meant as memory costs reduced and bus speeds soared eventually the Amiga design became obsolete. But that wasn't the case in 1990-1993.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    35. Re:Commodore engineers by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I meant C64. My bad.

  6. Surely the most widespread by aglider · · Score: 1

    But maybe not the oldest one!

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
  7. Remember the TV ad song? by ls671 · · Score: 1

    Anybody remembers the TV ad song? I just came through my mind, it went like:

    "I adore my sixty-four, my Commodore sixty-four"

    Heck, I just googled for it:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  8. phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do we know by how much would the phone next to it beat the C64 in terms of processing power ?

    1. Re:phone by lapm · · Score: 1

      Docent matter. They landed on moon with computing power less then even cheap chinese multifunction calculators are cabable... Just because its old, you dont throw it away... ;)

    2. Re:phone by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Show me how you balance the drive shafts on the phone.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:phone by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Probably by a huge margin. I already had a C64 emulator in my phone about 5 years ago.

    4. Re:phone by m.alessandrini · · Score: 1

      The sinusoidal waveform generator may have more power than it, if it has a microcontroller and is not purely analog.

    5. Re:phone by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Can't do a like-for-like comparison. I'd say somewhere around 100,000 times the speed (depending on task), and a similar order of magnitude for RAM.

    6. Re: phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use an app that reads the accelerometer. Smartphones have tons of useful sensors that can be used for all sorts of things.

    7. Re:phone by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Sending it to the moon isn't throwing it away?

    8. Re:phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how well a well-packed RasberryPi Zero would drive the system with an emulator..

    9. Re:phone by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      The AGC was a 16bit computer with 64k of memory 2K RAM). My last calculator from about 15 years ago was 64 bits, ran at 4MHz and had 640kb memory.

    10. Re:phone by Eric+Green · · Score: 1

      I would use an Arduino board with a Bluetooth adapter to do all the grunt work, and use the (Android) smartphone just for the user interface, talking to the Arduino via a Serial profile. We do something like that in ham radio nowadays to interface APRS with Android tablets, with the Android tablet providing GPS coordinates to be outputted as ham radio packets to the APRS system, and accepting GPS coordinates sent via packet radio from the ham-radio-interfaced Arduino to display the call signs of surrounding ham radio stations on the Android tablet's display . (Can't do it with iDevices because Apple won't open up access to the Serial profile).

      --
      Send mail here if you want to reach me.
  9. Can you please not talk about the computer of my by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    youth like it's a museum piece? Please?

  10. The last C64 I saw... by ctrl-alt-canc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...was managing the inventary of a bookstore here in Italy. I saw it about five years ago, and the bookstore was specialized in ancient books.
    It was a really inspiring vision to see on the same desk a C64 surrounded by some in-folio books. Too bad that the store was shut down recently, don't know what happened to the C64.

  11. Re: Can you please not talk about the computer of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    youth like it's a museum piece? Please?

    How about you fuck off until you learn the difference between the subject and contents??

  12. Help Me by bosseric · · Score: 0

    One common gripe in the twenty-first century is that nothing is built to last anymore. Even complex, expensive computers seem to have a relatively short shelf-life nowadays. However, one computer in a small auto repair shop in Gdansk, Poland has survived for the last twenty-five years against all odds. visa my

    1. Re:Help Me by ledow · · Score: 1

      I guarantee you that I can find a piece of paper older than 25 years quite easily. I probably have one in my attic.

      I can find you a microscope and telescope even older.
      Or if we're talking electronics, electronic games and games older than 25 years.

      25 years is, to be honest, pathetic in terms of longevity. I have electronic toys from my childhood that haven't been particularly looked after which still work just fine.

      To be honest, I'm sitting here thinking "Only 25 years?". I have a 1960's memory chip on my desk. It's the size of a dinner plate. If I had the room-sized supercomputer that went with it, I might even be able to tell you if it's working. I see no reason for it not to as it's in perfect condition and still in the original box.

      25 years is really pathetic.
      And how much tech has lasted that long? A handful of things across the world.

      How much is going to last 50-100 years? Almost nothing.

      And there goes entire periods of history with no permanent record, of technology or data.

      To give you a clue, this memory chip only has the code C630-5150-T001 on it. Find me a spec sheet. A manufacturer. Tell me what it does or how to interface with it.

      It's pretty, but it's completely dead technology without spending literally tens of thousands to analyse how it works and destroying it in the process.

      Now consider what's going to happen to everything else by the time they are that old. It's only another 20 years that you're asking of this C64. By then, even the generation that grew up with it and now enjoy it on emulators will have started to forget about it, and certainly how it works. You think your grandchild's generation are going to care at all, even the archivists and museum curators?

    2. Re:Help Me by ethanms · · Score: 1

      To give you a clue, this memory chip only has the code C630-5150-T001 on it. Find me a spec sheet. A manufacturer. Tell me what it does or how to interface with it.

      It's pretty, but it's completely dead technology without spending literally tens of thousands to analyse how it works and destroying it in the process.

      I have a Realistic Clarinette 119 from 1986 that still works, better yet, it includes a manual that has a full schematic printed in the back. I have a GE record player from the mid-1960s, complete with tube amplifier, also still works and includes the schematic printed inside the electronics access panel.

      Now to your memory device--We're building more and more into single package ICs (both single and multiple chips inside)... it's just impractical to even consider providing functional data with the devices those parts are used in, let alone the parts themselves, and in many cases the data isn't even publicly published for competitive reasons. The semiconductor company I used to work for produced audio components, we had cryptic markings on the chip and produced an absolutely minimal data sheet (for public consumption) because the part wasn't available for low volumes and where the volumes made sense for us to sell, we hand-held companies on the designs. These products are all disposable, not only because it's impractical to repair or reuse, but because no manufacturer would want it due to reducing future sales. So of course durability is hardly a factor for most products.

      Now consider just how little is being printed today? It's always fun (for me anyway) to find or read old newspapers--what was going on that day 50 years ago? In 50 years no one will have a clue what was posted to a news website on a particular day. You'll have to hope someone added it to Wiki or that whatever news conglomerate is running the news has a search history that goes back that far.

      What about old pictures? We used to cherish them, buy special enclosures for them. Now we take a picture, upload it, and hope it stays somewhere. Maybe we print it, but the paper and inks are less durable. If you keep it digital after a few years you've moved on to the next storage as a service provider and your stuff may stick around, but it's effectively in a digital landfill unless you take care of it. Moving your digital stuff ought to be easier than your physical stuff, but if you put a photo album on a shelf for 20 years it will still be there as long as you don't move. What digital medium can you say the same about? Even CD/DVD degrades relatively quickly--and that's assuming you still have a reader... My Mac laptop hasn't had a CD drive in years.

      Everything has become disposable, even our information.

      I predict that in 100 years we'll have more persistent informational "artifacts" from 1950 then 2050 because we'll continue down our path of disposable information, people will give less and less concern to the gigabytes and terabytes of information they generate year after year.

      / end grandpa rant

    3. Re:Help Me by Eric+Green · · Score: 1

      I still have most of the Commodore 64 code that I ever wrote, even though the computers are sitting in my brother's attic 2,000 miles from here and the disks are long gone. As I've upgraded platforms I've pulled in my files from the previous platforms, and now we have emulators so I could even run the programs again if I wished. This obviously isn't going to help with things that had a hardware component like my card for interfacing a Commodore 64 with a 1571 disk drive at full 1571 speed (wire-wrapped, naturally, and using a ROM simulator SRAM chip to hold my code), but (shrug). The whole need for that is really not there anymore since a simulated 1541 is ridiculously faster than the real thing was.

      --
      Send mail here if you want to reach me.
  13. Im not suprised it still works by lapm · · Score: 1

    Well old times things were not built to cheapest zhensen market special offer components. Om surprised our modern technology works as well at it does considering they use cheapest everything they can find on them... Vheapest capasitors, cheapest resistors, cheapest chips, cheapest pcb manufacturing.... And old Commodore64 pcb is not one of those moderns hey lets get little water on it and it corrodes away types...

    1. Re:Im not suprised it still works by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Vheapest capasitors

      Cheapest "C" key switches, as well, I see.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  14. As a huge Commodore nerd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a huge Commodore nerd with far too many C64s and C128s and accessories in my house, this is the kind of story I need from Slashdot.

    I recently dug out all my old 5¼-inch floppy disks and used my ZoomFloppy to try to image them to my PC. Sadly, many of them were stored in slightly damp conditions and now have some kind of mold or dirt on the disk surface. Gently wiping it off with isopropyl alcohol allowed me to read some of the disks, but others appear to be unrecoverable. Also, as the disks spin they transfer any residual dirt or mold to the drive head, so I need to clean the drive head constantly.

    On the other hand, it's kind of amazing that they work at all after ~25 years sitting in my basement.

  15. My God, clean it sometimes! by m.alessandrini · · Score: 1

    Sure it didn't last so long because well maintained.

    1. Re:My God, clean it sometimes! by Jeremi · · Score: 2

      It would be a bad idea to clean it now -- at this point the dirt is its primary structural element.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  16. It's the overall statistics that counts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A few survives long from everything. That does not prove reliability.

  17. Why did it have to fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I dare to say that Amiga was a good decade ahead of its time when it was released. X86 machines took surprisingly long to catch up. It also had massive potential for future.

    Yet it is gone. World could use one more major brand to keep the competition up..

  18. Best selling computer? by Yenya · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I highly doubt C64 is the best-selling computer of all time. Wikipedia estimates 10M-17M C64s were sold. It of course depends on what is a computer: for example, many smartphones have CPU(s), memory, storage, and even display. According to this page, in 2011 Apple sold 72M iPhones: https://www.statista.com/stati... . Also, 10M Raspberry Pi computers were sold till 2016: https://www.raspberrypi.org/bl.... I guess Arduinos have similar numbers, but they are hard to track because of clones.

    --
    -Yenya
    --
    While Linux is larger than Emacs, at least Linux has the excuse that it has to be. --Linus
    1. Re:Best selling computer? by eulernet · · Score: 1

      There are 80 millions of PlayStation 3 in the world:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    2. Re:Best selling computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      155 million PS2s could claim to hold the record.

      The Nokia 1100 sold 250 million units, but it wasn't a smartphone. The best selling smartphone was the Nokia 5230 with 150 million units. The iPhone 6 variants have managed to sell 100 million so far.

    3. Re:Best selling computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, but not the same exact model, that's what the 64 managed. It was the same machine sold for a decade.

    4. Re:Best selling computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's call spade a spade, I mean phone a phone.

    5. Re:Best selling computer? by wildstoo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, but not the same exact model, that's what the 64 managed. It was the same machine sold for a decade.

      THIS. It is the biggest selling single model of computer ever made. There were several hardware revisions for cost reduction and simplification (from ~40 chips down to 16 as they integrated a lot of components over time), but it was essentially exactly the same computer manufactured and sold from 1982 to 1992.

    6. Re:Best selling computer? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised that it was that few. I remember seeing them for £50 in Argos about a decade after they were first released. They were incredibly popular as games machines and a load of shops had a row of C64 game tapes for around 50p each (NES games were around £10, if I remember correctly, at the same time).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:Best selling computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you don't allow games consoles and smartphones to qualify as a "computer", then you are correct.

      But why, for example, would an iPhone not be a computer? It has a screen, an operating system, CPU and memory, keyboard input, speakers. Does its ability to send and receive radio signals mean that it cannot be regarded as a computer?

    8. Re:Best selling computer? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I have two different variants of the C64 and there was a later one (slightly off-white) that was in production for a long time.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    9. Re:Best selling computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But arduino is just an AVR, FTDI and headers cobbled together

    10. Re:Best selling computer? by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 2

      It's because Apple keeps messing with the operating system on iPhones that it doesn't really qualify (and nor does it come with a keyboard)

      The C64 had the same BASIC and KERNAL ROMs for the entire production run, meaning that each revision of the hardware was equally 100% compatible with any other C64.

      You can't really say that for most computer lines. Take the Atari 8-bit line, the Apple II series, or the Commodore Amigas..... All different revisions of essentially the same computer in different memory, kernel, and language configurations. Oftentimes the different cases prevented certain expansions from working correctly, but not the C64.

      Sure there was the C64 breadbin and C64C cases, and yes there were motherboard revisions of the circuitry including some sound and CPU chip revisions which were different yet otherwise 100% compatible... but other than that the Commodore 64 was a consistant platform for it's entire decade-long production run. Perhaps because of that, it held it's own defacto standard to which all demo coders could pitch towards in the demo scene. They weren't shit-fighting over using different hardware chips or memory expansions as the Amiga demoscene had to put up with. Most demos (with some notable exceptions) all used the stock hardware with a 1541 disk drive.... and that was it, and those were the rules that everyone understood (and still understands)

      For that reason the demoscene on the C64 has stayed more or less constant too, and hasn't died like the other demo scenes.

      --
      READY.
      PRINT ""+-0
    11. Re:Best selling computer? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      THIS. It is the biggest selling single model of computer ever made. There were several hardware revisions for cost reduction and simplification (from ~40 chips down to 16 as they integrated a lot of components over time),

      So, what you're saying is that if you pretend they didn't make three or four totally different revisions of hardware meeting the same spec, it's a single model?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:Best selling computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That just goes to show how misleading the ‘# sold of single model’ statistic is. The IBM PC and its clones were much more successful and their successors are now in every home, on every desk in every office, and in most server farms. And most other computers are Android phones. Meanwhile, the C64 is a footnote in the history of computing, even though it stings quite a bit to have to say this, as I'm an old C64 fan.

    13. Re:Best selling computer? by Yenya · · Score: 1

      I guess that amongst 72M iPhones sold in 2011 you can find at least 17M identical ones. Apple sells only few models at a given time, and the variability is not that high (the SoC sourced from two different foundries is probably the biggest difference).

      --
      -Yenya
      --
      While Linux is larger than Emacs, at least Linux has the excuse that it has to be. --Linus
    14. Re:Best selling computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might as well argue that every time they changed suppliers for a 2N3904 that makes it a "different" model as well.

    15. Re:Best selling computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many frigging times do we have to go through this with you dunces? When they say computer they mean general purpose computer, not anything with an IC in it. According to you morons the best selling computer of all times should be the tamagotchi but if someone would have mentioned that you'd have scoffed. You know what they meant but you're head is too far up your rear to be sensible about it.

    16. Re:Best selling computer? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You might as well argue that every time they changed suppliers for a 2N3904 that makes it a "different" model as well.

      They actually changed not just the suppliers of the chips, but actually what chips were used, and therefore changed the schematic. I would actually suggest that there's really only two C64s, the C64 and the later-serial-numbered C64S. Still, that's two models.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:Best selling computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it isn't you reprobate. It works the same, it looks the same, it runs the same software. I mean your body (I don't think you have a brain) is constantly swapping out cells and making news ones... are you a different shithead from yesterday?

    18. Re:Best selling computer? by lgw · · Score: 1

      We're talking about general purpose computers. Not locked down appliances that do some computing.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    19. Re:Best selling computer? by laffer1 · · Score: 1

      Early ones can run linux.

    20. Re:Best selling computer? by wildstoo · · Score: 1

      Well, the difference is that the C64 was actually good.

      *grabs popcorn*

    21. Re:Best selling computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, the Tamagotchi only sold 76 million units.

      What can a C64 do that an iPhone can't? What is your definition of "general purpose"?

    22. Re:Best selling computer? by wildstoo · · Score: 1

      Over 100million "iPhone6"s have been sold. Totally blows

      End the sentence there and I completely agree.

    23. Re:Best selling computer? by wildstoo · · Score: 1

      Does its ability to send and receive radio signals mean that it cannot be regarded as a computer?

      Hey, if you remove the RF shields from the C64 it'll send radio signals too. They won't mean much, but they'll be there nevertheless. ;)

      I suppose the definition of computer I'm using is: "Was it marketed and sold as a computer?"

      Feel free to bend over backwards attempting to assert that the iPhone was marketed that way. I'm going to bed.

    24. Re:Best selling computer? by wildstoo · · Score: 1

      I suppose if you want to quibble about the definition of the word "model", or have a philosophical discussion about Theseus' paradox then you might have a point... but if you do you'll probably be talking to yourself.

  19. Re: Can you please not talk about the computer of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But it is. Even 10 year old tech is museum-worthy in some cases. Computing ages on a severely compressed timescale.
    Sometimes you get so used to thinking about things from 20 years ago as "ancient", that you're surprised the people involved are still alive and producing things.

  20. Another 'oldie' but goodie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Our local school has an Amiga running the HVAC in 9 schools

    http://woodtv.com/2015/06/11/1980s-computer-controls-grps-heat-and-ac/

  21. Programming language by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Funny

    The worst part is you couldn't program C++ on the C65.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Programming language by anybody_out_there · · Score: 1

      The worst part is you couldn't program C++ on the C65.

      No, but you could program in Forth :-)

    2. Re:Programming language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We aren't talking about the C65 here, but the C64. There were very few C65s made.

    3. Re:Programming language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, at least you can do so today, see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBkNBP00wJE

    4. Re:Programming language by lefticus · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't be so sure about that.

    5. Re:Programming language by michael_wojcik · · Score: 1

      The worst part is you couldn't program C++ on the C65.

      If the code I've seen is representative, most C++ programmers can't "program C++" on anything.

  22. So many customers got the shaft by tomhath · · Score: 1

    They can all thank this hard working machine.

  23. Brings back memories by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

    I love how the three most battered/worn keys are "R" "U" and "N"

  24. headline by tobiasly · · Score: 1

    "Commodore C64 Survives Over 25 Years Balancing Drive Shafts In Auto Repair Shop"

    I completely misunderstood this headline and thought it was literally balancing drive shafts, as in they were missing a cinder block that day, stuck a C64 under them instead, and they'd been sitting like that in the back for 25 years.

    Still impressive I guess :)

  25. Re: Can you please not talk about the computer of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it's even more confusing given the message contents... an oldster who posts like a millennial?

  26. Disagree with the summary by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    PCs can and do last a long, long time. In my case, I have an old 486 from Compaq, '94 vintage, still up and running in my basement.

    1. Re:Disagree with the summary by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      You use it primarily in the winter months as a home heating source, I presume? ;)

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  27. Amstrad! by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

    My Amstrad CPC6128 was way better than the C=64 !!

    ;-)

    --
    "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
  28. What I would like to see... by Not-a-Neg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is the quality of the balancing compared to the modern equivalent device shops use. Is it still accurate after 25 years? Was it ever accurate or as accurate as a modern device can calculate?

    --
    -==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
    1. Re:What I would like to see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a computer... Outside of being slower and capped by bits, it's still accurate for what it can do.

    2. Re:What I would like to see... by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      Is the quality of the balancing compared to the modern equivalent device shops use

      It was every bit as well-balanced as the C64 floppy spindle assembly was.(Sorry, did you say something? I can't hear you over the disk grinding)

  29. Utter nonsense by StandardCell · · Score: 2

    While individuals under communism were extremely resourceful with the limited tools and materials they had on hand, they were inherently and perpetually limited due to central economic planning that failed to take into account individuality and limited access to real capital for research and development.



    As my Romanian friends who escaped Ceacescu's regime always say: the reason communism doesn't work is because all people don't want to be equal to everyone else.

    1. Re:Utter nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's not that people don't want to be equal to everyone else, they just want everyone to be equal to the most wealthy. Nobody is willing to GIVE UP anything to be equal. I think nearly everyone reading this website would be shocked at what would have to be sacrificed to bring equality to everyone in the world.

    2. Re:Utter nonsense by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      A few months ago I read a detailed analysis that showed that if the entire world were equal, people would be living at a $35/day level. Current western levels are $165/day.

  30. Power by sjbe · · Score: 1

    well it only have to be used once per boot and who sais that this machine has ever been turned off?

    How probable do you think it is that they haven't had a power outage in 25 years?

    1. Re:Power by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      If we play with the numbers and say that it happens once per year than that is still only 25 loads from the disk, even the 1541 wasn't _that_ bad at reading disks.

  31. The historical record by sjbe · · Score: 1

    And there goes entire periods of history with no permanent record, of technology or data.

    You do realize that ALL of human history has huge gaps in the historical record right? Both for technology and for everything else. It's not as if our ancestors were busy dutifully scribbling down a carefully maintained record of everything they did. Our historical record has always had big swaths of information that nobody bothered to save for posterity. If anything with the internet we are actually recording more than we ever did in days of yore.

    1. Re:The historical record by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably something like more every few hours than we ever did in days of yore combined.

  32. Captain Pedant by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

    The computer in question here is a Commodore C64 that has been balancing driveshafts non-stop for a quarter of a century.

    It's been running this program 24/7 for the last 25 years? Wow, this must be a really busy repair shop.

    "Non-stop" in a computing context like this to mean "daily" is rather misleading, and a large factor on the reliability of the machine is whether they're shutting it down and starting it up every day. So it's a relevant complaint.

    --
    Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  33. My Amiga 3000D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still works just as well as it did the first day I turned it on in 1991.

    (Actually better, since I upgraded it to have 4 HHDs, Picasso II+ gfxcard, 82MB RAM, and a 25Mhz 68040 accellerator..)

    Perfectly suited for controlling my vast army of flying monkeys.

    1. Re:My Amiga 3000D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, "HHD"s. Four of them, no less!

      What's a HHD?

  34. C-64 was often used for industrial applications by Eric+Green · · Score: 1

    Back in the day, the Commodore 64 was often used for industrial applications like this where the cosmetics of having a trash computer were outweighed by the cost savings of using a common off-the-shelf piece of hardware that had a bunch of easily controlled digital I/O lines hanging out on a card edge connector on the back. In the late 80's I had a contract to write software to display weather radar on a C-64 screen where the resulting consoles were deployed on offshore oil rigs talking back to the homeland over 1200 baud radio modems. I also had a contract to do the heat and magnetic calibration on directional drilling probes, where the signals from the drilling probe went through an analog to digital converter and were then bit-banged in over the parallel port lines on a Commodore 64.

    Today I'd probably use something like an Arduino for things like that. But that of course didn't exist back then.

    --
    Send mail here if you want to reach me.
  35. load "*", 8, 1 by drkoemans · · Score: 1

    I assume there is only one program on the disk.

  36. I bought the first C64 available in my city by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    On Dec 31, 1981 at 5:50 PM I bought the first C64 available for sale in my city. At the time I was a high school student in addition to working 40 hours per week in a retail store. I worked until 5:00 PM that day and I knew that if I didn't arrive before they closed I would have to wait at least 4 more days before the Commodore dealership was open again.

    I had to drive across the city was actually stopped for speeding. When I told the cop the reason that I was in a rush he gave me the weirdest look and sent me off with a warning.

    If my memory is correct I think I paid $1000 CAD for the computer and cassette drive. In 2016 dollars this would about 2700.00.

  37. Craftmanship and communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Communism worked well for some people with particular skills.
    Good mechanics were in high demand. They did not make a fortune as the payments were usually bartered, but their life was definitely good.

    Some other surprising professions were also living well.
    Restaurant / pub guards, for one.
    There was a special profession to scavenge all USSR for supplies for a factory or "kolkhoz". Imagine that you need to buy a plow for your Alabama-based farm or electronic components for your assembly line. Then you send someone off to Canada where, as rumoured, plows or capacitors or whatever may be produced and he might be able to obatain one. Or not. It needed social skill and good connections to do the job.

  38. C64 by MTBaldwin · · Score: 1

    Wow. And to think, I was so proud of my IBM PS2 286, that is still running. ($2000in 1987).

  39. C64 Magazines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember those old magazines where you got hexadecimal program listings you had to type in and run? That was a lot of fun!
    I remember typing in a game - my sister read me the codes - then we played it.
    Another time I typed in the LADS assembler listing and got into assembly language programming. I converted a BASIC program to assembler one time - that was very educational. It worked way faster after my conversion. (if you're curious, I converted a BASIC program that "squeezes" BASIC programs to make them use less memory) Such good memories. I have no such attachment to today's computers.