Slashdot Mirror

Are you sure denied is the right word?

http://www.zdnet.com/article/n...

My understanding was that Hillary wanted a Blackberry (like Obama) and that was denied because it was a one off for the president. They offered Hillary the standard secure mobile solution, and she balked.

Oh, you mean like this one?

http://www.zdnet.com/article/n...

The total amount that was actually used from Oracle's API code was very tiny, less than 0.2%,

The size is mostly irrelevant though. In one case (Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises) someone copied 400 words out of a 200,000 word book (the supreme court ruled against them). As one judge said, "you can't escape guilt by showing how much you didn't copy." You have to look at the importance of the copying, and whether they used more than necessary for the purpose.

Google's use was also transformative. They selected out a useful subset of the Java API, rewrote all of the actual implementation and documentation (97% of the code), then wrote a whole lot more more new APIs

That's not really what is meant by transformative. Here Google's approach was to say, "Before we did this, Java couldn't be used on mobile. We created a new work that allowed people to use Java on mobile." Oracle's counter-argument was to show phones that did have J2SE on mobile (SavaJe, Blackberry).

The nature of the copyrighted work was highly functional, a factor strongly in favor of fair use

Oracle's counter to this was to quote Google's own expert witness, Joshua Bloch, who said, "Writing a program is very much a creative process," and more (see here and here). The appellate court also pointed out that just because cod is functional, that doesn't prevent it from being creative (otherwise basically no code could be copyrighted, since it's all functional).

It most certainly was for interoperability, otherwise there was no reason to use it at all.

It didn't pass the Sun Java test suite (if it had, there wouldn't have been a problem). Google didn't push this argument as much as I expected them to in court, I'm not sure why.

As for market impact, Oracle had OpenJDK available for free as well, licensed under GPLv2+CE.

The court is supposed to look at potential income lost here. If your argument were correct, it would mean the GPL is meaningless because anyone could claim the market value was zero. You can't just take code and not follow the license.

Google is indeed for profit, however giving away the code (including source code) at no cost isn't particularly indicative of commercial use and exploitation.

That's Google's argument. Oracle counter-argued that Google made plenty of money from Android, and showed quotes from internal emails saying that if Google hadn't used Java, they wouldn't have been able to bring Android to market in time, for example, "It is widely believed by that if an open platform is not introduced in the next few years then Microsoft will own the programmable handset platform" and "we have two options: 1) Abandon our work and adopt MSFT C# language, or 2) Do Java anyway and defend our decision, perhaps making enemies along the way."

In this case, the CAFC made the whole process of clean room implementation impossible anyway.

I don't know why you think this. clean room is a technique to ensure that no more was copied than necessary, which would weigh favorably on fair use factor three (or at least prevent it from weighing negatively, since the amount copied is at best a neutral factor).

I also wondered why they would design a drone to do this instead of just using RFID tags. Back in 2003 Wal-Mart announced they were requiring their largest suppliers to integrate RFID tags into packaging.

Did Wal-Mart love RFID to death?

You'll get some great info from Slashdot, but you'll also get misleading advice like the above.

Cortana is an ad for the ads on Bing

Google Chrome is an ad for the ads on Google. If you're ok with search engines and virtual assistants like Siri or Google Now, I doubt Cortana would raise any real concerns.

I'm not saying you should be ok with search ads or virtual assistant data sent to these companies. That's up to you.

Live Tiles are just ads for the MS App Store

Live Tiles have nothing to do with ads. They're content-focused widgets. The content is completely at the discretion of the developer. And you can turn the "live" part off if you don't like what it shows... or unpin or uninstall the app, you have several options.

Windows 10 does include ads for store apps (called Suggested Apps). They are not live tiles. You can turn suggested apps off via a setting: http://www.zdnet.com/article/h...

How semi-literate children in a remote Indian village taught themselves molecular biology

less about the source code which most open sources users can't read anyways, and more about Open Standards

Yeah, they tried the 'open surface' argument before. We weren't fooled then and we aren't fooled now. But keep trying, punk.

http://www.zdnet.com/article/g...

The Google representative said "XMPP was designed over a decade ago to provide a way for chat networks to interoperate, known as federation. Google Talk was the only major network to support federation, and after seven years, it’s evident that the rest of the industry is not moving to embrace this open system. If, at some point in the future, the industry shows interest, then we would then be open to discussions about developing an interface that's designed for modern needs."

That doesn't sound like "let's be evil".

Alexa has the same problem, since voice recognition happens on the Internet.
  Is it possible to do full untrained voice recognition on a platform as limited as a smartphone?
Google supports offline voice recognition, but only for a very limited set of commands.
http://www.zdnet.com/article/g...

You can use Mac OS X VR-to-text in an offline mode. It downloads a big database (50 MB, big deal), and you have to adapt to its language: That is, "comma", "line break, line break", "close parentheses", and so on.

The help webpage gives the full list of commands for punctuating as you speak. And, in the usual Apple style, the specific words chosen are the most reasonable 'average intuitive' choice that people might make.

I wrote a 3-page essay, just to test it out. My wife read it, and asked if I had been the one who had written it, because it was in a dramatically different style than my normal (technical) writing. Well, I was speaking conversationally, so yes, the tone of my writing was completely different. Actually very cool.

Alexa has the same problem, since voice recognition happens on the Internet.
Is it possible to do full untrained voice recognition on a platform as limited as a smartphone?
Google supports offline voice recognition, but only for a very limited set of commands. http://www.zdnet.com/article/g...

Why would MS have to backport those features? Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 are no longer being sold.

For one OEM installations are still being sold. Retail license sales are not their only sales.

http://www.zdnet.com/article/w...

XP is still i686 only. It needs a pentium 2.

The version I'm getting explicit states "Upgrade Tonight" rather than simply "Upgrade Later". You can see a screenshot here. They don't make it obvious but you can just close it with the X in the upper right corner and it doesn't upgrade; there's no "Don't upgrade ever" button. It's only a slightly dirty trick on MS's part - you need to train your wife to read better before clicking on things....and yes I know difficult of a problem that is, I'm married, too.

Google announced this at Google IO in 2014 - http://www.zdnet.com/article/g...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...
https://threatpost.com/en_us/b...
http://www.zdnet.com/dutch-dns...
http://www.dshield.org/diary/n...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

APK

P.S.=> Next: Rogue DNS + GHOST domains - THEN, onto AntiVirus' ADMITTED inefficacy (SYMANTEC) & SECURITY FLAWS (Tavis Ormandy anyone?) ... apk

http://hardware.slashdot.org/s...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...
http://it.slashdot.org/story/1...
http://nakedsecurity.sophos.co...
http://thestack.com/zyxeltech-...
https://nakedsecurity.sophos.c...
http://www.itworld.com/article...
http://www.eweek.com/security/...
http://it.slashdot.org/story/1...
https://threatpost.com/exploit...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...
http://www.zdnet.com/linkedin-...
http://www.bing.com/search?q=r...

APK

P.S.=> See subject & now more specific attacks on DNS by malware's next... apk

https://isc.sans.edu/diary/wor...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...
http://www.dshield.org/diary/W...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://www.zdnet.com/au/optus-...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...
http://www.dshield.org/diary/N...
http://yro.slashdot.org/story/...
http://nakedsecurity.sophos.co...
http://www.crn.com/news/securi...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

APK

P.S.=> Next is SECURITY BREACHES due to DNS failures... apk

Shill some more dipshit.

The people at Microsoft has changed, but Microsoft has not. You simply do not change the culture in a company by changing the people who work for it over time.

There have been examples of companies with such a toxic culture it was easier to shut them down than change it, and that's among those who have tied. Microsoft has not. They are still serving the same old soup, they just partially use new ingredients.

Did you take some Nadella dick in the ass right now, or is it going to be tonight?

"the next phase of the case will head to court in May, where a jury will decide if Google had the right to use certain parts of Oracle's programming language, Java, for free or if it owes Oracle damages"

Google designed a totally independent implementation of the Java API. Java was originally described as being free to use unencumbered by a license by Jonathan Schwartz before Sun sold it to Oracle. The Google version used in android is a totally independent and unique design. Does not use the Java Virtual Machine but one of Dalvik or the Android Runtime (ART).

"Schwartz explained that if the Apache Software Foundation wished to release a product, even if it implemented Java APIs through Apache Harmony, it could do so without a license -- so long as it does not call it Java." ref

You're right, they won one. I am glad they did.

http://www.zdnet.com/article/a...

Skype was already switching away from P2P when they were acquired. This was fairly widely reported. Their P2P algorithm sucked, and was responsible for at least a couple global service outages. It just didn't scale as well as dedicated hardware.

We have to wear fitness trackers? That statement is so far beyond stupid that the single greatest thing you could do for humanity is to play in traffic.

You must be the hipster parents warn their children about.

I don't think Slashdot is the right target audience for fitness trackers, and you can always argue if anything is really needed, but there is no doubt that they are selling in far greater numbers than smartwatches. And in good enough numbers that they are prominently marketed by consumer electronics chains. This corresponds with my personal experience as well, I know a number of people using fitness trackers, I'm the only one with a smartwatch (Pebble Steel).

http://www.zdnet.com/article/f...

Whether or not blackberry devices survive is very much in the balance, but Blackberry the company is making a bundle on their QNX OS, which is quietly powering a huge number of devices in very diverse markets.

http://www.qnx.com/products/ne...
http://www.qnx.com/partners/pa...
http://www.zdnet.com/article/b...

The 9% is what Microsoft labels "Windows (VL) and Patent Licensing"; however, Microsoft counts Server Products, Cloud Services as separate, Enterprise Services as separate, Windows OEM as separate. So if we take away all of those, the volume licensing means far fewer products. It doesn't mean Dell installing Windows on their laptops for customers. It doesn't mean companies who buy server licenses. It may not even mean companies who purchase Windows Enterprise licenses. The last residual is tiny.

Katta forgot to use the Comcast unsubscribe hammer.


Today Justin Playfair would battle the cable company rather than the phone company.
Of course, the PHONE COPS are still tracking down Dr. Johnny Fever, because he's a delusional burnt-out ex-hippy.

If the US creates this precedent, the Chinese will take it even further, and while you may think the FBI is trustworthy I doubt most people would extend similar trust to the governments of every country in which Apple operates.

In fact, unlike you, I trust neither Apple, nor the FBI, nor the Chinese government. You live in a fantasy if you think that Apple hasn't already cooperated with the Chinese government in order to get access to the Chinese market, just like Microsoft has already done with the Russian government. That is why I so strenuously object to the fiction that somehow Apple's public refusal to comply with the FBI amounts to anything in terms of security.

Keep in mind that Cook is a gay man ... I wouldn't be surprised if for Mr. Cook personally, the idea that a government that would view people like him as sub-human or criminals due to their sexual preference might request the exact same tools that the FBI is requesting is terrifying.

Well, and I am a gay man and immigrated from a country where conditions were much worse than what Cook ever experienced. That's why I object to Cook's attempt at security-through-obscurity and the security fictions he is peddling. It's also why I don't trust or believe Apple when they say they have my best interests at heart: I've seen too many people like Cook stand up proclaiming that they are protecting privacy while quietly cooperating with governments to spy on people.

That does appear to be the way he is pushing his engineers.

The fact that iPhone encryption wasn't secure against government demands has been known for a long time. Tim Cook has been in charge of Apple since 2011, so he could have "pushed his engineers" to do this for nearly five years, but he didn't. The logical conclusion is he either didn't give a fuck about it until it became a PR problem, or the security holes in the iPhone's architecture are there deliberately to make the Russian and Chinese governments happy.

It's absolutely social engineering at its worst. Take a look at this article by Mary Jo Foley (well known Microsoft-focused writer) and check out the dialog box in the middle of the article. Notice how insanely difficult it is to figure out how to even cancel this operation. There's no standard "cancel" button, you click a tiny hyperlink to "cancel or delay" the update. I think (although not 100% certain) that just hitting the "close" button isn't the same as cancelling.

What appears to be happening is that this update is being scheduled without user consent in some cases, so unless the user actively cancels (they'll have two chances, one three days before, and one 60 minutes before), Windows 10 will be installed. It's hard to say whether this is intentional or not, but really, Microsoft has been pushing Windows 10 so aggressively that even if it *were* an honest mistake, they've really lost most of their credibility on this issue.

What's really sad is that at its core, Windows 10 is actually a decent OS, but MS has made so many questionable decisions that this really can't make up for all the negatives for many people. They could have made a few simple changes in strategy and I think a lot more people would have been fine with it:

* Offer the free Upgrade, and let the user dismiss it. Pop up once again before the free offer expires, but otherwise, shut the hell up.
* Allow a simple, one-click option to avoid all cloud-based options and telemetry (maximum privacy) both at install time or in the control panel.
* Kill advertisement in the OS itself - a seriously, seriously terrible idea.
* Allow pro and corporate users to opt out of mandatory updates ("pro" implies you know what the fuck you're doing, after all). Automatic updates is fine as the default setting.
* Anyone should be able to explicitly exclude specific updates for safety reasons.

I think these are the big issues people have. Most people probably would have been fine with the defaults, so they could have let privacy-conscious people stay happy without really even affecting how many people use those new services anyhow. If you make those services (like cloud integration or Cortana) compelling enough, people will want to use them anyhow.

Nope. It won't install unless you accept the EULA. It is NOT automatic. The same people that get trojan horses installed all the time and click OK to everything have got this installed too. They probably also have the Ask Toolbar and lots of other garbage. Here's the details: http://www.zdnet.com/article/h...

2008: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/v...

2009: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

2010: https://nakedsecurity.sophos.c...

Look what some moron said about the same subject back in 2011:
http://www.developers.slashdot...

2012: https://www.intego.com/mac-sec...

2012: http://www.zdnet.com/article/c...

2012: http://www.infosecisland.com/b...

etc., etc.

All I want to know is why I need to reboot my OS every time I do an Ubuntu update. It didn't use to be necessary.

Because Ksplice was acquired by Oracle: http://www.zdnet.com/article/o...
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Ksplic...

AC thats about all it is about. A mil and gov version of the US style Ag gag laws https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... to stop public comment on mil spending and shield no bid mil contractors from press comment.

The mentioned list is:
Epidemiology, the almost total lack of advance medical containment for patients per state and reduction in agricultural inspections thanks free trade deals.
Biotechnology: quarantine laws are been removed to allow more international trade deals. No talk in the press, no reports of new outbreaks due to policy changes so the policy is good if no reports are made.
The quantum computer aspect, quantum computers, signal processing is trying to secure dual use mil and civilian communications networks. Every mil base is basically connected to wide open civilian communications networks built by random global contractors. The hope is quantum computers will allow for effortless secure mil communications over the same public and international networks. A huge risk for any military to have to trust civilian communications networks rather than its own networks. A lot of domestic spending on quantum computers will try to solve the lack of any telco network design.
Defence to invest over AU$5b in cyber and IT to rectify under-investment (February 25, 2016)
http://www.zdnet.com/article/d...
Satellite sharing and a lack of secure satellite systems is another long term issue that should have been fixed but never was. Some vital mil satellite systems are shared with a few other nations, their govs, mil and contractors :)
Fault-tolerant systems dont exist and never got designed in. The less the wider public and press knows about that the better for the political class. No real fuel reserve policy, a very basic communications backup system.
Australia nearly completely dependent on imported fuel (24 February 2014)
http://www.abc.net.au/radionat... Image processing is basically what generations of staff learned from the "NRO" during staff trips. A huge amount of skilled staff could spot Soviet 1960-80's equipment thanks to US sharing :) A new generation of staff are trying to learn more eg Torus multi-beam antenna, infrared systems.
The Pine Gap project
http://nautilus.org/briefing-b...
Robotics is basically drone work and AI for drones. Nothing unique that any other advanced nation can work on given the same levels of funding.

Actually, Sydney was ranked #7 in 2015, and neither New York nor London appear in the bottom 10 (surprising nobody). Bottom of the list is Damascus in Syria. Maybe you forgot how big the world is. It's not just Western Europe, Australasia and North America.

certain foreigners refuse to assimilate

Oh fuck right off.

Because private companies are so much better at keeping their data safe.

http://www.zdnet.com/article/a...

About half of my family is running Linux instead of Windows. We're geekier than the average, but I can tell you that non-geeks in my family have no problem at all running a Linux desktop. (And I've installed Windows and Linux, and overall it's easier to do a Linux install.)

It has never been easier to junk Windows and switch to Linux. Many people just use email, a web browser, and Facebook; those all Just Work on Linux. Video, sound, it's all fine.

And desktop is getting less important all the time; people are using mobile devices more and more. And Microsoft missed the boat on mobile.

So even as the "network" that makes Windows important is crumbling ("network" as in "network effect"), even as Microsoft's actual power to push people is waning, they keep finding new ways to punish people who stick with them. Hey, nobody will mind if we monitor them a bunch, right? Make it almost impossible to figure out whether it's enabled or not. (If it's even possible to disable it... maybe it isn't!) And start pushing ads, because nobody hates having full-screen ads in their faces.

Is Microsoft actually trying to achieve Windows 8 levels of hatred for Windows 10? Does Linus Torvalds have sleeper agents inside Microsoft trying to make Windows crumble from inside?

Keep this up, MIcrosoft, and we may yet see the Year of Linux on the Desktop.

P.S. I haven't bothered to keep up with all the settings one must change to disable all the bad behaviors in Windows 10. I just checked to see if there's a tool for it... there's a bunch and it's not obvious which one(s) to use. Is there a clear favorite tool to fix the Windows 10 settings?

http://www.ghacks.net/2015/08/14/comparison-of-windows-10-privacy-tools/

Hmm... maybe this one: Spybot Anti-Beacon

To add to this already long list:

Some of the most important freedoms we have come from this guy as well due to the loopholes he introduced into the DMCA:
http://www.zdnet.com/article/b...

Seriously, what a fucking disgrace this summary is.

I don't think that's quite right either: zdnet has a reasonable rundown. The court order is for "Apple to provide", which I interpret as giving the gov the tool. I read elsewhere (can't find the source, maybe on /. earlier today...) that Apple requested the FBI make a sealed request and they would have complied. That hints that Apple didn't want their (potential) tool to be public knowledge.

It's also not quite as simple as "Apple does it, destroy the tool, call it a day." It's like any weapon, once developed it's hard to put the genie back in the bottle. We can't go back from missiles, guns, bombs, etc... The technology is there, and it can't be undone. Similarly, if Apple where to develop the tool and use it in-house, then there are brains in Cupertino that know how to defeat the protection. Think of insider threat, extortion, the increased attempts to break into Apples network, etc... Not to mention the requests from law enforcement to break into other phones.

I've never been a fan of Apple's walled garden and prefer to have control over my devices... though with their standing firm on consumer privacy that iPhone is starting to look pretty good.

I don't think that's quite right either: zdnet has a reasonable rundown. The court order is for "Apple to provide", which I interpret as giving the gov the tool. I read elsewhere (can't find the source, maybe on /. earlier today...) that Apple requested the FBI make a sealed request and they would have complied. That hints that Apple didn't want their (potential) tool to be public knowledge.

It's also not quite as simple as "Apple does it, destroy the tool, call it a day." It's like any weapon, once developed it's hard to put the genie back in the bottle. We can't go back from missiles, guns, bombs, etc... The technology is there, and it can't be undone. Similarly, if Apple where to develop the tool and use it in-house, then there are brains in Cupertino that know how to defeat the protection. Think of insider threat, extortion, the increased attempts to break into Apples network, etc... Not to mention the requests from law enforcement to break into other phones.

I've never been a fan of Apple's walled garden and prefer to have control over my devices... though with their standing firm on consumer privacy that iPhone is starting to look pretty good.

Sigh... You're pointing to a throughly debunked and retracted claim. Having your router deny all connections causes the networking stack to retry them, hence the overblown connection numbers. The IP addresses listed at things like the NetBIOS and DNS broadcast IPs (used by machines on a local network to identify each other).

http://www.zdnet.com/article/w...

Everything you're saying is just rubbish.

I hear they lose stuff all the time.

Sounds like a rip-off of PC-104, i.e. they are a few decades late.

Microsoft's smiley face patent?
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacg...

"I would have expected to see something like this suggested by one of our more immature community members as a joke on Slashdot, and probably would have chuckled at the absurdity of the notion. We now appear to be living in a world where even the most laughable paranoid fantasies about commercially controlling simple social concepts are being outdone in the real world by well-funded armies of lawyers on behalf of some of the most powerful companies on the planet," http://www.zdnet.com/article/m...

The day I get a real "can listen and produce cleartext locally" application (or device) is the day my home (and car, and boat) gain significant automation.

I was under the impression that many of the newer Android (possibly also iOS) devices do have this functionality (albeit for a limited subset of commands).

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2..." ADD_DATE="1449501567" LAST_VISITED="0">Lock up your top-of-racks, says Cisco, theres a bug in the USB code â The Register
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/P...
http://www.wired.com/threatlev...
http://www.zdnet.com.au/cisco-...
http://www.zdnet.com/cisco-fix...
http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
http://yro.slashdot.org/story/...
http://yro.slashdot.org/story/...
http://yro.slashdot.org/story/...
https://isc.sans.edu/forums/di...
https://nakedsecurity.sophos.c...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

APK

P.S.=> So much for your faith in routers alone stupid (225 in total, 15 posts with 15 items each)... apk

SMALL partial only sample of OpenBid/realtime bidding & other ad networks malware makers have taken advantage of to infect you with:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.wired.com/techbiz/m...

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023...

http://news.slashdot.org/story...

http://www.itworld.com/securit...

http://nakedsecurity.sophos.co...

http://www.zdnet.com/ad-exec-o...

http://search.slashdot.org/sto...

http://nakedsecurity.sophos.co...

http://www.securityweek.com/ea...

http://yro.slashdot.org/story/...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

APK

P.S.=> See subject & those links (+ ads not only INFECT US, but STEAL BANDWIDTH & SPEED WE PAY FOR MONTHLY+ track us too)

... apk

SMALL partial only sample of OpenBid/realtime bidding & other ad networks malware makers have taken advantage of to infect you with:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.wired.com/techbiz/m...

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023...

http://news.slashdot.org/story...

http://www.itworld.com/securit...

http://nakedsecurity.sophos.co...

http://www.zdnet.com/ad-exec-o...

http://search.slashdot.org/sto...

http://nakedsecurity.sophos.co...

http://www.securityweek.com/ea...

http://yro.slashdot.org/story/...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

APK

P.S.=> See subject & those links (+ ads not only INFECT US, but STEAL BANDWIDTH & SPEED WE PAY FOR MONTHLY+ track us too)

... apk

SMALL partial only sample of OpenBid/realtime bidding & other ad networks malware makers have taken advantage of to infect you with:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.wired.com/techbiz/m...

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023...

http://news.slashdot.org/story...

http://www.itworld.com/securit...

http://nakedsecurity.sophos.co...

http://www.zdnet.com/ad-exec-o...

http://search.slashdot.org/sto...

http://nakedsecurity.sophos.co...

http://www.securityweek.com/ea...

http://yro.slashdot.org/story/...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

APK

P.S.=> See subject & those links (+ ads not only INFECT US, but STEAL BANDWIDTH & SPEED WE PAY FOR MONTHLY+ track us too)

... apk

SMALL partial only sample of OpenBid/realtime bidding & other ad networks malware makers have taken advantage of to infect you with:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.wired.com/techbiz/m...

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023...

http://news.slashdot.org/story...

http://www.itworld.com/securit...

http://nakedsecurity.sophos.co...

http://www.zdnet.com/ad-exec-o...

http://search.slashdot.org/sto...

http://nakedsecurity.sophos.co...

http://www.securityweek.com/ea...

http://yro.slashdot.org/story/...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

APK

P.S.=> See subject & those links (+ ads not only INFECT US, but STEAL BANDWIDTH & SPEED WE PAY FOR MONTHLY+ track us too)

... apk

SMALL partial only sample of OpenBid/realtime bidding & other ad networks malware makers have taken advantage of to infect you with:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.wired.com/techbiz/m...

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023...

http://news.slashdot.org/story...

http://www.itworld.com/securit...

http://nakedsecurity.sophos.co...

http://www.zdnet.com/ad-exec-o...

http://search.slashdot.org/sto...

http://nakedsecurity.sophos.co...

http://www.securityweek.com/ea...

http://yro.slashdot.org/story/...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

APK

P.S.=> See subject & those links (+ ads not only INFECT US, but STEAL BANDWIDTH & SPEED WE PAY FOR MONTHLY+ track us too)

... apk

Here's a SMALL partial only sample of OpenBid/realtime bidding & other ad networks malware makers have taken advantage of to infect you with:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.wired.com/techbiz/m...

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023...

http://news.slashdot.org/story...

http://www.itworld.com/securit...

http://nakedsecurity.sophos.co...

http://www.zdnet.com/ad-exec-o...

http://search.slashdot.org/sto...

http://nakedsecurity.sophos.co...

http://www.securityweek.com/ea...

http://yro.slashdot.org/story/...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

APK

P.S.=> See subject & those links (+ ads not only INFECT US, but STEAL BANDWIDTH & SPEED WE PAY FOR MONTHLY+ track us too)

... apk

SMALL partial only sample of OpenBid/realtime bidding & other ad networks malware makers have taken advantage of to infect you with:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.wired.com/techbiz/m...

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023...

http://news.slashdot.org/story...

http://www.itworld.com/securit...

http://nakedsecurity.sophos.co...

http://www.zdnet.com/ad-exec-o...

http://search.slashdot.org/sto...

http://nakedsecurity.sophos.co...

http://www.securityweek.com/ea...

http://yro.slashdot.org/story/...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

APK

P.S.=> See subject & those links (+ ads not only INFECT US, but STEAL BANDWIDTH & SPEED WE PAY FOR MONTHLY+ track us too)

... apk

Here's a SMALL partial only sample of OpenBid/realtime bidding & other ad networks malware makers have taken advantage of to infect you with:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.wired.com/techbiz/m...

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023...

http://news.slashdot.org/story...

http://www.itworld.com/securit...

http://nakedsecurity.sophos.co...

http://www.zdnet.com/ad-exec-o...

http://search.slashdot.org/sto...

http://nakedsecurity.sophos.co...

http://www.securityweek.com/ea...

http://yro.slashdot.org/story/...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

APK

P.S.=> See subject & those links (+ ads not only INFECT US, but STEAL BANDWIDTH & SPEED WE PAY FOR MONTHLY+ track us too)

... apk