Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Denies Rogue Windows 10 Upgrades, Says Users Remain Fully In Control (hothardware.com)

MojoKid writes: Despite significant user outcry that Microsoft Windows 10 upgrade mechanism has gone rogue, installing on customers' Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 machines when their backs were turned or they were otherwise away from the computer, Microsoft is pleading innocent. News broke of the automatic Windows 10 upgrades over the weekend, and in nearly every case, it was claimed Windows 10 installed without user intervention. Microsoft issued the following statement regarding the alleged unplanned upgrades: "We shared in late October on the Windows Blog, we are committed to making it easy for our Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 customers to upgrade to Windows 10. As stated in that post, we have updated the upgrade experience to make it easier for customers to schedule a time for their upgrade to take place. Customers continue to be fully in control of their devices, and can choose to not install the Windows 10 upgrade or remove the upgrade from Windows Update (WU) by changing the WU settings." However, users are still reporting the Windows 10 has allegedly forcefully taken over their machines. Hundreds and maybe thousands of users and IT admins are still chiming in on various threads around the web that they've "been had" by Microsoft.

515 comments

  1. Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Happened on my wife's Windows 7 system over the weekend.

    1. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Happened to me last week as well. I have a desktop at my parents house running non genuine Windows 7. It shouldn't be able to run updates ever, but when I booted it after quite a while of sleeping, the Windows 10 update began. There wasn't even a mouse of keyboard plugged into the machine, so I'm sure it was not my parents.

    2. Re:Confirmed by Penguinisto · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, read the summary again... carefully.

      [...]and can choose to not install the Windows 10 upgrade or remove the upgrade from Windows Update (WU) by changing the WU settings."

      (emphasis mine)

      From what I see of that quote, so long as you intentionally tell the system to *not* push Windows 10 on your box, it will just do it whenever Microsoft and Windows Update decide to push it in.

      In the eyes of the typical user (who does not read tech blogs or suchlike, let alone dork around with their Windows Update settings), this appears by all counts to be a 'forced' push of Windows 10 onto their box.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    3. Re:Confirmed by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Missed a bit in the post:

      s/as you intentionally/as you do not intentionally/g

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    4. Re:Confirmed by DogDude · · Score: 0

      You may want to work on your reading comprehension.

      [...]and can choose to not install the Windows 10 upgrade or remove the upgrade from Windows Update (WU) by changing the WU settings."

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    5. Re:Confirmed by Penguinisto · · Score: 5, Informative

      You missed the point - in either case, the user has to go in and intentionally tell Windows Update to not install Windows 10.

      Most typical users don't even touch those settings, and with the default being that they will get Windows 10 installed, it appears to the user that they got the 'upgrade' forced on them.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    6. Re:Confirmed by LichtSpektren · · Score: 3

      Bullshit.

      Oh hey, you're that guy that keeps piping about how awesome Windows Phone is. Does Microsoft pay you to shill for them, or are you dumb enough to do it for free?

    7. Re:Confirmed by DogDude · · Score: 0, Troll

      I've got 30+ Windows 7 machines, and I've never seen it in Windows Update as an update. Maybe just for pirated versions of Windows 7?

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    8. Re:Confirmed by sexconker · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not bullshit.

      My own machine downloaded Windows 10, again, over the weekend for no fucking reason.

      I've set all manner of registry keys that MS recommends for blocking the update.
      I've hidden the updates that give you Windows 10.
      I've removed all the updates that give you the Get Windows 10 "app".
      I've run GWX Configuration tool.
      I've told Windows to NOT give me recommended updates the same way I receive important updates.
      I've told Windows to download updates but not install them.

      If I had the default, Windows 10 would have installed itself.

    9. Re:Confirmed by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3

      Does it ask you to agree to the EULA before installing Windows 10 or afterwards? If the latter, what happens when you decline?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re: Confirmed by slazzy · · Score: 5, Informative

      On a few of my systems as well. One of them is blackscreened (no video driver for win 10) and no way to restore. I've had to slave the drive in my Ubuntu system. Goodbye Windows for good.

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    11. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may want to work on your reading comprehension.

      ....holding back my own snarky comment...

      To make a long story short here on a Slashdot POST, if someone doesn't understand what you are saying, it's your own damn shitty writing.

      And in my years I have learned that whenever someone insults your intelligence, they are out to use your embarrassment against you.

      Always and never be ashamed to say the Emperor has no clothes. Yes, there will be assholes who will insult you, degrade you and even hurt you over that. But you can be hurt even more playing along.

    12. Re: Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, your check is in the mail. MS.

    13. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least with my Windows 7 machine, I have to deselect and hide the same updates each and every time. So through my eyes, it does look like they are trying to trick/force me into installing Windows 10, otherwise when I hide the Updates they would stay hidden! I'm sure if I had it set to download and install, those updates that I had previously deselected and hid would magically reappear and be installed, even though I had purposefully said not to show them to me.

    14. Re:Confirmed by sexconker · · Score: 4, Interesting

      MS hasn't pushed Win 10 to domain-joined machines.
      Your 30+ machines are either on a domain, using WSUS instead of Windows Update, or you're lying.

      You seem to be vehemently defending MS and denying that any pushing is going on.
      Further, you never see Windows 10 as an update in Windows Update. Various updates, in various categories (optional, recommended, important), at various times have installed various versions of the Get Windows 10 "app" since this shit started.

      If you're claiming that this never happened to you on 30+ machines, then you haven't used Windows Update on those 30+ machines in the past 6 months or you're a fucking liar.

    15. Re:Confirmed by tsqr · · Score: 1

      I've got 30+ Windows 7 machines, and I've never seen it in Windows Update as an update. Maybe just for pirated versions of Windows 7?

      I've got 4 Windows 7 machines, and I've seen it in Windows Update on one of them. Barely caught it - went to shut down the laptop at the end of a session, and noticed the little yellow flag on the Shutdown button that means, "I'm going to install updates during the shutdown sequence". Instead of shutting down, I went to Control Panel and looked at the list of pending updates. The "Upgrade to Windows 10" was right at the top of the list. I unchecked it, and haven't seen it since.

    16. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Same here. Different wife.

    17. Re:Confirmed by Holi · · Score: 2

      HAH, I have several domain joined machines, and they are all starting to pop up the dreaded windows 10 flag.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    18. Re:Confirmed by Penguinisto · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And this is why I don't have Windows running anywhere in my house - with multiple computers, I could see Microsoft totally raping the bandwidth caps on my rural Satellite Internet connection... and rural 3G/4G Internet users likely wouldn't get any relief from it either. :/

      Speaking of which, I wonder if Microsoft could be found liable for any extra expenses incurred as a result of such a use case?

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    19. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    20. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Nope. It won't install unless you accept the EULA. It is NOT automatic. The same people that get trojan horses installed all the time and click OK to everything have got this installed too. They probably also have the Ask Toolbar and lots of other garbage. Here's the details: http://www.zdnet.com/article/h...

    21. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      False. GWX is being pushed onto domain joined equipment, and if not for GWX control panel, *WILL* begin installing Win 10, even on Domain joined computers with Windows 10 updates disabled, and/or KB3035583 hidden/disabled.

      As noted, MS used a trojan horse to reactivate even if you blocked KB3035583.

      It looks like the KBs in question are KB3146449 and KB3139929. Issue is summarized in this article: http://www.ghacks.net/2016/03/09/security-update-ms16-023-installs-new-get-windows-10-functionality/

      From the article: "The main issue with pushing Windows 10 offers this way is that users cannot remove them from their system as KB3146449 does not appear in the list of installed updates for the system as it is integrated into KB3139929."

      You can't remove nor block KB3146449. You could remove KB3139929 (or hide/block it), but this would be counteractive because it's actually a security update for MSIE 11.

      If that is not MALWARE behavior, then what the hell is?

    22. Re: Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      On a few of my systems as well. One of them is blackscreened (no video driver for win 10) and no way to restore. I've had to slave the drive in my Ubuntu system. Goodbye Windows for good.

      Jesus, can the "Windows Experience" get any worse? I left MS-Windows seven years ago and haven't looked back -- no regrets in the slightest.

    23. Re:Confirmed by ClaraBow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not Bullshit! It happened to my work computer and several of my co-workers! We were told by our IT department several times not to upgrade. I can't remember how many times I had to decline the offer to upgrade to Windows 10 -- and still the damned machine was upgraded! So frustrating!

    24. Re:Confirmed by sexconker · · Score: 5, Informative

      False.

      KB3146449 injects banner ads for Windows 10 into IE11.
      KB3146449 does NOT have code to download or install Windows 10 itself. It merely throws ads in your face if you use IE11.

    25. Re:Confirmed by ClaraBow · · Score: 1

      I totally agree with you, he is fucking lying!

    26. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have cats? I am pretty sure our cats or possible the dogs installed windows 10 for me.

    27. Re:Confirmed by tsqr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you're claiming that this never happened to you on 30+ machines, then you haven't used Windows Update on those 30+ machines in the past 6 months or you're a fucking liar.

      Christ, calm down. As I've said elsewhere in this thread, I've seen (and evaded) it on one out of four Win7 machines at my house; not a whisper on the other three. It's entirely possible that 30 machines could skate on this.

    28. Re:Confirmed by phishybongwaters · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually I'm still assuming user error. So lets talk about what just happened to me today. Literally 4 hours ago. I'm currently tasked with spinning up a test environment for a Thycotic server. As such, I spun up a fresh VM using our Server 2012 R2 master in VMware. It was updated last month so after install it was finding roughly 24 optional updates. Again, this is a fresh, un-configured image. After the updates completed and the box rebooted I began prepping it for a dcpromo. Now, I'm not sure if it was related to opening IE, or something else, but I was prompted with one of those server 2012 blue bars telling me to click here to upgrade to win10. On server 2012 R2, enterprise license. Now, if I was average joe crazy clicker, I would have accidentally installed win10 onto my fucking DC. But I'm not, I pay close careful attention to what I'm doing. So, sure, your wife's system might have upgraded to win7 over the weekend. After someone in your family crazy clicked that popup. It wouldn't be a blue bar on win7, but it would popup and offer you an free upgrade right now just click here. I have yet to see a single documentation case of this actually happening without user intervention. And before you flip out, go ahead and grab the entire systems event logs, export it to a readable format, remove any identifying information, and I'll show you exactly when someone decided to install this.

    29. Re:Confirmed by droazen · · Score: 2

      You might want to read this article from a senior editor of Infoworld who systematically tested and confirmed this on a Windows 7 virtual machine with the default windows update settings. He even explicitly unchecked the Windows 10 update, only for it to be re-selected automatically and auto-installed overnight without his consent: http://www.infoworld.com/artic...

    30. Re:Confirmed by phishybongwaters · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's downloading the files to provide you that almost instant upgrade. Having the files downloaded does not install win10 onto your machine, but it does mean that if you do click install, it will start installing right there, no waiting for 16 gigs of bullshit.

    31. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit.

    32. Re:Confirmed by omnichad · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, read the summary again... carefully.

      [...]and can choose to not install the Windows 10 upgrade or remove the upgrade from Windows Update (WU) by changing the WU settings."

      And then do the same every single time Windows finds new updates. You can't hide it once forever. And if you miss the next update cycle because you were in bed sleeping, too bad.

    33. Re:Confirmed by Blue+Stone · · Score: 0

      I've had a not entirely dissimilar experience myself.

      To summarise, then: Microsoft are liars.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    34. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's doing something that it was never told to do and wasting bandwidth, storage space, CPU time, RAM and electricity to do it.

      Go back to Failbook, you don't understand computers.

    35. Re:Confirmed by zonk+the+purposeful · · Score: 1

      Same, I played with Windows 10 a bit, but after trying to figure out how to kill the telemetry, I thought - blow this. I only really kept it to play games. Have installed Mint, and it's fantastic, been using it for a couple of months now. Not looking back.

      --
      "I see. The fact that you...`can't explain'.. explains everything."
    36. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, the typical link to Microsoft's media puppet ZDNet. SURELY that's credible...

    37. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Install Linux, problem solved.

    38. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've told Windows to download updates but not install them.

      And that's the hole you left. Windows 10 update has been upgraded to critical update and windows will thus automatically download it for you, if this setting is enabled.

      I would also recommend anyone running windows to disable this setting, since it has some very sly side effects. For example, It replaces your "shut down" button with "Update and shut down". I've also witnessed windows just up and decide that updates have been sitting for too long and proceed to install the updates without my personal input. In other words, if you even allow Windows to download the updates, you put your computer at risk of having them installed without your full intention.

    39. Re:Confirmed by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      But you failed to disable Windows Update.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    40. Re:Confirmed by Ogive17 · · Score: 0

      All I can do is give my experience. I got one pop up many months ago asking if I wanted to upgrade, I closed the box and haven't see anything since then.

      There is still a button in the task bar but that's easy to avoid.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    41. Re:Confirmed by lpevey · · Score: 2

      Even so, the claim that "users remain totally in control" is false. When you have to download a third-party exe someone created in their spare time and just happened to share freely with others in order to rid your computer of microsoft malware and get it to stop nagging you about the upgrade, users are not "totally in control."

    42. Re:Confirmed by Howitzer86 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Thankfully this will be over in late July when the free upgrade offer ends.

    43. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said that he didn't see the Windows 10 update in Windows Update. That is an outright lie. It's impossible to not have it there unless you have updates shut off completely from before Windows 10 was released.

    44. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did not go that far, but my machine installed/upgraded itself at 2am a few mornings ago. I was woken up to the familiar "beep" of my computer rebooting and when I got out of bed and looked at the screen it was already 2% installing and I took a picture of it at 19% just to "prove" it was doing it in the middle of the night and without anyone touching it.

      Sure, you can say that somehow I scheduled it without realizing that I clicked on that particular date/time but what are the odds?

      "You can set Windows to automatically install important and recommended updates or to install important updates only."

      Obviously, I had it set to install them both and Microsoft re-categorized Windows 10 as Recommended so it installed automatically with the rest of the Windows 7 patches. So it's my fault, but it did happen "automatically" after changing that setting many, many years ago.

      I'm leaving it on... It seems to be working OK with everything I do. But still, I think there should have been a master "Opt-Out" button to click on last July 29th.

    45. Re:Confirmed by DogDude · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you have a non-genuine version of Windows?

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    46. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In the eyes of the typical user (who does not read tech blogs or suchlike, let alone dork around with their Windows Update settings), this appears by all counts to be a 'forced' push of Windows 10 onto their box.

      Even as a long-time Windows developer and admin (since the 90's) this is a forced push. Nobody reads the Microsoft blog, nobody is expected to read the IKEA blog to ensure the chair they just bought won't poison them when they touch it, etc.

    47. Re:Confirmed by DogDude · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      There's no reason for MS to do this. It makes no sense. What you're describing is kind of insane, actually. I've got Windows Update running on 30+ machines, and they're all still Windows 7. Sounds like you need some training on how to click your mouse.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    48. Re:Confirmed by Agent0013 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I haven't seen this Windows 10 update on my Win7 box! It is probably because I don't install any updates ever and have the widows updates turned to do not download, do not notify. I trust the malware infections I might get from pirated software more than I trust Microsoft.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    49. Re:Confirmed by Tharkkun · · Score: 3, Informative

      MS hasn't pushed Win 10 to domain-joined machines. Your 30+ machines are either on a domain, using WSUS instead of Windows Update, or you're lying.

      You seem to be vehemently defending MS and denying that any pushing is going on. Further, you never see Windows 10 as an update in Windows Update. Various updates, in various categories (optional, recommended, important), at various times have installed various versions of the Get Windows 10 "app" since this shit started.

      If you're claiming that this never happened to you on 30+ machines, then you haven't used Windows Update on those 30+ machines in the past 6 months or you're a fucking liar.

      It doesn't auto-push. These people have clicked the Windows button in the system tray and shown interest. Then they cancel it. We have over 120k machines on our network. Less than 1/3 use a domain. The "Upgrade to Windows 10" button appeared on nearly every machine but never once has it been forced. We've since pushed the GSX patch after a couple idiots ran the upgrade on encrypted machines resulting in full data loss.

    50. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And nope, no domain. No Windows 7 Ultimate. I think that you're probably lying, because there's no way that Microsoft would wipe out the OS's on millions of customers machines without asking them. They're not that stupid.

      Sorry, but you're full of shit.

    51. Re:Confirmed by avandesande · · Score: 1

      I've turned off the thing for automatic downloading and I don't normally reboot my machine, I just hibernate. Every couple of months I will review the updates and reboot. Also used GWX control panel to get rid of the popup.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    52. Re:Confirmed by NotDrWho · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Ironically, I was open to the idea of upgrading until I saw how bizarrely insistent MS was about the upgrade. When I began to hear stories of stealth upgrades, I ran, not walked, to the "GWX Control Panel" app and installed it. Anything that MS is this crazy insistent about has to be up to something very, very bad behind the scenes.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    53. Re:Confirmed by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      Not bullshit.

      My own machine downloaded Windows 10, again, over the weekend for no fucking reason.

      I've set all manner of registry keys that MS recommends for blocking the update. I've hidden the updates that give you Windows 10. I've removed all the updates that give you the Get Windows 10 "app". I've run GWX Configuration tool. I've told Windows to NOT give me recommended updates the same way I receive important updates. I've told Windows to download updates but not install them.

      If I had the default, Windows 10 would have installed itself.

      You're probably flagged for an upgrade after going through the process already. Different situation altogether. I'll bet you also have Windows update set to automatically push "all" updates.

    54. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It took 3 hours for the Windows 10 update to downgrade my Windows 8.1 Pro, 20 minutes for me to see that it was spyware garbage that removed all user control and another 20 minutes to roll back.

      Since then, I don't even do manual updates any more. I'll be moving over to Mint, but I'm waiting until Vulkan receives some optimisations and Valve gets more games on Linux.

    55. Re:Confirmed by Black+LED · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We can only hope.

    56. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. Different wife.

      Are you sure? Some people are running an open wife without realising it.

    57. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It runs the rollback routine and sets you back to Windows 7. However, the terrible thing about that, is the snapshot seems to occur right before it installs Windows 10, which includes having the Get Windows 10 program open with a running countdown.

    58. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft would be less likely to push Windows 10 to "non-genuine" versions of Windows. I'm going to hazard a guess that you're actually the one running pirated Windows and that's why you don't have the update appearing in Windows Update.

    59. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The EULA comes up afterwards, at least it did for me, after the first time you logged in. I hit decline, and it comes up with a helpful message that it will "attempt to restore your previous OS" and that "this process may take considerable time". But I didn't ask to be upgraded, so I went ahead. 20 minutes later, my Windows 7 install came back.

    60. Re: Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're fortunate. Windows 10 actually caused physical damage to some people's GPUs and displays. The affected products are from Nvidia, AMD, Alienware, Samsung, Lenovo and a few others.

    61. Re:Confirmed by arth1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There's no reason for MS to do this. It makes no sense.

      Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
      That someone in MS made an error and flipped a switch for a patch, or made the default timeout action for a requester being "accept" or any other possibilities are, well, possible. And doesn't imply malicious actions, only stupidity, ignorance, recklessness or all of the above, combined with management that repeat what they THINK should happen as if it is what happens.

      I saw my first GWX popup on a domain joined computer last week, on a DC with GPOs where anything related to Windows 10 updates has been blocked. That should not be possible. Yet it happened.

      There is something rotten in the state of Denmark.

    62. Re:Confirmed by castionsosa · · Score: 1

      That is strange. I seem to have dodged that running W2012R2 on the desktop. The difference might be that I activated my copies via MAK rather than bounced them off a KMS server, and I would guess GWX checks the activation state (for example, if a VM is sitting in 30 day demo mode on W7, it won't ask to upgrade, while if it is activated by MAK or KMS, it will prompt.)

      Makes me want to spin up a VM and see what happens if W10 gets installed over W2012R2 with full services running, just to see the trainwreck in action, if it doesn't error out at the last minute.

    63. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Did you read the article that you posted? The EULA comes up after installation of Windows 10, as they say here:

      "The EULA is presented to users at the The EULA is presented to users at the completion of the update process. This is the final step."

      So after you decline, it has to go back and uninstall Windows 10. And don't think this process is going to be completely bug-free. And when you hit "Decline" it even says it will "attempt to restore your previous OS" and "the process may take considerable time". If that doesn't scare some users, I don't know what will. And, yes, this happened to me. And I didn't "reserve" my copy of Windows 10. Every time that stupid "Install Windows 10" pop-up came up, it gave me two options "Install now" or "Install later". I kept hitting later. Yes, I should have looked up how to stop that shit in the first place and intended to at some point. But you know what, every time I got on my Windows box, I had shit to do other than try to figure out how to keep Microsoft from installing something I never asked for. So then the other day, I come to my computer and it already upgraded. I was pissed. And then I get the EULA with the option to decline. I would consider myself pretty computer savvy, working in the industry for over 15 years, using Linux, Windows and Mac OX daily. Even I had to stop and consider if hitting "Decline" would then just blow away my entire computer and require a reinstall. So would I blame a regular user from not taking that chance? No.

      So yeah, if you want to keep thinking this only happened to non-savvy computer users, go right ahead. But this whole process was bullshit.

    64. Re:Confirmed by sjames · · Score: 2

      I can understand the assumption, it's reasonable. However, someone above reported an "upgrade" happening on an unattended machine with no mouse or keyboard attached.

    65. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To make a long story short here on a Slashdot POST, if someone doesn't understand what you are saying, it's your own damn shitty writing.

      Yes and no.

      If I say something, and everyone misunderstands me, then yes, the problem lies with me. And this isn't just a hypothetical. I am constantly misunderstood, and fully recognize that the problem is with my communication skills (or lack thereof apparently).

      But if I say something, and just one person misunderstands me, the problem very well could lie with the reader and not the poster.

    66. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure thing, DogDude.

    67. Re:Confirmed by castionsosa · · Score: 1

      I can see MS pushing W10 to non-genuine or copied of W7 that are in a 30 day activation (re-activated with slmgr /rearm) states. Just because one can't reset the rearm count in W10 by just booting to a WinPE prompt like you do in W7.

    68. Re:Confirmed by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Who are you quoting? "totally in control" only appears in your post (and now mine). If you mean "fully in control", I never claimed they were. I've done everything recommended to stop it and Windows 10 still downloaded itself. On my machine it did not self-install. On others, it has.

      On my domain, I haven't seen hide nor hair of Windows 10. We use SCCM and WSUS.

    69. Re:Confirmed by sexconker · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're simply wrong.

      It auto downloads itself over and over on my personal machine despite removing all the Windows 10 and associated "telemetry" updates, putting several entries in my registry that MS recommends to stop it, etc. Every fucking month they reissue the patch and "oopsie" it gets pushed to users who have settings that should block it.

      It hasn't self-installed yet, but it forces the download. I have patches set to download automatically but not install, and recommended updates are OFF. WU is ignoring the fact that all Windows 10 shit is optional or recommended and downloading it anyway. No other optional/recommended update is predownloaded in this manner. (And of course, there was the "mistake" where it was previously pushed as "important" a couple months back.)

      If I had patches set to automatically install as most other users do, then I would have had to restore from backup (again, regardless of my choices to block Windows 10 and to NOT get recommended updates).

    70. Re:Confirmed by narcc · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They're just confused because they believe MS will force the 10 upgrade with no opt-out. The lack of any actual evidence doesn't phase them. All they need is a vague rumor and they'll be happy to consider their preexisting believes gospel truth.

      If there is any truth to those rumors, I figure they just come from a few users who just clicked through the nag screen without reading it or scheduled the upgrade for later and were then later shocked to discover windows 10 was installed "without doing anything".

    71. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sufficiently advanced malice is indistinguishable from stupidity.

    72. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and a whole set of new problems arise. I like Linux and I think recently some distros like Linux Mint, elementary OS and Steam OS are making great strides towards a true desktop OS replacement for Windows, but it's not quite there yet.

      For now, I'll just keep updates disabled and ignore Windows 10 as best I can.

    73. Re:Confirmed by narcc · · Score: 1

      If I had the default, Windows 10 would have installed itself.

      There is absolutely no rational basis for that belief.

    74. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yep, declining is one of the technique users have been using to get out of their surprise install. Rolling back the install has had varying results of stability though, most common being no internet, drivers reverted to way way back versions, fickle stability & blue screens of death, to flat out unbootable. Yep there's the love!

      As I read the other day, "the operating system is now the virus".

    75. Re:Confirmed by sexconker · · Score: 1

      I've told Windows to download updates but not install them.

      And that's the hole you left. Windows 10 update has been upgraded to critical update and windows will thus automatically download it for you, if this setting is enabled.

      I would also recommend anyone running windows to disable this setting, since it has some very sly side effects. For example, It replaces your "shut down" button with "Update and shut down". I've also witnessed windows just up and decide that updates have been sitting for too long and proceed to install the updates without my personal input. In other words, if you even allow Windows to download the updates, you put your computer at risk of having them installed without your full intention.

      What update (KB number please) is the Windows 10 update that has been marked as critical?
      I can review my system and confirm or deny whether or not it was installed.
      March's Patch Tuesday did not include such an update that I saw, and I manually reviewed all the updates that came into our WSUS server.
      If you give me the KB number I can also determine if this patch was given to home users but not WSUS servers.

      The Get Windows 10 "app" has flown under several KB numbers, and was flagged as optional, then recommended, and (for a brief time) important.
      As far as I know it's still recommended. I have all manner of it hidden in WU. I have no manner of it installed. No other recommended or optional update auto downloads. Only the important updates that auto install, and Windows 10 itself, auto download.

    76. Re:Confirmed by DogDude · · Score: 1

      The popups are there, sure, but you still have to tell it to go ahead and update. Windows 7 machines are NOT updating on their own.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    77. Re:Confirmed by DogDude · · Score: 1

      You missed the point - in either case, the user has to go in and intentionally tell Windows Update to not install Windows 10.

      Bullshit: http://postimg.org/image/6aykz...

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    78. Re:Confirmed by sexconker · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you have a non-genuine version of Windows?

      You're guessing wrong.
      Genuine, paid for, and activated.

      Got the licenses from MS through digitalriver back in the early days when they had the $30 promo.

    79. Re:Confirmed by DogDude · · Score: 1

      Lots of AC's trolling today (or just one unemployed basement dweller).

      http://postimg.org/image/6aykz...

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    80. Re:Confirmed by peragrin · · Score: 1

      I found a way to prevent Windows 10 forced installs.

      Use Symantec end point protection version 12.00000?????.15 the 15 is important. as it is a pain to uninstall and Windows 10 can't install around it.

      About 3/4 of our work machines were domain joined but running an old copy and those with that old copy can't auto update to Windows 10. I finally sat down and spent an hour manually removing symantec end point and the Windows 10 auto installed that night.

      Still deciding which is worse. It doesn't matter much to us as we Remote Desktop in.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    81. Re:Confirmed by sexconker · · Score: 1

      You're probably flagged for an upgrade after going through the process already. Different situation altogether. I'll bet you also have Windows update set to automatically push "all" updates.

      Never went through the process.
      Windows is set to download updates automatically but let me choose when to install them.
      I have chosen to NOT receive recommended updates the same way I receive important updates.
      I have uninstalled and hidden all the KBs related to Windows 10 and the back ported "telemetry".

    82. Re:Confirmed by RailRuler · · Score: 2

      Semi-confirmed. Was working on my PC and noticed a that GWX.exe had a window open in the taskbar, and it was throbbing to notify me it wanted attention. I clicked on it and saw: "Your PC has been scheduled to be updated to windows 10 tonight at 10:00. You can choose another time to upgrade." Those were the only two options. I don't remember what I did to cancel the update. But if I hadn't noticed the throbber, or if I hadn't cancelled it, it would have installed automatically.

    83. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      totally bogus. and of course microsoft is going to claim no wrongdoing and everything is the user's fault.. it's what big greedy companies do when they get caught.

      if you have never touched windows update settings from their defaults and have done nothing to proactively block windows 10, chances are quite good you've had windows 10 install forced upon you. so much for total control.... i think microsoft got that backwards.. *they* are the ones "in total control", not the user.

      and users are certainly not in 'total control' of windows updates (or data leakage, privacy, encryption keys, passwords, bandwidth usage, etc etc etc) after moving to windows 10 either.. the only windows users (non enterprise, that is) that have any control anymore are the ones still on vista.. and that control expires early next year when it EOLs.... or who dont connect their 7/8 systems to the internets at all.

    84. Re:Confirmed by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Well you must have agreed previously. That is on you as I do not have this problem

    85. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS hasn't pushed Win 10 to domain-joined machines.

      I beg to differ. All of my machines are in a domain. I have some random ones popping up with the Get Windows 10 flag.

      It's not on all of them, just some of them. How if they are ALL in the same domain do some get it and some don't?

    86. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's ok, they seem to be matching the amount of shilling you've been doing so it all balances out.

    87. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same wife here, but I patched my registry before this round of updates.

    88. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've missed an important one...

      Create a text file at the root of C:\ named $Windows.~BT. It cannot be zero-length, so put something in it. Personally, mine says "Not a chance, bitches."

      Now, modify the properties of that file to be read-only, and modify the security settings as follows. Add the "TrustedInstaller" user account to it, then explicitly deny the Full Control permissions to the file for that user. This makes the file inaccessible and unmodifiable to the WU/WSUS process user. It can't delete, modify, or overwrite that file or use that filename.

      Congratulations, you've just fucked over the Win10 update entirely. It won't download and can't install even if you ask it to. You will, as local admin, have to remove the block on the TrustedInstaller account and/or delete the file directly.

      This will work until such time as Microsoft changes the download location for the Win10 upgrade to something other than C:\$Windows.~BT.

    89. Re: Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then I guess I'm full of shit, too, since my anecdotal experience was also different than yours.

    90. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the moment KB3139929, which is marked as important, includes the update KB3146449, which is a nag screen on IE11 to upgrade windows.

      Honestly, given Microsoft's recent track record, I wouldn't even be surprised if Microsoft has internally classified the upgrade files as important so that Windows Update automatically downloads the files, if you allow it to download important files.

    91. Re:Confirmed by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Informative

      To steal a line from Mel Brooks "bullshit bullshit aaaaaaannnnnnndddd BULLSHIT!"

      I can CONFIRM as it happened to a "granny box" I was planning on running WSUS Offline on, I had just hooked it to the wireless at the shop when I got a call my mom was rushed to the hospital, naturally I took off and completely forgot about the thing and when I got back I started stripping the parts off some rough looking Lenovo boxes and looking up what CPUs they can take and never thought about the system....until I heard its HDD grinding away and flipped the monitor on to see WTF was going on...and found a FULLY INSTALLED Windows 10 with the EULA staring me in the face. I of course declined and it managed to restore Win 7...only to be showing a countdown for Win 10 to install! I had to GWX Control Panel its ass to keep Win 10 from reinstalling.

      If you read above and below me? Same exact pattern, found a fully installed Win 10 with EULA, declined, had to wait while it restored, only to have a countdown. There was NO interaction by me or anybody else, it was sitting in the corner with ONLY security updates set to install.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    92. Re:Confirmed by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      For most people, updates are all-or-nothing. Either they have their machines set to automatically install all updates or none ever. Outside techie circles, few people have the savvy to know which of many possible updates are OK and which aren't. Consequently, most of us have at some point gone into our parents' or other relatives' computers and enabled "install all available updates automatically" as the lesser of the two evils of "sometimes installs something unwanted" versus "still susceptible to vulnerabilities patched in 2008".

      Thanks a lot, Microsoft assholes who made this decision. Now we have to teach our social circle how to undo the advice we'd been giving them for years. And yes, this is a Microsoft-only problem. Ubuntu won't automatically upgrade you to a new release and neither will OS X (and anyone running Arch or similar can either handle updates themselves or has a sociopathic sysadmin who will take care of it for them).

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    93. Re:Confirmed by kheldan · · Score: 1

      Have you tried setting the Windows Update service to 'Disabled'? If so, what happened? If not, try it, report back to us.




      Oh and you're a cow. XDDD

      Please do try the above, though; that was a serious question/suggestion.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    94. Re:Confirmed by Harlequin80 · · Score: 2

      No there has been a change. My wife's machine updated to windows 10 without interaction from her. That said though it did pop up numerous windows saying it was going to upgrade on a certain day at least a week in advance, so she could have stopped it. However it required her input for it to not happen rather than to happen.

    95. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, sure they're not.

    96. Re: Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you are.

    97. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get it to stop nagging you about the upgrade, users are not "totally in control."

      By that logic I'm not in control of my phone, OSX, any software that is installed on my computer, or my Ubuntu installation. God forbid something tells you there are updates available.

    98. Re:Confirmed by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.

      What about a never ending stream of malice that occurs over and over again. Stupidity can only explain so much.

    99. Re:Confirmed by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Anybody know why the file extension is ".~BT"? Is Microsoft using a BitTorrent-like protocol to download Windows 10?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    100. Re: Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no - that's also happening - my mother installed it by mistake recently because she got a nice popup from microsoft, and has always been told to install updates for security reason. she got no concept what an OS is, and that windows 10 is actually not a usual windows update, but a new OS.

      but we are talking about unwanted, pushed auto-updates, with even microsoft admitting that the user has to change the WU settings in some cases to avoid installing win 10 - that's pretty devious of them, especially as they are perfectly aware of the technical illiteracy of 90% of their customers.

      i guess, it's just the new NSA-backdoor they probably got paid billions for forcing it on customers.

    101. Re:Confirmed by Z00L00K · · Score: 2

      That's why I have disabled Windows Update now. I don't trust it anymore.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    102. Re: Confirmed by unami · · Score: 1

      my words. years of teaching my parents to install updates, just to have my mother install the win10 upgrade after a popup told her to - it took me 20 minutes to explain to her the difference between a security update and a new OS, and i'm pretty sure, she already forgot it 10 minutes later. she's working from home, so it's the problem of her company's IT now, but still: asshole move on microsoft's part.

    103. Re: Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did she enjoy it?

    104. Re:Confirmed by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I am guessing that the ACs don't know that it is perfectly possible to not have it show, one way is to use WSUS which automagically blocks it from showing.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    105. Re:Confirmed by sabbede · · Score: 1

      Why? I have yet to find even one aspect where 7 is superior to 10. There's no advantage whatsoever in sticking with an OS now two releases out of date.

    106. Re:Confirmed by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      You really should install at least that definition update and the drivers. Unless you know the drivers won't work at least.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    107. Re:Confirmed by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

      Same here, I have been fighting KB3035583 on a bunch of domain joined systems. The volume licences ones even pop the get windows 10 icon, they are just not as pushy- the user needs to click he cute little window icon before it kicks off. Removing and blacklisting the KB only works for >12 hours before the scheduled task re-runs the little nag window....... the more you know.

      --
      You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
    108. Re:Confirmed by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Uh huh. Totally. Look, have you seen the way they're pushing this? They're going to entice/scare people into upgrading now while it's still free, then turn around and make another extension. They're not really planning to sell this version, ever.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    109. Re:Confirmed by sabbede · · Score: 1
      Well, knowing what the word Malware means should be your first clue.

      Oh, and domain joined computers can have all upgrade related features disabled via policy. They should also be receiving updates solely through WSUS, so an admin has to push the upgrade.

      So I'm just going to go ahead and call bullshit on you, and call whatever admin you heard that from (if any) an idiot.

    110. Re:Confirmed by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.

      What about a never ending stream of malice that occurs over and over again. Stupidity can only explain so much.

      That is covered by the first word in the razor.

      Even if you see malice, malice, malice, the next time something happens, Hanlon's Razor should still be applied. Because stupidity always takes less effort than malice, no matter how much expertise someone has in being malign.

    111. Re: Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a machine that had been running headless for months, now it has windows 10. It hasn't had a keyboard, mouse or monitor plugged and no vnc in for months. Clicking anything would have been impossible.

    112. Re:Confirmed by tsqr · · Score: 1

      Why? I have yet to find even one aspect where 7 is superior to 10. There's no advantage whatsoever in sticking with an OS now two releases out of date.

      Well, a lot of people think that Win7's lesser amount of phoning home with your data is a superior aspect, but let's put that one aside.

      The question should not be, "What aspect of 7 is superior to 10?", but "What aspect of 10 is superior to 7?" I have one laptop that has Windows 10 installed, because that's what it came with. It's fine, but my answer to that second question is still, "I haven't found one yet." Perhaps you have, but your use case is not my use case.

      Many people are unfamiliar with the idea that something that works doesn't need fixing. And of course, some just want the new shiny because it's new and shiny. Personally, if I have a tool that works the way I need it to, I prefer to leave it alone. In the end, it's just a tool.

    113. Re:Confirmed by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      Good god... No kidding.. I too, played with it for a while during preview and actually converted one of the OEM licenses for 7 Pro that came on one of my Dell systems over to 10, and installed it on a spare drive for my laptop. Since I normally (99.9999% of the time) am running one Linux distro or another on the laptop, I figured it would be a good way to see what all the hubbub was about.. Sure, it looks fairly nice and seems to run fairly smoothly on a Core2Quad with 8Gb of ram.. But, after seeing what a privacy nghtmare it was, even when installed in a "castrated" manner, I put the drive on the shelf to be used when I decide to play around with another Linux distro on the laptop.. Ain't NO way in hell I'm gonna use MS products anymore, despite the fact I used/supported them as a helldesk flunky+sysadmin for nearly 20 years.. Being I'm retired I have become the defacto neighborhood tech support, and I do my best to keep the less-knowledgable folks I work with to stay on Windows 7 for the time being.. The way MS keeps playing whack-a-mole trying to get their spyware crap on these systems, I've advised everybody to turn off WU.. I put Sandboxie on said systems, and force Firefox to run via Sandboxie, plus uBlock Origin/Ghostery. MS has lost ANY trust I *ever* had for them... Yeah, I know, they're a souless corporation and this kind of behavior is to be expected.. NOT BY ME!!!

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    114. Re:Confirmed by sabbede · · Score: 1, Informative

      Don't be paranoid. Microsoft is trying to get away from traditional OS lifecycles and shift to an SaS model, hence the push to upgrade. I've been on 10 since it released, and not only have I not looked back, I've come to despise 7. It's shortcomings are painfully obvious now.

    115. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you trust Microsoft to keep security for you, then you are an idiot.

      I have other measures in place to guarantee the security of my computers.

    116. Re:Confirmed by scdeimos · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It almost happened to one of my work computers over the weekend. We still keep some Windows 7 computers for development and testing because the majority of our customers still use various incarnations of it. This computer was configured for manual updates, thankfully, and we routinely hide all the Windows 10-related "security updates". On Friday I left with 21 updates pending and returned on Monday with just 1 update pending, which I thought was very odd. Checking the list of updates it had deselected all other updates and ticked only the "Upgrade to Windows 10 Pro, version 1511, 10586" item. Fucking Microsoft.

    117. Re:Confirmed by sabbede · · Score: 1

      Must not be Enterprise editions then.

    118. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be paranoid.

      It's not paranoid to avoid known spyware and forced, unwanted updates.

      Microsoft is trying to get away from traditional OS lifecycles and shift to an SaS model

      AKA advertising in the OS or pay a subscription fee. No thanks.

      I've been on 10 since it released, and not only have I not looked back

      Probably because you're past your 30 days and you can't, so now you're trying to rationalise that foolish decision to yourself.

      It's shortcomings are painfully obvious now.

      Elaborate.

    119. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      malware
      Pronunciation: /malw/
      NOUN

      [MASS NOUN]
      Software which is specifically designed to disrupt, damage, or gain authorized access to a computer system.

      Sounds exactly like Windows 10.

    120. Re:Confirmed by sabbede · · Score: 1
      You wouldn't see it happen, because you would flip the "Metered connection" switch. In fact, I think you're asked about that during setup.

      I'm going to mark this down under the "Complaints Based on Complete Ignorance" column. No offense.

    121. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how much does that cost? It is affordable and easy for everyone to set up?

    122. Re:Confirmed by sabbede · · Score: 1

      You had to try? It's not exactly complicated. Hell, if you can handle linux, you should have been able to figure it out. Or figure out that you actively want the hard-to-disable bits of telemetry to go through. Unless you really believe that sending anonymous crash reports is an invasion of privacy, in which case I'm not the sort of professional whose help you need.

    123. Re:Confirmed by Howitzer86 · · Score: 2

      They already sell it. You have to buy it if you build a new machine - you can't even transfer a free upgrade from an old computer, and there's still a Microsoft tax on new PCs.

      Free upgrades might be periodically available for big OS updates (no more releases or service packs, so they say). But I bet this kind of push is a one off, and the further back you are, the less likely you'll be bothered. Vista users aren't pestered with Windows 10 upgrades because the OS is considered too old and 10 year old hardware may not even run it. Windows 7 is next to be left alone. Then 8, 8.1, etc. Meanwhile the desktop will be neglected by Microsoft and everything developed for it will run on older OSes for a while.

      So the trick may be to stick with OSes old enough to skip the free upgrade push, but not so old they miss out on security patches.

      That said, there's going to be some people running Windows 10 now who will gradually find their PC is less able to run the system with the latest patches. Ten years down the line, their 2016 box may be too heavily encumbered... Users will have to find unsupported (or soon to be) copies of Windows (that may not have adequate driver support for the new hardware), buy a new computer just to stay productive, or switch to Linux.

      Same story for the rest of us. We can't run Windows 8.1 forever...

    124. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For starters:

      Windows 7 doesn't have built in spyware.
      Windows 7 doesn't have built in advertising.
      Windows 7 doesn't fry your hardware.
      Windows 7 doesn't use bandwidth without permission.
      Windows 7 doesn't use system resources without permission.
      Windows 7 doesn't aggressively try to get people to use it.
      Windows 7 doesn't have Metro.
      Windows 7 doesn't have tiles.
      Windows 7 doesn't have Cortana.

      Windows 7 does allow control over updates.
      Windows 7 does allow control over reboots.
      Windows 7 does have a history of stability.
      Windows 7 does have compatibility.
      Windows 7 does have a better start menu.

      There is no single area where Windows 10 is better than Windows 7 and many in which it is far worse.

    125. Re:Confirmed by sabbede · · Score: 0
      HAHAHAH!!!!!

      You fucking idiot. Know what you're talking about next time.

    126. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be quiet, junior. Adults are talking.

    127. Re:Confirmed by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      A few days ago, I flipped on an old 3.1 machine. It started making all kinds of racket, so I thought there was a problem with the cooling fan. To my surprise, it was in the middle of installing Windows 10! It didn't even have a network connection. I called Microsoft, and they said the 10 upgrade would not install on a 3.1 machine. Liars!

      See how easy that is? I'd like some evidence, thanks, which no one seems to be able to provide. As far as I can tell, the mystical belief that windows 10 installs itself without any user interaction is 100% pure bullshit.

      The issue of whether it happens by itself or happens by accident is a red herring to distract from evil engineering that went into designing an experience intentionally designed to result in accidents.

      Imagine a scenario where Microsoft cars randomly remapped foot pedals and direction of steering wheel each time they are driven. It wouldn't just be a few outliers anymore with unfounded complaints of cars going the opposite direction or suddenly stopping instead of going.

      The response would not be ... oh I don't believe you... it would be felony charges and suing the vendor into oblivion for deliberately creating an unsafe product.

      It is obvious to me by construction of UX Microsoft specifically intends for these "accidents" to happen. It does not matter one bit to me whether the user is at fault or recalls something that didn't actually occur.

    128. Re:Confirmed by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Who the crap cares about the EULA. Why the insane push to force windows 10. This is the stuff of conspiracies, what exactly is M$ really up to. Why the desperate need to force as many computers over to windows 10 as possible, in as short a time as possible. Why the insane push to take over so many machines, with monitoring and enforced remote control software. This is the sort of craziness you see in sci fi books where the intent is to take over and silence all opposition, it's like M$ has gone collectively insane. Main stream media stays completely silent, governments across the planet stay silent and consumer protection agencies stay silent. This would be exactly how you would force a big brother network. Replace secure operating systems with a completely remote controlled operating system. Either use it off the network or the government via M$ controls you computer equipment. M$ is just behaving crazier and crazier.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    129. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up. This is absolute, 100% documented proof that Microsoft is trying to sneak Windows 10 in everywhere that it can.

      Defend that, Microsoft shills.

    130. Re:Confirmed by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      Thankfully this will be over in late July when the free upgrade offer ends.

      Then they'll start pushing users to upgrade to Windows 10 Extra Crapware Edition.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    131. Re:Confirmed by vux984 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      However, someone above reported an "upgrade" happening on an unattended machine with no mouse or keyboard attached.

      This is /. people who haven't used Windows versions newer than XP have made all sorts of wild claims about what it has or hasn't done lately.

      I haven't seen any systems pushed to Windows 10 at all that weren't somehow user initiated.

      People simply don't read what they click on, then deny they clicked on anything at all. I've literally WATCHED it happen live hundreds of time when doing remote screen-sharing support.

      Other people will have had their kids click on it.

      And Win10 update does have a few quirks, where it will 'confirm and reserve your upgrade today' and then due to missing hardware support defer your upgrade until drivers available. My Mom's old laptop was like that, windows 10 showed up several months after she'd first tried to update it.

      I'm not saying it's outright impossible that MS has pushed the update without user confirmation on some systems due to a bug or some other issue. But I'd say the VAST majority are people who did confirm it and either don't even realize they confirmed it, or had someone else who uses the system confirm it, or who are just posturing on slashdot, or claiming other peoples anecdotes as their own (where the 'other person' probably clicked update without reading it...)

      Its nowhere near as bad as /. shrill monkeys would have you believe.

    132. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, me too. An updated screwed up my Surface wireless drives so it can't connect to any network nor receive updates anymore. I've never bothered to fix it. Using a memory stick to copy over books to read isn't that difficult.

    133. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But is that the user's fault or the fault of the OS?

      The ease with how malware is installed on Windows PC's is just a sign that there is something wrong with the security system on Windows. I've seen very clever people trash there computer ever few weeks because they keep on installing these toolbars, fake registry checkers, fake anti virus, ... They just want to get their work done but get annoying messages while they try to achieve that. They are used to those annoying message so they no longer read them. I understand that someone who is concentrated on his work, which has nothing to do with IT, doesn't want to get distracted by all those annoying message and just clicks OK to progress. When they don't click OK, they know they can't continue their work. It's just how those people work.

      Many of my friends who need to work with a PC have switched to Apple to get rid of those annoying set backs. No matter how often they do the right thing by not accepting malware to be installed, there will be a time when they are taken by surprise. Often when something has to be finished quick and they are stressed out.
       
      "Are your sure you blah blah blah...?", "ARGH, YES, FOR THE THOUSANDTH TIME, YES", OK, browser redirects to coolsearch.com. "NOOO, WHAT HAVE I DONE ..."

      What happened? He accidentally clicked on an ad disguised as a big download link that asked to install some toolbar, instead of on the small download link he had to reveal by scrolling down, because his client insisted to send him files via some ad ridden file sharing site. Yes it is the users fault, but it is really easy to trick people to open files they didn't want to open.

      Hey, even I have installed malware on a friends PC a few years ago. My friend, an architect, needed a FTP program to share some heavy files with another architect.
      I completely switched over the Mac/Linux world some 10 years ago, but I remembered Sourceforge and Filezilla as a trustworthy site and program. How wrong was I? I had to struggle with Windows 8 (Windows XP was my last experience with Windows back than) and relearn Windows to get rid of his crapware. I took me 4 hours to get rid of the crapware and thousand apologies to my friend.
       
      I completely understand that the problem isn't always with the user, but with Windows. When you have to train your users to not install malware or need to use expensive enterprise security software/hardware to have secure clients, than you can and should blame the OS.

    134. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe Microsoft means with free: It is 'free' as in 'free to choose to install it or not'.

      After this 'free' period it might be: You have no longer a choice but to install Windows 10 through Windows update.

    135. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah if you hit the X in the right hand corner you dont have to hit install later, of course it pops up again and again

    136. Re:Confirmed by narcc · · Score: 0

      I won't dispute that the UI is designed to encourage users to upgrade to Windows 10. Though that's not what is being claimed here.

      The claim is that Windows 10 is being installed without the users knowledge or consent. That claim, obviously, is unsubstantiated nonsense.

      If you want to claim that the UI was specifically designed to cause users to inadvertently install 10, you're welcome to offer it, along with whatever argument you want to make in support of that claim. I'm certain you'll find someone interested in engaging you on that point. I'm not interested in pointless speculation, so you'll need to look elsewhere.

    137. Re:Confirmed by mrprogrammerman · · Score: 2

      Sounds like social engineering. There may be a technical glitch but I think it's more likely MS has engineered the install Windows 10 dialog in such a way that it is difficult to refuse.

    138. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, sue these F**kers!

    139. Re:Confirmed by PCeye · · Score: 1

      I read the summary. I'm sure they're resetting Windows update to enable the Windows 10 download after each patch cycle. As I have Security Essentials installed, I wouldn't be surprised if the download is enabled after a definition update.

      I've had to repeat unchecking the download on both my machines twice last week. I had unchecked the Windows 10 download on my desktop Thursday morning, to still have Windows 10 installed that evening.

      Friday I found Windows 10 download in WU enabled AGAIN on my Windows 7 Pro laptop, and unchecked it. I went back into WU today - it was enabled again.

    140. Re:Confirmed by bigfinger76 · · Score: 1

      I've used Mint for years and I have idea what you're on about.

    141. Re:Confirmed by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      a clean install of win7, frequent backups and no win update AT ALL.

      I'm done trusting win update. I'll prefer to restore from backup if I need to; and I never browse risky sites using windows (never did, never will).

      its a shame we have to throw the baby out with the bathwater, but its best this way, for us end-users.

      too bad corp america won't learn from this. I was at a very large bay area company, on a contract, and I was shocked to see win10 deployed inside for internal use. this is a company that makes cpu chips, if you get what I'm saying. and even they were dumb enough to allow win10 to be in its internal network. boggle!

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    142. Re:Confirmed by bigfinger76 · · Score: 1

      *no idea

    143. Re:Confirmed by HiThere · · Score: 1

      And I've got a Windows 95 machine and it hasn't happened to me. Of course, the machine isn't connected to the Internet.

      Now I'm rather certain that not your explanation, but I also suspect that you have some kind of analogous protection that you just aren't happening to mention.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    144. Re:Confirmed by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Yes, Microsoft has again lied for PR purposes. I'm not surprised. In fact at this point I'd be surprised if they said something that WASN'T a lie, at least by implication.

      And as in this case there are obvious ways in which this could be avoided, so you can hardly say it was forced. E.g., I have an unupgraded MSWind95 machine that I just don't attach to the Internet. That's a technique that would work, and which I have in the past been driven to. (From the model you can tell it was quite awhile ago.) I'm sure there are less extreme approaches. So one can say that what is being argued about here is the meaning of the term "forced".

      A more accurate statement would probably be something along the lines of "

      • Unwary users of Microsoft Windows 7 risk being upgraded to Windows 10 without warning and against their will.

      " Even that doesn't say specifically how wary you need to be.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    145. Re:Confirmed by dbIII · · Score: 2

      They have certainly tricked a few people into doing it.
      Funny how with all the popups (adobe, nvidia, ms, etc) the malware style ANNOYING attention seeking behaviour has gone mainstream. It makes an MS machine almost useless as a media PC and much less useful as a gaming platform. A few times I've been fighting some critter in Skyrim and the full screen window minimises to be replaced with the desktop and some annoying popup appears telling me some new software is ready to download.

    146. Re:Confirmed by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It hasn't self-installed yet, but it forces the download

      At some point when small SSD drives were cheap I put together some machines for office workers that would do all of their legitimate tasks on network drives, so the local drive just needed MS Office and Win7. Despite having tiny disks the things are still downloading huge updates unasked, filling up, and failing in a variety of ways due to full disks - annoying. Those things are never going to have win10, they are too old and will get replaced by the time staff are used to the new windows interface (or hopefully the new windows interface will change to something more usable), so it's annoying that the patch software is too braindead to check for space before downloading a huge unwanted upgrade.

    147. Re:Confirmed by dbIII · · Score: 1

      In politics authoritarian rule is the lazy uncaring way to do things. In business it's nowhere near as sinister and I suspect it's all about not having to support three different desktop versions of MS Windows - so still the lazy uncaring way to do things especially since it appears a lot of people like what they have with Win7.

    148. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I SHUT OFF Windows update - the ONLY safe way to stop it....

    149. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One annoying thing is, if you have IE supposedly uninstalled, as I have, you are still offered security patches like this for IE in windows update. I just ignore those.

    150. Re:Confirmed by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Ah I see your mistake. You clicked later rather than the close X on the window. You did have the choice to decline, by closing the window but 99.9999% of users won't realize that and will click the later button which is passive acceptance of the upgrade. Once you click later you've given permission to install and it will install at it's first opportunity, later just like you told it.

    151. Re:Confirmed by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I had GWX already, but I took the extra step of asking it to disable windows upgrades. Which means that if I do want to upgrade I have to do a bit of extra work again to enable it, maybe giving me pause to reconsider. MS is up to something probably, or probably they've gone off the deep end. There was hope that they were cleaning up the mess after Windows 8 and they did a lot of improvements. But MS also has a dual personality, where one identity is trying to make a good operating system while the other identity seems to be psychotic and trying to undermine the customer at every turn.

      I'm on 8.1. I do like it better than 7. But I do want to get that newer start button (I do not like classic shell), virtual desktops, better command prompt, etc. Eventually support will end (2023?) and then I'll be stuck paying the high price for the Pro edition. If they had kept the current Windows 7/8 style of Windows Update I'd have upgraded already. But I don't want the forced updates with no recourse except a temporary deferral.

      I really only use my PC for three things now. Browsing, games, yearly taxes. Browsing I can do anywhere. Taxes require mac or windows as none support linux or run smoothly under wine, and online options are extremely limited. Games are the big headache though, I've got stuff for all versions of windows plus dos, and many will not run very well under wine, if I move to a console I lose everything, VMs currently won't run them well, etc.

      Linux on the other hand has gotten tremendously complex since I last used it seriously. Administration is baffling, if you use xubuntu or kubuntu instead of stock ubuntu then half of the online help about how to solve problems won't work (still can never get virtual xubuntu to sync time with my work mac). Updates more confusing than Windows and require more micromanaging. Every time I turn around the UI and method of administration has completely changed and I'm always having to relearn things. Just overall it's a helluva lot of work to use Linux compared to Linux 10 or 20 years ago.

    152. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A dialog pops up with two options: "Do you want to install Windows 10 now, or download it for installation later". If you select the latter option there is no way to prevent the "upgrade" to Windows 10. The only way to *not* install Windows 10 is to close the dialog by clicking the corner X in the dialog.

      Read that again. You have to close a dialog to create a "no" response. Any other button push results in a "yes" choice.

      So yes, the user does consent but only because s/he was tricked into consenting by Microsoft. And that is the rest of the story.

      TL;DR: Fuck you and your pro-Microsoft smugness.

    153. Re:Confirmed by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The OS life cycle model was good. The SaS model is stupid no matter what the product. It's stupid for Firefox and Chrome, especially with their breakneck speed. At least with those other products you are given a CHOICE. It's our computer, we paid for the software, we must have a choice instead of being dictated to by a company that cares nothing for us except how to get into our wallets.

      With the Windows 10 model you MUST accept all security updates, you can't even defer them for very long even with a Pro edition, and we know for a fact now that Windows is perfectly willing to subvert their security updates and use them to provide trivial and unwanted features (seriously ads served up via a security update, that's just insanely stupid). Other updates can not be refused except for a temporary deferral (a few months for Pro, maybe a few hours or days for Home). You are never given a choice to pick and choose which updates to apply, you get all or none.

    154. Re:Confirmed by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Actually you can always revert to an earlier edition. The 30 days limit if for the easy one-click revert. After that though you can do a clean install.

    155. Re:Confirmed by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      In Microsoft's case I think what we have is a mixture of utter stupidity and psychotic malice. A perfect storm.

    156. Re:Confirmed by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      That's possibly what's going on. If you click on neither button for accept or reject it may assumes the default is to accept.

    157. Re:Confirmed by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      Forcing upgrades against the users choice behind their backs is nuts, really right out their crazy, basically taking over end user computers. Do you not realise that is a criminal act, it's their computer, it's their connection to the internet and M$ are committing a computer crime by hacking it, especially considering the privacy invasive nature of the hack pretty much the equivalent to installing back orifice https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.... There is no sound logical reason to do so, to so push the bounds of law. They have well and truly crossed the line with regard to class action law suit and are into the territory of criminal prosecution. There is no sane logical reason to carry on in such a stupid fashion and that brings to mind conspiracy.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    158. Re:Confirmed by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I think Microsoft has lost the advantage it had when newer releases actually had a lot of improvements. But now that Windows 7 and 8.1 are good enough to stick with, it's not getting a lot of voluntary upgrades. It's hard to market this new version. Even the most pro-Windows technology sites listing "the 10 best things of Windows 10" can only come up with some rather ho-hum features. But so what, we don't use their new product and that should be the end of the story. They almost learned a lesson from the Windows 8 debacle but then promptly forgot it. There's someone at Microsoft that must be getting a performance bonus based upon how many people upgrade because otherwise no one would work this hard to push unwanted upgrades on people.

      If Microsoft really is honest that forced or mistaken upgrades should not be happening, then they need to fire that out of control employee of theirs that's doing this.

    159. Re:Confirmed by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Why don't you contact Infoworld as I'm sure they will be able to show you the logs...but of course you won't because its plain to see by your posting history you are shilling the living fuck out of anything MSFT.

      You might want to tell your boss you've been made and to send you to another site, nobody is gonna buy your BS here.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    160. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by outsourcing."

      There, FTFY.

    161. Re: Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My new Windows 7 installs get the Update service disabled before the network is connected. Somebody go ahead and tell me how risky that is, but I already know the OP and PP have had more problems with it on than I have had with it off.

    162. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bingo. Just disable the service.

    163. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can't run Windows 8.1 forever

      Heck, I didn't even make it to 2 weeks.

    164. Re:Confirmed by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      It's absolutely social engineering at its worst. Take a look at this article by Mary Jo Foley (well known Microsoft-focused writer) and check out the dialog box in the middle of the article. Notice how insanely difficult it is to figure out how to even cancel this operation. There's no standard "cancel" button, you click a tiny hyperlink to "cancel or delay" the update. I think (although not 100% certain) that just hitting the "close" button isn't the same as cancelling.

      What appears to be happening is that this update is being scheduled without user consent in some cases, so unless the user actively cancels (they'll have two chances, one three days before, and one 60 minutes before), Windows 10 will be installed. It's hard to say whether this is intentional or not, but really, Microsoft has been pushing Windows 10 so aggressively that even if it *were* an honest mistake, they've really lost most of their credibility on this issue.

      What's really sad is that at its core, Windows 10 is actually a decent OS, but MS has made so many questionable decisions that this really can't make up for all the negatives for many people. They could have made a few simple changes in strategy and I think a lot more people would have been fine with it:

      * Offer the free Upgrade, and let the user dismiss it. Pop up once again before the free offer expires, but otherwise, shut the hell up.
      * Allow a simple, one-click option to avoid all cloud-based options and telemetry (maximum privacy) both at install time or in the control panel.
      * Kill advertisement in the OS itself - a seriously, seriously terrible idea.
      * Allow pro and corporate users to opt out of mandatory updates ("pro" implies you know what the fuck you're doing, after all). Automatic updates is fine as the default setting.
      * Anyone should be able to explicitly exclude specific updates for safety reasons.

      I think these are the big issues people have. Most people probably would have been fine with the defaults, so they could have let privacy-conscious people stay happy without really even affecting how many people use those new services anyhow. If you make those services (like cloud integration or Cortana) compelling enough, people will want to use them anyhow.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    165. Re:Confirmed by narcc · · Score: 1

      So, according to the article, Windows 10 didn't install itself in the authors "test". The imaginary problem also seems to have vanished as his subsequent "tests" didn't provide the sensational result he wanted. What, exactly, did you intend to prove with that link? Or was that just the best you could manage, and you hoped I (more likely others reading the discussion) wouldn't bother to read it beyond the introduction?

      Color me skeptical, but I'm going to chalk up this absurdity to users not reading the upgrade dialog. It's the simplest explanation. Why should I believe your weird conspiracy? What would MS have to gain? Why would they lie about it if it was trivial to prove? Why can no one provide evidence of their claim that Windows 10 installs itself without the users knowledge or consent?

      its plain to see by your posting history you are shilling the living fuck out of anything MSFT.

      You're deeply confused. Outside this article, where all I did was bother to call out the bullshit, I doubt you could find any many posts where I even mention Microsoft. If I can be accused of "shilling" for anyone on the basis of my post history, it would be for Mozilla or Blackberry. Anyhow, it's pretty obvious that you've not examined my post history. So ... why would you lie?

      I think I know. What you want to do with a comment like that, I suspect, is to cast doubt on my reputation, and hence the sincerity of my post. Rather than address the content, you'd rather have others dismiss what I've written on the basis of your attack on my character. That's disgraceful. You should be ashamed of yourself.

    166. Re:Confirmed by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      Ironically, I was open to the idea of upgrading until I saw how bizarrely insistent MS was about the upgrade. When I began to hear stories of stealth upgrades, I ran, not walked, to the "GWX Control Panel" app and installed it. Anything that MS is this crazy insistent about has to be up to something very, very bad behind the scenes.

      Yes, this!!!

      Note the language of any Microsoft quote or press release regarding Win10. Every time, there is a buried snippet of language softening "FREE" by instead saying "...currently FREE...", or "...FREE for a certain period...", and so on.

      Nowhere have I seen them say "always FREE". It will not be. Just like Adobe moving from 'selling' copies of software to 'rental' agreements with their "Creative Cloud" crap – this is a FORCED RENTAL SCHEME –and has been from the start.

      How else can they retain a Monopoly on the desktop, now that their IBM agreement is no longer in-force? This is so clearly a grab at condor lock-in that I am surprised that few else have mentioned it.

    167. Re:Confirmed by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      Thankfully this will be over in late July when the free upgrade offer ends.

      THANKS. You bring up two points.

      1. Update != Upgrade != Security Patch

      2. I have no doubt that the "FREE upgrade period" will be extended "...due to overwhelming consumer response..."

      * Note that I used the word 'response' and not 'demand'.

    168. Re:Confirmed by BeCre8iv · · Score: 1

      Microsoft gets away with all sorts of malicious behavior, as long as they dont try anything clever.

      --
      This perpetual motion machine Lisa made is a joke, it just keeps getting faster and faster. - Homer
    169. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Thrice is Enemy Action.

    170. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strangely, the IE11 patch that includes the banner ad malware refused to install in my Win7 box. Simply failed. No idea why, but since I don't use IE I can live without the patch for a while...

    171. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I've told Windows to download updates but not install them.

      Mistake. Set WU to ask BEFORE DOWNLOADING. If you let it ask after, you get Win10 downloaded. Use GWX Control Panel to find it - it's there.

    172. Re:Confirmed by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Hanlon's Razor implies picking the obvious choice. Given Microsoft's really REALLY long history of under handed tactics, multiple convictions for breaching anti-trust laws in multiple countries, and general complete disdain for users wouldn't the default application of Hanlon's Razor imply malice and require you to prove stupidity?

      While you're right stupidity requires less effort, no company has ever grown to that size with such sheer stupidity.

      Note I'm sure it actually was stupidity, I just find it funny that every time another Microsoft SNAFU comes up someone raises that quote.

    173. Re: Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes agreed. Bullshit. You and you're wife are not techies, just your run of the mill click happy end user who can't be bothered to read a dialog box. Much less have a reading comprehension above that of a fifth grader. Win 10 is 100% optional. I choose the upgrade on my laptop. It's been 100% fine. I have declined the upgrade on my girlfriend's older slower laptop. My father, a man in his 60s at least still had the mindset to ask his techie son (someone in history 40s who actually reads the fucking dialogs) about the upgrade on his wife's laptop. So no it does not automatically happen without user confirmation. You or your wife clicked yes. End of story

    174. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. Different wife.

      Are you sure? Some people are running an open wife without realising it.

      Pretty sure. I try to patch my wife every time I can... when she allows it. /sarcasm

      I'll show myself out.....

    175. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here, I have been fighting KB3035583 on a bunch of domain joined systems. The volume licences ones even pop the get windows 10 icon, they are just not as pushy- the user needs to click he cute little window icon before it kicks off. Removing and blacklisting the KB only works for >12 hours before the scheduled task re-runs the little nag window....... the more you know.

      Take a look at the tasks in "Task Scheduler". There are a few items in there that you should delete that will help you out.

    176. Re:Confirmed by NDrinks · · Score: 0

      If you are actually the admin of these 30+ machines (which I doubt), you should be looking for another job because your comment suggests you shouldn't be left in charge of a toaster.

    177. Re: Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Win7 doesnt display ads in the OS (well except thise for win 10) = superior.

    178. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until someone demonstrates beyond all doubt that this is a thing, I will assume it is people clicking on things.

    179. Re:Confirmed by sabbede · · Score: 1
      Software, especially an OS, is significantly different from a hammer or other standard tool. Hammers never go out of date, never have to support new kinds of nails or wood, never contain security flaws, and are never too old to bang in new nails.

      At work, Windows 10 gives my users SSO to Office 365, protects them with a stronger security model, and offers new management options that are about to save us tens of thousands of dollars (Azure AD join plus integrated Intune and SCCM as opposed to dozens of domain controllers). There's also a new provisioning system to simplify deployments (still needs some work, but MS is actually being very quick and responsive). Powershell is better and like MMC, easier to get to (right click the start menu. I know it's a minor addition, but super convenient).

      At home, I get better performance, faster boots, better gaming (DX12=awesome, new WDM, xbox streaming), roaming profiles and simplified authentication for sharing files. Those last two depend on using microsoft accounts, which I initially resisted. I got over that pretty quick when I started logging into my work laptop with my Office 365 account and got punched in the face by the convenience.

      As the IT guy who handles all the networking, deployments and other cool stuff, there are a number of features that I want to see improved (like a couple of really annoying bugs in the new model for image building), but they're all new and immature. MS is really surprising me though, because they're actually making those improvements and faster than I've ever seen from them before. There's also an issue with the security model for Edge that prevents it from passing user codes to our office printers, which is magnified because it also handles image and PDF viewing. It's still a million times better than IE, but I have to prevent it from being the default handler for everything so my users can print normally. But I'd be installing Reader, Chrome and the old Office Picture Tool anyhow.

      So, I guess I could sum it up as better management at work and better gaming at home. Plus, if I RDP into one of my 10 machines with my iPad, it feels like I have a surface pro.

    180. Re:Confirmed by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Actually I'm still assuming user error.

      I've been dodging Windows 10 for awhile. Then it came out that Windows 10 was being pushed as a "Recommended" update, and with default settings, it would be installed automatically like the rest of the "Recommended" updates. After the latest spate of news, I checked Windows Update, and sure enough, I was scheduled a few days away for an install.

      This is NOT user error. And even if it was, it's clearly so prevalent that it's Microsoft heavy-handed efforts to push Windows 10 that it's Microsoft's fault, not the user. Here's an article from a tech writer that says it happened to him on a VM install of Windows 7.

      FUCK YOU MICROSOFT.

    181. Re:Confirmed by sabbede · · Score: 1
      First off, an "upgrade to 10" banner isn't adware. Second, not installing updates is stupid. Especially security updates. Are you familiar with the concept of herd immunity?

      Seriously, automatic updates are a problem? You're grasping at straws for excuses not to like something I suspect you haven't even given a fair chance.

    182. Re:Confirmed by Raenex · · Score: 1

      I trust the malware infections I might get from pirated software more than I trust Microsoft.

      This is idiotic. Your computer is an open door for every script kiddie on the Net. +5 Insightful?

      I guess it's fine if all you do is play games and you don't mind being part of a botnet.

    183. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, join us....it's blisssss

    184. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The metered connection setting only works if you are connected via wifi.

      Yet again you demonstrate that you don't know what you are talking about.

    185. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for your weighing in, Bill.

    186. Re:Confirmed by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      IT depends on your definition of affordable. WSUS is a free application, but it might require a Windows Server and/or Domain. But, that isn't the point, it is perfectly possible for a Windows machine to not show the Windows 10 update if it is on a domain, and/or using WSUS.

      My Windows 7 machine never showed the update, I had to manually run it. But, that was because my Windows 7 machine was Pro, and joined to a domain.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    187. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't think I would be able to hang in there with Windows 8 when I first bought a PC that came with it. Fortunately I found Classic Shell and was able to turn it into a serviceable OS by disabling and removing a bunch of garbage like the start screen, charms bar, hot corners, all Metro apps, Windows Store, Windows Media Player, Internet Explorer, Windows Defender and Windows Firewall. Nobody would even be able to tell it's Windows 8.1 Pro unless they went to the about screen.

      The scary part is that I'd sooner use Windows 8 in its default state than ever touch Spyware 10 again.

    188. Re: Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      workmac = faggot

    189. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is S3 sleep mode working? When I tried Mint again a couple of months ago it was still broken. The computer would go to sleep, but never wake up and required a hard power cycle.

      How is Optimus support going? When I tried, it didn't work out of box. The only thing I could find was Bumblebee, which required manual switching between my IGP and discrete GPU.

      How is driver support? Will it fully work with my scanner or will it be missing functionality like it did a couple months ago? How about with my printer? UPS? Video capture box? Audio mixer? DJ controller? Multiple displays using a combination of HDMI and DisplayPort? Will everything work fully with no featured omitted like it does under Windows?

      How is audio? Does it have proper kernel audio or ASIO support for low latency? Will it work seamlessly with my 4 audio devices at the same time?

      How is DirectX support in Linux (Wine)? Last I saw, most of the stuff I tried to run failed. How is graphics performance compared to Windows?

    190. Re:Confirmed by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      And this is why I don't have Windows running anywhere in my house - with multiple computers, I could see Microsoft totally raping the bandwidth caps on my rural Satellite Internet connection... and rural 3G/4G Internet users likely wouldn't get any relief from it either. :/

      Speaking of which, I wonder if Microsoft could be found liable for any extra expenses incurred as a result of such a use case?

      There's probably something in a previous EULA that says one assumes the cost of all downloads, upgrades, etc, etc blah blah blah

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    191. Re:Confirmed by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Wait - doesn't that only work if you're connected via a 3/4G fob, or over or wifi? Didn't think that hard-wired ethernet connections (which I have on at least 3 machines) would have that option.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    192. Re:Confirmed by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Also - you still have to download the thing if you want it, and that multi-GB file isn't going to get any smaller just because you flip a switch. :/

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    193. Re:Confirmed by rizole · · Score: 1

      Also ironically I can't get this to install at all on my laptop. I've specifically disabled upgrading on the other machines in the house 'cus do.not.want. But I picked an older, mostly unused laptop and had a go at installing it on that for shits and giggles and because anything the MS is that crazy insistent about is worth sandboxing and disecting. The install failed and ended up reverting the Win7 OS to a pre-activated state. Twice.

    194. Re:Confirmed by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Hrm... one possibility: are your machines using an MSDN-generated license (say, off of a private subscription, or an EA or SA contract), an OEM one, or...?

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    195. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "download updates but not install them." means they are installed when you restart. Atleast for me and my parents Windows7's.
      So I've put everything to manual.

    196. Re:Confirmed by tsqr · · Score: 1

      Hrm... one possibility: are your machines using an MSDN-generated license (say, off of a private subscription, or an EA or SA contract), an OEM one, or...?

      As I said, it came with the computer, so an OEM license.

    197. Re:Confirmed by tsqr · · Score: 1

      Hrm... one possibility: are your machines using an MSDN-generated license (say, off of a private subscription, or an EA or SA contract), an OEM one, or...?

      As I said, it came with the computer, so an OEM license.

      Actually, the one I was originally talking about coming with the computer was Win 10 OEM, but the Win7 laptop that tried to update to Win10 was also OEM.

    198. Re: Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Users who don't know what they're doing should have been trained not too click on the W10 popup or click negative answers as they don't recognise or understand it (my mom on W8 was smart enough to ask me). They'll never see the Windows Update dialog since they don't know how to bring it up (since it's auto).

      My two Windows 8 machines here, and a couple in the office have not moved an inch.

      Side note: people complaining about incessant popups about upgrading OS versions don't also seem to be winning about i OS. It's popup can't be uninstalled, can't be registry'd away, and can't be refused - it will block using your device unless you click no and then later.

    199. Re:Confirmed by Samizdata · · Score: 1

      Who the crap cares about the EULA. Why the insane push to force windows 10. This is the stuff of conspiracies, what exactly is M$ really up to. Why the desperate need to force as many computers over to windows 10 as possible, in as short a time as possible. Why the insane push to take over so many machines, with monitoring and enforced remote control software. This is the sort of craziness you see in sci fi books where the intent is to take over and silence all opposition, it's like M$ has gone collectively insane. Main stream media stays completely silent, governments across the planet stay silent and consumer protection agencies stay silent. This would be exactly how you would force a big brother network. Replace secure operating systems with a completely remote controlled operating system. Either use it off the network or the government via M$ controls you computer equipment. M$ is just behaving crazier and crazier.

      Not defending the alleged unattended updates, but I figure Microsoft is regretting spawning 19 million versions of Windows and then having to support them. I figure they are just pushing Windows 10 so hard so that they can consolidate everything around one basic codebase as much as possible.

      --
      It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. - Colonel Henry Walton Jones, Jr., Ph.D.
    200. Re:Confirmed by Kelsen · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing you didn't actually read the article, where Woody says, "On Saturday morning, I woke up to a notice that Windows 10 couldn't be installed (see screenshot), failing with an error 80007000E-2000C. Of course, I hit the roof. I hadn't given Microsoft permission to install Windows 10. I'd even gone so far as to uncheck the update."

      Windows ran the installation procedure when it had been explicitly unchecked.

      If you 're basing your response on the fact that something went wrong during the update, you're deliberately obfuscating.


      RFT!!!
      Dave Kelsen
      --
      Personally, I like my flying brains dark and evil.

    201. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my case; there was never a EULA, never permission given to install Win10 given, and the Microsoft website said that particular computer configuration was not able to have Windows 10 installed.

      While the computer, A Panasonic Toughbook, was doing real time data collection with proprietary software over the weekend; Win10 installed itself.

      Totally bricked the OS. To add insult to injury; Microsoft has broken the ability to activate a copy of Windows 7 that has previously been activated. So a wipe and reload of the hard drive would not work. I had to purchase a new HDD with an activated copy of Win7 installed in able to recover the computer for the field data collection unit.

      Microsoft needs to wake up that your company does not know best what their customers want and need. Learn to listen.

    202. Re:Confirmed by laxguy · · Score: 1

      First off, an "upgrade to 10" banner isn't adware. Second, not installing updates is stupid. Especially security updates. Are you familiar with the concept of herd immunity?

      Seriously, automatic updates are a problem? You're grasping at straws for excuses not to like something I suspect you haven't even given a fair chance.

      How is a forced banner NOT adware?? Remember the days of popup ads on the desktop not just in a web browser.. very similar. Regarding "not installing updates is stupid", if I want to be stupid that's my choice seeing as I bought the software and hardware that it's running on.

    203. Re:Confirmed by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      This is a definition of "acceptance" I had not previously encountered.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    204. Re:Confirmed by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It's an ad, it's not something necessary to include in a security update! It's a banner, which is an advertisement. How can you say this is not an advertisement when it's there for the sole purpose of persuading customers to use a new product. A product doesn't have to cost money for it to be an ad. And it's malware because it behaves exactly like malware, it shows up unwanted, gets in your way, is difficult to remove, and keeps evolving to avoid defenses against it.

      I also went and hid that security update because nothing in it applied to me as I don't use IE anyway. Microsoft has subverted their own security by hijacking the security updates to serve ads.

      Automatic updates are a problem when the updates are known to cause problems when it's not from a company I trust. So I check each update manually. And every other week or so there is yet another Get Windows 10 shennanigan. They are proving that they can not be trusted.

      Not installing important updates is stupid, yes. But Microsoft makes it hard to decide what is important and what is fluff. With Windows 10 home and pro, you have don't even get the option of only installing important update as you're required to install ALL updates even the stupid ones. Even the updates that brick your computer have to be accepted (and this was shown to happen in their preview). As one tech site pointed out, Windows 10 Pro lets you defer updates for awhile so that Windows 10 Home users can act as your beta testers.

      Sure herd immunity are good for preventing illness. However when the guy giving out the shots is dressed as a clown then maybe you want to find a more reputable doctor.

    205. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. My domain-joined machine started nagging me to upgrade to W10 last week (Professional edition, not Enterprise).

    206. Re: Confirmed by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Users who don't know what they're doing should have been trained

      Stop right there. If a solution ever begins with "just train them to..." then it's dead in the water. How much time do you want to spend training them that this "please upgrade me!" popup is OK, but that one should be ignored and closed. Me? I don't want to spend any time at all on that particular Sisyphean chore. There's also a timeliness factor: I don't want to have to constantly pore over tech news to update my "don't allow this update, {Mom,sis,Uncle Fred,neighbor}!" list and disseminate it to all of those people before they have a chance to click it anyway. Screw that.

      Side note: people complaining about incessant popups about upgrading OS versions don't also seem to be winning about i OS. It's popup can't be uninstalled, can't be registry'd away, and can't be refused - it will block using your device unless you click no and then later.

      You don't actually own an iOS device, do you. None of that is true, as evidenced by the fact that I regularly call my kids together and have them apply all the software updates they'd been skipping since last time we went through the routine. I assure you that it's 100% possible to tell iOS not to upgrade itself, and that your average middle schooler is perfectly capable of figuring it out for themselves.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    207. Re: Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but his non-updated anti malware hasnt warned him about anything, so it must be clean.

    208. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really think that they are going to stop offering Windows 10 for free in July? You can see they are desperate to get people to upgrade, they'll extend their offer indefinitely.

    209. Re:Confirmed by newbutold · · Score: 1

      Happened to my laptop with win 7 on it. Every time it asked to upgrade I said no. Started it up one morning and the message read welcome to windows 10!!!! I was really PO'ed. Not only that There was malware on it from "livepcexpert" and Now I'm really PO'ed! Microsot can deny all they want . I know I didn't authorize or accept any win 10 offers to replace what I had.

    210. Re:Confirmed by mrprogrammerman · · Score: 1

      Likely not going to happen, because MS is going for more control not less. You now have forced AV, forced updates. (By the way you should be able to disable everything including Windows updates through group policy.) Once they get everyone on the same OS it saves them money in supporting/maintaining Windows. Also they get a cut of all revenue for Windows Store Apps. It also can help them to enhance mobile where they're struggling. They have more builtin security so it enhances the security of the Windows ecosystem. It's easy to see why they're aggressively pushing W10.

    211. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but MS pushes 10 so hard that it is easy for the average user (or, potentially, a tired power user) to accidentally OK the upgrade. Backing MS on this is like saying the Citizen's United decision results in an acceptable political atmosphere because people with money have been pushing it so hard.

    212. Re:Confirmed by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong... I absolutely understand *why* they want people on Windows 10, but I think they'd catch more flies with honey. For the people who want to stay on older versions for whatever reason, all they've done now is alienate a good portion of them with their annoying and aggressive tactics. They're burning long-term loyalty for short term gain, which seems a foolish thing to do. It has the air of desperation about it, which seems strange, as MS is not hurting financially at the moment, nor do their prospects look terrible with their focus on "software and services".

      BTW, I'd argue they save no money on Windows support with this tactic, because they're already guaranteeing how long exactly each version of the OS remains supported. No matter what they do, a percentage of users will remain on those operating systems, and so they must be supported.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    213. Re:Confirmed by rsborg · · Score: 1

      There's no reason for MS to do this. It makes no sense.

      Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.

      http://wikidumper.blogspot.com...

      Microsoft's overeagerness to screw over their customer just smacks of sufficiently advanced incompetence.
      Just like when, oh, say, polling places "run out" of ballots. Whocouldanode?

      Plausible deniability will only get you so far.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    214. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only morons who don't know how to implement proper security think that Windows updates keep you safe.

    215. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT depends on your definition of affordable. WSUS is a free application, but it might require a Windows Server

      So then WSUS isn't free and is actually expensive. It also doesn't sound like something the average desktop user could set up.

      Yeah, great solution.

    216. Re:Confirmed by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Only morons think not running Windows updates to patch security flaws isn't a basic first step to securing Windows.

    217. Re:Confirmed by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I would not go that far but it is making me angry that I cannot just depend on automatic updates any longer. Not long after I read this article I had to revert the install of Windows 10 on a machine.
      It appears that selecting the default on a Win7 install of "automatically install updates" is considered enough permission to put Win10 on the thing. It looks like there was a countdown timer to install on the machine I just reverted (there certainly was after I reverted) but nobody was around to see it and stop the install.

      Some clueless fanboys may ask why I'm complaining and not just accepting the upgrade. The answer is the computers are only there to run applications and if those applications do not currently work in win10 then I do not want it. Win7 is quite nice but I couldn't upgrade to it either until it had been around for a couple of years (evil "security" dongle drivers that punish anyone that paid for the software are the main reason).

    218. Re:Confirmed by sabbede · · Score: 1
      Malware is short for Malicious Software, correct? Is there something malicious about the author of a program displaying a message within it about a major upgrade? If so, than Ccleaner, Wireshark, WinSCP, Adobe Reader, and Notepad++ are all malware.

      And let's face it, for over 90% of users, automatically installing upgrades is for the best. How many users with Home editions of Windows have even the slightest notion of what is being updated, why it's being updated, or what any of it means? For the vast majority of users, having all updates installed automatically is the safest and smartest route. If you do understand what's going on, and actually need to have some control over the process, you get a Pro or Enterprise edition that enables control over them.

      And yes, bad updates do occasionally happen, including those that brick a very small number of computers. But that's been true in every version of Windows. Hell, it happens with all kinds of software on pretty much every platform. But then, there's also a very, very tiny chance that a vaccine will kill you. Nothing is ever 100% safe.

    219. Re:Confirmed by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, taking something completely off topic you will come to odd conclusions. I was not advocating for the use of WSUS, I was stating that that is a reason for the update to not show.

      I have a domain at home, it isn't that expensive or difficult to do.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    220. Re:Confirmed by sabbede · · Score: 1

      Any connection. They managed to whip up some forethought and took into account the prevalence of data caps. It's a per-network toggle.

    221. Re:Confirmed by sabbede · · Score: 1
      True, but you can always order physical media or use an unmetered connection to create a bootable USB stick or DVD (via the Media Creation Tool). Not necessarily convenient, but feasible.

      Obviously doesn't solve the problem of an inadvertent download by 7, which doesn't handle metered connections, so it's kind of a boneheaded move in that regard. And I'll agree that it shouldn't have been made a 'recommended' update for that very reason. But it's also not unreasonable for them to assume that users who care about updates and how they are delivered would naturally be paying enough attention to them to avoid the issue.

      Which leaves me wondering just how many people complaining about it are greatly overestimating their knowledge and skills. Okay, that's not entirely true. I was already thinking that. Comments on the matter make it very clear that it's a major factor. Makes me wonder how many people who oppose autonomous vehicles are horrible drivers that should never be allowed behind a wheel in the first place.

    222. Re:Confirmed by sabbede · · Score: 1
      Then what are you complaining about? Sit back and stay stupid. Just be aware that telling everyone how stupid you are is even stupider.

      If you care so much about which updates you get and how you get them, why aren't you paying attention to them? If you actually know what you're doing as well as you think you do, it shouldn't be an issue.

    223. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except it's not. Security is built from the bottom up, not by enabling some dinky Windows Update mechanism which doesn't even keep hackers out.

    224. Re:Confirmed by Raenex · · Score: 1

      So describe your secure system that's still secure on an unpatched Windows. Just calling people "morons" isn't a security system.

    225. Re:Confirmed by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The problem with Windows 10 is that people don't trust what it's doing or the information it's sending back to Microsoft. The fact that Microsoft is pushing it so hard also is concerning.

      Also, the support for multiple keyboard layouts in Windows 10 is just fucking broken. You cannot set a default keyboard layout, and when you switch it to the non-default, it keeps setting it back. To be fair, the way it was done in Windows 7 (and Vista, XP, 2000) was also stupid as the layout was a per-application setting (not global). They actually fixed it in Windows 8, then managed to make it worse in 10.

    226. Re:Confirmed by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      If that were true, they would produce WindowsSE a secure edition that you buy with all the crap missing and guaranteed to remain missing. They choose not to do this, so yeah, huge stinking conspiracy and they are no longer to be trusted.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    227. Re:Confirmed by Samizdata · · Score: 1

      If that were true, they would produce WindowsSE a secure edition that you buy with all the crap missing and guaranteed to remain missing. They choose not to do this, so yeah, huge stinking conspiracy and they are no longer to be trusted.

      The problem with that idea is that you assume the average consumer is willing to accept workarounds or missing features or new applications they don't know in order to have a more secure OS. So, why isn't this the year of Linux on the Desktop again?

      --
      It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. - Colonel Henry Walton Jones, Jr., Ph.D.
    228. Re:Confirmed by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      The average consumer will not buy WindowsSE edition, wake up to your self. The average consumer will buy an Android or Apple tablet and an Android or Apple Big Screen all in one and an Android or Apple smart phone and an educational and knowledge tool Android or Apple notebook (simple near disposable product for school and work). Only power users and companies will be buying PCs, so M$ are fucking with them to try to sell a brand of product to people that quite simply will no longer be buying that product, now that's stupid. Basically to try to sell a brand of product to the average consumer who will no longer be buying that particular product they are pissing off the market base that still will be buying that product but now will be forced by M$s idiocy to buy a different brand of that product. So the M$ market droids are so far up their collective asses prying into every ones else's arse, they are trying to win a market that is ceasing to exist (average consumers buying personal computers) and doing so by destroying their share of the market that will still exist (power and business users who will still buy personal computers). Good luck with that morons ;D.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    229. Re:Confirmed by Samizdata · · Score: 1

      The average consumer will not buy WindowsSE edition, wake up to your self. The average consumer will buy an Android or Apple tablet and an Android or Apple Big Screen all in one and an Android or Apple smart phone and an educational and knowledge tool Android or Apple notebook (simple near disposable product for school and work). Only power users and companies will be buying PCs, so M$ are fucking with them to try to sell a brand of product to people that quite simply will no longer be buying that product, now that's stupid. Basically to try to sell a brand of product to the average consumer who will no longer be buying that particular product they are pissing off the market base that still will be buying that product but now will be forced by M$s idiocy to buy a different brand of that product. So the M$ market droids are so far up their collective asses prying into every ones else's arse, they are trying to win a market that is ceasing to exist (average consumers buying personal computers) and doing so by destroying their share of the market that will still exist (power and business users who will still buy personal computers). Good luck with that morons ;D.

      You did, in fact read my comment, right? Which made the point consumers will not sacrifice security for shiny things and WindowsSE would never go anywhere right?

      --
      It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. - Colonel Henry Walton Jones, Jr., Ph.D.
    230. Re:Confirmed by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Damn you just wont drop you marketdroid bullshit will you. The average consumer will stop buying PCs fullstop and only power users and businesses will, end of story. No matter what the fuck you do with Windows anal probe, it makes no difference, there is no market to sell it to. M$ is dead as shit on the TV and on the tablet and on the phone, dead, rotting, done (and still managing to make it worse). As for those devices all Apple has to say is M$ is watching you masturbate on a windows device and we don't ;D.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    231. Re:Confirmed by Samizdata · · Score: 1

      Damn you just wont drop you marketdroid bullshit will you. The average consumer will stop buying PCs fullstop and only power users and businesses will, end of story. No matter what the fuck you do with Windows anal probe, it makes no difference, there is no market to sell it to. M$ is dead as shit on the TV and on the tablet and on the phone, dead, rotting, done (and still managing to make it worse). As for those devices all Apple has to say is M$ is watching you masturbate on a windows device and we don't ;D.

      Welp, go ahead and argue the same point I am arguing. I would suggest getting rabies treatment before the hydrophobia kicks in. I hear that sucks.

      --
      It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. - Colonel Henry Walton Jones, Jr., Ph.D.
    232. Re:Confirmed by sabbede · · Score: 1
      Is the keyboard layout issue correctable with 3rd party software? Like how dealing with the weak multi-monitor support in 7 or the absence of a Start Menu in 8 could be fixed with programs like DisplayFusion or Classic Shell? 10 is also very new. Improvements to keyboard support could be rolling out next month for all I know.

      As for what it sends back, I really don't care. Anonymized crash and usage data is the sort of real-world feedback they need to improve the product. If a user is so paranoid that they don't want anything going back to MS at all (as if MS really cares about what they do) they can block it with a firewall.

    233. Re:Confirmed by tom_neutrino · · Score: 1

      My wife's computer also. Spent 1-1/2 hours with MS tech support to get it working. Actually it said I COULD revert to W7, but it would take quite a while. I decided to just go with 10 since I was going to do so before the "free" upgrade period was over. But it was pretty sneaky of MS.

  2. Windows 10... yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Which is why I shut off updates completely

    1. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Which is why I shut off updates completely

      Even though my work Win 7 laptop is on a Domain, I still shut off updates completely when all this started. I don't trust MS to, well, let's just leave it at that...

    2. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by DogDude · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You earn your living from using Microsoft software, but you don't trust Microsoft? That doesn't make any sense.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    3. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 2

      You earn your living from using Microsoft software, but you don't trust Microsoft? That doesn't make any sense.

      The employer may choose to "trust" Microsoft while the employee chooses not to but still has to use MS software on the job.

    4. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by krray · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I make a decent penny fixing computers [generally].

      On the few Linux installs that I've done outside of business' the users rarely call except to learn how to do something. Not because it is "broken". Business' get Linux servers and, well, never call.

      On the Mac installs they almost never call too. Except to learn how to do something because they can't use Google. I *know* virus' exist on the Mac (it is my personal desktop), but that never seems to be a problem.

      On the Windows installs I make a killing. Cleaning up virus', removing bloat they accidentally install, etc. I don't trust Microsoft. Makes perfect sense to me.

    5. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hold on. My employer uses systems that are almost exclusively Microsoft based. For me to do my job for them, I have to know my way around Visual Studio. I have to know my way around Windows 7 and Windows Server versions 2008 & 2012. I have to know C# and Visual Basic as Microsoft puts out. I have to have at least one system at home inside the Microsoft Ecosystem (one Laptop with Windows 7 Enterprise) that I can use to perform any work from home duties during my on-call time. This in no way implies that I trust anything from Microsoft, especially in their current mode of ignoring customer wishes and essentially forcing Windows 10 upon any unsuspecting user's throat without adequate warning. Just because my Employer seems to implicitly trust MS in their endeavors doesn't mean that I must also share in that trust.

      If MS does anything against my employer's trust that doesn't affect me beyond me being able to perform my job, it is still my employer's responsibility to either train me in the new ecosystem (MS support would be coming in to perform classes for all affected employees as part of the service contract), or spend the time returning the ecosystem to a state in which I can resume my duties. In either case I get paid for my time being a warm body in place. On my personal systems I don't trust MS not to screw with my home ecosystem, so it is then my responsibility that I make sure to mitigate my risks in that regard.

      So in contrast to your statement, me making a living using Microsoft Software and me distrusting Microsoft are not mutually exclusive by any means.

    6. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trusted, past tense. That's why he's still on Windows 7 instead of Windows 10.

    7. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, it makes all too much sense, if you consider that the GP might have trusted the Microsoft of whenever they bought Windows 7 but no longer trust the Microsoft of 2016. MS under Nadella is a very different organisation to MS under Gates and even Ballmer.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    8. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      You are joking right? I.T.'s relationship with Microsoft has ALWAYS been adversarial. If there was a better choice out there for their use-cases, people would drop MS in a second because they are fucking dicks to work with. My Linux installs will NEVER reboot without me explicitly telling it to (barring a hardware/software fault). Cant say the same for a WIndows machine and that is a big deal for a LOT of people.

      --
      Good-bye
    9. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      ITs a new coat of paint, but im not convinced its a new Microsoft. The ship might be turning, but all signs point to a 'Crazy Ivan' maneuver rather than a true course change.

      --
      Good-bye
    10. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by macs4all · · Score: 1

      You earn your living from using Microsoft software, but you don't trust Microsoft? That doesn't make any sense.

      You're trolling, right? You can't POSSIBLY be THAT stupid...

    11. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Friend, an apostrophe does not make a plural.

      "outside of businesses" is correct. "Businesses get Linux servers" is correct. "viruses exist" and "Cleaning up viruses" are correct.

      An apostrophe is used for a contraction, or for ownership.

      "it is" -> "it's" as in "it's too bad Microsoft sucks now"

      Tricky: there is a word "its" that means ownership, but the above contraction makes "its" an exception, an ownership word that doesn't use an apostrophe.

      "Microsoft needs to clean up its act" is correct; "clean up it's act" is incorrect.

      The ownership apostrophe rules are pretty simple, but people are commonly breaking them, and if that goes on long enough the language could change and the new rules may become correct. But for now, here's how it works:

      Singular ownership: add apostrophe + s

      "Microsoft's updater is evil"

      Plural ownership from a word ending in s: just add apostrophe
      "Companies' servers must be free of viruses"

      A singular word ending in s still gets apostrophe + s:
      "Charles's tonsils will be taken out"

      People are just sticking the apostrophe on words like "Charles" even though they are singular. People are also just sticking the apostrophe after words ending in x since such words have the sound of an s at the end.

      "The box's lid" -- correct
      "The box' lid" -- incorrect, but common

      Grammar isn't the most important thing in the world, but some people react to bad grammar like to fingernails on a chalkboard. It's worth mastering a few simple grammar rules for the same reason it's worth dressing in neat clothes before going out in public.

      Cheers!

    12. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Trusted, past tense. That's why he's still on Windows 7 instead of Windows 10.

      Actually, in my particular case, it is "Trusted", NEVER-Tense! I work in a MS-oriented shop, Developing s/w for MS products. But I don't like them (or it, generally), and I sure as HELL don't trust them!

      Just look at my Username for a clue...

    13. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you at least trust Windows 7 more than Windows 10, right?

    14. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Well you at least trust Windows 7 more than Windows 10, right?

      Yes, in the same way that I trust a feral cat more than a wild cougar.

    15. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "it is" -> "it's" as in "it's too bad Microsoft sucks now"

      The word "it's" can also be a contraction for "it has", as in "It's been a long time since we last met."

      Plural ownership from a word ending in s: just add apostrophe
      "Companies' servers must be free of viruses"

      A singular word ending in s still gets apostrophe + s:
      "Charles's tonsils will be taken out"

      Many people screw that one up by placing only an apostrophe after a singular that ends in the letter s. I'm happy to see that someone finally gets it right.

      "That is the Jones' car." vs "That is Jones's car."

    16. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Which is why I shut off updates completely

      Yeah great idea!

      I can't believe anyone in the tech industry would say and do something like that with a smile. Malware can get on just from viewing a webpage on windows. Windows Update is an essential for any computer that goes on the internet.

      I use GWX control panel as I do not want ransomware locking my stuff up

    17. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by sabbede · · Score: 0

      Why? Are you afraid of updates? Do security patches give you impotence? Does additional functionality intimidate or terrify you? Do you own a tin hat?

    18. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux users are almost exclusively tech savvy. Those that are supported by a tech savvy friend/family member who installed it for them. In the former case, they're not going to call up some random dude who fixes computers because they'll just fix it themselves. In the latter, they'll just call up their tech savvy friend.

      Mac users would sully neither themselves nor their hardware by calling John's Super Computer Repair when an issue arises. They've got Geniuses for that.

      And that leaves you with Windows users.

      You may not trust Microsoft, and that's totally fine. However, implying that you don't trust Microsoft because you have mostly Windows users for clients is ignorant, at best.

    19. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that's all that needs be said. Windows 7 is more trustworthy than Windows 10, which is why Windows 10 has such an abysmal adoption rate, despite Microsoft giving the upgrade away for "free" and doing their best to cram it down everyone's throat.

    20. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by sabbede · · Score: 1
      To what? Make it easy to install a free upgrade to their new OS? Release frequent updates and security fixes? Occasionally screw up, but no worse than any other major tech company, and generally fix said screw up in short order? Be a pain in the butt? (they're really good at it)

      And I hope you aren't an admin on that domain, as you should know better. If you were on mine and you turned off updates, I would probably take your laptop away. You would definitely be stripped of any rights your account had, and that's before upper management gets involved. Serious breach of policy.

      Then again, if it were my domain, you wouldn't have the option to begin with. That's a default policy right there.

    21. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Then again, if it were my domain, you wouldn't have the option to begin with. That's a default policy right there.

      I work for a small Mom and Pop (literally) Software Consultancy. Nearly half of the employees are Developers, and know better than to do stupid stuff. So, we are given pretty much carte-blanche to tromp around in our Domain, because we are all careful, and don't shit where we eat.

      I understand that turning off Windows Updates is a pretty risky thing to do; but so is having your OS ripped out from under you by those-that-think-that-THEY-own-your-computer.

      I didn't say I turned of my (two) AV apps, or my Firewall. I simply turned-off Windows Updates. Now if MS could be TRUSTED to actually categorize their Updates CORRECTLY (instead of lying about the Windows 10 "forced update" ones), I would be more-than-happy to let them continue to push me SECURITY Updates.

      But that simply isn't the case.

    22. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      Trust = Windows 7 with WU OFF... Only way to be safe.. Yes, you *may* pick up a zero-day due to having WU off, but if you don't use any browser but Chrome or FF and sandbox them via Sandboxie, plus uBlockOrigin/Ghostery, I'd say you're pretty safe and you won't pick up the guaranteed "malware" from MS that comes via WU...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    23. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by sabbede · · Score: 1
      It's absolutely the case! All the settings necessary to prevent 10 are GPOs. I think there's even one that specifically prevents upgrades (don't have my DC in front of me to verify).

      And it's not a matter of you being careful about what you do with it. It's a matter of what others can do to you. If you aren't updating, then that includes everything.

    24. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My firewalls and AV do a fine job of keeping my computer secure. Even if there is an unpatched exploit, it can't be exploited when hackers can't even get to it.

    25. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you own a tin hat?

      Ironic coming from someone who updated to Windows 10 because he thinks it's more secure.

      Kid, you haven't the foggiest clue what you are doing. Maybe it's best that Microsoft controls the PC that mommy and daddy bought for you.

    26. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by MechaStreisand · · Score: 1

      Are you stupid? That malware infects the computer through browser exploits. Keeping your browser updated is far different from constantly fighting Microsoft's attempts to push their spyware on you.

      --
      Disclaimer: IANAL. This post is, however, legal advice, and creates an attorney-client relationship.
    27. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      We can only hope. I want the old Microsoft back, with a Windows 11 that is the new Windows 7, before my current Windows 7 runs out and I have to make some tough choices.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    28. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by sabbede · · Score: 1

      I challenge you to support that claim.

    29. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can make a living shovelling shit, but you don't have to like the shit.

    30. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a very crappy analogy.

    31. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's supported by the fact that almost everything you've stated and intimated is blatantly wrong. It's also supported by the fact that you are running an operating system that has spyware and adware built right in.

      Sorry but you fail. Try again, son.

    32. Re:Windows 10... yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly not true. There are better choices for almost all 'use cases' but in corporate America, the person making the decision for the company is fearful of changing away from Microsoft. Fearful the decision will cost them their job should something go wrong.

      There is hope...

      As Microsoft ramps up and pushes for their monthly-revolving-billing for the 'use' (read you never own it) of their software-model, the risk of being 'turned off' by Microsoft greatly increases, not sure how you would measure this in 'Business Risk' but it should be a huge risk. Why would anyone put themselves in a position where inability to access software turns their computer investment into expensive paper weights?

      If corporations analyze this risk correctly, they should be dumping Microsoft in droves... And if they don't, it only takes a few hiccups where the company's business cannot get done to get decision maker's attention. It's not a matter of if, but when...though I suspect it will still take years.

      Evidently Adobe Photoshop will NOT let you purchase the software any longer, you must rent it monthly via their 'cloud' solution to use Photoshop. Pretty pathetic.

      If I can't 'own' it, not going to purchase it... I hate to perpetually 'rent' anything, prevents you from lowering your monthly overhead and putting more money in actual investments that can provide financial independence.

      To avoid Pro-Microsoft UEFI chipset BS, only order your computer hardware from Linux vendors who specialize in Linux. My favorite is ZaReason .

      I have never used System 76, but they are another 'Linux' vendor. Buy the right hardware, then use the right software and these problems go away.

  3. You consented to the install... well sorta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The popup before the forced install said "do you want to install Windows 10 now, or download it for installation later". Either of those option is consent to install Windows 10. You probably selected "download for later installation" thinking you'd have a chance to refuse the installation. What you should have done is click the close-box top right.

    It was a trick.

    1. Re:You consented to the install... well sorta by grumbel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yep, that is my experience as well. When you click the "download and install later" option, that's it, the update will now be carried out and you have no way to cancel it. The dialog box that is presented to you before the final update does not have a cancel button or a close button or any other means to not carry the installation out, you can delay the installation by some days, but you have to set a date for the install, there is no "ask me later".

    2. Re:You consented to the install... well sorta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have never clicked either of these two options. I closed my laptop and set it aside. Two days later I opened it back up and it had upgraded itself to windows 10. At no point did I consent to even downloading, let alone upgrading.

    3. Re:You consented to the install... well sorta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that's how ordinary folk are getting confused.

      I've had a number of support calls from my customers complaining of an attempted Windows 10 install.

      They didn't read the dialogue correctly.

      They don't understand how Windows works so very easy for them to accidentally do this.

    4. Re:You consented to the install... well sorta by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      An interesting new use of the word "consent", I see, via a truly gross abuse of user interface conventions.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  4. "the upgrade experience"? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah, its an experience all right. Possibly not quite the one they had in mind though.

    1. Re:"the upgrade experience"? by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, its an experience all right. Possibly not quite the one they had in mind though.

      Are you assuming that they are NOT sadists?

  5. Users ARE in full control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As long as they install GWX Control Panel. Otherwise, they get whatever turd sandwich Microsoft feels like shoving down their throats.

    Or users could go really nuts and install Linux or a BSD.

    1. Re:Users ARE in full control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did this. Haven't seen or heard from Windows 10 since. Recommended.

  6. You are in control all right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just remember what Microsoft can do with your machine if you allow the Microsoft Anti-Malware Scanner Update to install: anything it likes. If you allowed the earlier Windows 10 nag update to install, you consented to the upgrade in their view, even if it was automatically installed as a recommended update.

  7. Clueless users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More likely: Clueless users who forgot they clicked ok, or Microsoft conspiracy?

    1. Re:Clueless users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is exactly this. Users that were clueless that they need to dork around with system settings to avoid the forced update.

      So clueless? Yes. Innocent? Absolutely. Users should not need to read tech blogs and dork around in some system settings to maintain control of their machines.

      Fuck you MS.

    2. Re:Clueless users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! Just like people should not have to dork around knowing the laws of the road to be able to drive a car, fuck you DMV!

    3. Re:Clueless users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! Just like people should not have to dork around knowing the laws of the road to be able to drive a car, fuck you DMV!

      No. More like people should not have to dork around knowing the workings of an internal combustion engine, transmission, etc.,.. to be able to drive a car, fuck you Honda!

      Driver is to mechanic as user is to administrator.

      Understanding the ins and outs of Windows Update and how the gwx issue deviates from normal behavior is not a user thing, it is administration.

    4. Re:Clueless users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You let me know when you have to suddenly go out of your way to prevent having your car replaced with a shittier version that spies on you.

    5. Re:Clueless users? by phishybongwaters · · Score: 1

      I second that emotion, and have already offered my time and services to scour their event logs to show them when THEY CLICKED INSTALL. but no one is taking me up on it. Pro tip, half of the people here and elsewhere claiming this happened don't even run windows.

    6. Re:Clueless users? by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      > You let me know when you have to suddenly go out of your way to prevent having your car replaced with a shittier version that spies on you.

      Nailed it. This would be like, you can't get maintenance done on your car because all the mechanics will replace it with the shittier version that spies on you. Your only choice is to become a mechanic yourself to drive your car. That's ludicrous.

      "Well, a computer science major with time on his hands can technically prevent the upgrade from occurring... for now..."

    7. Re:Clueless users? by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      The argument is that Microsoft set it up in such a way that all roads lead to Win 10 with the user never being able to flat out deny it. Microsoft setup Windows 10 as a 'potential' for all eligible machines to fall into, like gravity. Its wrong for Microsoft to set us on the edge of an event horizon and then blame us for falling in.

      --
      Good-bye
    8. Re:Clueless users? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Disable and remove windows update. Don't install updates. Done.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    9. Re:Clueless users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is the aforementioned "going out of your way". You also have to consider that most people using Windows are a lot less tech savvy than the average Slashdotter and would not know to do this.

    10. Re:Clueless users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is sorta like watching blu-ray movies on a ps3. When you put it in, it asks if you'd like to allow it to connect online, or to adjust the settings. There are two settings, ask everytime or always allow. There is no NEVER option. Everytime you put in a movie, you have to click no, or always allow them. Pain in the butt, just like the win10 upgrade, one wrong click, and bam.

    11. Re:Clueless users? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      It's no different than going to dealer with your car and mindlessly signing on the dotted line for everything they want you to do. In fact, hilariously, I went for the $20 oil change special at my local dealer as I was short on time, and in their list of $1k plus items was a humorous note - change the brake fluid. Now, my brake fluid had been changed less than 3 months previously, complete flush, and was as sparkling clear in the almost new looking reservoir as it could be, so I'm guessing their "process" is just to check (on the sheet) everything by mileage that we haven't done. The rest were also largely funny, but that one took the cake as it told me they didn't even look at it. If you're going to operate a complex piece of machinery, you should at least be aware of the basics.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    12. Re:Clueless users? by sabbede · · Score: 1

      Gee, if they couldn't figure out the update settings, it's probably better that they were upgraded. For safety if nothing else.

    13. Re:Clueless users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went for the $20 oil change special at my local dealer as I was short on time, and in their list of $1k plus items was a humorous note - change the brake fluid. Now, my brake fluid had been changed less than 3 months previously, complete flush, and was as sparkling clear in the almost new looking reservoir as it could be

      Actually *that* is more like what Microsoft is doing with Windows 10. They are pushing something that you don't need or want. Many people probably wouldn't have even noticed or just thought that the mechanics working on their car know what's best. It takes a certain amount of knowledge to say "Hey, something ain't right here" and most people don't have that.

      The Dunning–Kruger effect often makes us techies blind to the inabilities of non-techies.

    14. Re:Clueless users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? If they got the Spyware 10 update, that would imply that their updates were already working correctly.

    15. Re:Clueless users? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      My point was that sticking a key in the ignition or flipping the on switch and pressing the pedal or keys are required but insufficient to be able to properly operate the machinery, IMNSHO. If you don't know enough to properly operate it leave it to someone else.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    16. Re:Clueless users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My point is that only a certain level of knowledge is required. An accountant only needs to know how to use their spreadsheets. A musician only needs to know how to use their sequencer. An artist only needs to know how to use Illustrator/Photoshop/Maya/etc. Are you saying that none of those people should be using computers?

      Knowing how to start and drive a car does not require knowledge of any of the internal components nor whether their brake fluid needs changing.

  8. Could it have something to do with the FBI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmmm, with all this rage going on with Apple and the FBI, could this conversation have already happened
    with MS? The government tells MS, we want our backdoors into your OS. MS replies with, well our new
    OS was especailly made with you in mind, as we know how much you like going in the backdoor. Now the
    government is a little angry with MS, as not enough people have taken the new upgrade, so MS is pushing hard
    to make people take the upgrade, wither they like it, or not.

  9. Automatic Updates. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTFA:

    Customers continue to be fully in control of their devices, and can choose to not install the Windows 10 upgrade or remove the upgrade from Windows Update (WU) by changing the WU settings.

    So, this sounds like if you have automatic update turned on, you'd get upgraded to Windows 10?

    If I'm right, then what one needs to do is turn off automatic updates?

    It's been a few years since I had a Windows system, so keep that in mind.

    1. Re:Automatic Updates. by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

      There are three tiers of updates: critical, recommended, and optional.

      Turning on automatic updates sets Windows Update to automatically download and install critical updates. It will prompt for a reboot if necessary.

      There is an option to receive recommended updates the same way as critical updates. If this is selected, the same thing happens for recommended updates. Since Microsoft made Windows 10 a recommended update recently, a lot of people recently became eligible for automatic installation of Windows 10. Windows 10 was previously an optional update.

      Windows Update can also be configured to never check for updates, check but prompt before download, or download but prompt before install. In all of these cases, the user is shown a list of updates and can choose individually which ones are installed.

      Most of this whining is from people who don't know how they setup Windows Update or have trouble keeping up with current events.

      I have three Windows 7/8 machines at home, and exactly none of them have installed Windows 10. Why not? Because I set them all to check for updates and ask me before downloading anything.

      --

      ---
      According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
    2. Re:Automatic Updates. by phishybongwaters · · Score: 1

      No, they will download the upgrade files, they still have to decide to actually install them. What's actually happening is people aren't paying attention and end up clicking ok on the nag popups. Every. God. Damn.Time.

    3. Re:Automatic Updates. by Jerry+Atrick · · Score: 1

      And Microsoft are trying very,very hard to give as many opportunities to make that mistake as possible, simultaneously trying to ensure it's a damn easy mistake to make with deceptive install dialogs.

      Trickery, it's still wrong, no better than any other malware campaign relying on the same tricks.

    4. Re:Automatic Updates. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have three Windows 7/8 machines at home, and exactly none of them have installed Windows 10. Why not? Because I set them all to check for updates and ask me before downloading anything.

      Well aren't you a fuckin' smartypants. Is my mom supposed to know what you know and how to go dick with her WU settings?

      You probably also know how to change the oil and sparkplugs in your car and do it yourself too right? Because by your definition, if you don't know how to do those and do them yourself, you should not be driving your own car.

    5. Re:Automatic Updates. by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

      This IE security fix https://support.microsoft.com/...
      forces the download and install of
      https://support.microsoft.com/...
      This is blackmail and its evil period end of story. Its not a bug fix, its not important to the system or OS Its a forced update they had as OPTIONAL previously many of us hid. Its bullshit, is dishonest, its deceitful. Yes many people who have gotten win 10 installed had it installed because they didn't read. This is a security update it should have nothing but a security fix.

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    6. Re:Automatic Updates. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want to use a car analogy, how about this:

      If you don't know how to check your tire pressure, fuel level, or oil level then you're going to end up in trouble sooner or later.

      You can pay someone to do these things if you're too lazy or stupid to learn, but someone with access to your car needs to be doing these things regularly.

      Patching is basic maintenance. Not understanding that it occurs or how to configure it is neglectful, so don't be surprised if Bad Things happen due to your own ignorance.

    7. Re:Automatic Updates. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't know how to check your tire pressure, fuel level, or oil level then you're going to end up in trouble sooner or later.

      Most people trust their mechanics to do that for them. They should be able to feel confident that the people they pay to handle maintenance will do so without fucking them over.

  10. ignorant clicking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Knowing how even somewhat savvy computer users will just click away anything they see, I have to agree with Microsoft on this. I have yet to see it install by itself on any of my many windows 7 and 8 machines. However, knowing that, Microsoft should NOT be installing it through Windows Update. The tray icon is good enough.

    1. Re:ignorant clicking by phishybongwaters · · Score: 1

      Well if these idiots would read what they click, and never ever enable install recommended, and the problem disappears

  11. Stop trying to install on old machines by jfdavis668 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We have some old machines which are clearly unable to run Windows 10. They barely run Windows 7. Yet, they keep getting notifications to upgrade to Windows 10, and list it on available updates. It is never going to run on a Pentium M or D machine. Microsoft, include a hardware check before you try to push it!

    1. Re:Stop trying to install on old machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did! The hardware check itself could cause machines to bluescreen or go into an endless reboot cycle.

    2. Re:Stop trying to install on old machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seconded. I have a machine that doesn't have EFI. I had to go to great length to install Windows 7 on it. Yet it nags me to install Windows 10. I fear my son will accidentally click OK and hose the machine.

    3. Re:Stop trying to install on old machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Old hardware like that does not help MS's bottom line, so it's in their interest to render it unusable*. Don't forget to pay the windows tax on the new machine! Oh wait, that's right, it's unavoidable.

      *yes I know you can reinstall 7 or upgrade to linux, but your average user can't/won't.

    4. Re:Stop trying to install on old machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They don't care. They want you to have to buy new computers and pay for more licenses.

    5. Re:Stop trying to install on old machines by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      If it's on a 32bit version and you're running on Windows 7 currently you most definitely CAN run Windows 10. You may even get a performance boost out of it. The core parts of Windows have gotten leaner and leaner since Vista with improvements to memory management and efficient use of hardware.

      The 2 things which may hold you back:
      1. Harddisk space. Windows 10 has a slightly larger footprint. The upgrade from Windows 7 however will result in Windows 7 backups, Windows 10 installers, and Windows 10 all present at the same time and that takes up a HUGE amount of disk space.
      2. On 64bit machines certain generations of processor were depreciated as the 64bit version relied on a relatively recent instruction to operate leaving some users of 64bit CPUs out in the cold.

    6. Re:Stop trying to install on old machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my experience, all the checks happen after the download, some even after the reboot. It's asinine.

    7. Re:Stop trying to install on old machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The hardware is checked before trying to push it. Windows 10 actually uses less resources than Windows 7 and would probably run better. But, the fact you have a 13 year old pentium m still running when even Windows 2000 was still king is pretty good.

    8. Re:Stop trying to install on old machines by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      The oldest thing we have still running is a Windows 95 box that controls a heating system. We have been trying to get money to replace the heating system, but it is still working and there are other environmental problems that had higher priority. The Windows 95 box is not hooked to a network, and locked in the control room, so it isn't a security risk. Not sure what processor that thing is even running. Probably a Pentium Pro or Pentium II.

    9. Re:Stop trying to install on old machines by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Windows 7 will install just fine on machines without EFI. In many ways, it can be trickier to get it to run on machines with EFI, unless they have an option to emulate a BIOS.

    10. Re:Stop trying to install on old machines by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Your processor needs to support the NX bit. Pentium D machines should be able to run it as they all have the NX bit. The later Pentium M chips also have the NX bit, but the earlier ones do not. Generally speaking, if it's EM64T, it will likely have the NX bit (some exceptions), and if it's 32 bit, it probably doesn't (some exceptions, such as some Pentium M and handful of the later Pentium 4's).

      Of course, those machines may have other issues, such as other hardware without Windows 10 drivers or lack of drive space.

    11. Re:Stop trying to install on old machines by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      > It is never going to run on a Pentium M or D machine

      --I actually had the Win10 Tech Preview running on an old Pentium-M laptop last year (single core, 2GHz, 1GB RAM, 100GB IDE HD.) Finally wiped out that install/test last month (after getting sick of all the obvious spyware builtin to Win10) and upgraded from an old Crunchbang Linux to Antix. Repurposed the laptop as a music jukebox with VLC and Deadbeef.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  12. Microsoft themselves is a "Rogue corporation" by FudRucker · · Score: 2

    they are raping people computers

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:Microsoft themselves is a "Rogue corporation" by sabbede · · Score: 1

      Your English is as poor as your reasoning.

    2. Re:Microsoft themselves is a "Rogue corporation" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why hasn't the antivirus and antimalware companies added windows 10 updates as malware, or spyware, or at the very least, detection under the PUP/PUA (potentially unwanted program/application) category?

      surely windows 10 upgrade offers, windows 10 upgrade itself, and numerous spying.. err i mean unconfigurable "telemetry".. pre-windows 10 updates for windows 7 and 8/8.1 fit the criteria for listing in one or more category.

    3. Re:Microsoft themselves is a "Rogue corporation" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      people computers

      "People Computers"?! When did we get strong AI working?

      And where's my sexbot, damn it?

    4. Re:Microsoft themselves is a "Rogue corporation" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not rape but consensual. You should never have agreed to the Windows 7 EULA in the first place. It's stupid to complain about banana peels once you've signed onto a slippery slope.

  13. 32 gb solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just use your Windows in a 32GB partition. There won't be any room for a huge Windows 10 push, or much of anything else. I typically have about 2GB free. The rest of the drive sits unpartitioned as far s Windows is concerned, which is great -- no space for the typically associated bloat and malware to leap around in.

    captcha: rascal

    1. Re:32 gb solution by cfalcon · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Just use your Windows in a 32GB partition.

      That's the workaround? I mean, I bet that works. It's just like... Windows users will put up with ANYTHING!

    2. Re:32 gb solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when did that stop MS from filling it up?

    3. Re:32 gb solution by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Historically, Windows Update won't check free drive space before it starts doing its thing, sometimes with ugly results when it runs out in the middle of installing an update, causing the update to fail, followed by the rollback attempt failing. I wouldn't count on it.

  14. Happened to my co-worker by LichtSpektren · · Score: 2

    Automatic updates on her Windows 7 computer were off but Windows 10 self-installed over a weekend.

    1. Re:Happened to my co-worker by DogDude · · Score: 1

      Sure it did...

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    2. Re:Happened to my co-worker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Obvious shill is obvious.

    3. Re:Happened to my co-worker by ClaraBow · · Score: 1

      You are such a pompous ass who thinks that users are stupid and incompetent --no wonder Microsoft hired you! Please stop your obvious astroturfing.

    4. Re:Happened to my co-worker by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna call bullshit on this one. The way Microsoft trick you into installing the update is despicable, but if automatic updates were indeed turned off then she must have at least been tricked into a manual install.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Happened to my co-worker by DogDude · · Score: 1

      users are stupid and incompetent

      Donald Trump is the Republican Party' nominee. Most people are stupid and incompetent.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    6. Re:Happened to my co-worker by squiggleslash · · Score: 0

      I woke up this morning to find that even my Android phone had been upgraded to Windows 10, as well as the "Smart" TV and our thermostat (the latter isn't even connected to the network, it's not even digital, it's one of those ones with a lever you point vaguely at a temperature.)

      I'm guessing the only reason my Mac hasn't upgraded to Windows 10 is that it's still in the middle of copying that 17 megabyte file.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    7. Re:Happened to my co-worker by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

      You are such a pompous ass who thinks that users are stupid and incompetent --no wonder Microsoft hired you! Please stop your obvious astroturfing.

      Uh yeah.

      MS would be sued into an oblivion if they pushed this on PC's. People do not watch what they click. Of course if anyone disagrees they must be a MS employee because everyone views things the exact same way

    8. Re:Happened to my co-worker by sabbede · · Score: 1
      No. It didn't.

      If automatic updates were off, then she upgraded manually through GWX. No other way it could happen. End of story.

    9. Re:Happened to my co-worker by sabbede · · Score: 1

      My car upgraded to Windows 10, now I can't find drivers.

    10. Re:Happened to my co-worker by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Uhhh...you wanna tell that to the writer at Infoworld chief? I also had it happen to an Athlon X2 I had at the shop, I didn't touch shit, it was set to ONLY install critical updates, i just hadn't gotten around to installing GWX control Panel on it...found a new Win 10 install with the Win 10 EULA staring me in the face.

      Sorry dude but it happened, you can argue whether it was malice or incompetence (with MSFT you can never tell, it could go either way) but we have more than enough evidence to say with certainty that a subset of users got "Win 10'd" without having to interact with the system.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    11. Re:Happened to my co-worker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      generally users are stupid and incompetent or at least lax in reading what they are approving. they will click agreeing to a download and upgrade without even reading what they are clicking and then scream admanantly that they never agreed to a thing. So despite the upgrade process being clearly documented their are people like the above that claim it somehow magically happened for them.

    12. Re:Happened to my co-worker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    13. Re:Happened to my co-worker by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Response to the wrong post?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    14. Re:Happened to my co-worker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps, but not everyone is.

      It is still rude to assume someone you don't know is stupid and incompetent until they prove themselves to be so.

  15. Apple "sheep" here. by Torp · · Score: 0, Troll

    I am just a dumb hipster overpaying for my hardware because of the logo...

    AND LAUGHING MY ASS OFF.

    You stay with Microsoft, you deserve what you get.

    --
    I apologize for the lack of a signature.
    1. Re:Apple "sheep" here. by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      You don't have that problem because Apple "sheep" buy the latest product every year.

      My wife had a MacBook that was 4 years old. For the last year, or so, that she used it, more and more websites just wouldn't load using Safari. We eventually took it to an Apple Store and the tech said that her OS was no supported and she would have to spend $100 to upgrade to the latest version.

      We left and she got a laptop running Windows. It still runs like a champ after 5 years.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    2. Re:Apple "sheep" here. by LichtSpektren · · Score: 2

      You don't have that problem because Apple "sheep" buy the latest product every year. My wife had a MacBook that was 4 years old. For the last year, or so, that she used it, more and more websites just wouldn't load using Safari. We eventually took it to an Apple Store and the tech said that her OS was no supported and she would have to spend $100 to upgrade to the latest version. We left and she got a laptop running Windows. It still runs like a champ after 5 years.

      In other words, you're proudly proclaiming you're not a sheep because you baaaaah to another corporation.

    3. Re:Apple "sheep" here. by Torp · · Score: 1

      Funny, a Windows OS upgrade would have cost more than $100 until Windows 10.

      --
      I apologize for the lack of a signature.
    4. Re:Apple "sheep" here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You shouldn't be. Apple has been controlling your computer and telling you how to do things since day one. Microsoft just started doing the same. The difference is with a PC, we can easily install a different OS while you're stuck with Mac OS forever.

    5. Re:Apple "sheep" here. by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      There's absolutely no comparing a reasonably open and Unix-based OS like OS X to Windows. If your standard of freedom and control is Linux or BSD, sure, Apple doesn't touch them there. But they have never done with Microsoft is doing now. NEVER!

    6. Re:Apple "sheep" here. by Torp · · Score: 1

      TBH I used Linux as my main OS for 8-10 years, then i got tired of waiting for the year of the Linux desktop and switched to OS X.
      With macports/homebrew, the command line is about as useful as on linux, while the GUI apps actually work.

      --
      I apologize for the lack of a signature.
    7. Re:Apple "sheep" here. by castionsosa · · Score: 1

      iOS, yes. OS X, you can turn off kernel signing and other features fairly easily.

      As for other operating systems, one can copy the BootCamp drivers to a USB flash drive, boot up Linux or Windows, and install the OS without any need for OS X on the drive whatsoever. It may not be a true UEFI boot... but it will run with few issues.

      No platform is perfect. However, OS X is a decent alternative, if one is tired of the MS stuff.

    8. Re:Apple "sheep" here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Installing a Linux or BSD distro on Apple hardware is not nearly as straightforward or easy as installing it on a PC and Mac users tend to be computer laymen. That combination basically means it will never happen.

    9. Re:Apple "sheep" here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I am saying is that up until Windows 10, Windows was far more customisable than Mac OS. Apple products tend to have a "one true way" of doing everything, whereas in Windows prior to 10 you had a great deal of options.

    10. Re:Apple "sheep" here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have the same story. Used Debian as a main computer for 6 years. Then I got a job and had actual money so decided to stop scrimping and get a real Unix laptop. Never looked back.

    11. Re:Apple "sheep" here. by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      We eventually took it to an Apple Store and the tech said that her OS was no supported and she would have to spend $100 to upgrade to the latest version.

      Calling that fishy, for two reasons:

      1) I ran OSX 10.3 just fine all the way up until 2007, when the problem with site support failed (I then just switched to Chrome and ran that just fine on OSX 10.3 until 2010-ish).

      2) You only paid for OS upgrades from before 10.7, when they actually charged money for OS upgrades - and OSX 10.5 - 10.6 were only like $35 each, not $100. 10.2 through 10.5 were $100 each, but 10.5 was supported until 2010, and 10.6 (the last PPC/Intel hybrid OS) was fully compatible and supported all the way to 2012 or so. Versions 10.7 all the way up to now were/are free of charge.

      Unlike Microsoft, you get one notification (and only one!), then you have to specifically go to the App Store and consciously download it - then you install it as a separate step.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    12. Re:Apple "sheep" here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it is true UEFI, the one that was specified by microsoft.
      However microsoft operating systems don't boot from a correct implementation of UEFI (as specified by microsoft) it needs some extra things.

      Although I think the newest versions of Windows do actually boot directly from Apple' UEFI.

      But most of the BootCamp is just drivers for the hardware nicely placed on a single image.

    13. Re:Apple "sheep" here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be honest though, it used to be that way for Linux on PC hardware too.

    14. Re:Apple "sheep" here. by not+flu · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that all OS X upgrades have been free for years now. Not that I think any of them has been as good as 10.6 was.

  16. Re: UN-Confirmed exceptions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From what I understand if you are running 7 ultimate or any of the "corporate licensed" versions, or on a domain, or running your own wsus server it's not going to happen to you.

  17. Anonymous Coward is legion, there by damaki · · Score: 1

    Has this happened to real people at Slashdot, or is this disinformation propagated by ACs? Cause from here, it looks like disinformation...
    But hey, as this is proprietary software, it could be an ugly and illegal piece of A/B testing. It could. Still, no proof seen here. My Windows 7 boxes are doing fine (and my Windows 10 too, BTW).

    --
    Stupidity is the root of all evil.
    1. Re:Anonymous Coward is legion, there by Holi · · Score: 2

      My experience on my work network, a 2008 r2 domain, says they are pushing too hard. I am starting to see the windows 10 flags show up on several pc's attached to my domain.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    2. Re:Anonymous Coward is legion, there by LichtSpektren · · Score: 2

      It happened to a computer in my office.

    3. Re:Anonymous Coward is legion, there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bro, do you even GPO?

      If you were actively managing your AD domain, this should never have happened. No excuse.

    4. Re:Anonymous Coward is legion, there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It nearly happened to me. I hadn't disabled stuff deep down, and one day the "your computer will restart soon to install updates" popup came up, and good thing I doublechecked because one of the ones it was going to install was Windows 10. I think a critical upgrade triggered the reboot and Windows 10 piggybacked. I've since repented and used GWX Control Panel / some online guides to make sure this does not happen again, because I do NOT want Windows 10.

    5. Re:Anonymous Coward is legion, there by DogDude · · Score: 1

      I tend to agree. I know of zero people that it's happened to, or any of the Windows 7 boxes that I manage. Everybody who's saying that it happened to them is AC. I smell something fishy...

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    6. Re:Anonymous Coward is legion, there by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      Complete disinformation and/or idiots that don't understand what they clicked on.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:Anonymous Coward is legion, there by sabbede · · Score: 1

      Did you miss the announcement last month? Did you set policies to prevent it? Are you not using Enterprise editions of 7? Why haven't you upgraded already? Most of my users didn't even notice.

    8. Re:Anonymous Coward is legion, there by sabbede · · Score: 1

      Well Enterprise editions are excluded, and it was changed to a recommended update last month. Still, the complaints I've seen so far are just idiotic. They all boil down to, "I wasn't paying attention," or, "I wasn't doing my job." With a lot of, "I already decided 10 must be bad, so I don't even want to try it. Because I'm stupid and angry."

    9. Re:Anonymous Coward is legion, there by BenVis · · Score: 1

      I think of myself as a real person, and I don't think I'm an idiot. I'd been running Windows 7 (fully legit copy), and every time it offered to upgrade itself to 10, I either closed the window or took the option that approximated "no." Now, maybe I am an idiot because I didn't go looking for any settings to prevent the upgrade. I planned to upgrade eventually, and clicking "no" every now and then until I was ready isn't that big of a problem for me.

      The other night I was playing a fullscreen game in Windows 7, and the screen briefly flickered like some window was trying to get my attention, but the fullscreen game immediately resumed control of the screen and I didn't see what the window was. I figured I'd check it out when I was done playing. Maybe 10 minutes later, my computer reboots (with no confirmation, countdown, or warning) and starts installing Windows 10.

      I was pretty irritated. I eventually had to agree to the EULA, and I guess I could have backed out at that point, but accepting Windows 10 seemed better than potentially having to reinstall Windows 7.

      --
      "Preceded by itself yields falsehood" preceded by itself yields falsehood.
  18. Watch out if you have a restrictive data cap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Happened to my daughter's computer. Unfortunately, her internet access was obtained over an LTE device (Rogers "Rocket Stick") - the Windows 10 downloads resulted in a $100 Cdn bill.

    1. Re:Watch out if you have a restrictive data cap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Three words: Small Claims Court

    2. Re:Watch out if you have a restrictive data cap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please. please. please take Microsoft to small claims court over it.

    3. Re: Watch out if you have a restrictive data cap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sue Microsoft in small claims court to recover the fees.

    4. Re:Watch out if you have a restrictive data cap by wbo · · Score: 1

      It sounds like the LTE device wasn't configured properly and was setup as an unmetered connection. If a network connection is marked at "metered" updates (including Windows 10) are not downloaded automatically, and if the user manually tries to download updates they receive warnings about possible data charges.

  19. Re:Dumb users or conspiracy? by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

    Hmm... This could be: - Dumb users clicking "Yes, upgrade my computer" or - A Microsoft conspiracy forcing millions of computers (most being used by businesses) to install a completely new OS on their computers without their consent. I don't believe in Bigfoot or the Illuminati or Obama being a secret Muslim, so I'm going to go with #1.

    Microsoft apologized months ago for doing exactly what you're denying is occurring now: https://tech.slashdot.org/stor...

  20. It's all a mass hallucination, then by OpenSourced · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yesterday I had a customer call because one of his PCs has updated to Windows 10 without asking. According to the user, she had come back to her PC to see the update already installing. Of course I cannot know if that is the complete story, users are notoriously unreliable, but a couple of things come to mind.

    First, the customer called mainly because some programs stopped working. If things stop working it's not an "upgrade", its a whole new OS, and you have to market it that way, and wait for people to install it proactively. Anything else is irresponsible.

    Second, reports like this one are suddenly multiplying. There is no real difference in my mind between starting the "upgrade" on Windows' own volition or offering the "upgrade" to the user so many times and in so different ways as to make it practically sure that he or she will accept it by mistake.

    Microsoft is clearly confident in that its ecosystem is so solid in the desktop that nothing they do will change that. They are probably right, most of my customers are so heavily invested in the MS environment that nothing at all will make them change. One tried to switch away from Office to LibreOffice and, after a couple of years, had to backtrack licking its wounds.

    So you have a monopoly, but also a saturated market. You miss out on the Web revolution because you don't like centralized services, you like distributed better, that's your business. Then you miss out on the mobile revolution because the interface is so different from the one you have, and in your religion there is only one commandment, and it is :"There is only one Windows, and all pledge loyalty to It". So God forbids that you make something imaginative, like another system that works well with Windows. Afterwards you foul your cash cow by changing the interface that was working (desktop Windows) to be usable in the touchscreen world, apparently ignoring that people are well capable of learning and using two different interfaces with ease.

    So you prod your customers in the direction you want, even if you are not very sure of it being a good direction. It may be a winning strategy, who knows, not I, I have never earned the fat bonuses these marketing geniuses make. But in my book, prodding customers isn't a winning strategy.

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
    1. Re:It's all a mass hallucination, then by Snotnose · · Score: 1

      There is no real difference in my mind between starting the "upgrade" on Windows' own volition or offering the "upgrade" to the user so many times and in so different ways as to make it practically sure that he or she will accept it by mistake.

      This is pretty much what happened to me. Surfing the web, the "wanna install win10?" popup appeared with the evil button right over the link I was in the process of clicking. Once the install started I didn't know how to stop it without borking my computer, and once it finished I wasn't aware I had 30 days to go back to my earlier version.

    2. Re:It's all a mass hallucination, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here here! Preach it brotha!

    3. Re:It's all a mass hallucination, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's 30 days to revert the upgrade, not 30 days to go back to the previous version. After 30 days Windows deletes the OS files it backed up that enables it to roll-back the upgrade, but after that time you can still do a clean reinstallation of your old version if you have the install media, or possibly restore from a recovery partition, assuming to upgrade hasn't borked that.

  21. Re:Not Bullshit Confirmed by tommyatomic · · Score: 1

    I dont know what the " GWX Configuration tool" is but I use the updated "GWX Control Panel" tool and I opt to disable all the win10 upgrades AND delete the GWX program right out of my system.

    A couple dozen of my users whom I havent disable the win10 update on got hit with random unauthorized win10 upgrades. But I have tracked that to a windows setting to install updates when shutting down the PC.

    They shut down Windows 7 they start up with Windows 10

  22. It should be easy to confirm. wtf. by bazorg · · Score: 1

    This doesn't look good for Microsoft. It should be easy to confirm, as all installations should behave in the same way at the very least if they are running the same edition of Windows7/8/8.1

    The fact that they can't give a simple Yes or No answer and a few screenshots about how this works makes it look like there is some sort of dodgy affair going on, like what was described earlier that the way to cancel is to use a tiny Close button instead of a proper Cancel button.

    My PC hasn't tried to install anything by itself, possibly because it knows that when I tried to do it (on day 1 after release!) it failed on hardware/BIOS stuff.
    Now the right way to get Win 10 on this PC is probably to wipe out the current installation, but I certainly don't plan on being the one idiot who pays for a licence when others are fighting their machines to not get the upgrade.

  23. BS - Mother-in-laws upgraded on its own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call from mother-in-law (78yo with really bad eyesight). She just back home from a week trip and when she logged into her notebook with Win7, it was upgraded to Win10.

    All of her special settings, very large font, extra large Icons ... gone, back to standard fonts with a new Win10 interface she doesn't understand etc.. computer was useless to her at that point.

    Upgrade took place the night before when she was not even in the house. I had to go over and revert it back to Win7, put GWX Control panel on it to prevent any further changes.

    Machine is old, she uses it for email and web, that is it. Not powerful enough to run Win10.

  24. Disabled Windows update by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In my case the solution was completely disable the Windows Update service (denying the service from booting, not just change a setting on the control panel). No more Windows updates for me, but these days I no longer trust the service to leave it on.

    --
    Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    1. Re:Disabled Windows update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did that six months ago and selectively installed security updates. One day I was turning off the machine to get a splash screen "Installing update 1 of 128..."

      The next day I found that all of the updates I actively chose not to install were installed and Windows Updates were set to download and install automatically.

      Lesson learned. Windows can't be trusted.

    2. Re:Disabled Windows update by avandesande · · Score: 4, Funny

      I unplugged the network and power cable, pulled the cpu and ram out and ran the hard drive through a deep wipe.... and Windows 10 still got installed!

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    3. Re:Disabled Windows update by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      Funny... How did you manage to install updates after disabling the Windows update service?

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    4. Re:Disabled Windows update by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      That's nothing! I have a system that I definitely did not want to update and it doesn't even run any MS software at all and yet I found Windows 10 on it. Somebody put a fucking Windows 10 sticker on my toilet.

  25. Re:Dumb users or conspiracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Then you're an idiot. Microsoft's history has shown they they are willing to do whatever it takes to dominate the PC market, including breaking the law.

  26. Me too by SB5407 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That was my experience as well. EXCEPT I had successfully rescheduled it several times AND THEN one night, it started upgrading without warning me. IT threw me off without a restart notice, there was no countdown that you mentioned. I was very disappointed to lose what I had been writing in a web app hosted by my Uni caused by the sudden and unexpected restart.

  27. Oh Really? by freak0fnature · · Score: 1

    Do you have kids???

    I have 3 windows 7 PCs, none of which automatically upgraded. On to of that, the one I tried to intentionally upgrade, failed miserably. I ended up installing kodibuntu on that...much faster!

  28. Wait what? by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Interesting
    They deny it happens automatically by confirming it happens automatically:

    [Customers] can choose to not install the Windows 10 upgrade or remove the upgrade from Windows Update (WU) by changing the WU settings.

    Hear that? It's not automatic IF YOU OPT OUT by changing the WU settings.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Wait what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear that is default without changing settings.

    2. Re:Wait what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume they mean turn off updates?

      I see no further explanations.
      GWX control panel seems to have zapped from Dad's laptop. I'll play around more with extra computer infected with popup later.

    3. Re:Wait what? by sabbede · · Score: 1
      No, you turn off automatic installation of recommended updates. Like Microsoft told everyone when they announced it last month.

      Oh, and "infected with popup"? Are you twelve? GWX can be disabled. Or even better, used to upgrade from an obsolete OS for free. Don't be so arrogant. Nobody playing with Daddy's toys has any right to be.

    4. Re:Wait what? by sabbede · · Score: 1

      Go back to the main /. page and hit 'older' until you get to February 1st or 2nd. Then take a moment to be embarrassed.

    5. Re:Wait what? by Raenex · · Score: 1

      No, you turn off automatic installation of recommended updates. Like Microsoft told everyone when they announced it last month.

      Uh huh. So if Microsoft told you they'd delete your personal files unless you opted out within a month, you'd be fine with that too? They're completely breaking user expectations, and fanboys/shills like you are making excuses for them. Microsoft has never been so aggressive about upgrading to a new version of Windows, to the point of being completely underhanded.

    6. Re:Wait what? by sabbede · · Score: 1
      You're right. They've never been so aggressive about upgrades before. They've also never made upgrading to a new version free or moved to an SaS model for their operating systems before. Would you have been happier with no notifications or "recomended" upgrading and a $100-$250 price tag?

      The entire industry is in the midst of a massive upheaval in the way software is provided. Am I thrilled about it? No. Am I a fan of the SaS approach? No, not really. Am I willing to accept the facts of a changing landscape and "just deal with it" instead of digging in my heels and whining about something I have absolutely zero control over? Yeah, I am.

      Have you even tried 10? It's really good. All the under-the-hood improvements from 8/8.1 plus many, many more, without the shit UI.

    7. Re:Wait what? by Raenex · · Score: 1

      You're right. They've never been so aggressive about upgrades before. They've also never made upgrading to a new version free or moved to an SaS model for their operating systems before. Would you have been happier with no notifications or "recomended" upgrading and a $100-$250 price tag?

      False dilemma. The middle ground would have been to offer the free upgrade, notify users in a non-belligerent fashion, and that's it. What they chose to do instead is the result of a long and steady decline in respect for their users out of Google and Apple envy.

      Am I willing to accept the facts of a changing landscape and "just deal with it" instead of digging in my heels and whining about something I have absolutely zero control over? Yeah, I am.

      Fine for you, but making excuses and denigrating others who call out their bullshit is bad behavior on your part. And unlike you, I have control. I am not upgrading to 10. I primarily use Windows for games, while running Linux as my main box. I can live without the Windows box when push comes to shove.

    8. Re:Wait what? by sabbede · · Score: 1

      If you use Windows mostly for gaming, upgrade to 10 for DX12. If your primary computer is running linux anyway, why turn it down? What's your stubbornness getting you? What's this "unlike you, I have control" nonsense? You have nothing I don't apart from a sense of smug self-satisfaction stemming from a futile exercise in sheer bloodymindedness.

    9. Re:Wait what? by Raenex · · Score: 1

      If you use Windows mostly for gaming, upgrade to 10 for DX12. If your primary computer is running linux anyway, why turn it down?

      I was put off by all the "telemetry" (spying), and their heavy-handed efforts to force Windows 10 on people shut the door completely.

      What's this "unlike you, I have control" nonsense? You have nothing I don't apart from a sense of smug self-satisfaction stemming from a futile exercise in sheer bloodymindedness.

      Sorry, bub, you admitted yourself that you have no control over a model you didn't like. What I get is to stick to my principles and avoid a company that's lost all respect for its users. The more people that do that the better. Nothing ever changes if people just accept the situation as is.

      Of course there's a price for going against the grain, and everybody makes their own value decisions. There's plenty of stuff I tolerate for expediency. But the way you tried to excuse Microsoft's behavior -- that was shitty behavior on your part to justify your own decision.

    10. Re:Wait what? by sabbede · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry, but you don't have any control over the industry's movement towards a service model either.

      You're going to be stuck with it no matter what you do. Why waste time and energy in such a futile exercise? Just disable the telemetry and take advantage of the improvements. As it stands now, you're basically saying, "Automobiles? Hell no! I'll keep my horse." Or, "A phone I carry with me wherever I go??? Hell no! I don't need some jerk calling me while I'm buying groceries. And my landline doesn't need batteries."

      You're not better or even better off because you're stubborn. You're just wasting time and trouble, causing nothing apart from irritating noise.

    11. Re:Wait what? by Raenex · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but you don't have any control over the industry's movement towards a service model either.

      I'm sorry you're too much of a lemming to take advantages of alternatives.

      Just disable the telemetry

      Easier said than done, and I wouldn't trust Microsoft to "accidentally" keep re-enabling it. And there's a fundamental point that I find their actions and disrespect for users so distasteful that I'm not following them into future Windows versions.

      You're not better or even better off because you're stubborn. You're just wasting time and trouble, causing nothing apart from irritating noise.

      Ah, see, there it is again. You're so bothered that you accepted your fate where others haven't that you continue to defend Microsoft's shitty behavior.

    12. Re:Wait what? by sabbede · · Score: 1

      I am satisfied with both Windows 10 and my choices in the matter. Absurd complaints based upon ignorance and reinforced by undeserved arrogance are what I find repellant.

    13. Re:Wait what? by Raenex · · Score: 1

      You've already admitted you weren't happy about the service model, but felt you had "no choice". You already admitted Microsoft has never been so aggressive in getting users to upgrade. What you find so upsetting is that you made a choice to be a lemming, believing you didn't have a choice, while others spoke out and made different choices.

    14. Re:Wait what? by sabbede · · Score: 1
      It's representative of a major shift in the industry. Sweeping changes are discomfiting, requiring adjustments. I'm annoyed that I have to make said adjustments, and like most humans, prefer to keep doing things in the way to which I am accustomed. Change, however, is inevitable. I'm not going to waste my time complaining about something I cannot control, especially since it actually works to my benefit both at work and at home. A fact that quickly became clear as I acclimated myself to the new model.

      l could not care less about how hard Microsoft is pushing it. If they were charging for the upgrade and pushing it the way they are, I'd be very annoyed, but they're giving it away for free.

      What I can't stand is when people act like their ceaseless whining is a sign of superiority. I don't need some smug luddite calling me a lemming because I'm not joining in on the tears. I had the sense to try it before decrying it, and found that my initial reservations were either unwarranted or easily accommodated. So, my question to you, if you'll deign to hear it, is this: Have you actually tried it, or are you basing all your resistance on second or third hand complaints? If you haven't given it a fair shot, like actually using it for a week or so, how do you justify your criticisms?

    15. Re:Wait what? by Raenex · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to waste my time complaining about something I cannot control

      You keep on saying this, despite the fact that others have made different choices, Mr. Lemming.

      l could not care less about how hard Microsoft is pushing it. If they were charging for the upgrade and pushing it the way they are, I'd be very annoyed, but they're giving it away for free.

      Treating your customers like shit just because the upgrade is free is not a good excuse for treating your customers like shit.

      So, my question to you, if you'll deign to hear it, is this: Have you actually tried it, or are you basing all your resistance on second or third hand complaints?

      It's an irrelevant question, as the reasons for not upgrading aren't for things like UI issues.

      Since this argument is going in circles, I'm bowing out.

  29. went to bed with 7, woke up with 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's because, as others have suggested, I didn't track down the setting that explicitly states "do not install windows 10", but sure enough, this happened on my Windows 7 machine. I put it to sleep one night and when I woke it up the next morning I was greeted by the "Welcome to Windows 10" screen and had to click through the configuration options to finish setting up Windows 10.

    Best of all, it killed my WiFI adapter, which is another thing that I am seeing many complaints about online. I had a D-LINK USB wireless adapter on my desktop, and it stopped working after the upgrade. The adapter isn't supported anymore and there were no compatible driver updates for it. SO I had to buy a new one that said it was Win10 compatible.

    1. Re:went to bed with 7, woke up with 10 by sabbede · · Score: 0
      Bright side - you had an excuse to replace an obsolete wifi adapter. Sucks if you didn't have $20 to spend, but it couldn't have had much life left anyhow.

      Second bright side - 10 makes 7 look as old and obsolete as it actually is.

    2. Re:went to bed with 7, woke up with 10 by dbIII · · Score: 1

      but it couldn't have had much life left anyhow

      What's the expected failure mode then?
      As I thought, extrapolating bread in the fridge to electronics - what a loser.

    3. Re:went to bed with 7, woke up with 10 by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I've just had that on an Audio Visual PC - people went to use it and were confronted with a Win10 EULA and a changed multi-screen configuration.

    4. Re:went to bed with 7, woke up with 10 by BeCre8iv · · Score: 1

      Damn dwarfes are breeding

      --
      This perpetual motion machine Lisa made is a joke, it just keeps getting faster and faster. - Homer
    5. Re:went to bed with 7, woke up with 10 by sabbede · · Score: 1
      What, you've never had a radio die? It ain't a clock radio, those things fail after a few years (especially with brands like D-Link. They don't do good work). They also become obsolete as new standards arise.

      Besides, if the manufacturer stopped supporting it, you were going to run into rear-end pains regardless.

    6. Re:went to bed with 7, woke up with 10 by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I've had electronic things break due to impacts, clog up with dust and overheat, corrode, have their plastic casing degrade by exposure to UV light but never killed by magic just because a date on the calendar has passed.
      Proposing magical thinking apart from in fiction is setting a bad example.

    7. Re:went to bed with 7, woke up with 10 by sabbede · · Score: 1
      But never had a crystal oscillator slip out of tune, or transmission power decline? Have you ever noticed wireless performance degrading over time? Granted, I've had to replace more APs than clients, but the cheaper they are, the less reliable they tend to be over the long term. Connection speed starts to drop, packets are dropped, reconnects become ever more frequent... You think maybe it's interference, but it happens on every channel. Ideal electronic components can't wear/burn out, but even if they existed outside theory, a cheap little usb adapter would still use cheaper and less reliable components.

      And all that aside, they're so cheap that if you lose manufacturer support, why not just replace it? If the firmware/driver hasn't been updated since before win 8 came out, take it as a sign of obsolescence if you don't want to consider MTBF.

    8. Re:went to bed with 7, woke up with 10 by dbIII · · Score: 1

      With the greatest possible respect I suggest that you consider that relatively old wifi standards are still supported by new devices before rolling out the "obsolete" and "broken" leaps to conclusions. As for the edge cases you've thought up, I get that coders have a different way of looking at things and thing that since software has a shelf life of bread then you pretend hardware is like that too, but it would be appreciated if you would at least try to think a bit before spreading misinformation based on magical thinking. You may be utterly fantastic at what you do but that is not a licence to pretend your guesses in other areas are of the same value.
      Each of your rare edge cases would have a basis in reality and not just the ticking of the clock.

    9. Re:went to bed with 7, woke up with 10 by sabbede · · Score: 1
      Well, maybe I just have lousy luck with them, or you have good luck with them. Regardless, I do understand your frustration. I bought a new motherboard shortly before the release of Win 8, absolute top of the line AMD board from ASUS. The single most expensive motherboard I have ever bought, by at least $100. Within months ASUS released an R2 version of the board and stopped supporting mine. It still stings, and I'm annoyed on a daily basis.

      However, I place the blame appropriately. It isn't MS's fault that my board doesn't include support for the fast-boot tech introduced in 8. Not their fault ASUS stopped publishing driver, firmware and software updates for it. Or that I bought a board made in an odd period between UEFI rising as the new standard and the introduction of windows extensions for faster boots (which I suspect could be added to the firmware by ASUS, if they wanted to). Microsoft isn't responsible for hardware vendors' choices about what they want to support.

  30. You are a liar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are knowingly saying statements that are not true.

  31. Optional update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I found Windows 10 was checked automatically as an optional update in Windows 8.1 for this month's updates. I had to click on "not accept" the license agreement twice before I found the issue the third time around.

  32. They denied denying the deny by Nightjed · · Score: 1

    What do you mean they are denying it ? they did not deny that they changed it to a recommended update, if you have automatic windows update enabled (enabled by default when you install the os) it WILL install windows 10

    i just opened windows update in windows 8.1 to check and it automatically selected the windows 10 upgrade (in the optional tab) as the most critical update instead of the 50+ critical updates in the priority tab

  33. Its Blackmail by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    Forced adware install to get an IE security update is user choice ?How please. It blackmail,its evil its Microsoft SSDD.

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
  34. Unpopular opinion: This is a good thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got two good points to make:

    First:
    Sounds cold, but if there's anything I've learned from two decades of supporting end users, it's that end users are incapable of administering windows machines. They don't know shit and they should probably all be on chromebooks, ipads, or locked down VDI sessions. It's probably good on the whole to force home users to 10 lest we have the same problem we did last time around with XP being the defacto OS for 10 years.

    This is consumer computing in 2016. Computing is a service. Deal with it. Expect it to get worse. If you want control use Linux.

    Second:
    Stalman was right.

    1. Re:Unpopular opinion: This is a good thing. by sabbede · · Score: 1

      I concur. With the addition of "Quit whining, it's your fault for not paying attention."

  35. Ran Windows Update last night by CrashNBrn · · Score: 3, Informative

    I ran Windows Update last night, and the 'Upgrade to Win 10' (an optional update) was auto-selected.
    The Windows Update page at this point had only one option to click. Begin installation of Windows 10.
    Just like this: http://postimg.org/image/qkvw8...
    You had to go into "show all available update options" which is in small blue text. Deselect the optional update, so that you can select the "important" ones.

    Today, I thought, I'll open Windows Update to see what the small blue text was, to be more accurate...and guess what... yeah the Windows 10 "optional" update is reselected, and if you bother looking at the image above, again the only option to proceed unless you "show all available update options"

    So Microsoft can claim whatever the fuck they want. It's bullshit.

    1. Re:Ran Windows Update last night by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1
      Addenum: I have Windows Update set to: "Download Updates but let me choose whether to install them"
      With an additional Security Policy to not LET Windows auto-reboot. You only have to experience that once before you want to smash Ballmer in the face (with a chair).

      The experience of:

      You have applied some updates, but you have work to do, so you delay rebooting. After a certain amount of time, the system will NOT ALLOW You to stop the automatic reboot.

    2. Re:Ran Windows Update last night by DogDude · · Score: 1

      What's bullshit? You can choose to install the update or not.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    3. Re:Ran Windows Update last night by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Update has worked that way for years. When there's one major update that potentially effects other updates, it's presented first as the only update to be installed at that time. Then when the computer reboots it'll select the other updates. It often happens with .Net updates or Windows Update updates. Even Linux (LMDE at least) tries to get you to update the updater before installing other updates. If you go through their GUI, the updater update is required first, that's more restrictive than Microsoft in this case. Microsoft does a ton of shitty things, but what your screenshot shows is normal. Don't go complaining if you don't know how your system works.

    4. Re:Ran Windows Update last night by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's bullshit? You can choose to install the update or not.

      Holee fuck! You are one missing-the-point mutha fucka, aren't you.

  36. Re:Clueless users?-car analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, finally a Slashdot car analogy.
    I feel much better now.

  37. It's all clear by no-body · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The jerks at M$oft are drunk with corporate cool-aid and follow other objectives abusing their customers.
    Happens a lot, just look at any larger corporation, where the only goal it to increase bottom-line - take them to the cleaner!

    1. Re:It's all clear by avandesande · · Score: 1

      It's a shame one of the anti-virus companies doesn't give you the option to call anything win 10 related a virus and remove it.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  38. It's absolutely true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Three of my 7 machines greeted me with Windows 10 Tuesday morning. I was furious, and there is no downgrade path. I had to restore from HDD image, which thankfully was recent.

    1. Re:It's absolutely true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a built-in downgrade path. You can do it for up to 30 days after the upgrade.
      You have to go to your Settings > Update & security > Recovery
      one of the options will be "go back" to your previous version.

    2. Re:It's absolutely true. by TRRosen · · Score: 1

      there is a restore function but MS will never tell you it's there.

    3. Re:It's absolutely true. by sabbede · · Score: 1

      Why? Did you even try it, or just reimage in a fit of thoughtless rage? I have to assume the latter given that you didn't bother to google how to undo the upgrade. (Hint: Under the Update and Recovery settings. Exactly where one would expect to find it.)

    4. Re:It's absolutely true. by mauriceh · · Score: 1

      Not that it matters because if you use that, they will re-install Windows 10.

      --
      Maurice W. Hilarius Voice: (778) 347-9907
  39. Slashdot is turning to shit by DogDude · · Score: 0

    I really have to say that the Slashdot users that made this community so great have either left, or have all gotten lobotomies. This stupid fake story is just that: a stupid fake story. If even a percentage of Windows 7 machines across the planet were automatically wiping themselves, there'd be a bit of news about it other than some anonymous Internet comments. Businesses and government agencies everywhere would be dead in their tracks. This is really a load of shit, and I'm disappointed that so few intelligent Slashdot users are left or care enough to moderate any more.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Slashdot is turning to shit by TRRosen · · Score: 1

      Of course it is happening. But you don't think MS is dumb enough to have a few million machines try to download a 6GB update at once do you?

    2. Re:Slashdot is turning to shit by DogDude · · Score: 1

      What do you mean "of course it is happening". Do you have any proof? I'm looking at 30+ Windows 7 boxes, and they all look like this: http://postimg.org/image/6aykz...

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    3. Re:Slashdot is turning to shit by Striek · · Score: 2

      Any one of those "Update for Windows 7 for x64-based Systems" could be the "upgrade" to Windows 10 - that's the whole problem. Well okay, assuming the update size is listed correctly, they aren't, but you get the point.

      --
      "Government is like fire; a handy servant, but a dangerous master." -- George Washington
  40. Undoing Accidental Mod by ZiakII · · Score: 1

    Undoing Accidental Mod... Why is there no way to do this without posting :(

  41. Microsoft douchebaggery by Misagon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is not as if Microsoft does not employ people who are competent at designing and testing proper user interfaces: People who know and expect how users will interface with Windows Update.
    They expect people to install it by mistake.
    The forced update is nothing else but intentional douchebaggery.
    To blame the users is probably what they had planned to do all along.

    --
    "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
  42. I'm not even shocked that Microsoft would lie by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    I am only a tiny little bit perplexed - it is, after all, a bald-faced lie, but this new, more malevolent Microsoft, is fully capable of such unethical behavior.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  43. Upgraded to windows 10 over the weekend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never consented to downloading or installing windows 10. My computer does have automatic updates turned on, but I never specifically agreed to upgrade. I closed the lid on my laptop, and next time I opened it I was greeted by the dreaded windows 10 screen.

  44. Re:Stop complaning already, remove the tinfoil hat by grumbel · · Score: 1

    I have done that, but the update didn't carry over the applications from Windows7 for some reason, it presented a mostly blank install. The only two application it did carry over where some old copies of Word and Excel, both of which failed to run in Windows10. The rollback to Windows7 however seems to have worked. Given how aggressively Microsoft is pushing Windows10 update I would have expected a better tested upgrade routine.

  45. Re:Clueless users?-car analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually a car analogy response to a car analogy.

  46. There are better ones. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But MS has a lock in strategy, massive PR spend and a marketing budget to aid to "convince" the executives that Windows is best and the rest are unreliable at best.

  47. What-ever, Microsoft. by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    If you're so serious about the user being in control, put your money where you mouth is and release an uninstall tool to stop the "Get Windows 10" icon in the System Tray (rather than us having to use a third-party software) and stop adding Windows 10 as a "recommended update" (regardless of whether it runs on it's own or not) so it quits downloading gigabytes of data before the customer consents to the upgrade.

  48. forced and brutal by TRRosen · · Score: 1

    Had to roll back a client's yesterday. Shut it down monday win 7 came back Tuesday to 10 and mass confusion. Of course rollback does not remove edge.
    Had 10's non-disablable updates pooch a quickbooks server on payday last week. Thanks MS your stupidity is making me a lot of money.

  49. Remarkable Coincidence by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do you not find it remarkable that each and every one of these... "incompetent" mistakes are always in their favor?

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    1. Re:Remarkable Coincidence by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Do you not find it remarkable that each and every one of these... "incompetent" mistakes are always in their favor?

      No. There are plenty of bugs and misconfigs that are not in Microsoft's favor. Some of them take years to get discovered. That there is a Patch Tuesday speaks to the volume of errors not in Microsoft's favor.

      And there are some that are in favor of the users, and not Microsoft. Like the Genuine Windows verification error that existed once upon a time, where you could still install patches as long as you unplugged networking while installing them. Or the unintentional way one could upgrade from a home server to a full domain controller for cheap. Those happen too. People just don't complain about them too much.

    2. Re:Remarkable Coincidence by sabbede · · Score: 1

      You're going to have to provide some evidence to back that up. A lot of it.

    3. Re:Remarkable Coincidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would anyone here have to do anything? Especially at the behest of some MS shill?

    4. Re:Remarkable Coincidence by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Informative

      Which reminds me updates. So I went to look. Oh, 23 updates waiting. Every single one of them it titled "Update for Windows 8.1 for x64-based systems (KB3xxxxxx). Every single one of them is described as "Install this update to resolve issues in Windows. For a complete listing o fthe issues that are included in this update, see the associated Microsoft Knowledge Base article for more information. After you install this item, you may have to restart your computer."

      Seriously every single update looks like this. It's been that way for a long time now, with the only variants being whether it's a basic, critical, or security update. Every. Single. Update! They do not want the user to easily read what's in the updates. And I can tell you that I have seem many of these updates which did NOT resolve issues in Windows unless "issue" is very loosely interpreted (such as needing an upgrade to support Azerbaijan language).

      And "you may have to restart" means exactly that: you may or may not need to restart. They don't want to actually come out and tell you which it is. Any other company would get excoriated over this sort of support.

    5. Re:Remarkable Coincidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are a list of (to use your terminology) mistakes that are in Microsoft's favour AND which can be attributed to stupidity. So it's not remarkable that they are all in their favour. That was one condition of the list.

      If it had been a list of mistakes that can be attributed to stupidity, and all of those had turned out to be in Microsoft's favour, you'd have a point. Now you're using a logical fallacy to make a cheap point.

      I'm not saying it's not due to malice. But please use your brain even when bashing MS for Karma.

  50. Re:Stop complaning already, remove the tinfoil hat by TRRosen · · Score: 1

    Windows 10 is a messy pile of dung. It just doesn't smell quite as bad as 8. The interface is a disaster because randomly placed tiles is such a great way to organize things. 10 is the thing that doesn't work.

  51. Read then click by stackOVFL · · Score: 1
    Sorry if this has already been said but...

    I think what we have here are users are not reading the update dialog carefully and just clicking "go". I'll capitulate that knowing exactly what is about to happen during a Windows update is often foggy at best. IMO for a major OS update is user should be told very clearly (flashing neon lights kinda clearly) that the OS is about to be replaced with a newer version and then confirm they want to do that. Anything other is questionable and will lead to this finger pointing. MS might want to stop auto checking the install Windows 10 checkbox. That's kinda dirty pool.

    1. Re:Read then click by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      As others have mentioned they also pop up a window periodically that asks to install windows 10. And then here's the catch, the second option, which is usually the "no" or "cancel", is an install later button that is worded in such a way that you wouldn't necessarily suppose that it'll do that upgrade without warning you or giving a postpone option like for every other update. The way to avoid the install in this case is to close out the dialog box using the little red x in the upper right corner. I have the feeling though that lots of people click that second button either thinking it's a cancel button as per standard practice, or they think it won't hurt anything to download the upgrade as they can then install it later at their convenience.

    2. Re:Read then click by stackOVFL · · Score: 1
      Well that IS dirty pool. Like i said, a OS upgrade is a major event. MS should make every effort to ensure the user understands that the current OS is about to be replaced. Popups with awkwardly worded buttons is IMO a very underhanded way to foist something on a user who may not want it and it may break stuff. Some SW will not function under Windows 10 (Doom 3 seems to not like it).

      It's sad in a way that we no longer use floppy disks. Back in those days you knew darn well you were installing a OS. I remember like it was yesterday, sitting in front of that tower PC inserting disk 1 of 15 and several minutes later disk 2 for 15....

  52. Re:Not Bullshit Confirmed by sexconker · · Score: 2

    I dont know what the " GWX Configuration tool" is but I use the updated "GWX Control Panel"

    Yes, that.
    I ran it once in the beginning, once a while back, and once over the weekend.

    The problem is MS keeps changing the game. I'd rather not install GWX Control Panel in watchdog mode, especially since whenever MS changes the game there's some delay before GWX Control Panel can react. Killing Windows Update entirely and blocking everything MS at my router seems like a better idea at this point.

  53. Mostly users fault by p51d007 · · Score: 0

    These people that say they never "authorized" the upgrade, are the same people that tell me I only hit the print button once, and it prints the same thing over and over again (even though the print log says they printed at: 14:14:18, 14:14:19, 14:14:20 etc)

  54. Absolutely Untrue by nuckfuts · · Score: 1

    You don't know what you're talking about. I have personally seen Windows 10 installed where a computer was left unattended. Nobody manually agreed to anything, and the EULA prompt was displayed AFTER Windows 10 was installed.

  55. voluntary control blindness by epine · · Score: 1

    One had better remain "fully" in control at all times, because one slip of the finger is borderline irreversible for a great many people (here "borderline" is defined to mean "would require a substantial wallet flex"). Mounting mountains of psychology research show that humans are only "fully" in control of anything when their declared intention at the convenience of their best cognizance can be locked into place once and for all, until countermanded with equal and opposite intentional force.

    Control as per our paleolithic instincts:

        [*] don't ever ask me again, if you value your nut sack

    What a surprising thing for HID professionals to fail to notice: human to human intentional declarations are expressed in eleven exponential shades of scatological glower.

    Move over b2b / b2c, here comes DeepMind with some long-overdue h2c (human to computer) gesture recognition.

  56. Oh Boo Hoo. by sabbede · · Score: 1
    It's not like there haven't been plenty of warnings. Feb 2, it was announced (I read it here) that it was going to be a Recommended update, and as such could be installed automatically. There's also the GWX window that's been popping up in every consumer edition of 7, that I guess nobody paid attention to.

    Besides, I can't think of one good reason to stay on 7 when 10 is free. I'm sure plenty of people will proffer suggestions, but I'm betting each is easily dismissed nonsense. Go ahead and try to prove me wrong.

  57. MS is lying, once again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The update for Windows 10 was moved from optional to recommend which means that if the user lets windows 7 or 8 auto update, then it will auto update into Windows 10. It starts with KB3035583 to force the GWX program on the users PC. After that is installed if you go into windows update all other updates are unchecked and only the Upgrade to Windows 10 update is checked which says it's like 2.2GB's. Unchecking it and hiding it does nothing as it re-appears if you close the window and go back into it. As soon as you hit "update", or let it auto update, BAM! Windows 10.

    The only thing you can do is to un-install KB3035583. Disable auto update, check for updates. Then uncheck and hide KB3035583. You now have to leave Windows Update on the option to "Check but not install updates" and manually go through the updates yourself.

    Don't trust MS.

  58. Skeptical by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

    I'm rather skeptical about this really happening. I have 1 Windows 7 machine here at home, it hasn't ever tried to install Windows 10.

    Additionally, I refurbish laptops with Windows 7 Home Premium every day, and I've more than once left them running over night to do updates to themselves, not a single one has attempted to install Windows 10 on it's own.

    So I dunno, I'm not saying people are lying, but there's got to be some kind of user interaction that's being done, that we're not being told about.

    1. Re:Skeptical by Nightjed · · Score: 1

      You need to have the automatic updates on, then it has to succeed downloading the 2~3 gb, then it needs to have enough space in the HD to unpack, and THEN the dreaded "you have 30 minutes to comply or ill ram windows 10 up your computer hole"

      If you want proof just run windows update, the windows 10 "upgrade" will be the autoselected option, should you turn automatic updates on it will try to install it

  59. Microsoft confirms they are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They say "we are committed to making it easy for our Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 customers to upgrade to Windows 10"

    If they had their customers in mind, they should be committed to making it easy to choose either option as opposed to easy to choose one.
    Especially when the one choice is good for Microsoft, but not necessarily one size fits all for the customer.

  60. Microsoft by aliquis · · Score: 1

    Just fix fucking sleep on my machine, it worked before, why doesn't it work in Windows 10?

    ASUS M3A32-MVP Deluxe.
    HD6950.
    DS4Windows.
    Geforce Experience for Nvidia Shield controller.

  61. The deceptiveness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is bullshit. He clearly (even after clicking the little blue text that a normal end user never would) deselected the option to put this virus on his computer.

    The next time he opened windows update, the virus was re-selected to install.

    It's bullshit, plain and simple.

  62. Re:So 0.000000001% Affected? by sabbede · · Score: 1

    Well, they did make it a recommended update, so automatic installations were going to happen. But it's not like it was a secret. Admins especially should have known. I did. Read it right here.

  63. It is easy to prevent Win10... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just make sure your C: drive is close to full, and it will never be able to force this down on you.

  64. Slashdot Pitchfork and Torch Festival by eumoria · · Score: 1

    Well known is most Slashdot's readership on Microsoft so the majority of these threads are nonsense and garbage.

    > You must have Automatic Updates enabled, then also have "Treat Recommended Updates as Important" however both of these are enabled by default, so there ya go.

    > Then you had to completely dismiss the Windows 10 upgrade options. Both available selection options to continue would eventually install win10.

    > Finally it seems that domain connected machines are not being forced by default but I can't find information specifically about it. All of my workstations are still Windows 8.1 and some have the GWX.exe running on them. So the no-force on domain controlled networks seems to be true but I don't know how the deadline works.

    Linux users/fans/shills, making up bullshit to make a company that already does shitty things worse just makes you all look like a bunch of idiotic children.

    1. Re:Slashdot Pitchfork and Torch Festival by mauriceh · · Score: 1

      I was thinking about writing a clear and informed response to that, then I thought some more and decided that it would be more even handed and appropriate to simply say: "fuck you, asshole"

      --
      Maurice W. Hilarius Voice: (778) 347-9907
  65. Xboner roll-out was the canary in the coal mine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft has been planing this for a LONG time. They've gone full double agent.

  66. What I've seen... by cmdr_klarg · · Score: 1

    Have not seen any Win10 nagware on my domain PCs (yet).

    I currently am running Win10 at home, but that was a complete fresh install, not an upgrade. Before I was running Win7 Home, but I never did see the Win10 nagware, even without being careful about updates. I was running Classic Shell, so that might have had something to do with it. I don't know. I *do* know my son's PC is showing the nagware. No auto-updated PCs in my experience yet. YMMV

    --
    THE SOFTWARE, IT NO WORKY!!!
  67. maybe it's a ploy from apple ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they surely got the money to grease some palms. it would distract everyone who's been complaining about their decreasing software-quality in a "see: windows is still a million times worse"-way :-)

  68. looks like this is going to be the year of the lin by unami · · Score: 1

    finally

  69. Netcraft confirms Microsoft full of liars by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    At this point I've resigned to add MS to my kill file and move on. If they have this much contempt and disregard for their customers now... Just imagine what they are going to be like when they really start to lose market share. Better abandon ship now while the abandoning is good.

    Microsoft is not stupid. They know all about Interface design and human factors. What they are doing is like an infomercial or PR department spewing misleading language while technically may be true is intentionally knowingly designed to leverage ignorance or trick people who are not lawyers into making implicit assumptions. Whether machines are upgrading themselves or not is irrelevant. What is relevant is the fact people are being fucked over by a deliberate and conscious action on the part of Microsoft.

    How can anyone expect integrity from a corporation who intentionally installs and enables backdoors access by default allowing Microsoft to read any file or setting they feel like from your computer without your knowledge or consent?

    https://technet.microsoft.com/...

    Do yourselves a favor, cut your losses and bail.

  70. Updating the upgrade experience? by khz6955 · · Score: 1

    "we have updated the upgrade experience to make it easier for customers to schedule a time for their upgrade to take place"

    But we don't give them the option to opt out of the upgrade experience :]

  71. New acronym... CTD=Computer Transmitted Disease.. by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

    I've come to the conclusion that Windows 10 and MS's abhorrent behavior makes Windows 10 a computer-equivalent of a sexually transmitted disease.. Call it say, a CTD. Of course in the case of the STD, a nice little rubber balloon does a fair job of protecting the "family-jewels" from said STD. In the case of a CTD, its quite a bit more complicated, but simply disabling WU does a pretty fine job...Of course, Windows being what it is, I certainly wouldn't advise disabling WU unless you take certain other precautions prior to using the system on the wild-n-wooly internet...

    --
    THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
  72. Makes me want to downgrade to Windows XP by blindseer · · Score: 1

    I have more computers in my basement than I care to admit and I have upgraded two of them from the Windows XP that came with them to Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 using licenses from the university. I have yet to see any nagging to upgrade to Windows 10.

    I'd like to keep those computers with the OS they have now for software testing and because of compatibility issues with older software I use. "Downgrading" to XP might actually be an improvement since both machines have Wi-Fi devices on board which drivers exist only for Windows XP. If I reinstall XP on those machines then I gain Wi-Fi, won't get nagged for an operating system that likely would not run on them anyway, and I can keep running the old software.

    What I'd lose with reverting to XP is the ability to test in Windows 7 and 8.1 but if this fiasco works out like Microsoft seems to intend then there is no point to testing on those operating systems anyway.

    Yes, Windows 7 is old and XP is ancient but for what I do they work just fine. I do networking stuff and web development. All I need those computers to do is run things like terminal emulators, ping, telnet, tftp, and some text editing. I use Windows instead of Linux because the drivers are there, they work well with the OS, and when it comes down to it I really don't think too much about what OS is there so long as it stays out of my way. Besides, with Windows XP I can run some of my old games and not have to tweak an emulator for it to work.

    --
    I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  73. Liars by mauriceh · · Score: 2

    They did it to my wife's PC 3 times.
    I had to go to fairly great lengths to stop it from recurring.
    Installed and deployed GWX Control Panel to stop it.
    Tell me: Why would GWX Control Panel even exist if this problem did not happen?

    --
    Maurice W. Hilarius Voice: (778) 347-9907
  74. Windows 2008r2 server with wsus and no updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a vm running server 2008r2. It is a clean vm that was created but never used years ago with only 1 update ever installed on it from the end of 2012. That update is the only one listed. It is set to NEVER DOWNLOAD UPDATES. When I ran GWX control panel on it, it showed about 500mb of data in the win10 folder and win 10 upgrades was listed as possible.

    How is it, a vm created years ago and never used with windows updates turned off and part of a wsus system that has all updates refused, could have win10 software folder and data?

  75. MS auto GWX in Win7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a computer tech I have come across this half a dozen times so far this year. I believe this is a horseshit statement.

    GroMM

  76. Cats, children and crazy clicking. by psinet · · Score: 1

    Do any of the group claiming that M$ is *pushing* W10 updates on people care to explain why only a very small percentage of users have reported this specific behaviour?

    Why has it not happened to me or all the others?

    Do you people possibly have cats? Children? Because they love to push keys and click the mouse when no one is looking.

    William of Ockham says hello, 'STEM' students.........

    1. Re:Cats, children and crazy clicking. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      only a very small percentage of users have reported this specific behaviour

      Because Microsoft software often inexplicably works differently on different machines? For decades, I've seen people on-line compare the behavior of Microsoft software, then carefully compare their systems and installed software, and being puzzled why it works differently. I'm no longer at all surprised at people with apparently identical systems having different behavior.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  77. Users fully in control, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In that case, I want win98 's floating toolbars back, pronto. And the degree of folder customization back too. In conducting my research for this, (fair use?) I installed a few flavors of Dosbox downloaded an ISO file containing win9x installations, used some instructions from VOGON as a guide, and swapped the virtual partitions between Dosbox flavors every time I hit a dead end and I had a system that I could use to demo the things I want Microsoft to do and took screenshots with Windows Feedback. If I worked a bit harder with it I could come up with a better demo, but I just can't right now. If you are willing to put in some effort to get Win98 working with Dosbox, you too can try out Win98's ability to do floating toolbars by right clicking on the taskbar, select something about adding a toolbar, choose a directory, and drag the resulting toolbar into anywhere on the screen. You can write batch files to move stuff in and out of these toolbars, allowing them to hold things that are context sensitive. For customizing folders, right-click on any folder and choose customize folder. First a wizard will open, and you can get to a point where a page containing html will appear and you edit this to control how the folder is displayed. I also needed a Dos boot disk image which is easier to search for, and it seems when I followed advice at VOGON to format the partition and transfer the DOS system over, apparently some vestges remained and the old COMMAND.COM stuck around so I had to download the right one from the same place I got the DOS boot image.

  78. As usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft is lying. Their rouge upgrade bullshit took out a Point of Sale system (POS) at a local shop last Monday. The shop's (contracted) IT guy eventually got it back to Win 7, but they had to go to paper records for hours, and now the books for Monday are all screwed up.

    MS may be looking at a class action suit if this shit keeps up.

  79. Sue Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go get em!

  80. rofl... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Burn baby burn!

  81. Microshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you Microsoft. Just auto upgrade my computer so I can join the class action lawsuit already

  82. A sad moment for MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use every OS daily and have watched MIcrosoft's out-of-touch-with-reality decline over the last 10 yrs with disbelief. When lately I first saw the FULL-SCREEN WIN 10 NAG SCREENS on my win 7 desktop at my university I just sat there in disbelief. I took a picture of the screen with my phone as it is one of the most embarrassing moments in the history of computing IMO. Desperation like this is shameful and I believe hurts the MS brand more than helps. Well at least it's been a resounding success with what 10% uptake?

  83. Hit them where it hurts by Joe+Branya · · Score: 1

    High-tech companies like Microsoft depend on employees being able to say proudly "I work at Microsoft". The moment that saying that leads to people screaming at them over the update problem the Microsofties start hiding who they work for and the best ones, the ones with choices, start looking for an employer they can admit to working for. Even better at conventions refuse to let them into conversations- shun them. And don't accept "But that's not my division" as an excuse.

  84. Microsoft taking advice from the Clintons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Happened to both of my parents machines overnight. Wanted alternative, with no apple tax. Looks like a general district of Linux is appealing to them

  85. Micro$oft is GUILTY! GUILTY! GUILTY! by kenwd0elq · · Score: 1

    If there is ever a person who knows what he's doing around computers, that person would be Jerry Pournelle, former columnist for BYTE magazine (and several others over the last 3 decades) and current master science fiction author.

    https://www.jerrypournelle.com...

    Jerry Pournelle's Windows 7 computer "updated" itself to Windows 10 overnight without his permission a few days ago.

    I continue to recommend the GWX Control Panel to prevent your Windows 7/8/8.1 system from upgrading before you're ready.
      https://askleo.com/block-windo...

  86. Microsoft isn't lying! by Druegan · · Score: 1

    Seriously folks, Users *do* remain in complete control! I can prove it.

    When I installed Windows 7 Pro 64 bit on my game machine a couple years ago, I disabled the Windows Update process in services.msc. Bam! One easy step and I've had no issues whatsoever with unwanted upgrades being forced on me, no nagging, no ads, nothing! Piece of cake, and total control!

  87. While playing game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A buddy of mine was playing an online game when the game closed out and a Windows upgrade for Windows 10 appeared. It just closed out his programs and began the upgrade. If only we could stop these Microsoft bastards!

  88. Same at Chaos Manor. by Reziac · · Score: 1
    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  89. DON'T BLINK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe microsoft's internal codename for their Windows 10 update program is "Weeping Angels".

  90. For The Best by johnsie · · Score: 1

    I'm happy about this. For too long thrte have been too many ve4sions of windows in use. Having just one will make tbings easier for developers.

  91. Stupid or Conniving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, Microsoft, are you stupid such that you don't know what your products are doing, or are you intentionally not listening to what your users are telling you?
    Based on the fact that you're still pushing the POS Metro interface on us, I'm betting it's the latter.

    But hey, you got me to install PC-BSD on my main desktop, you got me to migrate from all but one Windows-only program running on my laptop, and I'm still looking at alternatives for that one. I will be Windows-free at home before I'd upgrade to 10.

    And at work, in our next upgrade cycle I will be shifting us to web-dependent versions of all our applications so we can kiss Windows goodbye at our 50-workstation office as well.

    Heckuva job, Satya!

  92. Re:Stop complaning already, remove the tinfoil hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whether the devs of the software that breaks until Windows 10 are competent or not is beside the point, if you need to use that software regardless and Windows 10 is being shoved down your throat.

    I'd consider updating to a new version of Windows, when they fix the bloody UI, and give us a way to actually turn off the telemetry crap. For the UI, it really wouldn't be that hard for them to create a Windows 7 theme, for Windows 10, which would just leave the other big issue being the spying crap.

  93. I Call BS on Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just received a call from a client who (finally) reported that when the office staff arrived this Monday morning and turned on their computers, every Windows 7 Pro computer had been updated without consent or user intervention to Windows 10 over the weekend. Microsoft is flat out lying about what is going on. This is the absolute worst possible abuse by a vendor I have ever seen. As a Microsoft partner I want to be fully compensated for having to perform a rollback on these systems. My client didn't ask for it and they should not have to pay to have their systems restored.

  94. Microsoft is ignorant of the problem by cwsumner · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is ignorant of the actual cause of this. Or at least one cause.

    For decades this has been a problem, in several different ways.

    If a popup window appears when someone is actually working, whatever they are typing is suddenly diverted into the popup window. The popup can receive that and close, so fast that the user might not even see it. And not even know what they have "agreed" to!
    This means that, technically, it is not possible to show that a user has agreed to -anything-. And none of the "agreements" are binding, for anything.

    Unix and Linux and most others do Not do this. It takes a mouse click to select the popup on other OS types.

    Microsoft is not propperly testing stuff and might not even know how... 8-(

  95. Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, this supposed "forced upgrades" don't happen. People leave the box checked when they run updates. Because 99.9999999999 percent of computer users are fucking hapless idiots.