Slashdot Mirror


4" Penguins in Safety Sweaters Need Help

chrisd writes "We all give lip service to how much we like penguins and such, well a bunch of the "little" penguins (4 inch tall little guys) have been spooged by an oil tanker in southern australia. They need cash to help them take care of the little fellas. They put them in little sweaters and such to keep them from preening the oil off thier wings into thier stomaches, which causes them to die. A picture of them in thier protective gear can be found there or at a my mirror."

190 comments

  1. Ever try to swim in a sweater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't they sink like rocks?

    1. Re:Ever try to swim in a sweater? by GeeBee · · Score: 1
      If you had taken the time to read the article in your rush to post, you would have known that they are not released to the wild in the sweaters. The penguins are kept in a rehabilitation hospital until they recover.

      Sadly, not all the little fellows will make it even with the sweaters. Some have died already

      I agree that this is a good cause and that the Linux community should help Tux's kinfolk.

      What I'm burned over is that the unidentified persons who caused this disaster are still on the loose. I hope that they catch the @$#%!@#$.

    2. Re:Ever try to swim in a sweater? by robert+dobbs · · Score: 2

      Yes! They will release the little fellas with sweaters adorning their fragile bodies. idiot!

      --
      "The day they take Linux away from us is the day they pry it from our cold, dead fingers!"
  2. Perfect for those IPO millionaires by Brento · · Score: 4

    Now's your chance to do some good with those zillions of dollars you made from the RedHat and VA Linux IPO's. Let's make some donations.

    (I say "Let's", even though I didn't get in on the IPO. )

    --
    What's your damage, Heather?
    1. Re:Perfect for those IPO millionaires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, I don't think so. For me to make a donation, the animal affected would have to be those cute little adorable Red Hat hats that they sell. I would be just absolutely heartbroken if those little critters were harmed in any way :(.

    2. Re:Perfect for those IPO millionaires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How about some perspective people? Why not spend your millions on more worthwhile causes such as feeding the poor who live in your home town. Donate some money for cancer research, or one of the many hundreds of charitable organizations that are much more important than a bunch of flightless birds.

    3. Re:Perfect for those IPO millionaires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cause the penguins were minding their own business. I gave up on social work because homeless people work hard to stay that way. And before anyone gets all annoyed about that comment, this is based on observations of a family of nurses, police, do-gooders and social workers.

  3. Good cause by JamesSharman · · Score: 2

    Aww, they are so cute. Looks like a good cause, just dont come running to me for help when some un-cute (bsd?) demons get burnt in the fire!

    1. Re:Good cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > just dont come running to me for help when some un-cute (bsd?) demons get burnt in the fire! And this from a person that says negative stuff should be on exaflop.

    2. Re:Good cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because daemons don't exist in real life (hope not anyways *grin*)

      That's why...

  4. New Logo by Gandalf_007 · · Score: 1
    The penguin-in-a-sweater would make a great logo. After all, it's cute, it's a known symbol, what more can you ask for?
    Maybe this should be the logo for the "sysadmin at the south pole".

    But go ahead and help if you can (meaning you're not a poor college student like me).

    --

    "It's better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt."
    1. Re:New Logo by Cy+Guy · · Score: 2

      Seems ideal for Secure Linux!

    2. Re:New Logo by cute-boy · · Score: 1

      No, more suitable for Storm Linux... instead of a 'Twister' rip-off on the box...

  5. poor guys by dAzED1 · · Score: 4
    Those little guys sure were cute...

    It took a bit of reading to find anywhere to send money to, but I finally found this:

    Donations can be sent to: Phillip Island Penguin Parade, ATT: Penguin Hospital Support Fund P.O. Box 97 Cowes Phillip Island. Victoria. 3922. AUSTRALIA.

    The didn't have anyway that I found, in the amount of time I had, to give money online or anything. Darn it those things are cute. Easy to want to help.

    1. Re:poor guys by jbrw · · Score: 3

      Before sending money off to these guys, remember that most banks have nasty charges for converting cheques from one currency to another. From memory, the standard charge in Australia to convert currency is AUS$20, so either include enough money to cover the cost, or get your bank to write a cheque in Australian dollars. Maybe get together with some friends/your local LUG and pool your money to save on bank fees.

      There is the chance that since these guys are a worthy cause, their local bank might waive the fees, but I wouldn't count on it.

      ...j

      (US readers: s/cheques/checks/g - make sense now? <g>)

    2. Re:poor guys by Senior+Frac · · Score: 2

      They also need volunteers to help knit penguin jumpers. If you would like the pattern of the Little Penguin Jumper please write to us at penguins@penguins.org.au with your name and address and in a few weeks when we are back to our desks we will be able to send you out a copy. Don't look at me... I know nothing of knitting.

    3. Re:poor guys by Penguin_Parade · · Score: 2

      Thanks everyone, from all of us here at the Phillip Island Penguin Parade! We have tried to get a secure form online. You will probably get an error message about it, as we don't own our own certificate yet, and are relying on the generosity of a local ISP (Labyrinth Connections) to help us out so that things are as secure as can be. Maybe I should stick to being a ranger and not try and compete with all you programmers :) Thanks yet again!

  6. Uhh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    4 *INCH* tall penguins?
    Homey don't play that.

  7. Discharging tanks ... flags of convenience by LizardKing · · Score: 5

    Like much in our world, the merchant shipping industry is a haven for jobsworths, tightwads and schemers. Rather than have tanks cleaned properly in port (at a cost) unscrupulous shipowners encourage crews to simply flush them at sea. Stand on any beach near a shipping lane, and you can guarantee there'll be tar-like deposits everywhere from this heinous practise.

    There's little governments can do even if they have a fair idea which ships or copmanies are to blame. Do it in international waters, and no-one can get you. And if you get caught ... Well, almost every large merchant vessel flies under a flag of convenience. This enables the captain or owners to say ``well, sue me in Liberia''.

    A friend who works as a deck oficcer commented to me once that another problem is hopeless crews. OFficers tend to be trained and conscientius(sp?),
    but crews often don't speak the same language as the officers and have no training. In the British merchant navy, many crews are Philipino simply because the owners can get away with paying them shit wages.

    Anyways, enough of the ranting. I just hope no more of these little penguins succumb to the oil.

    Chris Wareham

    1. Re:Discharging tanks ... flags of convenience by Bad+Mojo · · Score: 1

      This is another area where my idea for an Open Source Army would work well. Destroying ships that violate the Earth is a worthwhile endevour. So who's with me on this Open Source Army? It would be non-central and the policy system would be totally open sourced. ;)

      Someone, *PLEASE*, think of the penguins!


      Bad Mojo

      --
      Bad Mojo
      "If you can't win by reason, go for volume." -- Calvin
    2. Re:Discharging tanks ... flags of convenience by Jburkholder · · Score: 2

      Do you have _any_ idea of the kind of mess it makes when you destroy a ship at sea? Ask the marine life in the area of one of the WWII sea battles how many decades it takes to recover from the fuel and oil that are released into the ocean when a vessel is sunk.

      (yes, I know you were probably just kidding, I'd like to dispose of those bastards as well. Finding the culprits and dipping them in oil a couple times would probably be more effective and less polluting than sinking an entire ship to punish them, killing the entire crew, only a handful of them even having anything to do with the pollution in the first place.)

    3. Re:Discharging tanks ... flags of convenience by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      You are right it makes no sense to kill the crew and sink the ship. What is more reasonable and easier to do would be to kill the CEO of the company. Ultimately the buck stops with him/her. Also the CEO would be an easier target and a cheaper one too. To sink a ship you would need heavy firepower to kill a CEO a bullet or two.

      No I am not kidding this is the only real solution. If enough CEOs get killed you will see the megacorps acting much more responsibly.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    4. Re:Discharging tanks ... flags of convenience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4" Fairy Penguins are little cuties. The good thing is that the Victorian State govt are doing an analysis on the oil and are testing all ships that come into Port Melbourne to ID the source. All they need to do then is sue the pants of the shipping line to make an example of them so this sort of crap doesn't happen again.

    5. Re:Discharging tanks ... flags of convenience by Penguin_Parade · · Score: 1

      You have hit the nail on the head mate! The problem that has caused this is also courtesy some very dangerous Australian Government legislation that we all here at Phillip Island Nature Park really are trying so hard to have changed. The law actually allows ships to clear their bilge at 7 kilometers off the coast. It is only illegal *if* the oil and waste drifts towards shore. This IGNORES that so many other marine animals are effected. Please see our Seal Tracking page at our research section of http://www.penguins.org.au and you will see what we mean. There are many unspoilt by man (except courtesy this sort of environmental tragedy) beyond the 7 km limit. And 7 kilometers is nothing as it is! Thankyou again for all your help and interest - and to Slashdot.org for caring enough to run this story. Thankyou for not just using a Penguin as a logo, but as a mascot that everyone actually cares for! It is making our work here tonight a cheery affair despite more deaths of the Little birds we love; knowing others share our love from around the world is fair dinkum beaut! Forgive my spelling, I have dirty hands and perhaps shouldn't be allowed to "oil" up this keyboard :) (ps the penguin Parade which we run is actually not just a visitor attraction, it is a genuine research centre and hospital facility. Visitors to the Parade help fun this via their ticket purchases).

  8. Stuff like this makes us fell in tears... by redhog · · Score: 2

    It is interresting how the hearts of all the techno-loving, junk-food-n-plastic eating hackers all feels sad for an animal. Perheaps not as strange, an OS has done it. But, to be honest, there are a lot of spiecis suffering from unlawfull chasing and from environmental destroying garbage. Please, everyone, try to help all of them, not just the one lyckily selected as the logo for Linux. They do have the same right to a good life filled with gras and baths (Or what the speiece in question values), as you have to one filled with cool hardware and free software!

    --
    --The knowledge that you are an idiot, is what distinguishes you from one.
    1. Re:Stuff like this makes us fell in tears... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah nothing worse than "a lot of spiecis suffering from unlawfull chasing." You mean like the Road Runner?

    2. Re:Stuff like this makes us fell in tears... by Machina · · Score: 1

      No offense, but I hate how everytime something good (like donations from /. readers) or bad (Columbine shooting), gives people the feeling they can use these events toward their own causes.

      /. reader's should be praised for helping such a cause! (Admittedly, the article I'm responding to, isn't that harsh, fortunately). The thing is, when things like this happen, and people start getting involved, it's one step further to getting more involved. It's possible one /. reader will really get into this cause, and maybe in doing so, might learn more about other causes, and get more involved. Either way, there are ton's of problems in the world, and every person can only put so much time to a few of them! We choose certain political causes, but not others (OSS, DVDCA?, Censorship), and we'll do the same for other causes. Other people will put their time, money, and energy toward other causes /. would skip over.

      Just my $0.02

  9. *ahem* by Pendulum · · Score: 1

    And remember, folks; if you're trying to attract women, having a soft spot for cute little penguins always helps.

    1. Re:*ahem* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are Roblimo and I claim my $5

  10. Tux is in trouble!... but seriously... by mathboy · · Score: 2

    Money is everythingin a case like this - perhaps some of the newly succesful Linux companies could use this to boost their image? :)

    Sounds disgustingly corporate, but I dont see any international agencies that arent charities/enviro groups that have guaranteed funding existing to take care of this.

    The penguins wont care where the money comes from, I can tell you that.

    Dont you all know its the corporations that have to take care of our environment and community now? Havent you seen those Saturn commercials?

    Just to make a really unpopular but important statement while Im at it: wasnt it found to be a waste of money to save animals from the Valdeez spill? Didnt they die anyway? Couldnt that money be used better to cleanup the spill unless saving these few animals will keep a population from crashing or becoming endangered?

    Remember, CUTE AND CUDDLY doesnt important make. Just cuz they're cute penguins doesnt matter as much as their position in the food chain and how other populations rely on them. Money should go where its really needed, not where the population, guided by what animals make cute stuffed toys, thinks it should.

    Math

  11. Alternative to sweaters by Megane · · Score: 1

    Instead of sweaters, perhaps they could try ponchos instead?

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    1. Re:Alternative to sweaters by The+Toad · · Score: 2

      Sure, but only if they wear those sombreros as well.

  12. And in other news... by _iodine_ · · Score: 3

    A company was recently hired to produce thousands of 4 inch tall sweaters specially designed to fit penguins. Sweaters, Inc. was listed as having better than expected earnings for the 4th quarter. The President of the U.S. has been quoted as saying, "The influx of new jobs that have been created because of the penguin crisis has been a boon to the international community."

    --
    printf("Why have a signature?");
    1. Re:And in other news... by robert+dobbs · · Score: 1

      This just in..... The CEO of Sweaters Inc. was just assassinated by a king penguin for "being racist against the larger sized penguin community"

      --
      "The day they take Linux away from us is the day they pry it from our cold, dead fingers!"
    2. Re:And in other news... by DartX · · Score: 1

      In response, a new startup, PenguinOne, has filed for an IPO with the SEC, claiming that they have sold $500,000 worth of penguin sweaters to an unnamed Antartic Consortium. PenguinOne put out an email claiming to be the predominant supplier of penguin-sized sweaters on the face of the earth.

      Initial Offering Price for the shares will be $18 - $20 each.

  13. "tar-like deposits" by Megane · · Score: 1

    I have heard that more often that not, "tar-like deposits on the beach" are caused by undersea oil deposits leaking naturally.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  14. Surf around the site some more. by Apuleius · · Score: 4

    Phillip Island's penguin colony is a great place to visit (I was there many years ago). The penguins all come from the sea to feed their chicks at roughly the same time in the evening. You can watch this from bleachers at the beach.

    Whoever dumped the slick off Phillip Island should be fed to sharks.

    1. Re:Surf around the site some more. by handorf · · Score: 1

      But don't forget: NO FLASH CAMERAS!

      I swear, watching the park rangers (or whatever) threaten the people in the stands with umbrellas the night I was there, you realize that most people are either too stupid to read the signs (which are EVERYWHERE) or too selfish to care.

      Fond memories from my trip to Australia. ;-)

      BTW: Agree on the shark thing.

      --
      -- IANAEG - I am not an elder god.
  15. Not everywhere. Re:"tar-like deposits" by Apuleius · · Score: 1

    That's only in places like the Gulf of Mexico
    where there are such deposits.

  16. I'm donating by Jonas+�berg · · Score: 3
    I'm donating $100 to them. Apparently, the address to send checks to is


    Phillip Island Penguin Parade

    att: Penguin Hospital Support Fund

    P.O. Box 97

    Cowes

    Phillip Island. Victoria. 3922. AUSTRALIA.


    But it would also be interesting to make sure that this
    doesn't continue to happen -- for any animals! What
    organisations exist that help prevent that these polluters
    get away?

    1. Re:I'm donating by ReadParse · · Score: 2
      > what organisations exist that help prevent
      > that these polluters get away?

      Uh, Greenpeace? And others, I'm sure. Polution and wildlife aren't new issues.

      RP

    2. Re:I'm donating by karb · · Score: 1

      ugh. Try the Sierra Club instead. Spend your money protecting the environment instead of harassing nuclear submarines.

      --

      Jack Valenti and the MPAA are to technology as the Boston strangler is to the woman home alone

  17. Consequences for the Oil company? by Kintanon · · Score: 3

    So what is being done to punish the oil company? Which company is responsible, are they investigating the cause? Who is being held accountable for this? Someone needs to get their ass handed to them on a platter for dumping a bunch of oil in our ocean!

    Kintanon

    --
    Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
  18. i would love by jrs · · Score: 1

    to have a pet pengiun or 2. Are they hard to take care of? :)

    1. Re:i would love by OrangeTide · · Score: 2

      Wild animals are notoriously bad pets. Domesticated animals have been bred for hundreds of years to remove a lot of thier instincts and allow them to be more social around people. Of course if you are lucky one out of many wild animals would have this behavior, that's where breeding starts.

      Of course some animals are not domesticated but tend to make good/decent pets such as: fish, most types of non-migratory birds, ferrets(this is debatable because many of them are neurotic furrballs). Snakes aren't too bad of a pet either, but most other reptiles (especially lizards) are a major venture to have as a pet. (except for frogs, although I've always found them to be tricky to feed right, but those are amphibians of course)

      A penguin might be okay in a nice large "cage", but I don't think it would be something to put on a leash and walk around the park with, nor something to cuddle up with on the couch and watch some TV together. :P

      Also realize that domesticated animals that have gone ferral do not make good pets either. Dingos for example are mostly the same as your pet dog, but they are horrible pets, almost as bad as a pet wolf. Of course you *could* start breeding dingos and after several generations have a decent and useful dog. (although that's a lot of work with little returns, dingos are probally better off without people)

      So instead of a penguin for a pet, maybe get a stuffed Tux or a big poster on your wall, or a nice penguin Theme for your favorite window manager.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:i would love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're a moron.

    3. Re:i would love by thogard · · Score: 1

      Pet Penguins are easy to take care of but like large dogs you need a big space to keep them in. They need some nice bushy area to nest in and they also need a rather large salt water swimming hole that needs to be stocked with little fish. I recomend set up a small area near the beach for them next to the pacific ocean.

  19. Clean them off by Andy · · Score: 1

    Has anyone thought of cleaning them off with a solvent and letting them go? I suppose that isn't an option because of the tree huggers involved. Better to whine about oil companies I guess.

    1. Re:Clean them off by Jonas+�berg · · Score: 1

      I think part of the problem is that the penguins have a lot of natural oils on their bodies to protect them.

    2. Re:Clean them off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can't just clean them and let them go because the cleaning process removes the waterproof quality of thier feathers.

    3. Re:Clean them off by lee · · Score: 3

      Why would they not just clean them off and let them go? It would kill them. Why clean the birds and then let them die?????

      According to the story they are cleaned with solvents and then kept in a penguin hospital in the little sweaters until they test waterproof and then they are released. The cleaning strips away their natural oils and they would freeze if they were released quickly. The sweaters prevent the penguin from trying to clean themselves and thus getting poisoned. From the sounds of it, they also keep them warm.

      --
      --- If you don't want to know the answer, don't ask the question.
    4. Re:Clean them off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Has anyone thought of cleaning them off with a solvent and letting them go? I suppose that isn't an option because of the tree huggers involved. Better to whine about oil companies I guess."

      Indeed! Or if that's too expensive maybe we should just move them to some part of the planet where there aren't oil spills. Why is it that whenever a corporation causes some sort of environmental disaster everyone always takes the environment's side? What about the poor corporation? It's got tremendous pressure to keep its shareholders happy, and nobody seems to care that being environmentally concious can cost these corporations money! I mean, soon gas will cost so much that I won't be able to storm around off-road in my SUV, or blow through the forest on my snowmobile. Screw the planet, save my portfolio and my environmentally destructive entertainments!

    5. Re:Clean them off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! Earth First: we'll strip-mine the other planets later!

    6. Re:Clean them off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is a joke right? corporations are raping this planet. Go read about how they've taken over America: http://www.adbusters.org/magazine/28/usa.html

  20. Way to go Slashdot by Cybergrrrrrl · · Score: 1

    Mad props to you guys for getting this story out.... I know some people bitch and moan when there is a "non-techie" article posted, but screw it. We Slashdotters have a LOT of power in our little mouse-held hands, and it's time we put it to good use (instead of just taking down servers-grin!).... Those little guys break my heart. I'm sending a check right now!

    Siobahn
    http://www.siobahn.com

    1. Re:Way to go Slashdot by Ravenfeather · · Score: 2

      That's right!

      The occasional story like this - and in particular, the response that arises within the /. community when one is posted - is one of my favorite things about slashdot.

      What do I mean by "the response"? Well, over at the Philip Island Preserve site, there have been thirty posts in the last couple of hours from slashdotters, most offering their help in the form of cash, sweaters, or whatever can be done.

      This sure makes the Linux community look good - imagine how good it would be if the press picks up on the way that slashdot readers came to help out. And if the story, or the pictures of penguins in sweaters tug at your heartstrings, head on over to the Philip Island site, leave a comment, or better yet, make a donation.

  21. The little penguins are very cool by rudedog · · Score: 1

    I made a point of going to Phillip Island when I was in Melbourne a couple of months ago, just to see the penguins. I froze my butt off on the beach right after sundown, but it was worth it to see them all march up the beach and head for their nests--one of the highlights of the trip. I even have a little stuffed fairy pengin gracing my monitor right now.

    The original URL has directions on where to send the donations. And, if you're in the US, your US dollars go a long way in Aus. dollars :-)

  22. Consequences under International Law by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1
    Does anyone know where to lobby for international law to impose really heavy penalties on such oil companies? It is disgusting to think that such companies with earnings in excess of the gross national product of many countries would clean their tanks in the earth's oceans rather than paying to have it done properly in port.

    We really need to jump up and down screaming about this to the right organization.

    1. Re:Consequences under International Law by blane.bramble · · Score: 1

      The majority of oil companies don't own or run their own fleets of tankers - Mobil used to (I don't know if it still does), and was unusual. It makes better financial sense to pay someone else. And of course, then it's not your fault if something goes wrong. That being said Mobil were pretty careful with theirs - the new tankers they ordered all had double-hulls, and they spent something like $1,000,000 per tanker per year on refits etc.

  23. Can't ThinkGeek set up a SKU to take CC donations? by Cy+Guy · · Score: 2

    I just visited webcertificate.com and got my free webcertificate which comes already charged with a free $5 worth of credit. If ThinkGeek could set up a SKU, I'd be glad to donate the $5 to the cute little guys.

    As mentioned in another post, this would be great way for anyone who is now filthy rich due to the Linux related stock craze to ease their open source conscience.

    (By the way, is conscience the opposite of science?)

  24. Sending U.S. Funds by sharv · · Score: 3

    FYI -

    According to a colleague of mine who lived for a time in Oz, it is possible to send U.S.-drawn checks to Australia. The recipient, however, will have to pony up the exchange rate difference and possibly pay a fee to their bank to take the deposit.

    Note that large banks (Citibank, Harris, etc.) usually will sell you a money order drawn in foreign currency, if you want to save the Penguin People from the evil bank fee collectors.

    Really big banks can probably even sell you authentic Australian currency, but we cannot recommend sending that by mail.


    -Sharv

    1. Re:Sending U.S. Funds by dbowen · · Score: 1

      It's been a while, but from memory, banks charge a per transaction fee of something like AUD$5 to cash overseas cheques. So if a bunch of US cheques are deposited at once, the fees are minimal.

  25. Re:This is not the first post by jd · · Score: 4
    I've never liked the term "colonies" for penguins. It's not like they're answerable to some dominion elsewhere. Maybe the collective term should be a "cluster", and their land habitation a "Beowulf".

    Orwell, I tried my best! :)

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  26. Lip Service by cruise · · Score: 0

    "We all give lip service to how much we like penguins and such"

    Which is about all you give.

    Release he source Taco/Slashdot/Andover.

    Your answers to the questions provided to you for the interview show that you do not practice what you preach. Put up or shut up. Release the source or stop with the lip service.

    Posted by a REAL OpenSource author/advocate.


    They are a threat to free speech and must be silenced! - Andrea Chen

  27. Might I suggest? by Nicholas+Vining · · Score: 5

    Why don't we nominate the penguins for the "Most deserving to win $2000.00" beanie thing? That'd certainly help them out, and they'd probably put it to very good use. Even if the awards are distributed after the crisis is over, the association which is taking care of the penguins will be in the middle of a major cash crunch and I'm sure that they could use it.

    --
    disclaimer: opinions contained therein are not neccessarily those of my employer.
    1. Re:Might I suggest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great Idea.

  28. Little Penguins aren't _that_ little by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Little Penguins are actually about 12" high, not 4" (I've been to Philip Island myself). Perhaps this is another metric to imperial conversion error, like the one which killed the NASA mars probe? Good cause anyway - the Philip Island folks are doing great work.

  29. Re:let's see if linux fools... by evilphish · · Score: 1

    I'm a dedicated linux user, and even though i'm
    insulted by your statement, I do agree with you.
    I wouldn't feel right looking at my tux alter :) and not being able to help.
    i've already sealed my envolope to them, which contains 100 dollars.
    I hope all the linux users out there make a contribution also.


    Gentleman, you can't fight in here, this is the war room..

    --


    who sez death can't be funny....www.endlesssorrow.com
  30. $$ /. effect? (off-topic) by jabber · · Score: 2

    Poor little guys. And a cause as worthy as any.

    On the off-topic side though, I wonder what the result of the slashdot effect would be when applied to charitable donations... Say, $10 from everyone who visits the site. Maybe even less.

    Has anyone out there done any work with electronic cash? Say: putting an amount into an online account, and then clicking on a URL to have a certain amount transfered to the cause..

    I know, the fraud potential is huge, so security comes up, but consider... Something a'la /. voting box on a secure and validated site. You select the amount to donate, click the donate button, and your contribution is added to the fund.

    Even contributions of e-pennies per person would amount to considerable funds when coupled with the slashdot effect.

    --

    -- What you do today will cost you a day of your life.
    1. Re:$$ /. effect? (off-topic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sounds good. could donate to fund raisers or something...

  31. No Offense by mochaone · · Score: 1

    This may be a worthy cause, but how the hell do I know what they'r doing with the money? Any background info on how they spend the money? What pct goes directly towards the penguins and what pct goes to admin?

    I know CmdrTaco thinks he's doing a service, but I don't need him telling me which causes to support. I'm sure there are some people who will give money because CmdrTaco thinks its a good idea. That's a shame. Besides, how much cash is CmdrTaco giving?

    --
    Hates people who have stupid little sigs
    1. Re:No Offense by thogard · · Score: 1

      I know what they do with the cash. They buy custom made clothes and beach front property. They are living the high life off your donations...

      The next time your in Melbourne Australia (you are going to vist arn't you?--it summer here now-hint, hint) go to the Penguin Parade on Phillip Island and you can see what they do. Just bring lots of warm clothes (think 20mph+ winds all the way from antartica) and don't bring a camera since they don't allow them(the flash blinds the birds)

    2. Re:No Offense by Penguin_Parade · · Score: 1

      Fair question! My name is Kieran Davies, and besides being the er, burrow master for Phillip Island and the Little penguins, I am also a trained Wildlife Ranger from back when I was at uni.

      The Penguin Parade is a totally non-profit organisation. Though it comes under the Victorian Govt., it has to raise its own funds. We exist SOLELY to protect the Little Penguins, Koalas, Seals and the natural environment of Phillip Island.

      We do this by running the "public" Penguin Parade where you can see up to 2000 penguins return to their burrows, and thus helping prevent habitat destruction for the remaining 28,000 Little Penguins we also care for that live on our Summerland Peninsula as well.

      Our staff are all real rangers, our researchers are dedicated guys and girls who don't do it for the money, but to find ways to improve our understanding of the cutest birds on earth :)) We seek to protect them in their natural and wild lifestyle/habitat; if you check out our web site at www.penguins.org.au you can read up on our management plans in the "Nature Notes" section off our Education page.

      I hope that helps - as you and so many others from Slashdot have helped our (meaning the worlds) Little Penguins.

      With the warmest reg'ds
      KD (Phillip Island Nature Park) and a bit lost on how to reply to so many fantastic threads in here!)

  32. Punish Them? by Skip666Kent · · Score: 3

    They should be thanked, for bringing about the greatest fashion breakthrough in Penguin history.

    --
    **>>BELCH
  33. Maybe hopeless (YMMV) by dbrower · · Score: 1
    One is given to wonder whether this is going to work. There is fairly recent research suggesting attempts to save birds from oil exposure are not effective, no matter how heroic. For one example, see this article about a UC Davis study on cleanup of pelicans.

    -dB

    --
    "It if was easy to do, we'd find someone cheaper than you to do it."
    1. Re:Maybe hopeless (YMMV) by Penguin_Parade · · Score: 1

      On behalf of the Little Penguins here with us on Phillip Island (writing from there after another night cleaning up), please *do* clean them up!

      It does work. The idea is to simply remove the oil. However this also removes the Penguins natural water proof coating.

      But the oil must go or our little ones would ingest the oil/gunk spewed into the ocean from the filthy bilge of the passing ship. Penguins constantly preen themselves to stay waterproof. If they do this when covered in oil, they simply make themselves worse off. Hence we pop the sweaters on them to ensure they can't do this.

      Once cleaned of oil, we rehabilitate them and check out their progress in an outdoor above ground pool, just like any pool you might find in a backyard here in Australia. When the penguins are secreting enough of their own oil to preen into their feathers (via the gland under their tail), and they are water proof again, we set them free.

      Penguins are wild, and that's how we like them to stay :)

      Our problem right now is that it is chick raising season. Penguin parents very much share the role of raising the chick. If dad or mum are killed or taken away, the remaining partner actually frets, staying by the nest and *not* going out to sea to get food for the chick. The chick starves, and eventually the sole parent leaves and swims out.

      But with the Hospital right now we are cleaning and getting the Little folk back home as soon as possible, without sparing expense or our own time to ensure it is safe to do so.

      The vast majority of released penguins will survive. we just hope we can help enough before their chicks die, or their partners leave.

      Thanks everyone for the interest!

      reg'ds
      kd (Phillip Island Nature Park)

  34. We need online credit card donations by Pyramid · · Score: 1

    If an entity set up a site with credit card verification or a current online vendor took donations via credit card, I for one would donate right now. The exchange fee problem would be overcome and the act of donating would be so easy there would be no excuse NOT to send a few bucks.

    Human laziness coupled with the "SlashDot Effect" could save a whole hell-of-alot of penguins.




    --
    ~Any apparent grammatical or typographic errors are caused by defects in your display device.
  35. a different idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you all make your checks out to me, then i can travel to Australia, hit the little birds with a fire hose (or power washer) and enjoy a good vacation.

    sound good?

  36. Another Startlingly Irrelevant Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does a stoopid article about penguins have to do with anything that the Slashdot community is interested in?

    If Linus had stuck with the original Duck-Billed Platapus mascot for Linux, would we be reading countless articles about the plight of that animal instead of this stuff about a bird species so stupid it forgot how to fly?

    1. Re:Another Startlingly Irrelevant Story by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2
      a bird species so stupid it forgot how to fly?
      They're not so stupid they forgot how to fly, they're so smart they figured out how to fly underwater! Evolution, the greatest of hackers.

      (Yes, I know the individual penguins didn't forget or figure out anything about flying any more than I figured out that an upright stance frees the forelimbs for carrying stuff.)

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  37. Profit over people (and nature) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fucking evil Corporations killing the planet. They don't care as long as it makes them $$$

  38. Penguins are cute, but people need help too by RuntimeError · · Score: 1

    Glad to see that thousands of us feel for the cute pengi-wengies.

    However, I have to remind you that there are thousands of poor, homeless, destitute people around the world, dying in streets, suffering in refugee camps, and there are hundreds and thousands (no, that's not a gross over estimation ) of children orphaned by wars and natural disasters.

    I believe we should think about those people too. They may not be as cute as penguins, but they sure need our help.

    1. Re:Penguins are cute, but people need help too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      *BS* - The difference is that history has shown us that PEOPLE can help THEMSELVES. It's just easier for them to sit around on their butts doing nothing and expecting handouts from governments and taxpayers. This tragedy is the direct result of human carelessness, and the penguins (or any animal, for that matter) cannot help themseleves. tree-huggin' republican

    2. Re:Penguins are cute, but people need help too by Kintanon · · Score: 3

      However, I have to remind you that there are thousands of poor, homeless, destitute people around the world, dying in streets, suffering in refugee camps, and there are hundreds and thousands (no, that's not a gross over estimation ) of children orphaned by wars and natural disasters.



      Each of those human beings is capable of making a choice as to how they live and what resources are available to them. The parents of the starving children chose to continue fucking like rabbits in order to spawn off a whole new generation of starving children. People in refugee camps are there by choice in one way or another, they can pick up and walk somewhere else. Yes, it's hard, no I doubt I'd be able to do it, but it can be done and they have that choice. The penguins have no such option.
      I for one have no sympathy for 90% of all poor/homeless/destitute people as I have seen people try to help over and over and over again and the person always ends up back in the gutter. Maybe the homeless in other countries aren't the laziest 3% of the population, but in the US the homeless aren't usually worth helping. Yes I'm a jackass, yes I'm a bastard, but I've tried helping these people and it doesn't work. At least the penguins don't smell like Wild Turkey when they stumble up to me.
      All of those orphaned children have relatives somewhere, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, that should be taking care of them. Yes it's too bad they lost their parents, but there should be people there to help them already, my contribution should not be needed.

      Mark this as flamebait and a troll if you really want to, but it's the way I feel about sanctimonious bastards that bitch and moan about the plight of the homeless.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    3. Re:Penguins are cute, but people need help too by Wench · · Score: 1

      Sure they do. But that's no reason not to help the penguins.

      Do you have any specific suggestions for helping people, or were you just having a whinge?

      The Hunger Site is a good one for lazy geeks.

      --
      No matter how cynical you become, it's never enough to keep up.
    4. Re:Penguins are cute, but people need help too by prizog · · Score: 1

      1. You have no heart.

      2. The laziness of the parents doesn't mean that the children should suffer.

      3. The laziness of the parents doesn't mean that the parents sohuld suffer. Everyone deserves a house, food, clothing and education, no matter what.

      4. 1/3 of all homeless people in the US are insane.

    5. Re:Penguins are cute, but people need help too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, fair enough, you show me where hundreds of humans are dying because of the greed, incompetence and stupidity of penguins, and I'll send a few bucks to help.

      Until then, screw you, I'm with the penguins.

    6. Re:Penguins are cute, but people need help too by Hello+Kitty · · Score: 1

      No heart? No head, more like. Leave social problems to fester behind your back and they *will* eventually bite you in the ass. "Out of sight, out of mind" works only for so long as social policy. The earlier poster's I've-got-mine-Jack is a kind of sociopathy -- one reserved for the middle class, where such this move from mental disorder into public policy.

      As for your points, prizog, I think #2 is the most salient, or at least the most easily defensible. No child asks to be born into difficult circumstances (or, come to think of it, at all). This "sins of the father" attitude has overflowed our jails and appears, by all available social statistics, to be breeding a bumper crop of violence and garden-variety psychosis in America.

      As to #3, this is America and we make people pay and pay and pay for their mistakes (and yes, there are those who just keep making the same damn mistakes, and those who don't care, and those who don't bother trying to do better -- and those people infuriate me, not least because they're used as an excuse to deny folks who have hit a rough patch or who simply can't get traction in this world).

      My thought? If Original Poster and his ilk won't donate to charity for the sake of shared humanity, or for the sake of unselfish action on behalf of another, he'd better do it for his own self-interest -- because if he won't, he deserves the mugging, the knife in the ribs, or whatever else he gets from his not-my-problem attitude.

      HK
      who expects this post to be karma'd down, since /. is fairly awash with racists, neocons, infinks, and other lunkheads of late. these days I only come here for the flamewars .

    7. Re:Penguins are cute, but people need help too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People deserve what they work to get. My parents were homeless because of decisions that they made. According to your post, 2/3 of all homeless are not insane. Let them utilize the resources available (such as AA). "If you are not a liberal when you are young, you have no heart. If you are not a conservative when you are old, you have no brain."

    8. Re:Penguins are cute, but people need help too by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      a penguin hit me in the head once, can you send me some money?

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
  39. This is *the* Linux penguin. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3
    There are a lot of penguin sub-species or whatever out there, but this is the specific one that bit Linus a long time ago, leading to Linux using penguins as the mascot.

    One source that confirms this

  40. is this for real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    penguins in sweaters?

    if it is, then somebody with more time and resources than me should find out in what way Microsoft owns that oil tanker. (we all know that M$ owns part of just about everything, there has to be a connection here somewhere)

    1. Re:is this for real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good. I was starting to worry this wasn't Slashdot.

      It's good someone had the sense to post the obligatory comment bashing Microsoft for existing, or some sort of trend might have started.

  41. Minimal to none. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Probably none, or not much. Most oil spills are cleaned up by NGO environmental groups, volunteers, and by state/federal governments. Usually the companies responsible for the spill gets off with at most a slap on the wrist. The one case where the oil company actually got a little more than a slap on the wrist (Exxon for the spill in Alaska) they still haven't paid their fines. They keep appealing and getting out of some fines. Besides, the amount they got fined was no where near the cost of cleanup or the cost of the destruction. The entire area had it's ecosystem destroyed, the economies of several towns were destroyed. The way of life for many native american people in the region was destroyed. Exxon should of had it's chartered revoked, it's assets liquidated, and that money should of gone to clean up and repair the region. People in America seem to have forgotten, there once was a time when the people had power over the corporations. http://www.adbusters.org/magazine/28/usa.html

  42. Get Serious. by Chip+Stillmore · · Score: 1

    There are much more worthy causes to which to donate money. For instance, there's the Red Cross, The Cancer Society, Ronald McDonald House, United Way, Heart Foundation (not to be confused with "Hart Foundation"), Diabetes Association (either Canadian, American, or other if any others exist). The list goes on.

    And YES, I know this could perhaps be considered a bad comment to some moderators out there, but this is kind of pathetic, where there are more deserving charities in the world, and someone wants us to start worrying about 4" tall penguins??!?!!

    1. Re:Get Serious. by Hello+Kitty · · Score: 1

      What, you can't worry about more than one thing at a time? Check your processor; something's wrong with your multitasking.

      Seriously, I think and hope that most of us are already donating to one or more social / educational / religious causes on a regular basis; most of us past the starving-student stage are well-set to do so. A one-time donation to what we all hope is a one-time need shouldn't make a difference to that well-ingrained good habit. Right? Right?!

      Besides, with any luck this money will help not only the cute widdle penguins but the other victims of this ecosystem violation. If the little fluffy guy is the poster child that can benefit some of the less photogenic fauna of Philip Island, so be it.

  43. Re:Yes! This why there is such a category! by Kurt+Gray · · Score: 2

    Good idea! If I had any mod points I'd moderate
    you up!

  44. Better picture link by theguru · · Score: 2

    Here's a link to a larger picture and more information from an ausie newspaper.
    http://www.theage.com.au /news/20000104/A5181-2000Jan3.html

  45. Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww! Cute! by TrevorB · · Score: 1

    Subject only message....

    C'mon, moderate me up, you were thinking it too when you saw the photo... ;)

  46. Why we should help animals.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    I noticed a few different people complaining about how people were being shafted here, how there is much suffering a poverty among people and, for some reason, they think that it must be addressed at the expense of the animals.

    Now, before you jump to the conclusion that I'm some maniac tree-huggers, let's look at this plain and scientific.

    Case 1: The suffering people, lacking food, shelter etc. Who screwed them over? Who benefited from their misery? Well, other people. So people caused the problem there. We did it to ourselves. We are all equally guilty.

    Case 2: The animals have no involvement, they don't squander resources, kill for no reason, elect republicans, or hurt homosexuals. They are therefore innocent, as a species, and by the same speciest reasoning that people use to put them last, they should be put first.

    1. Re:Why we should help animals.... by Chip+Stillmore · · Score: 1

      You mention in your post how you noticed "a few" people mentioning that there are more deserving charities. However, as of the time I'm writing this I only notice 2.

      One of them is my posting, the other is by an individual who used the "homeless people" argument, as you mentioned.

      Let me point out that I did not mention helping poor or homeless people in my posting. My message simply stated that there are much more deserving "charities" (not people) out there who should be targeted.

      Now, since you placed my posting in the group that you so richly singled out, let me point something out to you. People with cancer, heart conditions, diabetes, or any other type of physical condition, did not bring their condition upon themselves. With that in mind, you would do well to think about what you say in the future.

      Perhaps if you personally knew of someone who suffered from cancer, diabetes, heart problems, or some other type of physical condition, you would think differently.

    2. Re:Why we should help animals.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't help but point out that in many cases, cancer, heart problems, and other various maladies people suffer from are related to lifestyle choices those people made in the past. Why should people be absolved from blame for lifestyle choices they've made?

      I have a friend who hasn't worked in ages. Most of us agree that he isn't looking very hard. Whenever he finds out I've got new stuff of some kind, or a new O'Reilly book, he tries to make it into a "class difference" that I am some rich tyrant and he's the noble worker. This person is almost 50 years old and still can't really be said to have ever had a real job.

      It's much easier to lay around in the apartment smoking bowls all day while the rest of us work, but why should I have to hear about how "superior" that lifestyle choice makes this person?

      People can and should take responsibility for themselves.

      (end of rant)

    3. Re:Why we should help animals.... by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      Perhaps if you personally knew of someone who suffered from cancer, diabetes, heart problems, or some other type of physical condition, you would think differently.


      I have personally known people with these conditions, family members, neighbors, people I cared about. My FAMILY bands together to support itself, my COMMUNITY does the same. We don't go out searching for handouts and donations from everyone. If someone has cancer well that's just too bad, but they have friends, and relatives that can help them and should be helping them. My resources are devoted to helping people that I know and care about. And I'm afraid random charities that spend 50% of the money paying for their infrastructure aren't on my list.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    4. Re:Why we should help animals.... by Chip+Stillmore · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, gee, you're right, I'm sorry. Gosh, how could I have been so selfish and blind?!?

      bah, forget about a child in the hospital suffering from a defective heart valve, forget about the kids suffering from leukemia, and while I'm at it, forget about everyone else too.

      Thank you for showing me the way in such a hateful world. Even though I cannot be assured that my hard-earned money will actually benefit these poor little penguins, and that there is not information about who to actually make the check out to, at least I will be secure in the fact that it's not going to all those suffering kids who really have no one to blame for their condition but themselves. After all, as you put it, it's their own lifestyle choices that put them in that condition.

      Gee, you think maybe I should alert the medical community and let them know the exact cause for cancer while I'm at it? ... Recently Enlightened /. Poster addressing scientists: "Hey guys! You morons, you're doing it wrong! You're wasting all this money trying to find a cause, when the actual cause is their lifestyle!"

      Thanks, I feel enlightened.



    5. Re:Why we should help animals.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Terrific, now we have statistics entered to the arena.

      What a novel idea. I predict that there's a 98.9% chance that your figure was something that you completely pulled out of the air.

      Of course, you're more than welcome to prove me wrong by providing a reputable source for your 50% figure.

    6. Re:Why we should help animals.... by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      Oh yeah, gee, you're right, I'm sorry. Gosh, how could I have been so selfish and blind?!?

      bah, forget about a child in the hospital suffering from a defective heart valve, forget about the kids suffering from leukemia, and while I'm at it, forget about everyone else too.

      Thank you for showing me the way in such a hateful world. Even though I cannot be assured that my hard-earned money will actually benefit these poor little penguins, and that there is not information about who to actually make the check out to, at least I will be secure in the fact that it's not going to all those suffering kids who really have no one to blame for their condition but themselves. After all, as you put it, it's their own lifestyle choices that put them in that condition.

      Gee, you think maybe I should alert the medical community and let them know the exact cause for cancer while I'm at it? ... Recently Enlightened /. Poster addressing scientists: "Hey guys! You morons, you're doing it wrong! You're wasting all this money trying to find a cause, when the actual cause is their lifestyle!"

      Thanks, I feel enlightened.






      Nowhere did anyone say that it is the fault of the people with cancer that they have it, or any other medical condition. But WE aren't the ones that should be helping them. Their friends and relatives should be helping them. *I* should be helping my friends and relatives, which I do. I'm not sending any money to these penguins, even though I support the cause, because I have no idea where this money is actually going. I would be much more interested in prosecuting the company responsible. I'm sorry that you feel the burning need to try and add more useless crap to our gene pool but don't take your bitterness out on me. Despite my views I sleep perfectly soundly at night.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    7. Re:Why we should help animals.... by Chip+Stillmore · · Score: 1

      I can't help but point out that in many cases, cancer, heart problems, and other various maladies people suffer from are related to lifestyle choices those people made in the past. Why should people be absolved from blame for lifestyle choices they've made?

    8. Re:Why we should help animals.... by mosch · · Score: 2

      I personally had a mother who died of cancer. and I personally think your attitude is horrible. I took my VA Linux "winnings" and invested them in something with no chance of a financial ROI... research.

      No, I'm not saying anybody else should do this. Just that I wish everybody would stop telling everybody how to spend their money. There are far more good causes than I know how to give to, so I pick and choose. I'm sure this is the norm, for those of us who give to charity.

    9. Re:Why we should help animals.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there's also the 73.6% probability that you never performad a statistical computation of *your* estimate.

    10. Re:Why we should help animals.... by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      My bad then, I was only referencing my own posts.
      Though he wasn't being harsh as me paying for some lifetime smokers chemotherapy or lung transplant would be ludicrous. Or giving to a charity designed to help the 400lb over eater get a quad-bypass... I sympothize with children, adults usually make their own choices...

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    11. Re:Why we should help animals.... by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      I personally had a mother who died of cancer. and I personally think your attitude is horrible. I took my VA Linux "winnings" and invested them in something with no chance of a financial ROI... research.

      No, I'm not saying anybody else should do this. Just that I wish everybody would stop telling everybody how to spend their money. There are far more good causes than I know how to give to, so I pick and choose. I'm sure this is the norm, for those of us who give to charity


      I agree completely with this since you are doing it because someone you loved died of the disease. But charities soliciting donations from everyone and then people saying how horrible it is for others to pick and choose their charities instead of giving to the one THEY favor is inane. I'll give to the people *I* care about, you give to the people YOU care about, and everyone that anyone cares about gets something. Amazing how that works isn't it...?

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
  47. Cute and cuddly is SO important!!!! by teleny · · Score: 2
    Speaking from the ecological aspect, "cute" animals are actually using a very interesting evolutionary strategy called "commensalism", where a species shares food with another, unrelated one, and both profit. For instance, there is no earthly reason to have an Ethiopian desert cat in my living room: I don't live anywhere near Ethiopia, they eat meat (as do I), and they have their own agendas in life -- the perfect beast to be put on a stamp, and only thought about when someone makes a plea to Save Endangered Species. But as "housecats", these little beasts have made their homes on six continents and every place ships go, sleep in our beds, eat our leftovers, and enjoy the admiration of millions of humans, who are only too happy to keep the species going. In return, we have the company of beasts that sound and behave like little human children, and we, well, just can't resist.

    The same is true of most other species we consider "cute": "Babe" wouldn't have half its resonance if it were about a wild boar raised by a wolf pack who learns wolflike methods of hunting rams. Up until the century just passed, most children's stories, either "Western", or traditional, rarely cast wild animals as sympathetic characters: they were usually cast, even in vegetarian India and hunter-gatherer tribes, as being caricatures of humanity's gross and ignoble nature. A hundred years ago, educators warned parents that buying their daughters "Roosevelt's cubs" would pervert their maternal instinct away from their future roles as wives and mothers. (Sorry, guys, you're about 90,000 years too late...) Today, teddy bears share their toy chests with such perverse beasts as mandrills, owl-like Furbies, seals, and even (gasp!) penguins with Linuxmall buttons on them, as concerns as diverse as The Nature Conservancy and Mc Donald's find that the best way to popularize the plight of endangered species is to make plush animals in their image. Deer are now a problem in many suburban neighborhoods -- no one wants to shoot Bambi's mother. (Mice, which eat everything, crap everywhere, and spread fleas and microbes, are a sore point with many people, thanks to the same concern -- we now project our disgust on rats.) Bears are dangerous, destructive, beasts, who also invade human settlements -- who wants to draw a bead on Pooh?

    True, there aren't many ways of cutesifying snail darters. Most of the animals who occupy an important position in the food chain aren't all that glamorous (with the exception of rodents). But who wants to read zoological data to their kids at bedtime, or snuggle up to an ecocensus report at the end of the day?

    In keeping with the communitarian spirit of Linux, perhaps there ought to be a permanent Penguin fund set up with the Audubon Society, with contributions from Linux-minded people and groups. Such proposal has been made before, and would do much to popularize both causes in a way that would be truly commensal.

    "'Cause penguins are so sensitive, to my needs." --Lyle Lovett.

    --
    teleny, friend of cats.
  48. advice on overseas currency? by small_dick · · Score: 1

    people are asking on the ranger list how to send money, and they give an address, but what is the best method?

    money order, personal check, etc?

    no one seems to be able to answer this rather basic question...i've never sent money overseas.

    who would i even make the darn check out to? can someone from slashdot find out and update the post?

    i hate to whine (not really) but to ask for help with so many basic details missing is kind of ... (well, you know).

    Im stuck at work, someone be a hero for the little penguins, eh?

    --


    Treatment, not tyranny. End the drug war and free our American POWs.
    See my user info for links.
  49. flags of convenience by passion · · Score: 1

    well, if you can't sue them you can always stir up some public outcry and boycott them.

    --
    - passion
  50. too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    too bad Linus didn't choose a starving kid as the mascot.

    1. Re:too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I was given the same impression. This is a VERY loose relation to "news for nerds ... stuff that matters" in ONLY that a penguin is Linus' chosen symbol for Linux.

      Pretty lame if you ask me. Slashdot must be getting desperate for some news.

  51. Get Serious? I'll be serious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People can get up and move, people can adapt. Animals don't share this mobility. They are frequently tied to the evironment of specific regions. Since we (I'm assuming you are all people) are the dominant species, we have a certain obligation to help ensure habitat for less advanced species. I suppose it doesn't hurt to mention that people cause the oil slick in the first place? It's a shame that some individuals have incurable diseases, etc. But people (and the foundations you mention) are working on this, right?

  52. Prince Philip Island by Ravenfeather · · Score: 2

    I too visited Phillip Island, when I was a kid. I've loved penguins ever since. It's really an incredible sight, seeing all of these little penguins come wattling out of the surf. They make their way up the sandy beach and to the burrows in the dunes where their noisy, braying, fluffy, and impatient chicks - often bigger than the parents - are waiting. I'm so sorry to see that they've been hurt by an oil slick, and I sure hope this will have no serious impact on the Philip Island population as whole. Does anyone know anything about that, one way or the other????

    Oh, and with regard to the comment:

    Whoever dumped the slick off Phillip Island should be fed to sharks.

    I concur. One limb at a time.
  53. A possible PRODUCT... by Ravenfeather · · Score: 1
    ...for LinuxOne???

    ;-)

  54. Helping people hurts in the long run. by TheDullBlade · · Score: 3

    Let's face it, if we coordinated the worlds resources so there weren't thousands of children dying every day, in a couple of decades we'd reach the point that there were thousands of children dying every day again. And the world would be a lot more crowded.

    Nobody likes pain, misery, and death, but they are always going to be there. You can shift them around to someone else, or save them up for the next generation, but you can never really reduce them. Everyone must die, and most will go kicking and screaming.

    You might say that birth control is the answer, but it will only ever be a temporary solution. There will always be those who don't comply, and their exponential population growth will eventually displace the "responsible citizens." Natural selection favors the breeders. If they are kept in check by force, that is just more of the same misery and death.

    You might say that space travel is the answer, but assuming that any human can travel for free at _any_ constant speed, exponential population growth will overtake the cubic growth of the volume humans have reached. Even if humanity achieves methods of instantaneous travel, few believe in an infinite universe; it will get filled up. Something has to keep it in check, and that something will always be death; given that people will almost always accept pain to avoid death, and very few humans have the cold style of mercy (if it is worthy of that name) that would kill people just because they would starve eventually, that means misery.

    I help my family, I help my friends, I obey agreements I have made for mutual benefit, but I do not give charity, nor do I agonize over how the money I spend on a snack could have fed some distant family for days (as I used to when my morality was based on the value of survival and happiness of conscious minds). Nor do I care when I hear that some distant people are killing each other, except so far as it may destabilize the world and possibly cause nuclear war.

    You may consider this an evil morality, but pure altruism through charity is ultimately a lie, if you look at enough of the world and over a long enough period of time. There are many "positive sum games" out there to encourage cooperation (indeed, expansion into the universe is a worthy accomplishment that would be impossible if we all truly lived "every man for himself"), but remember that ultimately we are all competing for resources. If not in this generation, or the next, then five or fifty down the road.

    The standard of living can be raised across the board only by improvement/preservation of the environment. Beauty is a consolation to the hopeless. Nothing is more universally beautiful than nature.

    Saving the penguins preserves a beautiful part of the world that is no threat to anyone. As population pressures grow there may be no room for the planet's other inhabitants, but we should preserve what we can. I would rather live in a dangerous, beautiful, interesting world than a safe, boring, comfortable one. I would rather be born into a world of misery and have any slim chance to struggle for life than not be born at all.

    --
    /.
    1. Re:Helping people hurts in the long run. by ReadParse · · Score: 2
      I'm not trying to pick a fight or add to this off-topicness of this worthy thread (let's not forget it's about the cute sweater-clad penguins). And I agree with you about the population problem. It was just something that you said that struck me:

      > Nor do I care when I hear that some distant
      > people are killing each other, except so far
      > as it may destabilize the world and possibly
      > cause nuclear war.

      That's interesting. You don't seem to care about death somewhere else, because it helps curb population growth, but nuclear war is a problem, even though it's the ultimate population control solution. Why might that be? Might it be because nuclear war would kill you? Is that when people should start caring?

      Again, I'm not necessarily in disagreement with you. I'm not a bleeding-heart liberal, but rather a proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy.

      Anyhow, I've come to accept over the years that our population problem is going to get worse and worse until something catastrophic takes care of about half of us or more. It sucks but it's life.

      RP

    2. Re:Helping people hurts in the long run. by TheDullBlade · · Score: 2

      That's interesting. You don't seem to care about death somewhere else, because it helps curb population growth,

      No, I don't care about death somewhere else because it is somewhere else and doesn't affect me... unless it does affect me, which is the degree to which I do care about it.

      I do not value the individual lives of strangers, who are closer to enemies than friends, since we all compete for limited resources. I certainly wouldn't go out and attack them (or support their attackers) needlessly either, and make them true enemies; it's just common sense.

      The morality of valuing and respecting all human life is only appropriate in conditions of severe underpopulation or within one's mutually supportive group (this group should not be extended to too large a scale or the natural processes of competitive survival are replaced with oppressive central control; think 1984: beyond a certain scale cooperation becomes slavery to an abstraction). All the most destructive groups, whether religion or political movement, urge us to treat every man as our brother, not to fight over resources but cooperate, even sacrificing yourself, until those resources become insufficient, and allow the greater group to decide who is to be sacrificed for the survival of the remainder.

      but nuclear war is a problem, even though it's the ultimate population control solution. Why might that be? Might it be because nuclear war would kill you?

      Of course that's part of it. I care about anything that might kill me and the people I care about. But nuclear war in particular must be avoided because it can destroy all of humanity. I value the long-term survival of a diverse humanity (and precious little else) above my own life and the lives of my friends and family.

      I've come to accept over the years that our population problem is going to get worse and worse until something catastrophic takes care of about half of us or more.

      I do not believe this. Easily something might destroy half or even all the life on Earth, but I like to hope that humanity will have spread about more than that. Humans don't need planets to live (IMHO, at some point we won't even need stars to live, once we can create microsingularity power plants), and when we're distributed among hundreds of thousands or millions of independent environments, nuclear war won't threaten the survival of humanity as a whole any more than chemical explosives did.

      --
      /.
    3. Re:Helping people hurts in the long run. by Midnight+Coder · · Score: 1

      That was great.

      I'm actually an anti-enviromentalist and I would rather live in a safe dull world than a dangerous interesting one. But that in no way decreased the enjoyment I received from reading your (logically) beautiful post.

      Bravo!

    4. Re:Helping people hurts in the long run. by Ateran · · Score: 1

      Let's face it, if we coordinated the worlds resources so there weren't thousands of children dying every day, in a couple of decades we'd reach the point that there were thousands of children dying every day again. And the world would be a lot more crowded.

      Nobody likes pain, misery, and death, but they are always going to be there. You can shift them around to someone else, or save them up for the next generation, but you can never really reduce them. Everyone must die, and most will go kicking and screaming.


      **Clearing Throat**

      At this festive season of the year, Mr. Scrooge,'said the gentleman, taking up a pen, `it is more than usually desirable that we should make some slight provision for the Poor and Destitute, who suffer greatly at the present time. Many thousands are in want of common necessaries; hundreds of thousands are in want of common comforts, sir.'

      `Are there no prisons?' asked Scrooge.

      `Plenty of prisons,' said the gentleman, laying down the pen again.

      `And the Union workhouses?' demanded Scrooge.

      `Are they still in operation?'

      `They are. Still,' returned the gentleman, `I wish I could say they were not.'

      `The Treadmill and the Poor Law are in full vigour, then?' said Scrooge.

      `Both very busy, sir.'

      `Oh! I was afraid, from what you said at first, that something had occurred to stop them in their useful course,' said Scrooge. `I'm very glad to hear it.'

      **Moving On**

      `If they would rather die,' said Scrooge, `they had better do it, and decrease the surplus population.

      **I think you can see where I'm going with this...**

      -Quote taken from Project Gutenberg

    5. Re:Helping people hurts in the long run. by theJeff · · Score: 1
      Interesting arguments to justify what seems to be basically a selfish approach to life. It applies mostly to the crisis managemant mode of charity. And I probably would have to agree with you there. Short term fixes do nothing to fix long term problems and may, in fact, make them worse.

      On the other hand there are also long-term approaches. In every case that has been observed, education of a population, particularly of the female part of the population has led to a, usually drastic, drop in population growth. In terms of your concern with long-term competition for resources, this seems to make sense. It might not help you, but it will help your descendants.

      Finally you disparage charity, but claim

      The standard of living can be raised across the board only by improvement/preservation of the environment. Beauty is a consolation to the hopeless. Nothing is more universally beautiful than nature.
      May I assume from this that you do contribute in some fashion (money, time, etc) to environmental causes?

      thejeff

    6. Re:Helping people hurts in the long run. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Population growth in many countries is already negative. In industrialized nations the birth rate is usually inversely proportional to economic class. So if you really want ZPG, get rid of poverty and provide subsidized birth control and abortions. Discouraging religions which emphasize reproduction might not be a bad idea either, but that's not the sort of thing you can engineer from the top down. Of course, our economic system doesn't cope well when there aren't enough poor people around to take the crappy jobs and keep the employed from getting too comfortable or secure, but that's another issue, and I suspect it won't go away any time soon.

  55. I am tremendously sorry for all those animals by haggar · · Score: 1

    Not only penguins but also seagulls and similar, they get this oil on the feathers and then they die.
    And now comes the unpopular part of what I feel I have to say: big chunk of responsibility is on US materialistic, consumistic mentality. Do you know that the average US citizen consumes more than twice as much resources as a European, and hundreds of times more than an Indian.

    Look, I know you americans like cars, but I have never seen so many and so big cars like in US. Many of you people have more than one car, and in many cities a pedestrian has a tough time. In US the public transportation is pathetic compared to Finland or Germany. And that, dear friends, makes a difference. Public transportation, expecially trains and metros, have proven to be a great means to protect the ambient. And to consume less oil.

    I have asked many US friends why is the public transportation so bad in US (not everywhere, of course, but in the great majority of towns) and the cars so big? It turns out that the US oil and car companies are strongly connected to lobbysts and very politically influencial in general.

    Sorry if I have offended anyone living in US; I am actually very fond of Americans and the US, but if we talk about ambiental problems, the US is partly to blame.

    Maybe you think this issue is not important. However, today we have already exterminated many animal specias, polluted the air, the rivers and the oceans very significantly, and there is a very important phenomenon of global warning. Many forests in south america and in other parts of the world have been burnt, and the ozone layer that protected us from damaging UV rays is thinned. And all these processes are just aggravating. If you have a vision and not only live for today, you will think about what is going to happen to our home, the earth, some 50 to 100 years from now. I am afraid it will look more and more like Mars, without a sheltering atmosphere that would protect from extremely cold and hot weathers, poor of oxigene and with a very limited variety of wildlife. That is scary.





    --
    Sigged!
  56. This is "news for nerds ... stuff that matters"?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my god, this is pretty damn bad. This story doesn't deserve it's own place to thrive. It should've been slapped in with all those links last night ... you know, the story that had that wu-name generator link in it.

    don't have the url now, too lazy to look for it, and besides, I've already wasted enough time even posting a comment about this lame-ass story.

  57. Come on, just one thing at a time please! by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    As much as I'd like to help every single animal directly, I cannot. I do not have the resources for that. But what I *CAN* do is focus on just a few things to help directly. And I can also help all animals and the environment indirectly by not making things worse. For example, getting a better car that is more effiecent and scrubs it's emissions much better for going to CONs would be a start:) And not tossing my Jolt cans in the trash(damn California has a poor bottle system, Michigan's is far far superior in many ways)

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  58. Wire transfer! by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be easyer if they just posted an account number where we could wire funds to? And it would probably be quicker than sending a check too.

    --
    Say no to software patents.
  59. What the hell? by J.+FoxGlov · · Score: 1

    Release the source of what? /.? That's already been done.

    Penguin DNA? Talk to God.

    J.

    --
    damned vulpine http://sb.drtwister.com/
    1. Re:What the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah 3 year old sourcecode. now, that's what we need/want. why would we want the source to linux 2.2.14? the one to 0.7 has already been released, you are apparently satisfied with that. brat.

  60. We can get the Bas*ards who did this ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Or if we can't now, when will we ever be able to? All we need is data. Providence (and ARPANet) have given us a tool. How are we going to use it? We need :- type of Oil (grade, colour, suplhur content). Weather for last few days in area. Local sea currents and Winds for last few days. From people down-under, recent port movements (surely they must be logged somewhere). HF and radio hams in the area - transmissions made on marine band. I think a co-ordinated (and ass-kicking) team effort could seriously zoom in on the ship that did this. It shouldn't be too difficult to then get the parent company and which load / cargo they were carrying and for which company. Last step, tell the news organistaions, link to sites containing the facts, link to pictures of penguins and bingo! New World Order. I want to make it happen. I want to make it happen. I want to make it happen.

  61. You contemptible filth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Keep your insane life-hating socialist eco-religion to yourself, you miserable feminazi stormtrooper.


    (I say "Let's", even though I didn't get in on the IPO. )

    Of course you didn't. You're a parasite, a whining animated stomach that's totally incapable of creating wealth. The IPO millionaires should (and will) keep their wealth and do as they please with it. They will not waste it trying to kill off the human race by worshipping animals.

    Each of us gets a choice in this life: We can work for the human race, or against it. Animal-worshippers like you have made their choice. In choosing to destroy human wealth (fossil fuels are a key component of the modern world economy) you have become a traitor to your own species. I know your kind. I don't doubt that you also support the forced abortions in China. That's right up your alley, isn't it? Murdering human children in order to "protect the environment".

    You disgust me.


    1. Re:You contemptible filth. by Maurice · · Score: 1

      I think you are the nazi. Just read your own stuff and see who's the zealot. The guy was just kidding.

    2. Re:You contemptible filth. by Travoltus · · Score: 2


      I believe humanity rules the earth and when it comes to our survival pitted against the survival of other animals, we come first. If I can only save my dog or my baby from a burning house, the dog's gonna roast. Sorry.

      However, that ruling status brings some responsibility with it. We can't go around killing other species off with total indifference or malice, without eventually screwing up the ecosystem we rely for our very survival.

      Aside from the 'maybe someone bigger and badder might look at us and judge us by how we treat the weaker animals' aspect that only Patrick Stewart can teach us on TV (for now), it is good karma to save these penguins if you've got the money to burn on it. (And some people do have that kind of money). If you do it you're doing it because you want to, and if you do it without anyone knowing you're doing it for the right reasons, and that is an indicator of a man's character.

      Now I for one feel that more money should go to starving kids in Rwanda, or better yet, to the local loaves and fishes in my home town. The real people who should pay for protecting the penguins should be the people who spilled the oil! But since they won't, I won't fault anyone who chips in their place.

      My point is I don't see any dead babies or compromised human rights coming from donating to a save-the-penguins campaign. Then again I'm not from PETA or some insane leftist envirowhacko group either.

      But I'll say this - I've seen the exact sort of insane animal rights mindset that has driven you to make such an angry bitter post. They are really senseless people who would sell out their own species in a heartbeat (I mean these guys can't even tell if they'd rescue a dog or a baby from a burning house first! gee!), and they deserve 100% of your vitriol. I just think you need to pinpoint these people and give them your hatred, instead of lashing out blindly at anyone who lifts a finger for a lesser animal's sake.

      Just my opinion

      flame on :)


      BTW: Does anyone know how much those little sweaters cost per unit?

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    3. Re:You contemptible filth. by Chili · · Score: 1

      take moment & think what you said man.

      that is the most inhumane thing i've ever heard..
      if thats what goes on in the minds of the RH people, that makes me even more sure to stay away
      from them.

      besides from that fact, the littel critters are cute, just look at their pics. :)
      i'm not a millionaire guy that got in on the IPO's but i'm pretty sure i'll make a donation. :)

    4. Re:You contemptible filth. by bigchris · · Score: 1

      This kind of reminds me of a bumper sticker slogan I was told about once:

      "Earth first, we'll stripmine the other planets later!".

  62. the trouble with penguins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to mention you have to keep them in your refrigerator...

  63. Re:let's see if linux fools... by SeanNi · · Score: 1

    > 10 go to 20 20 go to 10

    ...otherwise known as "while (1);"

    :-)
    --
    - Sean

    --
    It's a fine line between trolling and karma-whoring... and I think I just crossed it.
    - Sean
  64. Moderators - moderate me down as well!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A top level post got me mad and I responded with the post one level up from this one. But you guys moderated the original (top level) post down. Good. Thanks for that. BUT if you don't moderate all the child posts / responses they move one level up. In my case my response is now at the root level of the story. Its now totally out of context. Please therfore moderate down all child posts if you moderate down a parent.

  65. uh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are you serious dude? humans ARE animals too you know? I mean, we are part of this whole ecosystem thing... if we break the ecosystem we ultimatly kill ourselves. current human practices are doing a lot to break the ecosystem, thus it makes sense for humans to learn how to make the global ecosystem as healthy as possible and then to do whatever they can that is reasonable to maintain a balanced and healthy ecosystem. You sound like some greedy Republican type. Money=God. Humans=Owners of Earth. You=Stupid. http://www.adbusters.org/magazine/28/usa.html http://www.the-revolution.org

    1. Re:uh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As Brian Gyson said, "Man is a bad animal".

  66. Oh please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those charities also have massive advertising budgets and huge corporations donating stuff. If you want to help them, fine, go write a check, but please will all you people STOP WHINING ABOUT WHERE WE CHOOSE TO SEND OUR MONEY!?!?!?!

  67. Give a man a fish... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I say we teach them to knit those little sweaters...

    I mean, what're we going to do? Buy them new clothes the next time we spill a little oil on em?

    sKitZ

  68. One thing better than sending money or knitting... by Nehemiah+S. · · Score: 1

    ...would be to develop some kind of device that could be placed near the oil-slicked areas to keep the seals and penguins from trying to swim in the poisoned water in the first place. Something like the nifty black box that keeps mice from wanting to live in my basement. It probably couldn't be done in time for these particular birds, but you could save their children.

    I would personally like to help these penguins, but I don't think sending money or knitting sweaters will help much; this spill seems relatively small from the reports and should be old news long before the sweater I knit gets to Australia. The best way to help is to pay attention to which environmental groups gave money to the rangers on day one, and/or sent people to help clean up, and reimburse them for their diligence. Or put your EE/biology skills to good use and design a better beeper, and make saving them cost less the next time around.

    Rev. Neh

    --
    ... and there is no doubt, that one day he will be
    where the eye of his telescope has already been
  69. How financially-strapped *nix geeks can help... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tar -xvf fairy_penguins

  70. American materialism had nothing to do with it by erice · · Score: 1

    This was Australia. Australia does not export oil. (IIRC, there isn't any oil in aus). That tanker was carrying oil for Australian consumption.

    1. Re:American materialism had nothing to do with it by jnew · · Score: 1

      Australia produces a large majority of its own oil in the oilfields just south of where the accident happened. Why do foreigners without a clue keep posting articles about Australia?

  71. Try 14" by ozbird · · Score: 2

    Little Penguins (Eudyptula minor) are 14" (35cm) tall - not 4" tall! While they look cute, these guys bite - just ask Linus. ;-)

    While the oil slick is relatively small (e.g. the French spill), it has come at a particularly bad time for the penguins - they have chicks in their burrows, so Mum and Dad need to fish twice as often. While the number of dead adults is known, I haven't heard how many chicks have starved in the burrows; expect this number to be high.

  72. That's what you get for biting Mr Torvalds by Anarchofascist · · Score: 1
    1. Yes, these are the very same fairy penguins which bit Linus on the finger, and the model for Tux the penguin.
    2. The penguin parade happens every night at sunset on the southern beaches of Phillip Island, and is one of the things you MUST see if you come down here to Victoria, especially if you bring kids. I don't know if you can do it any more, but when I was a kid we used to wander among the sand dunes after the parade, and watch the penguins returning to their burrows to feed the chicks. Ah, memories.

    --
    Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more, Or close the wall up with our American dead!
  73. Heh heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    If I can only save my dog or my baby from a burning house, the dog's gonna roast. Sorry.

    However, that ruling status brings some responsibility with it.


    Bingo. My thoughts exactly. The extremists on the right-wing end of the spectrum like to pretend that we must choose to annihilate either the human race, or all other life on Earth, and the Earth First! viewpoint is only slightly more nuanced than that. The problem is, it's a false opposition. It's total crap. But extreme views are usually like that; extremists spend the majority of their time trying to convince the mushy middle that it doesn't exist, basically :) Really, most of what they say is "if you don't choose us, you'll be stuck with the opposite extremists! There's no third option!" But they're saying it to people who for God's sake ARE the third option! Us, you know? Duh. :)


    I've seen the exact sort of insane animal rights mindset that has driven you to make such an angry bitter post.

    That's not what drove me. I was driven by needing to take a break from coding some weird shit that pulls apart executable files and hashes certain parts of them. So I posted some crazy gibberish on Slashdot for laughs.

    I have indeed encountered the sort of super-extreme animal-rightsers of whom you speak, but I borrowed the right-wing anti-animal-rights schtick from some idiot I once saw on Slashdot who accused Al Gore of being that kind of an animal-rightser -- you know, the reductionist non-sequitur thing: "Earth First! is called 'environmentalist', and so is Al, therefore EF! and Al are identical." Um, yeah, whatever, heh heh. :) But it's good for a laugh.


    They are really senseless people who would sell out their own species in a heartbeat

    True. And so would their opposite numbers in the extreme fringes of the right wing. Extremists "is mostly scoundrels", if you ask me. Gotta run and take my cat to the vet. Later.


    1. Re:Heh heh. by Travoltus · · Score: 1


      Hah. You scammed me. I'll get you for this!

      Wait'll I hit you with my latest patent I got for posting crazy gibberish on Slashdot for laughs! :)

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
  74. FLASH NEWS REPORT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Penguins hit by oil slick in Australia; Microsoft Denies Involvement

    MELBOURNE, Australia (./) -- Wildlife officers Monday were trying to save more than 100 fairy penguins covered in thick black oil from a slick that washed up on an island off Australia's southeast corner.

    Dick Smith, general manager of the Phillip Island Nature Park, said six penguins had died so far and another 110 were being treated at an animal hospital.

    First reports indicated an unidentified ship dumped the oil several days ago. However, it was learned from defense department sources that a U.S. spy satellite was observing the area and was able to read make out the ship's name - "MS Redmond".

    Based upon this evidence, U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno is preparing an investigation to see if Bill Gates, founder of the Redmond, WA based Microsoft Corporation was involved. "The government has reason to suspect that Microsoft is involved", said Reno. Penguins are the mascot of the Linux operating system, which is a competitor of Microsoft and poised to take its market share. The Attorney General is also preparing to file charges for six counts of murder, for the penguins that have been killed to date.

    In a related note, the vessel MS Redmond was discovered late last night in the mid-pacific, circling out of control, before incinerating into a large fireball, killing the entire crew. The last known radio contact with the vessel indicated its primary domain controller (PDC) crashed shortly before the explosion.

  75. He can't spell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Australia has a capital 'A', you tool.

    1. Re:He can't spell by connah · · Score: 1

      We know where you're from...

      Connah

      --

      Connah
      "Your mouse has moved. Windows NT must be restarted for this change to take effect."
  76. Unfortunately .... by deek · · Score: 1

    ... they don't know who actually made the spill. All they saw was that one day, there was a general oil spill that hit Phillip Island.

    From the news report I saw, they were trying to find the culprits. That was a few days ago. Not sure if they've found them yet.

  77. Response from the Philip Island Ranger by Ravenfeather · · Score: 5

    Well, once again it looks like we've been able, or will be able, to make a difference! From the penguins' web site:

    PINP Release (Park Ranger) Fri 9:28am

    This response is really fantastic - we are doing up a form page for those wanting to help out. And all the rangers here are *genuinely* moved at this overwhelming show of support. Wish we could show you the Penguin Hospital which is currently crowded by so many Little Penguins, and we will try and get some more pics online in our News Release service. And please keep the notes/emails coming in - this week has been very tiring and stressful. The Island and the Penguins (plus koalas and seals) are more than a job to everyone here. Its hard to explain, but these "wild animals" are very much a part of the life of our Island Community. I hope one day the Linux folk and others will join us for a celbration down here!

    All monies raised will be going directly to improving the Little Penguin Hospital facilities in the here and now. Everything IS helping - and your words of encouragement are as meaningful to us as the donations being received. Thankyou! PS Could someone please post this thankyou somewhere ALL the Linux folk etc. can read it? Ta muchly!

    and...

    Amazing to see the replies coming in from the Linux community - what can we say? Thanks all!

    Donations are very much appreciated as th enumber of affected penguins grows over 200 now, and sadly the number of dead is also rising :(

    You can send a donation via cheque, postal or money order (probably travellers cheque as well) to:

    Phillip Island Penguin Parade
    att: Penguin Hospital Support Fund
    P.O. Box 97
    Cowes
    Phillip Island. Victoria. 3922. AUSTRALIA.

    Email to: penguins@penguins.org.au (we WILL reply ASAP to all enquiries)

    On the programming side, we have just installed three (3) live online internet "kiosks" in our Visitor Centre. These are due to be up and running this week, delayed a little by the current crisis. Currently the three PC's are networked to a UNIX server, however we have been seriously investigating how to get a Linux box in place.I'm still on a learning curve with Linux, and must confess that it was Linux's use of the Little Penguin that first attracted me to the free/community OS. Programming enquiries to: penguins@ozgurus.com

    Thanks and have a good one all!

  78. Site for online credit card donations by Wench · · Score: 4

    From the site in the article:

    http://www.penguins.org.au/chat/index.html

    there is now a link near the top to a form for online donations by credit card. If you don't want to look at the news and chat page on the penguin site, you can go direct to
    https://www.penguins.org.au/medi a/helpinghand.html


    --
    No matter how cynical you become, it's never enough to keep up.
  79. moderators... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should get a brain for christmas and start moderating posts intelligently instead of whatever else is inside your head. Moderate me down but a lot of people would agree with me, slashdot needs new moderators.

  80. Re:Uhh.... (I want one!) by Chili · · Score: 1

    damn, i want a "4 penguin as a pet!

    Is it possible to mail order them things through the mail?
    hehehehehe (j/k btw)

  81. Credit card donation is now possible! by Ravenfeather · · Score: 3

    The Philip Island Nature Park now has a form available for credit card donations. That should take care of the currency-conversion problems.

    According to the rangers on the site, " All monies raised will be going directly to improving the Little Penguin Hospital facilities in the here and now."

  82. The doomsday millennium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The doomsday millennium; Bob Carr, Premier of New South Wales.

  83. Phillip Island Penguin parade by dbowen · · Score: 1

    I hear they've now banned cameras all together, because despite repeated warnings in many languages, people kept using their flashes/video camera lights. That was certainly the case in August, when I was there.

    I wrote about it at the time, see this page for a description and a picture (taken without a flash or light, of course): http://www.toxiccustard.com/diary /1999/08.html#01

    If you're ever in Australia, don't miss it - they are so damn cute!

  84. Ahmen Brother! by Jonathan+Hamilton · · Score: 1

    The Moderators on this site unfortuantly seem to have no social life what so ever. They seem to moderate the funny post down and the flamebait post up.

    1. Re:Ahmen Brother! by Hello+Kitty · · Score: 1

      Let's think about this: You get to be a moderator by spending a lot of time at Slashdot. If you're spending a lot of time at Slashdot, you're obviously not out having a life, now are you? (Hear me, the voice of experience!)

      Seriously, lot of crappy moderation happening on /. lately -- once upon a time my filters managed to knock out almost all the flames and almost none of the content, but the system seems to be failing. I worry that the threads are being taken over by the freaks that seem to infest most other online discussion areas sooner or later. Let's hope it's a temporary thing.

  85. Ahmen Brother! by Jonathan+Hamilton · · Score: 0

    The Moderators on this site unfortuantly seem to have no social life what so ever. They seem to moderate the funny post down and the flamebait post up.

  86. I Kiss You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Me very poor starving child. I am forced to use windoze on a 386. I support my 18 siblings by emptying bit buckets and selling the contents at recycling centers. My mom smokes crack and my dad was killed by a runaway oil tanker. Pleaz send me your money. And tell Linus I want to be his poster boy. Or just send us penguins to roast.

  87. Like hell they don't! by fable2112 · · Score: 1


    (Voluntarily forgoing my +1 because I know this is on the edge of flamebait ...)

    "People" suffering from "diseases" NEVER bring it on themselves, EVER? Wake up and smell the cigarettes burning.

    My mom's best friend has two inoperable tumors on her lungs. She's about 50 years old. And the crazy woman is still smoking! :P

    And more to the point, have fun telling your doctor that you're an innocent victim when your fast food, Mountain Dew, and lack of sleep catch up with you ....

    I'm sure doc will be doing his/her very best not to laugh.

    (And yeah, I know, I'm something of a hypocrite here, since I'm starting to be a bit of a caffeine addict and I'm theoretically 20 or so pounds overweight ... but when my number comes up, I'm not going to cry that I'm an innocent victim, and I'm taking at least reasonably good care of myself meanwhile.)



    --
    "Somebody exploded a letter-bomb today ... but it wasn't anybody I knew" -The Moody Blues, "Dear Diar
  88. The Hunger Site is ridiculous by TheDullBlade · · Score: 2

    Each time you click the button, you give about 4 or 5 cents. Sending $20/year directly to the UN World Food Program is more effective than visiting the Hunger Site every day (and lets face it, you'll miss days), and takes less effort.

    However, the site itself says that 3/4 of the people starving are children under 5. Practically every mouthful goes directly into increasing overpopulation in areas where people can't feed themselves. Feed one starving child today, watch six children starve twenty years from now.

    (BTW, I think the suggestion was that sending money to wash off penguins was not as good as sending money to feed starving children)

    Charity, too, is oppression.

    --
    /.
  89. just the facts mam! - sm4113414311 by goon · · Score: 2
    That tanker was carrying oil for Australian consumption.

    • the following
    • link suggest this may not be the case...check your sources first.

      ...It is believed the oil came from the pumping out of a ship's bilge, rather than a tanker spill, though neither the Environment Protection Authority nor the Maritime Board was able to confirm this yesterday. An EPA analysis of the oil is expected today...

      if you want to ask questions go to the source...here - (http://www.penguins.org.au/chat/index.html)

    links:
    http://www.theage.com.au/news/20000104/A5181-2000J an3.html
    http://www.penguins.org.au/chat/index.html
    --
    peterrenshaw ~ Another Scrappy Startup
  90. Earth First! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The extremists on the right-wing end of the spectrum like to pretend that we must choose to annihilate either the human race, or all other life on Earth, and the Earth First! viewpoint is only slightly more nuanced than that.

    I'm concerned that you're operating with a caricature of Earth First!, which is actually a very diverse, radically decentralized organization, with incredible folks like Judy Bari who organized and worked to protect the ancient redwoods in her home with great success because she pointed out that clear-cutting was destroying the jobs of loggers as well (and so they worked together). Earth First! is not an anti-human movement; rather, it's a diverse movement of people protecting the land from profit-seeking corporations who, legally, must maximize profit rather than considering the long-term consequences of destruction of wilderness and natural systems. Of course, the major media, controlled by companies like Disney, GE, etc, present Earth First! as a collection of nuts, rather than the incredibly brave, loving people that they are, people who have not forgotten the tradition of civil disobedience in opposition to unjust laws.

    Oh, incidentally, Judy is dead. She was car-bombed in 1990 during a campaign to save the redwoods in Mendocino County, then framed for her own bombing (the facts are clear on this), and died of liver on March 2, 1997. She will never be forgotten.

    1. Re:Earth First! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, incidentally, Judy is dead. She was car-bombed in 1990 during a campaign to save the redwoods in Mendocino County, then framed for her own bombing (the facts are clear on this), and died of liver on March 2, 1997. She will never be forgotten. That's "cancer of the liver." Missed my error.

  91. Stuffed Penguins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should bring a couple of the dead ones to a taxidermist so they can be stuffed. Beanie Penguins.

  92. Further updates by Ravenfeather · · Score: 2

    Great job, everyone!!! I just stopped by the Phillip Island site again, and there are scores of slashdot readers who have stopped by, taken advantage of the on-line credit-card-based donation form, and chipped in for this great cause, just the last few hours. Of course I did the same.

    More feedback from the rangers as well; this one made my whole day. The rangers there write:

    PINP Release (Park Ranger) Fri 11:08am

    ...we are really smiling down here with appreciation, and feeling that our Island is very much part of a small and caring planet; here at the moment its a sunny day, blue skys and perfect weather for enjoying the world as it was meant to be. We are still working at removing oil off the rock platforms to stop Penguins rubbing against the rocks and getting coated in oil that way. The still sea helps today, because it means the Ranger crews can get out there and actually hand wash each rock! Quite a task, but worth every effort. Thanks again! We'll be keeping everyone informed as the situation prgeresses. Our big concern is for the chicks that rely on their parents to be fed. Unfortunately many of the oiled penguins we are treating still can't be released to sea, as they have yet to preen themselves and thus stimulate their natural waterproof coating. This means they can't swim out to sea and get food for the young chicks waiting back in the burrows and it is likely many chicks will starve :( It is very unfortunate that this "accident" happened in chick raising season. Your help however, is doing just that, helping us help the Little Penguins and rehabilitate the adults ASAP!

    1. Re:Further updates by Ravenfeather · · Score: 2

      Oh yeah, and I forgot to mention...it seems that Linux Journal is planning to do a story about the response of the Linux community to the plight of these penguins...and they've also sent a donation of their own. I look forward to seeing that story come out!

      ---Ravenfeather, feeling somewhat sheepish for replying to his reply to his own post.
  93. Chariy or change? by Vryl · · Score: 1
    There is plenty of evidence that 'famine' is a man made artifact of modern economics, most notably 'cash cropping', ie where local subsistence farming is displaced by crops with 'international' value and sold to genereate foreign income, often to repay debt to set up the 'infrastructure' (ie dams) used to produce the stuff in the first place.

    Some orgainations (community aid abroad f'instnace) actually buy things like hoes and spades and teach permaculture, and actively take steps to produce long term infrastructural change to combat famine.

  94. Check out newspix for more pictures by bigchris · · Score: 1

    Hey ppl, if you guys want more pix I discovered the Australian (Aussie paper) has a "Newspix" section. Do a search on penguins and you should get some really cool pics!

  95. Penguins and Linus by B.D.Mills · · Score: 1

    Legend has it that it's this species of penguin (fairy penguin) that bit Linus on the finger when he was at Philip Island, thus inspiring him to adopt a penguin as the logo for Linux. It's unlikely due to the probable lifespans of these birds and that there's so many of them, but wouldn't be ironic if the same penguin that bit Linus was saved by Slashdot donations? If God existed and had a wacky sense of humour, then it could well happen....

    As for me, because I live only about 70 kilometres from Philip Island, I think I'll drive down and donate some Australian currency to the penguin hospital in person if they'll let me.

    If you ever get your hands on some genuine Australian currency, don't be surprised when you find that the banknotes are made of polymer. The polymer notes last longer than paper money, but they do shrink when you put them in the oven.... :)

    --

    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke
  96. Invalid certificate - bad domain name by Lev_Arris · · Score: 2

    I checked back that invalid certificate thingy which makes some users hesiate from donating. The cert is invalid because it was issued to the domain: www.labyrinth.net.au

    When checking DNS entries a little you can find that they are the providers for penguins.org.au. (See the domain info taken from http://www.nic.au below or online at ht tp://www.nic.au/cgi-bin/multisearch.pl?name=pengui ns&domain=.org.au&moreinfo=1)

    --------- snip ----------
    nslookup -type=NS penguins.org.au
    Source: Authorative server for .org.au


    Server: munnari.OZ.AU
    Address: 128.250.1.21

    Non-authoritative answer:
    penguins.org.au nameserver = rip.psg.COM
    penguins.org.au nameserver = warrane.connect.COM.AU
    penguins.org.au nameserver = yarrina.connect.COM.AU
    penguins.org.au nameserver = minotaur.labyrinth.NET.AU

    Authoritative answers can be found from:
    rip.psg.COM internet address = 147.28.0.39
    warrane.connect.COM.AU internet address = 192.189.54.33
    yarrina.connect.COM.AU internet address = 192.189.54.17
    minotaur.labyrinth.NET.AU internet address = 203.9.148.2




    dig -t any penguins.org.au
    ; > DiG 8.2 > @munnari.oz.au penguins.org.au -t
    ; (2 servers found)
    ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
    ;; got answer:
    ;; ->>HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 6
    ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 4, ADDITIONAL: 4
    ;; QUERY SECTION:
    ;; penguins.org.au, type = ANY, class = IN

    ;; ANSWER SECTION:
    penguins.org.au. 1D IN NS rip.psg.COM.
    penguins.org.au. 1D IN NS warrane.connect.COM.AU.
    penguins.org.au. 1D IN NS yarrina.connect.COM.AU.
    penguins.org.au. 1D IN NS minotaur.labyrinth.NET.AU.

    ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
    penguins.org.au. 1D IN NS rip.psg.COM.
    penguins.org.au. 1D IN NS warrane.connect.COM.AU.
    penguins.org.au. 1D IN NS yarrina.connect.COM.AU.
    penguins.org.au. 1D IN NS minotaur.labyrinth.NET.AU.

    ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
    rip.psg.COM. 1d21h55m26s IN A 147.28.0.39
    warrane.connect.COM.AU. 1D IN A 192.189.54.33
    yarrina.connect.COM.AU. 1D IN A 192.189.54.17
    minotaur.labyrinth.NET.AU. 1D IN A 203.9.148.2

    ;; Total query time: 271 msec
    ;; FROM: vserve4.netregistry.au.com to SERVER: munnari.oz.au 128.250.22.2
    ;; WHEN: Fri Jan 7 20:33:39 2000
    ;; MSG SIZE sent: 33 rcvd: 273




    Actual Server Reply
    [ns.aunic.net]

    domain: penguins.org.au
    descr: Phillip Island Penguin Reserve
    descr: (ACN)
    descr:
    descr: ACT
    admin-c: KD202-AU
    tech-c: EH201-AU
    zone-c: KD202-AU
    remarks: Created 19960824
    changed: register@aunic.net 19960918
    source: AUNIC

    person: kieran davies
    address: 13/68 gould street
    address: frankston
    address: VIC 3197
    phone: +61 9769 6966
    fax-no: +61 9769 6472
    e-mail: manmor@labyrinth.net.au
    nic-hdl: KD202-AU
    remarks: (Organisation) manmor
    remarks: (position) manager
    remarks: Created 19960918
    changed: register@aunic.net 19960918
    source: AUNIC

    person: Elizabeth Hemphill
    address: Level 10, 99 Queen St
    address: Melbourne
    address: VIC 3000
    address: AU
    phone: +61 3 9642 4222
    fax-no: +61 3 9642 4955
    e-mail: domainmaster@labyrinth.net.au
    nic-hdl: EH201-AU
    remarks: (Organisation) Labyrinth Connections Pty. Ltd.
    remarks: Created 19960725
    changed: register@aunic.net 19991014
    source: AUNIC
    --------- snip ----------

    Greetz

  97. Sponsorship?? by Tigger's+Pet · · Score: 2

    I've already posted this on the Phillip Island page, so maybe I'll get a response from there. As we've suddenly all become so 'concientous' (sp?), is there anywhere that we can adopt/sponsor a penguin via a zoo, wildlife center or similar?? Surely having a picture of a real-life Tux would be far better (if not more cool {sic}) than having a stuffed toy by your monitor. Also, we would be paying your sponsorship each year, thereby ensuring the continued survival of these little critters for years to come and doing our bit to 'save the planet'. Just a thought - maybe someone out there has some knowledge or a contact for this sort of thing. .sig removed by humor-detector. Can't have any of that around here!!

  98. I don't consider myself part of /. but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I certainly won't donate jack shit to the penguins. They can rot.

  99. I donated $20 by skurk · · Score: 1

    I encourage you all to do the same.
    These little creatures are our mascots,
    let us show them that we care.

    --
    www.6502asm.com - Code 6502 assembly or.. DIE!!
  100. Re:This is not the first post by Penguin_Parade · · Score: 1

    The better/correct term for a bunch of Little Penguins is actually a "raft" :))

    Least thats what they are called when they come home each night, and leave each morning in the waters of Bass Straight :)

    kd (Phillip Island Nature Park)

  101. Re:Uhh.... (I want one!) by CrayDrygu · · Score: 1
    Is it possible to mail order them things through the mail?

    (Score: 0, Redundant)

    --

    --
    "I personal[ly] think Unix is "superior" because on LSD it tastes like Blue." -- jbarnett

  102. Apologies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    You're right, Earth First! is a lot of people and by assuming them to be monolithic/homogeneous, I'm being just as reductionistic as the "extremists" I'm snarling about.


    it's a diverse movement of people protecting the land from profit-seeking corporations who, legally, must maximize profit rather than considering the long-term consequences of destruction of wilderness and natural systems.

    The depressing part is that they don't just have to "maximize profit"; they have to maximize short term profit. Bari was right about clear-cutting destroying the jobs of loggers; if there are no trees, you can't very well cut them down. There are cause-and-effect relationships here. From a hard-core free marketist perspective, it's "politically incorrect" to admit that bare topsoil will erode and turn into a wasteland, but the laws of nature don't pay much attention to ideology.

    By the way, I happen to know a "hard-core free marketist" who's pretty much a single-issue pro-environmentalist voter. He has (IMHO) exaggerated faith in the market in some respects, but in a few limited respects he recognizes that it's not the right tool for the job. It's nice to know that those guys aren't monolithic, either.


  103. Ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Hah. You scammed me. I'll get you for this!

    I've been trolled, too, actually. Half the people who agree with my trolls are trolls themselves, and sometimes they're so scary I end up falling out of character and trying to talk sense into them. :)


    Wait'll I hit you with my latest patent I got for posting crazy gibberish on Slashdot for laughs! :)

    I'm glad you enjoyed it.

  104. "Brion Gysin", innit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Not that it really matters. I never much liked the guy; he always seemed like he was sort of riding on WSB's coattails . . .


  105. Long winded opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too often in this world we forget about the big picture. The oil companies want money. Spilling oil saves money. This seemingly simple explanation can destroy the lives of living things. Personally I dont know where these people get off. Havent they ever seen a pic of a 4" penguin? You have to wonder about someone who would conciously KILL one of Tux's own. I think whoever is responsible for this should be covered in oil and put in a swimming pool. They can give it but can't take it. I remember when oil spills were very rare. now oil companies are DUMPING oil on PURPOSE? Will somebody tell me whats wrong here? Eventually they'll get the oceans so gunked up that they wont be able to get ships through them. What kind of sick eorls are we living in? On the bright side, it is great to see that the entire open sourde community is pitching in. maybe there is still hope for society.

  106. crackup by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    My mom smokes crack

    Are you sure it was your mum?

    To the this-is-not-techo-news AC: haven't you ever been rebuked by MAILER-PAENGUIN for getting an address wrong? Keep on insulting them, and the Paenguins will get you! (-: So play n-i-c-e, Sid... :-)

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing