Slashdot Mirror


Full Lunar Eclipse for North America

tech81 writes "MSNBC is reporting that all of North America will experience a full lunar eclipse on January 20, which also happens to be the first full moon of the new year. Check out the article at MSNBC Space News."

116 comments

  1. Numerology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahem. I thought that the lunar eclipse that occured in Turkey, shortly before the earthquake there, was the last lunar eclipse of the century. I understand that a coworker of mine actually went to Turkey to see it. Must have been a hell of an airfare. Such folly.

    I wonder how easy it is to predict these events anyway? Don't laugh. Of course Newton's laws work rather well, but is there a limit to how far you can go back or how far ahead you can accurately predict these occurences? Then again, probably not. So why don't these news agencies just release a big list of dates of eclipses and when/where they will happen and start reporting on more important things?

    1. Re:Numerology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Your co-worker probably believes that the century's over now...

      After all, most people do. I haven't decided whether to be pedantic or populist yet :-)

      -Ciaran (waiting for a password)

  2. Re:Good opportunity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried this on my boss. He wasn't worried. He said the moon would be restored in the next service pack.

  3. Re:Also a full moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last time I had jury duty, I went to a rave the night before. I left there and went straight to report. Needless to say, I got struck immediately, because I reeked of tobacco smoke, and I was kinda staring vacantly at the ceiling. Oh yeah, and I couldn't answer questions coherently.

    The only way to do jury duty.. =)

  4. Re:Moderate Down [Re:Screw the lunar... I want sol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    too bad we can't see karma anymore, or we'd know how far we had to send this dumbass down. Oh well, I got him for one. Too bad I can't use all 5 points to send this dude below sea level. People were amazed at the +6 comment that showed up, Lets go for -2!

  5. Re:Message from the Watchdogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which god were you addressing this to?

    There are so many....

  6. Re:``North America''? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    guess what?

    No one gives a FUCK about Europe.

  7. grits ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell are grits anyways ?
    Some american slang ?

  8. Coincidence?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The day after the Transmeta release...
    I always knew there was more to their technology.

  9. It will bring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yet another boring slashdot article.

  10. Best URLS I've found so far - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  11. Best URLS I've found so far - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  12. Best URLS I've found so far - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  13. LEARN ENGLISH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's "your a dork", not "you're a dork".

  14. Re:Upcoming eclipses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... unless you are consumed yourself by the Southern Californians ;-)

    Actually, Oregonians in general hate, or at least dislike Californians. So you'd be better flying here and renting a car than driving.

  15. Re:Learn English, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is "you're a dork."

    "you're" == "you are"

    "your" is possessive.

    Or maybe you are talking about an "a dork" (whatever that is) that belongs to that person.

    Please learn English before you tell somebody else to learn English.

    Thank you.

  16. Re:Learn English, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GOO FUCK YORSELF ASSLICKIN DONKIE FUCKER!

  17. Re:Also a full moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next thing you know /. will post a news item telling us that the next solar eclipse will happen during the day time hours.

  18. Moderate Down [Re:Screw the lunar... I want solar] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, lose the +1 bonus when you're posting off-topic crap. I hope you get scored back down to 1 or 0, which your comment deserves.

  19. "wow, moderate the size of that sucker up!" WHAT?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That explanation for the apparent size difference of the moon depending on azimuth is moronic. I mean, how often have you looked at a distant object and had your brain decide to 'zoom-in' on it because it's far away? It doesn't happen.

  20. Re:this is your brain. this is your brain on the m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's an easier way to test this: go outside when the moon is on the horizon, hold ruler at arms length and measure the apparent size of the moon, then when it's higher in the sky do the same thing. I haven't tried this, but I would bet the measurements would be exactly the same. I'm sure the reason the moon looks smaller when it's higher in the sky is that there's nothing for your brain to compare its size to (except the tiny looking stars, and the huge looking sky), there's no frame of reference. When it's nearer the horizon there are lots of things for your brain to compare it to.

  21. Re:Total eclipse possible only during fill moon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They probably meant to say that the first full moon of the century happens to have an eclipse... Could have been the second or third full moon. Always a full moon, though.

  22. Poor stupid bastards invented the computer :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before calling anyone stupid, I'd like you to converse with me on MY native language.

    Nuija.

  23. Re:``North America''? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously you do since you take time to rant about it.

  24. Re:Screw the lunar... I want solar! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the weather's so nice there, then why do you disguise it in that funny Fahrenheit number?

  25. Re:wow, funny. *cough* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you're a dork.

  26. Re:... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude.

    You are a dork.

    Please, quit posting. You hurt my brain. All of your posts are dorky. Stop!

  27. Re:So its news now it's American? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There wouldn't be.

  28. Re:So its news now it's American? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because face it, America is more important than the UK/Europe.

    We have more people online - mostly because we're not poor stupid bastards who can't afford computers. We're more important because the majority of people are American.

    There are a lot of foreign online users, but they're all fucking morons. I wish they wouldn't come to sites like these, but they do. Occasionally. However, mostly they are elsewhere being stupid like the stupid people they are.

    America rules.
    Sorry. Gotta face the facts, buddy.

  29. Re:First time in 30038392 Years! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This Lunar Eclispe is cool. I can go on a murder and rape spree and no one will see me. nice.

  30. Re:Moderate Down [Re:Screw the lunar... I want sol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you should do it all the time. it's quite annonying when you see these johnniec come latelies who don't know how to use their new found wealth.

    plus, i'll moderate your dumb ass down next time.

  31. What the hell are you talking about? by TheWall · · Score: 0

    What does this have to do with Star Wars TPM not being released in DVD?

    I don't know what's worse... people making wild absurd comments like this, or people talking about naked, petrified, hot grits down the pants. :P It's sad what popularity does to a site.

  32. Re:Lunar eclipse in the UK by fr0g · · Score: 0

    Is that the man in the Moon with the crona?

  33. Re:Moderate Down [Re:Screw the lunar... I want sol by Tim+Behrendsen · · Score: 0

    I'm drunk with the karma power! Feel my comments surge through your pathetic attempts at moderation!


    ---

  34. Re:Moderate Down [Re:Screw the lunar... I want sol by Tim+Behrendsen · · Score: 0

    I swear some of you people have no sense of humor. Moderate me down; I don't care. Woop-de-doo. Get a life.


    ---

  35. Best URLS I've found so far - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
  36. Best URLS I've found so far -- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
  37. Thanks /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Now I can plan my week with this useful bit of nformation.

  38. Total Lunar Eclipse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I believe there was a lunar eclipse late last year. So in effect we have an eclipse on either side of our New Year. A totally arbitrary distiction, but a bit ominous to those who believe in omens.

  39. Re:No time off for this one... by synaptik · · Score: 1

    Dude... Lunar eclipses ONLY happen at night. You must be thinking of a solar eclipse.

    --synaptik

    --
    HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
    NO CARRIER
  40. Hmm... date opportunities??? by Micah · · Score: 1

    Perhaps viewing this thing would make a good second or third date???? :-)

    Of course, I'm in western Washington where it will probably be obscured by clouds... :-(

  41. Re:Upcoming eclipses by caferace · · Score: 1
    Next total solar eclipse visible from the United States: 21 August 2017. If you live in California, you'll have to go to Oregon to see it (assuming that Oregon's that state north of California, my US geography is not too good)

    I'm pretty much sure that us Northern Californians will have annexed that state, along with Washington state and the opressed Republic of Redmond by then. ;)

  42. Re:Also a full moon by jCaT · · Score: 1

    WHAT?!?!? a dry night on your 21st? that's horrible. All you gotta do is call in sick... they will give you a new date to appear for jury duty. Unless you're _on_ the jury, they don't have a problem with you rescheduling. I totally _forgot_ to go to jury duty once, and they just rescheduled it- WHEN IT WAS CONVENIENT FOR ME. I'm in CA, so I don't know what the situation is like where you are... but you _gotta_ do something fun for your bday.

  43. Re:First time in 30038392 Years! LOL! by dangermouse · · Score: 1

    Dude, "remember the alamo" was just a slogan. Let it GO, man!

  44. Re:Also a full moon by GeorgeH · · Score: 1

    also on my birthday
    It will be my 21st birthday. Too bad I have jury duty Jan 21st, so it'll be a very dry night.
    --

    --
    Why can't I moderate something "Wrong" or at least "Grossly Misinformed"?
  45. Re:grits? (OT, but someone asked) by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1
    "Grits" are made of ground corn (that's "maize" to those of you outside North America) boiled to make a nasty sort of steamy, slimy slurry that supposedly passes itself off as a hot breakfast cereal when inundated with butter and salt but which is IMNSHO much better suited to being poured down the pants of and thus providing gratification to certain Anonymous Slashdotters. They (the grits, not the ACs) are consumed mostly in the southeast U.S. I get accused of being a Yankee because I can't stand 'em, myself, preferring oatmeal or reheated leftover pizza to break my fast.

    "And now you know... the rest of the story." :^p

    Zontar The Mindless,

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  46. So its news now it's American? by jazman · · Score: 1

    When the UK/European eclipse happened (yes I have registered that it's the other type of eclipse) there were plenty of voices complaining that eclipses aren't "News for Nerds".

    On behalf of all those posters may I be the first to point out that if an eclipse isn't news when it happens in Europe, it also isn't news if it happens in America?

    1. Re:So its news now it's American? by gooser23 · · Score: 1

      probally because we're american bastards who think that if it were not for us there would not be things like electricity, automobiles, freedom, happiness, social order, lunar eclipses, football, the human race, etc, etc, etc

      --
      "Dying tickles!" -- Ralph Wiggum
  47. Re:Screw the lunar... I want solar! by Beek · · Score: 1

    There is also one on August 1, 2008 for the Arctic.

  48. Re:Also a full moon by winnetou · · Score: 1
    doesn't it *have* to be a full moon to have a total lunar eclipse?

    Yes, it just happens to be the first full moon of the year.

    seems like if we're all lined up enough to make an eclipse it is bound to be a full moon.

    Indeed.

  49. Re:Screw the lunar... I want solar! by sheared · · Score: 1

    I don't think the US will have a solar eclipse until something like 2017 (seems like that's what the ole Farmers Almanac said, but it's been a while since I last read that).

  50. Re:Lunar eclipse in the UK by sheared · · Score: 1

    "Cold and dim during daylight hours"? Wouldn't that be a solar eclipse you're describing?

  51. Re:This is hardly news.. by BedPanDan · · Score: 1

    You would be correct...correct in that you are wrong. The moon is indeed orange during an eclipse, because there's no way all the light can be blocked. The small amount of light that hits the moon gives it a nice orange tint.


    It is funny that you had no idea what you were talking about though...

    ha..ha..........ha (sigh)

  52. This is hardly news.. by BedPanDan · · Score: 1

    A lunar eclipse happens multiple times a year and can be seen everywhere it is night during the eclipse. When the moon is orange, you are witnessing a lunar eclipse. It's really not as big of a deal as a solar eclipse because the shadow is big enough for everyone to see instead of it being localized in a certain place.

    This is neither flamebait nor troll, please don't moderate down...

    1. Re:This is hardly news.. by Zan+Thrax · · Score: 1

      Uh, I could be wrong here, but if the moon's eclipsed, you can't see it at all, because the earth's blocking the light that normally bounces of of it. Red (and orange & blue & any other funky colour) moons are atmospheric anomalies. And fairly rare in most places.

      --

      Intolerant people should be shot.
    2. Re:This is hardly news.. by Zan+Thrax · · Score: 1

      I see. Makes sense, I suppose. Never actually seen one myself. (Unless that's what caused that blood-red moon I saw a few months ago...)

      --

      Intolerant people should be shot.
    3. Re:This is hardly news.. by RuntimeError · · Score: 2
      Our atmosphere is acts bit like a lense, and bends refracts some of the light on to the moon. The amount of light that is defracted thus, therefore the brightness of the moon on during the eclipse, depends on the quality of earth's atmosphere on the day of the eclipse.

      If the atmosphere is all full a volcanic ash, or smoke from big forest-fires etc., then the light of the moon would greatly diminish.

      Every new-moon has the potential for a solar eclipse, and every fullmoon for a lunar one. However, given that the moon is pretty small compared to earth, during solar eclipses, the shadow of the moon might miss the earth completely. The moon is not that lucky to get out earth's shadow. Therefore, more lunar eclipses are visible than solar eclipses. For the folk on the moon, our lunar eclipse is a solar eclipse, and our solar eclipse is, errr, terra eclipse perhaps.

  53. Re:Also a full moon by webster · · Score: 1

    Of course it's a full moon. A full lunar eclipse can only happen during a full moon, just as a solar eclipse can only happen during a new moon.

    If we can see the dark side of the moon, we're not directly between the moon and the sun, which we must be to completely put the moon in shadow.


    Always and inevitably everyone underestimates the number of stupid individuals in circulation

    --

    Information is not Knowledge
  54. Only at night? NOT! by webster · · Score: 1

    Actually, while only the folks enjoying night time can see the eclipse without electronic aids, it is happening all the same for all the others who are on the sunlit side of the world.


    Always and inevitably everyone underestimates the number of stupid individuals in circulation

    --

    Information is not Knowledge
    1. Re:Only at night? NOT! by PurpleBob · · Score: 2

      How does that work? X-rays pointing through the ground?

      During a full moon, which is necessary for the eclipse, the side of the earth where it is night is the same side that can see the moon.
      --

      --
      Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
  55. A message from God by webster · · Score: 1

    This is obviously a message from God telling us all that we have, too, started the new millenium. Who are you going to believe, some monk who didn't even know about zero, or a heavenly portent?


    Always and inevitably everyone underestimates the number of stupid individuals in circulation

    --

    Information is not Knowledge
  56. Re:Total eclipse possible only during full moon? by Jburkholder · · Score: 1

    >I would guess that "heppens to be the first full moon of the year" refers to the coincidence of the first full moon of the year being an eclipse.

    Ah, thank you - when put that way, it makes complete sense.

  57. random number generator by RoLlEr_CoAsTeR · · Score: 1

    this is random, but I've noticed you seem to like to use the word skive.


    --

    Insert mind here.
  58. Re:Total eclipse possible only during full moon? by Robert+Link · · Score: 1
    That is correct. Lunar eclipses can occur only at the full moon, and solar eclipses can occur only at the new moon. I would guess that "heppens to be the first full moon of the year" refers to the coincidence of the first full moon of the year being an eclipse. Because not all full moons are eclipses, this would be somewhat unusual, albeit not particularly remarkable.


    -r

  59. Re:Also a full moon by raytracer · · Score: 1

    Lunar eclipses only occur during full moons.

    Think about it.

  60. Re:First time in 30038392 Years! by asqui · · Score: 1

    No...but youre obviously not as 31337 as you think...we c00l 31337 slashdotters have portable fires that come out of a small box...and little round glass things that look like a miniature sun!

    We also have wheels...oh yeah...and hand-dryers!!!!

  61. Re:First time in 30038392 Years! by asqui · · Score: 1

    I think if NASA read that post we'd likely hit Y3K beofre they managed to get back to you using the instructions in your sig.

    Cmon, explain what it all means!
    I bet you just typed in some random chars in didnt you?

  62. Re:First time in 30038392 Years! by asqui · · Score: 1

    hahaha, and I thought that was caused by Y2K....

  63. Re:First time in 30038392 Years! by asqui · · Score: 1

    I was scared of the sheer volume of mail I might get after all those endless pro-microsoft rants you see...

  64. Re:First time in 30038392 Years! by asqui · · Score: 1

    allright then rob@twcnyrr.com, ive got you now!
    hahahaha...is that even right? Im betting the rob and the com are right... but what is twcnyrr, lol

  65. Re:First time in 30038392 Years! by asqui · · Score: 1

    Wow, I think we just found the Full Lunar Eclipse Bug... quick!!! stop those landfill trucks going to your bunker and clean it out....but this time it will be worse... reinforce the concrete by 2 feet more, and stock at least 18 months of canned food this time!!!


  66. Re:First time in 30038392 Years! by PurpleBob · · Score: 1

    Funny, I've gotten about 70 e-mails from Slashdot. That many people seem to have figured out my address.

    And it's not like your address is very clear - or, in fact, visible at all.
    --

    --
    Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
  67. Re:Also a full moon by po_boy · · Score: 1

    doesn't it *have* to be a full moon to have a total lunar eclipse?

    seems like if we're all lined up enough to make an eclipse it is bound to be a full moon.

  68. Re:First time in 30038392 Years! by cheese63 · · Score: 1

    hey man, don't knock hand-dryers.

  69. It does indeed have to be full moon... by EyesOfNostradamus · · Score: 1

    ... however, due to timezone difference, the eclipse happens late evening 20th January in North America, but in the wee morning 21st January in Europe. Hence American calendars show the full moon on 20th, whereas European ones show it on 21st.

    1. Re:It does indeed have to be full moon... by alfredo · · Score: 2

      Here's more on the subject.
      Astronomy magazine

      check it out, but do dress warm.

      --
      photosMy Photostream
  70. Omens... by EyesOfNostradamus · · Score: 1
    > So in effect we have an eclipse on either side of our New Year. A totally arbitrary distiction, but a bit ominous to those who believe in omens.

    Speaking of Omens: does anybody chance a guess what this eclipse will do the stock markets, and to Linux stocks in particular? The solar eclipse was a boon (RHAT IPO), the "extrabright" full moon of December 22nd was a catastrophe (CORL 4th quarter losses preannouncement), now what kind of news will the lunar eclipse bring?

  71. Probably because there was more important news... by EyesOfNostradamus · · Score: 1

    ...for nerds that very day. A very eery coincidence, unless they picked that day on purpose (just wondering...)

  72. It will indeed be visible in Europe too... by EyesOfNostradamus · · Score: 1

    ... in the early morning hours (sometimes between 4 to 5 am, AFAIK) of January 21st.

  73. Lunar eclipse in the UK by jem · · Score: 1

    When we had the Lunar eclipse in the UK it was an odd and slightly mystical experience. The way it gets cold and dim during daylight hours is wierd but the corona is spectacular!

    Enjoy!

  74. What a strange coincidence... by cdensch · · Score: 1

    That's the day before Kevin Mitnick finally gets his release? Coincidence? I don't think so. This might be a "sign" that his release is a forerunner for... the ANTICHRIST!


    Yes, the antichrist will come in mid to late January. S/he didn't come earlier because they wanted to make you feel secure. Safe. Out of the frying pan. Into the fire. What's scarier, the monster jumping out of the closet, or checking the closet, finding it empty, and having the monster jump on your head?

    Yes, the antichrist is on his way. The signs will be inflicting demons upon the world (Mitnick, Prince Harry, solo spice girl albums), disappointing software (Quake 3, Netscape "Milestone" 10), and distortions in reality to cloud our sanity (Yahoo share price, linux-based start-ups, Charles Schulz' retirement).

    With his/her lackey Mitnick at his side, the antichrist will rule with an iron fist, and all those who bear the mark of the beast (the "apple" logo) will know his/her suzerainty.

    The news will be announced on mp3.com, as the antichrist flogs his/her new album. Then the end will come.

    http://www.slaughterhouse.ab.ca

  75. No time off for this one... by Crimplene+Prakman · · Score: 1

    Drat. This one's at nighttime, so no time skiving off to wander around outside the office wearing silly shiny overpriced paper goggles, staring at a heavenly body that's got a chunk ripped out of it.

    I'll be in bed.

    1. Re:No time off for this one... by Crimplene+Prakman · · Score: 1

      I was, oddly enough... I was around for the recent total solar (in Ireland), where everyone who wasn't chained to their desks was standing around looking like a mini festival crowd, only with spangly spectacles.... none of that with a lunar. Last lunar I saw I was working nights anyway... so I got to skive off. Didn't have to use the cheap welding goggles though...

  76. Re:Screw the lunar... I want solar! by Tim+Behrendsen · · Score: 1

    Oh good; I wouldn't want to risk getting a tan or anything. :)


    ---

  77. Screw the lunar... I want solar! by Tim+Behrendsen · · Score: 1

    I have never seen a total solar eclipse in my 35 years of life here in So Cal. Anyone know when we will see a total solar eclipse in North America (particularly here in So Cal)?

    I know it's not for a while, but I can't remember how long.


    ---

    1. Re:Screw the lunar... I want solar! by Micah · · Score: 2

      IIRC there is another total solar eclipse in the US from north to south in 2026. It will roughly follow the Mississippi river I believe.

      The 2017 eclipse should be good. August is a great month in Oregon, and I may climb Mt. Jefferson that day. :-) That eclipse goes west to east pretty much across the whole country.

    2. Re:Screw the lunar... I want solar! by Cy+Guy · · Score: 2

      I just want to say that I have to agree with you. But if you want to see a total solar eclipse, you should plan on travelling to go see one.

      I've seen several total lunar eclipses, and partial solars, but only one total solar eclipse (this one last summer on 8/11, from Hungary.) There is absolutely no comparison as to the profound effect seeing the sun blotted out and replaced with a glowing circle of white fire had on me, versus the mere curiosity of the lunar and partial solars. I can only describe the total eclipse in such superlatives as: a religious experience, an epiphany, or orgasmic. It literally left me trembling in awe and questioning my own place in the universe.

      As for the total lunar eclipses, and partial solars, I would describe them in terms such as: Hey that's cool, the moon is red! or, Wow pretty neat, if I look at the sun's shadow there is a bite taken out of it!

      If you wait for the total solar to come to you, who's to say you won't have cloud cover that day, or perhaps smog if you live in Southern Cali. Find a listing of total eclipses and choose one soon that will pass over a location you would like to trave to anyway. It may take a couple of tries, but eventually you will be treated to the experience of a lifetime.

    3. Re:Screw the lunar... I want solar! by dsplat · · Score: 2
      By the way, speaking of So Cal, I just want to say that it's about 72 degrees F and beautiful, just for you so-and-sos who have seen a solar eclipse. :)


      Don't worry, the temperature does drop slightly during the eclipse and during totality the amount of harmful UV is significantly reduced. It will be safe for you to come outside and watch the next one, even in So. California. ;-)
      --
      The net will not be what we demand, but what we make it. Build it well.
    4. Re:Screw the lunar... I want solar! by all4Tish · · Score: 2
      it looks like the next total solar eclipse in north america is on 21Aug2017, and passes through northern oregon

      unfortunately, that seems the be the closest (and soonest) before 2050


      but on 23Sept2071 there's one thru baja somewhere

      i got this data from http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.g ov/eclipse/SEmap/SENorAm.html

    5. Re:Screw the lunar... I want solar! by RuntimeError · · Score: 3

      The next total solar eclipse won't be seen in North America till 2017. The path of totality will cross,northern Oregon first, and then head down in a general southeast direction through parts of Idaho, Wyoming, Nebraska, Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee, Nth Carolina, Georgia, to finally leave the continent from South Carolina, between Charleston and Georgetown, and continue on down towards the south Atlantic.

  78. Re:Moderate Down [Re:Screw the lunar... I want sol by Tim+Behrendsen · · Score: 1

    Must be cold where you are.

    P.S. And I'm turning off my bonus for this comment, just for you.


    ---

  79. this is your brain. this is your brain on the moon by MattMann · · Score: 1
    kinda good article (nice picture anyway) about the moon on abcnews this week. Explains the "why does the moon look so big on the horizon" paradox. And it's pretty interesting.

    plot summary: seeing steroscopic stuff in the foreground drives home the point to your brain that the moon is far away. Your brain says, "wow, moderate the size of that sucker up!"

  80. Re:this is your brain. this is your brain on the m by billybob+jr · · Score: 1

    Interesting article. If we took a photograph of the moon when it looks big and one when it looks small to us, would the image of the moon be bigger on the first photograph? I would guess that the moon is bigger in the photograph taken when it looked bigger. Wouldn't this disprove their theory?

  81. Re:First time in 30038392 Years! by Leto2 · · Score: 1

    After all, every geek on earth has installed /usr/games/rot13 by now, since this Ufie.

    --
    <grub> Reading /. at -1 is like driving through Cracktown in a convertible that is stuck in 1st
  82. Also a full moon by all4Tish · · Score: 1
    according to some calendars, its also a full moon ... although other calendars say the full moon is on 21jan

    either way, i hope to find someplace with clear skys, because it'll either be full or nearly full, and pretty cool

    the last one i saw was a few years ago, and just really cool

    <shameless-plug>also on my birthday</shameless-plug>

    1. Re:Also a full moon by all4Tish · · Score: 1
      come to think of it, you're probably right

      oh well, i guess i never quite thought of it that way

      thanks for the correction, though

    2. Re:Also a full moon by Loath · · Score: 1

      My younger brother's birthday as well.

      --

      .sig not found...formatting hard drive.

  83. i suggest by Nastard · · Score: 1

    we all go to redmond and moon the ms campus

    i got your full moon right here

  84. The best eclipse related Web site is... by stand · · Score: 1
    --
    Four fifths of all our troubles in this life would disappear if we would just sit down and keep still. -C. Coolidge
  85. Re:Don't trust MSNBC.com's science by stand · · Score: 1

    whatever we're seeing in NGC4214 happened 13 million years ago. Not my definition of "currently,"

    Nor is it mine, but 13 million years is currently in stellar formation terms. Remember, our Sun is over 4.5 billion years old. The science behind the original statement is sound. My but aren't we quick to judge?

    --
    Four fifths of all our troubles in this life would disappear if we would just sit down and keep still. -C. Coolidge
  86. ... by Signal+11 · · Score: 2
    Yes... it's just a coincidence... yeah... you just keep telling yourself that... and when the sun gets blotted out and the alien ships land and turn you into food for their pets... yeah...

  87. Total eclipse possible only during fill moon? by Jburkholder · · Score: 2

    >a full lunar eclipse on January 20, which also happens to be the first full moon of the new year.

    I thought this was no coincidence, that a full lunar eclipse was only possible when the moon is on the far side of the earth from the sun, which is when it appears full. no? astonomers care to comment?


    1. Re:Total eclipse possible only during fill moon? by gengee · · Score: 2

      If you're still interested, checkout Encyclopedia Brittanica's article on the frequency of solar and lunar eclipses. Also, they have a rather technical, but very interesting article on the predictions and uses of both solar and lunar eclipses - including methods to prove General Relativity. I realize this is slightly offtopic, as some of it pertains to Solar eclipses, but its something Im interested in:)
      signature smigmature

      --
      - James
  88. Re:``North America''? by David+A.+Madore · · Score: 2

    Flamebait, but I won't bite. Ever learned how to read? I was talking about South America.

  89. Re:First time in 30038392 Years! by PurpleBob · · Score: 2

    This could be funny. Go and see how many people you can convince that the Moon is crashing from a Y2K bug.
    --

    --
    Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
  90. Re:this is your brain. this is your brain on the m by PurpleBob · · Score: 2

    It would disprove their theory if it actually happened, which I seriously doubt. The moon remains the same size in the sky.

    To test this, hold a dime a certain length away from your eye when the moon looks big, so that it just covers it. Then hold it the same distance away when it looks small, and it'll still just cover the moon.
    --

    --
    Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
  91. Don't trust MSNBC.com's science by gbnewby · · Score: 2

    Located about 13 million light-years from Earth, NGC4214 (a galaxy) is currently forming clusters of new stars from its interstellar gas and dust.

    Excuse me, alleged science journalists: whatever we're seeing in NGC4214 happened 13 million years ago. Not my definition of "currently," although it maybe explains certain software companies' definition of "we'll be coming out with a new version Really Soon Now."

    Of course, it might still be "currently" making new stars (right, Mr. Einstein?), but we can't see it.

  92. Re:First time in 30038392 Years! LOL! by Tim+Behrendsen · · Score: 2

    Didn't the mexicans attack the Alamo during a full lunar eclipse?


    ---

  93. Yet another Y2K bug by jmv · · Score: 2

    I guess the full moon was just not Y2K complient in North America. A programmers team is working on this issue and a patch will be released soon.

  94. Re:Total eclipse possible only during full moon? by Crixus · · Score: 2
    a full lunar eclipse on January 20, which also happens to be the first full moon of the new year.

    I thought this was no coincidence, that a full lunar eclipse was only possible when the moon is on the far side of the earth from the sun, which is when it appears full. no? astonomers care to comment?

    Yes, all lunar eclipses occur when the moon is full. Think of it this way, the only way that the earth can block the sun's light from getting to the moon would be if the sun was at 6-O'clock, and the moon was at 12-O'clock (using that crazy military reference where 6-o'clock is exactly behind you and 12-o'clock is exactly in front of you).

    The greatest irony is that the moon is at it's fullest at precisely the time that we can't see it. When it is totally eclipsed.

    --
    Ignore Alien Orders
  95. ``North America''? by David+A.+Madore · · Score: 3

    Excuuuuse me? What in the world does it mean for a lunar eclipse to be ``in (for) North America''?

    This would make sense for a solar eclipse, since solar eclipses are very localized, but a solar eclipse happens at the new moon, whereas a lunar eclipse happens at the full moon (for obvious reasons).

    A lunar eclipse is visible throughout the hemisphere where it is night (which, of course, is the same as the hemisphere where the moon is visible, since the moon and the sun are in opposition), so at best the ``north'' in ``North America'' is out of place.

    This fact (that lunar eclipses are visible from half the world whereas solar eclipses are visible from such a small region) makes lunar eclipses seem much more common than solar eclipses; in fact, the contrary is true. The last total solar eclipse in the world was on August 11, 1999 in Europe (I was there), and the next one is next year in Madagascar.

  96. Message from the Watchdogs by wagnerer · · Score: 3

    Dear God:

    This is to notify you that your program entitled 'full-moon screen saver' has a rather severe cosmetic Y2K bug in it. As a result, on January 20'th of your year 2000, the full moon will experience color and brightness difficulties that significantly deviate from the published standard. Our analysts believe there is even a chance it may turn red, a widely touted feature of your 'shutdown/halt' program, possibly causing confusion among your users.

    We strongly encourage you to correct this problem at your earliest convenience.

    Y2K Watchdog committee

  97. Good opportunity... by WombatControl · · Score: 3

    For all of you that work in an NT shop, all you need to do is tell your boss that if you don't switch over to Linux before January 20, you'll make the moon disappear. Who knows, it might even work.

    On another, related front, I've found that astronomical events make great times to get with your significant other and spend some quality time...

  98. how BIG is it, though? by LocalYokel · · Score: 3

    I'm not interested in this full moon eclipse unless the moon will be big and bright enough that you could drive without headlights. With a fresh coat of snow and a full moon, you can almost do this in Minnesota already, but...

    I understand that the Druids used a lunar eclipse to make a sneak attack on Crazy Horse, shortly after he used the light of an unusually bright moon the previous month to defeat George Washington's army at the battle of Waterloo. They went on to build the Great Wall of China, before finally settling in what's now called Venezuela, but I could be wrong -- there seems to be a little too much historical confusion about celestial events as of late... :-)

    --

    --

    --
    E2 IN2 IE?

  99. First time in 30038392 Years! by SGC · · Score: 4
    The combination of a full moon and a full lunar eclipse will result in the moon appearing 0.02001% larger AND brighter than it has in several centuries!

    This will truly be an exciting night! I suggest everyone emails every person they know with this amazing news!

  100. Upcoming eclipses by B.D.Mills · · Score: 5
    I happen to have the pair of NASA publications as reference books: (Fifty Year Canon of Solar Eclipses: 1986-2035 and (Fifty Year Canon of Lunar Eclipses: 1986-2035)... so here's the details.

    Next total solar eclipse visible from the United States: 21 August 2017. If you live in California, you'll have to go to Oregon to see it (assuming that Oregon's that state north of California, my US geography is not too good)

    Then there's a total solar eclipse visible from Texas to the Great Lakes on 8 Apr 2024.

    A third American total solar eclipse is on 12 Aug 2045, visible from northern California to Florida.

    There's more, but it's pointless posting those because you won't be around in 2078 or 2099 to see those ones (unless you're a Montgomery-Burns-style head-in-a-jar-of-liquid then...)

    As for total lunar eclipses, I'll give details of upcoming total eclipses by naming the dates and the approximate position of the point of the Earth's surface that's directly overhead at maximum eclipse:

    • 21 Jan 2000 - Carribbean
    • 16 Jul 2000 - the sea near Brisbane (Australia)
    • 09 Jan 2001 - Saudi Arabia
    • 16 May 2003 - Brazil
    • 09 Nov 2003 - Atlantic Ocean west of Africa
    • 04 May 2004 - Madagascar
    • 28 Oct 2004 - Atlantic Ocean north of Brazil

    For the Americans, who are the majority of the Slashotters, these total lunar eclipses should be visible at some point in the night in question:

    • 21 Jan 2000 - good view from all of U.S. and Canada
    • 16 Jul 2000 - beginning of eclipse visible from western U.S., but no view of totality
    • 09 Jan 2001 - end of eclipse visible from eastern U.S. and Canada but no view of totality
    • 16 May 2003 - Good view of eclipse from most of U.S. and Canada, but western regions will miss the beginning of eclipse.
    • 09 Nov 2003 - Most of eclipse visible from the U.S. and Canada, most regions will miss the beginning
    • 04 May 2004 - Not visible
    • 28 Oct 2004 - All of eclipse visible from U.S. and Canada, except for western regions that miss the beginning; all of totality visible
    --

    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke