Slashdot Mirror


"Lord of the Rings" Quicktime Preview Available

esk writes "A QuickTime 4.0 preview of the upcoming Lord of the Rings movie is now available at the official site." There's only about 30 seconds of actual footage from the movie in the two-minute trailer, but it's enough to give you an idea of what the characters will look like -- and they came out almost exactly as I have always envisioned them, even the Trolls and poor, sad Gollum. Yessssss!

243 comments

  1. This makes me feel like ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    pouring hot grits down The Witch King of Angmar's pants. thank you.

  2. still waiting for the Sorenson Codex dept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Until the guys at Apple decide kindly to make a Linux player available *hint, hint*, here's a second best alternative:
    A shot-by-shot summary from the kind-hearted folks over at theonering.net
    Lest the author be accused of karma-whoring, he is posting anonymously. However, suggest you moderate this up as informative. ;-)

  3. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What has been bothering me, is: why the hell the eagles just coudn't fly in, drop the ring and be done with it?

  4. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by Eccles · · Score: 1

    Note that the elves apparently did not know where the Ents were (and the Ents didn't know where the Entwives were), so incorporating them in a battle they weren't aware of wasn't an option.

    Cavalry would have had a hell of a time getting over the Misty Mountains.

    The hobbits were remarkably resistant to the Ring's effects. Bilbo and Sam were the only beings who ever voluntarily gave it up, and Bilbo nearly couldn't. (And Frodo largely snatched it from Sam.) Saruman was corrupted by the thought of it and planned to capture it and challenge Sauron. Borimir was also corrupted by the thought of it, and tried to take it by force.

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  5. Ah.. Quite right by DG · · Score: 1

    You're right - Gollum was captured at the border. My mistake.

    The point about Sauron expecting the Ring to be used against him and not an attempt at destroying it is still valid though. ;)

    --
    Want to learn about race cars? Read my Book
  6. Re:QuickTime's cool by Lurker · · Score: 1

    No, you can't. It uses the Sorenson codec.

  7. Why bother? by C.Lee · · Score: 1

    Bleh. Why do people get so hyped up over remakes of old movies that won't hold a candle to the orginal? First talk about remaking "Planet of the Apes" and now this? There can be only one "Lord of the Rings" movie, and that's already been made. What's next? Some idoit is going to remake "2001", replacing HAL with Wesley Crusher?

    1. Re:Why bother? by furiousgeorge · · Score: 1

      Everyone has their own opinions - though u are the first person i've heard say the original LOTR movie was anything but crap.

    2. Re:Why bother? by luckykaa · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call it crap. Thats too dismissive. The origional LOTR had a lot going for it. If it had actually finished and hadn't had about half the story removed to fit the space, then it would have been good. Aesthetically it worked very well (although some people have complained that the major characters are too much more detailed than the backgrounds and minor characters).

  8. Re:Discussion on the suckery of the Bakshi LOTR mo by C.Lee · · Score: 1

    >I watched this film a long time ago, and was mostly bored. The thing
    >is, Bakshi was the wrong guy for this film. Have you ever seen Fritz
    >the Cat or Coonskin? In his early days, Bakshi was the kind of guy
    >that just likes to do crazy visuals without worrying too much about a
    >plot.

    Just like I suspected. This thing is going to turn out to be another "Wing Commander" or "Starship Troopers". Feh.

  9. Re:Easier way: by Frater+219 · · Score: 1
    Even easier, if you're using a Mac:
    1. Set iCab as your default browser in your Internet control panel.
    2. Open the movie site in Navigator (so that the JavaScript runs properly).
    3. When you click on the link to load the movie, iCab will pop out of nowhere with its Download Manager and begin downloading the movie file itself.
  10. lordoftherings.net? by Derek+Pomery · · Score: 1

    Ok, I'm probably being anal, but why is a movie domain .net?
    Shouldn't it be .com?
    Was it just that lordoftherings.com was taken and they really wanted that domain name?
    Does this sort of stuff even matter anymore?

    --
    -- perl -e'print pack"H*","6e656d6f406d38792e6f7267"' /. ate my old sig. Bastards.
    1. Re:lordoftherings.net? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Did it start out as a commercial organization?

    2. Re:lordoftherings.net? by arc.light · · Score: 1

      Why is a commercial venture like /. a .org?
      Shouldn't it also be a .com?

    3. Re:lordoftherings.net? by luckykaa · · Score: 1

      Lordoftherings.com had been taken. COnsidering whats there seems to be a fan site thats very enthusiastic about the new movie, it seems odd that they didn't offer to buy the domain name, or if they did, its odd that it was refused.

  11. Grr... akamai again. by Derek+Pomery · · Score: 1

    Rush off to a lab windows machine.
    Cannot open 'http://a772.g.akamai.net/7/772/51/e2d91ae227744c/ www.apple.com/trailers/newline/lord_of_t he_rings/images/click2full.mov'. Please verify that the path and filename are correct and try again.

    Suggestion: Check the web site or content source for information about playing this content.

    Visiting www.apple.com/trailers/newline/lord_of_the_rings/i mages/click2full.mov didn't help either, so maybe someone lost the content at apple.com?

    --
    -- perl -e'print pack"H*","6e656d6f406d38792e6f7267"' /. ate my old sig. Bastards.
    1. Re:Grr... akamai again. by JohnnyX · · Score: 1

      Hey Derek,
      Email me if and when you find a mirror/workaround.

      Mr. X

  12. The Two Towers by AnarchySoftware · · Score: 1
    I wonder what they'll do to boost the second volume, "The Two Towers." Most people find that volume to be a hard bridge to cross between the more exciting introduction and conclusion volumes.

    The Two Towers is great, and not only on a "war strategy" level:

    • The strange alliance of Frodo and Gollum comes into play.
    • The ents are introduced. Treebeard is one of the most memorable characters (at least for the young reader).
    • Gandalf confronts Saruman, something that was set up when he mysteriously vanished in the first book.
    • Everything almost falls apart when Pippin is tempted by the Palantir. It's the only time we actually see the face of Sauron, in the whole book.
  13. But that typeface! by Squeeze+Truck · · Score: 1

    Great preview! That said, isn't everyone just a little tired of the "Mason" typeface they use in their title? I personally file Mason right under Exocet (Diablo, Tazo, "Man in the Iron Mask", etc.) in the annoyingly overused category.

    --

    "Reactionaries must be deprived of the right to voice their opinions; only the people have that right." - Mao

    1. Re:But that typeface! by Squeeze+Truck · · Score: 1

      This is Tolkein after all, what about something that loogs even vaguely Tengwar?

      --

      "Reactionaries must be deprived of the right to voice their opinions; only the people have that right." - Mao

  14. The perfect Gollum by RattRigg · · Score: 1

    In my minds eye Ive always imagined Gollum as looking a lot like Don Knots.

    --
    I started with nothing and I still have most of it.
    1. Re:The perfect Gollum by Redgie · · Score: 1

      I heard someone say Steve Buscemi recently. How perfect is that?
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~
      Artificial intelligence or natural stupidity?

      --

      Artificial intelligence or natural stupidity?
      Guess which wrote this...
  15. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by thulldud · · Score: 1
    Elrond does not say it directly, but at the Council, he says something like, "If I understand rightly all that I have heard, I think that this task is appointed for you, Frodo, and that if you do not find a way, no one will." The question is, who does Elrond think is doing the appointing? Not himself--he pointed out at the outset of the Council that he had not even convened the meeting--they all were "called" (his word) but not by him. By whom, he again does not say.

    Gandalf once brushed this subject when Frodo asked him why the Ring should have left Gollum just when Bilbo would happen by to find it. After all, "wouldn't an orc have suited it better?" And Gandalf said (danger! quoting without checking source! #include <stddisclaimer.h>) "I can put it no more plainly that Bilbo was meant to find the Ring, and not by its Maker." The question sometimes comes up as to whether this mysterious Power that summons councils, appoints burdens, and directs the loss and finding of a powerful weapon is actually Iluvatar or maybe just one of the Valar, Manwë most likely.

    I don't think that Manwë is the Unnamed Power in this case, because his input into the situation was the sending of the Five Wizards--Gandalf was one of those. But although Gandalf did a lot for the cause, there were a number of things that happened above and beyond his control or knowledge. The "fortuitous" meeting of the Council, the selection of Frodo, of Bilbo even, all these came to Gandalf and the others from "outside".

    I read a webpage once that opined that Gandalf's downfall in Moria constituted the actual failure and ruin of the plans of the Valar for Sauron's overthrow. Gandalf's aid was essential for the resistance--everybody knew they had next to zero chance of withstanding Sauron without him, for although he was not as powerful as Sauron, they were beings of the same order, and Gandalf had wisdom that nobody else had. But upon meeting the Balrog, which, like Gandalf, was also a Maia, Gandalf engaged the thing in combat, knowing that he could be no more help to the Company or anyone else, and in so doing he died.

    His coming back to life was not the doing of Manwë at all. He had no such power. It was Iluvatar himself that sent Gandalf back. Tolkien meant this as a "seal of approval" on the sacrifice that Gandalf, and all the Valar, had made. Their plan had failed, and could not but have failed against such an enemy, but they had done the right thing in trying it. So Iluvatar stepped in and made it possible to succeed anyway.

    None of this is explicitly stated in the books, which avoid directly mentioning Eru/Iluvatar in Middle-Earth contexts.

  16. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by thulldud · · Score: 1

    Not so...Gollum didn't "slip into" Mordor, he was captured at the frontier and dragged in, then interrogated and eventually released. When Frodo was given the mission to sneak into Mordor, nobody had any proper idea how he was supposed to do it. All the Council were certain of is that force was not an option, and if the Ring were to be destroyed at all, a hobbit might as well do it as anybody. And Master Elrond sensed that Iluvatar was actively guiding the process, and that He had appointed Frodo particularly to take the burden. That decision was not taken lightly, no more than it would have been in RL.

  17. Re:Der Ring des Nibelungen? by Jonathan · · Score: 1

    There is a reason for the similarity -- they draw on the same source material -- the Siegfried legend of Nordic mythology. Read Lin Carter's "Tolkien: A Look behind 'The Lord of The Rings'" for a full description. Another similarity of course is the sword that was broken and forged again -- Nothung (Wagner)/ Narsil (Tolkien).

    However, I've read that Tolkien had very little respect for Wagner's version of the legend.

  18. Re:Remember... Absolute power corrupts absolutely! by mcb · · Score: 1

    Yes, that's accurate. Frodo planned to take the ring for himself just as they reached the cracks of Mount Doom. This gives meaning to all the constant reminders how everyone (Sam, Gandalf, Aragorn, Bilbo..) could not bring themselves to killing Gollum, and Gandalf's foreshadowing in Rivendell that Gollum had some part to play before the end.

  19. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by mcb · · Score: 1

    And one insane hobbit isn't worth saving the world?

    No one else volunteered to take the ring, and anyone who held any amount of power would be corrupted by it. Gollum was an example how hobbits could wield the ring discretely (he used it to kill orcs underneath a mountain!). Frodo was the perfect choice for a ringbearer. Anyone else would have been overcome with desire to wield the ring openly against Sauron (and in a matter of hours find themselves surrounded by Sauron's millions of orcs).

  20. Sorry by mcb · · Score: 1

    Sorry..Bilbo volunteered, but he was far too old for the journey.

  21. Re:One correction by mcb · · Score: 1

    The only reason I caught it is I just reread the Silmarillion last month ;)

    Currently rereading the LOTR, I'll try to pay closer attention when Sam uses the phial, you've got me wanting to know now.

  22. One correction by mcb · · Score: 1

    Sauron watched his lord and master Morgoth brought down by the Valar, not by Elves and Men. Morgoth utterly defeated the Noldor, and Beleriend was destroyed, and men were terribly weak in the Elder days. His victory was nearly complete when Earendil sailed west to ask the Valar for aid. The Valar came, and almost entirely destroyed Morgoth's servants. Morgoth was thrust outside the world, into the void. Sauron was summoned to Valinor, but he hid in Middle Earth. What you are thinking of is when Sauron rose in power after he had destroyed Numenor (indirectly, by causing the Numenoreans to assail Valinor). The men of the west who settled in Middle Earth, Aragorn's descendents, allied with Gil Galad's Elven forces. Together they defeated Sauron, but he was not destroyed (Isildur kept the One Ring, as we all know). Elrond states that the reason they cannot assail Sauron by force is that Elves have greatly diminished in power and number. The majority of the High Elves have already sailed to Valinor, there are only the small remnants in Lorien and Rivendell. And I'm not so sure that the power of the high elves can be "detected", but the orcs thought Sam was an Elven lord because he had fought against Shelob and won. I could be wrong about this, though.

    1. Re:One correction by Erore · · Score: 1

      Men did not play a minor role in the War of the Jewels.

      They were numerous and strong. They were hardy and would often go into the extreme north to watch Angband during the long seige.

      Individuals of note performed amazing deeds, Hurin, Turin, Haleth, and Beren. Tuor married an elven queen and had a child who saved them all with his quest for the aid of the Valar.

      Treachorous men were even a deciding factor in the 5th battle. "Yet neither by wolf, nor by Balrog, nor by Dragon would Morgoth have achieved his end, but for the treachery of Men." If Ulfang and his accursed brood had been faithful, the good guys would have won!

      Finally, none of the elves of Beleriand fought in the final battle, the War of Wrath, however, men of the houses of the Edain did fight.

      "At BASF (Beleriandic Alliance of Sindarin Fletchers), we don't make the
      elf-hair; we give the elf-hair greater tensile strength. We don't make the
      great bows of black yew wood, we enchant them to shoot faster. We don't make
      the Silmarils, we make the Silmarils shinier. At BASF, we don't make a lot
      of the products you use to fight the War of Wrath; we make them better..."

    2. Re:One correction by belgin · · Score: 2
      Thank you. That was a very silly memory fudge on my part.

      Morgoth was the rogue of the Valar and was taken down by his own kin. Sauron was the strongest of Morgoth's Maiar(sp?) servitors. I haven't reread the Simarillion since my freshman year of college, wheras I reread TLotR in the past couple of years.

      I was actually thinking of Earendil and Beren(?) the one handed who retrieved one of the Simirils from Morgoth's crown. Men played a minor role in the war of the elves against Morgoth and his servents, and they were rewarded with the Isle of Numenor, within sight of Valinor. The elves of Beleriend and other Noldor fortifications were nonetheless potent enough to stick in Sauron's memory. He respected their power, but learned to warp it against them by insinuating himself in their circles to betray them to his master Morgoth.

      By the third age, most of the power displayed by remnants of the high elven lords appears related to words and the light of the last remaining Simiril: Earendil's star. Sauron was pretty well familiar with the power of the Simirils. IIRC, as soon as Sam used the Phial on Shelob, Sauron's eye started to drift his way. Sauron was not worried, however, as he had one of his most potent allies watching the path: Shelob.

      You are completely right in your recounting of the fall of Numenor, etc. I was just mixing things together in my mind a bit.

      B. Elgin

      --

      B. Elgin
      "Read at your own risk; feel free to ignore."
  23. Re:Der Ring des Nibelungen? by cthonious · · Score: 1

    uggh. Wagner. Some nice minutes, some very boring hours.

    I can't understand how anyone can enjoy that wagnerian crap with its insufferable geman nationalism.

    --

    support gun control: take guns from cops
  24. Oh, wow. by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 1
    Screw my karma for this useless post.

    The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings are most definitely among my favourite books. I do not read a lot *shame on me*, but the quality stuff just gets to you.

    My dad gave me a great set of these books during a deal we made during a ski trip (I gave him a copy of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Universe) and I was hooked since the very start. It is a real shame I didn't read this earlier, although, I am glad I read it *now*, because I have a lot more appreciation for my "first time" now than I would have had being a teenager.

    Despite the evil MPAA, this will sometime be one of the DVD's I will own. With pride.

  25. Re:(MOT) Converting QT to MPEG by lilgorgor · · Score: 1

    you can export to avi from qt pro. from there you should be able to mpg it with no probs.

  26. Re:Everybody sing along now... by lilgorgor · · Score: 1

    and the ring of dooooooooooooooooooooooooooom!

  27. Re:Scenes form LOTR they won't show Part I... by GypC · · Score: 1

    The 'pipeweed' is tobacco... they even call it tobacco in that same chapter (I just finished that chapter).

    "Free your mind and your ass will follow"

  28. Awwwwww yeah! by GypC · · Score: 1

    I'd rather wrassle an Ent than miss this one on the big screen!

    "Free your mind and your ass will follow"

  29. Hmmm. by Signal+11 · · Score: 1

    ...why does that one look like it's pouring hot grits down it's pants?

  30. Whoa... seriously! by Anonymous+Coed · · Score: 1
    This blows my mind because I am a huge Tolkien fan and I never even considered this. The books of course do not address this AFAIK. Why the hell couldn't a swarm of eagles swoop down suddenly and drop the Ring in Mt Doom? It's not like Gwaihir would want (or could use) the Ring himself... (put it on his leg?)

    Did Tolkien just never consider this?

  31. Re:Synopsis by Erore · · Score: 1

    I can't leave it alone.

    Saruman's Uruk-hai were defeated in 2 places. Both times by the Rohirrim.

    Once were the small group that kidnapped the hobbits Pippin and Merry and killed Boromir. They were killed outside Fangorn forest.

    The second group fought a battle outside of Helm's Deep, also in Rohan. These were killed by Riders and by the Huorn (sp) old ents who got more tree like.

    At the Battle of the Pellinor fields you have Sauron's forces of orcs and men against the forces of Gondor, later reinforced by the Rohirrim.

    Outside of Morder;s front gates you are more or less right, but the Rohirrim where there too.

    The elves in Rivendell, Lorien, and Mirkwood were all under attack themselves by branches of Sauron's forces. They were not going to be any help. The dwarves were also under attack in the iron hills and the lonely mountain.

  32. Re:Legolas was an elf-lord by Erore · · Score: 1

    That's the shits man. I read that quote and I see Eomer standing in the fields getting ready to go out and get himself killed in his grief and percieved end of everything.

    These staves he spoke, yet he laughed as he said them. For once more lust of battle was on him; and he was stil unscathed, and he was young, and he was king: the lord of a fell people.

    Gives me the chills each and every time I read them. That is why Tolkien is the best, he characters, writing, plots, stories, whatever it is move you in ways that nothing else can.

  33. Re:Legolas was an elf-lord by Erore · · Score: 1

    Actually, Legolas's father, Thranduil, was a Sindarin elf. The Sindarins were found in small numbers among the Silvan elves and were often the leaders.

    Basically there are Elves who never even started the journey, and elves who started the journey but stopped around the misty mountains. They are collectively known as the Elves of Darkness.

    Then there is an overlap of the elves who stopped around the misty mountains (known as Silvan) and those who went all the way to Beleriand but didn't go over the sea and who were under the lord ship of Elwe (Thingol) and they are known as Sindar. Collectively they are known as the Umanyar, or the Eldar who are not of Aman. Eldar being a term applied to all elves of all 3 houses who at least started on the journey.

    Finally, there are the leves who went all the way. These are the Calaquendi and include all of the Vanyar and Noldor, and that portion of the Teleri who went with Olwe, brother of Elwe.

    Anyway, Sindar and Noldo rule, everyone else drools. Long live the Longbeards. Moria Rocks.

  34. Re:This test was from the first age by Erore · · Score: 1

    BullSh*t.

    Get it straight, she chose to stay. Nobody forced anything on her.

    All of the Eldar were invited back to Aman at the end of the War. The only elves who had anything special upon them were the two surviving sons of Feanor, Maglor and Maedhros. Eonwe told them they would have to go and receive judgement from Manwe and Varda.

    Hell, all Galadriel did during the first age was hang around with Melian and learn to make lembas. What a spectacular waste if you ask me. At least Finrod (her brother) discovered and befriended men, established a kingdom, helped on the quest for the Silmarils, fought with Sauron, saved Beren's life, etc. Sure, he got killed, but that's living baby.

    Even Mablung (second fiddle to Beleg) did more than she did.

  35. Re:Last LotR movie by Erore · · Score: 1

    What planet are you from?

    The Lord of the Rings is about the only fantasy novel you can get that is perfect for the story it tells.

    The Shannara series by Brooks are too long, the Eddings sagas are complete humor fluff that are too long, and Robert Jordon, oh please, can you drag this out any longer to make more novels to make more money kinda crap?

    What is there to edit out of the LotR? Death of Boromir? Council of Elrond? I know, the Battle of the Pelennor fields. Anything that is not immediately essential to the story is always essential to make Middle-earth the rich fantastic world we all wish we had lived in or could experience and that all fantasy novelists aspire to.

    End of discussion and post.

  36. Re:oops... by Erore · · Score: 1

    There were also trolls at the battle outside of Mordor.

    Pippin slew one after it had crushed down Beregond. The troll fell on top of him and he passed out. Gimli later found him as his foot was sticking out.

    Interesting note about the name Grond. It was also the name of the mace of Morgoth in the Silmarillion. It's what he beat up Fingolfin with. Fingolfin rules. I still get choked up when I read about his battle.

  37. Direct link on Apples web site by AIXadmin · · Score: 1

    If you want to avoid the slow link at the lordoftherings.net you can get the trailer directrly through http://www.apple.com/trailers/ on Apple's web site.

    Thank god the movie itself is Akamized, or none of us would ever see it.
    Cheers,
    WFE
    ===========

  38. Maybe whichever you want? by Croaker · · Score: 1

    20 years or so ago when my freinds and I were reading it, we though David Bowie might make a good Elric. 'Course, now he's a geezer, so... I could rattle off a dozen fantasy/sci-fi books that I'd like to see made into movies (OK, OK, Cook's Black Company series, Zelazny's... err... just about anything) which might be easier with computer-generated effects. But, let's face it, *all* movies are going to become easier and more realistic (or perhaps the word authentic is more fitting). I'm reading Patrick O'Brian's Aubrey/Maturin novels now (which deal with the British Navy, around the era of Napleon. Think Star Trek: TOS, but on a sailing ship). I think the state of the art still isn't quite there yet (oceans are a still a real bitch to get right, I hear) but eventually you could make these novels into really kick-butt movies, without resorting to the old "models in a bathtub" way of filming battles which made all of the old swashbucklers look sorta cheesy. I read about a new Pearl Harbor movie (hmm.... targent... has anyone registered PerlHarbor as a forum for discussing Perl programming? :) in which a lot of the battle will probably be done on computers. The hired a few vintage airplanes, but to really fill the skies with zeros and the sea with wrecked battleships, it's going to have to be CG. Eventually, you figure that more and more of all types of productions will be going virtual. Many might bemoan this, but it will mean that a once huge, blockbuster film can be made for less... meaning more creative risk-taking, meaning lesser know books and totally new concepts coming to the screen. Personally, I can't wait for this sort of stuff to trickle down into the mere mortals realm. I dabble in computer graphics. I suppose, with the software and hardware at my disposal, I could probably remake the CG portions of TRON (well... of course, there's that pesky talent portion of the equation I'm lacking...) today. That was state of the art 20 years ago in movie making... I wonder what I'll be able to whip up on my desktop 20 years from now... stage my own personal battles with 60,000 orcs? Whee!

    1. Re:Maybe whichever you want? by TopShelf · · Score: 1
      First of all, model ships in a bathtub were good enough for the Godzilla movies, so they're good enough for me!

      Secondly, I think the interesting issue relating to CG and filmmaking isn't necessarily the realism or authenticity that becomes more available, but rather the ability to stretch the bounds of creativity in design and visual effects. Michael Moorcock's writing's, for example, are perfect fodder for a daring artist who wants to mess around with an audience's conception of reality - it's been a while since I've read those books, but the Lords of Chaos seemed to bend reality to their whim at any given time.

      For the really whacked out film, I'd love to see someone take on the Dancers at the End of Time books, like "An Alien Heat", and the others.

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  39. How about dropping it into the middle of the ocean by pm · · Score: 1

    I always thought that rather than take the risk of sneaking it into Mordor, they should have gone the other direction and dumped it at sea. You could make a chain out of mithril (rust-proof), attach it to a big rock and dump it when you are several hundred miles west of the shore.

    Yeah, the problem would have surfaced again in a few millenia when the ring figured out how to get itself caught in someone's net or something. But in the meantime it would have been life as usual back in MiddleEarth. Destroying the ring meant the end of a lot of things - so don't destroy it at all.

    It was something that I've thought about before.

  40. About damn time by nazgul · · Score: 1

    Jackson is either going to make a mockery of the story or kick much ass with his film adaptaion, and from the looks of the trailer, he is kicking much ass.

    1. Re:About damn time by Rantage · · Score: 1

      I think Jackson will do well. He's a real Tolkien fan, and not just a guy who thinks this will make a cool movie. I think the casting alone reflects this.
      Online gaming for motivated, sportsmanlike players: www.steelmaelstrom.org.

      --
      Online gaming for motivated, sportsmanlike players: www.steelmaelstrom.org.
  41. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by Someone · · Score: 1

    There are a few reasons.

    1) The ring is more dangerous to more powerful people as the temptation to try and use it for good would be overwelming.

    2) Hobbits are suppost to be able to resist it for longer, for some reason.

    3) To take it away by force would likely drive the person mad (is Gollum)

    4) Elves, and Ents would be to obvious, part of the problem was that they could not defeat Mordor by force of arms.

    5) Saruon would be able to sense Gandauf and a high elf.

    It's been a while since I read it so I'm not sure.

    Glynn

  42. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by waterbug · · Score: 1

    Well I haven't done all the collateral reading--I've just read the four books (Hobbit + LOTR), and this is my take on the Solo Frodo thing--hobbits have extraordinary constitution and incredibly ordinary ambitions. Key to keeping the Ring from falling into evil hands was keeping the Ring from hands that would become evil under its influence. nb Saruman and Boromir's lust, and Gandalf's refusal to take possession of the Ring. Every other wise and powerful character likewise refused to take custody, knowing that the temptation would be beyond their ability to resist. Frodo didn't have that problem. Anyway, that's my $0.0199999999 with a Pentium FP erratum.

    --
    Never refuse a breath mint.
  43. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by BukDuy · · Score: 1

    How about this: The ring had it's own agenda and went where it wanted. Even if they had tried to give it to someone else the ring wouldn't have stayed if it didn't want to. I personally believe it could, in a small way, see into the future so it's possible that it believed that Frodo was it's best way of getting to Sauron, which may have actually been true. This leads me to believe that if someone other than Frodo had taken responsibility for the ring Sauron still might not have gotten his hands on it. It's been said already that if left to Frodo the ring would not have been destroyed. Gollum was the key.

    --
    "Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it."
  44. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by Frey · · Score: 1

    The reason is because Sauron was so much stronger than they were. Any attempt at matching him force to force would certainly end up in disaster. The Council of Elrond determined that the ring could be disposed of stealth much easer that by force. Also, to take the ring from Frodo would probably cause him to go insane.

  45. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    No matter how powerful a force the Council sent, it would not have been enough. Their only hope was secrecy. You can't have that with an army.

    Of course, that still doesn't explain why the elves didn't send stealth experts. You would think that a small band of commando-elves dressed in black with the latest James Bond devices would have been able to do it. But then, it occurs to me that a stealth specialist would find The Ring's invisibility function to be particularly useful and inviting. This would lead to usage and corruption.


    ---
    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  46. Re:(Nitpicking.) by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    If I recall, there were no trolls in Lord of the Rings; they're not organized by Mordor.

    If I recall, when Aragorn's diversionary force attacked Mordor, they opposing force had some trolls. One of the hobbits (Merry or Pippin) may have even killed one (or had one fall dead on top of him, or something like that). (I guess it's time for me to read again.)


    ---
    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  47. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by Cordova · · Score: 1

    Well put. But I don't think the Queen ever actually held the ring to give it back to Frodo. The ring was actually so powerful she barely had the willpower to resist taking the ring when he offered it to her.

    Cordova

    Can't Lurk all the time.

    --
    My microbes must have translated that wrong! - Aeryn Sun
  48. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by Bombcar · · Score: 1

    Gandalf says that secrecy and unexpected moves are their best hope - go to the library and find the letters of JRR Tolkien - he explains it much better - basically, if Sauron knew where the ring was exactly, and it would be obvious with many Elves around it, then he would throw all his force there, and win.
    http://www.bombcar.com It's where it is at.

  49. Re:(Nitpicking.) by Colossus11 · · Score: 1

    Some companies of trolls were organized by Mordor, yes. Pippin was almost crushed by one in the last battle. Re-read Return of the King.

  50. Acting! by Colossus11 · · Score: 1

    At least as important as the special effects will be the acting, so here's hoping they get that right, too.

    It's incredibly important to bring across the geniality of the hobbits, and Frodo's mistakes in the initial flight from the Shire, and Strider's transformation from Ranger to King, etc. etc.

    J.R.R. Tolkien wasn't necessarily the most natural writer of dialogue, but I've seen enough bad fantasy movies to know he's much better than most of them, and it will kill the movie if we don't care about anything but the next special effect.

    So here's hopin'!

  51. Re:Discussion on the suckery of the Bakshi LOTR mo by esk · · Score: 1
    no, no, no, you misunderstand. bakshi has NOTHING to do with the new LOTR trilogy. he directed an animated version in 1978 called "lord of the rings" that only spanned the first half of the trilogy. part two never panned out, for financial(?) reasons.

    the director for the upcoming trilogy is peter jackson. i really don't think he's the type to turn it into another "wing commander." check out "heavenly creatures."

  52. Re:(MOT) Converting QT to MPEG by EricWright · · Score: 1

    Doesn't qt pro cost money? I'm not going to spend money to convert it. Now, if I already had qt pro...

    Eric

  53. JRRT Politically Incorrect? by Frog · · Score: 1

    As I remember the Orcs tend to resemble traditional Aryan enemies a lot, in their looks (swarthy), weapons (scimitars), language (which resemble Turkish or Arabic).

    It's the kind of thing I didn't realize the first dozen times I read the book as a kid, and wouldn't have cared about much. Actually, I don't think I care about it much now -- art draws on deep parts of our collective unconscious.

    1. Re:JRRT Politically Incorrect? by randombit · · Score: 1

      the land to the south of narnia (cant remember the name) was said to be barbaric and evil, in book 5 (?) "the horse and his boy" we see that this southern land has very Turkish or Arabic customs/clothing.

      IIRC it was Calorem or Calanorem or something like that (I should reread those sometime). You also see quite a bit of their culture/language/etc in the last book, which I can't recall the name of at the moment. The one where they invade Narnia...

      I wish PBS would show those old Narnia movies again. I remember seeing The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, The Voyage of the Dawn Treader and The Silver Chair (presumably they also did Prince Caspian but I never saw it). I really liked them, they were very well done.

    2. Re:JRRT Politically Incorrect? by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 1

      I don't think Tolkien was in anyway exceptionally racist. At the time Tolkien wrote, however, racism was just taken for granted. So he just incorporated that in his book, without even thinking it was a big deal.

      --
      Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
    3. Re:JRRT Politically Incorrect? by AxB_teeth · · Score: 1

      CS Lewis - tolkien's contemporary had alot of this in his chronicles of narnia. the land to the south of narnia (cant remember the name) was said to be barbaric and evil, in book 5 (?) "the horse and his boy" we see that this southern land has very Turkish or Arabic customs/clothing. I just think that perhaps lewis and tolkien had some subconscious euro-centric "my culture's better than yours" disease that so many are afflicted with.

      --

      However,
  54. Re:Synopsis by crush · · Score: 1

    Well, IAAN, and I think it's just peachy keen

    No, you misunderstood me. I was using N for neo-nazi not Numbskull!!! Ha what a laughable misunderstanding! Naturally as you are numbskull you didn't understand the clearly stated parts of my post that said that I liked Tolkein. Similarly you failed to understand that my worries about the movie are due to the fact that I don't necessarily want my own images to be replaced with other peoples images.My, you sure are an idiot. :-)

  55. Re:Three Years! by aculeus · · Score: 1
    They are going to be doing some cutting from the story to make it fit into three feature-length films. Most of the cutting is being done in the first book, when they were mostly just wandering around anyway. The movies will not stop and pick up again at the same points that the books do. Expect all the important parts to be there, however.

  56. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by JosefK · · Score: 1

    "Frodo Solo" was not the original strategy. That was a result of what happened along the way - losing Gandalf in Moria, Boromir's attempt to take the Ring by force. It was Frodo himself who decided to try and do it on his own, though Sam foiled that part of the plan at least. Aragorn would have wanted to go with him as well, but he turned out to be needed in Gondor much more to rally the troops.

    Besides, Frodo Solo actually failed in the end, and it was only his mad insistence on showing Gollum mercy that saved him (and the West) from Sauron's complete victory.

  57. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by Nept · · Score: 1
    well naturally he didn't want the ring - anyone with enough humility and wisdom would see that the task was too great for them and would not want it. But I was thinking specifically of the line where Frodo says

    I, Frodo, son of Drogo, will take the ring, although I do not know the way (pp)

    Frodo was unwilling, and everyone else (of wisdom) were willing he should, but he still volunteered for it.

    My point is that the council would not have thrust the ring upon anyone, as you have suggested.



    ---
    Jedi-Bene Gesserit

    --
    "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
  58. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by Nept · · Score: 1
    I disagree. It wasn't a matter of the high lacking the courage, but realizing their weakness.

    The Ring also affected different people in different ways. If Frodo had completely sucummbed to the ring, he would have become a wraith. If Gandalf had taken the ring, he would have become like Sauron (remember, both were Maia) and controlled the wraiths.

    I don't disagree that Frodo selflessly sacrificed himself - I think the last pages of the Return of the King are the saddest, when Frodo is unable to heal and is always in misery. I'm not intending to be dogmatic, but to say that Frodo was a guinea pig would suggest that the ring was thrust upon him. he voluntarily took it, and would not have been asked if he hadn't volunteered.



    ---
    Jedi-Bene Gesserit

    --
    "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
  59. Re:Can't save the trailer? Here's how to do it. by dvicci · · Score: 1

    Have you people forgotten Lynx?! Highlight the link to the movie, and hit "d" for download. Heh... there are even Win32 versions of Lynx available, so that's no excuse. ;)

    --
    ] D
  60. Re:Synopsis by Rolozo · · Score: 1

    They should pick up a copy of "Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien". Tolkien was actually asked by the Nazis themselves whether he was of Aryan origin. He sent back a letter letting them know he didn't believe in any of their mumbo-jumbo.

    --
    Ryan
  61. Re:I don't think I can do it... by Muffhead · · Score: 1

    Quicktime Pro won't let you export it. Quicktime won't let you save/export. Other programs have severe problems opening it. They can't or crash. I can get a copy onto MiniDV, the problem is I don't have a firewire card to get it back onto the PC.

  62. Everybody sing along now... by kmcardle · · Score: 1

    "Frodo of the nine fingers,
    Frodo of the nine fingers..."

    Gawd, that was awful.

    Rankin-Bass did a pretty good job with the Hobbit, but Lord of the Rings just sucked. It's just pretty hard to cut 1K+ pages down to a 90 minute cartoon. I sure hope this movie is good.

    --

    --
    then it comes to be that the soothing light at the end of your tunnel is just a freight train coming your way
    1. Re:Everybody sing along now... by Creosote · · Score: 1

      >"Frodo of the nine fingers,
      > Frodo of the nine fingers..."

      >Gawd, that was awful.

      Don't tell me... it was sung to the tune of "Lothar of the Hill People" from the Saturday Night Live sketch?

    2. Re:Everybody sing along now... by knobboy · · Score: 1

      Rankin Bass didn't do the Lord of the Rings, they only had rights to Return of the King (which they did do as a cartoon). I forget now who did the Lord of the Rings movie, which only covered up to the battle at Helm's Deep if memory serves.

    3. Re:Everybody sing along now... by luckykaa · · Score: 1

      It's just pretty hard to cut 1K+ pages down to a 90 minute cartoon. I think I remember that cartoon. Nice use of rotoscoping. It seemed to lose the plot about half way through and felt very rushed towards the "end". I wonder why they didn't plan for a 6 part series of films instead. Fortunately this is going to be a trilogy and the parts are longer so it should at least avoid that problem.

  63. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

    Frodo had a lot of help from Gandalf (often working behind the scenes) as well as the other members of the Fellowship. He also had a magic sword once he reached Rivendell: Bilbo gave him Sting, as well as his suit of elven mail.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  64. Re:QuickTime's cool by Hast · · Score: 1

    Sure it can probably be cool, if anyone ever uses it for something useful...

    Using 66% of the screen for a "see again" button when you can press the play button again instead is not what I'd call "cool".

    But it seems to me like the web-site was created by someone who had memorized "Creating Killer Websites" so I wasn't very surprised.

  65. Feeding time for the trolls by Rupert · · Score: 1

    There is only one LotR movie, and it's crap.

    This one looks like it will be a lot better. As someone else pointed out, condensing 900+ pages into 90 minutes is pretty much impossible. 270 minutes is maybe doable.

    --

    --
    E_NOSIG
  66. They're not the first... by hicktruckdriver · · Score: 1

    There was a little band around for a while called Led Zeppelin.

    --
    darius
    1. Re:They're not the first... by roamer · · Score: 1

      First off, I never said that they were the first, I merely said what they are. Secondly, Led Zeppelin doens't write most of there music based on Tolkien's stories and themes, as Blind Guardian does. As I recall, they use a little bit of Tolkienesque imagery in a couple of songs. Blind Guardian's music is much more in light of the ancient idea of "the bard". For more information about this, check "The Bard's song: In the Forest" (also check it s acoompanying song "The Bard's Song: The Hobbit") off of their "Somewhere Far Beyond" album.

      --
      I don't respect your opinions, but I respect your right to hold them
  67. mirror, just in case its ever needed. by Restil · · Score: 1

    Get the movie at:
    ftp://ftp.alignment.net/pub/lotr_640l.mov

    People have actually SEEN the preview, so there's a good chance a mirror isn't really necessary. But slashdot effects happen, the world is an imperfect place.

    Besides, I might be faster. Who knows. :)

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
  68. QuickTime's cool by adavidw · · Score: 1

    As an aside, am I the only one that thinks that the abillity to embed those interactive elements in the movie file is pretty boss?

    1. Re:QuickTime's cool by LordBishop · · Score: 1

      If I could download the freaking quicktime video I could watch it with xanim... but I can't find the link or filename.

      --

      --------------------------------------------------

    2. Re:QuickTime's cool by JayBonci · · Score: 1

      Its an okay feature, but i think that there are better places to advance the quicktime technology. Currently it is kinda developing towards a non-lingo type of Macromedia, in a way. Where there are interactive elements, along with the notion of a "beginning" and an end. Is quicktime and apple going to try to take up the interactive TV niche? Its an obvious step from where it is going now. The QT streaming servers are opened up now for more people to take advantage of the media control elements, but as far as a player itself... Quicktime is too vital to macOS strategy to reveal to "free loaders". It probably wont happen.

      Apple has really started to turn things around with their recent quicktime improvements. They even have a really sweet wavetable emulator included with it. Before, old versions were neat, but a compatability nightmare. With the maturity of some experience in the multiplatform world behind them, they seem to be seeing a bigger vision for QT, and the QT streaming technologies, and are probably looking to unseat Microsoft and Real as the big two currently, with the biggies of a few years ago, the bluky MPEG engines and the obscure Vivo players, coming up short recently.

      Luckily for Jobs, he has wooed hollywood in to his world of chic computing. In this war of the streaming servers, it seems that the winner will come out on top, not because of superior technology, but because of widely accepted content. Quicktime is the only good cross platform solution, and stands strongly on that ground for now. The technologies are too similal to really judge one against the other on any valuable outstanding metric, so we shall see whose marketing department prevails.

      Good luck. The web has come a long way. And Lord of the Rings should be one HELL of a movie

      --jay

    3. Re:QuickTime's cool by EvilGwyn · · Score: 1

      It would be *cooler* if those of us running not-mainstream operating systems could see what you were talking about :) Come on apple, open source quicktime, you know you want to :)

      --
      Phear my l33t homepage.
  69. The hobbits were unknown to Sauron by Dhrakar · · Score: 1

    One other detail that should be mentioned is that Sauron was familiar with the Elves, Dwarves, Men, etc. But did not have any real knowledge of Hobbits. Hobbits came on to the scene _after_ the Rings had been created and given and were, thus, largly unaffected by their power. The best example is, of course, Gollum. He, unlike the men, possessed the Ring for many years, yet never fully turned to a wraith. Yes, he was corrupted, but he was still less affected than the humans were.
    I often think that the Hobbits were created specifically by one of the Valar (or, possibly, by Illuvetor Himself) in order to counter the Ring's power (similarly to the way in which the dwarves were created). Their origins were always shrouded in a mystery that even Gandalf could not penetrate.

  70. Re:New actors? by jackmama · · Score: 1

    They're definitely not unknown. Liv Tyler, Elijah Wood, Sir Ian McLellan, and John Rhys-Davies are all listed in the credits.

    It's cool that they're actually doing the trilogy, instead of trying to cram them all into one long movie.

  71. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by David+Roundy · · Score: 1
    They could have given him one bodyguard, or a magic sword of his own, or at the very least a freakin' map, but they actually hung him out to dry.

    They did give him a guide, who had a magic sword (ok, ok, it was broken...), along with the most powerful good wizard in existence, along with a few others. The guide they gave him was perhaps the only good person to ever have snuck into Mordor before. It just turned out that the companions were forced to separate due to the divisive influences of the ring.

  72. Re:2 possible opinions by Eric+Berg · · Score: 1

    Actually my 'cynical response' more goes like - "they better make the first episode a blockbuster or they'll never get the funding to finish the other 2"

    They are filming all three concurrently, so this
    really isn't a concern. Last reports I heard, they were already filming Helm's Deep scenes, which take place halfway through the second novel.

    Eric Berg

  73. Wow! by Kaypro · · Score: 1

    I must say I had some serious doubts about this movie, particularly how the characters would be portrayed but I must say: Holy s*?t!
    So far this looks like an unbelievable production.
    As of now I say forget Ender's Game, Lara, Star Wars 2 and 3 and Matrix Sequels. I live for LOTR!!!

  74. Re:LOTR: Gave me goosebumps watching the trailer by jeffsplace · · Score: 1

    As did I. Some twenty minutes later (don't know what took me so long) I was in my car racing off to Barnes&Noble to pick up the boxed set (The Hobbit plus LOTR).

    Just finished The Hobbit and am preparing to tackle the Fellowship of the Ring.

    As I was reading The Hobbit, I was noticing so much more detail than I remember from my prior reading (some ten years earlier)... how Bilbo's dwarven companions were in the barrels for two days and escaped being detected three times (initally in the Elvenking's stronghold, again on the river by the elves charged with moving the barrels down the river and when they landed). The detail of Bilbo's interaction with Smaug gave me chills!

    Truly this was an excellent work. I look forward to rereading LOTR and even more so to it's theatrical debut!

  75. Re:OK, there are WAY too many people... by jeffsplace · · Score: 1

    who know WAY too much detail about the answer to this question. Is there a Tolkien University out there somewhere I haven't heard of? Or an ICS program?

    I've enjoyed reading these posts... but GEEZ!

    :-)

  76. So, who created the ring? by jeffsplace · · Score: 1

    How'd it get it's power?

    Just asking. I'm ordering the paperbacks right now so maybe I'll find out. But I don't remember the answer to that from the time I spent reading these in high school (10+ years ago).

    1. Re:So, who created the ring? by hypatia · · Score: 2

      How'd it get it's power?

      Sauron actually made it and let a 'large part' of his power pass into it. He learnt the skill from Celebrimbor, a High-Elvish descendant of Feanor (see The Silmarillion) who made the Three Rings. They appear to have collaborated on the Seven and the Nine.

      You'd think a descendant of Feanor (and Celebrimbor is only four or five generations down) would have been wary of Morgoth's lieutenant.

  77. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by Monte · · Score: 1

    ...why did the supposedly wise Elves entrust this mission to a young hobbit with no military experience, supported by any friends he happened to pick up along the way?

    My take is that a powerful force (ie, buncha bad-ass elves, assorted Rangers and a mottley wizard or three) would have been easy to track, observe, harass along the journey and then finally drop the million-ton s-hammer on, once they got in range.

    So the decision was to send a "stealth" force. Remember that ol' Lidless Eyeball hisself hardly knew what a hobbit was... all he had to go on is what he wrung out of poor Smeagol.

    What would have made more sense would have been to assemble said Mighty Elf Army, send it marching the long-way round, and act as a distraction for the A-team.

  78. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by Fourthstring · · Score: 1

    a. Frodo's lack of military experience gave him no preconceptions on the 'proper route.' His thinking was less blunt, less predictable.

    b. Everyone else was swept up in Gandalf's plan to throw everything at Sauron to gain Frodo some advantage in disposing of the ring.

    c. Sauron generally did not respect anything but brute, obvious power. One main theme in the book is everyone's blindness (except for the wise, eccentric ones) to the enormous potential of power in the soul of a little being. Gandalf would often say that he was endlessly surprised at the deep hardiness of the hobbits, underneath all their painful stupidity. Even then, he was required to divert Sauron's attention, since Sauron was a quick study.

    d. Sauron may still have been weakened from the ordeal of coming to power, but he could concentrate a great deal of force whenever he wanted, especially in his own territory. In addition, he mastered the dark illusory arts where he could mess with the morale of an otherwise exemplary army. Gandalf saw that he needed to split Sauron's forces, hit him with two threats that were each very deadly.

    e. The elves were in the pocket of Gandalf (though he would call it 'respect') and he was a student of overconfidence. (There were a number of encounters with adversaries where this possible aspect of his personality was brought out.) He felt that Sauron was the type to take a grim sort of glee in exercising his renewed power and rest on his laurels just enough to make a feint work.

  79. LOTR: Gave me goosebumps watching the trailer by cyberguyd · · Score: 1

    Can't wait, it gave me the goosebumps watching it. I have read and reread the triology many times and have been waiting for this day. As they said the technology has finally come of age to do justice to the visions of Tolkein. That animated adventure made many years back was no good although the The Hobbit animated movie was good. The best part, they aren't trying to squeeze in the whole story in one 2 hour movie but in a true triology. May we not be disappointed as which happens many times (ie Dune!)

  80. Convert to downloadable format by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

    So can someone do this?
    The actual .mov can't be downloaded except via the imbedded player, and I don't want to do that.
    Anyone with video capture and editing equipment?

  81. Here is a mirror of the quicktime file by Elyas · · Score: 1

    https://www.idrive.com/briogh/files/Shared/
    happy file grabbing

    1. Re:Here is a mirror of the quicktime file by Wag · · Score: 1

      Yeah, nice. You have to download a program first just so you can download the movie.

      No thanks.

    2. Re:Here is a mirror of the quicktime file by qirien · · Score: 1

      Or https://www.idrive.com/qirien/files/Shared/ if the other one is too slashdotted. :-)
      -- Qirien, Academy of Defenestration

      --
      -- Qirien, Academy of Defenestration
      "Who do you want to defenestrate today?"
  82. Removing the Can't save restriction by gbooker · · Score: 1

    Ok, here is the solution!

    Using this, you can export the movie and all the other fun stuff!!!! OK, first, download the movie using techniques described elsewhere in these comments. Next, download the program "Dumpster" from this page (Near the bottom). Now, open up the movie with dumpter, colapse the track info, expand the 'udta', and under it, the 'nsav'. Set all the values to 0 and save it. Open it up in Movie player or whatever and have fun. This worked for me. I can extract tracks, export, and all the other fun stuff.

    --
    You see? It's like I've always said. You can get more with a kind word and a 2x4 than you can with just a kind word.
    1. Re:Removing the Can't save restriction by Pathwalker · · Score: 2

      Hey - it worked.

      I'll put the MPEG files up at http://house.ofdoom.com/~hungerf3 /video/lotr.rxml
      They'll go up as they finish encoding, and stay up until someone asks me to take them down.

    2. Re:Removing the Can't save restriction by Pathwalker · · Score: 2

      Sorry - I can't get a good encode - I think I need to reinstall premiere. Every file I've encoded has had something wrong with it...

  83. Partial Solution by gbooker · · Score: 1

    Here is a partial solution. I placed the movie file into Final Cut Pro. I then turned off the audio tracks and exported the video (after I cropped it to 640x272). It exported, only I ended up with a data rate of about 811kbytes/s. Way too high. It is very likely that I just don't know what I am doing (I don't work with video that often, but have access to FCP) or that I don't have the good Sorenson Codec. If anyone out there has Final Cut Pro and the Developer Sorenson codec, give this a whirl. We can at least get the video. Now if anyone can figure a way to get the audio, we can reconstruct this to create the full movie file without the no-save restriction. Then we can make an MPEG or whatever out of that.

    --
    You see? It's like I've always said. You can get more with a kind word and a 2x4 than you can with just a kind word.
  84. Legolas was an elf-lord by Gyver · · Score: 1

    Legolas' father was king of the Wood Elves of Mirkwood Forest. This makes him a Prince and therefor an elf-lord.

    1. Re:Legolas was an elf-lord by hypatia · · Score: 1

      But Legolas' father was Silvan elf, and a ruler of Silvan elves. The ancestors of these elves (or perhaps they themselves - Elves did not age - although Legolas indicates somewhere he is only five huindred I think) had started the journey to the West that the Valar invited them to undertake.

      The Silvan elves became enamoured of their surroundings towards the end of the journey and refused the final crossing of the sea.

      Thus they never saw the Two Trees in the West in their full glory and were never the pupils of the Valar - the gods.

      Thus, although powerful and enlightened by human standards, they were not High Elves like Elrond (on the Elf side), whose Elvish ancestors had come back from the West to retake the Silmarils.

  85. Re:(Nitpicking.) by Gyver · · Score: 1

    At the Battle of Minis Tirith it was trolls who opperated Grawn, the huge battering ram to smash the gates to the city.

  86. oops... by Gyver · · Score: 1

    It's Minas Tirith, and the name of the ram was Grond. Should've looked at the book before I posted. There were also trolls in Moria.

  87. Re:Discussion on the suckery of the Bakshi LOTR mo by SydBarrett · · Score: 1

    I watched this film a long time ago, and was mostly bored. The thing is, Bakshi was the wrong guy for this film. Have you ever seen Fritz the Cat or Coonskin? In his early days, Bakshi was the kind of guy that just likes to do crazy visuals without worrying too much about a plot. This isn't so much the case in later films, like American Pop and Hey Good Looking, but you can still see this in spots (like the goofy ending of Amer. Pop), where he seems to say, "alright, let's forget what's happening and do some cool visuals, or maybe something just wierd (like the talking trashcan in the begining of Hey Good Looking)". This is just the opposiite of what a LOTR film needs, because Tolken fans are pretty nit-picky about details, and Bakshi just wanted to skim over the work and do what he wanted to do.

  88. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by marhar · · Score: 1

    This is discussed in chapter 2 of book 2 (the second half of "The Fellowship of the Ring").

    From the purely military point of view, the combined forces may have equalled those of Sauron, but were not overwhelming enough to overcome the formidable defensive structure of Mordor.

    Elrond sums up the desperation of their plight: "The road must be trod, but it will be very hard. And neither strength nor wisdom will carry us far upon it. This quest may be attempted by the weak with as much hope as the strong. Yet such is of the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world: small hands do them because the must, while the eyes of the great are elsewhere."

    There is also the question of destiny. Again, quoting Elrond: "If I understand aright all that I have heard, I think that this task is asppointed for you, Frodo; and that if you do not find a way, no one will. This is the hour of the Shire-folk, when they arise from their quiet fields to shake the towers and counsels of the great. Who of all the Wise could have forseen it? Or, if they are wise, why should they expect to know it, until the hour has struck?"

    HTH, Mark.

    PS, my favorite quotation in the chapter, from Frodo: "I will take the Ring, though I do not know the way."

  89. looking forward to the film by treebeard77 · · Score: 1

    I just hope it has a decent treebeard

    *grin*

  90. Re:Can't save the trailer? Here's how to do it. by Cramer · · Score: 1

    Dude, it's a lot easier to do than all that... ever heard of a "hard link". NTFS supports hard links -- even to files that are open (what bloody idiot designed "sharing".)

    Additionally, the player will place it's cached file in %TEMP%... just change %TEMP% to somewhere else -- presumably where there aren't such f***ing stupid sharing restrictions or another machine where the "file sharing" can be disconnected.

    Time invested: 15seconds.

  91. Re:2 possible opinions by taniwha · · Score: 1
    1 - the cynical response - Yeah, well of course they will. Why sell us 1 cinema ticket/video/DVD when they can sell us 3

    Actually my 'cynical response' more goes like - "they better make the first episode a blockbuster or they'll never get the funding to finish the other 2"

    2 - the enthusiastic response - Great! This should give about 7 hours of story! Plenty of time to fully explore the whole story!

    yup - that's the real intention -this thing has basicly taken over the entire New Zealand film industry for a couple of years - friends tell me bizarre sets are popping up in disused quarrys and other strange places. This is probably a good thing - there must be a lot of extras with time on their hands now that Hercules and Xena have stopped filming

  92. Re:TROLLS! by HBergeron · · Score: 1

    Cartoonish? Maybe that's because they WERE Cartoons.

    However I agree with you, it did suck.

    --
    THE YEAR WAS 2081, and everybody was finally equal...
  93. Re:Synopsis by shomon2 · · Score: 1

    While Tolkien steadfastly denied any metaphor for WWII politics, many scholars tied the Shire to England, the Elves to France, Mordor to Germany, Saruman's Orthanc to Japan, and the Rohirrim/Gondor pair as USA's two-fronted war.

    May be a bit off topic, but I've heard that LOTR is a favorite read among neonazis. Probably a result of the very clear differences between wrong and right, good and bad etc...

    It might also have to do with the obvious skin colour of elves and orcs, but I've never asked a neonazi...

  94. I posted this story to /. at about 1am WTF? by Phrogman · · Score: 1

    This is twice now that I have posted a story suggestion to slashdot *hours* before the story that appears on the front page. Man, I get sick of this. Makes me feel its not worth suggesting stories....

    --
    "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
  95. Previous Films by Potatoswatter · · Score: 1

    This isn't the first movie version of the Lord of the Rings. There was an animated film made a long time ago (not The Hobbit).
    And tho they didn't cut much out of the story for that film, it was terribly unclear from a lack of background. Everyone who reads LotR was introduced to the Tolkien universe in The Hobbit, but a movie isn't gonna include both stories.
    On the other hand, this is a movie _trilogy_, so it will do more justice... unless it comes out like Star Wars. There's more to Tolkien than scary monsters.

    Anyway, we won't know till the Christmas after next. (Just great to watch a pagan movie on the 2000th aniversary of Christ's birth!)

    Where is my mind?
    mfspr r3, pc / lvxl v0, 0, r3 / li r0, 16 / stvxl v0, r3, r0

    --

    Check out Project Upper/Mute, an all-around awesome compiler fra
  96. Re:Synopsis by MattXVI · · Score: 1
    What does "the very clear differences between wrong and right, good and bad etc..." have to do with neo-nazis? The battle between good and evil is central to stories all through literature, all over the world, all through history. It's because that struggle is central to human nature.

    The message in LOTR is universal (which is demonstrated by it's extraordinary popularity). This really has nothing at all to do with neo-nazis, except peripherally, like evil characters in the books, that they represent the worst in human nature.

    --
    When I'm singing a ballad and a pair of underwear lands on my head, I hate that. It really kills the mood.
    -Tom Jones
  97. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by Vicegrip · · Score: 1

    I believe you are correct. When Frodo offered the ring to Galadriel, the elven ring (one of the three) she wore started to shine and she appeared to grow in stature. Then when she finally refused the offer, as you said, in an exercise of immense willpower, she returned to herself.

    I always found that part of the story very compelling. Its when the reader finally gets an inclining of just how powerful the artifact would be in the hands of one such as the Elf Queen or Gandalf.

    I also especially appreciate the part when she laughs and confesses that Frodo, through his honesty, had bested her. She had passed her test.

    Its been a while. I always enjoy reading that book. Perhaps I'll pick it up again... for the fourth? time.

    Perhaps it should be noted that one element of the reason for giving the ring to Frodo was merely the fact that Sauron did not expect it. Sauron was convinced one of the Elves or Wizards would try to wield it against him. He never imagined that they would instead simply destroy it.

    --
    Do not spread "09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0" over the internet, thank you.
  98. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by Vicegrip · · Score: 1

    ..dogmatic, but to say that Frodo was a guinea pig would suggest that the ring was thrust upon him. he voluntarily took it, and ...

    I couldn't disagree more. The ring was indeed thrust upon him. In fact, if you re-read the earlier chapter where Gandalf explains the nature of the ring, Frodo was quite verbal in his expression that he wished somebody else had received the charge. That said, when given the burden, Frodo was strong enough to carry it to the very end. The wheight of the ring can also be seen by how relieved he was when Galadriel asked him for the ring. He was ecstatic about giving it to her.

    Frodo most certainly did not volunteer to be the ring bearer but was up to the task when he became it.

    --
    Do not spread "09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0" over the internet, thank you.
  99. What about the Silmarillion? by StorminNorman · · Score: 1

    okay, making a movie of the Lord of the Rings is fine, but let's face it, wouldn't the Silmarillion kick butt as a film?
    It's certainly my personal favorite Tolkien story, I think it has a much stronger storyline than LotR and the characters are much better drawn
    Perhaps the biggest drawback in it is that it can be a little difficult to understand at first, especially with things like Ainulindale attached. (Ainulindale is Tolkien's creation myth, it's very good).
    Then again, considering the story runs for around 4000 years, maybe it would be a little long. But it does have it all: revenge, betrayal, magic, a beautiful love story, and a brilliant, literally earth-shattering ending. What more could you ask for?

    --
    life is a canvas/and the paint is hope and promise/the world is ours/no one can ever take it from us.
    1. Re:What about the Silmarillion? by StorminNorman · · Score: 1

      agreed, but the story of Feanor's five sons, andtheir oath of vengeance, which is the crux of the Silmarillion, shouldn't be too hard...

      --
      life is a canvas/and the paint is hope and promise/the world is ours/no one can ever take it from us.
    2. Re:What about the Silmarillion? by pdion · · Score: 1

      I believe adapting the whole of Silmarillion would be too much. I agree that it probably is more complete than LOTR but if someone does it in a movie then the result would be rather confusing.

      On the other hand, there are chapters of the Silmarillion saga that could very wall be the basis of movies on their own merit. For example the love-heroism-love story of Beren and Luthien.

  100. Re:I can't stop watching it [spoilers] by Che+Guevarra · · Score: 1

    I never realized the peril LOTR fans were in. What would Lucas have done to us? Gollum with a jamaican accent, tripping and falling down all the time. Frodo yelling yippee as the ring is destroyed. Sauron and Gandalf oweing their powers to parasites in the blood. The fact that George couldn't get his politically correct, ages 12 and under hands on Tolkein is something for which we can all be greatful.

  101. Re:I can't stop watching it [spoilers] by Che+Guevarra · · Score: 1

    and if you don't believe Lucas is politically correct, I refer you to the scene in the re-released first star wars movie where Han Solo is confronted by Greedo the bounty hunter. I seem to recall that the original version had Solo blasting Greedo from under the table with out warning or mercy. In the enhanced re-release, Greedo shoots first so Solo can fire in self defense. No reason for it, other than to be pc.

  102. Re:if they do the same thing as they did with . . by Che+Guevarra · · Score: 1

    I'm sure that it will be better than Star Wars.
    If you're refering to Phantom Menace, I don't see how it could be any worse.

    Jolt! Take that George, Jar Jar sucks, George.

  103. Re:How about dropping it into the middle of the oc by hypatia · · Score: 1

    Yeah, the problem would have surfaced again in a few millenia when the ring figured out how to get itself caught in someone's net or something.

    Well it could have worked... but the elves and Gandalf as immortals, would have a longer view. Some skimming of some of the dates once suggested to me that Galadriel is over 10 000 years old at the time of LoTR even though dates don't work properly before the Rising of the Sun.

    Besides, Sauron would probably win if the Ring was lost - note how hopeless the last defence is. Whereas the destruction of the Ring is the destruction of all his power.

  104. Re:You can still do it by sarchasm · · Score: 1
    I do wish they'd quit trying to obfuscate things this way; it's so silly. ... I understand that the "content providers" want to keep some control on where their content goes, but half the point of putting it on the web in a digital format is that people can save it, to view at their pleasure, or to show off to friends. ...wouldn't you think that they'd want it to be seen by as many people as possible?

    They probably don't care about random distribution, but they would like to keep the content "read-only" as much as possible. But you're right, it is futile nowadays...

    --

    ----------------

    Overheard: "Aww, why'd you go and install Windows on a perfectly good machine?"

  105. Copies of artwork and the Tolkien archives. by mr · · Score: 1

    The offical archives of Tolkien are at Marquette University in Milwaukee. So, if you plan on being at GenCon, take a walk up Water Street and see if MU will let you look upon his original works :-)

    Artwork -just found this link today...wasn't actually looking for it. http://www.spowers.net/Tolkien/Tol kienWorld.html

    --
    If it was said on slashdot, it MUST be true!
  106. it's being mirrored here by zog78 · · Score: 1

    Also there are a few mirrors around (and yeah, some of them have already been pointed out). Links to places where all four versions of the trailer are being mirrored can be found here.

  107. Childrens version? by deadl0ck · · Score: 1

    Anyone know if there is a childrens book version of The Hobbit and/or LotR? My Daughter (11) saw a play of The Hobbit and was interested in reading the book, but its a bit too much for her.
    --

    --
    --
  108. Troll Song by illustir · · Score: 1
    In the Hobbit, three trolls were kept up past their bedtime, and they turned to stone.
    The fellowship encountered those three petrified trolls on their way to Rivendell.

    Here's the song from that passage:
    Troll sat alone on his seat of stone,
    And munched and mumbled a bare old bone;
    For many a year he had gnawed it near,
    For meat was hard to come by.
    Done by! Gum by!
    In a cave in the hills dwelt alone,
    And meat was hard to come by.

    Up came Tom with his big boots on.
    Said he to Troll:'Pray what is yon?
    For it looks like the shin o' my nuncle Tim,
    As should be a-lyin' in graveyard.
    Caveyard! Paveyard!
    This many a year has Tim been gone,
    And I thought he were lyin' in graveyard.'

    'My lad,' said Troll,' this bone I stole.
    But what be bones that lie in a hole?
    Thy nuncle was dead as a lump o' lead,
    Afore I found his shinbone.
    Tinbone! Thinbone!
    He can spare a share for a poor old troll,
    For he don't need his shinbone.'
    Said Tom:'I don't see why the likes o' thee
    Without axin' leave should go makin' free
    With the shank or the shin o' my father's kin;
    So hand the old bone over!
    Rover! Trover!
    Though dead he be, it belongs to he;
    So hand the old bone over!'

    'For a couple o' pins,' says Troll and grins,
    'I'll eat thee too, and gnaw thy shins.
    A bit o' fresh meat will go down sweet!
    I'll try my teeth on thee now.
    Hee Now! See Now!
    I'm tired o' gnawing old bones and skins;
    I've a mind to dine on thee now.'

    But just as he thought his dinner was caught,
    He found his hands had hold of naught.
    Before he could mind, Tom slipped behind
    And gave him the boot to larn him.
    Warn him! Darn him!
    A bump o' the boot on the seat, Tom thought
    Would be the way to larn him.

    But harder than stone is the flesh and bone
    Of a troll that sits in the hill alone.
    As well set your boot to the mountain's root,
    For the seat of a troll don't feel it.
    Peel it! Heal it!
    Old Troll laughed, when he heard Tom groan.
    And he knew his toes could feel it.

    Tom's leg is game, since home he came,
    And his bootless foot is lasting lame;
    But Troll don't care, and he's still there
    With the bone he boned from it's owner.
    Doner! Boner!
    Troll's old seat is still the same.
    And the bone he boned from its owner.

    --
    -- Alper
  109. Which fantasy novel comes next? by TopShelf · · Score: 1
    Ever since that awful Dragonheart (or whatever it was called) movie with the CG dragon and Sean Connery's voice, I've been anticipating a movie combining incredible effects with a GREAT story - LoTR. The folks involved seem to sense how much people are looking forward to this, and it seems like it will be a major success. One site worth visiting is www.mckellen.com - it's the site for Sir Ian McKellen, who portrays Gandalf.

    But what's next?

    Personally, I'd like to see an adventurous, stylish filmmaker take on the Elric of Melnibone story - lots of potential there for an incredible film. But who to cast as Elric?

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  110. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by Daldin · · Score: 1

    The Ring sought out the most Powerful and fed upon the wearer's greed and ambition, always trying to get back to it's Master Sauron. The Elves were *incredibly* ambitious and a full of themselves *because* of all their might and power. The Ring always used that against them. In the book Gandalf said that even if the King were to hide the Ring in his deepest basement it would still work at his mind, trying to get him to use it. The Elves and the Mighty of M.E. knew that if they even *thought* about possessing the ring they would become like Sauron himself. Boromir is a case in point. The Hobbits were by nature not greedy or ambitious and therefore had a natural immunity to the Ring's influence. I hope this helps.

  111. Re:if they do the same thing as they did with . . by Petethelate · · Score: 1

    Actually, the Ralph Bakshi film was all of the fellowship and about half of the two towers. IIRC, they ended the movie at the end of the battle of Helm's Deep.

    Pity the second part never got finished, but I think it was for the usual reason--the first one didn't do all that well, and despite the process (half animation, half filmed stuff), wasn't all that cheap.

    I have a soft spot for the movie; it was one of my more fun first dates. (*Not* a good date movie unless the date is a Tolkien fan, but I got lucky anyway....)

  112. Yes! by Rantage · · Score: 1
    I'm glad somebody else mentioned this. Makes you wonder what the hell changed in Lucas' mind in reference to Solo.

    I shudder to think what Lucas would have done to the Tolkien trilogy. While I doubt a Jar-Jar type of character would have been created, I envison a hell of a lot more cutsiness than Jackson (or any LOTR purist) would allow. And action figures. And McDonald's promotions.

    Of course, a Disney treatment would be even worse. Can you imagine the songs?
    Online gaming for motivated, sportsmanlike players: www.steelmaelstrom.org.

    --
    Online gaming for motivated, sportsmanlike players: www.steelmaelstrom.org.
    1. Re:Yes! by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      Of course, a Disney treatment would be even worse. Can you imagine the songs?

      Yes I can. I saw the Rankin/Bass Return of the King. Disney would be much worse though.

      I liked the Rankin/Bass music. };>

  113. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by esperandus · · Score: 1

    or taken out by the wringwraiths on their damn bat-things, Saurons magic, and the valar know what else....

    --
    The truth is out there - we'll let it back in after it sobers up a bit. -The Cube
  114. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by Life+Blood · · Score: 1

    I believe the reasoning that was established in the council meeting was that Sauron had too many resources. Good was to badly outnumbered by evil. Their only option was try to sneak the ring into Mordor and destroy it because a frontal assault would have been crushed. The Fellowship was an eminently capable group although I don't understand why they didn't send an elf-lord instead of Legolas.

    So the new question is why wasn't the ring given to a group of well-trained elven commandos to sneak it into Mordor instead of a group of hobbits.

    --

    So far I've gotten all my Karma from telling people they are wrong... :)

  115. ERROR by PDG · · Score: 1

    'Couldn't open the file because it is not a file that QuickTime understands' Whassup with that? PDG

    --
    "Where is my mind?"
    1. Re:ERROR by PDG · · Score: 1

      found a link that works over at themovie.net or something like that. Someone posted it in one of the below(or above) sub threads.

      PDG

      --
      "Where is my mind?"
    2. Re:ERROR by GrimDog420 · · Score: 1

      I'm getting the same crap...apple sucks, qt sucks, I'm dyin' over here to see this!

  116. Slashdotted by renai42 · · Score: 1

    surprise surprise....www.theonering.net where the review of the trailer was posted has been /.ed.

    Bummer. Does anyone know how quicktime movies are cached on your HD?

    --
    Digital Philosopher. Looking for work.
  117. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by Rakarra · · Score: 1
    Wow. That's a pretty good point. My guess would be:

    As has been said before, they needed stealth above all. Eagles flying in would be a pretty visible force, and I seem to remember those things the Nazguls were riding were supposed to be faster than eagles. They would be intercepted before they could reach their destination, especially since Mt. Doom was rather close to Barad-Dur.

    And don't forget that Orodruin was polluting the skies so much, obscuring everything up there. (Almost like flying through an eruption. See the beginning of the RotK).

  118. Link to .mov for LOTR preview by bozone · · Score: 1

    This link may have already been posted. I haven't been following the thread...
    If not enjoy...the movie looks fantastic..will be tough to wait

    http://a912.g.akamai.net/5/912/51/7f33d9e39a6b87/1 a1a1aaa2198c627970773
    d80669d84574a 8d80d3cb12453c02589f25382f668c9329e0375e81785ea61c
    d36a40938a41385e948b71d7cf058bd1 c8ef765c c3f/lotr_640_full.mov

    Taco's lameness filter prevented me from creating the proper link.
    Append the garble into to one long url and download at will

    --
    "Hatred is the coward's revenge for being intimidated" ...George Bernard Shaw
  119. Re:Can't save the trailer? Here's how to do it. by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

    There's another way, actually.

    Look in the source for the page and get the filename of the movie... then make a quick little html file that contains:

    -html-
    -a href=http://whereever.ext/movie.qt-
    -/html-

    Right click on the link, and save it to the disk!

    -- Dr. Eldarion --

  120. Re:Can't save the trailer? Here's how to do it. by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

    'eh, sorry, my mistake. I didn't actually try it out... I'm at school, and the connection here sucks.

    All I know is that it worked for me on a couple different websites :/

    -- Dr. Eldarion --

  121. New actors? by ltcordelia · · Score: 1

    I understand that they're not going to try to use well-known establishment actors. Unfortunately for these folks, they'll forever be known as "Frodo" and "Gollum". When I get home I'll be able to see the previews to verify - I find it amusing that I have worse access at work than at home.
    Information wants to be free

    --
    Information wants to be free
    So what? Guns want to kill, but we have laws against that.
    1. Re:New actors? by Redgie · · Score: 1

      Actually, they are combining well known actors with unknown ones. Among the well known ones cast so far are Cate Blanchet, Christopher Lee (hundreds of movies), Sir Ian McKellan (Gods and Monsters his most well known recently), John(?) Rhys-Davies (Indiana Jones, Sliders, etc), Liv Tyler, Elijah Wood, maybe some of the others if you watch a lot of movies, especially non-Hollywood.
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~
      Artificial intelligence or natural stupidity?

      --

      Artificial intelligence or natural stupidity?
      Guess which wrote this...
  122. Action v. Reaction by ltcordelia · · Score: 1

    I think he has an interesting notion that needs to be pursued - given that monitoring capabilities exist, how do we best utilize those technologies to make our lives easier/better/more secure, rather than just griping about the folks at Ft. Meade invading our privacy?
    Information wants to be free

    --
    Information wants to be free
    So what? Guns want to kill, but we have laws against that.
  123. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by ltcordelia · · Score: 1

    The Ring automatically corrupts anyone who carries it or is near it - witness Boromir's lunacy, Gollum's mutation, Frodo's refusal to give up the ring. The idea was to find a small group of incorruptibles, and have them carry the ring to its destruction. A large part of elven cavaliers would have been easily targetted by Sauron's forces.
    Information wants to be free

    --
    Information wants to be free
    So what? Guns want to kill, but we have laws against that.
  124. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by lythari · · Score: 1
    If you read the books, you'll find that the possessor of the Ring is unable to give it up by himself (Gandalf had to force it away from Biblo - the previous holder of the ring). Secondly, there wasn't anyone else who was willing to take the ring for the fear of being corrupted by it (except perhaps for Boromir, but he didn't volunteer).

    As to your second question, the elves no longer had the strength to force their way into Mordor. Their numbers and thus their powers had declinded since Sauron was last defeated. Instead, they decided to go for stealth and surprise and tried to sneak the Ring into Mordor.

  125. Re:Direct links - all that you need.. by lythari · · Score: 1

    Here are direct links to all four versions of the trailer

  126. Re:Can't save the trailer? Here's how to do it. by lythari · · Score: 1
    That doesn't work because the links on the Apple and New Line page connect you to some incy wincy 9k .mov file, whereupon you will be sent the trailer as streaming video.

    By the way, some guy has managed to save the 640x480 version and has posted it up as a 26.12 meg zip file. So here's the link. Now I'll just sit back and watch the /. effect occur!

  127. Der Ring des Nibelungen? by ballestra · · Score: 1
    Anyone else notice the similarities between Tolkien's Lord of the Rings and Wagner's Der Ring des Nibelungen?

    Let's see:

    • all powerful gold ring, which eventually destroys anyone who wears it
    • mythological humanoid races
    • epic plot/story/character development
    • innocent hero who must carry the ring as a surrogate for the more noble side of a power struggle between larger forces
    • ultimate end is the destruction of the ring as an implement of power
    • political implications?

    I would need a re-reading of the Tolkien Ring cycle to find more similarities. For anyone reading who hasn't been interested in opera before, I highly recommend Wagner's ring cycle. The music is nothing like prissy Italian opera. It's more like John Williams' soundtrack to the Star Wars Trilogy, only darker and more complex. Ok, end plug.

  128. Re:Three Years! by ballestra · · Score: 1
    I had a different experience with the original Star Wars Trilogy. The gap between the movies just intensified the adventure. It took me three years playing with my homemade "Hoth" and "Bespin" playsets before they got old to me. I had quite an elaborate trap-door carbon-freezing mechanism for Bespin (back then I only knew it as "Cloud City"). Before these I just imagined the beige carpet as the desert of Tatooine, and a small shipping box filled with those foam "peanuts" made a great Death Star trash compactor.

    Boy, this brings back memories! Anyway, I like the anticipation that the gaps built up for me, and I wonder if today's kids don't really care about Star Wars because they see it as yet another in a long series of toy fads (i.e. Power rangers, pokemon, etc). I wonder if I'll be able to impress my own kids with the significance of Star Wars some day, if they see the movies all at once.

  129. Pity it's Quicktime 4 by EvilGwyn · · Score: 1

    or I'd be able to actually see it :(. Oh well, before I went off to work they showed some footage on the news that some TVNZ cameraman had sneaked of a bunch of orcs attacking some castle. hmmm I wonder where that would be... It's been so long since I read the books. Anyway, the footage looked cewl :)

    --
    Phear my l33t homepage.
    1. Re:Pity it's Quicktime 4 by jtisdel · · Score: 2

      For those w/o QT 4.1.1 (yes, 4.1.1), http://www.theonering.net has teaser broken out into frames with some commentary on each -- the whole presentation takes up 8 screen pages.

      --
      J. M. Tisdel jmt@jmichaelt.org
  130. Re:language, please! by Redgie · · Score: 1

    Actually, they all will be speaking with accents. Most are variations on an english accent, I believe. They have a dialog coach, a Tolkien pronounciation specialist for names and such, and apparently some advisors on the right way to pronounce ancient elvish, dwarvish, etc. The idea is for the movie to have the exact pronounciations that Tolkien intended from his notes. Peter Jackson is a big fan of the book and he is being very thorough.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~
    Artificial intelligence or natural stupidity?

    --

    Artificial intelligence or natural stupidity?
    Guess which wrote this...
  131. Where to go if you can't see it by Redgie · · Score: 1

    There is a frame-by frame posting and analysis of the preview in common HTML at a great fan site for info about the movie. Go to theonering.net to check it out.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~
    Artificial intelligence or natural stupidity?

    --

    Artificial intelligence or natural stupidity?
    Guess which wrote this...
  132. Re:Last LotR movie by Grab · · Score: 1

    Although the book is 900+ pages, am I the only person who thinks Tolkien could use a good editor, and hence only about 700 pages of it is relevant? And the animated version was pretty damn good for the time, it's just that state-of-the-art in animation is a whole lot different now. Whaddya want, Jurassic Park effects? Get real!

    Besides, the animated version only covered the first 2 parts (up to the end of the battle in the Two Towers). I don't even remember it covering Frodo, Sam and the giant spider (can't remember her name offhand), although I may be wrong. So probably more like 500 pages to cover.

    Seriously, I think the animated version could have been the definitive version with a bit more funding to complete it (and maybe extend it in places), or at least a very good place-marker until FX technology improved. Didn't the animator die part-way through the last installment though? I seem to remember that's what halted it, and they couldn't get anyone else to replace him, and ran out of funding.

    Grab.

  133. Because...(mildly off topic) by WhiskeyJack · · Score: 1

    They decided not to send a large force because the success of the mission relied upon stealth; the entire Elvish army would more than likely fail to breach the gates of Mordor in a direct attack, so the only real option was to sneak the Ring in. Add to that that such a large force would very likely clue Sauron in to the exact location of the Ring, and their chances of failure grew even further -- Sauron would only have to send in the likes of the Nazgul to take the Ring unless the Bearer was willing to wield it in his defense, since they would be unlikely to have sufficiently powerful defenders to fend off such an attack on watch every moment of every day. The option of sending a large force was out of the question.

    So why send an untried and untravelled Frodo to do the job? Because Bilbo had shown that hobbits were unusually resistant to the Ring's power, while Elves and Men would have had a very high chance of succumbing to the temptation to try and use the Ring to defeat Sauron. (Examples: Boromir atempts to steal the Ring from Frodo, Galadriel refusing Frodo's offer to give her the Ring because she knew se would be unable to resist using it which would eventually lead to her ultimate corruption.) Since Frodo was of a species well suited to resist the Ring's siren call to power, and he was already the Ringbearer, they decided it best that he should be the one sent, but included the likes of Gandalf and Aragorn in the Fellowship to make up for Frodo's lack of experience.

    --WhiskyJack

    PS> Also, the Ents would never have entered the War were it not for Pippin and Meriadoc's jaunt into Fangorn and their fortuitous meeting of Treebeard.

    PPS> No, I'm not a fan. Not at all. *insert innocent look here* ;)

  134. Re:Don't forget ..... by Shin+Elendale · · Score: 1
    Only 3?!?!?!? HOW are they going to fit the whole story in only THREE movies?! Three movies per book would be better, but I'm thinking 12 movies would still have a hard time covering the whole thing...

    -Elendale (And thus the problem with book-to-movie rears it's ugly head...)

    --

    IANAT (I Am Not A Troll)

  135. 2 possible opinions by luckykaa · · Score: 1

    2 responses

    1 - the cynical response - Yeah, well of course they will. Why sell us 1 cinema ticket/video/DVD when they can sell us 3

    2 - the enthusiastic response - Great! This should give about 7 hours of story! Plenty of time to fully explore the whole story!

    Pick the one you like best.

  136. LOTR by fred_the_slow · · Score: 1

    I have not looked forward to a movie in a very long time, but LOTR is very special to me.

    I've read it on average once a year, and find that the older I am, the more I find in Tolkien to appreciate. The underlying theme of the books is, like in Genesis, the fall from grace and loss of innocence. I can only hope that the scriptwriters respected the essence of the book and did not eviscerate it in favor of an action film, no matter how great the special effects (remember Star Wars).

  137. Re:One little problem.... by 586 · · Score: 1

    One Word : Napster

  138. Re:Can't save the trailer? Here's how to do it. by jhesse · · Score: 1

    By the way, some guy has managed to save the 640x480 version and has posted it up as a 26.12 meg zip file.

    26.12 meg? Big whoop. It is only 27.5 meg uncompressed.
    Hell, even I was able to get it using Monica, so....
    Oh here is the uncompressed quicktime.

    --
    "I have also mastered pomposity, even if I do say so myself." -Kryten

    --

    --
    "I have also mastered pomposity, even if I do say so myself." -Kryten
  139. Discussion on the suckery of the Bakshi LOTR movie by testy · · Score: 1

    This page spells out in painful detail why the Bakshi adaptation sucked, how many levels it sucked at, ad nauseum. It is well worth the read, IMHO, particularly for the people here who have hazier memories of the books and the films.

  140. Re:(Nitpicking.) by testy · · Score: 1
    If I recall, there were no trolls in Lord of the Rings; they're not organized by Mordor.


    Not true. There were trolls in Moria, although they did little besides block out the torchlight so that the Orcs could see better. More importantly, a team of trolls manned 'Grond,' the giant battering ram that brought down the gates of Minas Tirith. Finally, companies of trolls wearing armor were mentioned in the ambush that was sprung on the Good Guys&#153 while they were in Mordor.



    In the Hobbit, three trolls were kept up past their bedtime, and they turned to stone.


    True. In Lord of the Rings, Sauron sent an artificial cloud cover out of Mordor to cover the land and provide darkness for his forces.



    I just want to see their rendition of Shelob. Do it wrong, and that half-goddess giant spider will come off very unbelievably.


    Agreed. I very much like what I've seen from the footage so far, though.

  141. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by savi · · Score: 1

    Quite simple really ... 1). The Ring itself CHOSE Bilbo, then Frodo. The ring had a habbit of slipping off fingers, disappearing, etc., often causing the death of the owner. To try and take the ring could bring VERY bad luck. 2). If the ring had been given to a powerful leader, like Elrond, Gandalf, Boromir, etc., they might not have been able to resist the temptation to use it. In fact, they would not! Both Galadriel and Gandalf are given the chance to take the ring, but both are terrified of the idea, because they know it would make them a Dark Lord themselves. So ... Frodo is a safe choice, because as a simple hobbit, he is almost too innocent to be twisted by the ring. Anyone else would have been subverted, and either served the Sauron or set themselves up as the next Sauron.

  142. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by FireKnight · · Score: 1

    to take on The Enemy directly would have been too risky

    What, risky compared to the "Frodo Solo strategy"? They could have given him one bodyguard, or a magic sword of his own, or at the very least a freakin' map, but they actually hung him out to dry.

    In any case, there is an actual explanation of why it has to be Frodo Solo, in the book, and it isn't that one. I'd remember something like that.


    Well, first off, he wasn't solo he had his companion Sam with him, and a good thing he did too. Also, he did have a "magical" sword (more like a dagger to a person) named Sting. He also received (as well as other companions) a wonderful Cloak to help disguise him.

    Also, the humans did send a some what large force to assault Mordor's gates. It was only a trick though to draw Sauron's attention towards them so Frodo would have a greater chance of success.

    But when it comes down to it, any large force, I mean even 10 people, would have easily of been discovered and the war would have bee lost. Stealth was the ONLY way in.

    One comment on some other posts on why a group of Elves and Ents wouldn't have attacked. I dealt with the Elves already so as to the Ents there is NO way they would have gotten involved. If you read the books it is VERY clear they do not get involved in the matters of humans. To them, the world outside their forest is of little concern except finding the location of the Entwives.

  143. Re:Synopsis by FireKnight · · Score: 1

    While Tolkien steadfastly denied any metaphor for WWII politics, many scholars tied the Shire to England, the Elves to France, Mordor to Germany, Saruman's Orthanc to Japan, and the Rohirrim/Gondor pair as USA's two-fronted war.

    May be a bit off topic, but I've heard that LOTR is a favorite read among neonazis. Probably a result of the very clear differences between wrong and right, good and bad etc...

    It might also have to do with the obvious skin colour of elves and orcs, but I've never asked a neonazi...


    If it is I wouldn't be surprised. Since it is also a favorite read among, sci-fi fans, musicians, writers, programmers, teenagers, role players, historians, etc etc....
    These books are loved by neary everyone and that doens't just include people that are considered good.

  144. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by Unanimous+Howard · · Score: 1

    Hobbits have a unique tendency toward level-headedness and a shallow practical view of the world. They are not tempted by power for power's sake. Gollum only used it to hide from Orcs and to catch fish. The other races would be quickly corrupted by the ring.

    An army of elves might just attract a bit of unwanted attention. Don't ya think?

  145. POLL.. by tardaeron · · Score: 1

    How Many Times have you read LOTR/Hobbit/Silmarillion, which is the best, who was the true hero (i personally would put alot of weight on Sam, and believe that his significance is highly overlooked by most), How many people use names of elvish origins.. (daeron was minstrel in King Thingol's court, and tar was the prefix added to the kings of Numenor, both in the sindarin language i THINK), etc. Also, for anyone who has read the silmarillion only once and didnt quite acquire a taste for it, re read it. i did not care much for it myself the first time i plowed through it, but the second time, (after i had re- re- re- re- read the LOTR and was hungry for more tolkien) it was much better. anyhow, heres to the movie being released on december 13, my birthday :- )

  146. Re:if they do the same thing as they did with . . by tardaeron · · Score: 1

    To My knowledge, not only were they being filmed simultaneously, but they were originally slated for release christmas/summer/christmas 2000/2001. this has obviously since changed, as the Internet Movie Database (www.imdb.com) lists their release dates as december 2001, 2002, and 2003, respectively. However, those dates are obvously off by a year.. i HOPE at least. anyhow, i believe that they are doing the filming of all three movies at the same time, yes.

  147. Scenes form LOTR they won't show Part I... by cheekymonkey_68 · · Score: 1

    I bet they will not show the scene where the hobbits enter the now abandoned Tower of Orthanc and find barrels of Saruman's 'pipeweed' amongst the ruins.
    Well can you imagine stoned hobbits in the movie ?
    I can imagine the disclaimer now :-
    Beware watching LOTR can be addictive.
    Independent tests have proved that Tolkien is Hobbit forming.

  148. Re:How long... by Quix0te · · Score: 1

    Please, oh please, oh please. Someone do this ASAP. My uni's stupid NT network has tonnes of luvly bandwidth, but NO QT 4!!! ARRGHH! AND they've set it up so that only those with administrator privillages can install it! ARRGGHH! Please, someone mpeg it. please, oh please. i must see this!!



    Quix0te - Wales, UK

  149. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by HiQ · · Score: 1

    You could write about a SWAT team of elven, that could go out, find the ring and be back before lunch, but that would hardly be an interesting read, would it????

  150. slightly off topic by Marco_polo · · Score: 1

    Is is me? or does the same guy do the the voice-overs for every trailer? :)

    --
    I am the lord of the pun. Dance Knave!
  151. Unknown? by gibbonboy · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure I caught Liv Tyler's name in the credits.

    --
    "Never pet a burning dog."
  152. Get it right here by hurqalya · · Score: 1
    Just another mirror, for you, from me. Now I get to sit back and watch my computer succum to the Slashdot effect.

    http://godmoney.dhs.org/lotr_640_full.mov

    --
    Hurqalya
  153. Moo-Ha-Ha-Ha!!!!! by grendelkhan · · Score: 1

    Now to load it into Premiere and convert it....

    --
    Wu-Tang Name: Half-Cut Skeleton Get your own Wu-Na
  154. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by yseult · · Score: 1

    I think the main reason is that they were trying not to attract Sauron's attention in order to forestall any nasty attacks, and it would be a little difficult to sneak a brigade of Elves and Ents through Mordor. Given that the soil in Mordor was presumably fairly toxic (one would think), I doubt that Ents would have survived anyway.

  155. Ok, now I know what I want for my birthday... by baelmix · · Score: 1

    Gimmie gimmie gimmie when it comes out on DVD!

    --
    --Baelmix
  156. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by streetlawyer · · Score: 1
    to take on The Enemy directly would have been too risky

    What, risky compared to the "Frodo Solo strategy"? They could have given him one bodyguard, or a magic sword of his own, or at the very least a freakin' map, but they actually hung him out to dry.

    In any case, there is an actual explanation of why it has to be Frodo Solo, in the book, and it isn't that one. I'd remember something like that.

  157. Re:if they do the same thing as they did with . . by matiasp · · Score: 1

    I *think* that they are actually filming everything at once, but releasing the three parts every one year mostly for post-production and marketing reasons. So, it's almost certain that either all three movies will come out, or none at all (and I'm sure they'll all come out :).

  158. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by dwakeman · · Score: 1

    The only thing I can think of is this... what is more suspicious? A band of elven cavalry with magic swords supported by Ents, and accompanied by guides familiar with the terrain. Or a bunch of little hobbits that would NEVER EVER be entrusted with a task as huge as destroying The Ring?

  159. This is how you download the movie by cow_licker · · Score: 1

    Of course I waited to long to post so everyone probably has a mirror up already.

    This works for windows.
    This is what you do. Go to

    http://www.quicktime.com

    wathc the trailer, in quicktime "Add to favorites", in windows/system/ open up quicktime.qtp

    look for the URL of the movie in the file, its been posted a hundred times on the site, but this is how you get it in the first place.

    now show the url into your browser, watch it again, after its done, look in your temporary internet files directory and there it is. amazing.

    --
    $_='while(read+STDIN,$_,2048){$a=29;$b=73;$c=142;$ t=255;@t=map{$_%16or$t^=$c^=($m=(11,10,116,100,
  160. TROLLS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Sorry this was just a Troll.

    1. Re:TROLLS! by troc · · Score: 2

      Excellent joke - I'd give this a [funny] if I had some spare points but I'm saving all mine to convert to beenz which I'll then convert into flooz and finally I might convert them into speedybucks which will allow me to get 0.0001% off a crap cd from a company nobody has ever heard of.

      In the meantime I'd just like to say Yeah! I've been waiting for this film ever since I read the books for the first time - they are still the most re-read story I own.

      That previous cartoonish attempt sucked as well but this looks like the guys in charge (Peter Jackson of Bad Taste fame) have the same mindset as myself.

      :)

      Troc

      --
      Troc's dubious podcast and blog: http://www.trocnet.net
  161. download link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Good news, the guys at movie-list.com have a good download link.
    Now, let's everybody rush there all at once so we can /. the poor place :-)

  162. I don't think I can do it... by Pathwalker · · Score: 2

    I don't think I can get this converted to mpeg.
    I'm making one more attempt by trying to edit the file headers to get around some annoyances, but I have little hope of it working...

    -Pathwalker

    1. Re:I don't think I can do it... by Pathwalker · · Score: 2

      QT Pro wont let you export files in general or just this particular one? I've already done several Sorenson->Cinepak conversions with QT Pro running in a VMware instance.

      QT Pro refuses to save or export this particular file.

      Premiere refuses to recognize it as a valid Quick Time file (I think the extra "sprite tracks" are causing the problem with premiere)
      If I don't see a URL for a MPEG version posted in a while, I'll try running my TV-out into my video capture card and see what I can get.

      -Pathwalker

  163. Easier way: by Pathwalker · · Score: 2

    Here's how I downloaded it:

    1. Download little 2k stub file.
    2. set netscape to prompt before opening quick time files.
    3. click on stub movie.
    4. when netscape asks, choose save.

    simple. Now getting it into a different format is much more tricky...

  164. Re:YOOHOO! CINEPAK VERSION HERE!!! by Pathwalker · · Score: 2

    Mind sharing how you converted it?
    I gave up after resorting to hexediting the header in an attempt to disable the sprite tracks so premiere might be able to load it...

    -Pathwalker

  165. Re:(MOT) Converting QT to MPEG by Pathwalker · · Score: 2

    Not this file - it disables save an export...

  166. Re:How long... by Pathwalker · · Score: 2

    I'm working on it - this one is more tricky than most - It's crashed premiere twice so far...

    If/When I get it converted, I'll post a URL.

  167. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by DG · · Score: 2

    You've received a lot of good answers here, but this pointlet has been overlooked so far:

    Sauron was a overwhelming, mass-power, crush-and-dominate kinda guy. He expected the Ring to be taken up by some sort of Hero, and openly used against him. He was searching for the Ring so desperately not only because he wanted the power of it for himself, but because he feared it in other hands.

    To him, the concept that the forces of good might actually wish to _destroy_ it never occured to him.

    And Gollum had shown (via Gandalf's interrigation of him) that it was possible to slip into Mordor unnoticed, if you were inconspicuous enough.

    --
    Want to learn about race cars? Read my Book
  168. Notes from Ian McKellen by jonr · · Score: 2

    McKellen has some interesting notes on his website Worth a read...

    Jón

  169. You can still do it by David+Gould · · Score: 2


    Right click on the link, and save it to the disk!

    That doesn't work because the links on the Apple and New Line page connect you to some incy wincy 9k .mov file, whereupon you will be sent the trailer as streaming video.

    You still need to have the QuickTime player to be able to receive and watch the stream, but then at least you can save the file. Just look for the temp file on your drive (they try to hide it soemwhere) where QuickTime buffers the stream -- it saves the entire file so you can jump around and watch more than once without downloading again, but it deletes it when you (I'm not sure which) close the window or quit the application. The file is called something like "QTPluginTemp1234567", or just search for files created today, sorted by size. Then just copy it somewhere else before it gets deleted.

    I do wish they'd quit trying to obfuscate things this way; it's so silly. For one thing, like CSS, SDMI, etc., it can never really work, so all they'll accomplish is making legitimate use (not that there's necessarily even anything illegitimate about the other uses, even if they don't like them) less convenient and pissing off customers, but they also should not even try. I understand that the "content providers" want to keep some control on where their content goes, but half the point of putting it on the web in a digital format is that people can save it, to view at their pleasure, or to show off to friends. Especially that last -- given that this is a trailer for an upcoming movie, wouldn't you think that they'd want it to be seen by as many people as possible? Letting us keep local copies can only be good for them. Probably half a dozen people will see this as a result of my keeping a local copy who wouldn't see it otherwise. They should pay me for the publicity.

    But even when it's not actually better for them, they should realize that accessibility is desirable. If I just wanted to watch the content as they present it, I'd watch it on TV instead of in a low-res window on a small screen; hence, if they only want me to watch it that way, they should just broadcast it on TV. Keeping the file is what I as a customer want, and it doesn't cost them anything, so why should they go to all that trouble trying to inconvenience me, especially when it won't work anyway?


    David Gould

    --
    David Gould
    main(i){putchar(340056100>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<6)<< 6)&&main(++i);}
  170. One little problem.... by RayChuang · · Score: 2

    roamer,

    One little problem: how about giving us record label and the catalog numbers for your Blind Guardian's albums? I'd like to get them but without that information, I'm not going to be able to order them online....

    --
    Raymond in Mountain View, CA
    1. Re:One little problem.... by RayChuang · · Score: 2

      Surely you jest.

      I prefer a REAL CD disk (since I have a home stereo CD player, a CD boombox and a car stereo CD player). ;-)

      --
      Raymond in Mountain View, CA
  171. Finally by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

    I've been hearing the rumours for this film for years upon years, I'm so glad it is FINALLY in production. If there is one trilogy that is really under exposed to the world it's Tolkien's. Star Wars is nice and all and gets props for technical wizardry but if you want good depth (Star Wars is a typical space opera with higher budget effects) you HAVE to go with LotR. I find it a bit depressing that all of the LotR stuff I have ever seen has been such poor quality and had little depth. The Super Nintendo video game sucked troll balls and I've never seen a good game reproduction of the trilogy. Maybe now with the movie exposure it will make its way into other media forms. I'd buy a MMPG if it were based on LotR or the Hobbit. Besides those you could easily use the world of the Silmarilion or the Second Age with Numenor. Fanboys unite!

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  172. CINEPAK MIRRORS NOW AVAILABLE!!! by webslacker · · Score: 2
  173. YOOHOO! CINEPAK VERSION HERE!!! by webslacker · · Score: 2

    Show me some FTP space, I'll show you a 60MB trailer. Email me.

  174. Mirrors for the Cinepak versions are up. by webslacker · · Score: 2
  175. Re:YOOHOO! 11MB small version done! by webslacker · · Score: 2

    If you have mirror space you'd like to spare, email me with the info.

  176. I am also working on an MPEG version by webslacker · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure if I can get around this anti-saving stuff, but in case I can, I'd like some volunteers for mirrors.

  177. (MOT) Converting QT to MPEG by EricWright · · Score: 2

    At work, I have a WinNT box on my desk and access to a RHL 6.1 box. Can someone tell me how to convert the QT file to MPG (either in Win or Linux)? I might make it available if I can convert it...

    Eric

  178. Re:Three Years! by Pope · · Score: 2

    Huh??
    "Back to the Future" was released in 1985, part 2 in 1989 and 3 in 1990. There weren't going to BE any sequels originally, but when the green light was given, Zemeckis wanted to do 2 and 3 back to back to shorten the time between films.
    That's 5 years between 1 and 3, while Star Wars was 1977, Empire in 1980 and Jedi in 1983, making 6 years between 1 and 3. How is this so different?
    and OF COURSE the re-release of the Star Wars trilogy was not drawn out: the movied were ALREADY MADE!

    Geez, I was 6 when Star Wars came out, and I remember getting totally jazzed up for both Empire and Jedi.

    I mean, come on, it takes time to make movies, ya know :)

    Pope

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  179. Re:Synopsis by crush · · Score: 2

    While Tolkien steadfastly denied any metaphor for WWII politics, many scholars tied the Shire to England, the Elves to France, Mordor to Germany, Saruman's Orthanc to Japan, and the Rohirrim/Gondor pair as USA's two-fronted war.

    May be a bit off topic, but I've heard that LOTR is a favorite read among neonazis. Probably a result of the very clear differences between wrong and right, good and bad etc... It might also have to do with the obvious skin colour of elves and orcs, but I've never asked a neonazi...

    IANAN but I can see that there are certainly elements that might appeal. I always found it interesting that Tolkein and C.S.Lewis had free, white, wild Northern and Western kingdoms that were under attack from the South and the East. In LOTR there are cruel Haradrim with dark skins and oliphaunts who are a mixture of harsh noble cruelty and corrupt evil. There are the swart Southerners that have been interbred by Saruman with orcs to make slant-eyed half-men such as Bill Ferny's friends or the Isengard servants. In Lewis's work there are the Calormen to the south who have curved swords and eat oil on their bread instead of good honest English butter. The orcs in LOTR always have scimitars too instead of decent upright straight swords.

    I think that this "foreigness" is a quick way to feel that the other group is not human. That supposedly is what racists and neo-nazis are all about - emphasizing difference. Tolkein was doing it for dramatic effect, utilizing something that really was probably quite common, a feeling that "Foreigners are fiends and abroad is unutterably bloody" and that "The wogs begin at Calais" [quotes from one of Nancy Mitford's characters.

    All that said I still find those writers (especially Tolkein, he's not as in-your-face-Xtian as Lewis and his world has a much greater depth not matched by any other fantasy author) amazing.

    I am torn about whether or not to see the movie though. I am afraid that its images will pollute the private ones that I have....what to do what to do!

  180. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by Salamander · · Score: 2

    The Council of Elrond discussed this very issue, and two reasons were given.

    1. Such a large well-armed war party would have drawn way too much unwelcome attention, and the "they'll never suspect this motley crew could possibly have anything so valuable" approach seemed more likely to succeed. This turned out to be true.
    2. Many of the big decision-makers at the CoE believed that there was more to hobbits in general, and this hobbit (Frodo) in particular, than met the eye*, particularly with respect to being able to resist the ring's mental "pull". This also turned out to be true.

    * ...or Eye. Get it?

    --
    Slashdot - News for Herds. Stuff that Splatters.
  181. Re:(Nitpicking.) by Salamander · · Score: 2

    >If I recall, there were no trolls in Lord of the Rings; they're not organized by Mordor

    Trolls are explicitly mentioned as being among the troops commanded by the Captain of Minas Morgul on the battle before the Gates of Mordor, staged to distract Sauron from the hobbit who was at that same moment climbing the slopes of Mount Doom with the Ring. Actually these were a special kind of troll bred by Sauron, called Olog-Hai. Pippin saved Beregond by killing one.

    --
    Slashdot - News for Herds. Stuff that Splatters.
  182. Re:Can't save the trailer? Here's how to do it. by spoon42 · · Score: 2

    In trying to save the movie myself, before reading these comments, I discovered yet another way to do it. It's significantly more complicated than the rest, and I don't really recommend it, but here goes.

    1. Get Quicktime Pro (by whatever means necessary) and try to save the movie. It yells at you. Apparently, they don't want you to save the movie. Reminds you of the whole DVD mess, doesn't it? Anyway...

    2. Look at the page that launched Quicktime. No hints. Fire up filemon, and notice that it's reading some file in windows\temp.

    3. Look at the file. It's zero bytes. What the hell? Quit Quicktime. The file disappears. argh.

    4. Download the whole movie again, since they don't want you to save it anywhere... and try to copy the file. Bzzt: Sharing violation. Tricky bastards.

    5. Now the fun begins. With Quicktime still running, kill Windows. Entirely. Turn off the power.

    6. When the computer restarts, let Scandisk run. It'll find about 28 MB in lost clusters. Save the file.

    7. Back in Windows, look at the file with a hex editor. It starts off with something that is apparently the Quicktime file header, and then either random bytes or the actual movie. Assume that it's the movie, and trim off the end of it since there's some extra crap there, but that shouldn't be too hard. (You can also look at other QT4 files and see how many ASCII 0 characters to leave at the end of the file, if you want.)

    8. Watch the movie. It works. Brag to your friend about your 1337 sk1lz.

    9. Accidentally delete the file that just took two hours of hacking to get. Complain to your friend because you're such a dumbass.

    10. Go read the comments on Slashdot to see if anyone else has managed to get the file. Not surprisingly, someone has.

    11. Not content to just blindly accept someone else's solution, try it yourself. Load the movie yet again, save it to your favorites, find the file that stores the favorites, and get the URL out of it.

    12. Have Quicktime crash, completely screwing up the graphics in Windows, and requiring another restart. (Granted, this step is somewhat out of your control, but with a little luck it'll happen.)

    13. Finally, just download the file (it's all one URL... complaints about this later.): http://a912.g.akamai.net/5/912/51/7f33d9e39a6b87/
    1a1a1aaa2198c627970773d80669d84574a8d 80d3 cb12453c02589f25382
    f668c9329e0375e81785ea61cd36a 40938a41385e948b71d7cf058bd1c8ef765cc3 f
    /lo tr_640_full.mov

    14. Post your method to Slashdot (Hey Rob, what's a "lameness filter"?) and hope somebody moderates it up as Funny^H^H^H^H^HInformative.

    Have a nice day. :-)

    --
    --- this comment is presented in WIDE SCREEN STEREO!!!
  183. Well... by cr0sh · · Score: 2

    Actually, for the most part - yes...

    There is one main guy they (meaning "Hollywood") hire to do the voiceovers for trailers (I can't remember his name) - he is on nearly EVERY trailer. It is something about his voice, and the way he does it - he can make a comedy trailer funny, and an action trailer "quickening", and a horror trailer downright scary.

    There are very few of these trailer voice "actors" - and this guy is one of the top dogs...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  184. if they do the same thing as they did with . . . by Snoobs · · Score: 2

    . . . the cartoon I will be pissed. They are going to do the movie in three installments. Each appearing about a year apart. The cartoon also did it this way, but they never finished the two towers and return of the king. I'm sure this movie has enough financial backing that it will get done. There are enough people who have read the books and loved them who will go see the movie. I'm sure that it will be better than Star Wars.

  185. How long... by imac.usr · · Score: 2

    ...before somebody converts it to MPEG?

    --
    I use Macs for work, Linux for education, and Windows for cardplaying.
  186. Music by roamer · · Score: 2

    Slightly off topic, but fitting in the same thread, any of you Tolkien fans might want to try out Blind Guardian. They are very deep, hard-hitting band that writes 90% of there music around Tolkien's stories and themes. Definitely not for the faint of heart or wannabe fans- it is pretty heavy stuff, and most of the songs relate more to the Silmarillion than the Lord of the Rings (ex. "Curse of Feanor", "Mordred's Song", "Noldor (Dead Winder Reigns)"etc). Some of their stuff does pertain to the Lord of the Rings- for instance "The Lord of the Rings" song is just a rendition of the opening verse on the books- the Orchestral version of it is excellent! (for the record, these guys have been doing symphonic metal for years, way longer than Metallica S&M, and unlike Metallica, Hansi from Blind Guardian actually rights all the music for all the instruments you here in all their songs). Anyway, just a quick promo for an excellent Tolkien based band...moderate me down if you think I need it, I don't really care. Whatever you do though, check out their album "Nightfall in Middle Earth". Oh, and just a warning, Yahoo lists them as a death metal band, but don't let that worry you, because death metal they are not (I loathe death metal), they are pretty different though. For more information, go to http://www.ba-stuttgart.de/~bziller/blind_guardian /
    or feel free to contact me.
    Icq#:25834656

    --
    I don't respect your opinions, but I respect your right to hold them
  187. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by Speare · · Score: 2

    The Ents would have had a difficult time with the Great River between Fangorn forest and Mordor.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  188. Three Years! by Speare · · Score: 2
    The movies will be released on a three year train. While I think it's cool to draw it out, I liked the faster releases of "Back to the Future" and the rerelease of "Star Wars IV-VI".

    I recall the big gap between Star Wars movies in my childhood, and it was way too spread. Almost all interest had died out in one before the next one began.

    As for LotR, I wonder what they'll do to boost the second volume, "The Two Towers." Most people find that volume to be a hard bridge to cross between the more exciting introduction and conclusion volumes. Lots of very important things happen in TT, but it holds less interest if you're not interested in war strategy.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  189. (Nitpicking.) by Speare · · Score: 2

    If I recall, there were no trolls in Lord of the Rings; they're not organized by Mordor.

    In the Hobbit, three trolls were kept up past their bedtime, and they turned to stone.

    I just want to see their rendition of Shelob. Do it wrong, and that half-goddess giant spider will come off very unbelievably.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  190. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by hypatia · · Score: 2

    He expected the Ring to be taken up by some sort of Hero, and openly used against him.

    Yes, and this is actively used as a strategy by Aragorn - that is why he uses the Palantir before venturing on the Paths of the Dead - he challanges Sauron, so as to hope that Sauron is fooled into believing that Isildur's heir weilds the Ring.

    This draws more of Sauron's forces out of Mordor, thus making it easier for Frodo.

    Aragorn does admit later however, that he didn't expect the response to be as swift as it is - he barely comes in time.

  191. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by Dracos · · Score: 2
    • Frodo was given the ring by his adopted uncle Bilbo, who found it/stole it from Gollum in The Hobbit
    • The Elves' power was fading by the time LOTR happened. LOTR is the end of the Third Age of Middle Earth. There were no companies of Elven cavalry at this point.
    • If the Ring had been openly marched to its destruction, Sauron would have noticed and intercepted with about 100x as many orcs as there were in the Ring's entire escort. Secrecy was a major strategy



    Dracos
    "Integer: a number that represents any valid floating-point value"
  192. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by belgin · · Score: 2
    So the new question is why wasn't the ring given to a group of well-trained elven commandos to sneak it into Mordor instead of a group of hobbits.

    Short Answer from someone who studied the books (including the Simarillion) too closely for his own good...

    Sauron did not take hobbits seriously. Nobody would entrust the fate of the world to a gaggle of pint-sized twerps. Elves on the other hand were a well known enemy. He had been fighting the high elves to one degree or another for millenia. He watched his lord and master Morgoth brought down by a combination of high elves and the men Aragorn was decended from. These enemies had specific patterns he could watch for. The moment Sam invoked the Phial of Galadriel to fight Shelob, Sauron knew something was up, because that was high elven magic.

    Legolas was sent because he was a grey elf. High elves were simply too distinctive and obvious. Sending a high elven lord like Glorfindel or Elrond's sons would be like sending in a panzer armed with a searchlight and a cannon into a sniper position. As soon as it fired once, you would know exactly where it was. It's trail would not be too hard to follow either. Grey elves didn't have that same type of power, because they never left Middle Earth to go dwell with the not-quite-gods.

    B. Elgin

    --

    B. Elgin
    "Read at your own risk; feel free to ignore."
  193. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by Quix0te · · Score: 2

    The answer is pretty simple really: gathering together a kickass army of elves, ents, humans etc and trotting off to mount-doom to take on The Enemy directly would have been too risky. Sauron had become too powerfull and The Ring would have been captured and Suaron would win etc etc (and anyway, the Elves would never again ally with man - the last defeat of Sauron was the Last Alliance of Mena and Elves: but that's a whole other story). Now, the only option left was to get the Ring into Mordor by stealth. Hence the ligh-footed Hobbits. Gandalf knew much of Hobbit lore and knew that they were a hardy bunch and would putt up with much to acheive their goal.

    For more info on this, read the Silmarillion, Unfinished Tales and/or TheOneRing.net


    Quix0te - Wales, UK

  194. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by denia1 · · Score: 2

    It should also be noted that hobbits were very resistant to the power of "fading" and to the evils of the ring itself. This is pointed out numerous times in the books. The fact is that hobbits are very tough concerning resisting magic.

  195. First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3

    Yessss, precious, we haves the first postesses!

  196. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by Aurik · · Score: 3

    This wasn't THE most important event in the entire history of Middle-Earth, but it was certainly one of the three most important. In order, those would have been: The casting out of Morgoth (and the end of the First Age), the defeat of Sauron at the hands of the Last Great Alliance of Elves and Men (end of the Second Age), and finally the destruction of the One Ring (ending the Third Age).

    There are a number of reasons that Elrond and the White Council chose not to use force to destroy the Ring, but instead sent a small Fellowship to destroy it. The first reason is that the strength of the Elves and Men of Numenor was much less than that in previous Ages. Many of the greatest Elves had been slain in prior Wars against Morgoth and Sauron, and many of the rest had returned across the Sea to Valinor. The only Elven strongholds with the strength to combat Sauron were in Rivendell and Lorien, and few of the race of Numenor remained as well (including the Rangers of the North and the Stewards of Gondor). They simply did not have the strength for a full-on assault on Mordor.

    Additionally, who would they give the Ring to? Gandalf? Galadriel? Aragorn? The desire to use the Ring would quickly overwhelm anyone with that kind of power, and they would find themselves in a position to overthrow Sauron; however, they would quickly be corrupted by the pure Evil of the ring. Of all the Ringbearers, only Frodo and Bilbo Baggins were pure enough of heart and free enough of desire and ambition to actually have a chance of resisting the temptation of the Ring, and in the end, Frodo even succumbed to the Ring's desire.

    Also, they did not send Frodo off "with just any friends he found along the way". Yes, the four hobbits seemed like unwise choices at the outset, but they all proved their worth by the end. However, Gandalf (in truth Olorin of the Maia) was one of the most powerful forces in Middle-Earth at the time (remember, he faced a Balrog one-on-one and defeated it). Aragorn was the Heir of Isildur, and probably one of the few Men in Middle-Earth that Sauron actually feared, and he wielded the blade that had originally defeated Sauron at the end of the Second Age. Boromir was the Heir to the Steward of Gondor, and a great warrior in his own right. Gimli and Legolas both proved to be outstanding warriors as well, felling over ninety orcs in the battle of Helm's Deep between the two of them.

    When given all of the options (hiding the Ring, sending a massive force to destroy the Ring, or sending a small Fellowship to destroy the Ring), this was the ONLY choice that had any reasonable chance of success.

  197. Don't forget ..... by taniwha · · Score: 3

    They are making a trilogy .... 3 full length movies .... not 1

  198. Re:OK, this has been bothering me for years by Vicegrip · · Score: 3

    Fundamental to the lore of the ring is the fact that while it gave immense power to whomever wore it, it also possessed that individual totally. Witness the effect the 9 lesser rings had on the riders.

    Gandalf himself said he could not even hold it in its hands lest he become enthralled with the power it held. The ring needed to be carried by somebody who didn't care for its power and was innocent. That person would take longer to be possessed by the ring. It took the immense willpower and self control for the elf queen not to keep the ring when Frodo gave it to her... even then she had to give the ring back to Frodo before the desire for power consumed her.

    There is also the additional side-effect to the person that destroyed the ring. The ring gradually transformed those who wore it into wraiths. Thus, when the ring was destroyed, in all likelyhood, he who wore the ring would be destroyed as well as much of what gave him former sustenance would be gone. In a way, Frodo was the guinea pig of the wizards and elves ... or their hero. He selflessly sacrificed himself to destroy something everyone else knew they wouldn't have the courage to do.

    And, on a final note, in the end even Frodo failed. Were it not for Golum, the ring would have fallen back into the hands of Sauron

    --
    Do not spread "09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0" over the internet, thank you.
  199. Re:Synopsis by Speare · · Score: 3

    Two orc battles in LotR.

    The human Riders of the Rohirrim, who knew nearly nothing about the saga of the Rings, but were next-door neighbors to the smooth charlatan, Saruman. It was Saruman's Uruk-hai (white hand) orc armies that were defeated on the Plains of the Pellenor.

    Sauron's orc army remained in Mordor, until there was a clash at the front gates; this was fought by the humans of Gondor.

    Elves don't breed like rabbits, humans do. Elves were giving up on life, waning in power and will to go on. Rivendell was an outpost, and Lothlorien was an enclave.

    It has been years since I picked the books up, but I self-studied it pretty deeply at the time. If I'm inaccurate here, forgive.

    While Tolkien steadfastly denied any metaphor for WWII politics, many scholars tied the Shire to England, the Elves to France, Mordor to Germany, Saruman's Orthanc to Japan, and the Rohirrim/Gondor pair as USA's two-fronted war.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  200. I can't stop watching it [spoilers] by Dracos · · Score: 3

    Even though the first movie is a year and a half away, I think this is a better trailer than some that are showing in theaters now.

    The most technically impressive shots are the two that show the orc army marching through Mordor...Massive is probably the best cg software in existence. And, watching the letters get burning into the ring is just awe inspiring.

    I'd love to be a fly on the wall when George Luca$ watches this. He wanted to make LOTR in the mid-eighties but couldn't get the rights to it. What did we get instead? Willow. Sad but true.

    www.theonering.net has a shot by shot analysys here.

    I was in their chat room earlier...watch for the preview to be mirrored around the web.




    Dracos
    "Integer: a number that represents any valid floating-point value"
  201. Here's the direct URL to the .mov... by matiasp · · Score: 3

    Here's the URL for the 27.5MB 640x320 mov, direct from akamai.net. I tried severaly times putting this all together and properly "a href"'d, but slashdot just gives me a "Lameness filter encountered: post aborted" (is that because the URL is too long or something???)... so you'll have to cut-and-paste from below. SOrry!

    http://a912.g.akamai.net/5/912/51/7f33d9e39a6b87 /

    1a1a1aaa2198c627970773d80669d84574a8d80d3cb12453 c02589f25382f668c 9329e0375e81785ea61cd36a40938a41385e948b71d7cf058b d1c8ef765cc3f

    /lotr_640_full.mov

  202. Direct links - all that you need.. by Gridle · · Score: 5

    lotr_640_full.mov (29 MB) (Now I really hate the damn AI of /., it didn't let me put the absurdly long direct URL into a href)

    QuickTime Installer.zip (8 MB) (Win32 version)

    I, as many others, like to actually download the files instead of downloading a downloader program which downloads something which perhaps downloads something, that you can't even save to your HD after downloading it. These links work as of my writing, let's hope nobody changes the URLs.

  203. Can't save the trailer? Here's how to do it. by lythari · · Score: 5

    For some reason, Apple or New Line have rigged it so that you can't save the trailer to hard drive. Fortunately, there are two ways to get around this.

  204. OK, this has been bothering me for years by streetlawyer · · Score: 5

    Right, I need an answer to this question from a Lord of the Rings fan. The question is this:

    Given that the Ring was so goddamned important, and that its destruction was literally the central event of the entire history of Middle-Earth, why did the supposedly wise Elves entrust this mission to a young hobbit with no military experience, supported by any friends he happened to pick up along the way? Particularly as the hobbit in question had never previously been more than a few miles from his native village.

    Surely, the obvious solution would have been to assign a company of elven cavalry with magic swords, supported by Ents, and accompanied by guides familiar with the terrain. It's clear from the book that the elves could raise a huge military force when they had to -- why not use it for this mission?

    The really annoying thing is that there *is* a reason why this was not an option, and a Lord of the Rings fan told me what it was three years ago. I forgot it, though, and it's been driving me mad ever since.

    thanks, streetlawyer