Titanium As Cheap As Aluminum?
ThesQuid writes: "I caught this article in The Economist the other week. If practical, the electrolytic process described could make the production of titanium as cheap as aluminum. Ridiculous? Just remember, aluminum used to be refined by a process somewhat similar to how titanium is refined nowadays, and when a practical electrolytic refining process was discovered the price of it went from more precious than gold to something, well, as cheap as aluminum is nowadays."
Yes, the weight probably was the biggest thing, but I'm sure the *resilience* of Titanium (see Materials Science geek posts above) caused some ringing -- of both helmet and head.
"You can't get something for nothing." - my grandfather, on the stock market and Reaganomics.
The Discovery Channel had a show about the 747. It really was amazing that it was essentially designed without computers. They tested the wing strength by hanging an insane amount of weight off of them, and the test pilot pulled the stick back so far on take-off that the tail scraped the runway.
"How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
And it's like that muppet song. You know, Da da, da-da-da (MUH NA MUH NA). Maybe it's time for some Muppet Schoolhouse Rock? Da da, da-da-da (UN UN I UM!)
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
The way that I think of it is this from heaviest to lightest Steel-titanium-aluminum. From designed strength highest to lowest, Steel-titanium-aluminum. However, the strength-to-weight ratio from highest to lowest goes like this: aluminum-titanium-steel.
I did enjoy the nice selection of links which you provided with your comment. Thank you indeed.
Keeping
In Genius , the Richard Feynman biography, there was an anecdote where the scientists working on the nuclear bomb at Los Alamos discovered they could requesition *anything* from the army. After asking for and recieving a 12 inch diameter solid sphere of gold (later cut in half and used as a door stop) they asked for a kilogram of osmium, only to be turned down when it was discovered that that significantly more than existed in pure form in the entire world at that time.
/* This post not warrantied for mission critical applications. */
Besides, beryllium is EXTREMELY tightly controlled ; mostly due to its very interesting properties when building "uncontrolled" nuclear fission devices (ie, bombs). Beryllium has the very interesting property of being a very good neutron reflector, which means that if you coat a mass of fissible material with a (thin !) beryllium reflector, you reduce by two or three the critical mass.
n dex.html for more design details (search for Beryllium there).
:-)
Also, Beryllium can be used as a source of neutrons (when bombarded with alpha rays), which again, is a desireable property when building certain types of devices...
Both effects have been put to use even since Trinity...
see the HEW archive at http://www.enviroweb.org/issues/nuketesting/hew/i
In short: don't show up at an airport with some Be on you. You'd Be In Trouble (tm)
Most if not all aluminum is refined from a relatively rare ore called bauxite. I'm not sure if a titanium equivalent is necessary for this new process. General abundnace of the element isn't necessarily the largest factor in a material's value.
"Anyone that has ever gotten an idea based on any of my work and done something better with it-good for you."--J.Carmack
I used to be involved with production of titanium bike frames, as well as aluminum, 4130, etc.
;-) With the correct setup welding is not a problem. Gotta keep the tubes clean as well. We used ultrasonic cleaning to keep them clean before welding. Works great.
You can not weld titanium in free air if you want it to last
~=Keelor
Folks,
If they can drastically cut the cost refining titanium and working with that metal, it could have a tremendous effect on the civilian aerospace industry.
For one thing, it would make Boeing's HSCT (High-Speed Civilian Transport) second-generation SST all that more practical. Given that titanium alloys are very strong and resist heat far better than aluminum alloys, with lower-cost titanium production Boeing could do major weight savings on the HSCT design compared to the aluminum-alloy/stainless steel structure design Boeing studied with NASA back in the mid-1990's. This means that Boeing's HSCT could either carry more pax/cargo for the same proposed range (Los Angeles-Tokyo nonstop) or carry enough fuel to fly LAX-SYD non-stop cruising at Mach 2.3.
Raymond in Mountain View, CA
Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
A chunk of a Diamondtalk.com Forum has some nice information on this. In particular, one poster cited an article in The Atlantic entitled "Have you ever tried to sell a diamond?" notably, it says the following:
Just like any other cartel, like the Cocaine People(tm).
That's true now, but remember that previous article in The Atlantic? Well, it links to another article which has this next juicy tidbit:
Namaqualand is described slightly above that snippet of text as "...a sandy slab of South Africa along the Atlantic coast. Namaqualand's pan-hot desert and scraped little hills start north of Cape Town and run up to the Orange River..." which is striking, because what that means is that at one time, you could head off from Cape Town, go to the beach with a rake, and just dig up uncut diamonds.
Also, the American Museum of Natural History has a nice diamond web exhibit which contains, among other things, this page which points out that diamonds were discovered in South Africa by a boy finding one just lying around on his father's farm. Nice anectodal evidence.
And just to make you ill without sending you to goatse.cx, consider this article (in Red Herring) which talks about a company (now called Blue Nile) which got billions of dollars (literally) in two rounds of VC funding in one month.
So when you're forking over two months' salary for an engagement ring like a barmy git, keep in mind that once upon a memory you could walk on the beach in Cape Town and spontaneously find a diamond in your toes. How often do you think that happens nowadays?
Enough data mining for tonight. You're all on your own from here on out.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
Titanium is quite reactive and quickly forms a protective oxide film when exposed to oxygen. The oxide film doesn't flake off (unlike iron oxide) and protects the metal from further damage. Aluminum, another very reactive metal, does the same thing.
Ryan
A brief search failed to turn up any confirmation of 747 loop-de-loops, but I can believe it. The "vomit commet" used by NASA for 0-g flights is a pretty big plane, and the parabolic cycle probably puts every bit as much stress on an airframe as a loop. Maybe more.
My question would be whether or not Ti is flexible enough. Fighter jets have shorter wings than passenger jets. Ever watched the wings of a 727 during heavy turbulence? They flex quite noticeably. Would Ti stand up to that day in and day out for 20 years or more?
For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
here are a few. (Nice post, btw - briefly covered the current state of titanium supply industry). If this electrolytic refining technology foreseen in the Economist article is realized, some changes will occur. Toothpaste and white paint might get more expensive as titanium metal gets less costly (as metal refining starts to compete with dioxide, the price of titanium dioxide will have to rise). But the major changes will likely proceed from a combination of technologies. One might note that several have remarked that titanium is tough and this means its hard to machine. What if you could create titanium parts without significant tooling? What if you could form a part out of a titanium dioxide/alloy paste on a 3-dimensional 'printer' and then use an electrolytic process to finish it as a completely formed titanium alloy part? Cool? You betcha! That's where the article is pointing. China won't be left behind in such a transition - they'll simply shift from (labor intensive) sponge production to new electrolytic processes and parts manufacture - to designs specified real-time. And they'll use unicode-enabled Linux (TurboLinux? or their own ripoff of same) to drive 3D "printers." Years ago, I toured the Wah Chang plant in Albany, Oregon. Their product was Zirconium, back then...
As a designer of helicopter rotor systems I can tell you that, yes, Ti is good stuff. I'm a personal fan of TI-Al6V4, we use it all over the BA609 tiltrotor (www.bellhelicopter.textron). However, as others have mentioned, the stuff is difficult to machine and has a real problem with galling, meaning that splines and other components with relative motion aren't good applications. But, hey, I'm all for cheaper Ti.
;-) Can't say I blame them... no liability, no quality assurance, and no need for machining tolerances on the order of a few thousandths of an inch.
However, God intended Ti to belong in airplanes, helicopters, and Soviet submarines. It does not belong in golf clubs. Everytime I hear a vendor turn us down because their production capacity is taken by golf clubs I want to kill someone
Baskin
Titanium: 16 million PSI
Aluminium Alloys: all at around 10 milion PSI
Ingot Iron and Plain Carbon Steel: both at 30 million PSI
Consciousness is not what it thinks it is
Thought exists only as an abstraction
you forgot one...
Beryllium dust causes Beryllicosis...one of the more unpleasant ways to die.
It's sort of like Black-Lung disease, only not so pretty.
Never let your fears overcome your dreams.
See the extensive data for your selves:
http://www.matweb.com/GetIndex2.asp
Aluminum has good points too... like it's got really high thermal/electrical conduction, and you can injection mold it. The latter is pretty cool, and happens because its high temp viscocity falls at high pressure. And interestingly if you go to small enough length scales like the TI micro-mirrors where you lengths are near the grain size of Aluminum the reliability goes way up.
http://www.dlp.com/dlp/resources/whitepapers/me
OK, so this has CID 277, so that explains part of it, but it still amazes me that this post remains at +2. If this post was arguing PRO-religion/christianity/catholocism, it would have been moded into oblivion in .4 seconds. I'm used to living in this lost world, but the bias here is larger than I expected.
So, what's your beef? What was anti-Christian about my post, assuming that that's what you've got the problem with? Any why post anonymously?
________________________________________
Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
OK, this is certainly going to get lost in the shuffle but ...
... if your finger ever swells up you will lose it (the finger), as standard tools will not be able to cut the ring from your finger.
:)
I have a titanium wedding ring, made of the Ti6Al4V alloy, which is the alloy that they use in those wonderful military applications. In other words, this is the really strong alloy; regular Titanium is, to my understanding, not all that strong.
Titanium is nice and light and I think it makes for a great, somewhat exclusive, cheap ($200) wedding ring. But
Furthermore, it's not really what I was going for - I wanted the ultimate ring, the most indestructible I could find, but I settled on Titanium because it was cheap and easy to get a ring made out of it (www.titaniumrings.com).
If I had it to do all over again, and I had the gumption to get going on the project early, I would have a tool steel ring made and have it coated with a TiN or TiCN layer, which should give it the strength and hardness to cut steel. Throw it in a wood chipper, and it would break the chipper and come out unscathed. That was my goal and I fell short with Titanium.
If there are any entrepeneurs out there listening, I will give you a free business idea: get yourself a foundry which is good at working with tool steel, and a jewelry designer, and start cranking out indestrucible wedding rings. If you can use the green tint or blue tint Titanium Nitride coatings, so much the better. I think people would go nuts over "indestructible" wedding rings. The symbolism is great - the commmittment is indestructible, and so is the ring.
Let me know when you have done so as I will be your first customer
Aluminium is makes up around 8 percent of the earths surface, and titanium is a fraction of 1%. I doubt titanium will ever be as cheap as aluminium
-----
"Almost isn't good enough - but it's almost good enough."
-Me
Damn, my Titanium VISA from First USA is worthless compared to the cheesy gold card I carry .. and I thought I was impressing the chicks at Denny's.
How cool! Now manufacturers will be able to advertise "super-strong titanium computers! Able to withstand everything!" Except the butchering that the wrong OS will do to the hardware :)
Yes, perhaps in some future day titanium could get as cheap as aluminum. But would it transform our everyday life in the same way that aluminum did? I think the largest influence of the cheapening of titanium is going to be in engineering, and I dont think it is going to be as important as the cheapening of aluminum.
Titanium? Forget that! Everyone knows that, with humanities' myopic nearsightedness, old-growth hardwood will be THE thing to own! No, you can't build missile casings or Aurora spy plane skin with it, but thanks to aggressive deforestation of old growth lumber, in 2215 a coffee table might cost you $25,000! REAL wood furniture will be accessable to only the filthy rich. "Vinyl Siding? What kind of LOSER are YOU? I have PAINTED WOOD SIDING on MY home. Get a REAL job!" (Roll the Ren & Stimpy Log Song)
THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
So how long until titanium foil hits the shelves?
One fellow had the bright idea of making himself a titanium helmet. It looked more or less normal, but it was incredibly light, and it gave him massive bragging rights..... Until he got into battle. The first head hit, he went down with a concussion.
After that, the SCA changed the rules so that helmets had to have a minimal weight. It turns out that the added inertia is part of the protection that they provide.
Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
Woohoo! Cheap 64-bit computing for everyone! And here I thought I'd have to take out a second mortgage!
Free music from Jack Merlot.
This stuff is getting seriously cheap already. When the Russians were putting up a titanium statue of Gagarin, you couldn't get the stuff for money or a reasonable amount of love. A few years ago the Russians sold off a submarine hull made of it, and it started showing up in golf clubs. You notice now that it is appearing in ordinary disposable batteries, hand tools sold via mass-mail, computer cases, etc. The Russians must be dumping it by the oxcart load to get foreign exchange. It's a fad, like cellophane, which was once a prestige material.
There aren't even any links in the artcile - and that was pretty funny!
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
What I want is... Adamantium.
Reinforced Skeleton, here I come!
Titanium is a bitch to machine, form, weld, etc. so it will still be expensive to make titanium stuff compared to aluminum.
Those who spend their time chasing the 'Karma' being handed out by the 'moderators' at SlashDot, will only find torment in the end.
:) However, theology is a pretty intersting topic. Did you know that satan and hell are largely inventions of the Catholic Church? And a lot of Protestant churches latched onto the fire-and-brimstone-hell, the model for which was the local trash dump in jerusalem (called "gehenna") which regularly caught fire. As far as I know, the Bible teaches that the 'wicked' will not be tormented for eternity in Hell (Gehenna/shaol/etc), but will simply be destroyed -- that is, cease to exist. The Gnostics began the process of creating a "Satan" -- an embodiment of evil -- from the biblical mentions of "satan" -- which just means "adversary," and "the devil" -- which means "slanderer." So "Satan" is the "father of all lies" in as much as the concepts and words that were lumped into the capital-S satan mean adversary-to-god, liar, deciver, slanderer, etc. Giving all evil corporeal form (no matter how fictional) allowed the Gnostics and their later followers to shift blame off of God for the things they thought were bad in the universe. Small-e evil became big-E Evil. All of the little opposers of Christendom were collected together and given form under the banner Satan.
I don't collect karma. I'm not kidding. My karma did not rise due to points allocated to that post.
It has come to my attention that the user who posted the parent comment has a nick that is the binary representation of 666.
You're darn tootin'!
You may be earnest in your satanism, but I am one-hundred fold more earnest in my respect for and love of Jesus Christ, Our Lord. If you ask Jesus to come into your heart, he will. That's all you have to do. Then you can put your pursuit of 'Karma' and other worldy goods behind you.
Snort. I know you're joking.
Notice also that Satanism is a derivative, not of Christianity, but of Catholicism. Black masses, inversion of the Catholic pentacle (which means "truth" and was painted on the inside of crusader's shields) to make the satanic pinnacle/goats' head, etc. In that Satan is defined as the antagonist/slanderer/etc. of catholicism, it is not surprising that it is, in fact, a dark mirror of catholicism. If something isn't adversarial or slanderous of catholic dogma, then it isn't satanic. Therefore, to be satanic, you must oppose, subvert and slander catholicism.
So, the pursuit of Satanism is really a convoluted self-deception based on wishful thinking begun by Gnostics many centuries ago. Not that it doesn't result in actual harm to actual people, but by setting it up with its own independant reality, rather than acknowledging its true nature, people give it way too much credit and authority. If the adversaries of the Church had never been lumped into an all-powerful Prince of This Planet, Satan, I imagine that there would be much less "satanism" and organized evil in the world.
Incidentally, what set you off originally was my 666-base-2 slashdot nick. It is unclear from the Bible that "666" has anything to do with the "satan" of popular doctrine. It is the "mark of the beast" -- but what is the beast? It might be the return of a global economic and military superpower akin in nature to the Holy Roman Empire. It's also used as a reference to "the Antichrist" -- which would be an enslaver rather than a liberator of Man; perhaps a single person, but more likely a system. It's also called a "great false prophet," a deciver of the people. It involves the ability to buy, sell and work contingent on the acceptance or refusal to accept the mark of the beast. I submit to you that the Beast was the Holy Roman Empire at the time that The Revelation of St John was written. The Romans used Fiat currency and printed lots and lots of it to finance their military ventures. They compelled its acceptance by the populace by the force of law. You couldn't work or be paid or buy anything without the use of Roamn currency. At the same time, Roman currency was a lie, a deception in and of itself. Unlike earlier Greece and Byzantium, which had gold standards (i.e., stable money actually worth something intrinsically), Rome money had no inherent or fixed value. In fact, its only value was that decreed by the state, diluted by people, unwillingness to accept it at face value. The real Beast is a military power that mandates acceptance of a worhtless currency by its subjects, which allows it to collect unlimited resources from them through inflation rather than the much more direct and difficult use of taxation. Rome finally went broke, and did it spetacularly. Byzantium, by contrast, had stable money (and prices) throughout its 800+ year ascendency, and its money was accepted the world over -- from China to Spain -- not because of the decree of law, but because it was actually valuable, and impossible to counterfeit. Metal is metal, or it is not; whereas fiat money merely has a stamp and a law backing it.
Remember that Jesus warned against the love of money as the cause of evil. He attacked the moneychangers. Real money -- like that an byzantium -- represents real value (in goods or labor). False money -- as that used in Rome and by the moneychangers in galilee -- represents a lie and the desire for unearned wealth.
Given this background, I would say that the Beasts of the modern day are the Federal Reserve, the IMF, the World Bank, and any other issuer of Fiat money; and the military powers that mandate its uses -- such as the United States, Britain, China, Japan, etc. It does not require prophecy to see that any time a government gives banks charter to print unlimited money, so that it can have unlimited spending power, that the banks will want to do all they can to get the governments in debt and keep them there, because they colelct the interest. Look at the history of the Rothschilds supporting both sides of the wars in Europe, and smuggling for both sides to boot. Look at how the Rothschilds, through JP Morgan and the Federal Reserve, draw the U.S. into World War I -- the banks benefitted massively through that war. Morgan was appointed banker and purchaser for the Allies. Total graft.
So, the moral of this story is that there is not just one Beast, who is satan, but lots of beasts. Any institutionalized deception is the hand of the Beast. U.S. dollars bear the current Mark of the Beast (the words "federal reserve note" and "legal tender for all debts"). The Mark fo the Beast used to be Niro, whose face appeared on the money.
________________________________________
Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
While we're on this diamond subject, I'll mention that diamonds have been discovered in Canada's arctic. Look for "Dia-Met" on the web.
They're one of the exceedingly few diamond mining companies that aren't controlled by DeBeers. And boy, is DeBeers pissed...
Anyway, point is, if you're looking to buy a diamond, you might enquire about getting a North American diamond. It's a bit more unique than the others.
Better yet, go with a simple gold band sans stone, and donate the money you saved by buying a goat for a third-world kid: http://catalog.heifer.org/goat.cfm
(this organization has phenomenally low administration costs: most of the money you donate actually does go to the people you're gifting, instead of lining the CEO's pockets!)
--
--
Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
"That is not because it is particularly rare (titanium dioxide is the basis of white paint) but because it is hard to extract as a pure metal"
If you are true about the 8:1 aluminum to titanium ratio it won't make very much difference. I doubt we will exhaust 1% of the earth's surface worth of alimuminum in our lifespans (correct me if my out of this world guesstimate is wrong)White paint is everywhere. They could maybe even (possibly) recycle cans of old paint just to make titanium.
Buying a Dell computer is equivalent to dropping the soap in a prison shower.
I was surprised to see this on slashdot as this initially struck me more as a bicycle geek thing. Titanium is a marvelous material for constructing bicycle frames, but it is very expensive. I'm eager to see this come to fruition in the bicycle industry.
-- Solaris Central - http://w
It is indeed a major bitch to weld. It is quite chemically reactive, even more so than aluminum which is part of the reason that it's been damn expensive to produce until now. The result is that you need a more than ususually inert atmosphere to do your welding. You can't even use nitrogen as your intert gas because Titanium will burn in a pure nitrogen atmosphere; you have to use Argon instead which is a fair bit more expensive. IIRC, for really large welding jobs, like airframes and submarine hulls, they've found that it's actually cheapest to put the thing that they're welding into a room with an inert atmosphere and have the welders wear breathing masks. This is obviously quite a hassle compared to working with Aluminum and absolutely outrageous compared to steel.
There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.
I'd be able to build robots w/ titanium bodies. It's to expensive for me now. I always wanted to try being in one of those robot battle shows. Not one with remote controls but with AI bots. That'd kick ass.
At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
I don't do custom orders, although I do make some for friends.
There are titanium wedding ring places online from which you can order. One-off titanium in New England is such a place.
My plans for a 15 foot tall war-mech are finally feasible! >D
One thing not mentioned in the article is how much calcium chloride is needed to produce the titanium... not too mention how often the electrolyte bath can be reused before the effectiveness of the conversion from solid titanium dioxide electrodes to titanium might start to fail. I'm assuming the basic principle behind this is similar to how a battery generates current until the chemical reaction dies from dilution.. Some /.'er with a more recent chemistry background care to comment? It's been way too long since I was in school learning this crap.
If the reaction has a relatively small window then the gain of using this process might be outweighed by the cost of managing/disposing of the spent calcium chloride...
It'll be interesting to see where this goes.
Do not taunt Happy-Fun Ball
I'm a machinist, and as an Expert In The Field, yeah, it would be neat to see a titanium beer can, but....
Titanium is a *bitch* to work with. It does *not* want to be worked. It doesn't like to be turned, milled, or ground, and if you're using a surface grinder and oil as a coolant, keep a fire extinguisher handy.
Or just shut off the oil.
I don't even want to imagine what it's like to weld.
Anyway, I digress...
Yeah, it'd be cool to see titanium as cheap as aluminum. It could be useful where aluminum cannot take the place of steel. It still won't make aluminum any less useful. Aluminum is *much* easier to work with (6061 alloy, anyone?), and therefore, less expensive for a finished product. You'll still see aluminum beer cans and aluminum engine blocks in the future.
This could be a tremendous environmental boon. One of the big costs of fuel cells is the titanium catalyst. If the price were brought down a lot, that would probably speed development and acceptance of fuel cell cars, not to mention the possibilities for other devices... I wonder if they would be cheap enough to replace the UPS on my computer. Or if not, at least the 20 or so UPS's on the computers at my old workplace. One car-sized fuel cell could easily power that many, and might be easier to have installed then a gasoline or diesel generator in an office building.
If you are modding me down because you disagree with me, use the "Flamebait" category, not the "Troll" one.
Titanium is as strong as steel, but 45% lighter. It is 60% heavier than aluminum, but twice as strong. Not surprisingly, it is often used in aircraft and missle hulls, as well as lacrosse sticks and mountian bike frames. It's used in that rainbow-hued metallic jewlery available at the mall. Because it's not corroded by salt water, it's used in desalination plants, propellers and other marine applications (including lures). Titanium is used to make "Shape memory alloys", notably nitinol (nickel-titanium). You can use nitinol wire to make walking robots, with the nitinol used as the musculature. It it used in pigments and is what makes white toothpaste white (TiO2). In fact, this is its major use. Plus, it's shiny. :)
________________________________________
Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
Sometimes it's better to stick with materials that we properly understand.
Drag n' Drop DVD Recommendations
When the Washington Monument, National Mall, Washington, D.C. was completed, a one-pound chunk of aluminum formed the very tip of the monument. Reasoning: it was a precious metal at that time. It was akin to placing a gemstone there.
[
Wrong. Iridium has 22.65 gr/cc. Osmium is 22.61 gr/cc. Platinum is 21.09. Rhenium is 21.02.
So you see the math says iridium is the densest. Since these are all precious metals, the most common element used for ammunition after lead is uranium (19.05 gr/cc) that has been depleted (i.e. nuclear waste).
It's called sapphire (an aluminum oxide.) In it's pure form it is clear from the visible all the way down to the midwave IR. Yes if you put impurities in it it turns pretty colors (basis for purple sapphire stones, rubys and other gem stones.) But you can see right through industrial sapphire with no problem. It is the second hardiest window material known to man. The US government uses it as a window to cover the seaker unit on a heat seaking missile. Sapphire is the only material that passes the IR used for such missiles and is strong enough to survive on the end of a missile that is going much faster than the speed of sound. The only problem is that it is difficult and expensive to make windows that are very large. If you could make your windshield out of it then it wouldn't crack as easily and your car would be cooler in the summer since sapphire doesn't block the IR. While in grad school my advisor spent a lot of time and money studying industrial sapphire. He always said it was the clear aluminum as seen in Star Trek :)
Drink the can first, jeeze! They didn't teach you anything in college.
--I assume full responsibility for my actions, except the ones that are someone else's fault.
Keeping
De Beers managed to increase the preceived value of diamonds though a carefully planned campaign of giving them to female Hollywood stars in the 1940s. Before that they were (rightly, IMO) considered rather boring.
Yeah, but diamond mining requires moving a huge amount of material to get a few diamonds. Titanium mining requires moving a large amount of material into a smelting facility. This process is not going to substantually change things other than making it cheaper. But it is going to change the lifestyle of titanium salesmen.
The main thing that excites me about this news is the possibility of airplane makers including more titanium in airplanes. That is a good thing. Stronger, lighter planes are always good.
"How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
Actually, the concept is not really that titanium will replace aluminum but that it will be in the same order of magnitude in price. Where the price really makes the difference and where the real usefulness will be is in large objects. Bridges that don't rust, supertankers that are stronger, ultra-tall skyscrapers, jumbo jets that can take more load before the wings fall off (ok, that is an aluminum replacement...I wonder if they'll be able to do a loop?)
At least for bike frames, I was under the impression that most of the premium was because titanium is so difficult to work with. This suggests that costs may not fall too much for frames, even if the material becomes suddenly cheap.
Merlin Metalworks, who make some of the nicest, imo (I ride a Kona myself as I don't have unlimited funds), frames on the market, has a titanium primer up that has some relevant info on how weld quality is very important when working with titanium, among other tidbits.
It also holds together Steve Austin, the Six Million Dollar Man. Where would the entertainment industry be without the advent of the Bionic Man and his accompanying sound effects?
I shudder to think...