Slashdot Mirror


Voices From The Hellmouth Revisited: Part Ten

This is the last in our retrospective on the columns that Jon Katz began writing after the killings at Columbine High School in 1999, followed by another handful of the many impassioned comments and emails that those columns drew, a few of which at least give hope that it is possible to tame the Hellmouth.

After Columbine: Geek Profiling W.A.V.E., a profit-making program ramping up in the southern U.S. and soon to go national, will use Web sites and toll-free numbers, to encourage students to anonymously turn in classmates whom they consider depressed, dangerous or potentially violent, this horrifically stupid Geek Profiling would be blatantly unconstitutional, if applied to adults.

According to David Bresnahan, reporting on the WorldNet Daily site, the new W.A.V.E. program, developed by Pinkerton Services Group, a division of the international security firm Pinkerton, Inc. is starting up in North Carolina, and is soon to go nationwide.

W.A.V.E. offers anonymous toll-free lines for students who will be trained to watch for and report "dangerous" behavior like depression, or for kids with weapons. Every North Carolina school will have free access to this program, which will include a Web site, classes, school assemblies and special sessions for parents and teachers. A North Carolina task force on school violence created W.A.V.E. America, working together with Pinkerton. A contact list of law-enforcement agencies is also being developed for each school in the state to notify when a tip has been received by Pinkerton on its nationwide toll-free line.

W.A.V.E. joins new software "security" programs like Mosaic 2000, which is being tested in public schools to compile and computerize information on students believed to be dangerous or potentially violent. This new rat-on-kids industry is an offshoot of the Geek Profiling, anti-Net hysteria that broke out all across the United States after last year's Columbine High School killings. Despite the fact that horrific incidents like Columbine are extremely rare, and that the FBI and Justice Department have both reported that youth violence has dropped to its lowest levels in more than half a century, the belief persists in much of America that technologies like the Internet (and activities like computer gaming) are turning otherwise healthy school children into mass murderers.

In a news magazine survey taken earlier this year, 81 percent of Americans said they believed the Net was responsible for the Columbine massacre. In the lunatic world of American education, and the surreal aftermath of Columbine, it now seems perfectly reasonable, even sensible, to suspend and force into counseling children who are angry, depressed. Children who wear white makeup, game obsessively, or who say intemperate and stupid things. The W.A.V.E. program is institutionalizing a culture in which kids are being taught to turn in classmates whose behavior they consider abnormal or dangerous. It is also reinforcing the notion that school students have no Constitutional rights of due process, rights such as privacy, confronting accusers, behaving in nonconformists ways, or even knowing that accusations against the exist.

Although school-age children are presumed to have few rights, it's obvious that this kind of anonymous and intrusive law enforcement would be blatantly unconstitutional for adults. Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a Florida law that permits police to search people for firearms solely on the basis of anonymous tips. Citing the Fourth Amendment, which prohibits unreasonable search and seizure, the court ruled that such a law would enable "any person to harass another to set in motion an intrusive, embarrassing police search." Authorities, the court ruled, needed some corroborating evidence before they could invade the privacy of any citizen. It's frightening to imagine how school authorities can possibly teach citizenship when they have so wantonly violated the very idea of constitutional rights.

The Orwellian phobia (Who do we turn in next? Dangerous parents, neighbors and sibs?) Has been a staple of the most venal political systems in the 20th Century, from Nazism to fascism to Communism. It is presumptuous and arrogant on so many levels. It's astonishing to see public officials like North Carolina Gov. Jim Hunt adopt an idea so unthinkingly and enthusiastically. But he's not alone-plenty of parents and educators are along for the ride.

It isn't clear where information goes once it's collected by kid-profiling software, or toll-free hot lines. Presumably, it remains in a computerized dangerous-kids database for life. This is just one more reason that it's insane to ask young children to evaluate their classmates for emotional disorders and other signs of potentially "dangerous" behavior. Not only are kids patently unqualified to make such judgments, the temptation to turn in teens who are socially competitive, "geeky", different, disliked, abrasive or unhappy seems almost irresistible, especially when doing so is cloaked in anonymity. Monitoring and evaluating behavior is a science that's supposed to be done by trained professionals - teachers, psychologists, guidance counselors, and therapists. Even then, kids ought to have the right to be openly confronted with the accusation that they're a menace to society, and to respond, rather than wonder if some angry classmate has branded them for life on an anonymous toll-free line run by a profit-making private company with a vested interest in promoting the notion that schools - and teenagers - are dangerous.

"A safe school environment is fundamental to helping North Carolina's students succeed in school," announced Governor Hunt. "Every school ought to be a safe one and W.A.V.E. America will help get every kid involved. This program is more than just a tip line, it teaches students and parents to look for early signs of violent behavior and to resolve conflicts constructively."

This is the worst kind of political exploitation. It takes schools off the hook and turns the complex process of school administration over to adolescents. Kids will ultimately have to live in fear that the desk mate they jostled with will turn them in, or that bragging about exploits on Doom will get them turned into W.A.V.E. as "unbalanced."

If a teen or a parent becomes aware that a classmate has a gun and plans to use it, there are plenty of cops and law enforcement officials they can call. There is no statistical evidence to support the notion that schools are so dangerous that children need to be manipulated into turning one another in. Nor is there much doubt about who will be targeted - geeks, nerds, Goths, oddballs, along with anyone else who is discontented, alienated and individualistic.

That kids are being asked to do this is revolting enough. That they are being asked to do it by a profit-making private corporation suggests a culture much sicker and more dangerous than most school kids.

"Seems to me that W.A.V.E. merely reflects the prevailing mindset of the majority of Americans. Not to mention the sad fact that intellectual midgets machine the majority of US political/power positions. I was a nerd in school, I still am. Does that make me dangerous? Only if the fact that I think makes me dangerous in a country where thought is considered dangerous. Allah/Jehovah/God/Buddha forbid!! Could this be America, the land of the free and blah, blah, blah? The often misquoted, precious, forefathers of this "great (foul)" land would curl into cinders to see what has become of their legacy. There is no humanity in this country, everybody wants liberty but only on their individual terms, only if it suits their self-interest and they don't even care if it impinges on someone else's liberty...that's the problem with the US. Big Brother does not exist and he's looking in through your windows, down your throat and into every other conceivable orifice in your body." ---A.C. (Original Comment #1)

"DO WHAT THOU WILT SHALL BE THE WHOLE OF THE LAW: This is the most ridiculous, ludicrous, fucked up shit I have heard in years. OF COURSE it is going to be nothing but a free-for-all with all the same fucking loser/conformist/fascist types trying to fuck up life in yet ANOTHER fashion for anyone/everyone who is unique, individual, different, creative, follows another drummer, doesn't swim with the lemming crowd, doesn't baaa with the herd of sheep, etc., ad nauseum. As if they didn't try to make life fucked up for us enough as it is. But shit, we had power, guts, determination, magic and ingenuity to invent the Internet, to truly render the earth a global village, and to redefine what "WORK" means in the "new millennium". So surely we can figure out a way to STOP these worthless twits...can't we? Whaddya say, people? What shall we do to overthrow them before they even ascend, to stomp them down before they even rear their pathetic virus-infested heads, to bring them to a screeching, grinding halt before they even cross the starting line? IDEAS? ANYONE? Love is the law, love under will."---S. (Original Comment #2)

"So depressed people are dangerous and should be locked up are they? I f only guns were legal in this country; I'd go out and shoot myself in the head right now. Fascist bastards."---M.O. (Original Comment #3)

"I also have spent years fighting depression. I was diagnosed with bi-polar disorder. I'm medically considered a danger to myself. Everyone assumes that this means I'll hurt them too. I could never physically hurt anyone else. I care deeply about everyone except my self. Now that's a crime?" ---A.C. (Original Comment #4)

"My father fought his depression for three decades until it finally won one morning. In the meantime he was a major scholar in his field, respected and well liked by colleagues and students across the world. We were simply astonished by the bundles of condolences from around the world, which kept coming for weeks. He wrote several of the standard texts in his field, as well as what are now the canonical translations/ Commentaries on a number of classical texts, and was credited with making it a significant area of study where before it was an obscure backwater. And practically nobody was aware of his illness outside of his family and his closest colleagues. A less dangerous man I can hardly envision. Now under the W.A.V.E. regime, I guess that, if anyone had actually noticed the symptoms, he would have been labeled as dangerous (to people other than himself) and might well have been unable to continue in academia and thus to carry out his work, his humble attempt to add to the sum of human knowledge. By all accounts this man was a really good teacher. Clearly I'm somewhat biased, but when he taught me, I could see the talent he had. And three decades worth of students would have been deprived of his abilities, care, concern and sense of duty, had he been blacklisted on health grounds. Tuberculosis is contagious - that's why it's a notifiable disease. Depression is an all-too-often fatal condition, but it is not contagious and should in the main remain a matter for the patient, their family and their physician. It is not grounds for a witch hunt."---Tom (Original Comment #5)

"Sounds wonderful. Now these people who would rather be left alone, and enjoy wearing black clothing will be labeled as depressed and violent. Is this the "Kick Me" sign for the 21st Century?" ---P.O. (Original Comment #6)

"Does anyone else remember the cheap school-TV movie "The Wave" about fascism in elementary school? I just thought that was a weird coincidence." ---F. (Original Comment #7)

"Yeah, I mean its not like depression is very well understood by the vast majority of adults in this country. I made the mistake of letting an employer know that I was seeking help for depression, and, did I ever regret it. I found that people in the office regarded me as a potential serial killer or something. I also started hearing nasty jokes told when they thought I wasn't around. I finally put a stop to it all by having my shrink write up a document "certifying" that I was sane. Did it up one of those award templates all fancy? I should have framed it. I presented that at a staff meeting and told all present that I was the only person there who was certifiably sane and that I would have no more jokes and ostracism. It worked surprisingly well. I was lucky. Sadly, mental illness still carries a stigma and too many people like to pretend there is no such thing as depression, or they treat it as moral failing. Or worse they fear it on the same level as demonic possession. So now we have a program that puts depressed people in a database of suspicious persons. Great. Just what we need to encourage people to go get help."---D. (Original Comment #8)

211 comments

  1. Hmmmmmm. by Jailbrekr · · Score: 2

    I always thought 'The Wave' was something you did at a sporting event.....

    First Post?

    --
    Feed the need: Digitaladdiction.net
  2. A few too many bytes by intmainvoid · · Score: 1
    13221 bytes in body

    Unfortunately only 20 bytes of new content...

  3. Let IT die Katz. by FallLine · · Score: 1

    You're a washed up hack, face it. Why don't you go back to writing fortune cookies or something?

    1. Re:Let IT die Katz. by emmons · · Score: 2

      Agreed. Katz, we're sick of this stuff... please, leave us in peace.

      --
      Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
  4. Two Katz articles in 1 day? by ninjalex · · Score: 2

    Gives a new meaning to s l o w news day.

    --
    Banned from moderation 01-27-2002. Fuck you too /.!
  5. W.A.V.E not The Wave by Lbsnb · · Score: 1

    W.A.V.E. is here.

  6. Yippee! Hellmouth again! by sgtron · · Score: 1

    Please... just let this subject die man, I've had enough already.

    --
    No todo lo que es oro brilla
  7. Too true by FallLine · · Score: 2

    Haha, too true. Perhaps 13221 bytes in BODY, but only 20 bytes in HEAD is more apropos? ;P

  8. Against W.A.V.E.? Sabotage it. by Sebastopol · · Score: 4


    End Geek Profiling.

    Simply call the # and report every student in all of your classrooms. Convince a few friends to do the same, and eventually, every student will be on the roster for investigation.

    Granted, this sounds like that lame Spacey movie "Pay it Forward", it would definitely complicate the works.


    ---

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    1. Re:Against W.A.V.E.? Sabotage it. by Thorin_ · · Score: 5

      Better yet the geeks can just call up and report all the jocks etc. Because it is anonymous you don't even have to have any friends help. Just use several differnt phones.

    2. Re:Against W.A.V.E.? Sabotage it. by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Damn, beat me to it, that's exactly what I was going to say. Somebody mod that up!


      --Gfunk

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    3. Re:Against W.A.V.E.? Sabotage it. by metasynth · · Score: 2

      Not only do that, but make up names as well, flood the entire system with so much useless and incorrect information that it can't work anymore. Get friends together and send in conflicting information. e.g. at 12:20 the high schools all star quarter back was seen in town lighting a fire in an abandoned house, at school beating up freshmen students in the toilets and in the principles office destroying files. All at 12:20. Also mention that he was wearing a QIII t-shirt just to really scare the people on the other end of the phone.
      If enough people do this then the database would be so full of conflicting information that it won't be useable. And also imagine the reactions of parents who find out that their kids are being investigated incase they are mass killers waiting to happen when they don't even own a computer.
      Minds are like Parachutes,

      --
      Minds are like Parachutes,
      They only function when open.
    4. Re:Against W.A.V.E.? Sabotage it. by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 2

      Simply call the # and report every student in all of your classrooms. Convince a few friends to do the same, and eventually, every student will be on the roster for investigation.

      Now this is interesting....imagine for a second that you and your pals report certain persons...the captain of the football team or cheerleading squad...the homecoming queen...eventually the whole school comes crashing down in one massive dystopia...everyone is being investigated, lawsuits everywhere...

      ObJectBridge (GPL'd Java ODMG) needs volunteers.

    5. Re:Against W.A.V.E.? Sabotage it. by Phoenix1 · · Score: 1

      Excellent plan. Step 1. Join the Netropolis Collective at http://netropolis.freeyellow.com Step 2. Organize a simultaneous call hour Step 3. Call and call and call until they go insane and jump out a window. VIVA LA REVOLUCION! And long live the Geek revolution!!

      --
      poop.
    6. Re:Against W.A.V.E.? Sabotage it. by deacent · · Score: 2

      Seriously, if you are being harrassed by someone who is a <insert your favorite stereotypical popular type here>, I'd say that qualifies as anti-social and possibly dangerous behavior. Use the hotline. Give details as to how that person has been anti-social and/or dangerous. Examples: physical abuse, public humiliation, slander, anything they'd be arrested for if they were an adult.

      Be sure that you think about what you are going to say and how you phrase it. You wouldn't want to come off sounding like sour grapes instead of a genuine report of abuse.

      -Jennifer

    7. Re:Against W.A.V.E.? Sabotage it. by Mike1024 · · Score: 2
      Hey,

      Simply call the # and report every student in all of your classrooms.

      Why stop at the students? You could phone in about the teachers too:

      "This guy at my school... John Maplebury... I think he might be mentally unstable or something. He's always wearing a long black gown and talking about punishing people."

      Put in a couple of those about different teachers every week, and watch the fun...

      Michael

      ...another comment from Michael Tandy.

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
  9. okay, this is all good by vsync64 · · Score: 5
    Now please please please make it into a book!

    Look, they posted AC, correct? Which means they purposely avoided being contacted. And they posted in a public forum, which means anyone can quote them. Fair use.

    Even if you have to remove a few comments, do so and publish the rest. I'd buy it. I'd show it to people.

    This book doesn't prove anything. It doesn't show that we're all oppressed, or that we're all whiners. But it's an honest look at the collective viewpoint of geeks (as ridiculous and cheesy as that phrase has become), and it can make people think.

    Publish it.

    (BTW, I'm proud of you for including the MasterCard joke in one of the installments... I was hoping you'd have the guts to do that.)

    --

    --
    TO BUY A NEW CAR WOULD MAKE YOU SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE.
    1. Re:okay, this is all good by Fervent · · Score: 2
      I'd buy it too.

      -
      -Be a man. Insult me without using an AC.

      --

      - I don't care if they globalize against free speech. All my best free thoughts are done in my head.

    2. Re:okay, this is all good by Rares+Marian · · Score: 1

      You're already on the WAVE list and you know it!

      --
      The message on the other side of this sig is false.
    3. Re:okay, this is all good by RedWizzard · · Score: 2
      Publish the book Mr. Katz and you will be sued.
      By who, the anonymous posters? How are they gonna prove it's their work?

      Besides it isn't illegal to publish this stuff at all. If you write a letter to a newspaper they can publish it. In it's entirity. Without a name, if they want (they don't because then they become the defendant in any ensuing slader/libel cases).

    4. Re:okay, this is all good by SparkyB · · Score: 1

      What about the Pinkertons? I know that isn't what the previous poster meant, but couldn't they sue for slander?

    5. Re:okay, this is all good by grunef · · Score: 1

      slander by defenition i believe means written statements that damages someones image to society .. and i doubt an anoymous poster is going to be saying any thing more than " the jocks at my school did bla bla " they arnt going to be naming the jocks or the school ...

      --
      www.grunef.com slashspam(an A with a squiggle around it) willcowan.com
    6. Re:okay, this is all good by jekk · · Score: 1
      Yes, it's redundant. But I'd buy it too, and there are certain people I would want to give copies to.

      -- Michael Chermside

  10. Re:Hmm.. by atrowe · · Score: 1

    hey that's my stapler... he stole my stapler... excuse me,... i paid for that... please give it back ..*mumble mumble*... burn the building down...

    --

    -atrowe: Card-carrying Mensa member. I have no toleranse for stupidity.

  11. How many people? by loki29 · · Score: 1


    How many people have went out and killed themselves after seeing Katz repeat himself over and over, whether it be discussions of angst-ridden teens who can't get a date to the prom or his reviews of the latest Tom Hanks movie?

    People! I think we are missing the real tragedy here! The real tragedy is Katz is not offering anything of substance to Slashdot. The real tragedy appears to be Katz is getting paid per article he writes, no matter whether it has anything to do with Slashdot or not.

    1. Re:How many people? by tewl · · Score: 1

      He's getting paid per article and per word I would assume :)

    2. Re:How many people? by Fervent · · Score: 2
      Hmm. Well I don't know if you could argue that most of what is posted on Slashdot is "content". I try to incite conversation... and arguments. I like the verbal play, and it leads to interesting thoughts. But is that "content"?

      I think Katz is a very eloquent speaker, and I enjoy reading his stuff. Plus, for someone relatively new to Slashdot (only about a year), reading Katz stuff is kind of interesting.

      -
      -Be a man. Insult me without using an AC.

      --

      - I don't care if they globalize against free speech. All my best free thoughts are done in my head.

    3. Re:How many people? by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      Agreed. What you describe is "dialogue", and the interesting patterns of thought are why I come here. I, too, enjoy Katz.

    4. Re:How many people? by alizard · · Score: 1
      >How many people have went out and killed themselves after seeing Katz repeat himself over and over,

      Please do it now before you pollute the human gene pool any further. In the slashdot how-to tradition, I'll even tell you how.

      1. Get a stick of dynamite, a blasting cap, and some vaseline.
      2. Set up a videocam.
      3. Turn on the videocam.
      4. Insert the blasting cap into the stick of dynamite.
      5. Cover the stick of dynamite with vaseline.
      6. Stick the dynamite as far up your ass as possible.
      7. Detonate the blasting cap.

      You'll do the species a lot more good that way than you will by any possible contribution you think you can make to humanity.

  12. Big shock... by Karma+Sink · · Score: 1

    The rights of teenagers erode day by day in America. Currently, in Northern California, there is a DAYTIME curfew being considered to 'keep teenagers out of trouble'. Laws like this are patently ridiculous. The only problem is, Teenagers don't have enough people standing up for their rights as citizens. There aren't enough lawyers standing up against the opression. After all, there are lawyers in any other opressed group, female lawyers, black lawyers, asian lawyers, etc... But, for obvious reasons, there are no tennaged lawyers. As a result, teenagers are under-represented, and thus easily opressed. Personally, I am working on my J.D. to fight exactly this kind of cause, opression of teenagers. This sort of ignorance simply can't be allowed to continue.

    --

    When encryption is outlawed, ?o'AZ-,++o+i++##4AoA+-/-C++bI+/.+~
    1. Re:Big shock... by Smitty825 · · Score: 2

      ...But the world will be such a better place with a daytime curfew! Once the daytime curfew is in place, we will be able to keep them in their schools, which are locked up and surrounded by guards preventing anyone entering or leaving. Kinda sounds like a prison to me (hmmm...that gives me a better idea what to do with teenagers)

      --

      Doh!
    2. Re:Big shock... by LWolenczak · · Score: 1

      .... but teenagers need lives, they need to develope emmotionally, and socially. This kind of stuff restricts that development.

      Let us not forget, that teachers often give better grades to children who are known to be on redilin. I worked as a camp counsulor last summer, nine of my twelve kids were on redilin, Only three of them really needed it, and then, only one was REAL bad.

      A curfew is not the way, teenagers will just ignore it. The state of North Carolina tried to enact a curfew for teenagers driving, slowly, it went from no driving after 9 pm on the permit, to no driving after 9pm automaticlly on provisional lisences for teenagers. What has happened with this? Nothing, Parents, and Police ignore it. How are they supposto enforce it anyway, profile? pull over random cars? arrest teenagers buying ink for their printers at the local walmart? arrest teenagers for going home from work? They cannot enforce it without infrindging the rights of adults.

    3. Re:Big shock... by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      there are lawyers in any other opressed group, female lawyers, black lawyers, asian lawyers, etc... But, for obvious reasons, there are no tennaged lawyers.

      Simple solution: extend the age of adulthood to 31, and then see how long those oppresive laws stay in place. Tee hee.

      Its like the cyber rights issues. When it was just linux geeks who couldn't view dvd no one cared. When it appeared that the Superbowl would be "record once with pay", and then the recording wouldn't work on your neighbors' player, all my dorm-mates started talking about lawyers and guns. Its easy to play "us vs. them" until we become them.

  13. how to make the thing work FOR geeks! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 5

    Report all the abusive bullies in the school. Seems they're the _real_ violent types, right?

    Maybe they can get counselling before they become alcoholic wife-beaters...

    1. Re:how to make the thing work FOR geeks! by Don+Symes · · Score: 1

      Now THERE's a valid idea!

    2. Re:how to make the thing work FOR geeks! by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      Thats the problem, there is no one group that will turn out to be killers or wife beaters. Violent tendencies cannot be easily traced to people exhibiting certain personality traits. Sure every once in a while a nation with millions of youths five or ten with violent tendencies will band together and cause a terrible tragedy. However, there are other factors leading to this, such as mob mentality. Most geeks don't kill their classmates. Most jocks don't grow up and beat their wives. However some geeks beat their wives, and in a society where jocks are treated like geeks the possibility of the football team at Columbine being the ones that killed their classmates exists. You can't group people.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    3. Re:how to make the thing work FOR geeks! by vsync64 · · Score: 1
      Very interesting... The original poster never said "jocks". The original poster said "abusive bullies". Yet you jumped to "jocks".

      Yes, you're right. You can't group people.

      I would say that 90% of high school students are abusive bullies, or aid and abet abusive bullying. There is nothing surprising in this. It's just Sturgeon's Law applied to people.

      --

      --
      TO BUY A NEW CAR WOULD MAKE YOU SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE.
    4. Re:how to make the thing work FOR geeks! by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 2
      It'll work against the white trash bullies, but there's this whole overclass of "approved" bullies. Jocks, for instance. And they'll get away with it, every time. When accused, they'll deny it, and the administration will believe them, then there'll be a big school assembly where they talk about how the system's being abused to settle jealousy-based vendettas, and the geeks in the back row will get careful looks from the podium that the rest of the student body can't help but pick up on, and the socially undesirable one will know he can't win, that the system isn't there for him, that it's all a lie and he'd better by-god get with the program, and the asshole that got away with the first punch will know he can get away with it next time, and the punch will get thrown twice as hard next time, and the next report will get ignored because if the first one was a sham the second one obviously is twice the sham, and the victim will get reported as a danger to himself, for failing to cowtow to the almighty sanctioned bully, and for walking around with a bruised cheek he refuses to explain, because there's no point in trying to explain, because the bully's in a protected class.

      There is a double standard, and that standard is set by the social worthiness victim. Compare the prison terms of blacks convicted of murdering whites, to the terms of whites convicted of murdering blacks. Anybody who's ostracized is up against similar odds.

      It won't work. It just won't work.

      --

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
    5. Re:how to make the thing work FOR geeks! by Puppet+Master · · Score: 1
      Report all the abusive bullies in the school. Seems they're the _real_ violent types, right?


      Maybe they can get counselling before they become alcoholic wife-beaters...


      But... Most of the abusive bullies were also on the football team (at least in my school)... I seriously doubt, that the school will allow their "Prized Players" to be labeled as abusive or anything else (other than heros perhaps)...

      --
      The day Microsoft creates a product that doesn't suck, it will be known as the Microsoft Vaccuum Cleaner!
  14. broader than a mere American issue by kubla2000 · · Score: 5
    The idea of setting up a federal tattle-tale system has a legacy rather more sinister than W.A.V.E or other media-hyped agencies of a smiliar ilk.

    The Nazis got good currency out of an informant system, as did the totalitarian regimes of Eastern Europe. Amongst the most notorius reigned in Romania, Bulgaira and Albania, three of the most depressed countries in the region. The legacy of the tattle-tale lives in as standing out in any way (read, being different from the herd, including being successful) is a cause of fear and neurosis.

    The brain-drain that results from an informant system is shocking. Witness the exodus of intellectuals from the former communist block. Project that to America and you'll find parents pulling their ostracised children out the public education sector and into the private.

    Who will suffer most? Typically, the ones who would have stood to gain the most: those for whom an intellectually stimulating peer group would have boosted motivation, intellectual discipline and dialogue. And if there's any group who can understand the benefits from a stimulating peer-group, it's the /. crowd.

    1. Re:broader than a mere American issue by shinji1911 · · Score: 1

      Who will suffer most? Typically, the ones who would have stood to gain the most: those for whom an intellectually stimulating peer group would have boosted motivation, intellectual discipline and dialogue. And if there's any group who can understand the benefits from a stimulating peer-group, it's the /. crowd.

      The brain drain is the inevitable result of such a fascist system, and is instrumental in bringing about its eventual downfall. Causing the exodus of your best and brightest has its costs, and such a system pays for its stupidity. Think:

      the intellectuals exit stage left, leaving behind a group who don't care about school, but who 'fit in' just fine. Test scores go down further, the public school system becomes even more of a failure, eventually leading to legistlated privatization.

      I see nothing critically wrong here, quite honestly. Let the system bring about its own downfall.

    2. Re:broader than a mere American issue by roystgnr · · Score: 2

      And if there's any group who can understand the benefits from a stimulating peer-group, it's the /. crowd.

      Darn right. Sure, I used Linux before I got my login here, but I installed it completely unaware of how l33t I was becoming. Why, until I started reading Slashdot, I had no idea how close the affiliation between Microsoft and Satan really was! And while I'm sure many of us had pictured Natalie Portman naked before, it took true insight to consider the implications of adding petrification to the scenario.

    3. Re:broader than a mere American issue by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      >The brain drain is the inevitable result of such a fascist system, and is instrumental in bringing about its eventual downfall. Causing the exodus of your best and brightest has its costs, and such a system pays for its stupidity.

      Amen, brother.

      Hitler is burning in hell right now.

      He could have lived to a ripe old age - and acquired the title of Global Emperor by means of owning the first operational nuclear weapon - had he spent a little more time paying attention to "Jew science".

      Somewhere in heaven, Albert Einstein, "Jew scientist" is playing dice with God - but I think he's OK with the way things turned out - even if God had to show him a thing or two about dice.

      Rule #1 for all wannabe-evil-emperors: NEVER piss off your geniuses. They're either your weapons enginners or your enemy's. Your choice.

  15. Part Ten? by Magus311X · · Score: 1

    I hate to say it, but come on. Part Ten? Doesn't anyone remember when the Friday the 13th series went this far?
    -----

  16. WooHoo! by Trevor+Goodchild · · Score: 1

    This is the last in our retrospective on the columns that Jon Katz began writing after the killings at Columbine

    ...and there was much rejoicing throughout the land.

    1. Re:WooHoo! by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 3
      No, no... the real question here is "what would Bryan Boytano do?"

      sigh...


      tagline

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
  17. Part Fucking Ten? by angelo · · Score: 1

    Damnit, Jon, write a book and LEAVE US ALONE!! It stopped becoming a geek thing a long time ago, and it just became a Katz thing!

  18. Didn't they have this in Russia? by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    Or in 1984? (Orwell) I seem to remember some name for these people.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
    1. Re:Didn't they have this in Russia? by mike449 · · Score: 1

      Yes, we did. Consequences were terrible. The nation has been crippled, and will suffer for a long time yet from the snitch mentality.

      The practice of anonymous tipping was abolished by Gorbachev around 1987, which is one of his greatest achievements.

      On the other hand we had learned the lesson. I wish Americans could learn from other people's mistakes. Well, you had McCarthy...

    2. Re:Didn't they have this in Russia? by strlen · · Score: 1

      Yes, they did. In fact, there is a famous case of that, the case of Pavlic Morozov. Basically in the 1930 he told on his father being a "kulak" (a wealthy farmer), and had his father executed as an enemy of the state -- due to a propaganda campaign which encouraged such to be done. He was then made into a hero. And that was only during the darkest hour, Stalinism -- even during Brejnev he was considered a traitor and an example of what kids should _NOT_ do. And here I see the same thing, in the middle of prosperity and the supposed diplomacy.

    3. Re:Didn't they have this in Russia? by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      A little closer to home is the DARE cop who talked a 3rd(?) grader into turning in his father for growing weed in his garage for personal use. The father was arrested, but a CA judge thru it out. These sorts of actions *are* unamerican in the truest (non-mccarthy) sense. "Land of the Free"...ouch!

    4. Re:Didn't they have this in Russia? by strlen · · Score: 1

      The war on drug is in itself is as American as Ho Chi Minh (no, I'm not advocating the Vietnam war).I don't aprove of McCarthy, neither do I approve of modern forms of McCarth-ism -- which is still the same thing, turning in your parents and your friends and co-workers. I think McCarthy himself was unAmerican -- the commitie for unAmerican activities was actually created to prosecute American nazi's, but instead was used to prosecute some of the strongest anti-nazi's ever in many cases.

  19. Just solve it. by Devout+Capitalist · · Score: 1
    There's a different solution than bemoaning the lack of education, let's fix the education problem so we have people that can make better decisions.

    Yes, it is slow, and often thankless, but it really is better to build one bonfire than to curse the darkness.

    One novel approach is TrueGift Donations, a nonprofit trying to get school supplies into classrooms without doing the usual funding games. Check it out.

    If you think its better to get bright kids out of schools, rather than just complain about Marching Morons, then moderate this up.

    Besides, wouldn't you like bright coworkers?

    --
    Profit motivates invention.
  20. Fight Back! by bowood · · Score: 1

    Join youthpower.net and make a difference!

  21. Re:Attn: Jon Katz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    If you don't mind, some of us are stuck in the Hellmouth and want to be kept aware of things like this. I just lead a campaign against cameras in our schools (we lost, of course), and this sounds like something that would be coming next. If you don't like the author, or the subject matter, don't read it, moron.

  22. Give it a rest, Katz by scotch · · Score: 1
    Give it up already, Katz. Why don't you go back to watch every lame-ass hollywood movie that comes out and posting a lame review?

    --
    XML causes global warming.
  23. Slashdot User Comments by StormDaemon · · Score: 2

    I still can't get over how absolutely negative you all are over every single Katz article. He writes very well, but it isn't good enough for the nerd population. JonKatz: You're a great writer, go somewhere where the people have enough intelligence to recognize your skill. Slashdot Commentors: Go get laid, you all obviously need it.

    1. Re:Slashdot User Comments by scrytch · · Score: 5

      I still can't get over how absolutely negative you all are over every single Katz article

      Voices from the Hellmouth Revisited: Part Ten

      There's your first clue.
      --

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    2. Re:Slashdot User Comments by darkmoon · · Score: 1

      Katz isn't a bad guy. I think that most people who hate him and the Hellmouth series are probably people who were never abused [much] at school.

    3. Re:Slashdot User Comments by fluxrad · · Score: 2

      oh for christ's sake. that's the battle cry of every loser i have ever met.

      "my parents beat me!"

      "My dad never loved me!"

      "I got beat up at school all the time!"

      "I never had any friends!"

      Guess what. I haven't met a single person yet who thought high-school was the best time of their lives. NO ONE LIKED HIGH-SCHOOL! Some people like to blither on mindlessly about how they had no clique in high-school. They had no friends, and were constantly being picked on by their peers and their teachers.

      When are assinine fools like Jon Kats (and yourself) going to realize that high school sucked for just about everybody. None of us had that many friends, and most of them talked shit about us behind our backs....just like we did to them. And most of us thought of ourselves as go-betweens. Never had a clique? No one did. My highschool was a group of 2500 loners who were just too stupid to realize it. Why? Because that's what groing up is all about. Alienation!

      You're supposed to feel like shit in high-school. You're a fuckin' teenager. I remember something about a transition from childhood to adulthood, or something?!?!?! somewhere?!?!? Growing up is a pain in the ass. you learn %90 of your life lessons between the age of 13-21. Guess what...it's going to hurt. Remember how you found you were supposed to be extremely careful with a knife? you cut yourself on it! Now take 100,000 more lessons like that and cram them into a span of 6 or 7 years...and poof. you're a teenager.

      Teenagers have been experiencing heartbrake and pain, and alienation, and physical "abuse" since before recorded history. The only difference between todays kids, and the kids of 30 years ago is that, today, our teens are told they are not responsible for feeling like outsiders. Today, it is not their fault that life sucks. 30 years ago, you shut up and dealt with it.


      FluX
      After 16 years, MTV has finally completed its deevolution into the shiny things network

      --
      "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -David Hume
    4. Re:Slashdot User Comments by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      They are also being asked to inform on their peers (and parents). They are also being given the expensive technology to perform said informing. That *is* the issue. It is a valid issue. This hasn't been going on "since before recorded time." Nazi Germany, yes. Soviet Union, yes. USA, only just beginning. "You shut up and dealt with it" isn't a viable adaptive behavior to this, or very many (if any) issues.

    5. Re:Slashdot User Comments by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      >Voices from the Hellmouth Revisited: Part Ten
      >
      >There's your first clue.

      [sigh] People who complain about how long this has gone on are spectacularly missing the point. It's still going on because it's _still important_. Bury your head in the sand if you want to, but the fact is that the horrors Katz writes about (writing better than 99 44/100 % of Slashdotters, I might add) are real and serious and have only become worse since Columbine. If you'd rather think only about something else -- for which I can't blame you, because this is unpleasant stuff to think about -- then try just skipping the articles.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    6. Re:Slashdot User Comments by Squid · · Score: 2

      You're supposed to feel like shit in high-school.

      No. You're supposed to feel like shit in prison.

    7. Re:Slashdot User Comments by Squid · · Score: 2

      "You shut up and dealt with it" isn't a viable adaptive behavior to this, or very many (if any) issues.

      Agreed. And maybe that's the idea - schools are, maybe intentionally, desensitizing kids to the idea that they should attempt to change what's wrong with the world. We see it here, all the people saying "but school is SUPPOSED to suck" - so it's obvious that it's working. Result, if allowed to continue: generations of kids who shrug off almost anything that bugs them and say "well, fuck it, can't change City Hall..."

    8. Re:Slashdot User Comments by fluxrad · · Score: 1

      the question of whether or not it's reasonable to inform on your peers is moot. of COURSE it's not reasonable.(in most circumstances. surely you would call the police or tell a teacher if a kid brought a gun to school)

      that being said, you completely missed the point of my post. it has absolutely nothing to do with the justification of teens informing on their "depressed" peers. I'd try to spell it out, but surely you wouldn't understand. So much for digressionary posting for the uneducated.


      FluX
      After 16 years, MTV has finally completed its deevolution into the shiny things network

      --
      "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -David Hume
  24. Corporate presence in schools by subbiecho · · Score: 3

    "Several factors are essential in establishing ethical standards for education-business partnerships and sponsorships. First, the expectations of each partner must be clearly defined before entering the partnership. Second, partnerships should not in any way compromise the goals of public education. Third, the participation of teachers in partnerships must be voluntary. Fourth, neither students nor their families should be exploited as a result of an education-business partnership. Finally, business partners must not promote specific products, determine curricula or influence education policies." [Alberta Teachers Assoc.]

    The above, from my research, is a commonly held view amongst most teacher organizations. This WAVE project is a blatant violation of such ethics. It encourages duplicity amongst school children and could lead to greater levels of fear and viciousness in revenge. How often in high school did someone piss you off and you wished you had a way to really get back at them? What better way than to drop an anonymous tip to the Pinkerton run WAVE hotline, which, as Katz stated, is fed to local law enforcement.
    As someone who is planning on becoming a public system educator, it disturbs me that North Carolina has provided its students with this new, and potentially damaging, system of paranoia. I greatly hope the ACLU looks into this and files a court action, as this project blatantly violates students civil liberties and exploits the youth in North Carolina.

    --
    "We don't stop playing because we grow old. We grow old because we stop playing."
    1. Re:Corporate presence in schools by vsync64 · · Score: 1
      It encourages duplicity amongst school children and could lead to greater levels of fear and viciousness in revenge. How often in high school did someone piss you off and you wished you had a way to really get back at them?

      No kidding. It gets even scarier when you add profit to the list of possible motivations for reporting your enemies.

      --

      --
      TO BUY A NEW CAR WOULD MAKE YOU SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE.
  25. Affect of the New President by Death+Rattle · · Score: 1

    Does anyone have any thoughts on how the new presidency is going to affect programs like
    W.A.V.E? Will the Bush/Chaney Repbulican Party take a supportive, indifferent or negative stance?

    1. Re:Affect of the New President by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      If its a toll free number, what makes you think it won't work from a private school? The "authoritarian bullshit" isn't limited to any school zone.

      There is no reason to believe it will be limited to school. Imagine some some kid reports that you were acting unusual, and that "for your own good" this is reported to your manager. Not gonna feel so nonchalant about it then?

    2. Re:Affect of the New President by Squid · · Score: 2

      They'll probably expand it: "and get EXTRA reward money if you turn in atheists, homosexuals, and liberals!"

  26. Revenge of the Nerds by gwjc · · Score: 1

    re: "Nor is there much doubt about who will betargeted - geeks, nerds, Goths, oddballs, along with anyone else who is discontented, alienated and dualistic."

    Maybe not, Geek kids are smarter and will be more likely to spend time calling the W.A.V.E. and reporting the dark sociopathic leanings of the captain of the football team and the members of the student assembly.

    1. Re:Revenge of the Nerds by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1
      geek kids are smarter?

      When I was in HS, nerds were some of the dumbest people I knew. That's one of the reasons they don't fit in...they think they know things, and they don't. It's very sad.

      When nerds were off dreaming about starships and computers, playing D&D, etc, the rest of us became real engineers with real lives, interacting in real sports with real people. Imagine that.

      --g, geek maybe, nerd never.

    2. Re:Revenge of the Nerds by darkmoon · · Score: 1

      That depends on your definition of a nerd, really.

      I was brought up believeing that a nerd is your general math/physics/whatever intellectual and that a geek is someone who uses computers for purposes other than work and video games.

      (Seeing as this is a Jon Katz article and tempers and egos are in critical, I feel that i have to say "I'm not claiming that I'm right or that you're wrong, the nerd/geek definition thing is open to interpetation. Please don't flame me)

    3. Re:Revenge of the Nerds by Mastagunna · · Score: 1

      We have to use a common definition. I have always under stood that nerds and geeks were smarter then the others, but did not conform to the ideal views of the class mates. The dweebs were the kids who were not only not part of the group, but were dumb, wether from drugs, inbreeding or just bad genes. If we follow these guid lines, post will be relivent under the correct heading.

    4. Re:Revenge of the Nerds by gwjc · · Score: 1

      Oh puleeeeezz, many who played D&D and watched Trek eventually got Laid and Paid - even if they didn't become engineers.
      The "us" types you mention where the boring old status quo - not pretty or rich enough to be at the top of the social food chain, not smart enough to do anything other than feel superior to the outcasts - and just be content they weren't tormented as much. The fact that anyone would try to differentiate geek and nerd is just a continuation of that pathetic system.
      Honestly, I think the threat of Columbine and Hordes of armed nerdkind might actually help temper the cruelty of the pinkboy school-jacket wearing goons who cause the problems in the first place.

    5. Re:Revenge of the Nerds by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      When I was in HS, nerds were some of the dumbest people I knew. That's one of the reasons they don't fit in...they think they know things, and they don't. It's very sad.

      All of us in the Bay Area Experience Program of the Mentally Gifted Minors were without doubt nerds. We knew it. The school new it. The students knew it. Sorry, but the "dumbest people you knew" wouldn't be accepted by nerds. Then again, a mere engineer might not get accepted by a real nerd, either. Unless you were at SLAC or NASA or Sandia or IBM labs...Imagine that.

  27. Pinkerton is great by anticypher · · Score: 5

    They're great if you want to dig up dirt on just about any american who lived over the last 40 years. They even provide similar services clandestinely in Europe on a smaller scale.

    Pinkerton Background Security Services claims to have files on over 350 million Americans going back over 40 years. For large companies who open an acount with them, they will provide a file on every potential employee for a US$60 fee. Digressive discounts for larger numbers of inquiries.

    Pinkerton has been a great implementor of database, indexing, search engine, and file(dossier) management technologies. They have a number of computing centres around the US to keep their data searching capabilities running 24/24.

    The WAVE project they proposed to North Carolina was another great project of their many ways of collecting as much data about Americans as they can. By manning a number of "hotlines" targeted directly at children, they can create files on all school age kids in the state, long before those kids have any other paper or electronic trails. This allows them to more proactively track juveniles with problems, and bypasses court restrictions on sealing juvenile criminal records.

    By offering these services to state governments, they avoid being seen in a criminal light, as they can spin their existence as a crime fighting branch of a state government. They are being given access to the school records of every student in NC, just to ensure their records are complete for when a hotline call comes in. North Carolina has given them permission to keep those records permanently, and once those records are stored in their own databases, they become the property of Pinkerton.

    It is amazing the level of detail in some Pinkerton records I've seen. Driving records, complete tax paying history, any brush with the law even if it didn't result in charges or conviction, medical records, known friends and acquaintances and family relations, sexual orientation, racial background, propensity for travel, fast cars, or other "extravigant" expenses, frequent flyer plans, school records and IQ test results, military service record and security classification, oh, and credit ratings. The reports can be summarised to show potential aberant behaviour such as innability to keep a job, excessive spending, potential drug use (drop in grades during school), and undeclared medical problems.

    I had an employer request a full report on me at one point (cost over US$800), because I was employed to write a security policy for them. The Pinkerton sales reps had made a sales call, and we wanted to see what was actually delivered and whether it would fit the new policy. Although their contract states the employer can never allow a person to see their own file, I was in a friendly crowd. I was stunned at the level of detail, and the inaccuracy of much of my report which combined a number of other people in America sharing my name. But the summaries of my being unstable due to moving around the US and being a flight risk due to being a foreign national were mostly right. And the analysis of being a "libertarian leaning, anti-establishment, technically savvy introvert with no social skills" was spot on for my early life, but I've got social skills now :-)

    the AC

    --
    Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
    1. Re:Pinkerton is great by jbrians · · Score: 1

      That sounds a little far-fetched. I doubt they have human-beings evaluating each of the folders they have and jotting down comments.
      -Brian

      --
      "Faith strikes me as intellectual laziness." -Robert A. Heinlen
    2. Re:Pinkerton is great by Gleef · · Score: 2

      jbrians comments:

      That sounds a little far-fetched. I doubt they have human-beings evaluating each of the folders they have and jotting down comments.

      True, but I can easily imagine that they have human beings evaluating each of the folders they sell, at the time of sale and jotting down comments.

      ----

      --

      ----
      Open mind, insert foot.
    3. Re:Pinkerton is great by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      > And the analysis of being a "libertarian leaning, anti-establishment, technically savvy introvert with no social skills" was spot on for my early life, but I've got social skills now :-)

      Did you send them a .diff file with the corrections>

      --

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    4. Re:Pinkerton is great by anticypher · · Score: 2

      I can easily imagine that they have human beings evaluating each of the folders they sell, at the time of sale and jotting down comments.

      The basic reports provide only a summary of an individual's life, enough to verify most of their declared history on a resume or CV. There is a simple cover page created from a form and probably checked over by a human, but the total time to create a background check doesn't run more than about 10 minutes of human time. At $40 to $60 a pop, you can't allow more than about 10 minutes and still make a profit, this is a production line operation.

      The complete reports pull up and print out many pages, and it is obvious a human spends some time looking it over for mistakes and providing a computer assisted summary. Normally these are provided as part of an investigation into potential new Chief Officers or other people who will handle large budgets or possibly drive the company. You'd be surprised, or maybe not, by the number of people who decide to try and fake it and go for the big money and bonuses as a CxO. VC firms use these reports as the starting point for a thorough background investigation before allowing an unknown to take control of their money. In the last dotcom frenzy, a number of VC firms skipped the background check and got burned by conmen who would have been revealed by a standard check. Casinos, banks, and anyone else handling large sums of money typically spend thousands of dollars investigating senior personnel before allowing them to touch money.

      I'm not sure I made it clear in my original post, but Pinkertons is the company offering WAVE, it's not an idea by the state of NC. WAVE is being touted by NC as their own creation to prove to worried parents they are tackling crime in schools. WAVE is a program being marketed by Pinkertons to any state stupid enough to turn over private student records to a large corporation and hope they don't abuse the data.

      the AC

      --
      Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
  28. Targeting only geeks? by taustin · · Score: 2

    Seems unlikely. Geeks are smarter than jocks. If anybody can figure out how to abuse the system for their own enjoyment, it will be those geeks, making anonymous tips about jocks doing drugs, and teachers who believe in this shit being pedophiles.

    1. Re:Targeting only geeks? by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1
      Seems unlikely. Geeks are smarter than jocks.

      How do you figure that? When I was in HS, the nerdy misfits were some of the dumbest people I knew. Daydreamers, not doers. They were playing D&D and writing stories and dreaming of starships while I was teaching myself assembler on my computers, and jumping ahead in calculus and physics, later to move on to get my aerospace degree and live a wonderful life full of wonderful friends, athletics, a great job, and interesting/fascinating hobbies. Where are the nerds now, I can't help but wonder.

    2. Re:Targeting only geeks? by Shads · · Score: 1


      The nerds/geeks are where they always were, daydreaming, playing d&d, writing stories, learning assembler, learning C, learning unix, growing up, having fun, etc.

      Honestly, based on your post, you were no better than the jocks.

      Ug, you not do what me do. You bad.

      If you were intelligent and outcast you were a geek, but if your were not quite so sharp and an outcast you were a burnout.

      Your hobbies are interesting to YOU. Just like daydreaming, playing d&d, writing stories was interesting to the person doing that thing. Dont judge someone elses hobbies/what YOU see them doing as being non-fruitful just because your not capable of understanding something different from yourself.

      --
      Shadus
    3. Re:Targeting only geeks? by mlogan · · Score: 1

      oh great, geeks are smarter than jocks... what an educated community we have here.

      Us freaks are better than those norms anyday!!! i hear they eat their young!!!

      b.s. i knew smart jocks and stupid outcasts in highschool.

    4. Re:Targeting only geeks? by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      Wow, what an ego you've built yourself there! I'm truly moved that you have a wonderful life and fascinating hobbies and all that. Well, some of those nerdy misfits who daydreamed and played games while you so industriously bettered yourself are doing just fine. Others are not. I spent a good portion of my youth dreaming about starships and playing D&D, and I didn't teach myself assembler on my computer (I don't know assembler even to this day), and I even got lousy grades in high school math. Now, I've got a wonderful life full of wonderful friends, athletics, a great job dreaming about and building starships (well, okay, satellites, but they _are_ spacecraft) and interesting/fascinating hobbies. Where are all of the doers who blew their youths being little grownups now, I can't help but wonder. Oh, that's right. That's you, isn't it?

      Perhaps you should spend a little time boning up on your social skills. You apparently spent so much time being better than all of those nerdy types that you failed to notice that elitism is a social failing.

      Virg

  29. The WAVE Promise by SirHalcyon · · Score: 2

    WAVE Promise as seen on www.waveamerica.com They need to change the background picture, "HAIL HITLER!"

    1. Re:The WAVE Promise by Araneas · · Score: 2
      Speaking as a lit geek, the whole piece is poorly written. The first stanza rhyme scheme is AABB, the second stanza CCDEC and the final stanza CFG. There is no structure within the stanzas and no internal rhyme or use of alliteration. The piece peters out into mediocrity. The initial AABB CC rhyme scheme is now considered amateurish (similar to using GOTO). Perhaps it's highschool audience justifies this structure. One must then ask why was it not continued through to the end? Perhaps the sign of a disturbed, unorganized mind.

      Having heard Hitler speak in various newsreels, any comparison of this piece to his speeches is an insult. At least as far as you can insult the facist bastard. ;)

  30. Enough already! by Raunchola · · Score: 2

    What good is this Hellmouth series on Slashdot doing anyway? This would have a far better impact if it was actually published (yes, I know, some people raised a stink about their comments being used), but this is just standard preaching to the choir.

    You've had your fifteen minues of fame Jon. I don't doubt that your initial work regarding this subject was good, but now it's getting old. Your constant rants on "Geek Profiling" (TM) are making you just as bad as the school officials and other such people you write about. Not all geeks (I prefer the term "nerd" myself :)) are depressed, trenchcoat wearing misanthropes. Quit trying to assume that they are, because you'll end up doing more bad than good ("Hey, Jon Katz says Billy is a depressed geek! Let's put him away!").

    Just drop it and find some new cause to trumpet, mmmkay?

    --

    --

    --
    The real Raunchola isn't cool enough to have any imposters
    1. Re:Enough already! by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      Actually if each installment counts as 15 minutes of fame he's got two and a half hours of fame out of it, and counting...

      It's a pity there isn't someone more persuasive doing this for a publication more mainstream than /....

  31. MOD KATZ DOWN! by colmore · · Score: 1

    Readers should be able to moderate whole stories... that way the slash team could know what we do and don't want to see more of....

    in fact, a story modding system could be used to *post* stories, thereby removing any central control of slashdot, and getting it closer to its "open" ideal.

    --
    In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    1. Re:MOD KATZ DOWN! by kidlinux · · Score: 1

      Go check your user preferences. You can select which authors to exclude from your view.

      --
      -kidlinux.
    2. Re:MOD KATZ DOWN! by sjwt · · Score: 1

      Mod Up

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
  32. Scenario by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 5
    • Principal: Hello Neil. The reason I've called you into my office is that it's come to my attention that some of the alpha-males in the schools have been beating and harassing you for the last two years. I understand that it's gotten so bad that you've become depressed and suicidal.
    • Neil: I didn't think it was that obvious, sir.
    • Principal: Well, it's not that obvious, but you've definitely been showing some of the signs. In any case a couple of the school alpha-males reported it because they're concerned.
    • Neil: Concerned about me?
    • Principal: Oh no. Of course not. They're concerned that you might get desperate and do something nasty to them. To allay their fears, I've decided to suspend you for two weeks and publicly berate you.
      Guido the security guard will escort you to clear out your locker. For security reasons, I can't let you leave anything in the locker.
      Do you have anything to say?
    • Neil: This is a bit of a surprise sir, and the timing is really bad. My science fair project is due in a week.
    • Principal: One other thing Neil.
    • Neil: Yes sir?
    • Get some professional help. I'll see you in two weeks.

    `ø,,ø!
    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    1. Re:Scenario by Fervent · · Score: 3
      Just an aside: anyone still in high school, NEVER leave anything personal in your locker. I ran away once and they raided the thing for clues. They even dug up some personal poetry in my notebooks there.

      Keep stuff like that under lock and key. In your room, and hidden.

      -
      -Be a man. Insult me without using an AC.

      --

      - I don't care if they globalize against free speech. All my best free thoughts are done in my head.

    2. Re:Scenario by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > NEVER leave anything personal in your locker. I ran away once and they raided the thing for clues.

      Nice thing about people like that is... it doesn't matter how many clues are in your locker. They couldn't get a clue if it was clue mating season and they were in a field of clues covered in clue pheromone.

      >Keep stuff like that under lock and key. In your room, and hidden.

      Keep the happy poetry, the stuff you copied out of birthday cards, in your locker. Keep more of the same hidden in your room under lock and key.

      Keep your poetry on multiple redundant floppies or in emails "in your inbox" on a Hotmail account, encrypted with PGP.

    3. Re:Scenario by Alioth · · Score: 2
      Not as fictional as it seems.

      Minus the W.A.V.E thing, and the fact it happened in the UK not US, this is almost exactly what happened to me at school. Did the jocks doing the bullying receive any punishment? Hell no! Fortunately, the doctor I ended up seeing told my parents, "He's a perfectly normal geek. I don't see any reason for treatment." Fortunately, my father also has backbone and reamed out the headmaster (principal in American).

      It still annoys me thinking about it now, and I'd have some polite, but choice words - and some difficult questions to ask of the headmaster in question.

    4. Re:Scenario by kieran · · Score: 1

      >Just an aside: anyone still in high school, NEVER leave anything personal in your locker.
      >I ran away once and they raided the thing for clues.
      >They even dug up some personal poetry in my notebooks there.

      How about if you left a large piece of plasticine attached to a little clock and a sign saying:

      "If I was a REAL nutcase, you would be dead. Now get the hell out of my locker!".

    5. Re:Scenario by Squid · · Score: 2

      Sounds frighteningly familiar. We had a retarded principal who, I guess, believed the first kid who walked through his door. So one of the major troublemakers at school picked a fight with me on lunch hour, I lost as usual, and they bring us down to the office. And for whatever reason we ended up seeing the principal instead of the vice principal (who was only slightly less dumb) - and the kid who started the fight got to tell his story first.

      When I got in there, the principal - who knew nothing about me but could probably have pulled my file to see what kind of kid I was - was warning me that if I didn't change my ways, I'd spend my life in and out of jail.

      Total number of minutes I've spent in jail in the twelve years since: 0. I'm afraid I can't speak for the other kid.

    6. Re:Scenario by grappler · · Score: 1

      Or just know that if you run away, they're going to look for clues because they might possibly be concerned, or at least curious. If you're worried they'll see your poetry, why in the world, even without the benefit of hindsight, would you leave it in you locker?

      --
      Vidi, Vici, Veni
  33. STOP USING DOOM AS THE EXAMPLE!!! by LtFiend · · Score: 1

    Quake III is 100% more morally desensitizing than Doom is!!!! :)

    1. Re:STOP USING DOOM AS THE EXAMPLE!!! by darkmoon · · Score: 1

      Everyone loves using Doom as an example. I haven't played the original game since I was in primary school but my dad still refers to it.

      "Did you do anything with your life today, son? Probably just wasting your time playing DOOM as usual."

      And how come they never pick on Half-Life or Quake II? Must be the lack of satanic imagery.

    2. Re:STOP USING DOOM AS THE EXAMPLE!!! by Fervent · · Score: 2
      More of a mass media thing.

      -
      -Be a man. Insult me without using an AC.

      --

      - I don't care if they globalize against free speech. All my best free thoughts are done in my head.

  34. Yeah, this'll last by dervish121 · · Score: 1

    I just wonder, are they really expecting that they won't be flooded with "tips" like: "Johnny is a fag. He said he was going to kill a bunch of people. Limp Bizkit rox!"

    Really, think back to high school: wouldn't the funniest way to spend a boring computer lab session be to "report" all your buddies? Ok, the funniest way would be tricking an unsuspecting victim to look at the receiver, but once everyone's had a good vomit over that, you've got to find something a bit more time consuming. Telling W.A.V.E that your best friend likes to sniff dog turds and dirty sweat socks would provide at least 15 minutes of hilarity (or even a bit of a fight, which always breaks up monotony).

    (disclaimer: it's not my fault if you didn't have any friends to abuse in high school)

    (preach: stereotyping by either side doesn't help)

    (phrase of the day: fart paste).

  35. Is it just me? by Thalia · · Score: 3

    Is it just me, or does this remind everyone of the tactics used by the Nazis? I know it's popular to say Nazi-something for anything that you dislike (those feminazis, and nazi-music-recording companies and so on.) But this actually does quite closely echo the actions of the Third Reich.

    Specifically, the Hitlerei's policy was to train children in school to turn in their classmates, their parents, and anyone else who they believed was "subversive." It was part of the daily "civics" class. This actually worked very well for them, and was in turn adopted by the Communists in Eastern Europe. Lest you Americans feel too smug, the McCarthy-ites did this as well, using the Alert Society.

    If we train kids in school now, to turn in their classmates, how long until we ask them to rat on their parents, for anti-social behavior, the use of drugs, etc.

    Be afraid, be very afraid.

    Thalia

    1. Re:Is it just me? by mother_superius · · Score: 1
      the actions of the Third Reich.

      Why is the Nazi empire so commonly referred to as the 3rd Reich? That's what the Nazis called it from the beginning because the empire was to be the 3rd empire to last over 1000 years. It, of course, lasted about 12 years. The other two were the Roman Empire and something else I can't remember, maybe China or Greece or something. If it didn't last for 1000 years, why is it still referred to as the 3rd Reich?

    2. Re:Is it just me? by 1337d00d · · Score: 1

      maybe China or Greece or something

      No. The 'Reich's were unifications of the German people. The first Reich was the Holy Roman Empire (after the actual Roman Empire) under Charlemagne, around 800 A.D. The second Reich was the new German government that formed after industrialization, and went up to the loss in World War One. Finally, the third Reich, which was supposed to "last a thousand years" was lead by a powerful, charismatic leader of the national socialist party, who came to power in the interregnum after World War One and forged an empire in Europe during World War Two, until he was defeated by combined American and Soviet forces. The Nazis are referred to as the 3rd Reich because thhat was what they called themselves; much like the American Republic is referred to as the 'United States'.

    3. Re:Is it just me? by CeramicNuts · · Score: 1
      There was a cheezy TV movie made about 15 years ago called "The Wave" or something similar. I watched this in JR High english so my memory is a bit fuzzy. But, the Wave was basically a mind control system started by a teacher who infected his class, and they in turn spread it to the rest of the school and the community. They had hand salutes, meetings, and other mysterious symbologies. In the end, it turns out the teacher was playing a devils advocate-ha-look-what-you've-become role.

      Just ironic that this SS-esque organiztion is also called The Wave. ;p

    4. Re:Is it just me? by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      Very academic. Thanks for the interesting read. Accept you meant that the United States of America (which is a country) is refered to as the American Republic (when in reality there are many American Republics). Oh, and the USA is a Democratic Republic. Thanks for the interesting read.

    5. Re:Is it just me? by marnanel · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I read that book. There's a page about it with a lot of detail-- one interesting point that I didn't realise before is that it was based on a true story. The teacher in question (Ron Jones) wanted to show the untruth in "it couldn't happen here"-- the students had opted for security and conformity at the loss of freedom and the human rights of their peers without realising they were slipping into it. Indeed, much of the impetus towards fascism seems to have come from the students themselves.

      Eerie, isn't it?

      M

      --
      GROGGS: alive and well and living in
    6. Re:Is it just me? by alumshubby · · Score: 2

      No, it's not just you, and you go on to answer your own question in detail. As John le Carre said through one of his characters, "If I had to choose between betraying my friend and betraying my country, I should hope I would have the guts to betray my country."

      --
      "How many light bulbs does it take to change a person?" --BMcC-->
    7. Re:Is it just me? by Kalten · · Score: 1

      It's not just you, no.

      If we train kids in school now, to turn in their classmates, how long until we ask them to rat on their parents, for anti-social behavior, the use of drugs, etc.

      DARE ("Drug Abuse Resistance Education", for non-USAians) already does this. And my parents wonder why I called it propaganda...

    8. Re:Is it just me? by madrone · · Score: 1
      "If we train kids in school now, to turn in their classmates, how long until we ask them to rat on their parents, for anti-social behavior, the use of drugs, etc."

      Actually, I think it's the reverse. We've been teaching our kids to rat out their parents for years...(think D.A.R.E.)

      Now they've just made a natural progression from trying to convince you to rat out your parents to ratting out your classmates.

      And to think...when I was in school being called a "Tattletale" was tantamount to being called a "Dirty-rotten MotherFucker"....

      ...oh the times, they are a'changin.

  36. Re:Oh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    it's due to people on slashdot linking the description "goatse.cx" with the site mary-kateandashley.com Because of the way google works since so many sites link to slashdot, and lots of sites link to various osdn sites which all link to slashdot slashdot is considered authoritative, therefore if you post stuff like that a lot then it will be linked in google.

  37. He'd Make a Plan, and He' Follow Through. . . . by Salgak1 · · Score: 1
    . . .That what Brian Boitano'd do. . .

    As opposed to Katz, who continually drones the same note, over and over. . .

  38. I'd like to say thank you by perdida · · Score: 2

    Thank you, Jon Katz.

    It is hard to be a reporter, to take a very complicated bunch of information and process it into something that carries some sort of meaning. It's even harder when your story is really thousands of stories, and thousands of people can, in turn, reply to those stories and to your analysis and presentation of them.

    You have done a good job putting the voices forward, and the response has been mixed. I think that's fine, controversy is a good thing.

  39. irony, or just stupidity? by inkey+string · · Score: 1

    there was a study done by a highschool teacher (and a movie made out of it im pretty sure... memory is hazy due to this being told in social class during discussion of nazi germany) who basically started a cult to teach the kids just how easy a leader can create followers. called it the wave. is it just me, or is this too much of an amazing coincidence to be real?

    1. Re:irony, or just stupidity? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is an amazing coincidence. I remember this movie too, and snitching was part of his basic plan. The movie was called 'The Wave'. The movie was based on the actual experiment. The teacher ended up calling it off early because it was so successful that it was scaring him. He started it because of a comment 'it can't happen here in the U.S.' It really disturbed me, because of the sheer ease of doing it.

      Firethorn

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  40. Website... by MatBurt · · Score: 1

    There is a Site Trying to stop it apparently.... They've got my vote!

    --
    lim brain -> meltdown
  41. slashdotters... by smash_phase · · Score: 1

    Consider the amount of crap that can be found for the last couple of years on slashdot (I've read it long even before I knew how to run LILO),
    I'd suggest to ban AC's and oblidge everbody to first to show their W.A.V.E. record, pass an IQ test, an medical test and show an attest of sanity.
    To show of their haxors skills as well, they need to infiltrate into the national security agency and dig up their profile.
    After all of this has been approved, they're certified of obtaining a ./ username & to post replies on Jon Katz articles...

    (If you think this is serious, then you're a fraud, your sanity attest if a fake, isn't?)

    --
    /* Be the change you wish to see in this world - Mohandas Karamchand "Mahatma" Gandhi */
  42. People who are sick of this make me sick.... by netrat · · Score: 2

    Hey, all you people who don't seem to appreciate this critique of post-columbine mass histeria can go suck an egg! Clearly you weren't victims of this state condoned harrassment based soley on your non-conformist thought, so you have no idea what it's like. I totally applaud Jon Katz and what he is doing and I encourage him to keep it up.

    I for one was a victim of this witch-hunt and I know a couple others who it happened to also. These though-police fuckers shut-down my website, threatened me with arrest, expulsion, and called me a cyber-terrorist. All for something I didn't even do!

    Just because some asshole decided to post a threat against my school on my website, I got in trouble. Of course my schoool authorities/assholes never doubted for one second that it was me who did it, never mind the fact that my site got 300 hits a day. My non-conformist style of dress and shabby hair PROVED me to be a murderous phsychopath. Never mind the fact that I am a devout pacifist and vegan and that is one of the central themes of my fucking site!

    This happened over a year ago and I am still pissed off about it. What they did was fucking wrong, and if you and I don't stand up to it it's only going to get worse. So you fucking go, Jn Katz, and fuck all the naysayers!
    ----------------------------------

    1. Re:People who are sick of this make me sick.... by darkmoon · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine got into trouble for some stuff he posted on his website. After punishing him, the school administration got the network guys to ban his site so that it's not accessible from the school (transparent proxy with a filter)

      And here's some thing else: my site got banned too! Purely because I was his friend and was a geek, except that I didn't have anything offensive to the school on my website.

      The next casual day I turned up in black clothes and a trench-coat and so did most of my other friends.

    2. Re:People who are sick of this make me sick.... by bikergeekgal · · Score: 1

      Is it really proper for a self described "devout pacifist" to hold a grudge for over a year? I'm not an overly enthusiastic pacifist myself, but I find it impossible to stay truly mad about anything for very long. Life isn't fair and it doesn't get any easier once you leave school.

  43. BORING by ogre2112 · · Score: 1

    Yay. Hey Katz, this atricle blew.

  44. ANI anonymity? by pangloss · · Score: 1
    Sorry if this is old hat, but I just heard about ANI for the first time not so long ago.

    In cases like this, or toll-free crisis/abuse call centers that profess to be anonymous, is ANI disabled?

    For instance, some posters were suggesting that students use the hotline to report all students, or non-geeks/jocks, for instance--a suggestion which would then want the stipulation that such calls be placed from a pay phone or something.

    err, for those who don't know what ANI is:


    ANI stands for Automatic Number Identification. It is a service feature in which the directory or equipment number of a calling station (read as ?telephone?) is automatically obtained. Enhanced 911 systems, 800/888 numbers and big companies make the most use out of this feature

    AFAIK, you can't "caller-id block" ANI.

  45. W.A.V.E. Submission by bnavarro · · Score: 1
    Dear W.A.V.E.:

    I would like to turn in the fellow who shares a locker with me. His name is Winston, and he hogs the locker space we share and I have no room to store my GameBoy in it. Recently, I caught him dozing off in class, and in his sleep, I heard him mumble, "Down with Big Brother! Down with Big Brother!". No doubt, this makes his loyalties to our HS highly questionable.

    Thank you for your help in removing this troubled classmate from my school.

  46. Re:Hmm.. by Glytch · · Score: 1

    Offtopic? Come on, moderators, grow a sense of humour. And this is perfectly on-topic, too.

  47. Geek Profiling? by Covener · · Score: 1

    to encourage students to anonymously turn in classmates whom they consider depressed, dangerous or potentially violent, this horrifically stupid Geek Profiling would be blatantly unconstitutional...

    They aren't being asked to turn in geeks, with the point being that geeks have a high(er) tendancy towards these things. They are being asked to turn in people who _are_ depressed, dangerous, or potentially violent.

    If loving taffy was a crime, and It was shown that blacks love taffy at a statistically higher level than non-blakcs, reporting suspected blacks for investigation would be 'profiling'.
    Then again, if it isn't sensational it probably can't stretch out for 10 installments.

    1. Re:Geek Profiling? by Squid · · Score: 2

      They aren't being asked to turn in geeks, with the point being that geeks have a high(er) tendancy towards these things. They are being asked to turn in people who _are_ depressed, dangerous, or potentially violent.

      And they're supposed to identify these traits how?

      Sure, let's let high school kids and untrained adults "diagnose" people as dangerous. What do you suppose they'll do? Answer: probably pick out anyone who looks or acts "weird".

  48. Re:Hmm.. by atrowe · · Score: 1

    Your sig is also remarkably on-topic for this story.

    --

    -atrowe: Card-carrying Mensa member. I have no toleranse for stupidity.

  49. Katz has performed a genuine service by edhall · · Score: 5

    The first couple of Hellmouth articles had a powerful effect, not only by providing an outlet for the ranks of schoolkids (and former schoolkids) outside of the dominant clique, but by sensitizing some of the more thoughtful teachers and counselors to their issues. The articles actually circulated among some of the professionals dealing with Columbine, something that no doubt helped sensitize them to the ways that reactions to Columbine would (and did) come down on innocent groups. I suspect that Katz was greatly surprised at the power and scope of the emotions and experiences that the articles tapped -- and the amount of attention they received. He's still riding the wave of outpourings from that series.

    He should stop. There is a point where self-expression becomes self-obsession. There is a point where opening old wounds becomes injurious, not cathartic. And there is a point where he becomes just another zealot milking Columbine to his own ends (even though I might support those ends), and to rapidly shrinking effect.

    I generally support Katz (which I'm sure many here feel puts me in a small minority). Yes, his pieces are sometimes fluffy and he often forgets to dot his intellectual I's and cross his factual T's. But he generally creates a good springboard for discussion (if you can ignore the knee-jerk Katz-haters that love to flock to his articles). And discussion (not "news") is what Slashdot is about, isn't it?

    But it is far past time to stop dragging out "Hellmouth" and start developing some fresh perspectives and constructive ideas on this subject, or drop it altogether. He should have stopped the series some time ago.

    -Ed
    1. Re:Katz has performed a genuine service by shinji1911 · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry, but the end of the Hellmouth series here on Slashdot is only the beginning of something larger. I agree that 'Hellmouth' itself is a well-beaten dead horse, but it has sparked discussions that are not directly related, and quite useful.

      Looking back over the series of 10 articles, there have been testimony from many, almost all _not_ from Columbine. Each piece of testimony is a different perspective, and some offer ideas for dealing with the problem.

      As long as the civil rights of minors continue to be violated, and as long as school administrators either turn a blind eye, or secretly help the agressors, the problems must be shown.

      You don't hear about genocide victims telling others to lay off discussing how evil their murderers are -- why should we? Especially when the abuses are still continuing?

      Pouring salt on old wounds only applies if those wounds have started to heal. Unfortunately, we're not the ones pouring salt by discussing on a weblog, the public school system is pouring, and quite a bit of it.

      In the end, it's time to take a stance, and actually go out and do something. Helping to subvert W.A.V.E. will certainly be a good statement to make, but we now need to discuss solutions to these problems.

      Legislation, perhaps, to increase minor rights? The increased privatization of the educational system? More Rent-a-cops? I don't know! But we need to discuss, and find solutions.

      To do the 'awww-so-sad-look-at-those-starving-Ethiopians-now -change-the-channel-XFiles-is-on' thing is not acceptable here.

    2. Re:Katz has performed a genuine service by edhall · · Score: 2

      Agreed, Katz has surfaced a lot of issues, many of them quite worthy of attention and frightening in their implications. This particular article focuses mainly on two of them: profiling and anonymous informant programs. Neither of these originated with Columbine, although people promoting them are quite willing to exploit Columbine to their ends. And Katz, by raising the "Hellmouth" banner, is doing the same.

      I don't think Katz helps his cause by conjuring the ghosts of Columbine. He sure as hell isn't helping those folks who are still dealing with its aftermath. Every year there are more breakdowns, more suicides, of people who lost family or friends or who witnessed the massacre or who have been laboring long hours to help put those shattered lives back together.

      The issues Katz raises are potent enough on their own, and there are ready examples with far more power at his fingertips, should he spend just a little time researching. Look at East Germany or the USSR, where informants and profiling were taken to their evil extremes. Leave Columbine alone.

      -Ed
    3. Re:Katz has performed a genuine service by themonkeyman · · Score: 1

      Yes, he has planted his Katzy skull firmly up your anal orifice. Now squeeze tight, get him out of there, and shut up.

      --
      I'm the king of bongo baby I'm the king of bongo bong.
    4. Re:Katz has performed a genuine service by mwa · · Score: 1
      Ed, Maybe yesterday I would have agreed with you. This morning, however, my wife called me to tell me my son had just been suspended from high school for wearing a hat. (Although I'm in Florida, it was around 45 degrees this morning.)

      Storming out of work and into the school, I discover that he wasn't even wearing the hat, just carrying it into the classroom. When I asked what the policy was, the senior administrator said that hats are 'contraband' and that this was announced clearly to all students yesterday. Hats and bandanas are worn by be gang members therefore hats present a danger in school. (I guess that's all gang members wear, since everyone is still allowed to wear clothes.)

      I went round and round with the sr. admin and guess what he brought up: Columbine. He wasn't particuliarly happy he did since I quoted the FBI report and pointed him to a variety of authoritative sources showing Zero-Tolerance crap like this for what it is. I also pointed out that both he and I where sitting there in his office discussing this issue while both of use where wearing black leather jackets!

      He offered to remove the suspension, if my son would not bring a hat to school in the future. I refused, and offered to remove my child from school until this policy was removed. He removed the suspension anyway, but my kids not going back until this BS stops.

      Columbine/Hellmouth only seems like a dead horse here on /. To the rest of the world, it's a pivotal media event that still defines their perception of "students". No one seems to understand that the word "students"="our children". If re-hashing this on /. raises one more voice against the persecution of our children, it's worth the electrons spent.

      p.s. I'm up to the area superintentent and I'm not stopping until the policy is changed. I'm already home-schooling one child, so keeping the other at home is not a big problem.

    5. Re:Katz has performed a genuine service by edhall · · Score: 2

      Of course he brought up Columbine. It's like anti-crypto arguments, where terrorism is produced as a "reason." As long as the sort of profiling that victimized your son is justified as "preventing Columbines" rather than "promulgating repression," it will continue to happen. Thus one of my points is that Katz is playing their game by bringing up Columbine. It's become a trigger word for those who would turn schools into lockups (and there is big money in this sort of fear-mongering both in terms of security personnel and hardware and a multitude of "training courses" for everyone from school superintendents on down).

      All of this I'm sure you already know. My hat's off to you for standing up for your son and for what you feel is right, and for speaking up here. I've not the slightest issue with you; my objection is to people who exploit Columbine to push various repressive programs. Not only do they harm a community which is still reeling years after the tragic event, but they injure their own communities by their fear-mongering and child-hating ideas. Why this may be so (aside from the aforementioned profit motive) could fill a book, so I'll stop now.

      -Ed
  50. Re:Hmm.. by Glytch · · Score: 1

    Heh. Never really noticed before...

  51. The wave has changed by darcee · · Score: 1
    I just surfed around the PINKERTON WAVE site and I hate to mention this, but NO WHERE is there anyplace on it that encourages students to call and report depressed geeks in dark cloths.

    What it does encourage you to report:

    • Serious physical fighting with peers or family members.
    • Severe destruction of property.
    • Severe rage for seemingly minor reasons.
    • Detailed threats of lethal violence.
    • Unlawful possession and/or use of firearms and other weapons.
    • Other self-injurious behaviors or threats of suicide.
    But not just depressed anti-social behavior. Check it out here. http://www.waveamerica.com/
    1. Re:The wave has changed by albanac · · Score: 1
      • Severe destruction of property.
      • Severe rage for seemingly minor reasons.
      • Detailed threats of lethal violence.

      I believe, based on teh comments I've read, that what most people are objecting to are the following: firstly, that any encouragement of annonymous informatn society is a ... risky strategy at best. Secondly, that children particularly are easiest to manipulate and least likely to understand the full significances of their actions. Thirdly, that having such a program operated by a commercial, investigatorial agency is probably unwise. And lastly, that children, along with most adults, are not particularly well equipped to make very significant judgement calls such as those suggested by the part of your comment that I quoted. What, to a kid, constitutes 'severe' rage for seemingly minor reasons? Would you have wanted every tantrum in your childhood to land you in an NSA database?

      ~cHris

      --
      Chris Naden
      "Sometimes, home is just where you pour your coffee"
  52. There's more to this than profiling... by piffy · · Score: 2
    I'd like to say that no matter how much I tend to dislike Katz's writing style, that I refuse to bash it. He has plenty to say and some of the time it is even logical.

    That out of the way, I would like to say that I dislike the blatant direction that Katz steers the usage of the W.A.V.E. program. I am not saying that it is a good program, far from it, but I tire of the "pandering to the geek" mentality.

    This program, if it goes into effect and is not monitored somehow, will be abused by anyone that can. Just imagine a high school full of students that get into petty fights everyday. Go ahead, I don't think that is hard to imagine. Now give those students an anonymous outlet to attack the person who they fought with. I don't care who the people are, it wouldn't necessarily be the outcast picked on. This has the possibility to be abused by anyone, against anyone. The head cheerleader has a bone to pick with some freshman girl, so she turns her in, and so the story goes.

    These scenarios and many more are just over the horizon when identifying troubled people is left in the hands of their peers, especially at the ages (lifespan and maturity) that most students in school are at.

    So, this program stinks, but let's not pandering to the outcasts. It stinks because it adds a level of tattle-tale to it. A sort of snitch mentality where you have to fear who is gonna turn you in.

    piffy

    --
    www.piffy.org -- me.
  53. What to do when there is a situation? by Dilly+Bar · · Score: 1

    While I am out of High School, my girlfriend is not. Recently, there has been a student that is threatening to hurt people. There is both written and verbal documentation of this.

    What can someone do in this situation? The problem has been brought to the attention of the principal, however, the student is still in class. People still feel unsafe.

    This is where I see a need for something like this. I don't think that it should be an automatic death sentance for the person reportedd, but I think it serves a valuable purpose for those people who feel unsafe.

    What are people's thoughts?

    1. Re:What to do when there is a situation? by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      My thought is that it adds a disquieting level to what people define as "dangerous". To take an extreme but very real example, I have a friend who (because of her upbringing, and by her own admission with no real-world reason) is afraid to stand next to a black man in an elevator. I was there with her; this man was dressed in typical teen clothing but was not acting menacing in any way whatsoever, but she still felt unsafe. In another example, a friend's father was in the car with me as we were driving in our neighborhood. There was a group of teenage guys skateboarding in the street. As our car passed, they moved out of the street to let us pass, and one of them (whom I know) smiled and waved as we went by. Still, his comment was, "lock the doors, I don't like the look of them." Again, they weren't doing anything menacing at all, but because of their looks he felt threatened. It's not a long leap of logic to extend this to the teen who wears pancake makeup and black clothes.

      The problem I sense with this whole thing is that since the reporting is anonymous, and the person accused often has no knowledge of the report, there's too much potential for abuse. The possibility that the system will come down on someone who hasn't done anything wrong is too great for it to be used as an effective tool. Perhaps it would help people in your situation, but to extend it to absurdity, handing out pistols at the door would also help protect you from this student's threats. That doesn't make it a good idea.

      Virg

      P.S. If there's written proof of threats of physical violence, report it to the police. It's their job to deal with such things, not your principal's. Forcing him/her to deal with it will just result in overkill solutions such as W.A.V.E.

    2. Re:What to do when there is a situation? by pandich · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. I wish there had been something like this when I was in school so I (a geek) could have had a better shot at protecting myself from a lot of the physical harassment I received.

      There was no way in hell I would have openly talked to any school people, and there was no credible anonymous way to communicate to anyone. Any anonymous info would have been highly questioned or ignored. Perhaps this makes them more accountable.

      The process seems to empower(I hate that word, but it fits) the underdog, not screw him over. Will it be misused ever? Hell yeah. But all changes comes with good and bad.

      High school is a closed system that you are forced to be in. The rules for survival in it are not the same as the adult world. You can't just leave if you are scared or uncomfortable: thus I don't feel the rules for information should be the same as they are in the "adult world".

  54. this WAVE thing sounds familiar. by dietcrack · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who finds this kinda creepy?

    There was a book, written by Morton Rhue, that I had to read back in grade school, about a movement, called the Wave, which a teacher started to illustrate the dangers of organizations like the Nazi party that emphasize conformity and betraying nonconformists and, er, some crap like that. Follow the link, there's a summary of the story that is loads more coherent than mine.

    1. Re:this WAVE thing sounds familiar. by ktiger · · Score: 1

      This American Life (www.thislife.org) did a program in May 2000 about the mentality of a mob. In act two of their program, they have a story of a teacher that did an experiment with their class in 1973 that was remarkably similiar. You can listen to it at: http://www.thislife.org/pages/descriptions/00/158. html

  55. W.A.V.E = STASI by Mr.+Spleen · · Score: 1
    East Germany, 1945 - 1989. The STASI (secret police) had almost every single person spying on those around them. If you uttered anything even slightly anti-Communist, even in passing, you would be instantly blacklisted with the possibility of losing your job, your family, or your life. The STASI kept extensive records on everyone, with everything from interecepted mail to DNA samples. Programs like W.A.V.E are the first step. I hope this thing is squashed before it gets too far.

    "What about the children? Won't somebody *please* think of the children!" --Helen Lovejoy, from "The Simpsons"

  56. History lesson by perdida · · Score: 2

    WAVE is administered by Pinkerton's, Inc., which is a rather nasty business intelligence firm that morphed into its spy-happy self from its previous incarnation as a union-busting, railroad-protecting gang of thugs. Katz has previously noted this connection.

  57. GW Bush's comments today by gmhowell · · Score: 4

    Was listening to NPR (or maybe PRI) on the way home, and caught a snippet wherein the Prez claimed that he would, as part of his educational initiatives, try to do something about all of the students who are in fear of going to school.

    Thank god, I thought. Finally, someone is going to do something about those asinine jocks and their cohort.

    Then I remembered: He meant he would be doing something about the people who get picked on and then retaliate with semi-automatic weapons.

    Fuck. Same shit, different elected official.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    1. Re:GW Bush's comments today by elefantstn · · Score: 1

      Um, yeah. So he didn't actually say that, you just "remembered" what you thought he meant. Way to go, buddy.

      --
      If it ain't broke, you need more software.
    2. Re:GW Bush's comments today by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      Actually, elefanstsn, he said what it was said he said. Then what was he said was interpreted, which was made clear. So he actually did say that. And it probably meant about what was suggested.

  58. My droogies... by mrcutrer · · Score: 2

    :::laughing hysterically:::...ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...oh. Excuse me, sorry, for all that laughter. I remember my skewl had a "homework hotline" one time...well turns out we "hacked" it...man how funny was that.[begin recording]"this is mr.teacher, for class today we will be having all the girls meet with me in the closet for a SPECIAL ASSIGNMENT." "a bunch more degrading shit".

    Anyway my point is...your targeting the geek culture here right...they're going to fuck this thing up...I swear! I would if I was still in skewl. And how are they going to ween out the false accusations?

    This system is one giant joke, and a bad one at that. Not only will it prove impotent in fighting skewl violence, it will also destroy the lifes of certain individuals. And if a kid...a fucking kid! can see depression in a classmate before a teacher does...well then, something is terribly wrong. Actually wait no...how about the fucking parents dealing with these situations...theres a fucking clue! Note to parents....TALK TO YOUR KIDS, you'll find this will defuse many problems.

    Depression is a serious problem, please don't fight it with neo bullshit problem solving (tattle-taling). A depressed person is volatile, not stable, and susceptable to critical comments and constant negative attention. I think some people deserve a bullet in the head for fucking with depressed people...hey they'll never do it again right? Plus how is someone outside the depressed person's life, like a pig, going to help? This system put forth is an antagonist on the back of depression. This system will do more damage than help. This system is just plain retarded, a "corporate check point". Fuck normal thoughts, fuck being a bitch for the skewl system, if you like something different...your not crazy...your not going to kill people...you just like different shit than the mass morons in the world. This is a system to stifle creative thinkers, artist, and overall open minded people who can see past trivial social nonsense.

    "Take magical mushrooms and squeegy your third eye." - Bill Hicks

    --
    "When I look back, my life is not a foreign country, it's more like a library book returned long ago." - ????
  59. I would like to report... by Hikahi · · Score: 1


    ...Johnny and Sue-Ann, because today they put spit balls in my hair durring Biology, and that seems like pretty antisocial behavior to me.


    And I would like to report Garrett, because on the bus this morning he called me a stupid fat girl, among other things, and he seemed really angry, and it frightened me. I think he could become violent.


    And I would like to report Mr. Larson, because after english class today, when I told him about how I could not turn in my homework because it was stolen from me at lunch by some kids I did not know and thrown in a mud puddle, he called me a liar and told me I better shape up if I wanted to get anywhere in this life.


    And most of all, I would like to report myself, because if this keeps up much longer, I just might decide to fight back...

    --
    Nessun maggior dolore, Che ricordarsi del tempo felice Nella miseria. -Dante
  60. How many of you are highschool students? by berteag00 · · Score: 1

    I would love to do a poll on the age of people who posted to these stories. Katz is as biased as any reporter/mudraker/conservative politician.

    A freshman in college, I went to a highschool in a county in which existed an anonymous tip line for weapons in school. I imagine that the principles would have cut the lock off of your locker and searched it, had they been tipped you might be hiding a firearm there.

    I never used it. I don't know of anyone who did. I also don't know of anyone who was a victim of a malicious tip. And I ran with the geek/nerd crowd...according to Katz, we should have been targets. But we never were.

    C'mon, people. Give us some credit! Highschoolers, even middle-schoolers are intelligent. They are responsible. Yeah, I can see there being some losers, and some space for malicious abuse. But I don't see it being nowhere *near* as bad as our resident demagogue suggests.

    1. Re:How many of you are highschool students? by Jolly()GreenGiant · · Score: 1

      I am a High School student and also run with the NERD (Never Ending Radical Dude; I know it's lame) croud and have had four of my friends and myself malicously tipped to our protection hotline. We are all gamers (computers as well as Magic: the gathering, and AD'nD type games) and leave everyone else alone. Our dress, although a bit outlandish is not the discriminate. We all scored at least a 28 on the ACT and are very into computers(specificly, Linux, Networking, A+, and gaming). Everyone hates us for that and that alone. I think this "saftey precaution" is backwards to say the least.

    2. Re:How many of you are highschool students? by Jerry+Talton · · Score: 1
      C'mon, people. Give us some credit! Highschoolers, even middle-schoolers are intelligent. They are responsible.

      I can't believe I just read that. You're making the terrible mistake of assuming that other people are like you, and you're assuming a correlation between "intelligence" and responsibility that doesn't exist.

      I graduated from the nerdiest high school in the entire nation last year: Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, in Alexandria, Virginia. We routinely have the most National Merit Semifinalists of any school in the country; the only school to come close to us in recent years has over twice our class size. Because so many of TJ's students are so intelligent and go to great colleges and do great things, it is assumed that they're responsible people and that they can be trusted. Having spent four years of my life in this environment I can safely say that that assumption is FLAWED.

      Kids at my high school acted like absolute idiots just as much as kids at other high schools. The only difference that their superior intellect made was that they were able to find extrodinarily brilliant ways to abuse the system and do terrible, awful things. Rather than writing mean notes about teachers and muttering vile invectives about each other under their breath, students organized an online messageboard system (almost as useful and as portable as slashcode) and then blasted teachers and other students under the protection of the first amendment. So many kids cut 8th period (a period added to the school day to allow our geographically diverse student body to participate together in extracirricular activities) that the administration was seriously considering canceling most of the school student organizations. Drugs, alcohol, and violence were all common, as were attempts by students to manipulate the administration for their own, often nefarious, purposes.


      As much as I hated high school, I was incredibly thankful that I was able to get into TJ. I know that my experiences would have been much worse at a "normal" school. Highschoolers (or at least some of them) may be intelligent, but that doesn't mean that they can be trusted not to abuse legitimate authority, nor that they are free from malevolent intentions.

    3. Re:How many of you are highschool students? by nightfever · · Score: 1

      Here, when I was in school, if there had been something like this available then I would SO have used it for mischief...and so would anyone that I know! Kids like to make trouble for each other!! It would turn into a contest to see who could come up with the most fun things to say about people...who can get the others sent in for counselling first. I never said that I was well adjusted, but then again, most kids like to make fun...they don't know what it can potentially do! I mean, "ha ha, you have to go to a shrink!" seems harmless enough. But they do know that shooting a classmate is damn serious and so would be SO much less likely to do this. A kid who shoots another kid is obviously totally f&%$ed in the head!

  61. I liked this one by harvardian · · Score: 1
    I have a few things to say...
    1. I've read a lot of comments here about how Katz should stop this marathon (10 part) series and just publish a book. Doesn't it seem plausible that the reason Slashdot has published 10 installments is because they want a large comment base from which to publish such a book?
    2. I actually liked this installment of Katz's ranting despite the fact that I hated the first two and stopped reading until now. I don't think Katz is beating a dead horse at all. Profiling of students because of suspicious behavior is exactly the wrong response to the Columbine massacre nad I'm not willing to stand by and watch it happen. This horse should be beaten as long as it takes to get a response.
    3. Let me explain why profiling of students is absolutely the wrong response, despite the fact that some of this has been said before. What happened in Columbine is that a community, like so many these days, is totally out of touch with its members. Those kids were bullied into a sub-culture that turned violent. Their crime was not that they joined a sub-culture, but that they chose a very costly method of expressing their pain at being ostracized. By profiling children in such a manner as WAVE is attempting to do, they merely make these isolated children more ostracized and give them less of what they need so desperately, compassion. The reason geeky kids form a sub-culture is because they're bullied and they need a social circle that provides reinforcement, just like everybody does. To bully them further by giving them the message "if you are depressed we will search you out and force you to be happy and compliant" WAVE is merely contributing to the debasing of children by their peers. They do this by further objectifying them and further denying them compassion. A depressed child doesn't need to hear "we will find you out if you're depressed and violent," they need to hear "I understand that you're human, feeling sad and lonely is natural when nobody loves you. I feel for you." WAVE needs to understand that their program will cause children to hide their depression even more than before because they feel so ashamed and commodified.
    4. On an unrelated note, something has to be wrong with this scenario: 1) Somebody reports something factually incorrect about you, 2) your character is defamed because of this by, say, you not getting a job you want (defamation of character is illegal, of course), 3) Because you don't have $800, you have no recourse to find out how and whether you are being defamed. Doesn't this sound too aristocratic for America?
    Just my $.02
  62. Tonight on Fox: When Denial And Ignorance Collide! by bigmaddog · · Score: 1

    This is one of the most ill-concieved political schemes I know of. It's all too well founded on the three principles of politics:

    1) Ignorance: like most decision makers, those behind this solution have no expertise, desire to consult experts, or any intellect of any kind.
    2) Speed: although it doesn't work in theory and is incredibly damaging in practice, this solution can be implemented quickly and easily.
    3) Lack of responsibility: the solution is such as not to suggest that the established institutions or voting majorities are in any way responsible for anything to do with the problem.

    WAVE is a political convenience that follows these rules and not a real soultion. I can't imagine any sociologist or psychologist worth the paper his/her diploma is printed on suggesting something this absurd and the intelligence of the politicians need not be debated. It's as easy to set up as any database and an 800-number, and places the blame for the problem and much of the responsibility for fixing it squarely on the kids themselves, absolving their parents and teachers of responsibility and making them all sleep better at night. It also makes the school a very unhealthy environment for children that's full of distrust. If I had kids and they were affected by this, I'd seriously consider leaving the state, or even the country.


    ----------
    --

    Even as you read this, your pants are strangling your loins! Aaa!

  63. Re:What a bunch of B.S.! by darkmoon · · Score: 1

    You're a geek, right?
    Doesn't that make you a wacko, psycho, nut AND loser among the geeks who disagree with you about your stance on Jon Katz and the Hellmouth?

    I'm in high-school right now and I've been going through some pretty rough times. I've considered both homicide and suicide (usually mixed together).

    AND, GOD DAMN IT, I AM THE ONLY PERSON IN THIS WHOLE FUCKING WORLD WHO *APPROVES* OF THE COLUMBINE SHOOTINGS!

    (There, I've said it. Moderate me down for advocating murder)

  64. SLASHDOT SHOULD SPLIT IN HALF! by loki29 · · Score: 1

    Sorry for the yelling, i'm just getting disturbed that so much non-slashdot material is getting thrown up while so many stories are getting ignored/buried.

    I would love to have a job where everything I write, no matter what it is, will get published and I get paid for it :-)

    Seriously.

    I get a creepy feeling reading katz's articles that just don't fit into Slashdot, and I begin to wonder, if this is what Slashdot has come down to today, what about 6 months from now, or a year from now. Is it going to be salon.com or inside.com or (insert "hip" "happening" site here) with the occasional linux blurb or tech blurb thrown in every few days?

    They need to split off Slashdot into two parts, the techie part (like it used to be, geek movies, info, software, hardware, cult type stuff) and the non-geek movie review/katz "reach deep inside your soul and tell me how you feel" site.

    1. Re:SLASHDOT SHOULD SPLIT IN HALF! by Plisken · · Score: 1

      How about a "Euro-trash ripping on America" slashdot.

    2. Re:SLASHDOT SHOULD SPLIT IN HALF! by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      Hey, sorry if your little geek arena has evolved beyond you into a culture. Fragmenting slashdot, by the way, is an option. RTFM. Do it. Stop whining.

  65. Orwellian is right! by magic · · Score: 1
    This is a page straight from 1984, training children to "turn in" their friends and parents to the State.

    -m

  66. It is important to keep reporting this by magic · · Score: 2
    By reporting continuing developments, Katz is keeping this important issue alive. If instead of following up, he did what the rest of the media does-- drop day-old news like a dead rodent-- those of us who aren't in highschool would not realize what is going on.

    It's a little annoying to hear the same stuff over and over again. But the kind of social problems that get solved are the ones where someone crusades to keep them visible. Squeaky wheel gets the grease kind of thing...

    -m

  67. www.badchoiceofwords.com by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2

    The Wave was the result of an experiment in Personality Cult worship in PaloAlto Cali. in the 60's. It is VERY funny that the monkeys who are developing this 'squeel' system have never heard about it.

    The book based on this event was required reading in my HighSchool - very interesting read.

    Maybe the people devloping the "W.A.V.E." program should read a book... it is uncanny that this experiment (in 60's California) detailed in this book is exactly what this "W.A.V.E." program will lead too - that the book actually warned against this.

    This is very weird.

    1. Re:www.badchoiceofwords.com by Kite · · Score: 1

      Thank you, I couldn't find the link.

      --
      - Kite

      `But gravity always wins.'
      - Radiohead
  68. the net responsible to columbine? by xted · · Score: 1

    I cannot imagine why the american public could even think about blaming the net for any of the horrible events that took place at Columbine High. 20% of americans own personal computers, and even about 70% of them are capable of connecting to the net. So it seems that 80% of America believes the net is in some way responsible, it is only out of ignorance.

    After the murders took place at columbine, a sawed off shotgun barrel was found in one of the shooter's rooms, along with supplies capable of constructing a bomb. If the parents were responsible, they should have noticed somthing was wrong before somthing like that would happen.

    And as for the W.A.V.E organization..
    Myself, a highschool student, have never been suicidal, extremely violent, depressed, or an outcast from my peers. Im just not an outspoken person. If somone confronted me and tried to assist me with some inposed issues, I would feel uncomfortable at school, and singled out. Programs like this would do more bad than good. It should be the teachers responsibility to point out these issues to a school official, only if it poses a threat to other students. Maby if got some more Outgoing teachers, this would work.

  69. Script to kill W.A.V.E. by Fervent · · Score: 2
    What would it take to write a simple script that would constantly call W.A.V.E., overrunning the thing with fake messages, so people wouldn't have to.

    Even using something like Yahoo Messenger and having it constantly dial in with silence or a recorded audio file.

    -
    -Be a man. Insult me without using an AC.

    --

    - I don't care if they globalize against free speech. All my best free thoughts are done in my head.

  70. Is it just you? No, it's 1984, too. by LoonXTall · · Score: 1

    ...policy was to train children in school to turn in their classmates, their parents, and anyone else who they believed was "subversive."

    Just like the children in Orwell's classic (and accurate) _1984_ when they turn in Winston's neighbor (I think. I remember the concepts, not the details.)

    --

    ~~~LXT~~~
    Life is like a computer program: anything that can't happen, will.

  71. Comumbine is way too overblown by mother_superius · · Score: 1
    This is the major news story about school and murder maybe in the past 10 years. I think it's a bit overblown. About 25 people (not sure exactly how many) died last year as a result of school shootings. I think TIME did a "special report" on every one of them. About 22000 murders (again, not exact) were committed last year. It is rediculous to make such a big deal over this. But fear makes for good news. Are your kids safe? Who's going to kill them? How can you prevent it?

    On the aniversary of Columbine last year, my moron math teacher (not actually a teacher, he never got a teaching degree. He was a carpenter teaching Geometry.) Got us all together, and told us the story. He showed us their pictures and he said "It could be anyone." If you're having problems, you can always talk to me about it. If you think anyone is having social problems, you can talk to me. Now, I'm in the "punk" group, and my friends were making fun of him (quietly) because he looked ridiculous. He freaked out and said "Guys, I'm serious." And we said that this was the least of our troubles/problems and he went on a yelling tirade... it wouldn't end.

    Some of you don't know how bad school has gotten. The school outlaws HATS, HEADBANDS, COATS, and a bunch of other stuff from being worn in school (a PUBLIC school!) It supposedly is to prevent gangs, because they cause violence. So hats/coats/headbands cause violence. Think about it. "I guess we can't have a gang anymore because we can't wear hats, and that just takes the fun out of it. I actually got sick and had to wear a coat because the school doesn't heat enough, plus I was cold from being sick. They made me take it off, and so I got sicker and missed more school. I wonder if the suspension from not taking it off would have lasted longer than the sickness. It would at least have been more pleasant. I better stop here before I get anymore pissed off and get bad karma for flamebait and start a flame war. But school really sucks.

    1. Re:Comumbine is way too overblown by oooga · · Score: 1

      I absolutely agree. At our school, there are guards posted everywhere to make sure no one leaves the lunch room early. Of course, all of the guards are mindless and imbecillic, and getting around them is a fairly simple task. But get this: I came in from lunch one day, through one of the side entrances. There was a guard posted there. I went to my locker which was about 20 feet from the guard, and in plain view, to put away my coat. He started threatening to suspend me! I was twenty feet from him. Furthermore, we are not allowed to wear hats or headbands in the school. That same guard was patroling the halls this morning with a megaphone telling people to take off hats. Also, twice a year we take off a day of school so teachers can practice for scenarios involving armed attackers! That's like 2 percent of the whole school year, gone to pot. It really is ridiculous.

      --
      -- Nerds on toast in the new millenium
  72. I could see this program working for drugs by Mastagunna · · Score: 1

    Now if they really wanted to have a call in line, turning in you class mates, why not use it for drugs. Metal profiling is something kids are not capable of doing, as opions of people are greatly swayed by there popularity. Drug use on the other hand requires no profiling, simply, Drugs Yes/No Once a child is singled out, its impossible to detect if he/she is going to go on a killing spree, simply because he played Quake. Testing for drugs though is much easier. It also returns a definite answer. This drug testing would provide so many benifites, including slowing the drug trade, increasing public safty and fix other problems. So why wont the goverment do something positve once.

  73. Sounds like Red hysteria all over again by makaera · · Score: 1
    It seems to me that this WAVE program is very similar to the anti-communist witch hunts that occured in this country during part of the Cold War. Most people decry this as a sad time in our history. We are now providing an opportunity for students to turn in each other, with no risk themselves. This is remarkably reminiscent of the anti-red hunts where people denounced others for their own gain, and were never punished. How many innocent children must be harmed to catch one "problem child"? How long before students start reporting others just because they don't like them? How long before the system is extended to adults to keep them from harming others? It seems to me that this is a dangerous slippery slope. How far can we go before we become a police state, with government spies watching us for abnormal behavior? This country was founded on the principle of individual freedom. The Consitution, especially the Bill of Rights, was designed to keep the government out of our lives. I don't care what important sounding justification is used, there is no excuse for setting up a program like this, which in the end can not help but hurting many and helping few.

    However, if a solution must be proposed, how about this: instead of punishing the few, educate the many. In a true democracy, the majority always prevails. However, this country was designed to have safeguards that prevented the majority from exercising tyrannical power over the minority. Unfortunately, most children are educated at government schools and are indoctrinated against standing out. It seems ironic that a government that was supposed to protect individual freedoms has begun to support the destruction of these freedoms. If this is not stopped now, there is no telling where it will end.

    Makaera

    --

    Don't make me use my other sig!!

  74. From the W.A.V.E. webpage FAQ by NewWazoo · · Score: 1

    Okay, I hate this as much as everyone else, but this caught my eye:

    ----------------
    Q: Is the information received used for any type of profiling?

    A: No. We do not perform any type of profiling. Information received is used in aggregate form by the Center for the Prevention of School violence to track school violence trends and to develop effective and relevant strategies to help schools stem violence.
    ----------------

    No, I don't believe them, but I thought I should pass this along. With that said, they give a lot more info on what questions you're gonna need to answer... make sure you plan ahead before you jam the system ;-)

    http://www.waveamerica.com/wave/wavefaq.asp

    The Waz
    "It's not old!" -- my slogan!

  75. 75% copy = Fair Use by Rares+Marian · · Score: 1

    Try again.

    --
    The message on the other side of this sig is false.
  76. Too late to get modded up, but... by Panamon777 · · Score: 1

    what the hell is this:

    "The WAVE Line is strictly for reporting concerns. Threats made to the WAVE Line are considered a federal offense."

    A federal offense? If it's a fucking anonymous phone call, how the hell do they plan to prosecute it? Or could it be that it's not actually anonymous? Gee, maybe Pinkerton hasn't heard about *69. Don't tell them, okay?

    Interestingly enough, there doesn't seem to be anything on their site about providing misinformation, or just blatantly lying. So if you can do that with a clear conscience (if you can't, well...you probably work for Pinkerton), go ahead and tell them the cheerleaders threatened to kill your puppy if you corrected them in class again.

    1. Re:Too late to get modded up, but... by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it depends on what they are threatened with? If the ACLU got involved, and threated lawsuits, that couldn't be a federal crime, could it? Yet?

  77. About the TV Movie "The WAVE" by HongPong · · Score: 1
    I recall the TV movie The Wave. If I recall, I actually watched it in History or English class when I was a freshman. In fact, it was based on a true story. The acting and production was generally atrocious, but it made a solid point.

    Judge Reinhold, I think, played a teacher who wanted to get across to his middle school students how seductive fascism was. He began a program called "The Wave" and everyone wore armbands and such, and discipline became highly strict within the classroom and so forth. Certain kids became enforcers, like the brownshirts. The TV-movie revolved around 2 kids who got really freaked out by it, and they fought to stop the evil teacher.

    Everything kept building to the point where the teacher planned to reveal the wave's "National Leader," and it was this really big deal. By that time, lots and lot of kids had joined the wave, and the 2 free-thinking ones were all panicking and so forth.

    So in this big auditorium, the teacher says, "Here is our national leader," and he pulls a paper off the overhead and there is Adolf Hitler. He's made his point rather dramatically about fascism, and after supposedly being mean to these 2 kids, he smiles at them because they were onto him the whole time. He loses his job, the end.

    It was a cheesy flick but I'm such a paranoid person that I loved it!

    1. Re:About the TV Movie "The WAVE" by jeff13 · · Score: 1

      Heeey - I remember that TV program. After school (not very) special? Heeheh, yea, I'm that old.

      I agree though, a simple story can make a complicated point quite clear (bad acting, sure, but obviously the writing was spot on).

      Whether we call it "the Wave" or the "new economy", fascistic morals will always rise to the scummy surface.
      As I bob up and down on the waves I can't help but wonder who all these IT Professionals are here with me. ;)

  78. It's ok to be mad about things by netrat · · Score: 1

    Being a pacifist to me means not using violence as a solution to problems, or at any other time for that matter. It doesn't mean not getting mad. I get pissed, but i vent it in healthy ways. And I'm not just pissed about what my school did to me, I'm also pissed about some of the things they have very recently done to some friends of mine.

    For example, our furher/principal forced my friend to rip out his earings right in front of him the other day, because they were a "liability". They bled all over the place (we got a picture :) ) and it was really generally sad. Of course they used the rulebook to justify this, even though it had no mention of jewelry! Only a rule which said "Students must obey teachers at all times". They also came close to expelling that same friend for not letting them confiscate his hat. Another friend got suspened for two days for giving someone the finger, and yet another friend got tackled to the ground by campus security for looking like he was "on-drugs".
    So yes, I don't like holding grudges, but it's sort of hard when i keep on getting reasons to renew them.
    ----------------------------------

    1. Re:It's ok to be mad about things by Squid · · Score: 2

      and yet another friend got tackled to the ground by campus security for looking like he was "on-drugs".

      I'd be fucked at that school. I look like I'm on drugs most of the time. Especially if i haven't slept well (dark bags under my eyes), my allergies are acting up (red bloodshot eyes, runny red nose), or have gone too long without food and my blood sugar level has crashed (incoherent, occasionally tripping over stuff). Then they'd look at my art (shameless plug) and realize I MUST be on drugs.

      But I'll bet that school turns a blind eye to teachers who come in smelling like Budweiser.

  79. Fucking right on man... by netrat · · Score: 1

    The subject says it all.

    :)
    ----------------------------------

  80. Give us all a break. by elgee · · Score: 1

    I enjoy Jon Katz'es writing. Not that I alway agree with him, but do we not agree with the conccept of free speech??? Us geeks/nerds/dorks, no matter what age we are, do deserve the discussion about our community.

    1. Re:Give us all a break. by wuice · · Score: 1

      "The right to be heard does not include the right to be taken seriously."
      - Hubert H. Humphrey

  81. Somebody HELP me! slashdot author filter broken? by cfish · · Score: 1

    I have checked "exclude author" on Katz and it doesn't work! I still see his disgusting comments all the time. Fellas, I need help. How do i kill all his posts?

    I checked, again and again, that Katz to be filtered out in my preference. basically, I went to "preference" and then click on the button that says Jon Katz under exclude author and hit save button but his posts still shows up AGAIN and AGAIN and AGAIN.

    Please! help me from the excruciating pain of seeing something like this. "Part 10" of Hellmouth. Save me! Please! Someone!

  82. Is it anonymous? by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 1

    I'm not too up on my phone line technology, but if this is from Pinkerton... What is to prevent them from tracing the calls, cross-referencing that information with their massive database (looking for a phone # match), and then identifying the household from which the call was made? You would think information about people who repeatedly ratted out others might be just as beneficial to their psychological profiling....

  83. ``The Third Wave'' by po8 · · Score: 1

    Anybody remember the movie The Third Wave, based on the true story? In 1968, a high-school teacher sets up a Nazi-like social organization as a classroom experiment, which then goes horribly awry, as such experiments will...

    I wonder if the Pinkertons were aware of this when they chose this name? My guess, sadly, is yes.

  84. Living in the US by uriyan · · Score: 1

    I am a teenager, and I don't live in the US. Having read some of the things here at ./, I am very glad I won't be living there anytime soon.

    It seems to me, that the American society is full of hidden hatred towards itself. I mean look at all the racist shit going there. For Americans, finding a way to hurt nerds is just another way of hating themselves.

    Americans also have an interesting conception, in which young people don't have any rights (I sometimes feel that neither do adults). They are subjects to spontaneous police scrutiny, as if there had never been such a

  85. Re:Somebody HELP me! slashdot author filter broken by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

    Simple enough solution for even a windows user: Try not clicking on the URL. That blue underlined hyperlink? You are wasting bandwidth.

  86. Easy Solution by enneff · · Score: 1

    Just make sure you turn everyone in, that way they'll be fudged so badly the system won't work at all. :)

  87. Oh great, so much for my rights. by ZiS · · Score: 1

    I am a young male living in North Carolina. I was hospitalized for depression when I was 15. I was under the impression that, by law, all my medical records would be destroyed when I recently turned 18. I'm far from a legal expert here, so someone help me out. Isn't Pinkerton breaking a law or two? If the local mental health agency can't keep my records on file, how does some huge company, only looking to make a profit, get a hold of my files and keep them forever? It seems to me that our government is dipping their hand into Pinkerton's pockets.

    At least I can buy a gun now...

    1. Re:Oh great, so much for my rights. by anticypher · · Score: 2

      Only government run databases have to be purged when you pass from juvenile to adult status. But private corporations in the US are allowed to copy your juvenile record data, and that copy no longer comes under the protection of the law.

      Expect that when you start applying for serious jobs in about 10 years that you will find this data coming back to haunt you. I hope you choose a path through life so that greedy corporate interests don't affect you much. Look towards becoming an artist, a freelance photographer, a coder, or anything else where you are free to pick and choose your income. Depression and Corporate Drone don't mix very well, trust me.

      the AC

      --
      Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
  88. Bravo John by jgaynor · · Score: 1

    You continue to put a face on the otherwise cold, beige Slahdot. Keep up the good work and ignore the assholes who flame you, they were probably bullied and now feel they need to seek revenge. To all of you who must just search for Katz articles to blast . . . you're ignorant children and deserve whatever ass-kickings or social shunning you're obviously getting to make you so angry. Post your numbers and ill report you to W.A.V.E.

  89. Slashdot demagogues by PyRoNeRd · · Score: 1

    Well let's see what they say in their FAQ:

    Q: Is the information received used for any type of profiling? TOP
    A: No. We do not perform any type of profiling. Information received is used in aggregate form by the Center for the Prevention of School Violence to track school violence trends and to develop effective and relevant strategies to help schools stem violence.

    Quite different from what the Slashdot chief demagogue John Katz is trying to tell us.

    1. Re:Slashdot demagogues by nnet · · Score: 1
      Open your eyes man, this is a company who's primary concern is to MAKE MONEY. They're not concerned about the actual children they'll harm in the long run. Do you seriously take the contents of that FAQ at face value? I have some beahchfront property in Arizona for you if thats the case.

      I have 3 children, and I'm extremely concerned about the potential for abuse of this WAVE system. Its run by a corporation, there's no compassion in that equation.

      Worry less about your personal opinion of John Katz, and more about the impact this has on us as a society, your energies are better directed to helping solve the problem, instead of exacerbating it with pointless rhetoric.

  90. Jesus Christ! by Glanz · · Score: 2

    ....was evidently depressed. He said, "Father, why hast thou forsaken me?" What more proof do they need? They should have taken that peace-geek right out and nailed him to a friggen cross. I haven't been keeping up with the news lately. Whatever happened to him anyway? Did he go Open Source?

    --
    Rien n'est plus beau que le creux du 0.
  91. Just accept it: High School sucks! by Mantrid · · Score: 1
    High School is a crappy place for some people. There's not really anything that can be done to effectively change this. The best advice is to just hang on until college/university - this is a whole different world where you can usually find a group somewhere that has common interests with you and where your formerly 'geeky' abilities may even be sought after. High School is full of teens going through puberty and starting to see what they can do. How are you going to effectively control that?

    ________________________________________

    worst...post...ever

  92. We konw the truth by Mr.roboto · · Score: 1

    they are the fools. One day we will be able to rise above their level, if we havn't already and they're scared as hell of anyone with more power than them. Anyone who had a remote amount of power over administration could probally run the whole school! Power would be simple to get without violence at any school. Methods of trying to aquire power through violence towards your peers is rather dumb, as the cops would get involved. I have numerous people ask me if "I make bombs" and I reply "that's illegal." Why use explosives when there are things that are so much more powerful? Couple of ideas for people here if you really want to get even at school. Please keep in mind I claim no liability for doing these things, they are the result of a "crazy" mind. =0 1)blackmail the admin. Follow the principal around. He have a stash of pot growing in his back yard? unfaithful to his wife? Take some pics and make them "appear" next time something goes down, and keep the negatives elsewhere. I'm sure he'll see your perspective better from then on, if not he'll be busy with other things. 2)anon tip lines. Oh the fun you can have with these. Either crack em or even better get it so there are messages about teachers/admin on them. "Yeah, I saw a kid who had a stack of 20 pipe bombs, he lives at . Boy won't he be in for a surprise when they learn who's been tipped off to! Or even better, use the tip line to report what you're blackmailing the guy for. Imagine if the cops get a hold of it without the principal knowing, he'd get his house raided elian style. I bet the "tip line" would be shut down in twenty minutes flat! These are just my rantings, so I ask of you not to be a jerk and try these without proper "motivation."

    --
    Don't call my crazy, that's what they called me back in the home!
  93. Profiling and Incarceration in Canada by davecb · · Score: 1
    Update on the case of a Cornwall, Ontario teen jailed for writing a short story about a bullied teen blowing up his school...

    Principal decries portrayal of case against jailed teen

    By Estanislao Oziewicz

    The principal of a rural Eastern Ontario school says that she is amazed at published portrayals of the case against a 16-year-old boy charged with making death threats to staff and fellow students.

    Some media have turned the case into one about freedom of expression rather than the safety of the students, she said.

    "It's really sad," said the woman, who has been principal at the school of 500 students for three years.

    (The Young Offenders Act prohibits publication of information that would lead to the identification of a young person charged with a crime.)

    The boy was charged on Dec. 8 with threatening to blow up the school after writing a story and presenting it to his drama class, and with making specific threats to kill three schoolmates.

    He was held in detention until Thursday, when he was released on bail in the care of his parents.

    After the boy's release, Toronto lawyer Clayton Ruby agreed to take the case.

    In an interview yesterday, he said that it is unconscionable that the boy was detained for a month.

    "We too often forget that young people have constitutional rights, too, and we tend to treat them as if we could just lock up them based in part on what they wrote, whereas we wouldn't do that for an adult," he said.

    "I really think that if you really believe in the free-expression guarantee, and you tell a child in school to write fiction, you should not be using that in evidence against him. And to lock him up for a month is really quite peculiar."

    PEN Canada, which sees the charges as an attack on freedom of expression, has sided with the boy. The Ottawa International Writers Festival is holding a fundraiser for the boy's defence and to discuss associated civil-liberties issues.

    [Email courtesy the globeandmail.com Web Centre.

    Clayton Ruby is one of the top defense lawyers in Canada, who occcasionally does pro-bono work in cases with a significant "political" component.

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
  94. Just another Pinkerton crime against humanity by SlackMeister · · Score: 1

    They've been up to this crap since just after the civil war, when Pinkerton agents ran southern farmers off their land (so the railroad could come through) like Nazis chasing Jews out of Poland. The James Gang rose up pretty much as a reaction to that (so who's the one creating serial killers?). Now these pigs are after you. I'm all for law enforcement but this is more like those automatic red-light-runner cameras. It's all about the money. Sabotage, sabotage, sabotage!!!

    --
    *** ***
  95. How to build your very own Fascist movement by alumshubby · · Score: 2

    Fifteen years ago a college roommate described "The Wave" incident to me, and I've been curious to read about it ever since. I'm grateful to you for posting this link, and I hope everyone will take the time to look through it.I'm planning to buy the book and, when my son's old enough, get him to read it so he'll understand certain things he needs to know.

    --
    "How many light bulbs does it take to change a person?" --BMcC-->
  96. The past is not important? by Shadows · · Score: 1

    "In our system, state operated schools may not be enclaves of totalitarianism. School officials do not possess absolute authority over their students. Students in school as well as out of school are 'persons' under our Constitution."
    Justice Abe Fortas, Tinker v. DesMoines

    Isn't this a legal precident that could be used against W.A.V.E. -- or whatever instrument of "totalitarianism" public schools choose to throw at students?

    Oh, and I know it's an old sore-point for many -- but Katz, dammit, cite your sources! "This survey said that, and some-other survey said this" -- This is the internet -- it's what hyperlinks are for. Not to mention that it might lend some credibility to what you're saying. It's awfully hard for some of us who were raised on "you can't always believe what you read/hear/see" to stomach "facts" that are pulled out of the proverbial nowhere.

    If you do all this research for your articles then don't be afraid to show it. Helping your readers feel that you aren't blowing things out of proportion, or at least that you aren't making things up, is not a bad thing. In fact (go figure), it's quite a good thing.

  97. FBI by Jim+Madison · · Score: 1
    The FBI released this report (sorry, pdf only) on dealing with school violence. The report rejects the notion of a profile for the school shooter and instead advocates standardized monitoring processes to ensure appropriate intervention to threats observed at schools.

    According to the study, the extensive media coverage has drawn a portrait of epidemic revenge killings by loners that have easy access to guns. This stereotype is inappropriate and they rebuke the media for often-times being incomplete, inaccurate, or unbalanced. (Are the media part of the problem, rewarding kids for crave attention and unnecessarily alarming citizens?)

    They recommend that every school should identify one staff member to be the 'threat assessment' coordinator. (The greatest cause of poor management is the lack of communication across multiple teacher, parents and students who observe threatening behavior.) This person becomes a central repository for information about threats at the school.

    Importantly, each threat should be analyzed by their "four pronged" approach to assessing threats. These prongs are mostly situational (Family dynamics, School dynamics and Social dynamics) with a little bit of profiling (Personality of the student). Based on the analysis of these factors, the coordinator can determine whether the threat requires intervention by law enforcement or not.

    There is a balance between individual rights (such as privacy rights not to be monitored or profiled) and collective rights (like safety from violence in schools). I am very heartened to see that the FBI advocates an approach based on analyzing the context of the situation, rather than profiling the individual, striking a good balance between the two potentially competing rights.

    --
    Hey democracy lovers, add Quorum as a c
  98. Selfish slashdotters by rossz · · Score: 1

    The Hellmouth series was the most important thing to ever come out of Slashdot. Had the book been published, it could have gone a long way to educating parents, teachers, administrators, and government types. But no, you whining bunch of little turds had to scream about your rights and prevent it from happening. So now the series is only published on Slashdot. What chance is there of it being seen by those who should see it? None.

    Sure, technically you own your personal posts, but the right thing to do was to give up your own selfish little interests and do what is best to help thousands of suffering kids. I guess too many of you have joined the overpaid, self-important, arrogant .com crowd and think the world owes you something. I got news for you, the world doesn't owe you a fucking thing. Unfortunately, you spoiled piles of dog excrement blew your chance to help make this world a better place.

    Go fuck yourselves.

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
    1. Re:Selfish slashdotters by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      Holy COW! That's quite a vitriolic post. Firstly, not everyone on Slashdot places (or placed) personal copyright above betterment of society; I for one already gave my consent for any and all of my posts to be published in such a work, and I doubt that I'm alone. Second, there are a lot of people that think that even with permission to publish the posts, any book produced from this will need a lot of work before publication, as Mr. Katz has the annoying tendency not to cite any sources at all, much less Slashdot posts, so it's really easy to shoot down anything he says since there's no proof of his points other than his say-so.

      Next time, take three deep breaths and a long think before you reach for that "submit" button, or you risk alienating even those who agree with you, as you have this time.

      Virg

  99. Simple Solution to this: by Maeryk · · Score: 2

    easy! Simply call in the football team. Every time they practice. Every time they get out of classes early. Every time there is a pep rally. Simply call up the toll-free number. Say that there are people in your school who are obsessed with violence. Say there is a club meeting quietly during school hours, where everyone involved slips out of class, and they meet to plot how to hurt other students. Vaguely reference the Pep rally.. in that it is an involuntary gathering where you are forced to cheer the vulgar and violent actions of a few in your school who "dont really fit in".

    Flood them with enough calls like this, it will die. And dont think for a moment a school is going to put up with *anything* that threatens their pretty little sports programs.. the band has to pay for their uniforms and instruments, but I dont see the football players buying the new stadiums.

    This is simple folks.. use their own system against them.

    Want to stop violence in school? Stop teachign the biggest, dumbest idiots *IN* the school that might makes right, and that crushing those who oppose them on the scrimmage field is a suitable application of power, and is okay!

    maeryk

    --
    Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
  100. Katz has phobias and stereotypes of his own by Kevin+S.+Van+Horn · · Score: 1

    > The Orwellian phobia has been a staple of the
    > most venal political systems in the 20th
    > Century, from Nazism to fascism to Communism.
    > [...]
    > If a teen or a parent becomes aware that a
    > classmate has a gun and plans to use it, there
    > are plenty of cops and law enforcement
    > officials they can call.

    Why should someone call the cops just because a student "has a gun and plans to use it"? The vast majority of gun uses are entirely legitimate (hunting, target practice, self-defense). Assuming that someone is dangerously violent just because they have and use guns is exactly the kind of stereotyping and witch-hunting that Katz decries elsewhere in his article.

    It's the kids who have guns and use them a lot---those who are immersed in the much-maligned "gun culture"--- who are least likely to do something stupid with a gun. Gun enthusiasts as a group are very big on gun safety rules, and many cases of police "accidentally" killing people could be avoided if police followed the same safety rules.

  101. Asperger's Syndrome by jcbarlow · · Score: 1

    I'm an old geek. Went to HS in the 60's. 40 years later we're still talking about the same sort of issues that I experienced. I don't expect this to change in my lifetime.

    One new wrinkle is that in 1994 Asperger's Syndrome became an official medical diagnosis. Look it up. It fits many of us. Before some jock rats you out as a weirdo and makes your life even harder, you can make a preemptive strike and get yourself diagnosed as an "Aspie". Most school districts will then be legally required to accommodate your "special needs".

  102. Dude. You rock. by WebFetus · · Score: 1
    Everyone needs a badass dad like you. And let me guess -- you actually give a shit about your child too?

    W.A.V.E. is attempting to take the place of responsible parenting and accountability. Take this fucker to the top.

    --
    ...suckling from the sweet amnion of life...
  103. "or that bragging about exploits on Doom" by Meursault · · Score: 1
    When will journalists start associating a new game with violent youth behavior?

    Doom was released shortly after the battle of Poitiers and enjoyed its greatest popularity during the latter years of the Hundred Years War. Needless to say nobody plays it anymore. They still used monochrome monitors and 8 inch floppy disks back then!

  104. Shit happened to me in '73 & it is still going on by wganz · · Score: 1

    When I was in high school, the jocks would rotate their senior rings 180 degrees then use them to "knot" the geeks. The standard indoctrination in the locker room was for the jocks to make whips from the towels and hit the geeks. The strongest admonishment from the coaches/teachers was "Now, don't do that." And is there any wonderment that when I started to drive to school, that I carried both my 12gauge goose gun and a double bit axe handle? Funny how that the harassement suddenly stopped when this redneck geek got to drive to school. Thank GOD that I didn't goto school during these politically correct days or else they would have me sentenced to a reeducation camp.

    Well, what happened to the assholes that tormented me && the rest of the geeks?? Two of them were the last two to goto the electric chair in Louisiana(Jimmy Wingo & Hugh Glass), another went to the state penitentary for assault with a deadly weapon(Everett Davis) and this was the pinnacle of all of their successes.The rest are run of the mill blue collar workers now; struggling to stay off of minimum wage/unemployment.

    KNOT (verb) to strike someone on the head with a large metal device to cause a prominent bump to rise up on their head. To inflict a mild concussion.

    WHIP(verb) to tightly twist a towel into a 3' roll, then swing and strike a geek to leave bruises and lacerations. /P.