Slashdot Mirror


Displaced Techies Find Sex Sells, And Pays

fataugie writes: "Oh yeah, just when you through the economy and Dot.Bombs couldn't suck anymore, we find that the porn business has a place for you. Enjoy!" Not necessarily in front of the cameras, however, but read those contracts carefully.

179 comments

  1. I propose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    that heidi wall becomes a sex worker for the porn industry. SHe can perl my code all day long

    1. Re:I propose by MrCreosote · · Score: 1

      ...or maybe a perl necklace?

      --
      MrCreosote Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump! "You're right! There isn't enough room to swing a cat in here!"
  2. Before the camera... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    or in the serverroom, uptime counts.

  3. Hm... given this information... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1
    ...wonder how much the goatse.cx guy is worth now?

    - A.P.

    --
    Forget Napster. Why not really break the law?

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  4. Re:Does this mean... by caferace · · Score: 1

    All Your Sperm Are Belong To Us. (oh jeez, please mod this down...)

  5. Re:You don't want to work for a Porn company by jbrw · · Score: 2
    Gee, keeping costs low, huh?



    What a whacky way to run a business. Thank god it'll never catch on!



    ...j

  6. You know someone should disagree around here by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 2

    So I will, I'm rather glad that I have never been
    is a position where I have had to consider this as I don't think that ethicaly I could work in the porn biz. Now I have no real problems with other people selling smut. But I don't think I could do it and be able to live the life that I want. I definitly could not face my friends or my family if I did. And I most certainly could not face my Rabbi. So before everyone here desides that there is no difference between selling porn and selling books think about the ethics of it.

    --
    Erlang Developer and podcaster
    1. Re:You know someone should disagree around here by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 2

      No I mean ethics. The basic question is this. Is what I do with my life making the world a better place? There are any number of jobs that I'm sure pay very well and are perfectly legal (Including selling porn) that at least to my mind are not ethical. For example I would not work for a company making censor-ware. Nor would I work for a company that used sweat shops or did any number of other things.

      For a large number of reasons I do not feal pornography is a healthy thing in our socity. So while I am not going to say that it should be banned, I am also not going to lift a finger to promote it. Nor would I work for a company that did.

      I really think that in the last few years we as a socity have stoped talking about ethics, or when we do the debate is far to shallow. And it does hurt us in ways both large and small.

      So I am standing up for ethics here on slashdot and in other places.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
    2. Re:You know someone should disagree around here by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 2

      Well I would say ethics is an absolute, but it does have grey areas. Would working in the Defense industry be ethical? I don't know it rather depends on for whom. I will not say that war is always unethical. In fact I will say quite the oposite, there are times when it would be unethical not to fight. When some thug Somewhere starts killing people en mass (Think Nazi Germany, Kosavo Bosnia etc) It shows a complete lack of ethics to sit on your hands and do nothing. As for biotech companies, you know many of them are working on drugs that can cure diseses or fight hunger on a massive level (The Golden rice).

      As for ethics being absolute yes they are. While I make it a point to not push my ethical views on others I do beliive there are some absolutes. If every positon about ethics is equaly valid then the Marxist position that "We therefore reject every attempt to impose on us any moral dogma whatsoever as an etenal, ultimate and forever immutable moral law..." Which Karl Marx wrote in his book "Capital". Lenin said similar things. If you accept that moraltiy can be defined as such than the Stalin's Gulag and Pol Pot's killing fields (Both of which in someone's mind advanced the "Class Struggle") were a perfectly acceptable thing. I do not accept that.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
    3. Re:You know someone should disagree around here by Squid · · Score: 2

      You say "ethics" when you mean guilt.

    4. Re:You know someone should disagree around here by artdodge · · Score: 2
      OK...so now you're saying that if I do not believe that ethics are an absolute then I am a Communist and also endorse mass murder.
      My rhetoric is a little rusty - what's the latin for straw man?

      A moral/ethical system with no absolute reference point is unable to evaluate any other moral/ethical system, simply because "better" and "worse" are only meaningful (you must see this coming by now) within the context of a moral/ethical system. Your only basis for evaluation is outcomes and results, and the value of an outcome will depend upon (here it comes again) the ethics within which it is evaluated.

      The argument is not that "you do not believe in absolute ethics, therefore you are a Communist and a mass murderer", but "you do not believe in absolutes, and as such, your system of ethics can not logically be said to be any better than that of Communists and mass murderers; neither can it be said to be any worse; neither can your system of ethics be used as a rational basis for any sort of meaningful judgement of theirs."

      Ask your friendly neighborhood existentialist - the important thing is not the merits of an ethical system itself, but that you choose one. (That the choice is recognized and even heralded as being totally arbitrarily is a non-issue.)

      Morals and ethics are not an absolute. Anyone who believes that they are absolute is seriously deluded.
      I think a much fairer statement would be: "Anyone who does not believe in an absolutely transcendent god-figure and believes that ethics are absolute is seriously deluded", which agrees with Zachary's point: without an absolute reference point, moral and ethical absolutism is groundless. It is, however, perfectly rational for someone who believes in the reality of such a being to believe morals and ethics could be absolute, in that their genesis is itself an untranscendable absolute.

      If you wish to argue that belief in such a being is itself delusional, then your conclusion is consistent. I would quite squarely disagree with you on that point, however :-)

    5. Re:You know someone should disagree around here by MKalus · · Score: 1

      >>When some thug Somewhere starts killing people en mass (Think Nazi Germany, Kosavo Bosnia etc)

      Or the US.... Let's not forget that.

      But you know what: Porn in itself (in moderation as everything) isn't something bad, the chances of sex / porn hurting someone is way less than a gun... After all, sex could create live and not destroy it, hardly something you can say about a gun, now can you?

      Besides: If the US would actually loosen up a bit about the Sex issue, maybe you guys could stop showing around all your new high tech guns with which you are "protecting" the world.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    6. Re:You know someone should disagree around here by ocbwilg · · Score: 1

      Re:You know someone should disagree around here (Score:2) by Zachary Kessin on Tuesday April 24, @06:46AM EDT (#227) (User #1372 Info) Well I would say ethics is an absolute, but it does have grey areas. Would working in the Defense industry be ethical? I don't know it rather depends on for whom. I will not say that war is always unethical. In fact I will say quite the oposite, there are times when it would be unethical not to fight. When some thug Somewhere starts killing people en mass (Think Nazi Germany, Kosavo Bosnia etc) It shows a complete lack of ethics to sit on your hands and do nothing. As for biotech companies, you know many of them are working on drugs that can cure diseses or fight hunger on a massive level (The Golden rice). As for ethics being absolute yes they are. While I make it a point to not push my ethical views on others I do beliive there are some absolutes. If every positon about ethics is equaly valid then the Marxist position that "We therefore reject every attempt to impose on us any moral dogma whatsoever as an etenal, ultimate and forever immutable moral law..." Which Karl Marx wrote in his book "Capital". Lenin said similar things. If you accept that moraltiy can be defined as such than the Stalin's Gulag and Pol Pot's killing fields (Both of which in someone's mind advanced the "Class Struggle") were a perfectly acceptable thing.

      OK...so now you're saying that if I do not believe that ethics are an absolute then I am a Communist and also endorse mass murder. Talk about demonizing the opposition...geez. Marxism as Marx promoted it isn't the way that it has been implemented anywhere in the world. Period. And regardless of your feelings on his political beliefs, he had some very interesting observations about society.

      It's funny that the conservative types agree with you though. They also believe that morals and ethics are an absolute. They believe this because they believe that morals and ethics come from a god-figure. But for those of us who do not believe in the Judeo-Christian religious figure, where do our morals and ethics come from? I certainly have morals and ethics. They came from somewhere. And they are absolutely not the same as those espoused by the Judeo-Christian "moralist" hatemongers in modern American society. So how did my morals and ethics come into being? How can it be possible that I can have a moral and ethical belief system that is totally without religious belief (and in fact contrary to most of it), yet it be life-affirming, loving, and happiness orientated?

      Morals and ethics are not an absolute. Anyone who believes that they are absolute is seriously deluded.

    7. Re:You know someone should disagree around here by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

      OK lets see about objectionable places to work, should we?:

      -Defense industry. No comments.

      -Gun makers. Again, co comments.

      -Banks and financial institutions: ask any third world country how ethic is that.

      -Oil companies. Look for Ken Saro Wiwa (sp?) and the Ogoni people of Nigeria, they will tell you how ethic is that.

      -Biotech companies: ask any environmentalist what can happen if some stuff gets out in the wild.

      And so on and so forth.

      Ethics is not an absolute, you think p()orn is unethical, that is fine, just remember that your ethics are not absolute and everybody will be happy.

      --
      IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  7. Sabrina by Brian+Kendig · · Score: 1
    Life imitates art! Sabrina went to work for an online porn company two years ago.

    http://www.sabrina-online.com/1999-02.html

    It's a fun cartoon strip. :-)

  8. Re:is there actually *that* much money in it? by stripes · · Score: 2
    plus a couple hundred for the photographer since they usually cost more than the girls

    I wonder why. A lot of places seem to have over exposed (as in too much light) photos because cameras left in matrix meter mode on that much untanned flesh tends to meter wrong. Anyone who has photographed nudes in an art class could do better.

    Plus they seldom use the rule of thirds, or set the shutter time to pick up motion.

    I could do a better job. Hey, where do I sign up?

  9. Re:is there actually *that* much money in it? by stripes · · Score: 2
    That's because amatuer porn is pretty popular right now. Who wants to see yet another airbrushed nude of Pamela Anderson when we can see Polaroids of that girl we ran into at the bar last nite?

    I thought am. porn was "normal looking" women, plain or no sets, no airbrush (or photoshop), single flash, flash shadow even. But not poor photography that makes the poor woman's skin look uniformly white. Ugh.

  10. Re:Choice of words by Kha0S · · Score: 1

    IIRC, at some point the words "intercourse" and "discourse" had the reverse meanings in English, but they then swapped for some reason.

  11. Shield thine virgin eyes by Ross+C.+Brackett · · Score: 2

    How quickly you forget! You do not remember the awfulness of the foldout (oh yes) cover of Wired 4.06??? BEHOLD! TREMBLE IN HIS PALENESS!!

    1. Re:Shield thine virgin eyes by Hilary+Rosen · · Score: 1

      Aaargh!

      That's worse than the goatse.cx guy.
      --

      --
      Yes, the nick is flamebait
  12. Re:What did you expect? by FFFish · · Score: 1

    Promote Peter McWilliams' book, available online for free ("Ain't Nobody's Business If You Do")?

    Only problem is, it requires people to read. Too many people would rather just suck down the entertainment pablum from Survivor, instead of challenging their minds with the written word...

    --

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  13. Re:What did you expect? by FFFish · · Score: 2

    To tie this in with an earlier thread, who else is really making money now? Marijuana seed sellers. Who's going to be making money tomorrow? The same.

    Here we have a culture that has outlawed the most basic of human needs: the need to feel good.

    It'd sure be nice if everyone would finally just get over the childhood conditioning their parents inflicted on them (because, hey, their parents inflicted it on them, and their parents before them) and finally come to grips with some basic facts of life.

    People is gonna fuck, suck, smoke, toke, and get it on it *whatever* ways thrill them.

    As long as it doesn't cause harm to others, or other's property, IT AIN'T NOBODY'S BUSINESS IF YOU DO.

    If the collective "we" could just get over that hurdle, imagine how much nicer the world would be...

    [Inevitably, the ill-informed dupes of the repressive minority will be sure to follow this post with insufferable statements about how masturbation makes you blind, THC makes you rob people, etc.... These are precisely the people who make this society so senselessly repressive.]

    --

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  14. Re:What did you expect? by FFFish · · Score: 2

    Sure dupe. Just as soon as *you* get a clue.

    My fucking doesn't cause any objective harm to you or your property, unless it's your tender and unwilling ass I'm poking.

    My sucking doesn't cause any objective harm to you or your property, unless it's that big ol' lollipop your mama was pacifying you with.

    My smoking doesn't cause any objective harm to you or your property, unless I'm puffing my cancer-stick an enclosed airspace shared with your unwilling lungs.

    My toking doesn't cause any objective harm to you or your property, unless I was bogarting your last smoke.

    You, dear Dwonis, need to do some remedial reading. Please go hustle your pert little ass over to [Peter McWilliams'] website, and read Ain't Nobody's Business If You Do. It'll do you a world o' good.

    I'm obliged to point out that Peter McWilliams is now deceased, killed by the repressive minority twats who insisted he choke on barf rather than supress his vomit reflex by smoking weed during his last ailing years.

    When you call "War on Drugs," it always affects other people. Gettaclue.

    --

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  15. "unlikely?" by fishbowl · · Score: 2

    The journalist's use of "unlikely refuge" really
    made me want to just stop reading right there. To anyone who thinks about it for a microsecond, it should plainly be the obvious, MOST LIKELY "refuge". Even the word "refuge" would seem to
    imply that it's a temporary situation. This is
    more of a Gibraltar, wouldn't you think?

    One of the weirdest things about our whole culture
    to me is that it's the norm to act embarrased and
    surprised about sex, the existance of sex, the fact that people have sex, and above all, SURPRISE! sex sells. To me, it's almost as if
    sex would be harder to sell if "we" (society) stopped acting shocked and surprised about porn.

    As if, part of the reason it's popular is because
    we enable it's mystique by pretending to be innocent, and by pretending that sex is something
    that needs to be hidden, restricted only to a certain class of people (e.g., only the marrieds
    may participate, and only in the dark even for them), etc.

    It just isn't so, but the delusion that it could be, should be, or ever was so, persists as thoroughly as any other cultural idiom in the USA
    and much of the world. The very conspicuous absense of any explicit sexual imagery in mainstream media is what creates a market for
    erotic material, but that's a topic for another
    rant.

    Anybody who is genuinely, honestly surprised that
    the porn industry thrives, please tell us what cave they've been living in their entire lives.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    1. Re:"unlikely?" by danox · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but i think that you are wrong. Having lived in Denmark, I have seen a community that is very open to sex. One where parents would rather have their kids having sex in their bedrooms, than sneaking off to do it behind the school.

      Danish media is filled with sex. It is portrayed as something common that people do and enjoy. There is very little mistyque to it. Danish school children have informed, mature attitudes to sex.

      And yet Denmark has a thriving sex industry, porn is everywhere, usually displayed in front of the counter at news agencies. It is just as big there as anywhere else.

      So I don't agree that represion of sex in the US has increased the desire for porn.

      --
      "Me and my girl named bimbo . . . limbo . . . spam" - Captain Beefheart.
    2. Re:"unlikely?" by ocbwilg · · Score: 1

      And yet Denmark has a thriving sex industry, porn is everywhere, usually displayed in front of the counter at news agencies. It is just as big there as anywhere else. So I don't agree that represion of sex in the US has increased the desire for porn.

      OMIGOD!!! That can only mean one thing: people actually LIKE porn! It must be genetic or something...

  16. Re:OOG CALL BLUFF!!! by Maserati · · Score: 1

    Kinda nice to see OOG back in action.

    --
    Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
  17. Re:Peter Norton meets Peter North by llywrch · · Score: 2

    >NO. Time to come up with something original. Penis birds have gone the way of the dodo.. or really have gone the way of
    > Natalie Portman, Hot Grits, All your * are belong to us, goatse.cx, and *BSD.

    Hmmm . . . goatse.cx . . . now I know what happened to www.godhatesfags.com. I guess when the rent is due, some people are willing to compromise their morals faster than others.

    It was a step up for the reverend anyhoo, if you ask me!

    Geoff

    --
    I think I see a trend here. Maybe for them it really would be easier to muzzle the entire internet than to produce p
  18. Re:Not all sleaze, not all bad... by madbrain · · Score: 1

    (strange)/u/jpierre{44} uname -a
    SunOS strange 5.8 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-60
    (strange)/u/jpierre{45} man killall
    Reformatting page. Please Wait... done
    killall(1M)

    NAME
    killall - kill all active processes

    SYNOPSIS
    /usr/sbin/killall [ signal ]

    --
    -- Julien Pierre http://www.madbrain.com/blog
  19. Re:Best Job Description Ever. by sharkey · · Score: 2

    Jon, huh? Could it possibly be Jon Katz?

    --

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  20. Dead Ringers by Pope · · Score: 1

    "...and I come home, after slaving over hot snatch all day..."

    Pope

    Freedom is Slavery! Ignorance is Strength! Monopolies offer Choice!

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  21. Whatever by rinkjustice · · Score: 1
    How many lames jokes can we squeeze out of this story? Plenty. Other than that - there is no merit to this discussion.

    "come off crisp and play up to the cynic
    clean and schooled right down to the minute"

  22. Re:is there actually *that* much money in it? by joshwa · · Score: 1

    If you're in the NYC area, I stumbled upon this messageboard where lots of models and photogs in the fetish/glamour/porn industry hang out.

    Going to change my userinfo link to some photos now... :)

  23. Re:If porn continues to grow... by JatTDB · · Score: 2

    Privately? Sure. Publicly? Not for a while.

    The internet gives people more opportunity than ever before to look at porn without anyone else ever knowing. Someone who wouldn't go to a strip club (for fear of someone seeing his car in the parking lot) or buying a porn mag in a gas station (what if the attendant labels him as a pervert? Oh no!) might dig up porn on the internet. There's no need for direct human contact in the transaction. He's just another string of bits in a database.

    Many people are more concerned about their image than they really have reason to be, and porn is one of those things that "decent people" don't want to be associated with. And even those people who look at porn on a regular basis frequently argue against porn so they won't be the one to sound like a pervert. It's one of those dirty little secrets that millions of people have, just like recreational drug use. Most people privately have nothing against porn, but damned if they'll admit it.

    Besides, the ultra-conservative types will always scream loudly against anything that anyone could find pleasure in.

    --
    "That's Tron. He fights for the Users."
  24. Boom? Perhaps not... by mughi · · Score: 1
    "Boom"? Perhaps not. At the same time some are reporting Trouble In Porn Land

    E-commerce times are tough, and the $1 billion online adult site industry is no exception.


    ...have combined to cause tectonic changes in the industry...
  25. Cease And Desist by Spyffe · · Score: 1
    Dear Mr. Coward,

    I represent the legal department at MasterCard International (www.mastercard.com) and must ask you to cease and desist from posting libelous posts on Slashdot.

    As a company with valuable intellectual property rights and great stake in the trademark (MasterCard, For everything else there's MasterCard, etc.) it is our legal responsibility to police our trademark to prevent dilution.

    If your post is not immediately removed from Slashdot, Messrs. Malda, etc. will be taken to court by MasterCard lawyers. We are giving warning because we are aware of the significance of Slashdot as a community portal.

    Sincerely,
    Spyffe
    Lawyer, MasterCard Int'l

    --
    Sigmentation fault - core dumped
  26. Re:Best argument yet for not splitting Microsoft by cornjones · · Score: 1

    heheh, that's ok. I thought the big-O references was appropriate. and funny.

  27. Re:Are there ANY women in IT worth seeing naked? by cornjones · · Score: 1

    Yes there are:
    BOOTH BABES!!!!!!

  28. LOL, I just quit by yomahz · · Score: 1

    Look out pr0n world. Here I cum.

    --
    "A mind is a terrible thing to taste."
  29. Just F'ing Great! by yomahz · · Score: 1

    Now their gonna have actual programmers to find new ways to pop-up windows faster than you can close them.

    --
    "A mind is a terrible thing to taste."
  30. Yeah... by Vector+Inspector · · Score: 1
    I could be a pr0n inspector! Now theres a career with a future!

    --


    spoo

  31. Ambiguity ... by timothy · · Score: 1

    is.

    :)

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  32. And yet... by ender- · · Score: 2
    InteractiveWeek is running an article saying that even the porn sites are showing a pretty big slowdown due to the recent tech sector problems.

    Anyway while it wouldn't be my first choice, I can certainly think of worse places to work than the porn industry.

    Ender

  33. Let's all try to remember.. by QuantumG · · Score: 2

    that Tim is only 14 years old.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  34. Re:What did you expect? by Dwonis · · Score: 2

    When you "fuck, suck, smoke, toke, and get it on", it *always* affects other people. Get a clue.
    ------

  35. Re:Best Job Description Ever. by Tackhead · · Score: 2
    > Jon, who now spends eight hours a day digitally covering up female nipples for the company's front-page

    Poor bastard. If he's got a SO, I'll bet she's pissed.

    Jon's SO: "Hi Jonny, glad you came home early today... wanna fool around?"

    Jon: "Aaaauuuugh, eight hours a day at work and now I gotta work with you nipples too? Nipples, nipples, nipples, I'm sick and tired of nipples!"

  36. Re:Solutions to Today's "Ask Slashdot?" by Tackhead · · Score: 2
    > you really generated income from images from nntp?

    I'll bet he did.

    Those who are willing to pay for pr0n over port 80 are unlikely to have even heard of USENET, let alone know how to use it.

    It's a self-selecting sample - anyone aware of NNTP would get their pr0n there, rather than paying bahtama for it.

    Of course, bahtama may be at risk of getting nuked for copyright infringement, as the magazine that originally owned those images (or the web site where they were originally posted) could open up a can of whoopass on him.

    But with a gazillion small-time sites out there, they'd have to find him first. And remember, he said used it to finance his own website, which implies that it was a small enough site to live comfortably under the radar. So odds are extremely good that he'll get away with it.

    Indeed, depending on your views on intellectual property, there may be nothing to "get away with" in the moral sense. Only in the "Don't get sued by a pr0n company with more lawyers than you" sense.

  37. Porn Job Board by p0d · · Score: 1
    The real "Hot" Jobs.

    Adult Staffing.com

  38. Not all sleaze, not all bad... by TrIaX · · Score: 1

    I work in the porn industry. I jumped ship from a fairly large ISP where I was a Senior SysEng, when it started to collapse under the weight of it's own upper management and became a SysEng for a local porn company. This decision was considered, they had been in business for 3 years up to this point, they didn't spam, they didn't flood users with popups, they kept everything above board and legal. The fact that they were dealing with porn didn't really affect my choice, the fact that they were good net.citizens did.

    I've now been with this company for over a year, and I must say, it's done wonders for my skills. Why? Because in an ISP environment, things were fairly stagnent (atleast for the company I was with) with had x number of users on y number of dialup lines, with z webservers, mailservers, etc. The most exciting thing that happened was when some junior tech would issue "killall -9" on a Solaris box.

    Since I leapt into the pr0n company, I've had to deal with traffic loads that would have caved the ISP's servers in. I had to change my way of thinking, write my programs leaner, always look for ways to optimize, etc, in ways that I hadn't had to do before. Unoptimized solutions didn't rear their heads when you were dealing with 500,000 page views a day, but toss 5,000,000 pages views at it, and suddenly you learn the error of your ways rather quickly.

    I deal rarely with the content side of things, I am more into the nuts and bolts, the backends, the scripts, the webservers, etc. I've increased their stability and reliability along the way with things I learned at the ISP, and I've learned several new things from sheer volume of traffic seen. When I do decide to move on, I think I'll be better for it, and will probably be better for it, always approaching solutions from the perspective that I have to build the solution to handle 5,000,000 hits a day, scaling up from there.

    So a foray into the porn world is not all sleaze, and it's not all bad. While there are companies out there that are just in it for a quick buck, and will do everything that they can (spam, etc) to get it, there are also ones that are in it for the long haul, pay their employees well (I'm making more than I made at the ISP, I get semi-annual reviews with atleast inflationary increases, etc) and try to be good net.citizens. As the comment said, check the contracts closely, and research the company completely

    before making the leap, but don't automatically turn it down because it has the word "porn" attatched.
    1. Re:Not all sleaze, not all bad... by normiep · · Score: 1
      Bzzt. wrong answer.

      killall exists on both linux and solaris boxes but they do different things.

      On linux killall kills off processes by name. So if you ran a killall -9 with no process name, you would end up with a usage message.

      On solaris boxes killall kills all active process. You don't specify anything other than the signal to send. So if you ran killall -9 you would kill everything and you would kill it in such away that none of them would be able to catch the signal and close cleanly.

      Look in /usr/sbin the next time you log into a sun box.

      --

      -- Point? None! Cob.

    2. Re:Not all sleaze, not all bad... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      "It could have changed but the story has not note about people that have come out of porn in to the main stream."

      That's because right now the porn industry is growing but the "mainstream" (by which the author apparently means "anything that isn't porn") on the whole isn't. Once other types of e-commerce pick up again, I'm sure there will be plenty of former porn-site workers making the moves based on the usual reasons people change jobs: salary, benefits, location, etc.

      And if I were running an e-commerce site, of any kind, I'd regard a background of running porn sites to look pretty damned good on an applicant's resume, for all the reasons mentioned by the author of the parent post. Porn sites are high-volume, high-demand sites with constantly changing inventory. Any business owner who's prejudiced against people who at one time worked in porn is probably going to lose out on some very good people.

      I was struck by the constant mentions of low pay. I suspect it's because porn industry workers are too accepting of the stigma society places on them to stand up for their rights in public. Too bad. The profits in porn for the business owners are, so to speak, obscene -- I'd love to see some serious unionization and bargaining so the workers could get a piece of the, so to speak, pie.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    3. Re:Not all sleaze, not all bad... by oliphaunt · · Score: 1

      Um, Traci Lords? Yeah, everyone knows she used to do dirty stuff, but she *ahem* worked the angles. And now she's doing stuff that's mainstream enough to be called a comedy.


      I'm not going to waste any bits trying to help you understand the rest of the ways you're trolling, because there are already many posts modded higher regarding the doctrine of personal denial and its methods of transmission from one generation to another.

      All I will say is, there is a huge difference between getting paid to stand there and shoot footage of people fucking, and being the guy who implements the security of the user DB that just happens to make money by accumulating and/or distributing pictures of people fucking.

      --




      Humpty Dumpty was pushed.
    4. Re:Not all sleaze, not all bad... by slashdoter · · Score: 1
      ok so lets make a list

      1. Traci Lords

      jump in at any time......


      ________

      --
      Does anyone actually have a Java program designed to control air traffic, or for the operation of a nuclear facility?
    5. Re:Not all sleaze, not all bad... by slashdoter · · Score: 2
      research the company completely

      I'm sure it was hard for you, the research that is.

      Sorry I had to, but really it can't look good on a resume, the fact that you posted your side of working for a p0rn site shows that most people look down on it. In high school I took TV production, one thing the teacher would say ( out side of class) is that once you were in porn there was no getting out. It could have changed but the story has not note about people that have come out of porn in to the main stream.


      ________

      --
      Does anyone actually have a Java program designed to control air traffic, or for the operation of a nuclear facility?
    6. Re:Not all sleaze, not all bad... by cculianu · · Score: 1
      The most exciting thing that happened was when some junior tech would issue "killall -9" on a Solaris box.

      The program 'killall' doesn't come with Solaris. So unless you guys went out of your way to compile and install it (why would you do a thing like that??), those couldn't have been solaris boxes.

    7. Re:Not all sleaze, not all bad... by Alatar · · Score: 1

      ISP work is well-known as being a dead-end career. The only perk is it's usually entry-level, and you get to read lots of manuals and send HUP signals to apache processes and register domain names and such.

    8. Re:Not all sleaze, not all bad... by NineNine · · Score: 1

      but really it can't look good on a resume

      Actually, I was hired to work for the US Gov't because of my experience with my porn site. They saw the quality of my work, and hired me because of it (and I even got 'Top Secret' clearance!)

    9. Re:Not all sleaze, not all bad... by NineNine · · Score: 1

      That means so much coming from an AC.

  39. Just like a pron site... by cute-boy · · Score: 1

    Just like a porn site, when you open up the article, you get another pop-up window you didn't ask for, trying to sell you something else....

    A practice more and more common these days I know, but surely a technique initially championed by the porn industry.

    RG

  40. is there actually *that* much money in it? by po_boy · · Score: 2
    I've noticed that even some of the larger porn providers, like vivid video or someone is actually pretty small scale. That's when compared to some other web sites I've seen. Given that and the tremendous amount of problems you must have with chargebacks and low pay for banner ads, I have to wonder if you can actually make *that* much money in porn.

    Perhaps some commentary from a few people who run porn sites that hang out here, like ninenine.com would clear up a bit of this question I've had.

    Also, does anyone have any firsthand experience knowing how many people actually pay for subscriptions to sites like danni.com or anything like that?

    1. Re:is there actually *that* much money in it? by PG · · Score: 1

      20% of all companies probably make 80% of the money.

      More like 1% makes 99% of the money.

      I own a number of adult sites, and one of the few constants in the industry is that the overwhelming majority of webmasters are idiots.

      They steal content, use non-adult free servers, spam Usenet, and generally behave like immature teenage boys. Hell, it wouldn't surprise me if most of them are. :-)

      You're right about the work though. Any bozo can make a couple hundred bucks a month, but if you want to quit the day job or get that exotic sports car, you will work your ass off.

    2. Re:is there actually *that* much money in it? by NineNine · · Score: 2

      Actually, we DO have our own content at http://ninenine.com/free_pics.asp. All of that content was purchased and licensed. As we continue to ramp up, we'll have more there. Yes, we have thousands of links to content on other sites, we DO NOT steal content. Just wanted to clear that up. Thanks.

    3. Re:is there actually *that* much money in it? by NineNine · · Score: 2

      Actually, yes, there is a LOT of money to be made. But that being said, it's not an easy business to run. There's a lot of competition out there. Like any other industry the 80/20 rule applies. 20% of all companies probably make 80% of the money. A lot of people give it a shot, but then back out when they realize that like anything else, it does take a LOT of work to make it profitable. People like Persian Kitty and Green Guy were average people who just persevered, and now they're millionaries. So yes, it's possible, but it's not easy. Trust me, it takes a LOT of work, a LOT of luck, and a little something different to make a buck.

    4. Re:is there actually *that* much money in it? by bahtama · · Score: 2
      It is fairly easy to get a porn site up and running and make a little profit. You pay a nice looking girl $100 to do a photo shoot, plus a couple hundred for the photographer since they usually cost more than the girls.

      The girl does a photo shoot for a few hours, you get your pictures, post a couple to newsgroups with the URL, get some teaser pictures on your website. Then put up some banners, offer more content for $5.95 a month and that's it! You can even host the pictures from geocities or somewhere although you would have to change them around since Yahoo doesn't like that sort of stuff. So you make a couple hundred a month in banner ads, mayby another couple hundred from subscribers. As long as bandwidth bills don't get yah, you can turn a profit. Then, rinse and repeat until you have more content. Just make sure you don't have so much content that subscribers can't pay for all your bandwidth.

      Keep getting original content and maybe increase the price every couple months. You can make a profit of a couple thousand a month with little work which is enough to be able to relax and take long vacations! Wow, this is starting to sound like that crap spam email I get promising easy money.. My apologies! :)

      =-=-=-=-=

      --

      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
      Oh bother.

    5. Re:is there actually *that* much money in it? by kbeast · · Score: 1

      oddly enough, a few chick friends I have, when they went to college, they would punch in their credit cards once in a while...think it was curiosity (sp?)...

      Newsgroups man! Newsgroups! :)

      .kb

      --
      Two Wrongs Don't Make A Right-- But They Make Me Feel A Whole Lot Better
    6. Re:is there actually *that* much money in it? by ocbwilg · · Score: 1

      I wonder why. A lot of places seem to have over exposed (as in too much light) photos because cameras left in matrix meter mode on that much untanned flesh tends to meter wrong. Anyone who has photographed nudes in an art class could do better.

      That's because amatuer porn is pretty popular right now. Who wants to see yet another airbrushed nude of Pamela Anderson when we can see Polaroids of that girl we ran into at the bar last nite?

    7. Re:is there actually *that* much money in it? by livingboy · · Score: 1
      Well web porn is currently quite difficult arena to make money if you are just starting out.

      Non paying freeloaders are very easy to get to visit your sites, but filtering them is the hard part if you actually want to make some money by selling porn.

      I have been doing porn part time two years now and if I want to make some money I need three times more traffic than year ago, basic problem is that there is so much free porn around, so you can only make real money by filtering your customers so that they can find such niche of porn they really want pay for.

      People just starting out have illusions that this is an easy business, when the reality is that it is really competitive market place and if you want to make money you really got to work, make sites, galleries, thumbnailpostings, search engine submitting, buy content and feel the daily pulse of this market.

  41. If it weren't for porn, there'd be no FTP by selectspec · · Score: 1

    Of course its the oldest profession in the book. With the car, came sex in the car. With the phone came phone-sex. With the telegraph came, well, I am sure something sexual. With ./ came goatsex. Sex is the most fundemental part of everything we do. Is it suprizing that porn is the largest employeer on the net?

    --

    Someone you trust is one of us.

  42. Choice of words by jesser · · Score: 1

    ranging from $100,000 high-concept films with plots to those featuring "wall-to-wall" intercourse with little or no dialogue.

    Didn't the word "intercourse" mean "dialogue" at some point in the past?

    --
    The shareholder is always right.
  43. Re:outweighting scenario by jesser · · Score: 1

    some of which are publicly traded (check NASDAQ NOOF, owner of pussy.com and tits.com, or PRVT).

    Is that an abbreviation of "private" or "pervert"?

    --
    The shareholder is always right.
  44. huh? by holzp · · Score: 1

    oh. i thought this was about 325 lb sysadmins becoming hookers. wait. perhaps it is.

  45. Re:Best argument yet for not splitting Microsoft by duckpinned · · Score: 1

    Oh, yeah, that BG knows how to show you some Big-O notation...

    ...sorry, it's the end of the semester, and I am totally burnt out on my data structures class...

  46. Watch out! by Greyfox · · Score: 2

    He's already on his way! He's only worth a paltry $54 billion now.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  47. Speaking of Which by Greyfox · · Score: 2

    Have you ever tried using disney.com's search engine to search for "Live Goat Porn"? You do actually get some hits back. I'll leave the interpretation of the results as an exercise for the student...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  48. Re:From apples to cherries by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 1

    Jeff Wozniak is not Woz. Woz is Steve Wozniak.

  49. What did you expect? by krmt · · Score: 2

    Seriously? Who's really making money now? Porn. Who's going to be making money tomorrow? Porn. Who's got the kind of pageviews and such that advertisers would kill for? Porn. Who's going to have that paycheck for you next year too? Porn. It's pretty logical to me. Just because portions of society (portions which, I might add, aren't often of the same views as those who work in the tech industry) consider porn immoral doesn't mean it's not going to make a buck.

    I think it's good news personally. You can read goatse.cx trolls while coding for a goatsex website. What could be better?

    "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

    --

    "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

    1. Re:What did you expect? by krmt · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't say slashdot is like porn... more like whiny and obnoxious observation.

      "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

      --

      "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

    2. Re:What did you expect? by Kalabajoui · · Score: 1

      I agree with you 100%. Now, how do you convince your average American that not only is it wrong to stick your nose in other peoples business in consensual matters, but it is harmful to society and their own personal interests?

    3. Re:What did you expect? by ez_TAB · · Score: 1

      >>Just because portions of society (portions which, I might add, aren't often of the same views as those who work in the tech industry) consider porn immoral doesn't mean it's not going to make a buck.

      In fact one might even argue that a lot of repression (immorality!) even guarantees it will make a buck.

      --
      Quote from ???: "There are lies; there are damn lies; and there are benchmarks."
    4. Re:What did you expect? by haruharaharu · · Score: 1

      yes, but in a good way.

      --
      Reboot macht Frei.
  50. better content by Paradise_Pete · · Score: 1
    With all these seasoned professionals producing porn, this could mean a whole new caliber of goat sex links.

  51. Well, I wonder how many people by Grelli · · Score: 1
    Although he started full time in October, Jon hasn't told his family. "My mom would kill me if she knew."

    I can only wonder how many people involved in the tech sector are going to be questioned by their mothers after they have read this article. "Jon, son, you know you can always come to us if you need help, financially. Are you selling porn?"

  52. Re:Quote by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

    ALL pop-ups are annoying. Either implement opt-in/outs, or only jerks will want to visit your site. Don't take this personally, though, you suck. Hehe, just kidding with ya man.

    - Steeltoe

  53. OOG's HTML? by fractaltiger · · Score: 1

    Pretty clever, I haven't seen enough of OOG's posts to notice that he knows HTML. Does that qualify him as a l33t hax0r? Come on, what else would you be able to do with pedal CPU? :)

    --
    "Wireless : LAN :: Laptop : Desktop"
  54. Does this mean... by B'Trey · · Score: 3

    ...that the rights to any sex you have while employed there automatically belong to them?

    --

    "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

  55. Re:Don't expect the pay by Kwelstr · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and maybe that's why your (more) reputable company just won't make as much money as those porn guys make. ;-p

    --


    ~~~Please pass the salt, I hate unsalted MD5s :-/
  56. Re:You don't want to work for a Porn company by spiro_killglance · · Score: 1
    I did a job like that once. Only $20k but the promised to let me screw one of the girls each night, so I took the job.

    The first night this hot brunette gave me grabbed hold of my penis and wacked it off till i came.

    The second night this hot redhead wanked me off again.

    The same thing with a blonde on the third night.

    So I went to my boss, and complained:

    "Hey I was promised sex each night, but all I get is hand-jobs".

    "Didn't you read the contract, the first month's wages is in hand"

    sorry old joke.

  57. Re:Don't expect the pay by oliphaunt · · Score: 1

    wow, i wish I had a mod point left for this post. Look at FC... you'll see lots of Pets.Com, but Kara's doesn't seem to be there. And I think that Pud would tell all of us about that one as soon as he became aware of it...

    --




    Humpty Dumpty was pushed.
  58. Re:Best Job Description Ever. by ahknight · · Score: 1

    "Yeah, you know, so they were about to lay me off and I said to myself, I said, 'now do I wanna get laid off, or do I wanna just get laid?'"

  59. Samples? by fobbman · · Score: 1
    His old job was the stuff of E-envy. Plush offices filled with chic industrial furniture. Free concert tickets and all the CDs he could carry.

    Damn, I'm suddenly very curious about the samples they provide in this job.

  60. Consider this by BugEyedEarl · · Score: 1

    Let me preface my comment by emphasizing that I don't care if someone I don't know wants to work in porn, watch porn, have porn for breakfast, or whatever - he or she is welcome to do so. This is totally not about my opinion regarding whether those things are right or wrong (although I do have one).

    Anyway, everyone seems to be implying that there is nothing wrong with this trend, and that tech workers moving to the Porn industry are making a great choice, but consider this:

    Sooner or later, the current economic slowdown will turn around and tech workers will have lots of options in more traditional fields again. My opinion is that those who go to work in the porn industry now, will find their resumes are significantly tainted should they ever decide they want to go back to a more mainstream employer. I know some people will say the world is more enlightened, and companies aren't all stodgy and traditional anymore, so they wouldn't discriminate against a candidate with an employment history that included, say Hustler, but they're kidding themselves if they think traditional companies would choose the ex-hustler candidate over someone else if all other qualifications were more or less equal. If I got laid off, I think I would beat the bushes a little harder, consider moving to a non-saturated region, and do whatever else I had to do to avoid closing future doors for myself.

    1. Re:Consider this by WildBeast · · Score: 1

      Haven't you heard? German scientists studied the influence of tits on men and amazingly, men who look at tits each day live longer than their counterparts. So don't come telling me that porn is bad.
      More traditional fields, the porn industry have been here since humans exist. Besides, who would seriously quit working in porn and work somewhere else? Oh I imagine myself saying : "Hey I'm making too much money in this porn stuff, I better quit and get another job so I can live poorly."

    2. Re:Consider this by ocbwilg · · Score: 1

      Sooner or later, the current economic slowdown will turn around and tech workers will have lots of options in more traditional fields again. My opinion is that those who go to work in the porn industry now, will find their resumes are significantly tainted should they ever decide they want to go back to a more mainstream employer.

      I might tend to agree with you that some employers would look negatively on resumes that listed Hustler.com or TeenageHardcore.com on them. But most resumes won't list the names of the sites that they work for. They'll say things like DHD Media, Vivid Entertainment Group, or LFP Inc (the company that own Hustler.com), and then they'll list the job duties and skills required of them in that postion (designed web-based front end for large databases in an e-commerce application, etc...).

      I know that you wanted to completely divorce your opinion of porn from your statement, but it shows through (just like mine does). We always tend to believe that we are normal and that most people (the right-thinking ones, anyway) think the same way that we do on "moral" issues. That may or may not be the case. I think that you'd find that most people don't necessarily adhere to the same moral standards that they espouse.

      Besides, I've worked with managers who would have said, "You used to work in porn? Cool..."

    3. Re:Consider this by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

      Please don't talk about beating bushes, I'm already double-entendre'd out.

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
  61. Sorta like the hair club for men... by rvaniwaa · · Score: 1

    I am not only the owner, I am a customer as well!

    --
    main(i){(10-putchar(((25208>>3*(i+=3))&7)+(i ?i-4?100:65:10)))?main(i-4):i;}
  62. "Traditional"? by locutus074 · · Score: 1

    ...worked at traditional dot-coms.

    Um... a "traditional dot-com"? What's that? :)

    --

    --

    --
    We have fought the AC's, and they have won.

  63. Re:Solutions to Today's "Ask Slashdot?" by locutus074 · · Score: 1
    --

    --
    We have fought the AC's, and they have won.

  64. Quote by Alexius · · Score: 5
    The porn companies, many of which produce X-rated videos and popular erotic Web sites

    Is that what porn companies do! I thought they made different web pages open when you closed the one at which you were looking.
    --------------------

    --
    `Lex - Find Me Here: Text Appeal
    1. Re:Quote by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Hey, man, not all porn sites do that. Actually, mainstream sites are starting to do that, but porn sites have tried that, realized that it pisses off the surfers more than it makes money, and they're starting to phase it out.

    2. Re:Quote by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Dude, it's not an annoying pop up that doesn't close. And it only opens sometimes. Deal with it, dude. Without the voting, you wouldn't know which sites sucked, and which didn't.

    3. Re:Quote by MikeRR · · Score: 1

      'CJ2ZTapu' -- mikerr

    4. Re:Quote by MikeRR · · Score: 1

      Powerbrowse kills those popups (and hides all but one browser window...) http://www.analogx.com/contents/download/network/p owerb.htm should be standard on all windoze boxes. ..and while you're there, grab the rest of AnalogX's programs - they're all tiny efficient non-bloatware apps. (now how do I cancel posts..)

    5. Re:Quote by kbeast · · Score: 1

      I think any pop up is annoying...if I wanted that shit opened, I would've clicked on it...now I gotta swing around and close out all this crap..McAfee's site is full of them...they always get in the way of where I want to click...and when those lame sites that shoot up 15 different popups and keep reopening, I can't even find the site I was browsing before that...

      .kb

      --
      Two Wrongs Don't Make A Right-- But They Make Me Feel A Whole Lot Better
    6. Re:Quote by w2gy · · Score: 1

      What I'm curious about is the use of the word "many" in the sentence - what do all the other porn companies do if they're not making X-rated videos and popular erotic websites? Sell home-made cookies?

      --
      This line intentionally left here to annoy you.
  65. Re:What are we looking for in the contract? by Judas96' · · Score: 1

    Just don't let them catch you NOT looking at porn on company time. That could be grounds for dismissal...

  66. And to think that... by fm6 · · Score: 2
    ...those Goatse.cx and penisbird guys have been entertaining us for free!

    __

  67. Re:They are just now figuring this out? by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2
    Sex has sold for years

    No kidding. Prostitution is what, one of the 4 oldest proffesions in the world?

    --

    --
    Dyolf Knip
  68. OOG CALL BLUFF!!! by OOG_THE_CAVEMAN · · Score: 1

    OOG SEE INACCURATE CAVEMAN REFERENCE POSTED ON HERE AND TAKE ISSUE!!! OOG NEVER ACTUALLY PAY FOR SEX, OOG JUST CLUB CAVE-HO WITH CLUB AND DRAG BACK TO CAVE REGARDLESS OF WHAT OTHER CAVEMAN THINK!!! OOG ALSO REMIND YOU THAT CURENCY OF DAY BE EITHER FISH HEADS OR FAT SACKS OF CAVE-WEED, NOT BOAR'S TEETH!!! OOG KNOW BOAR'S TEETH ONLY USED FOR SEX AMONG GAY CAVEMEN AND CAVE-BONDAGE FREAKS (OOG NORMAL)!!! OOG ALSO REMIND YOU THAT IN OLD CAVE LANGUAGE "UNF UNGA BOOG OOG LOOGA" ACTUALLY MEAN "I HAVE SMALL PENIS AND LIKE RECIEVING ANAL SEX TO POINT OF BLEEDING!!!" OOG NOW HAVE REASON TO QUESTION POSTER'S SEXUALITY!!!

    --
    OOG THE OPEN SOURCE CAVEMAN!!! OOG BREAK HEAD WITH OPEN SOURCE CD!!!
    1. Re:OOG CALL BLUFF!!! by TrollFeeder · · Score: 1
      "ooga also wonder why oog not have to buy special cave-keyboard with lowercase letters!"

      Well, why don't we go ahead and have a look at OOG's html shall we?

      OOG SEE INACCURATE CAVEMAN REFERENCE POSTED ON HERE AND TAKE ISSUE!!!<a HREF="oogoogoogoogoog"> </a> OOG NEVER ACTUALLY PAY FOR SEX, OOG JUST CLUB CAVE-HO WITH CLUB AND DRAG BACK TO CAVE REGARDLESS OF WHAT OTHER CAVEMAN THINK!!!<a HREF="oogoogoogoogoog"> </a> OOG ALSO REMIND YOU THAT CURENCY OF DAY BE EITHER FISH HEADS OR FAT SACKS OF CAVE-WEED, NOT BOAR'S TEETH!!!<a HREF="oogoogoogoogoog"> </a> OOG KNOW BOAR'S TEETH ONLY USED FOR SEX AMONG GAY CAVEMEN AND CAVE-BONDAGE FREAKS (OOG NORMAL)!!!<a HREF="oogoogoogoogoog"> </a> OOG ALSO REMIND YOU THAT IN OLD CAVE LANGUAGE "UNF UNGA BOOG OOG LOOGA" ACTUALLY MEAN "I HAVE SMALL PENIS AND LIKE RECIEVING ANAL SEX TO POINT OF BLEEDING!!!"<a HREF="oogoogoogoogoog"> </a> OOG NOW HAVE REASON TO QUESTION POSTER'S SEXUALITY!!!

      ooga wish ooga was as clever as oog!!!

      --
      "May the forces of evil become confused on the way to your house"

      --

      --
      "May the forces of evil become confused on the way to your house"
      -George Carlin

    2. Re:OOG CALL BLUFF!!! by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

      He's also got a diary at Kuro5hin.

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
  69. Re:Absurd by smack_attack · · Score: 1

    You had me until "that money comes at the expense of your eternal soul".

    "Imagine telling your mother or your wife, or your children that you're working in porn."
    I did tell them, they are proud that I make so much money, and enjoy what I do (programming, YAW!)

    Pray for my soul if you want, I'm gonna go spend my money.

    ---

  70. Made the move last August by smack_attack · · Score: 2

    Last August, I was a contract consultant... things were good, then slowly, the market started drying up (everyone was starting to buckle down on new projects).

    I figured it was a good time to look for a permanent job. I interviewed with quite a few dot com types, from Boston to SF to Fort Lauderdale, I finally went with a porn hosting company. About 3/4 of the other places I interviewed with are out of business or have had some serious layoffs. The place I work at has actually grown (and is profitable!)

    I don't see my family complaining anymore now that I have job security in the sin industry vs working for a conservative type company and getting laid off.

    ---

    1. Re:Made the move last August by smack_attack · · Score: 2

      I'm a geek I'm not married... sheeyit I can't even get a girlfriend. heh

      ---

  71. Pay ain't so great, but... by decaf_dude · · Score: 1

    the perks are excellent! I mean, with all the "freebies", who needs salary anyway!

    Jokes aside, recently there was an article on Advogato (use Google, will ya!?) about hypocrisy of some in the geek community, who turn their nose up when this guy said he codes for a porn site, yet probably spend most of their waking hours downloading smut.

    I work in IT dept. of a major oil company and sometimes get a similar reaction from some tree-hugging hypocrites (say, is that your diesel 4WD pick-up truck there?), but learned to simply ignore them.

    Moral issues aside (I don't give a shit, OK?), I'd personally work for a porn company. At least porn industry doesn't try to project some fake high-ground image of itself - they're all very honest about what they do and they do a good job.


    -----

  72. Hollywood forever by isomeme · · Score: 1
    Hey, the business model of capitalizing on the unused talents of young hopeful immigrants left disappointed and frustrated by their failure to get rich in the Industry is as old as Hollywood. Using twenty-something geeks instead of teenage runaways doesn't change the basic deal much.

    --

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
  73. There is no refuge! by isomeme · · Score: 1
    This ZDNet story indicates that even the web porn vendors are tightening their belts. Now, wouldn't that suck -- laid off from a dot-com, no options, battle personal ethics, give in, go to work for porn site...and get laid off.

    I guess now it's officially a recession, huh?

    --

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
  74. Re:You don't want to work for a Porn company by Scareduck · · Score: 2

    Well, what did you want? They're used to fucking people over (ba-dum-dum!) Thank you! I'm here all week!

    --

    Dog is my co-pilot.

  75. Re:Are there ANY women in IT worth seeing naked? by moongha · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with indian women?

  76. worst pr0n industry job... by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

    ...The guy who cleans up the booths! ack!

    I guess in a dot com the equivalent would be a monitor squeegee =P
    e.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  77. Get your dumbass mainstream hype from /. by gwjc · · Score: 1

    It's sad.. I just finished listening to that lame bit on the 'old people' station trying to get a traffic report. All they establish is that they claim 75000 people lost their jobs in .coms and some anecdotal bits about 'straight' people getting pron related jobs. Not to mention this weird BS about industrial-parks in SanFernando being a mecca for porn. Typical shallow dumbass media hype worthy of 20/20. Were we supposed to be excited by the fact that it has the word pron in it... Obviously whoever submitted/accepted it was since they didn't "through^H^H^H^H^Hought" (sorry I h8 spelling fLAMEs but this time it was justifiable).

  78. Re:Solutions to Today's "Ask Slashdot?" by cculianu · · Score: 1

    Woah.. that's clever.. create some robust perl scripts to extract the images and put them in a holding bin. Then, you weed out the bad ones and maybe validate their categoriczation. Shit.. I think I have a new business idea...

  79. Re:Solutions to Today's "Ask Slashdot?" by Mtgman · · Score: 1

    Most porn sites work this way. That is why you see more and more embedded "logos" and tags in the images on porn sites now. Someone would buy a membership for a month(or crack a password), download every damn thing on the site, publish it on usenet and BAM! All of a sudden you have no content that the "free" sites don't. Forget Sony, Lars Ulrich and the RIAA. Pretty damn soon we're going to have Jenna Jameson coming(going?) down on Congress to pass stricter IP laws so she can keep silly free sites from "pirating" her pics from her "official" site.

    Steven

    --
    -- I have marked myself unwilling to moderate-- I don't have other accounts to artificially inflate the karma of
  80. What are we looking for in the contract? by Mtgman · · Score: 2

    Not necessarily in front of the
    cameras, however, but read those contracts carefully.


    So would it be worse to be in front of the camera and get laid regularly, or would it be worse to be in the server room all day putting together websites with highly erotic content and never getting any?

    I'm not sure if Timothy's comment meant we should be looking for contracts with on-camera time, or if he meant we should beware lest they suck us incredibly virile and physically attractive geeks into the horrid world of *GASP* Adult Entertainment.

    Steven

    --
    -- I have marked myself unwilling to moderate-- I don't have other accounts to artificially inflate the karma of
  81. Guess what Mom and Dad ;-) by DanBari · · Score: 1

    Just when you thought that you couldn't get a job in the Information Technology business after studying hard and getting mediocare grades in your University's computer science department. . . you're coding Java applets to show off things that you probably never saw while you were in college. . . Well at least you've probably got root access and can look at whatever you want right?

    --
    Fruit flies like bananas... Time flies like the wind...
  82. hehe by benshutman · · Score: 1

    im not sure if this has anything to do with it, but the guy "Jon" that was quoted from Artist direct got arrested in mexico the other weekend. just a random "fyi"


    NEWS: cloning, genome, privacy, surveillance, and more!

    1. Re:hehe by chikanamakalaka · · Score: 1

      getting arrested in Mexico is pretty easy. :-)

  83. I don't believe it by Monkeyman334 · · Score: 1

    ZDnet, MSNBC and porn star Danni Ashe (how can you argue with her?), all disagree completely with that article. I think that the ZDnet article makes more sense because when all the companies are failing, I'm sure the first thing (I *hope* the first thing) dot com employees get rid of is porn fees.

  84. Re:Don't expect the pay by mami · · Score: 1

    Lol, so what do the actors get paid in the LA area at those porn producing companies ? Should they also not expect the pay ?

  85. Re:Porn is recession proof by mami · · Score: 1

    Wishful thinking.

  86. Re:Solutions to Today's "Ask Slashdot?" by agentZ · · Score: 2

    Well, you are paying for the time spent to weed out the "bad" pictures. There is some value added there.

  87. You don't want to work for a Porn company by Snosty · · Score: 4

    Trust me. About 6 months ago I interviewed with one of the larger (if not largest) 'net based porn companies for a sys-admin position. Given that porn seems to be the only industry that makes money on the web I was expecting a decent salary offer and a good working environment. Wrong! Porn companies make money on the web because their costs are low; They hire cheap labour, rent cheap offices etc..

    If you want to work as a sys-admin for $24k US out of a dingy warehouse in the bad part of town then I've got the industry for you.

    1. Re:You don't want to work for a Porn company by blair1q · · Score: 2

      They can keep their costs low because the people involved will tolerate that pay and those conditions for the payback of being in the porn business, being around porn and porn stars.

      I.e., you get part of your pay in product, the product being eyeball time on T&A...&D&P, &c.

      --Blair

  88. Disappointed, I am by ackthpt · · Score: 2
    Finally, an article about Techies and Pr0n, and what, 195 messages? C'mon. After all these goats.ex posts, this is all? Evidently, pr0n isn't all that interesting to slashdotters.

    Either that, or it's reminded most of them to download their daily dose, or are submitting resumes like mad ("Damn, it's in formatted in Word, with fonts and everything and I have to copy and paste it into a text box!")

    Well, here's some free pr0n anyway (.)(.) Send $5 to PO Box 555, Zeeland Michigan, and you get to see it in color!

    --

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  89. Re:CAN YUO SYA ENTRAPMENT? by Mr.+Polite · · Score: 2

    good
    ---

    --
    "Watch these suckers jump when I get Administrator."
  90. Nina Hartley in Boogie Nights by Hairy_Potter · · Score: 2

    and I think Ron Jeremy has a SAG card.

  91. There's a reason for this by unformed · · Score: 2

    Executives at the area's leading adult entertainment firms report a surge of resumes and telephone inquiries from disillusioned techies

    There's a reason for this.....after you work 60-70 hours a week, or more, your girlfriend/wife leaves you for not putting enough time into the relationship...then the company flunks, and guess what: now you're out of money and no girlfriend....and women don't like men w/o money

    so the only choice is.....GET PAID TO GET LAID

    and hence the porn industry

    :)

  92. Re:recession is porn boom? by NonSequor · · Score: 1
    Well as precedent you can look at the fact that the movie industry did fairly well during the Depression. Even when short on money many people were willing to spend a little bit on entertainment.

    Er... Well, y'know. You can't make an omelette without um... destroying a forest. Or something.

    --
    My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
  93. Amateurity by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

    Actually, "amateur pr0n" is supposed to be amateur models, not amateur photographers. The amateur photos are usually labeled "boyfriend/girlfriend" photos, since that's usually who's in the picture. The Internet for the most part has destroyed the distinction, but the the pr0n connoisseur, there's a world of difference.

    Virg

  94. Interview with a just transplanted techie... by xFoz · · Score: 1

    Interviewer: Tell me about your new job...
    Techie: It's hard.
    Interviewer: Your job is hard?!
    Techie: Um no, my job is easy.
    Interviewer: What's hard then...oh...never mind.

  95. Re:Traditional? by NineNine · · Score: 1

    Amen, bro. I wish I had some mod points for you.

  96. Porn is recession proof by NineNine · · Score: 2

    It's a fact of life that porn is recession proof. It always has been, it always will be. While consumers' desires for other goods and services may ebb and flow, man's libido will never diminish. It's not news really, just reality.

  97. Re:Don't expect the pay by NineNine · · Score: 2

    Well, while I'm not saying that you're not worth what you're getting paid, I will say that a big reason that porn businesses (even on the web) stay profitable is because they generally keep a hard eye on the bottom line. Yeah, there's a lot of money flowing in and out, but you're not going to find a lot of porn people squandering it. While lots of dot-com companies like pets.com, and others blow their money on big salaries, and lots of marketing, porn people generally keep costs down. It's a mature, and very aggressive market that requires costs to be as low as possible.

  98. Re:Don't expect the pay by NineNine · · Score: 2

    Actually, nope, I don't think that they do get paid all that well. The big stars do, but not as well as 'traditional' Hollywood stars, and most people aren't big stars. Plus, think about it: How much would YOU have to get paid to go to work every day and fuck beautiful women? I don't know about you, but I'd work for damn near free.

  99. The porn scene isn't that rosy afterall by ishrat · · Score: 1
    "MY [TRAFFIC] CONVERSION rates are not what they used to be," said Brad Gosse, president of Adult Money Maker, operator of about 10,000 sites.

    It used to be that one in 100 visitors to Gosse's pay sites bought a membership. Now, that figure is one in 400. As a result, his revenue -- which he wouldn't disclose -- is flat.

    --

    There's always sufficient, but not always at the right place nor for the right folks.

  100. They are just now figuring this out? by Calle+Ballz · · Score: 4

    Sex has sold for years, since biblical times. Probably before that, too....

    Caveman One: Unf Unga Boog Ooog Looga (Your girlfriend looks very alluring, I will pay you one million boar's teeth for one night with her)
    Caveman Two: Onga Bonga Loo Fung Dunga Bunga (I cannot let you do that to the woman I love, However I will sell you rights to draw a figure of her on your wall, surrounded by advertisements and banners, and sell tickets to people to come view that picture

    1. Re:They are just now figuring this out? by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1
      Caveman Two should have actually said it this way for correct paleolithic grammar: Onga Bonga Loo Fung DingaBoonunga.

      I should know, I am one. :)

  101. Traditional? by cube+farmer · · Score: 1

    Vivid Entertainment Group, which has expanded its online team in the last few months, says that 35% of its technical staff hail from the dot-com world. And officials with Playboy.com, the New York-based Internet subsidiary of the Chicago-based publishing company, say that "almost all" of its technical employees have--at one time--worked at traditional dot-coms.

    I'm just wondering what the hell a "traditional dot-com" is...

    --

    MacOS, Windows, BeOS, GNOME, KDE: they're all just Xerox copies

    1. Re:Traditional? by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

      One that has a crap business plan, spends all it's money in 18 months and then blames the slowdown in the economy for the inevitable bankruptcy.

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
  102. People will probably take the lower pay now by _N0EL · · Score: 1

    14 months ago things were still good. Now though, any money is probably okay especially given the picture in this article from the LA Times.

    --

    "My mother works for Microsoft now. A whole other cult."

  103. Solutions to Today's "Ask Slashdot?" by bahtama · · Score: 1
    This is actually an interesting solution to the Ask Slashdot: Financing Growing Websites? question from today. To finance a website that I created a while back, I used money from a cheap porn site I ran. I basically ran a site that posted the best pictures from the newsgroups.

    So I got money for looking at pr0n all day and weeding out the bad ones. Now, the other site makes enough to support itself so I don't have to run the image gallery site. Although I still spend a couple hours a week "catching" up on content in case I ever need to reopen the first site... :P

    =-=-=-=-=

    --

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Oh bother.

  104. Best Job Description Ever. by bahtama · · Score: 4
    Jon, who now spends eight hours a day digitally covering up female nipples for the company's front-page

    Now there is a conversation starter at the class reunions!

    =-=-=-=-=

    --

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Oh bother.

    1. Re:Best Job Description Ever. by blair1q · · Score: 2

      Only if it's a hands-on position.

      --Blair

  105. other article by Inquisitor13 · · Score: 1
    I liked the headline that read:

    Bush Faces Obstacles to Placing Pact on Fast Track.

    a related story?

  106. Re:recession is porn boom? by ocbwilg · · Score: 1

    but seriously, even stretching beyond the technology industry, does higher unemployment lead to more people in need of immediate gratification?

    Not necessarily more, but there is a certain maintenance level. It's kinda like food. A recession may come, the markets may crash, but people still need to eat. The same goes for the sex industry. People still need their rotating-vibrating-shivering-double-headed-translu scent-dong-now-with-enhanced-squirming-action!

    Er...something like that anyways.

  107. new meaning... by yetiman · · Score: 1

    This gives a whole new meaning to saying "This job sucks!"

  108. Best argument yet for not splitting Microsoft by Zeinfeld · · Score: 3

    The idea of Bill Gates as playgirl centerfold is too disgusting to contemplate.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    1. Re:Best argument yet for not splitting Microsoft by amyg · · Score: 1

      Alas! If only it had been too disgusting to mention.

  109. Only 75K lost jobs?! by nanojath · · Score: 1
    "Over the last 16 months, more than 75,500 Internet workers lost their jobs, according to research by Challenger, Gray & Christmas, a Chicago-based employee outplacement firm."

    Okay, I'm definitley less impressed with the dotcom meltdown now. Only seventy five thousand jobs in a year and a third? The way it gets talked about I would have expected at least a few hundred thousand.

    --

    It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

  110. My mom would kill me! by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 1

    "Jon hasn't told his family. "My mom would kill me if she knew." Makes me wonder what Stile's mom thinks of his whole operation. or whoever runs rotten.

    --

    Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

  111. outweighting scenario by deran9ed · · Score: 2


    Chicks or Unix

    Chicks or Unix

    Chicks or Unix

    Head hunters from the porn industry? I wonder if they sound as sleazy as media portrays them. Personally I know porn sites make extreme amounts of money, the problem I think of regarding that market is, there are way too many porn sites out there to even think that "this particular" company is going to make it in the long run.

    I wouldn't jump ship unless my options included Alley Bagget on Monday, Jenna Jameson on Tuesday, Racquel Darian on Wednesday, Anna Nicole Smith on Thursday, and Jenna again on Friday.

    Not that I watch porn or anything...

    Encryption saves the day

  112. Re:Business is business by MarkTiarra · · Score: 1

    Being that my company has designed five of the top ten porn sites on the net and that I have been involved in the myriad political efforts in this industry I can fairly speak from experience. One oft overlooked reason porn didn't dot bomb is this: People who run adult Internet business have learned to do business under an Internet only paradigm. All the big dot coms tried to do business in the Wall Street way (paying on ads per impresssion, for instance) and they bombed. The Internet is a world that one has to understand seperate from all others to succeed in. The guys in the suit and ties are lost here. They tried to come in and make a killing the same way they did in the brick and mortar world and got sent packing by people who learned to survive a whole new set of rules.

  113. Plain, simple, double-ended economics. by blair1q · · Score: 2

    Sex sells. Both ways.

    There's never a shortage of consumers of porn, and there will never be a shortage of production-side personnel willing to trade some of their pay rate for a chance to hobnob with the knobjobs.

    Security? Sure. That's got to be part of it. But I bet there's an inverse proportion of it in reality vs. what was demonstrated in that article.

    Until the cloners genetically engineer our sexual hormones out of existence, this is how it will be.

    --Blair

  114. From apples to cherries by Salieri · · Score: 1

    At Sin City Entertainment in Chatsworth, there's been a veritable casting call of people inquiring about jobs, said spokesman Jeff Wozniak.

    Woz, of all people?? Wow, the tech industry is hurt pretty bad.

    --------------------------------

    1. Re:From apples to cherries by Salieri · · Score: 1

      Right, I was being facetious. Woz isn't even in the tech industry any more.

      --------------------------------

  115. porn, religion, economics by corporatewhore · · Score: 1
    Porn is getting popular because of the major religious attitudes that foster a heavy dose of repression on each of us since birth (well, most of us). Humans are just animals that cook their food, and animals are for the most part highly sexual creatures. We live in a western european christian world where god lives in heaven, has granted man dominion over all things with an afterlife e-ticket out, and has made sex dirty.

    Does anyone really buy this anymore ?

    why ?

    I'd like to believe its all sacred-sex included-but I don't think the boom in internet sex really reflects this. And its funny to see the powerhouses of the economic world (guns, power, drugs) all pretend to belong to a religion that was started by a poor man walking around teaching each other to be nice and love one and all. Jesus kicked the money changers out of the temple for a reason-don't ever forget that.

    Now the moneychangers run the show, and religion keeps them all happy god-fearing cows.

    --

    you think it's easy, but you're wrong...

  116. Porn's not growing, at least not in proportion by e9ymous · · Score: 1
    Guppy06 is wrong--porn's not growing any more than anythine else online. According to the Online Computer Library Center, the share of sites on the net that are porn was the same in 1998 and 2000 (2.3% of web sites), and dropped noticably in 1999 (1.9%).

    I suspect porn probably peaked as share-of-sites five ir six years ago, when the net was mostly used by horny geekboydom, and not many other people.

    The number of horny geekboys on the net has probably stayed close to the same, but women are now the majority of US Internet users, and the average age of net users is up too. (Can't find that stat.)

    Enon

    1. Re:Porn's not growing, at least not in proportion by e9ymous · · Score: 1
      I couldn't find the stat I was really looking for. About a year ago, in the US, women became something like 51.2% of Internet users. I thought I read that in the Washington Post, but it really could have been anywhere.

      Much of that growth is reflected in the stat I did find--women are a substantial majority of new users. The same study indicated that the average age of Internet users was also growing, and not in the obviously meaningless way you described. The proportion of adults over 50 who used the net was growing, for example.

      I looked again for the study I was thinking of, and did not find it. But I did find a study from 1998 that said, more or less, "this is starting to happen and will happen by 2002." http://www.colostate.edu/Depts/CoopExt/PUBS/OCTNEW S/oc980806.html

      Enon

    2. Re:Porn's not growing, at least not in proportion by Guppy06 · · Score: 2
      Nothing against you philosophically, but your math seems off.

      "but women are now the majority of US Internet users,"

      According to the link, it says that out of all the users on the internet, 33% are brand new (less than a year), and 60% of that are women. 60% * 33% = 20%. Of course, this says nothing about any previous gender ratios, so it could mean anything.

      "the average age of net users is up too."

      As is, I don't see how that means anything. If five years ago, the average net user was 18, and now the average user is 23, it's still the same people. All it means is that we've aged five years in the past five years.

  117. Porn vs Erotica? by e9ymous · · Score: 1
    Is it porn and unethical when you don't like it, and erotic literature or art when you like it?

    Are sexual images or descriptions ever ethical? If an artist is paid well for a sexy sculpture, or an art gallery owner is paid for selling it, are they unethical?

    I'm not saying there's no such thing as unethical porn--all the participants should be adults who've consented to what they're doing. But it isn't sexual imagery per se that is ethically troubling, is it?

    Enon

  118. No ....It's NOT Much Money by erotictrance · · Score: 1

    My husband and I run a small adult website ... which is free. "Erotic Trance.Com All I ask is that people throw me a song play at my mp3.com artist page. But despite thousands of visitors and being totally scam free with no pop-ups, I only get less than half of one percent of the people to go through my site. So I have to say that the adult business is not nearly as profitable as people think. Not to mention that it is a ton of work LOL. And by the way, you can't just hire a girl for $100 and be in business LOL. (Unless they're extremely fat and ugly with their teeth falling out LOL.) Female porn actors cost at least $1200 a day these days, and the males charge at least $400 --- that is if you want to use anybody decent LOL. Not to mention AIDS tests, legal paperwork, etc. I'm sure the big sites are making money, but they also do all the annoying scam tactics that make it difficult for honest small operators like myself to do business.

  119. recession is porn boom? by mkbz · · Score: 1

    will the economic slowdown overall affect the porn industry positively? _unemployed_ lonely geeks have more time to ... amuse themselves. (almost as much as if they were back in college. ;)

    but seriously, even stretching beyond the technology industry, does higher unemployment lead to more people in need of immediate gratification?

  120. Ironically.... by Serious_Snark · · Score: 1

    Ironically, the pop-up ad I got was for one of those really small PC video cameras.

    I bet the porn industry has some sort of connection in this as well.

    Kevin Hodapp

  121. Yes, there is a LOT of money in it. by Keslin · · Score: 1
    That's when compared to some other web sites I've seen. Given that and the tremendous amount of problems you must have with chargebacks and low pay for banner ads, I have to wonder if you can actually make *that* much money in porn.
    There is an enormous amount of money to be made in adult material online. Even pretty tame softcore sites like mine are doing pretty well. As an example of how recession-proof this business is, I have people in the forums section of my web site talking about how they owe more money than they are worth to the IRS thanks to the alternative minimum tax, yet they still manage to scrape up $10 for my web site. I don't know of a more compelling example than somebody complaining in the paid members section of an adult web site about how they owe $90K in taxes.
    Also, does anyone have any firsthand experience knowing how many people actually pay for subscriptions to sites like danni.com or anything like that?
    Numbers for Danni's Hard Drive are pretty frequently released in press releases, she reportedly has a solid base of 27,000 users, which generated over 5 million dollars last year, for $1.5 million in profit.

    Keep in mind that adult sites are a totally different business than your stereotypical dot-com startup. We have solid revenue streams, we have profit models that work, and we don't squander money on hypotheticals. If sales drop, then we lower our overhead. It's a pretty simple concept that would have saved a lot of dot-coms in the recent crash if they had been paying attention. Adult businesses are looking at the current economic downturn as a minor wrinkle, whereas dot-coms are going out of business forever.

    -Keslin, the naked nerd girl

    --

    -Keslin, the naked nerd girl
  122. If porn continues to grow... by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

    The internet is widespread throughout the US, in spite of the recent economic downturn that has yet to really stop. It seems that with each passing day, porn takes up a larger part of the internet economy. Do you think that this "porn boom" will help change opinions about sex in the US?

  123. tech -> porn dictionary by redcup · · Score: 1
    brings new meaning to "guarenteed up time"

    not to mention

    • bringing work home with you
    • somebody sent us up the bomb
    • depth first search

    I'm making my stage name "Long Hours."

    --

    RC
  124. Huhuhuhhuhuhuh, hard huhuhuhuhuhuhuh by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

    "We're getting all sorts of calls from technology head-hunters asking if we have openings," Not the sort of question I'd ask a pornographer, but there you go.

    --
    Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
  125. Aussies would like.... by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

    Root access on a porn site. Watch out for an invasion of young men sporting backpacks and saying 'Strewth!'. Oh wait, that happens everywhere.

    --
    Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
  126. Business is business by RALE007 · · Score: 1

    I don't think peoples opinions should be skewed because they're discussing the success of porn on the net as apposed to some other "clean" industry. People should view it as it really is; offering something people want in a way that actually works on the internet. People buy porn, people buy dogfood, with the internet, porn is more plentiful, easier to access, and more private than having to go to some magazine stand and ask for a monthly fix of XXX China Dolls or whatever floats your boat. With dog food, is it easier to have them ship a 50 pound bag to your doorstep and getting it three days later while poochie starves? No, you go to the damn store. Hustler.com profits, pets.com bombs. It's horribly obvious. The internet won't be able to peddle *everything*, it can peddle whatever is more convenient over the net. You can apply it to anything weather or not it's porn or news pages or weather forecasts. Whatever is made more convenient and available by the internet will suceed, almost everything else will fail.

    --
    Beware blue cats moving at .99c
  127. Router Configuration by oscar21 · · Score: 1

    I was recently involved in a porn site which involves live webcams. When they went wrong I had to go and reconfigure the router with three naked girls watching. It put me off so much I had to go back three times before I got it to work. He He