Slashdot Mirror


LinuxToday Editor Apologizes For Astroturfing

Thanks to Dean Pannell (and Paul Ferris for the initial head's up) for pointing out the apology and statement of fact from Kevin Reichard, the Executive Editor of LinuxToday. I think the argument that people would know that "George Tirebiter" was merely a contrivance is weak, but whatever. You can read the previous stories in the astroturf [?] ing saga.

146 of 226 comments (clear)

  1. Re:that forced sound by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Funny

    > Plus it contains grammatical mistakes, which looks kind of bad when your job title includes "editor".

    Nod a nissue, far Linux-friendly geek cites.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  2. Re:'Don't Crush That Dwarf, Hand Me The Pliers' by talks_to_birds · · Score: 1
    something like that, anyway...

    ...it's been a *long* time.

    Don't know what this refers to?

    t_t_b

    --
    I'm on PJ's "enemies" list! Are you?
  3. Re:astroturf[?]ing ???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    For this reason I think there should at least be an option for disabling the e2 tags, or the /. editors should leave them out entirely. Just as we an honest person wouldn't want MS's definition of Linux, why should we go to e2 for, say, Microsoft?
    Its pushing e2 when I don't particularly want to visit it.
    "Smart tags" might be handy sometimes, but not when its an annoying ad for another website disguised as journalism, and dictionary.com has a perfectly good definition of astroturfing that the /. editors don't have an interest in promoting.

    Those who would respond "its their website, they can do with it what they want," should ask themselves if the same applies to MS's smarttags.

  4. Re:Considering by L41N14L · · Score: 1
    Ahh...

    Maybe it was him trying to make you think that it was someone else trying to make you think that it was him.

    I'll stop now.

  5. I swear on a stack of bibles.... by BillyGoatThree · · Score: 2

    I went to school with a guy (I can't remember his first name) who's last name was "Boner". But that's not all. I know you won't believe me, but nonetheless, I have to share: His dad's name was Richard.

    --
    324006
  6. Unix Toady's ironic disclaimer by SimHacker · · Score: 2, Funny
    At the top of all the messages in Linux Toady's talkback, it ironically claims:

    Linux Today is not responsible for the content of the message below.

    Maybe they should clearly label the astroturf articles written by their own editors differently:

    Linux Toady is responsible for the content of the message below.

    -Don

    Linux Toady

    Main Entry: 1 toady
    Pronunciation: 'tO-dE
    Function: noun
    Inflected Form(s): plural toadies
    Etymology: by shortening & alteration from toadeater
    Date: 1826
    : one who flatters in the hope of gaining favors : SYCOPHANT
    synonym see PARASITE

    ====

    --
    Take a look and feel free: http://www.PieMenu.com
  7. Definition by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1
    Is it 'astroturfing' due to the artificiality of the material in question, or 'astroturfing' due to the effect of the material, as in 'slamming the opposition to the astroturf'?

    If it's the latter, /. is the single longest field of astroturf in existence, and I'm no MicroSlave: just calling it as I see it.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    1. Re:Definition by kubrick · · Score: 1

      Is it 'astroturfing' due to the artificiality of the material in question, or 'astroturfing' due to the effect of the material, as in 'slamming the opposition to the astroturf'?

      I've always understood astroturf to be "fake grass-roots support"; thus, it's artificial grass roots, i.e. astroturf.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
  8. Re:No apology from Internet.com by Ghyl · · Score: 3, Interesting
    "You can't tell my thousands of slashdot losers havent tried to start a "web design" company or some such using pronouns like "we" and "us" to make it sound like a company when it was really just one guy..."
    That's crap, it was nothing like that at all. What we had here was the editor was pretending to be a reader and trashing open source people and competitors, as well as not linking to information on competing sites. It's hypocritical to criticise Microsoft for astroturfing but say it's OK for linuxtoday. It's like the truism that people get the government they deserve - well, it applies to media as well. If there is a choice between a media site that acts like that and one that is more honest, than I feel I should support the latter one.
  9. Didn't this guy use more than one alias. by thebitninja · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Hmmm, this doesn't really sound like an apology, more a forced statement. And isn't he missing out the other alias's he used! Why no mention of "Tom Dooley, Clark Addison and Will Smith". Also people use fake names on websites all the time, so why should we assume that Tirebiter is the papers editor rather than someone else with a weak sense of humour.

    How about mentioning the fact that he's been doing this for years, or that he caused others to be fired when they complained. Maybe he could talk about this being common practice in the industry. Links to every single false post would have really shown some remorse.

    Seems to me that this is an attempt to wind down the negative spin, without really understanding what has been done wrong, or really wanting to/feeling the need to apologise. As my mum always said, if your not really sorry then apologising is worse than saying nothing.

    If he had posted this on /. and I had mod then I'd be modding him down for facuous statements and insincere apologies.

  10. Re:Serious matter / Something weird WOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Alan Cox - Subject: Astroturfing ( Aug 8, 2001, 20:13:51 )
    So you've now publically admitted impersonating people in public and making libellous comments about me and other community members. Can you clear up one detail - why are you still working for internet.com/linuxtoday ?

    Alan

  11. Re:Astroturfing? This is normal practice. by aussersterne · · Score: 2

    I didn't say it was right. But it's also no more wrong than being an IRS agent. People have to work. Other people get screwed. It's the nature of capitalism.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
  12. Astroturfing? This is normal practice. by aussersterne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Having worked for a major (i.e. Media Metrix top 10) news and links portal, I can honestly say that this practice of "astroturfing" (as I understand the word) is not limited to small sites like LinuxToday.

    Part of my job description as the maintainer of a chunk of the site hierarchy was to use a whole stack of pseudonyms and basically wander around doing just this in the interest of generating page views, responses, and "positive" discussion for advertisers and reviewed products in a number of areas. This was not optional, it was expected.

    I'd be surprised if this is a rare practice.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    1. Re:Astroturfing? This is normal practice. by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      The sort of reasoning involved here is "Well, other people do it, it must be right!"

      This doesn't fly. Right and wrong are not judged by popularity.

      I don't know how you could sleep at night with a job like that...

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
  13. Oh C'mon! by mESSDan · · Score: 1

    I will never accept an apology from someone on this subject. I mean, real grass vs Astroturf? Football hasn't been the same since. I rue the day! Heh.

    --

    -- Dan
  14. Outraged? by joe-cecil · · Score: 1

    My goodness aren't people getting upset here.

    Sure, It wasn't honest but this sort of thing happens everywhere, all the time.
    Yes, people will dishonestly post messages. Yes, about their competitors. Yes, even in journalism. But do you think the collectively honest people of the world can flush out every journalist lacking integrity? Where would we get our news from?

    Open your eyes, use that massive brain of yours to scrutinize what you read and hear.

    -

  15. Is it SO bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I mean, editors want to post too! Sometimes I like to jump into a discussion, and post some thoughts without everyone knowing who I am!

    CmdrTa^H^H^H^H^H^H"Fred" Tirebiter

  16. George Tirebiter == Firesign Theater reference by bobalu · · Score: 1

    "George Tirebiter" (or some variation thereof) is a character from one of the great Firesign Theater albums, such as "Don't Crush that Dwarf, Hand Me the Pliers", "Waiting for the Electrician or Someone Like Him" and the always-popular "How Can You Be In Two Places At Once When You're Not Really Anywhere At All?"

    Unfortunately they're not all available on CD - you'll need what the ancients called a "LONG PLAYING RECORD" (a.k.a LP) to dig the best. Some are available on CDNOW.com (if you hate Amazon).

    Highly recommended. Of course it helps to be well and truly stoned before (during/after) you listen.

    --
    The revolution will NOT be televised.
    1. Re:George Tirebiter == Firesign Theater reference by mjackson14609 · · Score: 1

      "So vote for your only logical choice: me, George Leroy Tirebiter. Because I never lie. And I'm always right."

      --
      I decided that behaving ethically was the most nihilistic thing I could do. - Paul Pavel
  17. Re:heh by reflective+recursion · · Score: 1

    and you really trust their stories now? They have no integrity left. Infact, I don't think this so-called "Linux community" does. This "community" looks more to me (and probably outsiders) as a continuation of the dot-com gold rush. Which it is, in many cases.

    --
    Dijkstra Considered Dead
  18. Still not accepting responsibility by Mr_Huber · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Anyone notice how he shifted part of the blame on the reader for not seeing the joke in the name? He still isn't completely accepting responsibility for his actions. It is still partially the reader's fault for not seeing through his deception. It is still the reader's fault for being offended by the content of his posts.

    He is trying to blow this off as a misunderstanding between a well-intentioned editor trying to liven up the site and a few stodgy killjoys who didn't get the joke immediantly. He seems to think this is like some practical joke that went awry and that a smirking apology will fix the situation.

    He still does not understand that deception has no place in responsible journalism.

  19. Has anyone at SLASHDOT ever ASTROTURFED? by BroadbandBradley · · Score: 2

    well it seems like it'd be a real big tremptation to watch a forum all day and not interject something randomly to stir the coals... how about it, has it ever happend here?

    1. Re:Has anyone at SLASHDOT ever ASTROTURFED? by wiredog · · Score: 3, Funny
      tremptation

      A-ha! I've caught Taco astroturfing slashdot!

    2. Re:Has anyone at SLASHDOT ever ASTROTURFED? by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 2
      Dateline, Silicon Valley, Friday August 10th, 2001

      The technology world was shocked this morning by the startling admission that Slashdot has been astroturfing itself for years .. and that, in fact, almost all of the nearly half-million "members" of Slashdot are nothing more than the imaginings of Slashdot's staff.

      Bizarre stories have emerged in the last twenty four hours about the editors' antics, including Jon Katz's apparent habit of providing all the commentary for his own stories.

      "This is really an incredible situation," said Alan Stark, a reporter for National Public Radio. "Just last month we did a report on how Slashdot had changed the face of news in the last half of the 90's, and now it looks like the whole thing is one gigantic hoax."

      Originally created as a news site for the nerd culture, Slashdot grew to national prominence along with the Linux operating system, as a social voice behind the technological phenomenon of Open Source. But now it appears that the entire thing has been staged. An analysis of traffic to and from the Slashdot site, by an independent consulting agency, shows that most of the one million or so "hits" that Slashdot was once thought to have received in a day are actually generated through a combination of cyber-slight-of-hand and old-fashioned fraud.

      In particular, there is the so-called Slashdot Effect, by which a web site experiences a flood in traffic and often suffers technical problems. This is now believed to be a mere cover-up for Internet flooding, or Denial-of-Service attacks, carried out by Commander Taco and Hemos, the site's so-called editors. The FBI is currently investigating.

  20. Re:Serious matter by DrXym · · Score: 2

    I have to say - SO WHAT. Every one is entitled to their opinion whether others agree with it or not. If he wants to vent at the opposition then let him. I bet half the people on Slashdot have done the same at one time or another. I know I have.

  21. To sum up.... by Dr.+Smeegee · · Score: 2, Funny

    "I thought you all _knew_ I was a liar!"

  22. Re:As if a /. editor has ANY room to talk by Skuto · · Score: 2

    >I guess its okay for the /. editors to mod a
    >post pointing out their flaws down into the nine
    >realm of hell - but its bad that this LT guy
    >astroturfed?

    The really sad thing is of course that this is completely true, as has already been demonstrated. (you're at 0, Troll at the time of this posting).

    The Somethingawful debacle is another nice example. Everything that remotely indicated slashdot could have done something wrong was -1 within seconds.

    'We are slashdot. We are hypocrites'

    --
    GCP (come on, mod me down, see if I care)

  23. This is an editor? by jpellino · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Forget the fact that at any traditional news outfit you'd be the new copy boy for pulling a stunt like this - where I come from, editors know how to write. To wit:

    > "I participated in Linux Today talkbacks anonymously in the past using a pseudonym."

    > "It is too important you can trust what you read here."

    Judging from the reaction at Slashdot, you went from simply evil to under-qualified and evil.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  24. Re:Considering by qslack · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That post could also be from someone who wanted to make you think he was still astroturfing...just a thought.

  25. Wrong type of apology, bucko by fobbman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I sincerely apologize to those of you who were offended by my actions.

    Mom: Now Kevin, apologize to Suzie for what you did!

    Kevin: I'm sorry that you don't like your pigtails dipped in permanent ink, Suzie.

    He's apologizing that we were offended by his actions, not for his actions themselves. Big difference there.

    1. Re:Wrong type of apology, bucko by festers · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm having a hard time thinking of to whom else he should be apologizing...the people that weren't offended?

      --


      -------
      "Every artist is a cannibal, every poet is a thief."
    2. Re:Wrong type of apology, bucko by snake_dad · · Score: 2
      does anyone remember the best apology scene ever in "A Fish Called Wanda"
      Yes.

      That's probably the position Kevin was in
      A real shame there was no webcam pointed at Kevin (Reichard, not Kline :) ) while he wrote this apology. :-)

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    3. Re:Wrong type of apology, bucko by blang · · Score: 2
      Now Kevin, apologize ..

      Apropos Kevin, does anyone remember the best apology scene ever in "A Fish Called Wanda", with John Cleese giving this long speech, end then the camera rotates and zooms out , and we see Cleese being held out a window by Kevin Kline.

      That's probably the position Kevin was in when giving this apology to the LT readers, and explains the grammar errors.

      --
      -- Another senseless waste of fine bytes.
  26. Re:Doesn't sound like much of an apology by TheMidget · · Score: 1
    > "What's an editor of Linux Today doing criticizing /.?"

    So, what's Hemos doing here? Well, at least he signed his article.

  27. Re:Brainwashed? by HiThere · · Score: 2

    1) The editor at a publication repeatedly and knowingly lied in the publication.
    2) The editor at a publication intentionally deceived many people about a range of different matters, frequently to his own benefit, and to the detrement of others.
    3) The editor at a publication published without identifying himself as an editor.
    4) The editor at a publication (allegedly) censored user feedback to make his posts look more supported by the community than was in fact the case.
    I submit that when a new site publishes without regard to the truth, then it should cease to be considered a news site.

    Warning: IANAL
    To the extent that money was paid, this appears to me as a form of fraud. Actually, it definitely appears to me to be fraud. To the extent that money was involved, it looks legally actionable. The question is probably, who had jurisdiction and does anyone who paid want to make their association with this explicit. So he probably won't be charged.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  28. Re:How can you not know George Tirebiter???? by es2001 · · Score: 1

    Esoteric geeks and nerds from which part of the world?????? I'm not from the US; never heard of the 'Firesign Theater' before. Is there an URL where I could find any information afout it?

  29. Dodging the real point by xonker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    He doesn't even mention the other points, like trying to avoid linking to competing sites.

    LinuxToday used to have value because they posted *everything* and you could go there to quickly find anything going on in the Linux world. Now that's no longer the case.

    Not surprisingly Internet.com has ruined them, and just about every other Linux property they touched. Reichard should be promptly fired, but instead he'll probably stay there until Internet.com folds or does away with the Linux channel. I hope this indiscretion travels with him so no one else is foolish enough to hire him.

    Interestingly, the apology is under "normal news" so they don't even seem to consider it important enough to put at the top of the site.

    1. Re:Dodging the real point by TOTKChief · · Score: 2
      He doesn't even mention the other points, like trying to avoid linking to competing sites.

      I'm not surprised. I don't think internet.com wants you outside "their channels". If that's their thought process, he really has nothing to apologize about...from their perspective. The anonymous LT stuff is another issue, and smells worse for them, but everyone wants to keep you inside channels.

      Hell, at the new media company where I was Chief Editor, I got pressure from our Publisher not to link to stories that I commented on. That fact frustrated me greatly.

      I recognized this one fact: we [in the corporate sense] were never going to be a single source for everyone. Point to good [or bad, to suit your purposes] content and amplify [or refute, TSYP] the points made there. If you amplify it, people will go, "Gee, I want to see what Geof has to say about this ESPN.com piece. He's written on this before..." If you refute it, people will also want to see what you have to say.

      Come on, you know that you [in the /. Cabal sense] wait to see who responds first to M$FT FUD, and then you read the followers-on [notably RMS, if he didn't get FP on the FUD] to see what they amplify and what they don't. It's human nature to want to find someone to agree or disagree with. If new media companies will recognize that people will want to spend more time online reading content and might--GASP--pay for it.

  30. thank you by FreeUser · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Thanks. That was very interesting (and the slashdot editors deserve to be called on the carpet for that sort of thing). My critique of your logic in your previous statement stands, but my personal opinions as to the veracity of your accusations against the slashdot editors has been modified from "yeah, right" to "hmm...there may be something to what you say."

    Hopefully the /. editors will take this sort of criticism for what it is and modify their behavior in the future, rather than "bitchslapping" (is that your term, or theirs?) posts like these down. People do fuck up, and it is through being called on it, and changing one's behavior, that not only goods and services such as slashdot are improved, but so are we as people.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  31. Considering by geomcbay · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Considering how tame most of the LinuxToday talkbacks to his apology are, I think its safe to say they plan to continue censoring posts that oppose the views of the editors...

    Considering THIS post, to the LT talkback:

    Thank you for the apology. Here is one reader who appreciates it and will continue to recommend Linux Today as _the_ premier news site for all things Linux.

    Cheers,

    Caleb

    How much do you want to bet Kevin Reichard is still posting under assumed names? I mean c'mon, at least be more subtle!

    1. Re:Considering by Miles · · Score: 1

      But that's exactly what this kind of thing causes--a loop of mistrust. Suddenly, you don't know what to trust anymore.

      A little mistrust sows a lot of suspicion.

    2. Re:Considering by belbo · · Score: 1
      Well, and if it reached that point, don't you think that would be another reason for the resignation of this editor? Unless you wanted to go into an endless loop of mistrust and accusations.

      b.

      --

      --
      "Just believe everything I tell you, and it will all be very, very simple."

    3. Re:Considering by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1
      That is a dirty rotten lie! The man is a genius, and frankly, I forgive him!

      (before you flame: I am not the one who posted that comment, I just couldn't resist the similarity to my own ID...)

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  32. Re:As if a /. editor has ANY room to talk by gamorck · · Score: 2, Funny

    Have you looked at Tacos code lately? That may have actually been a legitimate excuse :-)

    Gam
    "Karma Hell Here I Come"

    --
    I love idealists not because I am one, but because they make life bearable for pragmatists such as myself.
  33. Re:Moore == Kiersky == ??? by FunkyRat · · Score: 2

    Dude. His name is Reichard. Slashdot and almost everyone here seems to be mis-spelling it.

    His e-mail address taken from the signature of his apology: kreichard@internet.com. See? Reichard not Richard.
  34. Re:That's good. by boinger · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure back then I wasn't even yet a sperm/egg couple living separately.

    --
    Send your friends messages of love at fuck-you.org
  35. Uh-uh, sure. by sharkey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    like George Tirebiter which I believed readers would understand was a contrivance.

    Well, since I went to high school with a guy named Mike Hunt, a name would have to be extremely obvious, much more so than "Tirebiter," to make me suspect a fake-that's-obviously-fake name. (His full name was Michael Steven Hunt, and he went by Steven.) There was also a family at a different school with the surname Homo. There are many, many interesting and different names out there, and as always: Ass-U-Me.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  36. Re:Circular reasoning anyone? by _xeno_ · · Score: 3, Informative
    A Slash editor who is logged in (editor accounts are separate from user accounts, but most /. editors seem to use the same name) has infinite moderation points, plus the ability to delete posts.

    And yes, they do moderate: I remember Hemos telling the WPI ACM that they spend time moderating down the trolls after a story goes live.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  37. Bit of a problem here by HiThere · · Score: 2

    With all the people posting under names like "Commander Taco" (see user 85921 right near here) one needs to look pretty close to be sure that the editors are posting themselves. So why would anyone need to astroturf. Just create a new account with your handle as the name, and post as someone pretending to be yourself.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  38. Re:existence of the Linux community by reflective+recursion · · Score: 1

    I don't believe there is a "Linux community." The term "Linux" has been co-opted and coerced so much that it looks like any old bandwagon ("Hop on everyone! We will give you a ride to greatness!"). From IBM to Sun, and even the "friends" of Linux such as Red Hat and Caldera. Free software ideology itself was co-opted by "Open Source(TM)" and ESR (free software being more "pure" and idealistic, while "Open Source" being oriented towards corporate America. A distinction many still do not grasp today). Even you toss "Linux community" into "Open Source," which "Open Source" can be considered even FreeBSD. Note that it is not "O'Reilly Free Software [or Linux] Convention." The word "open" does not have the connotation of "freedom," which is the whole purpose of GNU and FSF.

    Any "Linux community" will most likely include FreeBSD users, Mozilla (MPL license) users, etc. And it most likely will include people who do not use Linux, but like the GPL. Then there is probably a few who actually do not like Linux or the GPL.

    --
    Dijkstra Considered Dead
  39. Re:Contrivance? Sure. by jzitt · · Score: 1

    But the name "George Tirebiter" is so outrageous sounding as to be ludicrous. It's obviously contrived...

    I can think of a couple of ways that that name could happen, imagining that a family with the German term "Arbeiter" in their name came through the Ellis Island Name Scrambling Office. (And yes, I know about the Firesign Theatre reference.)

    But if you have a name like mine, you *never* assume that others' names are faked.

    Joe Zitt

  40. Re:astroturf[?]ing ???? by Hammer · · Score: 1
    If something is presented to me on IE's smarttags feature, I would filter it through an anti-pro-MS filter. Content /always/ has to be digested in the context of the source. I see no reason why MS is any more biased than /.


    I understand the difference between a regular underline link and a squiggly underline SmartTags link. You may do so. But Joe Sixpack? Not bloody likely!! Microsoft does not care about you and me, we are few and a lost cause. Joe Sixpack are many and easy to manipulate and a huge revenue potential. That's what MS is going for.
  41. Re:Contrivance? Sure. by TOTKChief · · Score: 2

    With a link to my own damn URL [and hell, my own real home information in the WHOIS db]? I think not.

  42. Re:that forced sound by Miles · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe not under other circumstances, but certainly in this case. What kind of editor issues an apology that is not checked for errors, or at least flow? Hell, even intent?

    "It is too important you can trust what you read here."

    I guess in English you can omit the 'that' between 'important' and 'you', but that sentence doesn't roll off the tongue very easily. It might also be more convincing if it were to say,
    It is important *to me* that you can trust what you read here.

    As it stands, I'm not convinced that it is important to him--just that it was important in a vague sort of way.

  43. Re:How can you not know George Tirebiter???? by JWhitlock · · Score: 2
    You must ALL go out and buy all the Firesign Theater tapes/CD you can find and listen to them now, and you'll never have this problem again! ;)

    I agree, but they are hard to find. I find many on cassette, in small counter-cuture record stores where they haven't got the message that they are out of print...

    There are some on Amazon (maybe that link will work, maybe not...), and a few places where you might find other stuff.

    Of course, if all else fails, a few people have made some albums availible by alternative means

  44. Re:Contrivance? Sure. by TOTKChief · · Score: 2

    I don't know it from anywhere. But the name "George Tirebiter" is so outrageous sounding as to be ludicrous. It's obviously contrived...heck, if you want to all our nicks are. But I'm happy to post my real email address and URL here on /. Hell, I'll even inquire as to whether cafepress does dartboards and start selling dartboards with my smiling mug on 'em on IJSM if you like...=P

  45. George Tirebiter by JWhitlock · · Score: 3, Insightful
    For those out of the loop, here's a link to the entry for Tirebiter in the Firesign Theater lexicon.

    In RealSpace, he was "the doughty unofficial mascot of USC (Univ. South. Calif.) athletic teams in earlier times, renowned for his devotion to attacking the spinning wheels of large American automobiles...."

    In the Firesign Theater world, he's the Everyman protaganist of the comedy album "Don't Crush That Dwarf, Hand Me The Pliers" (which appears to be out of print, although I found a cassette in a local record store). It's high comedy from Firesign Theater, a team that was known for a counter-cultural radio program in the sixties. It's very funny, but requires FULL attention, a strong liberal arts background, and occassionaly several listens, to get a large percentage of the jokes.

    Check out the entry for DWARF to get a feel for the humor.

    That said, even though I got the reference, I don't think seeing a post under the name George Tirebiter would make me think "Oh - It's the editor!" or "He's just joking!". I would instead think "This guy is a pretty poor satirist - it's like posting under 'Chaucer'".

    1. Re:George Tirebiter by geomcbay · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Huh? I think you are missing the point. Kevin seemed to miss the point too in his "apology" post.

      I doubt anyone thought George Tirebiter was someone's real name...

      Nobody cares that these troll posts were made using an alias, per se, they care that the person using the alias to post trolls was also an editor. The name he used, and its ability to be easily recognized as a pseudonym are totally irrelevant.

    2. Re:George Tirebiter by c0rtez · · Score: 1

      At least he could've used the reference properly: its Porgie Tirebiter.

      Porgie, Tirebiter.
      He's your average firefighter.
      Porgie, Tirebiter.
      Just a student like us.
      If you're looking for the captain of the handball team, you'll be sure he won't be there,

      uh i forget the rest. Great skit.

      "Holy Mudhead, mackarel!"

    3. Re:George Tirebiter by wickedpixie · · Score: 1

      Also, George Tirebiter is the name of the old mascot of the University of Southern California. Some students found a dog (who chased cars, hence Tirebiter) and he became an adopted mascot. There were several, but I doubt many people know about it anymore. I think I'm one of the few people who has ever read that sign on campus. (-: Just a little addition to the Tirebiter fame. I know it's off-topic

    4. Re:George Tirebiter by feces_tossin_primate · · Score: 1

      Actually it goes: Georgie Tirebiter, He's a spy and a girl delighter. Orgie firefigter, just a student like you. If you're looking for the captian of the Ringball team, you can bet he won't be there. You'll find him pop poppin alot at Pop's Sodium Shop, just turn'in all red from red-heads. doobie doo wah. Georgie Tirebiter just a student like you...etc etc...

  46. Can't Stand the Heat by Seanasy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Apparently Kevin didn't want ot stick around to see how his apology goes over.

    I will be on vacation through August 13. If this is an urgent matter, please contact Gus Venditto (gvenditto@internet.com) at internet.com.

    --
    Kevin Reichard
    Executive Editor
    internet.com
    http://www.internet.com
    -----
    1. Re:Can't Stand the Heat by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      My email to Kevin included "cc:"s, which did go through. The editorial staff of Linuxtoday: editors@linuxtoday.com Founder & CEO of Internet.com Alan Meckler: ameckler@internet.com (personal email) VP & GM of Internet.com Chris Elwell: celwell@internet.com Executive Editor, Linux Today Kevin Reichard kreichard@internet.com

  47. Just plain depressing that LT would fall so low by maynard · · Score: 1

    I don't know what else to write. I expect that LinuxToday and the other internet.com branded Linux sites will probably close pretty quickly, and the community will lose what was once a useful web portal. All because Reichard, along with his senior management I must assume, took it upon themselves break the most basic of ethical standards in journalism. Reichard refused to respond to the allegations at first, and when He did he assumed the issue was readers being offended by his posts, rather than the underlying ethical implications of his behavior. Reichard should be fired, the owners should apologize, and at the very least hire an independent editorial board. But I doubt it will happen -- and that will be the end of Internet.com.

    It's just plain sad...

    --Maynard

  48. Re:That's good. by lotussuper7 · · Score: 1

    "George Tirebiter" is rather obvious. Get out your Firesign Theater album and sing along.... "George-eee Tirebiter..." What, you don't have any Firesigh Theaterver LP's? Where were you in the drug induced cloud of the '60s? If I had anything important to say, this .sig would say it.

    --
    ----- Lotus Super 7 - A real car. :-}
  49. Re:It has worked before by ethereal · · Score: 2, Funny

    [wagging finger] I did not troll LinuxToday as that woman!

    Hmmm, not quite the same :)

    --

    Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  50. Re:Doesn't sound like much of an apology by fetta · · Score: 1
    > "What's an editor of Linux Today doing criticizing /.?"
    So, what's Hemos doing here? Well, at least he signed his article.
    That's the point. Because we know who's making the critique, we can take the biases into account in evaluating the criticism.

    I accept that if I read the NY Times or Wall Street Journal editorial pages (or listen to Rush Limbaugh or Dan Rather), that these news sources have biases. I can take those biases into account. In the case of the comments we're talking about here, the writer was deliberately trying to mislead his audience about his biases.
    --
    ** The opinions expressed here are my own, and do not reflect those of my employers - past, present, or future**
  51. Re:Contrivance? Sure. by Miles · · Score: 1

    Why couldn't George Tirebiter be the name of the poster's dog, or something like that, though? Whether or not the name is contrived, surely the content of the messages are more important, yes?

  52. How E2 Smart Tags would look by yerricde · · Score: 2, Interesting

    OK, so how should "Microsoft" or "proprietary software" or "DMCA" or "RIAA" or "MPAA" be explained by OSSmartTags?

    E2 nodes contain neutral, pro-individual, and even pro-business writeups. If you're not happy, register (only need name, email, and desired login/password, no personal information) and add your own. (If it's not well written, it will be voted down and deleted.) Here's how they'd look:

    • Microsoft[?]
    • proprietary software[?]
    • DMCA[?] and the politics of copy protection[?]
    • RIAA[?]
    • MPAA[?] mostly talks about the ratings and doesn't even mention DeCSS[?]
    • Napster[?]
    • Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act[?]
    Here's the rule: http://everything2.com/?node=(URL escaped node title)
    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  53. Re:A good start by reflective+recursion · · Score: 1
    At least they still have enough integrity to own-up to the responsibility they have to their readers.
    That is bullshit. This "integrity" is after the fact. If the story was never posted on /. or brought to light, then it would still be going on. It was going on from 1999 to May of this year IIRC. If you can't find your head from your ass in 3 years you deserve to lose 100% of your readers. Bad judgement is a one time "ut oh." What we have here is a long-term fuckup still (would be) in progress. And probably is. Who knows what underhanded things will be going on behind reader's backs.
    --
    Dijkstra Considered Dead
  54. Re:'Don't Crush That Dwarf, Hand Me The Pliers' by talks_to_birds · · Score: 1
    heh..

    Can't get off it..

    One of *my* favorite Firesign Theater moments was when they did a live simulcast voice-over naration for the Pasadena, CA, Tournament of Roses Parade on New Year's day, about 1970-71...

    It was on an FM station in LA..

    They broadcast live from a booth somewhere out on Colorado Boulevard..

    You watched on TV, and listened to their naration with headphones, for full effect...

    Later that afternoon my landlady kept asking me what I was laughing at so hard, all morning long.

    I didn't even *try* to explain..

    t_t_b

    --
    I'm on PJ's "enemies" list! Are you?
  55. As if a /. editor has ANY room to talk by gamorck · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I guess its okay for the /. editors to mod a post pointing out their flaws down into the nine realm of hell - but its bad that this LT guy astroturfed?

    Im sorry - thats just BS. You people ought to check up on what happened with the string of articles last time /. went down (the OSDN router outage thing). /. editors were modding down anti slashdot posts LEFT AND FUCKING RIGHT to -1 within seconds of their posting.

    A good example would be what will happen to this post within around 45 seconds from the time it hits the article. It'll be down to -1 and my karma will keep on sliding down down down.... (Im already at -5, can it get any lower?)

    Gam
    "Flame at Will"

    --
    I love idealists not because I am one, but because they make life bearable for pragmatists such as myself.
    1. Re:As if a /. editor has ANY room to talk by Skuto · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Slashdot posted a link to a site which already had trouble paying its bandwidth. Of course it was slashdotted into oblivion. The owner responded by redirecting all slashdotters to goatse.cx.

      Every post which said something about this was modded down instantly, and the front page claimed
      'link removed because people were being redirected randomly'.

      Randomly eh?

      --
      GCP

    2. Re:As if a /. editor has ANY room to talk by CommanderTaco · · Score: 1

      just curious - what is the "somethingawful debacle" you're referring to?

    3. Re:As if a /. editor has ANY room to talk by reflective+recursion · · Score: 3, Insightful

      modding down? haha. I remember times when posts and even whole _threads_ were removed completely. ("technical difficulties" I believe was an excuse)

      --
      Dijkstra Considered Dead
    4. Re:As if a /. editor has ANY room to talk by aka-ed · · Score: 1
      Can someone define "troll" for me? I thought I knew what a troll was, but if this post is a "troll" I obviously don't.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
  56. Contrivance? Sure. by TOTKChief · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yeah, I could see "George Tirebiter" being a contrivance. It's about as blaringly screaming "ignore me, I'm a mo-ron" as "Anonymous Coward". But for someone in charge to be doing it...guh.

    A few years back when I worked for TOTK.com Sports, I had a fellow staff member fake some email [or so he thought] from the current President of the United States. It sounded just a bit too much like this one guy...and when I traced it out, it was him. I "fired" [in the sense that I never let him write again] him on the spot. Though we were "new media", I wasn't going to put up with pointless bullshit. Scary to think that a college sophomore [at the time] had more balls than a "major new media company" like internet.com does at present.

    Oh well, I never read LT much anyway. This just assures that I never will.

  57. Circular reasoning anyone? by FreeUser · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The really sad thing is of course that this is completely true, as has already been demonstrated.

    ahem. Basic logic please.

    It does not follow that, because moderators have moderated the parent to your post down to zero, that those moderators were slashdot editors. Far more likely that slashdot readers with moderator priveleges modded the post down as the flaimbait it certainly appeared to be (to me at least, although I do not have moderator priveleges right now).

    The slashdot editors are the ones who decide which stories get posted (decisions I disagree with as often as not BTW), not those readers who happen to have moderator priveleges at a given moment.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:Circular reasoning anyone? by Skuto · · Score: 1

      >The slashdot editors are the ones who decide which stories get posted (decisions I disagree
      >with as often as not BTW), not those readers who happen to have moderator priveleges at a given moment.

      Slashdot editors _do_ moderate. Either that, or by some magic all moderators had the exact same ideas at the somethingawful.com messup.

      I agree that the parent could have been modded down by readers. The end result stays, namely that any post on slashdot which gives the remote hint that slashdot could have done something wrong is usually quickly at -1, no matter how factual it is.

      --
      GCP

  58. so by British · · Score: 3, Funny

    So will all the names being used be apologzing?

    1. Re:so by why-is-it · · Score: 1

      So will all the names being used be apologzing?

      He promised not to do that sort of thing anymore. Would an editor lie?

      More to the point, will he have the nads to acknowledge the aliases he used?

      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    2. Re:so by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Funny

      > So will all the names being used be apologzing?

      [LMAO]

      No, a simple "I and all my socks" will suffice.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  59. Re:That's good. by n3bulous · · Score: 1
    --
    "The area of penetration will no doubt be sensitive." ~ Spock
  60. SmartTags are evil by Hammer · · Score: 1

    Wrong!!
    This is why SmartTags are a BadThing (tm). Slashdot is pointing to a site of their choice to explain the word. In the SmartTags world it would point to a site of Microsofts choice.
    The words Open Source Software could be explained by this in a SlashTag and this way by SmartTags...

  61. Re:that forced sound by cruelworld · · Score: 2

    I guess he went to school at the Derek Zoolander Centre for Kids Who Can't Read Good.

  62. Re:That's good. by mrfiddlehead · · Score: 1
    astroturfing is lame, and he's right to apologize

    What a flocking crock of shite. Are you people all on glue? Who gives a flying flock of seaguls if the guy posts pseudo-anonymously? We all do this right? Isn't that right, Mr (or Ms. or Mrs.) Boinger?

    Sometimes I just don't understand this fucking world at all when assholes like George W. Bush can become president by worming his way into office and yet the common behaviour of an editor at LinuxToday somehow commits an idictable offence.

    Really now!

    --
    :wq
  63. Re:apology accepted! by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm with you all the way Rob...I mean Jeff, yeah, that's it. Jeff.

    --
    I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
  64. Re:Brainwashed? by fishebulb · · Score: 1

    quite frankly i agree. i dont see the big deal. that site is great for news. its a link page for news. how does this make a bit of different in the quality of the news articles? absolutely none. Get over it and find a different scapegoat. if you are incapable of that, dont visit that site, its as simple as that.

  65. How can you not know George Tirebiter???? by hellfire · · Score: 1

    Damnit, all the esoteric geeks and nerds out there an none of you have ever listened to Firesign Theater??????? If you had you'd all know this guy and all his aliases... George LaRoy Tirebiter, Porgie Tirebiter, etc etc ad infinitum. :)

    You must ALL go out and buy all the Firesign Theater tapes/CD you can find and listen to them now, and you'll never have this problem again! ;)

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

  66. Re:Doesn't sound like much of an apology by HiThere · · Score: 2

    Well, people might have said things like "What's an editor of Linux Today doing criticizing /.?". Not that there aren't sometimes decent reasons to criticise it, but it's usually out of place of a rival (sort of) to do so. Does the Times criticise the Inquirer? (I'm assuming not, without sufficient evidence.)

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  67. apology accepted! by bricriu · · Score: 5, Funny

    I personally think that these fine gentlemen have, by virtue of their effusive apology, proved themselves to be well and truly sorry, and that we should all forgive them their minor trespasses. Who's with me?

    -Kevin Richard... I mean, uh Ben. That's it. Ben.

    --

    AHHHHHHH! I'm burning with goodness again!
    - Reakk, Sluggy Freelance

  68. Wow, I Love Slashdot's Editorial Honesty by zulux · · Score: 1
    As a longtime member of the OSDN/Slashtot community, I'm proud of the premium content that's available to me 24 hours a day on my Friendly-Easy-To-Use(tm) Slashdot.

    Unlike some other web sites - I can trust that Hemos^h^h^h^h^h the Slashdot editors will alway strike a carefully balance between editorial honesty and bad spelling.

    --

    Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

  69. Re:'Don't Crush That Dwarf, Hand Me The Pliers' by talks_to_birds · · Score: 1
    Georgie... Georgie...?

    Cuh- cuh- coming, mother...!

    Oh, that Georgie.. he's so good with the help!

    t_t_b

    --
    I'm on PJ's "enemies" list! Are you?
  70. Re:A good start by LordNite · · Score: 1

    This is very true. My point is that he and LT aren't claiming that they have done nothing wrong. I don't think that they have much integrity, but it does take a little to publicly admit wrong doing and to face the inevitable tidal wave of flames and rages to follow.

    This is just a start. There may be more to come. I personally want to see all of the allegations answered for.

    Just because I think that the guy is starting to do the right thing doesn't mean that I forgive him, or don't think that he is a sleaze.

    My thought is that we should pat him on the back for comming out into the open, encourage him and any others involoved to make amends, and then encouragage Internet.Com to fire the bastards.

    I don't think that I am being unreasonable of wishy-washy here. I am just not getting angry about it.

    -LN

    --
    If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it must be a duck.
  71. It must be equally obvious ..... by terrymr · · Score: 1, Funny

    that Cmdr Taco is just a contrived name of somebody who doesn't exist too :-)

  72. Re:astroturf[?]ing ???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    No, but it is a good example of how SmartTags might be used. If everybody wasn't so blinded by the ubiquitous Microsoft hate, people would realize SmartTags can be a Good Thing.

  73. existence of the Linux community by tim_maroney · · Score: 2
    I asked why there should have been a controversy about whether the Linux community existed. It seems a community is a tangible thing. No one bothered to respond, but I continued to ask myself the question, and realized that there was an answer. The attendance of nearly two thousand people at the 2001 O'Reilly Open Source Convention demonstrates the existence of a community, though not necessarily a large one.

    Tim

  74. that forced sound by benedict · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The apology has that forced sound of someone who doesn't understand or doesn't want to understand why their actions were wrong.

    Plus it contains grammatical mistakes, which looks kind of bad when your job title includes "editor".

    --
    Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
  75. Serious matter by doomy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    An editor of a respected news portal should never have commited something like this. In paper media it would have been much better to resign and safe face afterwards. This person using psudonames trolled LinuxToday's talkback forums and flamed Linux, Linus, SlashDot etc. Often he used anti-linux and sentiments and questioned the existance of an opensource/linux community. He should resign IMHO. If LinuxToday is to be respected, this is the only way out for this publication.

    --
    ...free your source and the rest would follow...
    1. Re:Serious matter by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 1

      Agreed. So let's boycott Linux Today until he resigns. He's done nothing less than what MS and others have done (Specifically astroturfing) that invariably leds to calls of boycotts. Everyone on /. boycotting MS or Apple or Real hardly has any effect, but THIS has a chance to work! If everyone on /. boycotted Linux Today until he resigns and there is some proof of a return of jounalistic integrity, I think they would probably have to take notice. It's gets harder and harder to say anything negative about MS when your own house is morally crumbling around you. Course I'm just a pro MS troll, what do I know? But at least I'm not a /. editor :)

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
    2. Re:Serious matter by llywrch · · Score: 2

      > I have to say - SO WHAT. Every one is entitled to their opinion whether others agree with it or not. If he wants to vent at the
      > opposition then let him. I bet half the people on Slashdot have done the same at one time or another. I know I have.

      The difference in atmosphere between /. & LT was the fact that the editors posted under their own names. And Reichard knew this -- I remember reading several posts he made in the talk-backs under his own name.

      (And why is it there are 124 posts in the LT talk-back forum, most of which are critical of Reichard, & a few promising to boycott LT, but Reichard has not responded to a single one of them under his own name?)

      But was even more pernicious was the fact that LT appeared to have a number of trolls with a pro-Microsoft bent, a la Steve Bartko on the Compuserve forums from years past. A large number of LT readers honestly thought that this was part of a FUD attack encouraged either by Microsoft or people outside of MS who felt their livelihood depended on that company. And now it is clear that a hack journalist eager for more clicks was stirring up trouble . . . & the folks at MS have been watching this & smiling at the confusion on the other side.

      Reichard has proven he is no friend of Linux. If Internet.com were wise, they'd let him go.

      Geoff

      --
      I think I see a trend here. Maybe for them it really would be easier to muzzle the entire internet than to produce p
  76. Doesn't sound like much of an apology by fetta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It doesn't sound like the editor is acknowledging that he did anything wrong, just saying "I won't do it again because other people misunderstood."

    There are good reasons to post anonymously under some circumstances, but I don't think he gives any here. How would the debate have been any less "lively" if he had acknowledged the source of his comments all along?

    --
    ** The opinions expressed here are my own, and do not reflect those of my employers - past, present, or future**
  77. Please think of the children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    My name is Billy Evans. I am a very sick little boy. My mother is typing this for me, because I can't. She is crying. The reason she is so sad is because I'm so sick. I was born without a body. It doesn't hurt, except when I try to breathe. The doctors gave me an artificial body. It is a burlap bag filled with leaves. The doctors said that was the best they could do on account of us having no money or insurance. I would like to have a body transplant, but we need more money. Mommy doesn't work because she said nobody hires crying people. I said, "Don't cry, Mommy," and she hugged my burlap bag. Mommy always gives me hugs, even though she's allergic to burlap and it makes her sneeze and chafes her real bad. I hope you will help me. You can help me if you forward this email to everyone you know. Forward it to people you don't know, too. Dr. Johansen said that for every person you forward this email to, Bill Gates will team up with AOL and send a nickel to NASA. With that funding, NASA will collect prayers from school children all over America and have the astronauts take them up into space so that the angels can hear them better. Then they will come back to earth and go to the Pope, and he will take up a collection in church and send all the money to the doctors. The doctors could help me get better then. Maybe one day I will be able to play baseball. Right now I can only be third base. Every time you forward this letter, the astronauts can take more prayers to the angels and my dream will be closer to coming true. Please help me. Mommy is so sad, and I want a body. I don't want my leaves to rot before I turn 10. If you don' tforward this email, that's okay. Mommy says you're a mean and heartless bastard who doesn't care about a poor little boy with only a head. She says that if you don't stew in the raw pit of your own guilt-ridden stomach, she hopes you die a long slow horrible death and then burn forever in hell. What kind of cruel person are you that you can't take five freakin' minutes to forward this to all your friends so that they can feel guilt and shame about ignoring a poor, bodiless nine-year-old boy? Please help me. I try to be happy, but it's hard. I wish I had a kitty. I wish I could hold a kitty. I wish I could hold a kitty that wouldn't chew on me and try to bury its turds in the leaves of my burlap body. I wish that very much. Thank You, Billy "Smiley" Evans

  78. Excuse me? by crowchild · · Score: 5, Insightful
    On reflection, I have to admit that anonymous posting by an editor at a news site was wrong. I stopped months ago and vow to LT readers that I will never engage in the practice again. It is too important you can trust what you read here.

    As if we should believe him? I'm well aware of the current state of today's media. Journalistic integrity is a word that most media reporters and editors seem to have forgotten.

    However, this is totally out of line, even by today's standards. Someone looking at his apology would think that he had just committed minor infractions. No, he was busily posting nastygrams about competitors and rivals.

    He should just resign and get the heck out.

    'crow

  79. What's his name? by NewbieSpaz · · Score: 1

    ..."from Kevin Richard, the Executive Editor of LinuxToday"...

    I thought it was 'Reichard'

    --
    ------
    Random, useless fact: I type in startx entirely with my left hand.
    1. Re:What's his name? by ethereal · · Score: 1

      Not to bitch too hard, but in my story submission I spelled his name correctly. Twice. But then again, we can't all be Paul Ferris, I guess.

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  80. That's good. by boinger · · Score: 1
    I suppose I can see his point - George Tirebiter is a bit silly. Perhaps he should have made it TireByter or something more obvious. Regardless, astroturfing is lame, and he's right to apologize.

    Can you imagine most other companies (say, Microsoft, for instance) ever apologizing for anything? I would expect the standard "mistakes were made...steps have been taken to prevent...blah, blah, blah". It's refreshing to see someone in the public light in the commercial side of this industry with humility.

    --
    Send your friends messages of love at fuck-you.org
    1. Re:That's good. by boinger · · Score: 2

      My "anonymity" is a lame argument. First, no one believes "boinger" is my actual and/or full name. Second, anyone can find out who I am if you take about 10 seconds of time to look. Third, I'm not representing my own company with an artificial persona in an effort to drive up revenue. There's a big difference.

      --
      Send your friends messages of love at fuck-you.org
  81. Forced and on purpose? by md_doc · · Score: 1

    One has to wonder, since the appology seems--well to be nice--weak, if it was more or less a ploy to get more traffic to their site. I am sure getting /.ed will do nothing but serve more ads for them which, in this day of hard to get money from advertisers, will be nothing but a good thing for them.

    --
    --MD--
  82. Never again, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
    I stopped months ago and vow to LT readers that I will never engage in the practice again.

    Heh.

    I've said something similar to my wife more than once. I wonder if LT readers are sharper than she is...

  83. What about the censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's a *lot* of acusations of sensorship on the talkbacks. Until now, there's no apologies or explanations. And I think it stinks.

  84. Re:Serious matter / Something weird by Maldivian · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I agree with the orginal poster, Kevin Reichard, should be removed from Internet.com, that is the only way the respect of this community would ever return to an otherwise good site.

    Also, I noticed Kevin Reichard seemed to be having some really weird friends posting under his Talkback.

    A certain Mike Moore posted this under the subject of "Excellent",
    It takes a lot to admit this. I still dont believe astroturfing is anything to ruffle your feathers about, we all do it dont we? But I salute Kevin Reichard for taking this stance and explaining matters. This shows the maturity of Linux Today and the opensource nature of all their undertakings. Cheers
    A couple of posts below that, Eric Kiersky writes with subject "Kevin shouldnt apologize",
    I dont believe Kevin should have been preassured into apologizing about this. As I understand this pressure came from an individual who was fired from LinuxToday. I felt that individual's articles were more revenge based than anything to expose ethics on astroturfing. Kevin is an excellent individual and his work on Linux Today is second to non. I hope everyone takes a deep breath and just think before posting anymore slashdot induced flames on Mr. Kevin Reichard
    At first look this all seem to be optimistic well wishers giving their support to Richard. But if you ever visted the Borg, you might wonder why those names seem so familiar.

    Well, it just so happens that Kevin has some very good friends working backstage at one of the best authorites on Austroturfing.

    With friends like that who needs enemies? Now, I wonder how far deep the fangs of corporate monopoly sinks in our community....
    --
    Trust the source!
  85. Slashdot would be Immune to Astroturf like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    A Slashdot editor would be easy to identify from the spelling and gramatical errors.

  86. Not much of an apology... by MrEfficient · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Thats a pretty poor excuse for an apology. He didn't mention all of the pseudonyms he used and I don't think he came clean as to why he did it. "fostering lively debate" my ass. He was trying to influence the debate and in a dishonest manner. Anonymous postings are fine for readers, but an editor should be held to a higher standard, at least where his own paper/website are concerned.

    A lot of the talkbacks left on the page so far really astound me, how can these people be so quick to forgive something like this. Personnaly, I would find it hard to trust anything this guy, or Linux Today publishes.

    --
    Check out AbiWord.
  87. gramatical ? by snake_dad · · Score: 1
    Hey, it has already started! Hemos is already trying to spice up the discussion with funny one-liners :-)

    --
    karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
  88. Of course, it's obvious now... by mrbuckles · · Score: 1
    I'm really CmdrTaco! Did you think my name was really mrbuckles? Are you stupid?

    I'm so sorry you folks couldn't make the connection.

  89. Re:'Don't Crush That Dwarf, Hand Me The Pliers' by JWhitlock · · Score: 2
    Here's a fun one:

    You know, this is the midst of the disillusionment and heartbreak season and,with the recent outbreak of that suicidal strain of despair up in Boston,well, you'd better keep a close watch on your emotions. So remember the seven danger signals of depression; that's a general and lasting feeling of hope-lessness, inability to concentrate, loss of self-esteem, fear of rejection, feelings of guilt, misdirected anger, and extreme dependency on others. At the first sign of these symptoms, friends, follow these simple rules: keep working, drink as much as possible, and... take your television's advice. And y'know more TV's recommend an amazing new psychic breakthrough than any other, and that's... Confidence in the System. Fast, safe, and guaranteed through constant Federal control, Confidence in the System will keep THEM in power longer, longer, longer, and tend to calm and obscure the miseries of disillusionment and despair. In easy-to-swallow Propaganda form or new fast-acting Thought Control, that's Confidence in the System. So have some... today.
  90. This isn't that bad. by Gannoc · · Score: 1
    I used to do this way back when as a Sysop of a BBS.

    People don't contribute to a board unless there are interesting topics to lend discussion to; which requires people who contribute, etc, etc.

    I'm sure he saw it as a way to seed the discussion boards, and not as a fraudulent act.

  91. Slashdot editors do a good deal of moderation by Trepidity · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's not entirely the case. See my explanation in another thread in this story.

  92. Hey Hemos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Why don't you take that 'e' from argu(e)ment and use it in R(e)ichard. Then take an English course.

  93. Re:Contrivance? Sure. by JWhitlock · · Score: 2
    Yeah, I could see "George Tirebiter" being a contrivance. It's about as blaringly screaming "ignore me, I'm a mo-ron" as "Anonymous Coward". But for someone in charge to be doing it...guh.

    The only place I know the name "George Tirebiter" from is from the Firesign Theater album "Don't Crush That Dwarf, Hand Me The Pliers". Do you know of it being used in some other context? Or were you giving a cold impression of the name? Or, are you being sarcastic, and neglecting to use the &ltSARCASM&gt tags?

    I'm not being facetious - I really want to know.

  94. Apology by quantum+bit · · Score: 1

    I don't think he's really apologizing to the people for astroturfing per se, it's more of an apology to the stockholders that he got caught.

  95. 'Don't Crush That Dwarf, Hand Me The Pliers' by pmorrison · · Score: 1

    ... is the name of the Firesign Theatre album I listened to hundreds of times, featuring Mr. George Tirebiter as a key character. Maybe Mr. Richards listened one too many times, or assumed more people had heard of it than actually did. His practice was foul, but more people should hear the record. Highly recommended.

  96. Re:/. does this too by avdp · · Score: 2

    You missed the point.
    Moderation is users "censoring" (if you want to use that word at all) EACH OTHER. Now, if you're implying that Taco and company downgrade themselves messages that criticizes them, that's another thing entirely. But you'd be have some sort of proof before making that claim (like an insider blowing the whistle or something)

  97. A good start by LordNite · · Score: 1

    I would like to thank Kevin Reichard for finally swallowing his pride and admitting to wrong doing. I agree that his excuses do seem a little weak, but at least he is not acting like the second comming of Richard Nixon ("I am not a crook!").

    However, there are still many concerns which were brought up by Paul Ferris in his Linux Journal article that need to be addressed. The most important of these being LT's stance on linking to external content. Like I have said before, LT is a news portal therefore most of the relevant content that they should be printing is going to be found on external sites. As a journalist and editor Reichard should be more worried about boosting readership through quality of content, rather than keeping people "in the channel" to boost ad dollars.

    It sounds to me like LT and Internet.Com have greater problems than a little bit of astroturfing. At least they still have enough integrity to own-up to the responsibility they have to their readers.

    -LN

    --
    If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it must be a duck.
  98. It has worked before by why-is-it · · Score: 1

    1. He got caught
    2. People get upset
    3. He gave a semi-apology
    4. We all continue on with life as if nothing had happened.


    Well, that is the strategy Bill Clinton used several times, and it worked out pretty good for him.

    --
    *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
  99. Reichard should be fired. by maynard · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Here is the talback I sent to LinuxToday.
    I'm not just offended by your anonymous postings, Mr. Reichard, I'm personally offended by your regular censorship of content in talkback posts which refuted your editorial positions. You personally censored some of my talkbacks on an editorial that you wrote, so I speak from experience. I note that many others have claimed the same, so I am not alone. I've worked as a journalist for a local small time paper and I *never* saw that kind of behavior by our editorial board. Both censorship where you have an obvious conflict of interest and anonymous postings in your own forum show you lack the ethics required for the position of Sr. Editor. Personally, I think you should be fired for breach of trust to the Linux community, and for breach of journalistic ethics overall. Until this happens I will not consider LinuxToday a reputable source for news.

    J. Maynard Gelinas
    This speaks for itself. I have no respect for this man, or how he has behaved on their forums. Internet.com should fire the man posthaste.

    --Maynard
  100. Why not... by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
    Why not hire this guy to do the astroturfing? At least it would appear more authentic than "George Tirebiter".

    Notorious slimey pitchman for Isuzu, in case you didn't know.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  101. Re:astroturf[?]ing ???? by Hammer · · Score: 3, Insightful
    While I agree that /. is not exactly neutral in the way things are presented, at least I know that a lot of things tend to be slanted (not always justly). If something is presented to me on /. I would filter it through an anti-anti-MS filter. So if a link is pro MS it must be true....

    Those who would respond "its their website, they can do with it what they want," should ask themselves if the same applies to MS's smarttags.
    It is their site and therefore it is NOT up to MS (or SmartTags) to modify
  102. And on Slashdot? by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

    OK, how many of the so-called Users on this site are actually pseudonyms for Malda and his cronies? Perhaps I am one myself.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  103. Scandal redux by McSnickered · · Score: 2, Funny

    What a nice blend of moral outrage, incompetence, and vitriole! Let's see ...

    1. He got caught
    2. People get upset
    3. He gave a semi-apology
    4. We all continue on with life as if nothing had happened.

    Will all those who really give a crap please step forward. Not so fast Mr. Tirebiter.

    --
    They call me the working man. I guess that's what I am.
  104. Brainwashed? by etchosts · · Score: 1

    I fail to see why Reichard has to apologize. If people were duped by his sloppy postings, shame on them. We are supposed to be individuals with free thought.

  105. George Tirebiter by ishmalius · · Score: 1
    I don't know all of the people who might be George Tirebiter, but the one I know is the recurring character from Firesign Theatre , whose compatriots include Nick Danger and Rocky Rococo.

    I would never think that a poster who uses this name would be a real person. How naive can some people be? Very much, apparently. ;-)

  106. Liars and trust by mystery_bowler · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Call me a cynic, but I find it hard to believe a liar when they apologize.

    It's a shame that people give any credit at all to people who are caught in a lie. After all, the apology isn't for the lie. The apology is for getting caught. If the apology was for the lie, it would have been issued long before it was common knowledge that a falsehood existed.

    Feh...

    --

    My sigs always suck.
  107. /. does this too by gamorck · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Hmmm... you still post here though right? /. does the same thing. Do you know how they censor posts that are contrary to their beliefs? Thats right - its called the moderation system.

    Just check out the comments on the stories that were posted relating to the OSDN router outage - you'll see what I mean.

    Gam
    "Flame at Will"

    --
    I love idealists not because I am one, but because they make life bearable for pragmatists such as myself.
    1. Re:/. does this too by Trepidity · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Now, if you're implying that Taco and company downgrade themselves messages that criticizes them, that's another thing entirely.

      This does undoubtedly happen. It's referred to as the "bitchslap," and consists of an editor automatically moving a comment to -1, no matter what its previous rating. I remember this happening a long time ago with pb's "Will the Real Bruce Perens Please Stand Up" post - it was rated up to 5, Funny, bitchslapped by an editor down to -1, and then rated back up to 4, Funny, where it was left.

      They also often downrate posts that criticize their editorial practices - for example, the first draft of the Slashdot story on the OSDN router outage contained a comment by CmdrTaco about how they waited for knowledgeable support to show up, and "when she did, she was much less knowledgeable than we had hoped," or something to that effect. This was quickly removed from the story, and when people in the comments reposted the original text of CmdrTaco's story, noting what had been removed, all those comments were immediately rated down to -1; much faster than any users could have done.

      So it's pretty clear that the Slashdot editorship rates down comments themselves, and are not up-front about it.

  108. Not sure what the big deal is by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Okay, Linux Today is primarily a press-release site, right? It doesn't exactly claim to be a real news site, does it? As such, the expectations of partiality and journalistic integrity that you'd normally want of an editor don't really apply here, do they?

    Maybe it sounds like I'm oversimplifying a bit, I don't know. But I've never really gone to Linux Today hoping to find straight news, and it seemed like the editor was less an editor than a page maintainer. I guess what I'm saying is, in theory, I don't think there's anything wrong with the guy faking an alias and posting stuff to get a reaction. It's not like I give a damn who any of the other aliases are because they're all unverifiable anyway (or, I guess, considering this case, mostly unverifiable ;) -- if they post something debate-worthy, I'll fight it or support it on merit.

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

  109. Never mind, I'm starting to get it by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 1

    Didn't know this was going on at the same time as censorship of other posts. I see it now.

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

  110. Reich(ard) Rights by evilMoogle · · Score: 1

    So now it's not okay for editors to post links to goatse.cx? That's unfair! It's a fundamental right of every american to be an asshole. If we restrict this right, where will our freedoms be safe?

    --
    Erik
    "You," Bite me.
    "Each and every one of you." Bite me.
  111. What is the problem here? by Ian@FI · · Score: 1
    Firstly i would like to point out that i don't read LT, i haven't seen any of the postings in question and i haven't read the apology posted on the site.

    However, when was the last time you heard Bill Gates or Steve Balmer apologise for all the letters they pay people to write for the Freedom to Innovate Network?

    Its true that two wrongs don't make a right - but lets get this in perspective - if we were talking about a corporate portal run by a major software vendor instead of an open source website, this issue would not even be discussed.

  112. Absolutely agree about Linux Today censorship. by Magnus+Pym · · Score: 1

    Linux today has censored several of my posts that criticized some of their highlighted articles. In particular, comments on some of Dennis Powell's articles (one of which accused RMS in thinly veiled terms of stealing from the FSF for personal gain) were censored. These comments were in no way obscene. I have seen other people make comments on the same vein.

    Today's development explains a lot. I wonder what this person's motivation is. In any event, Linux Today has lost all of my goodwill and trust.

    Another "prominent" person of the Free Software community that I have reservations about is the aforementioned "journalist" Powell. I would really like to know where their money comes from.

    Magnus.
  113. Moore == Kiersky == ??? by cpeterso · · Score: 1, Informative

    Notice how "Mike Moore" and "Eric Kiersky" both mispell Kevin Richard's name as "Reichard" (as do some other talkback posts). Moore and Kiersky also both omit numerous apostrophes. Moore == Kiersky == ???

    Mike Moore posted this under the subject of "Excellent":
    It takes a lot to admit this. I still dont believe astroturfing is anything to ruffle your feathers about, we all do it dont we? But I salute Kevin Reichard for taking this stance and explaining matters. This shows the maturity of Linux Today and the opensource nature of all their undertakings. Cheers.

    Eric Kiersky writes with subject "Kevin shouldnt apologize":
    I dont believe Kevin should have been preassured into apologizing about this. As I understand this pressure came from an individual who was fired from LinuxToday. I felt that individual's articles were more revenge based than anything to expose ethics on astroturfing. Kevin is an excellent individual and his work on Linux Today is second to non. I hope everyone takes a deep breath and just think before posting anymore slashdot induced flames on Mr. Kevin Reichard.

  114. Well, I would have modded you down by HiThere · · Score: 2

    Making assertions doesn't qualify as evidence in my book. OTOH, I notice that some disagree. Currently your rank is 2, when I would have marked it troll, or possibly flamebait.

    Still, you might recall that for the first years, before the moderator system, the editors had total control. Then the original moderators were a close group of friends. It was only later that this was widened, and then widened again, into the current relatively large group of people.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  115. Re:astroturf[?]ing ???? by Kenyaman · · Score: 1

    Right, but the same people who think that Microsoft invented long file names (seems my Apple //e supported much longer than 8.3 file names) will think that the links are put there by the web site author. So it gets filtered through the "what does this web site think" filter and not the "what does Microsoft think" filter.

  116. No apology from Internet.com by Ghyl · · Score: 1

    We still haven't heard an apology from Internet.com. No admission that what they did was wrong. No assurance that they won't do it again in the future. In fact, their pronouncements have been to the opposite. They say this behaviour is perfectly normal and OK. I'll still be avoiding their sites in future now that I know where their journalistic standards lie.

    1. Re:No apology from Internet.com by Graymalkin · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the heads up on your new position regarding internet.com I know I am relieved to know you won't be reading their crap anymore. I'm sure there's hundred of not thousands more that are just as relieved as me. Phew.
      Why the fuck do people feel the need to tell other of their new and more retarded zealous position regarding this sort of stuff? What ever happened to apathy? So someone pretended in order to build up hype or at least make something appear cool. You can't tell my thousands of slashdot losers havent tried to start a "web design" company or some such using pronouns like "we" and "us" to make it sound like a company when it was really just one guy with warezed copies of Photoshop and Frontpage thinking he was l33t. That's pretty much what the linuxToday dude did. Those damn dropping journalistic standards, it must be due to the decline in the test scores of American high school students. Fuck me!

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.