Slashdot Mirror


Palm 'Molecular' Keyboard

Frank writes: "Here's an interesting new Palm application I found over at PalmGear.com. It's a new technology from IBM research called ATOMIK, it potentially allows typing of faster than 40 words per minute by using a Metropolis optimization algorithm in which the special keyboard is treated as a "molecule" and each key as an "atom"."

164 comments

  1. umm by core10k · · Score: 1

    It's called a fucking chord keyboard.

    1. Re:umm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I stand corrected. Kudos for Slashdot for alluding to chorded keyboards to trap unsuspecting first posters in this article, which is a piece of swill.

  2. Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


    But can it be subject to keystroke logging?

  3. Free Sticker by bitserve · · Score: 2, Funny

    Make sure and order your free sticker for the keypad layout. It'll be a neat car/cubicle decoration anyway.

    -mark

    1. Re:Free Sticker by Kaboom13 · · Score: 1

      I realize this is a joke but please dont request it if you arent gonna use it. This looks like a really neat idea and after /. Im doubt they will have enough to cover just the ppl who will actually use it.

  4. I will buy when they are made of electrons by kiltedtaco · · Score: 2, Funny

    Only with electrons

  5. Good idea... i think by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    "a Metropolis optimization algorithm"?
    sounds like something from superman :)

    can i remap my pc keyboard to do this? (maybe i should get a blank keyboard fisrt). Its about time we started using a keyboard thats designed to _help_ us find the keys instead of slowing us down... (ie QWERTY)

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    1. Re:Good idea... i think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would probably be a good basis for a layout if you were doing the `hunt-and-peck' method for typing. However, since you have ten fingers available when using a keyboard, the layout should be different.

      I've learned Dvorak, which is quite nice, although it could probably be improved.

    2. Re:Good idea... i think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Metropolis algorithm is named after its creator/inventor/whatever. Its used in stochastic machine learning like Simulated Annealing and Boltzman Machines & is particularly good at optimization problems and is probably overkill but a good example of its capabilities on an optimal keyboard layout problem. (Simulated Annealing is pretty good at quickly solving or finding "pretty good" solutions on 300 node TSP problems.)

      Most of the stochastic ML stuff is based off of simulations of (basic) models of cooling atoms from high energy (liquid ~ random state) into a state with low energy that hopefully corresponds to a solution (process is called annealing -> hence Simulated Annealing).

    3. Re:Good idea... i think by snyrt · · Score: 1

      QWERTY's fine. check out this site for the history of qwerty and why it was invented.

      --
      -"Hey, Baby. It's not a rash, it's textured love."
    4. Re:Good idea... i think by mother_superius · · Score: 1

      Actually, the article seems to point out that QWERTY is inefficient in a computer and was only developed so that the most common letter pairs were far apart to not hit each other. It says the "Dvorak" keyboard is much more efficient but QWERTY remains a standard.

    5. Re:Good idea... i think by Wdomburg · · Score: 2

      Which article were you reading? Look at the last two paragraphs:

      "The Dvorak keyboard sounds very good. However, a keyboard need to do more than just "sound" good, and unfortunately, Dvorak has failed to prove itself superior to QWERTY... It's not surprising, then, that Dvorak has failed to take hold. No one wants to take the time and trouble to learn a new keyboard, especially if it isn't convincingly superior to the old."

  6. What about Fitaly? by Radnor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Back when I had my Palm PDA I used FitalyStamp as my input method (a version is also available for the PocketPC). It's significantly faster than graffiti, and according to a contest held last year the fastest "tapist" could tap out words at 81.74 wpm! Sound crazy? You can see for yourself how fast they tap.

    1. Re:What about Fitaly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in additon to being an ad the software cost $25-$35. that is outragous

    2. Re:What about Fitaly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if you read the pdf studies on the ibm site (yes, the ones that tell the history behind the layout, the ones with the messed up links, dont be lazy, make a search on the site) you will understand why this is a better layout, the comparison they made with existing layout (yes, fitaly was there, this layout is about 10% more efficient) and the error of certifying a contest as a proof of quality... especially when a prize is involved...

    3. Re:What about Fitaly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Checkout about this nifty fitaly mod to a m505...

      http://org.qixo.com/tychay/public/m505dis/

  7. fitaly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same idea as the Fitaly keyboard. But I think the Fitaly would be easier to navigate with a stylus.

  8. sounds like Fitaly-like technology by pecka · · Score: 1

    this technology has been aroud for quite some time. Fitaly uses it and some others
    ok, maybe the algorithm is new but it's almost the same. In any case I'm from .cz so this sh*t won't save me anyway.

  9. New layout not so good by Simm0 · · Score: 1

    "Alphabetically-tuned layout: Generally, letters from A to Z run from the upper left corner to the lower right corner of the keyboard. This layout helps novice users find letters that are not yet memorized."
    Although it may allow for new users this would basically land me back at sqare one with wpm. I would probably average only a few wpm plus a bucketful of typos switching from standard qwerty layout.

    1. Re:New layout not so good by kilgore_47 · · Score: 1

      considering that you'd be typing with a stylus instead of 10 fingers, you're at square one regardless of layout. I bet its worth learning though, for people who have to put a lot of data into their palm devices by hand.

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
    2. Re:New layout not so good by SEGV · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As Donald A. Norman states in his classic book "The Psychology/Design of Everyday Things":

      ...every year some company foists another stupid alphabetical keyboard upon us...

      (paraphrased)

      --

      --
      Marc A. Lepage
      Software Developer
  10. Too bad you can't program C on it by MagicM · · Score: 2, Informative

    No curly braces / squiggly brackets / accolades

    1. Re:Too bad you can't program C on it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      accolades

      I think you are pretty presumptious about YOUR coding skills if you think you deserve accolades.

      Sorry couldn't resist. :-)

    2. Re:Too bad you can't program C on it by hackerhue · · Score: 1

      Send them a bug report. That's why they put it up on AlphaWorks.

      --

      To get something done, a committee should consist of no more than three persons, two of them absent.

    3. Re:Too bad you can't program C on it by AnarchoFreak_00 · · Score: 1
      Question is. How many people would really code C on a Palm anyway? Not that many. Especialy if you include people outside of the /. community.

      Palm garffiti areas are small. No point in wasting space on characters that arn't used that much.

    4. Re:Too bad you can't program C on it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Press the area marked "IBM" to get curly *braces* and square *brackets* -- can't find an accolade, though...

    5. Re:Too bad you can't program C on it by mgarraha · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's what the trigraphs are for. Just double-tap the question mark, consult a cheat sheet for the third character, and hope your compiler knows what to do with it.

  11. Quikwriting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm using quikwriting right now and its pretty good. I especially like the way the overlay works, you just print it out on a transparency and slide it in, which is much better than a sticker imo.

    Its probably slower than Fitaly and this keyboard but it does a pretty good job.

    http://mrl.nyu.edu/projects/quikwriting/

  12. Not good enough.. by PopeAlien · · Score: 2

    Until I can plug my PDA into my brainpan, I'll stick with transcriber on the ipaq and the targus stowaway keyboard for heavy text entry..

  13. Yet another attempt to break away from QWERTY by ErikTheRed · · Score: 2

    It will be interesting to see how this plays out. QWERTY keyboards have dominated for over a century, despite the proven inefficiencies of the layout, and despite the introduction of several allegedly superior products (I've never tried a Dvorak keyboard or anything else non-QWERTY, so I can't say).

    In any case, I think that as people who tend to investigate things on the forefront of technology, Slashdot readers with Palms/Visors should consider checking this out...

    --

    Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    1. Re:Yet another attempt to break away from QWERTY by jerrytcow · · Score: 2, Informative

      despite the proven inefficiencies of the layout

      Those inefficiencies are intentional. Early typewriters would jam if you typed too quickly, so an inefficient layout was designed that spread out the most common letters.

    2. Re:Yet another attempt to break away from QWERTY by quintessent · · Score: 2

      I looked at the site, and it's pretty interesting. I would have a very hard time switching from QWERTY for keyboard typing. This is because muscle memory tells me how to type letters and even entire words very quickly. With a pda, it's different. There is one stylus you hold in one hand and you have to visually find each key to press it. Even when you know QWERTY very well, this is a time-consuming process. The nice thing about this new layout is: 1) letters used together most often tend to be next to each other. 2) Letters near A in the alphabet tend to be at the upper-left, and letters near Z tend to be at the lower-right. This actually seems quite nice.

    3. Re:Yet another attempt to break away from QWERTY by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      I've seen this debunked as an "urban myth," and seen it reaffirmed as truth, so it's hard to say whether this is actually what the design was based on, but the other side of the story is that QWERTY keyboards were not designed to slow down the typist to avoid jams, but were designed with the most common letters furthers apart because if letters very close to each other were pressed in quick succession it would cause jams. With the common letters further apart, the typist could actually type very fast without jamming the typewriter.

    4. Re:Yet another attempt to break away from QWERTY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed -- the use of Querty on a pen-oriented device seems pretty brain-dead. The IBM design here has the 26 letters grouped in an approximate square, as opposed to the long and narrow rectangle of Querty. This not only means that your pen doesn't have to travel as far, but your eyes don't have to scan as far when searching for the next character. (From my experience, it seems that while my fingers know exactly how to find the Querty keys, my eyes don't have the pattern memorized quite as well.) In addition, the most common characters are grouped near the centre, further reducing the amount of looking around you need to do.

      I just don't know why everyone seems to want to licence their pen keyboard designs. Does anybody owns a patent on the Querty keyboard?

    5. Re:Yet another attempt to break away from QWERTY by StenD · · Score: 2

      The best article I've seen attempting to debunk this is The Fable of the Keys. I haven't seen a rebuttal of this from the Dvorak camp, but I'm sure that it exists. In short, the article claims that the Sholes (QWERTY) keyboard, far from being an arbitrary selection, actually was the survivor from a number of conteporaneous keyboard designs. On the other hand, most of the "studies" cited to support the Dvorak arrangement by those advocating the arrangement before hand, or even by LtC Dvorak himself.

    6. Re:Yet another attempt to break away from QWERTY by x1048576 · · Score: 1

      The authors of The Fable of the Keys are economists and are not experts in user interface design.

      The design of everyday things by Don Norman contains more accurate information. In brief, Dvorak is better than QWERTY, but only by about 10%, so it's not worthwhile to switch.

    7. Re:Yet another attempt to break away from QWERTY by hankwang · · Score: 1
      Dvorak is actually not much faster than QWERTY (neither slower), but as an experienced Dvorak typist, I can assure that it puts LOTS less strain on your fingers.

      However, LaTeX with all the backslashes and C/C++/Perl all remain cumbersome, because Dvorak was optimized for English language and not for computer programming languages that use almost every printable character in the ASCII set. I'm just in doubt whether dollar ($) and backquote (`) have any obscure meaning in C++

  14. So what about other languages? by Lars+T. · · Score: 1
    First, ATOMIK has higher movement efficiency for stylus typing than any other existing touch keyboards. This was achieved by a Metropolis optimization algorithm in which the keyboard was treated as a "molecule" and each key as an "atom". The "atomic" interactions among all of the keys drove the movement efficiency - defined by the summation of all Fitts's law movement times between every pair of keys, weighted by the statistical frequency of the corresponding pair of letters in English - towards the minimum.
    So what about other languages?
    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    1. Re:So what about other languages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So what about other languages?

      Sie mussen eine anderes technologie benutzen.

    2. Re:So what about other languages? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Ummm...use the same algorithm to generate yourself a new layout? Just a thought.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  15. All we need now by Modus+Nonsens · · Score: 1

    is a robotic hand that can write that fast

  16. DVORAK by mjoconnor81 · · Score: 1

    I wonder how similar this would be to the one handed DVORAK keyboard layout.

    --
    Pseudocode is code to demonstrate a concept, not designed to be run. Like certain M$ software.
    1. Re:DVORAK by hackerhue · · Score: 1

      Quite different.

      One-handed Dvorak takes advantage of the fact that you have four fingers to type with, and is meant for touch-typing. (Hence all the vowels are clumped together.) Dvorak is limited by the physical hardware (i.e. they can't create a new physical key).

      ATOMIK is designed for typing with one appendage, and is designed for hunt-and-peck. It is not limited by the physical location of keys. (Hence it has five rows of letters.)

      --

      To get something done, a committee should consist of no more than three persons, two of them absent.

    2. Re:DVORAK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      jesus dude thats funny, i've heard it called "spanking the monkey", "choking the chicken", etc. But I never heard it called "Doing the One Handed Dvorak"

  17. No chording/Fitaly by agdv · · Score: 1

    Some posters are saying it's just the same concept used in other schemes. From what I gather reading the article, it's not. It's a standard 'press one key at a time' keyboard, which everyone knows how to use, but they have optimized the layout so going from one key to the next is as fast as possible on average (in English writing, that is). Then they made up the required buzzwords for the PHBs of the world, the whole 'molecular synergy paradigm' crap.

    1. Re:No chording/Fitaly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. Just like Fitaly.

      (I wonder how they compare, speed-wise.)

    2. Re:No chording/Fitaly by agdv · · Score: 1
      Right. Just like Fitaly.

      Nope. No sliding either. Just a regular keyboard. That's just my point: all it is, is a new layout. The fact that they optimized it for speed using a certain type of input (one stylus instead of whatever number of fingers you use -since you made me go there, do anonymous cowards have opposable thumbs?) doesn't make it a revolutionary method.

  18. Suffers from the same problem as dvorak.. by qwaszx · · Score: 1, Insightful

    and every other alternative, which is the fact that it isn't qwerty. I know on the face of it is sounds like a stupid reason but there is logic in the stupidity...

    As much as I would want to learn a faster method of typing. unless I can use the same keyboard everywhere I am (at home - easy, at college - hard, at work - you try asking your boss to switch), then I will never be able to learn the new keyboard layout because I'm frever switching back and to from a qwerty keyboard layout. As is mentioned in nearly every dvorak tutorial I have seen, you need to use the same layout all the time until you are proficient with the new layout. Switching back and to between layouts only lowers your typing speed in both layouts.

    Now, if somebody could come up with a keyboard (cheaply, I dont want to sell my firstborn to type faster), that physically remaps the keys (so I can select US/UK keyboard layout in windows, but get a different layout on the actual keyboard), this would mean I could take this keyboard with me wherever I went (although on a palm it might be difficult), and use it in work, college, as well as at home, simpy unplugging the old keyboard and inserting the new without messing up the software settings that managers/admins won't hate you for 'hacking/cracking the network'.

    1. Re:Suffers from the same problem as dvorak.. by muck1969 · · Score: 1
      The problem with this argument is that it assumes that a human can only learn one method of input. In the same way that video game players can switch between two (or more) similar video games with different methods of control using the same input device, it is also possible for one to learn different keyboard layouts for different systems. It's the same difference between using a rotary telephone and a pushbutton telephone. It's the same difference between an automatic or manual transmission. It's the same difference between doing shots or pounding beers ... ok ... mebbe not :-)

      Humans are adaptable ... and it's been proven through Aging Studies that continuous learning of new concepts delays the onset of aging related afflictions such as Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, etc.

      --
      m.mmm..myyy ... sssissxxxtthh bbboottle offf mmmmmoouunnnttain ddeeewww.. in thhe pppassst ffffif
    2. Re:Suffers from the same problem as dvorak.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit.

      There is no logic here, just stupidity.

      It took me a month to learn Dvorak... and I didn't even use a typing tutor. I don't need to review the many advantages but switching back to qwerty as-needed has never been a problem -- why? just look at the keys. After a few minutes of confusion it all comes back... and if I need to use someone elses computer for more than just a couple of minutes, then I switch the layout... its not hard at all.

      I don't see why everyone wants a physical remapping keyboard... it just doesn't make sense. That function is already accomplished in software. Besides, not every dvorak layout is the same. Depending on the type of keyboard you may have to put symbols in different spots... or if you are left-handed or whatever.. there are just too many options.

    3. Re:Suffers from the same problem as dvorak.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, a company used to make these specialty dvorak keyboards that remapped the keys to a qwerty input. However, they haven't been available for several years due to lack of interest.

      Changing between keysettings is easy. MacOS and and Windows will switch between dvorak and qwerty by simply hitting shift-control or something similar. On *NIX systems, you can use xmodmap to easily change your keysettings. Using these methods will keep your boss / sysadmin happy.

      The best way to learn dvorak is on a qwerty keyboard. That way you can't look at the keyboard, and you learn to properly touch-type. Another advantage of dvorak. :)

    4. Re:Suffers from the same problem as dvorak.. by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      The problem with this argument is that it assumes that a human can only learn one method of input.
      It's not impossible, but it is very difficult when the two means are similar enough to interfere with one another. Prior knowledge can interfere with developing new skills; there's a term from psychology to describe the phenomenon but damned if I can remember what it is.
      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    5. Re:Suffers from the same problem as dvorak.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On windows, just go to the keyboard options and add another keyboard/language combination (the language doesn't matter, I have no clue why it asks for it) and use the options below to set a key to toggle it. I usually use Alt + Shift. On Linux, just add fiddle around and you'll find the options to do it (KDE keyboard tool?). I use Ctrl + Alt + Menu to toggle it, but there are a million possible combinations you can use.

      Also, this article is for a palm, not a PC.

    6. Re:Suffers from the same problem as dvorak.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the problem is that people don't *want* to learn 2 keyboards. It's way more complicated than a controller.

    7. Re:Suffers from the same problem as dvorak.. by theancient1 · · Score: 1

      (Ignoring the fact that the author doesn't seem to realize we're talking about on-screen keyboards...)

      I have a theory that our brains memorize the querty keyboard layout only in connection with our fingers. Even though I can type pretty fast on a regular keyboard, when faced with an on-screen keyboard, I'm back to hunt-and-peck (at least to some extent.) My ingrained knowledge of querty isn't a very big help.

      On top of that, a physical keyboard is used with ten styluses scattered across the length of the device (ie. your fingers), whereas a Palm keyboard uses only one. It is therefore a great advantage to have all of the buttons in a small square instead of a long thin rectangle. Imagine you wanted to enter lots of numeric data using one finger. Would you use the number keys at the top of your keyboard, or would you use the numeric keypad? The situation is the same when inputting characters with a stylus -- it's much better to have the keys arranged in a square (especially when you know the most common ones can be found near the centre of that square.)

    8. Re:Suffers from the same problem as dvorak.. by dawgmykatz · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It's not impossible, but it is very difficult when the two means are similar enough to interfere with one another

      Indeed. I used to a be a 70+ wpm qwerty typist, until I decided to switch to Dvorak this past January. After eight months, I mostly have my speed back, but now whenever I'm forced to use qwerty, I have to resort to hunt-and-peck. At any rate, Dvorak is much more comfortable, and I'm happy I made the switch -- I just don't see how anyone could ever manage to keep track of both keyboard layouts in their head.

    9. Re:Suffers from the same problem as dvorak.. by suffering.bot · · Score: 1

      DMB Ergonomics carries Kinesis, Fox Bay and Contour ergonomics keyboards, keyboard arms, trays, supports and contour mise.

      They carry QWERTY/DVORAK QD® SWITCHABLE , which allows to switch from DVORAK to QWERTY on the same keyboard and the best thing is it not something that the OS needs to support it's all done on the keyboard.

      There is also programmable keyboards -- Like the Proffessional which has "Programmable Key Layout - anyone can easily set keys to suit individual needs" and has on-board memmory for 24 macros holding up to 142 Characters each.

      The Professional QD for PC (Qwerty/Dvorak convertible) costs $355.50, which the simplier Professional for PC costs $319.50.

      It's not a matter of if you can switch to a different layout. It's a matter of (1) do you want to spend so much on a keyboard? and (2) do you really want to have to take your keyboard with you(to work, ...)?

      There is more information at the kinesis website on there keyboards.

      Chad

      --

      chad

      ERROR 404: sig not found
    10. Re:Suffers from the same problem as dvorak.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Dude. Changing between a Playstation controller and a Dreamcast controller or a stick and an automatic is not AT ALL similar to this discussion.

      You're right, humans are adaptable, but keyboards a much more complex method of input than half a dozen buttons or sliding a lever back and forth. I spent two or three months trying to switch to dvorak and was unable to come even near the speed at which I can type with Qwerty.

  19. Missing characters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Where are percent (%), dollar-sign ($), carat (^) and ampersan (&)?
    Are they just not part of regular palm use?

    1. Re:Missing characters? by larrypl · · Score: 1

      Yep, press the IBM -- they're all hidden there. Along with the square *brackets* and curly *braces* I mentioned before as an anonymous coward.

    2. Re:Missing characters? by larrypl · · Score: 1

      Plaintively I cried out, "can't someone PULEEZE give me my first karma point for pointing this out?!?", and no one did.

    3. Re:Missing characters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yep, press the IBM -- they're all hidden there. Along with the square *brackets* and curly *braces* I mentioned before as an anonymous coward.

      No. You are incorrect.

    4. Re:Missing characters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No. You are incorrect.

      I believe it is you who are mistaken... about a great many things.

    5. Re:Missing characters? by larrypl · · Score: 1

      Yeah; thanks, AC -- I feel vindicated.

  20. Good picture by Simm0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here's a better image of what the keyboard actally looks like.

  21. It's about time... by gazbo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...That we move away from using a qwerty keyboard just because it's what the computer professionals are used to. Admittedly the immediate effect would be for me (and every other /.er) to drop to a sluggish hunt-and-peck typing style, but in the future it should be easier to learn for novices, and boost everybody's wpm.

    Also, I think the idea of designing the keyboard according to Fitts' law applied to a certain language is a cunning idea - seems the obvious choice to boost wpm and reduce typing strain. Of course it'd have to be changed for other languages, but that is a fairly simple task, and it's not like it doesn't happen already (the French azerty, anyone?)

    Of course, we'll have to wait for a hardware version with all keys implemented before it's worth learning.

    1. Re:It's about time... by DrHoneydew · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ATOMIK won't be a replacement for conventional touch type keyboards. The ATOMIK interface is optimised for entering characters using a single stylus. When touch typing, more than one finger is used to press the keys on the keyboard, making ATOMIK unsuitable.

      It's not optimised for touch typing.

    2. Re:It's about time... by gazbo · · Score: 1

      Actually this is an interesting point, and I stand corrected. A keyboard optimised for a single stylus that works by keeping commonly grouped characters located close to each other may turn out to be a hinderance for a touch typist, as it would tend to force a couple of fingers on one hand at a time to do most of the typing.

      Perhaps for a hardware keyboard a more sensible option would be to keep commonly grouped characters on opposite sides of the keyboards, to distribute the typing between both hands. However, it may make sense to keep common groups of characters that happen to fall on the same side of the keyboard to all fall on the same row, to reduce the strain in each hand - useful in this age of RSI.

      Obviously this is just guesswork on my part, and really needs the same sort of research as with ATOMIK, but it is an idea.

  22. Gestural interface by magic · · Score: 1
    What's really cool about this keyboard is it turns common words (like "the") into gestures.


    -m

  23. I can now read /. 80% faster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow, after reading the article I found that by creating analogies I can accelerate anything I try.

    To prove the point, I treat /. as bread. Each article is a loaf, each post is a slice. Not only has this accelerated my reading. I don't feel as hungry.

    If I read a few slices in the morning, I don't need to visit /. until lunch.

    Thanks IBM! Thanks /.!

  24. Metropolis Algo is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since the Metropolis algorithm is based on the decay of an isotope from a dead world, eventually it will no longer be implementable.

    I argued that we instead use the Gotham algorithm which can be regenerated by a random bat attack.

  25. Stephen King, author, dead at 54 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I just heard some sad news on talk radio - Horror/fiction writer Stephen King was found dead in his Maine homee this morning. I'm sure we'll all miss him - even if you didn't read his books you've probably enjoyed one of his movies. Truly an American icon.

    1. Re:Stephen King, author, dead at 54 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Stephen King was found dead in his Maine homee

      There's a few typos there, big guy. It should read:

      Stephen King was found dead in his main homie

      You're welcome.

  26. Visionary Timothy McVeigh, dead at 33 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As heard on NPR a few minutes ago - Anti-Government Visionary Timothy McVeigh was found dead in his Terre Haute prison this morning. I'm sure we'll all miss him - even if you didn't follow his work you've probably enjoyed some of his writings. Truly an American icon.

  27. Re: Metropolis by SEGV · · Score: 1

    Similar to simulated annealing if I recall correctly.

    --

    --
    Marc A. Lepage
    Software Developer
  28. Metropolis Algo is Simulated Annealing by SEGV · · Score: 1

    It's a Monte Carlo method related to simulated annealing.

    --

    --
    Marc A. Lepage
    Software Developer
    1. Re:Metropolis Algo is Simulated Annealing by (void*) · · Score: 2

      Metropolis is the update procedure, and simulated annealing refers not just to one algorithm, but a whole class of algorithms which attempt to perform optimization by simulating how spin glass cools.

    2. Re:Metropolis Algo is Simulated Annealing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Metropolis is the update procedure, and simulated annealing refers not just to one algorithm, but a whole class of algorithms which attempt to perform optimization by simulating how spin glass cools.

      almost. should be just "simulating how glass (or metal) cools"

      a "spin glass" state is a spurious local minimum that doesn't correspond to a valid solution.

  29. Re:Suffers from the same problem as dvorak.. NO by A+Commentor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Did you or the person MODing you up actually read the article??? This is not an physical keyboard, it's for the touchpad of your palm type device. Not many people have used a QWERTY keyboard with the palm Stylus...

    --

    Looking for any old 8-bit Heathkit/Zenith software/hardware - http://heathkit.garlanger.com

  30. *thud* by aallan · · Score: 1

    Crashes with MemoryMgr.c, Line: 4340, NULL handle. Perhaps its interfering with some of my other extensions. Or the half dozen other things I've got installed with patch system traps on the Palm. None the less, sloppy coding by Big Blue...

    Al.
    --
    The Daily ACK - Eclectic posts by yet another hacker
    1. Re:*thud* by voidref · · Score: 1

      You need to use the X-Master hack software.

      There is a link to it in the 'Requirements' section of the site.

  31. WTF are you talking about? by hackerhue · · Score: 1

    This is a keyboard for YOUR Palm/Visor/Workpad. You know, that little device that you take wherever you go?

    So will you be able to use the same keyboard at home as you do at work and at school? Yes! Because you're typing into the same device!

    This is only a problem if you have fifty different PDA's that you actively use. (And if that's a problem for you, I can help: give me some of them.)

    --

    To get something done, a committee should consist of no more than three persons, two of them absent.

  32. Thumbscript by Bomb+Regardless · · Score: 1

    My favourite alt keyboard-like input has to be Thumbscript. It uses the 9 keys of a number-pad (like on a phone) to input characters. There's a free PalmOS hack, but I would really like to use it with real (physical) buttons, like the prototype pager on the home page./p

    --
    I'm a bomb regardless
    1. Re:Thumbscript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not such a good name. Sounds a lot like Thumbscrew.

    2. Re:Thumbscript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thumbscrew? Isn't that when you screw someone by shoving your thumb up their ass?

  33. Still one hand at a time by digitect · · Score: 1

    The problem with tap typing is that you don't get any benefit from 10 fingers. So they're all basically the same. And I still prefer graffiti because I can use it without even looking down at my PDA.

    Also, the Palm Keyboard is only $100US, and is really terrific if you are just looking for portability and super-fast input without having to re-learn a keyboard.

    --
    There is no need to use a SlashDot sig for SEO...
  34. Prior Art! by small_dick · · Score: 2

    My keyboard is made of atoms and molecules, and I bought it two years ago.

    --


    Treatment, not tyranny. End the drug war and free our American POWs.
    See my user info for links.
  35. Keyboard Layout by ArtWDrahn · · Score: 1

    I was thinking, wouldn't it make more since to make it similar to a keyboard layout? For those of us who actually have that type of keyboard layout memorized? It pretty much means any computer user will need to move back and forth between the two layouts. It would decrease my typing time tremendiously.

    Just some random thoughts.

    --
    The Tweak Files: Sanity is for t
  36. disclaimer! by Miriku+chan · · Score: 1

    the previous poster works for fitaly.com [fitaly.com] and is spamming an advertisment for fitaly.com [fitaly.com]

    --
    shaolin punk, activist post-industrial
    1. Re:disclaimer! by Radnor · · Score: 1

      What [fitaly.com] are [fitaly.com] you [fitaly.com] talking [fitaly.com] about? [fitaly.com]

  37. I've had it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I've had it with Slashdot. This site has been up and down in the past week more times than the elevator in the Empire state building.

    Maybe you guys should look into PHP Nuke or something. At least something that works.

    Up your's, AC has no karma

  38. 1337 h4x0r by agdv · · Score: 1

    1f 3v3ryb0dy 7yp35 1ik3 7hi5, w3 w0n'7 n33d 5700p1d n3w l4y0u75. J0057 4dd 4 f3w k3y5 70 7h3 n00m3ric 0n3.

    (and you thought script kiddies' typing was useless... sheesh).

  39. Re: Metropolis by jwakko · · Score: 1

    Metropolis and simulated annealing are mostly the same, I think. It basically works like this:

    1) Start off with a proposed solution (I suppose the "molecule").

    2) Evaluate its fitness, let's call that F. The fitness of the keypad was probably the weighted sum of stylus transition times from letter to letter. Lower fitness would be better (I know it doesn't sound right, but it's used by a lot of Evo-algorithm researchers).

    3) Randomly mutate the "molecule" to something similar to the original. Here, the researchers probably randomly swapped key positions, or "atoms".

    4) Evaluate the fitness of the new "molecule".

    5) Calculate the change in fitness, let's call that dF.

    6) If dF < 0, then use the new "molecule", and go back to step 2.

    7) Calculate the value of p=e^(-dF/T), where T is a constant. This value p is the probability you will switch to the new "molecule".

    8) Go back to step 2.

    I think the difference between Metropolis and simulated annealing is that T, the temperature of the system, goes down with time in simulated annealing.

    Anyhow, the reason I quoted the words "molecule" and "atom" is because they are only loosely related to the algorithm. And to call this thing a "molecular" keyboard is misleading (well, except for the fact that most matter here on earth is molecular). I could go ahead and replace the words "molecule" with "tinkertoy" and "atom" with "rods and wheels" and I'll sell you a tinkertoy keyboard. It could go well with that tinkertoy computer they built at MIT...

  40. ATOMIK vs Fitaly by FATRanger · · Score: 1

    Being a Fitaly user for about six months, I can now tap more than 50 wpm. However that wpm rate only applies when I am typing a lot of text and do not have my Stowaway with me.

    From looking at the pictures provided, there are a few reasons temping me to learn a new key layout and switch to ATOMIK. First of all, IBM has managed to fit the number pad into their basic keypad. Whereas on Fitaly you would need to press the little '123' button to get a number pad. This may not seem like a big deal, however I do find a lot of the time I dont even use the '123' button, but just write the numbers in Graffiti (I use Fitaly virtual keyboard so the Graffiti area is still available).

    Secondly, rarely used keys such as 'w, x, y, z' are placed together on the bottom right of the keypad, which is easy to remember and find. Fitaly on the other hand, because they map their keys based on frequency of individual keys (rather than pair of keys) used, the letters 'w, x, y, z' are found scattered around the outer border of the keypad. The placement of these keys on Fitaly slow me down greatly, and it seems ATOMIK may have found a better solution.

    Now I know I may sound like I am strongly in favor of IBMs ATOMIK, but its only because I have used Fitaly for so long and know all the advantages/disadvanges of it. I do believe it is possible for ATOMIK to take over Fitaly as the replacement keypad of choice on handheld devices, but I wront really know until I give it a try. Nonetheless, the design looks very promising.

    [FAT]Ranger
    1. Re:ATOMIK vs Fitaly by ksheff · · Score: 2

      How long did it take you to get up to 50wpm with the Fitaly stamp? I tried it a while back and with it, I wasn't much faster than what I could do with grafiti. Quikwriting looks promising too. I would prefer a stylus input method where the movement is more fluid and continuous and not a lot of tapping. Fitaly and this method are still prone to bad spots on the digitizer, so don't tap too hard.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  41. Slashdot still broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://slashdot.org/articles/01/08/25/2223238.shtm l is the link for the "Pirates!" story above this one, and when I go to it, it says "Nothing to see here, move along." Wonderful! Also, my cookie is not being read, and I cannot log in. Can you guys revert to slash 1.8 or whatever you were using a couple of weeks ago?

    1. Re:Slashdot still broken by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      hey! i second that emotion! I am being forced to use shitty MS Intenet Exploiter coz your crappy new code is pissing off my beautiful Omniweb. Are you guys being paid by BillG or what?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  42. *OVER* 40 WORDS minute?! by tcc · · Score: 2

    Man, I want to see someone writing 40 words minutes on that thing, Oh, and writting something intelligible, not sakhkdsfhdkhnssakohdwkldhas's :)

    Imagine that little plastic pen, imagine the guy's face while hitting that thing like crazy and sticking his tongue out in the middle of a meeting.

    "hey Joe, what are you doing? playing tag against a pixel?"

    :)

    --
    --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
    1. Re:*OVER* 40 WORDS minute?! by sphinxzhu · · Score: 1

      hi,
      of course you can. I use Fitalystamp, just like this one. I can write normal notes above 40wpm easily. And it saves a lot of enery in tapping than sliding.
      Try it. You won't stick out your tongue.

    2. Re:*OVER* 40 WORDS minute?! by Void · · Score: 1

      Click to see the video's of the winners of Fitaly's last fast-typing competition ...

  43. who gives a crap? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

    the ANN in my Newton understands me so well, sometimes I think she - sorry it - loves me. At night she sleeps under my pillow too. Keyboards? who needs them when you can have a mchine that LOVES you?

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  44. No, it's designed for a different purpose by Prof.+Pi · · Score: 1
    can i remap my pc keyboard to do this?


    There wouldn't be any benefit. This keyboard is designed for use of a single stylus. The goal is to minimize average distance between successive keystrokes. There are no "home keys" (where your fingers rest on a regular keyboard). On a regular keyboard, you have many fingers (if you know how to type :-). The goal is to minimize average distance to the home keys, and to try to put successive keystrokes on opposite hands for faster typing.


    I tried this new system and it seems to work. Not having the patience to wait for the sticker, I downloaded the , used xv to crop it and print it out in Postscript with the main area at 164pt by 60pt. That seems to work OK.

  45. Ooops -- DAMN! by Prof.+Pi · · Score: 1
    OK, go HERE and look for the icon that says "pathsticker.jpg" (third from the left).


    This new /. just sucks. I don't dare preview stuff because it just loses it before I can submit.

  46. Mmmm, free sticker by mdubinko · · Score: 1

    1. Go to the main page
    2. At the bottom, click (request one here):
    3. Fill out form

    --
    --- Learn XForms today: http://xformsinstitute.com
  47. Sounds like CJK input method transplanted by LittleStone · · Score: 1

    I don't know Korean, but for Chinese and Japanese input methods, it's very common to let phrase appear for choice after one word is input. It isn't useful for English using keyboard, coz' reading the screen to find the correct word after inputing a few characters just slowing thing down. However, that's a good idea on Palm, where there's no keyboard and you need to search for that character key to touch anyway.

    Now I can tell my friends who told me that CJK input methods were not interesting to English speaking world were wrong.

    --
    A sig is redundant.
  48. 2 relevant links for interest in Palm keyboards by afflatus_com · · Score: 1
    The first is a french company that not many in the world have heard about:
    e-acute [e-acute.fr], which uses one of the more unusual keyboards I have ever seen, which is a spoked wheel of penstrokes. I gave this a quick run through and it certainly is interesting, more so for very-small PDAs.

    The second is the Palm keyboard replacement that I think is the best and a work of virtuosity, and certainly doesn't get the coverage it deserves. It is a free piece of software called VirtualKB [freewarepalm.net).
    A guy named Gustavo Broos (I looked up his name on the 'About' screen so he gets some credit for this fine work) made a free Hack that lets a keyboard layout template be configured by the enduser instead of the Palm keyboard's default layout. Brilliantly thought out, with an improved cut/copy/paste/undo/redo/find micro-toolbar also across the top of the window. Works nice for international character sets too, so don't have to endlesslessly switch between the two keyboards. Also good for pre-OS 3.5 users (like myself) who want to use graffiti strokes while the keyboard is displayed.

    I suppose one could map this IBM keyboard layout to a VirtualKB if they run out of stickers after being slashdotted :)

    --

    -----
    Cast a Cold Eye
    On Life, on Death
    Horseman, pass by
    --W.B. Yeats' gravestone
  49. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your post should be modded up to +10.

    I agree completely. Let those whiny nancy-boys go somewhere else.

  50. drawback by bigbadbuccidaddy · · Score: 1

    With talking, typing, handwriting, and even graffiti, you don't have to pay too much attention to the data entry method itself while you're entering the data. Thus your senses are free for other tasks. This input method seems like it would require you to have your eyes glued to that little keyboard all the time. I wonder if anyone has done studies comparing input methods like this against the old standbys, but comparing not only input speed and accuracy, but other factors like comprehension. E.G. compare this against note-taking with pen and paper, but then ask questions about the subject matter.

  51. Another alternative Palm keyboard by stevenbee · · Score: 1

    Can be found here:

    http://mrl.nyu.edu/~perlin/demos/quikwriting.htm l

    .
    .

    --
    Don't read this!
  52. how this works, why it doesn't compete w/ qwerty by phil_light · · Score: 1
    Fitt's law, the law this keyboard layout is based on, is from human factors. Like most of the stuff in human factors, it's common sense made difficult. Basically what it says is that the speed and accuracy of hitting a "target" (key) are related to how big and how close the target is. Shocking, huh?

    They naturally presumed that you'd hit the spacebar more often than any other key, so that became the center. Frequently pressed keys are arranged close to the center to minimize the distance your stylus travels to hit them. What they're talking about when they call it "molecular" is that letters which are hit frequently one after another are placed closer together, and that they considered all the two-letter combinations in english to see which were the most important groupings.

    You guys are getting the wrong idea when you talk about replacing qwerty with this. The major difference, obviously, is that we have many fingers but only one stylus. This is also why a chord system doesn't enter the picture here. The developers are trying to increase the speed of entry with just a stylus. (Fitt's law still applies to fingered systems, but it's greatly complicated.)

    Personally, I'd like to see a PDA which is intended for two-handed use, something shaped more or less like an N64 controller, but with the buttons on the underside, and for fingers not thumbs. It'd be bigger, but more useful.

    For data entry, voice is another option, but I'd actually rather type than speak. Besides all the technical difficulties in voice recognition, I think I'd prefer the privacy of typing in the many situations where I don't want my stored information to be public. (plus, I'd feel pretty stupid dictating to a PDA in an office cube.)

    I hope I'm not just stating the blatantly obvious.

  53. There's a little problem: by sombragris · · Score: 1

    The optimization disappears when you write another language. English is common, but it is not the only one. Worse yet, there are accents and tildes that further complicates this picture.

    --
    -- Look to the Rose that blows about us--"Lo, Laughing," she says, "into the World I blow..."
  54. Proposal for a new acronym... by indole · · Score: 1

    DoSbSASE:
    Denial of Service by Self-Addressed Stamped Envelopes.

    For god sakes think of the mailman.

    --
    (2,3-Benzopyrrole)
  55. speed by doubtless · · Score: 1

    i was wondering why we are still using qwerty at work until i realized that i usually don't code more than a few lines in an hour. having a faster keyboard layout would make my productivity artificially lower, scary thought. eh

    :/

    --
    geek page at KY speaks
  56. Useless after 90 days. by Ranx · · Score: 1
    The license for the software expires after 90 days. How easy is it to peel off the sticker?

    2. Term and Termination

    This Agreement will terminate ninety (90) days after the date on which you receive the Software. Upon such termination you will delete or destroy all copies of the Software.

    --

    Me
  57. 5 button keyboard by jeti · · Score: 1

    In 1968 Douglas C. Engelbart presented not only hypertext and the mouse. He also used a keyboard consisting of 5 keys only. It looked like a very short piano keyboard. By pressing the keys in combination, he was able to type with one hand, blindly, at high speed.

    I think it was more or less his only invention at the presentation that didn't make it into a mainstream product.

    Two years ago, I modified the design by integrating microswitches into a joystick-formed object, and wrote a small driver for BeOS. I also thought about integrating a pointer device like the one in IBM notebooks, but never did so.

    The microswitches were suboptimal, and I never really learned to write fast with it. But other people reported that they could write on a 5 button keyboard much faster than on a conventional one.

    I think the modified design of the 5 button keyboard might be an ideal input device for PDAs and wearables. They're compact. Plus you can use them to point and type blindly, and do so fast.

  58. Re:stick it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You too?

  59. Licensing will kill it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We'll be stuck with QWERTY for another 120 years, because 4 or 5 "competing" commercial methods can never create a new standard.

    Just as Linux is the only hope of breaking away from the M$ operating system "standard", only a free keyboard layout can break QWERTY (or QWERTZ for Germans, etc.).

    I say we take Fitaly and Atomik, find a "good enough" intermediary and take that as a new open standard. Who's going to prove it's a "derived work" - the Fitaly or Atomik inventors? To do so, they would imply that each is a derived work of the other!!! Bwahahahaha!!!

  60. Re: Metropolis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stimulation, my friend, stimulation.

  61. Better yet, get a picture of the sticker itself by Prof.+Pi · · Score: 1

    Here's a JPEG of the sticker itself. Use xv or whatever to crop it at the outer line boundary (the copyright is not part of the sticker), and print it at about 164pt x 60pt. You'll get a pretty good approximation you can tape to your Palm and it will work until your sticker comes in the mail.

  62. Not for optimized for TWO hand typing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Folks seem to be commenting on how this could replace QWERTY keyboards. It is fine for stylus work; however, it looks like this optimization does not factor in two focal points.

  63. became the most efficient by snyrt · · Score: 1

    i never said it was the most efficient, but it became a standard. anyways, it has become the most efficient because that's what we all know how to use. If we switched to dvorak, then the efficiency would be greatly reduced as everyone had to buy new keyboards and had to learn a whole new system. everyone would be making errors left and right and taking twice as long to type. QWERTY has become our standard and cannot be changed without serious consequences.

    --
    -"Hey, Baby. It's not a rash, it's textured love."
  64. No look writing with Grafiti by n-baxley · · Score: 1

    The big advantage I see to Grafiti (sp?) is that I don't have to look at my palm to keep writing. I can be looking at the person I'm talking too, or at a presenters screen. Try to do that with a keyboard no matter how optomized it is.