Slashdot Mirror


X-Rays Of A TiBook's Interior

A reader writes: "A fine application of expensive medical equipment: producing neat desktop pictures by taking an x-ray of the guts of a PowerBook G4. Guy Mullins has the details." The actual photos are on a separate site.

234 comments

  1. oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guy Mullins has the details." The actual photos are details." The actual photos are on a separate site.

    I've heard that cutting and pasting can be difficult on Linux, but that's just silly.

    1. Re:oops by ubertroll · · Score: -1

      oo oooo oo oo oo oo oo oo
      oo oo ooo oo oo oo oo oo
      oo oo oooo oo oo oo oooo
      oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo
      oo oo oo oooo oo oo oooo
      oo oo oo ooo oo oo oo oo
      ooooooo oooo oo oo oooooo oo oo

      ssssss ss ss ssssss ss ss ssssss ss
      ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss
      ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss
      ssssss ss ss ss sssss ssssss ss
      ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss
      ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss
      ssssss ssssss ssssss ss ss ssssss ss

    2. Re:oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Hello I am new to slashdot how do I make big type like that I try bold and stuff but it don'ts work.

  2. Hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Repeating yourself, Hemos? Perhaps you should take a rest, eh?

  3. Someone set us up the details! by nougatmachine · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Dumb subject, but seriously, two endquotes? "The actual photos are details"? Top it off with a second occurence of "The actual photos", and you get compelling evidence that Hemos has been staying up a little too late : )

  4. Cool by YIAAL · · Score: 2

    Well, this is really cool, though I'm not sure I actually learned anything from the pictures. Except that it would be fun to have the use of a really good medical x-ray machine, along with a few household objects. But I already knew that. And you did, too, didn't you?

  5. Interesting... by clevershark · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Out of curiosity, are laptop batteries always made up of a large number of linked, smaller, cylindrical batteries?

    --

    My sig is too lon

    1. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've had a couple of assembled battery packs apart because off the shelf was not available and each time it was an assembly of standard batteries soldered together.

      OTOH I'm sure there are some custom batteries out there.

    2. Re:Interesting... by Bryan+Andersen · · Score: 5, Informative

      Generally yes, though some are using prizmatic cell shapes but they are more costly than the good ol' cylindrical cell. If you go with a non standard cell size or shape it costs more per unit due to lack of volume. The standard cell sizes are also available from many different manufacturers. That means you have second and third sources available in case your manufacturer of choice fails to meet your demand for some reason.

    3. Re:Interesting... by beable · · Score: 2, Informative
      Out of curiosity, are laptop batteries always made up of a large number of linked, smaller, cylindrical batteries?
      All batteries are made up of a number of cells. What people commonly call a "battery" (like an AA, a C, a D, or an AAA), is actually a cell. If you look at your car battery, you might be able to see that it is made up of six cells. Each one has its own compartment, and its own plug on top for adding more water if it gets low.

      The reason for this is that a cell puts out about 2 volts. To get a higher voltage, you have to connect several cells in series to make a battery. For a car, you need six cells to make twelve volts. For a telephone exchange, you need 24 cells to make about 50 volts. You can also connect several batteries together in parallel to get more current or more power.
      --
      ...
    4. Re:Interesting... by Crazy+Diamond · · Score: 3, Informative

      And of course a 9V battery is also just 6 cells underneath the outer covering. Your car battery is 6 cells but it is a lead-acid battery which produces ~2V per cell whereas normal batteries (AAA, AA, C, D) use a dry cell which produces ~1.5V. NiCad cells are ~1.2V.

    5. Re:Interesting... by babbage · · Score: 2
      I've heard (from a former employee) that at least some APC uninteruptable power supplies are little more than a metal case full of standard D cell batteries -- lots and lots of D batteries.

      I'm not sure if this is the case for the big ones that would power a rack of servers or whatever, but apparently it's true for the ones you'd put under your desk for personal use.

      Assuming that's true, I don't see why laptop power supplies should be any different....

  6. This was already my desktop picture by St3phen · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Found it on resexcellence on Friday.

    1. Re:This was already my desktop picture by itomato · · Score: 1

      Yeah.. This has been making the rounds in the Mac circles for what.. Since about a month after the Ti came out?

  7. Proof that slashdot is deleting comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    Here is the proof that the /. editors have decided to delete comments they didn't like in old stories:

    Notice the first comment in the cached version of the story is an ASCII goatse.cx, which had been modded up to +1 at the last minute before the story was archived. That comment is now gone.

    Slashdot is still censorware.

    1. Re:Proof that slashdot is deleting comments by jgaynor · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      If I was the one paying for the cost of archiving such a huge forum, I would definitely cut out the spam crap. I dont think future generations need to see ASCII art of a man's open asshole.

      Show me an example of a /. editor deleting a valid or better yet contradictory comment and Im sure youd sway a few more voices to your cause.

    2. Re:Proof that slashdot is deleting comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      But then they shouldn't be bragging about never deleting comments.

    3. Re:Proof that slashdot is deleting comments by Webmonger · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yes, but that makes it (extremely lame) porn, and Slashdot is not an adult site. It could get sued for leaving that there.

    4. Re:Proof that slashdot is deleting comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      They didn't delete it. It was moderated down for being a troll, it's at the bottom of the page. Goddamn, you're an idiot.

    5. Re:Proof that slashdot is deleting comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      No, it's not. Also see the poster's user page. Neatly wiped, eh?

    6. Re:Proof that slashdot is deleting comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
      Fresh from the Slashdot FAQ:
      The only time we ever delete comments is if the comment contains malformed HTML that is somehow causing Slashdot to fail to display properly. Comments are not deleted on the basis of content.
      Pretty blatant lie, isn't it?
    7. Re:Proof that slashdot is deleting comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      No, you idiot. Look at that google cached copy again. It clearly says:
      This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
      That means everything had already been frozen. And that comment had a score of +1. It had not been "modded down". The editors deleted it.

      The whole point of this is that /. brags about being user-moderated, and never deleting any comments. This incident proves that is a lie.

    8. Re:Proof that slashdot is deleting comments by ameoba · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      I dunno... doing an ASCII representation of the goatse guy is a bit of an achievement. If they're going to delete trolls, fine, but I'd like to see a Troller Hall of Fame... the first goatse link... and who started the Portman/Grits thing?

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    9. Re:Proof that slashdot is deleting comments by Webmonger · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I suppose. I know they've deleted DeCSS and scientology documents that were posted, too. Somehow, I just can't get upset at them protecting themselves.

    10. Re:Proof that slashdot is deleting comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      When they deleted that Scientology stuff, at least they told us about it. If they start deleting ASCII goatse.cx now, they should remove that section from the FAQ immediately. A lie is a lie is a lie.

    11. Re:Proof that slashdot is deleting comments by Webmonger · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Ah, but a book is a book is a book. A toaster is a toaster is a toaster.

      And while you think that this is a case where they're lying, it could be a mistake. It could be a problem with their database It could be that they don't know how to rephrase the FAQ so it says what you feel it should say. Or maybe they've forgotten about the FAQ. (God knows, I have.)

      And why "should" they remove that section from the FAQ? Why do you say that's an acceptable remedy? Wouldn't anonymous cowards start complaining about its mysterious removal? Perhaps they should make a news story about it. Perhaps they should go a day without banner ads and penance. Perhaps they should close down slashdot. And perhaps they should start treating Anonymous Coward as just another account with karma, so the assholes who post goatse.cx get moderated into a smoking pile of ash.

    12. Re:Proof that slashdot is deleting comments by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Hardly. ASCII art isn't "commenting" and besides, when they have the lameness filter working, it isn't even possible to post such garbage. Someone found a loophole or way around the filter, and so they retro-actively filtered it. If someone did mod it up as you claim, that only stands to show how corrupted the moderation system has become.

    13. Re:Proof that slashdot is deleting comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      And while you think that this is a case where they're lying, it could be a mistake. It could be a problem with their database

      Possible, yes. But the removal of all comments by that user is quite suspicious, isn't it?

      And why "should" they remove that section from the FAQ?

      If it isn't true, they shouldn't pretend it is. Is that a new concept to you?

    14. Re:Proof that slashdot is deleting comments by Webmonger · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      Possible, yes. But the removal of all comments by that user is quite suspicious, isn't it?

      That does sound suspicious.

      If it isn't true, they shouldn't pretend it is. Is that a new concept to you?

      No, the concept isn't new to me, but there are plenty of situations in which we pretend that things are true when they are not.

      Still, you must understand that I was pointing out that "should" usually reflects an opinion, rather than a fact. If they have changed their policy, I don't think changing their FAQ is sufficient.
    15. Re:Proof that slashdot is deleting comments by egg+troll · · Score: -1

      Hmmm ... interesting. I bet it got modded down later and Slashdot only archives posts at +1 or higher when the archiving process begins.

      --

      C - A language that combines the speed of assembly with the ease of use of assembly.
    16. Re:Proof that slashdot is deleting comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      From the old static page, it couldn't be moderated down.

    17. Re:Proof that slashdot is deleting comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      I don't think we'll ever get an "official" statement about it.

    18. Re:Proof that slashdot is deleting comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Stop replying with an initial score of 2! This entire thread will be sent into oblivion any minute now. Think about all the karma you'll lose. But with your stupid "Ben Kenobi" philosophy about truth, I think that you deserve it anyway.

    19. Re:Proof that slashdot is deleting comments by ubertroll · · Score: -1

      Yeah, truth isn't very popular on Slashdot.

    20. Re:Proof that slashdot is deleting comments by ubertroll · · Score: -1
      Then again, who cares about archived stories, as long as all the active stories have their dose of goatse.cx?


      * g o a t s e x * g o a t s e x * g o a t s e x *
      g g
      o / \ \ / \ o
      a| | \ | | a
      t| `. | | : t
      s` | | \| | s
      e \ | / / \\\ -- \\ : e
      x \ \/ --~~ ~--| \ | x
      * \ \-~ ~-\ | *
      g \ \ .--------.__\| | g
      o \ \_// ((> \ | o
      a \ . C ) _ ((> | / a
      t /\ | C )/ \ (> |/ t
      s / /\| C) | (> / \ s
      e | ( C__)\__/ // / / \ e
      x | \ | \\__// (/ | x
      * | \ \) `---- --' | *
      g | \ \ / / | g
      o | / | | \ | o
      a | | / \ \ | a
      t | / / | | \ |t
      s | / / \/\/ | |s
      e | / / | | | |e
      x | | | | | |x
      * g o a t s e x * g o a t s e x * g o a t s e x *

    21. Re:Proof that slashdot is deleting comments by Webmonger · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      So far, it's even. Someone actually modded me up!

    22. Re:Proof that slashdot is deleting comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      anyone responding to this thread (besides me of course!) is trollfood, and an idiot as well. plz dont feed the trollz. kthnxbye

    23. Re:Proof that slashdot is deleting comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      If someone did mod it up as you claim...

      Well, look at the score. It's at +1, isn't it? Did it ever occur to you that the only reason it still says "Troll" might be because people used "underrated" to mod it up?

      And I laugh at your pitiful euphemism, "retroactively filtered". The fact remains; the /. editors deleted a comment, despite their claims that they "never" do that.

    24. Re:Proof that slashdot is deleting comments by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Sorry, it has to be a comment first. Even a trollish comment might count, but pictures don't.

      If someone hacked the index.html, and put a "comment" there, would you heckle them for deleting that? Then why would you for deleting a PICTURE, not a comment, that somehow got snuck into the forums? It has long been acknowledged that their own prohibition against censorship is not absolute. That you would try to use a single example of deletion as proof that they are somehow hypocrites speaks volumes to me. And what an example. How bout this? Obvious to many, is the fact that this "comment" has been posted numerous times, and yet they also have built in mechanisms to prevent duplicates. If the system isn't perfect, they aren't allowed to go back and manually fix such "errors" ? Show me a deleted post that consists of words, of a message that doesn't involve a picture of a man with an asshole bigger than his own head, and I'll be standing right beside you bitching and hollaring. Until then, use your time constructively, like figuring out a fair way to remove that garbage permanently. If you read at +2, you only hear the karma whores, and if you browse at -1 (like I often do) then you get to see that picture way too often.

      Personally, I'm all for imposing a ban on duplicate posts across stories, that way the goatsex trolls are gonna have to get busy with a new ascii art each post, or accept that they have already been allowed to make that comment, and that they can't post it again.

    25. Re:Proof that slashdot is deleting comments by jamie · · Score: 2, Informative
      This comment was not deleted. When we converted from Slash 1.0 to 2.2, we had to run an import script to go over all our old .shtml files and pull their comments into our database. It must have missed this one. Probably, it missed more than one.

      Figuring out why, and going back to figure out what other comments we might have missed, is one of our priorities for this coming week.

      To the trolls who started this meme, if you are interested in getting these problems fixed rather than just raising a fuss, the next time you find something like this, please submit a SourceForge bug. Thanks. Meanwhile, extended discussion of Slashdot's bugs on a story that's not about testing the Slash code is offtopic and should be moderated as such.

    26. Re:Proof that slashdot is deleting comments by propstoalldeadhomiez · · Score: -1

      There are words in that. Last time I checked, "goatsex" was a word.

      --

      Jack Buck (1924-2002)
      Darryl Kile (1968-2002)
    27. Re:Proof that slashdot is deleting comments by gmeb · · Score: 1

      Actually a few days ago, when I was looking for something on Google, I came across an old /. page with nothing but empty posts. The only thing there was were subject lines.

      So there's quite a few comments gone missing.

      Unfortunately I haven't got the link handy any more, and I don't know the search terms for Google any more. :( (Probably something related with X on the TiBook, or dual-head support on the TiBook.)

      --
      The angry man always thinks he can do more than he can. -- Albertano of Brescia
    28. Re:Proof that slashdot is deleting comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      ...and now?? LOL.

    29. Re:Proof that slashdot is deleting comments by b0r1s · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      why is everything in this thread knocked to -1? is this someone's attempt to prevent this thread from being archived?

      --
      Mooniacs for iOS and Android
  8. Sad News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    I just heard some sad news on TV, apparently Slashdot website creator, Rob "CmdrTaco" Malda, was rushed to the hospital this afternoon after having his penis sliced off. Authorities say the accident involved Rob's penis, his computer, and an illegal computer device imported from China that was designed to stimulate the penis during cyber-sex. The authorities aren't releasing many details yet as to how it happened, but they suspect that the device malfunctioned which caused his penis to be sliced off. However, there is speculation among the Slashdot community that the Open Source Operating System "Linux" is to blame, for its faulty structure and lack of professional development. There is no word of whether there was any foul-play involved from hackers amongst the Linux community.

    1. Re:Sad News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      > but they suspect that the device malfunctioned which caused his penis to be sliced off

      Overclocking. Hard OCP.

    2. Re:Sad News... by l3377r0lld00d · · Score: -1

      More likely his infamiliarity with the proper use of Perl's chop() syntax...

      --
      -- Trolled...you WILL be === Yoda
  9. XRay.... by Mr+Thinly+Sliced · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't xrays wipe drives? I think I can see the hard drive in the xray - in the middle at the bottom - the CD drive is on the left, and the batteries are on the right I reckon.

    Anyone know what effects XRays have on magnetic media? I always used to post floppies with a 'magnetic media, do not xray' sticker on em?

    Fantastic images tho.

    1. Re:XRay.... by jcr · · Score: 4, Informative

      >Don't xrays wipe drives?

      Nope, but they can ruin your photo film.

      Of course, if your hard drives were subjected to a really *powerful* x-ray source, they'd melt. ;-)

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:XRay.... by kilrogg · · Score: 1
      Don't xrays wipe drives?


      Considering the number of people who have their laptops xrayed when bring them on to airplanes, I think it would be safe.

    3. Re:XRay.... by Mr+Thinly+Sliced · · Score: 1

      Are the xray machines used by airports the same as medical imaging xray units?

      The one they used was a medical imager...

      Just curious if they are the same strength....

    4. Re:XRay.... by t · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have no real knowledge other than common sense, and since this is /., I would guess the medical imager is weaker since the purpose is to scan people. Whereas the airport is not worried about radiating people, just seeing through laptops and such.Normal bomb/gun/knife stuff.

    5. Re:XRay.... by cperciva · · Score: 2

      Are the xray machines used by airports the same as medical imaging xray units?

      The security xray machines vary from locale to locale, but generally they are more powerful than their medical counterparts; the reason being, of course, that there are strict health + safety regulations concerning xray dosages given to humans, while no such regulations exist for luggage. (Another good reason why you shouldn't try to smuggle illegal immigrants inside your luggage!)

    6. Re:XRay.... by Mr+Thinly+Sliced · · Score: 1

      That would seem logical - but you don't see the guys at airports stood behind lead screens.

      Last time I was in hospital (I'm fatally allergic to wasp stings), the X-ray machine is operated by a nurse like 20 feet away behind a lead screen.

      Also, there is a maximum number of medical xrays you can have before you get 'your dose'.

      But those nutty security guards stand there all day scanning underwear for a living.

      Which tends to make me think the medical ones are a wee bit more powerful.

    7. Re:XRay.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got your left and your right mixed up there, chief.

    8. Re:XRay.... by Mr+Thinly+Sliced · · Score: 1

      Piss. Your right. Left. Dammit.

    9. Re:XRay.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The luggage ones are entirely enclosed in a large metal box. The entrance and exit have those plastic coverings which probably are lead filled. The medical ones do not have nearly the same type of protection so stray x-rays will radiate the nurse if they're not behind the shield.

    10. Re:XRay.... by t · · Score: 1
      The hospital people stand far away cause they do that many times a day and the cumulative exposure would be a bad thing. The airport one however doesn't require lead aprons because the machine itself is probably lead lined.

      t.

    11. Re:XRay.... by marcsiry · · Score: 2

      Or perhaps the medical staffers stand farther away because they *know* how dangerous the X-rays can be, unlike the security drones...

      --
      Marc Siry || interactive media professional, motorcycle enthusiast ||
    12. Re:XRay.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At Hartsfield International Airport in Atlanta, they have a sign by the x-ray machine saying that only ISO 1600+ (high speed) and medical and scientific film, will be affected by x-rays. General consumer film, which is usually ISO 800 or slower, is safe in the x-ray machine. I can back this up with empirical evidence, as I have carried ISO 800 film on many flights.

    13. Re:XRay.... by GlassUser · · Score: 1

      I wonder if this means we'll see an increase in the number of sterile security workers any time?

    14. Re:XRay.... by mosch · · Score: 2
      No, in the United States, regulations require that x-ray inspection be conducted only with low-output devices, less than 1 milliroentgen per exposure.

      Medical x-rays vary widely, depending on the procedure. On the low-end, a chest x-ray exposes the patient to between 9-16 milliRoentgen's, while a procedure such as a CT Scan of the head exposes the patient to a dose of approximately 5000 milliRoentgens.

    15. Re:XRay.... by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      No, they don't. Have you never taken a laptop on a plane before?

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    16. Re:XRay.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Are the xray machines used by airports the same as medical imaging xray units?

      Yes, they are exactly the same.

    17. Re:XRay.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I read somewhere online once about a company that was testing their hard drives versus luggage x-ray machines. They tried various positions in and around the machine (including sending the units through dozens of times).

      The most amazing was the one they duct taped to the top of the machine for something like three months. At the end, no problems.

      Indeed, a quick search with Google to find the article in question brought up a Samsung laptop user manual that said you should always send your Samsung laptop through the X-ray machine, as the medal detectors might corrupt data.

    18. Re:XRay.... by clifyt · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually its an urban legend that air port xrays will do this. Its the conveyor belts that these things run on that does the demagnitization. Nothing to do with the xray.

      These things use electric motors to pull them, which create electromagnets (errr...the electromagnets create the motor). Even so, you'd have to have media almost directly on the belt over top the motor for a while before it came close to damaging anything. A laptop is going to be more isolated because of the casing (yeah yeah, I know most of them are plastic anymore). And still, its been several years since airports had any of these where the strength was strong enough to damage anything.

      For the most part, they let folks go with these because of this urban legend to keep the lines moving. Until I got the real scoop on these things, I'd have my powerbook waiting ready to go so I could show them its running and they let me go. Fuck, what if I had molded symtex (or however you spell it) into the second battery port. I'm paranoid as it is...I WANT these guys to stop everyone and run the sucker through the xrays - though in their defense, the xrays also do bomb material sniffing and occasionally they will not only ask to see your machine running, but they will ask for a wipe - they take an alcohol wipe and run a gas chromatography on it right there in seconds. Good job security dudes!

    19. Re:XRay.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do wasp stings show up on xray? Can't you just get a pretty nurse to suck it out.

    20. Re:XRay.... by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 3, Informative

      Which tends to make me think the medical ones are a wee bit more powerful.

      It's not the power, per se, it's that a medical imager is capable of dispersing X-rays over a much wider range of area, some of which are going to irradiate the operator.

      The X-ray machines in an airport are shielded (ever notice the heavy looking rubber skirts that your bags go through on either end?), and the x-rays are directed at a very narrow section of the conveyor belt.

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    21. Re:XRay.... by mosch · · Score: 2
      your common sense is extremely wrong. your luggage gets exposed to less than 1 milliRoentgen of radiation. medical x-rays start at 10 and go up from there. 300 or so milliRoentgens for those plates the dentist took, 5000 if you need a full CT scan...

      Use your common sense to tell you, which is going to be harder for x-rays to penetrate, large amounts of muscle and fat, or ten layers of cotton?

    22. Re:XRay.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I wonder if this means we'll see an increase in
      >the number of sterile security workers any time?

      Would this be a BAD thing?

    23. Re:XRay.... by t · · Score: 1
      Well let's see, the start of all this was about an xray of a powerbook which happens to have a Ti shell, so I wasn't thinking ten layers of cotton. I was thinking layers of metal. Let's put it this way, we know that the image of the Ti Pb was from a medical xray machine, do you honestly think the xray machines at the airport can't see it also? If it can then it has at least the same level of power. o.w. they'd see a black mass which they'd ask you to open up. And I've watched the screen as my stuff has gone through, they can see everything.

      PS throwing numbers around is meaningless without backing them up.

      t.

    24. Re:XRay.... by jbrw · · Score: 2

      A guy I went to school with is a radiographer. He was talking about some of the super-neato imaging things they can do with extremely high levels of X-Rays and things - levels which are normally far too high for a person to take. The resulting images are of extremely high detail, can be mapped in to 3D models of internal systems, and things like that.

      As such, these techniques are only used on people with advanced stages of cancer, say, who are in a bad state already.

      Someone who knows what i'm trying to talk about might be able to post some links to details or images of such stuff.

      ...j

    25. Re:XRay.... by Computer+suck! · · Score: 0

      Them XRay machines move dam fast! ;-)

      Esp when your waiting for your x-ray, it'll be gone for days, and your'll be stuck in a corridor with two dead people in wheel chairs...

    26. Re:XRay.... by RobMahan · · Score: 0

      To get round this you cover your camera films in foil or keep them in the little metalic bags they came in (apparently).

      I have no idea if this works but it makes alot of sense to say it might

      --
      I wanted a funny .sig but all I got was this lousy T-shirt
    27. Re:XRay.... by mosch · · Score: 4, Informative
      This article is a nationwide study on the x-ray dose levels that patients are exposed to during various medical procedures. You'll see that it confirms the numbers I stated above.

      Further inspection reveals that airports actually use two different strength scanners. Checked luggage goes through a high-intensity scanner, such as an Invision Technologies CTX baggage scanner. This scanner starts with a low power beam, but can send a focused beam (1cm containing 100-300 milliRoentgens) on suspicious areas if closer analysis is required. The focused beam is actually a Computed Tomography scan, of the type that takes 5000milliRoentgens to do to one's head, so it's still less powerful than the medical version.

      According to FAA Regulation 108.17

      If the X-ray system exposes any carry-on or checked articles to more than 1 milliroentgen during the inspection, the certificate holder shall post a sign which advises passengers to remove film of all kinds from their articles before inspection.
      But you'll note that airports all tell you it's safe to let your film and camera go through the carry-on luggage x-ray. That's because they expose your luggage to less than 1 milliRoentgen. If they can't see what they need, they still have Explosive and Narcotic Detection Systems, and manual searches available.

      So you see, I wasn't throwing numbers around. I was making factual statements, you useless troll.

    28. Re:XRay.... by akamoe · · Score: 1

      hm. well, if my experience with airport (or many other) security people is any indication, that may not be a bad thing *lol*

    29. Re:XRay.... by stripes · · Score: 2
      The source of this allegation seems to be that the serial number is alledged to be transmitted during the same session in which the data is collected.

      Please don't. If you use a X-Ray safe lead bag they can't see the film, so it doesn't get hurt. Then they blast it with a stronger dose until they can see. Of corse since they have to go through the lead twice the x-rays that hit your film are much much stronger.

      The safest thing to do is get film in clear cylinders (Kodak select films and many Fuji films come that way), take them out of the boxes, put them in a ziplock bag. Don't put more then can be pressed to a single layer.

      Have the ziploc bags of film hand checked (dump them in the change bucket).

      If you happen to have an x-ray bag you can put the film in that after you have gone through the x-ray. It will keep the film from fogging in flight (there is less atmosphere to protect it).

      Even low speed film is damaged by x-ray, just not very much. The fogging is normally slight, unless the airport happens to be extra paranoid, or you take lots of flights. Of corse there is no reason for you to buy slow film unless you want the best quality shots, so the slight fogging should be unacceptable to you, esp when getting hand checked is such an easy option...

      (yes, I'm a film geek -- and a digital camera geek)

    30. Re:XRay.... by rneches · · Score: 2
      No no. You've got it all wrong. I can speak from experience - when you subject an Apple product to X radiation, it will turn into a giant monster and eat Tokyo.

      No really. It will - don't try it.

      --
      In spite of the suggestions and all the tests that I have made, I have not cavato a spider from the hole.
    31. Re:XRay.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      HAHA dickhead you were wrong!!!!!

    32. Re:XRay.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most mass storage devices are relatively insensitive to X-ray exposure. However, RAM (including buffered CMOS RAM), ((E)E)PROMs, Flash memory etc. can be a problem (bits can be flipped, EPROMs erased, etc), so for example the firmware could be toast. Potentially, semiconductor devices can also be destroyed by radiation damage. The doses of medical X-ray imaging equipment are (hopefully!) rather minuscule, though. Even most hand luggage scanners in use at airports are relatively harmless for standard photographic film. I'd expect X-ray doses for medical purposes to be lower.

    33. Re:XRay.... by t · · Score: 1
      I'm a troll? Funny, lets go back to my first comment where I clearly state where I'm coming from. Whereas you suddenly start spouting all kinds of seemingly factual numbers with nothing to back it up. What's to differentiate you from all the trolls? If you want people to take you seriously then you must back up your facts. Otherwise you're like cold fusion. Pop your head up and say all kinds of grandious things, details at 11. Just look at some of the other comments here, there's one that says that airport xrays are generally more powerful than medical xrays. So what is a person to do? I would be more of an idiot if I did not challenge your facts and force you to come up with hard evidence to back up your claim.

      And btw, it is not safe to leave your film in your luggage. It depends on the speed of the film. Get some nice shiny 1600 speed film, take some kodak moments, then go through the airport xrays and develop it. Are you wondering where I got this information? You should be. Maybe I'm making it up. Don't worry, it's for real, trust me. That is in effect what you said to me.

      And the comment about airports telling me it's safe... Reminds of the certain other large companies telling the public that, no really our product is safe. Trust us. You'll have to forgive my skepticism. Besides it's only "safe" if everything is within spec, not leaking, i.e. well maintained.

      But, thanks for the genuinely useful links that contain real honest to goodness information from sources more reputable than a random comment on /., why if I was willing to moderate I'd mod you up, despite the gratuitous flame at the bottom.

      t.

    34. Re:XRay.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a radiology tech, and I've never thought about imaging my notebook before. I don't see the point. Maybe I'll bring it in and film it tomorrow, and then post it to the web, if people are interested in seeing that kind of thing. I think I can film it in the OR and transfer the images directly to a jaz drive from the machine.

      The EM field of the generators is what fogs most non-medical film and can wipe hard drives (and other electronic equipment) at airports. You should have your film inspected by hand.

      And you should place any laptops that are going to be x-rayed in the center of the machine. Placing the laptop to either side of the conveyor belt may put it too close to the generator and the (small) EM field.

      I've never personally run my notebook through a machine at an airport though - the security guards ask you to turn it on anyhow, so I usually just hand it to them and let them do their thing.

      One question - someone posted that they had all kinds of objects they would like to have x-rayed -- like what? What would you like x-rayed?

  10. my new desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    trhats cool looking. I have set the first image as my desktop wallpaper

  11. Ask Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    I've got this girl who is a really good friend of mine, but I want more. How can I cross the boundries of friendship into a relationship?

    1. Re:Ask Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      The chicken that clucks the loudest is the one most likely to show up at the steam fitters' picnic

    2. Re:Ask Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Just tell her how you feel about her. If she responds the way you are hoping, fuck her ass off, and then never acknowledge her again. If she fails to respond the way you are hoping, never acknowledge her again.

      Either way, it's win-win, because the bitch is out of your life forever.

  12. Scary by lunk · · Score: -1, Troll

    It scares me to know that through the DMCA companies could more than likely attempt to get those pictures censored. :/

    --
    http://tf2.digitaljedi.com
    1. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up you whiny "oh no the DMCA is gonna put me in jail" faggot. All you do is sit around all day and run Linux and pirate software, you hippie freak. Go back to Sweden where you can fuck JonKatz in the A-hole (you know you like it) all day.

  13. Advice needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I'm new to Linux, and I was wondering-what is the best window manager/desktop environment to use? Thanks in advance.

    1. Re:Advice needed by ubertroll · · Score: -1
      Don't forget:

      oo oooo oo oo oo oo oo oo
      oo oo ooo oo oo oo oo oo
      oo oo oooo oo oo oo oooo
      oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo
      oo oo oo oooo oo oo oooo
      oo oo oo ooo oo oo oo oo
      ooooooo oooo oo oo oooooo oo oo

      ssssss ss ss ssssss ss ss ssssss ss
      ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss
      ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss
      ssssss ss ss ss sssss ssssss ss
      ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss
      ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss
      ssssss ssssss ssssss ss ss ssssss ss

  14. Oops. Meant xlr8yourmac.com by St3phen · · Score: 0, Redundant

    And it's the desktop to my TiBook.

  15. Format? by VirtualWolf · · Score: 1

    What format is that TiXray.orig picture in? (The 9.8MB one).

    1. Re:Format? by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 1

      Well, it's busy downloading for me right now, but I'd guess it's a higher res of the .pict file, which is (understandably) a Mac image format, which is viewable by Quicktime on Windows machines, and possibly the Gimp on Linux? Unfortunately, the site has been /.ed now, so it will take some time to finish the download and LILO my way into the fun partition and verify.


      And I need to reboot Windows anyway before viewing the pict file, because (a)I had to upgrade Quicktime, and (b)Windows is stupid and makes me reboot after every install/patch/upgrade/2 hours of productivity.


      --
      I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
    2. Re:Format? by seann · · Score: 0

      lynx --source http://ether.asu.edu/video/TiGutz/TiXray.orig | more

      oORIGINAL\PRIMARuy1.2.840.10008.5.1.4.1.1.w>1.2 .840.113789.17030.3177402725254517470

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    3. Re:Format? by VirtualWolf · · Score: 1

      That's wonderful.

      Now wtf does it mean? ;)

      (And what can open it?)

    4. Re:Format? by VirtualWolf · · Score: 1

      Hmm, well, Preview in OSX can't open it (and it can open just about anything)...

    5. Re:Format? by Wayfarer · · Score: 1

      Since this appears to have been scanned with a Lumisys LS135 desktop scanner, I believe the 9.8 one ('TiXray.orig') is DICOM-compliant.

      The viewer I use for DICOMs is MRIcro at 24 bpp. Your mileage may vary.

      --

      -W-

      Is it all journey, or is there landfall?
      --Ellison & van Vogt, 'The Human Operators'

    6. Re:Format? by paxil · · Score: 1

      It is a DICOM 3.0 image.

      This is a format used by medical imaging systems, which includes such interesting information as the name, sex, and age of the patient, how the image was obtained, the size and format of the image, etc. etc.

      It is pretty easy to extract the raw pixel data, if that is what you want to do.

    7. Re:Format? by DragonPup · · Score: 1

      I'd wager GraphicConverter for OS X could handle it(since it handles like everything). Try taking out the .orig extension and drop it on GC and see what happens(I haven't tried it yet myself)

      -Henry

      --
      "Useless organic meatbag" -HK-47
    8. Re:Format? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you determine the sex of a powerbook, anyway?

    9. Re:Format? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you determine the sex of a powerbook, anyway?

      Are you interested in how I do it, or are you looking for pointers to improve your own technique?

      Peronaly, I'll just bring them flowers and cook them dinner. I can usually determine the sex by the magnitude and direction of the response, but YMMV.
    10. Re:Format? by eFlashDash · · Score: 1

      Use the file command instead, it is much more readable...

    11. Re:Format? by seann · · Score: 0

      oh yah
      that involves downloading the file.
      And even thought that takes only 1 minute from my time:
      nataku@CO512570-A:~$ file TiXray.orig
      TiXray.orig: data

      It proved absolutly worthless to me.
      :)

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    12. Re:Format? by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Dicom is indeed listed on the list of understood formats. By the way, GC is not limited to OSX; it runs on any Mac with a 68020 or later processor and System 7 or later.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    13. Re:Format? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      All Mac portables are female (conversely the desktops are male). PowerBooks are in their early to mid-twenties and iBooks are cute little pre-teens. The PowerMac is a 30-some Alaska logger with rugged good looks. The iMac is the fat kid in 3rd grade that everyone made fun of.

    14. Re:Format? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait
      Since all Apple products are gay to begin with, there is no need to determine the sex. They are all the same sex, and that is homosexual male.

    15. Re:Format? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So are you saying that the iBooks are kind of like the Olsen twins?

  16. hEY! by Firebaal · · Score: -1, Troll

    Hey! Didn't you read the license agreement? It says right in the on the 38927th line: "You herby will not take x-ray pictures of this computer in any shape or form, use of x-rays will cause damage to your apple computer. May void warrenty also. Please x-ray microsoft computers. IF YOU BREAK THIS AGREEMENT YOU WILL BE TOTURED FOR LIFE BY HAVING YOUR COMPUTER BE REPLACED BY AN APPLE IIE" -Steve Jobs

    1. Re:hEY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at least try to be funny? or spell? or something. shit, at least show some effort for chrissakes

  17. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    ...are you saying I should cluck like a chicken???

    1. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux? Don't you mean Stallman/GNU/Linux?

    2. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you saying I should cluck like a chicken???

      Do so while bashing her skull in with a lead pipe. Works every time!

  18. Cool! by jcr · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Now, *that's* a great desktop pattern for a tiBook.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  19. Mac technology in medical imaging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Holy smokes, I hope nothing they use it for is time-sensitive!

    Imagine having to postpone emergency surgery because the X-Ray techs are too busy restarting their Macs after receiving those friendly "bomb" and "Error: type xx" dialogue boxes ;-)

    1. Re:Mac technology in medical imaging? by Spruitje · · Score: 1


      Imagine having to postpone emergency surgery because the X-Ray techs are too busy restarting their Macs after receiving those friendly "bomb" and "Error: type xx" dialogue boxes ;-)


      Well, actually.. the reason why they are using Macs is that they are a hunderd times more stable than Windoze.
      To be more precice :
      Mac's don't crash when they are used.
      And contrary to windoze, it is very normal to work more than a month without any crash.

    2. Re:Mac technology in medical imaging? by Kenyaman · · Score: 1

      Macs have been used in medical imaging for years. When I was on my internship, I worked with a guy who worked at Seimens and all their work was Mac based.

    3. Re:Mac technology in medical imaging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And contrary to windoze, it is very normal to work more than a month without any crash."

      LOL!:

      [rloef@ariel wd:rloef]$ uptime
      10:51pm up 203 days, 1:00, 9 users, load average: 0.08, 0.07, 0.04

      I love Macs, and my next computer will be an ibook. But let's get real here...

    4. Re:Mac technology in medical imaging? by jchristopher · · Score: 2
      Mac's don't crash when they are used.
      And contrary to windoze, it is very normal to work more than a month without any crash.


      You obviously never owned a Powerbook 5300 or any other Mac running OS 7.5 :(

      I love Macs, too, but anyone who would call classic MacOS "stable" is full of shit.

    5. Re:Mac technology in medical imaging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in case you hadn't noticed, 'classic' MacOS is up to version 9.2.1 now...

    6. Re:Mac technology in medical imaging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nor have you used win2k, I go 2-3 months between restarts, and that has been for hardware changes. (3 times)

    7. Re:Mac technology in medical imaging? by jchristopher · · Score: 1

      Yes, I have noticed. What's your point?

    8. Re:Mac technology in medical imaging? by GaCRuX · · Score: 0

      at uni we have both macs & windows. I used the M$ boxen for a while, but decided they were a pain in the ass & switched to using the macs. of course I soon found that the macs crashed even more than the windows computers. no joke. they were unstable as fuck. one would crash on me (hard lock. completly frozen. these are imacs btw) at least once per session I used one. so I switched back to using the windows ones. of course I use one of the solaris boxen over in the COSC department whenever the room isn't full.... but they don't have many of 'em. :-(

    9. Re:Mac technology in medical imaging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny, I'm been working on my Windows2000 box for 4 months now without a crash. Actually, it wasn't a crash, I just powered it off when I went on vacation. Stop feeding stupid stereotypes. Win2k is about a million times more stable than Win9x.

    10. Re:Mac technology in medical imaging? by Espen · · Score: 1

      We still run a couple of machines on OS 7.5.5, I was looking at one of these the other day and it had just passed 200 days uptime, and as far as I recall the last time it was down was due to a powert-cut.

    11. Re:Mac technology in medical imaging? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      the reason they use Macs is that they've got WORK to do, and can't spend three weeks trying to work out why their graphics card drivers don't work.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    12. Re:Mac technology in medical imaging? by stripes · · Score: 2
      I love Macs, too, but anyone who would call classic MacOS "stable" is full of shit.

      On the other hand OS X is pretty stable. Not as stable as my FreeBSD machine (which is modestly more stable then my Linux box, but that may be hardware related), but pretty good. It did refuse to unsusspend once last month, and it does panic when you umount -f. I also tend to reboot it a little more frequently for upgrades.

    13. Re:Mac technology in medical imaging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I installed Macintoshes into an MRI/Xray center several years ago. Two years ago we yanked out ALL the Macintoshes and replaced them with Windows NT machines. The immediate reaction on the part of the employees was "yeah! no more crashes!". It wasn't just the instability of the MacOS that was the problem. It was the stunning lack of decent client tools for development. Say what you will about Microsoft business practices but the use of Office tied into SQL server is so much simpler that cobbling together crap with Filemaker. And it scales MUCH better.

  20. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    ...are you saying that I should stop running Linux???

  21. Don't worry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    The owner is probably between reinstalling the OS, or upgrading to OS 9.2 to fix some problem, or downgrading to OS 9.1 to fix a problem that OS 9.2 created :-/

  22. iXRAY by Firebaal · · Score: 2, Funny

    September 1,2001-Apple Computers(APLE) have come out with a new piece of software called iXRAY, which will, X-ray your computer for bugs. We got ahold of Steve Jobs, here is what he has to say: "While creating our latest program, iMovie we where flabergasted by the error messages that said 'bug #93827239' So we have come out with iXRAY witch will find the bug for you in your computer!" UPDATE:"It seems hours after the release there have been numerous bugs in the program which actually X-RAY your brain and get all your memmorys, it seems that a program called GATOR has put a small add-on (virus?) into the iXRAY please use caution when using iXRAY

  23. Nerf darts? by Zach` · · Score: 1

    It appears this gentleman has a fetish for Nerf darts and has somehow tapped them as an energy source... Perhaps he got pointers from the Spud server?

  24. here's how it is, bitches! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    q: who is the greatest troll ever?

    a: AC, dipshit!

  25. my terrible secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    I was thirteen when it happened. I guess it didn't surprise me.
    I've always been somebody who gets picked on. It didn't help that I
    was painfully shy and lonely. It didn't help that I was an only
    child and my mother wanted a daughter so much she kept telling me
    "you should've been a girl." I almost was. Even though I was
    thirteen, I wasn't much of a boy. I was only four nine, eighty
    eight pounds, I guess. Long blonde hair, blue eyes, fair skin. I
    knew a little about sex. I knew that because a neighbor one day
    showed me his cock. He was gay, and he told me that he liked to
    have it sucked a lot. He told me it felt good and told me all about
    how it was done. He asked me if I wanted to try and I said no. I
    didn't, either. He never tried to make me, but he had a few gay
    friends who tried. They used to tell me how sexy I was, then they'd
    corner me and try to get me to take them in. One used to say I was
    pretty sexy in shorts, so I guess it's no surprise that was why I
    got raped.

    On the day it happened it was like any other--hot,
    sticky. For summer my mother usually packed away all my pants, and
    every pair of shorts I owned belonged on girls rather than me. They
    were all tight and short. The pair on had on that day were navy
    blue, with a red polo shirt and a pair of white canvas moccassins.
    On that same day, I probably should tell you this. I met my rapist
    before he got me. He saw me walking down the road and offered me a
    ride. He was pretty scuzzy looking, nearly bald but not that old. I
    refused. He asked where I was going and I told him.

    It was an old factory near my house that's been abandoned since the '60's. I like
    to hang out there because nobody bothered me. He left me alone
    then. I got there and just started to roam around, because that's
    what I did. And think. There's a lot of old crates and stuff, but
    I've never opened any. I went down to the basement floor to see if
    there was anything interesting. I didn't even see the man there
    when I came down the steps. Suddenly this hand was over my mouth,
    real tight. I struggled but he lifted me and carried me back up.
    "Now I'm going to take my hand off your mouth. Keep it shut!", he
    warned me. I didn't scream. I stood still and felt him take my
    hands and put them together behind me. I felt him tie them
    together. He pushed up against me. I could feel the thick bulge of
    his cock against his jeans, pressed against my bound hands. He must
    have wanted that, because he told me to rub it. I did. At the same
    time, he was pulling a cloth into my mouth and tying it behind my
    head. He grabbed my ass. "Nice", he told me. "I like the way those
    shorts show it off. Nice ass." He rubbed himself against my ass. I
    knew he was going to put it in there.

    He turned me around and sat
    me down on the crate. He was grinning. Kind of sick. I was pretty
    scared. He unzipped his pants and pulled out his cock. It was huge.
    Thick. He stroked it and smiled at me. "All for you", he said. He
    turned me over and put me face down on the crate. Pulled down my
    shorts and underwear. I started to cry. I felt him messing around
    back there, felt him put something cool in my crack. I tensed when
    I felt his head pushing up against my rosebud. He kept pushing and
    laughing, and I cried harder, but he was in me now, all thick and
    hard. It hurt, but it got me hard. He did me fast, then slow,
    laughing and holding me down. He filled me with that huge cock. I
    had to lean against the crate because I felt faint from it all.
    Then he filled me with cum and pulled out. I was afraid he was
    going to put it in my mouth now, but he didn't.

    He yanked my shorts
    up and told me we were going for a ride. Outside he had a car. He
    put me in the back seat and made me lie down while he tied my feet.
    I was crying really hard now, and he told me I hadn't seen anything
    yet. He touched my legs and ass and told me I was going to like
    this. It felt like a long time after that before he stopped and
    left me in the car. I struggled, but he was good with knots and I
    wasn't going to get free. When he came back and opened the door,
    untying my feet, I saw he was wearing different clothes: a t-shirt
    and a pair of baggy shorts. We were in a yard with a high hedge and
    there was a house. He took me inside into a bedroom and made me lay
    on the bed. He took some pictures of me and told me he'd always
    liked young boys, and I was perfect. He felt my legs again and
    rubbed my hard prick. Then he got up on me so he was sitting on my
    chest and took out my gag. He told me to shut up, then he pulled
    down his shorts.

    He told me to open my mouth. My heart was
    pounding, because I thought he would put it in. He didn't. He
    stroked it and jacked off into my mouth and told me not to swallow.
    His cum was salty and bitter and smelled like chlorine. He kissed
    me on the mouth and used his tongue in there. He gagged me again
    and told me he'd be back.

    When he came back, he told me how hot I
    got him when he saw me on the road. He really noticed my legs and
    ass, he said, and now he was going to get what he wanted. I was
    going to give it to him, I thought, and I hoped he'd let me go. He
    got me off the bed and put me on my knees. He undressed. He asked
    me if I liked what I saw, and I nodded. I didn't. He told me he
    didn't like liars, and that if he thought I was lying, he would
    hurt me. He asked me again if I liked what I saw. I shook my head.
    He told me I was a good boy for telling the truth. He took out my
    gag. He put the head of his prick in my mouth and told me to suck
    him. I sucked a little at the head. It was thick and warm. It
    tasted like soap and felt funny. He pushed it in more until I
    started to choke. I felt it jumping and pulsing. He started to
    moan. "Oh yeah, kid, good, good", he told me. "Suck my big dick.
    Suck it. You know you want it." I sucked harder. I wanted him to
    come and get it over with. His cock started to get thicker, and
    then he was shooting it in me. I choked and swallowed down. His cum
    was bitter and left a bad taste. I sucked until he pushed me away.
    "I've had better", he told me, and he put the gag back and threw me
    on the bed. I was afraid now, because he left the room.

    When he
    came back, he had his jeans on again. He pulled me off the bed and
    took me out to the car. He took out my gag and tell him my name and
    age, where I lived, my phone number and everything. He took more
    pictures, then he told me he'd show them to everybody I knew, and
    he'd get me if I told. Then he put me in the car and took me back
    to where he'd got me. He untied me and told me to count to a
    thousand before I left. I did. I didn't see him after that day, and
    I was glad. He did call a few times, and made me talk dirty to him.
    But that was all.

    1. Re:my terrible secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      Look Malda, we all know you enjoyed being raped as a child, but we don;t wabt to hear about it.

      Now go do something useful, like add more bugs to slashcode.

    2. Re:my terrible secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      Mmmm. I'm hard!

      -- J'Raxis

    3. Re:my terrible secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Fuck you. I only like female thirteen year olds.

      -- The Real J"Raxis

  26. Is that good for your computer? by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't know about you.... but I have to place a big lead sheet over my body when I get an xray. This guy might need to rebuild his desktop file or something ;).

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  27. X-Rays and computers? by exceed · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't the X-Rays damage some parts of the computer such as the hard drives, batteries, etc. etc.? I'd like to know if this computer was still usable without any odd problems after this X-Ray was taken.

    --

    void women (int money, time_t time);
    1. Re:X-Rays and computers? by CMiYC · · Score: 3, Informative

      No. X-Rays are just light. If it caused a problem, you wouldn't be able to take your computer on a plane. Nothing in a computer is affected by x-rays.

    2. Re:X-Rays and computers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir, are a fucking idiot. Please zap your nads with xrays and sterilize yourself so, if you accidently get laid, there's no chance you'll propogate.

    3. Re:X-Rays and computers? by sinster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Most parts of a computer are "immune" to xrays. Meaning that the computer doesn't get damaged by them.

      However, CMOS EEPROM cells that are designed using buried gate transistors (which is the most common type of EEPROM these days) can be damaged by xrays. If an xray passes through the buried gate to the channel, it'll ionize a bit of the silicon dioxide insulator between the buried gate and the channel. This makes the charge leak out of the buried gate somewhat faster. The more xrays that pass through that area, the more ionization and the faster the charge leaks out. This ionization is irreversable, and causes permanent damage.

      Whether the damage actually causes the bit in question to revert to a 1 depends on the strength of the xray source and how long (total across all the sessions) your computer has been bathed. An airline xray machine is unlikely to erase a bit if your machine passes through once. But if you travel a lot, then its almost certain that you'll suffer at least a one-bit error.

      In short: don't let the airport security goons xray your laptops, palm pilots, digital cameras, or anything else that has CMOS EEPROM memory.

      Every airport security checkpoint in the US has alternate procedures for electronics (generally involving a swab and a "portable" gas chromatograph to search for nitrogen compounds). The goons will argue with you, but it's worth the annoyance.

      I've done this in Las Vegas, Los Angeles, San Fransisco, San Jose, Seattle, Denver, Sioux City, Minneapolis, and New Orleans. Those airports pretty much run the gamut of size from little podunk warts to huge transport hubs.

      The FAA's assertion that airport x-ray machines dont damage electronics is a bald-faced lie.

      --
      -- Nolite audere delere orbiculum rigidum meum.
    4. Re:X-Rays and computers? by mks113 · · Score: 1

      There are probably 10s of thousands of experiences of slashdotters sending their computers through airport X-ray machines.

      Why are we not seeing a flood of people posting that they've had BIOS wiped/ drive crashes due to this?

      Answer: The X-ray levels used are very low and may cause damage to 1 in a 100,000 units.

    5. Re:X-Rays and computers? by sinster · · Score: 2, Informative

      When I was in college, the probability was closer to 1 in every 1000 scans. These days, the airport xray machines are much stronger than back then. I can't cite a new probability, because I don't know the new radiation strength, but it must be lower than 1 in 1000.

      The critical question is, "Will you notice the damage?" We're talking about a one bit error, here.

      Take your average PC. You've got pretty much three firmware chips in there: one for the system BIOS, one for the hard drive firmware, and one for the video controller. No matter which firmware suffers the error, there's first a question of whether or not the error is in a memory cell that ever gets accessed, and second whether or not the error changes the value in a way that makes a difference. If we're talking about one of those lame bootup graphics that a lot of manufacturers like these days, you'll probably never notice a one bit error. And if we're talking about code that drives a piece of hardware that you don't have installed (or dont use) you won't notice that error either. But if you get an error in your POST code, you're dead. System BIOSes these days are pretty fluffy. Lots of extraneous stuff in there. Video firmware is also pretty fluffy, but not nearly as bad as system BIOS. And drive firmware is quite tight. Almost any error you get in there will be in some code that gets executed.

      But on the other hand, the Intel opcode set is full of lots of unused bits. There are a whole lot of examples where flipping a bit from 0 to 1 doesn't change the opcode or operands. And recall that we're talking about errors that can only change a 0 to a 1; there is no way that xray damage could change a 1 to a 0. If the bit that gets damaged is already a 1 (~50% chance of that) then your dead memory cell is still functioning exactly the way you want... until it comes time to do a firmware upgrade.

      So that brings us to the last two issues: given that damage occurs, and given that its noticeable, then how long will it take for you to notice it, and will you ascribe the damage correctly to the airport xray machine? Many users are perfectly happy to ascribe crashes and corruptions to Windows. And while Windows certainly accounts for more than its fair share of errors, on a machine that crashes once every 40 hours, are you going to notice and correctly assign a failure that makes it crash every 39h30m?

      Lastly, we're not talking about a bit suddenly changing from 0 to 1. Normally a buried gate transistor will hold its charge for around 150 years (each transistor will be different). No insulator is perfect. You zap it with a single photon, and maybe you've chopped a year off that. Of course, a xray machine isn't going to output a single photon. It's going to bathe your machine in a tremendous number of photons. So maybe one airport xray machine will drop you from 150 years to 130 years (I'm pulling that 20 year figure out of my butt, pretty much, but it's within an order of magnitude of being right). Do it again, and we're down to 110 years (it'll always reduce the life by the same number: a single xray photon opens a single ionizied path in the silicon dioxide, and that single ionized path will saturate at a small fixed current). So after 8 hits in the airport xray machine, you've probably got a number of one bit errors. And then the discussion above about whether or not you'll notice the error and whether or not you ascribe it correctly comes into play.

      PS: these days, most microcontrollers, PICs, CPUs, MMUs, and other assorted large chips also have EEPROM cells on board. But in any particular computer, the technology used to design the EEPROM cells in functional chips is usually 5 to 7 years ahead of the technology used to create EEPROM cells in memory chips. That means that if your CPU is using a .2um technology (that tells us that the transistor channel will be .2um x .4um in EEPROM memory cells), then your bulk EEPROM is probably using a .5um or 1um process. That means that not only does your bulk memory have far more EEPROM transistors, but that each one is 6.25 to 16 times as large. For this reason, we can ignore the probability of getting a one bit error in your CPU when discussing the likely places for errors to occur. But a rigorous discussion would require that we pay attention to all EEPROM cells in a computer.

      --
      -- Nolite audere delere orbiculum rigidum meum.
    6. Re:X-Rays and computers? by bko · · Score: 1
      I'm curious as to your sources for this information. Searching on google was generally unhelpful, so any references you have would be great. there seemed to be a fair bit of "will my film be damaged" questions, and a fair number of "x-rays damage ccds" articles, but i didn't see any on eeproms (flash was unhelpful as a keyword because it associated w/ camera flashes, as was cmos, which pulled up no results).

      thanks for any information you can provide.

    7. Re:X-Rays and computers? by sinster · · Score: 1

      My source of information is the physics, chemistry, and design knowledge gained through a BS degree in Computer Engineering, with a focus on full custom CMOS VLSI design, and years of practice with the skills.

      I can't point you to any single one of my textbooks and give you a page number that says "airport xray machines damage channel insulation". But I could point you to one of my materials science textbooks that discusses the ionizing behavior of high energy photons. I could point you to one of my chemistry textbooks that discusses the ionization energy of SiO2 insulation, its breakdown voltage, and ionization byproducts. Then to one of my basic chemistry textbooks that'd let you calculate the saturation current of an ionized conduction channel as a function of the ionization energies of the outermost valence electrons of the atoms which have been ionized. And of course, I'd have to point you to one of my design textbooks that discusses the structure of different types of transistors. After that, you'd have to sit down and do a bit of thinking to realize why buried gate transistors are susceptible to this kind of damage but other CMOS transistors aren't (hint: it's all about saturation current).

      In other words, this subject /is/ my professional training. Unless you're prepared to go out and do a bunch of studying to get up to speed, then lets just say that I am my source of information on this subject, and leave it at that.

      --
      -- Nolite audere delere orbiculum rigidum meum.
  28. Poor Guy... by __aaahtg7394 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I feel bad for whoever's TiBook this is... he didn't get the AirPort card! that means he has to actually leave the internet behind when he goes to the can!

    (I just got my TiBook, and the airport range is less than spectacular anyway... sigh.)

    1. Re:Poor Guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got an iBook and the AirPort range is awesome. Covers the entire house and yard (.4 acres). Maybe it's the Cisco Aironet hub I use instead of the normal Apple/Lucent hub?

    2. Re:Poor Guy... by __aaahtg7394 · · Score: 1

      i've only heard rumors, but i hear it's just bad design of the TiBook. such is the way.

      the bigger screen alone makes the TiBook worth the extra expense to me, though i've had nothing but frustration with it otherwise (a word of caution: small rocks can get in between the screen and the large, flat expanse of metal when the machine is closed. and if you then proceed to walk around with it in your courier bag for a few hours, you wind up with a very large spot on the screen and marring on the metal. Not Good. i'm going to call apple about this on tuesday, to demand a replacement under warranty, because i consider this to be a design flaw)

    3. Re:Poor Guy... by IvyMike · · Score: 1

      I just got my TiBook, and the airport range is less than spectacular anyway... sigh.

      Have you tried other base stations or alternate base station antennas? (Just curious)

    4. Re:Poor Guy... by Spruitje · · Score: 1


      Have you tried other base stations or alternate base station antennas? (Just curious)


      The problem is not the basestation but the fact that the case of the Pb TI is made of .... titanium.
      And a titanium case is a very good in keeping radiosignals in or out.
      So, Apple had a problem with putting an antenna in the Pb TI.
      Their solution is the best they could find.
      They put a ceramic antenna on the left side and made some holes in the case.
      This does work but it isn't as good as the antenna in for instance the iBook.
      That's the drawback of using a titanium case.

    5. Re:Poor Guy... by phillymjs · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've discovered that being able to read /. from the Throne Room (or the patio) alone is worth the cost of the AirPort stuff. And the range on the dual-USB iBook is great.

      ~Philly

    6. Re:Poor Guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you folded your notebook with a rock inside it and you consider that a design flaw??

    7. Re:Poor Guy... by __aaahtg7394 · · Score: 1

      of course not. it was closed, inside a sleeve that is open where you insert the laptop, and inside a courier bag. i hadn't opened the laptop since the night before, in the car, and put it away while in the car. i assume the rock got knocked into the sleeve when i closed the bag up, after reading in the park (i sat in a landscaping bed, the place was full of people eating lunch).

      i think it's safe to assume that things aren't going to work their way into a closed laptop--i've not had a problem with this on my previous laptops. the marks are at a point where it makes perfect sense for something to have fallen in and gotten wedged, banging and scratching and dinging around for the rest of the day...

    8. Re:Poor Guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't you heard?

      It's ok to blame companies for stupid things that people do on their own. Heaven forbid that anyone that screws up actually take responsibility for it. Gotta blame it on someone else....

    9. Re:Poor Guy... by __aaahtg7394 · · Score: 2

      i hate to reply to myself on this one, but i figured i would point out something: when i pay 2700$ for a piece of equipment, i expect it to be solid. i expect it to be well-designed, and i expect it to be well-made. I expect all weaknesses to be clearly labeled on a sheet of paper included with the manual, especially ones that affect the most costly component of the system. True, i don't need warnings like "the display can be scratched," but instead things like "when closed, the latch is not guaranteed to be perfectly snug." If they had noted this weakness in the design relative to similiar products, i would not have had the problem.

      Anyway, this is something for me to bitch at apple about, not for me to expose myself to public humiliation over.

    10. Re:Poor Guy... by Mononoke · · Score: 1
      Anyway, this is something for me to bitch at apple about, not for me to expose myself to public humiliation over.
      Too late.

      BTW, you could close and latch any laptop on a 'rock.' There is enough play in the keyboard to allow all sorts of things in there. If there wasn't enough play in the keyboard, typing would be very difficult.

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    11. Re:Poor Guy... by RevAaron · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I realized I was pretty nerdy when I caught myself taking my iBook to the bathroom to read some STk documentation whilst pooping. heh.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    12. Re:Poor Guy... by torpor · · Score: 2

      Actually, those marks you're starting to see are the result of the grease on your fingers, transferring to the keys, which - on occasion - touch the screen when its closed.

      Learn to keep your tiBook keyboard clean. I mean *really* clean... or try out one of the various 3rd party 'protective sleeves' that are popping up now.

      My tiBook is a few months old. Just remember this: when the hinges start flecking paint, those flecks will get on the keys.

      And don't worry - the aluminum under the paint actually looks *really* good once the paint is all gone. Buff it!! It's a personal point of pride!

      :)

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  29. WARNING!!!!#(*&@( by Firebaal · · Score: 3, Funny

    CAUTION!!!!! XRaying Windows machines WILL cause your X-Raying machine to crash!

    1. Re:WARNING!!!!#(*&@( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And X-rays of TiBook's make airport security nervous! Look at that intimidating battery pack!! =)

  30. DMCA Complaint by Bob(TM) · · Score: 5, Funny

    By suggesting the use of an X-Ray machine to examine the interior of this computer, you are describing a method by which one can determine the layout of the circuit board (which is protected by copyright).

    Since the case is secured by a means to prevent access (screws) except as authorized by the copyright holder, you have, in effect, transported a method to bypass said method of "encryption." As such, you have potentially violated rights under the DMCA.

    Please remove the description of the x-ray methodology and all links from your site. Failure to do so may make you potentially liable for copyright violation and subject to civil penalties.

    DMCA - the Peter Principle of Legislation

    --

    The little guy just ain't getting it, is he?
  31. You need advice? by ubertroll · · Score: -1

    oo oo oooo oooooo oooooo
    oo oo oo oo oo oo oo
    oo oo oo oo oo
    ooooo oo oooooo oooooo
    oo oo oo oo oo
    oo oo oo oo oo oo oo
    oo oo oooo oooooo oooooo

    oo oo oo oo
    ooo ooo oo oo
    oooo oooo oo oo
    oo ooo oo oooo
    oo oo oo
    oo oo oo
    oo oo oo

    oooo oooooo oooooo
    oo oo oo oo oo oo
    oo oo oo oo
    oooooooo oooooo oooooo
    oo oo oo oo
    oo oo oo oo oo oo
    oo oo oooooo oooooo

  32. Mirror by Night0wl · · Score: 4, Informative

    TiGutz in Blue
    TiGutz plain

    The 3m and 9m files will half to wait for later ;p
    Sexy stuff.

    --
    Computational Madness in a round package.
  33. 4 circles by BrookHarty · · Score: 2, Funny

    What are the 4 circles on the bottom right?

    Kinda cool, see the firewire and usb ports, and the dual speakers. Even the 802.11b antenna. The battery doesnt look very hi-tech. lol

    1. Re:4 circles by dnorman · · Score: 1

      PRAM batteries. They keep some juice going to keep stuff like the clock and startup volume set properly. Didn't know there were 4 of them, though...

      --


      It is pitch dark. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    2. Re:4 circles by vincent99 · · Score: 1

      They're not PRAM batteries.. the PBG4 doesn't even have one, let alone 4; just a small capacitor that lasts for a little while.

      They're belt pulleys for the DVD drive('s suck-loading mechanism, I think).

      --
      -- V
    3. Re:4 circles by stephan.kohls · · Score: 1

      Acctually this it the backup battery. It it a flat thing in a rhomboid pattern which enables you to swap the main battery while the PowerBook is in sleep mode. It is located above the slot-loading DVD-ROM drive.

    4. Re:4 circles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clever - swap a battery without having to shut down. Do Wintel laptops have this?

    5. Re:4 circles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you can use this laptop to run your pram?

      Those Apple people, they think of everything...

  34. X-Rays a violation of DMCA? by Allocutor · · Score: 2, Redundant

    Could the X-raying of electronics be a violation of DMCA? Seems like there might be a lot of copyrighted work in there, right down to the patterning of PCBs. And an X-Ray machine certainly could be used to circumvent a factory sealed case... Should have gone to L-school

    1. Re:X-Rays a violation of DMCA? by Spruitje · · Score: 1


      Could the X-raying of electronics be a violation of DMCA? Seems like there might be a lot of copyrighted work in there, right down to the patterning of PCBs.


      Of course. But not outside the US.
      And second, who does give a shit about the DMCA?
      The US is vastly becoming a second world country compared with Europe and the rest of the world.
      And the DMCA will only makes this worse.
      That happens when you let corporations rule your country instead of your government.
      You lose and the corporations win.

    2. Re:X-Rays a violation of DMCA? by kilrogg · · Score: 1

      Sadly though, many countries around the world are following the US' lead and implementing similar laws (see this article (btw Canadians, there is only 2 weeks left to send in your comments on the proposed copyright reforms)). Don't laugh at the DMCA because soon a similar law may affect you.

  35. Mmmm... by satanist · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, see that shadow spot in the top left? Yes, it looks serious. Looks like a mycrosoftius tumor. Probably malignant. We'll have have to remove several ASICs, the hard drive, and a few capacitors. You may even have to subscribe to Office XP. It doesn't look good. Please tell your family and have your credit card limit increased.

  36. Tech Support by Firebaal · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Welcome to APPLE COMPUTER customer service, how may I help you on this beutiful day? My name is Mike" "Ahhh, yes I seemed to accidently X-Ray my brand new Powerbook G4 to get slashdotted but all my files seemed to get erased! What should I do?" *customer service guy faints* "Hello?" "......" "HELLO?!"

  37. Richard Gere's ti-book by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 4, Troll

    I just know that one day some sick bastard will bring his ti-book to an x-ray technician who'll be started to find a gerbil shoved up his PCMCIA slot.

    1. Re:Richard Gere's ti-book by htmlboy · · Score: 2

      I just know that one day some sick bastard will bring his ti-book to an x-ray technician who'll be started to find a gerbil shoved up his PCMCIA slot.

      Richard Gere? Wouldn't that more likely be something Brodie's cousin Walter would do?

  38. ATTN: Ralph JewHater Nader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    While you may feel concerned about kikes for various reasons, there is an even bigger threat lurking: Trolls.


    No, I'm not talking about the sort of troll who surfs slashdot posting useless comments; I'm talking about the sort of troll who lives under bridges and jumps up and eats you when you try to pass


    We should not rest until it is safe for our children and our children's children to again cross bridges without the fear of being eaten!!!

  39. You sir, are a genious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    God bless you, and many thanks!

  40. OMG by UnclePaeng · · Score: 2, Funny

    That thing runs off 8 AA batteries!

  41. Get this filth off of slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    This type of disgusting trash doesn't belong on the Internet, much less on slashdot. Now I've seen gaping assholes and blatant racism and anti-semitism but this type of thing just crosses the line. The exploitation of children is not something that slashdot should be promoting. And by keeping this sort of filth on their servers they are promoting it. I've reported this post to the administrators of Slashdot, and I hope they take immediate action to bring a stop to this filth and whoever is purpatrating it.

    1. Re:Get this filth off of slashdot. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 0

      Strange that you would get modded -1 for this response. Suppose I will too. Damn, the meta-moderation can't happen quickly enough, as far as I'm concerned.

  42. Desktop? by flink · · Score: 1

    I noticed many people mentioning the fact that this pic makes a great desktop image. I'm just curious: How many of us have even seen our desktops lately. I almost always have at least one if not more windows maximized. The most I see of my background image is when it flashes by when I flip to a new virtual desktop.

    1. Re:Desktop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see my desktop whenever I have to restart X because that crappy KDE crashed again.

    2. Re:Desktop? by Kev+Vance · · Score: 1

      Pseudotransparent Eterms



      Okay, didn't pass the lameness filter. Back in my day, we didn't.. bah. Anyway, that's an old screenshot.

      --
      F0 07 C7 C8
    3. Re:Desktop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer aterm. It doesn't care what program you used to set the background unlike eterm or gnome-terminal and it does all kinds of tinting.

    4. Re:Desktop? by Kev+Vance · · Score: 1

      aterm, eh? I'll have to try it. I'm using Eterm because at one point it was the only terminal emulator that did it, and if it ain't broke... fwiw, Eterm supports tinting also.

      --
      F0 07 C7 C8
    5. Re:Desktop? by The_Messenger · · Score: 1
      Aterm is really slick... it has NeXTstep-style scrollbars, so it goes really well with WindowMaker and AfterStep. It's very configurable. Download it here.

      Personally, I've gone back to plain old xterm. Tinted, transparent windows are great for showing off and taking screenshots, but unless the transparency allows you to see other windows (most new window managers, including GNOME, E, KDE, AS, and WM, only show the wallpaper in the "transparent" area), it's really sort of useless -- a waste of RAM and CPU cycles. I've been told that OS X has real transparent terminal emulators (with anti-aliased, shadowed text -- ooh!), but I haven't seen this in action. Also, believe it or not, Windows 2000 offers this feature (one of the Windows weenies at the office showed me last week), although it is never used in application programming because the transparent forms aren't supported in Win98, NT4, et cetera.

      But if you want transparency , aterm will do it, and seems to be much mroe resource-friendly than eterm.

      --

      --
      I like to watch.

  43. WOW by alexborges · · Score: -1, Offtopic



    Where is this ascii you say????

    :)

    --
    NO SIG
    1. Re:WOW by ubertroll · · Score: -1
      It's everywhere.


      * g o a t s e x * g o a t s e x * g o a t s e x *
      g g
      o / \ \ / \ o
      a| | \ | | a
      t| `. | | : t
      s` | | \| | s
      e \ | / / \\\ -- \\ : e
      x \ \/ --~~ ~--| \ | x
      * \ \-~ ~-\ | *
      g \ \ .--------.__\| | g
      o \ \_// ((> \ | o
      a \ . C ) _ ((> | / a
      t /\ | C )/ \ (> |/ t
      s / /\| C) | (> / \ s
      e | ( C__)\__/ // / / \ e
      x | \ | \\__// (/ | x
      * | \ \) `---- --' | *
      g | \ \ / / | g
      o | / | | \ | o
      a | | / \ \ | a
      t | / / | | \ |t
      s | / / \/\/ | |s
      e | / / | | | |e
      x | | | | | |x
      * g o a t s e x * g o a t s e x * g o a t s e x *

  44. And that is a good thing too. by dmaxwell · · Score: 3, Informative

    I once had to obtain a new battery for P75 laptop and that battery could not be had from anywhere. However, the cells were in Batteries Plus' catalog and they were able to rebuild the battery for me.

    I used to work as a technician for a firm that rented environmental instrumentation and we recelled batteries all of the time. It is a common practice for more than just laptops.

    1. Re:And that is a good thing too. by compwizrd · · Score: 1

      I've been trying to get my 5.25" cdrom sized battery pack from my old Omnibook 5500CT apart, looks like they desigend it so even if you take the screws out, it still doesn't come apart. Frustrating to say the least.. Not that i expect to find lithium batteries that are rechargable anyways =)

  45. Apple geeks need to get a life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    It's just a fucking computer, don't 'tard out over it.

  46. How'd they get that in somebody's mouth? by Crusty+Oldman · · Score: 5, Funny

    How'd they get that in somebody's mouth to take the picture?

    1. Re:How'd they get that in somebody's mouth? by ubertroll · · Score: -1

      Michael Sims' mouth sure is big enough. He sucks a dozen dicks simultaneously.

    2. Re:How'd they get that in somebody's mouth? by Crusty+Oldman · · Score: 1

      A five on Slashdot! I can die now, my work is finished here.

  47. Mirror by mosch · · Score: 1, Redundant
    That guy is slashdotted. Nab it here instead!
  48. wrong...moron by xXgeneric+nicknameXx · · Score: 0
    X-Rays are just light

    light is light...X-rays are X-rays. they're both electromagnetic radiation.

    --

    My cat's breath smells like cat food.--R. Wiggums

  49. yeah well now you are the moron. by CMiYC · · Score: 2

    alright well if you want to call me the moron, at least get it right yourself. Technically "Light" is infrared, ultraviolet, or visble. My point is that x-rays are no more harmful than visble light. If we could "see" x-rays we would call it light as well. Fundementally radio waves, x-rays, and visable light are all the same thing anyway. Which is the only thing you got right.

    1. Re:yeah well now you are the moron. by t · · Score: 1

      Hmm... perhaps you should read up on the discovery of xrays. And how they used to radiate their hands and whatever going "ohh aahh... neat oh..." and such. Until of course the effects of all that radiation on the body became painfully obvious.

    2. Re:yeah well now you are the moron. by Dahan · · Score: 1
      X-Rays may be "light" for some definition of light, but they're definitely more harmful than visible light. X-Rays are ionizing radiation--they can knock electrons out of orbit. Even ultraviolet light, which isn't that far from visible light in the spectrum, can be pretty dangerous.

      .
      .. You are a moron. Q.E.D.

    3. Re:yeah well now you are the moron. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think that light is harmless, I'd like to give you a little demonstration involving a magnifying glass, the mid-day Arizona sun, and your laptop.

    4. Re:yeah well now you are the moron. by xXgeneric+nicknameXx · · Score: 0

      ok...lets do a little experiment. how about if i go outside and spend 2 hours in the midday sun and soak up a few rays and you go to the hospital and spend 2 hours getting dosed by the X-ray machine. lets see who lives until the end of the week.

      --

      My cat's breath smells like cat food.--R. Wiggums

  50. What lameness filter? by ubertroll · · Score: -1
    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    XXX XXXX
    XXX XX XXX
    XXX XXX
    XXX XXX
    XXX XXX
    XXX XXX
    XXX XX XXX
    XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX XXX
    XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX XXX XXXXX XXXXX XXX XXX
    XXX XX XXX XXX XXXX XXXX XXX XXX
    XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX
    XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX
    XXX XXX XXX XXX XXXXXX
    XXX XXX XXX XXX XXXXXXX
    XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX
    XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXX XXX XXX
    XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXX XXX XXX
    XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX XXX XXX
    XXX
    XXX
    XXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX XXX XXX
    XXX XXX XXXXX XXXXX XXX XXX XXX
    XXX XXX XXXX XXXX XXX XXX XXX
    XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX
    XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX
    XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX
    XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX
    XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX
    XXXX XXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
    XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXX
    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX
    XXX
    XXXX XXXX
    XXXXX XXXXX
    XXXXXXXXXXXXX

    How do I submit stories to Slashdot?

    You can submit a story by using the Submissions Bin. When you submit a story, please remember to include appropriate links. Also, you'll have a better chance of getting our attention if you use a clear and specific subject line.

    Before you submit a story, please take a minute to make sure it's not a duplicate of a story we've posted already. Check the main Slashdot page and make sure it hasn't already been posted.If it's not breaking news, you might also run a search to see if it's something that might have been posted on a previous day. Roughly ten percent of all our story submissions are duplicates of stories we've already posted.

    Can I submit a story anonymously?

    Yes. And furthermore, anonymous submission will not increase or decrease the chances that we'll select it. (We do, however, reserve the right to refer to you as an Anonymous Coward, and mock you mercilessly.)

    How do I Ask Slashdot?

    Ask Slashdot is maintained by Cliff. We prefer that you submit questions through the submissions form, selecting the section "Ask Slashdot" so we know to route the question to Cliff.

  51. Re:ATTN: Ralph JewHater Nader by Ralph+JewHater+Nader · · Score: -1

    Are you talking about niggers? In my experience they don't eat their victims, the negroes simply mug them and buy drugs with the loot.

    --

  52. X-Ray? by sprior · · Score: 1

    I'm holding out for the MRI.

  53. New desktop backgrounds! by ChristianBaekkelund · · Score: 1, Redundant

    These images make great new desktop backgrounds... :)

  54. AirPort card by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 3, Funny


    Oh, so that's where the AirPort card slot is in these.

    For the humor impaired--yes, I do know where the AirPort card goes. I do believe that the TiBook Engineering team's meeting with Steve Jobs went something like this, however:

    Jobs: Wow! That's thin, and sexy! We're going to sell a billion of these! Raises and stock options for everyone! By the way, how do you put the AirPort card in?

    TiBook Team: Um, AirPort card?

    Jobs: AirPort--and it's Absolutely Vital that the home user be able to install this card by themselves, without fucking anything up--as simple to install as RAM. You've got that in there, right? Otherwise, you're going to be shitting Titanium bricks really soon...

    Titanium Team [palming screwdriver]: Oh, right! AirPort! Hahaha, we were just fooling. Of course we have that built in! Too bad we didn't bring a screwdriver to this meeting, we'll show you how to put an AirPort card in at the next meeting! You don't really need two PCMCIA slots, right?

    --

    --
    $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    1. Re:AirPort card by linuxbert · · Score: 1

      well you dont.. it has everything built in..
      work lent me a TiBook with airport. i loved it.. i miss it..

  55. well for me... it shows up more often by moogla · · Score: 1

    While I browse the web just as much as the next person, I spend a lot of my time using typing at the command line terminal. Specifically, I use aterm, which I set to be translucent (a randomly chosen hue). Images like that x-ray which are monochromatic look especially cool tinted, and because it's fairly dark, white text will look good superimposed on top. In fact, I just added it now. Thanx, Guy, you're one cool d00d!

    --
    Black holes are where the Matrix raised SIGFPE
  56. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  57. Not exactly... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Don't forget he sees the image from the other side of your monitor, thus the source of the confusion.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  58. Classic stability... by solios · · Score: 2

    ... is excellent if you don't run any applications or measure your uptime in nanoseconds. I've used six through ten.... the systems I've had the MOST problems with were 8.1 on an 8600 and 9.0.4 on an iMac. The most annoying- which doesn't count due to the fact that I'm payed by the hour to hassle with it- is a G3/Media 100 with 8.6.

    I had one of those HP Lovecraft moments a few months ago- I began to seriously question my sanity when I realized that the only Mac at work that hadn't been rebooted in over a month was..... my workstation. The one that was used every day, all day- a G4/733 with OS 9.1. The only time it's blown up in the last month was when I attempted to connect a bad firewire drive to it.

    For UNIX, that's a fart in a hurricaine. For Windows, it's next to impossible (my boss runs Win2k and reboots at least twice before lunch, the sysadmin for the building cycles his every week or two).... and for the Macintosh OS, I'd thought it propability zero.

    Wish I could get that level of uptime on my damned 9500 [G3/333, 196 RAM, Lucent USB, no-name Ethernet, Adaptec SCSI, Infinity and ATI video cards, Sonnet IDE card w/ an IBM and Fujitsu drive.... every piece of gear in the beast is made by a different manufacturer. Wouldn't stay up for more than ten minutes until I put OS X on it. :P ]

  59. Re:My analysis by daImpact · · Score: 1

    Did you see the shadowing around HD?? Maybe a virus or something.... Any recent installs of GPL software?

  60. This reminds me of the time... by Karpe · · Score: 2

    ...I was stopped at JFK airport because they couldn't figure out what I was carrying. They could only see two almost empty boxes except for a very dark area on the X-Ray machine, and some wires coming out of it. They probably thought "someone set up us the bomb" (TM), but it actually was a pair of Labtec computer speakers. Very fine speakers, I use them since 95 without problems. But It really got me confused to explain to them what I was carrying. (english is not my native language). I also had a HD with me, but at my pocket not my backpack, so it didn 't go through the monitor, only the metal detector. Not any problem with it also, I still use it.

    1. Re:This reminds me of the time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Now see, if you were a white American and not a filthy.. (err.. br.. what the fuck is br? Brazil?).. filthy Brazillian speaking that filthy pig latin you speak they wouldn't stop you. I'm sure if you were a good natured white American they wouldn't give you any problems about taking C4 or firearms aboard the plane. There was a documentary called Airplane II about this in the 1980's.

    2. Re:This reminds me of the time... by itomato · · Score: 1

      That there is pretty rotten.. But also damned funny! I'm torn!

    3. Re:This reminds me of the time... by big_hairy_mama · · Score: 1

      That's funny? You're just as racist as all the other trolls that have been posting here lately.

  61. Did it. by CdotZinger · · Score: 1


    It's the same (size/res) as the PICT file. Pretty damn exciting.

    --
    Your mouth is like Columbus Day.
  62. Re:ATTN: Ralph JewHater Nader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    You forgot to add rape to that list

  63. FYI by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    It's AAPL not APLE. Don't ask me why, as APLE isn't taken, but AAPL is the symbol they are traded under.

  64. Sorry, but I'm going to have to call you on that by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2
    Please remember that all EM radation acts differently. Low energy radation like FM radio has no real effect on organsims while high energy EM like gamma radation will kill you in short order. There's a reason they make you wear those cute bibs at the dentist's office. X-ray radation IS dangerous if you're exposed to too much of it.


    The properties of EM radation change drastically over the spectrum. For example, visible light is easily blocked by little solid matter, even a 1mm sheet of aluminum is enough to block all but the most intense lights. On the onther hand, radio waves will go right through. That's why you can pick up TV signals in a room, even if little outside light is getting in. Don't assume that the properties of one frequency range of EM radation necessairly apply to another.

  65. Details from TiXray.orig by Phroggy · · Score: 2, Informative

    The TiXray.orig file is in DICOM format, and I imported it into GraphicConverter. If anyone's interested, this is what GraphicConverter put in the comments:

    Image Type: ORIGINAL\PRIMARYStudy Date: 20010424Acquisition Date: 20010424Image Date: 20010424Study Time: 154340Acquisition Time: 154532Image Time: 154531Accession Number: TiModality: CRManufacturer: Lumisys Institution Name: Institution Address: Referring Physician's Name: Referring Physician's Telephone Numbers: Station Name: OPACS_SENDERStudy Description: Name of Physician(s) Reading Study: Operator's Name: Administrator Admitting Diagnoses Description: Manufacturer's Model Name: Lumisys LS135 Patient's Name: PowerBook^TitaniumPatient ID: Apple Patient's Birth Date: 20010101Patient's Sex: O Other Patient IDs: Ethnic Group: Additional Patient History: Body Part Examined: Device Serial Number: clt35403.datCassette Orientation: PORTRAITCassette Size: 35CMX43CM Relative X-ray Exposure: 1713View Position: Study ID: c0a865080gq5m8Series Number: 1 Image Number: 1 Photometric Interpretation: MONOCHROME2 Pixel Spacing: 0.172\0.172 Study Priority ID: MED Requesting Physician:

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  66. It does work! by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    Just tried it out and it works.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  67. Geek. by ivaldes3 · · Score: 1

    Proof that you are a complete geek when you can actually identify each of the parts on X-ray. Har, har.

    -- IV

    --
    http://www.LinuxMedNews.com Revolutionizing Medical Education and Practice.
  68. ImageJ by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 2

    ImageJ is a Java app that will handle the file without a problem and being in Java it is x-platform. Oh, and the source code is available on the download page.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  69. Troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fuck you moderator, this is a good point. you must be an apple geek, in which case you are biased in your moderating.

  70. Way Cool Wallpaper by bill.sheehan · · Score: 1, Redundant
    I don't know what anyone else did with this, but I grabbed the TiGutzBLUE.jpg and made it my default KDE wallpaper. Nice graphic!


    "My God! It's full of stars!"

  71. Whoooaaa!! by melikeyporn · · Score: 1

    Just x-rayed my TI. Dude, I got a lot of porn on my hard drive! See for yerself... http://www.bath-and-body.com/products/kenstixray.j pg

    1. Re:Whoooaaa!! by Home�rew · · Score: 1

      Dude, that is totally 100% funny.

      --
      Pablo Piccaso was never called an asshole. Not like you.
    2. Re:Whoooaaa!! by Home�rew · · Score: 1

      btw, u gotta take the space outta the .jpg part ta make the link work

      --
      Pablo Piccaso was never called an asshole. Not like you.
  72. AA batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup.

    Lithium-ion ones.

    Time for laptop manufacturers to standardise the setup so if your Li-ion batteries go you can just swap them out for Nicads or (shock) even one-shot alkaline batteries for emergencies.

    At least one digital cordless phone has Nicad AA batteries inside.

    It works for portable radios (so much nicer and smaller than a Walkman) so why not in a laptop?

  73. I'm sure it's a lovely town... by JamieF · · Score: 1

    But I wouldn't want to live down in the southwest corner near all those storage tanks. I bet there are some nasty chemicals down there.

    Isn't aerial photography wonderful?

    Oh wait, you're saying that's a laptop?

  74. I resized 'em and stuff... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey!

    I resized the x-ray to 1152x768, flipped it vertically, and played with colorization. Good wallpaper fo a TiBook. The gold one is my favorite:

    http://homepage.mac.com/gqualls

  75. hello I am a coward and anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a post which is cowardly and anonymous.