Slashdot Mirror


What Can You Do When Defrauded on eBay?

zeno_lee asks: "About 55 eBay buyers were defrauded by a single high volume ebay seller. I discovered all the victims by backtracking each transaction this guy had for the past month and contacting each one individually. Everyone lost between $400 to $1700 each. I then started an email group to organize action against him and to get our money back. This guy was particularly successful because he had positive feedback ratings before he decided to jump ship. " Systems like eBay are, as most have seen, extremely popular, but the one big shortcoming is that the system only works when buyers can trust the sellers. It's actions like this that break the system and if dishonest sellers can get away with fraud, auction sites will suffer. What options are there when consumers have been frauded on auction websites?

"Most of us followed the proper procedures. You wait 30 days to file a fraud claim on ebay. Then you have the option of getting $175 at most from eBay's insurance. It softens the blow, but for many it's not anywhere close to what they lost. Contacting local authorities hasn't accomplished anything nor has filing with the FBI. Many people who paid via PayPal did get a refund, but others paid via checks.

eBay has been one of the bright spots of the internet. As a NYSE listed company, you'd expect more to be done about helping customers. I hope this question comes as a warning to be more cautious on eBay or not to bid for items on ebay over $400 without escrow protection. I've learned my lesson not to do business with anyone who doesn't use paypal or billpoint. But regardless of what we learned, most of us feel helpless because eBay has not done more to get our money back. Any suggestions?"

143 of 382 comments (clear)

  1. Paypal doesn't give you much more protection by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 2, Redundant

    Paypal will only protect you if you pay with a credit card, and then only because you dispute the charge. (Also note that if you dispute a charge, you will get your paypal card yanked, since in essence paypal is now getting stuck with the bill)

    1. Re:Paypal doesn't give you much more protection by soren · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've used paypal numerous times successfully w/o a problem. Whether sending money from my bank account to someone just for the purposes of cash or purchasing on eBay. There was one problem with an eBay transaction. Suffice to say, the guy never fulfilled his obligation and proceeded to not respond for a month, then I notified paypal, they did their investigation and within a week I received a phone call notifying me that they had refunded the $539.00 -- problem solved. I'm not sure whether the guy had his paypal acct. yanked or who knows what action paypal took, but, problem solved on my end. ;)

      --
      :wq
    2. Re:Paypal doesn't give you much more protection by choprboy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Paypal will only protect you if you pay with a credit card

      Not true! Paypal will cover any transaction, provided you follow some simple and quite obvious steps:
      - Conduct transactions with verified users
      - Ship/send money only to the listed address
      - Use some common sense and not deal with someone who... say..., wants that new computer bought at $300 shipped overnight to a MailBoxes Etc., doesn't care shipping is going to cost $250, and says he's paying with a credit card (which just happens to be in the name of someone else).

      Really, how hard is it to spot things like this? Same thing applies to sellers. Ship to confirmed address and have paperwork/tracking numbers to back up your end of the transaction. I deal on Ebay all the time, people have tried to screw me over, but I take some common sense. In every case, I've either got my money back, or a replacement from the seller.

      Of course, on the other hand, the support systems of both Ebay and Paypal are terrible. It's not uncommon for it to take 4 or 5 days to get an illegal auction cancelled (bulk email addresses) on Ebay, or a month to report a spammer using Paypal as a payment vehicle.

    3. Re:Paypal doesn't give you much more protection by cymen · · Score: 2, Informative

      PayPal only refunds the money if they can get it out of the the account of the abuser. If that person has emptied his/her account PayPal will do nothing. I believe the original poster was pointing out that when you buy something with a credit card you have protection. With PayPal you have none.

    4. Re:Paypal doesn't give you much more protection by Tye_Informer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have used PayPal many times, but don't be fooled into thinking there is any protection! I bought an item for $89. (An ATI Radeon Video card) This was ~$20 cheaper than I get get it locally, so paying $9 for shipping didn't seem bad. The problem, they shipped me a card that did not match their description at all. (Not the ATI Radeon, didn't look like the photo, didn't have the features mentioned in the auction, etc.)

      After a month of sending emails and phone calls, of which none were returned, I filed tried to use SquareTrade, this at least got a response but still no fix. I then filed a complaint with PayPal. PayPal looked into it, and a few weeks later sent me a nice email, explaining that yes I had been defrauded, they found 100% in my favor, the refund. $0!! My guess, the seller had disappeared off of PayPal, so no money could be recovered. This was 6 months ago, and I have given up hope in getting anything back. (I was contacted by the District Attorney for Washington state, apparently the seller had started taking money for products and not sending them soon after my problem)

    5. Re:Paypal doesn't give you much more protection by choprboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unfortunately, more often true than not. Paypal only really covers outright theft, not disputes of "description" or dissatisfaction. My advice, forget the reccomendations of waiting 45 days, or whatever, and file a notice of dispute immediately (not the formal request for reimbursement). That puts Paypal on notice and they will immdiately flag the account if a couple other simmilar notices come in. And you did exactly the right thing following, call up the local police department and ask to speak with a detective in theft. Fraud and theft is fraud and theft, it doesn't matter whether you live a mile away or a 100 miles away.

    6. Re:Paypal doesn't give you much more protection by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 2

      Also note, if the other person has taken the money out of their account, it's too late, you can't get the money from paypal. I was ripped off by someone and that's what they told me after several weeks.

    7. Re:Paypal doesn't give you much more protection by markyd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Interestig one that. Not sure how the law works in the states, but in the UK, a credit card company is jointly liable for all credit card transactions. This means that if you buy something on a credit card from anyone and it doesn't turn up for whatever reason, the credit card company has to give you your money back (unless they can prove you were stupid).

      So if any of this happend to me on a british credit card, I get my money back from the card company and they have to chase the seller / paypal etc.

  2. Escrow Transactions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If its more than the insurance limit, escrow all transactions.

    1. Re:Escrow Transactions by TopShelf · · Score: 2

      Or use a credit card - fraud protection is pretty much a standard feature now...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  3. Ebay by recursiv · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One particularly notorious action concerned a certain 'haunted' painting. Word quickly spread over the net and attracted 10's of thousands of viewers. You can read the details here.

    --
    I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
  4. Auction fraud by man_ls · · Score: 5, Informative

    Auction fraud is illegal, I believe there is a way you can file with the FTC and have the fraudelant seller fined thousands of dollars, or even possibly jailed. IIRC, something about interstate commerce, or whatknot. I think you may also get a full refund of the amount of money you were defrauded from, or a portion of the money collected by the FTC in fines; I don't remember which.

    Look in to it.

    JKoebel

    1. Re:Auction fraud by schnurble · · Score: 5, Informative
      Auction fraud is illegal, I believe there is a way you can file with the FTC and have the fraudelant seller fined thousands of dollars, or even possibly jailed. IIRC, something about interstate commerce, or whatknot. I think you may also get a full refund of the amount of money you were defrauded from, or a portion of the money collected by the FTC in fines; I don't remember which.

      Absolutely. Since this is interstate commerce, it falls under the category of Mail Fraud. Contact the postmaster in your area, as well as the FTC. You might also want to seek legal advice (I wouldn't retain a lawyer yet) to get specifics for your locality (and his).

      --
      "To err is human, to forgive is simply not my policy." --root
    2. Re:Auction fraud by schnurble · · Score: 2
      From the original post:

      What options are there when consumers have been frauded on auction websites?

      And in the poster's own words:

      But regardless of what we learned, most of us feel helpless because eBay has not done more to get our money back. Any suggestions?

      I think he's asking for resolutions to his problem, not prevention for next time. Personally, if I'd lost $1700, I'd try my damndest to get it back before I allowed a "next time" to occur.

      --
      "To err is human, to forgive is simply not my policy." --root
    3. Re:Auction fraud by Subliminal+Fusion · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, but what better way to prevent this sort of crap than to have a few high profile cases where the person commiting the fraud gets nailed hard with thousands of dollars in fines and a jail sentance?

    4. Re:Auction fraud by rgmoore · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That may be true, but vigorous enforcement can have a deterrent effect. Part of the reason that people try these things is that they think that they can get away with it. If they start reading about people who have been fined thousands of dollars and/or sent to jail for a few years for trying to defraud people on E-bay, they may have some second thoughts about doing so themselves. It's certainly not an ideal solution, but since there are already people out there to use as examples it makes sense to prosecute to the full extent of the law.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    5. Re:Auction fraud by 11+platter+hard+driv · · Score: 2, Funny

      IIRC, something about interstate commerce, or whatknot.




      What does IIRC(Intensive Internet Relay Chat) have to do with it?

    6. Re:Auction fraud by sigwinch · · Score: 5, Informative
      Auction fraud is illegal, I believe there is a way you can file with the FTC and have the fraudelant seller fined thousands of dollars, or even possibly jailed. IIRC, something about interstate commerce, or whatknot.
      The US FTC doesn't usually handle individual consumer complaints. However, they are interested in finding patterns of abuse and ripping new assholes for serial criminals. It might not immediately help, but filing a complaint on their web page only takes a moment. The various Better Business Bureaus serve a similar function. You can also send complaints to you state/regional Attorney General.
      --

      --
      Kuro5hin.org: where the good times never end. ;-)

    7. Re:Auction fraud by krenskeoz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      2 years and 2 months ago a organised group set up several 10-20 article auctions of office 97 pro and came through on the deals for a while too build up confidence. I unfortunately bought a copy (for my father for Christmass) about 2 weeks after they decided to hammer E-bay with several very large volume auctions that they then refused to supply. After 5 months of back and forward garbage with E-Bay, (Including the fact their consumer fraud page failed for around 6 weeks straight with errors.) a complaint was made by another australian through our consulate regarding non delivery after payments were sent through the mail. Not long after I received emails from a special agent NNNNNN requesting all possible information.

      About 14 months ago I was informed a couple had been arrested in Texas on no less than 850 cases of mail fraud as many people had refused to use credit cards but rather used mailed money orders and cheques. I later saw reports in the IT section of our national paper discussing the conviction of a texas couple for E-Bay auction based mail fraud. I assumed that was them. I believe they were given 800 years of jail time, they were to serve a minimum of 5 years with the remainder to run concurrently. The fraud was believed to have netted over $200 000. The whole case was one of the first to actually progress through the courts, as an example. I guess they were lucky, being held in Texas they may or got the chair :)

      When I mentioned it to my father he was a little concerned over them having to do time. How else though would you deter people from doing it again?

    8. Re:Auction fraud by Nater · · Score: 2

      How else though would you deter people from doing it again?

      Award the amount frauded plus quadruple damages to the victims... Just a suggestion. I don't know what the current limits are, but I doubt the current law allows for that much.

      --

      I like to play children's songs in minor keys.
      "We're all sons of bitches now." --J. Robert Oppenheimer

    9. Re:Auction fraud by sydb · · Score: 2

      Or, what better way to escalate the arms war between dishonest sellers and innocent buyers?

      Punishing dishonesty doesn't turn would-be criminals into model citizens. It makes them work out ways to avoid being caught.

      What's needed is to make it harder for them to commit crimes, so that the profit incentive is reduced. If you can do that whilst minimising the cost of crime prevention, then honesty has prevailed.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    10. Re:Auction fraud by stripes · · Score: 2
      Award the amount frauded plus quadruple damages to the victims... Just a suggestion. I don't know what the current limits are, but I doubt the current law allows for that much

      I haven't heard of more the 3x damages, but that doesn't mean 4x doesn't exist. The problem is organized fraud like this makes more money then most people can repay. For example if you steal $200,000, how much are you going to spend? How much of it is on durable goods like cars, and how much on fleeting things like dining out, or hookers? Ok, now you get arrested for fraud. What do you do with the rest of the money? Ah, hire a lawyer, wonderful. Do you get the best you can afford? Ok, that takes care of the rest of the money.

      So now you lose the case (if you win, nobody get anything back anyway). You have spent all your money. Your broke. You are also in jail. There are very few jobs in jail, I don't think any pay above minimum wage, in fact I think they may all pay below it. So how long does it take to repay $200,000 plus three or four times that for damages at basically no pay?

      Assuming you ever get out of jail (rather then being murdered there), what do you do with your life? Any money you get legally will be garnished, part of it given to your victims. That doesn't really encourage you to seek a high paying legal job...assuming you were talented enough to get one anyway (would you bother to steal $200k if you could earn it? Most people wouldn't).

      Do you take crappy legal jobs? Or do you try to get the only well paying jobs that let you keep the money? That would be the illegal ones.

      I'm not saying large fines cause more crime, but it does seem logical that assessing fines larger the someone's net worth may not deter crime as well as assessing fines at or slightly below their net worth. They definitely don't cause rapid repayment...

    11. Re:Auction fraud by Nater · · Score: 2

      Good call.

      This is an idea I just came up with while reading your comment, so it hasn't had much time to ferment. Anyway, what if the state paid whatever part of the award the frauds couldn't and then imprisoned the frauds for as long as it took them to pay it back to the state (or life, whichever is shorter).

      Obviously there would sometimes be cases where the state loses money, but think of the deterents involved. With an award guaranteed by the state, a cottage industry of bounty hunters will develop that actively tries to get defrauded, then take the frauds to court. In the presence of such a cottage industry, frauds would have a significantly more difficult time not getting caught and their risk goes through the roof. If they're successful for a while, then they're probably going to spend the rest of their life in jail when they do get caught, and if they're not successful, then they'll lose five times what they raked in and be off to find a better living.

      Further analysis and critique is by all means welcome, as this is really just a few minutes pondering on my part.

      --

      I like to play children's songs in minor keys.
      "We're all sons of bitches now." --J. Robert Oppenheimer

    12. Re:Auction fraud by sydb · · Score: 2

      Of course I have heard of justice, and where a fraudulent act has been committed, I agree that punishment must be served.

      However, if we can prevent an act of dishonesty, by making it more profitable to be honest, then there is no need for justice.

      This is surely every reasonable person's preferred outcome. Nothing you said invalidated my original argument, so I presume you misunderstood me.

      It would be better if people were naturally honest, but that's not realistic.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    13. Re:Auction fraud by Nater · · Score: 2

      This is called Debtor's prison, and is one reason the original colonists wanted to break away from England.

      Debtors are people who borrow money, not people who steal it. We're talking about fraud here.

      --

      I like to play children's songs in minor keys.
      "We're all sons of bitches now." --J. Robert Oppenheimer

  5. eBay will protect you -- to an extent by Chester+K · · Score: 2, Redundant

    eBay has fraud protection guidelines where they'll reimburse up to $200 of the loss.

    --

    NO CARRIER
    1. Re:eBay will protect you -- to an extent by Quikah · · Score: 2

      That is what Escrow is for, which again is pointed out by the article's author. Really the question is already answered.

      Use Ebay's gurantee for something up to $200 then Escrow for above that. Really not that tough to figure out.

      --
      Q.
  6. Re:cut his balls off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    and if he wants them back, make him bid for them on ebay

  7. I think I read a suggestion by JoeShmoe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remember back a couple years ago when eBay frauds were big news...some article was suggesting that whenever possible involve the US Mail system. Have them mail you a quote, or mail payment information or such.

    The thing about it is, mail fraud is a federal crime which much higher penalties than other forms of fraud (Internet fraud being generally unclassified). If you get ripped off online, you can try to complain to your local police, or the police in the criminal's jurisdiction (if you can find it) but you will probably get nothing.

    In you involve the mail system, then the it becomes a federal issue that is tackled by the Office of the Postmaster General and/or the FBI?

    Don't quote me on this, but it would be definitely something to ask your local post office about. If a seller is legit, they should have no problem putting some information on paper and mailing it to you, right?

    Other than that...the other thing that was suggested is use a credit card. Paypal had a big fight with credit card agencies on whether people can dispute Paypal charges for fraudulent auctions, but I seem to remember that the courts came down on the side of consumers (yes they could dispute) forcing Paypal to get insurance.

    Sorry I couldn't find a link, but maybe it helps narrow down your searching?

    - JoeShmoe

    --
    -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
    1. Re:I think I read a suggestion by sigwinch · · Score: 2
      The thing about it is, mail fraud is a federal crime which much higher penalties than other forms of fraud (Internet fraud being generally unclassified).
      Mail is about the same as Internet from a strict legal point of view. The difference is that the Postal Inspectors pay attention to every complaint they receive and they're humorless professional government enforcers with considerable discretionary power. If it goes through the mail, they can kick ass and take names for you. If it doesn't, you are more on your own.
      --

      --
      Kuro5hin.org: where the good times never end. ;-)

    2. Re:I think I read a suggestion by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 2

      You've given me an idea for a deterrent. After winning an auction, ask the seller for a final quote for payment purposes. Specifically mention that you require this so that the seller is subject to Mail Fraud laws. While some sellers might take offense, and some criminals may laugh at you and send it anyway, I expect most small criminals would think twice before doing "business" with you.

      -Paul Komarek

  8. What I did: by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2

    I got screwed out of $400 once on eBay. The guy was using a PayPal account, thankfully. I called my bank and disputed the charges (which I'd paid with my debit card). I guess it helps that my bank is JP Morgan-Chase (the largest in the country), because, within a couple of months, I'd strongarmed my money back into my pocket. All of it.

    It probably depends a lot on your bank/credit card company, but I've been 1-for-1 so far. (I don't intend to try for 2-for-2.)

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:What I did: by SCHecklerX · · Score: 2

      Yup. My bank is ready to do this for me right now. The company that failed to ship the product I paid for has finally stated that my account should have been credited yesterday (no credit yet...), so if I don't have my money back by tomorrow, I'm disputing the charge through USAA, and am sure they will get my money back for me.

  9. My Screwed Experiences with Ebay by Calle+Ballz · · Score: 4, Informative

    I shop ebay quite often, and though I've had a few bad experiences, I've managed to let them go...

    1. From one seller, in 4 different auctions I bought 4 15" monitors for $25 a piece. Shortly after I sent him a money order for the combined total of the 4 auctions, this guy seemed to disappear off the face of the earth. His user account was cancelled, his email address bounced mail, and his phone number was disconnected. eBay didn't do anything for me at all.

    2. I bought a Cisco 3000 router that claimed to have 16 MB of RAM and 8 MB of Flash (enough to run IOS 12.0). I receieved the product which had barely enough flash & ram to run IOS 9.0 (worthless nowadays). I contacted the seller, he promised to send me the replacement RAM & Flash, he sent me some bunk chips that didn't even fit in the device. After numerous other emails and phone calls with no answers, I finally gave up. ebay didn't do anything for me on this one either.

    3. I won an auction for a bootleg TOOL video. I sent the guy the $14 total, and I never received a product. Apparently this guy screwed over 4 other people bidding on the same item from him, we all left negative feedback. This time the amount was not enough for ebay to care.

    Each time I filled out one of ebay's fraud reports, and never EVER got a response. Since these losses weren't too important, they were all things I never really needed, just impulse buys that would have ended up sitting in a corner taking space, I don't really fret over it. Plus, if you believe that the grand scheme of things fits together in one huge orchestrated puzzle that meshes together... they'll get what's coming to them.

    1. Re:My Screwed Experiences with Ebay by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      What is ebay supposed to do for you, exactly, other than factilitate the auction. All Ebay can do, at most, is provide contact info, or yank the guy's account. That's it. They are not part of the financial transaction.

  10. The system works by CmdrTroll · · Score: 5, Informative
    If you pay by credit card, you will not have to pay for fraudulent charges because it is the merchant's burden of proof to show that you got what you paid for. Almost all banks are extremely sympathetic to customers who are victims of fraud, because banks (who make about 2% commission on every single purchase on your card, in addition to interest) want to keep you as their customer. They don't have any reservations about sticking it to a bad merchant. And yes, if you paid through PayPal, you can still dispute the charge and win (regardless of what PayPal tries to tell you). I've done it before - because PayPal's customer service takes weeks to respond and my bank (MBNA) is much faster and nicer.

    If you paid by check or money order, though, you're just plain silly. Just because a seller has a fancy auction page or a good feedback rating doesn't mean you should send a check for $400-1000 to a total stranger somewhere else in the country and expect the seller to make good on it. Where's your common sense? People get busted for that all of the time and auction sites account for the majority of fraudulent online activity. So think before you pay next time, and good luck getting your money back.

    -CT

    1. Re:The system works by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      That's not true. Merchan'ts don't get to know if you have disputed charges or not.

      What IS true, though, is that most merchants, if you have ever disputed a charge with them, will never accept a credit card from you again (which makes sense, no?)

    2. Re:The system works by rkent · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you think you've been defrauded by someone using your credit card, you'd have to be cracked to use it again yourself.

      This happened to me recently. Someone used not only my citibank card number, but also figured out my address and phone number (creepy...) and ordered some "virtual phone cards." I immediately notified citibank, who terminated that account, and rolled my balance over into a new one. I had new cards within days.

      Furthermore, if you take advantage of it, being defrauded can make it that much more difficult for someone to steal your financial/personal information again. If you put a fraud watch on your SSN with the three major credit agencies (Equifax, Experian, and Trans Union), you will stop receiving pre-approved credit offers, and all institutions requesting to extend credit in your name must speak to you personally to confirm first.

      Furthermore, if you've been defrauded, you can probably get a free copy of your credit report, and that can potentially help you clean up a whole other category of problem: inaccurate (but not fraudulent) credit information.

      In short, disputing charges only puts you out for a few days, and is totally worth the hassle if you've genuinely been swindled. If you do it repeatedly, you might run into trouble, but that's because you become rightfully suspected of either taking advantage of the system, or handling your cards insecurely.

    3. Re:The system works by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      I've designed an ecommerce system. Similar to design of CyberCash, and they do keep track of your chargeback rating and get scores. It will flag of a "Risk" and most often will have you call or send another form of payment. The good thing (or bad thing) is that if you go against different merchant backends (there aren't that many that are widely used) they don't share the charge back data cross-network.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    4. Re:The system works by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      Sorry. I forgot the US system is a bit different.
      You have 'merchants' or whoever that then deal with the end-user businesses.... you have an extra tier of service.

      Canada, we don't.. the 'merchant' is the business/client, and the other end is a bank. Period.

    5. Re:The system works by Xerithane · · Score: 2
      I'm not really speaking of localized service. I'm speaking of electronic commerce. I'd be very surprised if your local mom&pop store has a direct line into a credit card clearing house, but instead is going through a tier to the clearing house.


      That's all an ecommerce providor is, the little box you swipe your card through. The only difference is the little box is a small cluster of computers that checks to make sure the transaction will hopefully go as smooth as possible.

      I know of quite a few canadian oriented businesses that do ecommerce through merchant access kits. Most companies don't have the cash or resources to maintain a direct veriphone contract anyway, which is the only way you can clear and process (Merchant => Bank) credit card transactions. In most circumstances it's Business => Merchant Vendor => Bank.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    6. Re:The system works by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      Hmm. Perhaps I misunderstood it all then.

    7. Re:The system works by sphealey · · Score: 2
      What IS true, though, is that most merchants, if you have ever disputed a charge with them, will never accept a credit card from you again (which makes sense, no?)
      Um, not, it doesn't make sense, since it would make the entire concept of a "credit dispute" under the Fair Credit Report Act meaningless. Such behaviour might well be actionable under the FCRA and/or Robinson-Patman Act.

      sPh
    8. Re:The system works by Xerithane · · Score: 2
      That is pretty much what I was saying. You have the little box, connecting to a merchant processing house that talks to a clearing house. I may have to go re-read what I wrote.. but that was what I was trying to illustrate.


      Final point was no one connects to a clearing house unless they are doing bulk (nightly close, etc).. Did you use the veriphone system for the CSI or another mechanism? I hate veriphone.. they did however finally get an XML interface to connect instead of their absurd "language" to process orders.. yay for innovation.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  11. Duh ... use escrow services. by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Escrow services like Tradenable (formerly i-escrow) and even Billpoint let you trust the largish corporation (which has much more incentive not to cut and run) instead of the seller. When buying anything over $100, I always use escrow. Sure it costs a couple of bucks more, and there's a tiny amount of added hassle (you have to go back to the web site to verify that the stuff arrived on time), but the security is great and the service really isn't very expensive.

    On several occasions, shady-sounding individuals have backed out of auction deals with me, after I suggested using Tradenable. To me, that's the surest sign of a huckster and a good indication that escrow works.

    1. Re:Duh ... use escrow services. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2
      had my first experience with escrow. went positively.

      went privately for a purchase (almost $3k camera) after bidding on it on ebay and having my bid NOT take for some reason (my bidBastard(tm) auction assistant must've failed me - darn!).

      for such a large sum, I would never have done this without an escrow. was able to pay that day via credit card, have him ship it the next day, and I got it the day after that. all was well. for anything over a few hundred $$, escrow is the way to go.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  12. Have the seller ship by geekoid · · Score: 2

    my wife always has the item shipped, and then we pay.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Have the seller ship by napir · · Score: 2, Informative

      And how does this protect the seller from being defrauded by the buyer? I've been selling on eBay for several years, and there's no way I would ship the item to a buyer before I received payment.

  13. Try changing your username by TheEviscerator · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd try bidding with a username like "Tony Soprano", or "Michael Corleone". I'm guessing that people would think twice about defrauding you.

    --
    The pomposity of the professor is inversely proportional to the difficulty and importance of the subject being taught.
    1. Re:Try changing your username by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
      "James T. Kirk"?, "Yahoo Serious"?, "The Eviscerator"?


      Yea, that'll work.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  14. The problem with Reputation... by Ted+V · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem with reputation is that it's just so easy to buy! Lets say I go place 20 bids on random crap and my $1 bid wins. Hey, I just got 20 points of reputation for $20! Then I can sell the crap back for maybe $.50 and I have 20 more points worth of reptuation! For literally $10 (and some free time), you can get 40 reputation points from ebay. The whole reputation system is flawed because untrustworthy people are allowed to give out good feedback. Who says that just because someone was honest with a $1 transaction that you can claim they are a "Good trader, very prompt"? What do you know about whether that person is really honest? Yet people give all the feedback to others because they want good feedback in turn.

    Listing how much money was spent as part of the feedback doesn't really help either. Just set up a ring of ebay accounts, bid on each other's stuff, and have it sell for higher values. Sure, ebay gets a small cut, but all you're really doing is buy reputation from ebay which you use to screw other people. Suppose I forge $5000 of transactions on ebay and they take 3%. I just bought an enormous amount of reputation (trustworthy for $5000 in transactions) for $167. It shouldn't be that hard for an unethical person to go make $500/scam off of 20+ people.

    Lets face it... Reputation doesn't mean anything.

    -Ted

    1. Re:The problem with Reputation... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

      But the quality of reputation matters - before I buy anything, I look to see what they have sold before (as a seller). If all they've sold is $1 items, why would I trust a $1000 purchase with them? The only way I'd even consider it is escrow, and even they it'd have to be an amazing deal to consider it.

      Still, there's no reason you can't sell $1000 items for a while and then gyp a whole lot of people for $1000... it's a danger but I agree with those that say anything over $100 you should probably buy through escrow (though I'll admit I've bought a lot more expensive items than that without escrow).

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    2. Re:The problem with Reputation... by choprboy · · Score: 5, Informative

      The problem with reputation is that it's just so easy to buy! Lets say I go place 20 bids on random crap and my $1 bid wins

      Well, gee... Your saying maybe we ought to look at the actual circumstances of the transaction rather then some overall number? Anybody who does Ebay business regularly should look at the seller's actual auctions. More than once I found deadbeats trying to build up feedback like this. Usually a ring of new accounts, all selling ridculous things like "Used condom" or "Banana peal" for $0.01 that closed 5 minutes after it opened with the "Buy it Now" feature. Easy... report them, accounts closed, move on with life.

      Just set up a ring of ebay accounts, bid on each other's stuff, and have it sell for higher values

      Well, that's a good idea too, it's called "Shill bidding" and it's against the rules. Again, by looking at the actual auctions you can easily detect this. Don't just look at the feedback of the seller, look at the feedback of those who left the seller's feedback, and the feedback of those who left the feedback of those who left feedback. Are they all the same people? Are they all new users whose account were all created the same day? If so, it's a pretty obvious clue there's some fraud going on.

      Most criminals aren't very smart, instead they just rely on others being dumber than they are.

    3. Re:The problem with Reputation... by Mike+McTernan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The whole reputation system is flawed because untrustworthy people are allowed to give out good feedback.

      Err, you are lacking a base case without this! (the trusted people have to come from somewhere!!!)

      Maybe a system where it is hard to gain trust and easy to lose is better. Kinda like TCP windows. Trust is gained point at a time, but lost by half. That way, one person with a complaint can really blow the whistle on a bad guy.

      This would put the cost of scamming up quite a bit assuming each ripped off person provides the negative feedback.

      --
      -- Mike
    4. Re:The problem with Reputation... by cowsurfer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, it's pretty easy to pad feedback on eBay... You have to look for other signs that they're a trusted seller, other than the feedback, like actually looking at the actual auctions - if they're all 50 cent items and you're planning on buying a 2x800 G4 from the guy, somethings going on... if you don't smell fish, you better go take some decongestants.

      There are a couple of other things that you can do, too. There's a pretty reputable company out there called SquareTrade that has a Seal that certifies sellers as legitimate. I doubt they can do anything is a situation of fraud, but they do dispute resolution too. They do some pretty extensive checking on sellers... plus they have a fraud protection guarantee so that you're protected against fraud for an additional $250 (over eBay's amount). I think they also have somewhere on their site where you can search for items being sold on eBay by their members, but i forget where it is.

      *the tide is right for cowsurfing*

    5. Re:The problem with Reputation... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2

      All it takes is a little patience on the con-man's part. Ebay 'expires' auctions way too quickly, you can't go look at an auction that is more than a few months old. Many times I have clicked on the auction id number in a seller's feedback to have ebay tell me that the page no longer exists. IMHO that's bogus, they should keep the expired auction info indefinitely - it is only a few K per auction and disk space is cheap.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    6. Re:The problem with Reputation... by MikeFM · · Score: 2

      I think it'd make plenty sense to calculate reputation against both number of transactions and total dollar amount. If you can give a party a negative, neutral, or positive rating then when you calculate it put that +/- 1 per dollar in the transaction. Then maybe take your total and take some percentage off for every transaction under the line you've drawn for the experienced users.. say 100 transactions..

      You could still screw with the system somewhat but you'd have to work a lot harder at it. I think forcing escrow on all transactions greater than $100 makes sense too. It doesn't even have to be through a corporation.. allow users with really high trust ratings to work as escrow for a couple dollars per transaction if they're willing.. have an escrow service reverse auction built-in.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    7. Re:The problem with Reputation... by Etyenne · · Score: 2
      Again, by looking at the actual auctions you can easily detect this. Don't just look at the feedback of the seller, look at the feedback of those who left the seller's feedback, and the feedback of those who left the feedback of those who left feedback.

      And, if your time is worth anything, it end up much cheaper to buy your part at CompUSA.

      --
      :wq
  15. A fool and his money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It is just this type of naivete that allows so many people to get ripped off on Ebay. PayPal does not protect you. The only way they will refund is if the seller cannot prove delivery (and only in the US). And the seller can send you a rock and PayPal is fine with that!

    The Ebay $200 insurance is a joke. You only have a chance to get $175 back and that's only when you spend many hours with their stupid hard-to-use forms . Ebay it self favors Ebay not the protection of buyers or sellers.

    Same goes for the way Ebay removes Microsoft auctions. They are in bed with Microsoft so what else would you expect?

    Escrow services work most of the time but they are not cheap or guaranteed. Bottom line if you can't afford to lose it don't buy on online auctions.

  16. Escrow, with a twist... by chhamilton · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Perhaps eBay should take a step forward here and make escrow transactions standard. If eBay itself would act as the escrow agent, and build it into their infrastructure, everybody wins. Typically, escrow fees are pretty tiny, and in reality, they make sense for most transactions.

    If eBay set up a decent, reliable, and affordably priced system and made it inherent in the auction process, the masses would follow.

    1. Re:Escrow, with a twist... by cr0sh · · Score: 2

      This is a good idea, especially with items over a certain limit. However, with small items (ie, those with low bids - I know there is a difference between a 10 caret diamond and a bolt) the fees would have to be adjusted accordingly.

      One thing about escrow - doesn't the third party have to hold the item while waiting for the money (or vice versa, depending on which arrives first)? If that is the case, then EBay would need a large warehouse as well as inventory tracking just to keep things straight - and then there is always the possibility that things could be "lost" in escrow (sticky fingered employees) - hopefully that could be cut to the minimum (security and insurance mostly)...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    2. Re:Escrow, with a twist... by cr0sh · · Score: 2

      And then, does the escrow service only release the money to the seller when the buyer confirms receipt of the item, and satisfaction with it? If that is the case, then a warehouse wouldn't be needed, and most of my suppositions are out the window...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  17. Same problem from other direction: bad buyers. by aussersterne · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What about all of the bad buyers?

    I both buy and sell on eBay. I've stopped listing auctions with the BuyItNow! option because too many of my auctions have been ended when a brand new bidder (i.e. someone who joined eBay within the last couple of days) comes and uses BuyItNow! to end the auction, then disappears completely and is never heard from/never logs into eBay again. Negative feedback doesn't help in this case, because these bidders inevitably have a feedback of zero or at best one and don't care if they lose one point.

    Even without BuyItNow, I've had a number of auctions close and then never heard from the high bidder again, forcing me to relist and costing me time and money. In the worst case, one of my auctions closed at just over $300, the buyer e-mailed me a simply said "I changed my mind I don't want it sorry" and when I left negative feedback saying so, I of course got the retaliatory "FRAUD! Took my money and never delivered!" feedback. Legal action got the feedback removed, but that cost me as well.

    I think that eBay should require a bank account number as a pre-requisite for buying or bidding. You agree when you join that if you default on a bid or if you are accused by n people of fraud, your assets will be frozen until the situation can be resolved and those involved can get the money owed to them.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    1. Re:Same problem from other direction: bad buyers. by BJH · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yahoo auctions here in Japan (I don't know about in the US, sorry) now require a credit-card number as a prerequisite for both posting and bidding on items, as the direct result of a rash of auction fraud incidents.

    2. Re:Same problem from other direction: bad buyers. by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree with you that there is a problem, but I don't see freezing assets as a solution. eBay, like it or not, is not seen as being as "legitimate" as say, an auction house. It's more like the internet classifieds. Doing business on eBay implies a certain risk, though I do think eBay should have some sort of protection for the seller (as in not charging them a fee) if the buyer bails. There's a certain culture to eBay (look at the wording on the feedback ratings, you'll know what I mean) that just oozes "take with a grain of salt." eBay is "buyer beware" more than anything else.

    3. Re:Same problem from other direction: bad buyers. by Mr.+Protocol · · Score: 2

      I'm interested in hearing about how "Legal action got the feedback removed..." Could you give some details of how you did this? Who did you take action against? Ebay, or the other party?

    4. Re:Same problem from other direction: bad buyers. by G-funk · · Score: 2

      True, but what about the rash of people who want you to paypal to a hotmail address? There's no way I'm paypaling to a hotmail address, espescially when half these people don't even respond to emails. I'm under no obligation to buy from somebody who doesn't answer emails.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    5. Re:Same problem from other direction: bad buyers. by John+Miles · · Score: 2

      Doing business on eBay implies a certain risk, though I do think eBay should have some sort of protection for the seller (as in not charging them a fee) if the buyer bails

      They do. It's called a Final Value Fee (FVF) refund.

      --
      Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
    6. Re:Same problem from other direction: bad buyers. by jgerman · · Score: 2

      Uhh, no, I agree with you for the most part, but I am a honest ebay user and there is no way in hell I'm giving them my bank account number. I barely trust them with a cc#, especially since they're in bed with MS.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
    7. Re:Same problem from other direction: bad buyers. by aussersterne · · Score: 2

      Basically eBay has a really strong policy about changing feedback -- they just won't do it unless you have attorneys and courts and things involved.

      So in my case (some time ago now) it came down to having my attorney look into going after the bidder himself with whatever we could. When the bidder received what my attorney had set in motion, the bidder then apparently talked things over with his attorney. Then both attorneys got together and worked something out amidst a whole stack of paperwork. They then approached eBay with the deal they'd worked out and, in the end, both pieces of feedback were removed.

      I don't want to get any more specific than this without first asking my attorney, as you can see I have no real idea when it comes to legal issues. Basically the whole thing wasn't worth it and really soured me on leaving negative feedback without first warning people that I'm considering doing so and seeing how they react.

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    8. Re:Same problem from other direction: bad buyers. by jgerman · · Score: 2
      You'd be suprised what you can do with a bank account number, I'd be suprised what you can do with a bank account number. In fact look at it like this, if a bank account number was used as a form of id online, what's to stop someone from signing on at a site as me?


      As far as the MS thing goes, if it's the usual anti-ms gripe it's only because MS has given so much to gripe about. I refuse to allow them to have any of my information, their security is so poor that I'd never feel safe.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
    9. Re:Same problem from other direction: bad buyers. by Fjord · · Score: 2
      there is no way in hell I'm giving them my bank account number


      So you would never pay by cheque? Your bank account number is printed on every single one of them.


      I agree though, that having this as "verification" would encourage more fraud, as people will just get bank account numbers from unsuspecting cheque writers.

      --
      -no broken link
    10. Re:Same problem from other direction: bad buyers. by jgerman · · Score: 2

      A check is much easier to trace, and in general, slightly more difficult to get, physical access is needed; I will admit that if someone wants that info they can get it. Although personally I don't pay by check unless absolutely necessary. More do to the fact that I find it archaic and a pain in the ass to write out checks. So I do something worse, I use my check card. So I'm already tracked everywhere.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
  18. That ol' stamp and envelope thing... by sphealey · · Score: 5, Informative

    For any significant amount of money on eBay I send the postal money order by U.S. Mail. The penalties for mail fraud are quite severe and the post office does like to investigate reports of same.

    See if any of the buys used the U.S. Mail and/or a postal money order. If so, have that person or persons file a complaint with the postmaster of their zip code, and have him reference the other cases that you have dug up.

    sPh

    1. Re:That ol' stamp and envelope thing... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2
      I agree - I believe sending a postal money order thru the US mail (NOT the private carriers) offers better protection than so-called 'safe' things like billpoint and paypal.

      mail fraud is serious. might take time to resolve, but its better to have the US govt fighting for you than some uninsured company (yes thats right, paypal is not a bank and they don't conform to FDIC style rules).

      also, ensure that you're not dealing with a minor! I once bought a cpu from a kid (not knowing it was a kid) via ebay. he promised it was going out, promised again, etc. weeks went by. I contacted others who bought from him and they also didn't get their stuff. I did get his phone number from ebay and his mommy answered the call. said her little baby wouldn't EVER do anything wrong... threatened small claims (we're in the same state, calif.) and he finally shipped the damned cpu. when I notifed ebay that he had 'borrowed' his mommies credit card to register for ebay, they promptly cancelled his account. sheesh, you'd have thunk they'd verify this before giving him the account!

      buyer beware was never truer than on ebay.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  19. what is eBay supposed to do? by dpease · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I'm not sure what eBay is legally--or even morally--obligated to do in this instance. You knew the risks, and eBay spells them out in their user agreement. Look at it from their point of view: they spell out the risks that you take, and their liability, in black and white. It'd be nice if they'd hire a private dick to track this scumbag down and sell him off to some slaver for the money he owed all of you, but that's not a reasonable way for a company to respond, NYSE listing or not.


    The scope we're talking about here is such that you can't expect local and federal authorities to burn lots of man-hours bringing you justice. You've done the right thing by reporting the incident, and perhaps something will come of it.


    As others have said, the number one best idea for buying big-ticket items over eBay is to use credit, because of those great limited liability clauses. If someone doesn't take credit (or PayPal), you've got to ask yourself how much you'll be hurting if your money wings off through the mail and the item never comes.


    Good luck.

    --
    Spare me your rationalizations. All I know is, stem-cell research kills a quasi-living four-day-old blob.
    1. Re:what is eBay supposed to do? by sphealey · · Score: 2

      I agree that it is unclear if eBay should have any responsibility here.

      But if you think they do, and you think they have not fulfilled that responsibility, write a letter outlining your case, and how you think it should be resolved. Put the letter on paper with a physical signature. Address the letter to the Chairman of the Board of eBay, with a copy to the chairman of the Audit Committee if he is a non-employee director, or to the senior non-employee director if he is not (I think the audit committee must be non-employees but not sure). Mail the letters US Mail, registered, return receipt requested.

      Note that you are unlikely to get any action anyway. But a registered letter to the Audit Committee must be logged and reviewed by someone, so you at least have a bit of a chance.

      sPh

  20. Interesting statistic from eMarketer: by Lawmeister · · Score: 4, Informative
    Found this on webmastertechniques.com


    Less than 66% of internet users have not been a victim of online fraud... Per victim, the price of fraud hovers around $600, which is more than most research estimates of average online retail spending.


    What this means is that 34% of all internet users have been screwed over (if you believe their report). Show me another industry that has that high a fraud rate - there isn't, why? 'cause the Fed's would come down hard.


    This just isn't acceptable.

    1. Re:Interesting statistic from eMarketer: by haruharaharu · · Score: 2

      Show me another industry that has that high a fraud rate - there isn't, why?

      For starters, the Internet is not an industry. It is a worldwide public network

      --
      Reboot macht Frei.
  21. 55 people is a LOT. Call EBay and the FBI by tinrobot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That is some serious fraud. I would imagine that EBay would have a vested interest in prosecuting this guy to the fullest extent because he lessens the value of their product. Defrauding 55 people is also a federal crime because it crosses state lines. I'm sure the FBI should be notified as well.

  22. Do what I did... by BoarderPhreak · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I reported him to the following agencies:

    - United States Postal Service
    - Internet Fraud Center
    - FBI
    - Discover Card
    - Ebay
    - Billpoint
    - PayPal

    This guy is currently wishing he never heard of me, with several charges levelled against him, including:

    - Mail fraud
    - Credit card fraud
    - Grand larceny
    - Plus the fact this was all interstate, making it worse.

    I also tracked his ass down using every known resource on the Internet, and ended up with his home address, home phone, AERIAL PHOTOS OF HIS HOUSE and more...

    Needless to say, my money has been safely returned and he's in a world of shit. Sorry, asshole.

  23. Wanna buy a bridge? by MadCow42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'll sell you and each of your friends a bridge that they can call their own for the meer sum of $25 each.

    After I've defrauded you on this, you won't feel the need to pursue it personally, because after all it's only $25. This is great, because I can now go and defraud the next guy, and eventually become a millionaire.

    The point is, "these losses weren't too important" just don't cut it. You have some sort of responsibility to ensure that these people don't f**k over other people too. If everyone just rolls over because it's too much hassle, they'll never stop because it's profitable.

    Please, for OUR sake, do NOT forget about these types of things, and pursue them as hard as possible, no matter how trivial $25 or whatever seems to you.

    Thanks,
    MadCow.

    --
    I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
    1. Re:Wanna buy a bridge? by Calle+Ballz · · Score: 2

      I leave my bad feedback. But I don't have the time, money or resources to pursue action like this. In the case of the router, this guy, because he had enough complaints against him had his account cut off. The guy with the monitors, apparently did something because his account was killed before I got a chance to leave my own 2 cents.

      In the case of the guy selling me the tooltape, I eventually got a copy of the entire video on the internet for free, and I figure 5 negative feedbacks all in a row for one account is a good sign you have a deadbeat seller.

      What goes around comes around, but when I take a gamble (what I consider every ebay transaction) and I lose, I will not waste my life for a small amount of money.

  24. I think I know this guy! by YouAreFatMan · · Score: 4, Funny
    Sure, I know him. I tried to purchase "The Truth" from his auction. It never showed up. The price was just too good to be true. Then he sold me 12 kilo of primo mexican brown. This time, all I got was a 25-lb bag of flour. Then I bought a human kidney from him. I didn't need it, but hey, you don't want to wait on one of those lists. Never arrived.

    I'm beginning to wonder if there are any good deals left on ebay...

    --
    Robotiq.com is heavily tested on animals
  25. Re:Good Feedback isn't a guarantee. by FeriteCore · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There are good reasons for that.

    First, ebay's much hearalded feedback system is constructed to discourage negative feedback. The text on the feedback page pleads with you not to leave negative feedback. If you decide to leave negative feedback anyway you must go through an extra confirmation page that is not required for positive feedback.

    Second, it opens you to retaliation from the other party in the form of negative feedback. The only negative feedback I ever received was retaliation from the only seller I ever left negative feedback for. Investigating his feedback history I discovered that he only ever left negative feedback, and most of that was retaliation for negative feedback he received.

  26. I just got done with a fraud battle on Ebay... by greygent · · Score: 5, Informative

    I just got done with a fraud battle on Ebay and this page was of immense help, and eventually got me my full money back from the bastard who tried to swindle me:

    http://www.mindspring.com/~bookdealers/ripoff.ht ml

    Pay particularly close attention to the sections on reporting the fraud to the IFCC section of the FBI, and the Postal Inspector fraud complaint form.

    In the postal inspector's case, when you file a fraud report, they notify the person that they're being investigated. This led to me promptly getting a $600 money order from the criminal in question. They actually had the money order to me in a day, and it cost them $25 to mail it. File reports galore, and try to get as much information about the person that you can.

  27. Do whatever it takes by dgb2n · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I had a bad experience on a $150 item (cell phone).

    The seller answered email immediately until I verified that I sent payment (he insisted on a money order). After that, he wouldn't answer email and his Ebay account was cancelled.

    I didn't take it laying down. I started by running a reverse lookup on his mailing address to get his phone number. Sure enough, that was disconnected. His email didn't bounce so I emailed him and informed him that I was contacting the local police department. I contacted the local police department and it turned out they'd had two complaints against the guy.

    All of a sudden he appeared back and said that the "shipment must have been delayed". 5 days later the phone arrived postmarked the day after I notified the Police.

    Auction fraud is fraud. Report it and hound them into the ground.

  28. Use your Capital One Credit Card... by hyrdra · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously, this isn't a product plug and I know Capital One isn't the best credit card company to ever exist, but I have been defrauded a few times on eBay, and each time I have used my Capital One credit card through PayPal. Capital One has an online protection program and all you have to do is call them up and explain the situation. They sometimes ask you to fax or e-mail documents and then they stop the charge by doing a charge-back.

    The process is completly transparent, and Capital One fraud investigators then automatically take over if, neccessary. They know you don't HAVE to pay the bill, and most people won't if they have been the victim of a fraud.

    The key is to do it quick, e.g. if you suspect you are dealing with a fraud, (e.g. "I just shipped it."), stop the charge. The worse that could happen is there will be a delay. Another option would be to stop the posting of the charge, but keep the charge. In this way, the seller is still guaranteed the funds because they are set aside for them, but they don't actually have them in their hands.

    This has worked good, and is why you should NEVER transfer money from your checking or bank account, because it's much EASIER to get credit back than your *real* money. PayPal says a bank transfer is the prefered method, and with good reason because they don't end up eating the cost when one their accounts commits fraud. You do.

    --


    "I'll just chip in a bit for RedHat: I actually have that installed on my university machine." - Linus, '95
  29. Mail fraud site by slouie · · Score: 4, Informative

    It becomes possible mail fraud if they don't deliver within the time alloted and they don't notify of delays or offer a full refund.

    For details and to file a complaint:

    http://www.usps.com/postalinspectors/fraud/welco me .htm

    --

    "I may be Love's bitch, but at least I'm man enough to admit it."
  30. Call the USPS. by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 2
    Since the people who paid by check are the ones who lost out, then get the USPS involved. This is presuming that they mailed checks. Mail fraud is a big thing for them, since it gives them a chance to flex their muscle.


    Also, go to the FBI and mention RICO. The feds may take his computer.

  31. How do we protect ourselves from fraud? Easy... by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 2

    Use a credit card to make the purchase. I don't buy anything from a vendor who doesn't take plastic or use a service that does.

    --
    by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
  32. What's the difference? by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 2

    When a seller disappears without sending merchandise out that's already been paid for, it's a terrible thing for the people who've lost money. If the seller took the money and ran, it's also illegal.

    But please, folks, keep in mind this happened before eBay and it'll keep on happening.

    Retailers go under all the time, and they often take customers' money with them. Sometimes the officers will cut and run with the cash, too. Other times they simply went bankrupt and couldn't deliver what they promised.

    A retailer can usually make more money keeping things together for a few months than it can by stealing and running away, so logically there's no reason to oommit theft. Unfortunately humans aren't always logical.

  33. FTC has trained more than 700 in 20 countries.... by Lawmeister · · Score: 3, Insightful
    From a report dated October 2000:


    As part of the ongoing Internet law enforcement initiative, the FTC has trained more than 700 law enforcement and consumer protection officials from 20 different countries, including 17 federal agencies, 25 state governments and 14 Canadian consumer protection offices in online investigation and law enforcement techniques in locations ranging from Anchorage, Alaska to Paris, France.

    Sounds like these are the boys (and girls) in blue to talk to. This is where to find them to file a complaint.

  34. Sue by bagman · · Score: 2

    Given the dollar amount involved, I think you have a great chance of finding an attorney who will take your case.

    Many states have consumer protection statutes that allow recovery of multiple damages and attorney's fees. Although this guy may not be a "business" for purposes of these statutes, the number of transactions involved makes for a decent argument that he is subject to consumer protection statutes.

    Also, if what he did really constitutes fraud, he may have committed at least two predicate acts (wire fraud) for federal RICO purposes. Federal law provides for civil damages for RICO violations, along with treble damages and the all important "cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee." 18 U.S.C. 1964(c).

    Find yourself a good commercial litigator and go to town on this guy.

  35. USPS Postal Inspection Service is our friend. by Multics · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I got whacked by a similar deal. 12 positive feedbacks and then wham, 6 of us were ripped off for HP laser printer parts. Thankfully, TWO of us paid by USPS.

    Between the TWO who paid by USPS we crossed the felony fraud line for them. It took them about 2 months to find him (he skipped his address and skipped on his roommates too). Though all I got back was ebay insurance (so far), USPS PIS did find him and jail him. I've not heard if they'll go for recovering all of our money, but eBay was very friendly with the USPS setting up the case.

    Moral: NEVER PAY BY ANY MEANS BUT USPS. People who only accept PayPal are likely to be trouble because they know that there can't be a USPS inspector knocking on their door if they exclude that mechanisim for payment.

    -- Multics

    1. Re:USPS Postal Inspection Service is our friend. by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      Au contraire. Use your credit card and be sure you have fraud protection clauses in your cardholder agreement.

    2. Re:USPS Postal Inspection Service is our friend. by TechnoGrl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >People who only accept PayPal are likely to be >trouble because they know that there can't be a >USPS inspector knocking on their door if they >exclude that mechanisim for payment.

      I must disagree. I *only* accept Paypal because:
      1. I'm a verified Paypal member and the customer is fully protected. The customer can request and receive a FULL chargeback from paypall if I do not ship merchandise.

      2. It's fast and I know there will be no BS regarding payment.

      --
      ----- In Your Cubicle No One Can Hear You Scream...
    3. Re:USPS Postal Inspection Service is our friend. by ScuzzMonkey · · Score: 2

      2. True

      1. Only true if there is sufficient money in your account to cover the chargeback. Of course, any of the sleaze who do this regularly are not going to leave money in their accounts so that this can happen.

      FWIW, I agree with posters above who pay via mail. The post office has the time, inclination, and legal obligation to help you out if you are defrauded while using their service--Paypal, or any other private payment scheme, does not. You are a liability to them the instant you start demanding employee time to resolve any dispute, and they'll be doing the bare minimum they can to keep you happy.

      --
      No relation to Happy Monkey
  36. Paypal doesn't protect anything by anewsome · · Score: 2, Informative

    Anyone who thinks that using Paypal protects you,.. is completley wrong. I have a close friend who was defrauded to the tune of $2,000 and paid via paypal. Paypal says they can not help him and the credit card company will not remove the charge. So be careful out there people. You could really loose some money if the seller decides to skate.

  37. PayPal won't help you even if you follow the rules by (WC)TheBrain · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have been thoroughly screwed on a PayPal transaction, and I'll likely never use the service again over it because of the way PayPal "handled" it.

    I purchased (or should I say, paid for) a GeForce 3 for roughly $400 from a certain merchant (that now appears to be defunct, imagine that). They were a verified user on PayPal, everything seemed legit. Two weeks pass and I get nothing, not even a notice of shipping delay. After a whole slew of emails back and forth, finally ending with me buying the card somewhere else and telling them to cancel the order, the "merchant" just stopped responding altogether.

    So I took the matter to PayPal. Their response: "We have investigated your claim and found the seller to be at fault. However, we are unable to recover any funds because the seller's account balance is zero. Thank you, have a nice day."

    What in the blue fsck is that? The fact that I played by every one of their rules, and they even admit I was defrauded by a so-called "verified" seller, and yet still refuse to extend any consumer protection to me, ticks me off even more. The SELLER should be the one biting the bullet, not me. I did my part of the bargain. He didn't.

    So short moral of the story: don't use PayPal to pay for anything you think might have even the most remote chance of going awry. In the end it's no different than sending cash.

    I am still trying to get that $400 back -- apparently the next step is going straight to my bank and disputing the charge, although I hear PayPal loves when people do that. Well, they can have all the love I'm willing to give on the matter, for being oh so helpful with an obvious fraud case.

  38. I was defrauded by lanner · · Score: 2, Informative

    I, along with a bunch of other people, were defrauded by a business with an eBay ID of bayco.

    It looks like feedback for this user is still around. You can see the feedback.
    http://cgi2.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFe ed back&userid=bayco

    Basically, what happened was this person was selling RAM and processors. Selling more than hey had in stock, and buying after they have received funds from the buyers. Then RAM prices rose dramatically. Whoops, not enough money to buy the parts we promised to the buyers. Screwed.

    This was also a case of a user with a preexisting high feedback rating, suddenly going bad. The buyers could not have helped the situation by researching on the seller.

    Do I blame eBay for this? NO!!! I support eBay. They are just a trading marketplace, I would not want to endanger them or make their lives more difficult by trying to blame this on anyone other than myself, or the bad seller. This would cause problems that would make eBay !eBay.

    I believe the San Jose police got in on the case, and they requested eMails from a lot of us asking to document our experience. I think I have that eMail around somewhere still, but am not willing to dig it up right now.

    I got repayment through eBay's insurance system. I finally got a check from Loyds of London some time afterwards.

    Bottom line; bad seller, not my fault, not eBay's fault, sellers's fault, seller is responsible. You sent a check somewhere, go find them, enter their home during the night, and cut off their testicles with a dull rusty butter knife.
    Problem solved!

  39. Re:CC companies by IronChef · · Score: 2


    CC companies are not white knights many make them out to be. In my experience, anyway.

    We had a dispute with a moving company once. They were a load of late, lying, box-smashing bastards. They had all our stuff, couldn't tell us when it would get to our new place, and had charged our credit card a huge amount, including last-second things we never agreed to. The moving company hadn't even made us sign a contract.

    We called the credit card company to see if there was any way we could stop payment or apply pressure to the movers. There wasn't. Since it wasn't a broken piece of merchandise, but a SERVICE, they utterly refused to get involved. They said that if you paid a company for a service, and that company then altered the terms of the arrangement -- charging more, delivering less, whatever -- that the CC company would not take action on your behalf. Period.

    Maybe it was just one brain-dead rep. I dunno. That is the first and last time I have ever tried to get help from a CC company.

    (Luckily my employer was paying for this move, so I had little motivation to go to court or something like that, and it worked out in the end. Except for the hassle of not having my stuff for 3 WEEKS when they said the move would take 4 DAYS.)

  40. Re: protection - as long as it doesn't cost them by TClevenger · · Score: 2, Informative

    Seller defrauded me on a non-eBay transaction. After 90 days (too late to dispute), I get word from PayPal that they found that the seller was fraudulent, but because their bank account was empty, there was nothing they would do to help. Thanks PayPal.

  41. Keep the horror stories coming, guys by drix · · Score: 2
    I just read a post about a guy who got ripped off and was able to involve the Postal Inspectors. After 2 months, the asshole got thrown in jail. I never knew something like that could happen; how wonderful. I mean, I knew that the laws existed, but I didn't think that individuals could actually get nailed by them, and I don't think very many people do either.

    I encourage anyone who has similar incidents to post them here; the existence of this story could prove a valuable deterrent that we can all utilize in the future. The next time you mail off a check and don't hear back from the guy, fire off an e-mail like this:

    "Hi there! I noticed you haven't responded to my prior e-mails and I still have not received the item in question. It may interest you that, should you take my money and run, you have committed mail fraud, and which is a federal offense punishable by jail. And guess what -- it's actually enforced! (Link to this story.) I will report your name and address to the postal inspector in my area in five business days if I do not hear back from you."
    Or something along those lines.
    --

    I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
  42. He had to cash those checks... by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2

    He should be traceable. The authorities in the area that the checks were cashed should assist the buyers.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  43. I'm also a victim :( by Cloud+K · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have also been a victim of EBay fraud. Probably not from the same person, since this one was in the UK. (I can't give any more details out YET for legal reasons - I'm in the middle of a claim. But believe me, when this is over he will be exposed to the extent available under the law)

    I tried to buy a Siemens mobile phone, which ended up over £50, sent the cheque to the seller, and he never sent the item. Repeated emails were ignored. His phone number was invalid.
    VERY annoying.

    When he first started, he had a negative feedback rating, but it was only one comment about not accepting Escrow (he claimed that he didn't know it defaulted to accepting it.) That should've set off alarm bells I guess, but I gave him the benefit of the doubt since it was such a minor issue, bidded and won.

    More interestingly, after the end of the transaction, he gained positive feedback. That's one good thing out of it anyway, since you can't claim fraud insurance from someone with negative feedback.
    What confuses me is HOW he got the positive feedback. They were all from people who seem to have a good reputation too - some with stars next to their names.
    So it doesn't make sense! Why would they praise him/her? Yet I'm 99% sure it's fraud - he gives a different name and address in his profile, the phone number is invalid, and he stopped replying to emails the moment I started questioning him on why the package hadn't arrived.

    Maybe some of these criminals set up more than one account, and bid highly on each other... then add positive feedback to each other's accounts (without exchanging items or money of course).
    In which case, the feedback system is total bull that means nothing whatsoever.

    I really don't trust EBay now.
    Any better suggestions?

  44. Are you sure? If so, start these wheels turning by sker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And you're sure that this was fraud and not some sort of freak accident, seller-in-the-hospital sort of thing? There has been many posts here on how to nail the seller, but I guess I would ask how you're sure? In the same situation, I'd try every possible avenue to have voice contact with the offending party. Emails & email adresses are often broken/changed/or misunderstood.

    Then, assuming due diligence,

    http://crs.ebay.com/aw-cgi/ebayisapi.dll?crsstar tp age

    That's eBay's fraud report form.

    I had a problem of a seller not shipping and did the same sort of backtracking to find other victims. After using eBay's seller info and some Anywho research, I was able to track down the seller directly. Faced with that information and the prospect of group action, I got the seller to finally provide what they had sold. The key was just starting the "machinery" promptly and as completely as possible. YMMV

    --
    nonsig. unsig. desig.
  45. Class Action by Deadric · · Score: 3, Informative

    About a year and three months ago I purchased a Porsche 944 off of ebay. And although I was promised a warrenty, the company who handeled the guys warrentys would not provide one for my car. I had transmission problems, muffler problems, air conditioner problems, and brake problems. I had finally given up when a representative from the state of New Jersey called me and informed me they were orgonizing a Class Action Lawsuit against the individual who sold me my car.

    This seems the way to go, collect information about the one individual, and bring it to the state. I happen to be fortunate because he forged my signiture several times when providing documents to the state, so I have a very strong case, so perhaps people might not have as good luck as I do.

    The downside is I provided all of this information to the state, and it has still been 10 months, and I have not got word on how the case is progressing.

    1. Re:Class Action by alexburke · · Score: 2

      About a year and three months ago I purchased a Porsche 944 off of ebay.

      I have absolutely nothing against you (heck, I don't even know you), but that sentence alone tells me that you got what you had coming without even needing to read the rest of your post.

      For purchases of that magnitude, one would have to be a few sandwiches short of a picnic, so to speak, to make such a purchase via an online auction (except, for example, if purchasing the vehicle from a manufacturer-authorized new-car dealership who was making the sale online).

      In my opinion, anything purchased from an online auction site for over $100 should be paid for through a company like Tradenable to avoid being bent over and sodomized with an 80-grit sandpaper dildo by a dishonest seller!

  46. Re:reword: problem with ebays broken reputation by Splork · · Score: 3, Interesting
    the real problem is that ebay has a broken reputation system (as you've made obvious).

    If it were done as a trust network it would be much more meaningful.

    Weight the trust passed on to people you certify (via feedback) using both the value of the item and the trust of the certifier.

    A more useful metric of how trust worthy someone is would then be based on a combination of:

    1. the number of items sold
    2. the cost of the items sold
    3. the trustworthiness of those who certified you

    Do this and keep seperate ratings for buying and selling and enjoy the results!

  47. NOTHING YOU CAN DO! by thype · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unfortunately, this is the truth. I was a culprit of this a year ago. The FTC would do nothing, there was nothing for me to do. The actuall positive remarks on the seller were from freinds that were doing the same thing. They would just make stuff up about one another. The postive remarks were from freinds they "sold" items too, which the items actually did not exist. Then they would pull one big scam on the public and get out quick. This is just a tricky market to purchase goods in, at least as far as I can tell. If you get screwed, there really is no one to help you.

    1. Re:NOTHING YOU CAN DO! by jgerman · · Score: 2

      Victim, you were a victim of this. Big difference. %lt;grin>

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
  48. Good Reputation = Easy on e-bay by Pedrito · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's what you do: Go get a bunch of free e-mail accounts. Create a bunch of e-bay accounts with this free e-mail account. Hold auctions for stuff nobody is going to buy and do this from 1 single account. From each of those other free accounts, bid on your $1.00 crap. When you win, give yourself a bunch of good feedback. You're an instant hit.

    It may be time consuming, but to swindle people for $400-$1700 per fraud, you're looking at a pretty good take for your effort.

    I got outbid on a fraud auction. Shortly before I got outbid, I got suspicious and discovered this guy had tons of auctions ranging greatly in what the items were and the costs. Many were dutch auctions. Before he finished his first auction, I got together a group of high bidders, pointed out what I saw and over the next few days, one of the guys in the group said he lived near the address being advertised. He checked it out and confronted the guy.

    Poor bastard wouldn't back down. Those who actually ended up sending him money filed for mail fraud with the USPS. It wasn't long before he found himself in court. So, go to the USPS would be my advice. They take this stuff seriously and don't make you wait for satisfaction.

  49. Report Fraud Here by truesaer · · Score: 3, Informative
    If you are defrauded online, you should report at this website:


    IFCC FBI Complaint Center


    One of their prime purposes is to handle online fraud.

  50. Ummmm... what would you suggest? by jabbo · · Score: 2

    The guy

    1) left bad feedback on the sellers,
    2) filled out fraud reports, and
    3) finally moved on.

    What exactly is he supposed to do? Track down the sellers, shave their cats, and blow up their houses? Realistically, you take a risk when you use eBay, and it's probably best attenuated by using PayPal/Billpoint and merchant agreements to insure yourself.

    --
    Remember that what's inside of you doesn't matter because nobody can see it.
  51. Got burnt too, PayPal useless by uradu · · Score: 2

    Bought a (not new) TiVo in spring from a seller named joscaro2. He didn't claim it was new, but said it was "as new", so it definitely was meant to be in working order. When it arrived, it didn't work. Kept freezing during setup. I called him the first time, and he claimed he never actually used it--bought it, then decided to get a Sony instead while still in the box. Yeah right. It turns out he bought it off ebay also (also used). Anyway, he wouldn't answer subsequent phone calls, despite me being curteous that first time. So I left him a message saying that I'll take up the matter with ebay and PayPal. Right away he responded to my ebay feedback saying that I left threats.

    PayPal takes 30 days to follow up an incident, during which time they give the seller a chance to respond. The guy never answered their emails and calls, so they decided in my favor. Which amounted to exactly squat: they said that they can't refund the money, and that's it. Period.

    Moral of the story: I won't spend any sums on ebay that I couldn't live with losing. Which basically means amounts considerably under $100, preferably around $25 or so. Any more than that, and I pretty much want to see a shirt that I could grab in anger.

    PS Philips serviced my TiVo for $140, so I wasn't completely out of that money. But I ended up spending definitely more than retail.

  52. Mandatory escrow? No way. by mindstrm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People are thinking this needs to be E-bay's problem to solve. It just ain't so. That's typical of today's society... 'someone solve my problems for me'.

    Look how many valid transactions are on ebay. How many dollars worth of commerce. What percentage of those are fraudulent? Anyone? I'm willing to bet it's extremely small.

    I just fail to see how anyone can expect ebay to take care of it. It's very, very clear that ebay is merely factilitating the auction, for a fee from the seller. Everything else, including payment and product delivery, is between buyer and seller directly, unless they chose otherwise. There are plenty of escrow services available for a fee already. Ebay does not need ot make it 'mandatory'.

  53. How do you figure? by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    Ebay is very clear about what they do and do not do; about the role they play.

    IT is not their responsbility to ensure that you get your product. They make this VERY clear. It is up to the Buyer and Seller individually to sort out mutually acceptable terms. Ebay is just facilitating the auction.

    Ebay is NOT responsible for fixing the problem. Ebay did not vouch for the users. Ebay did not guarantee you anything, and Ebay did not take your money.

    As for the 'swindling' part.. you could do that *anyway*, even without ebay. Oh wait.. people DO do that in real life.

    As for credit card numbers.. ebay DOES ask for credit card numbers from sellers. So they can pay Ebay for it's services.
    As for identification, drivers licenses, etc, why should ebay bother with all that effort? They aren't liable.

    1. Re:How do you figure? by sphealey · · Score: 2
      IT is not their responsbility to ensure that you get your product. They make this VERY clear.
      On the other hand, aiding and abetting a crime is also itself a crime. Even if you publish a disclaimer, if your conduct over a period of time assists a criminal, you could be liable in both civil and criminal action even if you did not commit the crime yourself.

      So the question is, if there actually were 700 bad auctions, did eBay have a standard of care to prevent more from occuring?

      sPh
  54. I find it interesting by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    that they would actually provide for this kind of service with Paypal (though I know it's increasingly common).

    In the case of paypal.. paypal is the one taking the cc payment.. not the pereson you are using paypal to send money to. As long as the money paypal took is valid.. the transaction should be valid as far as the credit company is concerned.

    I'd imagine paypal could dispute the fact that it's fraud as well. Paypal charged your credit card to deposit to your account. Nothing fraudulent about that whatsoever.

  55. Ebay's responsibilities. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    eBay has been one of the bright spots of the internet. As a NYSE listed company, you'd expect more to be done about helping customers.

    Yes, if things make sense, they should do them.. but only if it will sustain their business. A small fraction of transactions are fraudulent, and an even smaller number of those actually result in people not using the service anymore. Hardly worth the money to add 'extra services' to the company do deal with fraud.. especially when they are not a party to it! Ebay's service is to hook alleged buyers & sellers together, that's all. They do not make any guarantees.

  56. Intermediary by MouseR · · Score: 2

    A more secure way of doing online transaction would require an intermediary that would receive both the payment and a description of the good to receive from the buyer, and the goods and description of goods from the seller.

    The intermediary could then match and confirm the order, and proceed with the exchange of goods/payment.

  57. I helped put one of these guys in jail by jesup · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Back a Long Time Ago (1997? 98?) someone on eBay was selling non-existant Japanese swords, offering to repair people's swords, taking them and then selling them or simply disappearing, etc. A bunch of us from the sword mailing list and eBay bidders got together and worked to track him down.

    I identified an auction under a new name that was obvious fraud (the image was a link to someone's random web page). He also sent me email claiming to have not know anything about blades using his new email address - but signed it with his real first name, and used technical terms no layperson would know.

    We arranged for the deputy(!) he ripped off to be the winner on the bid and got a snail-mail address from him for the postal order. (We'd tracked him down, but he'd moved to another state, and we needed his new address.) When he tried to pick up his check at the PO box, he was arrested. About a dozen blades were recovered, and he was convicted.

    Banding together made us FAR more able to get action; this was probably one of the earliest arrests of an eBay seller. Of course, things have changed since then I imagine. Back then I bought a $2500 sword via eBay by personal check (and he mailed it before he received payment - the catch is that he knew who I was from the sword community).

    To a certain degree some people on eBay are like people driving around in a van saying "psst: want to get a great deal on some speakers" or "hey, genuine rolex, only $100". Why shuld you trust them? Photos are hardly evidence the item ever existed.

    1. Re:I helped put one of these guys in jail by nahdude812 · · Score: 2

      Back a Long Time Ago (1997? 98?)

      hehe :)

  58. Read the fine print first, too! by King_TJ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've both bought and sold a LOT of stuff on eBay over the years, and I've generally been very pleased with the outcome.

    However, I've had a few problems with buyers of my products which resulted from them not reading the details before bidding (or ignoring them).

    If an item does not state anyplace in the auction that it's "functional" or "in working order", you can assume it to be broken/malfunctioning. If you're not really sure, email the person and *ASK* before bidding!

    I've occasionally sold some items that were known to be in not-so-great condition, but I've always stated "as-is" clearly in my auctions when they were like this. I also started the bids at a very low dollar amount. Still, I've had winning bidders of these things get all bent out of shape and threaten legal action before when the product wasn't shiny new and working perfectly after they got it.

    The fact is, there are good reasons why people might actually want to buy broken products! Maybe they want to gut it for repair parts, or they want to take on the challenge of fixing it themselves?

    Also, if you're buying a smaller-cost item ($100 or less), keep in mind that UPS will typically insure it for up to that amount at no additional cost over normal ground delivery. Therefore, there's no excuse for someone to ship you an item via UPS and have it completely uninsured. (I use the UPS "Worldship" shipping software all the time, and even though it defaults to entering a 0 amount for insurance, it doesn't add anything to the price if you bump that up to 100.00.)

  59. Paypal has not contacted me back for 2 weeks by Skapare · · Score: 2

    Paypal has lately tried more and more to discourage complainers from contacting them. It seems they are suffering the same financial problems of other dot.coms and the first thing to go is customer service. If you're unhappy, they just don't want to deal with you. Of course if you are happy, there won't be any issue they have to deal with. So the simple way to save money is to just not give a damn. This is why I now no longer use Paypay, and why it's in my signature. Be sure to read here

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  60. File suit by Animats · · Score: 3, Interesting
    So file suit. If you don't know who the seller really is, you can name them as "John Doe", and get the court to issue a supoena requiring eBay or PayPal to disclose all identity information they have on the seller. In California, Small Claims Court goes to $10,000, so that's one way to go. eBay and PayPal are both in California, so you can sue there. Get the Nolo Press book on California Small Claims Court for instructions and forms.

    It takes some time, but you can use legal process to make ISPs, Mail Boxes Etc, credit card companies, and the USPS disclose identity info.

  61. Two commont ips by diadem · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are two things I notice that quite a few people ignore.

    The first is consistancy. I know the critsim of the feedback system has been beating to into the ground, but there is more to it than simply buying a lot of small auctions for feedback. The TYPES of items sold are important as well as looking for tons of $0.50 auctions. I mean, I saw someone selling a helecoptor on e-bay motors that brought their feeback up by selling cd's and stero equipment. He was talking like this was a normal thing. Always check the recent auctions for consistancy before you buy from someone, and check for generic feedback. Make sure the recent auctions weren't just to boost feedback AND make sure that they are consistant. Someone buying or selling an eratic array of items is an other sign of feedback boosting. On the same topic, your GUT FEELING is usaly right, and ignoring it is a foolish thing to do.

    The major other problem have I seen are people NOT READING THE ENTIRE AUCTION.

    One of the bigger items in this problem are the "you are paying for information" items. This can sometimes be at the end of the description in a table or something. Spending a few hundred for a playstation 2 and finding out you were paying a few hundred to find out where you can pay a few hundred to get a playstation two is something that wouldn't happen if you read the auction fully. If in doubt, mail the seller about shipping. If the seller doesn't respond within a reasonable amount of time before the auction, chances are you will have problems after the auction as well. For expensive purchaes, read the auction multiple times. You'd be supprised how much you missed.

    When dealing with computers, make sure everything is listed. Don't rely on pictures - if it isn't listed, it probably isn't there.

    The biggest problem I've seen with people not reading the entire auction are computers. Computers need the following
    -Ram, Sound, Hard Drive, Floppy,Case, Operating System, keyboard, modem, ethernet port, monitor, motherboard, processor, FANS, power supply, and the like.

    It is very common for an auction to not list ram, or say upgradeable to X amount of ram, or 6 speakers for $40 more or something similar. This means they are NOT INCLUDED IN THE AUCTION. That means this is not a full computer.

    Check for a No DOA garentee for some electronics options. Some phrasing may be ambigous, so ask. Basicly this means you should find out if when you get something if its fake or not working will you be frended or get a replacement. This is important espeicaly with electronics. Find out the warentey. I have purchased some items that have no garentees that work, and some that don't. I dealt with both with a grin, becuase i expected it. Why? becuase I read the auction.

    Read the auctions fully.

    Some items wear down, like monitors. Others work or they don't, like processors. Know the diffrence when you buy used. Remember, refurbershed means used.

    Never send cash.

    To sum up - Go with your gut, make sure the seller has feedback on the type of item you are buying, check the feedback ratings of the people who gave the seller feedback, and READ THE AUCTIONS FULLY

    --
    Liquid Gaming - Your daily dose of gaming news
  62. Re:how the hell by BoarderPhreak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Exactly... You can use http://four11.com to search for names and addresses and MapQuest for directions to the address as well as aerial photos. Terraserver is another example. It's a little scary, really.

  63. FBI and ebay by supabeast! · · Score: 3, Informative

    The FBI has a unit that handles nothing but online auction fraud. They are notorious for handling auction fraud quickly and seriously, but due to the sheer volume of cases they probably have a hard time getting to everyone. Poke around at the FBI until someone puts you in contact with these people.

  64. This is a Golden Opportunity to make history by serutan · · Score: 2

    One of the things that has always been broken about the world is that undoing a problem created by some asshole ALWAYS takes WAY more trouble than it took the asshole to create the problem in the first place. Even if you succeed in prosecuting somebody who victimized you, you really never end up in the plus column. So what if the guy spends a few years in prison, eating free food and watching cable tv furnished at your expense. No matter how sincerely sorry he is, or how well reformed he is, or how many times he gets butt-fucked while he's in there, it still doesn't get you back the money he took from you, or your stolen computer, power tools, CD collection, etc. They all went up his nose or wherever. They are gone. All you get is the satisfaction that he paid his debt (not to you) to society. Whoopie fuckin doo.

    Crime has been a problem throughout the history of civilization, yet we've made far more progress with problems we didn't even know about until the last century. Progress in the criminal justice system is measured in terms of the sophistication of investigative procedures. Things like DNA testing, chemical analysis, arson reconstruction. All brilliant stuff, to be sure. But the process you have to go through when somebody rips you off in some way is like rubbing two sticks together.

    I know I am lumping the criminal system and the civil system together, so sue me, I'm not a lawyer. What I'm saying is that although our legal system is a hell of a lot more complicated than it was a hundred years ago, I don't think it has proportionately improved the world. If anything, it is now easier to fuck somebody up and harder to do something about it.

    Imagine how much nicer life would be if the legal system had advanced during the 20th century as much as our knowledge of electricity or medicine. The system wouldn't just be more complex, it would work a lot better. AMAZINGLY better. After having all these thousands of years to work on the system, legal procedures should be as trivial as cash machines. Punishment and compensation should be as simple as committing the crime in the first place. Instead of assholes getting away with shit because it's too much trouble to stop them, what if it were the other way around? Now wouldn't that be a nice piece of progress?

    I sure wish some legal genius or social scientist would think of something truly revolutionary, as revolutionary as inventing transistors or Stripe toothpaste. Imagine a patent like, "A system by which the effects of being screwed with can be nullified with trivial effort." Whoever comes up with this can have just about any reward they want as far as I'm concerned. Yes, this does sound like a complete fantasy, but no more so than television, artificial hearts or entangled photons. They happened, so what's the deal?

  65. Re:Like anyone's dumb enough to put a bank number by radish · · Score: 2


    What's the big deal with a/c numbers? You can't actually DO anything with them you know! It's not like I can just walk into a bank with someone elses a/c number and empty the account, strangely enough they will want ID! All knowing someone's a/c will let you do is pay IN, and if anyone wants to pay into my account, just let me know and I'll tell you the number ;-)

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  66. Lasr time I checked fraud was illegal ... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2


    Last time I checked fraud was illegal, and interstate fraud was a federal felony. It doesn't matter if it happened on eBay or at the local flea market (assuming one on the state border with you in one state and the seller in the other of course)

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  67. My Experience by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The original poster has come up with about the best way I can think of to get back at some of the slime who defraud others through eBay - contact other victims and organize.

    Example? My ex-brother-in-law, a complete slime, sold coins through eBay. The coins were either overgraded by him or not delivered at all. Eventually, through the tireless efforts of his ex-wife, my sister, a wonderful woman who you just don't want to piss off and who was determined to pay him back for his theft of several hundred thousand dollars worth of her property as well as his bigamy, the authorities in Texas began to take notice. She organized the victims, put them in touch with the detective handling the complaints, and prodded them to support the lengthy prosecution process.

    He was eventually charged with 42 counts of felony fraud. Last week, he made a deal with the prosecutors. He made full monetary restitution to all 42 victims, got his charges reduced to class A misdemeanors for fraud, plead guilty to those misdemeanors, and was sentenced to 6 months probation. As a result, he's lost his precious license to carry a concealed handgun and his life will be tied to the whims of his probation officer for quite a while. For a guy like him who can't stand any structure in his life, that puts him just one slip-up away from a parole vioation and jail time. I'm looking forward to it. Timeline from first victim to final disposition: about three years.

    My advice: The law can work. You just have to be patient and motivated.

  68. Lawyer: no it's not! by hawk · · Score: 2
    I am a lawyer, but this is not legal advice. If you need legal advice, contact an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.


    >Mail is about the same as Internet from a strict legal point of view.


    No. Mail fraud is a specific federal crime. There is also wire fraud, which may cover an internet experience.


    Both, however, can be the basis for a RICO (Racketeering) complaint, civily or criminally.


    hawk, esq.

    1. Re:Lawyer: no it's not! by sigwinch · · Score: 2
      Mail is about the same as Internet from a strict legal point of view.
      No. Mail fraud is a specific federal crime.
      True, but I was speaking to end results. Blatant fraud--such as failing to deliver on an eBay auction--is pretty much unlawful in every jurisdiction. In my opinion, the useful thing about transactions involving the U.S. mail is not that there are particular laws governing it, but that the US Postal Inspection Service is very proactive about investigating complaints and intimidating offenders.
      --

      --
      Kuro5hin.org: where the good times never end. ;-)

  69. even further by hawk · · Score: 2
    > Any merchant that won't except my CC if I have disputed charges
    > doesn't deserve to get my business anyway.


    *he* doesn't deserve it? I don't understand *either* the merchant *or* the customer dealing with one another again after a dispute . . .


    hawk

  70. don't knock shills *too* hard by hawk · · Score: 2
    Hey, we got the ancestral home that way. Really.


    It was after the Earthquake, and another Irishman was subdividing what would become the block. He gave my great-grandfather the coin (family history has lost whether it was $5 or $10) to bid up the price on the first lot.


    Cornelius built the house, my grandmother was born there and bought it after her mother's death, and now my father and uncle own it.


    The return from nothing back then to a lot today in Menlo Park two blocks from SRI is staggering . . .


    hawk

  71. Always look at the seller's feedback details by orbital3 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I won an auction from Yahoo auctions a while back from a guy who had something like a 300 feedback rating. "Great!" I thought, "No chance of getting ripped off here!" I place my bid, win the auction, and then I notice, the guy had, I don't remember exactly, but somewhere between 80-100 negative feedbacks with about 400 or so positive feedbacks. he had ripped off 20-25% of his customers, but by sheer volume managed to obtain an incredibly high rating.

    My auction was for a video card, and it was like, $35+$10 shipping. And my case wasn't all that bad, it was supposed to be "new in box" but it obviously wasn't. The box was cut up, will all UPC info, and even some of the specs cut off. The card was in an open static bag, and the "brand new" manual bad was taped back together. I complained, and the guy claimed he just opened it to make sure it worked ok, but it was obviously BS. But, the card did work, and it _was_ actually the right card and all, so I didn't bother filing any official complaints or anything.

    Other people's auctions were things like "untested, as-is hard drives". Of course the guy had tested them, because among a lot of 10 or 20, not a single one would be good. The guy's responses to his negative feedback were things like "I said it's as-is, what do you expect?".

    Here's another flawed aspect of auction feedback ratings though. I have a 118 positive feedback rating on ebay, with no neutrals or negatives. I have a 1 positive feedback rating on yahoo, 2 positive, 1 negative. What's my negative from? This guy. I, of course, left negative feedback, and the bad seller, in retailation, left negative feedback for me. I don't think I'd ever leave negative feedback for anyone on ebay, because I KNOW they'd leave negative feedback for me as retribution, and it would ruin my perfect reputation. That's a really crappy situation, and I'm sure I'm not the only one who's dealt with it.

  72. Re:CC companies by GTRacer · · Score: 2
    Some debit cards do, others don't.

    Mine happens to have a $50 liability limit, per the same rules as the credit cards.

    But there's also a clause that says they offer it as a service and they can change the rules at any time.

    GTRacer
    - Thank God for Credit Unions!

    --
    Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
  73. Varied experiences from ebay by rolvow · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I've used ebay for awhile to buy and sell things. I have had all sorts of varied things happen.

    I've been defrauded for 600$ buying a computer that was never shipped. I emailed him and he kept saying that there were problems and that he would get the shipment out to me as soon as possible.

    Ebay claimed to be only liable for 175 in insurance, but since I had waited for him to fix things they were no longer responsible.

    Paypal, who I paid through, claimed that they weren't responsible.

    The credit card company said that since the offical merchant was paypal, that they couldn't do anything since paypal offically did their part.

    Eventually I got an email from and FBI agent saying that a number of people had been taken for all sorts of money, and that they would appreciate any information that I could give them, and that was the last I heard from it.

    I've closed a few auctions, and never heard from the person again, sometimes they email me a few times, but they never pay for it, so I never ship it. This leads me to feel that as a ebay seller, I will never ship an item before it is paid for.

    I've sent things internationally and then had problems with the shipping companies or with the customs in the countries that I've sent it to, which has lead me to stop selling internationally.

    I've had a number of people back out of auctions, saying that they changed their minds. In these cases I try to at least get them to pay for the listing cost of the auction and the fees that ebay charges me for the auction closing. Sometimes they do and sometimes they don't.

    But through all of these thing I still use ebay to buy things and sell thing. I follow some simple rules, which everyone here has already elaborated on (use usps, use credit cards, use escrow if its a high dollar auction).

    If people stop using online auctions because they can't trust the sellers or buyers, then it is a real blow to what we geeks feel is possible. The change that online auctions brings, is worth a little hassle as we try to get the kinks worked out. Then then again I always felt that the internet was better before the www and before it was called the internet.. But alas for the good ol' days... when it was all geeks online before geek became THE thing and was no longer geekly... but a business Opportunity.

  74. Prosecution of E-Bay Fraud; Prosecutor's View by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    [ObDisclaimer: Yes, I am a fraud prosecutor; no, I won't take your particular fraud case; yes, you should consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction; yes, I have been reading Slashdot long enough that my userid is around 100,000]


    Screw it, I'm just going to post anonymously. I tried to write this post without giving away what agency I work for, and it just didn't work.


    I see lots of E-Bay fraud complaints. Our office has an entire unit that deals with consumer frauds, and they're swamped in auction fraud complaints - thousands of them - involving auction sites. Yes, I have taken a few of the most egregious cases and prosecuted them criminally - and unlike most white collar fraud cases, I was able to get one guy sentenced to some jail time. The Judge commented at the sentencing that he was an E-Bay user and hated people like the defendant who preyed on the trust required in online auction systems. It was waaaay cool.


    Ok, here are the tips, from a law enforcement perspective, to Ebay users. BTW, I've used Ebay on a couple of occasions to purchase stuff, and conducted enough investigations to know some of the tricks of effective scams. (Also, these comments apply to any auction service - I just use E-Bay for ease of writing)

    Don't spend any more than you couldn't live without. E-Bay is the equivalent of going down to the swap mart or flea market and buying something based on it's apparent value. Except you can't actually touch it. And you don't know if those pictures are really of the item the seller has. And you don't know much about the seller at all. And the swap mart makes no assurances about the seller. You get my drift.

    Escrow. I've seen it posted a bunch of times, but I'll emphasize it: USE ESCROW SERVICES If you are sending anything over a few dollars, you are crazy not to use escrow. Personally, I'm less inclinded to take a case where a seller has lost a large amount of money in an E-Bay fraud and has not used escrow. Government cannot protect all of those who do not make even minimum efforts protect themselves. [BTW, I take the same tack with corporate victims who whine about spammers attacking them, when the real cause is the fact that they ran an open relay. Why anyone would run an open email relay in the year 2001 is beyond me. Anyway, many credit cards offer the same protections. If your seller demands cash, checks, money orders (especially ones not made out to any particular person), walk away. Online payment services, like Paypal, also waive liability for your losses like E-Bay does - the only advantage they present is that they tend to keep records on the identity of the seller, which I can use to track him down.

    Don't trust "feedback". Several posters have pointed out that feedback can be set up so that the seller has a high karma level based on a bunch of successful small dollar sales. I've found that a couple of my investigative targets used multiple accounts and shill bidders to make themselves look good, so they can't really rip you off. I like these cases because that's really good evidence of motive - fraudulent intent. But just like juries can see it, potential buys can see it too - if you look for it.

    Don't complain about E-Bay not helping you. I've dealt with their small, ardent team of fraud investigators. These people are in the middle of a huge storm of complaining customers, and doing their best. In reality, it's the users who more often than not failed to protect themselves against fraud. More importantly, it's in the user agreement that E-Bay is not responsible if Joe Seller rips you off. They are very helpful to law enforcement who eventually pursue the cases, and I think they do a good job.

    Don't expect 'infinite justice' over your $20 beanie baby. Oh, I hate those people who call and call and call demanding their $20 back because they bid on E-Bay on a beanie baby, and it was never sent to them. Arrgh. There are not enough prosecutors in the world to bring justice to all the auction fraud. Look, file your complaints, and then forget about it. Consider your loss paying your 'Stupidity Tax' for the year, and learn from your mistake. Even if I know who the guy who stole your $20, I'm not about to whistle up a team of jack-boot search warrant guys to go kick his door - unless I have a bunch of other cases against him that aggregate to a potential felony charge.

    Don't expect the FBI to help. My personal pet peeve is this statement, which I've seen so many times in this story: The guy who ripped me off was in another state so it's a Federal Crime and the FBI will help me! WRONG! The FBI is a little busy with Al Qaeda right now, and even before Sept. 11, they didn't care about auction frauds on E-Bay. The reason - auction frauds from online auctions rarely add up to enough loss to meet the US Attorney's prosecution guidelines. You have to steal hundreds of thousands of dollars to get the US Attorney's attention, and the FBI does most of its work with the US Attorney. In fact, the Internet Fraud Complaint Center, run by the FBI, is essentially an information gathering service - they aggregate all the complaints about specific individuals, looking for the next big case so they can prosecute it. Everything else sooner or later gets farmed out to a state or local agency, usually in the municipality or state where the target lives.

    Use the IFCC. The only successful case we built on auction fraud before the IFFC sucked. We used a team of investigators who tracked down the defendant, all the victims, and put together the case. In agency terms, it sucked. Why? It was a resource hog - it took up lots of valuable time and effort that could have been going to what the public views as more serious crimes - all to prosecute a guy who ripped off a bunch of people who arguably should have protected themselves. Want more police and prosecutorial resources devoted to auction fraud? Take your argument to your state legislature or city council. But back to my point - the IFFC provides a tremendously valuable service to the FBI, state and local agencies. It aggregates the losses as to each potential defendant, and helps me decide which cases merit prosecution - the defendant who rips off the most people for the most dollars in the most egregious way is the most likely to draw criminal charges. But I can only charge your loss if you let me know you've been ripped off. The best was to do that is to file a DETAILED IFCC fraud report.

    Prosecuting the cases takes time, and you may not receive constant updates about the progress of the investigation. Look, I have lots of cases. Investigations move very slowly, as do most things in the legal arena. I mentioned above that the IFCC is an information gathering service, and it takes time for that info to filter down to people who can actually act on it, and then those people have to find the time to pursue it. The statute of limitations varies from state to state, but mine is seven years for felonies. If I can put together a case showing a pattern of small-dollar fruads over a span of months or years, I can put a guy in jail, possibly prison. If I take your $20 beanie baby case, I can maybe get him on a petty offense, a trip to city court, and a fine similar to a parking ticket. BTW, getting your money back is my goal in fraud cases, but it rarely happens because the defendants often live large with your cash and have no way to pay you back.


    I'll watch this thread to see what responses pop up.

  75. How did you pay? by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

    IANAL, and generally unclear on the law, but if you ended up snail-mailing your payment to the seller, you might be able to call it "mail fraud" and send the USPS after them.

    If you paid through credit card, aren't there other inherent protections? Or is that only with unauthorized transactions?