Slashdot Mirror


Carbon Magnets At Room Temperature

Bolie writes: "Trying to make high temperature super conductors yielded an unexpected result. The pure carbon bucky ball material was put under pressure to make sheets. That worked. Picture microscopic bubble pack. But the result was a sheet that was magnetic at room temperature. It has not escaped the attention of the discoverer, Tatiana Makarova, that this might be useful for a non-metallic computer memory. The material is also lighter than metals, flexible and transparent. Lasers anyone?"

213 comments

  1. Yay Buckyball Experiments by House+of+Usher · · Score: 5, Interesting

    First off, I find it hilarious what we physicists end up naming different molecules and ensemble configurations.

    Once again it goes to show that even though we're trying to do the right thing in the lab, sometimes bad things happen, but typically we're able to come out with something in the experiment that is actually worthwhile. Crazy how that works eh?

    Nonetheless, there is some pretty cool research at the University of Virginia in bucky ball related research. If anyone is interested, check out http://www.phys.virginia.edu

    --
    I am but mad north-north-west: when the wind is southerly I know a hawk from a handsaw.
    1. Re:Yay Buckyball Experiments by Rademir · · Score: 2, Interesting

      These molecules were named right (fullerenes) doubly: first for their resemblance to Bucky's famous dome structures, and second for their persistent versatility -- who expected non-metallic magnetism? or superconductivity?

      FAQ Buckminster Fuller Institute

      Long live Bucky's spirit!

      --
      ourpla.net is your planet
    2. Re:Yay Buckyball Experiments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just goes to show how fantastically little we know and understand about our universe.

      I pity those who make science their religion...

    3. Re:Yay Buckyball Experiments by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      > Tatiana Makarova, working at Umeå University in
      > Sweden, discovered the material while
      > experimenting with buckyballs, football-shaped

      That is, of course, European Football, aka Soccer. Soccer-ball shaped.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    4. Re:Yay Buckyball Experiments by schtum · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But without science we'd never have figured this, or anything else, out. Pity those who make religion their science.

    5. Re:Yay Buckyball Experiments by 3ryon · · Score: 1

      This has to be the first Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead reference ever seen on Slashdot.

    6. Re:Yay Buckyball Experiments by plugger · · Score: 1

      So, between the two of you, the conclusion is 'pity anyone who thinks they know what is *really* going on' ?

    7. Re:Yay Buckyball Experiments by mprinkey · · Score: 1

      'pity anyone who thinks they know what is *really* going on'

      Well put!

    8. Re:Yay Buckyball Experiments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heads...
      heads...
      heads...

      (Infinity bottles of beer on the wall...)

      heads...

  2. Why the exotic ideas? by evilviper · · Score: 3, Troll

    Why is any new discovery automatically thrown into the PC composnents arena, even when there is no actual connection?

    It's a magnet, think SUPER-MOTOR.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Why the exotic ideas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      Why is any new discovery automatically thrown into the PC composnents arena, even when there is no actual connection?

      Because his is Slashdot. There's no one here except computer geeks. If you only have a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

    2. Re:Why the exotic ideas? by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      There's no one here except computer geeks. If you only have a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

      More tpo the point, if you have a big, hot noisy hammer which eats electricity as if it's going out of style and takes up most of your desk, everything looks like a way to make a smaller, cheaper, cooler, quieter hammer.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    3. Re:Why the exotic ideas? by megaduck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We see the world through the filter of our own experience. When something like this is posted on Slashdot, where a lot of people eat/sleep/breathe computers, the first idea is naturally going to be, "How can this make my computer better?".

      By your super-motor idea, I imagine that you deal with motors quite a bit (perhaps as an engineer?). It's just a matter of perspective.

      --
      This .sig for rent.
    4. Re:Why the exotic ideas? by cyclist1200 · · Score: 1

      Or might it be because that's the freakin' point of the freakin' article (which is actually entitled "Non-metallic magnet could be dream computer memory")?

    5. Re:Why the exotic ideas? by evilviper · · Score: 2

      I can't think of the last time I worked with a motor (apart from CPU fans and Hard Drives). I do understand your point, but there has to be at least a level of reason behind any ideas. I don't think people at Colgate run SETI@home hoping they will help find aliens that will come to earth and help us improve our oral hygene products... do you?

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  3. hello by trollapprentice · · Score: 0

    this is just soooo off-topic that I don't even bother to finish the senten

  4. Transparent? by Psiren · · Score: 5, Funny

    Transparent as in transparent aluminium, ala Trek? Can I build my whale tank now? ;)

    1. Re:Transparent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whale tank was plexiglass. That's what they traded the formula to transparent aluminum for.

      Duh.

    2. Re:Transparent? by Psiren · · Score: 2

      I'm aware of that. Duh.

    3. Re:Transparent? by Psion · · Score: 1

      Yes, but now the tank walls only need to be one centimeter thick.

    4. Re:Transparent? by dschuetz · · Score: 2

      The whale tank was plexiglass. That's what they traded the formula to transparent aluminum for.

      I don't think so. I think they considered plexiglass, but the walls would have needed to be too thick, so they showed the manufacturer how to make transparent aluminum so he could build them thinner, stronger tank walls.

      'course, it's been a while.

    5. Re:Transparent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think so. I think they considered plexiglass, but the walls would have needed to be too thick, so they showed the manufacturer how to make transparent aluminum so he could build them thinner, stronger tank walls.

      no, they traded the formula for a free piece of plexiglass that was 6 inches thick. they had no money remember so they had to trade knowlege.

      --I am posing anon because the moderaters are crack-head highschool geeks who have no idea of what they are doing.

    6. Re:Transparent? by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      Nope! They traded the formula for transparent aluminum for a bunch of giant, thick Plexiglas panes. They did use the Plexiglas for the tank walls in the baby warbird. "It'll take years to develop..." although how he could see it would be transparent by looking at a rotating molecule I don't know...

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    7. Re:Transparent? by SaxMaster · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was one INCH thick. Get it right.

      --
      "Dancing is the vertical expression of a horizontal desire" --Robert Frost
    8. Re:Transparent? by kramerj · · Score: 1

      The question is, why does it need to be transparent?

      Jay

      --
      "What's this script do? unzip ; touch ; finger ; mount ; gasp ; yes ; umount ; sleep Hint for the answer: not everyth
    9. Re:Transparent? by Hal-9001 · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, aluminum and plexiglas were pretty rigid, and this stuff is being touted for its flexibility. Maybe an inflatable kiddie whale pool?

      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
    10. Re:Transparent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a total nonsequitor, this is something that always bugged me about that movie: why were they so casually talking about inches when metric was supposedly always used? Heck, even in Enterprise (which is supposed to have taken place some hundred or so years before TOS) they always refer to distances in metric. Okay, so maybe it's a writer's error, I can live with that. :) (-1 offtopic, anyone?)

    11. Re:Transparent? by number+one+duck · · Score: 1

      Because the old bald guy they were talking to mentioned inches first. Being sober, Scotty was immediately able to adapt to this archaic unit by doing what he does best... making up some number to make him look smart while staving off the captain long enough to get his job done.

  5. Why we will never see it come to market... by motherhead · · Score: 4, Funny

    Also, Makarova's material is flexible and transparent, properties that could make it useful for storing data when a laser is used to record on it. It might also be possible to record data at unprecedented densities.

    Man, this is really going to piss off Hillary Rosen...


    1. Re:Why we will never see it come to market... by Hal-9001 · · Score: 1

      What, you mean you don't already have "The Complete Crappy Works of the RIAA" on the single super-hyper-buckyball-stuff DVD Audio disc?

      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
  6. Forget about Laser Memory.... by tonywestonuk · · Score: 4, Funny

    What about a new 'cool' translusent colored Fridge magnet!

    1. Re:Forget about Laser Memory.... by G-funk · · Score: 3, Funny

      Funny, except you know this is where it'll end up :-)

      And when we stick the shopping list on the fridge with our imac-coloured see-through magnets, we can tell our kids of the time when magnets had were all made of metal, and they'll look at us funny like we're older than god. I can see it now....

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    2. Re:Forget about Laser Memory.... by stripes · · Score: 2
      we can tell our kids of the time when magnets had were all made of metal

      What about ceramic magnets? Many hard drives use them. I have some up on my fridge, they stick great :-)

    3. Re:Forget about Laser Memory.... by FFFish · · Score: 3, Informative

      What about Spherical Magnets ?

      Pretty cool. Now if I could only think of a use for them... :)

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    4. Re:Forget about Laser Memory.... by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      Well, writing on it with a laser could be tricky if it were transparent... a lot of the energy would simply pass it through, unles you dye it, and then will that destroy its desirable properties?

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    5. Re:Forget about Laser Memory.... by pohl · · Score: 1

      Is that a magnet where one pole is at the center and the other pole is the surface of the sphere? In other words, is the entire surface the same pole? If so, that's pretty cool.

      --

      The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

    6. Re:Forget about Laser Memory.... by baglunch · · Score: 1

      I think you write with TWO lasers, and the whole point is for it to be transparent. That way each laser can penetrate the substance and intersect at some point within the substance to record a bit. If it wasn't transparent, you could only write to the surface.

      --

      Work is for people who lack the imagination to play.

  7. Another possibility by TheMMaster · · Score: 1

    If I understand correctly it is possible to change the magnetic state of this material... Maybe this FINIALLY means our persistent RAM??
    I might be way off here

    --
    Fighting for peace is like fucking for virginity
    1. Re:Another possibility by john_updyke · · Score: 1

      Dude, if you want persistent RAM just fetch some old core memory. There's nothing like soldering your own PDP-11-UNIBUS to CF converter for your IPAQ. No need to worry about battery life 'cause you'd have that diesel generator to lug around.

    2. Re:Another possibility by budgenator · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actualy NASA uses/used a form of core memory involving plated wires, for non-volatile memory in spacecraft. Seems resonable that fullereens would be stronger than the ferrite materials used in standard core memory, making it easier to make smaller arrays of core.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    3. Re:Another possibility by Rand+Race · · Score: 0
      I've mentioned before the inherant momentum problems in using ferrite core memory at the modern 100-133MHz speeds. Many of my mutant monkey research assistants have been killed by ferrite cores blowing holes in them on the way to near earth orbit when containment fails. Sad really.

      --
      Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
    4. Re:Another possibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Overated at 1? That moderator has to be the biggest fucking pussy in the world.

  8. minus signs by bowb · · Score: 1, Insightful
    But to her surprise, she found instead that the new material was magnetic even above 200 C. Until now, the highest temperature at which a non-metallic material was magnetic was 255 C. This record was held by a different form of buckyballs.

    I can't make sense of that. 255C is higher than 200C. Did they mean -255C and -200C ?

    1. Re:minus signs by nealbutler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, but -255C is lower than 200C! Besides, I hardly think -200C would count as room temperature.....

      --
      MS: ALL YOUR .BASE ARE BELONG TO US
    2. Re:minus signs by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      I think the error is the word "higiest" not the numbers. Perhaps they ment "lowest".

      Just a semi-educated guess, I have little to no knowlege in this field.

    3. Re:minus signs by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      Wait a second... I just re-read it again and I realized that what I said can't be right. Scratch that. You're right, though something is odd there.

    4. Re:minus signs by morie · · Score: 2, Funny

      The error is in the word "higiest" alright... :-)

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
    5. Re:minus signs by TheMidget · · Score: 1, Informative

      Or maybe, his browser doesn't show the minus sign. Due to a bug, some early versions of konqueror did that with certain fonts...

    6. Re:minus signs by bowb · · Score: 2, Informative

      yes, that's what is happening. IE5.5 isn't showing the minus sign on -255 even though it's there in the source. That's pretty scarey.

    7. Re:minus signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Amazingly, not only can't the poster read "-255C", a moderator cannot as well.

      I have always been taught that 200 > -255. Are you from Kansas?

    8. Re:minus signs by brunes69 · · Score: 2

      Doesn't show up in Kmeleon either.

    9. Re:minus signs by ThePilgrim · · Score: 1

      Its hear in opera 5.

      The relavent temps are old -255C new >+200C

      --
      Wouldn't it be nice if schools got all the money they wanted and the army had to hold jumble sales for guns
    10. Re:minus signs by jeff_bond · · Score: 1

      Im using a pretty recent Konqueror (2.1.1), and the minus was missing from the new scientist article, but visible in the posts here.

      Jeff

      --
      stty erase ^H
    11. Re:minus signs by GTRacer · · Score: 2
      Even stranger is that, although IE 5.5 doesn't render it, you can copy the text surrounding the "-255" and the soft hyphen will appear when pasted!

      GTRacer
      - "Fix that soft hyphen with this new virility drug! $19.95 for a 5-day supply!"

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    12. Re:minus signs by Theodrake · · Score: 1
      Ok here's the abstract from Nature magazine:
      The discovery of nanostructured forms of molecular carbon has led to renewed interest in the varied properties of this element. Both graphite and C60 can be electron-doped by alkali metals to become superconducting; transition temperatures of up to 52 K have been attained by field-induced hole-doping of C60 (ref. 2). Recent experiments and theoretical studies have suggested that electronic instabilities in pure graphite may give rise to superconducting and ferromagnetic properties, even at room temperature. Here we report the serendipitous discovery of strong magnetic signals in rhombohedral C60. Our intention was to search for superconductivity in polymerized C60 ; however, it appears that our high-pressure, high-temperature polymerization process results in a magnetically ordered state. The material exhibits features typical of ferromagnets: saturation magnetization, large hysteresis and attachment to a magnet at room temperature. The temperature dependences of the saturation and remanent magnetization indicate a Curie temperature near 500 K
  9. 250 degrees ? 200 ? by gibodean · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Is it just me, or do the following quotes from the article not make sense ?

    The new magnetic sheet "...is the first non-metallic magnet to work at room temperature."

    "...she found instead that the new material was magnetic even above 200 C. Until now, the highest temperature at which a non-metallic material was magnetic was 255 C."

    Which is it ?

  10. Re:250 degrees ? 200 ? by nealbutler · · Score: 1
    OK, from what I gathered from the article:
    • A previously discovered material made of buckyballs was magnetic for temperatures up to -255C.
    • However, this new material, also made of buckyballs (I love that word! :), is magnetic for temperatures up to 200C.

    The only reason I majored in C.S. rather than chemistry was because C.S. labs smelled marginally better...:)

    --
    MS: ALL YOUR .BASE ARE BELONG TO US
  11. Re:250 degrees ? 200 ? by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

    "Until now" as in "before this discovery".

    Maybe you should try using what little part of your brain is still active.

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  12. Curie Point by Self+Bias+Resistor · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, no. What the article was saying was that the material is the first non-metallic material that was magnetic at room temperature (meaning that other non-magnetic materials weren't, at least not at room temperature). The point about the material being magnetic even above 200C was about the material's Curie point (above which the material stops being magnetic) being much higher than any other material, the previous record being 255C which was held by a different form of buckyballs. So this material is interesting because it's the first non-metallic material to be magnetic at room temperature and has a higher Curie point than any other non-metallic material to date.

    Apparently, the material's magnetism could be linked to unpaired electrons, which can sustain a magnetic field when their spins are aligned (in this case there are unpaired electrons). One possibility is that they bond in triangular groups of three, which would provide for unpaired spins.

    Although, to be used as computer memory it would have to have uniform magnetism, not just in pockets. But either way it's a significant step forward.

    --

    ----------
    When the pin is pulled, Mr. Grenade is no longer our friend.

    1. Re:Curie Point by Phrogz · · Score: 4, Informative
      The point about the material being magnetic even above 200C [...] the previous record being 255C which was held by a different form of buckyballs...
      You do realize that the HTML for the article is broken, and that the previous record was -255C, right? Because simple math states that +255 is already greater than +200, right?
    2. Re:Curie Point by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      Right so.. just so I understand.. you are saying that 200 degrees is a higher temperature than 255 degrees.. correct?

  13. Wait I don't get it by Bugmaster · · Score: 1, Redundant
    The article says:
    But to her surprise, she found instead that the new material was magnetic even above 200 C. Until now, the highest temperature at which a non-metallic material was magnetic was 255 C.
    1. above 200 C < above 255 C. Do they mean, "below" ?
    2. 200 C is not exactly room-temperature. Water boils at 100 C, roughly
    Still, this is a pretty sweet discovery. I wonder how strong these magnets are - strong enough to build an ultra-light motor ?
    --
    >|<*:=
    1. Re:Wait I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Previous highest temperature record = -255C
      New record is +200C (ie 200C-(-255C)=455C higher)

      Got Math ?

    2. Re:Wait I don't get it by geekoid · · Score: 2

      you're browser is not displaying the minus sign,
      its formerly minus 255c, now positive 200c.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Wait I don't get it by Seor+Pelo · · Score: 1

      cheese, learn the metric system
      200 C = above boiling point
      -255 C = below 0 C freezing point
      So, this means that the earlier bucky ball would become non-magnetic above the minus 255 (really cold) point, and that the new bucky ball stays magnetic all the way up to the 200 (quite hot)point.

  14. Re:250 degrees ? 200 ? by TheMidget · · Score: 3, Informative
    The new magnetic sheet "...is the first non-metallic magnet to work at room temperature."

    "...she found instead that the new material was magnetic even above 200 C. Until now, the highest temperature at which a non-metallic material was magnetic was 255 C."

    Ok, let's take it word after word:
    • room temperature.: Aound 21C.
    • the new material was magnetic even above 200 C..The word "even" seems to imply that it is a feat to go above a certain temperature . Which implies that with higher temperature, materials tend to lose their magnetism (Curie point). Which implies that the material is also magnetic for all temperatures below 200 C. Which includes 21C, i.e. room temperature. Probably, the reason for the strange formulation was that the researcher didn't have any oven handy which went over 200 C, or that any higher temperature fried his magnetism measuring equipment, or whatever. So he was just saying that at 200 C it was keeping its magnetism, and that it was likely that it would keep it even beyond that mark.
    • Until now, the highest temperature at which a non-metallic material was magnetic was 255 C. The words "until now" means "all materials known before" this one was discovered. Meaning that the 255 C refers to a different material. Oh, and btw, 255 C (that's minus 255) is below room temperature.
    So where is the contradiction?
  15. Picture microscopic bubble pack... by morie · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... to wrap microscopic hardware parts. Finally we've found a solution to that one!

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
  16. Re:250 degrees ? 200 ? by nealbutler · · Score: 1

    Thank you, you explained it much better than I did!

    --
    MS: ALL YOUR .BASE ARE BELONG TO US
  17. Here , Let me Explain by lliinnuuxxlover · · Score: 1

    But to her surprise, she found instead that the new material was magnetic even above 200 C
    This means that the new material is magnetic Even above 200 C. Does'nt mean , It is not magnetic at room temperature.

    Until now, the highest temperature at which a non-metallic material was magnetic was 255 C.
    This means that before this discovery, the highest temprature at which a non metal behaved magnetically was -255 C. So basically, it's a jump of 455 C (from -255 to +200 C). I hope you are more clear now.


    If only people use Metric system only , things would be much easier! Scientist should mention tempratures in Kelvins , not in C or F.

    --
    This Post was entirely made up of recycled electrons making up recycled signals to generate recycles ASCII to generate t
    1. Re:Here , Let me Explain by drnomad · · Score: 2

      I cannot find the negative sign in the article, not even in the source...

      Still, (I'm no physisist) I interpreted this bit as "well, this bucky formation is magnetic (slightly) above 200 Celsius, which is high, but did not break the record, which is held by another formation which is magnetic at 255 Celsius"

    2. Re:Here , Let me Explain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As has been pointed out elsewhere, theyr'e using a soft-hyphen character in the page source instead of a proper minus sign - so browsers that handle soft hyphens properly aren't showing it. Most likely, they were using MS frottage (frontpage) to write the page, and the "autocorrect" feature fucked it up, like it does with quotes.

    3. Re:Here , Let me Explain by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      adding insult to injury, wordpad doesn't show the soft hyphen either, which means it doesn't show up in the source.

      I was a bit confused, when I could see it in the browser, but not in the source. Notepad solved that little problem.

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  18. Re:250 degrees ? 200 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    How are people managing to misunderstand this?


    Crazy.


    Tom.

  19. mystery solved by bowb · · Score: 3, Informative

    They used a Soft Hyphen (­ or ­) character instead of a minus sign. Browsers are not supposed to display a Soft Hyphen unless the line is broken at that point.

  20. Re:250 degrees ? 200 ? by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

    And how many of them are from the educated US of A?

    hehe :-p

    Next they're probably gonna complain, that they were confused because it wasn't measured in fahrenheit, and that the decimal nature of the temperature scale is illogical and that it should have been written in some obscure "impirical" way ...

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  21. Carbon chemistry by shawnseat · · Score: 4, Interesting
    One of the reasons buckball chemistry is likely to continue to make surprises is that carbon is one of the few elements (tin being the only other I can recall at the moment) that exists both as a metal -- graphite, and as a nonconductor -- diamond, in stable allotropes at room temperature.


    The interesting thing about buckyballs is that their bonding is somewhat of a cross between the two: it is a polyaromatic (like graphite) but it is a molecular solid (similar to, but not exactly like, diamond).

    --
    Religion is the opiate of the masses. The wealthy smoke the real stuff.
    1. Re:Carbon chemistry by jeff_bond · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say carbon exists *as* a metal, but agree that is does have metallic qualities.

      Actually carbon is more of a semiconductor - if you look at the periodic table it is in the same column ('group'?) as Silicon and Germanium, and is why it has semi-conductor properties.

      Jeff

      --
      stty erase ^H
    2. Re:Carbon chemistry by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 5, Funny

      Picard: Is it a carbon-based life form?

      Data: No

      Picard: Is it a silicon-based life form?

      Data: No

      Picard: Is it a germanium-based life form?

      Data: No

      Picard: Neon?

      Data: No

      Picard: Uranium?

      Data: You're just guessing, aren't you?

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    3. Re:Carbon chemistry by White+Shade · · Score: 1

      ...except that Data doesn't use contractions...

      :) :) :)

      --
      ìì!
    4. Re:Carbon chemistry by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      1. He has his emotion chip, now.

      2. There is precedence for him using contractions prior to that in normal speech.

      3. He could be aping a quote, in which case he uses contractions, or deliberately making a funny.

      I can't believe I have wasted brain cells storing this information.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    5. Re:Carbon chemistry by shawnseat · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't say carbon exists *as* a metal, but agree that is does have metallic qualities.

      Actually carbon is more of a semiconductor - if you look at the periodic table it is in the same column ('group'?) as Silicon and Germanium, and is why it has semi-conductor properties.

      Actually you're wrong. Graphite has electrons in a conduction band at absolute zero, which is the definition of a metal. Si and Ge are semiconductors (as is one allotrope of tin); a semiconductor is an "insulator" with a small band gap. Graphite (and bismuth and antimony) is called a semi-metal, though, but that's because there is much less than one electron per atom in the conduction band.

      --
      Religion is the opiate of the masses. The wealthy smoke the real stuff.
    6. Re:Carbon chemistry by 6EQUJ5 · · Score: 2

      (Ok I'll ask you since you seem to know about this stuff...) Ever heard the idea of caging atoms or molecules within buckyballs? I'm just wondering if much research is being done on that. It would be neat to see a whole new class of materials. That's what I would call human progress!

      --

    7. Re:Carbon chemistry by Andrew+Allan · · Score: 1

      OK, since I'm doing a Masters in chemistry, I'll have to pull you up on this one...

      Graphite is not a metal. It is a conductor, yes, but that doesn't make it a metal. For instance, you can make conductors out of other non-metal elements, such as aromatic hydrocarbon chains (think lots of benzene rings linked together to make a wire - currently being developed as organic LEDs). There are lots of elements around the metal/non-metal line in the periodic table that have properties of both metals and non-metals, but graphite does not have any other metallic properties, e.g. a tendency to form positive ions, or malleability.

      Buckyballs and buckytubes are the third allotrope (so far) of carbon - they conduct like graphite, but are discrete molecules, unlike diamond and graphite, which are both infinite atomic lattices.

  22. Re:250 degrees ? 200 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As someone elsewhere pointed out they used a softhyphen for the - so many browsers don't show it unless there is a line break there.

  23. Buckyballs by AndrewHowe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Has anyone discovered a way to reliably make large quantities of Buckyballs? Last time I looked into it, it was very hard... They were very expensive and only available in small quantities for experimentation.

    1. Re:Buckyballs by nealbutler · · Score: 3, Informative
      Here's a few interesting links on the subject...
      • Here is a not-too-technical report on buckyballs, their properties, etc.
      • According to
      • this article, buckyballs hold the record for highest-temperature superconductor.
      • A report (fairly technical) on research into building buckballs...
      • And
      • here's a report on single buckyball transistors.
      Enjoy! :)
      --
      MS: ALL YOUR .BASE ARE BELONG TO US
    2. Re:Buckyballs by Drownedrat · · Score: 1

      If memory serves a carbon arc in a vacuum chamber makes the balls, though not sure of the tubes. Assume you have to tweak the voltage, current & spacing to maximise yeild. There is also a solvent that can be used to seperate them I think, or may have been a floatation seperation. Sorry for vagueness, but going back several years in a memory that has trouble with last night. D.

    3. Re:Buckyballs by wass · · Score: 2
      According to this article [physicsweb.org], buckyballs hold the record for highest-temperature superconductor.

      Small correction. The article says that C-60 is non-copper-oxide superconductor with the highest transition temperature.There are high-Tc superconductors with transition temperatures way higher than that. Strange quaternary alloys (YBCO, or Yttrium-Barium-Copper-Oxide, is probably the most common) where the ratios of components must be just right are some of the highest transition temperature SC's. The highest transition temperatures, IIRC, occur around 150K or so. This is good news because liquid nitrogen temperature is 77K, which is cheaper than milk in bulk quantities. Thus, for some superconducting applications, you don't need expensive 4K liquid Helium refridgerators, but can make use of a dewar filled with cheap liquid nitrogen.

      Here is a link with various copper-oxide superconductors described.

      --

      make world, not war

    4. Re:Buckyballs by UberNex · · Score: 1

      Actually making Buckyballs is rather easy these days. For about 500$-1000$ you can build one yourself. All you need is an acr welding powersupply, a small roughing vacuum pump some helium (for purity) and a couple of gauges to monitor the process. Well that and a bunch of tubes and glass. Still just about any lab can whip up several grams of Buckyballs in a couple of days. If a lab is dedicated to it they would have no problems making much much more. The trick these days is getting the carbon into more exotic forms like onionskins (think buckyballs inside buckyballs) and carbon nanotubes. These aren't quite as easy to make.

  24. At the risk of slashdotting them... by nyjx · · Score: 5, Interesting
    More stuff on Buckminster Fullerine (an outstanding name for a molecule if ever there was one!) can be found here:

    Nice one Mr.Buckminster...

    --
    .sig
  25. Buckyballs are wonderful... by ymgve · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not only will they give us a new form of storage, but they can also be used as a treatment for AIDS.
    Interesting how versatile a simple molecule can be..

    1. Re:Buckyballs are wonderful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also makes a hell of a lining for artificial pussy molds.

  26. Fast writes, slow reads? by kuhneng · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can understand how a magnetic non-metal could be written to with a laser (briefly heating a spot above the curie point I assume), but it's not clear that you can read with the same mechanism. Could someone with a real grasp of the physics take a guess at the mechanisms they're hinting at? For that matter, what do we do with memory with exceptional write performance, but dismal read performance. I'm sure there are some scientific and data acquisition applications that could benefit.

    1. Re:Fast writes, slow reads? by wyldeling · · Score: 3, Informative

      By writing to a particular memory cell, light passing through that location may be polarized differently because of the different magnetic field. This could then be used to verify the particular state it is in. This could be a very fast way to read the memory.

    2. Re:Fast writes, slow reads? by jeff_bond · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can read the thing with a magnetic head.

      I believe minidiscs work like this. Someone's bound to correct me if i'm wrong.

      To write, the laser heats a very small spot on the disc (to above the Curie point), and the magnetic head magnetises the spot in the required orientation. The use of the laser allows a much smaller spot on the disc to be targetted than with the magnetic head alone.

      Reading is done without the laser, just the magnetic head in a manner similar to a hard disc.

      Jeff

      --
      stty erase ^H
    3. Re:Fast writes, slow reads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you change the permitivity of the magnetic material (i.e. magnetic resistance)then there is a simple equation that says for a given frequency ( i.e. a laser has frequency) there will be a slight phase shift. This phase shift is what one detects to be a one or zero. Now if the permitivity can be varied, then you get varying phase shifts, giving one the capability to store multiple bits in one location by detecting this phase shift. The sheet material could be used like a phased-array radar such that the total square area is in lock-step and performs a scanning function. This scanning function forms a beam that scans another sheet of the same material, but this other material is storing the actual memory bits. When the beam hits a certain point on this sheet, the bit (one or zero) creates a spike to appear in the sheet of material acting like the radar. This signal then can be amplified to let one read the memory. The same technique could be used with lasers doing the scanning to erase the other materials bits. One could also use a MEM scanning beam (see the HDTV technique) of the sheet material to read or set the data bits.

      It has been awhile since I worked in this area, but this is what is done for phased-array radars whereby they apply a voltage to each phased-array element. This voltage controls the degree of permitivity and when an RF frequency is sent through the material, a fixed phase shift is produced. All the elements working in concert (with the same phase shift) gives the radar its beam. By rapidly varying the permitivity for a given frequency, varying phase shifts are produced thus giving the impression the beam is sweeping across space.

    4. Re:Fast writes, slow reads? by babymac · · Score: 1

      You are correct! Mini-discs do indeed work along a similar principle. From what I understand, a magnetic head changes the position of a point on the disc after a laser heats up that particular point. The laser then reads the disc back after recording. Somehow the polarity of the light changes when it hits altered spots on the disc.

      --
      "War makes me sad." - Me
    5. Re:Fast writes, slow reads? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Someone's bound to correct me if i'm wrong.
      this is /., someone bound to correct you if your right.
      ;)

      (Winky added for the humor impaired)

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  27. Quick! Tell the Bacteria! by jcr · · Score: 2


    They don't need to make those iron-bearing structures anymore.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  28. Mozilla 0.9.4 too.. by T-Ranger · · Score: 1
    Its doing the same thing with this browser as well.. Under RedHat 7.1.95 that is..


    Strangeness..

    1. Re:Mozilla 0.9.4 too.. by nealbutler · · Score: 1

      Well, it's working on Opera....:)

      --
      MS: ALL YOUR .BASE ARE BELONG TO US
  29. Storage? by Dr_Cheeks · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "....record data at unprecedented densities."

    Right, so yet another possible way to store lots of data. We hear about these all the time (holographic memory, molecular storage etc.), but when are we actually going to get some of this - at the moment everyone still seems to be working on Winchester drives and semiconductor memory.

    Is all this just pie in the sky, or are people actually producing devices that use these exotic storage methods? I figure this is about the best place to ask.

    --

    1. Re:Storage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, when are we going to hear about buckyballs actually being used outside the lab? You hear about so many applications that scientist should just start working on ways to mass produce them.

  30. Good news for NanoTech. by jcr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hooray! One more thing you don't need metals for!

    So far, Carbon is good for hardness (diamond), tensile strength (aramid fiber, buckytubes), lubrication (graphite), electrical conductivity (buckytubes), and now it can even be used for magnetic memory, and presumably for transformer cores, and antennae.

    When NanoTech hits in a big way, I suspect that we'll have a major issue with depletion of atmospheric CO2.

    BTW, anyone know of a form of Carbon for that's good for optical fiber, or do we just continue to rely on Silicon for that?

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Good news for NanoTech. by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2, Insightful


      You forgot the biggie - Carbon is good for life!

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    2. Re:Good news for NanoTech. by vrmlknight · · Score: 1

      'anyone know of a form of Carbon for that's good for optical fiber, or do we just continue to rely on Silicon for that? '

      they said its clear... a type of this form may be able to be used as optics depends on how clear it really is...

      --
      This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
    3. Re:Good news for NanoTech. by rjforster · · Score: 1

      Maybe build photonic band gap structures out of carbon. Search the web for 'holey fibre' and look at the pictures of honeycomb holes down the length of fibres. The light goes down the holes through the glass and not down the glass itself as in a normal fibre.

    4. Re:Good news for NanoTech. by kieran · · Score: 2

      Hooray! One more thing you don't need metals for!

      So far, Carbon is good for hardness (diamond), tensile strength (aramid fiber, buckytubes), lubrication (graphite), electrical conductivity (buckytubes), and now it can even be used for magnetic memory, and presumably for transformer cores, and antennae.

      When NanoTech hits in a big way, I suspect that we'll have a major issue with depletion of atmospheric CO2.

      BTW, anyone know of a form of Carbon for that's good for optical fiber, or do we just continue to rely on Silicon for that?


      You are a carbon-biased life form, AICM5P.

    5. Re:Good news for NanoTech. by HiThere · · Score: 2

      Well, the newest optical fibers have a hole down the middle, where the em transmits through a vacuum. Think wave-guide? I don't know just how transparent the walls need to be. Still, diamond is pretty transparent. So it might even be too transparent. Could by you'll need to end up doping your optical fibers to make the opaque enough to hold the light in the center around curves.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    6. Re:Good news for NanoTech. by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2

      You are a carbon-biased life form

      You sure? I mean, there's a lot of really wierd people here on /.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    7. Re:Good news for NanoTech. by Hal-9001 · · Score: 1
      So far, Carbon is good for hardness (diamond), tensile strength (aramid fiber, buckytubes), lubrication (graphite), electrical conductivity (buckytubes), and now it can even be used for magnetic memory, and presumably for transformer cores, and antennae.
      Maybe that's why people are made with lots of carbon... :-p
      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
  31. Re:250 degrees ? 200 ? by PhilHibbs · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's a mistake in the HTML, the 250 should be -250, but they put a soft hyphen in instead of a minus sign or a dash.

  32. To late allready? by mAsterdam · · Score: 1

    Slashdot Jul 12:
    Disk Storage Limits Loom 3-5 Years From Now states:
    New technology won't be ready for something like ten years.

    Does this carbontechnology smash the there mentioned barrier?
    Will appliance be in time to nullify the harddisk manufacturers predictions?

    1. Re:To late allready? by fusiongyro · · Score: 1

      Of course. I've been in computers for about 10 years, and it's always fashionable to pronounce that the limit is about to be reached and "gosh, won't we all be fucked then, eh?"

      Problem is, "assuming the technology won't change significantly" is the essential assumption, and turns out to be the wrong assumption. Discoveries like this happen essentially at random, but regularly enough to keep us moving forward. While I know there is an upper limit, I don't believe we'll approach it for some time. Theoretically, it will become an asymptotic approach when we get near to the theoretical limit (ie. the speed of light). But any sort of prediction is totally ridiculous as you have seen yourself.

      I'm under the impression the constant stream of doomsaying has been going on since the inception of computing. Which seems to make sense; the arguments for it haven't really changed in the years I've been here. They almost always say "unless there's some breakthrough, we'll hit the hard limit in X years," and then some breakthrough happens. Or we just find a great way to cheat.

      in short, don't bother dealing with the problem until the problem exists. :) the problem doesn't exist yet, so don't worry yet. Even if some critical hard limit were reached we could hack around it as we do now in servers with RAID or SMP.

      Daniel

    2. Re:To late allready? by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      This applies to all types of technology and areas of life. That's why this guy kicks ass, and why people have such a hard time understanding it. Do you want people passing draconian laws about the looming HD limit in 3 years -- OMFG we have to do something? Nahh, that would be stupid, as it is for environmental problems, real or otherwise. Relax, open your minds, and realize the Truth.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  33. Cure for blindness... by satanami69 · · Score: 1

    So you use this as a cover for a pair of glasses. The lenses are separated into a 2D array. Then, you use a laser to that shines into the eye, using the reflection off the pupil and the 2d array, you find where you're "looking". Now, you take a wire and stick it in your brain that sends a "signal" of what you're "looking" at...or something.

    --
    I really hate Dan Patrick.
    1. Re:Cure for blindness... by vrmlknight · · Score: 1

      a lot of the blindness involves the retna not actually 'working' to understand and send singals to the brain

      --
      This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
    2. Re:Cure for blindness... by Kirkoff · · Score: 1

      Now, you take a wire and stick it in your brain that sends a "signal" of what you're "looking" at...or something.

      That's actually the hard part. There are already solutions that involve talking to the implants, the problem is making a working implant. Right now, there is no way to connect something to the optic nerve which is what you need to do to make a blind person see. More specificly, you need to make a ton of very fine connections along that nerve. I know about this becuase I went to a lecture/confrence at the University Of Michigan's Kellog Eye Center for people with retinal degernerative diseases. Unfortunatly, I fall in to that catagory.

      --Josh

      --
      There are exactly 42,935,718 letter sized sheets in a square mile.
  34. Re:mystery NOT solved by warmcat · · Score: 2

    I looked at the source and saw a single ASCII '-' character, using IE and Netscape. It should display and on Netscape it does display. On IE it does NOT.

    Nor is it fixed in IE 6.0.2600 that ships with XP.

    Nasty little bug!

  35. Spot the odd one out by radja · · Score: 2

    aramid is a bit more than just Carbon.. need nitrogen and oxygen too. This is a nice explanation on what kevlar (and other aramids) is..

    //rdj

    --

    No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
    --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
    1. Re:Spot the odd one out by jcr · · Score: 2

      >aramid is a bit more than just Carbon.. need nitrogen and oxygen too.

      OF course, but my point is that this is one more application that doesn't require metals. Nitrogen and Oxygen are pretty common (read: cheap), too.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  36. Re:mystery NOT solved by bowb · · Score: 1

    I found it by using a hex editor on the page source. It is clearly 0xAD (173), a soft hyphen.

  37. Re:250 degrees ? 200 ? by Matchstick · · Score: 1
    the researcher didn't have any oven handy [...] So he was just saying that at 200
    Also note that "Tatiana Makarova" is a she, not a he.
  38. Need to have applications to create demand.. by xtal · · Score: 2

    There aren't consumer level apps that max out existing memory yet, by orders of magnitude, anyhow. There are also still gains to be had from conventional storage. So it's the chicken-egg problem. Once existing technology is nearing it's limit, then someone will produce an alternative to keep up.. but it's nice to know there's lots of choices.

    --
    ..don't panic
  39. Re:Towards a room temperature superconductor by gill · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Exuse me, AC, but what the hell are these statements doing in your post?

    Niggers must be incarcerated. (paragraph 2)

    Niggers trying to wear human clothes look so funny, don't you think? (paragraph 4)

    I seriously do not beleive that anybody can come up with a credible argument against complete incineration of the negro race. (paragraph 10)

    Niggers roaming freely in human inhabited areas is unacceptable. (paragraph 11)

    I do not understand! The rest of your post seems so on-topic.

  40. Undetectable weapons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Carbon that channels energy- electricity, magnetic-
    could make a great weapon. It would like organic flesh to sensors which are tuned for metals or nitrates.

  41. Re: no, and here's why, and why this matters by phoenix_orb · · Score: 0, Informative

    No, -255C is impossible. It is below absolute zero. (-253.15C or 0Kelvin)

    I would also conclude that they may have goten Kelvin and Celsius mixed up. (A lot of places do.)

    I did some projects on this way back when cutting edge was Yittrium-Barium-Copper Oxide and we could use Liquid nitrogen rather than Liquid Helium.

    Just think of the possibility of superconductivity at room tempurature:

    Batteries that have huge spans. (You make a superconductor into a ring... walla.. you made a battery.)

    Computers with no heat dissapation, and super fast. (Superconductors don't release ANY energy as waste, so no melting down of processors because they don't get hot at all. If the material is robust enough, they could make the MoBo, video card, and Ram. Damn, I bet that would make a quick computer )

    Anyway, this discovery is important, as it one step closer to this utopia.

    http://www.egglescliffe.org.uk/physics/supercond /b ob.html ( an intro to superconductivity ) Will give you a primer if you are interested in this.

    --
    Blah Blah Blah.
  42. Re:250 degrees ? 200 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your hatred for Americans got the better of you. (and everyone tells us that Americans are closed minded). It's supposed to read -200C and 225C. The problem is your browser. Wow, open source sure is neat-o.

  43. Lighter Magnets == Better Power source? by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Becided the use in computer technology could these be used to create more efficient generators, and lighter electrical motors that need less electrical energy to produce. Yea computers are great and all but just the Light Magnetic quality can help out a lot too.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  44. Re:Towards a room temperature superconductor by phoenix_orb · · Score: 1

    I didn't post this as AC, but I can easily tell you what he did.

    Cut and paste from a website... Add in dumb racist comments to see if anyone would even pay attention.

    You caught it.

    --
    Blah Blah Blah.
  45. Re:250 degrees ? 200 ? by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

    Hmm ... first of - it's not supposed to read -200 and 225, but -250 and 200.

    Secondly, I didn't have a problem seeing the soft hyphen (which, admitedly, I didn't know was the cause of the problem other people had).

    Third - I don't hate americans anymore than I hate swedes or germans, I just like to make fun of them, because they tend to go stark raving mad, when you do that.

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  46. wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Absolute zero is not -253.15 deg C, it is -273.16 deg C.

    1. Re:wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Absolute zero is not -253.15 deg C, it is -253.15 deg C.

      But he did write 253.15. Or maybe you are using IE 5.5, which occasionnally displays a seven and sixes as fives. This feature is supposed to only kick in when displaying prices of Microsoft server software in order to make them look friendlier, but apparently, here it misfired...

  47. Re: no, and here's why, and why this matters by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

    Absolute zero is -273.16C, so -255C is indeed possible.

  48. so that means... by AssFace · · Score: 2, Interesting

    since ram is already getting so damn cheap (I recall back not too long ago - '95'ish - when it was $3-8 a meg) - now with these technologies to make it lighter, faster, better, cheaper - how much less will/can it cost?
    my guess is that I will start getting paid to use the ram.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    1. Re:so that means... by CyberKnet · · Score: 2

      Hrmph. Think back just a little more to the very early 90s. When 386s were new, and Simms still cost AUD$100/USD$76 per megabyte. And even before, on the 286's, although RAM was less likely to be measured in MB sticks on desktop computers.

      Anyways.

      Yes, it can get significantly cheaper. No, not very quickly.

      Especially if it is significantly faster. Expect to see those wonderful "Server Component" prices for a while whilst the research money is made back, and *eventually* the public will get a reasonable crack at it.

      --
      Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor - Ovidius
  49. Re:Towards a room temperature superconductor by Luyseyal · · Score: 2

    Someone did that to me once... reposted a letter I'd posted regarding UCITA, IIRC, but with added in references to masturbation and whatnot.

    It was pretty funny. I enjoy a tasty roast once in awhile.

    -l

    --
    Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
  50. boiling water by posmon · · Score: 1

    completely pure water boils at *exactly* 100C. it freezes at *exactly* 0C. these are the original technical definations of these temperatures, and are only changed by impurities in the water.

    --

    update comments set karma=-1, reason='offtopic' where sid=26315

  51. Even so, that's still not higher... by Nino+the+Mind+Boggle · · Score: 1

    As someone pointed out, 0 K =273.15 C. But even if they were talking K rather than C, 200 K is colder than 255K.

    --
    ------ "Darn floor. Big bite." (Koko the gorilla's best attempt at explaining the experience of an earthquake.)
    1. Re:Even so, that's still not higher... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But even if they were talking K rather than C, 200 K is colder than 255K.

      True enough, but 255 is still colder than 200! Or does the Fahrenheit scale run backwards?

  52. Re:mystery NOT solved by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

    News for Nerds. Stuff that matters.

    --
    I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  53. The shape of a bucky ball... by Phrogz · · Score: 4, Funny
    The article says:
    Tatiana Makarova...discovered the material while experimenting with buckyballs, football-shaped molecules made up of 60 carbon atoms.

    I figure most geeks on slashdot already know what a buckyball looks like; just in case, for the U.S. readers, this means soccerball-shaped...

    1. Re:The shape of a bucky ball... by Blorgo · · Score: 2, Informative

      (Ignoring the fact that most of the world calls the sport the Americans call soccer 'football'; I'll write with American usage:)

      Right, and wrong. Buckballs are C-60 and soccerball shaped, but some relatives are indeed football shaped (more like a rugby ball, really), and have 70 or 76 Carbon atoms inside.

      "C60 and C70 have similar properties, with six reversible, one electron reductions to C60(6-) and C70(6-) having been observed, whereas oxidation is irreversible. The first reduction for both fullerenes is ~1.0 V (Fc/Fc+), indicating they have electron accepting properties. C76 exhibits both electron donor/acceptor properties. C60 has a tendency of avoiding having double bonds within the pentagonal rings which makes electron delocalisation poor, and results in the fact that C60 is not "superaromatic". C60 behaves very much like an electron deficient alkene and readily reacts with electron rich species. " (from
      http://www.bris.ac.uk/Depts/Chemistry/MOTM/bucky ba ll/c60a.htm )

    2. Re:The shape of a bucky ball... by Hal-9001 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, that shape is technically called a truncated icosahedron, IIRC. That way it doesn't matter what sport you play: everyone is equally confused... ;-)

      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
  54. Re:250 degrees ? 200 ? by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

    I can confirm that in Netscape 6, the minus sign is missing (the 173 decimal one). Saving the page, opening it in WordPad (which shows it as -), and copying and pasting such a minus sign into Character Map shows it is a minus, but a different one (173) from the normal one.

    Webdings shows it as a little bomb burst, BTW.

    Anyway, it ain't just an ancient version of Konqueoreror that does it.

    --
    I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  55. Great to see Unexpected Results by XPulga · · Score: 3, Interesting
    ...Trying to make high temperature super conductors yielded an unexpected result...

    It is absolutely amazing to see something like this happening. Upon entry on a research program most science programs I knew required the applicant to fill-in a form stating:

    • what the project will be
    • budget requirements
    • chronogram
    • publishing chronogram
    • what the results will be
    Now I wonder how many years of tenure one needs to be allowed to have unexpected results... *grin*
  56. Re:250 degrees ? 200 ? by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

    Evidently, since it is this soft hyphen, if you CAN see it, then it is your browser that is busted, not those of us who can't. If you're bragging that your superior browser shows it, have a seat. Your baby is defective. The article is improperly formatted.

    --
    I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  57. only "sometimes" exactly by arete · · Score: 1

    This isn't exactly true, because boiling-point measurements also depend on the pressure. It's exactly 0 and 100 at a particular pressure, but it's non-trivial to establish that you have that pressure without knowing the temperature already - so you have a circle.

    You can determine the triple-point of water, which is the pressure, temperature combination where it is a solid liquid AND gas simultaneously. I believe this is something like 0.16 C, but I'm not going to look it up right now. And it's at a fairly low pressure.

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
  58. Re:Towards a room temperature superconductor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Caught it...and spoiled it. I, too, wanted to see if it got modded up.

  59. Re:Towards a room temperature superconductor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's mid-level trolling, 200-level. He goofed in putting in the first references so near the beginning. He (or a friend with some scientific knowledge, but not an expert in the field) should have read the article until the desire to start scrolling to the next message kicks in, then started adding Troll Meat a few sentences after that point.

  60. This could have a thousand uses by p3d0 · · Score: 2

    I wonder if they could eventually assemble carbon atoms in such a way as to trade-off the flexibility of this "buckywall" structure for the durability of diamond.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  61. They're comparing MINUS 255 and PLUS 200 by cfriesen · · Score: 1

    In case people can't read, the previous record was 255 degrees C BELOW zero. The new record is 200 degrees C ABOVE zero.

    Where's the problem?

    1. Re:They're comparing MINUS 255 and PLUS 200 by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      But to her surprise, she found instead that the new material was magnetic even above 200 C. Until now, the highest temperature at which a non-metallic material was magnetic was 255 C. This record was held by a different form of buckyballs.

      Cut and pasted straight from the article. Now, my eyesight may be going, but I'm pretty sure that there's no minus 255 C in there. Kindly shut the hell up.

      It's evidently a typo on New Scientist's part. They could mean -255 C, they could also mean 255 K, which would make just as much sense.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    2. Re:They're comparing MINUS 255 and PLUS 200 by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2

      Ok, evidently the problem is with some browsers just not showing the negative sign. HTML typo, not an editing one.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
  62. Flat panel displays? by babymac · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Forget lasers, my question is...

    Could this technology be used to develop inexpensive flat panel displays? It sounds like it could possibly be ideal. Transparent, flexible, magnetic. I know that there was some talk recently about the possibility of using carbon nanotubes in a display device. Now if they could just get past the mass production barrier, things could be looking very good.

    From what I understand, mass production shouldn't be too much of a problem either. First of all, I always thought that carbon nanotubes were a lot harder to produce than buckyballs. Second of all, Dr. Smalley has been claiming loudly that his company will be able to mass produce nanotubes in the very near future.

    What do you think? Anyone have any info. on this?

    --
    "War makes me sad." - Me
    1. Re:Flat panel displays? by KillerBob · · Score: 1

      Take a peek at: http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,5090 409,00.html
      (It was the first hit on a Google search for "Organic Display". No... I wasn't looking for pr0n)

      Toshiba, and a few other manufacturers, are already working in organic carbon-based LCD's. If I'm not mistaken, these LCD's are already in use in cellular phones that are commercially available in Japan. We're about 2 years away from seeing them in North America, by Toshiba's estimates.

      But I'm waiting for the active refresh technology in development by Samsung, instead, which promises to upgrade the refresh rate on LCD's from 42Hz to 72Hz.... finally I can play EQ on my laptop... ;)

      HTH

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
  63. What? by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    What do you find hilarious? How do you feel they should be named? Who should name them, if not the discoverer?
    Buckyballs is a nickname; the compound is 'buckminsterfullerene'.. a fitting name, given the molecule's resemblence to Buckminster Fuller's domes.

    And why do you think bad things happen? Even though we're 'trying' to do the right thing? What they are TRYING to do is experiment - test their hypothesis. It's okay to be wrong.. that's the whole point of the scientific method. Real scientists never, ever expect to be right all the time; you experiment so you can further your research, whether it's to cut-off a certain avenue of thinking with certainty, or try to open up a new one.

    1. Re:What? by UberNex · · Score: 1

      Absolutely correct, being wrong is actually one of the greatest things that can happen in science becasue it makes you take a step back and ask "why?"

  64. Nope. It was plexiglass. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    They traded the forumla for transparent aluminum to the guy in exchange for the plexiglass they needed; they didn't have any money.
    Even with the molecular structure, it would have taken years to figure out how to make it.

    1. Re:Nope. It was plexiglass. by urmensch · · Score: 0

      nope. it wasn't - for the reasons stated above.
      what they didn't have USD? wtf? I'm assuming scotty took care of the manufacturing details too.

  65. You have no idea what you are talking about. by mindstrm · · Score: 4, Informative

    Absolute zero is -273.15C (or is it .16)
    or 0K There is no such thing as 'degrees kelvin'; the proper way to say it is 'zero kelvins'.

    And this discovery has absolutely nothing to do with superconductivity; only that they were trying to produce a superconductor when they discovered it was magnetic. This is not an advancement in superconductivity. They didn't produce a superconductor. That's obvious even without reading the article...

    Also, you are correct about superconductors.. but... the reason microprocessors work is because they are full of SEMIconductors... transistors... you HAVE to have resistance.. you can't build logic with pure superconductors.

    1. Re:You have no idea what you are talking about. by Fyndo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Errr. there are superconducting devices that you can use to build logic. Well, you need insulators too, but the josephon junction can be used as a switch, and involves no semiconductors. That said, it's not something we'll be seeing any time soon.

  66. Re:sTUpId cARboN rOd ... DOH ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You forgot two:

    THE CLASSICS: DEEP SPACE HOMER

    Episode Guide

    BTW, I see some prick mod'd you down for injecting a little bit of ON TOPIC humor (must be some type 'A'sshole who combs the bristles to his toothbrush after flossing for an hour).

    Well, here are some ON TOPIC links that shows this entire article is OLD hat (relatively speaking).

    Scientific America : STRANGE ATTRACTORS - Chemists make magnets without metal

    New Magnetic Materials

    Cryostat Modeling for the Superconducting Interaction Region Magnets: CESR Phase III

    All of these articles are circa 1997-98.

  67. You forgot.. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    To add 'under *exactly* one atmosphere' of pressure, or 101.325 kpa ( I think )

    1. Re:You forgot.. by posmon · · Score: 1

      indeed i did. well, it's been a hard day....

      <excuse><excuse>

      --

      update comments set karma=-1, reason='offtopic' where sid=26315

  68. Re:250 degrees ? 200 ? by rabidcow · · Score: 1

    Oh, and btw, 255 C (that's minus 255) is below room temperature.

    Can we teach these people how to write proper HTML next time? I'm getting really confused trying to figure out if 255 is 255 or if it's really -255. And is it 200 or -200?

  69. the art of pedantry by posmon · · Score: 1

    of course you're changing the temperature merely by measuring it.

    it's a minor miracle that i can get my coffee to a reasonable temperature.

    --

    update comments set karma=-1, reason='offtopic' where sid=26315

  70. ITS -255c by geekoid · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is a bug in some browsers that fail to display the - sign. The articl may appear to say the previous temp was 255c when it actually says(look in the source) -255c.
    I don't know how to post a story update, so I'll do this here.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:ITS -255c by geekoid · · Score: 2

      So natural I show a Minus sign in a post about browsers not being able to show the minus sign, sheesh.
      thats minus 255c

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:ITS -255c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the source also shows that the 200 C that the 255 is compared to is positive (there is no minus in the source). So which one is it?

    3. Re:ITS -255c by n1vux · · Score: 1

      The problem is not in your IE browser for once. Netscape is /wrong/ when it renders this page apparently (or content-semantically) correctly. It's that whoever (wrote the program that) translated the article to HTML didn't check the spec. The 0xAD character used in the page is NOT a MINUS, it's a "SHY"

      ref http://www.w3.org/TR/html40/sgml/entities.html

    4. Re:ITS -255c by Gunstick · · Score: 1

      oh yeah, once the - is not displayed in IE, everybody talks about it. But when the thousands of ' characters show up as ? in my linux-netscape
      noone cries out.
      Why do people use the ' (accent) instead of the ' (single quote) when writing texts?
      Must be the same reason DOS use \ instead of / :-)
      George

      --
      Atari rules... ermm... ruled.
    5. Re:ITS -255c by chrae · · Score: 1

      *Snipped from the page source*

      <p>But to her surprise, she found instead that the new material was magnetic even above 200 C. Until now, the highest temperature at which a non-metallic material was magnetic was 255 C. This record was held by a different form of buckyballs. </p>

      No minus in the source. Just take my word for it that the minus wasn't there. Because if it was there in the source but didn't show up in a browser, then why would it show up in this post?

      - <---

      "First they tell you you're wrong and they can prove it; then they tell you you're right but it isn't important; then they tell you it's important but they knew it all along."
      -Charles Kettering

    6. Re:ITS -255c by taleman · · Score: 1

      The bug is in the New Scientist article. The character that looks like a minus sign is actually soft-hyphen, and Netscape is clever and displays it after a space, but IE performs "correctly" and does not display a soft hyphen in the middle of a line.

  71. Generators and Motors... by cr0sh · · Score: 2

    Good idea, but I doubt it.

    For large scale power generation, the generators do not use permanent magnets, but rather use electromagnets. These electromagnets are energized by a small current, then the generator spun up, and the electromagnets keep generating a magnetic field, either by being fed directly off the generator (like a car alternator works), or by simple induction (look here for how to do this yourself from common electric motors!!!). Permanent magnets tend to only be used on small generators like that used for bicycle lights, or for the spark generation on small engines (where I suppose it could make a difference).

    As for motors, most AC motors, once again, are either induction based, or three phase with two sets of electromagnets - no permanent magnets used. Where it could get interesting though, for electric vehicles - where I think your idea might have merit. A lighter, but more powerful motor using these magnets (if they prove to be more powerful than other magnets, of course) would mean longer battery life. Still, I think some electric vehicles actually use AC motors as well, and do a DC->AC conversion. AC motors are used, I think, because even after the conversion from DC to AC, they are more powerful for a smaller package, and more efficient (of course, I could be wrong - someone enlighten me, please).

    Also, smaller, lighter motors could mean smaller conventional DC motors, like smaller pager motors, smaller printer stepper motors, all the small motors that exist (smaller, lighter, more powerful kick-ass battlebot motors - yeah!!!)...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  72. come on... by Twisted+Logic · · Score: 0


    "Computer? Hello, computer?"
    "Uh.. you have to use the keyboard."
    "Ah.. they keyboard. How quaint."

    "TRANSPARENT ALUMINUM?!?!?"

  73. OT: Your Sig by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

    Fighting for peace is like fucking for virginity

    It's nice and quippy, but the fundamental flaw in your argument is the assumption that peace can never be regained. History shows otherwise. (WWII and Japan?)

    --
    I got my Linux laptop at System76.
  74. Fiber curves... by cr0sh · · Score: 2

    Actually, from what I understand, what "holds the light in around curves" in current fiber optic strands is the cladding, which is of a different refraction index, thus it bends (bounces) the light back toward the center, except in extremely tight bends. I would imagine the same thing would/could be done with this stuff. Also, sometimes having the light leak can be a good thing: Think VR glove bend sensors, and lightweight robotic whisker bump sensors (see Gordon McCombs latest edition of "99 Inexpensive Robotics Projects" for more on this one)...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    1. Re:Fiber curves... by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1

      It's called Total Internal Reflection, and it's as perfect a mirroring surface as we know how to make.

      Here's how it works. When you have two transparent materials bordering each other, you have a boundary where refraction can occur. Let's say that light is passing through material "A" on its way to the boundaryy with material "B". Out of necessity, let's say these two materials have different indeces of refraction.

      An "index of refraction" is a ratio of the speed of light in that material vs. c (the speed of light in vacuum). The magic that this pertains to is a result of the wave nature of light. (Though Newton held that light was strictly of particle nature. Most everyone believed him until he was proved wrong. Can't remember the name of the experiment that proved Newton wrong. It was sarcastically suggested by a scientist who claimed Newton was right.)

      When the light wave(I'll call it a wave now) hits the boundary, it has two options: Either be reflected back into the medum it came from, or be transmitted into the other medium at a different path. (It usually does both, but I don't know how that works, so I won't bother describing it.)

      If the wave is transmitted, its new path depends on the ratio of the speed of light in the two substances. The slower the wave can move in substance B, the closer to the "normal" line the new path will be. The normal line is the line perpendicular to the substance.

      However, the reverse is true. The faster the wave can move in material B, the further from the normal line the new path will be.

      Refraction also depends on the angle at which the wave hits the boundary. The shallower the angle at which the wave strikes the boundary, the shallower the angle of light leaving the bouna dary will be. But wait a second. The effects add up. If you are moving from a material where the wave travels slowly into a material where the wave travels quickly, and your angle of insidence is shallow enough, you'll reach a point where the angle at which the wave leaves coinsides with the boundary between the two materials. Interestingly enough, waves can't travel on the boundary like that, so instead it gets reflected back into material A.

      Some examples of this happening: Reflections inside of prisms (used most often in binoculars and cameras) and that funky reflection you see when you look up underwater.

      Mirages are /similar/, but I don't completely understand how they work, so I'm not going to drive myself nuts trying to describe them. As far as I can, it's just a layer of hot air that acts as a fuzzy boundary and second material, and I think there's some calculus, too.

      --
      What's this Submit thingy do?
  75. Speakers? by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 2

    I wonder if this stuff could be used to make "flat ribbon"-style speakers better & cheaper?

  76. Wet Blanket by DumbSwede · · Score: 1
    Much as I respect New Scientist, which is one of the best general lay science magazines around, this has all the earmarks of too-good-to-be-true.

    Judgement withheld until reproduced in other labs.

  77. 200? 255? -200? -255? (Use the source, luke!) by mark-t · · Score: 1

    A quick "View Source" check on the page revealed the following:

    ... But to her surprise, she found instead that the new material was magnetic even above 200 C. Until now, the highest temperature at which a non-metallic material was magnetic was -255 C. This record was held by a different form of buckyballs.
    So it looks like she beat the old record by over 455 degrees.

    One word... Wow!

  78. Silcon Bucky Balls by pagen · · Score: 1

    Since Silcon cages (similar to Bucky balls) have been discovered (see http://www.sciam.com/news/022701/1.html), I can't stop thinking that this will lead to a major breakthrough in Silcon Bucky Balls. The potential, if this same (similar) relationship exists in silicon, is incredible!

    --
    When a Ball Dreams, It Dreams it's a Frisbee.
  79. I am YEARS ahead of this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This technology is OLD NEWS. I've had flexible, non-metallic magnets sitting around my house for at least 10 years or so now. In fact they are SO common, I use them primarily to stick things to my fridge.

    1. Re:I am YEARS ahead of this! by compuserf · · Score: 1

      no you haven't, they are ferrite magnet powder dispersed in rubber.

  80. Re:mystery NOT solved by nusuth · · Score: 1

    256TB at 2032? 512PB makes more sense, even for gates family.

    --

    Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room!

  81. Flying cars? by KurdtX · · Score: 1

    Ok, maybe not flying ones, and it might not apply to cars, but this would finally give mag-lev trains the lift they need. Light, flexible, and since it's transparent you could make as much of the train out of it as you needed. The only barrier would cost, and since (from the spotty detail in the article) it would seem to be easily manufactured that would not be much of an issue either.

    Of course, going off with this (and depending on how magnetic it turns out to be), we could have magnetic skating rinks (and you thought ice was low friction!), beds with air as a cusion instead of springs, car bumpers that could repulse in the event of a collision, or attract to enable "convoying" on freeways. I'm just going off because magnetics seems to be one area that science has not advanced in as much as other areas, our greatest (sarcasm here) use of magnetics is for those perpetual motion machines you see alongside the inspirational posters.

    --

    Kurdt
    I'm not anti-social. Just pro-technology.
    1. Re:Flying cars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flux Capacitors!!!!!!!, use this material in a standard capacitor, in Place of the insulating material, and Wala, its just that easy!

  82. Re:mystery NOT solved by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1

    WHAT ARE YOU DOING?!

    dont you know that you shouldnt be advertising these bugs to the public! Did you contact microsoft about this. Good job you just got the security community in a heap of bad press by proving that culp was right. thanks.

  83. Re:250 degrees ? 200 ? by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

    Who's bragging? I was explaining why I was acting stupid earlier. I didn't know there was a problem, and when I found out, I changed my stance. How were you expecting me to behave? Like a politician?

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  84. How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the early 90s when I was working on C60 synthesis, it was quite well known that bucky ball went superconductive at super low temperatures (which is weird because graphite doesn't, and bucky ball is basically graphite wrapped into a ball, the only quickly notatable difference being bent p-orbitals). There has been so much fullerene work done so far that I am rather confused as to how this one piece more of research on the subject ended up here on /.. I'm guessing due to the bell publicity stunt announcement recently.

  85. Stupid comment by KurdtX · · Score: 1

    On the ironic note, today's Dictionary.com word of the day is Serendipity : The faculty or phenomenon of making fortunate accidental discoveries

    --

    Kurdt
    I'm not anti-social. Just pro-technology.
    1. Re:Stupid comment by SpeelingChekka · · Score: 2

      On the ironic note

      While you're there, check out http://www.dictionary.com/cgi-bin/dict.pl?term=iro nic ("poignantly contrary to what was expected") .. I think you meant, on a "coincidental" note :) (Check out their "usage note" for 'ironic' too :).

  86. Superconducting Transistor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.trnmag.com/Stories/092000/Superconducti ng_Transistor.html

  87. Re:mystery NOT solved by compuserf · · Score: 1

    Is it possible, from examining the style of the source, to identify the page creation tool which produced this poor code? Clearly it should not be a soft hyphen. It's not the browser at fault so much as the editor.

  88. Okay. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    Didn't know that. Cool.

  89. I suggest by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    that you watch the movie again.

    I'm absolutely, 100%, positively sure about this. So is every review of the movie I can find online.

    They didn't have USD because they don't use money in the future...remember when they first arrive on earth? They need money?

    Scotty traded the guy the formula for transparent aluminum. It was a *plexiglass* factory. It's even mentioned in the movie (I forget by who) that it will take years just to figure out how to synthesize... and they needed their plexiglass *immediately*.

    1. Re:I suggest by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that if you remember back, the slots in the floor that held the Plexiglass were 6 inches wide...

      --
      What's this Submit thingy do?
  90. Carbon-Biased? by jcr · · Score: 2

    Well, I don't think I'll ever meet anyone who's not Carbon-based, but if I do I'll try to keep an open mind. There's no need to call me "biased." ;-)

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  91. Re:250 degrees ? 200 ? by gibodean · · Score: 1

    Actually, my original comment which I cut and pasted the offending piece from the article. I still can't see the minus sign in my comment.

    But, I have just cut and paste from my comment into notepad, and can now see the minus sign !!! Yay!

  92. Excellent explanation... by cr0sh · · Score: 2

    I remember a lot of this from high school physics - I didn't want to get too deep into it in my reply, but you did an excellent job.

    One thing, I am sure you are aware of, is in regards to the wave/particle duality of particles (double slit experiment), which of course begins to lead one down a slippery slope toward quantum physics, HUP, and other "magical" things...

    Looks like, in a way, Newton was right after all.

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon