Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: Solidity, Sneakiness, Recovery

The first slashback of normal time (not Daylight Savings) in a while, tonight with news of 3Dwm's continuing progress, ways brave OS X pioneers can bravely reclaim their lost MP3 files, and a word of caution on HP's upcoming digital-audio playbox.

Vivid Video, take note: NickElm writes: "The 3Dwm project, already featured twice before on Slashdot (the last time little more than a year ago), is still alive and kicking and making steady progress. This summer, we added CSG support, full VNC interaction, and our first real application (a 3Dwm clock). To top it off, Xybernaut recently donated two wearable computers to the project, perfect platforms for this kind of thing. 3Dwm packages have existed for Debian for quite some time, and we were just now adopted by Mandrake as well. What are you waiting for, download it and try it out for yourself! Still far from a complete user environment, but we're getting there..."

Do you want your iTunes iBack, little iBoy? pinqkandi writes "Apple has released some tips on getting back your data lost by the iTunes Installer for Mac OS X. If you haven't written to the partition where the loss occured, you should be able to get it back with Tech Tool Pro or Norton Utilities. Apple's tips warn to NOT use a Volume Recover feature in these utilities, but instead use their tools to recover lost data. Also, boot from a CD before recovering data, and also follow your utility's maker's directions. Unfortunately, no free utilities are listed for the recovery."

The sort of details you'll find on page 17 in small print. ARP writes "A while ago RatedPC brought us some scoop of HP's upcoming Digital Entertainment Center de100c. At first this unit seems to be a perfect addition to home theatre systems right? Well, you better forget about it if you think you are going to use it to share music or make your own CDs from your MP3 collection. What HP hasn't told us is they have been seriously whipped by DRM (Digital Rights Management). An internal FAQ has revealed that users will be unable to use CD-RWs to burn off their own CDs. You will need to buy "Digital Audio Discs" and royalties from these discs are distributed to artists via the RIAA. And you can't transfer your songs to your PC either. Without a doubt RIAA's foothold has extended much above just this. Don't be surprised if it won't play your MP3 collection because they are not digitally signed. The problem is that RIAA will be riding high on HP success with this product and their grip will be firmer when it comes to controlling what you will do with your music."

A similar problem affects the otherwise very cool-looking Terapin video recorder, which I would pick up in a heartbeat if it worked with regular CD-Rs. The HP website talks about burning tracks to CD, but makes no mention of such restrictions; I hope this is simply bad information, but it seems quite likely that "burning to CD" in this case will mean burning to industry-sanctioned CDs with their accompanying surcharge. Can anyone provide further information?

185 comments

  1. Vivid Video? by geekd · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't get the reference to Vivid Video.

    What does a major porn distributor have to do with 3Dwm?

    1. Re:Vivid Video? by laserjet · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I'm retarded, but I didn't see a reference to Vivid Video. Or it could be because it's after 5:00 and my brain is worn out for the day. I don't know either.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    2. Re:Vivid Video? by timothy · · Score: 3, Offtopic

      Vivid is known for putting to use some of the interesting features of the DVD format (like multiple angles / "story" jumping akin to Choose Your Own Adventure, but ... with naked people) while mainstream filmmakers mostly haven't.

      One of the features they have apparenly added is a 3-D walkthrough as a menu-choosing function (navigate choices by browsing, first-person-like through a hallway in their simulated House O' Skin). Perhaps someone with a functioning DVD player can better comment on this.

      Added to which, they have a big online / computer interest if not presence (the vivid studio head, whose name I forget, gets shown / interviewed on TV sometimes talking about such), so this seems like a natural fit for them.

      timothy

      --
      jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    3. Re:Vivid Video? by geekd · · Score: 1

      Thanks. That's probably it.

      I haven't seen a Vivid movie in years. Too tame for my taste, although their girls are *hot*

    4. Re:Vivid Video? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does Vivid put out the Where The Girls Aren't series? That one is pretty high quality stuff.

    5. Re:Vivid Video? by geekd · · Score: 1

      Where The Girls Aren't

      But that would mean... men only... and that would be... gay.

      Aha. I see what you're getting at... ;-)

      IIRC, Vivid puts out the "Where The Boys Aren't". It's been a few years since I worked at the video store (dot-com boom got me hired doing computer work and that put a damper on my video store clerk career) but I don't think Vivid does gay (male) porn.

    6. Re:Vivid Video? by czardonic · · Score: 1

      One of the features they have apparenly added is a 3-D walkthrough as a menu-choosing function (navigate choices by browsing, first-person-like through a hallway in their simulated House O' Skin). Perhaps someone with a functioning DVD player can better comment on this.

      This is a gerat feature if you like the idea of walking through down a hallway (replete with crappy texture mapping) in order to get to the, ahem, content. Personally, I think that the main reason to buy DVDs is to avoid cumbersome access times. On the plus side, they do manage to cram a lot of, ahem, content onto those DVDs. Definitely a value.

      BTW, this feature works on both my laptop and my DVD player.

      --
      Takahashi Rumiko made beats! DON, taku, DON, taku. . .
    7. Re:Vivid Video? by geekd · · Score: 1

      It's right at the top of the article here on ./:

      Vivid Video, take note: NickElm writes: "The 3Dwm project, already featured twice before on Slashdot (the last time little more than a year ago), is...

    8. Re:Vivid Video? by roberjo · · Score: 3, Funny
      Here comes captain obvious to save the day. The refernce to Vivid Video is because the 3Dwm project is about Human/Computer Interaction. High Tech porn... Human/Computer Interaction... High Tech Porn... HUMAN/COMPUTER INTERACTION..


      To top it off, Xybernaut recently donated two wearable computers to the project, perfect platforms for this kind of thing.


      Can I make it any clearer?

      --

      Deterrence is the art of producing, in the mind of the enemy, the fear to attack! - Dr. Strangelove
    9. Re:Vivid Video? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep, that's them one of those was my first porn rental. Ah, the memories...

    10. Re:Vivid Video? by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Timmy... you, uhhh, seem to know your porn distributors rather well.

      --

      Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
    11. Re:Vivid Video? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... VA Software is having financial problems, and the /. crew start running stories about pr0n.

      Coincidence? Read the book.

    12. Re:Vivid Video? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Too tame for my taste, although their girls are *hot*"

      Oh well, not all of us love nipple clamps, bukkake, and massive anal insertions as much as you do. Normal folks are content with the incredible Virtual Sex DVDs, which simulate sex with beautiful women, something Vivid does well, rather than asian school girls, which wierdos like you do hard.

  2. Apple giving an even more helping hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Apple is offering users who lost data using the initial version of the iTunes 2.0 for OS X installer both reimbursement for purchase of Norton Utilities and/or data recovery services.

    http://newforums.macnn.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cg i? ubb=get_topic&f=45&t=000637

    1. Re:Apple giving an even more helping hand... by motherhead · · Score: 1

      is there any real numbers on how many people were effected by this? i installed 2.0 (the Bad Apple) on the boot partition of a multi-partitioned disk and have not had any trouble at all. i am not claiming it is a hoax, because it obviously is not. but on the other hand i don't think this was a rampant DOS4 like mess.

    2. Re:Apple giving an even more helping hand... by SilentChris · · Score: 2
      "Apple is offering users who lost data using the initial version of the iTunes 2.0 for OS X installer both reimbursement for purchase of Norton Utilities and/or data recovery services."

      As they should. Although, they shouldn't have erased my files to begin with.

      Now, how do I start my broken Mac again?

    3. Re:Apple giving an even more helping hand... by gvsu_snow_lord · · Score: 0

      its said if you have mutiple partitions... have spaces in your hd partaition name... and have removed iTunes 1.1 and ran the orginal 2.0 installer then you would loose your data.

    4. Re:Apple giving an even more helping hand... by iso · · Score: 2

      Although, they shouldn't have erased my files to begin with.

      Granted, but mistakes happen.

      Now, how do I start my broken Mac again?

      With your OS 9 CD. Pop it in and hold down "c" until you see OS 9 booting up. Alternatively, the Norton CD is self-booting.

      - j

    5. Re:Apple giving an even more helping hand... by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Why not just write their own one-click fix utility instead of artificially boosting other people's sales ?

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    6. Re:Apple giving an even more helping hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the hand was favouring the RIAA?

      Easy way to ensure 6% of the PC market has no mp3's!

      I have an AppleIIe, so don't flame me!

    7. Re:Apple giving an even more helping hand... by SilentChris · · Score: 2
      "Granted, but mistakes happen."

      If this was Microsoft, Slashdot would be wiping the floor with this story. 2000 comments...

    8. Re:Apple giving an even more helping hand... by daniel_isaacs · · Score: 1

      What a brilliant fucking observation. One that's only been made 1.44 Quintillion times the last few days.

      --
      - Dan I.
    9. Re:Apple giving an even more helping hand... by mr100percent · · Score: 2

      Because I don't think Apple could build a disk utility overnight without bugs, and even if it took a week, people would scream bloody murder at the loss of productivity as their system would have to be untouched for that time.

    10. Re:Apple giving an even more helping hand... by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 2
      "Why not just write their own one-click fix utility"

      Oh, great. If a simple non-system-related application can screw up and delete an entire partition, I can just imagine something as low-level as a file undeleter reflashing your BIOS with garbage.

      Seriously, though, when you're mucking about with file recovery and such, you want lots of looking at the code, lots of testing, and all those other software engineering things that take lots of time and effort but produce better, safer, more stable code. It's not the kind of thing you rush out the door, and it's not the kind of thing that'd get done in time to appease customers that currently have boat anchors sitting on their desks. Using an existing product is the obvious choice.

    11. Re:Apple giving an even more helping hand... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      customers that currently have boat anchors sitting on their desks

      On the contrary, the apple cases are way too lightweight to be used as boat anchors :)

  3. It's Unfortunate, but not unexpected by Erioll · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can't say I'm totally suprised by the move from HP. With their upcoming merger with Compaq, there is no doubt that they are worried about possible legal action from others while they are vulnerable. This move by them for DRM is really only to protect themselves. I don't like it, but I can't really blame them.

    As for the 3Dwm, great idea! I hope you guys keep it going. Something like that could be very good for UIs in the future.

    And the Apple stuff. Hmm. Not an Apple user myself since Elementary School, so I won't seriously comment.

    1. Re:It's Unfortunate, but not unexpected by b_pretender · · Score: 5, Funny
      It's not just legal action. The RIAA has time and time again been connected to the mafia and some major organized crime. When this is the case, then it lobbying and court battles aren't the only things you have to worry about. You have to worry about arson, death to loved ones, and your own personal safety.

      Probably the only large group with more connections than the RIAA is the MPAA.

    2. Re:It's Unfortunate, but not unexpected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having sait this, you realize that we need to eliminate you.

      Stay home and wait for Vito.

    3. Re:It's Unfortunate, but not unexpected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Organized crime? Umm, what?

    4. Re:It's Unfortunate, but not unexpected by jovlinger · · Score: 2

      So what do you get for the royalties you pay for the media?

      I would presume (not assume, since, well, statistics aren't on my side) that you are buying the rights to make a legal copy of some music onto that disk.

      So using this burner and media, I would be able to make mix-cds for my friends w/o infringing any copyrights? I mean, I am already allowed to make mix-cds for myself, as per fair-use, so I must be getting SOMETHING for the extra money I pay, no? And since you say it is for royalties, that must mean that ANOTHER legal copy was created by my copying (as you only pay royalites on each song once).

    5. Re:It's Unfortunate, but not unexpected by Pandora's+Vox · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but i think the royalties go to make up for people who burn music ilegally. that's how it is with audiocasettes; you have the right to make a fair use copy (ie a backup, or a copy for your car or to keep up at your cottage), but not to give it to a friend or whatever, and you're charged a bit (it's at least 20-30c/tape here in canada) to make up for the people who make non-fair-use copies.

    6. Re:It's Unfortunate, but not unexpected by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      So you're assumed guilty and fined accordingly....

      The Audio-only CD-Rs are designed to 'eliminate' or 'substantially reduce' piracy (if you have an audio CD recorder you can only use those specials CD-Rs, you can't make copies from the copies, etc.) yet they assume that if you're going to burn audio CDs, you are a pirate and you have to pay a fee to the artists (and how many artists have ever actually received that money?) through the RIAA for that privelege(sp?)....

      Ok, it all makes sense now... NOT!

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    7. Re:It's Unfortunate, but not unexpected by jovlinger · · Score: 2

      That would seem to go against double jeopardy. Once you've paid the fine, you're off the hook for the crime. And since you're paying the fine ahead of time..

      I dunno. It seems like something that wouldn't stand a true legal test. Does anyone know of any cases where this has been brought up?

  4. ITunes Recovery by Alien54 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    If you haven't written to the partition where the loss occured, you should be able to get it back with Tech Tool Pro or Norton Utilities.

    Which is what any data recovery pro could have told you.

    But many modern systems are sold with only one partition. and there is the added question of virtual memory systems such as used in Mac and windows. The Mac OSX setup, based on BSD, should not have this as a big issue, if they use the typical swap partition.

    (and some people wonder why you would not put it all into one large partition!)

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:ITunes Recovery by penguinboy · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      Well, it really doesn't matter how your partitions are arranged if you end up doing 'rm -rf /' as root - anything that's mounted is going to get wiped. That said, there are of course still very good reasons to partition one's drives.

    2. Re:ITunes Recovery by pythas · · Score: 1

      This bug only happened if you had multiple partitions.

    3. Re:ITunes Recovery by victim · · Score: 5, Informative

      People with only one partition were not harmed. You had to have more than one partition and have one of them named like the first one with another word after it. "Disk" and "Disk 2" would do it.

      Very few mac users use more than one partition. There isn't a compelling reason for most people.

    4. Re:ITunes Recovery by marx · · Score: 0

      I think you could only lose the data if you had at least two partitions, so that's probably irrelevant .

    5. Re:ITunes Recovery by kaimiike1970 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I and all the mac users I know use multiple partitions... especially usefull is the deicated 1 GB scratch partition for photoshop...

      --


      Do a google search before posting.
    6. Re:ITunes Recovery by schwanerhill · · Score: 2

      Mac OS X does not use a separate swap partition by default; the swap files are in /private/var/vm unless the user put them somewhere else.

      As others have said, this bug did not erase the disk mounted at / ; it only erased partions mounted in /Volumes. (OS X mounts every partition except / at "/Volumes/Partition Name" (note the space, which is, of course, what caused the problem).

    7. Re:ITunes Recovery by king-manic · · Score: 1

      poeple partition their drives to reduce fragmentation and reduce the size of clusters. It's a habit from Win9x I suppose. Smaller cluster Sizes reduce space wastage and access times. Unix uses somethign different though.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    8. Re:ITunes Recovery by Lonesmurf · · Score: 2

      Hear hear to that. I have an old 2 gig hard drive that I use solely as a scratch partition for working in photoshop and illustrator. Very handy when keeping my larger drive from constantly being written to by two or three programs at the same time (like downloading mps and working at the same time).

    9. Re:ITunes Recovery by ninewands · · Score: 1

      I don't know about others' reasons, but I have separate /tmp and /var partitions to prevent a compiler crash from corrupting my / filesystem. I have separate /home and /usr/local partitions so I don't have to reinstall all the non-distro stuff I've added to my system if I reinstall the OS or install a newer version.

    10. Re:ITunes Recovery by TerryMathews · · Score: 1
      Very few mac users use more than one partition.


      While I would normally agree with this, I think that you will find that "normal" Mac users aren't yet running OS X. It's mostly us UNIX loving freaks running it. Most of us have at least two partitions, personally I have three (Mac OS X, Mac OS 9.1, Downloads). It really helped back in the day to be able to reformat and reinstall without losing my downloads.
      --
      -- Terry
    11. Re:ITunes Recovery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I and none of the Mac users I know use scratch partitions. Scratch *drives*, yes, but not partitions.

      There is no compelling reason, these days, to repartition a drive into smaller pieces, even for swap space. There is no speed gain. There is no increased safety. There is no reduction in drive corruption. Your scratch partition should be free to roam your drive or else you should put it on a separate drive altogether, where you will get the speed benefit of two drives spinning at once (and in that case, you might consider a RAID setup instead of two separate drives). Of course, you should also load up on the maximum amount of RAM.

  5. HP (the printer maker) will see this die... by microbob · · Score: 1, Troll

    Yeah, yeah. Unless they GIVE IT AWAY, no one will buy it.

    Good riddance.

    1. Re:HP (the printer maker) will see this die... by laserjet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...Which is precisely what they do with their printers. They give them away, sometimes even losing money initially, but wait... people need... toner! Yeah that's it, we'll charge an arm and a leg for finely ground plastic!

      To be semi on-topic, I can't believe that HP's new mp3 device is so limiting. It seems that the old HP would have gone with what people really want, and not bow to the RIAA and all this digital protection crap. Look what happened with Napster: You used to have one mp3-sharing company to kill, now you have 50 small, flexible, and no-one-person-owns-me mp3 sharing networks/programs. They really shot themselves in the foot on this one!

      Viva la resistance.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    2. Re:HP (the printer maker) will see this die... by arbofnot · · Score: 1

      Why would I want to pay $1000 for this device? I can get a DVD player for $150-$200 that plays MP3s on CD-R. In fact, I did. And it plays DVDs and VCDs as well. Could put together a P3 or Athlon system for the difference in price, have a general-purpose device...which among other things can create or download the files in the first place, and burn the CD-Rs to play in the DVD player. It makes no sense.

  6. iTunes by BoarderPhreak · · Score: 5, Informative
    I downloaded iTunes v2.0 when it came out, and promptly installed it. Luckily, my drives were named without spaces, etc. and I escaped the wrath of the unquoted "rm -rf" bug.

    I managed to get v2.0.1 later this weekend and re-installed, just to be on the safe-side, and in case there were any other changes.

    The improvements like the EQ, crossfade and faster burning are nice. It doesn't crossfade when burning, though, which stinks - but otherwise you couldn't track-change. You can burn MP3 CDs now, too.

    A costly upgrade for some... ;) But pretty darned nice if it works out, which should be for the majority of the people.

    Hey, give Apple a chance - they're a little new to this Unix thing. Heh. MacOS X fully rocks.

    1. Re:iTunes by reddeno · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ahhh... but you can crossfade with tracks! Just don't use audio padding.

    2. Re:iTunes by Espresso_Boy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      they're a little new to this Unix thing.

      Actually, Apple had it's own Unix a long time ago. It was called A/UX and it ran on many of the 68k macs (no PowerPC). It was pretty slick. It had this cool System 7 intigration thing, and IIRC it could run normal MacOS binaries. Pitty Apple hasn't opensourced it, or at least made it free. The people in comp.unix.aux are really informative if you have any questions.

    3. Re:iTunes by Uncle+Dick · · Score: 1

      Luckily, my drives were named without spaces, etc. and I escaped the wrath of the unquoted "rm -rf" bug. Drives named with spaces weren't the only victims of the iTunes Installer Bug. My 60 GB Hard Drive has three partitions. I installed iTunes on the first and lost all data on the second, which was a single word "That". Interestingly enough, my third partition, named "The Other Thing" was untouched. The problems with the installer went far beyond those that have already been reported.

      --
      END OF LINE
    4. Re:iTunes by kaimiike1970 · · Score: 2, Funny

      YOur error was clearly that your middle drive should have been called 'That and'. It would have saved you.

      --


      Do a google search before posting.
    5. Re:iTunes by czardonic · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Luckily, my drives were named without spaces, etc.

      Who, other than a Mac user, would use spaces in their drive names?

      --
      Takahashi Rumiko made beats! DON, taku, DON, taku. . .
    6. Re:iTunes by technos · · Score: 3, Informative

      Apple also sold rebranded AIX (Read: IBM's Unix) boxes as servers.

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
    7. Re:iTunes by ninewands · · Score: 1

      A Winblows user ...

    8. Re:iTunes by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Hey, give Apple a chance - they're a little new to this Unix thing. Heh. MacOS X fully rocks.

      Isn't that what beta testing is for? Oh yeah - thats what apple uses their users for...

      Seriously though - nothing pisses me off more then data loss. HD dieing is one thing, flakey software is another.

    9. Re:iTunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I though that's what Linux used its users for...

    10. Re:iTunes by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Oh thats really flamebait - we can diss on windows machines all we want - and this isn't even a diss.

      Someone's gonna get metamoderated :).

  7. Apple is offering to reimburse users by SiMac · · Score: 2, Redundant
    According to this page Apple is offering to reimburse users who lost data from iTunes 2 for Norton Utilities and data recovery services.

    It's nice that they're doing the right thing.

    1. Re:Apple is offering to reimburse users by SiMac · · Score: 1

      I can understand how this would be uncommon among testing systems. Most testers probably don't have multiple hard drives with names like "Disk", "Disk 1", and "Disk 2". The only real combination I could think of anyone having is "MacOS" and "MacOS X".

    2. Re:Apple is offering to reimburse users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple's default name is "Macintosh HD" (or was until recently).

    3. Re:Apple is offering to reimburse users by RogrWilco · · Score: 1

      That could be said about any software developer. I imagined it worked fine in the lab.

      ...although drive wiping is a pretty embarassing oversight.

    4. Re:Apple is offering to reimburse users by DAldredge · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      It would have been even nicer if apple had tested the product before they shipped it...

      This is not flamebate...don't mod it as such...

    5. Re:Apple is offering to reimburse users by iso · · Score: 2

      Well I'm not intimite with Apple's QA procedure, but I'm sure it's no worse than any other vendor, and considerably better than open source (you know, the "it worked on my machine so I'll release it" philosophy.).

      Do you realize that this bug is very specific? You must have at least two partitions, and one must be called "Foo" while the other is called "Foo Bar." That is, the drives must have the same name up to the space. "Disk" and "Disk 1" is an another example that many have used. QA is all fine and dandy, and programmers should be exceedingly careful with "rm -rf," but nevertheless, this is a very obscure bug.

      - j

    6. Re:Apple is offering to reimburse users by DAldredge · · Score: 2

      But as someone else posted to this thread. Didn't the default drive name that apple used in the past have a space in it?

    7. Re:Apple is offering to reimburse users by iso · · Score: 2

      Well perhaps, but then no default Apple install has two partitions, which is a requirement as well. Still, I imagine the problems happened to quite a few people who had made two partitions: one called "Mac OS 9" and the other "Mac OS X."

      - j

  8. Free utilities? Feh... by Cutriss · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Unfortunately, no free utilities are listed for the recovery."

    Well, for what it's worth, us Mac users are already used to paying out the nose for stuff. I happen to have both Norton Utilities and TechTool Pro actually, and I don't know a Mac user who doesn't have one or the other. They're excellent resources in a pinch.

    For those of you who claim that with "Apple's stuck-up attitude about it's OS" that it should come with these sorts of utilities, understand that Norton Utilities for the Mac is much different from Norton "Let's baby the infantile user" Utilities for Windows. TechTool Pro and NU bring out the power users in the Macintosh community. Oh...and IAAPOBIHAMAW. (I am a PC owner but I have a Mac at Work)

    --
    "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    1. Re:Free utilities? Feh... by dankow · · Score: 1

      Apple has announced that they will reimburse customers for the money that they shell out for Norton or Techtool if they bought it to recover data lost due to the iTunes installer.

      I'm one of the stupid people who download and install everything the moment it comes out, and thus I installed iTunes 2.0 for OS X. Both of my partitions have spaces in their names, but I was saved by the fact that I had moved iTunes 1.2.1 into a subdirectory of my /Applications directory. Close call!

      --
      I am the hub of Jack's digital lifestyle.
  9. Apple helps out by Beowulfto · · Score: 2
    According to this account, Apple is making it right.
    He offered to reimburse me for the purchase of nortan utilities, and to have it sent to DriveSavers (apparently a company that recovers data from harddrives) on Apple's dime.

    While the whole situation sucks, at least steps are being taken in the right direction. Anyone have confirmation of the account? How about accounts of other companies taking similar steps. I am quite curious.

    --
    There's no point in being grown up if you can't be childish sometimes. -- Dr. Who
  10. HP success? What are you smoking? by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The problem is that RIAA will be riding high on HP success with this product and their grip will be firmer when it comes to controlling what you will do with your music.

    This is not a problem, it's a blessing, as at $1000 HP will sell few of these. Then we can all point to the RIAA's DRM component as the reason for lousy sales (it's certainly a major reason I wouldn't buy one, even at half the price). To make this work, everyone here should write HP a nice snail-mail letter politely telling them that you were interested in the de100c until you learned of the DRM crap.

    --
    If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    1. Re:HP success? What are you smoking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HP would sell you their normal PC line that have none of these restrictions probably at a cheaper price.

  11. Slashdot's Clock is an Hour fast by A+Commentor · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Did slashdot not update their clock?

    It appears the slashdot's clock is an hour fast... I'm in the CST zone and it's about 6:15pm, EST is only 1 hour ahead and should be about 7:15pm, but the timestamps on the article and the other comments is 8:00.. ??? 45 mins off???

    --

    Looking for any old 8-bit Heathkit/Zenith software/hardware - http://heathkit.garlanger.com

    1. Re:Slashdot's Clock is an Hour fast by A+Commentor · · Score: 1

      So the time stamp on the article preview showed 8:00, but when posted it showed 8:16... when it should have be been 7:16, unless slashdot moved into the 'Atlantic Time' zone.

      --

      Looking for any old 8-bit Heathkit/Zenith software/hardware - http://heathkit.garlanger.com

    2. Re:Slashdot's Clock is an Hour fast by red_dragon · · Score: 1

      Go to your preferences page, and choose your timezone. To me, your post appears as having been posted at 7:16pm, and I'm in EST. Everything else in this and other articles seems right, too.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Jesus asks: "What Would You Do?"
    3. Re:Slashdot's Clock is an Hour fast by A+Commentor · · Score: 1
      Go to your preferences page, and choose your timezone.

      Ok... I feel stupid.. didn't even see that option ;-)
      --

      Looking for any old 8-bit Heathkit/Zenith software/hardware - http://heathkit.garlanger.com

    4. Re:Slashdot's Clock is an Hour fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It appears to me that you posted at 19:16 military time which is 7:16pm eastern time if you are in the central time zone that would mean your comment was posted at 6:19 pm central time which is a few minutes difference from your 6:15 pm observation.
      fwiw my time is 08:02 pm eastern time at the mark

      mark

    5. Re:Slashdot's Clock is an Hour fast by tbone1 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Maybe it's because we just went off Daylight Savings Time and they are based in Indiana, Arizona, and Hawaii.

      (Semi-obscure time zone reference there.)

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
  12. Overhead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The concept looks nice but like alot of new geewiz "technology" the 3d cube looks like alot of overhead to do what my KDE desktops button already does just fine...

  13. Re: Apple by joshyboy · · Score: 0, Troll

    Jesus H. You'd think that Apple, a (mostly) respectable, honest company would release some kind of 'free only for users of the service' program to restore the partitions. Making users pay for Apple's mistakes is seriously wrong.

  14. HP dec by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 4, Insightful
    There is always a problem in introducing more restrictive formats into a generally open market. Ok, here goes: HP markets a box with a 40GB disc to store MP3s and a CD-RW to burn said music.

    Pros: Looks pretty and fits in with the rest of my entertainment system, neato little remote, able to d/l new music (marginal in my skeptical opinion)

    Cons: I gotta buy a $6 (?)dollar blank disc so that Britney isn't robbed of her royalties, potentially "signed" format preventing me free movement of my files from the device, to my PC, to my iPod, whatever. Also, broadband link to my music collection, potentially showing them, what music I have, and what I'm listening to (marketing anyone?)

    Here's my solution. Buy yourself a cheap old box (I a P3 350 on ebay for under $100), throw a big HD and a CD-RW on it, and hide it in your entertainment system. Not as pretty, sure, but cheap, and no big brother RIAA.

    --

    Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    1. Re:HP dec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, Flamebait.
      Roofle Owned Negative-Karma.

    2. Re:HP dec by papa248 · · Score: 1

      Here's my solution. Buy yourself a cheap old box (I a P3 350 on ebay for under $100), throw a big HD and a CD-RW on it, and hide it in your entertainment system. Not as pretty, sure, but cheap, and no big brother RIAA.

      I have a similar setup, but I've found that a true 1U rack computer with a CD-RW and an SB Live works terrific, and looks really awesome on your stereo rack. I can't afford it by any means, but a local HiFi outfit had a rig setup with one (on a Tag/McLaren setup no less) that was just kick ass.

      --


      The higher, the fewer.
    3. Re:HP dec by daviddennis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You know, I would say there's merit to this, except ...

      If I took a Vanessa Daou CD (one of my favourite artists) and burned it on one of those $6 CDs, Britney would get all the royalties (because they are based on artist popularity), and Vanessa wouldn't get a penny.

      I paid my $25 for Vanessa's MP3 collection, (http://www.eq8r.com) so all my MP3s of her music are perfectly legit. So tell me, why on earth should I pay Britney Spears when I loathe her music?

      Far as I'm concerned, the ASCAP and BMI folks, who make these charges, are stealing from Vanessa and the other obscure artists in their catalogue so Britney will get more, and this is deeply offensive to my sense of fair play.

      You can find more interesting information on the workings of this here:
      http://www.dnalounge.com/backstage/webcasting.ht ml

      D

      PS I make a first-class living as a programmer using open source tools.

    4. Re:HP dec by bill_kress · · Score: 1

      On top of that excellent point, I'd just love to know what percentage actually goes to ANY artist and what happens to get eaten by the RIAA along the way.

      My guess would be something like a 35%/65% artist/RIAA ratio. Anyone know how we could find out?

  15. Music only CD's by bbk · · Score: 4, Informative

    The HP recorder probably only writes to the "CD for audio recorders" - the ones they sell for standalone CD->CD consumer audio devices. Nothing new for that market segment.

    The media generally costs twice as much as normal CD's, even though it is basically identical - the extra is for the RIAA tax that is placed on the media.

    BBK

    1. Re:Music only CD's by spectral · · Score: 1

      twice as much? You mean I can buy these for $0.60? My cds cost me $30 or less for 100, and I'm not talking about crap brands either. Any of the music ones are always much, much, much higher just for a couple bits pressed into them and royalties to go to the RIAA (since how do they decide which artists get the cash?)

    2. Re:Music only CD's by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      Better question is "which labels get the cash?" It is up the artists to negotiate contracts with their labels that take stuff like this into account, so, basically any band out there with an older contract that was signed for 10 years or something silly like that, is immediately screwed. And if you are not willing to do long term deals, then the label does a poor job with your last album with them, thereby killing the chance of you switching labels with anything approaching impressive numbers... In the end, most of the pie goes to the label... Why do you think so many artists are generating their own labels now??

  16. 3dwm by neroz · · Score: 0

    I'd just like to mention, 3dwm is not an X wm. So lets not go down the "wouldn't it be cool if..." because this isn't going to be of much use to us desktop users. (sadly)

  17. Re: Apple by joshyboy · · Score: 1

    In my hastiness, I chose to read the story here and not click on the link...blah blah blah, Apple's back on my Christmas list.

  18. I'm in trouble now... by tjgrant · · Score: 5, Funny

    So I clicked on the link looking for enlightenment, and all it was was some porn site.
    Then the boss walked in...
    Then the popups started popping up.
    "Yes, I was doing my job I was reading Slashdot and the article linked...
    "...Oh, never mind"

    --

    Stand Fast,
    tjg.

    1. Re:I'm in trouble now... by Meleneth · · Score: 1

      slacker!

      we all believe you. suuuuure.

      --
      remote access CLI with tools is the only friend you'll ever need.
  19. HP Madness by Alien54 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    What HP hasn't told us is they have been seriously whipped by DRM (Digital Rights Management). An internal FAQ has revealed that users will be unable to use CD-RWs to burn off their own CDs. You will need to buy "Digital Audio Discs" and royalties from these discs are distributed to artists via the RIAA. And you can't transfer your songs to your PC either.

    the thing to do here is to go into stores and badmouth it to the sales reps, tell them that they'll get a bunch of returns and it is a bogus system because the customers can not use the device the way they think they could.

    Now sales geek do _not_ like dealing with customer returns from angry customers, and likes to know about insider secrets so that customers will think he has a clue.

    So talk up the bad points - special HP only CD Media, etc.

    "yeh, you can't use the regular blanks, you got to use their special cd blanks. and it can only be played on their machine, no place else. It is as bad as the ink cartridges. A real dog man."

    make this stuff go the way of the DIVX format. (remember that?)

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:HP Madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just about all the movies on my college's network are in the DivX format, thank you very much.

    2. Re:HP Madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The DivX (MPEG-4) video codec has NOTHING to do with the DIVX "rental" program of Circuit City.

    3. Re:HP Madness by Technician · · Score: 2

      How soon before someone says "NICE HARDWARE" like the I-Opener or Cue Cat and replaces the OS for something useful? Anybody up to hacking this geek box? I would love to see a new OS for it listed online.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    4. Re:HP Madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cue:cat was free. This is a bit pricier. Hacking is not an option when you are setting fire to almost a grand.

    5. Re:HP Madness by Technician · · Score: 2

      I don't know... Have you seen the amount of stuff seriously hacked in the sat TV industry? They don't give the smart cards away and a few were destroyed figuring out how the defeat the read only bit so the software could be cloned. When I was in the Cayman Islands where you can't legaly subscribe to satelite TV, I saw lots of hacked C-band TV stuff. (it's true, it's out of their market. It's either pirate, subscribe using US address, or go without.) They don't give away General Instruments video cypher II boxes. Then again at the rates they charge for TV service, the rewards are much greater making the payoff for the risk much greater.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  20. A Few Things On A Few Subjects by Angry+Black+Man · · Score: 3, Interesting

    First of all, you might be interested to know that 3DWM is now available for Mandrake Linux (RPMs, here).

    Second, some thoughts on how the iTunes fiasco can hurt Apple. Not only does this further embarass the company but also goes to say that their bug fixing department can't really be trusted too much. This was a rather large bug and suggests that not too much testing was done. If Apple becomes known for releasing buggy software that crashes your computer then they might dig themselves even deeper graves in the tech industry.

    Onto the third subject, he says that you cannot transfer files from the HP Digital Entertainment center to your PC. Two things. One, the device has USB ports. Something tells me that people will find a way to hack it. Second, the part about not being able to use CD-RWs (you have to pay for special RIAA approved discs) is probably also hackable in some way shape or form. The RIAA will never win.

    --
    the byproduct of years of oppression by the white man
    1. Re:A Few Things On A Few Subjects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >This was a rather large bug

      Slashdot has mad this bigger than it really is... you would only have a problem if you had multiple partations, had spaces in your drives name, and removed iTunes 1.1 prior to the update.... it effect a reletively small % of users... like >1%

    2. Re:A Few Things On A Few Subjects by cygnus · · Score: 3, Funny
      If Apple becomes known for releasing buggy software that crashes your computer then they might dig themselves even deeper graves in the tech industry.
      <sarcasm>but of course. after all, this is what has happened to Microsoft.</sarcasm>
      --
      Just raise the taxes on crack.
    3. Re:A Few Things On A Few Subjects by TheInternet · · Score: 1

      This was a rather large bug and suggests that not too much testing was done. If Apple becomes known for releasing buggy software that crashes your computer then they might dig themselves even deeper graves in the tech industry.

      I have one thing to say to this....

      "Eh?"

      - Scott

      --
      Scott Stevenson
      Tree House Ideas
    4. Re:A Few Things On A Few Subjects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually more than you think... the naming of the partitions from Apple has spaces... and if you have OS 9.x and OSX.x than...

  21. Norton Utilities by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2

    I used to have a high opinion of Norton Utilities-- until I paid through the nose for a version (6.0 something) that didn't boot my iBook (500 Mhz) because the install disk didn't have a recent enough finder (I needed 9.1)-- and that I was unable to get it working in OSX. My problems were unrelated to the iTunes fiasco.)

    Does anybody know how how to burn a bootable Norton Utilities CD (with System 9.2)? Is it posssible to do this using the Apple CD Burner program?

    1. Re:Norton Utilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kay, don't know about apple's burner, but if you can do sessions it should be okay. I know toast works well.

      step 1. burn session of an OS cd (direct copy, bootable)
      step 2. burn session with app (or cd)

      The os cd can be whatever version you want, but the app (or apps/utilities/whatever) should be runnable from the cd - some don't like read-only media. It helps if you use the installed version and not the installer or archive, because it's useable then.

    2. Re:Norton Utilities by hearingaid · · Score: 2

      Apple's CD Burner program can't burn bootable CDs.

      I believe that Toast Platinum will, however I haven't used it.

      Norton 6 wouldn't boot your iBook? Curious. Why do you need 9.1? AFAIK it was mostly a bug-fix release.

      I have Norton 5, which has 9.0.3 installed. It boots my iMac 400 just fine.

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

    3. Re:Norton Utilities by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2

      AFAIK, apple's Disc Burner utility only allows single session CD-Rs.

    4. Re:Norton Utilities by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2

      My iBook (white) was released after 9.03, and apparently requires the additional extensions released with 9.1.

  22. You cant have your MP3's back!! by Darth+Turbogeek · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not after the RIAA did the deal to make sure the iTunes deleted all those naughty MP3 files of N'Sync and Britney! Stop it! Take the hint! Bad! Bad!

    (Then again, deleteing a disk full of N'Sync and Britney tunes * IS * a good thing)

    --
    "Old Rallydrivers never die - they just fail to book in on time"
  23. Does 3dwm have a purpose? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one that sees 3dwm as being totally ugly and completely pointless?

  24. Make your own CDR-Audio? by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Pardon my ignorance, but it's my understanding that the only difference between regular CDR's and CDR-Audio (outside of the outrageous price difference) is a "few bits" that are burned onto the media to tell the device, "Hey, I'm a CDR-Audio disk".

    Accordingly, wouldn't it be possible for someone to write a utility that will write those "few bits" onto a regular CDR and solve the problem?

    Or am I missing something here?

    --
    If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    1. Re:Make your own CDR-Audio? by scorcherer · · Score: 1

      Huh? I haven't seen different CDRs for data and audio in a long time. I've recently burned audio CDs usign Xcdroast on these 'general purpose' CDRs without problems, and they even play in my ~10 year old AKAI player without a glitch.

      --

      --
      The Cap is nigh. Time to get a fresh new account.

    2. Re:Make your own CDR-Audio? by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 2

      You obviously didn't read the write-up at the top of the page about the new HP doohickey.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    3. Re:Make your own CDR-Audio? by Technician · · Score: 4, Informative

      Stand alone players read the header on a blank CD to get information such as what size it is, who made it, what type of die is used, etc. This format information is written and pressed in from the master. It is not alterable as it is pressed not written from the master. Consumer computer CDR's may ignore the Music CD bits. A hardware deveice may have have coding to not ignore these bits and refuse to write to a non-music CD.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    4. Re:Make your own CDR-Audio? by neafevoc · · Score: 1

      That blank information is stored in the ATIP... Absolute Time In Pre-Groove. And there's a nifty little program that can pull information from the ATIP.

      CDR Identifier

    5. Re:Make your own CDR-Audio? by Pope · · Score: 1

      I bought some "audio" CD-Rs at the local shop a while back. The guy behind the counter kept saying "No! Audio only! Won't work!" despite me saying "Yes, it will" a few times. They're Imation-brand, 25 discs on a spindle. Backed up my Mac just fine using Toast.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    6. Re:Make your own CDR-Audio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there isn't a way to write over the pressed-in data maybe some good hardware hacker could create a thing "template" that would fit over the cd's burned in data and make it look like it's a CDR-audio.

    7. Re:Make your own CDR-Audio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL theoretically yes, but if you accidentally bought some of the blank cd's for consumer audio equipment only (or WTFever they say on them) and try them in an ATAPI cdrw it's not going to work.
      Trust me I know, I tried :P
      It gives you a sense key error and a message stating that the media is PREFORMATTED SCSI ONLY.

    8. Re:Make your own CDR-Audio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL no, some cdr's have 'for audio' on the case but they are regular cdr's that they jack up the price a little due to the type of manufacturing process/type of material used - we are talking about the blank cd's for consumer audio equipment only (or WTFever they say on them) and try them in an ATAPI cdrw it's not going to work.
      Trust me I know, I tried :P
      It gives you a sense key error and a message stating that the media is PREFORMATTED SCSI ONLY.

  25. RIAA walking a well-travelled road by HalfFlat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I know it's not the same, but it does feel similar to what the MPAA tried to pull with Divx. Divx of course failed because customers didn't want to buy crippled equipment, and rightly so. Perhaps HP will face a similar response here.

    Region coding is another example of crippling for profit, but unlike say Divx, it didn't affect the majority of customers. In the major markets of US and Japan, only a few would seek to play DVDs from outside their native region. Europe was more badly affected, and DVD still hasn't taken off in Australia really, due to the paucity of region 4 releases outside the big titles.

    HP's crippling though would become apparent everytime one tried to record on it. What is Digital Audio Media, other than a disingenuous choice of name? I'm presuming it's the same as the (expensive) CD-Audio disks, which or course are just CD-R with magic mark on it for the benefit of (presumably) the RIAA.

    Similar shenanigans killed DAT as a home medium, but maybe the other features of the HP device will win out. Recording aside, it does look like a nice piece of kit.

    1. Re:RIAA walking a well-travelled road by TBBle · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Australian Consumer and Competition Commission is asking the Australian DVD distributors to 'please explain' in what way Region Code Protection isn't a restraint on free trade.
      They're already in court with Warner Pty Ltd about attempting to restrict parallel imports of Audio CDs (using marketing clout rather than technological measures). And Sony, who were also being taken to court, settled.
      I understand New Zealand already requires DVD players sold to be region-free.
      Anyway, RPC Phase II can be defeated by a 'region-select' player, can't it?

      --
      Paul "TBBle" Hampson
      Paul.Hampson@Pobox.Com
  26. Quake WM by Keighvin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The best stuff is always rejected. Anywho: there's another 3DUI project in the works using the Quake engine, up on Source Forge. It's a Win32 shell replacement for now with the possibility of integration into a Linux distro later; if it survives.

    --
    Any spoon would be too big.
  27. Daylight Saving Time by Seether · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    The first slashback of normal time (not Daylight Savings)

    That should be Daylight Saving.

    Note there is no "s" at the end of Saving.

    Please remember this in the future.

    1. Re:Daylight Saving Time by magicslax · · Score: 0

      Oh. My. God. You found an error on Slahsdot? Stop the presses, this is real news.

      /sarcasm

      ^_^

    2. Re:Daylight Saving Time by PurpleBob · · Score: 1

      You sound like an ass when you try to convince people to say things that nobody actually says, for the purpose of "correctness". Some grammatical errors impede clarity and are useful to correct, but not this. If the "correct" version sounds wrong to absolutely everybody, it is wrong.

      Please remember this in the future.

      Do you order "two Whoppers Junior" at Burger King too?

      what's with Slashdot failing to put a line break before the sig now?

      --
      Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
    3. Re:Daylight Saving Time by tdye · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Of course not... Whopper Junior is a name unto itself. The 'Junior' is not a descriptor, it's part of the name. That would be like saying "How many Johns Smith are there, anyway?".

      Now, I do say 'attorneys general' and if people look at me funny, well, that's the look of ignorance. They aren't generals, they're attorneys. Get it straight, people!

  28. distributed to capitalist pigs by SubtleNuance · · Score: 3, Insightful

    these discs are distributed to artists via the RIAA

    that is probably not exactly correct, according to this account at salon.com, the artists are the LAST people that are likely to see any of this money...

  29. Hp trying to cater to a non-market by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    First off, anyone deep in the mp3 world would never ever buy something like that. You already have several devices that are worlds better and cheaper. and finally..... The mp3 user already has a computer and a CD burner is $59.00 at Best buy.

    No DRM crap, and no content control.

    If you really want that integrated device do a searxh for linux and CAJUN on google and build one yourself for less, without DRM, and get higher quality playback (esp if you use a SB Live or better Sound card)

    Nice try HP, I'll keep using my audiotron and my PC which does more and was less money with the network wiring,100base switch and wall plates for the Cat5 cable.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  30. What happened with the iTunes installer? by George+Walker+Bush · · Score: 0

    Anyone have a link to technical details? Sorry, I'm not a Mac person so I don't follow Mac news usually. Nevertheless, It seems quite strange that such a major bug slipped past QA!

    --
    George W. Bush
    President, United States of America
  31. HP device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I have heard that the new realplayer (RealOne) is tightly integrated with this device so I suspect the DRM stuff will be even more restrictive than might be anticipated since Real will be pushing DRM hard.

  32. Yes they do have an online presence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For downloadable or streaming full length high quality Vivid videos, you need look no further than Bluebare. No, this isn't an advertisement, just filling in details on timothy's sketchy comments.

  33. The Empire by cibrPLUR · · Score: 1

    The problem is that RIAA will be riding high on HP success with this product and their grip will be firmer when it comes to controlling what you will do with your music.

    The more you tighten your grip, RIAA, the more digital music files will slip through your fingers.

    --

    -cibrPLUR

    1. Re:The Empire by LegendLength · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unless they wear webbed gloves...

    2. Re:The Empire by titaniafq · · Score: 1

      I find your lack of faith...disturbing.

      --
      -- Do not bite the bait of pleasure till you know there is no hook beneath it.
  34. Re:Here's the fix for free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And whats a real OS? It surely isn't linux.

  35. Re:Here's the fix for free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you stupid??? of course it's XP for god sake!

  36. Nothing new here: AHRA by n6mod · · Score: 1

    This isn't surprising. The RIAA crammed through a terribly nasty piece of legislation several years ago called the AHRA. This is what required the consumer electronics vendors to implement SCMS (the so-called "copyright" bit), and more or less killed DAT. It also created a tax on audio media.

    Now the theory was that this tax was compensation for the copies of your music that you make. Any copies made on taxed media were presumed non-infringing. Now, RIAA hasn't kept that end of the bargain, but that shouldn't surprise you.

    Why two kinds of CD-Rs? Simple. Computer have always been exempt from the AHRA, hence no required DRM (even something as feeble as SCMS) and no media tax. But the consumer CD-R burners are considered consumer electronics, and are thus subject to the AHRA. RIAA managed to lobby/browbeat/threaten the CD burner vendors into a standard for detecting taxed media and only burning to it. I think they'll play CD-Rs from a PC, but they won't burn to them.

    --
    You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
  37. Region Coding by SiriusBlack · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, region coding has resulted in the wide availability of DVD decks altered defeat region coding (and Macrovision) in Europe and Australia. (Although it seem Phase II DVDs are designed to make this impossible by requiring the drive itself to enforce region coding, not the DVD player firmware).

    1. Re:Region Coding by hearingaid · · Score: 2

      I believe region coding is actually illegal in New Zealand. The Kiwis have a law against using artificial means to prevent people from importing goods; maybe they're free-trade nuts, I dunno.

      but the upshot is that Kiwi DVD players will all play back all regions.

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

  38. Re:blame BSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you are incorrect, there are several cases that I can think of off the top of my head where programs built with a Windows installer erased data they should not have. One game in particular (don't remember which one) had an uninstall bug that would wipe out the _entire_ parent directory of where it was installed if the user specified something other than the default \program files\. Bad news if you installed in someplace like \games\foo or worse \yourgamehere\

  39. Lets make the /. home audio distribution by mendepie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I had hopes for the HP unit, but hearing this I will avoid it like a Hand Addressed Envelope full of white powder.

    We all know that this stuff is simple with a linux box. Why dont we get together, and build up a mini-distribution and software for a roll your own version of this.

    Find a smallish PC box that can do reasonable audio in and out, tv out, cdrw, IR for remote control. The software is there, it just has to be put together to make it appliance simple to use.

    Make it so simple to install, setup, and use that even a windows user can do it :-)

    --

    Are you paranoid if you know that they just want to know everything you say and do?

    1. Re:Lets make the /. home audio distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the approach we're trying to take, though we're still in the early stages... We're working on developing a software architecture for building these types of systems...

      We don't care what the hardware is, as long as it's running some sort of linux.

      It's still alot of work making everything work nicely together but seems to be going pretty well...

      http://www.interact-tv.com

      Sorry for the "Anonymous Coward" I don't have a nick here.. Also, my apologies for the corporate "plug" but it seemed relevant....

      Cheers,

      smitty@interact-tv.com

    2. Re:Lets make the /. home audio distribution by hearingaid · · Score: 2

      Releasing an integrated MP3 box: you're going to get prosecuted under the DMCA for putting out a circumvention device. There is no doubt.

      You're right in a sense, though, and maybe some kind Europeans will do it.

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

    3. Re:Lets make the /. home audio distribution by mendepie · · Score: 1

      No ... Do not sell a box ... Give a CD and instrustions away. Make it so that someone burns a copy of the cd, sticks it into one of the "supported" boxes that they put togeter, sticks cd in, an it just installs itself. When it's done, the cd pops out, and they are ready to go.

      Some of the booksize PCs that are out there are really easy to put together, and have 99% of the HW you need to make this a reality.

      I am considering doing this as a one of on the system that I have which is a warm spare for my home router/server.

      --

      Are you paranoid if you know that they just want to know everything you say and do?

    4. Re:Lets make the /. home audio distribution by hearingaid · · Score: 2

      That's still likely going to hit DMCA trouble, but it's much easier to distribute: just put an iso on an ftp site someplace.

      It doesn't have the liberating implications for consumers in general of a black box though.

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

    5. Re:Lets make the /. home audio distribution by mendepie · · Score: 1
      It doesn't have the liberating implications for consumers in general of a black box though


      Yes ... But it may have the advantage of getting a number of windows weenies to be willing to "build" a linux box and use it. Some of them may see that MS is not the only answer, and open their minds to free software (as opposed to free pirated software) and linux.

      If it's done right, the system could be the base for a lot more than a mp3 player/server. When we are able to add internet radio, www access (with a spinning TuX logo :-)), DVD player, etc. ... people will take notice.

      I bet that people would rather buy a system (or use a older one) than pay $500 - $1000 for a DRM
      hampered box.
      --

      Are you paranoid if you know that they just want to know everything you say and do?

    6. Re:Lets make the /. home audio distribution by seligman · · Score: 2

      There are already several attempts at this. One of my favorites is Musicbox. It's probably everything that's anti-Slashdot, but I still think it's a slick solution to playing MP3's on a computer connected to a home-theater system.

      --
      -- It is too late for the pebbles to vote, the avalanche has already started.
  40. Priceless by Snafoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    * One Microsoft-bought double-agent at Cupertino: $4million
    * Two covert lunch meetings with top RIAA officials: $120

    * Steve Jobs' Facial Expression: Priceless.

    The only thing that could possibly make it better (for the bad guys, you troll-modding trigger-finger amateur 'moderators'!) would to have the installer play the 'sosumi' System 7 beep

    (for those not hip to the jive: Apple promised recording company Apple Records Inc. that it would never, ever record any sounds sohelpthembunny, but they did anyway, so they named the sound 'sosumi'.
    )

    --
    - undoware.ca
    1. Re:Priceless by CottonEyedJoe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, Apple didnt agree not to make "Sounds" but did agree that their computers would not be used for "music" including "chords" which is what the sosumi sound is albeit a slightly discordant one.

  41. Not to toot my own horn... by thesolo · · Score: 1

    But I predicted the RIAA's foothold in HP's device when the story broke last time:
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=23075&cid=2486 850

    Here's to hoping that set-top fails faster than DivX.

  42. The Third Hollow Victory by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    If you have to hack it to make it work as it should, then RIAA has already won.

    It's a case of winning a battle but loosing the war.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  43. Speaking about time....slashdot is OFF an hour by dbCooper0 · · Score: 1
    Why not fix the linux time that has been off an hour since the Daylight Savings change. HUH ? HUH ? rdate anyone? Set the time with our own Naval Observatory's Atomic Clock:(tick*or*tock.usno.usno.navy.mil)

    geez, I could do it in cmos easier than that, too. Too busy posting anti M$ stuff to get your own boxen correct? - it's one of the only problems I have with my various hosts for websites running linux - no bothering with the CORRECT time and date. My FTP client always bitches about the file I'm sending being older that the destination...no, it's you WRONG time. Get a clue, sysops!

    --
    db
    Cig:
    ôô
    /`
  44. Screw 'em by buss_error · · Score: 0, Troll

    I say it's time we all went and bought one (using our credit card, of course!) and took it home, spend hours hooking it up only to find, horror of horrors! It won't play the MP3's we made of our grage band! I want my money back, I'm suing for false and misleading ads! Whaaa! Whaa! You don't credit my credit card, I'm calling the issuer and telling them the product wasn't as advertised! Whaaaa!
    And, by the way, please purchase this crap at Circuit City, the spammers that won't stop spamming until you get the e-mail address of some admins.

    --
    Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
  45. On your little "Trouble" topic by fractaltiger · · Score: 1

    >So I clicked on the link looking for
    >enlightenment, and all it was was some porn site.
    >Then the boss walked in...
    >Then the popups started popping up.

    If you get Opera or a MDI browser then popups can't overtake your screen... they're contained inside a mother window. And you can promptly ALT-F4 it or Mininize your entire internet session to a full half. Most browsers let windows spawn out of control and in random locations... a very annoying process to "inhibit"

    I wish all popups were indeed user-called, with helpful site hints and good-willed javascript, rather than adds or pr0n.

    --
    "Wireless : LAN :: Laptop : Desktop"
    1. Re:On your little "Trouble" topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get any problems with popups, I browse with Konqueror which lets you block them - or ask for your permission each time they want to start and the latter is what I normally use. If you can stop the first one, you lose the whole rotten cascade.

      However every other damn site seems to want to use flash and despite installing the netscape plugin, almost flash-using sites these days aren't satisfied with that and try to download something else that just doesn't exist. It's gotta be said, when browsing for entertainment purposes, Linux just doesn't cut it.

      Yeah, I know, install Crossover. But that needs Wine & Win98, and if I wanted that crap on my system would I be using Linux in the first place?

  46. "Mininize ... to a full HALT", not a "FULL HALF" by fractaltiger · · Score: 1

    >Mininize your entire internet session to a full >half.

    Sorry, I meant a "full halt."

    --
    "Wireless : LAN :: Laptop : Desktop"
  47. Audio CD's versus Data CD's by Satai · · Score: 2

    Rumors are that CD-Audio format media benefit from some strip of data that enables them to be used in regular, standalone CD recorders. Is this true? What is the actual difference between these and regular CD-R's? Is there a program to convert them, or is it on a hardware level?

    1. Re:Audio CD's versus Data CD's by ProfMoriarty · · Score: 1
      CDR-FAQ has a section S7-17 that explains the difference ...


      The more RIAA forces us to use DRM, the more MP3s will slip through their fingers

      --
      Karma? Karma? I don't need no stinkin' karma.
  48. 3dWM will not succeed without a 3d input device by LightStruk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The front page of 3dWM's website asks, "Why Not?" The reason not to is given by their own promotional material. They note that the command line is 1-D, the desktop is 2-D, and their product is 3-D. Well, not quite. It's still being displayed on a 2-D device (a monitor), and it's still controlled and manipulated by a 2-D device (a mouse). 3-D user interface paradigms hold promise when the parts that interface with the user are actually 3-D (think: volumetric displays; hand-mounted, motion-sensing pointing devices). Otherwise, getting things done becomes more difficult and less intuitive.

    1. Re:3dWM will not succeed without a 3d input device by Nino+the+Mind+Boggle · · Score: 1

      I looked at the screenshots, and my first question was "How does this help me get my stuff done?"

      Eye candy is all well and good, unless it gets in the way of that simple little thing: getting my stuff done. It's such a basic concept, but that's what it boils down to: The interface should not interfere with the task. Using the interface is NOT the task.

      People who prefer to use GUIs or CLIs do so because they've found that they're the best way to get their stuff done, not because of the eye candy (or lack thereof).

      --
      ------ "Darn floor. Big bite." (Koko the gorilla's best attempt at explaining the experience of an earthquake.)
  49. AHRA mandates DRM, royalties for all dig. aud. by beland · · Score: 3, Informative

    "More information" indeed. I can't believe no one's mentioned this yet, but...

    Chapter 10 of 17 USC (federal copyright law) requires that all manufacturers and importers of digital audio devices in the US incorporate Serial Copy Management System or similar systems into their devices, and pay royalties into a central fund. These royalties are then distributed to the American Federation of Musicians, the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, music publishers, lyricists, and directly to "interested copyright parties" which includes copyright owners (potentially studios) and artists themselves.

    In return, the public is granted the right to make unlimited copies of music on digital audio devices, though of course they may not circumvent copy protection if it is turned on. (The law does not require that all artists enable it.)

    Note that "digital audio devices" do not include general-purpose computers. Sorry, all you peer-to-peer fans. Thank the Audio Home Recording Act. (Not the DMCA.)

    See the full text of the law yourself.

    Everyone should know this, right? Maybe I only think so because I'm writing my thesis on the topic. 8P

    -B.

  50. Artists and the RIAA by John+Paul+Jones · · Score: 1

    " You will need to buy "Digital Audio Discs" and royalties from these discs are distributed to artists via the RIAA."

    Let's get this straight. Any royalties from these discs will go to the artists.... well, maybe 1% of the royalties will go to the artists. If they're lucky.

    To paraphrase Terry Prachett: "There exists no greater evil than music industry executives"
    -John Paul Jones

    --
    Feh.
  51. One thing leads to another.... by darrad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    like all of you here who are so for the break up of MS. I don't like Bill Gates' business practices any better than you do, but what I hate is the federal gov't becoming involved in an industry that depends on inovation.

    If you love something, set it free, if it comes back, it is yours forever, if the fed gets it, it never was.

    Never has there been a bigger life sucking entity than the US Fed govt. They produce nothing, yet we gladly give them more money to produce even more nothing.

    The bottom line is if they suceed in breaking up MS, then who knows what is next. Some lame ass congressman or senator finds out that Linux is free, and not subject to federal taxation, declares that it is evil on the basis of so and so.....
    sound familiar, it should.

    This country is founded on the free market system. Let the market work as it should.

    If you think the HP device is a unique device, just wait. Before long, all consumer electronics will have to pass the "Copyright protection test" where the various industry leaders vote on how big a piece of the pie they are intitled to. Think back 30 or so years when the IBM clone first came out. If that where to happen now, it would be killed by legislation and copyright infringment litigation.

    So the next time you start getting excited about MS being broke up, remember that your pet ox is the next one in the goreing queue.

    1. Re:One thing leads to another.... by vrmlguy · · Score: 1
      Where to start, where to start.... :-)

      Let's see, first of all, the federal government produces things, just not (often) things that commerce finds profitable. Interstate highways, public vacination programs, and oh yeah, let's not forget a little thing called the Internet.

      One of the few functions of government that even Libertarians agree with is to provide for the common defense. This defense can take many forms, such as the planes flying sorties over the East and West coasts since 9/11. There's also police protection, such as is provided by the FBI. There's protection of the public well-being, such as is provided by the CDC.

      Finally, there is protection from those who would abuse the free market system that you claim to admire. Monopolies break free markets. Yes, I know that card-carrying Libertarians don't fully agree on that point, but their position papers clearly state that only government regulation creates monopolies, completely ignoring the fact that the sale of information (books, music, software) differs in several fundamental ways from the sale of material goods.

      On the other hand, copyrights are the only goverment regulations that I can think of that have assisted the RIAA, the MPAA, and Microsoft in establishing their monopolies. So maybe the Libertarians are right! Let's tell Microsoft that we'll let them completely off the hook, no breakup, no fines, no punishments of any kind, except that they will have to forgo copyrights on their products forever more. Heck, I'd even let them keep the source code for everything secret for as long as they are able, just as long as they realize that if any of it ever gets out, they couldn't do anything to stop its spread.

      --
      Nothing for 6-digit uids?
  52. Terrapin VCD Burner by Arben · · Score: 0

    I've used a Terrapin at ye local public access station, and it's worked just fine with Terrapin's own discs, imation CD-R's, and (coincidentally) a truckload of HP R's and RW's that the admin there ordered for broadcast - However, this was all for video. Was there another release of recorders, making the one we have extra neat? There was never any problems to be had except for an ugly plaid that recorded instead of video once due to a bad VTR connection.

    --
    This post, like so much of Creation, is NotArt
  53. Not Surprising by TheCodeFoundry · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The digital-audio disc requirement shouldn't be surprising; it's a consumer electronic device; since it's not a PC, it's not excluded from the existing legislation on this.

    But if it doesn't play non-signed MP3's it will go nowhere. I'd be surprised if that turns out to be true, though.

  54. Long live PC's!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am surprised that Apple is still in the game! They should have disappeared a long time ago.

    Part of their moronic strategy is to claim that their iMacs are better than PC's, in fact, they are better than everything else. WRONG! IT is a science still in the development phase, not an already developped tool such as the wheel. It involves pretty much all humanity has ever learned, so they simlply cannot say their stuff is better.

    Anyways, I proudly claim that I never had a Mac, and never will!

  55. `Daylight Savings'?  Wossat? by gidds · · Score: 0
    The first slashback of normal time (not Daylight Savings)...

    Not here, it's not!

    Oh, sorry, I forgot, America is the world. Us folks elsewhere must just be a group hallucination...

    --

    Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

  56. If RIAA sold bottled water... by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

    (ok, I know this is flamebait...)

    * You'd pay a predefined tax every time you bought an empty bottle
    * The water would be poisoned in such a manner that you could drink it but you couldn't let friends have a sip
    * You couldn't transfer the water from their bottle to a different container (people in uniforms would knock down your door and throw you in jail)
    * You couldn't *describe* a manner in which to extract water from their bottles and put it into a different container (again, you might get thrown in jail)
    * The government would be lobbied so that all manufacturers of bottles of any type must conform to the rules the RIAA sets out, namely not allow the transfer of contents between bottles. This might even extend to straws or spigots. It would also obviously impact containers that were never specifically intended or designed to contain water.
    * You might not even be able to resell the bottled water if you didn't use it, or found you didn't like it
    * The price of water would go through the roof
    * The water would taste like crap anyway, all the good springs having long since run out of business

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?