Slashdot Mirror


Slash 2.2.0 Released

If you meander over to Slashcode, you will notice that Slash 2.2.0 has been released. This is of course the website engine that runs Slashdot. The release has the message system, improved journal functions, new comment filters, and countless bug fixes. And of course a variety of optimizations that continue to make it possible to serve a quantity of pages that no other open source package like this can even touch :) Plus it's way easier to install. Now that we've got the Fry tree out of the way, its off to work on Zoidberg (which will include subscriptions, killfiles, and a few surprises)

132 of 397 comments (clear)

  1. Changelog lacks any real value. by Neutron_F1uX · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "More changes to stats report" Bug fix changes, or just changes? It'd be pretty nice if the changelog was a little more detailed. When there are a whopping 4 entries in it, you could give a little bit more detail.

    1. Re:Changelog lacks any real value. by krez · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Any chance of there being a DEB package of Slashcode? Does anyone know? Anyone working on this?

      --
      =U= "Just because you're not paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you"
    2. Re:Changelog lacks any real value. by devphil · · Score: 3, Interesting


      When I give my indoctrination spiel, uh, er, "training lecture" on CVS to coworkers and lackeys, I usually hand down a list of requirements for log/commit messages and a ChangeLog entry.

      Most of the time it's a variation on http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/changelogs/guile -changelogs_toc.html, or sometimes the rules used for ChangeLogs in the GCC project, which I've found to be of immense value when tracking down changes.

      Personally I can't stand changelogs that don't say a thing. It's just enough "open source" to look good, but not open enough to actually invite help.

      --
      You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  2. Reliability. by saintlupus · · Score: 2, Troll

    Gee, I sure hope the new slashcode has the same rock-solid reliability I've come to expect from this site.

    *crickets*

    --saint

  3. A nice surprice wuold be: by CptnHarlock · · Score: 4, Troll
    If the box called "No Score +1 Bonus" became "I really wanna use my KH bonus"... Then noone could blame posting at +1 because of "forgetting" to mark the No Bonus Checkbox. Please Taco!?.. :) .. Just for the sake of it I'm "forgetting" to uncheck the box... Only to illustrate my point that is.. Err.. whatever..

    Cheers..

    --
    $HOME is where the .*shrc is
    -- silver_p
    1. Re:A nice surprice wuold be: by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Another nice suprise would be to have posting at +1 cost a point a karma.

    2. Re:A nice surprice wuold be: by einstein · · Score: 2

      you have that backwards. if you don't check the box, your karma currently doesn't go down, you just add +1 to the comments moderation by default.
      The parent poster is suggesting that when you use your plus 1 bonus, you lose karma to essential add a bit of self decided moderation to you comment.. I'm not sure how I feel about either. but just for kicks, I'm leaving my +1 bonus on. :)
      ---

    3. Re:A nice surprice wuold be: by j-beda · · Score: 2
      ...but it costs me a point of karma...

      I don't think that it costs a point of karma. At least I hope not...

    4. Re:A nice surprice wuold be: by MindStalker · · Score: 2

      Well, the easiest way to loose it, is to post everything at +1. Because the average post will get moderated down from 2.

    5. Re:A nice surprice wuold be: by Glytch · · Score: 2

      Either that, or you've just hung around for several years getting the occasional (+1, Funny). ;)

    6. Re:A nice surprice wuold be: by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2

      In very early releases of slashdot, one could gain karma by using the +1 bonus...

    7. Re:A nice surprice wuold be: by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 2

      How about making the "Parent" link actually work? That's one of my pet peeves with Slashdot: If you click "Parent" it is usually because the parent is below your threshold and you want to read it. Does the "Parent" link acually lower your threshold so you can read the comment? No. Does it even display the parent comment if it is below your threshold? No. It dumps you at the top of the comment page with no explanation and the same threshold you had before.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    8. Re:A nice surprice wuold be: by Sloppy · · Score: 2

      the idea that you've consistently had {insightful,funny,etc.} things to say means that more than likely, you're worth listening to.

      No, no, no, you missed my point. It's not that they consistently had insightful/funny things to say -- it's just that they said insightful/funny things many times. There's a difference.

      Consider: Poster A and Poster B, each post useless crud 90% of the time. Both are consistently not funny/insightful. But Poster A posts 10 times as often as Poster B. So let's say Poster A has a good post once per week, and Poster B has a good post every ten weeks. Poster A is going to accumulate karma ten times faster than poster B.

      You don't lose karma for making flat, boring, or unobservant posts at score 1 (they just don't get marked down, because 1 really is an appropriate score), so those 9 out of 10 posts don't really cost anything. Oh sure, you can lose karma for certain types of posts (grits down pants, Natalie Portman naked and petrified, BSD is dying, etc), but that's a fringe case.

      It just occurred to me that it would be pretty easy to fix the situation. All you gotta do is get rid of the "No Score +1 bonus" checkbox. Make posters use their +1 bonus, so if they post boring things, their score 2 post sticks out and gets modded down as overrated, and the lose karma. Then their karma may actually start to reflect their typical quality.

      Hmm... I usually know when I'm really trying to contribute to a conversation, and when I'm just spouting off drivel. (Obviously other people would disagree with me about what's drivel and what's insightful, but what I'm talking about here is intent, not the specific details of the post.) So, based on that, I decide whether or not to use my +1 or not. Now one way to look at this, is to say that when I don't use my +1, I'm moderating myself, so try to keep my useless crap from floating to the top, "for the good of the community." That sounds like a good thing. But another way to look at it, is to say that when I don't use my +1, it's because I'm selfishly trying to reduce the risk of losing a point of karma, while still getting the satisfaction of spouting off my useless drivel.

      Another much better solution would be to get rid of karma altogether. Just have people's posts start out with a score equal to the average moderated score of their last n posts.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  4. So when is /. going to get a facelift? by BenLutgens · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I mean really, we've been looking at the same interface for years. Not that there's anything wrong with the current appearance, it's just time for a change.

    --
    "If you love someone, set them free. If they come home, set them on fire." - George Carlin
    1. Re:So when is /. going to get a facelift? by the+Man+in+Black · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not that there's anything wrong with the current appearance, it's just time for a change.

      How very Microsoft-ian of you.

    2. Re:So when is /. going to get a facelift? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2

      Please-- no funky windows XP themes. I've recently downloaded IE 6.0, and found it to "fuzzy." Maybe I'm supposed to squint and think that the blue smears/drop shadows are supposed to be pretty?

    3. Re:So when is /. going to get a facelift? by scrytch · · Score: 2

      I rather like the slashdot look -- except for those awful "themed" color selections. Apache stories are the worst, it's like bisque and mauve. I hate to say it, but "skins" (oh dear god, just strike me dead) are really the answer here... Slash obviously has some support for them, c.f. slashdot lite. I personally think skinning is the most useless interface boondoggle that actually detracts from real interface usability (distracts anyway), but it would seem to be a necessary feature point for a good blog.

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
  5. Question... by EnglishTim · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'd like to be able to put in an URL something like

    http://slashdot.org/frontpage.pl?commentthresh=5 &s tyle=light

    and have it give me slashdot in 'light' format, with comments in the stories as 5 & over only.

    The reason for this is that I want to get Slashdot on Avantgo, but obviously I have different viewing requierments on my Palm than I have on my desktop.

    Is there any way of doing this with Slash 2.2?
    I know there wasn't in the old Slash 1.x ...

    1. Re:Question... by michael · · Score: 5, Informative

      http://slashdot.org/palm/ doesn't do it for you?

    2. Re:Question... by crumley · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, the obvious answer is to have a separate slashdot user ID for reading off your Palm, and set that user to read in light mode. It shouldn't hurt too much having an extra user since, I would guess you wouldn't want to do that much posting from the Palm anyway. Of course, I don't know enough about Avantgo to know if this answer makes sense.

      --
      Preventive War is like committing suicide for fear of death. - Otto Von Bismarck
    3. Re:Question... by woggo · · Score: 2

      Speaking of "light" mode, here are a couple of questions/tirades:

      * I've used light mode for a long time. One of my favorite things about it was that I didn't have to deal with a lot of the extraneous crap that shows up in "regular mode". That seems to be changing, though. Now light mode nags me to metamoderate (which it didn't do before) and now also features that stupid, Mad-Libs-like "this page generated by a <collective-noun> of <adjective> <noun>s for <user>" Not only are those both completely useless, but they take up enough screen space so that I can only see one story. I have no problem with <miniscule font>logged in as "user"</miniscule font>, but the total lack of regard for vertical space in "light mode" is irritating. If these are going to be the norm, please let me disable them in my prefs.

      * Why doesn't light mode include link tags? It seems really dense that "putting mad libs and metamod nagging in light mode" was a higher priority than "putting link tags in light mode", especially since most text-mode browsers support link tags.

      One last thing (that I realized when previewing this comment): Is it too much to ask to have slashdot convert angle braces to html entities (i.e. lt and rt) when posting in "Plain old Text"?

    4. Re:Question... by AntiFreeze · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is what I use. The source code is available. Quite helpful. Enjoy.

      --

      ---
      "Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." --Dennis Miller

    5. Re:Question... by Pope+Slackman · · Score: 2

      Looks like it'd be pretty cool...
      If I could fucking use it!

      It appears (on a background of absolutely vile SPAM-pink, even) that he banned my entire subnet.
      Why the hell do people feel the need to ban entire goddamn subnets because of one misbehaving IP?

      C-X C-S

    6. Re:Question... by Mr_Silver · · Score: 2
      Unfortunately the site IP was banned because he was running an old version of the script and failed to update it despite numerious email requests.

      There are alternatives - check them out at http://www.custard.org/~richard/avantslash.

      On a side note, I'm desperately looking for people who can host a public avantslash site in non-UK locations. If you can help, please let me know at the email address on the URL above.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  6. "A few surprises" by BarefootClown · · Score: 5, Funny

    Any chacne one of thoes sprises could be a web itnerface to aspel?

    --

    "Make it ten--I am only a poor corrupt official."
    --Captain Louis Renault (Claude Rains), Casablanca

    1. Re:"A few surprises" by big.ears · · Score: 2

      Maybe its an automated database query that checks to see if the story has been posted already.

    2. Re:"A few surprises" by SCHecklerX · · Score: 2
      I've actually implemented that in a system I wrote at work. I'd be happy to release the code...

      What it does is if you hit 'spellcheck', each misspelled word becomes a drop down list of the suggestions. You then pick the proper spelling at each of these (or leave them alone if they are already right) and when you submit, all replacements are made. It's really very slick.

      The drawback with the way I wrote it at the moment is the fork to ispell though. I think there is a perl module for ispell which would work better, I just didn't have the time to research it.

  7. Add sub-categories to main page by crow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I want to be able to set my preferences to include stories that only appear in certain sub-categories (Science and Ask Slashdot) on the main page as if they were full-fledged main stories.

    1. Re:Add sub-categories to main page by pudge · · Score: 2

      You can. Well, you can include every sectional-only story on the main page, that is not otherwise excluded. Pretty close to the same thing.

  8. Kill funny messages by crow · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm still waiting for the option to recalculate the point value for articles based on my own preferences. I want funny to count as +0.

    1. Re:Kill funny messages by ralmeida · · Score: 3, Funny

      LOL! Someone mod this +0, Funny!

      --
      This space left intentionally blank.
    2. Re:Kill funny messages by krow · · Score: 3, Informative

      That is somewhere with one of the next couple of items I will toss in. Expect it sometime in the next couple of weeks (I have other changes that I want to go in at the same time).

      --
      You can't grep a dead tree.
    3. Re:Kill funny messages by ftobin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm still waiting for the option to recalculate the point value for articles based on my own preferences. I want funny to count as +0.

      I find it hilariously ironic that I and many others would have never seen this message if it hadn't been modded +5. By getting people going directly against the author's proposal he get more people to see it.

    4. Re:Kill funny messages by Corporate+Gadfly · · Score: 2, Funny

      Its true... I don't come to slashdot to catch up on funny punch lines. I would much rather go here. Lately, /. has become a place for people to tickle their funny bone. Its a contest for who can come up with the funniest response? I already see people lining up to repond to this post in the funniest possible way.

      --
      Corporate Gadfly
      Jonathan Archer: the most beaten up Enterprise captain in Star Trek history
    5. Re:Kill funny messages by odaiwai · · Score: 2

      New mod options:
      -1: Innacurate information
      -2: Just plain Wrong
      -3: Poster on Crack

      dave

  9. ...Slash code has a... by ekrout · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Slash code has a variety of new improvements for users and administrators alike!

    For example, the new SlashTag &ltgoatsex>, which saves you the tedium of having to do all that HREF and HTTP:// stuff.

    --

    If you celebrate Xmas, befriend me (538
  10. How about an NNTP gateway? I'll gladly subscribe. by Dast · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Taco, I've posted this before, but I will post it again. I would be willing to pay for an ad-free, subscription based NNTP gateway to slashdot. I think something in the range of $5-10 US / month or maybe $50 US for a whole year would be reasonable, as long as there aren't any ads and it works with GNUS. (I know GNUS has a /. backend, but it sucks, sorry. I don't want to worry about parsing html to get the content into GNUS.)

    Think about it, cause there isn't anything else you could offer me that I would pay for.

    --

    This sig is false.

  11. No Score +1 Bonus broken by crow · · Score: 2

    The option to not add +1 to your posts is broken. I've used it on another post, and it still came in as a score of 2 without moderation.

  12. Improvement suggestions: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    * Lose the lameness filter. It is lame. Why? Because it
    a) doesn't deter trolls but
    b) does annoy legitimate posters.

    * Separate karma moderation from comment moderation, eg. a plagiarizing post could be moderated interesting, yet the poster's karma could be modded down.

    * Kill the CowboyNeal cop-out poll option. It hasn't been funny for, oh I dunno, about a year or so.

    * Add year to (at least some of) the dates. Currently the only way to determine the year in which a given story or a post was made is to look at the URL, which is just plain dumb.

    * Improve the search. Finer details of this left as an excersise.

    * Add a link to stories that leads to the "daily issue" of Slashdot when the story appeared. Currently the only way to see the full Slashdot for a given day is, if I'm not mistaken, to keep clicking on the "yesterday's issue" link or hack the URL.

    * Expand the hall of fame to cover more top stories, say 30 or so, ten is too little.

    Other than that I'm pretty happy with Slashdot. :)

    (I like the fact how users who aren't logged in don't see sigs anymore, the ability of the Slashdot crowd to generate good sigs AND UPDATE THEM has always been a bit, um, shitty.)

    1. Re:Improvement suggestions: by VA+Software · · Score: 2, Informative

      Add year to (at least some of) the dates.

      Login.
      Go to the homepage preferences.
      Choose a time/date format with a 4 digit year.
      Voila.

      --

      ---
      http://slashdot.org/moderation.shtml
    2. Re:Improvement suggestions: by rif42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree that the UI should default to use year indication in its default date format - without it is a mess when searching old articles.

      Preferable using a universal understandable date format, which do not leaves you wonder if month or date are written first.

      yyyy/MM/dd hh:mm, e.g. 2001/11/07 19:25
      or
      dd month yyyy hh:mm, e.g. November 7 2001 19:25

    3. Re:Improvement suggestions: by mosch · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Lose the gzip filter too. Testing how well a comment compresses is a fucking retarded way to check if it might contain valid content. On a number of occasions I've attempted to post code to do something useful, that was related to the story or a parent comment, and it got rejected because it compressed too well.

      The fact of the matter is that most of the filters do not stop trolls, who are willing to attempt to post an obnoxious piece of ascii art multiple times, but do not stop legitimate posters who just want to share a contribution with the community. After all, who here has a job and a life, and time to refine their messages to make the slashdot retardo-filters pass their content along successfully.

      I'm so glad to see that somebody else has realized that the slashdot auto-filters are useless, annoying, poorly written pieces of software that merely detract from the slashdot community.

    4. Re:Improvement suggestions: by Skyshadow · · Score: 2
      I second the Cowboy Neil thing. Maybe that could be a subscriber bonus: deletion of the Cowboy Neil option in polls and result tabulation.

      If you really, really want to get people to pay, you could also allow only subscribers to filter Katz (you know, I used to be a supporter of that poser?). That seems a little mean, though.

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    5. Re:Improvement suggestions: by jamie · · Score: 4, Informative
      Actually the gzip filter is a really clever way to determine whether you're posting ascii art or repetition.

      It's been eased up a couple of weeks ago and now catches very little except ascii art. It used to catch comments posted in the mode "Code" pretty frequently but that's been fixed as well.

      If anyone has good examples of genuine attempted comment text that trips the compression filter, email it to me and I'll see about fixing it.

    6. Re:Improvement suggestions: by YKnot · · Score: 2

      ISO8601 defines an international standard format for date/time which avoids some of the issues of other formats, like wrong sort order and ambiguity. It is summarized here: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-time.html

    7. Re:Improvement suggestions: by denshi · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Jamie, I think you're the best editor on this site, but your response is the lamest I've seen you write yet.
      "Actually the gzip filter is a really clever way..."
      This line angers me b/c it is just a one-line unsupported dismissal of a widely held viewpoint. That may have been the design intention of the lameness filter. That may be what it looks like to you from up there. But down here in the posters' trenches, the consensus is that it sucks ass. Way too many people catch the lameness filter for a short subject, or trying to be lyrical, or just having too much whitespace. I have caught it several times, and after playing with the text for a while to evade the filter, I just give up. Most people I know do. Email it to you? Sure, right after pouring one's energies into writing someing insightful and on-topic, a tiny block of perl tells one to piss off, one should feel motivated to email bug reports to a group that has grown continually less responsive to user input?? Right, he said.

      Why the continuing trend to offload debugging onto users who didn't ask for the 'improvement' in the first place? Why keep pushing code onto a hugely popular community site that only serves in Generalissimo Taco's war on trolls, dadaists, and the generally absurd? Why a gzip "filter"?? There are decades of research into fast algorithms for determining statistics on bodies of text -- any one of them, many public domain, would be an intelligent tool against crapflooders. But a 'compress and size check' line instead?? That's the worst kind of lax unfeeling code, that wields a brutal metric without regard for corollary damage. ("Rob code", I've heard it called, but "MS code" is more typifying of that style of program design.)

      I generally don't rant. You are running a valuable site at no monetary cost to us. But /. continues to become a place where trenchant technical analysis is unwelcome, master geeks ignore the pablum, and Taco & the trolls continue their little war with the rest of us caught in the minefields that they lay. Every day I feel a greater desire for the /. of 1998. I say, bring back Chips and Dips.

    8. Re:Improvement suggestions: by jamie · · Score: 3, Funny
      "But down here in the posters' trenches, the consensus is that it sucks ass. Way too many people catch the lameness filter for a short subject..."

      It sucks ass to have to type more than one character for a subject?

      I log every instance of the compress filter doing its thing. In the last 20,000 comments or so that have been posted to Slashdot, it's blocked exactly two attempts to post because of a too-compressible subject. Both times the poster could easily have added about one character and it would have gone through.

      And of the last 20,000 successfully posted comments, there have been exactly 50 blocked attempts because of compression on the text. (Note that two blocked previews followed by a successful post, which is typically what happens, counts for 2 of that 50.) The blocked posts are mostly things like the same link pasted in over and over, or one that was 23K worth of "... testtesttestesttesttestesttesttestest..."

      Big chunks of whitespace look too much like ascii art and are frequently caught (where "frequently" means "well under 1%"). The solution is simple: trim out the whitespace. Sooner or later I'll get around to a feature that lets the Slash code trim it out automatically if you ask.

      As I say, the code changed a couple of weeks ago, becoming much better. I am always very interested to hear about its failures, please, submit bug reports and let me know exactly what legitimate comment you were stopped from posting. But be precise. I have the debug logs, so vague anecdotes aren't convincing. And in this case, you're complaining about stuff that has already been addressed. Get with the times :)

    9. Re:Improvement suggestions: by An+Ominous+Coward · · Score: 2

      Your definition of censorship is totally wrong. I think you're confusing the definition of censhorship with the application and scope of the First Amendment.

    10. Re:Improvement suggestions: by An+Ominous+Coward · · Score: 2
      the institution, system, or practice of censoring


      What about this confuses you? That's an "or" in there, not an "and". If you run a forum and delete someone's posts, you are censoring. You are a censor. You are engaging in censorship. It's your right to do that, but that doesn't change what it is.

    11. Re:Improvement suggestions: by cduffy · · Score: 2
      You presume a rather expansive definition of "censoring", such that it may be done by a private entity without enforced support; otherwise, the "or" is irrelevant.
      censoring
      n 1: counterintelligence achieved by banning or deleting any information of value to the enemy [syn: censorship, security review]
      2: deleting parts of publications or correspondence or theatrical performances [syn: censorship]
      As none of these apply quite correctly, let's turn to the synonym of censorship:
      Censorship \Cen"sor*ship\, n. The office or power of a censor; as, to stand for a censorship. --Holland.

      The press was not indeed at that moment under a general censorship. --Macaulay.
      Here, it's quite clear that being a censor requires an office or other form of empowerment; thus, that a private individual controlling the content which he or she publishes does not qualify.

      In any event, even *were* the practice which Slashdot engages in censorship, it is most certainly less harmful than its less voluntary form; hence, I can see a reasonable entity (ie. the Slashdot editorial staff) believing the former to be benign and the latter to be harmful.
    12. Re:Improvement suggestions: by An+Ominous+Coward · · Score: 2

      From m-w.com:

      censoring: to examine in order to suppress or delete anything considered objectionable.

      And members of the Slashdot editorial staff are being quite hypocritical, because they have stated that even "voluntary" censorship is wrong. Michael and Jamie have frequently spoken against "censorware" -- programs designed by private companies for use by parents and organizations for voluntary censorship. That is why their support for censorship on Slashdot, a private organization that has the right to censor, is hypocritical.

  13. nntp by stevens · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Now that we've got the Fry tree out of the way, its off to work on Zoidberg (which will include subscriptions, killfiles, and a few surprises)

    Wow. In just a few short years they'll have implemented....usenet!

    Just kidding, I know there are differences. Still, an nntp gateway would allow people to use their own clients, and those killfiles.

    1. Re:nntp by Jason+Earl · · Score: 3, Informative

      There already is a Gnus client for Slashdot. It allows you to use Gnus scorefiles and everything. Sometimes I wonder if Emacs hackers belong to a totally different species.

  14. Re:Karma Kap by sporty · · Score: 2

    Its karma for Christ's sake, not money. You don't get any smarter, stronger or better looking because your karma is higher. To boot, you are well above the +1 bonus mark. That's like complaining you lost a point off of the SAT's so instead of 1390, you got 1380. The difference is negligable .

    --

    -
    ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

  15. Does post anonymously work? by crow · · Score: 2

    I hope posting anonymously still works. We'll see real soon.

  16. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I there any plans to stop this first post c##p in the code"

    Yes, I hear that Taco plans to introduce the following snippet into Slash:

    if(comment.number() == 1)
    {
    post.abort();
    }

    ie. anybody trying to post a first comment to a story will be rejected, only the second, third etc. posts will be allowed.

    HTH.

  17. Security? by Krieger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Have the passwords for accounts been moved to a secure format yet? And along similar lines, what about password resets?

    I remember that these were pending problems from a while ago.

  18. My biggest wish by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How about comment editing capability??? There's nothing worse than posting a comment, even using preview, and realize you screwed it up somehow.

    It might even be interesting to add a "previous version" capability. Just stick the message in some other dump table and have a different screen to dump them out.

    The journals have editing capability, so I don't see why normal messages can't do the same.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    1. Re:My biggest wish by sam@caveman.org · · Score: 5, Insightful

      excellent idea. i agree that being able to go back and edit your posts is a BAD idea. that is what preview is for. however there are dozens of 'oops, i meant to say' comments all over the place on nearly every story, and being able to append to the story (much like Ebay allows you to append info but not change what is already there) would be good.

      -sam

      --
      burn the computers. go back to the abacus.
    2. Re:My biggest wish by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      I have to admit, that this is a great point. Being able to edit the posts would be open to huge abuse.

      Even appending comments would be pretty open game -- as another poster pointed out, the trolls could put up a normal post, and then just add "Oh! by the way, I forgot this link (which is goatse.cx).

      Annoying. I think you're probably right that we're better off the way it is now.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    3. Re:My biggest wish by Shagg · · Score: 2
      The problem with this is if you could change your comment after it was moderated. Say you post something intelligent and it gets moded to +5. Than you could go back and edit it to say "First Post" or something , and basically get around the whole moderation system.


      If comment editing is put in place, at least make it so that you can only edit the comment if it has not been moderated yet. This will allow people to make quick corrections right after they post, but hopefully avoid the abusive implications of an edit feature.

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    4. Re:My biggest wish by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      The problem with this is if you could change your comment after it was moderated.

      Hm; this gives rise to another idea: What if you could edit it only until it was moderated or comments were added to it?

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    5. Re:My biggest wish by tb3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Now that makes sense. I post to a few other message boards running other code, and some of them let you edit your posts, and it does make for cleaner posts. None of them have a moderation system, however. Locking the post after child posts or moderation would make a lot of sense.

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    6. Re:My biggest wish by baptiste · · Score: 3, Interesting
      So make comment editing painful so folks won;t do it. Just like you can't moderate a story you post to. If you edit a comment, the moderation gets reset to whatever it posted at (-1 to +2) plain and simple. Also to avoid lamers from editing comments to get out of -1 land (say they posted at +1), you make it so that your post has to be at its original moderation or higher to edit it (or for simplicity, +1) So 0 and -1 comments could NOT be edited.

      OR even simpler. Any comment at -1 or 0 could be edited at its current moderation - who cares? Any comment at +1 or higher will automatically get set to +1 when edited to start over. Easy enough and hard to abuse.

      So for the word problem challenged:

      sub edit_submit { if current_moderation > 1 { moderation = 1 } }

      Easy enough!

    7. Re:My biggest wish by baptiste · · Score: 2

      I wasn't saying don't allow 0/-1 comments to be edited - I said don't change teh mod score - let them edit it at will since they're so close to the hole. But anything at +1 or higher would have its mod score reset to +1 - simply easy

    8. Re:My biggest wish by baptiste · · Score: 2
      Why is it convoluted? Its very simple.
      • Any comment can be edited (very simple)
      • If moderation < 1 leave moderation score alone
      • If moderation >= 1 reset moderation to 1

      That's convoluted? Under your proposal hardly anyone would be able to edit their comment after like 30 minutes - and even worse, if someone replies and says 'you made a mistake' you can't go and fix it! My proposal eliminates just about all avenues of abuse without penalizing people left and right. You can't edit yourself out of -1 or 0 and you can't toss goatse.cx into a +5 comment and expect it to stay there - it goes to +1 and will disappear in no time.

    9. Re:My biggest wish by scrytch · · Score: 2

      Or do like half-empty does. Only allow appending, which is clearly marked, not outright editing, and the ability to do so times out once the post is a few hours old.

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
  19. Re:Karma Kap by Calle+Ballz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I agree with the overrated. Also the "Redundant" moderation needs to go. I have only seen this used correctly a few times. Most of the time I will see an informative post that's near the top modded as Reduntant... yet near the bottom, a similar post will be modded as Informative. I think whoever is moderating needs to learn to look at which they have on: Oldest First or Newest First.

  20. Four suggestions.. by update() · · Score: 4, Interesting
    First of all, the new code seems to be working well. Availability and response time has been much better than before. (Bender code was in place on September 11, right? I was amazed at how well the system held up.)

    Four suggestions -- three of which should be easy and the fourth is harder:

    • The hard one -- I'd love the ability to go back and revise posts for typos or even delete them if I realize I've said something false.
    • Moderation by editors should be noted as such. This would reduce (or confirm) a lot of the conspiracy theories around here.
    • I'll also agree that the +1 bonus should be off by default.
    • How about a lameness filter against HTML posts where more than 30% of the displayed text is formatted? This would help out people who forget to close a tag and don't bother to preview, and reduce readability problems caused by people who want to use all bold. (In a related vein, does the Code option for post formatting do anything but generate unreadable posts? If people want to post code, let them use HTML.)
    1. Re:Four suggestions.. by FortKnox · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The hard one -- I'd love the ability to go back and revise posts for typos or even delete them if I realize I've said something false.

      The abuse for "modified" comments would be immense (ie - whore to +5 quickly to be on top of the comments, then change all your links to goatse). Deletion isn't, though. I like that idea (although what happens to mods and replied?).

      Moderation by editors should be noted as such. This would reduce (or confirm) a lot of the conspiracy theories around here

      Yeah, like michael would agree to that (I'm teasin michael... don't mod me down!) ;-)
      I don't think editors should have mod points at all! Unlimited mod points *DESTROY* the moderation system by definition. They should trust in the system they designed!!

      I'll also agree that the +1 bonus should be off by default.

      I think majority will rule, and this one come in effect quickly.

      How about a lameness filter against HTML posts where more than 30% of the displayed text is formatted? This would help out people who forget to close a tag and don't bother to preview, and reduce readability problems caused by people who want to use all bold. (In a related vein, does the Code option for post formatting do anything but generate unreadable posts? If people want to post code, let them use HTML.)

      How about killing the lameness filter altogether?
      We all hate it, and it doesn't stop the trolling. Plus, isn't it a form of *censoring* (gasp!)??
      Honestly, my only suggestion (both for comments AND articles) is to have the terminator of every type of valid HTML tag forced at the end (already done on comments). This will prevent bleeding of comments (and no more "Close you italics flag!" comments).

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    2. Re:Four suggestions.. by athakur999 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The abuse for "modified" comments would be immense
      Allowing deletion only if the post hasn't been replied to or moderated would be compromise. Since most of the "doh, I wish I could edit this" probably fall in the "oops, I misspelled something" or the "I forgot to preview" category, the author will catch these pretty quickly and be able to do something about it.
      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    3. Re:Four suggestions.. by baptiste · · Score: 2

      Simply reset ann edited comment's moderation to +1 if it is already at +1 or higher. If its at 0 or -1 leave it at that moderation level - no biggie.

  21. Spell Checker? by Christianfreak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I mean there's been a perl mod for ispell for a long time now. How about incorporating it in? That would certainly help both users and administrators.

    1. Re:Spell Checker? by Calle+Ballz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One think I have learned about any technical conversation is that they kill spell checkers. I set my outlook (I don't choose my software) at work to automatically check for spelling errors before I send it out and initially I found myself adding TONS of new words for spellcheck to ignore. It's been a year, and it's still trying to correct various technical terms, acronyms, abbreviations & such. On slashdot I think it would mostly be a pain in the neck trying to post, unless you could choose to use it or whatever.

      I can read past misspellings anyways, 99% of the time. I am not like the grammer trolls who feel it is their duty to give everyone a language lesson, I just say give it a break... no one is perfect and not everyone has a degree in literature.

    2. Re:Spell Checker? by ellem · · Score: 3, Funny

      grammer trolls

      grammar

      --
      This .sig is fake but accurate.
    3. Re:Spell Checker? by SCHecklerX · · Score: 2
      If you are not a good speller, try this:

      http://freefall.homeip.net/stuff/spellcheck/

      Be warned that this is VERY SIMPLE. You CAN hurt yourself if there is, something bad in the stuff you are spell checking (although unless there is a " before it, you are probably safe).

    4. Re:Spell Checker? by Knobby · · Score: 2

      Here's a link to OmniWeb
      on Mac OS X checking the speeling of a post as it's typed.

  22. Re:Karma Kap by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Actually its more like complaining about getting a 1590 on the SAT due to a glitch in the system when you should have gotten a 1600.


    That would piss me off too.

    --

    No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

  23. I want more room by ellem · · Score: 2

    in my Slashbox.

    I need more room in my Slashbox. This way I can log into /. from anywhere and go to my fave places that aren't /.!

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
  24. Re:Mozilla issue by crumley · · Score: 2

    Yep, mozilla builds since 20011102 have had some nasty form bugs - they make posting to slashdot quite interesting - take a look at mozillazine's build bar comments for details. Hmm, it looks like the bugs were supposed to be fixed for today's builds. Strange that you're still seeing them. For now I'm sticking with 20011030.

    --
    Preventive War is like committing suicide for fear of death. - Otto Von Bismarck
  25. Dotslash. by Odinson · · Score: 3, Funny
    Oh oh oh, I want to change my prefrences to form....

    Eeeeevvvvviiiilll Slaaaaaassshhdoooooot!!!

    • Underrated +0
    • Overrated +1
    • Funny -1
    • Offtopic +1
    • Interesting -2
    • Redundant +2
    • Informitive -2
    • Troll +2
    • Insightful -3

    and drum roll please.....
    • Flamebait +5
  26. My wish for meta-moderation by Erik+Hensema · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd like to see the score of an article at the time the moderation I'm metamoderating was done.

    A slightly interesting post at +3 shouldn't be awarded yet another point, so in that case an 'interesting' moderation would be unfair.

    Currently you only see the comment and think 'hey, interesting' and you'd M2 it as fair.

    And please dump the over/underrated moderations. They're only used to dodge M2.

    --

    This is your sig. There are thousands more, but this one is yours.

    1. Re:My wish for meta-moderation by Erik+Hensema · · Score: 2

      Are slow readers to be penalized for their "late" moderations?

      No they aren't. And just this makes it very hard to implement it. It would require slashcode to remember the scores it presents to a moderator until moderation is done (you offcourse cannot let the webbrowser of the moderator remember them, to avoid abuse). Implementing this would be very, very not trivial I think.

      Still, for me as a user it would be nice ;-)

      --

      This is your sig. There are thousands more, but this one is yours.

    2. Re:My wish for meta-moderation by ink · · Score: 2
      And just this makes it very hard to implement it. It would require slashcode to remember the scores it presents to a moderator until moderation is done (you offcourse cannot let the webbrowser of the moderator remember them, to avoid abuse). Implementing this would be very, very not trivial I think.

      It wouldn't be difficult at all. Instead of giving the moderator a +1 / -1, you'd ask the moderator what score the post deserves to have (eg, +3, interesting); if that article has already reached the desired threshold, no points are spent and nothing is moderated. If there is a difference, the points are deducted and the post is moved up or down by one point.

      --
      The wheel is turning, but the hamster is dead.
  27. NNTP is copiable by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 2

    Um, but if somebody receives an NNTP stream even a paid one, there is no technical difficulty to create an NNTP server that rebroadcasts the news.
    Maybe that's why.

    Anyway has somebody actually done that converter? I remember that when Slash was formally published as usable Open Source there were people saying it was the first thing they'll contribute.

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
    1. Re:NNTP is copiable by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2

      Um, but if somebody receives an NNTP stream even a paid one, there is no technical difficulty to create an NNTP server that rebroadcasts the news.

      People have been viewing web pages from behind proxy servers like Squid for years. I don't believe that there's a fundamental difference.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    2. Re:NNTP is copiable by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2

      The difference is that if /. ever opens a NNTP server, it will be subscription-based.

      Are you implying that you can't store subscription content in a web cache?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    3. Re:NNTP is copiable by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2

      Webcaches store HTTP requests, not *NNTP*.

      Sigh. Yes, we all know that. The point is that NNTP is not really any more 'copiable' than HTTP requests. Both can be requested through proxy servers, such as Squid (for HTTP) or Leafnode (for NNTP). Multiple users can suck the subscription content from a Squid server as readily as from a Leafnode server, given the proper configuration.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    4. Re:NNTP is copiable by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 2

      The difference is that HTML pages will have advertisements and Newsposts won't (if under subscription) or they will be text-only (or will they be HTML pages).

      If somebody reads an ad-free version of Slashdot is easy to check for abuse (password-sharing) because it is centralized. An NNTP stream is easily distributable.

      --
      __
      Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
      GW Bu
  28. 20 Second Timer by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

    How about killing that 20 second timer? That's pretty lame...

    And under certain browsers (*cringe*IE5.5*cringe), when you hit the back button, you've lost what you typed if you blow the 20 second filter.

    I also think that adding a new story type "Poll" along the lines of Ask Slashdot would be nice (for user suggested polls).

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  29. BWAHAHAHA by Pope+Slackman · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's open source, that's really the only documentation any reasonably intelligent person needs.

    You've obviously never read slashcode.

    C-X C-S

  30. Surprises... by Swaffs · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Now that we've got the Fry tree out of the way, its off to work on Zoidberg (which will include subscriptions, killfiles, and a few surprises)"

    The rest of the world calls these surprises "bugs". Except Microsoft, who calls them "features".

    --

    --
    "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." - Homer Simpson [1F10]

  31. Will I pay for Slashdot? by Skyshadow · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I've been thinking about this off and on ever since I heard that Taco was going to institute subscriptions: Would I pay for Slashdot?

    In favor: I've used and enjoyed Slashdot for a very long time. I'm not concerned about privacy issues involving my email address, so that's not a worry for me. I know that a lot of hard work has been done to keep this service running for me to enjoy, and I know that the upkeep costs a lot. I know that the reality of the web is different now than it was.

    Convincing, but against: I, and all the other posters, experts, flamers, trolls and etc. are what make Slashdot even basically interesting. The stories alone I can get anywhere -- it's the posts that are semi-interesting. When I pay for a subscription to Salon, I'm paying to get content I enjoy. If I were to pay for Slashdot, even just to get ride of ads, I feel like I'd be paying for something I help make happen.

    All that said: I'll pay for Slashdot. The reason is that, all philosophical problems aside, I know that economic realities are forcing this thing in. I'll miss the free Slashdot, but even a subscriber-friendly Slashdot is better than no Slashdot at all (what would I *do* with my days?).

    In return, I'd really, really like to see a more intelligent basis for story selection. I *miss* that Slashdot from three years ago where the stories were mostly tech-oriented and not just another excuse to flame Katz or diss Microsoft. I want to see real efforts to improve the signal to noise ratio without stomping on unpopular views (like moderation tends to). Maybe it's not possible to go back to that, but I'd like to see some effort made to try.

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
  32. That whole option should go by Lac · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I believe that allowing posters to "opt out" of their +1 is moronic. The premise behind the bonus is that said poster generally posts good comments, so this one is probably good too. Now this either works or it doesn't. If it doesn't, remove the +1. If it does, grant the +1 and get over it.

    Allowing an option to "opt out" of the +1 is like an option that would allow you to "opt out" of being moderated up. The feature is down-right silly. Judging the quality of a post is not the job of the poster. It is the job of the community system and the moderators.

    Just remove that option. It makes no sense.

    1. Re:That whole option should go by baptiste · · Score: 2
      Just remove that option. It makes no sense.

      Actually I like having the option. I look at it this way. I normally try to post good solid comments. But if I'm in the mood and just want to spout off and be an idiot, I post at +1 - that way the worst that can happen is a -2 hit to my karma :) Yeah its only one point. But lose 10 and you lose hte bonus - easy enough to whore and get it back. But seriously - it lets you post subpar comments at +1 instead of +2 where you're more likely to get modded down.

      Of course sometimes when I'm being a d**k and posting obnoxious stuff it'll be funny enough to get +5 so go figure :) :)

    2. Re:That whole option should go by scrytch · · Score: 2

      I post at +2, and occasionally use the "No Score +1 Bonus" checkbox. I dont see the point of making it a default, but I do see its use, as I do occasionally post cute or snide little one liners that really don't belong at the +2 threshold that many (including myself) read slashdot at. I should probably use it more often, actually...

      ObWish: Javascriptify slash for browsers that are capable. Background moderation submits like half-empty. Disable the submit button until the timeouts pass. Or just make the submission textarea a little bit bigger (there's a preference item for ya). I'd hack on it myself, but last I looked at Slash.pm I was just too horrified for words.

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
  33. Re:Karma Kap by Shagg · · Score: 2
    How many colleges will turn you down because you ONLY got a 1590 on the SAT? In reality, it makes absolutely no difference, so why do you care?


    Just the same, what real difference does it make if you have 50 karma or 500 karma. After the +1 bonus at 20 something, the rest is meaningless, so why do you care?

    --
    Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
  34. More useless suggestions by yardbird · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Two quick suggestions:

    Enable me to have separate comment viewing prefs for when I'm a moderator. Changing them back and forth is annoying. Plus then they could be set automatically to more socially responsible defaults.

    If a comment below my threshold has a child which is above my threshold, I think that should be clearer; ideally, in between the visible grandparent and the visible child should be a link to the invisible parent.

    --
    Free, legal music for iTunes users.
    1. Re:More useless suggestions by mech9t8 · · Score: 2

      If a comment below my threshold has a child which is above my threshold, I think that should be clearer; ideally, in between the visible grandparent and the visible child should be a link to the invisible parent.

      Try putting your Threshold to zero, your Highlight Threshold to +3 (or whatever) and your Spill to something like 1. Works for me...

      --
      Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies.
      - Nietzsche
  35. Subscriptions? by hutchy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The moment it costs more than $0.00 for any content on /. I for one will no longer be a reader of Slashdot. The next we know it VA software will pull up the leash, and slashcode will become proprietary

  36. Re:Karma Kap by sporty · · Score: 2

    You'll get over it. The difference is negligable. I've had people excuse thigns like waranties just because i'm a day over. Its all negligable.

    --

    -
    ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

  37. Lameness filter by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 2

    Screw it. Be more like K5. If someone posts a goatse.cx ascii art (I know, probably old, but I haven't checked what the latest troll nonsense is in a while), bitchslap them. It's not fair? Who cares- we all hate each other here anyway.

  38. My small wish by Polo · · Score: 2
    I only wish for one thing:

    An easy way on the main page to scroll back through previous stories.

    This could be as simple as an "Older stories..." link or as "complicated" as separators between days and something like a "Monday's stories" link.

    If I miss a day or two, I always have to fiddle with the slashboxes to scroll back through the stories. This is a simple UI fix and would greatly increase usability.

  39. Re:Not necessarily... by dhamsaic · · Score: 2

    tru dat. i've had it forever. i think i hit 50 around post 50-60...

    --
    Every once in a while I like to masturbate a new word into my vocabulary, even if I don't know what it means.
  40. Re:Karma Kap by enrico_suave · · Score: 2

    The karma itself does not matter.. you are correct... The parent poster was identifying a "bug" in the code or a flaw in the design of the system/implementation... or more likely a missed/overlooked requirement =P

    E.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  41. But only if... by tswinzig · · Score: 2

    ...the karma cap is removed.

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  42. Stylesheets by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Nobody else has mentioned it, and it's my pet peeve, so I'll throw it in there -- I would love to have nice clean XHTML or XML that could be formatted with stylesheets (CSS or XSLT) on the client-side. Now that Mozilla is out there, this should be politically acceptable.

    This could potentially reduce serverload quite a bit -- not only would you be spitting out far less bandwidth per page, but things like score filtering could be done on the clientside instead of requiring another roundtrip to the server.

    You could even invent your own killfile, highlighting, light-mode, and score biasing schemes. Slashdot could use a default stylesheet, and then host user-submitted ones. Removing all the presentation goop would probably make NNTP/Gopher/whatever gateways easier to implement too. This would also have the positive aspect of pushing off most of the minor bitches back onto the userbase.

    --
    Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
  43. In short, no. by _xeno_ · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I could try and explain it, or I could simply point to AvantSlash and let Scott Tringali's plagerized comment from Kuro5hin explain.

    Reproduced for the terminaly lazy:

    First of all, this is a great example of how not to write a Palm version of the site, and here's why. Offline readers depend on "link-depth" to traverse a site. However, their Palm version breaks each story into a random number of small chunks. So, you can't just page-down to read a long story or a bunch of comments- you have to click on lots and lots of links. A real pain. Lots of small links makes sense on a slow online connection, but it's awful when you have more bandwidth available, as your desktop PC or an offline browser.

    Additionally, it's restricted to 10 comments, not a threshold. That's boring. I'm sitting here in Jiffy Lube picking my nose, I wanna read some funny trolls and flamewars!

    Finally, using /. in "light" mode doesn't work either. There are too many useless links on the front page. I don't care about the advertising or the FAQ or all the other stuff: I want the stories and the comments. Basically, the readers I use so far have no way to "prune" sections of the tree you don't care about. This causes the site to be gigantic and not fit into the paltry 8MB of your typical handheld, or, it fits, but it so big as to detract from its usefulness.

    Finally, someone did the right thing: AvantSlash takes the page, filters out all the crap you don't care about, and doesn't break it up into a thousand chunks so it's readable.

    In order to make that usable, I'd have to pump my link depth to something like 4 in order to read the stories. Plus, for the first time in months, slashdot.org has stopped serving 403's to sync.avantgo.com, which basically killed it's usefulnes... (It was one of the first sites I tried to sync to my iPaq via AvantGo, and until today, everytime I tried, I'd get access denied errors reading it when I tried to sync.)

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  44. As long as we're on the subject of wishlists... by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 3, Insightful

    An anonymous post by a logged-in user should be treated exactly the same as a regular post. It should include any +1 bonuses and affect karma. If only unregistered ACs were rated at 0, I'd have less qualms about missing something browsing at +1.

  45. No open-source package can touch it, eh? by Wonko42 · · Score: 2
    And of course a variety of optimizations that continue to make it possible to serve a quantity of pages that no other open source package like this can even touch :)

    I am insulted, chagrined, annoyed, disturbed, perturbed, dismayed, aghast, and perhaps even indignant at this shocking act of arrogance, Mr. Taco! Shame on you, sir. Shame shame shame!

    1. Re:No open-source package can touch it, eh? by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hmm. I haven't seen a PHP package that would do nearly as well as Slash under heavy load. Kuro5hin is a perfect example - while they have similar hardware their site is usually slow and often painfully slow. And that's with a fraction of the traffic.

      --

      No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

    2. Re:No open-source package can touch it, eh? by Wonko42 · · Score: 2
      My response was merely intended to register my tongue-in-cheek fake disgust at Taco's arrogance. I'm the original author of PHPSlice, a little-known PHP-based (duh) weblog package that we've worked hard at making fast and efficient.

      The only reason that was *mock* disgust and not *real* disgust is that, like you mentioned, we've never had an opportunity to test it under a load like Slashdot's.

      But, personally, we think it could kick Slash's ass. ;)

  46. Open to contributions? by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It seems as if there are two different versions of GPL/Open Source development. One is where the project is open to anyone capable enough to contribute to it. Mozilla and KDE are examples of this. The other is where the development, while open to suggestions, is tightly controlled.


    Slashcode seems to fall into the second camp. There doesn't seem to be a wide variety of people who have contributed, rather the credit is purely to CmdrTaco and friends.


    Instead of doing all the work yourselves, why not have a todo list and let others make contributions to the project, rather than just implementing suggestions?

    --

    No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

  47. Update the lameness filter! by bgarcia · · Score: 2
    http://slashdot.org/frontpage.pl?commentthresh=5&s tyle=light
    I'd like to see the stupid lameness filter changed so that instead of placing spaces into the middle of long words (like the URL above), it would simply add a <wbr> tag at that spot so that the browser can break the word there only if it thinks it's necessary.
    --
    I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
  48. Update lameness filter behavior! by bgarcia · · Score: 2
    How about updating the lameness filter?

    Instead of adding a space to the middle of long words, why not just add a <wbr> tag so that the browser can decide whether or not it needs to actually break the word at that spot?

    There are too many times when someone posts a URL in a comment, and I can't simply cut & paste because the lame filter has put a space in the middle of it!

    --
    I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
  49. Warning! by RageMachine · · Score: 2, Funny

    This release contains a security flaw. This flaw will not be revlealed in the ChangeLog, and is protected under the DMCA!

    --

    --------------------------
    Is this a sig?
    --------------------------
  50. I implemented a spell checker for free! by jelwell · · Score: 2
    I hacked in a spell checker for free (as in beer). You can read the Slashcode story or test it out at TivoNews.com.

    Joseph Elwell.

  51. Slashcode may not be the most scalable open source by Paul+Bain · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Commander Taco wrote that Slashcode contains

    a variety of optimizations that continue to make it possible to serve a quantity of pages that no other open source package like this can even touch :) [emphasis added]

    I am not an expert on improving the scalability of web applications (especially those written in Perl, as is Slashcode), but, from what I read, I understand that Java generally scales much better, especially when it has been tweaked for that purpose. Recently, an open source discussion board (written in Java) appeared that its creators say is one of the most scalable on the planet: Jive. Even in Jive's old, version 1.24 form, it was so scalable that Sun Microsystems decided to use it as its main web discussion software, replacing discussion software that they had written themselves (in Java). Sun employee Eric Larson wrote (in article's last paragraph) that

    Jive has proven itself at Sun by supporting 94 forums with more than 358,000 messages, and about 2 million users. And the current infrastructure is not even close to capacity. As more developers try the software and contribute to the project, Jive's success will only continue.

    Jive's developers swear that it can serve a million page views per day without a problem. On the other hand, Jive doesn't support the posting of news items in a manner similar to Slashcode. Maybe that's what Taco meant when he wrote "like this" (above). Of course, the open source developers at Meinds may decide to alter the Jive source to permit the posting of news items. Then Slashcode might have been bested in terms of features as well as scalability.

    --

    A lawyer & digital forensics examiner. Also an expert on open source software (OSS).
  52. Eh? All digital information can be copied. by Dast · · Score: 2

    So what is your point?

    --

    This sig is false.

  53. MM of Redundant... by singularity · · Score: 2

    I would like to see Redundant be removed from at least meta-moderation, if not gull moderation. It is impossible to accurately see if a moderation of Redundant is Fair or not. You could go back at look at the original discussion, but that is a lot of work.

    --
    - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
  54. True enough by kuro5hin · · Score: 2
    Er, if by "similar" you mean "Intel-based"...

    Regardless, you're right that Slashcode is the only package I know of that's been tested with the kind of load and range of attacks that Slashdot gets. I certainly wouldn't argue that it's proven that Scoop could do what Slashcode does, in terms of sheer numbers. That just hasn't been done. Maybe it could, maybe it couldn't, but we don't know for sure.

    I do think feature-wise, Scoop kicks Slashcode's ass, but that's to be expected. :-)

    PS: The previous defender of Scoop was hurstdog, who is our primary project manager now.

    --
    There is no K5 cabal.
    I am not the real rusty.
  55. I already won slashdot by TomatoMan · · Score: 2

    I've managed to bite, scratch, and claw my way up to 25 points, and it's a bit disappointing to find out (finally) that I have to make 40 or better to get that precious posting bonus.

    After a couple of years of periodic karma whoring and ass-kissing, I have scored 50 points, but I can't find where to put in my initials. Anybody know? I'm still waiting for CmdrTaco to send me my prize, should be any day now! I hope it's a GameCube.

    (Thankfully, this post should get me back down to 47 or so, so I have something to shoot for again! Life is good.)

    --
    -- http://frobnosticate.com
  56. Someone please enlighten me by scorcherer · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I can't use w3m anymore for /. because the current code has these stupid links:


    <a href="//slashdot.org/whatever.pl...">


    So. w3m interprets this as http://slashdot.org/slashdot.org/whatever.pl. OK, it's probably valid html since it works correctly in Mozilla and friends. But still, I wonder why the fsck does such a convention exist in the first place. More importantly, what's the point of repeating the host name for local links?

    --

    --
    The Cap is nigh. Time to get a fresh new account.

  57. Yes, when you open the deadly 32nd chamber of /. by Dast · · Score: 2

    But not at a measly 40 karma. When you get 2.147e9 karma points, you unlock the deadly 32nd chamber of slashdot, in which you gain unlimited moderation abilities and spiritual bliss. You do know how to break the 50 karma limit, right?

    Right? If not, you better start reading /. at -1 threshold, newest first. You will find the anser in the pink underbelly of the /. horde. I will start you off in the right direction.

    There are many paths to breaking the karma limit. In fact, the limit itself isn't a real limit at all, but your own mind restricting you from realizing your full potential. The obvious shortest path to breaking this limit is to fully realize this truth. Of course, this is easier said than done; it takes years of mental and physical training. I doubt you could manage it if you haven't even yet gotten 40 karma.

    Another path to breaking the limit is to go back in the other direction. Negativity meets positivity when you roll over. Troll long and hard enough to drive your karma so low that it rolls over to an astoundingly high positive number.
    Of course, these are only two of the infinite number of paths you can take to karmic bliss.

    --

    This sig is false.

  58. And if you need Slash hosting... by Micah · · Score: 2

    I can do that (blatent plug). We're still at 2.0 and may be for some time, but eventually we'll get upgraded to 2.2 or 2.4.

    Or if anyone can tell me how to run two versions on the same server we can start right away. Possibly by dedicating one httpd to 2.2 and having it on its own IP (which I could do) but then I'd have to figure out how to isolate the Slash .pm files from each other. I've heard it said that it can't be done, but there's probably a way...

    1. Re:And if you need Slash hosting... by Micah · · Score: 2

      Thanks, looks like that is what I needed to know! I thought there was an env variable for setting the @INC, but couldn't find it with a quick look through the docs. It's in the FAQ though... sweet! I hope to have 2.2 up this weekend. :-)

  59. The Karma Cap Should Be 42 by Sara+Chan · · Score: 2
    Surely it's obvious that the purpose of real karma is life, the universe, and everything. It thus follows that the karma cap should be 42!


    Buy Windows XP. Give Bill Gates more of your money.

  60. Bite, scratch, and claw? Heh, back in my day by Dast · · Score: 2

    my boy, the Karma Wyrms of old regularly got well over 200 karma. If you are having to bite and scratch, you are doing something wrong. Spinning your wheels but not going anywhere.

    You have two choices on how to accumulate karma, the path of light and the path of dark, and millions of variations on the two.

    If you want to go after karma the honest way, here are some hints.

    * Post early. I can't stress this enough. Moderators browse at highest score first, so the only way to get noticed is to post early before a lot of people have been bumped up into the 4-5 range.
    * Post content not crap. Don't just voice some uninformed opinion on something. If you catch a story early, before the site linked to is /.'ed, read the article! Have something to say.
    * Don't reply to other posts, make a reply to the story. Moderators don't go through replies to other peoples comments as much as they see the parents.
    * Use a good subject. Moderators notice funny titles; it gets you noticed.
    * Use your +1 to your advantage. Get it in early and strike hard. But don't use it all of the time, or you might get modded down a lot.
    * And don't let me catch you saying something like: "I know I will lose karma for this, but...", "I know this is an unpopular opinion with the /. horde and moderators only mod up stories the sheep agree with", "Here goes all karma...", or "Oh well, I have karma to burn..." If you do I will mod you down to karma hell on every post you've ever made. I've said it before and I'll say it again. Sometimes on /. it seems like (+5, Insightful) means only "This user doesn't feel confident that his opinion stands on its own and thus needs to end his posts by suggesting he would only be moderated down because his views are unpopular to the /. horde."

    If you wish to take the dark side, ie karma whoring, start reading the slashdot underbelly of trolls. They will tell you how.

    Good luck and enjoy the game. You have already lost. :)

    --

    This sig is false.

  61. Suggestions by iomud · · Score: 2

    I'd like to see an open submissions section, ie a singular section which users contribute and moderate stories. There's a lot of decent contributions that get dropped because an editor dosen't think its news in this section the slash users would decide, perhaps this could be made a subscription option or someting, to deter troll submissions.

  62. Ideas by autocracy · · Score: 2

    The new "absolute" comment number seems to have stopped a lot of FPs, but it makes it a real pain to see if something is redundant when doing M2. Also, editing is not such a good idea, I would think. This is a web LOG for a reason.

    --
    SIG: HUP
  63. Suggestion by Sloppy · · Score: 2

    Get rid of accumulated karma.

    Instead, just have people's posts start out with a score equal to the average score of their last n posts.

    This will solve most karma-related problems.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  64. Re:sig by Pope+Slackman · · Score: 2

    I dunno. Sounds like something JWZ, Theo de Raadt or Jordan K Hubbard might say.
    I just saw it on a forum somewhere. Mighta even been crapdot.

    The BSD crowd seems to have more of a utilitarian "because it works" attitude rather than the "because it's cool" attitude the linux crowd has, and I happen to like that better.
    Note how the main things the BSD faction has been working on (and are known for) are serving and security, while the main thing the linux people have been working on over the last few years are toolkits and desktops.
    (Aside from all the window managers and mp3 players, that is...)

    C-X C-S