Slashdot Mirror


Canadian Researchers Create Supernova In-lab

Erebus42 writes "Canada has done something neat. Apparently researchers at the University of British Columbia have created supernova in their ISAC (Isotope Seperator and Accelerator), transmuting sodium 21 into magnesium 22. Spiffy."

308 comments

  1. Could this be used in weapons development? by skrowl · · Score: 1, Troll

    If a country were able to make this portable enough to use in battle, could this be made into a type of weapon?

    The rammifications of a portable supernova are chilling when you put in in Osama or Saddam's hands, no?

    --

    Prevent linux based DDOS's!
    http://linux.denialofservice.org/
    1. Re:Could this be used in weapons development? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ramifications (one "m") are even worse with this technology in Bush's hands: we're the only country in the world to ever unleash weapons of mass destruction.

    2. Re:Could this be used in weapons development? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      moron. thats such a stupid comment

  2. I can see it now! by IIOIOOIOO · · Score: 1

    R1: 'Hey eddie, turn the dial up, let's see what this can do, eh! (get it? eh?) R2: 'Here it goes!' *POOF* R1: 'Where'd nova scotia go?'

    1. Re:I can see it now! by greenfly · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Nova" Scotia should have known better!

    2. Re:I can see it now! by klewlis · · Score: 1

      Except that Nova Scotia is exactly at the OPPOSITE end of Canada from Vancouver... the joke's kinda lost...

  3. WOW! I want one! by AltGrendel · · Score: 2, Funny
    A supernova in my backyard! Great going Canada!

    Now could you make a black-hole for power generation purposes?

    Thanks!

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

    1. Re:WOW! I want one! by Mattsson · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't a supernova be a better source of energy than a black hole?

      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
  4. Neat? by saintlupus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Canada has done something neat.

    Christ, how many dollars is the new coin worth this time?

    --saint

    1. Re:Neat? by ergo98 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You know the coins really are a government way of encouraging savings: I constantly empty pockets of change into a dish/pile/on the washer machine, etc. Every now and then I realize that it actually amounts to hundreds of dollars. When you have $2 coins it's amazing how valuable a coin pile can become.

    2. Re:Neat? by digitalunity · · Score: 1

      toonies for everyone :)

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    3. Re:Neat? by Schrodinger's+Mouse · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but how much is a toonie really worth? US$0.03?

      --

      *****

      There are many people in this country who, through no fault of their own, are sane.

    4. Re:Neat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada is the only country in the world where the currency is loonie-toonie.;-)

      (NB: loonie==1 dollar, toonie==2 dollars)

    5. Re:Neat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's worth $0.62US. But considering that everything in the US is 40% more expensive than in canada, it works out nicely. :)

    6. Re:Neat? by William+Fold · · Score: 1

      I think you mean $1.24 -- toonie == $2 CDN.

    7. Re:Neat? by Misao · · Score: 1

      Someone neither a) knows how to do math or b) checks exchange rates.

      Starting with b) the exchange rate is 0.6351. But that's just being nit-picky. More important is a); even at 0.62, the twonie, or _$2_ is in fact $1.24, and not $0.62.

      I'm not going to bother decrying the lousy exchange rate. That's for another day... (/she remembers when it was 0.89, and was born when it was around 1.00)

      -mis

    8. Re:Neat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At one point in time the canadian dollar (well it wasn't called that at the time iirc) was worth well over $2 US.

      There is a nice little currency graph on the bank of canada's web site somewhere.

    9. Re:Neat? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 3, Funny

      gosh, they seem to wqant to move backward in Monetary technology
      Canada's goal......

      by 2005 they plan to only be using chickens and goats.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    10. Re:Neat? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      when was that? when the Articles of the confederacy were still being used?

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    11. Re:Neat? by Mr_Dyqik · · Score: 1

      At one point the Deutsch Mark was worth 1 trillionth of a US dollar.

  5. Ah yes by mrroot · · Score: 4, Funny

    The world has enough Sodium 21. It's about time someone started converting all that crap to Magnesium 22.

    --
    I Heart Sorting Networks
    1. Re:Ah yes by PD · · Score: 2

      On the Fourth of July, either one will do.

  6. Science for Sciences Sake? by JohnHegarty · · Score: 1

    Is this science for sciences sake, or will there be any praticle uses from this. I can't think of any off the top of my head....

    1. Re:Science for Sciences Sake? by vinnythenose · · Score: 2, Informative

      The idea is that by recreating a supernova we can possibly see how the universe was formed. The theory I believe suggests that the big bang was essentially a really large supernova. It said this in the article (although I've been known for not reading every single little word, sort of like in Army of Darkness)

      --
      --- I used to moderate, then I read the -1 articles and decided having to filter through them was not worth it.
    2. Re:Science for Sciences Sake? by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      The theory I believe suggests that the big bang was essentially a really large supernova.

      Which is about like saying that the universe is like a really large apartment.

    3. Re:Science for Sciences Sake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure there will be many 'praticle' *snicker* uses for it. Why don't you leave the science to the scientists, ok? Before you hurt yourself.

  7. Bragging rights. by exceed · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Canada is now leading the world in the field of nuclear astrophysics.

    "We have bragging rights."


    Finally... I was wondering when we would. ;-)

    --

    void women (int money, time_t time);
    1. Re:Bragging rights. by DrMaurer · · Score: 1

      Footer on the bottom of the slashdot's story page (at least when I opened the it first):

      "Don't get to bragging."

      heh

      --
      Dan
    2. Re:Bragging rights. by jkeegan · · Score: 1

      Hey, you've also got Rush!

      --

      ..Jeff Keegan
      seven syllables explain TiVo: kee gan dot org slash ti vo
    3. Re:Bragging rights. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have bragging rights in many ways.

      1) back when we built the Arrow, The only Mach 2 fighter and the first fighter that was controlled by Fly-by-Wire until the F-16 in the mid 70's

      2) The CanadaArm. One of the few pieces of the Shuttle program that exceeded its expectations.

      3) (My favorite), compared to our neighbours to the south, we have a freedom where we generally do not have to put bars on the windows of our houses and can walk the streets at 2 or 3 in the morning without feer of being severly maimed and murdered.

      4) The only English speaking country in North America (No I am not forgetting our french speaking brothers in Quebec & New Brunswick) that still knows how to spell.

    4. Re:Bragging rights. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that we are respected almost everywhere in the world.

      ... and you wonder why Americans often sew Canadian flags on their backpacks when travelling through Europe.

    5. Re:Bragging rights. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh little brother, your jealousy oozes from your pores. never forget, your little socialistic paradise exists only by big brother's good graces.

    6. Re:Bragging rights. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You tried that stunt in 1812 and look what happened to your whitehouse (which was actually a light shade of pink at that time).

      And before you think that I hate America, I don't. My comments are more for my fellow Canadians that have a negative attitude towards their own country thinking that we can't do anything. To me the biggest problem with Canada is not the US swallowing us up but the attitude that we have to be swallowed up by the US in order for us to be of any value to the world.

      As to the socialistic paradise that we have up here. Man socialism is great when we spend less person on social programs than our neighbour to the south.

      As well your attitude in Congress seems to be, well we won't provide good medical care to our people but we will sure give tons of corporate welfare to our friends in the business world. Well my friend, welfare is welfare and giving money in the name of big business does not change that basic fact.

    7. Re:Bragging rights. by klewlis · · Score: 1

      We also lead in fiberoptics (hence the much better and earlier distribution of highspeed internet) and robotics (hence the Canadarm). We also have been far ahead in banking technology, having ATM's, interac, and internet banking widespread long before the US. :)

    8. Re:Bragging rights. by tuxlove · · Score: 1

      The only English speaking country in North America (No I am not forgetting our french speaking brothers in Quebec & New Brunswick) that still knows how to spell.

      Apparently you don't know much about grammar or capitalization, though. I'll leave the corrections as an exercise for the reader.

    9. Re:Bragging rights. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      you wonder why Americans often sew Canadian flags on their backpacks when travelling through Europe.

      Oh jeeziz. Look we had some guy fightin' on the side of the Taliban, too. One draft dodger in '67, and we have to take shit for it in 2001? What about William Shatner?

  8. Alchemy? by Starship+Trooper · · Score: 0, Funny

    If they can turn sodium(21) into magnesium(22), they're only two steps away from transforming Lead(82) into Gold(79)! Go Canada! :-)

    --
    Loneliness is a power that we possess to give or take away forever
    1. Re:Alchemy? by bourne · · Score: 1, Informative

      If I read the article right, it decomposed back into sodium(22). We can create lots of elements with super science gadgets, but none that I've heard of are stable.

      However, I have to wonder what would happen to radioactive waste that was modified this way. We've got to figure out some way to make that stuff less dangerous, at least until we can create black holes to dump it into.

    2. Re:Alchemy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      they're only two steps away from transforming Lead(82) into Gold(79)!
      Look buddy, if you'd read the damn article you'd know that they need smurf(66) for that.
    3. Re:Alchemy? by mmontour · · Score: 2

      If I read the article right, it decomposed back into sodium(22). We can create lots of elements with super science gadgets, but none that I've heard of are stable.

      Even the sodium(22) is temporary. It decays to neon(22), which is stable.

      In general, if it's stable, it's found in nature at high enough concentrations that you don't need to produce it (e.g. gold). The accelerators and reactors are for when you want an unstable element that isn't found in nature, and that does something interesting as it decays toward stability.

      However, I have to wonder what would happen to radioactive waste that was modified this way.

      It would probably just get more radioactive. If you were able to isolate a particular waste isotope you might be able to transmute it into something more friendly, but it'd probably require more energy than you ever got from the nuclear fuel in the first place.

      We've got to figure out some way to make that stuff less dangerous,

      Put it back in the mine where you originally got the uranium, enclosed in leak-resistant containers (e.g. a block of glass). That should make it less dangerous than the other background hazards (radon from the natural uranium that we haven't yet mined, radioactive potassium in bananas, carbon-14, pesticides, tobacco smoke and car exhaust, etc).

      Or just make bullets out of it and shoot it at your enemies. Worked well for the US in the Gulf war, with the depleted uranium left over after producing enriched power-plant fuel and bombs.

    4. Re:Alchemy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is being studied. Check e.g. here.

  9. Help... Please? by The+Great+Wakka · · Score: 1

    The way the author describes this, they make it sound like something impressive. But, um... could someone fill me in here? And for all the other clueless out there?

    --
    Everything is mainstream now.
    1. Re:Help... Please? by nerdlyone · · Score: 2, Interesting
      In a star, the massive outward pressure from the nuclear reaction is balanced by the inward pressure of gravity. The bigger the star, the more gravity. The more gravity, the closer the individual atoms inside the star have to be. Once the star gets big enough, some of the atoms are literally mashed together to form a new element. Example: a hydrogen (one proton) gets added to a helium (two protons), creating whatever element #3 is. This is alchemy. New elements. All the heavy elements (i.e., anything greater than atomic number 2) were supposedly made this way. We are all stardust. Every atom in our bodies went through a supernova, or so the theory goes.

      In this experiment, they apparently used a particle accelerator to add a proton to sodium 21. This made magnesium (?), a new element. But it didn't last long, the proton decayed into a neutron, converting the atom back into sodium, this time with 22 nucleons (one extra neutron than before).

      The reason this is news: we have never converted one element into another before (at least not this way).

    2. Re:Help... Please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (sarcasm)actually you are wrong. everthing that exists today was greated in 7 days by god.(/sarcasm)

    3. Re:Help... Please? by grnbrg · · Score: 1
      (sarcasm)actually you are wrong. everthing that exists today was created in 7 days by god.(/sarcasm)

      (pedant)Six days.(/pedant)

    4. Re:Help... Please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we have never converted one element into another before (at least not this way).

      "Nuclear transmutation was first demonstrated by Rutherford in 1919 , who transmuted 14N to 17O using energetic alpha-particles." source

  10. Except... by Robber+Baron · · Score: 1, Troll

    Nova Scotia's on the other coast you butthead!

    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

    1. Re:Except... by Robber+Baron · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Hey! How the hell did that happen??? I was replying to the guy below you!

      --

      You're using her as bait, Master!

  11. Melt Snow ? by JohnHegarty · · Score: 0, Troll

    They could use it to melt snow ? ... or something else , i am sure there is other things in canada... mabey melt snow ?

  12. Heh, UBC is Cool by PK_ERTW · · Score: 1
    Well, I always new that UBC was cool, but I kind of wondered what the hell they did with that big 'ol atom smasher at the corner of the Campus. (Yeah, I know it has a real name, but come on, I go to the school, I can call it what I want)

    PK
    "Where are we going... and why are we in this handbasket?"

    --
    Engineers arn't boring people, we just get excited about boring things.
    1. Re:Heh, UBC is Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would rather have a particle accleerator than the nuclear reactor that they have (or had as I am not sure it is still there anymore) at University of Toronto.

      Oh well, at least it was a solid and safe CANDU reactor rather than a lightwater or a Chernoble type reactor.

    2. Re:Heh, UBC is Cool by BurntSand · · Score: 1

      It wasn't a CANDU reactor, it was a SLOWPOKE (Safe LOW POwer Kritical Experiment) reactor.

      Generated about enough power to run an average house for 20 years, if you didn't mind the $500,000 per year operating cost - I wonder why they never caught on?

      Details on its history (it's now being decommissioned) are here: http://www.newsandevents.utoronto.ca/bin1/000724e. asp

      Cheers, a U of T alumnus.

  13. Slippery Slope by adamy · · Score: 4, Funny

    THere seems to be wuite a bit of bragging in the article, but I guess that is to be expected. Something big like this sounds like it took a lot of effort, so these guys were psyched. Can't say as I blame them.

    But it does kindof worry me that Canadians ccan now create there own elements at will. What is to prevent them from creating tons and tons of gold and flooding the gold market? Or How about creating their own Plutonium. Uh oh, I think Canada just got the bomb...Or Carbon. If canada can create it's own Carbon, what can keep them from creating diamonds and flooding the diamond market. And Carbopn is the basis for life. they can create their own stem cells. George Bush ain't going to be happy about that one...Wait, I just relized this means they can create their Hydrogen. My god, they cancreate their own sun. My god, Canada must be stopped.

    Congrats goes out to these guys.

    --
    Open Source Identity Management: FreeIPA.org
    1. Re:Slippery Slope by vinnythenose · · Score: 1

      (I know you're being sarcastic but for those that might not think so...)
      Well one thing to prevent making tonnes and tonnes of gold would be, well, the cost? To make it would cost tonnes more than the gold is worth.

      Oh, and sure Canada hasn't been making any nukes, but we've had the materials for a long time. Ever heard of the Can-Du reactor? (safest reactor in the world I believe) It outputs perfect nuclear waste for a nuke (hence all the fuss by the US when a few were sold to China)

      It's kinda cool for nifty sake as well. Hmm, maybe we can create more elements with stupid names!
      (do I hear that song blame canada on the horizon?)

      --
      --- I used to moderate, then I read the -1 articles and decided having to filter through them was not worth it.
    2. Re:Slippery Slope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the energy required to make tons and tons of Gold would be pretty extreme. Liquid He might become as valuable as gold, though, at the rate it would have to work to do it in a reasonable amount of time.

      It would probably be better to get it out of sea water by electrolysis.

    3. Re:Slippery Slope by cadfael · · Score: 1

      Nah, we're just using this as a step to create beer. Canadians looooove beer, especially Canadian beer. If only beer were an element, we'd be so much closer to the perfect society. We'd close the borders, turn on some hockey, start up the Beer maker, and have a few friends over...

      --
      -- The Hollow Man
      Non illegitimati carborundum
    4. Re:Slippery Slope by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Canada in truth doesn't have alot of things to be proud of, sure we have the neutrino detector, I've been there that damn thing is neat, been to a few particle accelerators but intresting none the less.

      Well gold could be a problem but that could be regulated. Plutonium hell we burn that in our power plants. Canada is considered a non-nuclear power but as the ability to build the bomb, in canada there is no stratigic importance to build them, after all we have the states to protect us...I hate saying that but 99% of canadaians think that way.

      Well you can go talk to russia about the diamonds, they have 40-50 billion US dollars worth sitting in store rooms they have an agreement with the diamond cartel not to sell them though, and they get some money from them every year. On another note, when they were doing some geo-surveying up north(in the territories), they found that the concentration of diamonds makes the finds in africa look like a pin in a pin box.

      Regardless, there are lots of good things that can come from this, after all maybe we can crack the understanding of the universe or something from it.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    5. Re:Slippery Slope by MeNeXT · · Score: 2
      Every country has something to be proud of...If you would like to find out what, read their history.

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
    6. Re:Slippery Slope by ADRA · · Score: 1

      Hey, this is bull! 99% of canadians don't go around thanking their lucky stars for being behind the US's good graces, Maybe 1%, but the 98% that do think we have an innept millitary JUST DON'T CARE!

      As so many have pointed out before, who would waste their time terrorizing Canada? We don't (generally) piss people off, exploit, discriminate, or anything else. The only thing we stink at is environmental protection, so I could see protecters putting spikes in.. prime ministers, but beyond that, I thnk Canadians don't care about national war machines because we have been given no need to fear.

      PS: Plutonium is a reactor's byproduct, not the fuel. They use Uranium as the fuel.. That is why the US pushed for atomic energy in the 50's, to harvest plutonium for bombs.

      --
      Bye!
    7. Re:Slippery Slope by mmontour · · Score: 2

      But it does kindof worry me that Canadians can now create there own elements at will.

      TRIUMF is a couple of km from the UBC hospital, and for years they've been creating elements for medical imaging and treatment. The material is produced in the TRIUMF beamline, extracted and processed through some rather nasty chemistry, then shot down a pneumatic tube to the hospital to be injected into the patient. These isotopes have short half-lives (minutes) so they have to be produced close to where they are used.

    8. Re:Slippery Slope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where do you think usa gets there uranium?

      (canada)

    9. Re:Slippery Slope by TrevorB · · Score: 2

      There seems to be quite a bit of bragging in the article.

      Considering how much the present B.C. government is trying to cut back anything with a budget, it's likely the hype is an attempt to hold on to any funding that TRIUMF has whatsoever.

      When the provincial government starts considering cutting whole universities you've got to scream to stay alive...

    10. Re:Slippery Slope by mmontour · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of the Can-Du reactor? (safest reactor in the world I believe) It outputs perfect nuclear waste for a nuke (hence all the fuss by the US when a few were sold to China)

      Another interesting bit of trivia about this reactor - it can run on natural uranium, while US designs require enriched uranium. In other words, to fuel our reactors you just need a shovel, while to fuel a US-style reactor you need a substantial part of a weapons-program infrastructure (Oak Ridge, etc).

    11. Re:Slippery Slope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also can run on other fissionable fuels as well. I believe they did tests at Cold Lake running on Thorium which I believe is more plentiful than Uranium is.

    12. Re:Slippery Slope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fissionable waste material output from a CANDU has only about 3% weapons grade material (It has been a while since I got that figure so my memory may be a bit hazy on that but the point is that the spent Uranium would have to be refined a lot further to be able to create a bomb) but there is one other byproduct of the CANDU and that is a fair amount of Tritium (radioactive isotope of hydrogen) which can be used to make fusion bombs.

      I am not sure if the nuclear weapons that china has are Fusion or Fission weapons but it was the Fusion breakthrough that allowed the size and weight of a warhead to be as small as they are today.

    13. Re:Slippery Slope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In truth, we in Canada have a LOT to be proud of. And if you don't like it here, then get the &^%$ out.

      Lets see a short list of things

      1) the lightbulb
      2) insulin
      3) The AVRO ARROW
      4) CanadaArm
      5) Half of the Hollywood actors lol (mind you, can we call that pride, America can have Jim Carrey if they want)
      6) and if we want to get into more things that have more political failing rather than technological or marketing the AVRO Jetliner as well.

      There are lots of things that have nothing to do with technology as well. The fact that we became an independant country without firing a single shot and kicking out 100,000 people just because they happened to not vow to crush the british. (hey that sounds way too much like Cuba).

      Also, we have a country that unlike the US Melting Pot, you can still retain a sense of your ancestry without feeling like you should be ashamed of yourself.

    14. Re:Slippery Slope by FFFish · · Score: 1

      We don't have to create our own diamonds: we mine them. (Go here to skip the Flash intro.)

      Also, I don't think we've got stem cell restrictions.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    15. Re:Slippery Slope by superflex · · Score: 1
      Canada's reputation for answering the call of the internation community in times of need has been going downhill for over 10 years now, as our military falls further and further into decline. It's a sad, sad state of affairs. I mean, it's to the point now where we cannot rely on our own coast guard for search and rescue, due to the decrepit fleet of Sea King helicopters they've been flying for over thirty years. Do you not think that the country with the longest coastline in the world should have an adequate means of peforming these duties!? I agree that since the start of the cold war, we've been under the protective umbrella of the DEW line (later NORAD) and the U.S. in general, but they needed our strategic position guarding the northern polar route as much as we needed them.

      arrr...

      and another thing. CANDU reactors can burn plutonium. It hasn't been in the news lately, but do you recall the plan to burn surplus Russian and American MOX fuel (95% uranium oxide, 5% plutonium oxide) in CANDU reactors? Check out this info page at the Atomic Energy Canada Limited website. The project update from January 22, 2001 refers to burning MOX with 3% and 5% weapons-grade plutonium content. The idea is to actually eliminate all this surplus fissile material which resulted from the START treaties and their ilk.

      --
      sigs are for suckers
    16. Re:Slippery Slope by Canuckanuck · · Score: 1

      But you need a fission bomb first in order to drive the fusion bomb reaction. I.E. In every H bomb, there's a little A bomb that makes it go...

    17. Re:Slippery Slope by nigelc · · Score: 1
      And we all know (from watching Young Einstein) that it's possible to split the beer atom. Hence Canada's interest in things atomic.

      Now that was the Australians, true, but I have difficulty telling these former British colonies apart...

      --


      Cthulhu Barata Nikto
    18. Re:Slippery Slope by Canuckanuck · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the major means to produce the attentuated Polio virus, shipped it to the US for vaccine production.

      And the fact that we have a larger oil reserve than Saudi Arabia.

      And the fact that Bell made the world's first phone call in Ontario.

      And the fact that we had the world's first nuclear accident at Chalk River.

      And the fact that we can walk the planet proudly wearing our flag and be welcomed with open arms, while our southern neighbours are not so lucky.

      And the fact that we have the lowest population density in the world.

      And the fact that we have the cheapest high speed internet access in the world.

      And the fact that we are the most technologically savvy society in the world.

      And the fact that a great deal of the formost researchers in the US have been educated at Canadian universities.

      And the fact that it was a Canadian - Paul Shaffeur - who was the first to say the word "fu(k" on television.

      And the fact that OUR movies are uncensored (even softcore p0rn) after 9pm at night on CityTV because we don't have the stupid FCC breathing down necks.

      And there's lots more.

  14. Winamp Visualizations... by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 0

    Just another visual stimulant to add to Pink Floyd...

  15. Canadian Researchers Create Supernova In-lab by Renraku · · Score: 4, Informative

    ..Canadian shield proves ineffective.

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
  16. black hole near you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the physicist was right after all. Someone just created a black hole!

  17. We get it, Canada by Levine · · Score: 1, Troll
    "Canada is now the world leader in this research," TRIUMF director Alan Shotter said after the breakthrough experiment
    ...
    "We are pushing this technology to the absolute limits of what's possible."
    ...
    With the completion of ISAC in 1999, TRIUMF became unequalled in the world in its ability to study nuclear astrophysics and element synthesis in the universe. The only other facility of its kind, in Geneva, sent congratulations Monday to the ISAC team that beat it to the finish line.
    ...
    "The Americans are planning a similar facility and they expect it to cost $800 million US and take 10 years to build. So we're 10 years ahead," Schmor said.
    ...
    "Canada is now leading the world in the field of nuclear astrophysics.
    ...
    "We have bragging rights."
    I swear, this article had more to say about Canada than the actual process or what it means. Okay, Canada! We get it! You guys rock! Next time we want some space magnesium, we'll know where to look. In the meantime, keep planting those trees.

    Cheers,
    levine
    1. Re:We get it, Canada by aredubya74 · · Score: 1

      Aw, give em a break. After all, they already apologized for Brian Adams on numerous occasions...

      --

      RW

    2. Re:We get it, Canada by Quasar1999 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Okay, Canada! We get it! You guys rock! Next time we want some space magnesium, we'll know where to look. In the meantime, keep planting those trees.

      Ya, being Canadian means we might be better than our American neighbours when it comes to nuclear astrophysics, but when it comes to satellite TV, you guys kick ASS! (GO DTV!!!) :)

      --

      ---
      Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    3. Re:We get it, Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I swear, this article had more to say about Canada than the actual process or what it means. Okay, Canada! We get it! You guys rock! Next time we want some space magnesium, we'll know where to look. In the meantime, keep planting those trees.

      National pride. It's charming, but gets obnoxious fast. I went to a Canadian space conference and I swear I heard "The American Space Shuttle with the Canadian Arm" at least a thousand times.

      I followed up with talk about the American Star Trek with Canadian Acting and got shouted out of the room. Sorry, bub - Shatner's Canadian, eh?

    4. Re:We get it, Canada by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      And no, it wasn't just their still exploding.

    5. Re:We get it, Canada by deglr6328 · · Score: 1, Troll

      Ugh, if you ask me Canadians are even more nauseatingly patriotic than us Americans. We've been doing nuclear astrophysics experiments for decades already and with cooler looking instruments too! ha! take that Canada!

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    6. Re:We get it, Canada by Howie · · Score: 2

      National pride. It's charming, but gets obnoxious fast.

      You want to try reading slashdot sometime.

      --
      "don't fall into the fallacy of believing that Perl can solve social problems. Maybe Perl 6 can, but that's a ways off"
    7. Re:We get it, Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya, being Canadian means we might be better than our American neighbours when it comes to nuclear astrophysics, but when it comes to satellite TV, you guys kick ASS! (GO DTV!!!) :)

      ... in which we Canadians can legally steal. :-)

    8. Re:We get it, Canada by DNAGuy · · Score: 1

      Does anyone else think it's ironic to hear an American complain about Canadian patriotism?

      Most citizens of industrialized countries are patriotic to some degree, and often for good reason. To hear an American (I'm assuming) complain about it is pretty funny, though. Americans practically invented patriotism.

      ...end offtopic rant.

      --

      BRENT ROCKWOOD, EST'd 1975

    9. Re:We get it, Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, we Canadians are just as patriotic as you Americans. When you have 30 million patriots its cute, when you have 300 million its just nauseating.

    10. Re:We get it, Canada by nexthec · · Score: 1

      no, I think the romans did, NOT_ROMAN == "Slave", Tho I am engaged to a candian, I find that most canadians define them sleves as "not american" and in the last couple of years she has come to ralize that she has to define who she is by what canada is, not isnt. Her dad is really talks about how only americans are patriotic, but he really likes the comercials for molson, you know the "I am candaian" ones, with ice hockey, or the curling one..... seems very patriotic to me. That is cool, but I am tired of hearing from candians that only americans are patriotic.

    11. Re:We get it, Canada by Levine · · Score: 2

      To the naysayers amongst you, I'm actually Canadian born and a dual citizen, so this is just a poke in the ribs, really.

      Cheers,
      levine

    12. Re:We get it, Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the funny this is they don't really believe Canada is great - they all have a huge inferiority chip on their shoulder, and only proffer up these examples of Canadian greatnes with a "so there! we're not all aboot beer drinking" kind of quirky charm.

      Gotta love those canucks though. They're sooo cute!

    13. Re:We get it, Canada by crakrjak · · Score: 0, Troll

      shouldn't patriotism be treated the same as racism and sexism?

      What's the difference?

    14. Re:We get it, Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a very big problem here and it pisses me off big time and it is the only reason why I would consider leaving this country.

    15. Re:We get it, Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it really depends on how you define patriotism. When I lived in the US, sometimes the attitude that the US is the center of the Universe and the 'we are the only place that matters in the world' really sickened me and very often that is how we here in Canada define patriotism.

      Having a pride in your country and a pride of who we are as a country is more my definition and that attitude is prevelent in just about every country that I have visited, even in countries that are going through some major upheaval like Russia or even to a much lesser extent countries like Afghanistan.

      I love my country and would consider myself patriotic but do I have an 'in your face' attitude about it, no I don't and that to me is the difference.

    16. Re:We get it, Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although I really don't like to admit that Shatner is a Canadian ;)

      I suppose that if Quebec seperates, we won't be forced to say that as he was born in Montreal. :)

    17. Re:We get it, Canada by nexthec · · Score: 1

      it really depends on how you define patriotism. When I lived in the US, sometimes the attitude that the US is the center of the Universe and the 'we are the only place that matters in the world' really sickened me and very often that is how we here in Canada define patriotism.

      Ofcourse we do, we are one of the most powerfull nations in the world, and we are a bunch of arrogant, egotistical, religios, and uniformed groups of people with increadble technology. However, I personally dont think that candains are less patriotic or in-your-face than americans, I get to see it every holiday personally. And dont get me started about the french......

    18. Re:We get it, Canada by Tim+Doran · · Score: 2

      Oh jeez, it's been a while.

      Listen. Everybody - we're really, really sorry about Brian Adams. Nobody actually listens to him up here, but the gov't sponsors the production of tonnes of his albums, which we decided to dispose of south of the border.

      We're really quite mortified at the whole thing. Please accept my apologies.

    19. Re:We get it, Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but more recently it's been Celine Dion. We're really awfully sorry about that. We realize that it'll take more than Supernova simulations to make up for her, but we're trying.

  18. My Mac did this 5 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cannot believe how lame this is!

  19. Supernova? by Rupert · · Score: 4, Funny

    What has this to do with stars exploding?

    I mean, yes, this is a nuclear reaction that occurs in supernovas, but it's only one of many. If you come to my house and I sell you a book, I have not recreated Barnes and Noble in my study.

    Still, it's a cool trick.

    --

    --
    E_NOSIG
    1. Re:Supernova? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in order to understand the entire process that is called a supernova (or in simple terms, a mighty big explosion of a star), you should first try and understand the simpler reactions and then try to understand them as a whole.

      This is just a significant step in that process.

  20. Funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't know scientific research was about "braggin rights."

    I can hear Isaac Newton now: "Suck dis m*therF*#$^@ Michaelangelo. You be illin & I be chillin."

    d@

    1. Re:Funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah - they should have done it as a rap.

      That's how you get through to da kidz.

  21. Could you please just shut up? by nanojath · · Score: 5, Insightful
    They didn't make a "portable supernova." They created situations where radioactive isotopes were generated at accelerations comparable to those in a supernova, allowing them to make real observations of situation analogous to those occuring in a supernova. We call this science.


    It will never cease to amaze me that there is this army of trolls just lying in wait to come up with the stupidest, most knee-jerk, ignorant and uninformed comment on damn near anything withing moments of its appearance. There's almost a sort of genius to it...


    Unfortunately it's a really stupid, useless sort of genius.

    --

    It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

    1. Re:Could you please just shut up? by millerjl · · Score: 1

      i second that motion...

      and for those of you who think that the US could do better etc, and so what, and other such comments take note: the supercollider project was to be 20,000 GeV of potential... perhaps forever lost to scientists like those canadian reasearchers with innovative ideas. hats off to the canadians.

      --
      --- I never lie when I have sand in my shoes.
    2. Re:Could you please just shut up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but doesn't finding the inner workings of the Universe through this manner violate God's IP and thus is illegal under the DMCA?

    3. Re:Could you please just shut up? by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      It will never cease to amaze me that there is this army of trolls just lying in wait to come up with the stupidest, most knee-jerk, ignorant and uninformed comment on damn near anything withing moments of its appearance.

      Yes...the most prominent ones are called "journalists".

    4. Re:Could you please just shut up? by Kwikymart · · Score: 1

      Yes, but doesn't finding the inner workings of the Universe through this manner violate God's IP and thus is illegal under the DMCA?

      The key word here is Canada.

      C - A - N - A - D - A

      --

      Buying a Dell computer is equivalent to dropping the soap in a prison shower.
    5. Re:Could you please just shut up? by Boli · · Score: 1

      Hey! If you want a useless sort of genius, then join The Church of the SubGenius. I never understood the appeal of that place...

    6. Re:Could you please just shut up? by mmontour · · Score: 1

      take note: the supercollider project was to be 20,000 GeV of potential...

      I think it's worth mentioning that the per-particle energy isn't the only figure of merit for an accelerator. Cyclotrons like TRIUMF are capable of producing a high number of particles per second, making them good for things like isotope production or for experiments that require large numbers of other particles like muons or pions.

      IIRC, TRIUMF can produce a beam current of about 140uA at 500MeV (which is a Mega electron Volt, a unit of energy, not the "megavolt" claimed by the article). That's a continuous beam power of 70 kW.

    7. Re:Could you please just shut up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but doesn't finding the inner workings of the Universe through this manner violate God's IP and thus is illegal under the DMCA?

      The key word here is Canada.
      C - A - N - A - D - A


      The key word here is joke.
      J - O - K - E

      sheesh!

    8. Re:Could you please just shut up? by PhuCknuT · · Score: 1

      Well with titles like "Canadian Researchers Create Supernova In-lab" which are completely untrue, it's easy to see how someone uneducated in the field might be confused.

    9. Re:Could you please just shut up? by Kwikymart · · Score: 1

      a) the "joke" sucked in the first place

      b) the "joke" was not funny - a complete slashdot-esque cloned comment that has been heard 1000 times before

      c) the "joke" was less funny (less funny than not funny) because it didnt even apply

      When you have droves of morons telling the same joke in every story no matter what it is, it gets redundant. Also, the fact that it was supposed to be a joke means nothing in the defence of it.

      --

      Buying a Dell computer is equivalent to dropping the soap in a prison shower.
    10. Re:Could you please just shut up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More proof Canadians have no sense of humor. Exhibit A: Tom Green.

    11. Re:Could you please just shut up? by bitrott · · Score: 1

      "It will never cease to amaze me that there is this army of trolls just lying in wait to come up with the stupidest, most knee-jerk BLAH BLAH BLAH...."

      good lord, do YOU ever shut up? /.'ers will never cease to amaze in the "Pretentious asshole" department. The guy glanced at the headline, thought "hmm... sun... power... BOOM!" and posted. BFD. The rest of us READ the review... made some witty remarks... moved on. YOU had to be a prick, shoving your glasses up your acne strewn nose, and chortle under your breath about this fellow's "uninformed comment".

      True, there is a dearth of "idiots" like this guy. But there always seems to be a thin foul mist of pretention hanging between them and the rest of us non-reactionary types.

      In short... you're not helping.

    12. Re:Could you please just shut up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please speak for yourself.

      There are more idiots like the parent post that generated this thread, than witty remarks on /.

      And IT WAS an uninformed comment - this was originally supposed to be a forum for interesting INSIGHTGUL commentary, not knee-jerk crap, and thoughtless responses. The original poster posted a really stupid comment, and was rightly criticized for it. The responder was not "shoving his glasses up his acne strewn nose" but making an OBVIOUS POINT - that half the people here neither read the articles posted, nor have the proper understanding to MAKE insightful commenary.

      And BTW "dearth" means a SHORTAGE or SCARE SUPPLY of, not excess of, so before you try to act the snotty, erudite upbraider and act all intellectual yourself - please make sure your fancy words are even USED correctly.

      Sincerely,
      Kevin Christie
      crispiewm@hotmail.com

    13. Re:Could you please just shut up? by linuxdoctor · · Score: 1

      "It will never cease to amaze me that there is this army of trolls just lying in wait to come up with the stupidest, most knee-jerk, ignorant and uninformed comment on damn near anything withing moments of its appearance. There's almost a sort of genius to it..."

      Is it trolling or just a complete lack of education and understanding of things nuclear? There is an paranoia that many people have concerning nuclear issues, and most of it fed by ignorance. What's more frightening is that many people prefer to not understand these issues. Ignornace is bliss, and leads to trollism.

      While there are many things that we all need to be concerned about regarding nuclear safety, it should be approached from the standpoint of knowledge and understanding, not fear and loathing.

      Having worked in the nuclear industry for ten years, including breifly as an advisor on the validation of the software at the TRIUMF facility and this accelerator in particular, I know what I'm talking about.

      If you want to stop this sort of troll-like responses, work toward educating everyone on what nuclear science is all about. It's not hsi fault he is stupid and ignorant, but the educational system that teaches people everything nuclear is evil.

    14. Re:Could you please just shut up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Toques off, my man... Toques off to the canadians, eh?

    15. Re:Could you please just shut up? by bitrott · · Score: 1

      ooh! and you have a girly last name! Yes, dearth means shortage... yes koolaid and coke is not a didn't also find it to be a vapid waste of precious /. space (a replenishable resource I'll remind you).

      I WAS pointing out how sad/sorry it is to waste MOD points let alone energy on a sanctimonious ass who decides to parade the obvious around like he's making a good point... SO next TIME you MAKE a POST to SLASHDOT (spastic caps man), consider THIS: upbraider I may be, but you misspelled insightful! HARFUCKINGHARHARHAR.

      PS. When did "dearth" become a fancy word? I misuse a word momentarily, you mispell a word. Tomatoes/Tomatoes, it's a useless argument and gets your points NOWHERE strawman.

  22. I'm usually proppin' canucks.... by loraksus · · Score: 4, Funny

    But the next thing ubc wants to do is ignite the "supernova".

    Next for the lab is what Shotter describes as one of the thorniest problems for nuclear astrophysicists, duplicating the reaction of the isotope oxygen 15, which is believed to be the spark that ignites nova explosions and x-ray bursts.

    What can I say, America better not try and invade... :)

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  23. Ummmm.... by Brat+Food · · Score: 1

    While this is all facinating and incredible and stuff, im just wondering when these guys are gonna blow up he planet =)

    --

    "Stuff... In my home!? NEVER!" - Zim on Invader Zim
    "I want the toilet seat!" - Little Dog on Two Stupid Dogs
  24. First-hand account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Chalmers: Good Lord, what is happening in there?
    Skinner: Aurora Borealis?
    Chalmers: Aurora Borealis? At this time of year? At this time of day? In this part of the country? Localized entirely within your kitchen?
    Skinner: Yes.
    Chalmers: May I see it?
    Skinner: Oh, erm... No.

    1. Re:First-hand account by jkeegan · · Score: 1

      LOL

      --

      ..Jeff Keegan
      seven syllables explain TiVo: kee gan dot org slash ti vo
  25. Alchemy... by dygytyz · · Score: 1

    So now I can have my Leaden Took turned into a Golden Took?

    --
    Mmmm... Pistol Whip...
    1. Re:Alchemy... by enabled · · Score: 1

      It's "toque"...

  26. Interesting how "journalists" get it wrong by T-Punkt · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you go through the quotes you will notice that the scientiest never said they created "a supernova". For some reasons - saying so is really stupid, a supernova is something million times brighter than a star (more precise: around 10^10 times as bright as our sun). Even if our sun goes up in a nova it won't even come close to that - how do you want to build that in a lab?

    1. Re:Interesting how "journalists" get it wrong by Bonker · · Score: 2

      Most of what the 'journalist' was saying came directly from the Encarta 2000 entry on 'Supernova', with a few quotes from Canadian researchers thrown in.

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  27. Black Holes? by cliffy2000 · · Score: 1

    Artifical supernovas? Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't supernovas the cause of black holes? I mean, it seems unlikely to occur, considering the small mass involved in the experimental samples... but if the matter is compressed enough, won't we get a "mini" black hole -- the idea that escape velocity from a single point would be that great is not (completely) insane.

    1. Re:Black Holes? by Bonker · · Score: 5, Informative

      but aren't supernovas the cause of black holes?

      Not necessarily. The immense amount of forces that are involved in a supernova create conditions that allow black holes to form. All you really need for a black hole is enough heavy matter in small enough space.

      It's like this... When planets and even small stars form, the electromagnetic force is enough to keep individual atoms from crushing each other. You can't push electrons any closer.

      Stars who die without becoming any bigger become white, and eventually black dwarfs.

      In larger stars, after they ignite, the nuclear force-- the constant fusion reaction-- is enough to do the same thing. Once that fusion reaction shuts down, however, the atoms begin to collapse, increasing density and pressure until the heavier atoms are able to fuse.

      If a star this size goes nova, the electrons and protons collapse, leaving neutrons. The neutron matter will hold up to a certain point under the force of gravity. AP's correct me, but I think it's the electroweak force that is responisble for this resistance.

      If a star dies at this stage, you get a neutron star.

      If a star is very, very massive... Think blue giants... Even the force that keeps the neutrons from crushing eachother is not enough to overcome the force of gravity. The neutrons collapse under their own weight into an infinitly small point and the space around the singularity warps until the escape velocity is greater than the speed of light.

      I'm certain what we all know that singularity + event horizon = black hole.

      Despite the fact that the researchers were creating the same kinds of reaction that occurs in the latter period of the death of a star, they simply weren't dealing with the kind of mass necessarly to create a black hole. Even if scientists *did* manage to create enough pressure to force matter to collapse into a singularity, it would evaporate away into Hawking radiation almost instantly. You don't just need the singularity to keep a black hole, you need to have it be massive and keep feeding it to keep it alive.

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    2. Re:Black Holes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AP's correct me, but I think it's the electroweak force that is responisble for this resistance.

      No, it's fermionic exclusion due to neutrons having half-integer spin. Black dwarfs are similar, but with electrons. A common homework problem in quantum mechanics classes is to use the particles-in-a-box model to predict the mass domain for which these objects are stable.

  28. This is cool, but... by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 3, Redundant


    When are they going to make a dollar that's actually worth one dollar?

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    1. Re:This is cool, but... by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Probably around the same time we in the US do.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    2. Re:This is cool, but... by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Have you never heard of foreign currency? Belgium and France both (still) have currency called "Francs", but the French Franc is worth about six Belgian Francs. Nothing wrong with that.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    3. Re:This is cool, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not for much longer. At the end of the year, all national currencies in the EU except the pound disappear.

    4. Re:This is cool, but... by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Well duh. Since I am older than six (don't know if I can say that about the average AC ;-) ), I got my euro-kit from the Dutch government, with one piece of all the new coins in it, to get used to them.

      They look like French Francs, but they have a value derived from German Marks...

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  29. DOH! IGON! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is *that* what you meant by "don't cross the streams"?

    1. Re:DOH! IGON! by JimmytheGeek · · Score: 1

      hee hee

  30. Alchemy is acheived by Boli · · Score: 1
    If they could only convert Pt78 into Au79 then the Alchemist's Dream will be realized!

    Oh, wait a minute. The price for Platinum is 1.7 times the price of gold.

    nevermind...

  31. Say What? by jhines0042 · · Score: 1

    Using a proton beam from the university's TRIUMF cyclotron directed by giant electromagnets, the team accelerated the radioactive isotope sodium 21 in a recreation of the explosive death of a star eight times the size of our own sun.

    So let me get this straight. They made a small supernova? They made a supernova the size of a sodium isotope?

    Would that be a Supernovetta?

    --
    42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
    1. Re:Say What? by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 3, Funny
      So let me get this straight. They made a small supernova? They made a supernova the size of a sodium isotope?

      Would that be a Supernovetta?



      I think the term is "nanonova".

      --
      All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
    2. Re:Say What? by jhines0042 · · Score: 1

      I think the term is "nanonova".

      Brings to mind Jumbo Shrimp, doesn't it?

      --
      42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
  32. Oh, please! by Karellan · · Score: 1

    If this was a supernova, the earth and the moon would be a plasma wave in a few seconds and the rest of the planets and the sun would be next. Hell, Alpha Centuri would be toast in about 4.5 years!

    What a load of hype!!!

  33. Damn Canuks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They just needed some way to keep warm.

  34. What? by Zen+Mastuh · · Score: 2

    I went outside a little while ago and didn't see any bright flashes. I was looking northward too (from Florida). Are you sure this wasn't made up, like the lunar landings?

    --
    "What is the sound of one belly slapping?"
    1. Re:What? by MeNeXT · · Score: 2
      You need to look North West It's in BC, Go back outside, check it out and let me know...

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
    2. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, I just did it. Pretty impressive. Now I have burn marks on my retinas so I can't see what I'm typing unless I look away. Thanks, I guess...

      --ZM

  35. Well now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you can turn salt in to Mg

    All you have to do is light it, add a tough of rust and Al to it and boom...

    You can have a new way to have salt melt snow....

  36. Whatever by dthor · · Score: 1

    Project director Paul Schmor noted, "We have satellite detectors in space called observatories, studying the effects [of stellar explosions] long after the event.

    "Now we can re-create the event itself."


    BS. You may be able to emulate the effects or the reactions of supernovae, but studying the facsimile will avail us nothing in the realm of physics.

    That would be like me saying that I could create a black hole in my bathtub with a few particle accelerators and a little needle to punch a hole in the STC, and then saying I knew how they formed in space.

    The very fact that you could do such a thing is impressive, but the creation is based on your limited, earth-based observations nonetheless.

    --
    dthor

  37. Canada is doomed! by filbo · · Score: 1

    One can see any number of science fiction books coming out in which Canada manages to suck itself into a black hole or blow itself into orbit.

    1. Re:Canada is doomed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I'm sure the supernova would stop at the arbitrary boundry between our synthetic countries that we've drawn on a map.

      Face it, it'd take a lot more than just Canada, but hey, at least we'd finally capture Osama bin Laden.

  38. Article is misleading by LMCBoy · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's a huge stretch to say this is the first man-made supernova. Maybe it's the first man-made r-process nuclear reaction, but that's a far cry from a supernova. The reaction they've reproduced involves trace elements, not the iron/nickel that are really important in a SN.

    Basically, a SN happens when a massive star has converted all of its core fuel into iron by nuclear fusion. The star's gravity compresses and heats the iron until it can fuse also. However, iron is the most tightly bound element, so fusing iron nuclei doesn't release heat energy, it removes it. The thermal pressure that was holding up the star's core disappears in a fraction of a second, and the whole thing comes crashing down in a huge implosion. The implosion causes the core material to form a neutron star or a black hole, and the rebounding shock wave blows the rest of the star apart.

    Doesn't sound much like what they did. I don't mean to downplay their achievement; it's still very impressive. I'm just lamenting the sorry state of most science reporting...

    --
    Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    1. Re:Article is misleading by ovapositor · · Score: 1

      Ummm.... the binding energy per nucleon of lead is the ultimate goal of all fission or fusion reactions. Lead is the stable element. Not Iron. Check out the curve.

    2. Re:Article is misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope the best binding energy per nucleon is at iron and cobalt.

    3. Re:Article is misleading by LMCBoy · · Score: 2

      I didn't say iron was the most stable element; I said it was the most tightly bound; i.e., it is at the peak of the curve of binding energy. See here:

      http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/energy/b in dingE.html

      http://www.phy.uct.ac.za/courses/phy300w/np/ch1/ no de20.html

      http://blueox.uoregon.edu/~courses/dlivelyb/ph16 1/ L25.html

      Actually, Nickel-56 is slightly more tightly bound (because it's "double magic", has the same number of protons and neutrons), but it decays to Fe-56 on a very short timescale.

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
  39. Interesting.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is more interesting than the article, is the fact that most of the slashdot comments are nothing more than vaguely anti-canadian blither. Good stuff.

  40. Now I get it by rbgaynor · · Score: 1

    ...there long term goal being to convert water directly into beer

    Now I get it :)
    --
    "Good things don't end with eum, they end with mania or teria." - H. Simpson
  41. UBC website by ndevice · · Score: 1

    Offtopic, but it's interesting to know that the University of British Columbia has the ubc.edu domain too as the article links to. As a former UBC student, I always thought that it was just ubc.ca... Always thought that .edu was just for the american universities. Simon Fraser University - also in Vancouver, BC is just sfu.ca, not sfu.edu.

    1. Re:UBC website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like other real canadian universities (mcgill.edu and dalhousie.edu are two that come immediately to mind), ubc has an alias in the .edu hierarchy. UBC, however, refers to itself as ubc.ca. I think the slashdot people just couldn't comprehend the existence of a non-edu university. Much as I cannot comprehend a university sitting in a cloud somewhere near burnaby (ie: sfu).

    2. Re:UBC website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Univerity of Toronto used to have an .edu suffix as well. Not really sure why they stopped using it though.

    3. Re:UBC website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Much as I cannot comprehend a university sitting in a cloud somewhere near burnaby (ie: sfu).

      There's a university up there? I thought it was just a set for various sci-fi shows (X-files, Stargate SG1, etc).

    4. Re:UBC website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They still have it. They have utoronto.ca and toronto.edu. Neat, eh?

  42. It's not an atom smasher by JMZero · · Score: 1

    It's just giving the atoms "special hugs".

    --
    Let's not stir that bag of worms...
  43. Not to give away my age too much... by aquisgrana · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ...But I can remember people saying things like this about the laser. It was called "a solution looking for an application."

    The better we understand how the universe works, the closer we get to that hyperdrive.

    Also this shows that the same physics applies here as applies many light years away. That might seem like an obvious assumption to make, but it is good to confirm these things.

    1. Re:Not to give away my age too much... by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      ...But I can remember people saying things like this about the laser. It was called "a solution looking for an application."

      So... you're saying that cats will love this thing?

  44. Bad timing by Grape+Shasta · · Score: 2, Funny


    All this bragging aboot Canada makes me want to go download that Molson beer commercial from AdCritic...

    --

    "I am a cipher, a cipher, wrapped in an enigma, smothered in secret sauce" -Jimmy James
    1. Re:Bad timing by puppetman · · Score: 1

      Geesh - don't you read all the new articles? Adcritic went out of business, and the story was posted an hour before this one.

    2. Re:Bad timing by puppetman · · Score: 1

      OK - I'm an idiot - your subject line implies sarcasm. Will go turn on brain now

    3. Re:Bad timing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunatley adcritic is gone. Perhaps the first victim of the first man made supernova?

      coincidence?

    4. Re:Bad timing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but GUESS WHAT!!! AdCritic is GONE now, as you would know if you bothered to read the articles!

  45. Canada constructs the Death Star! by CrazyJim0 · · Score: 0

    I hate starwars buffs, but I honestly misread this:
    "A University of B.C. research team has recreated the death of a star"
    as
    "A University of B.C. research team has recreated the death star"

    1. Re:Canada constructs the Death Star! by MisterBlister · · Score: 1

      It is you who are mistaken -- aboot a great many things!!!

    2. Re:Canada constructs the Death Star! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (soda spurts through nose) Ppphhphphphttttt!!!!!

      You owe me a new keyboard!

  46. Rats, I wanted beer to be involved... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I must be tired. The first time I read this headline, I read:

    Canadian Researchers Create Supernova In-Pub

    I think my first reading would have made a more interesting story.

  47. We should ban hands as well by JMZero · · Score: 4, Funny

    Lots of things could end up in Osama's hands. Let's ban hands altogether.

    Where's the guy who makes the joke about other people asking about Beowulf clusters of supernova's?
    -

    --
    Let's not stir that bag of worms...
  48. Breakthrough by quantaman · · Score: 2, Informative
    By the way there is a slight inaccuracy in the post.

    the sodium 21 was transmuted into magnesium 22, which decays into the radioactive isotope sodium 22

    as opposed to remaining as magnesium 22. That being said this is still a huge breakthough. With the exception of hydrogren and helium all the elements in the universe are believe to have been formed in Novas or Supernovas. These researchers now has the ability to observe this process directly. Up till now all our knowledge on the subject in based on theories based observations of distant (super)Nova. Who knows the possible extensions of this technology? Transmutation of elements? Fission reactors? Not to mention the huge betterment of our understanding of these processes which will undoubtedly lead to new fields of research which may lead to other breakthroughs in themselves.

    --
    I stole this Sig
    1. Re:Breakthrough by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      There's more than one....

      MeV = megavolt??? No, no, no.... accelerator energies are usually measured in "Mega-electron-volts", or MeV. A megavolt is MV.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
  49. Is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Or does anyone else hope that aliens are monitoring us and we accidentally make a blackhole that sucks in the world they'll just step in and save us?

    Just me?

  50. competition by rossjudson · · Score: 2

    Scientific groups RUSH and SAGA were disappointed to learn of TRIUMF's success, but swore to produce even bigger explosions next time.

    1. Re:competition by puppetman · · Score: 1

      OK - that's damned funny. I forgot about Triumph.

      Where does Helix ("Give me an R... R... Give me an O... O...."), that Canadian band at the zenith of bad hair and guitar riffs, stand on this important issue?

    2. Re:competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scientific groups RUSH and SAGA were disappointed to learn of TRIUMF's success, but swore to produce even bigger explosions next time.

      Yes, but NoMeansNo once said they want to destroy humanity!

      "The world is to gone to ressurect it, we need the warheads to disinfect it"

      Keep the supernova from Vancouver, the world depends on it!

    3. Re:competition by astroboscope · · Score: 1

      Mod it up! It's really funny, eh!

      --
      If we were ants living on a Rubik's cube, differential geometry would be a little more confusing.
  51. Canada, soon to be the richest nation in the world by siliconvortex · · Score: 1

    Now that they have conquered the tricky sodium to magnesium problem, they can begin work on the classic lead to gold problem. We must annex Canada (no, its not a state yet despite what most Americans think) before its too late!

  52. Re:Canada, soon to be the richest nation in the wo by SirSlud · · Score: 2

    .. what about the classic water to wine? I'd be far more interested in that - good thing I've got a vote in this country!

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  53. well, this is what you do with 40 MILLION dollars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There goes the funding, they created a super nova, using fourty million, which is like $90 in US dollars. What does this mean for humanity? Ohhh, just another nightlight for Johnny.

  54. supernova?? by dollargonzo · · Score: 1

    NOT QUITE!!! sure its one of the reactions in one...but if they created a supernova...we wouldnt need canada.com (of all places) to report....the shock wave would deliver the news a little faster!

    QED

    --
    BSD is for people who love UNIX. Linux is for those who hate Microsoft.
  55. Woot! by 0WaitState · · Score: 1

    Now can they turn silicon into unobtanium?

    --

    Remain calm! All is well!
    1. Re:Woot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about silicon to carbon converter ?
      You can do that by leaving the heatsink off the Athelon.

  56. Could this be used in weapons development? Sure by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 2

    I suppose the perfect antidote to a portable 'Supernova' weapon would be a portable 'Blackhole' weapon. Man the defense industry is going to love this.

    1. Re:Could this be used in weapons development? Sure by millerjl · · Score: 1
      the perfect antidote to a portable 'Supernova' weapon would be a portable 'Blackhole' weapon

      black holes are products of supernova explosions.
      if a black hole were to be near a star that is in the process of going supernova, it would steal matter/light from it when it gets into the gravitation influence area of the black hole... but stop the supernova? no.

      also, when you get to the microscale, a black hole of the size to be "portable" would not last that long as a blackhole before it explodes into energy and particles... in fact scientists at CERN are working on trying to create tiny black holes as well...
      --
      --- I never lie when I have sand in my shoes.
    2. Re:Could this be used in weapons development? Sure by (H)elix1 · · Score: 2

      And, as a reminder... never, never, ever put your bag of holding in a portable hole..

    3. Re:Could this be used in weapons development? Sure by dumpster_d · · Score: 1

      I'm sending you a cleaning bill to get off all the Coke I just sprayed on this monitor.

      Damn. That was funny.

      On a similar note--make sure to not let your Rod of Cancelation come into contact with any stray Spheres of Annihilation either.

    4. Re:Could this be used in weapons development? Sure by C0LDFusion · · Score: 1

      Rods and Spheres...could D&D get any more phallic?

      --
      Only in slashdot are posts of solidarity modded at -1 Redundant, while posts of antagonism are modded as -1 Flamebait.
  57. When we all die in the explosion... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

    Blame Canada!

  58. Not impressed by KarmaBlackballed · · Score: 2

    I'm waiting for the machine that turns Pb into Au.

    --

    --- -- - -
    Give me LIBERTY, or give me a check.
    1. Re:Not impressed by cronio · · Score: 1

      That's Lead into Gold for all you non-chemistry types.

      Have a nice day.

      --


      My plan is to pimp before they realize I'm a jackass. Hit 'em hard and fast.
    2. Re:Not impressed by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • I'm waiting for the machine that turns Pb into Au.

      You'd need to sell it damn quick before it decayed into FeS2

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    3. Re:Not impressed by Fyndo · · Score: 1

      Hg -> Au has been done.

  59. Gold? by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

    What happens when they figure out how to cheaply turn an element into gold? I guess it would be some strange isotope of gold that would then decay into a new isotope of the original element?

    --

    --

    WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
  60. Apparently they forgot to mention... by doorbot.com · · Score: 2

    A University of B.C. research team has recreated the death of a star and subsequent birth of elements that form the universe, the first time this has been done by mankind.

    The statement following was left out for some unknown reason. In the interest of preserving the true integrity of journalism, it is included below:

    The team, along with the University of B.C., became the first humans and university, respectively, to be instantly vaporized by a supernova. Bystanders were awed at the sight before receiving intensive doses of gamma- and x-rays. Despite their injuries, some requested prior notification of future tests, in hopes of capturing the event on film.
    University of B.C. officials were not commenting on the event, but bystanders were eager to recount their version of the story: "It went boom," said one man, who claimed to be in his early forties and said he had been attending the school for over 20 years, "and I think I had a class in that building once! It's things like this which make me try that much harder to graduate."

  61. Right, not rights by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1

    Come on, it's only one feat, so you get one (1) bragging right, no more.

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  62. I mean, *honestly*.. by ArizonaBay · · Score: 1

    Has everyone forgot that what happened on September 11th was made possible by the everyday technology of airplanes and _box cutters_ ?

    Come on.. a few months ago bin Laden was under the refuge of a backwards government that *prohibited* technology.. and now, if you listen to people like this, bin Laden and al Queda are suddenly on the cutting edge of <a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/12/18/ 1450218&mode=thread">computer trojans</a> [slashdot.org] and nuclear astrophysics.

    This isn't to say that bin Laden and al Queda aren't dangerous, but let's keep things in perspective, mmkay?

    1. Re:I mean, *honestly*.. by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      So what's to stop him from stealing our new "portable supernova" with box-cutters? And how much technical skill is needed to introduce bugs into Windows?

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  63. Toonie Deals by Kenshin · · Score: 1

    One Toonie = Twenty Timbits
    One Toonie = 2 KFC Pieces + Fries (on Tuesday)

    Most certainly a versatile coin!

    --

    Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    1. Re:Toonie Deals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yah thats what I like about canada. every tuesday for lunch you know where I am.. lol

    2. Re:Toonie Deals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know... Timbits as currency!! It'll be the all the rage! Hungry? Get 2 KFC Pieces + Fries (on Tuesday) for just Tb20 (twenty timbits) -- or just eat your change!!

  64. They are lined up to do more. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you look at their Vision Statement you can see they have some pretty ambitious plans. I'm not sure if this is on the order of cold fusion but I certainly made a bookmark of it.

    -Sean Pepes
    UNCLV

  65. Wait a sec by gregfortune · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Ok, for the disclaimer: I've only had one course in Chemistry and don't have much of a clue what's going on, but....
    1. If this decays into radioactive sodium, how long does it last? Are we talking standard half life stuff, or is this "magnesium" only magnesium for a very very short period of time?
    2. Why sodium? Is there a property of sodium that makes this easier?
    3. Would this process take more and more energy when working with larger atoms? If so, the alchemy idea is pretty much out.
    4. On all the comments about lead to gold, I think we're talking about a different process. It looks like the sodium atom is being bombarded with protons until one sticks, correct? Lead to Gold would require ripping 2 protons out of lead which seems a lot less feasible...


    Just some assorted ravings of a mad man ;o)
    1. Re:Wait a sec by mmontour · · Score: 2, Informative

      If this decays into radioactive sodium, how long does it last? Are we talking standard half life stuff, or is this "magnesium" only magnesium for a very very short period of time?

      The CRC handbook lists the following half-lives:

      Na21 22.5s
      Mg22 3.86s
      Na22 2.605y

  66. Shut up! You'll spoil the secret plan! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do so many of my fellow Canadians have to keep gloating like this? We already know we're faster, bigger and better. Why do they keep blowing our perfect cover as the economically challenged, polite underdog of the free world? Why can't they all just shut up, keep with the Secret Plans(R)(C) and bide their time until we can hold our powerful neighbours as hostages with our superior science and beer? Now someone will buy our nova gun.... erm, research patents and we'll be stuck with a two-four of empties.

  67. Re:well, this is what you do with 40 MILLION dolla by ccwaterz · · Score: 1

    other way around... it would be $20-25mil US.

  68. If there is anything left to invade ... by TheViffer · · Score: 1

    ... can see it already

    "Canada destroyed by ignited Super Nova".

    Last reported words by one scientist "No .. Bud Light ... ehh"

    --
    -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
    1. Re:If there is anything left to invade ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real Canadians do not drink that sort of piss.

  69. We Now Plan A Larger, More Destructive Super Nova by puppetman · · Score: 1


    to take place sometime next year in Toronto.

    You'd understand if you were Canadian.

  70. Hmm by wbav · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Well it only took us thousands of years, but now we can turn lead into gold, LOL.

    --

    =================
    Unix is very user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are.
  71. I'm tired of these Canadian bashers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have a look at SOME OF THE FIRSTS Canada is in the world and then get back to your bashing.

    1. Re:I'm tired of these Canadian bashers by shymog · · Score: 1

      Thanks for giving us all the more reason to bash Canada. Please note that I hate Quebec only, being that they are almost as haughty as the British, without and of the intelligence. Wow, I'm making my first completely useless post! Go me!

      --
      "I wasn't sniffing your spicy brains."
  72. UBC's URL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although the URL you gave referring to the .edu TLD may work, the correct URL for UBC is actually www.ubc.ca.


    The .edu alias is there for idiots who can't work out that the University of British Columbia is not in the US.

  73. roflmao by TheViffer · · Score: 1

    mod this up!

    --
    -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
  74. Re:Canada, soon to be the richest nation in the wo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Jesus was way cool.
    Everybody liked Jesus.
    Everybody wanted to hang out with him.
    Anything he wanted to do he did.
    He turned water into wine,
    and if he had wanted to,
    he could have turned wheat into
    marijuana, sugar into cocaine,
    or vitamin pills into amphetamines.

  75. Why is a proton beam like a nova? by rdmiller3 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    To transmute Na(11,21) into Mg(12,22), you just add a proton, ...which I imagine is bound to happen if you blast a solid sample of Sodium-21 with a high-enough energy proton beam for long enough. Well, duh!

    I guess I'm not catching the real significance of this "achievement". What was the theory? What was this experiment attempting to prove or disprove? Were they just showing off how fast they could accellerate protons??

    Proclaiming that their proton beam somehow creates a miniature nova seems like a ploy to attract attention (and funding, of course).

    1. Re:Why is a proton beam like a nova? by MrEd · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The DRAGON experiment is concerned with trying to acquire data about the transmutation reaction of Na(11,21) into Mg(12,22). The reactions occur quite infrequently and result in only a very small momentum change in the particle, so the two bending magnets and electric dipoles are required to isolate the stream of Mg particles and feed them into a detector.


      I'm a little fuzzy on the details, but you can probably find them on the ISAC webpage.

      --

      Wah!

    2. Re:Why is a proton beam like a nova? by astroboscope · · Score: 1
      The tricky part about adding protons to nuclei is that like charges repel, so the protons tend to get deflected before they hit the nucleus. For some reason that I forget, this is called the "r-process" of making new nuclei.

      But it's theorized that these reactions (and others) happen in supernovae, and now TRIUMF have shown that it really is doable. This is important because we are mostly made up from the products of these reactions, i.e. most of the elements heavier than helium, and all of the ones heavier than iron, are made in supernovae.

      Also, doing the reaction in the lab lets us measure the cross section, which experimentally pins down more of our model of what's going on in massive stars.

      --
      If we were ants living on a Rubik's cube, differential geometry would be a little more confusing.
  76. Blame Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fact that they are more excited by "Canada" doing it, than the actual event, says it isn't so special...

    If it were that impressive, someone would have thought it up 18 years ago (like Canada did in this case), and got it to work 15 years ago...

  77. Is it just me.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    ... or is this article overflowing with America-envy? It actually reads similar to those press releases that used to be published by the extinct URSS whenever they managed to topple the US at something.

    Kind of pathetic.

  78. How about ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lighting Colemans and frying up back bacon?

  79. Missing the point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone here seems to be missing the point. They all want to know "Can it be used as a weapon?". This would be like using a particle accelerator as a weapon; very impractical and expensive. The reason this is news is because they are getting closer to understanding how supernovae work. (And Im not really an AC, I just lost my password and don't have access to my old email acct)

  80. BLAME CANADA by allknowing · · Score: 0
    "Canada has done something neat"?

    This is neat? No, it's scary.

    If we all die, I blame Canada.

    Hail South Park

  81. Real information from TRIUMF by jstott · · Score: 2, Informative
    Since the newpaper writer clearly hasn't a clue what he's talking about, I ran over to the TRIUMF webpage for the actual story. Here's what they have to say in the "News" section:

    TRIUMF SUCCESSFULLY ACCELERATES RADIOACTIVE EXOTIC ION BEAMS

    Research with radioactive exotic ions is recognized worldwide as an exciting new frontier in physical science. ISAC, one of the world's first facilities specifically dedicated to the production and acceleration of such exotic ions, has been developed and constructed at TRIUMF, Canada's national laboratory for particle and nuclear physics. Low energy exotic beams were first produced in 1999 and during the past summer the exotic ion 8Li was the first beam to be successfully accelerated to high energy (~1.5 MeV/A). On the 5th of October an accelerated beam of 21Na (a radioactive isotope of sodium) was produced (at a preliminary intensity of about 4x108 particles per second on target) and experiments with this beam are producing the first data concerning nuclear processing of sodium in stellar explosions.

    For the future, there are plans to accelerate a whole variety of exotic isotopes that will be used to address a wide range of research areas.

    So, to sum up, they've got their isotope accellerator up and working to the point where they can do some very nice experiments on high-energy nuclear processes, including a number that are important in stellar explosions. No supernova though.

    -JS

    --
    Vanity of vanities, all is vanity...
  82. Blame Canada by x_man · · Score: 1

    Now where did the U.S. put that super conducting super collider - Doh!

    Blame Canada!

  83. aha!!! by dollargonzo · · Score: 1

    now we know who is regular canada.com reader! we spotted the canadans(sic)!!!

    QED

    --
    BSD is for people who love UNIX. Linux is for those who hate Microsoft.
    1. Re:aha!!! by meheler · · Score: 0

      That is an ingenious quote.
      You're right.. I do hate Microsoft.

  84. Have you ever ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    had one of those moments when a joke is told to a large audience, and your the only one who didn't get it? Then everyone laughs again and makes hand gestures over there head with the sounds "VVVRRRRROOOMMMMMM"?

    Your in one of those moments right now ...

  85. is anyone else scared? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is anyone else scared that these tests are being preformed by Canadians? They will end up sucking this planet into a blackhole and only say "eh?"

  86. Re:Article is misleading - why is this funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how the fuck is this "funny"?
    huh?
    crack head mods?
    funny? no, interesting yes, but not funny.... if I had filtered out all "funny" I'd not seen this +5 informitive article.. because it's +5 funny.. HHMMM??

  87. So THAT'S what blew our fence down the other night by ashitaka · · Score: 1

    I thought it was just the wind...

    Living WAY too close to UBC.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  88. Re:We Now Plan A Larger, More Destructive Super No by William+Fold · · Score: 1

    lol.

    Obviously a non-Torontonian who doesn't believe Toronto is the center of the universe, eh.

  89. Re:well, this is what you do with 40 MILLION dolla by pyrite504 · · Score: 1

    No, he was right, it was $90.00. It would be better spent on a TiVo.

  90. In the words of the Beatles by ocie · · Score: 2

    It's only a northern sun.

    --
    JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
  91. Translation for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dose New York people are SOOOO self-centred! I mean look at 'em! Days got dere big builduns and days gots all dat money! We's just hate 'em SOOOO much!

  92. American Researcher Creates Black Hole In-Cubicle by Tsar · · Score: 5, Funny

    In a parallel breakthrough sure to rock the physics world to its very foundations, Tsar has created a mini black hole in his ISAC (Incredibly Stinky, Ancient Cubicle), causing light to bend uniformly around a point approximately six inches above his desk. The feat was accomplished by using a sample of very pure silicon-based substance called "glass", which was ground and shaped to form what is, in effect, a solid "lens".

    Ultraviolet light generated by an ionized gas was then used to excite a flourescent coating on the interior of a nearby cylinder, creating visible light which was reflected by the surface of a technical document placed precisely in its path. The light was then directed through the "lens" to produce the light-bending effect commonly seen only around supermassive objects such as black holes and galactic superclusters.

    Tsar's next ambitious project is to create a miniature expanding multiverse by blowing up several balloons for a staff New Year's party, the expense of which will likely be covered by the piles of grant money expected due to the unqualified success of the LENS experiment.

    Disclaimer: I'm all all for the advancement of science, but why do we have to use hyperbole to make it seem interesting, or valuable? Maybe if everyone stopped claiming to have created supernovae or black holes or the core of a star or the moment of creation, we could get to a point where dull, devoted, brilliant researchers who didn't minor in drama can still get funding for their worthy efforts. (This is not a plug—I'm not a researcher, and I'm vastly overpaid as it is.)

  93. Eat it Yankee dogs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hah! This is just the beginning of our rise to dominance over the soon-to-be-former most powerful nation in the world.

    Bow down before our greatness!

  94. TRIUMF != UBC by cperciva · · Score: 2

    The media always get this one wrong. TRIUMF is not the same as UBC -- it happens to be situated near to UBC's campus, but they are about as separate as Linux and Redhat. Not completely distinct, but you'll get lots of people annoyed if you always say Redhat when you mean Linux.

    The name "TRIUMF" actually comes from the original name: TRI University Meson Facility. The three founding universities being UBC, Simon Fraser University, and the University of Victoria.

    Work at TRIUMF is done by people from the member universities, people from other institutions (although there's more paperwork involved IIRC), and by "facilities scientists" -- people hired by TRIUMF itself. I don't know about the rest of the research group, but Paul Schmor is listed in TRIUMF's databases as having TRIUMF affiliation -- not UBC.

  95. Re:Canada, soon to be the richest nation in the wo by meheler · · Score: 0

    LOL. Try it.

    The last time Americans tried to Annex Canada we not only turned you back, but pushed you back south of your beloved White House, then burned it down.

    ;)

    Mike

  96. Another good link by MrEd · · Score: 3, Interesting
    is here at the Toronto Star. It's a bit older, but hey, it's got more background information about the facility.


    I can't believe that the 3D View of the Experimental Hall (which I worked two weeks on as a summer student) is actually posted on Slashdot! Fame and fortune, here I come!

    --

    Wah!

  97. Stop it by valley · · Score: 1

    Don't you wish these guys would quit creating nasty things in their laboratories. There are things we shouldn't be screwing around with...

  98. What do you bet... by BigZaphod · · Score: 1

    ...that they had a Champaign Supernova afterward?

  99. Slashdot is trolling you by LS · · Score: 2, Troll

    It still amazes me after all these years that so many people react to the Slashdot editors' trolls. A lot of articles posted to Slashdot are informative, but obviously as a corporate entity, Slashdot needs to attract the masses with sensationalist, trollish stories as well. There are at least three 5-rated posts in response to this story that it is exagerative.

    This happens over and over. Do you think that the Slashdot editors are that stupid? No, they are smart, and they make a lot of money. If they keep it too tight and smart, a lot of people (read: lurkers, not the average poster) might get bored or scared away.

    Why do you think there is no article moderation or ratings in this supposedly "open" community? All I'm saying is that you shouldn't waste so much energy on getting worked up over Slashdot's editing.

    LS

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
  100. Re:We Now Plan A Larger, More Destructive Super No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many Torontonians does it take to change a light bulb?

    Just one to hold the bulb - the country turns around him.

  101. who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tell me when they turn lead into gold

  102. Better than storm in a teacup! by line-bundle · · Score: 1

    Even bigger and better than a storm in a teacup.

  103. Someone set us up the bomb! by rlanctot · · Score: 1

    Dunno, think they could probably go dig Uranium out of the ground in Saskatchewan and modify it with our world class reactors =).

    And as for us having the bomb, we've had it for years. We call them the Canucks.

  104. Also burns plutonium... by Ron+Harwood · · Score: 2

    ...a great way of getting rid of weapons grade stuff you might have around...

    (former IT guy from AECL makers of the CANDU)

  105. You should be punished. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When my regime comes to power anyone who says something like "Canada has done something neat", when in-fact only a small part of Canada (the researchers) actually did something, will be sent to death camps.

  106. WE have MASSIVE black holes by +junis_al_barek_ash_ · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This story is no big deal - we have MANY black hole
    my uncle recently lost his leg in such a hole - was unexploded 10'000 ordinance, not birth of sun, but hole is hole!

    I have also seen many black hole on c64 at www.blacksluts.com!!!

    --
    Internet is Great!!! junis
  107. I guess it was worth it, then by Brant · · Score: 1

    They dug up my old office at TRIUMF to put ISAC in. I guess I'll stop pouting now that they've done something cool with it :) Actually, it wasn't a great loss; smelly old trailer from the 70s with a bunch of old DECs in it.

    Brant

  108. Why magnesium? by aralin · · Score: 2

    Let's make some gold, baby...

    --
    If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
  109. Re:Black Holes? Wait a second! by doorbot.com · · Score: 1

    All you really need for a black hole is enough heavy matter in small enough space.

    Astute physics students (those paying attention in class) should be able to distinguish weight (how "heavy" something is) to mass. What you need is a very very dense object... get it dense enough and you get a black hole. Size is irrelevant.

    The step "above" a black hole is a neutron star. Among other things, they spin very very fast, and have cores which are superfluids. Neato!

    A supernova can create a neutron star by compressing the core and ejecting the remaining matter, forming a very small (relative to the original size of the star) and very dense "dead star." If these neutron stars are able to accrete material from, say, a nearby gas giant, well you're on your way to becoming a black hole. If a black hole is small enough, it could be the center of a solar system and not cause any problems for the orbiting planet.

    A cool part of the black hole is the ergosphere. It is outside the event horizon, so if you put a space craft in the ergosphere, the craft would be accelerated by the black hole's gravity and could leave the ergosphere with more (kinetic) energy that in came in with... it could be used, in theory, to "slingshot" vessels around, the obvious advantage being they're actually going faster when they leave.

  110. Re:American Researcher Creates Black Hole In-Cubic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why do we have to use hyperbole to make it seem interesting, or valuable?

    Most people can't relate to science stories unless they're pumped up. The "oooo, aaaaa" thang. In this story, it's done badly by a crappy writer.

    More generally, in a crowded world full of talented people, attracting attention -- getting a share of people's limited attention span -- means more and more arm-waving. It's the same way at science conferences, just more subtle... sometimes.

  111. It's a Canadian Plot to Accelerate Global Warning by billstewart · · Score: 2, Funny
    Let's get to the point of this. The reason the Canadians are trying to replicate Supernovae is because Canada is TOO COLD*. They're doing this insidious dangerous experiment as part of their campaign to Make Canada Warmer. Sure, they could just burn all that oil instead of shipping it south of the border, but that's not enough - they want something Really Really Warm, and this not only solves the problem, it gets the job done a lot faster than shipping us aerosol cans full of ozone.

    *I mean, how often have you seen a weather map on TV that has temperatures in Canada that are even 32 degrees? It'll be 72 in Seattle and just across the border in Vancouver it's 20 degrees. And when it's 35 degrees in Buffalo, it's usually like ZERO in Toronto.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  112. bragging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    another thing we can brag about.. we dont have to pay for your satellite stations.. Wohoo for Canada and Direct TV! 1000 Channels and Nothings on!

  113. So that's it by sharkey · · Score: 2

    I was wondering what that bright flash was. Just wish they had warned us to put on 9999 SPF sunblock. Still, at least I know who's to blame for being sunburned extra crispy: Blame Canada! Blame Canada!

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  114. Re:It's a Canadian Plot to Accelerate Global Warni by klewlis · · Score: 1

    "*I mean, how often have you seen a weather map on TV that has temperatures in Canada that are even 32 degrees? It'll be 72 in Seattle and just across the border in Vancouver it's 20 degrees." This is most likely due to the fact that in Canada, temperature is calculated in Celsius, not Farenheit. 0 is freezing. :P

  115. Re:It's a Canadian Plot to Accelerate Global Warni by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Score:-1, Doesn't Realise It's A Joke)

  116. Idiotic question by SilentChris · · Score: 2
    Ok, this question is coming from a total idiot, as I have little knowledge of physics: but what is the possibility of something like this "mushrooming" unintentionally? Kind of like the "grey goo" for nanotechnology, or "ice nine" from Cat's Cradle?

    I understand these things are small, and are likewise controlled, but if you create something which may accidentally grow exponently bigger (if this is even possible)?...

    1. Re:Idiotic question by mmontour · · Score: 2

      Ok, this question is coming from a total idiot, as I have little knowledge of physics: but what is the possibility of something like this "mushrooming" unintentionally?

      Somewhere between "negligible" and "none".

      Have a nice day.

      (A useful baseline is to consider the cosmic radiation that hits us every day. These particles can have much higher energies than anything TRIUMF is putting out, and the planet's survived ~4 billion years so far. Experiments like RHIC are at high enough energy levels that it's worth asking the question, but the TRIUMF stuff is quite routine and is not going to run away.)

  117. Spiffy! by Alsee · · Score: 2

    Yep, spiffy is a perfect description.

    You grab any old particle accelerator and aim it at element X and get element Y. Spiffy.

    Well, I guess Canada needs bragging rights to SOMETHING better than "The only country in the world less likely to get in war with the US than Texas".

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  118. Re:It's a Canadian Plot to Accelerate Global Warni by gatesh8r · · Score: 1

    What's Celsius?

    --
    Karma whorin' since 1999
  119. An Idea by Izanagi · · Score: 1

    I don't understand the points system, so I'll say it...

    How about a Beowolf cluster of theses!!

    --
    SCO (noun.)- A Slimy Corporate Ogre. Often seeks free money.
  120. This is nothing! by Snafoo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why, here in Canada, we've not only created a supernova but in fact a whole 'mirror universe'. Although virtually identical to the US in most ways, in this 'twin world' the dollar is almost worthless, the politics are leftish, measurements are conducted in a rather strange "metric" system, the minority language is French rather than Spanish, and people manifest love for their nation by violently asserting a profound lack of patriotism.

    As near as I can tell, the real universe split from its when the war of independence failed to happen, although it could also have something to do with the invention of poutine.

    Interestingly, since prime-time television programming has apparently not yet been invented in this timeline, this alternate universe is almost completely dependent upon its mate for non-drama, non-Prince-Edward-Island-themed broadcasts. Thus, while the existence of a 'shadow -universe' may come as a shock to all of you in out there in the real one, citizens of this other realm have known about your universe for quite some time. They've been watching you! They don't wear goatees, but they all seem to wear mustaches! Avoid replacement by your evil twin: Destroy Canada today!

    --
    - undoware.ca
    1. Re:This is nothing! by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • Why, here in Canada, we've not only created a supernova but in fact a whole 'mirror universe'. Although virtually identical to the US in most ways, in this 'twin world' the dollar is almost worthless [...]

      And wait a minute... you all have beards... so you must be the Evil Mirror Universe!

      And now you control the very power of the stars. God help us all.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    2. Re:This is nothing! by astroboscope · · Score: 1

      Hey! I do too have a goatee! (and a mustache)

      --
      If we were ants living on a Rubik's cube, differential geometry would be a little more confusing.
  121. Re:It's a Canadian Plot to Accelerate Global Warni by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canadians don't need global warming, dumbass. We're tough enough to handle the cold.

  122. Nothing to brag about ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the nuclear physics field, reactions with unstable isotopes are a relativlely new topic (less than 10 years), yet such reactions are routinely measured at various labs in the world
    (Michigan State Univerity NSCL, France's GANIL, and many others). The reaction of interest 21Na(p,gamma)22Mg is indeed one that is thought to take place in the so called rp (rapid proton capture) process that is supposed to happen in imploding super novae. But, this is a far stretch
    from building a SN in a lab, it is only reproducing one elementary reaction among the many
    that occun in a SN. However that does not detract from the academic interest of this experiment.

    Now comming to the subject of transmutation, it is indded possible to transmute materials with a particle accelerator, and this has been known in the nuclear physics community for ages. But the difficulty lies in transmuting macroscopic quantities (of the order of one mole or more: 10E22 atoms). The 22Mg must have been produced with at most 10E4 atoms (probably much less): there is a long way to go up to macroscopic scale.

    The best example of transumtation on an industrial scale is the 239Pu production for military uses from 238U and neutrons from fission reaction (and this is hardly new, think Manhattan project !).

  123. Re:It's a Canadian Plot to Accelerate Global Warni by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure Canadians calculate in Celcius, but do you really think American weathermen care about that?

    Besides, our weather maps are colorized so that we don't have to read the numbers:

    "Well, acording to the weather man it is blue here in Minnesota, and it is even bluer in Ontario. Must be really cold there!"

  124. URL by gutier · · Score: 1

    UBC's address is http://www.ubc.ca, not .edu.

  125. Re:Black Holes? Wait a second! by kwishot · · Score: 1

    Someone correct me if I'm wrong here, but since black holes have so much pulling force that even light can't escape, by using that same force couldnt you use the "slingshot" thing to accelerate yourself faster than the speed of light? The only problem that I would see with that is getting out of "the loop"

  126. Re:Black Holes? Wait a second! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A cool part of the black hole is the ergosphere. It is outside the event horizon, so if you put a space craft in the ergosphere, the craft would be accelerated by the black hole's gravity and could leave the ergosphere with more (kinetic) energy that in came in with... it could be used, in theory, to "slingshot" vessels around, the obvious advantage being they're actually going faster when they leave.

    Perhaps some explanation is warranted. When any massive object rotates, general relativity predicts that it induces a "frame-dragging" effect around it, pulling other objects in the direction of rotation. With ordinary objects like Earth, the effect is minimal, but when a black hole rotates, there is a region outside the event horizon in which everything must revolve the axis, including photons. This is the ergosphere.

    Ergospheres are only present around rotating black holes, and they are only significant around those whose rotational kinetic energy is a large fraction of their rest mass energy (i.e. they are spinning awfully quickly). The other neat aspect of rotating black holes is that the singular set is not a point, but a circle. However, you can't "jump through the hoop" - if you enter the event horizon, you will hit the circle with probability 1.

  127. Re:Hmm.. by phat_rat · · Score: 0

    Hmm...Well for those of YOU who believe in a god and are profound on your beliefs, then you must realize that even god's firewall is vulnerable sometimes...hackers,free thinkers and others of the sort will one day go to that fiery place in the ground?FOR WHAT?What if you look at the other end of the spectrum,for instance: The Al' Quaida Network are some hardcore radical muslim SOBs whom believe that what their doing will get THEM to heaven and us to hell. On the other hand Americans believe that by reigning in capitalism and spreading freedom around the world,taking out terror from the planet will get THEM to heaven. So who is right? If you are at a different end of the same spectrum you understand ONLY that side unless you have the ability to care much for one side but understand the other,Like Me. I know I went totally off subject. But the Israelis deserve to die.If you stop and think, every thing bad that has happened to the US in the last 6 monthes can be blamed on them. And thats all I have to say.

    --
    "Fight The Power"
  128. Oh my god! by saintm · · Score: 1

    Didn't these people *ever* play Half-Life?

    Anyone got a Hazard Suit for sale?

  129. Canada watches too much TV! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    didn't they just steal this idea from an episode of Stargate?

    No, really, they did.

  130. More tinkering with Pandora's Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just let this escape and we will see up close and personal what a nova is like. Much like fusion experiments, what is to guarantee this is a controllable reaction? Remember the "Pepsi Syndrome" skit on Saturday Night Live? I would not bet money or my life that this kind of stupidity won't happen. Remember "O" rings on the space shuttle? Now there is a high tech solution. Sheesh!
    P.S. Douchebags!

  131. Where? [was: Re:What?] by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

    You went where?!

    What's it like out there? It looks kinda bright to me. Much brighter than my room. God knows why you'd wanna go there.

  132. Vancouver Sun? by Ioldanach · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who finds the fact that the article referenced is in the Vancouver Sun just the slightest bit funny?

  133. lumping all IT together skews things by Monofilament · · Score: 1

    I think there needs to be a seperation of IT undergrads. Out in the real world CS majors and MIS majors and CIS majors may all vie for the same or similar jobs... BUT.. their curriculums in undergrad institutions are governed many times by completely different schools of thought. Many CS departments I've seen (plus my own) are run my science and research oriented faculty and many times see unix/linux as a great learning tool to tear down the system and show their students how the stuff really is programmed. As for MIS departments (at least in my college) are usually under the school of business or at least have a tie with that school. This is a completely different school of thought from the Science or math proffessors. The business guys see Micro$oft as the big kid on the block you should get behind.. which they are in some respects.. but still either way. Many of these programs would naturally go toward microsoft products.. and programming. As far as when you get out into the real world.. hopefully you've learned enough to be able to deal with any of these situations and hopefully learn the specifics as you work.

    --


    Who makes you Sig?
    1. Re:lumping all IT together skews things by Monofilament · · Score: 1

      Ok i'm an ass.. i can't figure out how this happened but I seemed to have posted in the completely wrong topic... GO AHEAD Flame and TROLL me down..

      --


      Who makes you Sig?
  134. What elements would be created from Anne Murray? by SnickleFritz · · Score: 1

    I think you wouldn't get much from Celein Dion. Maybe I'm thinking of deaths of stars carreers.

  135. Re:Black Holes? Wait a second! by NulDevice · · Score: 1

    Light can't escape once it's passed a certain point, the Schwarzchild radius, IIRC. But the hole still exerts force beyond the "edge."

    You could slingshot a spaceship around the otuside at a certain distance, although I'd hate to think what the tidal forces exerted by a black hole would do to your pilot.

    --

    ----
    "I used to listen to Null Device before they sold out."

  136. Re:Close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    rim job?

  137. movie rights ? by eremos · · Score: 1

    anyone want to take a guess as to how long it will take the studios to make this into another Arnie movie?

  138. I recreated a supernova in my own house... by BenJeremy · · Score: 1

    ...I turned on a light, thus flooding the room with a billion^billion times more photons than before.

  139. the real problem with fusion energy is political by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US annex Canada! Not likely, dearest. Canada, now a proprietary of the truly beneficient ER, is way ahead of the US, and will remain so.

    Canadians are able to admit truth, that they borrow their lunch currency from their children, through a bank which is privately owned by the most beneficient ER. From this bank, she is then able to direct funding, though the royal heirachy of knights (i.e. central bankers) towards progress. From within this honesty, their entire approach to the politics of life is based on reality: their approach to funding of scientific progress includes an admission of their duty of obedience, arising from their indenturement of their children to the Queen, and the beneficient Queen returns the favor.

    US idiot-citizens still deny the fact that their "Federal Reserve Banking System" is owned by agent-knights of ER, through the Knights of the Order of Saint John of Jeruselum. These same US citizen-drones blindly deny that the United States has become a ressurection of the British East India Company, wherein the original British stockholders have merely been suplanted by the Queen. In a similar way, they deny that their lunch currency is created by a perpetual indenturement of their children to the owner's of the Wall Street banks which partake at the table of the so-called "Open Market Committee" of the "Federal" "Reserve." The result of this core dishonesty is that American billionaries do not seek progress, through implementation of scientific discoveries. Rather, through their babbling facilitator, i.e. through Osama-bin-Greenspan (who, with his Wall Street KKKronies, has debt bombed the US industrial infrastructure, once the most powerful in the world, far worse than any bomb imported by some unshaven anti-Muslim reptile who spends all day crawling around in caves), the Mike Milkins, Jim Kimseys and Manuel Maralandas of the world, are systematically preparing America for its higher destiny.

    You bleedin' Yanks might do well to hope, that America will someday rise again in its more truthful form then, as a proprietary of the Queen, where it truly belongs, in harmonic similitude with its more truthful brothers, Canada and Austrilia.

    Long live the Queen! Long live Canadian and Austrialian scientific progress! Long live the funding of scientific progress, by our beneficient Queen!

  140. Relax, man by nanojath · · Score: 1
    good lord, do YOU ever shut up?


    Yeah, well, your response on my unecessary derision of slashdot posters was longer than my original post...


    ..."Pretentious asshole"...prick...shoving your glasses up your acne strewn nose...


    I'll have to head over to your user profile and check out your other comments for more tips on the "proper" way to deal with posts I don't care for... I've obviously gone astray pointing out factual errors in comments and taking people to task for pretending to weigh in on articles when they're in fact too lazy to read anything but the headline. Clearly I haven't given enough thought to the high road of profane language and unkind "geek" stereotypes like glasses and acne. You kiss your momma with that mouth?


    ...a thin foul mist of pretention...


    I gotta take this from someone that uses phrases like "a thin foul mist of pretention?"


    the rest of us non-reactionary types.


    After you learn how to spell "pretension" you may want to keep that dictionary out and review the definition of "hypocrisy."


    In short... you're not helping.


    Helping what? Helping the slashdot comments forum become a kinder, gentler place? Whatever. Yeah, I've got my pet peeves and occasionally vent my spleen. If I gotta swing for it I can take some comfort in the fact that there will be a very long line in front of me to the gallows. None of us is achieving social revolution wasting our time posting our brain drool to slashdot. At best we learn something from time to time, get into the occasional interesting conversation, and have the chance to blow off some verbal steam without doing any real harm. So get off your high horse. Anyone can see that you're easily as pretentious and reactionary as I am (though clearly nowhere near so smart and glib).

    --

    It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries