Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: Games, Goats, Galileo

Slashback tonight brings you word on a games contest, an update to the famous spider-goat hybrid which grossed you out months ago, bad news for Galileo's last days, passable news for anyone following the David McOwen story and more. Read on for the updates :)

Make sure you slip this into the fine print of your consulting contracts. Adn writes "Newsbytes is reporting in a story that David McOwen, who was facing some pretty serious charges will be let go with a fine as against a much harsher fate. If utilizing so called "unused cycles" for the greater good is a crime (I know he was not charged for that per se... but bear with me here) then makes you consider uninstalling all those SETI@Home Screensavers doesnt it? Also a larger question...If the law (in these kinds of cases) operates on the 'intent' of the accused, what is the justification for even considering it a crime?"

Playing games builds your mind and your hand-eye coordination. Bill Kendrick writes: "The results are in for the SDL Game Contest held by No Starch Press, Linux Journal and Loki Games.

First place was awarded to LBreakout by Michael Speck. Second place went to Tower Toppler by Andreas Roever. My own game, Vectoroids just barely made third place over another asteroids-style game, Rock Dodgers by Paul Holt.

Congratulations! The full list of games is listed on No Starch's results page."

Guaranteed not to be your average Slashdot book review! Alex Chiu writes "Hello. This is alex chiu. I have written an online book at http://superiching.com Teaching people how to communicate with God using I-Ching. This online book is free for everyone to read. It's at least 5 times bigger than alexchiu.com. If interested, please release this news."

You may remember Alex from the interview we did with him a little while ago -- truly a unique individual.

Flying blind and a long way from home. Vertigo01 writes: "According to this article on CNN.com, galileo has encountered some technical problems on its flyby of Io and "for unknown reasons, went into safe mode" ... (sounds like my last Win98 install) ... flight engineers hope to restore normal operation for the duration of Galileo's life, but it looks like we won't get any more pictures of Io out of her."

Victoria's Secret probably won't put this on the box. FortKnox writes "Spider Silk is long known to be one of the strongest biological structure made (5 times stronger than steel by weight). Biologists have already genetically engineered goats to produce spider silk in their milk. Now, they have successfully extracted the protein and "spun" the silk. The next, and final step, is to mass produce the silk to be available commercially. Move over kevlar, here comes something better! I want to have the first biologically built house! I wonder how insulated spider silk is...."

165 comments

  1. Break Out Gets an Award by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ummm... There are 8,000,000 kinds of break out. It was an orginal idea when Atari was out. Think I can get an award for remaking pong, oh wait.

  2. Next thing you know... by epsalon · · Score: 5, Funny

    They'll sue you for installing WindowsXP on company hardware. It wastes far more "unused" cycles than a mere distributed.net challange...

    1. Re:Next thing you know... by epsalon · · Score: 1

      I can run those on my 486 with windows!
      And you can run a Linux workstation on a 386. I wrote "Windows XP" (aka Windows DRM), with the slogan "What does M$ want to do with your cycles today?"

    2. Re:Next thing you know... by FeeDBaCK · · Score: 1

      Mandrake != Linux

      --
      wolf31o2 Developer, Gentoo Linux Games Team
    3. Re:Next thing you know... by Perdo · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Because XP is a distributed client itself. Microsoft does not have the server resources to handle serving their .NET architecture. So, XP uses raw sockets to implement a clandestine P2P network. MSN is not serving XP clients, other XP clients are. In the mean time, MS surfs our personal info like google surfs usenet while utilizing what will become the most powerfull supercomputer possible: Everyone's computers.

      --

      If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    4. Re:Next thing you know... by Mandrias · · Score: 1

      Mandrake is a specialized distribution. It's compiled with optimization for pentiums.. so of course it's not going to run on anything lower

      --
      Use the Z-modem protocol between Information Superhighway routers to compress the plaintext. ~LordOfYourPants
  3. Spider Silk by BiggestPOS · · Score: 1

    Even at Five Times stronger than steel pales in Comparison to Spectra. I bet its a lot cooler though, and probably more stylish.

    --
    What, me worry?
    1. Re:Spider Silk by SumDeusExMachina · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Spectra? Was that intended as a joke?

      I used to do some serious competitive sailing, and I can tell you that spectra is rather mediocre when compared to other high-tech synthetic materials on the market currently. It doesn't even measure up to Kevlar as far as strength or streching resistence is concerned. The best that comes to my mind right now would be Vectran, but it has been several years since I was in the field, and thus new developments may have ocurred as a result of America's Cup development and such.

      --

      Is your company running tools written by ma
    2. Re:Spider Silk by Phanatic1a · · Score: 1

      Uh...really?

      There are three main grades of Kevlar available: 29, 49, and 149. Respectively, they have tensile moduluses of 62 GPa, 131 GPa, and 186 GPa, and tensile strengths of 2.76 GPa, 3.6-4.1 GPa, and 3.4 GPa. There's also Kevlar Edge, but I don't know nothin' from nothin' about that.

      Spectra 900 has a tensile modules of 117 GPa and Spectra 1000 has 172.0 GPa. Their tensile strengths are, respectively, 2.59 and 3.27.

      Sounds pretty comparable to me, and I certainly wouldn't call it "mediocre." I also don't think Spectra is as susceptible to degradation from ultraviolet exposure, but I could be very wrong on that point. It does creep, though, which I guess could be a bad thing in sails.

      All I can find on Vectran claims that its modulus and strength is similar to Kevlar-29.

    3. Re:Spider Silk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great stuff for stunt kite strings though.

    4. Re:Spider Silk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and rock climbing gear

    5. Re:Spider Silk by SumDeusExMachina · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'd imagine so. The problem with discussing materials is that there are so many different aspects to them that what makes something absolute crap for one task has a different, special advantage for an entirely different task. Not unlike comparing programming languages.

      --

      Is your company running tools written by ma
    6. Re:Spider Silk by MrResistor · · Score: 2
      I used to wind line sets for sport kites at a kite factory (Shanti, if anyone cares). We used Spectra and Kevlar (and Dacron, but it's really only suitable for single line kites). Anyway, Spectra does have a fair amount of creep, IIRC something like 8-12%. We would stretch it out with 3 or 4 strong pulls and then it had the same stretch as Kevlar, something like 3-5%. Once the creep was out the main difference between Spectra and Kevlar was flamability. The Kevlar wouldn't burn. We did have to put sleeves on both, because when you tied them in knots they'd cut through themselves.

      Oh, and Kevlar really thrashes scissors.

      Never heard of Vectran, though. Has it been around long?

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    7. Re:Spider Silk by RapaNui · · Score: 2, Informative

      IIRC Vectran is a 'Liquid Crystal Polymer' fibre, quite frequently mentioned during the last two(?) or so America's Cup events.
      Seems to mainly be used in competition sails.

      Uh.. found a link:

      Vectran fibres

  4. Immortal people are going to die? by Wizard+of+OS · · Score: 4, Funny
    Hmm, didn't Alex Chiu invent the immortality device? Doesn't that mean that people don't die anymore? Well .. he apparently thinks different now:

    This I-Ching book is designed to allow you to predict just about everything: the death of a person, the exact time and date to expect a visitor, the rise and fall of the stock market, the presidential election, the out come of a war, etc.

    If you know somebody is going to die, then why don't you give him an immortality device. Hmm, buf if you give him that, he won't die anymore, your prediction becomes fraud and the universe will then collapse into a singularity with infinite impropability. :)
    --

    --
    If code was hard to write, it should be hard to read
    1. Re:Immortal people are going to die? by PhuCknuT · · Score: 1

      His immortality device didn't prevent accidental death, just aging and illness. Still a giant load of crap, but not really a contradiction.

    2. Re:Immortal people are going to die? by Alkaiser · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think the e-book's for people who may be too poor to get the money for eternal life rings, but still have access to a public computer terminal.

      --
      Netjak.com independent reviews of domestic & import video ga
    3. Re:Immortal people are going to die? by bonzoesc · · Score: 0

      You don't need money for Alex Chiu immortality rings - they're free if you shamelessly whore him like I'm about to. Click my sig to LIVE FOREVER!

    4. Re:Immortal people are going to die? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you know somebody is going to die, then why don't you give him an immortality device. Hmm, buf if you give him that, he won't die anymore, your prediction becomes fraud and the universe will then collapse into a singularity with infinite impropability. :)


      That sounds like an easier way to power the Heart of Gold... it's been awfully hard to keep the coffee hot.
    5. Re:Immortal people are going to die? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? No one got that? I thought it was pretty funny. That AC should've been modded up. :(

  5. Misreading the site name by InterruptDescriptorT · · Score: 3, Funny

    Heh. I initially read superiching.com as superitching.com, and I was just wondering what the market was for prank itching powder e-commerce.

    Hmmm... now that I think about it... (goes off to register superitching.com) ;-)

    ---

    Some say Netware is just like a wheel/ When you abend it, you can't mend it

    --
    Karma: Excellent Birds (mostly as a result of listening to Laurie Anderson)
    1. Re:Misreading the site name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, I first read it as super-ch-ching. Bring in the cash.

    2. Re:Misreading the site name by tenman · · Score: 1

      hold on to that domain name... maybe vagisil will pick it up from you.

    3. Re:Misreading the site name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better than reading it as superchink, like I did...

  6. Bonus... by xinit · · Score: 4, Funny

    At least Super I-Ching doesn't charge by the minute. Unfortunately, I never seem to get through to God - I always seem to reach some joker named Gord, and he's none too happy about the bad listing in the directory.

    --
    --- http://foo.ca
  7. Spider Silk...this gives me an idea... by Gavitron_zero · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    now all i need to do is get bitten by a radioactive spider, and then i can get the webbing from those dudes.... I will be Spider-Gavitron_ZERO

  8. On the first one there by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why should this guy's community service be "not related to computers"? If thats what he's best at, then shouldn't he be allowed to use his talents to benefit the community? What, is he going to hack the pentagon while streamlining the city hall databases? Or would this all make way too much sense to be in an american court?

    --

    Shift happens. Fire it up.
    1. Re:On the first one there by 11thangel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's supposed to be a punishment, which implies it's something you DON'T like. If he likes computers, this makes sense...

      --

      I am !amused.
    2. Re:On the first one there by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Then make him use an OS he hates... The punishment is also this: He has been arrested, maybe loses his job over it, and working under the watchful eye of an officer of the law is not something I think he would enjoy. My point is this, instead of just locking people up, why not use whatever skills they may have to benefit the rest of society. In my opinion, if you break the law, you're going against society, so your punishment should benefit society. I do think punishment shouldn't be enjoyed, and so maybe he should be forced to work the help desk or something...

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
    3. Re:On the first one there by billcopc · · Score: 0, Troll

      Well then.. he should have told the judge he didn't like being sucked off by hot teens.

      "Please Your Honor! Not the cocksucking teens!"

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    4. Re:On the first one there by namespan · · Score: 2

      Not to mention the fact that _some_ courts impose computer related community service as a requirement.

      But maybe that's only in large anti-trust cases where the defendant is a corporation and has something to gain from their sentence.

      --
      Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    5. Re:On the first one there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are a brilliant, brilliant man. thanks for the idea, i'm going to go commit a crime now. :

    6. Re:On the first one there by agentZ · · Score: 2

      The punishment for a crime should be something that forces you to repay your debt to society. You must repair the damage you've done.

    7. Re:On the first one there by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 1

      Criminal punishment should be about rehabilitation, not anal sex in prison showers. By teaching criminals to use their talents for the benefit of society, we might actually see drops in crim rates and prison headcounts. The other solution is we hire Judge Dredd... Either way we all win.

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
  9. I-Ching Web Design by Tom7 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Alex is one fuckin' awesome web designer, but I know at least one of his tricks: How to get those awesome flaming gifs. Check it out at http://www.flamingtext.com/ !

  10. Spider silk has some amazing properties by Ralph+Malph+Alpha · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Just ask Peter Parker.

    --
    _________________
    EBAY SAFETY TIPZ!
  11. The Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Your guilt or innocence in matters like this isn't a function of the intent. Intent is relevant when you're sentenced. The appropriate thing to have happen is to be found guilty, and then be given a suspended sentence. After all, he did break the law.

    1. Re:The Law by quincy_MD · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not quite... The law makes a distinction between 2 different classes of crime: malum prohibitum and malum in se. Malum prohibitum crimes are crimes that are (literally) "Evil because it's prohibited". There is no need to have intent to break malum prohibitum laws. Speeding on the interstate, for example, is malum prohibitum. Even if you didn't intend to speed, you still broke the law. Malum in se crimes are crimes that are (literally) "Evil in and of themselves". These are crimes like murder... To murder someone requires an intent to murder. To be guilty of the crime requires that the prosecution prove you intended to commit the crime. And I'm sure the "stealing computer time" thing is malum prohibitum.

    2. Re:The Law by radrich449 · · Score: 1, Troll

      way to go. someone was paying attention during Legally Blonde.

    3. Re:The Law by KewlPC · · Score: 1
      Actually, it's mala prohibita and mala in se.
      See?

    4. Re:The Law by rarose · · Score: 1

      Not to sound pedantic, but I don't think so. Mala is the plural of malum. The original poster's usage was:
      malum prohibitum and malum in se. Seems correct.

      Malum prohibitum crimes are crimes that are (literally) "Evil because it's prohibited". seems correct... otherwise you get the awkward double plural "prohibited evils crimes".

      Check out http://ecclesia.org/lawgiver/M.asp or perhaps http://dictionary.law.com/definition2.asp?selected =1202&bold=%7C%7C%7C%7C

      --
      --Rob
    5. Re:The Law by AlanStokes · · Score: 1

      Sometimes intent is the crux of whether a crime has been committed or not.

      For example, getting married is a crime - if you do so believing that you are already married (even if you're wrong), then it's bigamy.

      Similarly giving truthful evidence under oath can be a crime - if you do so believing it to be untrue.

      (This is true in my local jurisdiction, anyway. YMMV)

      Obviously intent can be difficult to prove, but the courts seem to manage to cope OK.

      --
      - Alan
  12. this should be the real story.. by ubugly2 · · Score: 0

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=26315&cid=2855 882&pid=2855882&startat=&threshold=-1&mode=nested& commentsort=0 this should be addressed

  13. Wasn't this in the Bible? by mshomphe · · Score: 2

    Something about many-eyed goats & whatnot?

    --
    She sat at the window watching the evening invade the avenue.
  14. Funniest quote ever. by bahtama · · Score: 5, Funny
    Regarding the spider story, this is the funniest quote I have seen all day. Does he realize what he just said?

    ``The spiders unfortunately are territorial carnivores. They eat each other, and this has caused them to resist all forms of domestication,'' Turner said.

    I can see it now, "Heel boy, now sit, stand. Now spin some silk into a shirt for me!"

    --

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Oh bother.

    1. Re:Funniest quote ever. by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2, Informative

      There was another funny quote about them from a couple years back.

      "If you put a bunch of spiders in togeather, in a few days you are left with one big, fat, happy spider."

      IIRC this was when the genetic alterations was being done to the goats, nice to see there's been progress. This has been a Army funded project for years, I remeber reading it in the WSJ back in the mid 80s.

    2. Re:Funniest quote ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      > I can see it now, "Heel boy, now sit, stand. Now spin some silk into a shirt for me!"

      This was tried, France, late 1800's or so. A group of entrepreneurs shut hundreds of spiders into a disused barn, I presume with the intent of fumigating later, and then collecting the webbing and spinning.

      When the Barn was opened some time later, it was found that in the absence of other food, the spiders had eaten each other.

      Oh well, back to le drawing board.

    3. Re:Funniest quote ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if this means the goats exhibit the same characteristics. Now that would be something to see. I can just picture the goats fighting over their teritory the victor munching into the looser and letting out a satisfied burp. The quote would then probably read something like this.
      "The Goats are now unfortunately teritorial carnivores. They eat each other etc ..."

    4. Re:Funniest quote ever. by ghmh · · Score: 1

      There was another funny quote about them from a couple years back. >

      "If you put a bunch of spiders in togeather, in a few days you are left with one big, fat, happy spider."

      IIRC this was when the genetic alterations was being done to the goats, nice to see there's been progress. This has been a Army funded project for years, I remeber reading it in the WSJ back in the mid 80s.

      Does this mean we're going to end up with one big, fat, happy goat? After all, goats supposedly eat anything - how do they stop the goat eating all the silk?

  15. you know... for girls... by doooras · · Score: 4, Funny

    i can't wait to see the bullet proof spider silk bra in the local Contrampo or Wet Seal.

    1. Re:you know... for girls... by ThatComputerGuy · · Score: 1

      Mix this up with fembots, now there's something interesting....

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  16. Unauthorized Software by Cato+the+Elder · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think the prosecution of McOwen went overboard. However, if you don't own machines, you shouldn't run software on them without permission. Increasing system load means the system spends less time in power saving modes. It does consume bandwith. Also, and I don't know if this was the case here, it can be damned annoying when not set up properly. When I was working to help administer the computers at a Math department at my college, the sysadmin for general computing stayed logged in and run Seti@home through scripts. Problem was, he didn't do a very good job, and sometimes two or more copies would run at once. They also seemed to take a perceptible amount of time to get off the CPU.

    1. Re:Unauthorized Software by gpinzone · · Score: 1

      The same could be said of the million other things people do at their jobs and take for granted. Ever send or receive a personal fax at work? Make a personal call? Write something down on a piece of paper like "Bring home milk" and stick it in your pocket? Yes, these are really petty examples, but (if set up correctly) so is using these kinds of programs.

  17. Finally. by EggplantMan · · Score: 1

    They've found a use for goat milk. ugh!

    --

    ?-|||-----x<*))))><
    1. Re:Finally. by imrdkl · · Score: 2, Funny

      Goat cheese is pretty tasty. Although this milk might make better string cheese.

    2. Re: Finally. by V.P. · · Score: 1

      Goat milk is actually quite good. More taste in there than cow milk, and less fat than sheep milk. You got to try it!

    3. Re: Finally. by MrResistor · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Goat milk is actually quite good.

      As long as you restrict their diet. A goat that's been alowed to eat whatever it wants can have some pretty gnarly-tasting milk.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  18. How about the editors' mod bombing of a thread?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Right here, hundreds of points down-modding wasted on down-modding people. come on, editors. have some balls and just admit it.

    By the way, if this can't get discussed in slashback where can it be?

  19. Bah-h-h-h-h by Anomaly+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bertha shouldn't be-e-e-e! Bertha shouldn't be-e-e-e!

  20. Super-I-Ching and Alex Chiu by efuseekay · · Score: 2

    Normally, it's a lot of fun to mock people like Alex Chiu. Then I realized that he is probably making tons of money selling his "rings" to clueless surfers. *Sigh*.

    By the way, he will be coming out with your very own "One Ring" (Immortality Ring Ver 2.0) soon.

    --
    Mode (3) smart-aleck mode. Press * to return to main menu.
    1. Re:Super-I-Ching and Alex Chiu by istartedi · · Score: 3, Funny

      One scam to... oh nevermind.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  21. Forget body armor -- I want climbing ropes! by Rikardon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I want climbing ropes made out of spider silk! I think the smallest-diameter climbing rope is currently 9.5mm. Spider silk would be much lighter even at the same diameter; you could probably trust your life to a 3mm diameter (just guessing) spider silk rope, at dramatically lighter weight than is currently possible.

    OTOH, can you imagine how freaky it would be to suspend your body weight from a rope so thin that you might not even be able to see the end of it?

    1. Re:Forget body armor -- I want climbing ropes! by doooras · · Score: 1

      i wouldn't be surprised to see 007 using that to infiltrate the russians or whoever needs some good spyin' on at the time of the next movie.

    2. Re:Forget body armor -- I want climbing ropes! by Shade,+The · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It would have interesting applications for movies and theatres. Actors could "fly" about, and producers wouldn't have to worry about people seeing the wires.

    3. Re:Forget body armor -- I want climbing ropes! by Atrax · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can get 8.5mm 'half-ropes' - you're meant to use them in pairs, but when in extremis they're employed singly for tough sport routes to reduce weight and drag. I did my first F7c (Hard UK E6 6b, not sure of the US grade) on one. not sure if it made any physical difference in that case, but it was a psychological edge.

      Big disadvantage with this, though, is that the thinner it gets, the trickier it is to get into your quickdraw. I had length-matched 'draws with BD 'hotwire' krabs on them in the crux section so I wouldn't fumble the clip. A 3mm spider-silk rope wuld be very tricky to clip with - like using prussik cord. perhaps you could stiffen a section in the manner of the Beal program ropes to make clipping easier and the sheath more durable?

      3mm - fine for topropes, no good for real climbing

      --
      Screw you all! I'm off to the pub
    4. Re:Forget body armor -- I want climbing ropes! by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      if you get the rope too short, you'll cut your finger off with a swift jerk ;-)

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    5. Re:Forget body armor -- I want climbing ropes! by Dancing+Tree · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh yes, I can just imagine the fun of taking a fall and -whoops!- I just cut myself in half with my non-stretching very thin line. Yes, this sounds like a great idea, but I'll pass thanks. Perhaps what you really need is a rope cored with woven spider silk and then sheathed in something light and abrasion resistant. Just a thought.

      --
      :::Horrendous Experiences Make Amusing Anecdotes:::
    6. Re:Forget body armor -- I want climbing ropes! by blair1q · · Score: 5, Funny

      Big disadvantage with this, though, is that the thinner it gets, the trickier it is to get into your quickdraw. I had length-matched 'draws with BD 'hotwire' krabs on them in the crux section so I wouldn't fumble the clip. A 3mm spider-silk rope wuld be very tricky to clip with - like using prussik cord. perhaps you could stiffen a section in the manner of the Beal program ropes to make clipping easier and the sheath more durable?

      Damn.

      Babelfish just looks at me funny when I feed it this.

      --Blair

    7. Re:Forget body armor -- I want climbing ropes! by Random+Data · · Score: 1

      I did my first F7c (Hard UK E6 6b, not sure of the US grade)

      F7c is around 5.12c/d or around Australian 27-28. There's not a bad conversion chart at http://www.australianbouldering.com/

      Hmmm, methinks it's time to dust off the chalk bag (no, that ain't Anthrax!)

  22. hahahahah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Redundant

    "superiching.com" -- sounds like the site you'd
    go to when you can't get rid of that damn jock
    itch. :)

  23. Tower Toppler by Renraku · · Score: 2, Informative

    Tower Toppler was an Atari game from way back in the day. Dunno if the gameplay in the one mentioned is the same as the sourceforge one, but it wouldn't surprise me. I begged my parents for this game for years, forgetting about shitty pac-man or the Indiana Jones game that had no point at all.

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    1. Re:Tower Toppler by SuzanneA · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, its a rewrite of Nebulus by Hewson. It was released on the C64, Spectrum, ST, Amiga, and probably others. I'm not sure which came first, probably either the Spectrum or C64 version (given that Hewson was a UK company).

  24. Play Connect The Goats! by Com2Kid · · Score: 2, Funny

    Imagine what would happen if a goat fed her offsprings. The silk could end up passing through through them, creating the first ever animal made leash! Since that would count as tool usage, would that mean that we'd have species competition? :)

    1. Re:Play Connect The Goats! by coltrane99 · · Score: 3, Funny

      A friend of mine once got home from work at Christmastime to her cat stuck on some tinsel it had eaten off the tree in exactly the way you describe. Not pretty.

  25. now that you're posting stuff by alex chieu by xeeno · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why don't you include some more kooks and kook science for us. I'm sure Ludwig Plutonium is eager for an interview.

  26. Inviting trouble by Nathdot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't care if the latest breaking news is "Scientist clone new super species of hybrid shark/goat" or "Apple releases latest PC: the iGoat", know this, and know it well:

    An article on slashdot with "GOAT" in the headline is inviting trouble

    :)

    1. Re:Inviting trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      An article on slashdot with "GOAT" in the headline is inviting trouble

      Oddly enough, whilst in the middle of an evil link war earlier today with the QA department, I replied to their Steroid Child with goatse, and it turns out that it doesn't resolve. I then checked my link without thinking, and it did.

      This story was much funnier when I started.
  27. Safe mode for Galileo by imrdkl · · Score: 3, Funny

    Means that, at 100km high, perhaps one of those bigger volcanos it was going to look at took offense?

    1. Re:Safe mode for Galileo by roqetman · · Score: 1

      Perhaps Galileo learned what NASA had in store for it?

      "Dave? Dave?"

  28. McOwen still got too much by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    McOwen used resources without permission. Ideally that gets you a talking-to from a supervisor, at worst it gets you fired.

    Taking legal action against an employee for it is way overboard, and even 80 hour community service and $2100 is too much, considering he was fired from a subsequent job, and probably has had his life turned upside down for a few months (I believe he and his wife had a newborn at the time). The reason we should have a fair legal system is so you don't have to go through this kind of thing. What on earth was the attorney general thinking? Where they trying to meet some quota or something? Testing out a new law?

    Anyway, glad to see things turned out all right, and he didn't have to go to court, where he probably wouldn't have had enough money to win the case.

    1. Re:McOwen still got too much by JoeBuck · · Score: 3

      Oh, nonsense. He was at a university, ,allegedly a center of learning. A good one would applaud him for his initiative: capturing otherwise wasted resources for purposes of advancing scientific research. If there were some reason that the screensavers caused a problem, then the right response would be to ask the guy to uninstall the screen savers.

    2. Re:McOwen still got too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually most computers will go into power saving mode, so actually he is wasting resources.

      A university has to treat its staff just like other entities.

      Finally, seti@home can hardly be called research, its more of a childish game.

      Computers at work are not to be played with, its just common sense.

  29. On a more serious note by epsalon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder if they have been taking McOwen to court if has run something that could actually save lives on the department's spare time.
    I think they just decided to use public opinion against "cracking" and made McOwen a criminal ("Look, he's trying to break codes on company time. He must be a criminal"). Sorry, not criminal, what's the buzzword again? Ah, terrorist...

  30. Houses?? by freeweed · · Score: 5, Funny
    I want to have the first biologically built house!

    You mean, as opposed to all the wooden houses that we currently live in, all produced from 100% inorganic trees? :)

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  31. Strong, but Bulky! by meggito · · Score: 0

    Well, Spider Silk may be 5 times stronger than steel by weight, but how much volume would it take up? It seems to me that one steel beam's weight of spider silk would be very large. And wouldn't the strength be distributed over that volume? So, I would think a projectile would have an easier time penetrating a few feet of spider silk than a few inches of steel. Thus, the pure bulk of this stuff becomes impractical for an kind of armory (which is why they most likely compared it to steal). It may, however, still make make a durable fabric.

    1. Re:Strong, but Bulky! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're thinking about armory and fabric. A bit Lord-of-the-ringish, but fine. I'm thinking about cables for a suspension bridge with a 5 km main span. Would "bulky" cause any problem? I don't think so, but you will need a lot of goats, that's for sure.

    2. Re:Strong, but Bulky! by cicadia · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Of course, the question then, is how long does it last, and how gracefully does it degrade?

      A great thing about using steel as a construction material is that not much eats it. You can leave steel on it's own for a while, and count on it to stay pretty much in the same condition you left it. On the other hand, I'm sure there's been a nice little biological niche carved out by insects/bacteria/whatever that eat old abandoned cobwebs. I'd hate to see what would happen when they discover your bridge :)

      --
      Living better through chemicals
    3. Re:Strong, but Bulky! by roystgnr · · Score: 2

      A great thing about using steel as a construction material is that not much eats it.

      By "not much", are you perhaps to the 20% of our atmosphere which undergoes exothermic reactions with iron? Steel bridges (to use your example) have a whole lot of thought put into "how can we plant this in the middle of salt water spray and expect it to still be here in ten years?"

    4. Re:Strong, but Bulky! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you could cover it with a polymer like plastic, or a posionous metal like zinc or something. I'm sure there's lots of ways to make it so the environment can't get to it. Wonder how well a plastic coating would stick to it anyway?

      About bullet resistance : remember its not just the strength of the fibers, kevlar also absorbs and distributes the shock. It might not make a better vest.

  32. Super I-Ching by Gord.ca · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Wow.. I was on Alex's website just yesterday. I noticed the link to the Super I-Ching sister site, and was browsing around it a bit.

    From what I picked up, I-Ching is more a method of telling the future than conversing with the supernatural. Then again, I think the idea is that seeing the future and talking to God are kinda the same thing.

    As you may be aware, Alex's main claim to fame is that he is the purveyor of the eternal life rings. These cheat death by stopping or even reversing aging. However, they can't protect from accidents, some diseases, being shot (how I'm glad I'm not American...) That's where I-Ching comes in. If you can see the future, you can avoid being shot or whatever. So you need both the rings and I-Ching to really be immortal. They complement each other nicely.

    I-Ching is performed by throwing coins or something. (I wasn't really clear on this.) The results, as well as the time/date/year (on Beijing time) and maybe some other variables, go through a complex analysis. Future events, as well as vagely the time and place they will occur, come out. Those who are better at I-Ching will be able to figure out more. Oh yeah, and when I say complex, I mean it. It looks like learning Java was easier than learning I-Ching. There's 5 elements and hexagrams and bonding and lines and more fun than I can handle.

    The most interesting part is how logical it is. It might not be backed up by properly controlled scientific evidence, but the method itself really makes sense if you let it make sense. It's just like getting answers from a complex physics equation.

    So here's the moral of the story, children: Just because it makes sense to you, doesn't make it correct. People who can use this lesson include:
    Politicians (Tax cuts create jobs! The economists say so, I understand it, it must be true!)
    Almost anyone who argues about anything (Yes, that includes you. And me.)
    Alex Chiu, the subject of the day. This can actually be used to understand his website. He wrote something down. It made sense to him, so now he doesn't understand that it might not be true.

    </rant> ;-)

    --
    The opinons expressed are those of the voices in the author's head and are not necessarily those of the author.
    1. Re:Super I-Ching by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2, Informative

      I-ching is performed by throwing three coins.
      The I-ching is the reading of the meanings of tri-grams. Tri-grams are made up of three lines - either solid or broken.

      Each coin represents one line. Heads=solid Tails=broken.

      So if you throw three coins it will be something like: heads, heads, tail (usually you predetermine that you are going to read the coins leftmost first - or something.)

      so H,H,T would look like:

      ---
      ---
      - -

      and you would look up this trigram symbol for its meaning....

      sometimes you would throw 3 times and look up all three symbols to get a more in depth reading.

    2. Re:Super I-Ching by IronChef · · Score: 2

      I briefly thought about writing a program to automate the processing of Mr. Chiu's Super I-Ching method. As I mulled it over I realized that there was an algorith so simple you can do it in your head for any arbitrarily complex set of I-Ching data.

      f(i-ching inputs) = bullshit

      You won't even need to use your fingers, as with those party-trick arithmetic methods!

    3. Re:Super I-Ching by armb · · Score: 2

      > I-Ching is performed by throwing coins or something.

      Yarrow stalks, traditionally. That's why Bruce Schneier's strong pseudorandom number generator is called Yarrow.
      http://www.counterpane.com/yarrow.html

      But anything that gives random bits will do - coin flips, dice, thermal noise on a diode, radioactive decay, lava lamps (http://www.sciencenews.org/20010512/mathtrek.asp) , whatever.

      --
      rant
    4. Re:Super I-Ching by flink · · Score: 1

      I think Yarrow sticks are used in traditionaly.

    5. Re:Super I-Ching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez, you're a sucker.

  33. Why Goats? by bnavarro · · Score: 1

    What makes goat milk so special for spider silk production? I would have thought of two other scenarios first:

    -- Genetically alter silkworms to produce the spider silk.

    -- Genetically alter cows to produce the silk laden milk, since they would produce much higher yields than goats.

    The article is a little short on details, and it makes it appear like after the spider domestication failed, they went straight to goats. Anybody know why the above two examples are inferior to genetically altered goats?

    1. Re:Why Goats? by Wise+Dragon · · Score: 2, Informative
      I have years of experience milking and caring for goats and cows.

      Goats

      Are less likely to die than cows, and less expensive when they DO die

      Reproduce faster than cows.

      Can eat a wider variety of foods than cows

      Are easier to milk than cows

      Are easier to drag around than cows

      Goats make less of a mess when they defecate.

      The main problem with goats is that the milk tastes terrible. Some breeds are tastier than others, but I gag on most of it. Note that this is not a problem when it comes to spider silk.

    2. Re:Why Goats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not giant spiders. That would be alot cooler.
      You could even open a theme park based around it.
      Arachnid Park. I could just see the law suits now!

    3. Re:Why Goats? by LabRatty · · Score: 2, Funny

      speak for yourself, I still gag on spider silk too.

      ratty.

    4. Re:Why Goats? by coyul · · Score: 1

      What makes goat milk so special for spider silk production?

      From another article in Forbes:

      Turner got the idea while teaching at McGill University in Montreal in 1992, after learning that scientists had isolated three spider genes that code for silk proteins. "It was a purely serendipitous find. The silk gland of spiders and the milk gland of goats are almost identical. Teats equal spinnerets."

      The advantages of goats over cows are detailed in another reply.

    5. Re:Why Goats? by coyul · · Score: 2, Informative
    6. Re:Why Goats? by scorcherer · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot, right? It should be obvious. Ever heard of cowse.cx?

      --

      --
      The Cap is nigh. Time to get a fresh new account.

    7. Re:Why Goats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would also guess that it is much easier and cheaper to research on goats than it is on couws... but then why not on Sheep - after all it was a sheep that was cloned first...

      I guess they all are good for something else...

    8. Re:Why Goats? by kilroy_hau · · Score: 1

      Now you can have cows too, acording to this article on Wired

      --


      Kilroy was here!
  34. Um... I prefer ropes that bounce thanks... by ebyrob · · Score: 1

    If spider silk resists stretching more than kevlar, I don't see it being much fun to land a lead fall on onna those suckers.

    Still, might make great sheaf material. No idea how this would affect diameter though...

  35. SDL game contest downloads by OverCode@work · · Score: 3, Informative

    The game download page is not ready yet, but you can find many of these games on the authors' home pages. I highly recommend downloading them -- there were some really good submissions. And by all means don't just download the top three. Almost all of the entries are worth a look.

    Although some were disappointed that their games didn't win, everyone has been very polite and understanding. That says a lot about the open source/free software development community. It really was a pleasure to deal with everyone involved in the contest.

    -John (one of four SDL game contest judges)

    1. Re:SDL game contest downloads by mathgenius · · Score: 1

      Thanks to John and all the other Judges!

      I had a lot of fun working on Axis Runner,
      a game i have been working on and off for some years now.
      It is inspired by the apple II game "Lode Runner".
      I added another dimension and changed the topology of things a bit :),
      but you still run around diging holes, and collecting parcels.

      It's not released yet anywhere, and you may need to be a genius to play it,
      but you can download the latest source from my page here.
      I still work on it, currently i am working on the audio engine.

      -simon

  36. Great. by emf · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I have written an online book at http://superiching.com Teaching people how to communicate with God using I-Ching. "

    Great, now God's going to get slashdotted.

    1. Re:Great. by ewhac · · Score: 3, Funny

      Great, now God's going to get slashdotted.

      The God that can be Slashdotted is Not the True God.

      Schwab

    2. Re:Great. by dstone · · Score: 3, Funny

      I prefer...

      If you meet God on the web, Slashdot him.

  37. Re:How about the editors' mod bombing of a thread? by bonch · · Score: 0

    It is being discussed in the journal entry comments at http://slashdot.org/~negativekarmanow%20tm/journal /

  38. More on WMP unique identifier by Shadowin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    In case anyone missed this story, there is a global unique identifier for every user of Windows Media Player (just about everyone who uses Windows). This can be used to track you with a simple javascript... not a good thing for privacy. In response, I made a little utility to modify that identifier. It changes it to a nice, little message for the guys in Redmond. If a lot of people use it, then it's not exactly unique any more. Cheers!

  39. Until it is addressed... by bonch · · Score: 0

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=26315&threshol d=-1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&cid=2850660

    Moderation Totals: Offtopic=60, Flamebait=1, Troll=3, Redundant=2, Insightful=11, Interesting=39, Informative=12, Funny=2, Overrated=2, Underrated=4, Total=136

  40. Punishment: Teach cranky old people... by simetra · · Score: 1

    how to use Linux! Or Windows for that matter.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
  41. Repost: first Slashdot troll post investigation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Mad propz to negativekarmanow tm for the following, as it is his work.

    The last few months I have been doing some research into the trolling phenomenon on slashdot.org. In order to do this as thoroughly as possible, I have written both normal and troll posts, 1st posts, etc., both logged in and anonymously, and I have found these rather shocking results:

    • More moderator points are being used to mod posts down than up. Furthermore, when modding a post up, every moderator seems to follow previous moderators in their choices, even when it's not a particularly interesting or clever post [slashdot.org]. There are a LOT more +5 posts than +3 or +4.
    • Logged in people are modded down faster than anonymous cowards. Presumably these Nazi Moderators think it's more important to burn a user's existing karma, to silence that individual for the future, than to use the moderation system for what it's meant for : identifying "good" and "bad" posts (Notice how nearly all oppressive governments in the past and present do the same thing : marking individuals as bad and untrustworthy because they have conflicting opinions, instead of engaging in a public discussion about these opinions)
    • Once you have a karma of -4 or -5, your posts have a score of -1 by default. When this is the case, no-one bothers to mod you down anymore. This means a logged in user can keep on trolling as much as he (or she) likes, without risking a ban to post on slashdot. When trolling as an anonymous user, every post starts at score 0, and you will be modded down to -1 ON EVERY POST. When you are modded down a certain number of times in 24 hour, you cannot post anymore from your current IP for a day or so. So, for successful trolling, ALWAYS log in.
    • A lot of the modded down posts are actually quite clever [slashdot.org], funny [slashdot.org], etc., and they are only modded down because they are offtopic. Now, on a news site like slashdot, where the number of different topics of discussion can be counted on 1 hand, I must say I quite like the distraction these posts offer. But no, when the topic is yet another minor version change of the Linux kernel [slashdot.org], they only expect ooohs and aaahs about this great feat of engineering. Look at the moderation done in this thread [slashdot.org] to see what I mean.
    • Digging deep into the history of slashdot, I found this poll [slashdot.org], which clearly indicates the vast majority does NOT want the moderation we have here today. 'nuff said.


    Feel free to use this information to your advantage. I thank you for your time.
  42. 152!!! 152!!! by jfgagnon · · Score: 0
    The first Slashdot troll post investigation :

    Moderation Totals: Offtopic=68, Flamebait=1, Troll=3, Redundant=2, Insightful=14, Interesting=43, Informative=12, Funny=2, Overrated=2, Underrated=5, Total=152.

  43. Spidergoats! by Ravagin · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can see it now. There's going to be some horrible accident, and the genetic alterations will get out of control, and then we'll have eight-limbed goats clambering all over our metropolisesisesesises. Massive got-webs woven from one building to another! Enormous throbbing goat egg-sacks, from whence come countless tiny goat-spiders which will invade everything and everywhere!

    There will be all kinds, just like with spiders! We'll have daedly black-widow goats, which kill with a single bite! Wolf-goats (there's an irony!) that stalk about on their massive hairy legs! Jumping goats! Goats that, you know, dig those little holes with the fake top thingies and jumpout at their prey... maybe they'll use sewers.

    The web-spinning goats will feast on large birds - the raptor population will be decimated. Mexico and Canada would dig massive moats to keep them in the States, and Britain will patrol our waters and airspace to preserve the quarantine, but the goats will weave parachute thingies and fly across the waters on the winds.

    The goatspiders will soon cover the entire planet. They will adapt to every environment, forcing humanity into underground fortresses. The goatspiders will improve upon our technology and colonize the solar system, being contacted by the Culture, who don't even notice humanity. Soon our kind will be nothing more than few highly isolated communities deep beneath the planet's surface. At that point, it's only a matter of time before humanity's flame is exitnguished entirely.

    But we'll have lots of really comfortable lingerie!

    --

    Karma: T-rexcellent.

    1. Re:Spidergoats! by crush · · Score: 1

      God, maybe I'm tired but that had me sputtering onto my monitor! Thank you, the funniest thing that I've read in days. Obviously the spirit of John Wyndham passed on into you!

    2. Re:Spidergoats! by morbid · · Score: 0

      Next, we might see the spider baby! It has the body of a spider, but the mind of a baby...

      --
      I'm out of my tree just now but please feel free to leave a banana.
    3. Re:Spidergoats! by Ravagin · · Score: 1

      Gosh, thanks. Probably the combined result of too much science fiction and too little sleep (with a play opening this week and the inexorable approach of the end of the semester).

      --

      Karma: T-rexcellent.

  44. Taco, tsk, tsk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shame, Taco! Why'dja slap all the responses to First Slashdot Troll Post Investigation!?

    1. Re:Taco, tsk, tsk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Maybe because you're spamming every thread. Jesus christ, grow up. The moderation system here sucks, we know. Thank you for your insight into this matter. Download the source to slash, implement a better moderation system, and demonstrate that it's better by running a site the size of slashdot.

      Just stop fucking whining about it. It's not CmdrTaco who's bitchslapping that post and its replies, it's the moderators who you're successfully pissing off with this inane spam.

      Yeah yeah, so I've been trolled, whatever. Yay for you.

  45. Need to Read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Link may be killed, so here is the text.

    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

    The first Slashdot troll post investigation (Score:0, Interesting)
    by negativekarmanow tm on 1 ish (#2850660)
    (User #518080 Info | http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: 4 ish)

    The last few months I have been doing some research into the trolling phenomenon on slashdot.org. In order to do this as thoroughly as possible, I have written both normal and troll posts, 1st posts, etc., both logged in and anonymously, and I have found these rather shocking results:More moderator points are being used to mod posts down than up. Furthermore, when modding a post up, every moderator seems to follow previous moderators in their choices, even when it's not a particularly interesting or clever post [slashdot.org]. There are a LOT more +5 posts than +3 or +4.Logged in people are modded down faster than anonymous cowards. Presumably these Nazi Moderators think it's more important to burn a user's existing karma, to silence that individual for the future, than to use the moderation system for what it's meant for : identifying "good" and "bad" posts (Notice how nearly all oppressive governments in the past and present do the same thing : marking individuals as bad and untrustworthy because they have conflicting opinions, instead of engaging in a public discussion about these opinions)Once you have a karma of -4 or -5, your posts have a score of -1 by default. When this is the case, no-one bothers to mod you down anymore. This means a logged in user can keep on trolling as much as he (or she) likes, without risking a ban to post on slashdot. When trolling as an anonymous user, every post starts at score 0, and you will be modded down to -1 ON EVERY POST. When you are modded down a certain number of times in 24 hour, you cannot post anymore from your current IP for a day or so. So, for successful trolling, ALWAYS log in.A lot of the modded down posts are actually quite clever [slashdot.org], funny [slashdot.org], etc., and they are only modded down because they are offtopic. Now, on a news site like slashdot, where the number of different topics of discussion can be counted on 1 hand, I must say I quite like the distraction these posts offer. But no, when the topic is yet another minor version change of the Linux kernel [slashdot.org], they only expect ooohs and aaahs about this great feat of engineering. Look at the moderation done in this thread [slashdot.org] to see what I mean.Digging deep into the history of slashdot, I found this poll [slashdot.org], which clearly indicates the vast majority does NOT want the moderation we have here today. 'nuff said.

    Feel free to use this information to your advantage. I thank you for your time.
    *sigh* since I can't post normally anymore : my journal [slashdot.org]

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]

    Moderation Totals: Offtopic=75, Flamebait=1, Troll=3, Redundant=2, Insightful=15, Interesting=49, Informative=12, Funny=2, Overrated=2, Underrated=5, Total=166.

  46. Should have hit preview... by roystgnr · · Score: 1

    That should read "perhaps referring to", of course.

  47. I'm not sure I trust any plan that includes by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Funny

    the phrase:

    `That's where the goats come in'
    .

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  48. IMPORTANT by baron000 · · Score: 0

    IMPORTANT: Please read the whole post

    I'm sure many of you are aware of this thread already.

    If you are interested in helping against the moderators who have been "editing" the thread, please read this.

    Please do not moderate this post down. It is good for the long term, but if you still feel like being someone who denies the horrible truth, give me your best shot. You will help hold all of Slashdot users back in the long term.

    For more info, read this piece from an apparently superior news site.

  49. Re:Good for them! by Perdo · · Score: 2

    Why not submit a patch for Linux?

    Because in my current position I am not allowed to even LOOK at GPL'd source code.

    Socialist... moron, we OWN you.

    --

    If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

  50. Goat spider silk by orbitalia · · Score: 1

    Actually, I'd suggest not building houses out of spider silk as stated in the article, for the primary reason that spider silk is water soluble.

    background on all this can be found
    here

    1. Re:Goat spider silk by Doppleganger · · Score: 2

      Of course, that's why it would DEFINATELY be a good idea to make lots of lingerie, dresses, etc out of it.

      Might be the next evolution to the "wet t-shirt" contest!

  51. The XP Files... by Neck_of_the_Woods · · Score: 1


    What you don't know is that XP is just covering up Microsofts attempt to distribute the worlds first "micronet" that is processing hundreds of trillions of flops a day, everyday.

    What is happening, and you the public don't know is XP is really a work of art and uses less processing power the windows 3.11! All that drive spinnig, Proccessor time, and bandwidth is MicroNet juicing your systems unused processor time. Playing it off as XP's poor coding is better than admitting they are jacking your cycles.

    What else are you really going to do with p4 2ghz machines besides secretly back the worlds largest distributive net project. Your just part of Big Bills world wide web farm baby.

    --
    Neck_of_the_Woods
    #/usr/local/surf/glassy/overhead
  52. book review by mlong · · Score: 1
    truly a unique individual.

    Nope, there are lots of people are mentally ill and even more who want to rip people off with claims for a product that cannot possibly be true.

    --
    //m
  53. Re:hazards of research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn, that was disturbing -- and funny!

  54. I love this comment by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 1

    "where he probably wouldn't have had enough money to win the case"

    It takes a whole new dimension when first you read : "The reason we should have a fair legal system "

    If your actual legal system is in the view of : I have money, the best lawer possible, so now move and abandon the case, well yes, you're in trouble...

    Oh yes, Moderator, Flamebait is -1. Honesty would put me in "Insightful", or Offtopoc. Now make you choice, and remember : I have more money, and the best lawyer...

    Ooops, got carried away 8)

    --
    It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
  55. Spider silk is stretchy and abrasion resistant! by Rikardon · · Score: 1

    What gives you the idea that spider silk is non-stretching? Au contraire, spider silk is very stretchy. University of Wyoming researchers found the gene for capture silk which, while also very sticky, can stretch up to 3 times its original length. That's a bit too far, and it would be REALLY tough to handle (how would you let go?).

    Dragline silk, though (which is what I imagine we'd want for climbing) is what Nexia is producing. It's only 1/5th as stretchy as capture silk (see first link, above), which means it'll stretch to 1.4 times its original length -- plenty of "shock absorption" to keep you from getting cut in two.

    And although Nexia doesn't say anything about abrasion resistance, they do say they're hoping to create fibers with specific properties for specific applications. I do agree that the fibers may need to be sheathed in something else (maybe even dragline silk would be too sticky -- who knows?), but I still think it'd be a vast improvement over what we carry today.

  56. Logistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm. Wonder how many goats it takes to build a house...

  57. how odd... by Magius_AR · · Score: 1
    Gallileo hasn't even crashed yet...
    You're supposed to crash BEFORE you go into safe mode.
    Or at least that's what Win98 has always told me :)

    Magius_AR

  58. God is Just Pretend by suprslackr420 · · Score: 1

    Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

    --
    ubi dubium ibi libertas.