Slashdot Mirror


KaZaA Resumes Downloads, Company Sold?

Robert Johnson writes "According to an article on Dotcom Scoop, popular file-sharing service KaZaA may have been sold over the weekend. "As of last week the company was based in the Netherlands. However, upon close examination of its new terms of use license, the company now says, "This License as well as all disputes arising out of or in connection with this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the New South Wales, without regard to or application of choice of law rules or principles. Any dispute arising out of or in connection with this License, or in future agreements resulting there from, shall be exclusively resolved before the competent court in New South Wales," the article states. New South Wales is an Australian state." Update Apparently the website reverted to the former content which might raise a few eyebrows. Update: 01/21 18:17 GMT by T : DotcomScoop writes: "KaZaA isssued a statement regarding its sale after our story was published." Here is the statement and a little more info.

203 comments

  1. Okay, quick! by InfinityWpi · · Score: 2

    What are the laws on file-sharing and Peer-to-peer networking in Aussie-land? Does this mean they can be blacklisted? Or does it mean that they can't be sued as easily?

    1. Re:Okay, quick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Australia has a DMCA like law, CDCA or something like that. Australia will bow to pressure from America in a heartbeat, because:

      a) It makes our politicians feel like real politicians when they get to speak to foreign diplomats

      b) we can't afford to have anything interfere with our beef exports. (Particularly atm as our governments whole basis is to reduce the national debt)

  2. Sold ... or moved? by dzym · · Score: 1

    Because of that Dutch thing.

  3. Thanks by FigBugDeux · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the geography lesson.

  4. legal by den_erpel · · Score: 1

    way to go,fight them with legal means like they do you

    :))

    --
    Genius doesn't work on an assembly line basis. You can't simply say, "Today I will be brilliant."
  5. Usage Laws by KingAdrock · · Score: 1

    So does this Aulstralian state have less stringent laws about Copyright violation? Is their a legal advantage to having the company there?

    1. Re:Usage Laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to the best of my knowledge laws here state that you are alowed to download something and use it for 24hours for evaluation without penalty,

    2. Re:Usage Laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, sir, are an idiot. There is no such law.

  6. Smart Move. by derrickh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If a country's laws dont suit your needs...move.

    It's only a matter of time until MS becomes based in the Cayman Islands.

    D

    1. Re:Smart Move. by Mr.Spaz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This may be "funny," but I've said that such maneuvering may be in the future for software / internet firms in the future. There's no big manufacturing plants to build and the money is right for them to "lease" a small island for 99 years and just plant themselves on it. And how hard would it be to recruit personnel to work on gorgeous Caribbean islands? Grow your company to the right size in a protected nation (see USA), then when that country starts to turn on you, pack up and head for your own mini country! If you had sufficient market penetration, the best they could do is put up or shut up.

    2. Re:Smart Move. by sheldon · · Score: 5, Informative

      See previous article on Somalia having it's internet service disconnected...

      http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/11/23/1746 24 5

    3. Re:Smart Move. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not cayman, but american virgin island is already classified as a tax heaven...

      from http://www.simplystocks.com/investools/BusDesc/Bus Desc.asp?tick=MSFT&fid=7

      Subsidiaries:Company Name Location/Jurisdiction
      CarPoint.com, LLC Delaware
      East Africa Software Limited Kenya
      Expedia, Inc. Washington
      GraceMac Corporation Nevada
      Microsoft (China) Company Limited The People's Republic Of China
      Microsoft (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. Malaysia
      Microsoft (S.A.) (Proprietary) Limited South Africa
      Microsoft (Thailand) Limited Thailand
      Microsoft AG Switzerland
      Microsoft Aktiebolag Sweden
      Microsoft Arabia Limited Saudi Arabia
      Microsoft Asia Ltd Nevada
      Microsoft B.V. The Netherlands
      Microsoft B.V.B.A. Belgium
      Microsoft Bilgisayar Yazilim Hizmetleri Limited Sirketi Turkey
      Microsoft Bolivia S.R.L. Bolivia
      Microsoft Bulgaria EOOD Bulgaria
      Microsoft Canada Co. Canada
      Microsoft Caribbean, Inc. Delaware
      Microsoft CH Korea
      Microsoft Chile S.A. Chile
      Microsoft Colombia Inc. Delaware
      Microsoft Company, Limited Japan
      Microsoft Corporation United Arab Emirates
      Microsoft Corporation (Liaison Office) Zimbabwe
      MICROSOFT Corporation (Resident Representative Office) Vietnam
      Microsoft Corporation India Private Limited India
      Microsoft Corporation Lebanon Representative Office Lebanon
      Microsoft Corporation-Pakistan Liaison Office Pakistan
      Microsoft Cote d'Ivoire SARL Ivory Coast
      Microsoft d.o.o. Slovenia
      Microsoft Danmark ApS Denmark
      Microsoft de Argentina S.A. Argentina
      Microsoft de Centroamerica S.A. Costa Rica
      Microsoft de Guatemala, S.A. Guatemala
      Microsoft de Panama, S.A. Panama
      Microsoft Del Ecuador S.A. Del Ecuador
      Microsoft Dominicana, S.A. Dominican Republic
      Microsoft Egypt L.L.C. Egypt
      Microsoft El Salvador S.A. de C.V. El Salvador
      Microsoft France S.A.R.L. France
      Microsoft FSC Corporation. U.S. Virgin Islands
      Microsoft G.m.b.H. Germany
      Microsoft Gesellschaft m.b.H. Austria
      Microsoft Hellas S.A. Greece
      Microsoft HomeAdvisor, LLC Nevada
      Microsoft Hong Kong Limited Hong Kong
      Microsoft Hrvatska d.o.o. Croatia
      Microsoft Hungary Kft. Hungary
      Microsoft Iberica S.R.L. Spain
      Microsoft India (R&D) Private Limited India
      Microsoft Indian Ocean Islands Limited Mauritius
      Microsoft Informatica Limitada Brazil
      Microsoft International B.V. The Netherlands
      Microsoft Investments, Inc. Nevada
      Microsoft Ireland Operations Limited Ireland
      Microsoft Israel Ltd. Israel
      Microsoft Jamaica, Inc. Jamica
      Microsoft Kuwait Representative Office Kuwait
      Microsoft Licensing, Inc. Nevada
      Microsoft Limited United Kingdom
      Microsoft Manufacturing B.V. The Netherlands
      Microsoft Maroc S.A.R.L. Morocco
      Microsoft Mexico, S.A. de C.V. Mexico
      Microsoft New Zealand Limited New Zealand
      Microsoft Nigeria Limited Nigeria
      Microsoft Norge AS Norway
      Microsoft Operations Pte Ltd. Singapore
      Microsoft Oy Finland
      Microsoft Peru, S.R.L. Peru
      Microsoft Philippines, Inc. Philippines
      Microsoft Product Development Ltd. Nevada
      Microsoft Pty. Limited Australia
      Microsoft Puerto Rico, Inc. Delaware
      Microsoft Regional Sales Corporation Nevada
      Microsoft Research Limited United Kingdom
      Microsoft Romania SRL Romania
      Microsoft s.r.o. Czech Republic
      Microsoft Singapore Pte Ltd. Singapore
      Microsoft Slovakia s.r.o. Slovakia
      Microsoft sp. z.o.o. Poland
      Microsoft SRL Italy
      Microsoft Taiwan Corporation Taiwan
      Microsoft Treasury, Inc Nevada
      Microsoft Trinidad & Tobago Limited NA
      Microsoft Tunisie, S.A.R.L. Tunisia
      Microsoft Uruguay, S.A. Uruguay
      Microsoft Venezuela, S.A. Venezuela
      Microsoft ZAO Russia
      Mobimagic Co. Ltd. Japan
      Moscow Microsoft Ireland Operations Limited Russia
      MSFT-Software Para Microcomputadores, LDA Portugal
      MSLI, GP Nevada
      MSNBC Cable, L.L.C. Delaware
      MSNBC Interactive News, L.L.C. Delaware
      Ninemsn Pty. Limited Australia
      PT. Microsoft Indonesia Indonesia
      SIA Microsoft Latvija Latvija
      T1-MSN, Inc. Delaware
      The Microsoft Network L.L.C. Delaware
      Travelscape.com, Inc. Delaware
      VacationSpot.com, Inc. Delaware
      WebTV Networks K.K. Japan
      WebTV Networks, Inc. California
      Wireless Knowledge L.L.C. Delaware

    4. Re:Smart Move. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't you see the Family Guy episode when the Griffins found out that their property was not of the USA? It just doesn't work as well as you might think.

      Unless this software company has their own army. Other countries can pretty much do what they want to them.

    5. Re:Smart Move. by kaladorn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You might headquarter there as many US Corps headquarter in states that offer shareholders more minimal rights. But I con't think you'd actually move your real physical HQ.

      You think it would be trivial to move the tech base required to support a computer industry? To provide all the things like medical, etc. that you require as infrastructural support? To provide equivalent services to all the nearby small companies your company does business with?

      I can't see it. And then there are the physical security issues. Remember, Sealand was once taken by hostile forces. And they are arguably inside UK territorial waters! And denial of service becomes far easier if your connection is a seafloor fibre pipe (oops, sorry about that Micro$oft...). Not to mention exposing your HQ and your employees to flooding and tropical storms. And all those wonderful bugs that dont thrive in North America.

      It might make sense to maintain a legal fiction with a lawyer and a P.O. Box down there, much like corps do in Virginia, but that's about the end of it. And in this New World of Terrorism (really, the same old world but with a new media focus...), it seems unlikely corporations would be anxious to locate to more vulnerable locations. Or did you think they'd pay for their own army, navy, air force, and significant intelligence assets? There are a few benefits to being HQ'd in the Continental USA!

      Besides, if M$ were to relocate to the Carribean, whose Judges would they buy? Whose DoJ would they bribe? :)

      --
      -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
    6. Re:Smart Move. by Incongruity · · Score: 3, Insightful
      And how hard would it be to recruit personnel to work on gorgeous Caribbean islands? Grow your company to the right size in a protected nation (see USA), then when that country starts to turn on you, pack up and head for your own mini country!

      Yeah, it'd be wonderful up until huricane abby or some such comes along and wipes out all of your senior software engineers...wait. Can we sell Microsoft on this idea?

    7. Re:Smart Move. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please don't. I'm not sure Europe could house all the Americans. :)

    8. Re:Smart Move. by barenakedAvenger · · Score: 1

      Hell, yeah.

      Then they start annezing the neighbors pool, the hot dog stand.. next thing you know, we're at war!

      --
      You can automatically log in by clicking This Link and Bookmarking the resulting page. This is totally insecure, but ver
    9. Re:Smart Move. by Pyrosz · · Score: 1

      If a country's laws dont suit your needs...move.

      It's only a matter of time until MS becomes based in the Cayman Islands.


      Or if its a Canadian company, break off a part of Canada (ie: Quebec) and declare it a seperate country!

      --

      An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears this is true.
    10. Re:Smart Move. by mpe · · Score: 2

      It's only a matter of time until MS becomes based in the Cayman Islands

      What do they then do if they annoy the US government? Whilst they are US based the only thing they have to fear is the DOJ, move outside the US and they then have to face the DOD. (And the militry of any other country they might annoy.)

    11. Re:Smart Move. by mpe · · Score: 2

      This may be "funny," but I've said that such maneuvering may be in the future for software / internet firms in the future. There's no big manufacturing plants to build and the money is right for them to "lease" a small island for 99 years and just plant themselves on it. And how hard would it be to recruit personnel to work on gorgeous Caribbean islands?

      You mean like this nice large island in the Caribbean known as Cuba...

      Grow your company to the right size in a protected nation (see USA), then when that country starts to turn on you, pack up and head for your own mini country!

      Exactly where does this mini country get the sort of military hardware it may need to be sure of maintaining its independance?

    12. Re:Smart Move. by mpe · · Score: 2

      Didn't you see the Family Guy episode when the Griffins found out that their property was not of the USA?

      Since at least 2 of the US states arn't strictly legitimatly part of the US there are a whole bunch of people who this could be the case for.

      Unless this software company has their own army.

      They'd also need air and sea defence.

      Other countries can pretty much do what they want to them.

      Especially the USA...

    13. Re:Smart Move. by limekiller4 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they could hire those nice glowing aliens at the bottom of the trench for ...PR maybe?

      --
      My .02,
      Limekiller
  7. Great by Rupert · · Score: 1

    Presumably no Chinese or Saudi company wanted to buy them. I mean, presumably they were looking for a buyer in an internet-hostile country?

    --

    --
    E_NOSIG
  8. I bought them! by LordNimon · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'll admit it - I bought the company. Don't believe me? I have a receipt for $24.95 to prove it.

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    1. Re:I bought them! by IAgreeWithThisPost · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Does anyone care what score you read at? YOU'RE MISSING OUT ON THE BEST POSTS(or a reasonable facsimile of such)

      --
      security through obscurity = modding down anti-linux posts so maybe noone will see them
  9. I hope.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that they don't try and pull a Napster.

  10. good or bad? by thetechfreak · · Score: 0, Redundant

    will this be good or bad for KaZaA?

    --
    {TheT3chfreak}
  11. This isn't good for KaZaa by Pop+n'+Fresh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If what we've seen over the past few months are any indication (broadband woes, ridiculous internet laws), Australia's laws won't be too kind to file-sharing. Not that it will matter to P2P users, they can just move on to the newest P2P startup that hasn't been gobbled up yet.

    --
    *This page intentionally left pointless*
    1. Re:This isn't good for KaZaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If what we've seen over the past few months are any indication (broadband woes, ridiculous internet laws), Australia's laws won't be too kind to file-sharing.

      So? If someone files a lawsuit against them in Australia they can just sell the company and move to Belgium. There are hundreds of countries on the planet to move to with IP connectivity. It's hard to hit a moving target, especially when the real world lawyers are using crossbows and you're flying around in a jet.

    2. Re:This isn't good for KaZaa by CaptIronfist · · Score: 1

      Or they can just move to anonymous ftp sites...
      Or they can always trade cds by snail mail...
      Or they can always trade thru icq, im, etc...
      Or ...

      The end will always justify the means...

    3. Re:This isn't good for KaZaa by SectoidRandom · · Score: 1

      No, I see this as a very smart move by FastTrack/Kazaa. Think about it, they develop this FastTrack P2P protocol, licences it out to a few companies, and at the same time start their own service to boost its popularity. At the first sign of legal trouble (obviously Kazaa software is more venerable to a lawsuit!) the sell of that part of the business.

      Bye-bye lawsuit, hello increased licencing fees!

      Now the RIAA can chase after every FastTrack client, but do they have the grounds to sue someone for making the protocol?

  12. kazaa working fine? by ankit · · Score: 4, Informative

    I am unable to get kazaa to work for the past day or so. I get the following error :

    Error logging into Kazaa, continuing as anonymous.

    I am using the linux client. Is it only me, or are others also having difficulty logging onto the network?

    --
    Don't Panic
    1. Re:kazaa working fine? by 11thangel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I had the same thing starting to happen this morning. I can't even create a new account. I don't see a linux download available anymore either...

      --

      I am !amused.
    2. Re:kazaa working fine? by I.T.R.A.R.K. · · Score: 0

      It's probably you.
      Granted, I'm on the Morpheus network, but I'm downloading from a Kazaa user as we speak.

      --

      "Adequacy.org: Where congenital stupidity is not an option, but a requirement."

    3. Re:kazaa working fine? by ankit · · Score: 1

      does this mean, no linux support under the new company? this sucks!

      --
      Don't Panic
    4. Re:kazaa working fine? by airin · · Score: 1
      my linux client is no longer working.


      "Error logging into Kazaa, continuing as anonymous."


      ...continued by a forever "connecting...".

      too bad. it had served me well up to this point.

    5. Re:kazaa working fine? by CDWert · · Score: 1

      Getting the same thing here

      An iteresting note is my username is followed by ??? instead of what was there (kazaa) I wonder if this has to do with them moving their servers, (anyone actually see if the IP space has change ?)

      I know recently they changed their keyserver, did they change it back to allow for automomous operation again, compleyley decentalized , as it was in the begginign ?

      Im betting dollars to dimes, they changed the keyserver info in some way or another to ELIMINATE being shut down as a whole networ, this is how it was originally supposed to work until clients other than their own started showing up on the network.

      The linux version was a quick and dirty hack at best, Has anyone on the windows side been updated since running thier client last ???

      --
      Sig went tro...aahemmm.....fishing........
    6. Re:kazaa working fine? by daw · · Score: 5, Informative

      Kazaa is a decentralized filesharing network with a centralized login mechanism. But authentication is really enforced only in the client. As insurance against being shut down by a lawsuit, if the login servers disappear, the clients are supposed to just forget about authentication and join the network anyway, by trying to connect to any of a series of hardcoded supernodes. This list is also supposed to be refreshed whenever you connect to the network.

      My guess is that the login servers are down and the linux binary's supernode list is out of date. (And I don't know about you, but I have to wipe out the whole .kza directory every time I run kazaa or it crashes on restart; so I surely don't have a refreshed list saved.)

      I further imagine that by editing in the address of a working supernode into the binary or config file somewhere, you can get the linux version to connect.

      Are Windows people connecting okay?

    7. Re:kazaa working fine? by wampus · · Score: 1

      At least yours RUNS... mine displays the splash screen then segfaults.

    8. Re:kazaa working fine? by doob · · Score: 1

      I have been getting the same errors since this morning. My flatmates running the windoze client are all connecting fine with no updates.

      There is now a follow up story @ dotcomscoop quoting a statement from the company that has bought KaZaa, so it would seem to be true.

      --
      In the spoon, there is no Soviet Russia!
    9. Re:kazaa working fine? by christopherstroud · · Score: 2, Informative

      Kazaa is running fine on my Windows box,
      aside from the general instability of the program.

    10. Re:kazaa working fine? by kilroy_hau · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      by trying to connect to any of a series of hardcoded supernodes

      Am I the only one that read "Hardcore supermodels" ???

      --


      Kilroy was here!
    11. Re:kazaa working fine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No problem connecting to Morpheus with Windows.

    12. Re:kazaa working fine? by neurojab · · Score: 1

      Mine segfaults 9 out of 10 times on startup... big deal.. just keep trying (or put it in a script loop) and it will eventually log you in. After login it's stable and has only a few other problems. Except today... I'm having the same problem as the other linux users where I can't log in at all.

    13. Re:kazaa working fine? by Lispy · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the hint. Ill try...still i dont get it. Why didnt they just add a parm or a logfile where you can enter the Servers manually??

      Bad Design. Maybe its cause it was just a quick and dirty hack...

    14. Re:kazaa working fine? by I.T.R.A.R.K. · · Score: 0

      Hey, it's your IQ that is at stake, not mine. ;)

      --

      "Adequacy.org: Where congenital stupidity is not an option, but a requirement."

    15. Re:kazaa working fine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux client will not log on. No adware, no support, no code - now also no service

  13. It's a trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no "competent court" in New South Wales.

    Incompetency is the hallmark of NSW.

  14. And this helps how? by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With the recent posting about the mystery blacklist in Australia, I don't see how hosting the service from Sydney is really going to improve the situation all that much from the Netherlands. Sure, they're not currently being sued in Australia, but they're not currently being sued in Australia.

  15. Aussie Internet Laws by samj · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Interesting someone would choose to base a company like this in Australia... given our track record with Internet censorship, banning porn [hosted down under], forcing gambling overseas (where it does just as much damage, except without our collecting taxes on it), etc.

    I'll bet they'll completely ignore the idea that this might actually be a GoodThing[tm] and use it as an excuse to push through more shitty laws.

    Anyway it's past my bedtime.

    1. Re:Aussie Internet Laws by core_blimey · · Score: 1

      Internet censorship: Um.. what internet censorship? You mean I have to install Cyber patrol or something and use it now? Has anyone got an example of something that someone in the US can get too that I can't? Is my ISP filtering this traffic, even if I don't use their proxy server?

      banning porn [hosted down under]: I thought that was only X+ rated stuff, same as the sale of magazines and videos of that level are banned. Isn't R rated porn still able to be hosted here? Doesn't stop you getting to it if you want to anyway...

      Forcing gambling overseas: Actually, you can't gamble overseas, or more to the point, you can but overseas companies can not legally charge your credit card when you lose. Supposedly you can still win though, seems like a good deal to me! As for gambling in Australia, I don't know if any "Australian" Casino's have applied to offer their services online in Australia, but didn't the TAB get a licence to do so???

      Anyone know any different? There may be a lot of laws passed here, but I've not noticed any changes personally. Maybe I don't surf enough porn sites, or want to give my money away to rich mafia types...

      --
      In democracy your vote counts. In feudalism your count votes.
  16. Looks like they're doing just that by PowerTroll+5000 · · Score: 2

    And for the same reasons. They have a court order to suspend their service, and now they're trying to launch a pay service so they can pay royalties and continue operations.

    The only difference is that they're much faster. According to the Napster website, they were supposed to launch their pay service last summer, and only recently have they started asking people to preview their new pay service.

    --

    I'm not afraid of falling, it's the sudden stop at the end that frightens me.

  17. where they should be... by bje2 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    is it me, or shouldn't they be based in Kazakstan???

    --

    "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
  18. This does not make sense. by eAndroid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why sell to an Australian company? Am I totally wrong in assuming that the rampant government censorship of the internet would be a bad thing for this company? I could probably think of a dozen countries that would be a better place to have KaZaA.

    Well, at least they didn't move to the US.

    --

    I can't spell or type, but that doesn't mean I'm unusually stupid.
    1. Re:This does not make sense. by monkeydo · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      They sold to an Australian company, because an Australian company wanted to buy them.

      The proper question then is, "Why would an Australian company want to buy KaZaA given the Aussies view toward the Internet?" The answer is quite obviously that they think they can make money.

      KaZaA will be turned into a pay service just like Naptster and they will partner with the labels and try not to run afoul of the law. If they accomplish this it doesn't much matter where they are.

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
  19. Do they..... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    have the potential to keep changing ownership of the company to various contries across the world?

    They could probably stay up for a few years just bouncing from country to country, or could they host the servers off shore us in some place like Bermuda with very lax laws in this type of instance?

  20. Linux client no more by blackcat++ · · Score: 4, Informative

    Seems that the Linux client is no longer available for download. Posting a link to a mirrored version won't help either, since it stopped working. Error message is "Error logging into Kazaa".

    1. Re:Linux client no more by Joe+MacDonald · · Score: 1

      This all makes no sense to me. Exactly six days ago I downloaded both the Windows and Linux clients. Saturday I installed the Windows client. About twenty hours ago I installed the linux one and was using it no more than tweleve hours ago. I haven't logged in yet today, but it was working last night.

      --
      -Joe
    2. Re:Linux client no more by praedor · · Score: 2

      Just yesterday afternoon (Jan 20) I was sniffing a wireless network in downtown salt lake. There was a lot of Kazaa activity there. I then moved to another nice location to sniff another network...there was active kazaa transfers going on in that network too.


      Can't tell you what client it was...likely the doze client, but it seems that the network itself was working as of yesterday afternoon.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
  21. Moving or selling KaZaA doesn't change liability by ccmann · · Score: 5, Informative

    Very odd. Moving the company to Australia doesn't spare Niklas Zennstrom (the guy who cofounded both KaZaA and FastTrack, the company that provides the software) of any liability for his past actions in Europe, especially given that Australia is a signatory to the same international copyright treaties as everyone else. Nor would selling the company be any help, unless he could hornswoggle somebody into assuming the liabilities. That seems unlikely, given that the vicarious infringement liability that Napster is exposed to -- identical to the one risked by KaZaA -- is in the billions of dollars. An acquirer would have to be crazy to take it on, and would probably have a hard time finding hosting services (they're legally exposed, too). And the service is still up and running exactly as it was before. Very hard to figure out this one.

  22. Geography? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    "New South Wales is an Australian state."

    So sorry, we Amerikuns can't learn geography this way. Australia needs to piss us off so we bomb NSW, and then CNN can show us where it is.

    1. Re:Geography? by Bongo+Wafer · · Score: 1

      Well, they recently tried to burn down a goodly portion of it, if that's any help. And I do believe there was some bombing done by Americans, albeit from helicopters using water.



      Geoff.

  23. Slashdotted by metalhed77 · · Score: 4, Informative

    for the unfortuanate:

    A week after the company stopped downloads of its software, Amsterdam-based peer-to-peer software firm KaZaA announced on its website that it had launched a new version of its software, that includes a pay service, and a cryptic message made it appear that KaZaA is now owned by an Australian company called Sharman Network Services. Or perhaps not.

    The Kazaa.com website was stripped bare of much of its content on Sunday and was allowing users to download an updated version of its software, although attempts to download this software were met with an error message.

    By 4:15 AM EST on Monday, the original KaZaA website was back up with no mention of new software or Sharman Network Services. But access to the new terms of use agreement was still possible and the copyright information at the bottom identifies "Sharman Network Services" as the owner of the website's contents.

    As of last week the company was based in the Netherlands. However, upon close examination of its new terms of use license, the company now appears to be based in Australia.

    "This License as well as all disputes arising out of or in connection with this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the New South Wales, without regard to or application of choice of law rules or principles. Any dispute arising out of or in connection with this License, or in future agreements resulting there from, shall be exclusively resolved before the competent court in New South Wales," the new terms of use dictate.

    New South Wales is Australia's largest state population wise and the home of Sydney.

    The "WHOIS" information for the Kazaa.com domain has not been updated, but a note posted on the KaZaA site on early Monday morning EST led users to believe that FastTrack, the company that created the code used for and owns KaZaA, and has licensed its code out to competitors MusicCity and Grokster, no longer controls KaZaA. Various searches for "Sharman Network Services" turned up no results.

    "The original brains behind Kazaa have moved on to develop new innovative software. The team now running Kazaa will continue to deliver the best technology for finding, saving and transfering all the data you want: no limits. Get ready for the next version of KaZaA with even better performance and enhanced usability," said a note posted on the KaZaA homepage, before it reverted back to its original state.

    In an ironic twist, one major new area of the company's terms of service agreement covers the distribution of the KaZaA software itself. KaZaA and other file sharing companies are under legal fire for allowing users to trade copyrighted material.

    "This License allows you to install and use the KaZaA Media Desktop on a single computer. This License does not permit you to install the Software on more than one computer at a time. You may make one copy of the Software in machine-readable form for backup purposes only. The backup copy must include all copyright information contained on the original," according to KaZaA's new terms of use agreement. The original terms of use agreement is still linked on the KaZaA homepage.

    The company has also apparently added new features that consumers will be forced to pay for.

    "Certain features of the KaZaA Media Desktop may require payment in the future including a prepaid fee ("Prepaid Fee"). The Prepaid Fee, and all taxes and other fees related thereto will be paid by you in advance. You shall pay all fees and charges incurred through your account at the rates in effect for the billing period in which such fees and charges are incurred. All fees and charges shall be billed to you, and you shall be solely responsible for their payment. You shall pay all applicable taxes relating to the use of the Software through your account. If you do not pay the applicable fees, including Prepaid Fees, within the prescribed period of time your account will be terminated immediately, without limiting KaZaA's right to demand payment of fees and damages at a later time," the company now says.

    The new terms appear to try to help KaZaA further indemnify itself from being responsible for users who trade copyrighted material.

    KaZaA suspended downloads of its software last week saying it was awaiting a Dutch court decision on its fate.

    "Download of the KaZaA Media Desktop software is temporarily and voluntarily suspended pending Dutch court decision on January 31. We apologise for the inconvenience. Please check back at www.kazaa.com for more information," the company said in a statement issued on its website last week.

    A Dutch court ruled in November that the company must stop its users from sharing copyrighted material. The ruling is under appeal and the court will make a decision on Jan. 31.

    KaZaA also recently added a disclaimer on its site regarding the copyright issue.

    KaZaA, MusicCity and Grokster find themselves the subject of international court pressure. The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) launched a lawsuit against the companies last fall in an effort to stem the tide of peer-to-peer transfer of copyrighted music files.

    In October, an internal RIAA memo, leaked to Dotcom Scoop, outlined the RIAA's strategy to take on the file-sharing networks. The memo indicated that the RIAA would attempt to negotiate with FastTrack in an effort to shut down its licensees.

    "Thus, we recommend (1) filing claims against FastTrack, MusicCity, and Grockster, (2) immediately thereafter initiating discussions with FastTrack about resolving our claims in a way that will provide us with useful information and testimony against MusicCity, and if possible obtain FastTrack's cooperation in shutting down or converting MusicCity and Grokster," the memo stated.

    --
    Photos.
  24. Brought to you by Conspiracy Theorists!!! by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 3, Funny


    Its a trap! Don't do it! They said they were free! All I wanted was some more Pogues bootlegs and now I've got a black helicopter in my yard!

    Oh my God...They're coming in! Aiiiiiiiieeeeee...

    (PAUSE- THEN DIALTONE)

  25. Who Needs Kazaa? by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    There are plenty of decentrlaized, absolutely unregulatable things for file sharing, like IRC.

  26. Snoppers and poopers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If these people are so up front about skirting legal jurisdiction I wonder how much of a problem they would have with planting spyware in the client and not telling anybody. I mean if the RIAA can't get to them, how would you?

  27. From Their Site by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is stright from the front page of he web site:

    The original brains behind Kazaa have moved on to develop new innovative software. The team now running Kazaa will continue to deliver the best technology for finding, saving and transfering all the data you want: no limits. Get ready for the next version of KaZaA with even better performance and enhanced usability. Click here to read the new Terms of Use for KaZaA.

    To me, this sounds like a mass exodus, not a simple move to avoid some laws...

    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    1. Re:From Their Site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      RIAA/MPAA: What's your price?

      Kazaa: Excuse me?

      RIAA/MPAA: We'll give you 2 million a piece to play by our rules... or, we'll sue you to death. Our lawyers tell fasttrack doesn't have a leg to stand on.

      Kazaa: Deal.

      RIAA/MPAA: Great... Kazaa next gen will feature DRM - previous gen will be blocked at the router by our ISP cartell buddies. *muhahaha*

  28. Napster Mark II by parliboy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    From the new terms:

    6 Payment and fees

    6.1 Certain features of the KaZaA Media Desktop may require payment in the future including a prepaid fee ("Prepaid Fee").

    The Prepaid Fee, and all taxes and other fees related thereto will be paid by you in advance.

    Guess someone in the RIAA managed to make a new acquisition, as per the leaked memo.

    Okay, new game. Who wants to make acronyms for KAZAA that indicate how f*cked they are?

    --
    "You're never ready, just less unprepared."
    1. Re:Napster Mark II by Mr.Spaz · · Score: 1

      The most disturbing part of that memo:

      Liability for contributory infringement attaches to "one who, with knowledge of the infringing activity, induces, causes or materially contributes to the infringing conduct of another . . . [L]iability exists if the defendant engages in personal conduct that encourages or assists the infringement." A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 239 F.3d 1004, 1014 (9th Cir. 2001).

      It's already being cited to try and take down others. And with terminology like that, you could use that decision to sue people who even live in the same house as someone who downloads illegal MP3s.

    2. Re:Napster Mark II by liquidsin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Okay, new game. Who wants to make acronyms for KAZAA that indicate how f*cked they are?

      I'm sure that when they shut down again, we can all proclaim them
      Killed Again by Zealous Aussie Attorneys

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    3. Re:Napster Mark II by pimpinmonk · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Heh... interesting memo. Ya gotta love the RIAA going against the DMCA or whatever that anti-reverse-engineering thing is called. There's not much proof that they tried to break the encryption, but it's suggested. From the memo:
      The FastTrack network designates (perhaps automatically) certain peers - more powerful computers with high-bandwidth connections - as "supernodes." [because of the system's encrypted communication, we are unable to determine how supernodes are designated].
      And:
      A supernode also connects to other supernodes. [because of the system's encrypted communication, we are unable to determine how one supernode knows how to locate other supernodes]. Vidius found that when one of its machines was in supernode status, it was connected to approximately 25 other supernodes.
      And this one looks particularly incriminating:
      KaZaA operates another server in addition to the log-in (.37) server and the (.38) server described above. That is alpha.kazaa.com (213.248.112.34), the address of which, as with the other two, is hard-coded into the application. The (.34) server communicates with supernodes [we do not know the nature of the communication]. During an interval when a Vidius machine was acting as a supernode, there were 12 different attempts by the (.34) server to connect to the supernode. Vidius reports that in a completed transaction the (.34) server sends approximately 1600 bytes of information to the supernode. In addition, as noted above, a supernode makes periodic connection with the KaZaA log-in (.37) server. Vidius hypothesizes that there is a loop between the (.34) server, the (.37) server, and the supernode, which is highly suggestive of some sort of control mechanism - the nature of which must remain unknown until the substance of the communications can be analyzed.
      I love that last line :P
  29. Re:Moving or selling KaZaA doesn't change liabilit by shepd · · Score: 1

    >Australia is a signatory to the same international copyright treaties as everyone else.

    Yep, but... KaaZaa itself doesn't include any material that is of questionable original. The client itself is made of 100% pure legit code.

    Perhaps they hope that in Australia they won't extend copyright violation to include clients that can be coaxed into it?

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  30. Sad for Aussies... by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 3, Funny


    I mean, they get KaZaA in their back yard...

    AND THEY HAVE TO PAY WHAT, 5 BAZILLION A MONTH FOR BROADBAND? With a bandwidth cap?

    I can already see a whole bunch of Aussies looking up in the sky and moaning like Heston at the end of Planet of the Apes when they find this out.

    "Damn you! Damn you all! ARrrrgggghhhh!"

  31. Australia a bad move? by autocracy · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Seems to me that Australia is well on it's way to beating China at Internet control. You think perhaps Kazaa moving / being sold to a company in Australia might cause a nasty problem?

    --
    SIG: HUP
  32. Does it matter... by dperkins · · Score: 1

    Whether or not they continue serving up spyware to the public? Yea, you get your songs, but they get your information! Why would anyone want to install a bunch of garbage on their system? Here is a link to a page with more information.

    --
    My sig hates me. That's ok, I never cared for it much anyway.
    1. Re:Does it matter... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      you assume the data on my computer is of any value. Unless there reallinterested in what some guy named I.P. Nightly browses.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  33. When... by J'raxis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When are people going to realize that if you try to build a business around giving away other peoples work that first youre going to get sued, and if that doesnt work, theyre just going to try and buy you out?

    Decentralized, head-less networks like Gnutella or Freenet are, once again, the only way to make sure this doesnt happen. KazaA may have a decentralized network but there still is the one authority distributing the client; if they go down, eventually the network they created will disintegrate. With Gnutella or Freenet, there&#x2019s no one to sue worth their time (individual users?), and no one to buy out at all.

    1. Re:When... by kz45 · · Score: 1

      When are people going to realize that if you try to build a business around giving away other people's work that first you're going to get sued, and if that doesn't work, they're just going to try and buy you out?

      Gnutella's backbone is run by businesses. Namely bearshare and limewire, which are making some kind of profit. They run the main cache servers that 99% of all gnutella connect through.

    2. Re:When... by peter_gzowski · · Score: 1

      KazaA may have a decentralized network but there still is the one authority distributing the client; if they go down, eventually the network they created will disintegrate.

      I disagree. KaZaA has an installed user base of 30 million or so (or, at least, that's how many downloads of their software have been recorded on cnet, last I checked). Those 10's of millions of users aren't just going to uninstall their software if the network is still working (KaZaA claims the network is self-sustaining).

      There is Gnutella, but I find more content on the Fast Track network, and that's what it's all about. I'm waiting patiently for the giFT project to release its OpenFT program, and then all this will be a moot point, as we'll have an open source, Fast Track-like network to play with.

      --
      "Now gluttony and exploitation serves eight!" - TV's Frank
    3. Re:When... by J'raxis · · Score: 1

      You think it would survive? Take a look at Napster. That old client can still be used to connect to various non-Napster.com servers, but how many people still use it? If no one is developing, fixing or improving the client (i.e., since it is a closed-source binary), it will eventually fizzle out. What would most likely save the network is something like giFT, however.

  34. URL Dutch news article by Thingul · · Score: 1

    Ere you are:
    http://www.telegraaf.nl/digilink/teksten/digi.ka za a.sharman.networks.verkocht.html

  35. article on webwereld.nl by leuk_he · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is an article [dutch] on webwerel.nl:

    "According to a monday released press announcement the buyer - Sharman Networks - it is a aboute certain parts of KaZaA. The following company parts are "in ieder geval" involved: The website, name(/trademark), logo's , and a licence on the peer to peer network of fastrack. If the client software is involved is unknown

    Futher details are not made public. What amount the from Australia coming Sharman Networdks paid for KaZaA is not clear. According to Nikkki Hemming, CEO of sharman the continuenece of Kazaa is insured. "we think it is fantastic to resume the service of Kazaa and development the tradmark Kazaa"

    [sorry for the bad translation, my dutch is better]

    rest of article is stuff we already know.
    -download suspended.
    -talks bumra stemra (riaa)

  36. The Best Country / Law Mix by Beautyon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Which country has the best mix of sensible copyright law and robust internet access?

    That is where you want to locate a Napster/Kazaa/Morpheus/$whatever; a place where the legislators have better things to do than "fix" imaginary problems, and where everyone from everytwhere can connect fast, every time, 24/7/365.

    How long will it be before countries face sanctions for allowing unfettered file sharing from thier soil?

    The lobbying pressure will be strong for sanctions, because investors are still putting money into pay for stream/download business plans like Peter Gabriel's OD2

    --
    ATH0 Bitcoin: 1DnwFLXczVZV8kLJbMYoheUrpqHesjxrSi
    1. Re:The Best Country / Law Mix by Kryptonomic · · Score: 1
      How long will it be before countries face sanctions for allowing unfettered file sharing from thier soil?

      Not very far, I think. Most technologically advanced nations are signatories to international copyright agreements that frown upon file sharing.

    2. Re:The Best Country / Law Mix by Tazzy531 · · Score: 1
      There is an old anti aircraft fortress off the coast of England that someone claimed soveriegnty. He named it Principality of Sealand. On this nation, he created a company called Havenco which will host anything that might be considered: "risky, subversive or plain old anti-establishment" without any legal actions from any government.

      Go here to read more
      excerpt:
      Sealand was originally used as an armed fortress in the Second World War as one of the most easterly aspects of the UK, whose main role was shooting down Nazi bombers, U2 rockets and other undesirables.
      In 1967, the island - then known as Roughs Tower - was founded as a sovereign principality with a currency called the Sealand dollar - which runs at parity with the US dollar - and with English as its official language.
      Sealand was founded on the principle that a group of people dissatisfied with oppressive laws and restrictions of existing nation states can declare independence in any place that is not under the jurisdiction of another sovereign entity.
      The state's independence was upheld in the British courts in the late 1960s when a judge held that Roughs Tower stood in international waters and did not fall under UK legal jurisdiction.
      ...
      HavenCo is offering what it calls "secure Web hosting" on its server farm for any company or organization that is looking for a Web hosting service that is free of any existing global legislation and tax laws.
      Although Samir acknowledged that HavenCo could well attract companies wanting to offer tax-free havens for customers wanting offshore services, the firm's main emphasis would be in attracting organizations looking for Web site hosting facilities free from any possible monitoring or censorship from third-party governments.
      With its high degree of independence, he said, Sealand offers an ideal home for those organizations looking for a totally offshore Web hosting facility.
      Samir said that, while Sealand obviously cannot defend itself against a serious military attack from a country such as Great Britain, its operation is heavily armed to protect the firm from pirates.
      "We also chose to locate in Sealand because we know that the UK respects the law. Any legal problems that could develop regarding our sovereignty would be heard in an English Court of Law," he said.
      --


      _______________________________
      "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."
    3. Re:The Best Country / Law Mix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      First, it is expensive to host on Sealand. The yearly cost for managed co-location is $15,000us.

      Second, I doubt that they created it to allow copyright violations. They did it, I suspect, to allow individuals to place data outside of prying government hands. Since they too have ISPs, probably located in the EU, those governments could be persuaded to shutoff internet connectivity to the island if the need should arise.

    4. Re:The Best Country / Law Mix by Tazzy531 · · Score: 1
      From their Acceptable Use Policy
      Unacceptable publications include, but are not limited to: Material that is unlawful in the jurisdiction of the server. For instance, if a customer's machine is hosted on Sealand by HavenCo, content which is illegal in Sealand may not be published or housed on that server. Sealand's laws prohibit child pornography. Sealand currently has no regulations regarding copyright, patents, libel, restrictions on political speech, non-disclosure agreements, cryptography, restrictions on maintaining customer records, tax or mandatory licensing, DMCA, music sharing services, or other issues; child pornography is the only content explicitly prohibited. At the present time, child pornography is not precisely defined; HavenCo is obeying rules similar to those of the United States, specifically a prohibition on any depiction of those under 18 in a sexual context.


      Also, with the support of UK (whom granted them sovereignty), it is quite unlikely that they get disconnected. It is like saying that we are going to cut off all the internet to California because a Gnutella hub is based there. Also, they are seeking a second connection to another place in Europe. For RIAA (for example) to be able to get the power to do such a thing would be quite unlikely and/or cost a lot of money. Also, I don't think the EU is quite supportive of RIAA.
      --


      _______________________________
      "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."
    5. Re:The Best Country / Law Mix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A friend once told me, "Never underestimate the power of lawyers to charge by the hour." It may be unlikely, but given enough time/presure, it could. Again, the real thing is that it's expensive to host there. If, say, Napster was doing it, how would they get money?

      I've often suspected they were secretly funded by the RIAA...

    6. Re:The Best Country / Law Mix by kz45 · · Score: 1

      First, it is expensive to host on Sealand. The yearly cost for managed co-location is $15,000us

      Does this include bandwidth?

      If so, it's a pretty Damn good price. Only about $1250 a month.

  37. KaZaA Linux by nice · · Score: 1

    Does this mean they've dumped kza-linux for good?

    There's no mention of it on the site and it stopped working rather abruptly sometime yesterday.

    1. Re:KaZaA Linux by mathboy · · Score: 5, Informative

      No it continues to work for a current session if you didnt restart after the changeover. I noticed this on one of my two kazaa sessions on different boxen so I went to try and test to see if I could login via the other one. So I quit my 2nd sessions and then couldnt login again. I proved my point.

      Then I slapped my head and said "DOH!"

      * DONT terminate your running linux clients! *

      they'll stay running if you dont kill them.

      Someone gonna hack the protocol to do a fake insert of a hacked linux client into the network?

    2. Re:KaZaA Linux by CrabCakeJimmy2k · · Score: 0
      * DONT terminate your running linux clients! *

      Don't terminate your windows clients either! The idea behind of these type of programs is give and take. If you only run the program when you want something, you're nothing but a leech. Of course, I'll bet that most of you who only run the software only when you want something have sharing disabled anyway.

      I know, I know. You're gonna tell me that using these types of programs is contradictory to the moral highground I am trying to take because I'm leeching money from the pockets of the artists that have worked hard to produce the wonderful music, moveis and software that I am downloading. But hey, at least I am giving back to the community of theives that make it possible for me to get the files I am downloading in the first place.

  38. Charge for access? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would anyone pay a monthly fee to access when you can get the same thing for free? The short list:

    http://www.filenavigator.com
    http://www.winmx.com
    http://www.limewire.com
    http://www.bearshare.com

    1. Re:Charge for access? by NiftyNews · · Score: 2

      If you're seriously comparing KaZaa and BearShare, you have a lot of learning to do.

      Start with "SpyWare Tracking for Dummies" and then move on to "Why a File-Sharing Service with 1000 Times More Content is Better."

    2. Re:Charge for access? by kz45 · · Score: 1

      If you're seriously comparing KaZaa and BearShare, you have a lot of learning to do.

      Start with "SpyWare Tracking for Dummies" and then move on to "Why a File-Sharing Service with 1000 Times More Content is Better."


      You should try filenavigator. I just tried it, and it has just as many results as kazaa.

      No spyware either (as far as I can tell, with adaware).

  39. Some Kazaa Linux clients no longer login? by mathboy · · Score: 1, Redundant

    my linux client wont login at all, just sits 'connecting...'. (some suggested that the linux client logs in as anon and continues as always)

    since there's no way to get at more interactive or per-peer user functions in the linux client (and you dont have to see advertising!) it doesnt much matter that you're anonymous (at least it didnt matter to me :)

    trying to sign up again as a new user doesnt work either. and there seems to be no new version for linux to download on the site.

    do others have a different version for linux?

    mine was 294517 Dec 18 17:52 kza.linux.tar.gz
    which calls itself .0401

    (if yours works, can, i uh, get a copy? :)

    1. Re:Some Kazaa Linux clients no longer login? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      reporting the size of the tar file and the version number ISNT redundant. no one else has posted that.

      trying to share information here. please punish me for that.

  40. Legal Action in the Internet Age by Tazzy531 · · Score: 1

    This is probably the first action where an internet company has avoided a court order by moving its base of operation to another country. If this is continued, KaZaa could potentially avoid shutting down by doing this each time they are sued. One thing though, this would cost RIAA a whole lot of money to keep up with them.

    --


    _______________________________
    "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."
  41. Same thing C= did... by OneFix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most likely, they've not been sold at all. This used to be pretty common for companies to do. For those that don't remember, Commodore did this back in the 70's so they could pay lower taxes. They incorporated in the Bahamas I think. One advantage is that when the company goes bust, the top executives can't be touched. It happened in C='s case and if it can happen with that company (massive debt and serious problems with management decisions), it could easily happen with KaZaA...

    1. Re:Same thing C= did... by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 2

      It's also extremely common that if you want some technology you just go out and buy it.

      It's all speculation now. I mean, what if Sharman is actually a huge SPAM operation? They've just bought a huge client base. When you download their "new" software, it automatically uploads SPAM to your system, and then distributes it to all the other peers. There are plenty of RIAA conspiracy theories out there as well. Who knows.

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  42. In related news, Gnutella quadruples overnight by Froze · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It would seem that the disgruntled users have decided to switch to gnutella. This chart shows that an increase of 400% overnight just occured . Shuting down a truly decentralized P2P network won't be so easy.

    --
    -- The morphemes of your disquisition are ascertainable, but they have eschewed an ambit of transpicuous exposition.
    1. Re:In related news, Gnutella quadruples overnight by I.T.R.A.R.K. · · Score: 0

      Considering how badly Gnutella scales, it seems to do a pretty good job of shutting itself down. ;p
      Gnutella is fine if you like sub-1kbyte/second downloads.

      --

      "Adequacy.org: Where congenital stupidity is not an option, but a requirement."

    2. Re:In related news, Gnutella quadruples overnight by Pussy+Is+Money · · Score: 2, Troll

      Why do people keep saying this? All that needs to happen is for the ISP's to block the proper port ranges. DEADBEEF

      --
      Pushin' 'n dealin', shovin' 'n stealin'
    3. Re:In related news, Gnutella quadruples overnight by __past__ · · Score: 1
      Unless they block everything except port 80 (and maybe 25, 110, 443 and a few others), you could always just use another port. The only problem is to agree on a well-known port fast enough to switch every so often.

      Maybe we could distribute the portnumber-of-the-week for Gnutella on Freenet, and vice versa :)

    4. Re:In related news, Gnutella quadruples overnight by Stonehand · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the socket version of frequency hopping.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    5. Re:In related news, Gnutella quadruples overnight by beebware · · Score: 1

      Is there a good reason why Gnutella et al couldn't also use port 80? I know that officially it's for the HTTP protocol, but it could be unofficially used by anything else...

    6. Re:In related news, Gnutella quadruples overnight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you trying to stay within stack boundries? :)

    7. Re:In related news, Gnutella quadruples overnight by wampus · · Score: 1

      I'm not too familiar with gnutella, but I for one am not going to run ANY p2p apps as root...

    8. Re:In related news, Gnutella quadruples overnight by PierceLabs · · Score: 1

      Gee thanks, now the broadband ISPs have even more reason to stop people from hosting servers from their homes. If the ISPs find themselves forced to do the blocking, they'll just block everything.

    9. Re:In related news, Gnutella quadruples overnight by kz45 · · Score: 1

      Is there a good reason why Gnutella et al couldn't also use port 80? I know that officially it's for the HTTP protocol, but it could be unofficially used by anything else...

      For starters, many cable modem providers block any port below 1024. I know mine will be starting such actions within 3 months.

    10. Re:In related news, Gnutella quadruples overnight by Pussy+Is+Money · · Score: 1

      Right, like using pig latin to get around Napster filtering. Look at how well that worked.

      --
      Pushin' 'n dealin', shovin' 'n stealin'
    11. Re:In related news, Gnutella quadruples overnight by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

      In my case [isp's] the only port blocked is 80.

      This isn't because of servers, rather Code Red... and that is because everyone was warez'n win2k server.

      I think though they have lifted that by now... but I think they still SAY it's blocked on their website.

      Your best bet, I think[?], would be to use a port higher than 65555. But if your report to dsheild or something it would look like an attack because it won't know what you are doing.

    12. Re:In related news, Gnutella quadruples overnight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Your best bet, I think[?], would be to use a port higher than 65555.

      My, aren't you a bright one. You're probably not aware that port is a short int, ie, 2 bytes. How you would have a port higher than 65536 is beyond me (you could at least use the correct number, numbnuts)

    13. Re:In related news, Gnutella quadruples overnight by gorilla · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The proper port ranges for gnutella are 1-65535.

    14. Re:In related news, Gnutella quadruples overnight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok, numbnuts... i went 19 over.

      notice the question mark?

    15. Re:In related news, Gnutella quadruples overnight by X.25 · · Score: 1

      I'm not too familiar with gnutella, but I for one am not going to run ANY p2p apps as root

      You don't need to run Gnutella clients as root. It binds to port 6346, which can be done by any user.

    16. Re:In related news, Gnutella quadruples overnight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, the proper port ranges for _ports_ are 1-65535. You're like the fourth person to do this in this thread. What's so mysterious about the whole 'a port number is two bytes' business?

    17. Re:In related news, Gnutella quadruples overnight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey ASSHOLE. two BYTES is sixteen BITS. That leaves two the SIXTEEENTH combinations, which is exactly your POINT, thus proving your POINT, numbnuts.

    18. Re:In related news, Gnutella quadruples overnight by Pussy+Is+Money · · Score: 1

      If you can make sizable segments of the Gnutella network switch from one port to another overnight, if you can get that information out there quickly and reliably, then what is preventing ISP's from picking it up?

      --
      Pushin' 'n dealin', shovin' 'n stealin'
    19. Re:In related news, Gnutella quadruples overnight by gorilla · · Score: 2

      It doesn't have to be a sizable segment, it only needs to be a few, because the protocol encodes the port number that each server is running on.

    20. Re:In related news, Gnutella quadruples overnight by Pussy+Is+Money · · Score: 1
      Hypothetically:

      All servers run on port X.
      ISP blocks port X.
      "Few" servers start running on port Y.

      Explain to me how does this help the servers still running on port X?

      --
      Pushin' 'n dealin', shovin' 'n stealin'
    21. Re:In related news, Gnutella quadruples overnight by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      wussy

    22. Re:In related news, Gnutella quadruples overnight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wussy wussy!!!

    23. Re:In related news, Gnutella quadruples overnight by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      And why should you be allowed to run a server from home? please do explain.

  43. If you're wealthy enough to buy a country. by dmaxwell · · Score: 2

    Any firm with that kind of power wouldn't necessarily have to tolerate that sort of ham handedness. I suppose that if the price is right, China or Russia would cheerfully launch their comsats. I also have little doubt that connectivity for the constellation could be bought from somewhere as well.

  44. What happened to the argument... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    ..that they provided to the court stating they didn't have the ability to stop users from using the software/network since by it's very nature it is decentralized.

    By disabling the linux client from being able to connect, haven't they proved otherwise?

  45. Use the Free alternatives by __past__ · · Score: 1
    The only chance if we don't want to look for another service twice a week is not to depend on central servers and, even more important, on single companies that can simply decide not to support Linux any more or to suddendly charge per download etc.

    There are a number of Free alternatives, like Gnutella, Freenet or the FastTrack-Clone giFT. Use them. Make them work. Make them get big. Donate billions of dollars for advertising :)

    1. Re:Use the Free alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should be for Anonymous Cowards to and and use Ip-adresses hard to trace. (Multicast with .par checksums?)

  46. Educate us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use neither Kazaa or BearShare. What is the difference, if any? What is the spyware situation with them?

  47. Buyer is Sharman Networks by morzel · · Score: 3, Informative
    According to ZDNET Belgium [Dutch Text], the buyer appears to be "Sharman Networks", an Australian based company.
    They've also acquired the fasttrack licence.

    Users will be required to agree to new terms of usage, the next time they log in.

    --
    Okay... I'll do the stupid things first, then you shy people follow.
    [Zappa]
    1. Re:Buyer is Sharman Networks by tumutbound · · Score: 2, Informative

      A search of the Australian Tax Office online data as of the 20th Jan, didn't reveral an ABN number for Sharman networks. (An ABN - australian business number - is required for all for businesses operating in Australia)

    2. Re:Buyer is Sharman Networks by Rob+from+RPI · · Score: 1

      I noticed that as well. Nothing comes up on the asic database for any combination of network networks, ltd and pty.

    3. Re:Buyer is Sharman Networks by Smokinn · · Score: 1

      My personal solution to this, don't log off! My box has been up 3.5 weeks so far (Not too bad with win98 =P) and I've been pimping out files on Kazaa the whole time. As long as you don't have to reboot you're perfectly fine!

      --
      "We must all be alike. Not everyone born free and equal, as the Constitution says, but everyone made equal."
  48. After all that investment? by anticypher · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's only a matter of time until MS becomes based in the Cayman Islands.

    Why would they move after investing all that time and money buying all those american politicians, and getting all those pro-microsoft laws passed?

    Nope. M$ will stay where they are, this anti-trust thing will be dealt with by a suitcase full of money or the assassination of clueful judges. The bandwidth is too good in the PNW compared to backward tropical islands.

    the AC

    --
    Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
  49. Conspiracy theory! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Futher details are not made public. What amount the from Australia coming Sharman Networdks paid for KaZaA is not clear. According to Nikkki Hemming, CEO of sharman the continuenece of Kazaa is insured. "we think it is fantastic to resume the service of Kazaa and development the tradmark Kazaa"

    heres a conspiracy theory for yall

    http://www.smh.com.au/news/0011/07/national/nati on al13.html

    a Nikki Hemming was segaworld's CEO in sydney. sega world was owned by the same guy (kevin burmeister) who also ran brilliant 3d (www.bde3d.com)- but its really suffering. brilliant 3d's projector plugin was included with all morpheus downloads (and maybe kazaa too) for the last few months (you might have seen it quickly installing when you installed morpheus). could they be the new owners??

  50. Must...resist...urge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    New South Wales is an Australian state.

    The urge to bark "Yes, I know!" in exasperated tones at my monitor...

  51. Music City by ImaLamer · · Score: 3, Informative

    I just downloaded Morpheus this morning because a major HD crash pushed Kazaa off with the rest of my data.

    Now I read on that site in the RIAA letter that they [RIAA] is teaming up with the Fast Track team [MC&Kazaa].

    Not good for me since my registered name on Morpheus is: IH8URIAA.

    I must also report that about 30 mins ago I wasn't getting files [segments] from Kazaa users, but now I'm doing that and also getting great speeds.

    I'm going to gnutella [mainstream] if Limewire puts a tad more work into their program. It's great now, and so is gnutella in general. But it doesn't have the 'juice' like Fast Track does. I know I will get flamed for this.

  52. hm... something else. by Profe55or+Booty · · Score: 4, Informative

    from the terms of use:

    6. Payment and fees
    6.1 Certain features of the KaZaA Media Desktop may require payment in the future including a prepaid fee ("Prepaid Fee").
    The Prepaid Fee, and all taxes and other fees related thereto will be paid by you in advance.
    You shall pay all fees and charges incurred through your account at the rates in effect for the billing period in which such fees and charges are incurred.
    All fees and charges shall be billed to you, and you shall be solely responsible for their payment.
    You shall pay all applicable taxes relating to the use of the Software through your account.
    If you do not pay the applicable fees, including Prepaid Fees, within the prescribed period of time your account will be terminated immediately, without limiting KaZaA's right to demand payment of fees and damages at a later time.

    *sigh*

    --
    sig - .
    1. Re:hm... something else. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Good thing I have the old version, which has the additional advantage of requiring them to litigate me in the Netherlands when I h@x0r their protocol :).

      ~~~

    2. Re:hm... something else. by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

      At least it's pre-paid and doesn't suggest that sometime down the line you will get a bill for the thousands of dollars that you 'saved'.

      I've read complete web pages warning that Fast Track keeps track of what you dl, and may use it against you some day.

    3. Re:hm... something else. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yet anopther company that wants me to A: host material so they can make money, b: charge me for the privlage.
      good-bye

  53. I'm baffled by ziggy_zero · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I use KaZaA. Every day. KaZaA never stopped downloads. I'm wondering what all the hubbub was about.

    --
    I belong to the ______ generation.
    1. Re:I'm baffled by burbs · · Score: 1

      The company had stopped downloads of the client itself due to pending litigation (or some other legal matter) with the Dutch government, which is supposed to happen on Jan 31. So those who wanted to get the client were SOL.

  54. Re:Moving or selling KaZaA doesn't change liabilit by ccmann · · Score: 1

    Napster was hit for "vicarious" liability, which means (more or less) that they helped somebody infringe copyright, even though they didn't actually infringe copyright themselves. In other words, the company didn't actually have to download or use any copyrighted material itself to be guilty. As I understand it, the liability consisted of operating the service -- not in having a central index -- so that KaZaA could be charged with the same offense. To show that the service itself wasn't vicarious infringement, they had to show substantial noninfringing uses, which in the opinion of the court they didn't (I'm not making this argument, I'm just saying what the court said). KaZaA argues that it can't know what people are trading, because a) it doesn't maintain a central index; and b) the files are encrypted. IP lawyers have told me that these arguments are weak as a matter of law. That the FastTrack crew seem (on the basis of this article and the web posting on the KaZaA site) to be bailing would suggest that they agree.

  55. silliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even if there was the most amazing / stable / perfect / best performing operating system out there; if it was made by M$, the average slashdot reader would still say that it 'sucked'.

    1. Re:silliness by praedor · · Score: 1

      Because it WOULD. You wrote an oxymoron. ANYTHING from M$, no matter how "hard" they try, will/does suck. It sucks on technical grounds, it sucks on moral grounds, it sucks in prinicipal.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
  56. Cops are exempt from 17 USC 1201 by yerricde · · Score: 2

    Ya gotta love the RIAA going against the DMCA or whatever that anti-reverse-engineering thing is called.

    According to this PDF from the US Library of Congress, law enforcement officers operating in the line of duty are exempt from the anti-circumvention provisions of the DMCA. (Read More...)

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  57. Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not offtopic. If Kazaa goes down, who cares? There are plenty of superior file sharing systems that the government can't stop.

  58. Former site: with one key change - no more Linux by pyite69 · · Score: 1


    This sucks... does anyone have a copy of the linux client?
    Does it work?

  59. The site is throwing MySQL errors... by IIOIOOIOO · · Score: 1
    So here is the text...

    Dotcom Scoop first reported earlier today that it appeared that file-sharing service KaZaA had been sold after the company's website was mysteriously changed early this morning and then reverted back to its original form.

    The company issued the following statement this morning:

    "Jan. 21, 2002 -- Sharman Networks Limited, a privately held company, has purchased certain assets of KaZaA BV, including the popular consumer site KaZaA.com, distributor of KaZaA Media Desktop software. KaZaA BV is the Netherlands-based software and products company that founded KaZaA.com. The transaction was announced by Sharman CEO Nikki Hemming.

    KaZaA Media Desktop is a full-featured peer-to-peer file sharing software that allows users to search, download, organize and play media files. Included in Sharman's purchase of assets are the license for the FastTrack P2P Stack, the KaZaA.com Web site, name, and logos.

    "We are thrilled at our opportunity to resume the KaZaA service and further develop the KaZaA brand,'' stated Sharman CEO Nikki Hemming. "We value the millions of users of KaZaA's software and will continue to enhance and grow our core offerings."

    KaZaA BV will continue to operate its remaining assets. Terms of the deal were not disclosed."

    No further information was provided about Sharman Network Services. As we reported earlier, the company appears to be based in Australia due to information contained in KaZaA's new terms of use agreement.

    A search for Sharman CEO Nikki Hemming reveals that she was the CEO of Sega World, an electronic theme park in Sydney, Australia that closed in late 2000. If that is indeed the same Nikki Hemming.

    1. Re:The site is throwing MySQL errors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. You can copy and paste. Mod this post up! +5; Informative.

  60. kazaa on mac by athagon · · Score: 1

    Hopefully - provided KaZaA really did sell out - the new company will put more effort into developing a MacOSX version of KaZaA--LimeWire is good, but KaZaA is great.

    --
    I think, therefore, I'm smarter than our president.
  61. Poor chechians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think millions of chechians pray that
    Switzerland never pisses of the US of A.
    See:

    http://www.clifford.at/funpic/cnn_europe.jpg

    for reference.

    johnboy

  62. Re-sume or Res-u-me' ? by billstewart · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wait - are they saying you can resume downloading now? Or are they saying you can download their resumes if you're interested in hiring them? :-)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Re-sume or Res-u-me' ? by Natalie's+Hot+Grits · · Score: 1

      let me guess, did you misread the quote? Did you accidently misread Resume? ROFL LOL OMFG LOFL ICBI CUML's. i can't believe that is so fucking funny OMG im going to go tell my mommy

      --
      Two infinite things: your stupidity and mine. But I'm not sure about the latter. If my sig offends you, I'm sorry.
  63. "If we can't kill them....lets buy them!" by Alehandro · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    LOL...big bro srtike again.:)
    If Kazza (btw in translation from Russian kazza means a female-buck..yes yes..the one with sharp horns and which gives milk.:))) will be charging for their service. It'll die as Napster died. What happened in company itself?. Ha... Good old american way to win wars. If we can't kill them....lets buy them. War in Afganistan is a good example. And now we have another exelent example of War@Work.

  64. He should have sold it to Cuba by aztektum · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Come on like Fidel would give two shits.

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
  65. They'd better opensourced it... by Lispy · · Score: 1

    What a shame. I got the linux client just the other day and i loved it. Only thing i was worried bout was that it wasn't open source.

    I didn't consider this to be a problem but now when i hear about hardcoded nodes i am really upset. Why oh why?? It could be all up and running in a few mins. But nope! They had to close the code ;-(

    Any other useful Linux Fastrack Clients I don't know of?

  66. New way to avoid the RIAA/MPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So...next time the RIAA/MPAA come knocking, quickly sell to someone in another country. Then the media giants will have to go get new warrents in that country...

  67. Complaints And Grievances by nevek · · Score: 1

    I've posted this before, but it was late and I think it was missed. Just incase I'm reposting it just to get my thoughts out on the media sharing community.

    My journey through music sharing.

    It started with borrowing your friend's cd and ripping the big files to your hard drive.. Or copying it to a 4$ CD-R.

    Then came the MP3, and password ftp sites came along with the endless run of phony music WebPages.

    Then Napster came, I know there were a few before it, but Napster- worked... It was finally the perfect alternative to searching for FTP passwords or waiting in endless IRC lines.

    It was great at first, you could throw around your George Carlin, Doors, or the newest Grateful Dead Re-Release. We were rarely bothered by a Jessica Simpson. Then the 10-13 year old girls discovered this magical service, suddenly they could click their friendly AOL 6.0 shoutcuts, open a cute little kitten, and listen to their "boy bands" through their gateway speakers and the magical Napster audio player.

    It spread like a plague, every day more and more 98 degrees fans joined, using cute little symbolized usernames and their hotmail e-mail addresses. It was madness thousands and thousands of songs and servers bloated with them. Here comes the bad part, they told their friends, who in turn told their friends and they kept coming. Eventually their parents found out and eventually the record companies realized that the parents of this 12 year old don't have to go spend 21.95 on the newest 11 track cd, when they could let them simply download the music. This pissed off the record companies.

    Napster Died

    Then came Scour, and CuteMx.. Also died, almost no profit, could not fight the endless supply of lawsuits.

    A few services came to try and fill the napster void, Napigator, Bearshare etc, all failed..

    Then came Kazaa, it was great at first. Geeks could trade the newest excerpt of Linux source code, or the latest Avery Brooks IBM commercial. But like I expected: - two weeks later every girl scout with a Barbie computer and a brain powerful enough to spell download.com strolled in, flooded the service with N'SHIT and told all their 11 year old purse carrying friends that "It was just like napster" Goodbye Kazaa. Almost every 13 year old girl would come home after school fire up Windows Me, clear through the endless adds that pop up with their computer from all the crap they have downloaded. Open their Icq, MSN, YahooChat, Hotmail Mailboxes, and now Kazaa.

    Turn on Kazaa, type in any of a hundred key words, street, oops, love... And your screen will be flooded with the endless lip-syncing remixes.

    It's not all bad, we still have IRC, they cannot dominate that, they lack the brainpower. Anything that takes actual interface with other users, or requires a distant thought is out of their league. How often have you seen a person jump into a warez channel and yell "SOMEONE DCC ME THE NEWEST TIMBERLAKE REMIX." It won't happen.

    I know I'm ranting, and I may be wrong, they're just trying to get some free songs the same way that I am. Regardless of music tastes, they do not contribute, the second they accidentally find the "Disable Sharing With Other Users" and put the D section of the encyclopedia back on the shelf. They stop sharing. Freeloaders. I also understand I may be biased, but I think the majority of the problem is coming from them, feel free to argue with me, I don't mind.. They don't actually contribute to the community, they just take. How many of them do you think have ripped and encoded a cd. How many of them do you think have ever run a free FTP?

    I could go on and on with different rants and the problems with these people, I think I've written enough to be heard. These are just my thoughts.

    Kevin Franklin
    Windsor Ontario.
    I am not an Atheist I believe in Dog.

    1. Re:Complaints And Grievances by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Thats a rant, I would argue with you, but I agree 100%

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  68. So you're saying by Lispy · · Score: 1

    all i needed to do was to leave it running on my router instead on my desktop machine. Doh! This is sad. It's got the nicest uptime...

    Anyways, let's go for Kza-Uptime Records...see if we can sit out the windows client...

  69. Re:Australia a bad move? - What would you know ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you live in australia?

    NO - well i do and you have no fucking idea about our 'laws' on internet or other issues - i work in Aussie IT and the supposed restrcitions are something i have never come up against nor most lilkely will.

    If your not an aussie butt out - after all when was the last time and american listened to someone from overseas ? (hint it involved 3 airplanes)

  70. Red dwarf by neurojab · · Score: 1

    I had 800+ megs of VCD-compliant red dwarf, that I've been leeching for a week and a half, but all the episodes are about 90% complete. This morning I killed kazaa in order to surf the web (I can't with kazaa running, HTTP timeouts everywhere), and now I'm SOL!

    DOH DOH DOH!

    1. Re:Red dwarf by neurojab · · Score: 1

      Sorry, what I meant was SMEG SMEG SMEG!

    2. Re:Red dwarf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which ones are you missing? I'vr ripped most of mine to divx to save space, but I may have what you're missing

  71. does -your- gnutella work? by acid_zebra · · Score: 1

    Everybody keeps saying 'yea, I'm switching to gnutella'. and yes, the downloads are through the roof:
    http://www.limewire.com/historical_size.html
    (as mentioned earlier in this discussion)

    And I recall a few days earlier /. ran this article
    http://slashdot.org/articles/01/02/14/190225.sht ml
    describing why Gnutella et al can't scale
    It points to the whole dissertation here:
    http://www.darkridge.com/~jpr5/doc/gnutella.html
    (last url, I swear)

    So, is Gnutella still working?
    I know my kazaa is...

    --
    -- No Sig is a Good Sig
  72. It costs me around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US$35/month on Optus Cable - hardly unreasonable by any means

  73. why is it OK to tape a show and not to divX it? by acid_zebra · · Score: 1

    why is it OK to tape a show and not to divX it? well? why can everybody individually put any show on the telly on video; but as soon as you make it machine-readable and share it so others that could potentially tape the very same show don't have to? (is this a sentence? I need some sleep)

    --
    -- No Sig is a Good Sig
    1. Re:why is it OK to tape a show and not to divX it? by mpe · · Score: 2

      why is it OK to tape a show and not to divX it?

      Because we have ended up with a situation where the law is actually different for analogue and digital recordings. Something which major publishing and distribution companies appear to have worked hard to create.

  74. Re:Former site: with one key change - no more Linu by burbs · · Score: 1

    I had the client, then for some silly reason I decided to format my drives. I believe it was an "alpha" version, but it worked well. The only thing which I didn't care about it was it forced you to share files. Other than that it was pretty straight forward. It ran from the console and you weren't bombarded with ads and such. Just a simple interface: search and download. I really could care less if there's anything else there for me to use.

  75. Re:Australia a bad move? - What would you know ? by autocracy · · Score: 1
    Me, yesterday. And I don't live in China - but I know they're pretty fucked up.

    A country that bans GTA 3 from it's citizens because of what you can do in it that is not part of the story line is dealing with some rather stupid politicians (yeah, we have that problem in America too)...

    --
    SIG: HUP
  76. They Should Move to a small country by phat_rat · · Score: 0

    Why dont they just move to Bolivia or something?And pay the government to allow you to do whatever you want.Small govs are easily corrupted,as are large ones.

    --
    "Fight The Power"
  77. Does 'Sharman Networks' really exist? by Nick+Smith · · Score: 1

    I did a search of the Australian Securities and Investment Commission business names register [www.asic.gov.au] and the Australian Business Register [www.abr.business.gov.au] and no company like Sharman Networks Limited exists...

    I don't see how this company can be "Limited" and not be in ASIC's register.

  78. Sharman Network Services is not a company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok.

    There is no Sharman Network Services registered as a company or trading name in Australia.

    There is a Sharman Motor Company and a Sharman Constructions. There is a Sharman Pty Ltd which is owned and directed by SHARBEL FARAH, born 1968 in Isreal. However that company is registered in Victoria, not NSW.

    I smell something fishy.

    Nikki Hemming would appear to be Nicola Anne Hemming born 1967 in the UK. She is a director of NKB Holdings and RESONANCE BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS PTY LIMITED both are incorporated in NSW but don't mention Sharman at all.

    Hmmm. Very interesting.

  79. Morpheus? KaZaA mod? by Tigris666 · · Score: 1

    Does morpheus [musiccity.com] use KaZaA as it's engine?

    I know it names all the files kazaa29387409871234.dat

    If this is the case, what other software out there uses KaZaA as it's engine and what is going to happen to all of those?

    --
    Kids, you tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is, never try. -- Homer J. Simpson
    1. Re:Morpheus? KaZaA mod? by WWWWolf · · Score: 1
      Does morpheus [musiccity.com] use KaZaA as it's engine?

      Kazaa, Morpheus and Grokster all use the FastTrack P2P stack - basically, same program, different UI.

  80. Re:Legal Action in the Internet Age-Uplink. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not put the thing on a ship and connect via satellite?

  81. Gnutella will scale with ultrapeers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out the details on Ultrapeers. Gnutella will scale very nicely. Ultrapeer Proposal

  82. Sharman Networks Limited *does not exist* by Zeddicus_Z · · Score: 1

    Sharman Networks Limited does not exist as a company in Australia.

    According to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (with which *every* Australian company must be registered), there is no such company as Sharman Networks Limited.

    Furthermore, there is no company by that name in either the Yellow Pages nor the White Pages. Heck, I even checked Directory Assistence in case they had newly been added.

    NSW Department of Fair Trading hasn't heard of Sharman Networks. Sharman Networks holds no patents. Sharman Networks is not listed as either an Australian company name or Australian business name. As far as I can tell, no Australian Gov. organisation (or indeed Industry organisation) has had contact with Sharman.

    That leaves two possabilites.

    #1 Sharman Networks is a newly formed shell company that is being used soley for this transaction (hence lack of web presence or reference). However, this is unlikely as the ASIC database carries information on companies who are registered under names different to those they trade under.

    #2 Sharman Networks does not exist, and Kazaa is up to some strange tricks in order to move juristiction of its matters out of Dutch hands, as their new ToS states.

    --
    Janie took my gun...
  83. 400% is way too few by burbilog · · Score: 1
    It would seem that the disgruntled users have decided to switch to gnutella

    NO. I won't switch to gnutella in the nearest future, and many people won't. Why? Let's do the experiment: fire up gnutella and search for something like "Klaus Hallen", "Koopmans", "Nico Haak", "Max Greger". You'll get shitloads of hits in all morpheus/kazaa/whatever clients, and very quickly, but only a few in Gnutella. May be there is no difference when you search for britney on these systems, but when you want to find rare records... Unfortunately, today Gnutella can't beat Fast Track systems. Gnutella is a nice concept, but still needs imporvement. And by the way, there are STILL NO CLIENT WORKING WITH FRIGGING SOCKS PROXY! And don't say anything about sockscap... it doesn't work.

  84. New business model! by eison · · Score: 1

    1) Incorporate.
    2) Program P2P file sharing system.
    3) Host enough Britney Spears songs/videos to get RIAA attention.
    4) Sell company to RIAA, Get Rich Quick!

    --
    is competition good, or is duplication of effort bad?
  85. followup Re:article on webwereld.nl by leuk_he · · Score: 2

    There is a followup to this article.:
    http://www.webwereld.nl/nieuws/9910.phtml
    -sherman networks is unknow.
    -A judge will not take this.(according to a involved loyer)
    -bumra/stemra knows of nothing