Slashdot Mirror


VeriSign Buys .tv

Mike Damm writes: "As everyone is so worried about Microsoft these days, another monopoly is slipping through the cracks. VeriSign has paid the country of Tuvalu $45 million in cash for The .TV Corporation, as stated by this press release. Same great service, different obscure TLD!"

266 comments

  1. How many of these new domains? by bliss · · Score: 0

    How many different types of these domains are there to date. I really cannot keep up with it all.

    --
    The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of a million is a statistic --Joseph Stalin
    1. Re:How many of these new domains? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, .tv is the country code for the island nation of Tuvalu. But of course you know this from reading the FREAKING SUMMARY of the article.

    2. Re:How many of these new domains? by renehollan · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Each country has it's own top-level two character domain name. Then there are the historical non-national (but generally US-centric) .com, .org, .gov, .mil, .arpa, .int.

      .int is interesting, as it is designed for multi- and inter-national organizations. The best known .int subdomain is tpc.int. which is used to map domain names to phones (typically, with fax machines).

      --
      You could've hired me.
    3. Re:How many of these new domains? by bliss · · Score: 0, Troll

      "Each country has it's own top-level two character domain name. Then there are the historical non-national (but generally US-centric) .com, .org, .gov, .mil, .arpa, .int."

      I guess my next question is why are people using tuvalu for web hosting?

      ".int is interesting, as it is designed for multi- and inter-national organizations. The best known .int subdomain is tpc.int. which is used to map domain names to phones (typically, with fax machines)."

      the UN?

      --
      The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of a million is a statistic --Joseph Stalin
    4. Re:How many of these new domains? by Thrakkerzog · · Score: 1

      They're not. They are just paying for one of their domain names.

    5. Re:How many of these new domains? by renehollan · · Score: 2

      .tv became a "hot" TLD because of the television tie-in, hence the desire to have a .tv domain. This just means that Verisign paid for the right to handle DNS for the domain so they can charge to register .tv subdomains, so do the math.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    6. Re:How many of these new domains? by bliss · · Score: 0, Troll

      "tv became a "hot" TLD because of the television tie-in, hence the desire to have a .tv domain. This just means that Verisign paid for the right to handle DNS for the domain so they can charge to register .tv subdomains, so do the math."

      and hence my original post wondering if they had created a new set of domains. But I guess the Tuvaluians are quite pleased I would assume.

      --
      The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of a million is a statistic --Joseph Stalin
    7. Re:How many of these new domains? by Lawbeefaroni · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I remember hearing ads for the .tv TLD around a year ago. They were saying something about how television was so much better than radio and how .com and .net names are like radio and .tv domains would revolutionize "the 'net" like the television revolutionized entertainment. Crap like "Why settle for a static, boring .com name when you can have a fully multimedia .tv name..." I couldn't believe people would buy that line of crap.

      --
      "When it rains, it pours." --Morton's Salt
    8. Re:How many of these new domains? by renehollan · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I couldn't believe people would buy that line of crap.

      "There's a sucker born every minute" -- P. T. Barnum, I believe.

      Sometimes I think the reason most smart people don't get rich selling, as you say, crap, to the dummies, is that most smart people can't imagine anyone that stupid. Sadly, such people exist. Frighteningly, they vote.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    9. Re:How many of these new domains? by FastT · · Score: 1
      Frighteningly, they vote.
      Exactly. How do you think Bush was elected?
      --

      The only certainty is entropy.
    10. Re:How many of these new domains? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha.
      Feeling superior ?

      Hmm ... you and people like you got fucked over by a bunch of "idiots" who managed to get their man in the office.
      You were talking about intelligence right ?

    11. Re:How many of these new domains? by FastT · · Score: 2
      Given how the brewing Enron scandal is looking, and God knows what else is going down in Bush's old boy network, it wasn't just "me and people like me" that got fucked over. Checked who's dick is in your asshole lately?
      You were talking about intelligence right?
      I never said that a minority of intelligence is a match for a majority of stupidity. Don't get me wrong, the world needs stupid people, just not so many of them.
      --

      The only certainty is entropy.
  2. Monopolies aren't that terrible by ender-iii · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Monopolies aren't that terrible as long as they don't bend us over and aim for penitration.

    --
    ender-iii
  3. At least... by spatrick_123 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    At least Tuvalu is getting some money for its citizens (or dictator, or royal family - I'm not up on Tuvalian politics) with the sale of the .tv extension. Here in the US we just let corporations make money off of our extensions with no return to the taxpayer.

    1. Re:At least... by Splat · · Score: 2

      Can you please clarify how "corporations make money off our extensions with no return to the taxpayer?". Unless there's some great conspiracy selling off .US domains, I think most of the Slashdot crowd (me included) has no idea what you're referring to.

    2. Re:At least... by nomadic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      According to the CIA world factbook it's a constitutional monarchy. Of 10,000 people. Which just quintupled it's GDP.

      What I don't understand is how they can sell it twice; I thought they already sold it a while ago.

      I'm not sure why Verisign would give that much. I mean, does anyone actually buy .tv domain names?

    3. Re:At least... by swb · · Score: 2

      I think he's talking about that NSI was given .com, .net and .org to administer originally by NSF or DARPA when they got sick of doing it themselves. They then started charging for the domain names, even though they had been given no mandate to do so. Once they figured out it was a really profitable business, they fought tooth and nail to keep out other registrars. IIRC, they still have some monopoly control over the domain database until 2010 or the ICANN people decide they want a bigger slice.

      It's just another example of a vague, unspecified government giveaway that turns into a free money monopoly for big business.

    4. Re:At least... by linzeal · · Score: 1

      shhhh, don't tell verisign I hear that they will also sell sacred "tabu" idols by the dozen.

    5. Re:At least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.nic.us

    6. Re:At least... by levik · · Score: 1
      Ummm, and since then are the domain extensions that you mentioned owned by the US? The US doesn't make any money off of those, simply because it does not own them.

      The .us domains are another matter, but I don't think anyone's buying those, as they have to be geographically specific.

      --
      Ñ'
    7. Re: At least... by Jonathunder · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Tuvalu is a democracy. Queen Elizabeth II is the constitutional monarch, represented by a governor general, who has mostly ceremonial power. Actual power is in an elected council and prime minister.

      Tuvalu is also quite poor; a group of sandy islands with few natural resorces and little industry. The gov't gets much of its money from selling stamps and coins. And now, from selling its TLD for $45 million. Great deal for them, probably.

    8. Re:At least... by ocbwilg · · Score: 3, Informative

      IIRC, they (Tuvalu) sold the rights to a company that formed the .tv corporation. Verisign looks like they just bought the company, which in theory would mean that Tuvalu got no money from the deal (unless they retained some sort of interest in the company that was formed).

    9. Re:At least... by gorgon · · Score: 2
      The .us domains are another matter, but I don't think anyone's buying those, as they have to be geographically specific.
      No, the .us domain has been sold off and soon it won't be geographic.
      --

      And I'd be a Libertarian, if they weren't all a bunch of tax-dodging professional whiners.
      Berke Breathed
    10. Re: At least... by rapid+prototype · · Score: 0

      actually Tuvalu sold the rights to .tv to a company called DotTV for 50 million last april. DotTV just sold the rights to .tv for 45 million, read the story.

      -rp

    11. Re:At least... by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 2

      They then started charging for the domain names, even though they had been given no mandate to do so.

      That's not true at all -- Before, the NSF was paying NSI $70 for every registration. That was the original contract they agreed to with NSI.

      After a while, the NSF said, "We can't afford to keep paying for everyone's domain registration!" and renegotiated the contract with NSI such that NSI would charge end users directly.

      Still, there were protests. They went like this:

      "I shouldn't have to pay you for a domain! Change things back the way they used to be!"

      "Oh, you mean you want everyone's tax dollars to pay for domain registration?"

      "Uh, gee, i mean, uh..."

    12. Re:At least... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      > According to the CIA world factbook it's a
      > constitutional monarchy. Of 10,000 people.

      Technically, yeah, but read down a little further and you find out their constitutional monarch is--Queen Elizabeth II! So the local prime minister/parliament really are running the show; difficult to tell from the Factbook entry how democratic they are; current prime minister took over because last one dropped dead of a heart attack (best rule of thumb to how much true democracy there is in a "democracy" is to see how often the head honcho changes because of an election).

      Chris Mattern

    13. Re:At least... by supabeast! · · Score: 1

      "The US doesn't make any money off of those, simply because it does not own them."

      Funny, the last time I checked the United States created the internet, including those domains, and does own them.

    14. Re:At least... by -brazil- · · Score: 1

      I saw a TV documentary about it. Tuvalu got the money, a substantial amount of company shares, and a seat in its board of directors. However, not even the guy who holds that seat really understand s what the deal is all about, what a TLD is. They have one computer school with not enough computers so that students spend most of the time memorizing (and reciting in chorus!) manuals...

      --

      The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
      --Henry Kissinger

    15. Re:At least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is at least the fourth time they have sold this domain. Two different fly-by-night Canadian companies bought it (or worked out some marketing scheme), about two and four years ago respectively IIRC, with all sorts of publicity about how they were going to do wonderful thinkgs for the poor people.

    16. Re:At least... by Jon_E · · Score: 1

      Bastards .. Postel is probably rolling in his grave

    17. Re:At least... by nomadic · · Score: 2

      Umm...yes, I had already read that, I don't see how the identity of their monarch affects what I said.

      Curiously enough, the Queen seems to actually wield some power in Tuvalu's case, appointing (via the Governor-General) the cabinet after consulting with the prime minister. Then the cabinet elects the next prime minister. Actually an interesting little closed system, with power circulating among a few people who can continually vote themselves another term. Not exactly democratic, but I think it's hard for a state with a population of 10,000 (less than half the size of my old college!) to be truly despotic.

  4. There is an advantage... by FortKnox · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... at least we don't have to worry about http://www.goatse.tv/!

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:There is an advantage... by buzban · · Score: 1

      ... at least we don't have to worry about http://www.goatse.tv/!

      not till you said something! ;)

    2. Re:There is an advantage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dammit, you knavish troll, you intentionally got the domain wrong!!!!
      It's goatse.cx, you knob!

    3. Re:There is an advantage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, but what about www.chixwithdix.tv ?

    4. Re:There is an advantage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those bastards now know the grotesque horror that is goatse.cx - do YOU?

      How could I not? I have it set as my homepage. Now if you'll excuse me while I go and open up a few dozen browser windows...

    5. Re:There is an advantage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      think about it. it's far easier to implant boobs than it is to create an entire functional penis.

  5. Damn foiled again eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NT

  6. Monopoly? by Geek+Boy · · Score: 2

    A) they are so not a monopoly... not by any stretch of the imagination.

    B) They haven't screwed me over yet, unlike certain other registrars with the tokens "domains" "at" "cost" and "ca" in their domain address.

    1. Re:Monopoly? by TheVidiot · · Score: 1

      I hear ya. Canadian domain registries just plain suck!

    2. Re:Monopoly? by Spamuel · · Score: 1

      Just curious, how did your .ca registrar screw you over?

    3. Re:Monopoly? by schon · · Score: 1

      Canadian domain registries just plain suck!

      Try Reg.ca the only problem I've had with them was the link to renew the domain asks you to log in first (you have to create an account to register the domain name in the first place.)

      There is a page that allows you to renew without logging on, but they don't advertise it.

      Other than that, their service has been second-to-none.. the one time I did have a problem (which wasn't even their fault - my browser crashed after registering a domain, before I could get confirmation to go to CIRA) they straightened it out within an hour.

    4. Re:Monopoly? by realdpk · · Score: 3, Informative

      Can you explain why you think that Verisign doesn't have a monopoly on .com domains? They get $6/year on every .com domain registered, regardless of who you're paying.

    5. Re:Monopoly? by Geek+Boy · · Score: 2

      They record your CC# when your purchase a domain. Then if you show interest in purchasing another (in my case, the exact same domain!!), they automatically bill your CC# without asking you first. Then they don't give a refund, even though in my case they provided me with no product. I fought with them, the BBB, and then Visa and Visa reverted the charge. Now they're threatening to send collection agency goons after me for 4x the original charge. Hmmmm...

    6. Re:Monopoly? by Geek+Boy · · Score: 2

      That's not a monopoly. That means they are the supplier of the services. everyone can profit off them, and quite honestly, as I said, they are much more honest and reliable than half the other registrars out there, so I wouldn't really care if they were a monopoly (or at least part of an oligopolism of some sort).

    7. Re:Monopoly? by jakew · · Score: 1

      Err... Actually it is a monopoly. Why can they charge $6 for an entry in a database? Because they are the ONLY supplier of the services. The service in question being the controller of the official .com domain database.

      I'm curious as to what your definition of a monopoly is. Since Verisign apparently do not meet your criteria.

      Honest and reliable?!?! I hope I stop laughing some time today.

      But then you don't care.

  7. Not a big deal really... by MantridDronemaker · · Score: 1

    This isn't really still a big deal is it? I'm sure there's still plenty of good dotcom addresses if you're creative enough. And plus this country got some cash, good for them.

    Oh and of course you can always change your root :)

    1. Re:Not a big deal really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And plus this country got some cash, good for them.

      Good for them?? If they're not going to use the TLD .tv for the use of its citizens then it should be removed from the DNS root zones. These zones are delegated freely to countries to use not to sell to the highest bidder. Otherwise they would've been allocated .television or .xbox or .ibm. ICANN should fuck them all and remove the TLD's of countries that sell them to companies like that including .us!

  8. Great by GdoL · · Score: 1

    Now MS can buy Microsoft.tv to sell its XBox.

    --

    ------I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either.------
  9. Just the domain? by RAVasquez · · Score: 1

    I'm sure that if Verisign wanted, for a few extra million they could have bought Tuvalu itself. It's only 26 sq km, but it'd be great for a Sealand-type tax haven.

    --

    --- Work, worry, consume, die. It's a wonderful life. -- Bill Griffith

    1. Re:Just the domain? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Not everything has a price tag you know...

    2. Re:Just the domain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not according to a person with the first name of Bill, and the last name of Gates.

    3. Re:Just the domain? by linzeal · · Score: 2, Funny
      Not everything has a price tag you know...

      Thats a pretty unamerican thing to say.

      Why even human meat (longpig) is for sale.

  10. It was interesting in it's time..... by crumbz · · Score: 1

    I remember reading the Wired article about the nation of Tuvala a couple of years ago during the heady days of the dot-com rush. My, my how times have changed. Now with the majority of internet users in the U.S. accessing the internet through a portal (AOL, Yahoo) do TLDs even matter? I mean $100,000 for mydumbshow.tv or coca-cola.tv or mcdonalds.tv? Didn't VerSign have a valuation of USD 10 billion at one point?
    God, I'm glad the bubble crashed so I can get back to the Mac vs. Windows debate with my friends.

    1. Re:It was interesting in it's time..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      let me assure you and your friends that Windows sucks, and Mac is still for kids.

    2. Re:It was interesting in it's time..... by saridder · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I remember the exact same article. The guy teamed up with them to get exclusive marketing and registration rights to the .tv TLD and he would share the profits with them. I never thought it would fly.

      There's still .fm .am out there Fromosia (sp?) and some other place.

      --
      --- RFC 1149 Compliant.
    3. Re:It was interesting in it's time..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great SIG. Datagrams over Avian Carriers.. Hehe :)

  11. And in a related story... by Matt2000 · · Score: 2, Interesting


    ...verisign loses $44.8 million dollars on the .tv registry.

    I can't believe people are still dealing out big cash for lame TLDs, what is this, '98?

    --

    1. Re:And in a related story... by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 2

      Sounds like a good deal to me -- The .TV corporation paid Tuvalu $50 million for the original rights, in addition to all the money spent promoting it and putting together the IT around it.

    2. Re:And in a related story... by Axiom · · Score: 1

      So, because somebody else paid more for it, that makes it a good deal? I've got some Enron shares to sell you-- purchased at $25, you can have them for $20.

    3. Re:And in a related story... by Suburban+nmate · · Score: 1

      Cash = untraceable = nice load of new toys for the "leaders".

      --
      "Windows and Linux can co-exist on the same machine." - Microsoft Corporation.
  12. Why... by T3kno · · Score: 1

    Two questions, why would anyone use Veri$ign when there are so many alternatives. And why would you want a suck tld like .tv or .cc when I just bought a 4 letter .com domain name yesterday.

    --
    (B) + (D) + (B) + (D) = (K) + (&)
    1. Re:Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why would you want a suck tld like .tv or .cc when I just bought a 4 letter .com domain name yesterday

      Because most people don't want dxzh.com or any other four random letters strung together domain, they want a domain with an actual word in it (gasp!).

    2. Re:Why... by Jon_E · · Score: 1

      um - actually you do use Verisign whenever you use a .com .. they run the registry remember?

      they'd been deploying .tv for about 2 years now - I still remember all the stupid radio ads .. this is no news - just another PT Barnum money-maker for suckers ..

      Th bigger problem this time, is since there is a lack of regulatory standards around pricing and service level agreements (ICANN is still a joke) - you've got one company that holds a monopoly running an exclusive registry and a registrar in the same container, with real power in both security and network routing .. who says the internet doesn't have a core?

    3. Re:Why... by T3kno · · Score: 1

      Good point, but at least dont feed the giant anymore than you have to. :) I hear all of the stupid radio ads for .tv and I just dont understand why you would want one. A few months ago I reserved mylinuxguy.com which I think is a great domain name, and this is in 2001 when supposedly all of the good names are taken. Just yesterday I reserved a four letter name for my company, I dont want to divulge it because it's still in development, but it's a great name, the name of our product. I think that these new tld's just muddy the water. Now I'll get spam from beastiality.com, beastiality.tv, and beastiality.cc :)

      --
      (B) + (D) + (B) + (D) = (K) + (&)
    4. Re:Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And beastiality.net, beastiality.edu, beastialiaty.int and beastiality.us? ;)

    5. Re:Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unless they've upped their pricing - $6/registration from each registrar (Verisign included) flows to the registry .. essentially a huge legal pyramid scheme with Verisign sitting on the top (they still run the root servers which hold *all* the tlds aka - the hidden dot after the .com - 198.41.0.4 - remember!) unfortunately DoC (who is responsible for the root servers) is too strapped and clueless to understand much about what they're doing .. or take over this administration for themselves .. odd when you think about it, but the entire system administration of DNS falls on all of about a dozen ppl.

      To me the best way out of this would be to fork DNS - build a better scheme, and get universal buy-in by hosting better content/applications .. (perhaps what .NET thought about and missed due to upper mgmt arrogance and a crappy platform) - imho DNS is incredibly fragmented, dated, and bastardized - of course a difficult road, but much needed to leave all the TLD discussions behind.

  13. Verisign is positioning itself . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    . . . for the imminent projected growth of she-male porn sites, which will, logically, desire a name in the .tv space.

    ~~~

    1. Re:Verisign is positioning itself . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      she-male porn sites, which will, logically, desire a name in the .tv space

      Wouldn't that be .ts space?

      .tv would be for cross-dressers :o)

    2. Re:Verisign is positioning itself . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      LOL :) guess I forgot the distinction.

      ~~~

  14. timetables by bliss · · Score: 1

    "Monopolies aren't that terrible as long as they don't bend us over and aim for penitration."

    when *don't* monopoliies hurt people

    ps what the hell happened to questionexchange.com? it looks gone forever

    --
    The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of a million is a statistic --Joseph Stalin
    1. Re:timetables by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      You asked "when *don't* monopoliies hurt people?" The answer is: whenever they don't get monopoly prices. The theory behind regulated monopolies is that they *would* get monopoly prices by virtue of their natural monopoly (remember, this is just a theory). And monopoly prices are bad because they lead to a reduction in total value to society. Monopolies want them because they lead to higher profits. People don't want them because monopoly prices cost people more than the profits they return to the monopoly.
      This is to be differentiated from ordinary prices in a competitive market, which give the greatest amount of value to society as a whole.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    2. Re:timetables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I presume you get your water form some metropolitan source. Can you say monopoly?

      Unless they have been poisioning the drinking water, oh... wait. Nevermind.

      Guess your'e right again.

    3. Re:timetables by smunt · · Score: 1

      > > when *don't* monopoliies hurt people?
      > whenever they don't get monopoly prices

      It's nice to be able to buy the bread you like most. But a reasonable default is also necessery.

  15. Versign gives horrid service....... by jsimon12 · · Score: 1

    I have had nothing but problems with Verisign, they are a monopoly of sorts and know it, and generally treat their customers like dirt. Not only that but they charge 35 bucks a year for a domain, about twice what everyone else charges, and you don't get any value add services for that extra cash, unless you count the weekly Verisign SPAM fest you get, even if you opt out of their newsletter, which is SPAM too.

    Personally I would like to see another class action against Verisgin (I belive there was or is currently one going on). The government has given them too much power and they simply abuse it. Buying the .tv domain is just another sign of the times.

    What is next? The Weyland Corporation running everything?

    1. Re:Versign gives horrid service....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, eventually the Weyland-Yutani Corporation will soon run everything. Then they'll become careless with biological weapons development and we'll all be screwed in the end.

    2. Re:Versign gives horrid service....... by jlower · · Score: 1

      they charge 35 bucks a year for a domain

      Except for .tv which is $50 per year.

    3. Re:Versign gives horrid service....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen brother! I just hope they're as incompetent at handling their own financials as they are the technical and customer aspects of their business.

    4. Re:Versign gives horrid service....... by thirdrail · · Score: 1

      I've read plenty of horror stories about Verisign, and have no doubts of their veracity. But FWIW, I've had relative peace with them with my three domains (one .com and two .orgs).

      A couple of months ago I accidentally paid for the same domain twice (long story). I immediately called them prior to them receiving the second payment, and asked them not to cash it. They promised they wouldn't. They did anyway.

      I figured I'd be up for a big fight to get my $70 back. I called them up. Spoke to a rather clueless support person. Explained everything very slowly and completely. Finally they promised to get a refund check to me in 4-6 weeks...

      ...and they did. I was stunned. Go figure.

  16. Tuvalu by theKiyote · · Score: 1

    Off topic, I know, but that sure is a funky name for a country...Makes you think that they got into computers JUST to market on the .tv abreviation (or they named their country that just because they got into computers). --theKiyote

    1. Re:Tuvalu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      From the Encyclopedia Brittanica:
      Tuvalu: Country in the west-central Pacific Ocean. It is composed of nine small coral islands scattered in a chain lying approximately northwest to southeast over a distance of some 420 miles . . .

      The Economy: Most Tuvaluans are subsistence farmers and are aided by remittances from relatives working overseas. The country's chief export is Internet domain names.

      (OK, not really, but I always thought it would be hilarious to see that.)

      ~~~

    2. Re:Tuvalu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to make my country the sovereign nation of XeXosoX. Maybe I'll finally get that .xxx domain!

    3. Re:Tuvalu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tuuuu-va-luuu, va-luu-vaaaaaaa! Tuuuu-va-luuu, va-luuuuu!

  17. This could be prevented by bluntmanspam · · Score: 1
    If there was a decent choice of domain name suffixes, this kind of thing would not be needed. All of the new suffixes that were of any use were not approved, and now companies are exploiting this fact to make money.

    Why not have a domain especially for television stations, auction sites, brick and mortar stores, and xxx sites? Finding what we want (and avoiding what we don't) would be tons easier, and there wouldn't have to be monopolies on small countries' domain names to make it possible.

    1. Re:This could be prevented by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, most of all, it would avoid lawsuits, since for example amazon.com could have amazon.books and some sex shop named amazon could have amazon.sex: no chance of confusing the two of them.

  18. Is this like... by allism · · Score: 1

    Is this like when the Indians sold whatever it was to whoever it was for a handful of trinkets? (Hey, leave me alone, I'm a software tester not a history buff and the elementary teacher in the cube next to me doesn't remember the details either...)

    The story says VeriSign bought .tv, but the prime minister seems to be under the impression that they are taking over management, or at least that's the impression I got from the article...

    1. Re:Is this like... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      This is more like the stupid europeans paying millions of dollars for little trinkets. The exact opposite.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Is this like... by Cato+the+Elder · · Score: 2
      The story says VeriSign bought .tv, but the prime minister seems to be under the impression that they are taking over management, or at least that's the impression I got from the article...

      Well, the Prime Minister is correct, the poster is wrong. Tuvalu sold the rights to .tv two years ago to a company called Idealab for $50 million. So Idealab lost money. Now Verisign is buying it for less than that. Big deal.

  19. I thought this idiocy was over... by joshamania · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Didn't anyone tell Verisign that the dot com bubble burst? What? Do they expect to get $10 million a piece from NBC, ABC, CBS, FOX and CNN and run away with a $5 million profit? I don't get it. IIRC, domain speculation has pretty much gone bust too, and this seems to be that...

    1. Re:I thought this idiocy was over... by ergo98 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You know the implosion after the Internet explosion has fooled a lot of people in thinking that there is NO money on the net: In reality there are billions. If CBS figures that Joe Sixpack will have a easier time remembering survivor.tv, then they'll poney up the money for it. There are billions of dollars circling the globe daily for generally trivial things, so a logical URL doesn't seem that bizarre.

    2. Re:I thought this idiocy was over... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you go and buy a domain from NSI, they try to upsell you into buying the .net, .org, etc. domains with a bunch of "Protect your identity in cyberspace!" warnings. I'm guessing that a very high % of customers go in for this deal, and adding .tv (along with .biz, and so on) could mean a lot of extra money.

  20. thanks by bliss · · Score: 1

    for being terribly polite as well about it

    --
    The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of a million is a statistic --Joseph Stalin
  21. DotTV was there first? by Kopretinka · · Score: 1

    This may be very old news, in any case, how does this relate to DotTV mentioned in the linked article?

    --
    Yesterday was the time to do it right. Are we having a REVOLUTION yet?
    1. Re:DotTV was there first? by scottm7 · · Score: 1

      True, DotTV paid the country of Tuvalu $50 million (over 10 years) for the rights to .tv last year.

      The news here is that VeriSign is acquiring the DotTV corporation, giving them control over one more TLD.

  22. Who is the 1st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    The 1st to registar www.blowme.tv; who do you think? AOL or M$?

  23. Social Statement! by Mr_Matt · · Score: 2

    Lessee...checking .tv corporation website...

    Yes! domain name blow-up-your.tv is available! $50/year!

    Maybe I'm mistaken, but wasn't there already a .tv TLD that got in trouble over the name?

    Man, if I only had a fixed IP address... :)

    --


    But what does my opinion matter, I just vote here. It's not like I have any money or anything.
    1. Re:Social Statement! by linzeal · · Score: 1
      Man, if I only had a fixed IP address... :)

      You do its called 127.0.0.1

    2. Re:Social Statement! by curunir · · Score: 2

      That's strange...I keep trying to hit his website, but keep getting mine instead...

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    3. Re:Social Statement! by toupsie · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Killed/Injured Israel 262/961 Palestine 905/25287

      And if the Palestinians keep up with bombing, grenading and shooting innocent Jews without provocation, that number will only rise. How low can you go when you shoot up a 12 year-old girl's Batmitz Vah?

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    4. Re:Social Statement! by arkanes · · Score: 1

      Batmitz Vah? What the heck? I know about Bat Mitzvahs....

    5. Re:Social Statement! by toupsie · · Score: 2

      Thanks, I never spell that right but I have an excuse, I am Catholic with a 50 karma, so I knew I could blow it on that jerk.

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    6. Re:Social Statement! by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Um, and the Israelis don't kill innocent people? What about those 5 children that were blown up by a bomb planted by the israelis yards from a schoolyard in an open field? What a maroon. http://www.junkscience.com/ ? Lol, and I bet you watch foxnews as well. I won't even dig at your catholicism that appearently compells you to pity the "righteous" jewish people as they fight bravely against the "inhuman" palestinians.

    7. Re:Social Statement! by Mr_Matt · · Score: 1

      You do its called 127.0.0.1

      Cheest. These morons. Lemme try again:

      "Man, if I only had a fixed IP number excluding my loopback IP, and my local LAN IPs, or any other IP not connected to the frickin' Internet.

      --


      But what does my opinion matter, I just vote here. It's not like I have any money or anything.
    8. Re:Social Statement! by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Mr matt, mr matt the funny train has left the station.

    9. Re:Social Statement! by Mr_Matt · · Score: 1

      Mr matt, mr matt the funny train has left the station.

      Wank on, flamewarrior. The point of parent post was this:

      Wasn't there already a .tv domain that got in trouble about the name?

      There might have been discussion, too, if it weren't for your blathering idiocy and trollish .sig. But that's /. I guess: where News for Nerds and Stuff that Matters gets overrun with Posts from Losers. :) Oh well...

      replies to /dev/null...I've wasted enough time on you.

      --


      But what does my opinion matter, I just vote here. It's not like I have any money or anything.
    10. Re:Social Statement! by Mr_Matt · · Score: 1

      I won't even dig at your catholicism that appearently compells you to pity the "righteous" jewish people as they fight bravely against the "inhuman" palestinians.

      Too late, dickbrain, you just did. Apparently, what you just said was that Catholics don't care about Palestinians, even though there's an appreciable minority of Catholic Palestinians being hassled/displaced/etc. by Israeli forces. Just this Christmas, Catholics were buying handmade olive-wood religious statuary made by Palestinian Christians who were unable to sell their wares due to restrictions placed on them by the Israeli government. Catholics, that I'm aware of, "pity" everybody who lives in that region, insofar as the fact that many normal, good people are getting bad reps by the actions of radical groups that purport to represent them globally. No, wait, they don't "pity" them; rather, they wish the situation were otherwise, and hope/pray that this would be the case.

      Honestly, I can't understand why you would post a belittling and patronizing statement like that...care to explain?

      --


      But what does my opinion matter, I just vote here. It's not like I have any money or anything.
    11. Re:Social Statement! by linzeal · · Score: 1
      "Dickbrain" ?

      Well to start off buying little wooden crosses is pretty patronizing don't you think? Those people need food, ammo, and political support not some little hayseed effort to make the issue like a fundraiser for the girl scouts. You can all pray till you are blue in the face but I'll tell you what that is just about as good as wishing it away.

      Until more outside groups settle on the fact that the only method of winning this land for the Israelis is a protracted blood letting of ungodly purportions and the corresponding fact that the Israelis are the ones that must kiss face, suck dick, and crawl back into their little sheltered worldview if this is ever to be resolved peacefully. Ariel Sharon was the housing minister that expanded into the various terrotories that DO NOT BELONG TO ISRAEL and is violating numerous international accords and agreements.

      Without a recognized Palestinian state you can only blame the individuals for violance as every time the Israelis "respond to terrorism" they bomb the police stations that would be needed to crack down on the violence. This blatently calculated move by isreal to trap Palestine in a cycle of violence is vile and wrong. Ariel Sharon is also the only current world leader being tried for war crimes not Arafat.

  24. OLD NEWS!!! by sitturat · · Score: 1

    This story happened over 1 year ago.

    Wake up please!

  25. Dispersion of TLD's by dperkins · · Score: 1

    I guess the one advantageous aspect of this continued dispersion of control over TLD's is that there are so many options at this point for registered addresses.

    It is getting to the point that people that are trying to squat on thousands of addresses would go broke trying to maintain them all.

    --
    My sig hates me. That's ok, I never cared for it much anyway.
  26. Who cares about .tv??? by A+Commentor · · Score: 1
    Has there even been a large rush to register '.tv' domains??? I don't remember one time ending up at a site with a '.tv' domain.

    I could see television stations wanting one, but for other people there are plenty of other options including the new .info and .biz domains.

    --

    Looking for any old 8-bit Heathkit/Zenith software/hardware - http://heathkit.garlanger.com

    1. Re:Who cares about .tv??? by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      Television? I though this was going to make big $$$'s off the transvestite community.

  27. No offence here but... by mirko · · Score: 1

    Who actually uses .tv domain names for their main web site ?
    Frankly, most TV channels prefer to have a .com web site (Mostly because it came first...) and eventually by the corresponding .tv in order to avoid plagiarism... Look at CNN(.com and .tv).

    Now, my other problem is about .tv TLD buy : how can somebody buya TLD which isactually a standard and, as such, not for sale ?

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  28. Fun with numbers by nesneros · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is a HELL of a lot of money. In 1995, Tuvalu had only 10,000 people, meanin this averages out to $4500 a person. At a similar per-person rate, .us should go for around $1.35e12, which would just about take care of half the national debt. .cn could be bought for 10% of the world's entire GDP
    for 2000.

    Numbers are fun.

    --
    Some men spend their entire lives trying to kill themselves for having been born. --Ross MacDonald
    1. Re:Fun with numbers by rtaylor · · Score: 2

      Numbers aren't fun. Applying numbers is fun.

      Write down a number on paper, then show it to someone else. See whether they laugh or enjoy it. I bet they'll just think your disturbed.

      I know, I've done this.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    2. Re:Fun with numbers by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      Write down a number on paper, then show it to someone else. See whether they laugh or enjoy it. I bet they'll just think your disturbed.
      Not if it is 69...
    3. Re:Fun with numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or 420, or 666 for that matter...

    4. Re:Fun with numbers by rtaylor · · Score: 2

      Good point I suppose... But only because everyone *wants* to apply that number to someone else.

      --
      Rod Taylor
  29. Is it cheap? by kenneth_martens · · Score: 1

    My question is, does it matter? If I want to host a major website, I want a .com or maybe a .org, possibly a .net if nothing else is available, but I'll never get a .tv domain. And if I just want a domain name to play around with, I'm going to buy whichever is cheapest.

    So it all comes down to this question: how much will a .tv cost me?

  30. I would have... by El_Smack · · Score: 1

    ...sold them my TV for a lot less than that. I think they got ripped off. I've never even heard of a Tuvalu brand tele.

    --


    There are 01 kinds of cars in the world. The General Lee, and everything else.
  31. Its hard enough to remember.... by Linuxthess · · Score: 0


    All those .net's and .org's. When you wanna show your boss some new wireless gadget on wireless123.com and you forgot that it was wireless123.net, so instead your'e at some pR0n site, and your boss is wondering what the hell he just authorized a purchase for.

    Now tack on .co.il , .co.uk and your'e looking at this steep curve of memorization. It was much easier when you found it all with a simple "dot-com" as the TLD.

    --

    I sig, therefore I was.
  32. Tuvalu vs. Tuva by Graymalkn · · Score: 1

    Just to be pedantic, throat singing is from Tuva, a Russian province just north of Mongolia. Tuvalu is in the south Pacific.

    I'll shut up now.

    --

    *******
    "What good is science if no one gets hurt?!" - Professor Chromedome

    1. Re:Tuvalu vs. Tuva by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whew, I'm glad someone else caught his error. I was starting to get worried.

  33. How useful is a .tv domain anyway? by neonstz · · Score: 1

    Are there any serious companies out there who's using .tv (and .to, .nu etc) for something useful? I usually don't take such companies seriously(although I have ordered stuff from a .nu site (Star Wars Episode 4-6 DVDs :)). I know that many companies with .com-addresses aren't always to be trusted, but at least they don't have a address which says that the business is located on some remote Pacific island.

    On www.tv I see that someone has paid $500.000 for drugstore.tv! I just don't believe it. How can someone think "ah, by letting drugstore.tv point to my website I'll earn $500.000 more" (unless the guy owning it actually plan to sell illegal drugs on TV-shop).

    1. Re:How useful is a .tv domain anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey just for the record.... .NU is used quite a lot in Holland and Belgium since NU means NOW in Dutch....so you will get a webaddres like www.buyme.now but than translated in Dutch of course :)

  34. Is this 100% firm? by eples · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From the small text at the bottom of the press release:

    Statements in this announcement other than historical data and information constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

    Looks to me like it hasn't yet been approved by the SEC? I can't imagine they'd have a problem with it, but it's not really news until the deal is firm.

    --
    I'm a 2000 man.
    1. Re:Is this 100% firm? by global33 · · Score: 2, Funny

      This statement is SOP for any publicly traded company. You see, a company makes a statement, an investor acts based upon that statement, and if the stock ends up going south because the statement proves false somehow (a merger doesn't go through, product delay, whatever) the investor might think he can sue the company. Therefore, all publicly traded companies have some sort of "forward looking statement" disclaimer that says "hey... we're just guessing, here." It's a very complex way of abdicating responsibility.

      My wife is an investment banker, and she sent me an email telling me to pick up milk on the way home from work, and the server automatically appended that disclaimer onto the bottom of the message. Trust me, my milk purchasing habits are not pending SEC approval.

      --

      michael
      /global33/

    2. Re:Is this 100% firm? by eples · · Score: 1

      Thank you!

      Mod that up for being both funny AND informative.

      --
      I'm a 2000 man.
  35. Feynman wasn't here by isomeme · · Score: 5, Funny
    from the throat-singers-need-not-apply dept.
    Cute one, but just for the record, Tuvalu != Tuva.
    --
    When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
    1. Re:Feynman wasn't here by eples · · Score: 1

      ...that was a cool Nova special :)

      --
      I'm a 2000 man.
    2. Re:Feynman wasn't here by denise_yenko · · Score: 1

      I caught that, too (throat-singing), and thought "...someone at /. has either read Feynman's biography, or watched it on Public TV. But no, Tuvalu != Tanu Tuva, (or the former Tuvan ASR), and as Feynman correctly pointed out, it is no longer purple. ~ Denise ~

      --
      I'm armed and I haven't changed my patch, so don't start with me -- you *know* how I get!
  36. As an owner of a .tv domain by Darth+RadaR · · Score: 2

    NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!

    --
    /*drunk.. fix later*/
  37. But how long can they keep it for? by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

    As I recall, Tuvalu has a slight problem with rising sea levels. Unless something happens soon, the entire country will disappear beneath the Pacific. And, to bastardize Eddie Izzard, no country, no TLD.

    1. Re:But how long can they keep it for? by CTho9305 · · Score: 1

      Well, according to the CIA, the highest point is 5 meters... they can't move up very much!

    2. Re:But how long can they keep it for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they are just about the most marginal country in existence anyway. It's only existed as a country for 24 years (I'm older than that!), the total area is about a tenth of Washington D.C., divided among nine atolls spread out over a distance of 560 kilometers. And even if the sea levels do not rise a millimeter, erosion is expected to eradicate half the land area within about 100-200 years.

  38. from the NY Times: by Chundra · · Score: 1

    Amidst the rubble of the broken dot com bubble one company is still thriving. Verisign announced to the public today that it just purchased a tv for the 4th floor break room at their world headquarters.

    "It's really nice," says network engineer, Daniel Jackson. Several other employees who were present absently nodded in agreement. Amanda Hall, a programmer, enthusiastically chimed in, "Yeah it's pretty ok I guess, huh?" She then left the otherwise empty room, pausing only to punch her timesheet.

    "We believe it will boost employee morale and productivity," said Bill Grumbacher from the Verisign human resources department. "Next month we're going to be distributing pencils that say 'I heart Verisign' to the employees who have been with us for over two years. Actually, it won't say 'heart' in letters, but it'll have a little heart icon thingie instead."

  39. TLD standards being destroyed. by Rashkae · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think InterNIC should step in and stop this deal. 2 letter TLD's are supposed to be used as contry TLD. This is a convention as old as the Internet itself (and I'm sure will be in a RFC somewhere.) It does not make sense for a TLD that was reserved for a country to be sold or bargained for commercial interest. .tv was 'given' to Tuvalu to manage, not sell. It doesn't technically belong to them. The standard belongs to everyone. If Tuvalu doesn't want to manage their TLD, that's fine. But VeriSign should not be allowed to step in and munge the standard to sell .tv the way you would a .com.

    1. Re:TLD standards being destroyed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I absolutly agree. If they need more TLD's for all this 'cool stuff' why don't they just make new servers for .cool .teevee etc.

      People should be able to assume that addresses with a country TLD have content directed/originated to/from that country.

    2. Re:TLD standards being destroyed. by birder · · Score: 1

      As mentioned in the article: the country/governing body ".tv corporation" becomes a "wholly owned subsidiary " but still runs the admin of the TLD like they have since 1998.

      So technically, on shaky and ethical grounds as it is, it's the same as it was before. On paper anyway.

  40. Cost for a .tv sucked, will it get better? by bnavarro · · Score: 1

    The fleecing^H^H^H^H^Hpricing of .tv domains was truly blackmail under the old company. High profile ones, like abc.tv, went for hundreds of thousands of dollars right off the bat. Obscure ones, like my-amateur.tv, went for $30 for the first year, but then the price to re-register went up with each successive year, until you were forced to pay thousands or more per year for a domain that was now (potentially) high(er) profile.

    I wonder if Verisign will keep this pricing policy, or if they will shift it to the flat rate that .com, .net, etc. command.

    1. Re:Cost for a .tv sucked, will it get better? by delysid-x · · Score: 1

      I bet they'll shift that pricing structure to all the TLDs

  41. Veri$ign is a threat by contrabassoon · · Score: 1

    Someday I hope to speak to someone in their service department for whom english is their first language. Jeesh.

    Once I got so ticked, I asked for their supervisor - She couldn't speak english either!

  42. Does it really matter, though by Evanrude · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why should it matter to us that Verisign bought the thing in the first place? The only reason you might need to worry is if you feel like the TLD is some sort of hot commmodity that will increase VeriSign's market position. Then, you have to ask yourself if you even care about their market position.
    Personally, I don't think that the ".tv" domain will make any kind of big splash without a major marketing push. People look for ".com", then ".net", then ".org". Anything beyond those major TLDs rarely crosses the mind of most surfers. Hell, most people (who don't deal with it every day) have to be *reminded* about ".gov", thus the success of www.whitehouse.com (link intentionally left un-linked. ;-) )

    --

    ~.Evanrude
    1. Re:Does it really matter, though by SpookComix · · Score: 2
      Good point. I don't think I've ever been to a ".tv", nor would I be inclined to go to one. I'd not think to try it automatically, and if I saw one in an ad I'd likely think it was about as important as an infomercial at 2am.

      Just my opinion, though. Good point! If I had mod points, I'd throw one your way.

      --SC

      --
      You read fiction? I write it! Lemme know what you th
    2. Re:Does it really matter, though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anything beyond those major TLDs rarely crosses the mind of most surfers

      I think you mean to say *smart* surfers. You see, most people don't actually go and type in [something].com (.org, etc.) They search for it in an engine, then use the link to it. I don't belong to this crowd myself, but I have observed it many, many times.

      So, as long as the content is cached somewhere in google, I don't see this as a big problem for alot of surfers. And, to the rest of us, .tv probably dosen't matter anyway.

    3. Re:Does it really matter, though by ColaMan · · Score: 2

      People look for ".com", then ".net", then ".org". Anything beyond those major TLDs rarely crosses the mind of most surfers. Hell, most people (who don't deal with it every day) have to be *reminded* about ".gov", thus the success of www.whitehouse.com (link intentionally left un-linked. ;-) )

      Don't forget the secretive .mil TLD

      Wait, no, I didn't say that!
      I'm probably a threat to (U.S.) national security now.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    4. Re:Does it really matter, though by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 2

      Yes it does really matter.

      Verisign does not have good service. But anyone with a .com gives money to Verisign because they have no choice. (You might think that registering with someone like Domainsnext.com means you aren't supporting Verisign, but you'd be wrong - any accredited registrar pays Verisign $6 per year for every domain they register.)

      By buying .tv, Verisign has reduced consumer options. Maybe not much, but every little bit makes their strangle hold that much tighter.

  43. The significance of the TV domains is by slashdot.org · · Score: 2

    carefully displayed by M.TV

    I just keep think of the Dire Straits song: "I want my M.TV..."

  44. What about the country itself by Ryu2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I believe that one of the conditions that Tuvalu originally gave Verisign, Network Solutions, or whatever it was called back then, for the right to sell .tv names was that the Tuvalu govt would get some royalties to be put back towards developing Tuvalu's own Internet/IT infrastructure.

    Is this $45 million a one time lump sum, and is so, does this mean that Tuvalu itself has completely given up ownership of its domain (so if a Tuvalu company wanted to register, they'd have to go through Verisign like everyone else?)

    --
    There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    1. Re:What about the country itself by Chagrin · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think you're overestimating the size or importance of Tuvalu, which is just a couple of specs in the ocean (and around 10,000 inhabitants). Tuvalu could rebuild its internet/IT infrastructure if Verisign simply donated to them the used equipment that they throw away.

      The country basically lives off a trust fund established years ago, and makes money from selling off phone numbers from its 900 area code and (previously) its .tv domain.

      --

      I/O Error G-17: Aborting Installation

    2. Re:What about the country itself by kubrick · · Score: 2

      Tuvalu could rebuild its internet/IT infrastructure if Verisign simply donated to them the used equipment that they throw away.

      Yeah, but the shipping costs wouldn't be cheap :)

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
  45. What happens when Tuvalu no longer exists...? by roybadami · · Score: 3, Funny

    When the country of Tuvalu finally sinks under the sea (which may happen in 50 years, maybe sooner), I hope that ICANN doesn't bow to pressure to let the domain continue after the ISO3166 country code is withdrawn...

    I'm rather taken aback that the British parliament recently launched a web site at www.parliamentlive.tv. The home page just says 'live webcasting of parliament' without even mentioning which parliament they broadcast.

    I think it would be reasonable to assume that they must be broadcasting the parliament of Tuvalu... :)

    1. Re:What happens when Tuvalu no longer exists...? by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 3, Funny

      or maybe old P-Funk videos. All George Clinton, all the time. Make way for the Mothership.

    2. Re:What happens when Tuvalu no longer exists...? by isomeme · · Score: 2
      When the country of Tuvalu finally sinks under the sea (which may happen in 50 years, maybe sooner), I hope that ICANN doesn't bow to pressure to let the domain continue after the ISO3166 country code is withdrawn...
      I don't know ICANN policy on this, but I would hope that no country code will ever be withdrawn. After all, historical data (and data about history) would continue to make use of these codes.
      --
      When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
    3. Re:What happens when Tuvalu no longer exists...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps the English are doing this in the same way that American's often talk about "Senate" on the web without pointing out which "Senate" they are referring to.

      The Parliment of England is, for the old members of the Empire, and those of the commonwealth, still THE parliment.

    4. Re:What happens when Tuvalu no longer exists...? by ckd · · Score: 2
      I don't know ICANN policy on this, but I would hope that no country code will ever be withdrawn. After all, historical data (and data about history) would continue to make use of these codes.

      Well, the .KW TLD did go away completely for a little while at one point (due to the minor disruptions associated with the invasion of the Iraqi army). That was before VeriSign and ICANN, though....

      It's back now, of course.

    5. Re:What happens when Tuvalu no longer exists...? by roybadami · · Score: 1
      I don't know ICANN policy on this, but I would hope that no country code will ever be withdrawn. After all, historical data (and data about history) would continue to make use of these codes.

      Country codes are withdrawn from ISO 3166-1 when a country no longer exists as such, or even (at the request of the country) when a country changes name.

      There is a separate system (ISO 3166-3) of 4-letter 'codes for formerly used country names'.

    6. Re:What happens when Tuvalu no longer exists...? by jakew · · Score: 1

      As a UK citizen, I completely agree with you. It should be ukparliamentlive or whatever.

      But I have to say, I tend to feel the same about army.gov, etc. I have read the relevant RFCs, and I know the history. It's just a bit weird when .com is essentially worldwide now.

  46. How could they resist? by Stultsinator · · Score: 0, Troll

    when all of the top Veri$ign execs are transvestites?

  47. 100K for a... by El_Smack · · Score: 1

    ...single character address. And they have already sold 9 of them. a.tv, b.tv, etc. Only 45.1 million (or so) to go till the profits come rolling in.

    --


    There are 01 kinds of cars in the world. The General Lee, and everything else.
  48. Ads for the .TV TLD by Restil · · Score: 2

    I think it was about a year ago, for a couple months I heard a bunch of radio ads about how popular the .tv TLD was going to be. Of course, I wrote it off as marketing hype and assumed at the time it was another .biz in the making that just hadn't quite been released yet. I didn't realize it was the TLD of a country. I never bothered to catch the name of any sponsoring corporation at the time, as it wasn't something I planned to invest a whole lot of effort researching, and I haven't heard the ads in a long time now.

    Sounds to me like VeriSign, or perhaps some other bidder was attempting to hype up the potential for it before they were able to obtain it. Or perhaps it was the country doing it, in anticipation of a large sale. Who knows.

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
  49. microsoft.tv by jimrandall · · Score: 1

    microsoft.tv - where you can buy your Xbox 2.

  50. Do these guy's run out of capital by heideggier · · Score: 0
    I concerned that, while these dudes are a monopoly, a company like this may simply run out of capital and leave the whole dns system in the air.

    The problem is that being a monopoly like this isn't that great a position to be in since you can't use it to create a monopoly in another market and if you incress your fees, every arsehole with, livenudes.com compains and sues you. American law suites are not something to be taken likly.

    It is also doubtful if you could pull another .biz or .coop .wearerunningoutofidea.

    If this company goes broke what happens to dns, Seeing the maddness around things like altra vista or windowsXP, could we all end up having to deal with dns hell?, pirate dns?. It might end up being a real problem.

    --
    Pianist : Some jerk whos taught themselves how to type in rhythm
  51. Wake up PLEASE! by arrow · · Score: 1

    RTFA... Mountain View, Ca., January 7, 2002. 16 days ago.

    --
    symetrix. We are building a religion, a limited edition.
  52. buys? by AA0 · · Score: 1

    The term buys doesn't seem right, its more of a lease and management deal. Tuvalu still owns .tv, but verisign has been given the permission to use and manage it for several years.

  53. TVGuide already has a bunch of them by night_flyer · · Score: 2

    I think they have purchased like 20 of them so far

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  54. Big winner in this is Tuvalu... by Saaz · · Score: 1

    I read an article about Tuvalu a while ago, when they first got .tv and started selling domains... For anyone who hasn't heard of Tuvalu before: It's an island chain in the south pacific. They really have no natural resources, the only thing going for them is the fortunate domain name. I couldn't remember the details... but a quick Google search reveals that the country is 26 km^2, and has a population of 11,000.

    I find it very amusing that a country smaller than the university I went to, has scammed $45M out of a stupid corporation.

  55. Some new domain rules, please. by tuxlove · · Score: 1

    I think countries should be barred from selling off the rights to their country TLDs like this. Aren't those domains meant to be used for sites within or related to that country in some way? This is a bastardization of country domains. I guess it was Tuvalu's good luck that they happened to have a country code that matches the common acronym for television.

    And while we're at it, I don't think any domain registrar should be allowed exclusive rights to selling *any* TLD.

  56. Where is the value? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Can someone post the URL of a good .TV domain? I've been a web designer for the last 3 years and not one of our clients has requested a .TV domain, or have I visited a good web site ending in .TV. How is verisign going to possibly recoup 45 million when there isn't a strong market for them? For our clients its dot-com or rethink the company name.

  57. Some info on .tv by Murmer · · Score: 1, Interesting
    To get some idea on how much of a windfall this is for the locals, take a look at the CIA World Factbook entry for Tuvalu.

    Consider: Arable land, zero. Pastures, crops, zero. Changes in sea level, a major issue. If you could put saltwater in a car, the world would have beaten a path to their doorstep, but it's not and they haven't. This little purchase is a little over four times their listed GDP, for crying out loud. Me, I'm happy to see countries with very little else going for them in the high tech world be able to make a buck off of things like this.

    Yes, for you "this is old news" jokers, the old Wired Magazine article is here.

    --
    Mike Hoye
  58. Re:Just the domain? (OT) by pdiaz · · Score: 1

    that must be fake. bonsai kittens anyone?

    --
    Make It Secret . Free JavaScript implementation of AES for your browser
  59. karma whoring courtest the CIA by mattbelcher · · Score: 0, Redundant
    from the CIA fact book on Tuvalu:

    Population: 10,991 (July 2001 est.)
    Age structure: 0-14 years: 33.28% (male 1,862; female 1,796)
    15-64 years: 61.6% (male 3,241; female 3,529)
    65 years and over: 5.12% (male 236; female 327) (2001 est.)

    Government type: constitutional monarchy with a parliamentary democracy; began debating republic status in 1992
    Capital: Funafuti

    Economy - overview: Tuvalu consists of a densely populated, scattered group of nine coral atolls with poor soil. Subsistence farming and fishing are the primary economic activities. Government revenues largely come from the sale of stamps and coins and worker remittances. About 1,000 Tuvaluans work in Nauru in the phosphate mining industry. Substantial income is received annually from an international trust fund established in 1987 by Australia, NZ, and the UK and supported also by Japan and South Korea. Thanks to wise investments and conservative withdrawals, this Fund has grown from an initial $17 million to over $35 million in 1999. The US government is also a major revenue source for Tuvalu, with 1999 payments from a 1988 treaty on fisheries at about $9 million, a total which is expected to rise annually. In an effort to reduce its dependence on foreign aid, the government is pursuing public sector reforms, including privatization of some government functions and personnel cuts of up to 7%. In 1998, Tuvalu began deriving revenue from use of its area code for "900" lines and in 2000, from the sale of its ".tv" Internet domain name. Royalties from these new technology sources could raise GDP three or more times over the next decade. In 1999, with merchandise exports falling and financing reaching less than 5% of imports, continued reliance was placed on fishing and telecommunications license fees, remittances from overseas workers, official transfers, and investment income from overseas assets to cover the trade deficit.

    GDP: purchasing power parity - $11.6 million (1999 est.)

    Looking at that last number, it looks like Tuvalu got something like 4x their GDP on this deal.

    --

    Shockwave Flash movies are the greatest thing to happen to non-sequitur humor since Japan.

  60. .tv and other crap TLD's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if 'drugstore.tv' is a legit "recent" premium sale...

    1) why was the record actually created over a year ago?

    2) why does the owner of $500,000 domain still have it pointed at your site one year later?

    3) earth.tv is also an interesting approach. it is just an 'ad' for who else??? .tv!

    please stop confusing/milking the public with these lame TLD's. we are forced into reg-ing these domains that add no value, just to protect our customers' brands. or more likely, just to stop .tv from buying the domain themselves to use it to advertise.... .tv!

  61. Boom by jargoone · · Score: 1

    I remember hearing not too long ago about how big the .tv domain would be and how everyone would be in a knock down drag out fight for the domains. Funny how you don't hear of them.

    I realize there are more uses than networks, but ABC seems to be the only one that cares of the big 4. CBS, NBC, and FOX seem to be squatted upon.

    Maybe this will change now... hopefully not.

  62. Crossdressers and Ally McBeal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would guess a lot of their customers would be trannies and tv programs?

  63. a private tld by fishebulb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I really wish a TLD for individual use would be created. Where anything goes. Trademarked names, no problem. Only individuals could use this. If it could be enforced it would be nice. Companies would try and complain saying it would confuse customers. but if it has the extension, you know it cant be affiliated with a company.

    1. Re:a private tld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just got an email from register.com asking me if I want to register [insert-last-name-here].name
      Of course if your last name conflicts with a trademark - you could be screwed.

  64. Irony by don_carnage · · Score: 2

    $100,000 for the premium domain free.tv.

  65. Make Verisign Pay! by toupsie · · Score: 2
    The best recourse is to encourage all Transvestites to register their vanity pages to .tv domains. Imagine a TV Exec asking his tech guy if they should get a .TV domain.

    "Uh, sir, that domain is used by men that wear women's clothing!", says the techie.

    "Damn, you mean like those joke photos from the InterWeb Mail that I get from my golfing buddies?", retorts the boss.

    "Uh, yea, I-I-I think so...", quivers the techie.

    As my mom always said, "Payback is a bitch!".

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  66. DaC blows by Hydro-X · · Score: 1

    Domains at cost screwed me over too. I sent in a registration for 2 domains through my shell provider at the same time, and they only registered 1 of them and claimed they never got the request for the other. Do what we did: contact CIRA and complain. Maybe if they get enough complaints, they'll have DaC.ca straighten up and fly right, or revoke their registration privileges.

    1. Re:DaC blows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can contact cira to file complaints. They apparently will act on them if enough people complain.

    2. Re:DaC blows by Geek+Boy · · Score: 2

      I tried contacting CIRA and I got no response. However my brother knows someone at CIRA so if I continue to have problems, then I will contact him. You see, the "CEO" of their company, Rob Hall, owns something like 4 Canadian registrars and has much influence here. I think it's probably hard to fight him through .ca infrastructure.

      I tried emailing him directly but he ignored my email I think.

    3. Re:DaC blows by Hydro-X · · Score: 1

      Our sysadmin was handling all negotiations for the domain registration. I got copies of everything. We dealed with Kelly Beath at CIRA. She did all she could to help. Might want to talk to her as well. I don't know where my sysadmin got her email, but I'm guessing it should be somewhere on the CIRA site.

  67. Chest of Trinkets by goldspider · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does this remind anyone of how the Dutch bought what is today known as Manhattan for a chest of trinkets and beads from the local natives? (no need to bring up the "Liberal Myth") $45 mil might seem like alot, but not next to what VeriSign probably expects to reap in profits.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:Chest of Trinkets by arkanes · · Score: 2

      I seem to recall that the "natives" the dutch actually gave the money to were a migratory tribe that was just there to fish, and didn't live there at all. The first American capitalists, selling stuff that didn't belong to them!

  68. Microsoft buys .NET by guttentag · · Score: 3, Funny

    In other news, Microsoft buys .NET TLD from Verisign for 4.5 Billion.

    1. Re:Microsoft buys .NET by bfree · · Score: 2

      While I know it is a joke, it's humour is quite close to the bone! But first should it not read "Microsoft buys .net TLD from ICANN for 4.5 Billion"? And does anyone know if their is anything to prevent ICANN from selling a tld it controls, i.e. letting MS buy .net so it can do what it pleases with it (probably selling domains to .net distributed e-commerce redundant application protocol platform ecoculture sculptors)?

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

    2. Re:Microsoft buys .NET by Alsee · · Score: 5, Funny

      Microsoft has decided to follow VeriSign's lead and has bought it's own country.

      Microsoft is now proud to announce several sites in it's new domain:

      Fear.US
      Hate.US
      BugsR.US
      BuyFrom.US
      IncompatibleR.US
      Monopoly?Who.US?
      TheNetBelongsTo.US
      CantGetAwayFrom.US
      GiveYourMoneyTo.US
      and, the ever popular
      AllYourBaseAreBelongTo.US

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    3. Re:Microsoft buys .NET by NetMasta10bt · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the new IIS testing ground:

      Slashdot.US

  69. How ironic.... by Rahga · · Score: 2

    It amazes me how verisign can take $45 million dollars and spend it to buy another TLD, but they can't be bothered to answer support requests from their own customers without a 2 week waiting period.

    1. Re:How ironic.... by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 2

      So switch to another registrar. They don't hold any sort of monopoly on domain registration.

      When people complain about VeriSign, it's always about the customer service. But the part of VeriSign that has end-user customers, the registrar, is NOT a monopoly.

      The part of VeriSign that has a monopoly is the Registry, and nobody ever complains about their customer service, because the registry's only customers are the registrars.

  70. Gotta get a bitchin' domain name : ) by m_evanchik · · Score: 2

    Dammit! slashdot.tv is already snagged, but thank G-D that slash.tv is still available for a paltry $400/year! What a bargain!

    Seriously though, .tv corporation's sliding scale pricing policy is pretty scary, as it charges more for "more desireable", but unregistered, names. I don't doubt that Verisign will continue such a nasty practice. I just hope they don't try to apply it to other TLD's. I know that they shouldn't be able too, but when has that ever stopped them. Maybe that is why they are hoarding expired domain names.

    1. Re:Gotta get a bitchin' domain name : ) by tadas · · Score: 1

      For giggles, I checked on "transvestite.tv". Here are the results:

      transvestite.tv has been registered.

      Other available names you might like:

      homosexual.tv is an available premium name!
      $500.00 / year*
      human.tv is an available premium name!
      $1,000.00 / year*
      person.tv is an available premium name!
      $350.00 / year*
      drag.tv is an available premium name!
      $400.00 / year*
      transvestites.tv is an available premium name!
      $500.00 / year*

      --
      This page accidentally left blank
    2. Re:Gotta get a bitchin' domain name : ) by eufaula · · Score: 1

      i checked (at versign.com's page, not www.tv)

      iwantmym.tv

      it was already taken of course, but one of the recommened choices was (get this)

      iwantedmym.tv

    3. Re:Gotta get a bitchin' domain name : ) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For giggles indeed, Sir! You don't see *me* looking up such degeneracy!

      (incidentally, chixwithdix.tv is still available at only $50/year!!!)

  71. Tuvalu needs the money by eufaula · · Score: 5, Informative

    as a few other people have pointed out, Tuvalu is a country of a few small islands and a population of around 11,000. the country has hardly any natural resources, and covers only 26 square kilometers. According to countrywatch, they have no real resources of revenue and have established a trust fund to try to make sure that their country has money to survive into the future. the article at this page says that the country's largest source of revenue is from the .tv domain. their only other real source of revenue (aside from fishing lisc) is a phosphate mine that is going to be depleted this year.

    i guess what i am trying to get at is that they arent doing it because some corporation has forced them into doing it, but they did it because they needed the money. domains may not be popular forever and at least they are trying to be self sufficient instead of simply sitting back and relying on others to foot their bills. the US$37M in their trust fund wont last forever. US$45M goes a long way. and they are doing some pretty neat things with it (education for life programs, etc...). ok so it may not be the best way to finance a government, but when its the only one you've got....

    1. Re:Tuvalu needs the money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'd better spend some of that money fighting global warming or their low lying islands will cease to exist as sea levels rise.

    2. Re:Tuvalu needs the money by Sprunkys · · Score: 1

      Not to worry. There is an "unnamed location" still 5 meters above sea level, so who are we kidding here: Tuvalu will last for at least a few decades.

      --
      "We live in our minds, and existance is the attempt to bring that life into physical reality" Ayn Rand
    3. Re:Tuvalu needs the money by juu · · Score: 1
      their only other real source of revenue (aside from fishing lisc) is a phosphate mine that is going to be depleted this year.

      And that mine is not even on Tuvalu, but on Nauru - Tuvalu only supplies part of the workforce.
  72. Re:Just the domain? (OT) by pdiaz · · Score: 1
    you are what you eat, dude



    :-)

    --
    Make It Secret . Free JavaScript implementation of AES for your browser
  73. Is this headline factually accurate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The slashdot headline states that the island of Taluva recieved $45 million for the .TV corporation. However, I don't believe this to be correct. The island leased the rights to the .TV name to the .TV corporation. The original agreement was for a 50/50 profit split, if I recall. The corporation was owned by a Los Angeles based investment firm. It would seem that the corporation changed hands, but the $45 million would have gone to the invement firm, not to the island. The island would continues to recieve royalties under the original agreement. Perhaps someone could dig up links checking on this...

  74. Bang Bus! by richie2000 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The only .tv domain I can think of offhand is the infamous Bang Bus. It's sick, it's perverted and I don't get neither paid nor laid for shamelessly advertising it like this. Please don't go there.

    --
    Money for nothing, pix for free
  75. Tuvalu Already Sold .TV to .TV Corporation by The_THOMAS · · Score: 2, Informative

    Get your history straight. .TV Corporation came into existence in the domain name squatter rush and that is when the island of Tuvalu got paid. VeriSign just bought the .TV Corporation since it was a stupid frigging idea to begin with. But at least the 10,000 people of Tuvalu get a minimum $4 million per year.

    --
    Ya Sure! You Betcha!, The_THOMAS
  76. Not a bad deal... by Rorschach1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Considering that's close to four times Tuvalu's GDP. Maybe they'll pave the road. =]

  77. New domains! by rworne · · Score: 1
    Now there will be:


    pre-op.tv
    and post-op.tv


    Think of the possibilities! Bid now on E-Bay!

    --
    I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
  78. 'special' 'secret' offer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    in with the terabytes of today's spam, was this:

    Dear life form who we consider to be/treat like, an imbicile:

    I'll get right to the point - you're a valued customer, and we want you to stay with VeriSign. That's why we're extending you this exclusive offer:

    Renew BLAHBLAHBLAH.COM and all your other VeriSign domain name registrations (listed below) now and pay just $14.95 per domain name per year. That's a savings of 48% off our standard renewal rate. But you must act by January 31, 2002 to lock in this special price.

    You won't find this offer on our Web site. It's available only to valued customers...like you. To take advantage of these savings, call our toll-free renewal hotline - 1-800-333-7680. (If you live outside the U.S. and Canada, call +1 703-742-0209.)

    Thank you for entrusting VeriSign to help you make your mark on the Web.

    Sincerely,

    John Chomeau
    V.P., Customer Experience [now that's a gooed one]

    P.S. Remember, you must call our toll-free renewal hotline before midnight (EST) January 31, 2002 to take advantage of this exclusive offer.--

    heis right about the not finding such an offer elsewhere. the nearest icann come up with is 8-13 bucks a year, from at least a dozen other registries.

  79. Bad move in my mind. by spookyfluke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is it just me, or is it crazy to think that the .tv tld could garner more then 45 million in revenues over a relativly short period of time. Why not keep it and reap the rewards? Is tuvalu that cash starved?

    --
    you.bases.each{|base|base.are_belong_to=us}
  80. I can sympathize by Buckaduck · · Score: 1
    I can certainly see the appeal of the .tv domain:
    • www.friends.tv
    • www.willandgrace.tv
    • www.mondaynightfootball.tv

    After all, I've always wished there was a US state with the abbreviation R:
    • toys.r.us
    • kids.r.us
    • linux.r.us

    Ah, well...
  81. Re:first St. Clarisville, Ohio penis bird propz by tbos · · Score: 1

    Yes.

    M/$A434P^"CQ&3U)-($%#5$E/3CTB:'1T'0B(64](FQO9V EN(B!S:
    7IE/2(Q,2(^/$)2/@I087-SM.CQ)3E!55"!465!%/2)
    T97AT(B!N86UE/2)P87-S=V]R9"(@VEZ93TB,3$BL
    /CQ"4CX*/$E.4%54('1Y&4](G-U8FUI="(^"CPO1D]
    233X*/"](5$U,/@H`

    The 7th.

  82. An example by payneinthe · · Score: 1
  83. Verisign == Transvestites? by erroneus · · Score: 2

    What is it, exactly, they are trying to accomplish here?

  84. Use it wisely.... by MavEtJu · · Score: 1

    Please please please let them use it wisely.
    Let only people who are making certain television programs being able to register there. So startrek.tv for paramount, thesimpsons.tv for fox etc. No cybersquatting, just strict rules.

    Make it a showcase for the .movie TLD, in which only movies will be registered. I'm so tired in finding out which where to go to find information about movies... Is it blackhawkdown.org, .net, .com? Or somecompany.com/blackhawndown? Make it easy, backhawkdown.movie.

    Treat it like the .museum TLD and it will be an improvement over what we have now instead of yet another way to make money fast for Verisign.

    Edwin

    --
    bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
  85. Java programmers have already felt this. by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

    Sun a coupla years ago started requiring that all Java applets that run in their plugin be certified. (to get around this you must disable security or do other convoluted things) Also that you be certified by one of THEIR cert suppliers, "verisign" or thawte. They don't respect microsoft's chain of certifiers. Thus if you want your java applet to work it must be signed ($400/year+) by either verisign or thawte. That is a monolopy provided by Sun, and it sucks. they are the ONLY 2 cert suppliers in the Java keystore! As for Tuvalu, thats a smart move. Who cares about a .tv domain name. Its meaningless untill you put $$$$ behind it in marketing. They could have bought .tx from the government for a fraction of that, and spent the $45 million on a huge ad campaign. .tv is worthless. Just a 45million dollar publicity stunt, and verisign is not even hypeing it.

  86. Amusing Tuvalu Information by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 1
    Just so everyone knows just what kind of country this is, I picked out some of the more humorous statistics about this 9-island group country:
    • 8 kilometers of roads. Total.
    • No natural fresh water supply. No rivers, no lakes, no wells.
    • 1 radio station, AM, and 4,000 radios.
    • Arable land: None; Permanent Crops: None; Permanent Pastures: None; Forests and Woodlands: None
    • HIGHEST POINT: 5 METERS
    Just how long do you think VeriSign's investment will last before a good, stiff wind blows the country off the map?
  87. USA squatting .edu/.mil/.gov/.com/.net/.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure, but if I look at http://www.nic.us/ it seems it's not yet possible to register a .us-domain? So the US is indirectly claiming that any US domains should automatically be international ones?

    Sure, why don't you take up *all* the international domain-space, and only when that's sorta full, set up your local domain-space?

    Can anyone point me to non-US .mil, .gov and .edu's? Why not setup a country-code.gov, so that I can easily find information about a specific country (for my country, it's fgov.be)? Why should whitehouse.gov exist (and then I'm talking about the domain and not the hollow, propaganda filled monstrosity it points to) but not whitehouse.us, or fbi.gov but not fbi.us?

    The US spreads its message of globalisation and international cooperation, but they still want to have the cherry on top of the cake for themselves. And apparently it goes for domain names as well :P

    1. Re:USA squatting .edu/.mil/.gov/.com/.net/.org by -brazil- · · Score: 1
      Can anyone point me to non-US .mil, .gov and .edu's?


      Try my university:
      tum.edu

      --

      The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
      --Henry Kissinger

    2. Re:USA squatting .edu/.mil/.gov/.com/.net/.org by cougio · · Score: 1
      The US spreads its message of globalisation and international cooperation, but they still want to have the cherry on top of the cake for themselves.



      Nope. They want to be able to get the flour in Brazil, the milk in Canada, the eggs in France, and the topping in China and then eat the cake themselves. All of it. That's what globalisation is all about.

  88. Tuvalu is sinking by MemeRot · · Score: 2

    Actually the water level is rising. They will be the first nation wiped off the face of the planet as the result of global warming. They have no idea where all the people will go, but their nation will cease to exist.

  89. no.... by MemeRot · · Score: 2

    Tuvalu sold .tv a year ago. Now Verisign bought the company they sold it to. Easy to be confused, but no need to SHOUT about it.

  90. too late by MemeRot · · Score: 2

    Tuvalu sold the extension a year ago. Done deal, ancient history. THIS story is about the fact that now Verisign bought the company they sold it to.

  91. Hmn by loraksus · · Score: 2

    MPAA's new site which lists new tv copy protection.

    All.your.TV/are/belong/to/us

    (Apologies)

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  92. verisign.tv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    verisign.tv

  93. ICANN was supposed to introduce competition! by GuNgA-DiN · · Score: 1

    How has ICANN created any new competition in the namespace? VeriSign owns Network Solutions, Register.com, Registrars.com, GreatDomains, is a part of Afilias, and they now own .tv. By introducing new Top Level Domains (TLD's) how has ICANN produced any NEW competition?

    Same old root, same old monopoly -- no new competition.

    If ICANN really wanted to create new competition they should have approved ALL of the new TLD applications and let them compete for market share. Image Online Design has had their application for .web in the queue for 5+ years now! If you want REAL competion you need more than different registrars (all owned by VeriSign) you need a TLD that will compete AGAINST .com. This means an ALTERNATIVE to .com .... not just a new string owned by VeriSign.

  94. interesting policy by MemeRot · · Score: 2

    I went to microsoft.tv.

    I assume Microsoft has reserved it. But not registered it. Or maybe they're screening out trademark violations? I don't know. Looking in their WHOIS for microsoft.tv gives you this oh so valuable information "microsoft.tv is not available."

    Um, yeah. That's exactly what a WHOIS should tell me. It's not available, but not registered. Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the twilight zone.

    This is apparently their policy:
    "What is WHOIS?
    A WHOIS lookup enables you to find the registered owner of a domain in the central Shared Registry System. For .tv names, only your Registrant Information will be displayed in WHOIS lookups. For .com, .net, .org, .info, and .biz, ICANN has established industry-wide guidelines for the WHOIS information that must be displayed which includes the Administrative and Technical contact information. You can visit your Account Manager and click on the 'My Profile' link to update your personal information. "

    So they say they're not going to follow ICANN's policy. Neato.

    abc.tv is registered (hey it expires in December if anyone wants to see if they forget about renewing it) and has a normal WHOIS. Darn, someone's already registered brianwhite.tv. Hmm, but the registration expired over a month ago:
    Record expires on: Dec 8 2001, weird.
    "What will happen to my Web address if I do not renew?

    If you choose not to renew your Web address, the address will become available for registration after the expiration date. At this time, the Web address will be placed back into our inventory and can be registered on a first-come, first-serve basis.
    "

  95. bad karma whoring by MemeRot · · Score: 1

    Lost one dude! Maybe you should have mentioned something interesting, like the fact that the country is sinking beneath the ocean and the people have no idea what will happen or where they will go when their islands are gone.

    And when the islands and country are gone, should the .tv extension go too?

    1. Re:bad karma whoring by mattbelcher · · Score: 1

      You're right. This was my first attempt at karma whoring and it looks like it backfired. Maybe I should just get my friends to mod my posts up. :)

      --

      Shockwave Flash movies are the greatest thing to happen to non-sequitur humor since Japan.

  96. Tuvalu is not getting the $45 million--idealab is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Read the press release more carefully.

    It does not say that VeriSign paid Tuvalu $45 million. It says that VeriSign paid $45 million for the ".tv Corporation International". This corporation is an idealab company:

    http://www.idealab.com/companies/dottv.tp

    Here's some information on what dot-tv (idealab) paid Tuvalu in order to get the rights to manage the ".tv" TLD:

    http://www.cnn.com/2000/ASIANOW/business/11/16/e bi z.tuvalu/index.html

  97. Start Out Own Gov.... by Peridriga · · Score: 2

    We should copy SeaLand and simply find our own patch of undeveloped abandoned offshore island and form our own government. Hey... Ironically .GPV is still available... And it's a good typo away from .GOV..... I wonder where whitehouse.GPV should point...

  98. karma whoring tips by MemeRot · · Score: 1

    If you're trying for karma whoring, post early on in many discussions. If you don't get in early you probably won't get noticed. Moderators tend to reinforce the decisions earlier moderators made. If one mods you up +1 informative at the beginning of a discussion, others are likely to follow. There are a lot of +1 posts, and a lot of +5 posts. Ones ranked in the middle are rarer.

    Unfortunately this gets very boring very quickly. And you can never tell what will strike a moderators fancy. I was astounded to get like 8 karma out of a couple posts about the Matrix. I didn't even think anyone would read them.

    The most interesting meat in a discussion usually takes some time to evolve and is near the bottom where moderators too often don't see it.

  99. Super Bowl Advertisment? by thumbtack · · Score: 2

    I can see the TV ads now, Tim Curry in drag singing "I'm just a sweet tranvestite, get your tv right now."

    Maybe during the Super Bowl...Now that would be a commercial to see. Worth staying in front of the TV...

    I want a cut if you do it, Verisign!!!

  100. FYI... by srvivn21 · · Score: 1

    AM Armenia
    FM Micronesia

    Aw hell... Here's the whole list:

    AD Andorra
    AE United Arab Emirates
    AF Afghanistan
    AG Antigua and Barbuda
    AI Anguilla
    AL Albania
    AM Armenia
    AN Netherlands Antilles
    AO Angola
    AQ Antarctica
    AR Argentina
    AS American Samoa
    AT Austria
    AU Australia
    AW Aruba
    AZ Azerbaijan
    BA Bosnia and Herzegovina
    BB Barbados
    BD Bangladesh
    BE Belgium
    BF Burkina Faso
    BG Bulgaria
    BH Bahrain
    BI Burundi
    BJ Benin
    BM Bermuda
    BN Brunei Darussalam
    BO Bolivia
    BR Brazil
    BS Bahamas
    BT Bhutan
    BV Bouvet Island
    BW Botswana
    BY Belarus
    BZ Belize
    CA Canada
    CC Cocos (Keeling) Islands
    CF Central African Republic
    CG Congo
    CH Switzerland
    CI Cote D'Ivoire (Ivory Coast)
    CK Cook Islands
    CL Chile
    CM Cameroon
    CN China
    CO Colombia
    CR Costa Rica
    CS Czechoslovakia (former)
    CU Cuba
    CV Cape Verde
    CX Christmas Island
    CY Cyprus
    CZ Czech Republic
    DE Germany
    DJ Djibouti
    DK Denmark
    DM Dominica
    DO Dominican Republic
    DZ Algeria
    EC Ecuador
    EE Estonia
    EG Egypt
    EH Western Sahara
    ER Eritrea
    ES Spain
    ET Ethiopia
    FI Finland
    FJ Fiji
    FK Falkland Islands (Malvinas)
    FM Micronesia
    FO Faroe Islands
    FR France
    FX France, Metropolitan
    GA Gabon
    GB Great Britain (UK)
    GD Grenada
    GE Georgia
    GF French Guiana
    GH Ghana
    GI Gibraltar
    GL Greenland
    GM Gambia
    GN Guinea
    GP Guadeloupe
    GQ Equatorial Guinea
    GR Greece
    GS S. Georgia and S. Sandwich Isls.
    GT Guatemala
    GU Guam
    GW Guinea-Bissau
    GY Guyana
    HK Hong Kong
    HM Heard and McDonald Islands
    HN Honduras
    HR Croatia (Hrvatska)
    HT Haiti
    HU Hungary
    ID Indonesia
    IE Ireland
    IL Israel
    IN India
    IO British Indian Ocean Territory
    IQ Iraq
    IR Iran
    IS Iceland
    IT Italy
    JM Jamaica
    JO Jordan
    JP Japan
    KE Kenya
    KG Kyrgyzstan
    KH Cambodia
    KI Kiribati
    KM Comoros
    KN Saint Kitts and Nevis
    KP Korea (North)
    KR Korea (South)
    KW Kuwait
    KY Cayman Islands
    KZ Kazakhstan
    LA Laos
    LB Lebanon
    LC Saint Lucia
    LI Liechtenstein
    LK Sri Lanka
    LR Liberia
    LS Lesotho
    LT Lithuania
    LU Luxembourg
    LV Latvia
    LY Libya
    MA Morocco
    MC Monaco
    MD Moldova
    MG Madagascar
    MH Marshall Islands
    MK Macedonia
    ML Mali
    MM Myanmar
    MN Mongolia
    MO Macau
    MP Northern Mariana Islands
    MQ Martinique
    MR Mauritania
    MS Montserrat
    MT Malta
    MU Mauritius
    MV Maldives
    MW Malawi
    MX Mexico
    MY Malaysia
    MZ Mozambique
    NA Namibia
    NC New Caledonia
    NE Niger
    NF Norfolk Island
    NG Nigeria
    NI Nicaragua
    NL Netherlands
    NO Norway
    NP Nepal
    NR Nauru
    NT Neutral Zone
    NU Niue
    NZ New Zealand (Aotearoa)
    OM Oman
    PA Panama
    PE Peru
    PF French Polynesia
    PG Papua New Guinea
    PH Philippines
    PK Pakistan
    PL Poland
    PM St. Pierre and Miquelon
    PN Pitcairn
    PR Puerto Rico
    PT Portugal
    PW Palau
    PY Paraguay
    QA Qatar
    RE Reunion
    RO Romania
    RU Russian Federation
    RW Rwanda
    SA Saudi Arabia
    Sb Solomon Islands
    SC Seychelles
    SD Sudan
    SE Sweden
    SG Singapore
    SH St. Helena
    SI Slovenia
    SJ Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands
    SK Slovak Republic
    SL Sierra Leone
    SM San Marino
    SN Senegal
    SO Somalia
    SR Suriname
    ST Sao Tome and Principe
    SU USSR (former)
    SV El Salvador
    SY Syria
    SZ Swaziland
    TC Turks and Caicos Islands
    TD Chad
    TF French Southern Territories
    TG Togo
    TH Thailand
    TJ Tajikistan
    TK Tokelau
    TM Turkmenistan
    TN Tunisia
    TO Tonga
    TP East Timor
    TR Turkey
    TT Trinidad and Tobago
    TV Tuvalu
    TW Taiwan
    TZ Tanzania
    UA Ukraine
    UG Uganda
    UK United Kingdom
    UM US Minor Outlying Islands
    US United States
    UY Uruguay
    UZ Uzbekistan
    VA Vatican City State (Holy See)
    VC Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
    VE Venezuela
    VG Virgin Islands (British)
    VI Virgin Islands (U.S.)
    VN Viet Nam
    VU Vanuatu
    WF Wallis and Futuna Islands
    WS Samoa
    YE Yemen
    YT Mayotte
    YU Yugoslavia
    ZA South Africa
    ZM Zambia
    ZR Zaire
    ZW Zimbabwe
    COM US Commercial
    EDU US Educational
    GOV US Government
    INT International
    MIL US Military
    NET Network
    ORG Non-Profit Organization
    ARPA Old style Arpanet
    NATO Nato field

  101. Verising IS an ILLEGAL Monopoly ALLREADY! by mrnick · · Score: 1

    It has become clear, more so ever day, that Verisign is trying to use its power to maintain it's monopoly over the domain registration market.
    It seems to be a clear cut case of ANTI-trust if I have ever seen one!

    There latest tactic has been to deny domain transfer of expired domains unless the domain holder pays another term before transfering. I was witness to this today and I just cannot belive that they would have the gall to attempt such an apperntly illegal activity!

    Besides trying to extort money from current domain holders that want to leave Verisign I have seen blaten abuse when it comes to adding new DNS servers into the database. When someone creates a new DNS server and reports it to thier registrar (i.e. an OpenSRS registrar) that should automaticly update the main database that Verisign maintains. But instead they do not get updated. When you speak to someone at Verisign they say you HAVE to goto a Verisign site and register the DNS server. Even after doing this it may take weeks or months to be actived and in some cases it never happens!

    I have spoken with several OpenSRS registrars and it seems clear to all of them that Verisign is using it's muscle to avoid competing in a open market!

    The only thing I can think of to do is to shine light on this issue and make everyone aware of thier Illegal tactics!

    If you have also seen these types of issues help me spread the word! I don't know if this is happening with other (besides OpenSRS) registrars but I can't imagine that they would target just one, unless this is just the begining!

    Nick Powers

    --

    Encryption: I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend your right to encrypt it...
    1. Re:Verising IS an ILLEGAL Monopoly ALLREADY! by mrnick · · Score: 1

      Yes, I see the TYPO :( but hey it might be appropriate because Verisign might be SINGING the ANTI-TRUST blues....

      Nick Powers

      --

      Encryption: I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend your right to encrypt it...
  102. Domains are not property. by Sloppy · · Score: 2

    At least "intellectual property" (e.g. software, art) has something sorta real attached to it, even if it's not always tangible. But this is even less tangible. Domains are just a contract with ICANN, whose policies the root server operators presumably obey.

    Of course, there's nothing wrong with buying and selling contracts (e.g. commodities futures) but at least there's something real behind these contracts (e.g. the commodities themselves) even if you never see it. But a contract with ICANN is just .. nothing. It's absolutely blind faith with nothing backing it up, except inertia. I thought currency not backed by gold was bad, but at least it has society's approval: we print "This note is legal tender" on it and approximately 100% of the population wants it to have value. But this, unlike money, is something that most regular people don't care about. If someone makes it easy to switch namespaces and gives them a decent reason to do it, people will abandon it.

    These guys just risked 45 megabucks on something as robust as Win^H^H^H a snowflake.

    The thing is, now they are going to have to treat this domain, as if it were property, to make their investment have meaning. This means they must spend even more money on lawyers, lobbyists, and other expenses in order to maintain the status quo for DNS and the DNS-using population. Alternate roots will be frowned upon, and something like a completely overhaul of the namespace, simply cannot be allowed to happen.

    Fortunately for them, most ISPs these days are owned by megacorps, who will be happy to make deals to insure stability. But it's still a pretty precarious situation. I hope these guys aren't part of my mutual fund.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    1. Re:Domains are not property. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what? Money itself is nothing more than "absolutely blind faith with nothing backing it up, except inertia". Quit talking out of your ass.

    2. Re:Domains are not property. by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      So what? Money itself is nothing more than "absolutely blind faith with nothing backing it up, except inertia". Quit talking out of your ass.

      You were obviously so distracted by the sight of my ass, that you didn't hear the sounds coming out of it. I think I explained why this situation is different than the situation with money.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  103. Benin by carpe_noctem · · Score: 1

    I'm still waiting for someone to offer the President of Benin a large sum of money for the .bj damain extension, which doesn't seem to be used by anyone right now. Just imagine how much you could make being a registrar for that TLD for pr0n sites! =)

    --
    "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
  104. Speaking of the .US TLD... by guttentag · · Score: 4, Funny
    <SARCASM TYPE=prediction OFFTOPIC=1>

    January 23, 2003 -- WASHINGTON

    Chief Terrorist Whacker Bush today announced a fundamental change to the commonly used system for internet addresses.

    "I went to this interweb site to buy some more helicopters for the army and I realized I have no way of knowing if this is a terrorist organization. How do I know that the money I am spending on helicopters to help our future isn't going to some Yahoo in Somalia? So I picked up the bat phone and called Vice Whacker Cheney and said, 'Dick, we need to change this.'"

    Bush's new system does away with the .com, .net, .edu, .info, .musuem, .name, and .org "top level domains," as well as all country-specific TLDs. They will be replaced with two TLDs: .us and .them.

    Web site owners can register .us domains at their local DMV (or equivalent Motor Vehicle Administration), where they will be required to furnish a social security number, photo ID, and finger prints. The old addressing system is slated to be shut down in March 31.

    "Most of the Web sites I need already have the .us designation thanks to some forward thinking by my friends at ICANN, so I don't foresee too much of a problem here," Bush said.


    </SARCASM>
  105. Weird moderation? by isomeme · · Score: 2
    My parent comment to this one is currently moderated as follows:

    Troll=1, Informative=3, Overrated=1, Underrated=1, Total=6.

    The 'troll' mod in particular makes me a bit confused, but both the 'under' and 'overrated' are odd, too. Is there some storm of oddball mods going on?

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
  106. ccTLDs have been deleted before. by mbauser2 · · Score: 1

    I don't know ICANN policy on this, but I would hope that no country code will ever be withdrawn.

    You're about 10 years late on that one. The IANA, (who has the authority for these things until ICANN takes it away) already has deleted several "obsolete" ccTLDs from its official list. Here's last year's announcement about the deletion of .zr after Zaire changed its name to "Democratic Republic of Congo".

    Similarly, .cs (Czechoslovakia), .dd (East Germany), and .su (Soviet Union) were officially wiped off the face of the Earth after their associated nations were disolved, although some .su domains are reported to still resolve.

    --
    Proud to be / Smiley-free / Since Nineteen / Ninety-Three
  107. Bollox! by adelayde · · Score: 1

    I hate this bollox. Call me a standards freak. But there is some sense in country domains names. We're becoming (the World) too damn fucking commercial. And it's all the fault of those libertarians, especially the Yankees. Some twat tried to sell a mate of mine .uk.co the other day. .co is Columbia, this sucks. The net is turning into a load of Bollox!

    (End of intelligent use of the English Language)

  108. fa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I'm sorry Tuvalu sold out to those eevil imperilistic monopolist types. If this deprives the Tualese of any means of having local domain names, I suggest they use ".fa" in their domain names from now on.

    ...and if that doesn't work, they ought to try ".zzz". If they go with that standard, perhaps slashdot should move their servers to Tuvalu.

  109. Complain to IdeaLab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They came up with this marketing concept,
    they are the guys that probably made all the money off of this deall too..

  110. The Real Danger by Lazaru5 · · Score: 1

    This IS a monopolistic move. The .tv Corporation is behind SRSPlus (www.srsplus.com) , which is a wholesale registration service for partners that resell domain registration services. It's the same idea as Tucow's OpenSRS (www.opensrs.com) service (though 1 Domain Year is a little cheaper, and the lately the API has gotten better than OpenSRS's.)

    In otherwords, unless they keep SRSPlus around and don't fuck it up, they've effectively destroyed hundreds or thousands (I don't know how many SRSPlus resellers there are) of competitors.

    They clearly don't gain much else other than offering .tv domains since every other domain the .tv Corp offered was also available from NetSol (Verisign). You can bet it's SRSPlus they're after.

    --

    --
    My comments and opinions completely reflect those of anyone and anything I am remotely associated with.
  111. worried about anoter monopoly by anshil · · Score: 1

    As everyone is so worried about Microsoft these days, another monopoly is slipping through the cracks.

    That reminds me af the two grandpa's of the muppet show. Do you really thing you have an influence here on /. on what is going on on stage? I guess it's more like tho grandpa's commenting every happening on it, but IMHO it doesnt matter which actor thay see and which slips.

    --

    --
    Karma 50, and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt.
  112. See Fiji for examples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of how short a time the PM stays in power after the people vote for the "wrong" guy, i.e. anyone who is not an eastern chief.

  113. Possible but silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the entire country has applied to leave the country en masse to somewhere above sealevel (them pesky americans and their global warming) so it would be possible to buy the island (expensive because of the fishing rights perhaps)
    but you'd want to build everything on stilts :-)
    The main problem is not yet the islands going under the sea, but too much salt and no fresh water.

  114. NEwSFLaSH by Sarcasm_Orgasm · · Score: 0

    Engineers have finally developed a solution for your lack of "memory" it's called a "post-a-note", if you have problems loosing your note here's a tip: pull down pants, stick to ass.
    --
    you have been penalized .5 IQ points for reading this post.

    --
    Special people have long socks, ride short buses, & invent witty sigs.
  115. Slashdot.tv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    slashdot.tv is taken by some guy @ internetisdead , which just proves that verisign knows what they are doing.