Slashdot Mirror


California's "Wireless-Free" Zone

pangur writes: "In Wired, there's the story about how Arthur Firstenberg changed Mendocino, CA into a 'wireless-free zone' as a safehaven for those deemed 'electrically sensitive'. His critics claim that he is driving away any chance of a significant economy."

223 of 662 comments (clear)

  1. News flash! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Flamebait

    Sensitive, luddite granola types spotted in California! Nose cut to spite face! News at 11:00!

    1. Re:News flash! by arkanes · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'll be damned, I grew up in Mendo. Everything you say is true :P.

    2. Re:News flash! by arkanes · · Score: 2

      Gasp! You probably know my mom! *has shopped at Corners many times* *now REALLY hates carob*

  2. Microwaving the Planet by rde · · Score: 5, Funny

    That book of his sounds interesting. Is there an electronic version available?

    1. Re:Microwaving the Planet by linzeal · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here is a good synopsis.

  3. They already have this. by Heem · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There already is an area like this, It's called the Amish Country, Pennsylvania Dutch, etc. Seriously. The article describes being bothered by anything electronic, ranging from radio waves to hairdryers. May as well go back to the horse and buggy.

    --
    Don't Tread on Me
    1. Re:They already have this. by SComps · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Given this whole scenario the gentleman in the article describes himself has having a large "bevy" devices in his possession when he roams to San Franciso. Is he doing this on his horse or is he using his automobile which generates high voltage to make a spark, and lots of EMI from all those sensors talking to the cars computer? Personally I think the guys a whacko and probably would be thrown out of Amish country for being just a tad too conservative and holding them back!

    2. Re:They already have this. by GreyPoopon · · Score: 3, Interesting
      There already is an area like this, It's called the Amish Country, Pennsylvania Dutch, etc

      The only problem with "Amish Country" is that it definitely isn't devoid of electronic signals. There are all kinds of radio stations in the area, and almost all of the tourists carry cell phones, so there are plenty of cells spitting out a signal.

      Personally, I think that if this is such a problem for all these people, they should all just get together and go buy an island somewhere so they can leave the rest of the world alone. I really resent some nut who moves into a town and expects the whole town to bow to his every wacked out whim.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

  4. Oh no! Certain doom! by edremy · · Score: 5, Funny
    Has anyone told these folks that they are constantly bathed in microwave radiation from the Big Bang?

    They should move to another universe, provided they aren't already living in one...

    Eric

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  5. 5 years from now: Studies prove that.. by bugg · · Score: 4, Funny
    Studies show that hypochrondia is being diagnosed in Mendocino, CA at a rate ten times the national average. Reduced levels of electromagnetic exposure is the prime suspect.

    Mendocino had been attracting thousands of people due to their reduced levels of EMF exposure. It now seems that these people may have been actually endangering their mental health.

    --
    -bugg
  6. waves by joshuaos · · Score: 2, Informative
    Is there no electricity in Mendicino? I mean, I know there are lots of stoners, but is there no radio signals or microwaves? Can I not get any TV channels at all with my antenna there?

    I would certainly be the first to admit that all these waves that we've been sending out and bouncing around for about the last hundred odd years could be harmful. Hell, I'm not even sure that it would surprise me. But I know there are great benefits to wireless networking (not to mention electricity), and good luck getting entirely away from signals and waves. Go to some third world underdeveloped country if you must, cause I don't think you're going to find it here.

    Also, the very important point that what if some others in Mendicino like thier radio waves. I would certainly not want to see this guy's problem inflicted on everyone else in this community.

    Cheers, Joshua

    --

    When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout!

    1. Re:waves by nanojath · · Score: 2

      More to the point, are they gonna put up a big lead roof over the whole county? Just because there are no cell-phones in town, doesn't mean they aren't getting hammered by signals from sattelites, television stations, radio stations, power lines...

      --

      It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

  7. Electrically Sensitive? by ThatComputerGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I must be electrically sensitive too, because every time I put a fork on the wall socket I also get a "Burning pain" and "Electric shocks".

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  8. Microwaving the Planet by solarce · · Score: 2, Funny

    That must take on hell of a large microwave, and what setting would you use? "Half-Baked"

    --
    Is a Sig really an expression of the person behind the post or just random nonsense?
  9. tin foil hats - the only solution by ajm · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's worked for kooks for many, many years. In fact, you might say it's a "proven" solution to the problems of wireless interference with your brain waves, at least to the same extent that it's been "proven" that wireless hurts your head!

  10. Mendocino has a thriving "offline" economy by Infonaut · · Score: 5, Funny
    it's called marijuana. When you're high all the time, who needs wireless acceess?

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:Mendocino has a thriving "offline" economy by QuietRiot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm there. Unix when you're high is a treat. Playing with my FreeBSD box after a bowl or two is a great way to satiate either the anti-social [sit there in front of your computer for hours without having to talk to anybody] or super-social [email, and lots of it] person you may become. While there are many other things I can enjoy under the influence, unix is a treat for me.

      I love to build - and I especially like to be crafty and work with my hands after a nice J with some friends. I like to build, fix, and create. And while marijuana can make you pretty spacy, it often helps me to concentrate - and become less distractable than I usually am. I can give myself a little project, or part of a big one, and just go at it.

      The slight change in perspective at the command line can be a benefit too. Seeing problems and relations between system resources in a different way can help anyone become a better sysadmin or to better solve problems that may develop. Stepping off your own beaten path can lead to shortcuts and enlightenment. You may realize you've been taking the long way home on a simple function you've been performing for years. A chance to explore - that's what it's really all about.

      While I don't suggest relying on yourself when you're very high or whipping out a J at work - if you never use your computer when you smoke - or if you used to smoke long ago, but haven't in a while ... well - give it a shot. Explore. If it doesn't work for you... well, you probably haven't lost much. And it's pretty hard to experiment without learning _something_ right?

      Just remember to dose yoruself properly. Don't do too much - or you'll just stare at your screen and call me crazy. Use your command history - and keep an editor window open to jot down ideas or help you remember what you've done. [Short term memory IS affected - so compensate!]

      Experiment. You're bound to learn _something_

    2. Re:Mendocino has a thriving "offline" economy by arkanes · · Score: 2

      Your friends are pulling your leg, it's kansas where it grows wild. However, it IS so common that pot considered primo stuff in southern california gets thrown away (by the garbage bag) there. There's a fair amount of usage in Mendocino, the town (not city), but theres little or no cultivation. All the real cultivation is done in Humboldt, mainly on the state parks. Small scale growing is done on GP land, usually in smaller outlying areas like Albion and Comptche.

  11. So who is DEEMED electrically sensitive.. by Restil · · Score: 3, Insightful

    and how is this accomplished exactly? What credible research shows that one person is more likely to be affected by radio waves then someone else. Does this also mean that there are no TV broadcasts, no radio broadcasts, no police radios, no satellite reception. I mean... if you're going to cut one source of RF, you better cut it all, just to be on the safe side.

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
    1. Re:So who is DEEMED electrically sensitive.. by Algorithm+wrangler · · Score: 5, Informative

      At the university I attended the department of telecommunications (!) did a very simple experiment in this field: They found 20 people who (according to themselves) were very plagued by electrical sensitivity - in particular high-voltage power lines. They were then put - one bye one - into a grounded magnetically shielded room where the only source of electrical or magnetic fields was a high-voltage power line running below the ceiling. Then the power (1 kV 50 Hz) was turned randomly on and off, and the participants were then to give a sign through a window when they "felt" the power coming on - after all they were supposed to be sensitive to this. However the study found no correllation between the power going on and off and the signs that the subjects gave. Not even for one single subject. The study concluded that the only problem for these people was a too lively imagination.

      --
      -._''_.-
    2. Re:So who is DEEMED electrically sensitive.. by cgleba · · Score: 2

      Perhaps his political opponets should do the same to him. Lock him in a room and see if he can actually "feel the waves". That will take a lot of credability off of his argument.

      The reason I'm lobbying so hard to stop the expansion of wireless facilities all over the country is because I firmly believe this is affecting the health of the nation," said Firstenberg, who graduated from Cornell University with a degree in mathematics and a minor in physics.

      Perhaps he should have made that minor in physics a major and minored in the medical field instead. . .

      Btw, Art, I'll decide if the "waves" hurt me, you don't have to "save the nation" for us. ..

    3. Re:So who is DEEMED electrically sensitive.. by Wntrmute · · Score: 2

      I had the same thought, and was also reminded of James Randi's challenge to an alleged aura-seer:

      http://skepdic.com/auras.html

    4. Re:So who is DEEMED electrically sensitive.. by rekoil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A good folloup test would be to do the same experiment, but with the addition of a speaker that emitted a "buzz" that sounds like the humming of a transformer, or some other stimuli that the subject should interpret as a sign of existence of the flowing current - nothing too overt; a "power on" light in the room might be a interpreted as easily spoofable. The key is to make the subject believe that the juice is flowing independent of whether or not it actually is.

      Turn said stimuli on and off in a pattern completely unrelated to the actual activation/deactivation of the current. See if the subject reponds to the stimuli pattern instead of the actual current flow. I'll betcha they do.

    5. Re:So who is DEEMED electrically sensitive.. by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2

      Not that I buy into this stuff, but it occurs to me that an experiment like that is fairly simplistic. Try putting subjects into a room to see if they can detect the presence or absence of vitamin C -- do your results call scurvy into question?

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    6. Re:So who is DEEMED electrically sensitive.. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

      Not that I buy into this stuff, but it occurs to me that an experiment like that is fairly simplistic. Try putting subjects into a room to see if they can detect the presence or absence of vitamin C -- do your results call scurvy into question?

      The difference is that these people claim to be able to detect the (immediate) presence or absence of electromagnetic fields.

      I make no claims of being able to detect whether my orange juice really contains vitamin C by tasting it.

    7. Re:So who is DEEMED electrically sensitive.. by Anemophilous+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
      Perhaps he should have made that minor in physics a major and minored in the medical field instead.

      Hrm, from page 2 of the wired article:
      "Firstenberg says he became electrically sensitive in 1982 as a pre-med student at the University of California at Irvine, after he received more than 40 dental X-rays. One day he collapsed on the hospital floor with heart pains and subsequently he lost 15 pounds in two weeks. He also grew short of breath around electrical equipment. Finally he dropped out of med school and moved to the "clean environment" of Mendocino.

      Looks like he sort of tried that route already...

      - A non-productive mind is with absolutely zero balance.
      - AC
    8. Re:So who is DEEMED electrically sensitive.. by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2

      Yes, that's true in this case, and I assume was true in the case of your experiment, but that doesn't rule out the possibility that others are sensitive, or that these folks are but exagerate the immediacy of it. Just because my premonitions of a bus crash are hogwash doesn't mean that I'm immune to that Flxible bearing down on me, and CO can kill me just as dead even though I can't smell it. :)

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

  12. Sounds like by wiredog · · Score: 2

    Some of "the town's 1,000-odd residents" are pretty odd indeed.

  13. hmmm by Em+Emalb · · Score: 2

    from the article:
    "People vary in their sensitivity to EMFs, and up to 20% of the population (according to Swedish research) can become electrically sensitive."

    Damn, no TVs, VCRs, video games, Microwaves, phones, powerlines, hair dryers, etc. for 20%!!!!! That's like 1/5th of the population. That would really suck. This sounds to me like a simple ploy. People like this guy are always up to something, and that is usually no good. For what it's worth, you can always find stats to prove what ever you want.

    Call me skeptical, but this is PR BullSh!t.

    Besides, wouldn't they be ok if they wore the static guards used for working on computer equipment?

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
    1. Re:hmmm by Mr_Matt · · Score: 2

      Besides, wouldn't they be ok if they wore the static guards used for working on computer equipment?

      Static guards, feh. These guys need the Aluminum Foil Deflector Beanies to solve their real problem - being brainwashed hypochondriacs. :)

      --


      But what does my opinion matter, I just vote here. It's not like I have any money or anything.
  14. The list of things that cause the symptoms. by DrEldarion · · Score: 3, Informative

    The following can provoke symptoms:

    Laptop computers using their mains adapters Computer monitors (VDTs, VDUs) Televisions Mobile phones Fluorescent lights Pylons, substations Electric fields due to house wiring Electrical 'noise' in trains, buses and cars Battery-operated appliances Telephones, answering machines and faxes Refrigerators, freezers, electric cookers, vacuum cleaners etc. Fire alarms and burglar alarms Underground electric cables Hearing-aid induction loops


    If the "electrically sensitive" people can't be near any of those, they might as well become Amish...

    -- Dr. Eldarion --

  15. Re:Credible Studies? by mshomphe · · Score: 2

    More than likely these people are hypochondriacs. People will say they feel better in these 'wireless-free' areas for the same reason people prefer bottled water to tap water: 'placebo effect' or 'the power of suggestion'.

    --
    She sat at the window watching the evening invade the avenue.
  16. Wireless Free Zone? by mprindle · · Score: 2

    How can one make a zone wireless free? From the article it seems that they are worried about the radio emissions from radio and other devices. Just because they have that small area where no cell phone towers exist, it doesn't mean that there are no radio waves in the area. If humans could see the radio waves it would totally freak us out since there is SO much out there. Just think of how many waves are out there just for your local TV and radio stations.

    1. Re:Wireless Free Zone? by GigsVT · · Score: 2

      And considering "radio waves" are just EM waves.... They better call Monty Burns to come block out the Sun, and all other sources of light.

      And candles are definitely verboten. Only a life of total EM darkness will be safe for these people.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  17. Oh Please! by billmaly · · Score: 2

    Hypochondria run amok! I'd be interested in knowing what other "conditions" these people have suffered from in the past.

    Although, this would explain the feeling of dread and nausea I get when cell phone caller ID displays my boss calling.

  18. The only thing this guy is missing ... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... is the aluminum-foil-covered hat to keep out the CIA mind control rays. There has never been a single piece of hard evidence for low-intensity radio waves causing the symptoms he and others describe. Considering how long radio-based devices have been in common use (just over a century) it's very hard to believe that this is real.

    In fact, it sounds to me like classic mass hysteria, which (unfortunately) is a well-documented medical phenomenon. If this guy and his buddies are looking for a place to live that will satisfy their needs, may I suggest Salem, Mass.?

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    1. Re:The only thing this guy is missing ... by jht · · Score: 2

      Please, no! I live and work in Salem, and the last thing I need is someone like him getting on my case about my hacked-up AirPort Base Station!

      Though now that I think about it, if he's that sensitive inviting him to my house should help take care of the problem...

      --
      -- Josh Turiel
      "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
    2. Re:The only thing this guy is missing ... by Robotech_Master · · Score: 2

      These people do exist, though. There's one fellow who comes to the Kmart where I work occasionally who is rather indignant about the bigscreen TV behind the service desk that shows continuous advertisements and things; he says it makes him sick, and he has to make a wide loop around it when he comes in or out.

      The human body is an amazing and wonderful thing, and our medicine isn't even close to understanding it fully. If we can be sickened by large doses of radiation, who's to say some among us can't be sickened by smaller ones?

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    3. Re:The only thing this guy is missing ... by PD · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Indeed. Who's to say that some among us can't be sickened by:

      1) small doses of fluoride in the water
      2) small doses of iron in the water
      3) small doses of radiation from smoke detectors
      4) small doses of nutrasweet
      5) small doses of saccharin
      6) small doses of psychic energy
      7) small needles inserted into energy points in the body
      8) small amounts of chemicals emitted by menstruating women
      9) small amounts of pig sweat in perfumes
      10) extremely large amounts of staph bacteria on everything we touch
      11) etc.

      The answer to your question "who's to say that some among us can't be sickened by smaller ones?" is ME. It's called the burden of proof. The person making the claim needs to provide the evidence. Without evidence the rational position to take is "I don't believe it. Prove it."

    4. Re:The only thing this guy is missing ... by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 2

      People who get sick watching television are suffering from one of two conditions. Sensitivity to the 60hz flickering (Same with most flourescent bulbs) Or from motion sickness from seeing motion on the TV but not feeling it in theie ears. It has NOTHING to do with EMR...

      People that see such crack pot statements as this guys then think "Oh my mother had that, she got sick watching TV, it must be true" are guilty of the WORST form of insanity, complete lack of rational thought.

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
    5. Re:The only thing this guy is missing ... by scoove · · Score: 4, Funny

      No kidding... we've got a weather spotter affectionally known as Tornado Tim in our parts (we're about as far away from an ocean as you can get) who mounted one of those boat radar systems on the top of his beat up Nissan pickup.

      Even the hams who play with RF all the time walk in a big circle to avoid his truck...

      *scoove*

    6. Re:The only thing this guy is missing ... by loydcc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes exactly my point. Some of the marine radar setups are based on the same technology that caused all those state troopers to go sterile. Now on a sailboat 30 feet up the mast these pose no threat but on the roof a Nissan truck it's about 2 feet from the guys head. I'm not big on power boats but I think the rule of thumb is to put them on a tower at least 6 feet high.

    7. Re:The only thing this guy is missing ... by FirstOne · · Score: 3, Interesting
      "There's one fellow who comes to the KMart where I work occasionally who is rather indignant about the big screen TV behind the service desk that shows continuous advertisements and things; he says it makes him sick, and he has to make a wide loop around it when he comes in or out. "

      Most TV set's emit a significant amount of sonic energy, and no, I am not just talking about the content of the TV programs. :-)

      In the US, the NTSC standard frequency of 15.75 kilohertz was chosen for horizontal retrace interval. As a natural design consequence of the standard, both the horizontal coil and fly back transformer both operate at this same frequency. These components contain wire coils which vibrate as the magnetic field expands and contracts 15,750 times a second. As these wire coils vibrate, the mechanical movement converts into sonic energy at the same frequency, very similar to a speaker. This vibration results in the TV set emitting a continuous, high pitched pure tone, just within the hearing range of humans.

      For the most part, the larger the TV screen, the larger the components, which results in an even higher intensity pure tone emission.

      Exposure to these moderately intense, high frequency pure tones for long periods of time,
      can inflict serious damage too your hearing. One of these conditions is called "Tinnitus".

      Tinnitus sufferers, will often continue to perceive these continuous high pitch tones, long after being exposed. (often years). I.E. A living hell ! The number of 'Tinnitus" sufferers in the US is estimated to be in the 30 to 50 million range. Their number continues to increase at epidemic proportions.

      Thus, avoiding additional exposure to these continuous, pure sound tones is a good start!
      Some suggestions for the technically inclined.

      1. Switch to a full time line double HDTV set/monitor (~31Khz) for normal TV viewing.
      2. Change the scan rate frequency preferences for the video card, sometimes up or sometimes down.
      Often a 1/2 or 1/3 harmonic can inflict just as much damage, especially if it is just a few feet away.
      3. Avoid placing CRT monitors & TV sets in the corners of a room.
      The sound reflections off walls just increase the exposure.
      4. Replace computer CRT monitors with LCD monitors.
      5. Use a laptop computer, and it's built in LCD display for most daily tasks.

    8. Re:The only thing this guy is missing ... by alcmena · · Score: 2

      My roomie has the motion sickness one. He can't play FPS games for very long. Rather than try and ban all FPS games from the city, he just plays Black & White. :)

  19. Interference by kenneth_martens · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know about effects on one's health, but radio frequency interference can be a real problem. For example, I have a set of cordless headphones that I use so I can roam my room listening to music and not bother anyone else. However, my neighbor's cordless phone uses the same frequency (approximately 900MHz, in case you're interested.) I can tell when he's using the phone because the static interrupts my music. If I tune my headphones carefully, I can even hear his conversation.

    Banning wireless technology entirely (as the article describes them doing in Mendocino) is probably not a good solution, but I think there should be regulations and standards enforced to make ensure better cooperation between wireless devices, to prevent interference.

    1. Re:Interference by GigsVT · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's probably front end overload of your reciever. If a signal is strong enough, you will hear it on every frequency.

      There isn't much you can do. Try sticking a ferrite on any power cords attached to the reciever, and any other non-antenna cables.

      As an unlicensed user of the radio spectrum, you pretty much have to accept any interference generated by any other part 15 device. It's possible his phone is malfunctioning, but it's more likely your reciever is just overwhelmed by it's signal.

      You might want to ask him if he can relocate the base station part of it, or you can relocate the base station part of your equipment. That might help.

      You could also just put metal screen inside all your walls, celing, and floor, that will solve all future interference problems for good.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  20. Huh? by cperciva · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "This overexposure to pulsed microwaves has been a personal tragedy for me," Wagner said in an e-mail interview. "I'm left hypersensitive -- even my mouse burns my hand when I use my computer now."

    Am I the only person who doesn't understand this? Why did he give an *email* interview if using computers is so painful to him?

    1. Re:Huh? by Rupert · · Score: 2
      --

      --
      E_NOSIG
    2. Re:Huh? by arkanes · · Score: 2

      She actually is just a kook, because she uses a computer regularly. In fact, she had one in her home for years, without any problems. She'd never figure out how to use her computer without a mouse anyway.

    3. Re:Huh? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 3, Funny

      > Perhaps she uses a non-point-and-click mail reader?

      If a mouse burns her hands, how could a computer keyboard fail to burn her fingertips?

      Chris Mattern

    4. Re:Huh? by GreyKnight · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hm. This sounds more like carpal tunnel syndrome, than sensitivity to electric fields (though I daresay it's probably all in her head). Assuming, of course, that she's telling the truth (it's not like no one ever lies to the media).

      Anyway, how much of an electric field does she think a mouse generates anyway? I don't have any hard numbers, but I'd bet that the EM fields from a monitor exceed those of a mouse by a few orders of magnitude.

      What would be interesting would be a correlation between the complainants degree of technical literacy and their perceived sensitivity...I wouldn't be surprised if technically literate people are much less susceptible to this sort of thing...

    5. Re:Huh? by Suppafly · · Score: 2

      no.. the interviewee specifically noted that using a computer mouse made her hands hurt.. obviously they used a computer occaisionally to learn that..

  21. did you read this crap? My MOUSE BURNS!!!!! by ruebarb · · Score: 4, Funny

    ""This overexposure to pulsed microwaves has been a personal tragedy for me," Wagner said in an e-mail interview. "I'm left hypersensitive -- even my mouse burns my hand when I use my computer now."

    Isn't a mouse a MECHANICAL DEVICE - virtually 99 percent electronics free...there may be a diode or two in there..but it can't be generating an electronic signal - it's probably only getting the barest of electricity from the PS2 port to power the thing. (unless you're using one of those new Infrared mice) -

    If it's burning your hand, then that means it's probably IN YOUR FRIGGEN HEAD!!!!

    Sounds like someone's setting themselves up for another juicy lawsuit. Glad I don't live in California right now or I'd be paying for it.

    --

    ----------
    ah honey, we're all resplendent - Bill Mallonee
  22. Hypocritical? by Mondrames · · Score: 2, Funny

    For someone who is "Hypersensitive" wouldn't this be harmful?
    "Nowadays when Firstenberg travels, he lugs along a bevy of devices to detect radio frequencies, including a meter that gauges electrical, magnetic and microwave fields."

  23. 9 out of 10 reviewers said the book was by TheViffer · · Score: 4, Funny

    "shocking and electrifying"

    --
    -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
  24. ES techie issues by -douggy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am a bit of a geek with a few PCs in my room + lapto + stero equipment like many a slashdot reader has I am sure. However I find that I possitivly cannot sleep if there is anything electrical near my bed. I accidentally left a mobile phone near me the other night and couldn't sleep a wink. Probably caused by too mush slashdotting and irc. My GF is similar she cannot sleeo with her alarm clock by her bed as it gives her nightmares

    1. Re:ES techie issues by buysse · · Score: 2
      My GF is similar she cannot sleeo with her alarm clock by her bed as it gives her nightmares

      My alarm clock gives me nightmares too. I hate mornings. Especially mornings on Mondays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Thursdays, Fridays, and (when I have to work) Saturdays.

      Hello Psycho, I'm Somatic! Nice ta meetcha.

      --
      -30-
    2. Re:ES techie issues by RollingThunder · · Score: 2
      I accidentally left a mobile phone near me the other night and couldn't sleep a wink.


      The problem with this anectodal "evidence" is that you only thought to look for something 'odd' when you couldn't sleep.

      The five other times that you left the phone near the bed and slept fine, there was nothing odd, so you didn't look. (illustrative example only)

      The human brain is an amazing pattern matching device - so much so that it will fixate on patterns that absolutely do not exist, because damnit, there MUST be one!
  25. These people are flakes... by meldroc · · Score: 2

    Somebody needs to put straitjackets on these folks and lock them in a padded Faraday Cage.

    --

    Meldroc, Waster of Electrons
  26. Faraday cage? by elsegundo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why doesn't this guy build himself a Faraday cage, and leave everybody else alone?

    Nope, don't like it. Too simple. Too clear cut...

    --


    The revolution will be televised. Blackout restrictions apply.
    1. Re:Faraday cage? by JesseL · · Score: 2

      He wouldn't know what to complain about when his "symptoms" didn't go away. He's found somthing to bitch about and he doesn't want to give it up.

      --
      "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
  27. Oh, I love it! by SecurityGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    The guy's electrically sensitive, and yet he carries around sensors to tell him when he's in fields he's sensitive to. :) Funny, I'm thermally sensitive (anything over a couple hundred degrees causes intense burning pains), but I don't carry around a thermometer to tell me when I've stepped in the campfire.

    1. Re:Oh, I love it! by haruharaharu · · Score: 2

      Evolution will select for those people that can thrive under fluorescent light, surrounded by electrical devices, and generally bathed in ever increasing amounts of radiation

      Yes, we humans aren't cut out for days filled with radiation. Well, except for the Sun that puts out ~1KW/M^2 during a clear summer day. And the Earth's magnetic field. Yes, this pales before a 50W microwave transmitter or a pole 5 miles away.

      --
      Reboot macht Frei.
  28. Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by Ioldanach · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The list of symptoms causing 'electrical sensitivity' reads like a laundry list of psychosomatic effects. In the article, one woman says that since the school put up this tower, going to the school makes her ill and even touching her computer mouse burns her. Of course, the article goes on to say that there have been towers on that school for the past 30 years. And the big advocate for this? He carries around a bevy of equipment to detect electrical fields, which I don't expect make him feel any better about the places he visits.


    And I have one all-important question: Have *any* of these people been tested within the confines of an experiment to see if they *really* experience these problems? Try putting them through an experiment in an environment secure & devoid of radio activity (say, a bunker somewhere with a guassian cage around it).

    Such an experiment would entail:

    1. A control group which does not get any sort of exposure, and has no means by which the occupant would see any source of exposure.
    2. A group with appliances inside the gaussian cage that can emit RF, such as computers & microwaves
    3. A group with appliances inside that don't get any juice, and thus *can't* emit
    4. A group in the same environment as the control group but with externally injected RF noise.

    Only with that kind of an experiment can their claims be given any sort of credence. Until then, its all quackery.

    1. Re:Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by Ioldanach · · Score: 2

      Doh! I meant Faraday Cage, not Gaussian Cage. (sorry)

    2. Re:Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by SanLouBlues · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or better yet, when the school has it's public hearing with the goofballs complaining of the emf reveal that it hasn't been broadcasting for the last two weeks. It'd blow their minds :)

    3. Re:Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by scoove · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Don't tell Mr. Firstenberg, but Mendocino lists a good dozen hams, and I'd have to believe that Mendocino county hasn't been terribly effective in telling the FCC they're the boss.

      According to the ARRL's callsign lookup for zipcode 95460, there are 14 hams listed in the community. The town also sports a amateur radio club - Willits Amateur Radio Society (look at their stated objectives for reference to their county).

      And I'd have to bet the local luddites haven't been too effective in shutting off satellite reception, AM, FM and broadcast TV reception, licensed microwave, 800 MHz trunking (e.g. city/county police, fire and roads), etc.

      So I'm terribly curious how this RF allergy is only affected by specific frequency bands - e.g. 900 MHz analog cellular (but not amateur use of 900), PCS around 1.8 GHz, 2.4 GHz ISM and 5.3/5.8 U-NII allocations?

      Even more curious is that I don't see any reference to the pulsed microwaves emitted by microwave ovens - approximately 2.4 GHz devices that often carry 500 watt radios and leak significantly more RF than the receive end of a 2.4 GHz wireless ISP transmission (e.g. -55 to -85 dBm).

      Apparently the energy crisis wasn't enough for these mysticism-led luddites. They probably won't be happy until the state is living in an ag commune...

      *scoove*

      I'd even bet that if we moved service into another frequency assignment, the allergy would follow.

    4. Re:Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by PD · · Score: 2

      Try putting them through an experiment in an environment secure & devoid of radio activity (say, a bunker somewhere with a guassian cage around it).

      Then your experiment would have to control for those who are ground sensitive. It wouldn't work otherwise.

    5. Re:Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      you are missing a large portion of Radio energy..

      every sattelite in space that has that location in it's illumination area. or how about that funny juggawatt tranmitter we have in the sky called the sun? Or the telephone microwave links that aim across that town, etc..

      I have "expierienced" one of these wacko's before.. complaining that my Ham radio station's transmissions upset her. when confronted because she called the police I was transmitting with my 2meter handheld in my pocket that was 3 feet from her at 5 watts (more ERP then she recieves from my tower antenna at 100 watts) and was saying how she felt better now that I wasn't transmitting. The officer was amused when I asked him why she didin't notice my radio, and I had been transmitting for the past 5 minutes. but she started to act as if in pain when I pulled it out of my coat.... wow it must be in view then? LMAO.

      It's a mential illness, just like the pierced freaks. (no offense to pierced freaks)

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by arkanes · · Score: 2

      Some nitpicks - willits it's several hours drive from Mendo (it's not even in 95460, it's in 95490), and I'd be suprised if anyone actually living within Mendocino broadcasts (rural area, remember. Lots of people get mail in Mendo that don't live there). Sattelite reception is fine, but there's no cable, and only one (weak) broadcast televion station. No AM radio to speak of. There is FM radio, but the only one based in Mendo is the student station mentioned in the article. There's no police station (Mendocino isn't incorporated, there is no "city"), and, to my knowledge, all the fire house has is scanners. They've been VERY effective in shutting off celular, there's no cell service in most of the county, and every time there's a bid to put one up, it rapidly gets shot down.

    7. Re:Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by elmegil · · Score: 2

      It is difficult, nigh unto impossible, to prove a negative, i.e. absolutely refute such claims. The burden of proof is on the claimants. They've had a LONG TIME to provide even hints of evidence with scientific validity (I've been hearing such claims since my childhood in the 70's). If we haven't had any indications outside of anecdotal evidence (see above comments about HAM dealing with a woman who couldn't feel his portable xmitter until she saw it), then I'm going to err on the side of calling their bluff and telling them to put up or shut up.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    8. Re:Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by M-G · · Score: 2

      And I'm sure the officer that responded had a repeater in his car to tie in to his handheld radio....

    9. Re:Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by M-G · · Score: 2

      Hook up that exciter to a dummy load and you won't have as much problem... :)

  29. Re:other things by arkanes · · Score: 2

    The same people mentioned in the article also have managed to keep cell towers from being put up - thus, no one in the area has a cell phone. They also are lobbying to have the radio tower at the local high school shut down. (Apparently, KPFA over the hill in Booneville is okay, however)

  30. Re:Credible Studies? by Mondrames · · Score: 2, Funny

    Granted, but as a chronic kidney stone former, I prefer bottled or filtered water to the tap - I live in a so-called Kidney Stone belt due to levels of minerals and such in our drinking water...

    However I agree that Bob Evian is making a killing from the tap in his "Mountain" basement.

  31. No, no, no! by joshamania · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not the CIA! Major League Baseball with their roving constellations of satellites...

    1. Re:No, no, no! by sharkey · · Score: 2

      Shhh! Not so loud, or you'll have Mark McGuire down on you...

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  32. Re:Credible Studies? by connorbd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hypochondria is one word for it... The thing is that a lot of these people don't want to hear that what they have is really a mental imbalance. I've heard of people with imagined skin parasites too -- they will go to the dermatologist, present no obvious symptoms, and simply do not wish to be told that what they really need is a mild antipsychotic.

    It's a bizarre situation. I feel safe in saying that these people's conditions are probably delusional; what has to be brought into account is that whether or not it's all in their heads, their suffering is certainly real. The problem is that they take any attempt to bridge the disconnect as a personal insult...

    /Brian

  33. He's ignoring the True Conspiracy by wiredog · · Score: 2

    The Cabal is behind it all! Think about it! What do Mozart's Silver Flute, the Defenestration of Prague, Philip K Dick, and Dubya all have in common? Who was it that poisoned Rusty? And Inoshiro?
    It's not the Black Helicopters you fool! Those are just a ruse to distract your attention from the Real Truth! (They're chartreuse helicopters, anyway.) You have been wasting years of your empty life in an obsessive, paranoiac search for the truth! And you can't handle the Truth! The Truth is that there is one, single, true conspiracy!

  34. Move him to WV by pdqlamb · · Score: 2

    Isn't there an area in West Virginia, something like 10 miles square, where you can't get radio, TV, or cellular? Started by accident but then the radio astronomers and spooks decided they like the low RF background.

    Residents hate it, and want cable.

    1. Re:Move him to WV by cdipierr · · Score: 2

      You're referring to Greenbank, West Virginia, which is part of the NRAO. You can get info about it here. It's pretty cool. I've been there 3 times as part of an astronomy group when I was in college.

    2. Re:Move him to WV by Animats · · Score: 2

      Yes, that's the National Radio Quiet Zone, which covers 13,000 square miles of West Virginia. It was created to create a quiet enough area that spying on RF emissions from the USSR via moonbounce would work. It's retained for radio astronomy.

    3. Re:Move him to WV by fader · · Score: 2

      Having been to some scary parts of West Virginia (yeah, there's about 15 square miles in the state that aren't terribly scary) I can safely say there are a lot of places where you can't get radio, TV, or cellular. There are places that only get a couple of hours of direct sunlight a day... the valleys are that low and steep.

      I can't imagine they're of much use to radio astronomers though, because the very things that make them so low in RFI would block the signals the astronomers are looking for. Being able to see only a few degrees of sky wouldn't help them much. As far as what the spooks are doing, who can say...?

      --
      - fader
    4. Re:Move him to WV by jjeffries · · Score: 2
      Yeah... take a look at their page; I'm sure this guy would love to have dishes in his backyard that make the Statue of Liberty look tiny in comparison.

      At least he'd be close to skiing.

    5. Re:Move him to WV by Barbarian · · Score: 2

      Are you kidding? He'd freak out at all the radio telescope dishes, and insist the CIA was using them to mind control him.

  35. Afraid of aerial electromagnetic transmissions? by toupsie · · Score: 3, Funny
    Have I got a deal for you! Here at Toupsie Tinfoil Haberdashery, we build the best head protection a crazy nut like you can find. The Toupsie MkIV Cranial Aluminum Wrapper can prevent 99.96% of all satellite transmissions, cell phone calls and Dan Rather's nightly CIA instructions from entering that skull of yours.

    What a f%cking nut job this Firstenberg is. I wouldn't be surprised if this is the nutburger preaching all the multiple chemical sensitivity crap. Its sad to see a local economy being devistated by the lunatic fears of a vocal whackjob.

    Click on my link and read about real science and not this pseudo science cow manure.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  36. The guy has a great scam going by jet_silver · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Didja see the part where he doesn't disclose his diagnosis, so he can keep collecting disability benefits? His scam goes:

    1) Whine a lot about a man-made phenomenon.
    2) Get good at malingering.
    3) See a doctor, claiming 1) makes you "sick".
    4) Vote for your living from that day forward. (The louder you bitch, the more you cash in!)

    Really, this guy deserves a kick from every Californian, because we are supporting this bullshit with our taxes.

  37. Re:Credible Studies? by cats-paw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is a VERY easy "condition" to test.

    I take the "patient" and put him or her in a shielded room so that the detectors all read 0.

    Naturally I have a partition in the room so that I can beam waves at the "patient" from the other side of the partition (the partition is also part of the shielded room) without their knowledge.

    Turn on the transmitter at random intervals and see if and, more importantly, when, they complain.

    --
    Absolute statements are never true
  38. Swedish research? by ptrourke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    People vary in their sensitivity to EMFs, and up to 20% of the population (according to Swedish research) can become electrically sensitive.

    Anybody notice that this doesn't cite the article, or quote it? Where was it published, the Swedish edition of The Journal of Irreproducible Results?

  39. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by Calcbert · · Score: 2, Funny

    Perhaps they should put up a giant metal sheild over the whole town to block out services like satellite TV and GPS too.....or just lobby the providers of those services to stop them entirely.

    On a slight tangent, is the effect created by microwaving a town wacko about the same as for an AOL CD?

  40. This is almost as bad... by joshamania · · Score: 2

    ...as the idiot with the web site dedicated to eliminating letterboxed movies and television because "the black bars are censoring the movie".

    There was a movie out several years ago called "S.A.F.E" about that chemical sensitivity crap. Please avoid it at all costs, as it is about a nutjob who thinks she's allergic to everything and must live in a clean porcelain box.

    All you nutjobs out there...you don't like electromagnetic radiation? I suggest you bury yourselves deep within the ground in a lead lined box...even that will not stop many cosmic rays from penetrating your soul from time to time.

    1. Re:This is almost as bad... by joshamania · · Score: 2

      Egggcellent...I forgot where that was. Thanks!

  41. excerpt by schnitzi · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Wireless Free Mendocino has been instrumental in defeating attempts to bring cell phone and a high-speed Internet service to the town's 1,000-odd residents.

    That hyphen is entirely superfluous.

    --



    I object to that article, and to the next reply.
  42. I wonder what his comment would be to the fact... by Newer+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That most of the RF radiation received on earth comes from space...you know from places like the SUN! I know...Mendocino is going to build a giant aluminumized dome over itself..and become the SUN FREE ZONE! What a pure whacko!

  43. Sounds Familiar by Auckerman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is a communities of people who live wire and wireless free in the US, they are called the Amish. Nice folk, live a simple life. They don't try to remove radio stations from nearby communities.

    Now if someone beleives that the transmissions are giving them trouble, move to Montana or North Dakota, don't stay in Ca and certainly don't try to move everyone backwards with you. There are alternatives, and they are feasable.

    --

    Burn Hollywood Burn
  44. Re:did you read this crap? My MOUSE BURNS!!!!! by arkanes · · Score: 4, Informative
    I know Christy, and I'll promise that it's in her friggen head. She's also really unlikely to get it together enough to ever file a lawsuit, but she did take medical leave over it.

    People in mendo are really easily swayed by hysterical rantings, especially if they're involved with conspiracies and anti-"The Man". Much the way /. is about Microsoft. Crackpot theories are a pretty big market there.

  45. Guess I'm Sensitive too by stinkydog · · Score: 3, Funny

    If I leave my laptop on my lap for more than a few minutes, I develop a burning sensation.

    Bender: (points scanner at Fry)
    Fry: Ouch, My Sperm.
    Bender: (Scans Fry again)
    Fry: Funny, it didn't hurt that time.

    SD

    --
    âoeWho knew something as harmless as willful ignorance could end up having real consequences?â
  46. Gee, Thanks! by w.p.richardson · · Score: 3
    Do you have a website I could check out for this place? It sounds like something I would be interested in.


    TIA!

    --

    Curb CO2 emissions: Kill yourself today!

    1. Re:Gee, Thanks! by jandrese · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ironically, yes the Amish hhave a website. Go figure.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:Gee, Thanks! by GreyPoopon · · Score: 2
      Ironically, yes the Amish [800padutch.com] hhave a website.


      I'm reasonably certain that the website is not run by an Amish person. There's a lot of tourist activity in the PA Dutch area. And although some of the Amish reap the rewards, much of the money goes to other individuals hoping to make a buck off of the interesting facets of the Amish community.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

  47. I think i'm electrically sensitive. by zerofoo · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was wiring a 3 phase 220 outlet and I got hit with 220. It thew me clear across the room. I guess this would qualify me as "electrically sensitive".

    -ted

    1. Re:I think i'm electrically sensitive. by zulux · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was wiring a 3 phase 220 outlet and I got hit with 220.

      Jesus - be carefull with this stuff!

      I'm a smart geek - so I figgured that I could wire 220 -- 'just like 110, just with higher voltage.' Woops. Please if any of you fellow geeks get the idea that wiring 220 is just like 110, only stronger - PLEASE CURL UP ONE LATE EVENING WITH A GOOD ELECTRICIAN'S BOOK AND READ IT. I think my genetals are ok now, and the twitching has mostly gone down when I take the pills, but please, don't make Sally Stuthers sad.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    2. Re:I think i'm electrically sensitive. by jayed_99 · · Score: 2

      Based on my experience (getting zapped with 220) and my observations (watching other people getting zapped by 110 and 220), I say, "Take the 220 zap every time."

      Imagine that you just had 18 pots of coffee instantaneously administered via IV, were dipped into hot grease for a split-second, and a Mack truck ran into you and rammed you into the wall 20 feet away. That's getting hit by 220.

      110 is just like the above minus the Mack truck. Which means that you stay attached to the nasty circuit that is frying you. All of those movie images about some guy grabbing a live wire and hanging on while he jerks -- that is 110. If it had been 220 he would have been blown across the room.

      You're more likely to get injured by 220, but you're more likely to get killed by 110.

  48. Re:Umm... news?? by Fishstick · · Score: 2

    >Some people are whackjobs

    That was my initial impression, scanned the article for evidence of the 'tinfoil-hat' syndrome, but found this instead:

    Firstenberg ... graduated from Cornell University with a degree in mathematics and a minor in physics.

    Now, I'm not about to say that he can't be a 'whackjob' because he is a university graduate, but it does seem to throw water on the 'he's just some random nutcase' angle I was expecting to hear.

    Then again...

    A series of public forums were launched, in which technophiles argued in favor of the service, and the anti-wireless folks -- including a woman who appeared at one meeting wearing dark sunglasses and protective headgear to ward off stray signals -- insisted that the plan was dangerous.

    I do feel sorry for anyone who has problems which they are only able to attribute to unseen forces like radio waves, microwaves, magnetic fields, etc.. but showing up wearing protective headgear is hard to take seriously (in the absence of any scientific/medical evidence).

    --

    There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
    Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  49. Wha? by govtcheez · · Score: 2, Funny

    English teacher Christy Wagner said her students suddenly became "irritable and easily distracted" and that she herself felt nauseous whenever she was at the school
    Since when have English students not been irritable and easily distracted?

    Teacher: "Billy, what did Shakespeare mean with his use of the term 'ass-backwards' in Sonnet 103?"
    Billy: ::snore::

  50. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by ergo98 · · Score: 2

    The list of symptoms is like a hypochondriacs grab bag: Such vague, common symptoms like "sleep problems", or "tiredness". To be honest it sounds more like depression than anything else.

    Until such a time as they can put someone in a radio isolated room, and test how they feel with and without a transmitter turned on, with a positive correlation, I find this absolutely ridiculous. The symptom list is exactly the same as the sympton list used for dirty vents, bad office air, extended computer use, drinking unfiltered water, having bad feng sheu, etc.

  51. Prove it and make a million bucks by Daniel+Rutter · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I think James Randi would agree that being able to organically and personally detect "domestic" levels of EMR counts as a paranormal ability.

    Prove a paranormal ability and Randi will give you one million U.S. dollars, baby.

    Seriously. A million bucks. No kidding.

    Well, Mr Firstenberg?

    We're waiting.

    We're still waiting.

    We're going to be waiting forever, as usual, aren't we?

    Just to save Mr Firstenberg some time, I'll list a typical collection of objections to the validity of Randi's offer, as proffered by various alleged levitators and mind readers, on Mr Firstenberg's behalf:

    "There is no money. There is too little money. There is too much money. I want to see the money in a pile. Proximity to cash compromises my spiritual enlightenment. Randi is a powerful anti-psi ray emitter. Randi is a cannibal and I am afraid of him. The FBI will forcibly change my gender if I win. I want it in Tongan Pa'angas, not US dollars. Money is an illusion. Property is theft. I'm a teapot! I'm a teapot!"

  52. S.A.F.E. by 2Flower · · Score: 2

    Actually, don't avoid the movie. It's an interesting look at exactly the sort of hypochondria this guy has -- while the character in the movie SEEMS to have intense allergic reactions to everyday chemicals, near the end of the movie it's made... not CLEAR, exactly, but definitely implied as a theme of the film that it's more psychological. The chem-free camp she goes to feels awkwardly wrong, her new lifestyle is so sterile that she's barely alive, etc...

    Not totally off topic. This movie is actually good footage to study the issue. Even if you feel the issue is crackpots and tinfoil hats, it illustrates what can lead to this sort of reaction.

    1. Re:S.A.F.E. by joshamania · · Score: 2

      I suppose if you look at S.A.F.E. in that light, it might be a descent film. I really didn't like it mostly because it made me cringe to think that people like that exist, not so much that it was a bad film. I believe I spent about 90 minutes writhing in pained anxiety that one of these nutjobs would turn up in real life.

      Of course, "nutjob" not being the preferred nomenclature, as psychological conditions are really not to be made light of.

      Go see the movie, it'll provide some insight...

  53. Psychosomatic? by not_cub · · Score: 2

    I would really like this guy to be wired up to something that may or may not be emitting low-level electromagnetic signals he claims hurt him so much. Say a series of mice that may or may not have had every piece of conductor ripped out of them. If he can successfully guess 20 times (odds of 2^20:1 ~ a million to one), which shouldn't be so difficult if these things physically hurt him. Until then, I don't think I am alone in thinking this guy is a nut-bar.
    Not to mention that if he tries to stifle my broadband internet access, I'll hook him up to some very high-voltage mice indeed.
    not_cub

    --
    q='echo "q=$s$q$s;s=$b$s;b=$b$b;$q"';s=\';b=\\;echo "q=$s$q$s;s=$b$s;b=$b$b;$q"
  54. Sensitivity by Rupert · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sensitivity of the emotional kind is called for here.

    The tin-foil hat brigade need places to live, too.

    --

    --
    E_NOSIG
  55. Faraday cages by rcw-work · · Score: 5, Informative
    How can one make a zone wireless free?

    If one were really serious (ly-screwed-up IMHO) about this, one could construct their home as a Faraday cage. Just lay chicken wire around the entire frame (through the double-paned windows and attached to the steel doors' frame, and use conductive weatherproofing in the door jambs) and connect it all together (solder/weld/twist all points of all corners together) into one giant grounded box. All RF with wavelengths less than about one-tenth the gap of the chicken wire will be blocked (the same principle is used for the window on your microwave oven, it's also why you can see through some satellite dishes). If you want this home to have power, you'll want to hook the breaker panel to a large iron-core transformer which will act as a low-pass filter. A similar low-pass filter can be used for the phone line.

    Such a home would be unable to recieve TV or radio, DSL or power-line networking would never pass through, cellphones and government-planted transmitter bugs would be dead inside, and you wouldn't have to worry much about lightning strikes either. Of course it would be cheaper to move out into the boonies.

    Pure bliss huh?

    *groan*

  56. Mostly harmless by villoks · · Score: 2

    Well,

    The City of Helsinki made recently a study about the effects of mobile phones in hospitals. In most of cases there's no interference or only if the mobile phone is located excatly next to the instrument. After the study most of restrictions on mobile phone use have been lifted, although there's still some areas (intense care etc.) there's mobile phones are prohibited.

  57. Cant use my CB anymore!!! by night_flyer · · Score: 2

    'Ol smokey trying to stop da rubber duck! least they wont be able to use those rader guns anymore either...

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  58. Dehydration? Suspicious quote by morcheeba · · Score: 5, Interesting
    From the powerwatch website, I noticed this line:

    Drink plenty of good clean water (minimum of 2 litres per day for an adult). This is VERY important as we have found that most ES people we have seen are chronically dehydrated.


    Let's just compare the symptoms of the two...
    (Dehydration references: here and here.)

    ES: Unusual tiredness, Flu-like symptoms, Weakness
    Dehydration: Weakness, Fatigue and/or loss of energy

    ES: Problems with concentration, dizziness and loss of memory, Sound sensitivity, Sun sensitivity
    Dehydration: dizziness, changes in mental state (disorientation, memory loss), Delirium, Irritability

    ES: Unconsciousness
    Dehydration: Loss of consciousness

    ES: Cardiac palpitations
    Dehydration: Rapid or weak pulse

    ES: Headaches, Teeth and jaw pains, aches in muscles and joints, Burning pain
    Dehydration: Headache or bodyache

    ES: Nausea and digestive problems
    Dehydration: Nausea, vomitting

    ES: Dryness of the upper respiratory tract
    Dehydration: Dry mouth

    ES: Perspiration
    Dehydration: Sweating

    -------------
    Dehydration doesn't account for all the symptoms, but it sure does cover a lot. Makes you wonder if Mendicino just needs a mandatory water consuption policy...

    Police officer: sir, I noticed that your driving seems as if you are unusally tired and/or dizzy. Have you been drinking?
    Guy: No officer, not a drop!
    Police officer: I knew it! I can spot dehydration a mile away! Take this low life and put him in the tank until he sobers up.
    1. Re:Dehydration? Suspicious quote by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

      Now you know why I have a Brita water filter pitcher in my refrigerator. I drink quite a lot of water per day so I feel way better.

    2. Re:Dehydration? Suspicious quote by Kris_J · · Score: 2
      I find that drinking a simple glass of water gets rid of a headache as effectively as drinking a glass of water with an asprin tablet desolved in it. YMMV.

      Mind you, exercise without consuming enough water leaves me with a blinding headache -- something that can possibly be traced to a head injury when I was very young. I used to have blinding headaches right through primary school, but no one believed they could be as bad as they were. Chances are that if someone had told me they would go away if I drank water all the time I would have been much better off.

  59. I know the secret by FrankDrebin · · Score: 2

    Firstenberg refused to disclose his diagnosis, which allows him to collect disability income

    If he visits wireless-saturated San Francisco, three hours south of Mendocino, his devices go berserk and he experiences multiple symptoms, including an unquenchable thirst, a pressure in his chest and behind his eyeballs, and "buzzing sensations" in his lips.

    Apparently it is possible to get on the gubment cheese by claiming an affliction derived from the plot of any Gilligan's Island episode.

    --
    Anybody want a peanut?
  60. Someone set him up... by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2, Funny

    He didn't realize he was using a 2.4 GHz cordless mouse 10 miles from the actual computer and someone had hooked up a giant hidden power supply inside the mouse.

    No wonder it's burning his hand! It could burn trees down if they were between him and the receiver!

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  61. Flux happens by Tsar · · Score: 2

    "I have people calling me, crying to me that they're in pain all the time, asking me where they can live," Firstenberg said. "I tell them we're trying to save Mendocino as a refuge."

    What I want to know is, why are these people using telephones? Cry to him in a letter! On unbleached, natural paper, of course, using squid ink.

  62. This is hilarious by Uttles · · Score: 2

    I hope this woman uses a wireless mouse:
    "This overexposure to pulsed microwaves has been a personal tragedy for me," Wagner said in an e-mail interview. "I'm left hypersensitive -- even my mouse burns my hand when I use my computer now."

    That's just too funny.

    One more thing, if these people are electrically sensitive, how are they calling this guy on their phones? Shouldn't they be using a can and string or maybe a letter or something?

    --

    ~ now you know
  63. Calling all Ham Radio ops... by Temkin · · Score: 3, Funny


    Field day for all California Ham's should be held in Mendocino this year. Special emphasis on 23cm moonbounce operation requested. All HF ops with 1500 watt amps should bring their own generators, as an electrical shortage is expected.

    Temkin

  64. hmm by greymond · · Score: 2, Funny

    so if i go there and start using my cell phone near someone can they arrest me for ES-assault?
    Even if they had a legitimate problem (which i dont believe they do) i say there obvioulsy not as evolved as they should be and to bad for them - life sucks then you get run over by a bus.

  65. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by mizhi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember in physics class in high school, we figured out the strength of the EM field around a high voltage wire. We calculated that even as close at 50 feet (like wires suspended in the air), the earth's natural field was like 100 times stronger.

    Since then, I've always viewed these claims of EM radiation problems with a skeptical eye. My own suspicions is that this guy had a few too many REMs to the skull from his dental X-Rays and is a candidate for therapy. :-D

    --
    Humorless sig goes here.
  66. Nut allergies very real by edremy · · Score: 2
    nut allergies

    Careful about the nut allergy thing- peanuts kill more than 100 people/year- more deaths than beestings, shark attacks, snake bites and a lot of other things people worry about. That ain't psychosomatic.

    My wife carries an epipen in case she accidentally eats a peanut or peanut product-very small amounts of peanuts cause her throat to swell shut. Accidentally eating peanuts is a whole lot easier than you might suspect- many, many restaurants fry things in peanut oil and don't tell you. If I eat at Chick-fil-A I can't kiss my wife or touch anything around the house until I wash my mouth and hands to get rid of residual oil.

    Nut allergies are very, very real

    Eric

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    1. Re:Nut allergies very real by drodver · · Score: 2

      Some people have bad reactions to just the smell of peanuts. That too is very real physical problem. Some schools ban peanut butter in lunches because the smell might cause a reaction in a sensitive child.

    2. Re:Nut allergies very real by SoftwareJanitor · · Score: 2

      You can probably call me insensitive jerk, but aren't we tampering with evolution when we protect people with such an obvious genetic defect from natural selection?

    3. Re:Nut allergies very real by drodver · · Score: 2

      Yes

      But we also do that for people that:
      - have poor vision (genetic defect)
      - have diabetes (genetic defect)
      - are obese (can be a genetic defect)
      - are drug addicts (can be a genetic defect)
      - maybe depression might be a genetic defect)
      - get cancer (lack of enough genetic resistance)
      - any other kind of virus/disease which we treat (lack of genetic resistance)
      - etc etc

    4. Re:Nut allergies very real by drodver · · Score: 2

      How is someone going to avoid a smell in a communial area if the smell causing substance is allowed? Would you want your child to be excluded from eating lunch with the other children if your child was sensitive to it? What if in the first class after lunch a child that had peanut butter on their hands lends a pencil to a sensitive child?

    5. Re:Nut allergies very real by SoftwareJanitor · · Score: 2

      How is someone going to avoid a smell in a communial area if the smell causing substance is allowed?

      They probably can't. How are you going to protect them from "smells" their whole life?

      Would you want your child to be excluded from eating lunch with the other children if your child was sensitive to it?

      Nobody would want that, but it is preferable to having to go out and ban from schools every little thing that might cause a child to have an alergic reaction. Are we now going to have a "zero tolerance" peanut policy in schools so we start suspending any child caught in school with the smell of peanuts on their person. Schools have gotten insanely totalitarian enough already without adding this sort of craziness to the mix.

      What if in the first class after lunch a child that had peanut butter on their hands lends a pencil to a sensitive child?

      What if in the first class of the day a child that had eaten a peanut butter sandwich for breakfast lends a pencil to a sensitive child? Do we now ban peanut butter from all houses with children of school age?

      I'm sorry, but if a child is so sensitive that mere exposure to a smell is life threatening, then they are probably never really going to be able to live normally in society. Sure, that sucks, but it just isn't going to be possible to change that.

    6. Re:Nut allergies very real by SoftwareJanitor · · Score: 2

      What's the point of becoming gods through technology if we can't tamper with a little evolution along the way?

      That is true up to a point, which is partially why my original post was a question rather than a statement. But if we tamper with evolution too much we may have to live with the consequences, and by allowing defects to remain in our gene pool we may be causing a lot of problems for ourselves in the future.

  67. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by Graff · · Score: 5, Informative
    Until such a time as they can put someone in a radio isolated room, and test how they feel with and without a transmitter turned on, with a positive correlation

    Another Wired article linked on that page, Wireless Harmless, More or Less?, talks about research doing just what you have suggested. I didn't search around for the references to the research, but here is what the article said:

    Swedish researchers found that people who claim they suffer from electrical sensitivity failed to detect the presence of electromagnetic fields in double-blind tests.

    A double-blind test, properly run, should be able to eliminate any psychosomatic effects which would bias the testing of "electronic sensitives".

  68. Amish by ruvreve · · Score: 2, Informative

    This better get modded as Informative......Is this guy aware of large sections of Pennslyvania where no electricity is used? I also know of several places in Indiana that have a large Amish community. Seriously if he is worried about his electo-medical condition why doesn't he move to a remote part of Montana. Errr wait all of Montana is remote.

  69. Easy To Fix by Judebert · · Score: 3, Funny

    As my friend Virtros suggests, don't use your mouse in a microwave!

    --

    For geek dads: Contraction Timer

  70. personal experience by carambola5 · · Score: 4, Troll

    After reading all the posts at my threshold, I was appalled to see a significant lack of 'interesting' or 'informative' comments. This is a serious problem for certain people, and just because you don't experience it yourself doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
    My grandmother suffers from a psychosomatic disease that makes her very ill when around certain things (i.e. televisions, CRTs, anything with a strong or synthetic odor, etc.). She has been unable for many years now to watch an entire 30 minute TV show without turning the set off during commercials. But like I said, it's purely psychosomatic... in her head.
    For example, a few years ago, our family bought her a computer for Christmas. Very slow, very lacking of features, but it allows for email, word processing, and checking of stocks, which is all she needs or ever will need. Problem was, it had a CRT, so she never used it. Ever. So as the LCD screens began coming out, I thought a change of monitors would let her use the computer. Prefacing the purchase of the LCD with information about how the screen doesn't emit the "harmful electrons" that TVs use, she agreed that it might be worth a try. Making sure that a return policy was in effect for the purchase, I bought the LCD and installed it at her house for a test run. She was able to use it without any problems and did not feel sick at all. "Sick," by the way, does not mean feeling a simple headache. We're talking shaking of extremities, loss of strength, vomiting. Even though it has been assumed (and probably proven) that electron emission has no harmful effects, my grandma doesn't care. As long as she thinks it's emitting stuff at her, she will get sick. Tell her it works like a LCD (my explanation to her: thousands of tiny light bulbs arranged in a pattern. just miniature versions of the ones that light your house), and she's completely fine.
    So please, take this seriously. Our family has had to deal with it for years now. Say what you will about the author of the article, but people do suffer from the so-called electro-pollution. Even though it may be all in their minds.

    --
    IWARS.
    People, in general, disappoint me. Politicians even more so.
    1. Re:personal experience by RobertAG · · Score: 2

      It it possible that she's sensitive to the flickering of a CRT? I actually know some people that are bothered by a 60 Hz scan rate.

    2. Re:personal experience by chefmonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But your grandmother hasn't gone on a crusade to rid her entire city of CRTs. Haven't you noticed: you can't go to a restauant, mall, airport, or many other public places without having a television mounted somewhere.

      I agree that psychosomatic illnesses are a very real problem which needs addressing. But we need to start out by acknowedging that the problem lies with the individual, not with the item inciting their phobia. What this crackpot needs is therapy, not legislation.

    3. Re:personal experience by bwalling · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The mind is a very powerful thing. You can convince yourself (intentionally or not) of a great many things. The problem started when he start convincing others of them too. It sounds like the people in the town were just fine until this guy starting convincing them otherwise.

      I only have a problem with this guy forcing his problems on others. I have an irrational fear of seeing cinnamon raisin bread. Once, when I was a kid, I was very sick and I watched (and smelled) my mother make some cinnamon raisin bread. Now, the sight or smell of the stuff makes me very sick to my stomach. I know it's all in my head, and I don't go around telling other people that it makes me feel sick and we should put a stop to having cinnamon raisin bread available.

  71. Re:did you read this crap? My MOUSE BURNS!!!!! by ryanwright · · Score: 2

    I know Christy, and I'll promise that it's in her friggen head.

    Of course it's in her head. Transmitters placed on roofs don't "agitate students" or "give (people) headaches." And mice certainly do not burn anyone's hands.

    This kind of insanity is why I refuse to live in a small town. Too many idiots with crazy, wild beliefs infecting each other's minds. "Did you hear about Ethel? She's really an alien from outer space! I know, I saw her hobbling around on her walker late last night. She opened the garage door with nothing but her eyes, and there was a big silver disc parked in there!" .. "Oh dear! We'd better inform Bubba the police chief right away! Hurry, the bar closes in an hour and we'll want to catch him before he's passed out in his squad car!"

    --
    -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
  72. I can "feel" tv's from houses away ? by CDWert · · Score: 2

    This sounds "out there" but I have been working with electronics full time since I was a kid around 77, NOW, I started racing motorcycles around the same time, my hearing SUCKS, I have a very hard time hearing "bass" and my own voice it deep so half the time I cant hear myself talk...

    That said, ever since I was a child I could "hear" or maybe its rather "feel" tv's on, monitors or other gadgets are pretty much the same. I have heard so many explanations on this, but a TV, any TV has a whine it sounds like a dog whisle almost. I can tell from outside ahouse if a TV or monitor (not so true with smaller ones) is on or not, My wife loves it as I hate a TV being on if noone is watching it. My mother thinks its freaky, I have been in 7000sq ft houses and asked where a TV was, I said a TV is on in this house somewhere, the said no, Then hour later we go down to the rec room to play pool, lo and behold someone left the TV on,

    Circut City/ Sears, what have you drives me nuts.

    You just learn to live with it, kinda like some bizzare sixth sense seen on , "Mystery Men" whats his power, he can hear if a TV is on 1/4 mile away !:)

    This, its fu**king assinine, I dont go around telling people to turn their TV's off, who the hell are they to tell me I cant do wireless where I want, ITS A FACT OF LIFE !, Maybe next we should blot out the sky so people with light sensitive eyes can roam free without sunscreen and sunglasses.

    Isnt wrapping aluminum foil around your head to stop this interference just as eccective ?

    --
    Sig went tro...aahemmm.....fishing........
  73. Re:Credible Studies? by Tassach · · Score: 3
    More than likely these people are hypochondriacs


    Or just credulous fools of the same variety who believe newspaper horoscopes, consult telephone "psychics", or subscribe to any other of a million pseudo-scientific and superstitious belief systems.



    Critical thinking should be a required subject from elementary school on up; Carl Sagan's The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark should be required reading for all high school students.

    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  74. My solution by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 2

    My gut feeling is that these people are a bunch of california nut jobs, but who knows. We used to think that smoking was safe too, you know.

    So, have we actually done studies about these people who are supposedly "electrically sensitive?" There was a teacher in the article who said she felt nauseous whenever she was in the school with a wireless transmitter on the roof. If she is so sensitive to radio waves, why don't we put her in a shielded room with high powered radio transmitters, and run a test. We see if she can tell when she is being bombarded by radio waves. It works exactly like a hearing test, which is used to detect tinnitus and hearing loss. Just tell her to raise her hand when the radio waves make her feel sick.

    Until we prove that this is an actual condition, why is anyone listening to these nuts?

    1. Re:My solution by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      > My gut feeling is that these people are a bunch
      > of california nut jobs, but who knows. We used
      > to think that smoking was safe too, you know.

      Um, no, we didn't. Check up the term "coffin nails". It goes back much further than the Surgeon General's warning, y'know. Miriam-Webster dates it back to 1888. There's been suspicions that smoking isn't good for you as long as there's been smoking: it doesn't take a genius to figure out that breathing in large quantities of burning smoke on a daily basis might not be good for your lungs.

      Chris Mattern

  75. Mendocino Death Ray Band Plan by scoove · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't believe I missed this on the county's website - I believe it explains everything:

    Official Mendocino RF Band Plan
    The following band plan has been established to assist Mendocino residents in identifying their illness and subsequently locating the offending service provider. Should you require public assistance in notifying a provider to terminate service and initiate financial repairations for the harm caused, please contact our office at (707) 463-4480, or visit our website.

    BANDPLAN (Revised January 4, 2002)

    BAND: VLF

    3-10 Hz - heart disease, cancer, diabetes, strange voices, ghosts, UFOs and other unexplained apparations (see this site for scientific proof and to learn about a special device that will protect your home from these evil VLF rays)

    60 Hz - cancer, heart disease, mental illness, colds, flu, hairloss, rashes, psychotic episodes, ebola, gulf war syndrome

    BAND: HF

    26.965-27.405 MHz - Obesity, intestinal gas, intellectual stunting, unexplained cravings for tractor pulls, women with tatoos and very cheap beer

    BAND: VHF/UHF

    400-470 MHz - Uncontrollable sexual urges, strange thoughts, dishonesty, attraction to interns, voices, balding, interest in congressional office

    800-950 MHz - AIDS, Herpes and other SIDs

    BAND: SHF AND ABOVE

    2400-2472 MHz - Cancer, blisters, warts, headaches, nausea

    5300-5850 MHz - Blindness, body odor, night sweats, rashes

  76. Field amplitude isn't enough by roystgnr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Frequency is important, too. The earth's natural field takes tens (or is it hundreds?) of millions of years to flip around; the power line's field is changing every 1/60 of a second. There's a reason you can wrap an inductor around the line to get juice, but can't do the same around the equator.

    Don't get me wrong, I strongly doubt there's any detectable biological effects from power lines, but that's something that would have to be proven by double-blind experiment; your calculations aren't enough.

    1. Re:Field amplitude isn't enough by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 2

      There's a reason you can wrap an inductor around the line to get juice, but can't do the same around the equator.

      There are more reasons than that! How about logistics?

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
  77. Doesn't this sound a little familiar by mobiux · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sounds like Eddie, the brother-in-law from National Lampoons Christmas Vacation.
    "Had a metal plate in my head, but everytime I would fire up the microwave, I'd piss my pants and forget who I was for a half an hour."

  78. The only answer to these nuts... by gnovos · · Score: 4, Insightful

    is by faking them out. Put them in a room with a fake transmitter and tell them that everytime the green light goes on, they are going to get zapped and you will watch thier reactions. Except, in reality, you actually zap them when the light is OFF. Then after they finish having thier seizures or whatever when the EMF radation is off and they seem to recover when it's on, go publish your report saying that too little radiation is bad for people's health.

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
  79. IHBT, but ICR by virg_mattes · · Score: 5, Informative

    Okay, I can't resist.

    > Microwaves are intentional radiation and are used to TRANSMIT power, not always to simply carry a signal.

    Microwaves are EM waves with a certain wavelength, not "intentional radiation" as you've stated. The largest generator of microwave radiation around is the Sun. Microwaves that are generated outside of microwave ovens are used almost exclusively for communications (which is not to say they aren't harmful, but not for the reason you state). Microwaves in ovens are EM waves with the specific wavelength that best transmits energy to water molecules. The microwaves used in tower transmitters is not. Also, microwave transmitters put out microwave beams that don't attenuate very much. It's why they're used; the signal can be thrown farther than a simple broadcast like radio waves because the beam stays cohesive, so most of your power goes down the transmit path, whereas with radio, most of the power goes everywhere but the receiving antenna. It's also why you need line-of-sight to use microwave communications.

    The simple fact is that exposure to microwaves in the outside world is not increased to any real degree by the use of microwave transmitters. The exposure you get from standing in range of a microwave tower is smaller by powers of ten than the amount you're getting from the sunlight.

    Of course, all of this discussion is offtopic to the original article, as they're not talking about exposure to microwave radiation. The original article is about someone working to eliminate broadcast transmitters to reduce public exposure to radio waves. The whole "electrically sensitive" thing seems to be a misnomer for sensitivity to induced magnetic fields, and I'm not sure why it's part of the discussion, but then sensibility never figured highly in these matters.

    Virg

    P.S. The law to which you refer has to do with preventing local governments from passing laws that would have excessive externalities. The main reasoning is the threat from a midwest community to prohibit satellite owners from sending down satellite transmissions within its confines. This would have precluded any satellite transmissions to anywhere in North America, as most satellites use a footprint of that size to transmit. And before you get all bent about how that exposes you to radiation, keep in mind that you need a concentrator (a dish) just to get enough signal to detect.

  80. Sometimes, there is a bit of reason... by amccall · · Score: 2
    A couple years ago my little brother had a pace maker implanted. Now, earlier versions of pace makers required that the user avoid a great many of what we would consider "normal" activities.

    Fortunately, this is no longer the case. However, when he had the pacemaker put in, we were given a set of rules regarding things he could and could not do, among these were recomendations that he not allow himself get too near to wireless devices. This is not to say no wireless networks in the house at all - but to simply not place himself in a manner where he was extremely close to such a thing. (They actually choose the side of your body to place the PaceMaker, based on your dominant hand - such that you can hold a cell phone in your other hand, having little impact on the pacemaker itself, as well as to reduce the strain on the device during movement.)

    Newer devices are even less restricted - and as time goes on, I imagine many of the restrictions above will be reduced or eliminated. (Maybe future versions will actually talk to wireless networks.. hehe.) In any event, this was to simply answer your question about whether or not there were actually people that could be considered sensitive to RF. I can't imagine anybody requiring the extreme that was mentioned in this article.

    --
    ------ 24.5% slashdot pure
  81. Oh, I love it! by Paul+Neubauer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not this guy isn't a kook, but this argument has a problem. People tend to be 'sensitive' to ionizing radiation in that it affects them (radiation poisoning for nontrivial exposures) but they can't tell that they're being exposed until well past the danger point.. So people in places where there might possibly be accidental exposure get to carry some kind of radiation sensor around with them.

    --
    I don't subscribe to RMS's GNUtopian vision.
  82. Your sig doesn't work by jdavidb · · Score: 2

    Actually, it works only for you. Try this.

  83. Ha Ha! by gnovos · · Score: 2

    Well, of course "Wired" would run this story! "Wireless" is the LAST thing that the want!

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
  84. Re:My spidey sense is tingling by arkanes · · Score: 2

    No, he's a self important prick. Mendocino has alot of them. I'm all excited because this is the first time I've seen one in anything as mainstream as Wired and slashdot, though.

  85. Re:Pacemakers? by amccall · · Score: 2
    I shoulda posted my earlier reply here...

    A few years ago my little brother got a pacemaker. While they are not as restricted as the once where, in terms of avoiding certain things, the manufacturers/doctors still recommend avoiding a few things.

    One such thing is that while using a cellphone, it should be used on the the side of the head furthest away from the pacemaker. They also recommended avoiding close contact with wireless devices near the area of the PM. - Nothing to the extreme requiring someone to move out to a town far away w/o anything.

    More likely, the hospitals are concerned with monitoring equipment or ppl with OLD pacemakers. I get the impression that they only warn off certain activities with the new more advanced ones as insurance.

    --
    ------ 24.5% slashdot pure
  86. Three words: by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

    Only in California. Articles like these make me feel sorry for the poor bastards that have to live in the same state as these people. And they vote, too.

    Seriously, if they're so electrically sensitive, why haven't they put up a giant umbrella to blot out the biggest E-M noisemaker in the solar system (more commonly known as "the sun")? Or why haven't they moved closer to the equator to make sure they're as far away from the aurora borealis as possible?

    I'm willing to bet that, within five years of the first viable fusion reactor going on-line, somebody in California will have neutrino-related health problems. And THEN where will they move?

  87. I Won't Mod, I'll Reply by virg_mattes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > Please, you idiots making fun of these people, you are true idiots and it is becouse you are not complaining on the companies instead. They should create products not transmitting harmful radiation. They should find alternative methods of doing same things that doesnt HARM humans.

    There are some real problems with this. Creating products that don't create harmful radiation (based on this fellow's definition of "dangerous") would require them to build devices that don't use electricity, since he's complaining about any radiant EM field, and these fields are induced by electric current. Needless to say, few people (in the modern world, anyway) are willing to give up the use of electricity to protect themselves from EM fields.

    > And becouse, you are the #1 on the list to become electricsensitive. And many of you are that already Your ears getting hot? It feels like sand in your eyes? Dry skin? And many more things that are signs of electricsensitivity.

    The problem here is that of all of the sysmptoms listed, none of them (and no combination of them) seems exclusive to the condition. Moreover, the only backing information cited was a vague reference to a Swedish study, and the facts from the only study data the Swedes ever published stated that people who claimed to be electrically sensitive could not detect and were not demonstrably affected by EM fields in double blind tests. This would tend to refute Mr. Firstenburg's claims, but strangely the web site makes no mention of the results, only the study. This leads me to believe that more proof is needed about the causal link of bad health and EM exposure before it makes sense to start in on lifestyle changes.

    Virg

    1. Re:I Won't Mod, I'll Reply by Anemophilous+Coward · · Score: 2
      ...Needless to say, few people (in the modern world, anyway) are willing to give up the use of electricity to protect themselves from EM fields........This leads me to believe that more proof is needed about the causal link of bad health and EM exposure before it makes sense to start in on lifestyle changes.

      Couldn't agree with you more.

      Funny thing, this phenomenon (freaking out over EM radiation), has been following a somewhat cyclic pattern lately. Having taken several EE fields and antennas course, I had one excellent instructor who pointed this fact out to me. The cycle is roughly every seven years that people start freaking out and raising concerns about EM radiation. Go back seven years and it was the start of cell phones; another seven it was the huge power lines going across country (and through some backyards); another seven and it was those new 'cordless' phones in your house; etc..

      It seems around every seven years or so a furor is raised over something new in the technological realm killing us off with EM radiation. Sometimes much is said, sometimes it makes a few late night news slots, then it dies off....until the next new thing sparks almost the same controversy all over again.

      The problem is, we are so bathed in EM fields from so many sources, it is impossible to track it down to any particular source. Not to mention (as the poster did above) that the symptons listed are so vague, the percentage is high that they are caused by other environmental factors (natural or man-made). If you are so worried about EM fields: don't drive your car; get rid of your tv, radio, computer, cell phone, cordless phone; no more refridgerator for you; toss out the electric shaver; better not live in a house fed with electricity in case you pick up from the wiring in the house; and so on...

      And there has been various studies for over the last 25 or so years that have yet to make any clear connections. Funny thing, seeing how the freaking out is kind of cyclic (roughly 7 years between outbreaks), maybe there is some truth to their complaining after all. The complaining cycle could be representative of a large sine wave, oscillating up and down - not quite unlike a component of an EM wave.

      - A non-productive mind is with absolutely zero balance.
      - I am not an Electrical Engineer, I just play one on tv.
      - AC
  88. DISABILTY!?!?!?! by Picass0 · · Score: 2

    Electrical sensitivity is not recognized by the U.S. medical establishment, and Firstenberg refused to disclose his diagnosis, which allows him to collect disability income.

    For cryin' out f*ckin' loud! I'm paying tax money for this flake to sit at home on his ass and fire up?

    These people better hope there's never a thunderstorm nearby. Do you know how much RF noise fills the air during even a modest storm? It'll kill 'em all. Or maybe not. Because there's NOTHING WRONG WITH THEM! They just want to live in some hippie commune.

    What a great example of mass hysteria. Ultra-liberals have moved from pushing smokers around to picking new targets.

    I wonder if Firstenberg owns an SUV to haul his " ...bevy of devices to detect radio frequencies, including a meter that gauges electrical, magnetic and microwave fields." Probably not. I bet he rides a bike, and his next "illness" will be an allergy to gas fumes.

  89. Re:Pacemakers and Java by MemeRot · · Score: 2

    Anyone ever carefully read the EULA for Java? You aren't allowed to use Java to control pacemakers or nuclear facilities.

    I don't know why, but I just found that hilarious.

    I know what you mean about pacemakers. They always put those signs on the scanners at libraries that check to see if you're taking a book without checking it out warning that they might interfere with pacemakers. I always wondered how they decided to install them.

    "We have this new device that prevents people from stealing our books."
    "Great, lets install it."
    "There's one catch, it kills old people."
    "Oh who the hell cares about that? Install the damn thing. And make sure this old person killing device runs on Java."

  90. Re:Credible Studies? by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    > you really think this huge ammount of wave shit waving through us constantly has no effect on you?

    I do think it has an effect on me. However, the question is whether all of the unnaturally occurring radiation has any different or more deleterious effect on me than all of the naturally occurring wave shit waving through me.

    Virg

  91. I must be electrically sensitive.... by mblase · · Score: 2

    - My computer monitor gives me eyestrain.
    - Microwaved convenience food makes me nauseous.
    - Fluorescent lighting produces a humming sound in my ears.
    - Cable television makes my brain hurt.

  92. Re:[OT] TV noise by freeweed · · Score: 2
    Nope, there're lots of people who are sensitive to this. I've been able to tell if a TV was turned on since I can remember (it was fun telling the teacher in like grade 2 that the TV wasn't on, and she didn't believe me until she realized it was unplugged and the switch didn't do anything :)

    My current girlfriend is the first person I've met with the same level of sensitivity, but beyond the obviously broken tubes that anyone can hear whine, it really isn't a big deal. Just turn on some music to drown it out :)

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  93. A Lesson To Be Learned by Arandir · · Score: 4, Informative

    Mendocino, the entire country, is an object lesson for every Californian. Humbolt the city, and the rest of the country, was once staunchly conservative with a thriving economy in lumber. Than Cal State Humbolt set up shop. Thousands of students with empty heads showed up. Ivory tower professors showed up to fill their heads with ivory tower thoughts. Then the students started voting. Humbolt became a liberal mecca. The cancer spread throughout the county. Now Humbolt's economy is based on lawsuits and welfare checks.

    Don't let this happen to your community. It happened to Santa Cruz. It happened to La Jolla. It happened even to Berkeley and Palo Alto, both conservative havens in the liberal bay area...until the voting age was lowered to toddlerhood. It's going to happen to Merced with the new UC. The only place this hasn't happened is when the university is in a big city. The old saying goes "if you're not liberal at 18 you have no heart, if you're not conservative at 68 you have no brain." Well, move a major university to a small town and you suddenly get more heart than brains.

    I'm sure the guy in this story has his heart in the right place, but he certainly has no brain!

    --
    A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    1. Re:A Lesson To Be Learned by metachimp · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Now Humbolt's economy is based on lawsuits and welfare checks


      I dispute this. Humboldt's economy, on the books is still largely based on lumber. Of course, off the books it's marijuana, and everybody knows it. The cops, city government and local business all receieve kickbacks for looking the other way when it comes to grass, California's number one cash crop. What makes Humboldt and Mendocino counties such a haven for layabouts and shady folks is the drug trade. Go to Garberville one fall weekend, and you'll see the streets lined with Mercedes-Benzs. Don't get me wrong, I have no problem with this, but pot is what saved Northern California, and much of rural Cascadia for that matter, after the timber industry there went south (as it sould have).


      Therefore, it makes sense that a lot of these 'electro-sensitive' people live up there, stoners are more paranoid than most folks. You have tons of orthorexics there, too. It's a beautiful place, but there are some awfully freaky people up there.

      --
      The system has failed you, don't fail yourself. --Billy Bragg
  94. Re:even Lud would be embarrassed by this by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2
    people call me 'that crazy jewish guy' all the time, doesn't bother me one bit. and i'm not even really jewish.

    Maybe that's why it doesn't bother you?
    --

    This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

  95. Rush Limbaugh comedy fodder! by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

    I think this action is going make it comedy fodder for Rush Limbaugh and other conservative hosts, sad to say.

    It just proves that some Californians live up to the pejorative moniker of Land of Fruits and Nuts. They should be more concerned about things like low altitude air pollution.

  96. I've felt it, but not that it hurt... by slykens · · Score: 2
    I think hese people are wack jobs but I have felt something similar.

    I had the fun experience of helping a friend set up his ISP's wireless network and on top of the tallest building in town is located an 800 MHz cell site. When working up there in proximity to the cell site (ie 15-25 feet) I could definately feel something odd, but when I went back downstairs I was fine and I have no after effects.

    Exposure to high-intensity RF can do funny things to you, just look at chicken in the microwave, but the regular stuff we all live in won't hurt, much. ;)

    As a side note there was a sign up there that said something to the effect of, "WARNING: This area exceeds FCC limits for human exposure to RF."

  97. bad ions by Barbarian · · Score: 4, Funny

    Stories like this remind me of when my mother's friend's son got a cable modem in his room a few years ago, and suddenly was unable to get up at any reasonable time in the morning to go to school. Since they thought I was a computer expert, I was quizzed if the cable modem could be emitting "bad ions" that were damaging his health. I didn't have the heart to say that it wasn't bad ions, just staying up late downloading porn and playing Quake that was the problem.

  98. What It Is by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    Two things. First, some people use their PDA to read (get an article or book on the PDA, then head for the "reading" room). Second, there's no need for an apostrophe after PDA. "PDAs" works.

    Virg

  99. This defines "junk scientists" perfectly by MtViewGuy · · Score: 3

    It's people like this that define the phrase junk science. (shaking head!)

    Personally, if electricity were causing cancer and other dehabilitating conditions, they would have found out like by 1910, twenty years after electric power generation and power transmission by overhead wires became common in the northeastern USA.

    Another good example is the Three Mile Island accident in 1979. The radioactive release on a per person basis near that plant is the equivalent of getting radiation at altitude from a New York City to Los Angeles jet flight of 5.5 hours.

    Now you know why I dislike the majority of the environmental movement--they don't bother to test their theories before making their conclusions at times.

    1. Re:This defines "junk scientists" perfectly by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

      If I remember correctly, there were some scientific experiments where they measured the amount of radiation received on a US cross-country flight in daytime by jet airplane flying at over 30,000 feet. The result was quite surprising: the amount of alpha, beta and gamma radiation recorded on just one flight was surprisingly high.

      I'll have to look up the references to those experiments, which I believe were done in the early 1970's.

    2. Re:This defines "junk scientists" perfectly by M-G · · Score: 2

      Phen-Phen passed FDA approval

      Sort of. First, it's Fen-Phen, which is short for the combination of fenfluramine and phentermine. Both drugs were approved as appetite supressants for short-term use (a few weeks). One was approved in 1959, the other in 1973. It was only in the late '90's that doctors starting prescribing the two drugs in combination for long-term use. This is "off-label use", IOW, it was being prescribed in a manner that differed from that described by the FDA approval. Heart-valve defects showed up only in those patients who took the combination for prolonged periods.

  100. Re:Actually, they do care by CharlieG · · Score: 2

    You are dealing with a "Part 15" device - aka, unlicensed. Part 15 devices use PARTS of the RF spectrum as secondary users - They have the resposability not to interfere with the licensed PRIMARY users of that part of the spectrum, and it's THEIR problem if they receice interference

    --
    -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
  101. Re:Credible Studies? by mshomphe · · Score: 2

    I totally agree with you. I just couldn't find a way to fit in a good James Randi rant...

    --
    She sat at the window watching the evening invade the avenue.
  102. Aurally Sensitive?!? by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    Interesting turn of phrase, that. The medical term for it is "good high-range hearing" and I understand, as I'm also able to pick up the high-pitched sound given off by old picture tubes. The difference between this and the statement of electric sensitivity is that hearing high-pitched sounds can be proven (and has been) with a simple microphone, speaker and oscilloscope.

    Virg

  103. No such thing as a "microwave free zone" by evil_one · · Score: 2

    Telecommunication and television satellites ALL paint all of the continental US with microwaves, and many of the DTH satellites are 120 watts. Regardless, there are 30+ satellites all painting the us with a minimum of 40 watts of microwave energy each. This town is no exception.

    --
    Desperation is a stinky cologne
  104. Re:Credible Studies? by mshomphe · · Score: 2

    Listen, no doubt there is some tap water that's crappy. I used to live near Woburn, MA (A Civil Action). The study I was referring to was when they put tap water in cups labeled "bottled water" (like Dasani or something) and "tap water". Then the subjects were asked for a taste comparison between the two. Lo and behold, people thought the "bottled water" tasted better. It's a well-known psychological phenomenon.

    --
    She sat at the window watching the evening invade the avenue.
  105. Oi! What is it with acronyms? by MemeRot · · Score: 2

    When the hell did periods disappear from acronyms? I VERY clearly remember being taught in elementary school that acronyms use the first letter from each word, capitalized, and followed by a period. Like N.A.S.A. or A.I. Was I hallucinating all of fourth grade? Surely I didn't start that young.

    When did the nation vote to remove periods? When was this on the nightly news? PDAs CANNOT work by the rules as I know them. Personal Digital Assistants would just be P.D.A. Making it indistinguishable from Personal Digital Assistant, P.D.A. N.A.S.A.s makes no sense. Grammar nazis, what the hell are the rules for capitalizing and pluralizing acronyms?

  106. How Convenient! by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Funny

    There are some pretty big holes in this chart.

    Nothing mentioned between 60 Hz and 27 MHz, so all those quacks on the AM band (535 kHz - 1605 kHz) are still able to talk to their gullible audiences about E-M sensitivity.

    Also conveniently lacking are all your VHF TV channels. That gap between 27 MHz and 400 MHz is more than big enough for all channels between 2 and 13 (54 MHz - 88 MHz for channels 2 through 6, and 174 MHz - 215 MHz for 7 through 13). You may be sensitive to other parts of the spectrum, but at least you can still catch your Must See TV with no risk of odd sexual urges!

    FM radio is also OK (88 MHz to 108 MHz), so NPR is still good for me. Thank heaven for little favors...

    But some of you Dawson's Creek fanatics may be out of luck. The UHF TV channels are mostly harmless (470 MHz - 608 MHz for channels 14 to 36, 614 MHz - 806 MHz for 38 to 69), but as we can see, channel 69 may cause AIDS. Check your local listings!

    New customers of satellite radio should be safe (they tend to sit in the S-band, between 2.31 GHz and 2.36 GHz, just under the frequencies for blisters and warts).

    Unfortunately for Cox, Comcast and other cable companies is the way they get their feeds on the C-band (3.6 GHz to 7.025 GHz) Proof positive that too much late-night Cinemax can make you go blind!

    Even worse for them, their competitors in the digital satellite market are sitting pretty in the ku-band (10.7 GHz - 14.5 GHz). Too energetic for any problems listed here.

    On a slightly more serious note, I'm surprised they didn't mention the serious (proven) health risks of more energetic frequencies, like the severe burns that can be caused by EM waves in the 350 THz - 400 THz range, or the relation between skin cancer and frequencies over 750 THz. Hell, if you have too much of anything between 400 THz and 750 THz, you might go blind!

  107. whats really crazy.. by Suppafly · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This guy is quoted in the article as saying he can't even hold his computer mouse anymore without pain.. whats he think is happening to him? magical ray eminating from the mouse are microwaving his hand.. out of all the computer equipment most people use, surely the mouse is the least dangerous..

    Its like the one guy in the article said.. "you can't argue with zealots"

    It disturbs me that this crazy person can collect disability for the fact that he thinks electronics harm him..

  108. Onion article describes cure for RF sensitivity by Yet+Another+Smith · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Onion describes new technology that is bound to cure electrical sensitivity. Approved for your use by men in very white coats.

    Why am I tempted to move to Mendocino and start a HAM radio hobby?

    --
    if ($it != $onething) {$it = $another;}
  109. The Least of Mendocino's Problems by MrResistor · · Score: 2
    Mendocino is a theme park. IIRC buildings can only be painted 3 colors in Mendocino. Almost every building is white, there are a few that are a very pale yellow which is pretty close to white, and I'm not sure what the other color is. This is mentioned briefly on the second page of the article. There are 3 bars, a couple of restaurants, a couple of antique shops, a pretty good coffee place, and a bunch of bed-and-breakfasts.

    That's Mendocino. The whole thing. It's a flyspeck. If you want to buy anything useful, like groceries for example, you go to Fort Bragg, which is about 10 minutes north.

    The real irony, I think, is that a tower placed in Caspar (an even smaller town that sits between Mendocino and Fort Bragg, consisting of a bar with a kitchen, a small hotel, and a small recording studio) would probably serve all the wireless needs of anyone in Mendocino just fine.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  110. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by Crispin+Cowan · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Then you calculated wrong. Experiment: go get a 3 or 4 foot florescent tube light bulb, go stand under a high voltage line at night, and point the bulb at the high voltage line. The bulb will light up. I have personally verified that this works.

    In a related anecdote, some guy (IIRC in the UK) was busted for stealing power from the power company. He did this buy winding a large quantity of copper coil around his garage, which was situated underneith a high voltage line. The garage full of coil was sufficient to induce enough power to run his house. Unfortunately, I can't find a link to the story.

    Caveat: I still think the people trying to shut down the school radio are nuts. I just wanted to point out that short-range EM from high voltage lines is a much different situation than EM from cell towers.

    Crispin
    ----
    Crispin Cowan, Ph.D.
    Chief Scientist, WireX Communications, Inc.
    Immunix: Security Hardened Linux Distribution
    Available for purchase

  111. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by Computer! · · Score: 2

    To play the devil's advocate for a moment...

    I don't think they think it's possible to block out all stray radiation, just like it's not possible to avoid all injury in football. They're just putting on some pads.

    Of course, none of them will be able to read this, so I'm burning karma for nothing. Oh well.

    --
    If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
  112. The sad thing by fleener · · Score: 2

    The sad thing is that people feel wireless and fast Internet access are essential for a good economy. If you take one of the most beautiful places on earth and give it a "healthy economy," that means extreme land development and infrastructure that ruins everything about the place that made people want to live there in the first place. Why is it "unhealthy" to have an economy that is not growing, that merely sustains itself?

    1. Re:The sad thing by fleener · · Score: 2

      However, let's not confuse the quackery with legitimate opposition to cell towers. They are massive, unsightly structures, often put in the most serene beautiful places. I hope/trust such obvious structures are kept well out of common public view. (It can be a difficult idea to understand if you live in a cement metropolis.)

  113. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by OmegaDan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While I agree the guy is, um, strange ... its not the presence of a EM field thats dangerous ... its more like being exposed to changes in flux thats a problem ... Either by moving *your* body through the field, or the field changing somehow, IE alternatic current :)

    You have to recall the universe is all about motion ... the reason the earths field dosen't bother is us, because relative to us it is stationary.

  114. Radio Free Zone already exists in W.Virginia by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 5, Informative

    There already exists a "Radio Free Zone" in the United States that is far more free of stray electromagnetic fields than Mendocino could ever hope to be. It is a very large area around the Greenbank Radio Telescope facility (and some military facilities) in West Virginia called the National Radio Quiet Zone.

    If these kooks really want to be "free" from the EM spectrum then they should stop trying to take over the politics of Mendocino and force the locals to give up their technology so these "sensitives" can all move there. Instead they should just move to the 13,000 square miles of land already covered by the National Radio Quiet Zone. That way the people of Mendocino can enjoy their wireless technology and cell phones and the "sensitives" can live as sheltered an existence as they could ever hope to have.

    http://astrosun.tn.cornell.edu/faculty/haynes/as at /nrqz.html

  115. Acronymity by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    Acronyms were originally under strict rules for use. However, as of 1991 (by my best recollection, at least) the Chicago Manual of Style allowed for acronyms to be built with or without periods. Capital letters are still a requirement, and I don't recall seeing any mention allowing apostrophes to pluralize. Anyone have a recent copy of the big orange that can check?

    Virg

    P.S. Since when have changes to accepted editorial style been news? I figure that if the nightly news people cared enough about style changes to report on them, they might consider using editorial style guidelines once in a while as well.

    1. Re:Acronymity by Preposterous+Coward · · Score: 2
      Anyone have a recent copy of the big orange that can check?

      I have the 1982 edition, which states:

      14.2 It is often an open question whether or not periods should be used with particular abbreviations. The trend is now strongly away from the use of periods with all kinds of abbreviations that have carried them in the past. In our view this is to the good: anything that reduces the fussiness of typography makes for easier reading.

      14.15 Both in run of text (preferably after one spelled-out use) and in tabular matter, notes, etc., the names of government agencies, network broadcasting companies, associations, fraternal and service organizations, unions, and other groups are often abbreviated. Such abbreviations are usually set in full caps with no periods[.]

      However, IIRC, the New York Times is a holdout in this regard and still uses periods in most acronyms. Of course, the Times is stylistically very conservative; I believe it was only a few years ago that the Times stopped spelling government (when referring to the federal government as an entity) with a capital G. I could never decide if that was out of some sort of Teutonic complex or because the Times simply had a predilection for Big Government with a literal Big G ;-)

      --

      "Biped! Good cranial development. Evidently considerable human ancestry."
  116. On a related topic... by Hydro-X · · Score: 2, Funny

    The crusade of the good people of Mendocino, CA has inspired me to make an effort to help aliviate the pain and suffering of myself and many others. I am photosensitive, meaning my eyes burn if I don't wear sunglasses or tinted lenses outdoors on a sunny day. I am told that many other people, even a few of my friends, are also affected by this horrible affliction. This is why I am taking advantage of this thread to announce my plans to invade a small town with photosensitive people (Lorne NB looks promising right now) and block out the sun and all other forms of light.

  117. Where does the sensitivity come from? by pclminion · · Score: 2
    I have a theory, which explains why people can be fine for years, and then suddenly become "sensitized."

    Maybe certain frequencies cause chemical changes in these people's bodies, who knows how -- a broken bond, an inactive gene that becomes active, a protein is somehow modified, whatever. Over time, these people develop allergic sensitivities to these mutated biochemicals (the same way a worker in a perfume factory might develop a sensitivity over the years).

    Then, whenever they are exposed to the right frequency radiation, and these chemicals start to get produced, they have an allergic reaction.

    Could it be possible? I'm not a chemist, so could somebody comment on it?

  118. Firstenburg is doubly blind by MadAhab · · Score: 2

    Funny that you mention double-blind tests. According to the article, Firstenburg rambles around with a carload of equipment to detect the things that are causing him such pain and discomfort. You'd think he wouldn't need elaborate sensors to detect that he has a headache. You don't see people with carpal tunnel problems checking levels taped to their forearms before deciding their wrists hurt.

    --
    Expanding a vast wasteland since 1996.
  119. Radio waves from lightning by ttyRazor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd like to see how these people react in a thunderstorm. If they're really as bothered by radio waves as they say, their heads should explode. More likely they don't even react.

  120. Re:He probably calls himself a "progressive" by SecurityGuy · · Score: 2
    I've yet to see a proper use of that word. I like the "progressive" tax, where the more progress you make, the more value you provide to society, the harder Uncle Sam shakes you to get the money out of your pockets. Double your salary quintuple your tax.


    I used to think the opposite of progress was Congress, but progressive's pretty near opposite as well.

  121. INFRASOUND is a Real Threat as Opposed To EMFs. by Ron+Bennett · · Score: 2

    Infrasound, sounds below the normal range of human hearing, present a small, but real threat many people. Infrasound can greatly effect one's mood and health.

    Low frequency sounds can travel thousands of miles and is used for military communications. In some areas, such infrasounds can be EXTREMELY LOUD...some sources of very intense infrasound include manufacturing, some vehicles, long-range military transmission equipment, and of course various natural sources including thunderstorms, earthquakes and volcanoes - and according to current theory, infrasound partly explains the bizarre behavior of some animals before an earthquake, etc.

    EMFs are everywhere and if the people in the article really are sensitive to them, then how can they have electricity in their house or use the telephone?? Electrical systems produce a large amount of EMFs and thus I would assume these folks would all live in candle-lit houses or at minimum live in houses with highly shielded electrical systems costing tens of thousands...but instead it appears they live in ordinary homes.

    Anyways, in my view, these folks ought to worry more about infrasound than EMFs.

  122. Let me show them pain.... by t_allardyce · · Score: 2

    Let me go to that town, i will bring a microwave, and strap someones head in it... then we'll see if emf is dangerous to health...

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  123. Broadcast power - that trick never works by Mandelbrute · · Score: 2
    Microwaves are intentional radiation and are used to TRANSMIT power
    Well over a hundred years back Tesla tried broadcast power, showed that it was very ineffient, and moved on to other things. That is why we use AC over wires.

    I see this whole thing as about science getting a bad reputation (often due to misinformation eg. "smoking won't kill you", or drastic and incorrect simplification by elements of the media), and being opposed at every turn by the superstitious.

    I would not live under an 11kV power line, but wouln't mind living fifty metres away, because I know that the intensity of the electric field drops away rapidly with distance. Some people would object to it being within sight. A lot of people fall into the trap of sorting things into "bad" and "good", without remembering that something as simple as fire can be both, depending on where it is.

  124. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by WNight · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's not just the strength of the field that matters (directly), it's the delta in field strength between the ends of the bulb.

    At the same field strength, the larger source is further away and the field delta is lower.

    Thus, the Earth's EM field could be vastly stronger, but still not cause a bulb to glow as brightly as a power line. (Unless the bulb stretched from here to the moon...)

    However, the human body is likely affected in somewhat the same way as a bulb, so it's not totally silly to think that EM from a power line might cause some weird effects.

    The people advocating this would get a lot farther if they didn't seem to be crystal-healing, acupuncture using, ginko-biloba eating freaks without a clue about the scientific method (or any discoveries since the 1920s for that matter.) But try to bring up double-blind studies with them and you'll get a rant about the ego of western science, etc, etc...

  125. Quick question for you: by Kymermosst · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since you claim to be a Ph.D...

    If the Earth's magnetic field alternated its polarity 60 times a second, do you think ALL of the flourescent lighting in the world would glow?

    From what I understand, from an article in Discover magazine years back (I know... biased and questionable... but...) which discussed magnetic fields around high-voltage power lines, and also electric blankets, the chief problem is the frequency of the field in question. The article states that the danger from a D.C. current is negligable no matter the voltage, but that 60 (and 50) hz A.C. can cause damage, in theory.

    Me personally, I like electricity. A.C., D.C.... doesn't matter, just as long as my gadgets run.

    Oh, and as far as I am concerned, it's not theft of service to tap inductively into high voltage lines that run over your property... It should be considered payment for the risk of cancer that some people think is there.

    --
    "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    1. Re:Quick question for you: by Crispin+Cowan · · Score: 2
      claim to be a Ph.D
      "claim"?! How hard can it be to look up someone named "crispin"? :-) However, my Ph.D is in computer science, not EE, so I'm just as much of a diletante as the usual slashdotter on this topic. I just happen to be a big enough geek to have gone out to a power line with a florescent tube once upon a time :-)

      If the Earth's magnetic field alternated its polarity 60 times a second, do you think ALL of the flourescent lighting in the world would glow?
      Yes, they would. That's because a static magnetic field does not convey any energy, and an alternating field does. You can only induce power from moving EM fields.

      It's an inference from there to the assumption that static magnetic fields are harmless while various alternating EM fields may cause damage. I'm pretty comfortable with the idea that the Earth's magnetic field is harmless to us :-)

      I'm somewhat more on the fence about whether EM radiation causes health hazards. It seems plausible that any field with lots of energy (such as lighting up a florescent tube, or microwaves that melt chocolate) stand a stronger chance of being dangerous than weak fields (such as cell phone or radio towers).

      Note that there have been cases in the past where something was thought to be safe and turned out to be very dangerous. In the 1950's, shoe stores had these X-ray devices for checking out your shoe fit. Put your feet over the emitter, put your face above the view plate, and lookit your tooties in the shoes. Small problem: loads of X-ray rems hitting you in the face :-)

      Crispin
      ----
      Crispin Cowan, Ph.D.
      Chief Scientist, WireX Communications, Inc.
      Immunix: Security Hardened Linux Distribution
      Available for purchase

    2. Re:Quick question for you: by Eil · · Score: 2

      The article states that the danger from a D.C. current is negligable no matter the voltage, but that 60 (and 50) hz A.C. can cause damage, in theory.

      HAH. You go ahead and grab that 15,000 volt inside your computer monitor while holding onto ground and then I'll gladly listen to your new definition of "negligable." Better yet, get struck by lightning; that's DC as well.

      It's true that DC current isn't as harmful as AC, but crank up the potential and either one will zap you just fine.

      In the aircraft maintenance biz, we work with many different types of power including 28VDC, 115VAC @ 50Hz, and 115VAC @ 400Hz. We have a saying that goes, "60 Hertz but 400 really Hertz!"

    3. Re:Quick question for you: by Eil · · Score: 2


      Well, I suppose it depends on the tube. I just chose that value because that's what they use on the 9" monitors that I repair at work...

      The voltmeter probes make quite a spark when nearing up to the terminal on that guy.

    4. Re:Quick question for you: by Kymermosst · · Score: 2

      One minor problem... we were talking about induction, not direct contact.

      Of course direct contact would do some damage :)

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    5. Re:Quick question for you: by Kymermosst · · Score: 2

      Hey, you know, I've seen one of those X-ray machines in an antique store... pretty cool.

      I was curious about the Earth's magnetic field, because I am not sure how much energy is there... So that answers my question, thanks. I am working on a CS degree, and so don't know much outside of that.

      Now... if there were a way we could cause it to alternate... bingo... free power for a good long time!

      --Mike

      P.S. I wasn't quite sure Crispin was a real name or not.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    6. Re:Quick question for you: by Eil · · Score: 2


      That much is true... I can't remember what the original post said (too lazy to look it up) but I'm pretty sure I was on-topic!

      That being said, I do remember that one of the hazards quoted by the luddite was electric shock.

  126. Re:Stealing power for the chicken coop... by WNight · · Score: 2

    IMHO this is stupid. If the power radiates through my property, I should be able to use it. Much the same as the descrambler issue (pre DMCA) of having the right to view anything someone broadcast to you, regardless of their desires.

    Does this use of inductive coils somehow reduce the available power at the other end of the wire, or is it just using "waste" energy and not affecting anything?

  127. Re:don't dismiss this so easily by John+Miles · · Score: 2

    I can always tell when a new apartment I go to has wireless ethernet ;-(),

    Then God help you if you ever come within 100 feet of a working microwave oven. At that distance, their emissions are still 10-20X as powerful as an 802.11 card at 6 feet.

    I can 'see' more radiation from my neighbor's microwave oven on a 2.4 GHz spectrum analyzer than I get from the Orinoco card in the PC that sits next to the analyzer on my workbench.

    Seriously... get help. Even though the supposed cause of your suffering is purely imaginary, your symptoms themselves may not be.

    --
    Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
  128. Playing devil's advocate by pyramid+termite · · Score: 2

    Alright, these people in Medocino are plainly deluded - but a claim there's never been any hard evidence that low intensity radio waves harm anyone skips an important issue - how could there be? We've been saturated in them for the last 50 or so years and by the time anyone thought of asking what the long term effects of this might be it was too late - you can't have a study like this without a control group and no control group is possible. And putting people in a radio free room and seeing if they can predict bursts of energy aimed at them only proves that people can't decect bursts of energy aimed at them. It does nothing to prove or disprove what the long term psychological or physical effects may or may not be.

    Let's look at some other things that have happened for the last 100 years. There are increased rates of depression, autism, schizophrenia, cancer and birth defects. The population of songbirds and amphibians has decreased remarkably. Violence has increased and so has fear. Is all of that due to radio waves? I really doubt it - one can find a lot of alternate explanations. Could some of it be due to the increase in radio waves?

    How could we possibly know? There are too many variables between the world of 100 years ago and now to say. If there is any place where one can find a group of people to study who've lived a modern lifestyle and avoided radio wave effects, (if any), I don't know about it. In short, this may be an issue that we are incapable of understanding scientifically with the tools we currently have. But just because we don't understand it doesn't mean it can't exist or can't affect us.

    Where does that leave us? Pretty much in the dark on this issue. We can prove or disprove effects of higher levels of this radiation, but the long term effects of lower levels are unknown. Forget about the people with their tinfoil hats in Medocino; there are valid reasons to investigate this issue, if we can find a way to do so. Scoffing at the people with extreme opinions is not going to resolve the question. And part of having an a scientific mindset is recognizing a good question when one sees one, not just attributing the issue to hysteria or paranoia.

    For the record, I don't believe I have any conditions caused by radio wave exposure, and don't have an informed opinion on what the effects of long term radiation might be. Neither, as far as I know, does anyone else. Neither the proposition "radio waves are doing things to us" or "radio waves aren't doing thing to us" are provable. A true skeptic has to treat both as dubious statements. I'm a little disappointed that no one replying to this article has taken this point of view.

  129. Re:Stealing power for the chicken coop... by Accelerated+Joe · · Score: 3, Informative

    Does this use of inductive coils somehow reduce the available power at the other end of the wire, or is it just using "waste" energy and not affecting anything?

    The inductive coils certainly will deplete the power from the power lines. In fact, those high voltage power lines are not even attached to anything directly at the near end, but run through a transformer, which uses two coils of wire to induce a lower voltage after the transformer.

    --
    They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security
  130. Is Mendecino miles underground? by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

    ...That's the only place these kooks are going to get any relief. Oh wait, the earth itself generates a magnetic field. Maybe these folks are the secret grandchildren of Molemen, surfacing once to take a bride with a human woman, impregnate her, then descend into the caves again.

    Well, it's possible. If one completely insane guy can convince a town to cut off radio communications, anything is possible.

  131. Re:Why didn't he move to northwest Nebraska? by Capsaicin · · Score: 2, Informative
    FYI, silicone breast implants have not been shown to cause any medical problems in the women who have them. Also, since you don't seem to keep up with this kind of stuff, high voltage lines do not cause cancer.

    To translate for the irony deprived ... Dow Corning have now gone out of the silicon breast business because the expense of paying for their customers health bills and there is a demonstrably higher incidence of childhood leukemeas in children living near high power lines.

    HOWEVER, this does not prove that microwaves are dangerous ... they might only possibly be dangerous.

    --
    Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
  132. Re:Dehydration? Dangers of dihydrogen monoxide! by Reziac · · Score: 3, Informative

    What you entirely neglect to consider are the dangers inherent to your proposed therapy. Why, millions of people may have already died from dihydrogen monoxide poisoning!!

    More information can be found at http://www.dhmo.org/facts.html

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  133. Re:Faraday cages -- old sheet plaster works too! by Reziac · · Score: 2

    My house was built in 1956, with that newfangled prefab sheet plaster -- its backing is 0.5" gauge expanded metal mesh, grounded willy-nilly where it touches the electrical outlet boxes (since they use the metal outlet box, not a 3rd wire, as their ground point). Most radios, and my newer TV, get absolutely ZERO reception indoors.

    (An old hi-fi radio and an old TV both have decent reception in here. Must be some defect in my chicken wire. :)

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  134. Don't dismiss? You're talking to morons here! by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2
    Just run a story on Free Energy or the Harmfulness of EM on Slashdot to see 600+ posters come out with their denial horns blaring. You can tell just how important a secret is by how loudly people are programmed to auto-react.

    People on Slashdot are victims.

    You were modded down to 'troll' for giving your honest opinion in a free debate zone. It's more than just a bad mod; it's the result of culture-wide thought conditioning. (I'd call it mind-control, but too many idiots here would assume that I meant short term, electrode in the neck bullshit. Mind control happens over the long term.)

    The fact is, Slashdotters are part of the geek-elite: tech-geeks are prime targets because even though they are only pawns they remain in many ways the engineers and keepers of today's accepted reality. We make the machines go; and the nature of the machines determines our level of enslavement.

    As such, you can always count on the brain-mush factor in people. Slashdot is living proof. Tell them it's not 'cool' to believe in Cold Fusion, or what have you, and the low-egos around here will drop the idea like a hot rock in order to jump back into the safety of popular concensus and the modified truths sold to them since birth. --Why do you think we were fed so much 'science' learning channel crap when we were kids? --I'll tell you why: It's because kids are easy to program. Most of the people here will argue till they're blue in the face to defend their childhood conditioning, which makes them no better than kids brought up in hard-core Christian communities. They insist that they choose through free will, but the truth is they've been brainwashed since birth.


    -Fantastic Lad

  135. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by JimPooley · · Score: 2

    You say: "his credentials are dubious at best." Really? The man has written a book, how many books have you written? I'm much more likely to believe someone who has gone to all the trouble to research and write a book about something, than someone who hasn't.

    David Icke has had several books published, but this doesn't disguise the fact that he is still a barking mad loon!

    Or do you believe him too?

    --

    "Information wants to be paid"
  136. Re:Here's what the FTC says.... by connorbd · · Score: 2

    This article more or less supports my point, actually. Not very strongly, but it leans heavily in that direction.

    /Brian

  137. Conundrum by Mignon · · Score: 2
    How does an electrically-sensitive person update this web page without exposing themselves to the electrical fields they are trying to avoid?

    Maybe this is a reason to pursue development of an all-optical solar-powered computer.

  138. how does that compare to paint chips? by MemeRot · · Score: 2

    If the amount of lead that leached into the water were at least equal to the amount that a kid gets eating paint flakes, then I'd say there's the potential for damage. I have no physical measurements on either of these. But I'd imagine it would take a while for enough oxides to cover the inside of the pipes to prevent most leaching.

  139. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by M-G · · Score: 2

    L. Ron Hubbard has written a book too... :)

  140. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by M-G · · Score: 2

    Nah...I was careful to leave out any disparaging remarks...unless they want to read something into the smiley....

  141. Re:UNIX - because I got high by QuietRiot · · Score: 2

    Standing applause!!!!

    Wish I could mod in a discussion I was participating in!!!

    Very nice.