Slashdot Mirror


Audio Download: Linux Kernel to be on Radio

cyber_rigger writes: "The Linux Kernel is to have a (spoken) reading on Radio Free Linux and some other regular radio station throughout the world. http://radioqualia.va.com.au/freeradiolinux/ I guess this makes Linux offically 'free as in speech.' 'The Linux kernel contains 4,141,432 lines of code. Reading the entire kernel will take an estimated 14253.43 hours, or 593.89 days. Free Radio Linux begins transmission on February 3, 2002, the fourth anniversary of the term "Open Source."'" If only the mysterious numbers stations would open their source as well.

161 comments

  1. no human is reading this... who will listen? by Gunstick · · Score: 1

    This is done via computer generated speach.
    Will there be anyone listening?
    Or will someone go and have a computer listen to the transmission and turn it back into code :-)

    George

    --
    Atari rules... ermm... ruled.
    1. Re:no human is reading this... who will listen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might be more scientificly interesting to listern to the sequence of digits in pi, e or any irrational numbers.

      By the time the "reading" is done, there will be another os release and patches.

    2. Re:no human is reading this... who will listen? by noelmc · · Score: 1

      Exactely! I won't! There'll probably be a sharp rise in listeners for the novelty value for a very short time, immediately followed by a large sharp and permanent downturn in listernership because this is the most inane and stupid use of technology that must surely have ever come about! I'm so happy for the people involved that they have so little to do with their lives that they could set up this trash. They could provide useful content - instead they provide this! Its such a pity! Radio has such potential, its a shame to see this squandered.

  2. bahaha by Blymie · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Oh yeah, this is really useful :PPP

    Even art, if to be appreciated, has to be observed. If you can call this art.

    How lame ;P

  3. Linux Users Are Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Windows users don't do stupid things like that.

    1. Re:Linux Users Are Stupid by ActiveSX · · Score: 0

      The correct response is: Windows users can't do stupid things like that.

    2. Re:Linux Users Are Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      windows couldn't stay up long enough to be able to broadcast that many hours without having to be rebooted...

  4. Number Stations on DMOZ by hardcode · · Score: 2

    Try http://search.dmoz.org/cgi-bin/search?search=numbe r+stations for more info on number stations...

    I'm not a karma whore I'm a karma whores mate and I'm only whoring karma cos tha karma whore is late

    1. Re:Number Stations on DMOZ by hardcode · · Score: 1

      Of course that should be http://search.dmoz.org/cgi-bin/search?search=numbe r+stations

      or:

      http://slashdot.org/articles/00/05/27/1735225.sh tm l
      http://www.shmoo.com/numbers/
      http://www.dxing.com/numbers.htm
      http://havana.iwsp.com/radio/numbers.html

      I'll preview it this time ;)

      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes.
      - Dr. Warren Jackson, Director, UTCS

    2. Re:Number Stations on DMOZ by Eil · · Score: 2


      No sites matching your query were found in the Open Directory.

      Try your search on one of these search engines that incorporate Open Directory data in their results:

      Netscape
      Google
      AOL
      Lycos

  5. advance ET IT by lightray · · Score: 1

    Excellent! now those little green men out there in other planetary systems will receive something useful in the radio transmissions from earth instead of endless daytime TV re-runs... but how many thousands of years will it take to get there?

    1. Re:advance ET IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But will there be advertisements every 15minutes??? 8-)

  6. Can they keep up? by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

    Can they even generate speech fast enough to keep up with the huge patches?

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    1. Re:Can they keep up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that Linus no longer accepts patches, yes.

  7. I wonder by Nobody+Real · · Score: 1

    Is it going to try to read it off like words or will it spell everything out? And what about code comments?

  8. What Kernel revision? by mESSDan · · Score: 4, Funny

    Also, can we submit bug reports to the radio station now? Heh.

    --

    -- Dan
    1. Re:What Kernel revision? by Lord+Sauron · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah. And instead of the top 10 hits, they have the top ten patches.

    2. Re:What Kernel revision? by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah. I imagine some guy calling the radio station:

      DJ: Hi, you're live now. What's your name?

      guy: David.

      DJ: And what music do you want, son ?

      guy: I want the preemptible kernel patch.

      DJ: Oh, so you like low latency, uh ?

      guy: Yep. I sure do.

      DJ: Ok, here it goes. We'll now play Preemptible Kernel Patch Opus 1, No. 1. Trio Sonata in E Minor

      --

      -
      Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
    3. Re:What Kernel revision? by falzer · · Score: 1

      DJ: Ok, here it goes. We'll now play Preemptible Kernel Patch Opus 1, No. 1. Trio Sonata in E Minor

      ...with Linus Torvalds, Alan Cox, and Robert M. Love on the keyboards.

  9. 593.89 days == 1.63 years == quite long by Shiny+Metal+S. · · Score: 2, Informative
    The Linux kernel contains 4,141,432 lines of code. Reading the entire kernel will take an estimated 14253.43 hours, or 593.89 days.
    After 593.89 days it's going to be quite out of date...

    Will they also read patches while they arrive?

    --

    ~shiny
    WILL HACK FOR $$$

  10. Why ??? by JohnHegarty · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can anyone think of any reason for this?

    And does anyone plan to listen for more than 30 seconds?

    1. Re:Why ??? by October_30th · · Score: 0

      To demonstrate that code is speech?

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    2. Re:Why ??? by Sarcasm_Orgasm · · Score: 0

      If you have to think of a reason, you do not fall into their target audience.

      --
      Special people have long socks, ride short buses, & invent witty sigs.
    3. Re:Why ??? by $uperjay · · Score: 1

      If I describe to you, in detail, the plans for top-secret U.S. weaponry (you know, stealth jets and the like) it's still considered treason. Or rather, terrorism, since I'm not American. The code is being read; that does not automatically validate it as free speech in the eyes of the law.

    4. Re:Why ??? by $uperjay · · Score: 1

      Their target audience, apparently, does not include people capable of critical thinking.

    5. Re:Why ??? by October_30th · · Score: 0
      the plans for top-secret U.S. weaponry (you know, stealth jets and the like) it's still considered treason

      That is, because in order to get access to this information you'll basically sign a document in which you give up certain constitutional rights like free speech.

      If I haven't signed such a document it's perfectly OK for me to publish them. See the Supreme Court decision on so called Pentagon Papers (ref. Nixon).

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    6. Re:Why ??? by nusuth · · Score: 2
      That is, because in order to get access to this information you'll basically sign a document in which you give up certain constitutional rights like free speech. If I haven't signed such a document it's perfectly OK for me to publish them.

      So if you could get such information from a high rank officer and supply it to China, you wouldn't be a spy, right?

      --

      Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room!

    7. Re:Why ??? by October_30th · · Score: 0
      you wouldn't be a spy

      I'm sure the military and government would be hopping mad and would call me by worse names than "spy", but legally it would not be a clear-cut case at all. At least before the September 11th.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    8. Re:Why ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Can anyone think of any reason for this?
      Simple: cheap 3 $ crack
      Same answer for the second question.

    9. Re:Why ??? by mcubed · · Score: 1
      What's the big deal about proving that it is speech? There's a big difference between "speech" and "protected speech." The argument that computer code is automatically protected speech was already shot full of holes in the 2600 DMCA violation case. If this is the reason, it's a waste of time.

      --------

      --
      "No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions of absolute reality;..."
    10. Re:Why ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their target audience, apparently, does not include people capable of critical thinking.

      Don't be ridiculous. If their target audience enjoys hearing kernel code read out then that is rather unusual but it doesn't have any more to do with critical thinking tha enjoying watching plays or films or listening to music. Enjoyment of something is unrelated to a capacity for critical thinking. I would suggest, however, that you have some problems in that direction yourself.

    11. Re:Why ??? by October_30th · · Score: 0
      protected speech was already shot full of holes in the 2600 DMCA violation case.

      That's because it was never presented properly. The 2600 team screwed up.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    12. Re:Why ??? by mcubed · · Score: 1

      That's because it was never presented properly. The 2600 team screwed up.

      --
      "No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions of absolute reality;..."
    13. Re:Why ??? by mcubed · · Score: 1
      That's because it was never presented properly. The 2600 team screwed up.

      How could you possibly "properly" present an arguement that computer code is subject to the highest level of First Amendment scrutiny? Trying to make that claim at all is a screw-up because it's patently false.

      -----

      --
      "No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions of absolute reality;..."
    14. Re:Why ??? by cduffy · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. Code that serves a political function or demonstrates a point should be legally viewed as political speech, which is what it is. What's most immediately needed, anyhow, is not necessarily the "highest level" of First Amentment scrutiny, but merely the same level of protection that would be provided were the exact same instructions codified in written English. I'm certain you can see this as a reasonable request.

      Certainly, claiming that *all* code should be viewed as political speech is patently false -- but you build a strawman in portraying that as the position of those you oppose.

  11. WTF? by $uperjay · · Score: 1, Troll

    I dare someone to give me an explanation of why this isn't a total waste of time and effort. Shouldn't you geeks be jamming these spare cycles into some distributed whatchama-fuck, like SETI@home, protein research, or at least crypto?

  12. And what if ... by locohijo · · Score: 0, Redundant

    a new kernel release comes out.

    Damn frequent kernel releases ... have to start all over again

  13. And we thought Linus took a while. by minus23 · · Score: 2, Funny

    And we thought Torvalds took a while to get the new kernals out!

  14. In other news today... by Pollux · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...the PI channel, a channel dedicated to dictating the sequencial numbers of pi, went off the air today. Apparently, their Neilson ratings dropped to zero five seconds after they went on the air. No later had the digits "1415926" been read before the plug was pulled.

    "I don't understand," says Ira Tional, promotional manager of the PI channel. "I thought everyone loved pi, and they could now get it 24-7!" Tional thought that perhaps if they had started the channel with guest stars doing the reading, such as Drew Carey or Britany Spears, the PI channel wouldn't have come to such an abbrupt halt. "But for some reason, they told me I was being too irrational."

    1. Re:In other news today... by RC514 · · Score: 1

      Maybe if they had just played PI as sound (base 16384) their ratings wouldn't suck. There's some pretty neat stuff in there. Sure, there's a lot of rubbish in between, but...

      --

    2. Re:In other news today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all it's Britney and second she is busy teaching semiconductor physics.

    3. Re:In other news today... by wsloand · · Score: 5, Funny

      "I thought everyone loved pi, and they could now get it 24-7!"

      If only they had realized that people can only take pi about 22/7. 24/7 is just more than people want it.

    4. Re:In other news today... by psb777 · · Score: 1

      "I don't understand," says Ira Tional, promotional manager of the PI channel. "I thought everyone loved pi, and they could now get it 24-7!"


      Wrong! You can now get it 22/7, approximately.

      --
      Paul Beardsell
    5. Re:In other news today... by divbyzero · · Score: 1, Redundant

      ROTFL! I wish I had moderator points today. Thanks!

      --
      But my grandest creation, as history will tell,
      Was Firefrorefiddle, the Fiend of the Fell.
    6. Re:In other news today... by Dwonis · · Score: 2

      22/7 is inaccurate after the second decimal place.

    7. Re:In other news today... by Destacona · · Score: 1

      simply brilliant.

    8. Re:In other news today... by joshuac · · Score: 1

      22/7 is inaccurate after the second decimal place.

      geesh, it was meant as humor, not for calculating orbits.

    9. Re:In other news today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? Please explain! I am very interested in finding patterns in pi, but I don't see how base 16384 would make it sound.

    10. Re:In other news today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every digit of a base 16384 number has a value in [0..16387], so every digit could be used as a sound sample. Since all sequences of digits are believed to show up in the numeric representation of PI, every good song would eventually be played.

  15. It's nothing new after all. by Shiny+Metal+S. · · Score: 1
    It reminds me the good ol' days when I was recording ZX Spectrum games played on radio.

    But it was in a machine readable form, so a little bit more advanced technology...

    --

    ~shiny
    WILL HACK FOR $$$

  16. link for numbers station by odaiwai · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Why is the link for the 'numbers station' pointing to slashdot.org?

    dave

    1. Re:link for numbers station by minus23 · · Score: 1

      Because the URL for the link is actually (href= ""). Most browsers asume that you just want to stay where you are in that situation. It isn't *actually* pointing to Slashdot. Even still though I imagine it was not intentional.

    2. Re:link for numbers station by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's pointing to one of CmderTaco's page lenghteners

  17. Minimalist Art. by minus23 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Personally I think this is great. In a minimalist sort of way I really dig these sorts of things. I dig monitors in my room that show the airplanes in the skies. ... I dig 4 measure beat clips playing on a speaker in the corner in the bathroom really softly. ... I dig old laptops playing Sim City (black and white) with the time slowed down to real-time... or on normal and let people check on the village when they come over and visit. I could see myself setting up a little speaker somewhere just to play back the linux kernal. I am actually excited. :)

    1. Re:Minimalist Art. by wackybrit · · Score: 1

      I dig old laptops playing Sim City (black and white) with the time slowed down to real-time... or on normal and let people check on the village when they come over and visit.

      Whoa! That is a really cool idea. Just get an old Mac Classic or a nice looking ultra-old PC laptop, run up SimCity, and keep it running as a form of artificial life. Nice talking point for the living room ;-)

  18. what kernel ? by XPulga · · Score: 5, Funny
    turns radio on

    slash kernel slash sched dot c slash asterisk line break asterisk (...) 1998-12-28 Implemented better SMP scheduling by Ingo Molnar

    Dang! It's the vanilla kernel where are user mode Linux and Alan's cool toys ?

    switches station

    ...Then Iluvatar arose, and the Ainur perceived that he smiled; and he lifted up his left hand, and a new theme began amid the storm...

    Silmarillion. Spoken. Again.

    switches station again

    eight dot three four six minus a dash greather than c zero wb zero yn dot eat...

    Yay, they've got Reiser in this one, but they're still reciteing the console driver, it'll be 3 days before we get to the filesystem

    switches stations frantically

    hash include less-than linux slash config dot h NO NO GET OUT OF HERE WHAT ARE YOU DOING ?

    Hello, I am Richard M. Stallman and you are being deceived, for it takes much more than a kernel to get a computer going. Here are 3 billion lines of GNU code that this radio hasn't read aloud yet. [DOOR SLAMS] Tee hee, and how do you think you get those tiny little icons on the screen ? Here's the XFree86 source to be read.

    turns off radio, goes to slashdot, picks cowboyneal option on poll

    1. Re:what kernel ? by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I haven't tuned in as of yet (just woke up at work and cannot find the power supply for my speakers), but it seems to me that they would be reading the algorithym, not the code.

      Reading the code symbol for symbol would seem to me to be slightly, well, geeky. But not in that good way.

      On a side note, has anyone thought about calling Guiness ( the records guys, not the beer guys) for a note in The Book? This has to be the longest online reading ever.

      On second thought, call the beer guys too. It might be harder to understand, but it would be a hellava lot more fun. And I can always get the written transcripts later:)

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    2. Re:what kernel ? by r+a+d+i+o+q+u+a+l+i · · Score: 1

      mind if we quote yr comment on the free radio linux site?

      --
      frequency shifting paradigms in streaming audio
    3. Re:what kernel ? by pizen · · Score: 2, Informative

      On a side note, has anyone thought about calling Guiness ( the records guys, not the beer guys) for a note in The Book? This has to be the longest online reading ever.

      Just a little OT history lesson. The Guinness book guys are the Guinness beer guys. The idea came about when Sir Hugh Beaver, managing directory for the Guinness Brewery, went to a shooting party where he became involved in a discussion as to what was the fastest game bird in England. He had the idea for a book, Published by Guinness, that would provide the answers to these sorts of questions would be perfect. The first edition was published in 1955.

      "Wherever people congregate to talk, they will argue, and sometimes the joy lies in the arguing and would be lost if there were any definite answer. But more often the argument takes place on a dispute of fact, and it can be very exasperating if there is no immediate means of settling the argument. Who was the first to swim the Channel? Where is England's deepest well, or Scotland's highest tree, or Ireland's oldest church? How many died in history's worst rail crash? Who gained the biggest majority in Parliament? What is the highest point in our country? What is the greatest weight a man has ever lifted? And so on. How much heat these innocent questions can raise! Guinness in producing this book hopes that it may assist in resolving many such disputes, and may, we hope, turn heat into light."
      - Rt. Hon. the Earl of Iveagh, Chairman of Guinness.

    4. Re:what kernel ? by timbck2 · · Score: 1

      >Reading the code symbol for symbol would seem to me to be slightly, well, geeky.

      Am I the only person who sees the irony in this? In what way would reading the algorithm *not* be "geeky"?

      --
      Absurdity: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce
  19. I'm listening. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds really boring. And the reader softweare should be tweaked a bit more. It reads comments quit good, but the source sounds bad.

    Here it is:
    http://ams-node.montevideo.nl:8000/free_radio_li nu x.ogg

  20. 'Regular radio stations'? by 0123456789 · · Score: 1

    How on Earth did they persuade regular radio stations to go along with this?

  21. Whaaaat? by damas · · Score: 4, Funny

    Kernel.org is down again?

  22. Well hot shit! by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know what I'M gonna be listening to for the next year and a half.

    Before this, it was test patterns. I consider this a lateral move.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  23. I wonder if.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..comments in the kernel will be read too.

    I wouldn't mind hearing such "gems" as

    // Fuck me plenty.
    // Linus fucked up this part.

  24. I wonder... by Briareos · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just how many people will be listening to this all day long, waiting to hear "fsck me gently with a chainsaw" (arch/sparc/kernel/ptrace.c) on public radio for the first time? ^_^

    Also, how long will it then take before "concerned parents" get the project off the air? >_<

    np: Phonem - Decay (Arovane/Phonem - Aer (Valid))

    --

    "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

  25. magic numbers + the synth sux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) their voice synth sucks
    I was disappointed by the bad speech encoding.
    I had expected in 2002 you'd actually be able
    to synthesize a voice that sounds close to
    human or at least be understandable.
    The old amiga 500 had a utility that was much
    more understandable than this is.

    2) I heard a lot of magic numbers.
    although it was mostly things like 255 or 256 or
    16, there was quite an incredible amount of magic
    numbers at 13:00 cet. I think they should fix
    this in the code... magic numbers are no gooood.

    1. Re:magic numbers + the synth sux by abdulwahid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was disappointed by the bad speech encoding. I had expected in 2002 you'd actually be able to synthesize a voice that sounds close to human or at least be understandable. The old amiga 500 had a utility that was much more understandable than this is.

      I don't know about the Amiga but I had an old TI99-4A that had a speech synthesis module. It was quite good at reading most words but had a built in list of words it could read. You could get it to read other words but it meant that you had to express the word in a special way so that the module could pronounce it properly. That really defeats the point of text to speech.

      I think text to speech has come on a long way since those days but it seems like slow progress which is due to the complexity of the subject. There is a good open source text to speech engine called Festival. You can test it with your own text here

      .
      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10);'
  26. Another stupid linux post...arrg by tomstdenis · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why is it everytime someone uses Linux its ground-breaking news?

    I mean I have a MP3CD player. I don't care if it runs linux or windows or macos. I just want it to play MP3s.

    Also how much of Linux are they using? A fragment of it? I mean a radio certainly has no use for 99% of the linux kernel [multi-tasking, virtual memory, etc...]

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  27. Not that good by komet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I listened in for a bit and it was very confusing. The punctuation marks especially have very confusing names and not enough pause between them. =( came out as: equals..... signpar-en-the-sis ... very confusing. And why "traditional hyphen"?

    It also mispronounced "Linus Torvalds". How hard would it have been to sample Linus' name properly?

    Of course, these are all things that can be improved as time goes on and I do hope they will actually do so.

    --
    Any technology which is distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced.
    1. Re:Not that good by koekepeer · · Score: 1

      They don't even need to sample it:

      ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/SillySound s/ english.au

      But anyway, this is a complete waste of time. My god, can't people find something more usefull to do with their lives...

  28. d'oh! by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    disregard that post, I misread the /. page

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  29. archives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So will there be archives of the broadcast?

    Also, too bad you can't make out anything that the machine is saying in the transation.

  30. no prob,I have a transcript of the broadcast by nomadic · · Score: 0, Redundant

    3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375 1058209749445923078164062862 08998628034825342117067982148086513282306647093844 6095505822317253594081284811 17450284102701938521105559644622948954930381964428 8109756659334461284756482337 86783165271201909145648566923460348610454326648213 3936072602491412737245870066 06315588174881520920962829254091715364367892590360 0113305305488204665213841469 51941511609433057270365759591953092186117381932611 7931051185480744623799627495 67351885752724891227938183011949129833673362440656 6430860213949463952247371907 02179860943702770539217176293176752384674818467669 4051320005681271452635608277 85771342757789609173637178721468440901224953430146 5495853710507922796892589235 42019956112129021960864034418159813629774771309960 5187072113499999983729780499 51059731732816096318595024459455346908302642522308 2533446850352619311881710100 03137838752886587533208381420617177669147303598253 4904287554687311595628638823 53787593751957781857780532171226806613001927876611 1959092164201989380952572010 65485863278865936153381827968230301952035301852968 9957736225994138912497217752 83479131515574857242454150695950829533116861727855 8890750983817546374649393192 55060400927701671139009848824012858361603563707660 1047101819429555961989467678 37449448255379774726847104047534646208046684259069 4912933136770289891521047521 62056966024058038150193511253382430035587640247496 4732639141992726042699227967 82354781636009341721641219924586315030286182974555 7067498385054945885869269956 90927210797509302955321165344987202755960236480665 4991198818347977535663698074 26542527862551818417574672890977772793800081647060 0161452491921732172147723501 41441973568548161361157352552133475741849468438523 3239073941433345477624168625 18983569485562099219222184272550254256887671790494 6016534668049886272327917860 85784383827967976681454100953883786360950680064225 1252051173929848960841284886 26945604241965285022210661186306744278622039194945 0471237137869609563643719172 87467764657573962413890865832645995813390478027590 0994657640789512694683983525 95709825822620522489407726719478268482601476990902 6401363944374553050682034962 52451749399651431429809190659250937221696461515709 8583874105978859597729754989 30161753928468138268683868942774155991855925245953 9594310499725246808459872736 44695848653836736222626099124608051243884390451244 1365497627807977156914359977 00129616089441694868555848406353422072225828488648 1584560285060168427394522674 67678895252138522549954666727823986456596116354886 2305774564980355936345681743 24112515076069479451096596094025228879710893145669 1368672287489405601015033086 17928680920874760917824938589009714909675985261365 5497818931297848216829989487 22658804857564014270477555132379641451523746234364 5428584447952658678210511413 54735739523113427166102135969536231442952484937187 1101457654035902799344037420 07310578539062198387447808478489683321445713868751 9435064302184531910484810053 70614680674919278191197939952061419663428754440643 7451237181921799983910159195 61814675142691239748940907186494231961567945208095 1465502252316038819301420937 62137855956638937787083039069792077346722182562599 6615014215030680384477345492 02605414665925201497442850732518666002132434088190 7104863317346496514539057962 68561005508106658796998163574736384052571459102897 0641401109712062804390397595 15677157700420337869936007230558763176359421873125 1471205329281918261861258673 21579198414848829164470609575270695722091756711672 2910981690915280173506712748 58322287183520935396572512108357915136988209144421 0067510334671103141267111369 90865851639831501970165151168517143765761835155650 8849099898599823873455283316 35507647918535893226185489632132933089857064204675 2590709154814165498594616371 80270981994309924488957571282890592323326097299712 0844335732654893823911932597 46366730583604142813883032038249037589852437441702 9132765618093773444030707469 21120191302033038019762110110044929321516084244485 9637669838952286847831235526 58213144957685726243344189303968642624341077322697 8028073189154411010446823252 71620105265227211166039666557309254711055785376346 6820653109896526918620564769 31257058635662018558100729360659876486117910453348 8503461136576867532494416680 39626579787718556084552965412665408530614344431858 6769751456614068007002378776 59134401712749470420562230538994561314071127000407 8547332699390814546646458807 97270826683063432858785698305235808933065757406795 4571637752542021149557615814
    For the love of all that's good and decent, someone mod me down...

    1. Re:no prob,I have a transcript of the broadcast by Mr.+Piccolo · · Score: 1

      No, that is not the transcript.

      The transcript reads like this:

      Three point one four one five nine two six... Oh, I've just been handed a note from our program director that we are to be preempted permanently by Loveline. This is John Doe signing off.

      --
      Glückwünsche, haben Sie Slashdot ermordet, indem Sie zum korporativen Druck beugten und Subskriptionen einlei
  31. Code and Weird comments by Jenova · · Score: 1

    Is that radio station going to read the f*** word in the code or just bleep it out?

    :)

  32. Um, this stream is being encoded by... winamp? by prs · · Score: 1
    Doesn't using non-`free as in speech' software to encode the stream kind of defeat the whole point of this..?

    ``For encoding we are using the free Oddsock DSP plugin for Winamp. This encoder converts the live audio input from the speech.bot into a streaming Ogg Vorbis file. This file is then sent as a 'continuous stream' to the server.''
  33. Needs Scratchin' by heretic108 · · Score: 1

    I had a listen, and it's a bit bland. Hard to listen to.

    It needs a bit of spice - a drum loop, some samples, and a bit of scratching. Give it a bit of 'old school' Hip-Hop.

    f-f-f-for

    LEFT paren

    i-i-i-i

    equals
    z-z-z-zero
    s-s-s-semicolon !
    ...

    --
    -- In the beginning was the WORD, and the WORD was UNSIGNED, and the main(){} was without form and void...
  34. General public by jsse · · Score: 1, Redundant

    would have thought this is a x-rate channel when they hear this:

    arch/sparc/kernel/process.c: /* fuck me plenty */

    1. Re:General public by be-fan · · Score: 2

      Dude, what is it about the SPARC maintainer? All the obscene stuff in the kernel is in arch/sparc.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    2. Re:General public by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you hacked sparc at low levels? The obscenity is completely valid.

  35. Needs Scratchin' (corrected) by heretic108 · · Score: 1

    I had a listen, and it's a bit bland. Hard to listen to.

    It needs a bit of spice - a drum loop, some samples, and a bit of scratching. Give it a bit of 'old school' Hip-Hop.

    [boom blat]
    [bo-boom-boom-blat]
    f-f-f-for [blat]
    [bo-boom-boom-blat]
    LEFT paren [blat]
    [bo-boom-boom-blat]
    i-i-i-i [blat]
    [bo-boom-boom-blat]
    equals [blat]
    [bo-boom-boom-blat]
    z-z-z-zero
    [scratch-hctarcs-scratch-hctarcs]
    s-s-s-semicolon !

    --
    -- In the beginning was the WORD, and the WORD was UNSIGNED, and the main(){} was without form and void...
    1. Re:Needs Scratchin' (corrected) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha that would kick some ass!

      superandroid.com

  36. Woah... by James+Foster · · Score: 1

    593.89 days?!? I sure hope they have commercial/toilet breaks!

  37. Linux must be perfect and free of bugs now, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    People like this make me ill. There are tons of things we're working on in Linux to fix and make it better, and people like this waste their time with no benefit to the community, yet get the headlines. Get off your ass and do something useful.

    Fuck, no wonder Microsoft rules the world, if this is how the community treats the coders.

  38. Microsoft's response... by alvi · · Score: 1

    ...should be a radio station that reads Windows binary hexcode.

    That way they could prove that there are situations when there's no real difference between open source and closed source. It's both gibberish (as a radio show, that is).

    1. Re:Microsoft's response... by uncl_bob · · Score: 1

      I fully agree, it is a completely idiotic idea.

  39. Only in the USA... by iangoldby · · Score: 1, Insightful

    (I know I'll get mod'ed down for this, but please don't just write this off as an anti-american troll before reading it. Some of my best friends are american.)

    Only in the United States of America could anyone think that this is a good idea. How is it that anyone can think that a symbolic action like this could change the reality of whether the kernal is actually 'Free Speech' or not?

    It strikes me as in some ways similar to those people who secretly walk along an overgrown and disused public right-of-way once every 20 years just to make sure it can't be closed down. It doesn't actually achieve anything - it's just fiddling about with legal technicalities.

    Why only the United States? Well, similar things might happen here in the UK, but we have not yet become quite such a litigation- and legally-obsessed nation as the USA. Also, the US preoccupation with 'free speech' is something most Brits just don't get.

    Ok, now watch all that hard-earned karma evaporate...

    1. Re:Only in the USA... by Howie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As far is I know, speech isn't legally protected in the UK. The 'preoccupation' is that the constitution of the US is one of very few constitutions that works by restricting the government rather than the people, as I understand it (I'm neither an American or a political scientist) - this make it interesting, and worth following.

      Similar things do happen in the UK, and what happens is everyone grumbles about it for a while but not enough for things to change. Witness the handful of privacy/freedom restricting ("criminal justice/public order") laws of the last 10 years or so.

      --
      "don't fall into the fallacy of believing that Perl can solve social problems. Maybe Perl 6 can, but that's a ways off"
    2. Re:Only in the USA... by r+a+d+i+o+q+u+a+l+i · · Score: 1

      sorry to pop your bubble but we live in the UK

      :-)

      eset(r a d i o q u a l i a)

      --
      frequency shifting paradigms in streaming audio
    3. Re:Only in the USA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Commissioned by Gallery 9/Walker Art Center with the support of the Jerome Foundation, USA. *

      Not the UK then.

    4. Re:Only in the USA... by LeftOfCentre · · Score: 1

      The constitutions of most western countries restrict the government and provide free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association etc. In many cases dating back hundreds of years. I don't think the US is special in this regard, however it could be that the UK is since it lacks a written constitution.

  40. Fork here : by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    i've decided that the kernel just doesn;t do what I want so I'm forking the broadcast.

    /jk

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  41. No...but kind've spooky by srand · · Score: 1

    Eeeeek.....I was not expecting it to be a
    computer-generated voice! That was creepy!

    On the other hand, it would sound pretty interesting as background to industrial/techno songs or maybe some Pink Floyd (which I'm sure it will be used for in not too long a while).

  42. What a waste of time... by weave · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This seems a horrible waste of resources. And what do they hope to gain or prove by this?

    I'd be more impressed if they steered the bot so it began reading out loud the DeCSS code and other forbidden code over and over. Then it really would be about free speech...

    1. Re:What a waste of time... by AnalogBoy · · Score: 2

      Apparently Linux Zealots like to think they are being persecuted.

      By the time this code is finished, the kernel will be quite obsolete.

  43. Right...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just what we need to get Linux into the mainstream.....

  44. Will it be... by Shanep · · Score: 2

    gzip'ed or bzip2'ed? (that's a joke BTW, for the dork who is going to no doubt take me seriously and reply at length.)

    Perhaps if someone piped their radio through their speech recognition software, to get this transmission back into some compilable form, we might be able to finally get back to legendary Microsoft stability. (now this, is sarcasm.)

    --
    War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
  45. numbers stations by discogravy · · Score: 2

    i don't know what the "numbers stations" link was supposed to be, but i'm pretty sure it's referencing the shortwave stations that are the subject of the conet project. If anyone knows of some online recordings of these, I'd love to hear them, but I'm not going to shell out $$ to listen to people read numbers.

    1. Re:numbers stations by Beautyon · · Score: 2

      Goto:

      http://www.ibmpcug.co.uk/~irdial/catfix.htm

      Where you can download the entire Conet Project. Be sure to buy a t-shirt or a physical copy if you liked it.

      --
      ATH0 Bitcoin: 1DnwFLXczVZV8kLJbMYoheUrpqHesjxrSi
  46. Why not Gutenberg? by heyetv · · Score: 4, Interesting



    Why the linux kernel???

    Why not start reading from the Project Gutenberg files instead, something that would support 'open' and 'free' concepts, but at the same time be useful and improving...

    1. Re:Why not Gutenberg? by taxman_10m · · Score: 1

      Using radio to actually broadcast something intelligible? Are you insane? Without every station pumping out mind numbingly bad music every second of every day the world would descend into chaos. I wouldn't want that on my conscience, would you?

  47. It sounds like ... by myster0n · · Score: 1

    It sounds like the new Radiohead album ;-)

    --
    Nobody believes the official spokesman, but everybody trusts an unidentified source. -- Ron Nesen
  48. The only one answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because we can.

  49. Voice Synthesizer? by mrfiddlehead · · Score: 1
    I hope they have the sense to have a voice synthesiser 'read' out the code, if the participants really feel that this is an important project. The whole endeavour sounds to be a bit dumb. And if they really want to emulate the 'numbers' stations they'll have to use a one time pad to encrypt the 'message'.

    It's all codswallop this morning ... where's my goddamned newspaper!!??!!

    --
    :wq
  50. I listened for a bit ... by pyramid+termite · · Score: 2

    ... and I'm not sure what that bit about the Illodium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator was all about. That voice sounds familiar though ...

  51. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux to be ported on the walkman in mid 2003.

  52. Icecast2 is pretty impressive by Querty · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm surprised noone has notices that the station still hasn't been slashdotted! They are streaming with the experimental icecast2 server. I'd say that's pretty impressive.

    Thanks to all who are making this possible. Especially Monty, Ogg/Vorbis rocks!

  53. I want the .wav version !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..for my startup sound :)))

  54. OT: Your sig is a lie by partingshot · · Score: 1, Offtopic


    I believe that quote belongs to Tannenbaum.
    Its from Computer Networks: Third Edition.

    "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway."

    See ERCB: Computer Networks X 2 for more info.

    --
    Anonymous posts are filtered.
  55. Re:OT: Your sig is a lie by hardcode · · Score: 1

    Not mine, fortune(6) from OpenBSD 2.9, is that a bug Theo would like to hear about? *grin*

    "Unix is not a "A-ha" experience, it is more of a "holy-shit" experience."
    - Colin McFadyen in alt.folklore.computers

  56. arg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    plus sign hyphen minus plus sign hyphen minus plus sign hyphen minus plus sign hyphen minus
    vertical bar vertical bar vertical bar vertical bar vertical bar vertical bar vertical bar

    Dunno bout' you, but this makes my head hurt

  57. What the hell is the point?? by t_allardyce · · Score: 3, Funny

    To fund it, their gonna hide advertising in the code - e.g. "printf("This kernel sponsered by Pepsi, for a coders everywhere");"

    After the first month, all the advertisers will pull out because the listener base = 5.

    When they've finished, someone will ring up telling them that they made a mistake in line 2,432,243 it was "x" instead of "y".

    And Microsoft will probably have something to say about it all being evil...

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  58. You have a point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Various forms of the word "fu*k" appear in @15 files in the 2.2.16 kernel code, and in 2.2.19 as well (I only checked those two versions.).

    The references are generally in comments only, so they are unlikely to be seen in a binary distribution, but Linux needs to develop a reputation as being appropriate for all users, even kids.

    Removing inappropriate language from the kernel source (at least) would take very little effort. It should be done immediately. Contributors should be cautioned not to include bad language in source code destined for public release.

    If it isn't removed, the masses of semi-brainless, totally thoughtless religious conservatives based in the US will proclaim to their equally thoughtless fellows "I don't want my little Johnny seeing any of those nasty words that are built into that Linux program."

    It might be logically argued that religious conservatives should not be allowed access to computers in the first place, but it happens that (sadly) they control most of US government policy.

    1. Re:You have a point. by Fnurk · · Score: 1

      WTF? :)

      Are you serious? If not id mod you +1 troll if i could. But then againg you probably are serious...

  59. Better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't I just make an MP3 of the linux kernel being sent over a 56K modem in .tgz format? I mean if you're hardcore enough to listen to it being read, anything will get you off!

  60. Wasteful? by PhotoGuy · · Score: 2

    I gotta say, I'm all for cool and geeky ideas for their own sake. But this just strikes me as a major waste of time, effort, and especially bandwidth.

    It'd take a lot of spam mail to equate to an audiobroad cast that long.

    -me

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    1. Re:Wasteful? by PhotoGuy · · Score: 2

      D'oh! The new touchpad driver on this laptop is a little sensitive; I submitted before finishing :-)

      I was going to say that they could have devoted the same time, effort, and bandwidth to something like broadcast text from the Gutenberg project, and done something useful (as well as novel).

      -me

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  61. Shorthand Writers Wanted.... by Anaplexian · · Score: 1

    In other news, TimepassTown placed signs outside Redmond stating that it urgently needed shorthand writers, who would work for about a year of two in twelve hour shifts.

  62. God by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    That's the stupidest Thing I've heard in a long time.
    What's the point?

    1. Re:God by cecil36 · · Score: 1

      I agree. Makes me wonder what else the people who set up the project do to pay the bills and feed themselves.

  63. Binary or source? by dnoyeb · · Score: 0

    reading in c or assembly? Hex or text? Does recording the streaming break any recording industry rules?

  64. Finally, we prove ourselves by wowbagger · · Score: 2

    Don't you all see, this is what it is going to take to prove to the rest of the universe that we actually are worth talking to.

    The first interstellar message we receive will start out:

    RCS file: /cvs/linux-2.4-xfs/linux/Makefile,v
    retrieving revision 1.146
    diff -r1.146 Makefile

  65. I'm really impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just when I think I've finally, after much effort, understood how navel-staring and just plain stupid the Linux crowd can get, they prove me wrong.

    1. Re:I'm really impressed by DaCool42 · · Score: 1

      Oh it gets much worse.....

      The best part is that we do it just to make other people think we're insane.

      --

      ----
      All of whose base are belong to the what-now?
  66. Linux radio by jhines · · Score: 1

    It would be interesting to have a radio talk show, which could be carried on the web, that would take a single module per episode, and discuss it.

    Today on Linux radio weekly we have the module blah.c for discussion, joining us are, so and so.

    A bit of discussion, and open up to some questions. Could be quite educational

    1. Re:Linux radio by r+a+d+i+o+q+u+a+l+i · · Score: 1

      grtngz, yep, we are planning to do this actually. a kind of net.radio talkshow / roundtable, isolating modules, even specific routines. we may rope in our colleagues, talkaoke to produce the talk show for us ... .hh radioqualia

      --
      frequency shifting paradigms in streaming audio
    2. Re:Linux radio by wedgegeck · · Score: 1

      I'll be sure to listen in-- especially with isolated code and commentary-- perhaps a dvd release will be in order?

  67. Perhaps this could be useful. by Recovery1 · · Score: 1

    I was just thinking about the atomic time signal that is sent around the globe and how clocks set themselves to the signals.

    Perhaps we could download and install new kernels and mods just by tuning in the channel. Perfect for newbies or the dialup-bandwidth challenged.

  68. /* Kernel Marketing Patch */ by Grax · · Score: 3, Funny

    /*
    USB support sponsored by
    KFC - Try the Kernel's special recipe today
    Pepsi - The Choice of a GNU Generation
    Raid - Kills bugs dead
    */

  69. Re:Linux must be perfect and free of bugs now, the by AnalogBoy · · Score: 1, Redundant

    amen.

    IMHO, this is a tremendous waste of resources.

  70. Background noise? by Refrag · · Score: 2

    What is with all of the background noise? It sounds like it is on a loop instead of being real noise. Are they just trying to make it sound like a cool "Contact" sort of transmission?

    --
    I have a website. It's about Macs.
    1. Re:Background noise? by DaCool42 · · Score: 1

      I dunno, but it's really annoying. Almost sounds like they have a speaker playing it and put a mic beside it, and the computer has a noisy fan.

      --

      ----
      All of whose base are belong to the what-now?
  71. Re:OT: Your sig is a lie by partingshot · · Score: 1

    I'll let you submit it. ;)

    --
    Anonymous posts are filtered.
  72. A silly idea.... by Fenris2001 · · Score: 2

    OK, you could use this as a rather inefficient way of getting software to remote area - have a text-to-speech program "read" the code, broadcast it on the radio, and tape it at your location. Then, play the recording back to a voice-recognition program (should be easier if the speech was computer-generated). You could probably even do this a double speed or more, right? Only, how the heck do you implement error correcting?

    --
    ---------------
    Vpered na Mars!
  73. Cool... by Garion911 · · Score: 1

    I'm sure the people with various diabilities will love this.. Now they can start submitting patches and the like! Just will be a bit out of date, but lets see Windows have accessibility like this!

    --
    Slashdot is like Playboy: I read it for the articles
  74. I'm auditioning for this!!! by erroneus · · Score: 4, Funny

    I want to play the part of a memory manager or an interrupt handler. That'd be SO COOL!

  75. What in gods name.. by Chicane-UK · · Score: 0

    OK... I love Linux, I stand up for Linux where possible, and I suggest the use of Linux where I work where possible.

    But what the F*CK IS THE POINT OF THIS ! Donate the hardware and bandwith to charity rather than wasting on this crap ! My god... *rolls eyes*

    --
    "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
  76. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, it says "Fuck me gently with a chainsaw", not "fsck me gently with a chainsaw".

  77. Nifty. by Mister+Snee · · Score: 1

    I can't help thinking this is really cool in a sick sort of way, but you'd hope they could have used a text-to-speech that sounded a bit nicer...

  78. Lyrics/Tabs? by XRayX · · Score: 2

    Anyone knows where to get the Lyrics and/or Tabs for this? I want to do a PunkRock-Cover of it...
    X

    --
    Boycot? Blackout? Subscriptions?
    I don't care!
  79. DeCSS Code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't they already translate that into a mp3 file? I seem to remember having it at one point. Of course that could have just been a code induced hallucination.

  80. implications... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not have it broadcast compressed data, like
    a transmission to a submarine? It could broadcast
    the latest major release in full every midnight,
    then continuously loop the latest diffs all day.

    Some bright person could invent a receiving appliance
    that synched with the transmission and kept your
    kernel up to date without using any Internet
    bandwidth. A push model of the source, instead of
    the usual on-demand model of CVS or tarball download.

    It really would be "Radio Free Linux". Disclaimer:
    I don't know what the bandwidth is like for the
    various frequencies, except that it takes forever
    to get a short message on VLF while underwater.

  81. a loophole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if the code for something like DeCSS was read aloud, would a transcript be protected speech?

    1. Re:a loophole? by DaCool42 · · Score: 1

      People have made songs with DeCSS for lyrics

      --

      ----
      All of whose base are belong to the what-now?
  82. Repetitive garbage by kputnam · · Score: 1
    This is the stupidest things I have listened to since Windows' 2000 text to speech reading the swap file, but I am going to use it with XMMS Wake Up as my alarm clock, nothing could make me want to get out of bed and shut it off more than this.

    vertical bar d vertical bar... f vertical bar f vertical bar f vertical bar ... plus sign hyphen minus plus sign hyphen minus plus sign hyphen minus plus sign hyphen minus vertical bar vertical bar veritcal b vertical bar b verictal bar...

  83. Wow! by Victors+Monster · · Score: 1

    What a nice gesture, for Stephen Hawking to read the whole thing!

  84. Special guests by nookieman · · Score: 1

    This will be big. Soon loads of famous people will call in to read small parts.

    --
    sigfault. comment dumped.
  85. WTF!?!?!?! by DaCool42 · · Score: 1

    I was listening and it just started doing weird electronic beep beats and a guy starting talking in the background?! I think they are trying for the alien mysterious tranmission thing.

    --

    ----
    All of whose base are belong to the what-now?
  86. Hawking by weeeeeww · · Score: 1

    Geez, doesn't Steven Hawking have anything better to do with his time???? :)

  87. Wasteful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a fucking waste of resources! Spend the effort on something more worthwhile. What does this prove anyway? No one will be listening to this for more than a minute...

  88. Um ... right. by JoeGee · · Score: 1
    This reminds me of an episode of Mork and Mindy, where Mork is watching a test pattern. Mindy changes the channel. Mork says to her:

    "Why are you changing that?! It's the most popular program on my planet!!"

    On an aside, the voice just changed for me to some synthetic woman. Is Ananova moonlighting?
    --

    Get off my virtual lawn, you damned virtual kids!