Slashdot Mirror


Stanford Mouse Video Archive

serutan writes "Stanford University has a retro-cool series of video clips of a 1968 presentation that foreshadowed the Internet and marked the public debut of the mouse. It is a surreal, weirdly captivating piece of computer history." Part of the site includes a solicitation for those who have memories and stories about the old days of computing, when programs were measured in inches and people felt they were lucky, lucky I tell you, to have ones and zeros.

140 comments

  1. We saw this recently - its got a hyperlink demo by iainl · · Score: 4, Informative

    The page linked is, of course, the one from BT's hyperlink patent story we discussed recently. One of the videos on the site demonstrates the use of that very thing.

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    1. Re:We saw this recently - its got a hyperlink demo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also a dupe of this story from 2000.

    2. Re:We saw this recently - its got a hyperlink demo by iainl · · Score: 1

      D'oh! The link wasn't given in the main text of that story, but in this highly informative comment that was linked to during it. I knew I'd seen it before from that thread, just forgot where.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    3. Re:We saw this recently - its got a hyperlink demo by blane.bramble · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's the beauty of hypertext and hyperlinking, you don't need to duplicate the data, you can link to it multiple times from multiple sites!

    4. Re:We saw this recently - its got a hyperlink demo by rsklnkv · · Score: 2, Funny

      So basically, everything on the net now works like the Kevin Bacon game : Every bit of it can be connected within five hyperlinks or less.

      --
      _____ "If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." -- Orwell
  2. This story is a repeat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    another repeat

  3. Ivies... by Ando[evilmedic] · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It's the Ivy League theme-day on Slashdot!

    1. Re:Ivies... by jeffy124 · · Score: 1

      Stanford aint Ivy League. Ivy League schools are only in the northeast. See list of Ivy schools, and list containing Stanford's conf (the Pac-10. I do agree, however, that Stanford would be Ivy if they were on the east coast.

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
  4. Anybody remember.. by Space+Coyote · · Score: 2, Interesting

    .. How great it was when you figured out that WordPerfect 5.0 had mouse support? Not that anybody had mice back then... After all, it was the 1980's for cryin' out loud.

    --
    ___
    Cogito cogito, ergo cogito sum.
    1. Re:Anybody remember.. by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      cept for all those amiga users.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:Anybody remember.. by EvlPenguin · · Score: 2

      After all, it was the 1980's for cryin' out loud.

      I used Write on my Amiga 2500's Workbench back in the late/mid 1980s. And you know what? It had a mouse! Amigas really were ahead of their time...

      Honsetly, though, I don't like using the mouse unless I'm doing some work that explicitly requires it (i.e., Quake II, CAD, etc). I find the keyboard much faster, and with BlackBox (my window manager, very possibly the best) I can access an infinite number of screens and move around with keystrokes. It's just faster when you don't have to take your hands off the keyboard. This is also why I use elvis for text editing; so I can do anything and everything without moving my hands from the "home row" (well, the general area atleast).

      --

      --
      #nohup cat /dev/dsp > /dev/hda & killall -9 getty
    3. Re:Anybody remember.. by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      Or the Mac users. Remember MacWrite? It changed the world.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    4. Re:Anybody remember.. by DavidRavenMoon · · Score: 1
      Or the Mac users. Remember MacWrite? It changed the world.

      Yes, and the Apple Lisa before that. And don't forget MacDraw, which introduced the now familiar Toolbar as seen in Photoshop et al. BTW MacWrite was written by Quark.

      (Mac user since 1991, owns a 512k, 2- Pluses, MacPortable w/backlight, 2- Mac II fx's, 2 Mac II ci's, Centris 610, PowerCenter 132, PowerMac G4/466 running OS X)

      --
      -- if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic - Lewis Carrol
  5. Ones and Zeroes by forged · · Score: 1
    Quoting the text on:

    [. ..] people felt they were lucky, lucky I tell you, to have ones and zeros.

    Well, read this piece and think about it for a moment!

    Okay it's a bit old.. couldn't resist though :)

    1. Re:Ones and Zeroes by forged · · Score: 1
      couldn't resist, and made friend with you. are you amazed yet?

      btw i hope you have subscribed yet. if not, you should.

    2. Re:Ones and Zeroes by forged · · Score: 1
      good trolls and crapflooders

      Yes, that's a fairly good description of what I think of you, neal n bob. Made friends with you too! ;)

  6. Back in my days... by Xerion · · Score: 1

    we didn't have the luxury of 0nes AND Zeros, we had ONLY 0nes. Yup, those were the good old days. No bugs like division by Zeros and all array indices start with 0nes!

    But eventually we grew tired of having only 0nes, so we tried all we can to discover the mysterious Zero.

    We were sooooo excited when we finally realized the way to get Zeros (and lots of them) is to get rid of our NES that's been consuming so much of our time. So we are left with 0!

    Ahh, the good old days. Though it sometimes troubles me to see how kids these days forget the pain we went through to bring them the Zeros. All they talk about are Twos...

  7. Mac users should be ashamed... by codexus · · Score: 5, Funny

    even the first mouse had 3 buttons! ;)

    --
    True warriors use the Klingon Google
    1. Re:Mac users should be ashamed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, somebody should tell Bill G. to stop using Macintosh at his office, because it doesn't 3 buttons...

    2. Re:Mac users should be ashamed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post is really funny -- and also somewhat ironic.

      But, seriously, I don't get the Mac 1-button mouse, unless for impaired people use.

      Haven't they read about that 5 plus or minus 2 essay?

      I find 2- or 3-button moce simpler than 1-button ones.

      What a joy is opening a new window with the third button in Linux!

      Some thoughtful phrases:

      What is the sound of just one hand clapping? (Zen?)

      Anything should be made simple, but not simpler that it stops working. (A. Einstein)

      The search for total lack of vanity is vain. (Don't know the origin).

      * o

      I'm not idea nazi. If you have a point, I'd like to hear.

    3. Re:Mac users should be ashamed... by DavidRavenMoon · · Score: 1
      But, seriously, I don't get the Mac 1-button mouse, unless for impaired people use.

      At the time Apple did some studies and found people preferred the one button mouse. Plus the other buttons didn't do what they do now... not on the Xerox Star or Alto anyway. You didn't have a "right-click" to pop up a menu. And Macs didn't have that until a few years ago anyway. On the Xerox systems you needed to right-click so you could type in the X/Y coordinates to move your window!

      And I'm sure you have heard this before... but Macs can use any multi-button mouse. My old ADB Mac that I run Linux on has a three button MouseSystems mouse, and my G4/OS X has an MS Intellimouse Optical, and I can program all the extra buttons using USB Overdrive.

      --
      -- if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic - Lewis Carrol
    4. Re:Mac users should be ashamed... by DavidRavenMoon · · Score: 1
      Yes, somebody should tell Bill G. to stop using Macintosh at his office...

      This is true, according to his ex girlfriend that wrote a book about him. I even have a photo somewhere showing him at his desk with an old Mac Plus on it.

      --
      -- if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic - Lewis Carrol
    5. Re:Mac users should be ashamed... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      So you're too stupid to use a one button mouse? Hah, I'm more l33t than you. And I also can clap with one hand

      "Piece o' cake" Bart Simpson

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    6. Re:Mac users should be ashamed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the well-written explanation.

      My experience with recent Apple is very limited. My curiosity was satisfied.

      BTW, they make excellent machines overall. I always envied the processor having access to all memory in those old 8086 times.

      Unfortunately they are too expensive in my particular case. Maybe I can get an used one and put Linux, like you did. That would be cool!

      Thx again. Live long and prosper.

    7. Re:Mac users should be ashamed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, el Barto, I must be really stupid, 'cause I couldn't even start to understand what you meant!

      Hah, being l33t is not bad... Buy an ice-cream and you'll get cooler!

      One hand...1-button... got it?

      Now, the Simpsons really rock.

    8. Re:Mac users should be ashamed... by Lars+T. · · Score: 2
      Dead Putting Society

      Lisa and Bart sit atop a mountain.

      Lisa: What is the sound of one hand clapping?
      Bart: Piece of cake. [claps with one hand]
      Lisa: No, Bart, it's a 3000-year-old riddle with no anwer.
      It's supposed to clear your mind of conscious thought.
      Bart: No answer? Lisa, listen up! [claps with one hand]

      -- Solving unsolved problems, ``Dead Putting Society''

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  8. Real by ChrisJC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And why can't we have these clips in MPEG or something that everybody can see?

    --
    -- PC architecture - what a mess.
    1. Re:Real by Junta · · Score: 2

      Because MPEG would be a bandwidth hog compared to Real, and Real *is* accessible by most people. Mac, Win, Linux, Sparc Solaris all have working players, though real.com seems to treat them like their bastard children, hiding them in an unimaginable maze of links to get to the linux versions. I keep a realplay8 and the alpha realone player for linux around, because realone supports XVideo extension, but sometimes it breaks and you need realplayer8...

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:Real by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Um, are you sure you don't confuse Real with Quicktime or Wmedia?

      Its Real with all platforms support, not others :-)

      Oh about MPEG? Would be nice but if you are unless on an freaking speedy line, you wouldn't have chance to stream it.

    3. Re:Real by VoiceOfRaisin · · Score: 1

      you do know that the bitrate of mpeg is variable right? you can have a low bitrate mpeg thats the same size and quality as a real video file.

    4. Re:Real by Cerebus · · Score: 0

      Mac, Win, Linux, Sparc Solaris all have working players [...]

      Uh, Real.com has no working player for Mac OS X.

      HTH, HAND.

      --
      -- Cerebus
    5. Re:Real by Junta · · Score: 2

      Yes the bitrate of MPEG-1 is variable, and yes you can have the same bitrate, and yes you can have the same quality as real, *but* you can't have both the same quality and MPEG-1 video, MPEG-1 at typical realmedia bitrates is complete and utter crap, MPEG-2 is designed for high bitrates, and MPEG-4 based video codecs might well do as good or better, but availability of those is rather strange right now. Real is the best cross-platform low-bandwidth video choice out there today..

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    6. Re:Real by ToadMan8 · · Score: 1

      They're not real smart at Stanford ;) - Actaully, I hate real too, it's like a legitimate virus or something, takes over your computer. Aomost as bad a windows.....

      --
      I haven't posted in so long, my sig is out of date.
    7. Re:Real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, they are using the original RV codec (at 184Kbps). This was designed more for very low bitrate streaming on lowend machines (56K video on a pentium, for example) than it was for quality. It could be possible that MPEG2 might beat this with a bigger CPU -- I dunno. Newer RV codecs are much better.

    8. Re:Real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's working under Classic just fine, even if that's not optimal. HTH.

    9. Re:Real by serutan · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      This comment gets a score of 4 Insightful??? Uh, okay Beavis.

    10. Re:Real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, because you can view it with Real? Whiny bumfucker.

    11. Re:Real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real *is* a bandwidth hog compaired to DivX. DivX is accessible to ANYONE with porn. The folks who develop the Real GUI are in fact bastard children imported from 3rd world nations.

  9. BT Patent by haplo21112 · · Score: 2

    Doesn't this trump the BT patent on Hyperlinks?

    --
    Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
  10. The slashdotting rules for this story by Spackler · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you were not born when this event took place (1968) please step aside and wait until tomorrow to view the site. This way, us older nerds with the short memories can have a chance at it.

    Younger folks who actually programmed a PDP-anything also can have a quick look.

    1. Re:The slashdotting rules for this story by CerebusUS · · Score: 1

      heh, I think I was born AS the event was taking place :-)

    2. Re:The slashdotting rules for this story by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2

      Hmmm.... I'm not sure that anybody younger than 34 had a chance to program a PDP-anything, except in very rare circumstances where the machine was kept running on life support.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    3. Re:The slashdotting rules for this story by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      I'm 28, I own a (not-yet-working) PDP-11/34, and I wrote a PDP-8 emulator. Can I go and look?

    4. Re:The slashdotting rules for this story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off bitch! I'll look at the goddamn story whenever I fucking want! Whatcha gonna do about it cocksucker?

  11. What type of age? by Aceticon · · Score: 1

    Whould that be:
    - Real life age?
    - Internet age (equal to 10 times the numbers of years you've used the Internet)
    - Slashdot age (slashdot_user_id - max_slashdot_user_id)?

    1. Re:What type of age? by keli · · Score: 1

      ... so my slashdot age is negative?

    2. Re:What type of age? by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      It would work better with the larger number first ;)

      Slashdot age = Delta(max_slash_id/your_slash_id)

      Jeremy

  12. repost by joshwa · · Score: 4, Funny

    *sigh* ...

    British Telecom, Hyperlinking And Mr. Englebart Slashdot, 28 Sep 2000

  13. Did I see a reference to SOAP in there? by matthew.thompson · · Score: 2
    Right close to the end of the page it's mentioned that...
    Individuals and groups in the Network can query "Who's got what services?" NLS provides the tools to connect different users to appropriate technology
    I think it's amazing that these guys were developing all this back in '68 and it's taken 32 years before the rest of the world catches on.
    --
    Matt Thompson - Actuality - Insert product here.
  14. Completely off topic, perhaps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And of course, just to make my day even better, they used .ram to encode their video, so I couldn't watch it.

    And before you tell me that I can download some worthless extra baggage of a player, I already know that there is one. I always messes up my system so I refuse to install it, and I don't want another player thank you. This is exactly why media formats should be free and why it's a good thing M$ bundles programs etc(just as linux distros do the same). We don't want to pay for watching a free piece of video...

    Now ignore me and read someone elses post that probably won't make your day worse like this post has. I am feeling negative and I am letting it out on you.

    1. Re:Completely off topic, perhaps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree on the Real Player stuff - I dont like it because:

      Its fat - it takes up lots of memory on my system
      It tries to make itself start with my system, and near enough pleads for me not to turn off StartCentre
      It deviously tries to get me to sign up for five billion kinds of information alerts when I sign up, just so five million idiots can sell me things.
      It's full of ads - i hate ads!
      I can't download those movies through our proxy server at work.

      Compare and contrast to winamp

      lightweight, no ads, beautiful, fast, serves its purpose. Form & Function.

      Basiclly i'd have preferred to see those movies in mpg, asf or avi flavours. (yes even asf, at least media player (before the latest version) just does its job and plays movies.

  15. Has BT seen this? by arminh1974 · · Score: 1

    This is great stuff! Someone should enter this into the ongoing BT hyperlink-patent trial if it hasn't already been done. Check it out yourself: http://vodreal.stanford.edu/engel/07engel200.ram Looks very much like hyperlinking to me! And that was 1968!
    Maybe the bad guys will now lose for a change.

    1. Re:Has BT seen this? by arminh1974 · · Score: 1

      Doh! Ok, I should definitely try to store some of /.'s stories in the longterm memory banks. Anyway, cool film archive still :)

  16. Any other pages with videos on computer history? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have (an old copy of) RealPlayer for Linux so I was able to watch those videos.

    I wonder if there are more websites like these.

    It is interesting to find how many things were already thought and available several years before common people actually knew that they existed. (The Internet, Windowing environments, RPC, ...)

    If you know of other websites please post them here.

    Thanks, TSK (Too lazy to have my own /. account)

  17. Quick Text-Only Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    That poor stanford site is getting slashdotted real fast (it took me 2 minutes to load the page after only a couple of comments had been written), so here goes, useless textual description of the videos contents:
    THE DEMO

    On December 9, 1968, Douglas C. Engelbart and the group of 17 researchers working with him in the Augmentation Research Center at Stanford Research Institute in Menlo Park, CA, presented a 90-minute live public demonstration of the online system, NLS, they had been working on since 1962. The public presentation was a session in the of the Fall Joint Computer Conference held at the Convention Center in San Francisco, and it was attended by about 1,000 computer professionals. This was the public debut of the computer mouse. But the mouse was only one of many innovations demonstrated that day, including hypertext, object addressing and dynamic file linking, as well as shared-screen collaboration involving two persons at different sites communicating over a network with audio and video interface.

    The original 90-minute video of this event is part of the Engelbart Collection in Special Collections of Stanford University. This original video has been edited into 35 segments and reformatted as RealVideo streaming video clips. A brief abstract of the subject matter treated in each segment is provided below.

    Augmentation credits in computer script. Describes location, technical arrangements, methods of mixing signals, and explains how the video was produced
    Doug introduction, "if you had a workstation at your disposal all day that was perfectly responsible....or responsive." Doug gives general description of what will happen. The goal of the demo is show the elements of the program live rather than explain what it does.

    Word processing beginning with "blank piece of paper," text entry, Illustrates cut, copy, file creation including header with name, date, creator. Doug is shown using keyboard, mouse, and chord keyset.

    Formatting, hierarchical view control. Doug illustrates the many different levels and views a file can be given.

    Example using a file with lists, graphics. Doug show how it is possible to rearrange the items by categories and by invoking hierarchical view control for displaying contents of different levels.

    Continuation of examples of view control.

    Doug demonstrates capability of NLS to jump between levels in the architecture of a text, making cross references, creating Internal linking and live hyperlinks within a file. Links can be made visible or invisible.

    Doug demonstrates working with a graphic file tagged with hyperlinked items. Clicking on a link in the graphic, Doug jumps to separate items, such as texts, linked to the graphic.

    Introduction to next part of the program, shifting from illustrative material to the inner workings of the system that enable a knowledge worker to have this system at his or her disposal all day long.

    Doug demonstrates creation of "chains of views," linked to one another. Doug illustrates creation of links and "jumping on a link." Doug Illustrates goals of project, supporting agencies and number of people involved since the beginning. Doug describes the goal of creating a "system oriented discipline": Bootstrapping as an evolutionary strategy for developing and improving the tools by using the system as the basis of the Augment Research Center's daily work practice.

    Doug describes the goals of NLS (online system). NLS is an instrument for helping humans operate within the domain of complex information structures. By "operate" Doug means compose, study and modify. By "complex information structures" Doug says that content represents concepts, but there is also a relation between the content of concepts, their structure, and the structure of other domains of human thought that is too complex to investigate in linear text. The computer is a tool for navigating through those structures and examining them in ways that would be too complex otherwise.

    This segment discusses control devices, the keyboard and mouse. "I don't know why we call it a mouse. It started that way and we never changed it." The operation principles of the mouse are explained with Bill Paxton being video patched in from SRI in Menlo Park. Doug discusses the tracking spot on the screen and relation between mouse movements and attention focused on the tracking spot.

    Chord Key Set provides a five-finger equivalent of what can be done with the keyboard. Combinations of keystrokes can launch different operations.

    This segment provides an overview of the controller system for I/O. buses, and the timeshare software system on the 940.

    This segment discusses display systems. Doug switches to Menlo Park where the image of the CRT that is generating the text view on the console image that is being viewed by the audience on the auditorium screen.

    Discusses refresh rates and lag times with sweeps of 15 cycles per second, persistent memory in CRT. Slight smearing of "bug" (cursor) for text, but still useful for multiple users sharing screens.

    In this segment Doug brings in Jeff Rulifson working at his console in Menlo Park to discuss software design of NLS. Special languages that have enabled the construction of commands, functions. Jeff shows a graphic with links to files explaining parts of the program. He also jumps to a place where programmers leave messages for one another. As an example Rulifson shows documentation and explanation for "move word" and word delimiter commands and the code that executes it. Another programming language described is MOL (machine oriented language).

    In this segment Rulifson discusses compiler. Rulifson references SDC people for assistance in constructing languages that enable them to easily reconfigure compilers.

    Rulifson shows how statements are tagged with annotations made by individuals. Search patterns tracing the annotations and links constructed by individuals can be created. (This topic is also discussed in more detail later).

    Doug and Jeff discuss hierarchical control and use of control meta languages.

    In this segment, Doug explains how the group uses the NLS system. As an example he shows the use of the online documentation in the NLS manual for the system to find definitions, such as What's a bug? What's a mouse?

    In this segment Doug illustrates how NLS can be used to construct, collaboratively modify, and ultimately publish reports and papers. He shows how to examine and modify the paper he and his colleagues wrote for this conference, sets formatting for printing, hypertext linking and viewing of document.

    Doug explains joint usage and modification of a file by a group. Also in this segment is a discussion of messaging techniques for working collaboratively on a file. A content analyzer is described which can be used to retrieve messages composed by a specific individual, between two individuals, or further specified by specific content strings.

    Doug explains construction of "markers" which can be compiled. These enable pattern matching for strings of text and dynamic macro searches.

    In this segment Doug shifts to two- person collaboration. Doug initiates a "collaborative mode" in which he shares the same text-display with Bill Paxton in Menlo Park and at the same time a live audio-video window inset with Bill Paxton in Menlo Park.

    Bill Paxton explains Information retrieval via indirect construction of a catalog. The segment illustrates flexible formatting and line drawing. Paxton draws a picture to explain keyword searching. The segment represents a good example of using the system to work out a course of action collaboratively.

    Bill Paxton demonstrates set up and use of keyword searching. A humorous moment occurs when Bill Paxton thinks the signal has gone down.

    Bill Paxton Illustrates multiple weighted keyword searching using the System Programmer's guide as example.

    In this segment Bill demonstrates keyword searching and weighting. He goes on to illustrate jumping from the ordered list generated by the keyword search to retrieve the full-content document linked to the keyword. Doug concludes the segment with a recap and summary of the power of keyword weighting, hyperlinking, and full-content retrieval enabled by the system.

    In this segment Doug distinguishes between the Service System and the User System. The ARC team distinguishes overall man-computer system into a dichotomy between two systems, the service system and user system.The Service System is what appears at the terminal, the organization of software and hardware the system gives to me, the set of tools and capabilities available when I click on the screen. The user system is what is beyond that. Given these tools, how do we use the links, what are the conventions for leaving messages? How do we use the NLS capabilities to do work? The procedures, skills, methods, procedures, skills, and specific concepts people use are all developed in coordination with the kind of tools they have available.

    Doug describes a project within the Augmentation Research Center to study and develop their own system of management tools to organize and manage the work of the 17 people in the group.

    In this segment Doug outlines the participation of ARC in the planned ARPA computer network to be established within the next year (1969), in which 20 different computer sites across the country will be connected in a network. Doug muses that with the planned band width of 20KB per second and delay times with less than one-tenth of a second, he might be able to show the present demo again next year from Boston.

    In this segment Doug explains how NLS will be used as the infrastructure for ARPA networks experiment in creating the Network Information Center. Individuals and groups in the Network can query "Who's got what services?" NLS provides the tools to connect different users to appropriate technology. This is an example of enhancing group productivity and augmenting human intellect.

    After all this what's the product we're providing in this research? It is a sample augmentation system that is provided to augment computer system development. In addition the aim is to provide tools for generating further, improved augmentation systems--bootstrapping.

    Credits of the individuals, agencies and institutions who have provided funding and support for the project. These include the ARC team, Bill English, Ed van de Viet, Martin Hardy, Roger Bates, John Farbodough, Dave Evans, Don Andrews, Jeff Rulifson, Bill Paxton and support from SRI staff, Steward Brand, Air Force, ARPA. Doug also thanks Herman Miller Research Company part of Herman Miller furniture company for creating office environments, desks, and the operating and display consoles.

  18. spreading the news. by Alien54 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Of course, by spreading the link to those very videos around the net, we make sure the almost anyone who cares knows that BT is just being a bit greedy. and very foolish.

    God, I'd love to see this on the national news someplace.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  19. The New Four Yorkshiremen by marnanel · · Score: 2
    people felt they were lucky, lucky I tell you, to have ones and zeros.

    Cue the ucam.chat New Four Yorkshiremen sketch. Binary? We used to dream o' binary!

    --
    GROGGS: alive and well and living in
  20. proprietary video formats in education by vapurtrail · · Score: 0

    I just can't understand why universities continue to use the Real media format for streaming. Shouldn't they (universities) be embracing more open ended necessarily open source, though that would be even better) streaming technologies? It really bothers me that Stanford wants me to install Real's really crappy player.

    1. Re:proprietary video formats in education by PoiBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What really bothers me are people like you who embrace open source code like it's as precious as the Holy Virgin Mary.

      Real is a perfectly fine format to use to distribute this type of stuff. RealPlayer is available for Win, Mac, Linux, Solaris, etc. It's not like it costs you money or is not available for most computers.

      Pull the fucking stick out of your ass and realize that not everything has to be open source. There are countless perfectly acceptable closed-source programs, and RealPlayer is among them.

      The reason to hate Microsoft is not because they are a monopolist but because they are a monopolist which has been found guilty of breaking the law on multiple occassions and has refused to reform their behavior.

      Go ahead, mod me down to -1, Troll. I've been at the karma cap for so fucking long that I'm willing to burn it back down to zero JUST SO I CAN TELL THESE OPEN-SOURCE ZEALOTS TO GO TO HELL AND GET INTO THE REAL WORLD!

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    2. Re:proprietary video formats in education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa there...

      Not everyone is of the OPEN SOURCE OR DIE mindset. I happen to dislike the various real* media formats simply because I dislike the real* software. I don't like how it works. I don't like its reliability problems. I don't like that it spies on me (this was true a while back, not sure if the software still does this). I don't like having to upgrade every few months because suddenly my player is obsolete. In short, I don't use the Real software. Converting these to one of the more widely supported formats will allow me to play them with non-Real software.

      So please, give your blood pressure a break.

    3. Re:proprietary video formats in education by vapurtrail · · Score: 0

      Actually the point was that UNIVERSITIES should not be using software that they have to pay for. Real's streaming software is not free. Beyond that the Real format will only work with the Real player. Universities should use non-proprietary formats that allow users to choose which player to use.

      All that aside, I'm not a huge proponent of open-source software. I think the idea is great, but not quite ready for the US business model.

    4. Re:proprietary video formats in education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Realplayer sucks and you know it. Boycott Realplayer! http://www.hawk606.f2s.com/burp.htm

    5. Re:proprietary video formats in education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      while I agree with your "get into the real world" statement on some levels... why does every thread have to turn into this argument... why don't people (not you, the guy who posted about real and hating micro$haft) STAY ON TOPIC... yeeesh, you jealous bastard... just cause he has more money than you will ever see in many generations... as IF NOBODY EVER BREAKS THE LAW TO GET AHEAD... how about your lamo gov't, huh? Gosh, I need to take my own advice,

      pez

    6. Re:proprietary video formats in education by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      I don't have a problem with Real as long as I can download the videos over the fat pipe at work and view them at home. I don't think my boss would appreciate me spending 90 minutes watching these things and I don't think my kids would appreciate me staying at work past their bedtimes...

      Unfortunately, people who use Real often only offer their content as streaming.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    7. Re:proprietary video formats in education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clue brick time!

      Open Standards != Open Source

      To paraphrase your comment - why use a proprietry video encoding standard when there are perfectly acceptable open standard ones, and mpeg is among them.

      Perhaps you could point me to the proprietry verision of the RealPlayer for my workstation? It's a Solaris 8 UltraSparc - no? I thought not. Mind you I can find a Solaris 7 / Sparc player that might work, but whats this? It's a 'community supported player' ... wow Real speak for "you write it because we frankly don't care, and we'll only tell you about the older formats anyway"

      And what, pray, is the relevance of the Microsoft comment? We are talking about a company called 'RealNetworks' here, and video encoding standards.

    8. Re:proprietary video formats in education by ipfwadm · · Score: 1

      UNIVERSITIES should not be using software that they have to pay for

      You're joking, right? So every computer on every campus in the world should run either Linux or FreeBSD? What if it's a machine that Linux doesn't support, i.e. SGI (it actually does "works" on some systems, for lack of a better word)? Graphics design majors shouldn't be exposed to Photoshop, they should learn on the GIMP just on principle? Word shouldn't be available to students, even though (unfortunately) it is the de-facto standard word processor file format in the "real world"? What about AutoCAD? You're clearly insane.

  21. Someone should remind the PTO to look at these... by Sebby · · Score: 1
    before they process more patent requests.

    --

    AC comments get piped to /dev/null
  22. Wither the BT Patent Claim by Beautyon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Doug demonstrates working with a graphic file tagged with hyperlinked items. Clicking on a link in the graphic, Doug jumps to separate items, such as texts, linked to the graphic."

    We call this Prior Art.

    --
    ATH0 Bitcoin: 1DnwFLXczVZV8kLJbMYoheUrpqHesjxrSi
  23. Mouse is on display at The Tech by ascii · · Score: 4, Informative

    I do believe the original prototype is still on display at The Tech Museum of Innovation, San Jose, CA.

    It's encased in a transparent plastic box and you can actually pick it up and study it at close. I was lucky enough to get a couple of snapshots of it.

    Get a glimpse here.

    --
    naah sig schmig
  24. So Xerox stole thier ideas from these guys??? by JohnDenver · · Score: 3, Funny

    * Microsoft rips off Apple
    * Apple rips off Xerox
    * Xerox rips off Stanford's Augmentation Research Center

    Who did Stanford's Augmentation Research Center rip off?

    --
    "Communism is like having one [local] phone company " - Lenny Bruce
    1. Re:So Xerox stole thier ideas from these guys??? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Informative

      Who did Stanford's Augmentation Research Center rip off?
      If you were paying attention, you would know that these guys invented the mouse pointing device. Xerox PARC came up with the ball-driven mouse and was the first place the mouse really moved from a mere crufted-together tech-demo to a seriously usuable tool.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    2. Re:So Xerox stole thier ideas from these guys??? by JohnDenver · · Score: 2

      I was paying attention, and I understood well enough that they invented the mouse.

      The question is somewhat legitimate: Who inspired them? Science fiction? Was there a XY pointing device prior to the mouse? (I can envision some clunky ideas) Who inspired them?

      --
      "Communism is like having one [local] phone company " - Lenny Bruce
    3. Re:So Xerox stole thier ideas from these guys??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Who did Stanford's Augmentation Research Center rip off?

      The Wright brothers.

      Wilbur even commented: -"Now *this* is erratic!"

      :-)

  25. DEC hockey puck mouse memories by acomj · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I remember that particular mouse. It was like a big hockey puck, but without a ball. It had two feet that would spin when you moved the mouse. Depending on how both feet spun (together for left and right (cw/ccw for forward and back) it moved the curser (sic). It worked suprisingly well.

    I like the new optical mice better though, especially since the "puck" mouse was awkward fit in the hand...

    That stanford mouse is too old school

    1. Re:DEC hockey puck mouse memories by gjbivin · · Score: 1

      The University of Utah had an early mouse and graphical display system in '68 or '69 with the same kind of technology (although I remember the mouse being a bit smaller than the one in the video). Still not very ergonomic, though.

      Like modern ball mice, it had two digitizers, but instead of a ball, there were two metal wheels that stuck out of the bottom at right angles. Moving left/right would roll one wheel while the other one, being at right angles, would just drag sideways across the desktop. Likewise, moving up/down would roll the other wheel while the first one dragged. Other directions would roll/slide both wheels proportionately. I can't remember how many buttons were on it.

      It certainly impressed us at the time. Of course, I now also use an optical mouse which would have been unbelievable back in '68.

  26. Has anyone got this as one big file? by mindslip · · Score: 1

    Has anyone got this as one big file?

    I'd LOVE to put this on Video CD and show it to a bunch of people...

    mindslip

    1. Re:Has anyone got this as one big file? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. There has to be a large single file out there somewhere. This deserves to be on vcd!

    2. Re:Has anyone got this as one big file? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After retrieving all the files with Streambox VCR, I tried to concatenate them with rmeditor, but failed (it complained that they didn't match). Also, I don't have anything decent that exports video from RM, so I wasn't able to convert them to MPEG or something else useful. (I do have TINRA, which can sort-of capture every 10th frame, but it's useless.)

      What I did manage to do was to create my own .ram file so that I could watch the thing straight through. Here's what I did:

      for x in 00 01 (etc.) 35; do wget
      http://whatever it was/${x}Engel200.rm; done
      for x in *.ram; do cat $x >> all.ram;
      echo >> all.ram; done

      Then I popped up Streambox VCR in Windows, and pointed it at all.ram. After that, I made a new
      .ram file for local viewing:

      for x *.rm; do echo file://$x >> all.ram; done
      realplay all.ram

      If you prefer to stream, just use the first .ram file created above.

      The really roundabout method: I could use the TV out on my video card to record the thing to tape, then play it back and capture it to MPEG, etc. There's gotta be a better way.

  27. Back in MY day... by pizen · · Score: 2, Funny

    people felt they were lucky, lucky I tell you, to have ones and zeros.

    Oh yeah? We had to use the letter 'O'. And when RAM was being developed the only way we could store anything was by building up static electricity and using our fingers. And then sometimes we didn't even have socks. Other times we didn't have carpet. Any we liked it that way.

    1. Re:Back in MY day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU had SOCKS?! Bloody luxury...

    2. Re:Back in MY day... by jkeegan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and there were no neutrons, only electrons and protons.. and you had to spin the electrons by hand to get keep them going, blah blah blah..

      :)

      --

      ..Jeff Keegan
      seven syllables explain TiVo: kee gan dot org slash ti vo
  28. IMO This blows BTs patent claim out of the water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can you not see the incredibale similarities to web browing. I found the video vey entertaining

  29. Mouse Videos by JonWan · · Score: 1

    These guys are going to get so sued by Disney, Don't they know that Disney owns "The Mouse"! :-)

  30. Formatting issues. by Pentomino · · Score: 1

    I agree that formatting these videos in RealVideo was a regrettable choice.

    I also wish it weren't encoded at such a high bitrate. You 56k users will have a hard time looking at these, if these are in the same format as when they were first slashdotted; at times, even my cablemodem couldn't keep up. In fact, since it is a monochrome recording, isn't there a monochrome codec that could be used to archive this video with the same quality but without the bandwidth overkill?

  31. Ahhhhh the good old days... by MrIcee · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The rush of returning memories... the days when SHUFFLE THE DECK meant more than playing a hand of cribbage... when DEBUGGING meant, not only listening to the program run on AM radio - it meant opening the cabinets and physically removing beetles and moths... when even opening the cabinet was dangerous because they weighed over a ton a piece... and if you opened the front door without opening the back door, it would tip over on you.

    Yes... we loved our ones and zeros (not to mention BAUDOT too!)... and we loved the front panel lights where we could actually watch binary flowing through the registers... and who could forget the fantastic rocker switches on the front where you could REALLY man-handle your software.

    Yes... the good old days where finding a bug in your program meant that the computer operator simply threw a 2 inch thick printout at you with a scrawled note at the top... YOU HAVE A BUG. And who could forget the chad wars while waiting for a program to compile!

    But the thing we ESPECIALLY liked is the fact that there was no Microsoft.... computers were pure and we didn't need 2 gigahertz pentiums in order to take 3 minutes to boot a stupid OS.

    The good old days... when computers were computers and programmers actually knew how to program!

    1. Re:Ahhhhh the good old days... by RetroGeek · · Score: 1

      Yes, and there was nothing like taking a blank set of cards, walking into some programmer's office and "tripping".

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
  32. Thanks for posting this story again. by slurry47 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, this is a story worth re-posting every two to three years.

    There's always Net newbies coming here and bookmarks that need updating.

    Most interesting to me this time are the metaphors Doug does[n't] use -- language shapes the world ya know.

    --


    Dirt doesn't need luck.
  33. Comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doug Engelbart's comments on the '68 demo, recorded in 2000.

    http://www.liquid.org/glossary/68_demo.html

  34. noise by brer_rabbit · · Score: 1

    why does the screen make funny noises whenever the display changes? I wish mine did that.

  35. REPOST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This time I have PROOF!

  36. Sound Effects by segfaultdot · · Score: 1

    I love the little sounds that Engelbart's system made, as a function and work indicator. Not very practical, but cool nonetheless. I wish photoshop would do something like that whenever i apply a gaussian blur on a 40MB file. :)

  37. repost? by essdodson · · Score: 1

    Wasn't this posted before? Same content different site, just not cut up into short videos?

    --
    scott
  38. too bad... by jglow · · Score: 1

    I refuse to install Real. Shame..

    --


    There's no "I" in Linux.. err..
  39. More proof that life is a circle... by bittmann · · Score: 1
    All right...Let's see...It's 1968. What cool features do we want on our new computer?
    • Broadband network connection
    • Multitasking operating environment
    • Clickable/graphical user interface, with sound cues linked to events
    • Multi-head display
    • "Video Out" for use for large, low-scan-rate displays
    • Support for a programmamble "left-hand controller" for executing frequently-used commands
    • Effortless video conferencing
    • Built-in support for cutting-edge mouse design
    • "A browser that *is* part of the operating system


    OK, it's now 1998. What cool features do we want on our new computer?...ummm...

    Disclaimer: I'm one of the "crusty old pharts" you read about...still make a living programming in, among other languages, COBOL. Last year, I burned a copy of this presentation on a CD, and now use it frequently to educate any "pimply-faced youth" that for whatever reason seem to believe that Microsoft *invented* computing. Try it sometime...

    The moral of this story: It ain't innovation if you're copying what has already been done!
    1. Re:More proof that life is a circle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, so how did you get it on CD?

    2. Re:More proof that life is a circle... by bittmann · · Score: 1

      Simple. One way: Connect to Real Video stream through a proxy. (Have to set Real Player to connect only via http). Tell proxy to cache large http files. Watch stream. Take files from proxy's cache, burn to CD...

      There are also tools to grab files from Real streams...I just don't have experience with them.

      This method means that you end up with a set of discrete files. It's pretty simple to write a shell script to spin thru all of them in sequence...

  40. Of mice and men by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haha, couldn't resist this one!

    Mice are very useful, cheap, simple and work well. My ideal kind of hardware.

    After some time, though, I get "tired". E.g.:

    When you point at an icon, you really point at an area on the table. Mapping (x,y) movements to (x,z) ones is unnatural.

    Translating (x,y) to rotation (as in Quake, Descent) is a little better, but not ideal.

    ========
    == =====

    Coindently just today I searched for hard-mods using mice (US $3 to #4 here).

    A trackball would be great ($30, out of question here); maybe I try to cross a joystick and a mouse...

    Ah, another neat idea: using DDR mats to control the cursor. Net result: hands always on keyboard.

    1. Re:Of mice and men by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From Slashdot, on my first trial:

      Lameness filter encountered.
      Your comment violated the "postercomment" compression filter. Try less
      whitespace and/or less repetition.
      Comment aborted.

      Also:

      Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
      Reason: Please use fewer 'junk' characters.

      Thanks for giving feedback and not just rejecting the comment. Now...

      a) Since when whitespace is bad? I use one line between paragraphs!

      b) I'm not a native English speaker, of course I must be repetitive. Should I buy a Thesaurus? Puh-leaze!

      c) The junk characters were just one line of hyphens I used as separator. Please, use bzip2 over there!

      Anyway, it's a good idea if it get us rid of the trolls -- *just* the trolls!

      Now that Kathleen rules /. life is so much more difficult! 8^D

  41. First mouse, but not first pointing device by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative
    The first pointing device for computer input was the "light gun" developed for the SAGE air defense system, in the 1950s. The trackball and the RAND tablet both predated the mouse.

    Predating all of these was the sliding crank used as a target designator in the Nike missile system. This was a 2 degree of freedom crank; you could turn the crank, or slide the handle radially. This device is not well known, but can be seen at the restored launch site in Marin County, CA. The guidance computer for the Nike was an analog system, not a digital computer, though.

    1. Re:First mouse, but not first pointing device by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here's a picture of the Nike Battery Commander's Console, showing the sliding crank device. Note the two radarscopes set into the desk, and the crank to the lower right of each. That was how the battery commander selected the target to be shot down.

  42. Chord Keyset? by deadgoon42 · · Score: 1

    What exactly is a chord keyset? To me it looked as if the gentleman was using it to issue commands. I wish that something similar had been introduced into the PC. I know that I find it hard to remember keyboard shortcuts. Having a separate tool for this that had 5 or 6 keys would make a great addition the the PC platform and would make it easier for me to remember which buttons to push. Or maybe I'm just crazy.

    --

    Smeghead every day of the week.
    1. Re:Chord Keyset? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is one such input keyboard, depicted right here at /. (one-hand kbd it seems...).
      Sorry, no link, do a search.

    2. Re:Chord Keyset? by Rabid+Mongoose+Boy · · Score: 1

      Doug was using the buttons on his "keypad" to type, as well as issue commands. It has a very limited input set, not as large as a standard keyboard. But, within that input set, some people have been able to get about 25 words per minute.

      It works like this: each individual key has a value. And each combination of keys has a value. So, for example, pressing the button under your thumb may correspond to the letter "a". While your other fingers may be "b", "c", "d", and "e".
      Pressing both your first and second finger may input an "f". Pressing your first and third finger may input a "g".

      If I remembered enough combinatorial mathematics, I could tell you how many combinations there are in 5 buttons. But, I'll just leave it as something between 26 (the alphabet) and 110 (a normal keyboard).

      On a side note, I'm really glad to see that this video is getting such wide distribution. I haven't seen it in a while. But in case they don't mention it, this was done across a wireless network! The packets were transmitted between trucks parked on top of hills.

      RMB

    3. Re:Chord Keyset? by DavidRavenMoon · · Score: 1
      What exactly is a chord keyset? To me it looked as if the gentleman was using it to issue commands. I wish that something similar had been introduced into the PC. I know that I find it hard to remember keyboard shortcuts. Having a separate tool for this that had 5 or 6 keys would make a great addition the the PC platform and would make it easier for me to remember which buttons to push. Or maybe I'm just crazy.

      On the old Xerox systems you kept your one hand on the mouse and the other hand on the chord keyset. It was a keyboard with fewer keys, and you would press the keys in combinations... or chords, just like playing a chord on a piano.

      --
      -- if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic - Lewis Carrol
    4. Re:Chord Keyset? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that looked interesting. If I may speculate here, it looks like 5 copper strips mounted to some electronics. It probably detects the pervasive 60HZ (50Hz for the Euros) field that is picked up by the body. A sort of touch sensitive keypad, if you will.

  43. think-geek need this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL imagin if TG carryied this one!!! thatd be awesome cuz then we could all see the history of the Mouse.

  44. Programs measured in inches? by volpe · · Score: 2


    ...when programs were measured in inches ...


    Inches long? Or inches thick?

  45. It's not that it's closed source... by Pope+Slackman · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't really mind closed source.
    Hell, my desktop OS is Windows.

    I never install Real because it's an ugly, ad-laden, untrustworthy piece of spyware crap.

    Besides, I'd rather have files I can download, because streaming...[buffering (10%)]...in any...[buffering(15%)]...format...[buffering(20%)] ...sucks...[buffering(35%)]...my...[buffering(50%) ]...arse.

    And as for MS being an illegal monopoly, I'll just say I think Be's argument is much more valid than Netscape's, because unlike Netscape, Be's flagship product didn't suck.

    C-X C-S

  46. Editors on Vacation? by g0rath · · Score: 1

    Hmmm....I read this a year ago on here. It's just like those stupid jokes servers I was on back before gopher. After awhile, I get the same jokes again. So I unsubscribed, nothing new.

    Still it's an awesome video, who knows what videos they have now, of things that will look extermely weird to our children.

  47. The first hyperlink!! by Zero1za · · Score: 0

    See this[stanford.edu]
    Prof. Englebart creates a hyperlinked carrot!!!!

    BT sucks @ss

  48. Doug Englebart didn't quite invent it _all_.... by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 2



    While Doug certainly had alot to do with bringing the machine to the people, he didn't quite invent all of the ideas shown in the '68 Demo. Some of them had been around for years, and in some cases, decades. Alot of people tend to think that 50's and 60's computing were archaic and limited in scope..That everything before the personal computer was miserably bad, terribly slow and difficult to handle. Not true.

    For example, Ivan Sutherland was doing primitive virtual reality, complete with head-mounted displays and motion sensors, by 1969.. Of course, it wasnt like Quake or anything, but the idea was there, the code was there, and the people to do it were there. Analog voice synthesis goes back to 1939. Realtime text-to-speech synthesis popped up in 1962. Your MP3 collection is the great, great, great grandson of research done in 1958 on digital sound synthesis.

    More interestingly, perhaps, is videoconferencing. Videoconferencing, as an idea, was first demonstrated in 1926. If you can find Fritz Lang's "Metropolis" at Blockbuster, rent it. Like Englebart, Lang's vision was horrifyingly ahead of its time. Theres a scene in the film where one person dials up another person (complete with an on-screen display of the dialing process!) and within a few seconds, it connects and thye begin talking to eachother via video.

    Not bad for 1926.

    Cheers,
    Bowie

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

  49. I posted this before, but what the heck... by stickb0y · · Score: 1

    I saw a brief interview with Engelbart on TechTV over a year ago in response to tactile mice (like Logitech's iFeel mouse), and he had some interesting things to say about mouse evolution.

    One of the things he mentioned was that his original mouse used two orthogonal wheels instead of a mouseball. If you tilted the mouse, it would rest on only one of the wheels. Depending on which wheel it was resting on, you then could move the mouse perfectly horizontally or vertically.

    This can be kind of useful in CAD work. Modern mice don't do this, although I guess you can restrict movement to one dimension via software anyway.

  50. Saw this at school by Curl+E · · Score: 1

    The University of Canterbury (in New Zealand) used to show this to stage 1 computer science students. It blew me away then and it is still impressive.

    --
    Backups are for wimps. Real men post their data in comments and have slashdot mirror it
  51. What about H�kan Lans? by the_arrow · · Score: 1

    At least here in Sweden, it is a known "fact" that the inventor Håkan Lans invented the mouse (and color graphics, and a mini submarine, and...)

    See this link for some more info about him.

    But this has already been discussed before.

    --
    / The Arrow
    "How lovely you are. So lovely in my straightjacket..." - Nny
  52. Engelbarts Unfinished Revolution by Nonillion · · Score: 0

    Try this site also..

    http://stanford-online.stanford.edu/engelbart/

    --
    "I bow to no man" - Riddick
  53. Real Media Proprietary Video Format by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Losers

    1. Re:Real Media Proprietary Video Format by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, right.

      Can I join them, if I prove I'm a loser, too?

      Next time you have a rant, put some justifying words behind it.

  54. Quick question by sharkey · · Score: 2

    Was ANYBODY able to find Al Gore in those clips?

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  55. Mod this down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why on Earth is this modded "Insightful"? Give the man what he wants (and deserves); mod him Troll.