Slashdot Mirror


The New Nomad Jukebox, And Handheld Oggs

Tha_Zanthrax writes: "The best portable MP3-player has become better! The people from Tbreak.com have recieved a Nomad/Creative Jukebox 3. They have yet to write a review but have put up some detailed pics on their messageboard. It's a bit smaller, but the best improvements are the firewire-port and the 2 (!) internal batteries for 22 hours of operation. Too bad I recieved my Creative JB2 last week ..." If you have a hankering to play Ogg Vorbis audio, though, it looks like the first handheld ogg player has finally arrived in the form of a (payware) app for the Sharp Zaurus called tkc Player, available from theKompany. Where's there's one, there will be more. Woo-hoo!

167 comments

  1. Wow! by Arminius · · Score: 1

    The newer Ogg codec is really good. Much better to my ear than my mp3's. That player for the Sharp isn't bad either, interface could use some tweaking but sounds great.

    --

    ------
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
  2. the best ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful



    I thought the IPOD was the best mp3 player ?

    ----------
    you can keep linux,
    its 2002 no 1982 if you hadn't noticed

    1. Re:the best ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you believe that then you've been in Steve-O's Reality Distortion Field too long. Prolonged exposure can cause unnatural cravings for translucent plastic.

    2. Re:the best ? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The iPOD also has the size advantage - ie it will fit in your trouser, or shirt, pockets without any problems. You are going to need cargo pants for the RIO. Size makes a big difference when it comes to usability, and for most intents and purposes the 10Gb configuration of the iPOD is plenty for many people. I don't have either but I would rather put my money down for the iPOD, especially since it looks good.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    3. Re:the best ? by troc · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I would vote for an iPod as my definition of the best mp3 player. It already hs firewire, it's lovely and small, has more than acceptable battery life, weighs less than 200g, has more than enough storage, works as an exceptionally handy general stirage medium, works perfectly with my G4 powermac, works acceptably with my PC at work and looks cool.

      The problem is that this article asserts that the Nomad is the best - this is, however, merely a subjective decision. I initially read it and thought "ooh, a new iPod". I'm also sure others will read it and go "ooh, a new ****" (replace **** with an mp3 player of your choice).

      This immediately puts people who disagree with the initial assertion on the wrong foot - and biasing their comments etc accordingly.

      Surely a posting to Slashdot should be, at least title-wise, objective, to avoid knee-jerk reactions by other people who, rightly or wrongly, have differing opinions about the subject-matter at hand.

      Troc

      PS Yes, I used too many commas, however I'm at work and we've a box of them that are nearing their use-by date.

      --
      Troc's dubious podcast and blog: http://www.trocnet.net
    4. Re:the best ? by zzyzx · · Score: 2

      Depends on your needs. I'm finding that the 20 gig hd my Neo has isn't large enough and plan to throw a 30-40 gig drive in. The 10 gig cap and the fact that it won't work well with my computer makes the iPod not the best player for me.

    5. Re:the best ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, the ipod is the best mp3 player.
      But that's like saying the German Cockroach is the best roach.

      mp3 players are obsolete. This is the 21st century, so Ogg players are what matters.

    6. Re:the best ? by rbruels · · Score: 1

      It's also the best because it uses FireWire. Christ, I can't even imagine transferring 10GB of MP3s over USB. *shudder*

      By the way, iPod also looks great, comes with wicked earbuds powered by a great amplifier, charges from the computer, and also acts as a FireWire hard drive!

      Doesn't even require a Mac (though that is the best way to do it). FireWire cards cost $20, baby. There's about six software packages out that all claim to do iPod connectivity for Windows (any Linux claims yet? I'm not sure), two of which actually work well (XPlay holds the gold medal, though).

      Jeez, it even holds your VCF cards now! Solid!

      http://www.apple.com/ipod/

      --

      "All your base are belong to this file I send in order to have your advice."
    7. Re:the best ? by Jonathan · · Score: 2

      Try out ephPod -- in its latest version, it surpasses Xplay easily -- you can even get headlines synced to your iPod.

  3. get over ogg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's will never make it.

    1. Re:get over ogg by Derwen · · Score: 1

      it's will never make it.

      But it already has. It is a mature codec; Free and offers better quality at normally-used bitrates.

      Ogg is used by many thousands of people who aren't going to stop using it just because it isn't currently the most popular lossy compression.

      Of course one day we may have so much bandwidth and diskspace that we don't need to compress our 24-bit, 192KHz, 5.1 sound files - but until then we'll stick with ogg, thanks :)
      - Derwen

      --
      http://fsfeurope.org/
    2. Re:get over ogg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      show me where you get 'many thousands' and i will show you hundreds of thousands, if not millions, that use mp3 instead, even if it is technically inferior. i have 10mbit + 100gb of space, so bandwidth/storage isn't an issue - the facts are that i can find a wide variety of hardware players that support mp3 and most people 'share' mp3 files instead of any other format. oh yeah, linux sux.

  4. Another /. "infomercial" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting



    is this a messageboard or a product endorsment and evaluation site ?

  5. interesting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that thekompany claims to have made the first portable ogg player, i mean the zaurus is like an Acorn in a really small case with whatnot extension options.. and i would guess the cpu is strong enough to handle the ogg decoder with fpu emulation. paying for some gui with a libogg backend.. haha foools :D

    ps.
    and i made the first portable ogg player when i startet to carry my midi tower around !

  6. Next by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think the next improvement should be a cynic inside the machine, who would scold you appropriatly if you were listening to N'Sync, or congratulate you for picking Radiohead.

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    1. Re:Next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No! Radiohead is deep and insightful. Just like They Might Be Giants. You're a sheep if you don't listen to them, because Britney and N'Sync are the only other musicians in the world. BAAAH! BAAAH!

    2. Re:Next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Radiohead?...Radiohead??

      Sure their music is ok, but what about Zero7, Beulah, Ugly Duckling, New Pornographers, Squirrel Nut Zippers, etc etc?

  7. Whats the difference... by afinn · · Score: 3, Informative

    .. between this and nomad v2? Basically it's got a firewire port and lithium ion batteries. Some more details available here.

  8. Color faceplates by Safety+Cap · · Score: 2
    Do people actually care about the colored templates one can snap on the face? It seems kinda silly... and my experience with similar devices has been that over time the one I'm using ends up getting cracked.

    After rolling through all three (or whatever) faceplaces, the unit ends up looking naked; there's no way I'm going to plunk down $20 + S&H for a new set.

    --
    Yeah, right.
    1. Re:Color faceplates by blankmange · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Of course they do -- ever notice the plethora of faceplates for cellphones -- any color, pattern, or theme that you can think is available. Never underestimate the superficiality or vacuousness of the general public. Give me technology, but it better be cute and personable or it will never be widely adopted. For example, the dumbing down of the Windows interface (not NT or 2K) for the general public... most vomitous

      --
      ...we are from the government - we are here to help...
    2. Re:Color faceplates by Sarcasm_Orgasm · · Score: 0, Funny

      -
      Dear Sir or Madem,

      When you were being conditioned to be a good consumer, you somehow missed a very important point. Hopefully this will set you straight: When stuff looks old, gets cracked, and you'd rather not pay $20 just for a silly new case. Buy the new model, it's l33t, it's what all the cool kids have, it has new cosmetic features (if you're a cheap ass and wait long enough, it may even have functional improvments), the opposite sex will like you more, & it'll make you feel better.

      Thank You,
      Your good friends at your Local Government

      --
      Special people have long socks, ride short buses, & invent witty sigs.
    3. Re:Color faceplates by MyNameIsFred · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I agree faceplates tend to be cheap, and oriented to the fashion conscience. However, they have uses.

      My sister-in-law carries her cellphone in her purse (a lot of dresses just don't have pockets). When it rang, she had a hard time finding it. Flip-o change-o to a bright colored faceplate and the problem was solved.

      The real issue with faceplates is when they're cheap pieces of plastic, as opposed to those made for cellphones which tend to be more rugged.

    4. Re:Color faceplates by Inoshiro · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Eh?

      Just because you don't like something, doesn't make it "wrong" for others to like it.

      The new XP look is nicer than the old Windows look, just like I prefer the "metal2" icewm theme to "warp4." Does that make me a "most vomitous" person?

      Never underestimate the superficiality of some people who think that just because someone's taste in what looks good is different, they're stupid.

      --
      --
      Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  9. Still waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    For a mini-disc player/recorder that not only "supports" mp3/ogg/wav/etc, but will also play them in their original format instead of converting it to an ATRAC file (such as the new Sony NET mini-disc players). No matter what happens to the price of CF cards, it will be a very long time before it can compete with the cost of a single 700MB mini-disc. These hard drive driven portables and such would have a hard time competing in terms of cost of unit + media, weight of the player, and size.

    1. Re:Still waiting... by psxndc · · Score: 2
      And I'm still waiting for a minidisc player that lets me upload recordings to my computer in faster-than-real time. I guess the current belief (SONY NetMD) is that allowing the minidisc player to do so would promote piracy.

      psxndc

      --

      The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    2. Re:Still waiting... by BelDion · · Score: 2

      Couple of points there AC.

      Minidiscs do not hold 700mb of data, they only hold 160mb(the 74 minute discs anyway, not 100% sure about the 80 mins.) There was once an actual minidisc data drive for the pc which failed pretty much because they were small capacity, though the fact that they were slow as frell also weighed in heavily.

      I can't disagree about an actual mp3 holding md player though, that would be an incredible toy. Even at 160mb, with CAN$6 discs, it wouldn't be a problem. But hey, I'm fine until then with what I have. Recording real-time doesn't bother most of the real md fan(atics?). NetMD is available too, though majorly crippled by Sony's piracy protection.

      The (Hopefully) Great Slashdot Blackout , April 21-27

      --

      I am BelDion's .Sig; Who the hell is Jack?
    3. Re:Still waiting... by turbine216 · · Score: 2

      Try this. Okay, so it's not really minidisc, but it's mini-CD, which is cheaper and holds just as much. I bought this device when it first came out, and I absolutely love it so far. It doesn't play anything but WAV, CDDA, and MP3, but for the price, I can't really complain. The best part is the flexibility, though. Three little pocket-sized miniCD's will hold about 10 hours of music. And I think there's supposed to be mini-CDRW's on the horizon, which are slated to cost less than $2.00 each (which i'm sure will come down over time)...then you get the added value of being able to rewrite on the same discs, just like flash memory or minidisc.

    4. Re:Still waiting... by WoodenBoy · · Score: 1

      There's also the Philips eXpanium. It's nice, but not great -- poor battery life (three hours on one AA) and a poor interface are my main gripes.

    5. Re:Still waiting... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2

      Hmmm, lets see.
      74 minutes of decent quality for $2 a disc
      $150 for a MD-player/recorder.
      740 minutes = $20+$150
      Weight of 20 discs + weight of MD player?
      Realtime upload; 2x if you're lucky. Is there a 4x?

      iPod
      $399 for 5gb
      3000+ minutes = 6.5oz
      $499 for 10gb
      6000+ minutes = 6.5oz
      Near instantaneous upload; 74 minutes of music in 10 seconds of upload. 2 gb of music in 4 minutes

      Just to be fair, I *do* own both a minidisc and an iPod, but the MD is now relegated for note-taking and recording purposes, rather than music :)

    6. Re:Still waiting... by jamesbulman · · Score: 1

      Sony's new MZ-N1 MD player allows you to record MP3s or CDs at up to 32x speed.

    7. Re:Still waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you actually own one of these? According to the specs they only play ATRAC files. It appears the software decodes your .wav/.mp3/etc and ships it over the wire for ATRAC encoding on disk. Blah.

    8. Re:Still waiting... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2

      Very impressive, but still not available.

      MSRP of $350, when you consider that an iPod was available 6 months ago, at $400.

    9. Re:Still waiting... by karnal · · Score: 1

      Check out this link:

      http://www.minidisco.com/minispecs/sony_mz-n505. ht ml

      Up to 32x transfer speed to minidisc.

      The only thing (problem) I see with this is you have to "Create" the tracks in their software to be able to transfer them. No dragging your home mp3 collection to it... yet.

      I wonder if someone is working on hacking this one? I'd buy one in a heartbeat (Especially for that price!!!!!!)

      --
      Karnal
    10. Re:Still waiting... by psxndc · · Score: 1
      The 505 has no inputs though so I can't record me and my band playing, or record shows of bands that allow taping. At least with the 707 and N1 you can do that stuff, but you can't upload it at 32x. You have to line-in to your soundcard and record it real-time. Blech.

      psxndc

      --

      The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

  10. drool by Farrell · · Score: 1

    I have the original Jukebox, and this new one is gonna be even better. I only wish it were out right now. Anyone got any info on the cost?

    --
    I want you to assume that all spelling and grammar errors are intentional. Thank You.
    1. Re:drool by Tha_Zanthrax · · Score: 1

      from http://www.nomadness.net/article.php?sid=317&mode= thread&order=0:

      Price will be around USD $399 (454) Ex Tax.

  11. its great by tanveer1979 · · Score: 1

    inally Ogg is making an impact. But still endorsment by big cmpanies is needed before we have ogg plugins in evey mp3 player in market

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
  12. Ogg Vorbis Player by j09824 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are a bunch of excellent, free graphical Ogg Vorbis players for X11, and they even work on small screens and handhelds. Why ever would you pay money for something like tkcPlayer?

    1. Re:Ogg Vorbis Player by kenydl · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think the major break-through is that this implementation uses a "fixed-point decoder".

      I believe the major problem with ogg was that it was very floating-point intensive, which doesn't suit the processors used in mp3 players and PDAs. theKompany must have developed or implemented a non floating point version of the decoder, thus enabling it to be used on the Zaurus without a huge cpu hit.

      --
      .sig (insert funny sig here)
    2. Re:Ogg Vorbis Player by j09824 · · Score: 1

      I see. Like the fixed point MP3 decoder, I suspect the free Ogg libraries will probably be updated to include a fixed point version as well soon and you'll just be able to use that with the existing clients; usually, those kinds of conversions aren't all that hard, at least if you have a C++ compiler.

    3. Re:Ogg Vorbis Player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i idled around in #vorbis and w0rd is that its done but xiph.org needs money so they are figuring out a way to make money. holding back the integer decoder as it represents a possible resource is one of the sideeffects.

    4. Re:Ogg Vorbis Player by croanon · · Score: 1

      But do not forget that ogg is better than mp3 in couple of points. For example, the beginning of songs in mp3 has holes. So that even you have some gappless plug-ins for mp3 players, they do not work very well. :)

      --
      Dear Bill, do you have a .net tatoo on your ass for marketing?
    5. Re:Ogg Vorbis Player by sydb · · Score: 2

      I thought Xiph were dedicated to free software and open standards.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    6. Re:Ogg Vorbis Player by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 2

      I remember reading ~6 months ago that one of the key Ogg devs was working on an example fixed-point decoder. IIRC, it was assembly for a specific architecture, but was touted as being somewhat portable. theKompany may have used that decoder, or they may have written their own.

      I suppose the point is, there is, or will be soon, a decoder for portable devices.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    7. Re:Ogg Vorbis Player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well think again:

      http://www.xiph. org/archives/vorbis-dev/200204/0064.html

  13. more details about tckPlayer by HeUnique · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can find more details about the tckPlayer here - it can be bought as a single stand alone app or it can be bought in a package of 9 applications for (for Zaurus) for $74.95 (details are here)

    --
    Hetz (Heunique)
    1. Re:more details about tckPlayer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or it can be warezed for free.

  14. Site down already? by Petronius · · Score: 0

    It's only been posted here for a few minutes. And it's friday. Come on people!

    --
    there's no place like ~
  15. The Best? Hardly! by @madeus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even though you have to download software seperately if your a Windows user, Apple's 10 GB iPod is by far and away better.

    There is no way any objective person could think this unit is superior.

    It's got a 10 GB HD, 32 MB of Ram, the battery life is 10 hours, you can store your contacts on it, you can use it as a hard drive, you can even *BOOT* off it. There are also 3rd party apps to extend the functionality.

    And still it's less then half the size of this thing!

    For me, that's a key feature This thing is way too big for my pocket (the Nomad is *still* discman size!). It's just not practicle, whereas my iPod fit's in my shirt pocket (and isn't nearly as heavy).

    The iPod is so small, and it's interface so simple and elegant, that I take it everywhere, even just nipping down the to the shop. I know I'd think twice before taking this thing outside with me.

    I guess it depends on how much you like music.

    - If your a big music fan, then your better off with something cassete player sized (ThinkGeek has one, though bigger that the iPod, it has slightly more storage, and still of a practicle in-your-pocket size)

    - If your not a big music fan and only want something for long journeys then this could be the unit for you. But if you are, you'd be better getting a discman for 30 USD instead...

    1. Re:The Best? Hardly! by datazone · · Score: 1

      i would have to partialy agree with you, the ipod interface is very sweet, and the size is great, but when it comes down to it, i choose the archos models over any others any day, it works as a usb hard drive on ANY os! i just have to plus it into my linux box, and mount it, and its done. on windows you have to get drivers, on the mac (not os X) it will automagicaly download and install then mount the device for you, which is also pretty sweet.
      plus archos is coming out with a new model that is so good i cant believe it! just go to their site and look at what they have lined up.

      --
      Its spelt "L-I-N-U-X", but pronunced as "Free Beer"
    2. Re:The Best? Hardly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Nomad II was complete shit - 30 seconds to start up! If they haven't cut that to around 5 seconds then this unit is also shit. Besides that it's a stupid shape and comes froma company that doesn't know the first thing about sound quality.

      14 oz! Hey, great for the gym, extra workout!

    3. Re:The Best? Hardly! by Bklyn · · Score: 1
      I love my iPod as well, but unless you are a full-time Mac user, it is a pain in the ass to get music onto it.

      The current crop of Windows-based iPod software is just NOT up to the job. XPlay will lock up your iPod regularly and corrupt its table-of-contents, forcing you to do a full reset and lose everything on the disk. I was unable to get EphPod to work at all on my Windows 2000 box. I got a setup screen to configure it, and the application appeared in the taskbar when I started it, but no user interface ever showed up. I had to kill it with the Task Manager to get rid of it.

      The only realistic option is using a Macintosh for managing your MP3 collection, and if you have your files stored on a network server as I do, this can be problematic as well.

      Under MacOS X, you can mount SMB servers and browse them in the finder as you'd expect. You can even drag an MP3 folder from a network drive directly into iTunes or into your iPod. Oops, that doesn't work!. You get a mysterious error -39 when you try this.

      All of your MP3s need to live locally on your Mac's filesystems before iTunes will let you add them to your Collection or copy them to your iPod. Couple this with the woeful SMB performance under OSX, and feeding your iPod becomes a painful experience of copying and syncing.

      Once you have the music (or audiobooks, or contacts or whatever) on the unit, though, its a true joy to use. I love the iPod, I just detest the software surrounding it.

    4. Re:The Best? Hardly! by zzyzx · · Score: 2

      "There is no way any objective person could think this unit is superior."

      It depends on your needs again. I realise that a lot of people love their iPods, but I wish they'd see that it's not the perfect solution for everyone. I have some 1500 cds in my collection. The power of an MP3 player for me is that I can decide to listen to THAT Dark Star or Black Clouds or Tweezer and odds are I'd have it with me. 10 gigs just doesn't cut it.

    5. Re:The Best? Hardly! by GusherJizmac · · Score: 1

      "There is no way any objective person could think this unit is superior."

      The iPod currently does not:
      - allow you to play all songs of a given genre (without having made a playlist holding them in iTunes first)
      - create a playlist on the fly from just the iPod

      (All playlists must be made in iTunes ahead of time, unless you play an album or all tunes of an artist.)

      The nomad jukebox does both (and every discman and home CD player in the world lets you do #2). Until this is fixed I couldn't really use the iPod. I frequently don't know what I want to listen to until I'm about to listen, except that I rarely, if ever, want to listen to songs by artist or album. Usually, I queue up a bunch of songs I feel like listenting to, or a bunch in a certain genre and put it on repeat. This is a key feature of any jukebox. Hopefully they will fix this in newer firmware.

      --
      http://www.naildrivin5.com/davec
    6. Re:The Best? Hardly! by afidel · · Score: 1

      Actually with PR5 from Xplay you can rebuild the database so you don't have to reset the unit. I also beleieve they have greatly minimized the lockups. (Oh and btw, its a windows firewire driver thing NOT a software thing, you can get the exact same results by transfering stuff to the ipod without their software on it (one user did it as a diagnostic, he formatted the ipod's drive as fat32 and tried transferring files to it on a virgin xp install, no dice same kind of lockups))

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    7. Re:The Best? Hardly! by croanon · · Score: 1

      iPod is seeeeexy! But, can it play ogg files? I prefer oggs to mp3s. I don't like mp3s much. ogg is better.

      --
      Dear Bill, do you have a .net tatoo on your ass for marketing?
    8. Re:The Best? Hardly! by Ingerod · · Score: 1

      Just a nit-pick:

      All of your MP3s need to live locally on your Mac's filesystems before iTunes will let you add them to your Collection or copy them to your iPod.

      That may be true for SMB (I haven't tried), but not for volumes mounted over AppleShare or NFS. It works just fine for me anyway.

    9. Re:The Best? Hardly! by spectecjr · · Score: 2

      Even though you have to download software seperately if your a Windows user, Apple's 10 GB iPod is by far and away better.

      There is no way any objective person could think this unit is superior.

      It's got a 10 GB HD, 32 MB of Ram, the battery life is 10 hours, you can store your contacts on it, you can use it as a hard drive, you can even *BOOT* off it. There are also 3rd party apps to extend the functionality.


      Waitaminute. Only 10Gb HD? The Nomad Jukebox 2 has 20Gb today .

      The new Jukebox 3 will also have 20Gb, Firewire, etc. for the price of a 5Gb iPod.

      What's superior about the iPod again? Oh... yeah... the size.

      Well, sod the size. I want to carry my entire MP3 collection without paying a massive premium on top of the price of a Toshiba card-drive.

      Simon

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    10. Re:The Best? Hardly! by @madeus · · Score: 1

      By your reasoning one can only assume that you've never bought a device which couldn't hold your entire collection.

      That would mean you don't have a CD player in your car, your CD jukebox at home holds 1500 cds at once and you've *never* listened to music on the move? This must be the case clearly because Walkmans and Discmans only store ONE album at a time, let alone 200 (and they are still bigger than the likes of the iPod & Rio).

      This new Nomad unit cant store 1500 CD's (Albums) either. So, your wrong, it *doesnt *"depend on your needs" - if the Nomad can't do what you want either how can it be better?

      Regardless of that - 99.99% of people in the market for a portable music device have less than 200 hundred CD's. Most people have around a hundred or so (and so only need about 5 GB for music and tend to use the other half for storing data).

      Added to that, it only takes 10 seconds to upload a CD, and it can store 2000 songs, so an iPod is very much *more* than enough for most pople.

      Have fun missing out on listening to music while you wait for a pocket sized 80 GB portable MP3 player.

      What a jerk ROFL!

    11. Re:The Best? Hardly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The nomad jukebox does both (and every discman and home CD player in the world lets you do #2).

      What kind of a world do we live in where we need a discman or CD player to give us permission to do #2?? My bowel movements shall not be controlled by machines!!!
    12. Re:The Best? Hardly! by @madeus · · Score: 1

      IMO, the ability to play via genre (which is not native to the iPod, but as you say can be done using simple playlists) is one feature and does not make up for the other glaring problems (notibly the size) of the current Nomad range.

      So yes, I think it's fair to to say it's superior. The only thing the Nomad does much better is the battery life, which is great for those on long journeys, though I can fly about half way round the world in 10 hours so the iPod is okay for me, *just* :-).

      Personally I don't want this feature as for the most part I listen to Albums that are meant to be listened to end-to-end (and album's by artists like Pink Floyd, Kate Bush etc typically have tracks that run into each other), though I can see how you would want this feature.

      I totally cant see how this would put someone off so completly!

      It's certainly not true that every CD player in the work lets you "create a playlist on the fly" - very few let you do this IME. Most 'home' systems certainly don't allow this (say from Dixons, Tandy, etc). Also I have two Discmans right here (one Sony, and one Goodmans) and neither of them let me do this.

      I can see that these would both be good features to have, thought the second one less so (I think it would be too cumbersome for most people to bother with as it's a device for listening to music, not organising it). Though the iPod's UI makes it easy for me to flip between songs like no other device, it's really quite charming to use.

      Oh and one thing perhaps worth pointing out, while you " rarely, if ever, want to listen to songs by artist or album." the world has been listening to music one album or artist at a time for over a hundred years and everybody is most familer with it that way.

      That doesn't mean listing by genre isn't a good idea, but it does indicate that most people won't mind if they can't do something they'd never done before :)

    13. Re:The Best? Hardly! by @madeus · · Score: 1

      Most poeple have less than 200 CD's (which the iPod can store). Most poeple even have less than 100 CD's, so the 10 Gb option is far more than they need.

      Note that *2* iPods have 20 hours battery life and store 20 GB and are still smaller than *1* Nomad.

      Amusing, but points out how much of a size difference there is! Nomad's are *massive* in comparison!

    14. Re:The Best? Hardly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, sod the size. I want to carry my entire MP3 collection without paying a massive premium on top of the price of a Toshiba card-drive.

      So you're planning on never buying anything, right?

    15. Re:The Best? Hardly! by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      So you're planning on never buying anything, right?

      No, I have a Nomad Jukebox. The iPod holds zero advantages for me.

      Simon

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    16. Re:The Best? Hardly! by Bklyn · · Score: 1

      The problem with AppleShare is the 32-character filename limitation (or at least thats what I see when I use netatalk on my Linux box). The problem with NFS is my MP3s are all on a Windows PC. I may have to do something about the latter problem.

    17. Re:The Best? Hardly! by Bklyn · · Score: 1

      Hm, I'm pretty sure I am using PR5, but it may be PR4. I'll definitely check this out and upgrade if its the older version. It is sad that the MS FireWire drivers suck so badly.

    18. Re:The Best? Hardly! by zzyzx · · Score: 2

      I agree that for many people it's a great player. My point is that, for me, it's more important to have storage space than a faster one time upload. Different people have different needs. How does saying that make me a jerk?

    19. Re:The Best? Hardly! by brunes69 · · Score: 2

      • iPod has only 10GB? WTF can you store on that? THe Nomad has 20 Gb TODAY and the Nomad 3 is going to have 30GB and firewire.
      • Nomad can play 3rd party formats, iPod can't
      • iPod only works with Mac. If you want to use it wirh Windows you have to buy 3rd party software. And good luck getting it to work in Linux at all (I know there are efforts, but from what I have seen none have come to fruition yet). The Nomad works with Mac, Windows, AND Linux, out of the box. There is even a Nomad KIO Slave, so yes, you can use it as a hard drive,

        Why id iPod superior again? Oh yeah, cause you own one. Sorry bub, that doesn't cut it for me.

    20. Re:The Best? Hardly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no way any objective person could think this unit is superior.

      It doesn't record. That's the one reason I bought my current Nomad; do you know how fun it is making 4 hour long mp3s of stuff you recorded live? Not with the iPod.

    21. Re:The Best? Hardly! by Bklyn · · Score: 1

      OK, well I was using TP4, silly me. Just installed TP5 and we'll see how that goes. Unfortunately it says it expires on 4/15/02 so I'd better hurry!

    22. Re:The Best? Hardly! by @madeus · · Score: 1

      Well to answer your question it can store 2000 songs, or ~200 CD's. That's more than most people even own (loads of folks are still going for the 5 GB model because ~100 cd's is all they have), so erm, storage clearly isn't the problem for most users.

      I remind you that *most* players on the market still have ~64 MB and are still selling. So attempting to invalidate it's usefulness becase it has ~9000 MB is utterly rediculous.

      The Nomad is slow and very large, yeah I'm sure it will have firewire 'in the future', but my iPod had it last year and it has more storage space than I even need.

      Now just to be clear - *it's not superiour to the Nomad because I have one (that's just a dumb statement to make)* *I bought one because it _was_ superior to the Nomad*.

      Hell if I didn't have a G4 PowerBook I *STILL* wouldn't have a Nomad - I'd be sensible and get an Archos:
      http://www.thinkgeek.com/stuff/electronic s/5784.sh tmlwww.thinkgeek.com/stuff/electronics/5784.shtml

      It's had 20 GB for ages, even when the Nomad had only 6 GB and it costs the same (at least in my local electronics store in London).

      Despite it being larger than the iPod (hence the reason I went for an iPod) it's /still/ ~half the size of the Nomad! Don't you get how big an *non portable* the Nomad is?

      I don't want to carry around something as clunky as a Discman (like the Nomad), just like I don't want to carry around something as clunky as a Newton anymore.

      Even this new one won't fit in my trouser pocket, let alone my shirt pocket!

      There is a lot of room for competition in the MP3 player marketplace, some are better than others (for example the Panasonic and Casio offerings are tiny, the Archos has the most space and iPod is the fastest to sync and fit's neatly in between. Whatever the question, the answer is just simply never the Nomad.

      With ~20 hours battery life, it will have created a new neiche for itself, but I can fly roughly to the other side of the globe in 10 hours, so I'm not sure that I'd ever need much longer battery life in an MP3 player, unless I take a trip to the moon or something.

    23. Re:The Best? Hardly! by @madeus · · Score: 1

      Having storage space being more important than transfer time doesn't make you a jerk. The Archos is also a great player

      However I think saying that the iPod is not the right choice because "10 gigs just doesn't cut it" because you have "1500 CDS" does.

      No portable player that exists does that. You'd need ~80 GB of storage. You'd need *two* slimline hard disk to get close to that much storage (even then you'd still fall short).

      So onces again:
      "There is no way any objective person could think this unit is superior."

      I realise that's inflammatory, but it's true!

      Even if you discounted the iPod, the Archos is *still* about half the size of the Nomad (and so fit's in a pocket) and still has exactly the same storage capacity as the Nomad. The Nomad just isn't a great offering and never was compared to the competion.

      Sure the long lasting battery life will be nice, but as I've said in other posts, I can fly ~to the other side of the globe before my iPod goes flat (and I recently did), and half way around the world that's the longest journey I'm ever likely to take! (Any longer than that and I'd be (a) in space or (b) just going the wrong way round the globe :)

    24. Re:The Best? Hardly! by @madeus · · Score: 1

      I'll bet the Archos does though.

      It has exactly the same storage capacity and much much less size, while costing the same (at least in Canary Wharf [Europe's Tallest Building and my local shopping center]). Also it's been avalible for much longer.

      So again, the Nomad Jukebox isn't "The Best", there are far better options.

      People tend to defend their purchasing decions feircly though, so it's amusing to see Nomad users stick up for their players, even against the likes of the Archos and the iPod, not a lot of Nomad users defending the Nomad against the Archos, wonder why?.

    25. Re:The Best? Hardly! by -Harlequin- · · Score: 2

      Most poeple have less than 200 CD's (which the iPod can store).

      It depends. I have far fewer CDs than that on my (archos) player and are past 10gig - since my player has a digital output, thus can drive a decent home sound system without degrading it through the less-than-amazing analogue systems necessitated by portability, suddenly the bitrates that are more than sufficient for portable listening are not quite enough for listening under situations so much closer to ideal. But the ipod doesn't offer optical or coax digital output (from memory), so it's apples and oranges anyway.

      But more to the point, I have several gig of data files on my player also. So 10gig is just too small for a lot of people, but the ipod is still a fantastic unit, and I find that I recommend it to more people than the archos. (Eg, I wouldn't recommend archos to my grandmother :).

      Yeah, the size of the nomad is crappy. I understand why people like the ipod player, and I understand why people like the (later-model) archos players and recorders, but I just don't really get what people see in the nomad. And it seems to be one of the more crippled brands as well (though nothing next to sony's digital rubbish - utterly fantastic technology, but insultingly crippled and proprietary. What a shame.)

      Strange.

    26. Re:The Best? Hardly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10 gig or 5 gig is more than enough for most people.
      iPod plays three formats and I'm sure they can play more with a rom upgrade if they need to.
      ePhod is free software and the developer says it will always be free.
      Nobody cares (in the real word, not the Slashdot world) if an MP3 player works with Linux...even so there are several efforts under way to make it work with Linux.

    27. Re:The Best? Hardly! by zzyzx · · Score: 2

      Even if I can't fit all 1500 cds onto a player, I'd rather have one that lets me get closer to that goal. Since I use it at work or in my car, the size of the player isn't that important. Why is this hard to understand?

    28. Re:The Best? Hardly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude -- take a remedial English course. It's != its, your != you're, and "fit's" is not even a valid construct.

  16. Payware by Phexro · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even though the player is payware, I'm sure it's worth it. It sure looks like it from the screenshots.

    theKompany is a good company which has done a lot for the KDE /FS community. They have developed Aethera, Kamera, KDE Studio, Kivio, and Kugar, all of which are available under the GPL for free.

    Support the companies that support Free Software. Buy something from theKompany.

    1. Re:Payware by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      Even though the player is payware, I'm sure it's worth it. It sure looks like it from the screenshots

      Hmmm...having looked at those screenshots, I'm curious - the Zaurus is a Linux PDA, yes?

      And...

      Support the companies that support Free Software. Buy something from theKompany.

      So why does that player software have icons from Windows XP all over the place?

      I do hope they've licensed them from Microsoft, given they're charging money for the product.

      Tim

    2. Re:Payware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zaurus is a linux PDA right, using the Qtopia
      SDK from Trolltech, basicaly Qt-embedded beefed up for PDA use, som apps etc.
      www.troll.com

      Nope no XP icons, but the standard Qtopia look/
      icons.

    3. Re:Payware by PhunkyOne · · Score: 0

      Has anyone noticed how much that last screen shot looks a whole lot like the ipod design. Can't knock it, the ipod has a great design. Just interesting.

    4. Re:Payware by jra101 · · Score: 1

      Those are Windows XP icons, take a look at any Windows XP installation (the icons are in shell32.dll) and you will see.

      --
      I write code.
  17. brrrrrr... by koekepeer · · Score: 2, Funny

    they're playing "modern talking" on the tkc player. they *must be evil*

    ;-)

  18. iomega hipzip rumored to play ogg vorbis by emptybody · · Score: 1

    Does anyone have an iomega hipzip mp3 player? I have heard rumors (from reliable sources) that this player will play ogg vorbis files.

    Can someone please test and confirm this?

    --
    comment directly in my journal
    1. Re:iomega hipzip rumored to play ogg vorbis by mcspock · · Score: 1

      Yes, there is code to enable your iomega hipzip player to play ogg vorbis content from beta4. Unfortunately iomega never authorized the release of this code, so end users have never been allowed to use this.

      --
      -- Patience is a virtue, but impatience is an art.
  19. Ogg Player...? by Qwerpafw · · Score: 1

    I just looked at the pictures of the ogg vorbis player... and I have to say, I was quite shocked by this one.

    I was shocked by the amazing similarity between the (software) ogg player's interface and Apple's iPod. First iPod ripoff or what?

    I guess this silences those who said the iPod's interface was "teh suck."

    1. Re:Ogg Player...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume you are talking about the circular control button. This is a very common interface, it's on my TV remote control as well.

    2. Re:Ogg Player...? by CamelTrader · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but their page is done in quicktime!

      --
      Your .sig is important to us. Please hold.
    3. Re:Ogg Player...? by tlotoxl · · Score: 1

      no kidding - my sharp vcr has the same kind of circular control, too.

  20. Where is my code for this? by bagder · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Archos MP3 player series at least have this ambitious crowd of hackers working on replacing the firmware with an open source alternative:

    http://bjorn.haxx.se/rockbox/

  21. Uh, are you sure taco didn't post this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Where's there's one, there will be more. Woo-hoo!"

  22. Archos is smaller, cheaper, more GB, USB 2.0 by jbridges · · Score: 5, Informative

    Archos model 500277
    Jukebox MP3 Recorder 20 - 20GB HD (USB 2.0)

    PriceWatch lists it for $315

    Jukebox MP3 Recorders / USB Hard Drives

    Can both record and playback MP3s

    USB 2.0 is standard on newer PCs

    1. Re:Archos is smaller, cheaper, more GB, USB 2.0 by osolemirnix · · Score: 2

      True, but it's GUI sucks and it doesn't support playlists or ID3 tags. I have yet to see a test of the sound output quality. If you want a cheap portable HD with MP3 player on the side, go for the Archos.
      If you want a really nice MP3 player, I suggest the Nomad or iPod.

      Disclaimer: I'm not trying to flamebait or troll. A friend of mine has the Archos and likes it, but I think it has some serious drawbacks.

      --

      Idempotent operation: Like MS software, wether you run it once or often, that doesn't make it any better.
    2. Re:Archos is smaller, cheaper, more GB, USB 2.0 by madenosine · · Score: 1

      I have one....they really are great.

    3. Re:Archos is smaller, cheaper, more GB, USB 2.0 by fiendo · · Score: 1

      Maybe your friend has one of the older models. I have the 6GB recorder (which can easily be upgraded to any size 9.5mm harddrive) and it *does* support ID3 tags (version 1.0 or 1.1) as well as playlists (tip: use absolute paths, not relative paths in the lists). Helpful links: Archos faq at funmp3players
      Upgrade the harddrive

      --
      I went to the city because I wished to live without deliberation.
    4. Re:Archos is smaller, cheaper, more GB, USB 2.0 by -Harlequin- · · Score: 2

      True, but it's GUI sucks and it doesn't support playlists or ID3 tags. I have yet to see a test of the sound output quality.

      You seem to be confused - you're probably thinking of the ancient Archos mp3 player insead of the 20GB recorder he was talking about. Not only does it support ID3 and playlists (you can even make new ones in the field, or drag and drop your fav winamp playlists from your computer), and have a great GUI, it has a digital output!
      That means that as wellas using it as a portable player, when I get home I can plug it into my home theatre system directly via the digital, and the results are amazing compared to connecting any other portable CD, MD, or mp3 player I've ever had (because portable units by neccessity don't have fantastic analogue systems, and normally you have to connect them via analogue jack - and with a good sound system, this is more apparent than portable listening in heavy traffic).

      On top of that, it has both analogue and digital input (it records), fits in your pocket (unlike the Nomad), and unlike the iPod it has replaceable batteries (so you can take it camping) and upgradable HDD. The upgradable HDD is important because of the digital output - when you're using this unit with a home sound system, then 128bps (more than enough for portable listening) doesn't cut it anymore, and you'll want space for bigger files.

      Actually, I lie, I think you void your warrentee by upgrading it yourself, but that didn't stop me jumping to 30gig :-)

      Oh, and it's the least crippled HDD mp3 player that I know of. I think copyright compliance is the responsibility of the user, and should not be enforced by function and feature cripples in the unit. So I boycott crippleware.

      That said, I wouldn't recommend it to everyone. But for what I want, it's great. I'm mainly writing this because you posted mistakenly.

  23. "I AM NOMAD." by Kalabajoui · · Score: 1

    Everytime I hear about his new Nomad player, I
    think of that old Star Trek episode, with the
    confused probe. You know, it was an Earth probe
    with a mission to explore that melded with an
    alien probe who's mission was to sterilize. So it
    went around finding new planets to wipe clear of
    life. Ahhh the memories.

  24. It's down... by Tha_Zanthrax · · Score: 3, Informative

    another source for news on Nomad JB's has some info too. http://www.nomadness.com/

    1. Re:It's down... by Tha_Zanthrax · · Score: 1

      How can someone mod this up!?
      the url is wrong: it should be .net not .com

      http://www.nomadness.net/

  25. The best MP3 player? by chrysrobyn · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't understand. The posting starts off saying, "The best portable MP3-player has become better!" and then goes on to talk about the battery munching USB wielding Bigger Than A Discman Nomad.

    Was there an editorial problem? Shouldn't we have heard about it when the story broke? "The best MP3 player on the planet just got even better." It's small, it's got battery life beyond what I thought possible and the transfer rate over [IEEE 1394|Firewire|iLink] is pretty good.

    Of course, that announcement was like a month ago.

    1. Re:The best MP3 player? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Possibly because the new Nomad is smaller, uses Li-Ion batteries, has firewire interface as well as USB, faster CPU, more HD space, etc.

      And it's not made by Apple!

    2. Re:The best MP3 player? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Possibly because the new Nomad is

      smaller

      Maybe smaller than the old Nomad, but you must admit that an iPod is very small and easy to carry in a shirt pocket.

      uses Li-Ion batteries

      Who cares what battery technology it uses, as long as it works? Sure, with two batteries, you can get up to 22 hours, but at what cost in size?

      has firewire interface as well as USB

      USB isn't worth anything if you have a Firewire port. And if you don't, the hard drive space isn't worth much.

      faster CPU

      As long as it keeps up with my preferred sound quality (256 variable), who cares how fast it is?

      more HD space

      A larger HD is always hard to turn down. Being able to actually store data on (and boot off of) this generation of player means so much more with the big drives. Here's the only compromise: Large case + large drive or smaller case + smaller drive?

      And it's not made by Apple!

      As I type this on my Thinkpad, next to my Power3+ RS6k, I wonder what point you're making? I'm not an Apple bigot, but I certainly see that they bring value to several markets (before calling me an IBM bigot, I don't know of any IBM parts are in the iPod). Apple has a great rep for quality products, service and nice stable software integration. Do you complain about Apple's dollar premium? Have you even tried an iPod out? Have you noticed how well those things sell?

    3. Re:The best MP3 player? by brunes69 · · Score: 2

      Er, WTF are you talking about. The Nomad 3 has a firewire interface, and at 30 GB and OGG capable for the same price, it pretty much beats the piss out of the iPod. Not to mention it works in Windows (without buying 3rd party software) and Linux

    4. Re:The best MP3 player? by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2

      It looks like about 4-5 times the size of the iPod, and I seriously doubt that it's Ogg compatible.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    5. Re:The best MP3 player? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares about OGG? MP3 sounds better and the HD is so damn big who cares about saving a few megs?

  26. Re:spelling... by Tha_Zanthrax · · Score: 1

    I know my engrish sucks... but I don't really the error in that one... maybe the word 'from' could be replaced with 'at'?

  27. IGN has a preview of the Jukebox3 too... by psxndc · · Score: 5, Informative
    http://gear.ign.com/articles/317/317470p1.html. The site listed here was slashdotted so:
    • Firewire port
    • USB port
    • 2 line outs
    • head phone out
    • Mic/optical input (sorry iPod fans, your baby doesn't have this one. I wish it did, but it don't)
    • 20 Gig Drive

    And they've shrunk it. It's still bigger than the iPod by a good amount, but it appears to be less-than-CD-player size (see the site)

    psxndc

    --

    The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

  28. Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever you say, MP3-boy. And in the year 2006, when the RIAA is scanning your computer and making a list of all of your officially-watermarked MP3s and sending you a big fat bill (thanks to the Music Digital Rights Protection Act of 2004), Ogg users will be safe from this kind of nonsense. Hillary Rosen will be sitting at her computer, thinking about us Ogg users, tears streaming down her face, gorging herself on chocolate cake, shrieking "MY MONEY!! WHERE IS MY MONEY!? WAHAHAHA!!"

    Personally, I like the second scenario better.

    Screw the RIAA.

    1. Re:Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you think they wouldn't go after ogg if it were to become more than a faggy format? you are a complete moron if you think 'the (wo)man' is going to stop mp3.

  29. And it's a hard drive! by samael · · Score: 2

    I use mine all the time for transporting gigs of data about the place.

  30. Re:666th post! And a widening post at that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Klerck I use Mozilla under Linux, your page posts do not hurt me. Heh it is funny how you idiots always make fun of Linux and say how you are so proud to be Windows users and then at the end of the day your crap only affects Windows users and the rest of us (users of a better OS) are not affected at all. That must make you mad, huh? Heh, all crapflooders can go crawl off somewhere and die.

  31. Re:EphPod by firewort · · Score: 2
    Funny,
    I have EphPod working on a WinNT 4/sp6 machine, and have MediaFour's Xplay working on a win2k box. (Still waiting for development to firm up a bit on linux communications).

    As for iTunes management, that's only if you have it be the primary machine. You can move music around without having to have it on the machine first.

    Go to MetaMage.com and get EscapePod to move mp3s off the iPod to iTunes.

    Or, get iPod Free File Sync...

    Or, get PodMaster...

    So, there are a range of options you haven't tried to make managing your music a little more flexible.

    --

  32. I hope they support it better than the original. by biafra · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I purchased the original 6GB NJB, and although it does work well as a MP3 player there are a lot of bugs that Creative will probably never fix. Some of these bugs sound simple to correct (eg. no line wrap on long song titles), but I now suspect that firmware development for the first NJB is done (last update sometime last year). I'm not sure when I will learn my lesson and stop buying creative products. They used to be a really great company and I have bought thousands of dollars worth of their products over the years (from several of the original soundblasters all the way to Live5.1 bla bla bla's, video cards, you name it). In the past few years I've just started to feel like support beyond their latest gizmo is not a priority for them. Oh well my next MP3 player purchase is a few months away so we'll see how the reviews are....

    --
    :wq
  33. But does it recharge power over firewire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The iPod does, which is a really cool thing (tm).
    Does the Nomad 3?

  34. Ogg by austad · · Score: 2

    I thought Ogg wouldn't play on an ARM based device because the decoder supplied by Xiph used floating point, and the ARM processor has no FPU?

    Did someone make a non-FPU version of the decoder? Or does the kernel on the Zaurus have FPU emulation enabled?

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    1. Re:Ogg by Sloppy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Did someone make a non-FPU version of the decoder?

      Yes. Xiph. They have two decoders. One is free but requires floating point. The other is commercial and only needs integers (and judging from some of Monty's posts, it sounds like the integer player even includes some hand-crafted assembly code specifically for ARM).

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    2. Re:Ogg by mcspock · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is incorrect; the xiph integerized codebase is pure C. There is another integerized vorbis decoder which only plays up to beta4 content available at http://ivdev.sourceforge.net, but this is not endorsed or supported by xiph.

      --
      -- Patience is a virtue, but impatience is an art.
  35. first Ogg? I think not by fean · · Score: 1

    my iomega "hipzip" has been playing ogg for a while now

    1. Re:first Ogg? I think not by dberger · · Score: 1

      But at only 40Meg per hip zip, that's barely an album per disk at "normal" (VBR) encode rates. Seems hardly worth it.

    2. Re:first Ogg? I think not by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 2

      The fact that it holds 40 megs per disk has nothing to do with the fact that it can indeed play OGG files.....(BTW -- 40 megs is a lot if you are listening to audio books at 24K)

      --
      (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
    3. Re:first Ogg? I think not by mcspock · · Score: 1

      wow it has? because, to my knowledge, that software was never generally released, and the only parties that were allowed to have a copy of that image were jack moffit and chris montgomery.

      not that i should know or anything, since i built that image and burned it into the devices. hello.

      --
      -- Patience is a virtue, but impatience is an art.
    4. Re:first Ogg? I think not by fean · · Score: 1

      hi

      believe it or not, I can play .ogg files on my hipzip... which is a good thing after I converted all of my mp3s to ogg...

      of course, I am running a beta firmware, and I don't know if it's the latest or what... I don't have any problems, so I've never needed to update again....

      and remind me what you were doing burning the software into the hipzip if you worked for dadio?

      and what do the head of vorbis and icecast have to do with the hipzip? why would the dadio developers give them an image? interesting to ponder.....

    5. Re:first Ogg? I think not by mcspock · · Score: 2, Interesting

      where did you get this beta firmware? it was never released outside of a controlled audience. monty and jack (jack works on the vorbis project) were allowed to have a copy; iomega granted permission for both of them to have a copy of the firmware, but no rights were given to redistribute it. this was primarily an advocacy item.

      i built and burned the images with vorbis support as part of this arrangement. there were also demo players furnished to iomega, and for a while they were discussing releasing a tested approved firmware update with vorbis support, but that fell through.

      so i'll ask again, where did you get that firmware image from?

      --
      -- Patience is a virtue, but impatience is an art.
    6. Re:first Ogg? I think not by fean · · Score: 1

      I signed up with iomega for their beta software testing... their first firmware had some retarded bugs, so when they notified me that they had new firmware, I downloaded it the first day....

      unfortunately I don't have my hipzip here @ college, otherwise I'd tell you the software version

  36. Why did you have to go post this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was enjoying reading the comments on the T-Break.com forum until it got slashdotted. I knew about this way before it was posted but didn't say anything because I didn't want this to happen.
    Oh well...

  37. I AM V'GER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you see the word "Voyager" do you have flashbacks of that horrible movie?

    1. Re:I AM V'GER by Kalabajoui · · Score: 1

      Only when I see it in connection to the NASA probe. When I hear the word Voyager, I have flashbacks to the horrible TV series.

  38. Error -39 on Mac OS by yerricde · · Score: 1

    You can even drag an MP3 folder from a network drive directly into iTunes or into your iPod. Oops, that doesn't work!. You get a mysterious error -39 when you try this.

    According to this list of Mac OS error codes, error -39 is "end of file". The mysterious thing is why iTunes gives you "end of file" in when syncing through Samba.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  39. this is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is great, there will be more ogg portable players in the future. I can't wait until they come out with one that can play oggs off of cdrs. What great news. I use the ogg format with my music, awesome.

    http://www.darkambient.org

  40. Statically linked FPU emu by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Or does the kernel on the Zaurus have FPU emulation enabled?

    The ARM GCC toolchain will let you statically link FPU emulation into a binary if your kernel doesn't support it. It simply replaces all F___ instructions with calls to the emulator.

    The differences between the Zaurus PDA and a pocket MP3 player: Zaurus has a very fast general-purpose ARM CPU, while the pocket MP3 players rely on either a cheap processor just barely fast enough to decode 192 kbps MP3 at 90% CPU or a dedicated MPEG audio decoder chip.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Statically linked FPU emu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've read that FPU emulation isn't fast enough to decode Vorbis on current ARM CPUs.

    2. Re:Statically linked FPU emu by mcspock · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is incorrect; the strongarm 206mhz processor in the zaurus is not fast enough to decode ogg real time using floating point emulation. It's close, but not quite.

      Pocket MP3 players typically use a cirrus 7212 74mhz arm processor, which are much faster than you describe (decode at less than 60% of the cpu). Also, as a side note, decoding 192kbps is easier than decoding, say, 96kbps; you just spend more time pushing the data through.

      --
      -- Patience is a virtue, but impatience is an art.
    3. Re:Statically linked FPU emu by davidhedbor · · Score: 1

      Actually, the processor isn't even close to be able to decode Ogg using a the freely available floating point libraries. As a matter of fact, I think one test showed that decoding 50 seconds of audio took 500 seconds. I.e it's painfully slow using an FP codec.

  41. Re:spelling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anonymous to avoid karma burn...

    Did you see the "..." part in my post you ignorant fuck? There's more to the rhyme. Once you're done with your sister or not brushing your teeth, depending on whatever "superior" country you're from, go look it up.

  42. Amen by sulli · · Score: 2
    My 5 GB iPod is the best electronic device I have bought in years. If only I could trade it in for a 10 GB one ... but dem's da breaks.

    Size matters!

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  43. playlist-on-the-fly by sulli · · Score: 1

    yes, this feature is desperately needed. but it's the sort of thing that apple could add in a firmware upgrade (like they added EQ per customer input). i can wait for that.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  44. Re:The Best? Hardly! - Interesting, thanks. by @madeus · · Score: 1

    Hmm interesting points, thanks.

    I agree with SMB performance under OS X being pretty crappy, could be my network though :-). Also hate the *stupid* way the Finder locks up when dealing with SMB/NFS shares :(

    I've not tried the iPod on a Windows PC though, none of the boxes I have at home have Firewire card apart from my PowerBook. I have heard some bad things about it though, but assumed they were teething problems...

    Didn't know was that bad on Windows :(

  45. Hacking the Archos by theoriginalturtle · · Score: 1

    I've got an Archos 6GB playback-only jukebox, and the thing is pretty much unbeatable for what I need to do. What's more, if 6Gb isn't enough for you, you can grab pretty much any other decent 9.5mm drive and replace the Toshiba 6Gb with your favorite, and the system is none the wiser. A 1394 port is useful and relevant only to those people who have a 1394 port. Except for Apple, and a few specific models from Dell and Gateway and maybe a Sony VAIO, most machines are still not shipping with 1394, but every one of them ships with USB, and usually USB 2.0.

    Archos has been remarkably good about firmware updates and there's a pretty active community involved in hacking and modding the Archos devices. Different controls, different behaviors, bigger drives, etc. I've heard of one guy who's planning on jacking a 60Gb into his. That's enough MP3s to make Hillary Rosen soil herself.

    They're not the smallest/lightest/most-elegant, but the batteries last longer than I do, they hold a pile of stuff, play it back decently, and act as a nice portable drive for those times you don't feel like carting around a mountain of Zip disks.

    I really don't understand the dazzle effect that the Nomads have on people. I looked at them, priced them, and said "eh."

    And while I look on the OggVorbis development effort with interest, there's no compelling reason right now to move away from MP3.

    Turtle

    --
    ---------------------------------------
    Rotate the pod, please, HAL....
  46. Re:EphPod by Bklyn · · Score: 1
    As for iTunes management, that's only if you have it be the primary machine. You can move music around without having to have it on the machine first.

    I don't have my machine setup as the primary, but I get Error -39 whenever I try copying files from SMB -> iTunes or iPod. Are you using SMB?

  47. Re:EphPod by Bklyn · · Score: 1
    Go to MetaMage.com [metamage.com] and get EscapePod to move mp3s off the iPod to iTunes

    I have absolutely no need to do that. I just want to take my music and put it ONTO my iPod.

    Or, get iPod Free File Sync... [crispsofties.com]

    This appears to be more of the same. Copy files from the iPod, not to it. I don't want that.

    Or, get PodMaster... [mac.com]

    Sigh, even more of the same.

  48. Sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know someone that still has a betamax player too!

  49. Re:spelling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    im from the country where it is spelled Wolfenstein.

  50. Re:EphPod by firewort · · Score: 2

    Beg your pardon, I misunderstood your needs.

    --

  51. Re:EphPod by firewort · · Score: 2

    I am using SMB but not in conjunction with an iPod. I haven't tried dropping a folder of music files onto the iPod from an SMB-accessed share.

    In all other respects, SMB is working great for me, but this is one I'll have to try. Sorry to hear it isn't successful for you-- I'm going to see if I can't replicate the problem, myself.

    --

  52. They've made 4GB mini-disks in the labs.. by willy_me · · Score: 2
    I believe the point the poster was trying to make is that while mini-disks are currently at 160MB, they have newer disks in R&D. A year ago I read an article on /. about Sharp pushing the size up to 4GB - most likely using multi-layer blue laser technology. While 4GB will certainly not make it out until blue lasers are very common, a smaller 700MB or possibly even 1GB disk is technically viable.

    Think of it this way, minidisks are actually very old - over ten years since their introduction. It's very possible to apply recent technologies, similar to what is now common in DVD players, to increase their capacity. Such a disk would make minidisks very competitive with the iPod and such.

    Willy

    1. Re:They've made 4GB mini-disks in the labs.. by karnal · · Score: 1

      Actually, I can't give any specs (not exactly sure), but Sony does have the MD2 specification out -- not sure if it's just for data only, but I seem to recall they're about 700MB, and their main application is camcorders (roughly 20 minutes per disk...?)

      They're not using them for music yet though, from what I can tell. I kinda wish they would, rather than going to the MDLP (read - more compression). I haven't used an MDLP deck yet (primarily because I have 2 components and they don't speak MDLP anyways) but I've heard decent things about the mid-range compression.

      --
      Karnal
  53. A subtle point by xiphmont · · Score: 2

    The HipZip, unfortunately, never officially supported Ogg and the firmware for HipZip that plays oggs only handles up to beta 4 files. It may well never be updated at this point due to an unfortunate pissing match involving the company that supplied the firmware for HipZip (iObjects/Fullplay).

    So, yes, it can certainly be argued HipZip was first. HipZip certainly proved that an embedded processor had the necessary power (the early beta files were even more expensive to decode than current Vorbis files). However, Iomega never officially acknowledged Ogg support.

    In terms of official company support, theKompany/Zaurus are definately the first handheld, and the first handheld to play all current/future OggVorbis I files.

    Monty

  54. Start with FPU emu, then gradually move to fixed by yerricde · · Score: 1

    I've read that FPU emulation isn't fast enough to decode Vorbis on current ARM CPUs.

    Total IEEE FPU emulation no, but emulating floating-point via fixed-point math may show some promise. Fixed-point is especially fast with ARM because every instruction has a built-in rotation, making it easy to deal with scaling of multiplied values. From there, continue to optimize the code until you have something that runs in real time

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  55. "Free Software". by castlan · · Score: 2

    It seems fairly evident that the phrase "open standards" has nothing to do with money, but with "trade secrets" and proprietary formats that a company can legally prevent others from using.

    While the words free software can mean software that can be had for no money, making it "free of cost", the phrase "free software" usually refers to Free Software. Free Software can be a free download, or it can cost money to buy it. The point of Free Software, is that once you have it, you can do just about anything you want with it, even share it with your friends. A Copyleft like the General Public License (GPL) is a kind of Copyright, which ensures that everybody you give the software to has the same freedoms that were given to you. Even if all of Ogg were totally under the GPL, they could still try to sell the software for money, just like you can, one you have a copy.

    There is no reason why you can't make money off of Free Software or open standards. For more information on Free software, check out http://www.gnu.org/philosophy

    1. Re:"Free Software". by sydb · · Score: 2

      If you're talking to me, you're preaching to the converted.

      It appears that Xiph have made the integerised codec proprietary.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    2. Re:"Free Software". by castlan · · Score: 2

      Wasn't so much advocating as trying to clarify things. Surely didn't mean to preach to the choir. Do you mean that they closed the standard, or that they didn't release a Free reference implementation?

      If you understand that one can be charged for Free Software, than could you explain what you meant by this post? Maybe my preaching should have been posted to the AC's "Think again", but then your post seems like a non-sequiter. Am I missing something?

    3. Re:"Free Software". by sydb · · Score: 2

      Well, I haven't seen the license for the integerised codec. But Xiph want to charge for it. Yes you can do that with Free Software.

      But no, it doesn't make business sense. It just takes one person to pay for it then put the code up for free on their FTP server, and no-one else is going to pay.

      So I concluded that Xiph weren't going to be that daft, and that they were releasing the code under a non-free license.

      Yes I'm jumping to a conclusion, but it's a higly probable one.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
  56. Tp5 by jarodss · · Score: 2

    Dave@mediafour said in the mediafour.com/fourms that there would be an anouncement monday (04/15) about xPlay.

    It may be a final release or it may be TP6, I've been a user since TP3 and have had access to my iPod since then, xPlay just keeps getting better, so when xPlay 1.0 or TP6 comes out it should be even better.

    You can even update the firmware with xPlay now, what more could you want?

    1. Re:Tp5 by Bklyn · · Score: 1

      No FireWire lockups, but that might not be Mediafour's problem.

  57. Re:666th post! And a widening post at that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think of it as a punishment for using IE. I use alternately Moz or Opera. They don't effect me either.