Slashdot Mirror


Spanish Province Dist-Upgrades

Johnny Mnemonic writes "The Spanish province of Extremadura has adopted Linux for the official OS of schools and offices, largely because of price. Simply, they don't have enough money for other OSes, and they promise to handle the rollout more gracefully than a similar Linux initiative in Mexico. According to Wired, this is the first time a European school system has switched to Linux."

217 comments

  1. What's most interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not the Free as in speech aspects of the technology that's attracted them. It's the Free Beer loving software pirate that lives within deep within the Spanish psyche that's driven them to OSS.

    Yo ho! Yo ho! A pirate's life for me!

    1. Re:What's most interesting... by yintercept · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's the Free Beer loving software pirate that lives within deep within the Spanish psyche that's driven them to OSS.

      Isn't it the same pirate spirit that attracts most /. users to Linux. My bet is that a third of the /.ers have a parrot sitting on their shoulders as they hack, a tenth have a false eye earned in MUD challenge, and a good 70% say "har" when they think a post is funny.

      A hardy and light hearted bunch they be. But if ye break the prirate code (GPL) then to to plank with ye mateys.

    2. Re:What's most interesting... by Ratsarse · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Har! There be no parrot on me poop deck, but I do be having a false eye.

  2. Re:Bored during the blackout? You need this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ugh, pdf format sucks. i'm not even going to consider looking at it until you get it in an open format like PostScript. jeez, get a clue.

  3. M�s potencia a ellos! by kwishot · · Score: 1

    More power to them!

    (I don't know Spanish, but Babelfish is my friend and really....more power to them)

  4. Just a minor correction... by mfarah · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Spanish province of Extremadura has[...]

    Actually, Extremadura is an autonomous community (formerly a region under the older division of the country). It's composed of TWO provinces: Cáceres and Badajoz.

    There. Mod me down as redundant if you will.

    --
    "Trust me - I know what I'm doing."
    - Sledge Hammer
    1. Re:Just a minor correction... by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 3, Funny

      Extremadura is an autonomous community

      WOMAN: I didn't know we had a king. I thought we were an autonomous collective.
      DENNIS: You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship: a self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working classes--
      WOMAN: Oh, there you go bringing class into it again.

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    2. Re:Just a minor correction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah... and some more info:
      It hasn't been "officially adopted" since it is neither mandatory nor it will be installed by default. It'll be up to the informatics responsible at each and every center to install it if they want.
      It has been not a question of money: they have signed so they *already* have cheap access to all Microsoft products. It has been due to the admitance of free source programs being the way to go.

      Unluckily, the distro has still some way to go to be really productive (too much politics involved: they would be done much more just by adopting a personalized version of latest Red Hat or SuSE).

    3. Re:Just a minor correction... by ghurtado · · Score: 1

      Correct, I was born in Caceres, and lived there until I was 21. There is an autonomous Extremadura governing body akin to state institutions in the US.

  5. The desktop-revolution begins by rseuhs · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Even the most die-hard Microsoft supporters will admit that Linux is viable on the desktop right now.

    Microsoft supporters usually cite "migration costs" or "training costs", or other shortsighted reasons why people should not switch to Linux.

    This is shortsighted because corporations and organisations come and go -> If switching costs is the only thing in favor of Windows, then it will lose slowly, but steadily.

    Of course, the massive Windows-exodus will not start before CodeWeavers and Transgaming make Linux "Windows compatible", but I see them doing exactly this in the next 2 years.

    Then computer-makers will start putting Windows-compatible-but-cheaper-than-Windows Linux on their boxes.

    1. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by 56ker · · Score: 2

      If you notice which companies grow the most - it's the small ones. They're flexible enough to change their working practices unlike the big behemoths where they're virtually set in stone!

    2. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No software=No acceptance by a majority of the public.

      Look at Apple, decent systems with SHIT for software or at the very least, a good wait of 6 months to a year to get the same software Windows already has.

      Linux on the desktop looks great right now with the more current distros, but until its got all the same software available on windows, people with money are not going to bother with it.

      Software=Success

    3. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by Not+The+Real+Me · · Score: 1

      Linux is not viable on the desktop yet. It's all about the apps, not the OS.

      Until Star Office or Open Office can match up with MS Office, Linux on the desktop is only viable for geeks. (I also like Photoshop, Dreamweaver, Cakewalk Pro, but don't see them being ported any time soon. GIMP ain't in the Photoshop caliber league inspite of what some people may think.)

      Hardware compatibility is another problem. With all the winmodems and NICs out there that don't work with Linux how can you expect to get people to use it if you can't network? Replacing the NICs and winmodems isn't always the answer if you've got a cash strapped school.

      If it takes an extra 3 or 4 hours plus the cost of extra parts to get a machine compatible with Linux, and you guestimate labor at $50/hour, suddenly buying an M$ license doesn't look so terrible.

      I still like Linux on the servers, but on the desktop, it's got a long way to go.

    4. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by municio · · Score: 4, Interesting

      IMHO, it's going to be the other way around: people will first switch to open source applications, (StarOffice/OpenOffice for instance, since it works in Windows) and then to an Open Source OS. It's easier this way, and it does more economic sense. I can imagine my company switching to an open source Office suite to save $500, I don't imagine them migrating to Linux to save on a Windows license they already paid for when the bought the computer. Besides, a marketoid who can MS Office can use StarOffice/OpenOffice very easily. If a marketoid has a problem with OpenOffice, I'm sure he will find his way around. But I can't imagine the same marketoid doing a su or changing file permissions. Besides the support team in many companies is made of MCSEs very familiar with Windows and that perceive Linux like a thread to their jobs. But I don't think they view OpenOffice like a thread, since they are not so into MS Office either.

      Once a companies rely on specific open source applications, it might make sense for the market and free developers to target their efforts in providing bullet proof distributions based on specific applications, that hide all complexity to the final user (a la AOL), and gives maintenance responsibilities to the administrators. By complexity I mean very simple things for technical people (file permissions, packages installation, etc...), that look very complex for regular users.

      For know, it's to soon to target the non-technical desktop market. Look at Red Hat, they don't even mention the desktop market. They focus only on the server side.

      Move people first to open source applications, (I convinced 5 people to move over Mozilla on Windows this month on my job). OS will come later.

    5. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by Dave_bsr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As far as i'm concerned, OO matches MS office. it's not _exactly_ the same thing but it does what an office app should do, and it's very close to being able to open up MS docs well. It can do what an office system should do, and it does it well. Once an office application is available, adoption will follow. Applications follow a market - and if linux doesn't get XYZ applications in ABC time that doesn't mean it isn't "viable", it just means it isn't the right thing for you at that time.

      Gimp is cool, there are a million cool things about linux. And yes you can use it successfully as a desktop OS - I do.

      Getting a machine "linux compatible" is much easier in my experience than getting a machine windows 2K compatible, by far - and XP has some pretty high standards too. I've never had problem with NICs, and my bet is that winmodem support will come, and in some areas is coming. As much as they suck, i wouldn't mind the extra for a REAL MODEM, thank you.

      --


      Who is this Anonymous Coward character, how does he post so much, and why is he always such a whore?
    6. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Until Star Office or Open Office can match up with MS Office, Linux on the desktop is only viable for geeks.

      Star/Open Office don't have to be better than MS Office, they only have to be good enough, which they are. The most critical thing that's lacking is file format compatibility. But when that isn't an issue (such as in this case), Star/Open Office is good enough.

      Hardware compatibility is another problem. With all the winmodems and NICs out there that don't work with Linux how can you expect to get people to use it if you can't network? Replacing the NICs and winmodems isn't always the answer if you've got a cash strapped school.

      Aside from the fact that Linux NIC compatibility is very good, a cheap NE2000 card is still a good ways cheaper than an XP license.

      ...and you guestimate labor at $50/hour

      You really think that admins in Spain make $50/hour? Bwahahahahahahahaha!

    7. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by Chasuk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Even the most die-hard Microsoft supporters will admit that Linux is viable on the desktop right now.

      I suppose you could call me a die-hard Microsoft supporter, though I tend to consider myself agnostic regarding OS's. However, as I use Microsoft OS's to the virtual exclusion of all others, the die-hard Linux supporters will probably consider me a die-hard Microsoft supporter. The point of this wordy preamble? I am [or might be considered] a die-hard Microsoft supporter, and I take exception to the quote italicized above.

      Linux ISN'T viable on the Desktop right now.

      Linux will be ready for the Desktop when the majority of *neophyte computer users* don't need tech support and hand-holding to use it, or when the tech support which is available is as freely and ubiquitously available as it is for the Windows platform.

      The words *neophyte computer users* were emphasized for a reason. Don't respond unless you have digested them.

      I work in telephone tech support, and I have done so for years. Further, I am the guy who is called by in-laws, friends, acquaintances, and other assorted and otherwise not-even-on-their-xmas-card-list family members when their PC stops co-operating.

      During the day, EVERY day, I get phone calls like this one:

      Customer: "Hello, I use you for my e-mails, and now I can't get them."

      Me: "We are your Internet Service Provider, and you are having trouble receiving your e-mail through us?"

      Customer: "Uh-huh."

      I collect the customer's name, I look their account up, and after I have ensured that their service has not been disconnected due to a deliquent bill, we proceed.

      Me: "Are you connected to the Internet when you try to check your e-mail?"

      Customer: "What?"

      Me: "When you try to check your e-mail, are you sure that you are actually connected to the Internet?"

      Customer: "I don't know. How do I tell?"

      After several false starts we do solve the problem, but the conversation almost always includes moments similar to this:

      Me: "What version of Windows are you using?"

      Customer: "I don't know. How do I tell?"

      Or:

      Me: "What browser do you use?"

      Customer: "I don't know. What's a browser?"

      Me: "The program that you use to browse the web. Do you use Internet Explorer, Netscape Communicator, Opera, or something else?"

      Customer: "I don't know. How do I tell?"

      Or:

      Customer: "I can't read what my friend sent me."

      Me: "What did you send you?"

      Customer: "I don't know, I can't open it to find out."

      Me: "No, I mean did he send you a text file, a sound file, an image, what?"

      Customer: "I don't know, I can't open it to find out."

      Me: "What is the name of the file that he sent you?"

      Customer: "I don't know. How do I tell?"

      Me: "Did he send it to you as an e-mail attachment, or was it sent on a zip disk, a floppy, or a CD?"

      Customer: "I don't know. How do I tell?"

      Or:

      Customer: "How can I get rid of my cookies?"

      I spend several minutes trying to explain one of several different processes, during which time it becomes obvious that the customer has no fucking idea what a cookie even is, but a helpful computer "expert" told him they were bad.

      I spend hours a month trying to explain to people how to install, and remove, various computer applications. In Windows, it is a relatively painless procedure, though it is far from standard or perfect. The customer might have to download a program to help him extract the file he has downloaded, which is always confusing to a neophyte, but they eventually manage. Usually it is double-click and go, for both installation and removal. I say usually: Windows is especially sloppy in leaving fragments of removed programs all over the HD, and in leaving shit in the registry. And DLL hell sucks, but both problems are getting better.

      In Linux, the customer has to understand debs, and rpms, and tarballs, minimum. He has to understand the compile process, and what a dependency is, and that the kernel may be rock solid, but that the Windows Manager or the application he is using isn't. In other words, he has to understand that the stable OS he is using, as a Desktop solution, is just as prone to crashes as Windows, but that if he were running a server it wouldn't crash nearly as often as a server crashes in Windows. That is exceedingly useful to a Desktop user.

      Imagine a conversation with a neophyte Linux Desktop user.

      Me: "What distribution of Linux are you using?"

      Customer: "I don't know. How do I tell?"

      Or:

      Me: "What Window Manager are you using?"

      Customer: "I don't know. How do I tell?"

      I would then spend several minutes trying to ascertain whether the customer was using Gnome, or KDE (all arguments over what a Windows Manager is put aside), or Enlightenment, or...

      You get the idea.

      Now, today, right now, the average Linux user is several times more computer literate than the average Windows user. They are members of the geek-elite. They wouldn't ask questions as dumb as the examples I've given.

      But for Linux to be viable on the Desktop, it would have to embrace the masses of *neophyte computer users* who are already petrified by MS Windows. And MS Windows is pretty bloody simple, in most regards, to Linux, regardless of which distribution or Windows Manager you are using.

      I've been installing Linux since 1995, with Slackware as my first install, and it has improved leaps and bounds, but it is still not ready for the Desktop, the Desktop being that user space inhabited by the non computer-geeks, the computer neophytes.

    8. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by derF024 · · Score: 1

      Until Star Office or Open Office can match up with MS Office, Linux on the desktop is only viable for geeks.

      between openoffice, koffice, and gnome office (abiword, gnumeric, gnucash, etc) the free office suites handle almost every function that a home user will ever really use. also, features are constantly getting added to accomidate niche users that currently couldn't use one of the free office suites.

      Hardware compatibility is another problem. With all the winmodems and NICs out there that don't work with Linux how can you expect to get people to use it if you can't network?

      eh.. winmodems are one thing, but i have yet to find a nic that didn't work 100% with linux. how many schools/offices are there that have individual desktop machines dialing into anything on their own? there's almost always a local network and _maybe_ a server that dials up on network activity.

      I still like Linux on the servers, but on the desktop, it's got a long way to go.

      it's closer than you think. if you haven't looked at kde or gnome lately, look again.

    9. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by WetCat · · Score: 1
      Hmmm... One thing I really suggest to have in desktop Linux
      is to create it without usual UNIX file permissions (!)

      The system of file permissions wiped out - you are essentially ONE and ONLY ONE user of this system,
      all requests to change file permissions ignored, ls -l has no column with confusing rwxrwxrwx
      and instead of it we can put security labels that you can "attach" to files, programs and directories.
      System then check files against programs for consistency of labels

      For example you can have "Private" directory that you can read only by "Private" password-protected "kdedit-passworded"

      It's much more secure than doing magic with -rwxrwxrwx-

      So for desktop system, you'll have

      1. a smooth non-confusing file system
      2. mandatory labeled (and theoretically secure!) security control
      This will be great!
    10. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by jesterzog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Even the most die-hard Microsoft supporters will admit that Linux is viable on the desktop right now.

      Even the most die-hard Linux supporters will admit that Windows is viable on the desktop right now. Unfortunately it has to be better before most people will consider it a reasonable alternative. It also needs better marketing, because effective (not necessarily honest) marketing is so often what decides the purchasing decisions that people and businesses make. Whether or not GNU fans want to sell their soul and push boundaries to gain market share is another issue, though.

      Microsoft supporters usually cite "migration costs" or "training costs", or other shortsighted reasons why people should not switch to Linux.

      This is shortsighted because corporations and organisations come and go -> If switching costs is the only thing in favor of Windows, then it will lose slowly, but steadily.

      I'll agree that it's shortsighted, but I also don't see a serious difference between Linux supporters citing "software purchasing costs", which for the most part is just a fixed cost in the first place. Once you've bought it, you have it.

      I've had Win98 on one of my boxes for three years, I've installed the updates when they came along, and it hasn't cost me much more than what I paid for it. It's the ongoing maintenance that's the big cost to a lot of businesses. Linux usually requires much higher paid and harder to find staff than Windows requires...

      Yes it's partly because of the education system and the Microsoft monopoly and the unfair popularity of winmodems from companies that don't release alternative drivers, but it's true. And it's unlikely to be too difficult to put together an argument showing this to be more expensive than the occasional Microsoft upgrade.

      Personally I like using linux/bsd/unix/whatever more than Windows. But I think it's naive to talk about free software as an inevitable dinosaur that will soon rise up and thwart Microsoft out of existence. Five years ago, people were saying that exactly that would happen within months, and people never stop saying it. It also never really happens.

      When it comes down to it, Microsoft is full of very smart (albeit cut-throat competitive) business people who, whatever you might read around slashdot, are not stupid. Microsoft could be split in half and it'd still come out on top one way or another. This doesn't mean that Microsoft doesn't make mistakes or that people won't switch away from Microsoft products; all of that is just part of the calculated risk taking that any business does. But it's not going to collapse under its own stupidity any time soon.

      That's how I feel about it, anyway.

    11. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by marcs · · Score: 1

      I use Linux on my main desktop machine (and a good handful of servers) and I certainly prefer Linux (even on the desktop) to anything MS has produced so far...

      However, is this not supposed to be about choice? If someone wants to use an MS solution, let them. Or MAC/OSX, Sun, Amiga or a TRS80 for all I care. Last time I checked, my Red Hat T-shirt said "revolution of choice", not "zealots will conquer the earth" nor "MS must fall".

      Don't care about modding, this is getting stupid. Zealots (any cause) usually don't help the "cause".

    12. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by visualight · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know an 11 year old girl who can produce web pages in a text editor and is equally comfortable using linux as she is using windows. Her parents think she's a brainiac, but the truth is she just didn't know in advance that linux would be harder. Just as she thinks that using Front Page or GoLive is harder than using NotePad. I quote, "I don't know what all those buttons do, it's easier to just type it." She's learning javascripting from one of the Bible books now, although I am available to "translate" the lessons from the book.

      The point is it's just as easy to tell a friend in need to type "rpm -Uvh" as it is to say "doubleclick this file".

      Linux is not so difficult it's just different and some people are too timid to attempt the adjustment. Think of how AOL spends a billion dollars a year convincing people that they're "easy" to use when in fact all they did was make they're user interface deliberately different from the "generic" IE/NS set. When an AOL user see's me open up Mozilla to a "blank" page they go "What do I do now?" because all the banner ads and popups are missing.

      --
      Samsung took back my unlocked bootloader because Google wants me to rent movies. They're both evil.
    13. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The desktop" is by no means limited to that subset of the computer-using population made up of naive home users.

    14. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually, it is FAR easier to phone support command line operations like "sudo apt-get install mozilla" than it is to navigate the maze of varying icons and menus on a winbox.

    15. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by Gizzmonic · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Look at Apple, decent systems with SHIT for software or at the very least, a good wait of 6 months to a year to get the same software Windows already has.

      Not everyone cares about playing Doom 2k2, or having 12 different versions of label-making software. Some of us have video to edit, and the best packages are Mac-only.

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    16. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by uspsguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You must not support the same Windows that I do. I just spent Friday night and Saturday morning trying to clean up a botched modem install on a W2K laptop. Finding and deleting files manually, searching and editing the regestry for multiple abandoned keys, frequent reboots. It was my father-in-law's machine. He is more computer literate than most but was completely lost. Don't tell me Windows is ready for the desktop. Its there by default in most cases but that doesn't mean its any better than Linux. At work, we have numerous Unix-flavor boxes that just run day in and day out. We keep Ghost images of our Windows workstations on the network because we don't have time to figure out all the problems that crop up. We just give them a fresh working image and walk away.

      --
      Profanity - The sign of a small mind trying to express itself.
    17. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'script'here

    18. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ' script' here 'scr ipt' here 'script' here 'script' here 'sc ript' here 'script' here 'scri pt' here'scrip t' here 'script' here 'script ' here 'scr ipt ' here 'script' here 'script' here 'script' here 'script' here 'script' here 'script' here 'script' here 'script' here 'script' here 'script' here 'script' here 'script' here 'script' here 'script' here 'script' here 'script' here 'script' here

    19. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by mikeb · · Score: 1

      Viable on the desktop for whom? It's getting there for some classes of users, but only some can/will use it because the applications or services they need still aren't available. As just one class of user - a small business that evicted Windows 4 years ago now - I still can't do my company's accounts on Linux. The other infuriating lack is the inability of Linux to integrate faxing with printing. Don't tell me how to do it, I KNOW how to bodge it. The problem is that Linux doesn't. A proper fax API so that everything automatically becomes fax aware when it enumerates printers remains important. The hard bit in printing to fax, especially fax/merge for sending out price lists to customers is the API for injecting the recipient number. Solve those two problems and one more class of user can pick up Linux and run with it.

    20. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by m_evanchik · · Score: 2

      Just putting my two cents in, but after 3 abortive attempts (Slackware, Mandrake, Debian) I finally got Linux workably installed through Red Hat.

      I'm impressed with it, but it is definitely a work in progress.

      Probably the biggest obstacle is just inertia. Whether it sucks or not, I've gotten used to my Windows box and have amassed the software on it and tweaked the interface that I'm used to.

      Linux also lacks some pretty important software support on the desktop, particularly Adobe's Illustrator and Photoshop.

      And finally hardware support is not out of the box. I still haven't started using my digicam with Linux because I'm worried it will be a long and tedious process.

      That all said, I am very impressed with the potential of Linux as a desktop workstation. I'm really most interested in it as a server and platform for some big number-crunching.

      So we'll see...

    21. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by dvdeug · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Linux will be ready for the Desktop when the majority of *neophyte computer users* don't need tech support and hand-holding to use it, or when the tech support which is available is as freely and ubiquitously available as it is for the Windows platform.

      Viable - Capable of living; born alive and with such form and development of organs as to be capable of living; -- said of a newborn, or a prematurely born, infant.

      Viable doesn't mean that it conquers all. It means that there is something there that works.

      In Linux, the customer has to understand debs, and rpms, and tarballs, minimum.

      Why? Minimum, you have to understand debs or rpms, whichever is native on your system. For most major distributions, that will let you install pretty much everything you could possibly want. I have at most two or three packages installed from source hanging around, and none from RPM. You may as well claim that any Windows user must understand zips and rars and isos, minimum.

    22. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by quintessent · · Score: 2

      The point is it's just as easy to tell a friend in need to type "rpm -Uvh" as it is to say "doubleclick this file".

      Your point is well made except for this part. How many people are actually going to remember such a long string of unrelated letters, vs. people who will know to double click a file? The idea is to minize those phone calls from your "friend."

    23. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by Tord · · Score: 2
      Until Star Office or Open Office can match up with MS Office, Linux on the desktop is only viable for geeks. (I also like Photoshop, Dreamweaver, Cakewalk Pro, but don't see them being ported any time soon. GIMP ain't in the Photoshop caliber league inspite of what some people may think.)

      As far as I'm concerned Open Office allready matches up with MS Office. I'm using it both at work and home for all my Wordprocessing and Spreadsheet needs and yes, I do need good MS Office import/export ability. All my colleagues use MS Office, but I have no trouble keeping up with them although Open Office still is a beta. I can't speak about the other programs because I don't use them.

      Hardware compatibility is another problem. With all the winmodems and NICs out there that don't work with Linux how can you expect to get people to use it if you can't network? Replacing the NICs and winmodems isn't always the answer if you've got a cash strapped school.

      I can't imagine many schools using a winmodem for each and every computer. They have a local network and one or a handful of connection points to the outside world. A new NIC is cheaper than one license of Windows, but I don't think many schools needs to replace those either.

      I still like Linux on the servers, but on the desktop, it's got a long way to go.

      I'm not a server guy, in fact I've nerver set up a server in my whole life. I'm only running deskop computers, but I still prefer Linux. Sure, there are a lot of areas that needs to be improved, but there are also a lot of things I like better with the Linux desktops (both Gnome and KDE) than Windows, for example:

      • A lot of standard programs (editors, compilers, graphics tools, webbrowsers, games, scripting languages, IM clients etc) installed and correctly configured by default. I don't need to install them one by one.
      • More themability and eye-candy. I want my computer to be fun and friendly to work with and I like to play around with look'n feel settings. It's fun! :)
      • A good text shell. The MS-DOS prompt sucks.
      • Linux has another kind of user community which I find more fun to be a part of.
      • It's more adapted to multi-user environments. It will be perfect when me and my fiance get kids, I just give them their own account and let them play around, knowing that they can't screw up my files.
      • Most good, standard programs are free. I save a lot of money. :)

      As you can see, there is already a lot of reasons for me to run Linux on the desktop. I'm absolutely more techsavy than the average user (I'm a programmer by profession) and some of the points only apply to me, but quite many do apply to the average user as well.

    24. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by Permission+Denied · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The point is it's just as easy to tell a friend in need to type "rpm -Uvh" as it is to say "doubleclick this file".

      Surely you gest.

      (a) recognition and memorization are completely different cognitive abilities, and (b) you need to actually work with these people to figure out what the parent poster is talking about. I'll talk about (b).

      I knew this guy in college - physics major, really smart guy. He was doing numerical analysis in Fortran and he decided he needed his own Linux box instead of just using the iron the physics department offered. He bought a system from VA (this was a while ago).

      Mein Gott, the problems this guy had. He never bothered to look up the rpm command. He just used the KDE feature where it would install an rpm once you double-clicked on it. If you think the "neophyte user" will remember that command you're completely wrong. If you think the neophyte user will do a google or apropos search for the rpm syntax, you're wrong. The neophyte user will never even see a demonstration of the rpm syntax.

      One day, he decided to use GNOME instead of KDE. I get a phonecall when he wants to go back to KDE from GNOME. The Hell I went through that day.... No he wasn't using gdm, kdm, just plain xdm. Forget trying to guide him through editting .xsession. I ended up physically going to his machine and fixing it myself. Fortunately, I also enabled ssh that day.

      Week later, I get another phone call. He can't log in using xdm. It took a while to get a good explanation of what was really going on, but I finally figured that logging into xdm was just spitting him back to the xdm prompt. So I tell hime to give me his passwords, and I log into his box. Nothing seems wrong - his .xsession is fine, I tried it myself remotely. Everything in his user account looked peachy. Then I did a "df -h". Turns out he had like 20 gigs empty in /home, but the 4 gigs in / were all filled up. This guy never used the user account that the VA setup program must have created for him. Double-clicking on rpm files requires root privs, so he would always log in as root. Thus, /root was full of crap and /home was completely empty (VA had a nice partitioning scheme which I understood). Problem is, this guy didn't have any idea of what a user even is, so the lecture about not logging in as root probably did nothing.

      Now, you might call this guy clueless. Regarding unix administration, yes, he was completely clueless, but the stuff he was doing in his fortran programs was way over my head. This guy definitely knew his physics, so he wasn't stupid. Problem with us unix folks is that a lot of time we lump in people who don't understand Unix as idiots.

      Me? I love /usr/ports, CVSup, the whole lot. Makes my job easier and more fun. But I know this stuff is not for everybody, and I'm OK with that - I'm not going to install Linux on my aging mother's win98 PC and if my colleague likes using MacOS, that's fine by me - no need to force Unix on everybody.

    25. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem isn't "hardware out of the box", it's that the seller doesn't provide enough infomration. The OV511 chipset is *very well supported* in Linux. I haven't yet seen a box that says "Specifications: OV511, USB 1.0...". Without this information, you ask the seller:
      Me: "Hi, does this support Linux?"
      Seller: "I don't know. I cant' make any guarantees".

      So do I take the risk, and "suck it and see"? Or do I skip it?

      The only reason that Windows doesn;t have this problem is that the box will say "Supports Windows XXX", and though the one you want isn;t supported under WinXP or whatever, there *will* be one that does. Windows therefore has a much better chance of being shopped for. Nothing to do with the Hardware support. All to do with Marketing.

    26. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Linux ISN'T viable on the Desktop right now.

      I'm using nothing but GNU/Linux on my desktop since 7 1/2 years and you tell me it isn't viable?

      > I suppose you could call me a die-hard Microsoft supporter, though I tend to consider myself agnostic regarding OS's.

      So ignorant would be the better word.

    27. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by rseuhs · · Score: 2
      Linux will be ready for the Desktop when the majority of *neophyte computer users* don't need tech support and hand-holding to use it, or when the tech support which is available is as freely and ubiquitously available as it is for the Windows platform.

      The words *neophyte computer users* were emphasized for a reason. Don't respond unless you have digested them.

      I installed Linux (and before you ask: I also installed Windows for him, he is not willing to install *anything* by himself) for one of this kind.

      One month ago, he calls me up for a need for a painting program, so I tell him on the phone: "Type Alt-F2 and then G-I-M-P Enter"

      Problem solved. And much easier than in Windows where I would have to guide him through the start-menu where even I had no idea where the goddamn Photoshop/whatever is.

      Actually supporting Linux on the phone or per E-Mail is much, much easier than supporting Windows over the phone, because you can do pretty everything with the commandline, and simple tasks in one line.

      But how should an OS "agnostic" user who uses exclusively Windows know?

    28. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by rseuhs · · Score: 2
      However, is this not supposed to be about choice? If someone wants to use an MS solution, let them. Or MAC/OSX, Sun, Amiga or a TRS80 for all I care. Last time I checked, my Red Hat T-shirt said "revolution of choice", not "zealots will conquer the earth" nor "MS must fall".

      Sorry, but all the advantages (great software library, good education system, good driver support) of Windows are results of their surpreme marketshare.

      If their dominating marketshare goes away, all their advantages will go away and they are pretty much toast.

      So "revolution of choice" is EQUIVALENT to "MS must fall". Microsoft can't survive on a leveled playing field.

      And MS knows that pretty well, that's why they care so much about that 1% - 2% of desktop-Linux users.

    29. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Look at freshmeat today... I think you'll be happy

    30. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by BlueWonder · · Score: 2

      You have a strong point that Microsoft Windows is not ready for the desktop. But I fail to see what this has to do with the desktop viability of Linux.

    31. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as the customer can get online using any form of GNU/Linux, techsupport is a breeze! As long as SSH is working, just log in and fix whatever's wrong. Try doing that on a standard win98/2k box (since Terminal Service or VPN isn't installed by default).

    32. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux will be ready for the Desktop when the majority of *neophyte computer users* don't need tech support and hand-holding to use it
      ---------

      So, you're telling me that you plop Grandma down in front of a Windows box and a KDE box, and the Windows box is somehow the path of least resistance? Okay, maybe that might be the case, but please substantiate that claim; otherwise it's FUD.

    33. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by Onnimikki · · Score: 1

      Ah, I finally reinstalled Linux on my home machine because my dial-up connection under Win2K started acting funny. How funny? Well, just about any webpage related to Sympatico (my ISP) no longer loads. That's right. Slashdot will load fine once I'm connected, but www.sympatico.ca (my ISP's homepage) does not. Reading Sympatico POP mail? Impossible.



      Tech support's answer? Reinstall Netscape. Fine. That didn't work. Next answer? Remove and reinstall the TCP/IP module. Tried that. Twice.



      My answer: install Libranet Debian Linux. It's a little prettier than stock Debian. Reading email and connecting to the ISP homepage via the same dialup number and modem is NO LONGER A PROBLEM.



      So what was the problem? I have no idea. Windows 2000 choked on itself. Now we only reboot to Win2k for my fiancee to use Word, Excel and to book tickets on the Air Canada website.

    34. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by miguel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      People have been using computers with DOS and different variations of Windows for quite some time. I do not think anyone could claim that those systems were consistent or easy to use. They have always been a mess. We just happen to know how to use them.

      Joel addresses the issue of frustration when moving between platforms: little things that are different frustrate people.

      Anyways, if you are just starting to train people (like this is the case), you might train them in Linux or Windows.

      Sure, Linux could use some improvements, but those improvements will not happen in a vacuum, in a lab and then deployed to the rest of the world. Just like Windows and the MacOS they will benefit the most from direct and real life exposure.

      There are a couple of very nice stories that the Linex people have witnesses over the past few days (my favorite one being a sheep sheppard in the region that fell in love with the Linux distribution they had prepared).

      Professors that have offered their input and the help of themselves and their students to improve Linex: This is the kind of thing that you will not see with proprietary software.

      Anyways, we are not *that* far, you are just not used to Linux on the desktop. And it will only get better ;-)

      Miguel.

    35. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by FFNieko · · Score: 1

      >Then computer-makers will start putting Windows-
      >compatible-but-cheaper-than-Windows Linux on
      >their boxes.
      I doubt this'll work, a friend recently told me
      that Microsoft is making Windows licences more
      expensive for computerstores that sell computers
      with any OS other than Windows.
      If this is true, computerstores will think twice
      about bundling Linux with a computer.

    36. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Obviously, Windows is not ready for your neophyte computer user! Linux would be no different in that regard. Admittedly, there are fewer support resources for Linux. The average person knows a dozen people who could help with Doze, and maybe one who could help with RedHat. But that's strictly a popularity issue. Linux is not any harder to *use* than Windows.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    37. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by basse · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. And so does the IT department of my homecity (Turku, Finland). They are considering moving from MS Office to Openoffice.org, and have therefore made this report. Check it out.

      Among other things it shows that the average computer user can handle Openoffice just as well as MS Office. The same seems to apply to the OS level (Windows vs. Linux) as well. All it takes is some training in the new program.

    38. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Hardware compatibility is another problem. With all the winmodems and NICs out there that don't work with Linux how can you expect to get people to use it if you can't network? Replacing the NICs and winmodems isn't always the answer if you've got a cash strapped school.

      Eh? I understand your argument about winmodems, but what NIC do you know of that's not Linux compatible?

    39. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by theolein · · Score: 1

      At the risk of being redundant I'll say this is a very good posting. I've also done tech support on the telephone (In no less than three languages) and the amount of people using computers who have absolutely no idea of what they are is amazing. Doing windows support was the worst for me because of the differences in Windows versions meaning that one has to first figure out what they are using and then *where* the various control dialogues are etc. Mac support has been the easiest both in OSX and Classic OS. What I did find interesting is that doing Linux support (although I am far from a guru in the OS) was easier than I expected. I was doing support for a guy running Linux on a cobalt RaQ and the great thing about Linux is that you can do most of the support through the command line once you get the guy to find the terminal (this is a similar process to windows i.e. "What's a terminal/console/taskbar etc") But once you're there you can do almost everything by simply asking the person to type in commands and read out the answers to you, which saves you a lot of hassle trying to figure out in which dialogue or control panel the user has just got lost in.

      Of course if they ask "What's a keyboard?" then you have some more work cut out for you.

    40. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by dhogaza · · Score: 2

      After spending much of yesterday removing the Nimda virus from a friend's computer, I have to laugh at claims that Window's is easy for the neophyte to use while Linux isn't.

      My friend went to MIT on a full scholarship (civil engineering) and to Tufts on a tuition scholarship (environmental engineering). While she has no sysadmin skills she's neither neophtye nor stupid.

      Yet without my help I doubt she would've been able to defeat Nimda in any reasonable amount of time.

      As soon as ESRi releases ArcGIS for Linux (hopefully later this year) she's switching. It will be easier than learning to dodge, avoid, and when necessary remove all the friggin' viruses, worms, and other nasties that keep cropping up in the Windows world. Her GIS tools are the only thing keeping her on Windows. Other than that she only needs a web browser, e-mail client, and Open Office, no problem.

    41. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Linux will be ready for the Desktop when the majority of *neophyte computer users* don't need tech support and hand-holding to use it ...

      By this standard, Windows is not ready for the desktop, as the rest of your post amply demonstrates. Neither Linux nor Windows ever will be, by your standards.

      My daughter's Mattel toys are ready for the desktop by this standard; I wonder why corporate America hasn't rushed to adopt this exciting new technology, with its low support costs? Perhaps it's the fact that the batteries aren't ever included?

      ..., or when the tech support which is available is as freely and ubiquitously available as it is for the Windows platform.

      Freely available? I haven't EVER found anything ``freely available'' in the Windows world!

      Linux has been ready for the corporate desktop for a LONG time now. Anyplace that is going to have a full-time sys-admin will be able to set up a destop which will function for most office workers, and this has been true for quite a while now. The extra cost of the Unix sys-admin will be offset by the lower cost of licensing, downtime, and ``hidden'' support personel.

      In my experience, every organization which uses Windows and has computer support personel on staff also has a number of ``hidden'' support folks: employees who's title indicates that they are non-computer staff, but who actually spend a significant portion of their day dealing with the innumerable problems which come with Windows, for themselves and for others. The cost is hidden because often no-one outside the department realizes that when you have a problem, Joe or Jenny down the hall spends an hour troubleshooting before the helpdesk gets called. When you count the cost of these (often very highly paid) people, the lower cost of hiring products of the MSCE cookie-cutter seems a lot less compelling.

    42. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by Dakkus · · Score: 1

      Linux IS viable on the Desktop right now.

      What do you do if you want to install a program when you're using windows?
      1) You open the internet browser.
      2) You go to a site where you download a file
      3) You have to save the file somewhere.
      4) You have to find the file after saving it.
      5) You have to run the installer (maybe even unzip (or even vorse: unrar) it first).
      6) You have to install the program with all those confusing dialogs.
      7) You have to start the program

      What do you do if you want to install a program when you're using linux?
      1) You open the equivalent of start menu.
      2) From there you select package manager.
      3) You'll wait a while while the package manager updates it's database.
      4) You'll scroll through a list of programs and click the program you wish to install.
      5) You click the installing-button.
      6) Package manager fetches the package from internet, installs and configures it.
      7) You'll start the program.

      I think the first isn't so easy after all.

      You also said that a linux user must understand deb,rpm or source. I disagree.
      Yes. It's good for them to know those things. But not necessary at all.
      In a modern linux distribution you'll just install programs as I mentioned above. You can live without knowing anything about RPM or source.
      In windows you have to know exe and zip (two things versus linux's zero).

      I guess you haven't really used modern distributions as I can see that you've been using slackware etc.
      For a guru slackware is good (and debian is better).
      It's quite a shame that every linux geek tell even the most *neophyte computer users* to install debian. They just say "you'll learn by using". I don't think they will.

      There are many easier distributions, too.
      Many say that RedHat is easy or even the easiest. I'd say that isn't true.
      RedHat is indeed very good for a company because of its good tech support.
      But as a *neophyte computer user* you don't really use tech support.
      RedHat doesn't have any advanced package managing software as doesn't slackware, neither.

      For a newbie SuSE or Mandrake would be better choises.
      In SuSE you've got YaST, a very easy program used to configure the system. While I was using SuSE i never *had* to use command prompt to anything. I used SuSE for half a year.
      SuSE's bad thing is that you'll need to use RPM's or YaST1, which doesn't have GUI-dialogs (though it is semi-graphical)

      Then about mandrake:
      I just installed mandrake's linux-distribution to a friend of mine.
      I chose the "expert mode" in the installer. Even then the installer was easier to use than windows' installer.
      It let me partition my hard-disk and resize the partitions when I wanted. The program was much easier than dos's fdisk is.
      Then it put me to a screen where I had to choose what programs I wanted to install.
      I just clicked through the menus and chose the programs I wanted. In windows you'd have had to install all them separately (quite a big work).
      The above example of installing new programs was from Mandrake so you already know how easy it is.
      OK. Someone might call that mandrake's package manager useless since everything's ready when you've installed the OS. As an example: you've got OpenOffice which is a very good office program.
      The OS gives you more eye-candy than other windows' than XP do. XP has quite the same amount of eye candy.

      Someone made a test with someone who had never used a computer. He used windows and mandrake. He said that mandrake was easier to use.

      For someone who's used windows for 666 years and who's never used linux it might be harder to change the OS. It took me a few weeks to get comfortable with linux's directory tree etc when I became a linux-user. I've been using linux for a year now and I've tried the following distros: RedHat 7,1 SuSE 7.1, Debian 2.1, SuSE 7.2, Redhat 7.2, Mandrake 8.2, Debian woody (just did a dist-upgrade).
      Currently I'm using debian. I installed it 33 days ago. It's fallen down only once. That was because of power blackout. The machine has 128MB ram and I've often had load averages over 8. Currently my load averages are 2.00, 2.02, 2.09.
      And still the machine has remained stable even though I've done everything to make it hang (upgrade every night etc.)

      Hmm. Maybe this is enough to convince you. Maybe it isn't.

    43. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like the guy has just explained why WINDOWS isn't a viable desktop. Check out www.thinknic.com . . . I think this would put you in tech support heaven (other than the fact you would probably lose your job, since it is so simple it probably doesn't require 1/10 the tech support of a PC).

      Some questions:
      Besides, why does Desktop = stupid computer user?

      Why do people who don't even use Linux make stupid assumption about Linux?

      Why do people blame users for being stupid when they are using an O$ that seems built around the principle that the user SHOULDN'T know how their computer works? . . . seems like a stupid O$ if you ask me.

    44. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by Stephen+VanDahm · · Score: 2

      I used to do some tech support too, and I remember those people. However, what you don't see in tech support are all the thousands of people in the world who may not know much, but can sit down and figure it out, because they don't need to call tech support. I think most computer users fall into this catagory. If this is true, then Linux is certainly a suitable cadidate for the desktop. Here are two examples off the top of my head:

      Case 1:

      I have a grandmother. She's the stereotypical grandma who doesn't know anything about computers, and calls me on the phone with silly computer questions all the time. However, she was able to use DR-DOS and WordPerfect 5.1 on an old 386 without any problems. Of course, DOS isn't like UNIX, but it's still fairly technical. Back when she had the 386, she had a copy of DOS For Dummies and consulted the book whenever she had a problem. In most cases, that worked fine.

      Case 2:

      My friend at college, who had never used a computer in his life for anything except MS Word bought an old computer for $25. He got sick of Windows 95 and demanded that I install Linux because he heard it ran faster than Windows on old hardware. So, we put Linux on it, and he's been using it every day ever since. My friend doesn't know the difference between RAM and hard drive space, but he can use FVWM2, Pine, and AbiWord without much trouble. I gave him a copy of O'Reilly's "Running Linux" and I've come by to fix a few hardware-related problems, but he's been basically on his own the whole time, and he likes Linux better than Windows 95.

      My Point

      Clueless newbies are perfectly capable of running UNIX, especially in corporate environments where the computers are managed by a sysadmin. All the complicated stuff that average users would need to do can be done from graphical utilities like Nautilus or Konqueror. Using Linux in the home may be more annoying than it is worth to Joe Sixpack, but that's just because most i386 UNIX distros are targeted towards corporate customers, rather than home users. Even those products aren't any more complicated than DOS was.

      I think the fact that we're computer geeks is irrelevent. We weren't born computer geeks, after all. Everyone reading this post can remember a time when they didn't know anything about computers, but we all managed to learn UNIX. I don't think I'm that much smarter than anyone else is, in fact, I don't have much natural ability in math or science at all. I just sat down and learned how to use it. Anyone else could, if they had a good reason to do so.

      That last part is the problem. While I think that Linux offers real advantages over Windows in a corporate or institutional setting (LAN of managed PC's, and so on), Linux isn't any better or worse than Windows or MacOS or BeOS or anything else. Once you can play your MP3's, run office apps, and connect to the Internet, you've done everything a home user needs to do with a computer. Unless Linux does something cool and amazing that Windows can't do, there is no incentive for Joe Sixpack to switch.

      Steve

    45. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by m_evanchik · · Score: 2

      My problems really weren't with hardware compatibility, Red Hat runs fine.
      My problems were with

      1) My own lack of expertise and inability to get Xwindows working (Slackware)

      2) An evil installation process that wiped out a lot of data. And then a desktop enviroment that crashed whenever I used the hardware config utilities. (Mandrake, and I hope that they go out of business, the arseholes)

      3)Debian. For some reason the installation discs got corrupted. Anyway, I never got past installation.

      Finally, I tried Red Hat, which I had avoided because: a) they have publically expressed tepid support for the desktop. b) they just seemed a little too corporate.

      Well, I'm glad I gave them a shot, because they finally got Linux up for me.

    46. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2
      Linux ISN'T viable on the Desktop right now.

      This assertion is based on the assumption that ALL desktop users are beginners. I use Linux on my desktop, and it is viable for me. Please don't make sweeping generalisations. Many users do know more about computer users than the people you deal with on the phone.

    47. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you heard about man?

    48. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by joekool · · Score: 1

      if you want help gettin X working in Slack, let me know--it's generally not hard, once you know what to do(especially once it is working once, on some distribution--save your XF86Config!!). actually just take that file leave it in /etc/ and type starx, and you will likely be fine.

      --

      Slackware: old school feel, new school gear.
    49. Re:The desktop-revolution begins by m_evanchik · · Score: 2

      Thanks for the offer and advice.

      I'm going to stick with Red Hat for now, but one thing I liked about Slackware is that it at least did not cause any problems. But I am also wary of tying myself down to a distro that seems to be a one man show, regardless of how competent that one man might be.

  6. Lone Gunman Dead at the age of 55 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares???

  7. Use the AOL strategy by fungus · · Score: 3, Funny

    The government has burned 80,000 CDs with the Debian Linux operating system and software ranging from text editors to an Internet browser. The disks will be sent to the area's 670 schools and distributed to the public through newspaper inserts.

    1- One could send millions of CDs, containing an idiot proof linux system, to every computer owners and in computer stores. Add on it a free access to the internet for X months with a random isp, and configure it to be the easiest to use as you can.

    2- ???

    3- profit.

    It would make Linux SO popular!

    1. Re:Use the AOL strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The government has burned 80,000 CDs with the Debian Linux operating system and software ranging from text editors to an Internet browser.
      Why are third world countries always trying to keep information out of the peoples hands. First they burn books, now this!

      I propos drops of CD's from airplanes, we need to let these people know what thier government doesn't. We cant let MSMexico get away with this!

    2. Re:Use the AOL strategy by rmohr02 · · Score: 1
      One could send millions of CDs, containing an idiot proof linux system, to every computer owners and in computer stores. Add on it a free access to the internet for X months with a random isp, and configure it to be the easiest to use as you can.
      Why don't we leave MSN out of the list of ISPs.

      Also, Linux is a great operating system, but it isn't meant for people who are new to computing or haven't been trained on it. There is no idiot-proofing of Linux. There is with Windows: you know, after you delete a file you have to say "Yes, I'm sure", then "Yes, I know it's an application, and I know I won't be able to run it after I delete it, but I deleted it because I didn't want to run it anymore". Then you go the the recycle bin. Lather, rinse, repeat.
    3. Re:Use the AOL strategy by dodald · · Score: 1
      I would have to completly disagree with you. The reason people use windows is because they have always used windows. The only reason people don't use linux is because 1. They already have windows. 2. They don't know how to install linux (those people can't install Windows either). or 3. They don't even know it exists.

      Linux (ok I am really talking about an installed system running KDE or GNOME) is not hard to use for the point and click user. Its surly not any harder then windows. And they are less likly to get one of those pesky BSOD's (or a crash like equivilent). In order for people to start using Linux it has to be used in Schools (High Schools, and secondary), OEM's need to offer it as the default OS (A Majority), And businesses need to use it as thier Desktop of choice.

      Short: People can't use linux because they never have!

      --
      101010b 2Ah 52o
    4. Re:Use the AOL strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      One could send millions of CDs, containing an idiot proof linux system, to every computer owners and in computer stores.(emphasis mine)

      That'd be nice but I'd like to see linux distributed less than 10 years from now.

    5. Re:Use the AOL strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no idiot-proofing of Linux.

      Au contraire.

      Lycoris seems to be a pretty good stab at idiot-proofing. Idiot-proofing need not be crippling to the technically savvy, either. Mac OS X seems to be pretty good evidence that you can have your cake and eat it too.

    6. Re:Use the AOL strategy by vircum · · Score: 0

      Maybe someday I'll be able to put random Linux/ISP disks on my wall along with the AOL CDs.

    7. Re:Use the AOL strategy by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      Nevermind Lycoris: Howabout Tivo?

      Unix in general is "expert friendly" and already structured to work around idiots and the malevolent. Unix has both the transparency to sysadmins and the tools to allow for "idiot-proofing".

      WinDOS does not.

      It's still a system that often asks too much of it's end users and is not willing to affect positive change due to business model conflicts.

      The accelerated and gratis release schedule of Linux distributions, as well as the tendency of distributions to include ALL current drivers can actually make Linux more "idiot proof" in the end.

      Many of these Lemmings are out of touch with the "common" user that might be intimidated by a mere driver download or fumbling with driver disks. With some devices, it's not merely enough to install everything for some users. Often, little conceptual issues might pose a total barrier.

      Even XP's attempts to dumb things down don't even entirely solve this issue.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  8. I wish more people would do it. by primus_sucks · · Score: 1

    It's too bad mostly schools/governments too poor to afford Windows crap are the only one's switching to Linux. I wish more schools would do it so they could spend more money on kids and higher teacher's salaries instead of helping Gates pay for his fricking 10000 sq/ft house. I'm sick of my tax dollars being squandered on these fat cat bastards.

    1. Re:I wish more people would do it. by archen · · Score: 1

      As long as Linux gets adoped somewhere, that's what is important. Many of these kids might grow up to be exeptional programmers and do some really cool stuff one day, but they need to be exposed to Linux first. One thing MS has against it, they don't really give you any tools to make your own stuff anymore. Then again I really can't afford (legally) to buy MS stuff for the sorts of things I wan't to do either. Looking at a Webserver, interacting with a SQL database (just to tinker with it) is way out of my price range with an MS solution.

      Hmm... Mozilla RC1 seems to be sort of buggy with forms...

    2. Re:I wish more people would do it. by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 1
      I wish more schools would do it so they could spend more money on kids and higher teacher's salaries instead of helping Gates pay for his fricking 10000 sq/ft house.


      Mr Gates does not have to pay for his house, it is more likely the occassional country that he has bought.


      No seriously, it doesn't matter that it is poorer organisations are switching, because there are a lot of them, and schools by their nature have a disproportionate effect on businesses, because they are the training grounds. Guess, why Mr Gates wants to put cheap Windows into US schools?

    3. Re:I wish more people would do it. by KjetilK · · Score: 2
      Well, Norway isn't among the poorest countries on earth, though research and education is not getting it's share of the wealth. Yet, there is a project going on to get Linux into schools, supported by some good computer firms as well as governmental grants. They're still testing.

      A friend of mine got Woody installed on all the computers where he is currently working, he is the only teacher aged under 50, but the other teachers love it, and they will probably make a complete switch to Linux (the Debian Woody-based distro the School Linux project is producing) in a short while.

      There has allready been a few schools in Norway that has made the transition, for example Høle. They're still struggling with some governmental standards requiring M$ products, though.

      --
      Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
  9. Re:Bored during the blackout? You need this! by SirRichardPumpaloaf · · Score: 1

    PDF is just as open if not more so than Postscript, and there are more and better viewers available for it. Time to get your head out of the early nineties.

  10. bilingual? by CmdrTaco+(editor) · · Score: 2, Troll
    I've wondered for quite some time now about the need for programmers to be bilingual, especially with things such as Linux. I know most of the documentation has been translated into various languages, but it is impossible to translate the actual code. So to be a sysadmin for a Linux based network, I would think you would need to know at least some English.

    This brings up the point of cost. Sysadmins in Spain that are bilingual will probably charge a slightly higher fee than those that speak only Spanish. In my experiences, getting Linux running properly requires mucking about in .conf files and code and what not, whereas an MS box will essentially set itself with only the occasional button to press or box to check. I think the end result will be lower cost savings over other alternative OS's than previously predicted, although it will definitely still save them a significant amount of money over an MS "solution".

    1. Re:bilingual? by glwtta · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why on earth do you need to read source code to be a sysadmin? Hell, our sysadmin can barely read at all, and the place is still running. Are you like the FUD consumer of the year?

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    2. Re:bilingual? by CmdrTaco+(editor) · · Score: 0, Troll

      That's my point, he's probably an MS sysadmin. I'm talking about Linux sysadmins here, which is what this Spanish province will need.

    3. Re:bilingual? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just about anyone that works with computers in Spain knows at least a bit of English.

      Just think about it, the hardest problem in speaking a language is practice, you have to practice daily if you ever want to speak it well.

      Thanks to the internet, satelite tv and amazon, you can know practice English daily almost for free.

      And in case you couldn't tell, I writing this from Spain.

    4. Re:bilingual? by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 1
      The higher end of the computer business is dominated by documentation in English. It isn't that there are no translations available but often they are astonishingly bad.


      I once gave some lessons in C to a bunch of Germans using K&R as the text. I gave the talk in English, but they all had the German version of the book. When it got to pointers, they gave up and photocopied the chapter out of my book.


      To translate something technical, you have to not only know the languages but also understand the subject. Most of the people who can do this have another job, hence the better documentation tends to be read in the original English.


      I am more worried about the introductory and intermediate stuff, which you need a lot of with any system. The LDP does translations, but will they be good or complete enough?


      It is one thing having a bilingual sysadmin, but bilingual users?

    5. Re:bilingual? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, as Spanish sysadmin I would say that any computer science student here is able to _read_ English, since almost all the documentation is wrote in this language. I think this is a non-written requirement to finish computer science studies here.

    6. Re:bilingual? by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 1

      This is my experience with people in various parts of the world. It is possible to be a Minesweeper Consultant and Solitaire Expert without knowing English as many of those books have been translated into the other major languages. Persons who really know computers can read enough English to read technical documentation and some can even write comments in the language (even though they speak it poorly).

    7. Re:bilingual? by cthulhubob · · Score: 1

      You must be American. Most countries in the world slready teach children to read and speak English in schools. Only in America is it natural for people to grow up speaking only the mother tongue, n'est-ce pas?

      Also, the open source documentation that I have read in languages other than English far surpasses the quality of translated MSDN documentation.

      The amount of "mucking about" that Linux requires to run "properly" depends on your personal value of "properly" - I'm more or less happy with Mandrake or Red Hat out of the box. If I were installing Windows, I would have to install many third-party utilities (Windowblinds, Litestep, XMouse, Mozilla...) before my desktop acheived a state consistent with my value of "running properly".

      That's been my experience anyway.

      --

      In post-9/11 America, the CIA interrogates YOU!
  11. I hope they've considered all of the by Slash+Veteran · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ancillary costs. Not to prompt a flamebait, but if you only compare the costs of the various OSes to purchase, you're missing the boat.

    Linux is free to acquire, but it is certainly not free in terms of support costs, training, finding compatibility solutions (when someone in the windoze world sends you that office document), etc.

    None of this is insurmountable, but much of it is often overlooked.

    JWZ himself said it best: linux is only free if your time has no value.

    Now stand back and think about that. So true. Open Source is still the way to go, but don't forget the cost of Open Source in your financial rollups.

    1. Re:I hope they've considered all of the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Join the Great Slashdot Blackout [slashdot.org] April 21-27

      You are aware that today is the 21st, right?

    2. Re:I hope they've considered all of the by archen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Um, this is a school, not an office. Chances are they'll have to have a few people who "know what's going on" to keep everything running even if they went with windows. Training will have to happen anyway, reguardless of if they went with an Apple, MS, BSD or whatever. And if their teachers are anywhere as near as bad as the ones I had, no ammount of training will help anyway =) Compatability isn't much of an issue either with Open Office. I haven't had any regular document not open with Open Office, aside from some wacked out spreadsheets that causes Exel to die half the time.

      So basically I'm sure they'd still come out ahead. Linux takes time to learn yes, but then again much of what you learned years ago still works with Linux today. There's something to be said about needing to re-learn things that change (often for no good reason) - something that happens much more often with Apple/MS. So yes, "linux is only free if your time has no value", but I also consider that to be a good investment that doesn't depreciate with time.

    3. Re:I hope they've considered all of the by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 2
      Join the Great Slashdot Blackout [slashdot.org] April 21-27
      You are aware that today is the 21st, right?

      Well. That's funny.

    4. Re:I hope they've considered all of the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      JWZ himself said it best:

      Ooooohhhh.... well if JWZ himself said it, it must be true.... Jesus fucking christ, you talk like he's some kind of deity or something. Let me tell you: he's no Knuth. He's just a nerd who was in the right place at the right time, and had a few good ideas. Since he left Netscape, what's he done? A fucking nightclub? Fucking lame.

    5. Re:I hope they've considered all of the by rebelcool · · Score: 2
      Chances are they'll have to have a few people who "know what's going on" to keep everything running

      I laughed out loud when I read this. Public schools are worse than offices because the teachers often don't want to seem incompetant in front of students when it comes to computers.

      As someone who's had to deal with public schools and computers for quite some time, I can't help but think linux is a poor choice from a usability stand point and I wonder what exactly they plan on doing with the computers. Maybe they only intend to browse the web with them.

      --

      -

    6. Re:I hope they've considered all of the by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 2, Interesting

      linux is only free if your time has no value.

      Not to be a unix zealot, or anything but that quote bothers me, because it implies that Linux maintainnence is a nightmare while other OSes are point and click. That is simply not true.

      Didn't have a chance to see MS shops when nimda virus roled along did you? Or constantly taking down their servers for the latest service pack? Or Exchange is "acting up again"

      The point is there are major time cost for maintannence of any operating system.

      I management solaris servers currently ( linux only as my desktop for now ). And we're constantly on the look out for critical patches, etc. Software screws up just like on any other OS ( eg. very expensive iplanet ldap starts to use 100% CPU for no apparent reason ) My point is the windows people are busy doing the same kind of thing, only with Exchange, IIS, etc.

      That view that UNIX total cost of ownership is higher due to higher maintainence cost is incorrect. If you have to hire a small group of competent MS admins to run your MS shop, it would cost you the same as to hire a group of UNIX admins.

      Please not buy into that MS marketing crap that any modern Enterprise class OS is point and click

      --
      Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
    7. Re:I hope they've considered all of the by slimme · · Score: 1

      I get so tired from listening to people saying how easy windows is and how difficult linux is.

      I don't understand either of them. I have installed them both on my computers. For both, I have to call someone or spend a lot of time looking if I have a problem.

      I used to understand dos and windows 3.1. I knew my way around windows9x (I'm lost when it comes to that 'registry' stuf). But now I have to use windows 2000 and everything has moved. It looks alike, but I can't find anything anymore. And I'm absolutly more computer literate than all of my friends.

      Joe user doesn't know the difference between internet explorer, netscape navigator, mozilla, opera or whatever.
      Joe user doesn't know the difference between star office, microsoft office or whatever.
      Joe user doesn't know the difference between windows95, windows 2000 or red hat 7.2. He or she will take whatever is installed on the computer and learn to live with that.
      If Joe user gets a word document sent to him that he or she can't open, he or she will panic and call the helpdesk:

      simple solution: have them reply with the following message: I can not read your message. please use a different format like PDF or text.

      A school can even impose a file format like star offices file format. It's not like you are going to offend customers.

    8. Re:I hope they've considered all of the by catfood · · Score: 2
      Linux is only free if your time is of no value.

      Well yeah, and Windows is only however-many-bucks per desktop if your time is of no value.

      Unless you mean that you never have to mess with Windows to get it to do what you want.

    9. Re:I hope they've considered all of the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jamie who?

    10. Re:I hope they've considered all of the by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      JWZ is simply an idiot.

      ALL computing enviroments have system administration overhead. Even WinDOS is not immune to this. Infact, this aspect of WinDOS is why many of us switched to desktop Unix.

      We wanted something that was more robust and needed less babysitting.

      When compared to the "predominant desktop platform", Unix is far more tolerant of being deployed and then forgotten about.

      One must seriously wonder what alternate reality of PC based computing Jamie suddenly dropped in from.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    11. Re:I hope they've considered all of the by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      Yet somehow they muddled through the days of DOS and AppleDOS.

      Once you get over the culture shock of make, downloading and installing software for Unix is no more complex or intimidating than dealing with InstallShield. Past that point, Linux is using the same interfaces present under Windows.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    12. Re:I hope they've considered all of the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .........'...script'...here....'scr...ipt'....here . . .s.c.ript'....here..

    13. Re:I hope they've considered all of the by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      And I thought I was just not posting because I was busy. Didn't know I was striking a blow against editor tyranny. Good for me! Boycott /.! We will withhold our posts until their value is. . .

      Oops.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    14. Re:I hope they've considered all of the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frankly, when you stop buttlicking customers, they DO seem offended! ;-)

      It's not like we can dictate our customers that much. Certainly not demand them installing Open Office (it's free - it must be bad and full of security holes).

    15. Re:I hope they've considered all of the by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Thanks to this thread, I now have a new sig.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    16. Re:I hope they've considered all of the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A point I would just like to add to bolster your argument is that there are many people still using Word 7 or earlier, because it "does all that they require".

      My parents for example only get an unpgrade when I am able to get back from Uni to do it, have the time available and can afford to do it.

      If I didn't/don't, what happens when they get an izzy-wizzy wordXP formated doc?? The very same thing as if they used Linux and Openoffice!!

      Ok, you can format to Word 7 etc. in WordXP, but they can also format to RTF, HTML or other universal formats...

      The Key is using OPEN STANDARDS. The sooner we can teach this to other people the sooner everything becomes a _lot_ easier.

    17. Re:I hope they've considered all of the by Chemicalscum · · Score: 1
      JWZ himself said it best: linux is only free if your time has no value.

      jwz was comparing Linux to SGI Irix, not to Windows when he wrote that - http://www.jwz.org/doc/linux.html.

      He wrote it in 1998 and was referring to trying to keep up with upgrading in the face of the rapid development of Linux

      Context is all!

    18. Re:I hope they've considered all of the by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2
      One must seriously wonder what alternate reality of PC based computing Jamie suddenly dropped in from.
      Lisp machines. If you don't know, you'll never understand what could have been. And you'll never know how fucked up things really are.
    19. Re:I hope they've considered all of the by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2
      JWZ himself said it best: linux is only free if your time has no value.

      This rates as a troll, or at least startlingly misinformed. JWZ said this circa 1995, when the state-of-the-art in packaging was .TGZ, and the only real configuration tools were XF86Config and vi.

      How long is this going to be regurgitated by second-hand accounts of the Unix-Haters (sic.) Handbook?

      Do your own thinking, and validate your criticisms. I admire JWZ too, but he has always shot from the hip - and this is just plain stale to boot!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  12. Offtopic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on moderators, lighten up! It's obvious a lot of work went into making this, and it's just as deserving of a "Funny" moderation as any of the "Micro$$oft sux0rs!! Linux rulez!!" garbage that gets routinely modded to +5. While it's technically offtopic, it's at least amusing.

  13. Re:The desktop-revolution stays where it is by WetCat · · Score: 2, Informative
    Did you try new Mandrake Linux for example?

    Maintaining XP is much much worse... especially its OEM stripped mode when you have only one big C drive and a backup CD that allow you to only recreate that big C drive...

  14. Re:NOBODY EXPECTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody expects the Spanish inquisition

  15. Think about it. . . by czardonic · · Score: 1

    In any discipline that invloves multiple nationalities, a single language is generally chosen as the common language (and yes, it is usually English). It makes more sense for sysadmins in Spain, France, Japan, etc to learn English than for Programmers to learn Spanish, French, Japanese etc.

    As for bilingual sysadmins, my bet is its tough to get a job as a sysadmin in any country if you can't read English.

    --
    Takahashi Rumiko made beats! DON, taku, DON, taku. . .
  16. Re:Bored during the blackout? You need this! by Fiver-rah · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    This is why God made pdf2ps, if you're going to be a real stinker about it.

    Sheesh.

    But if you insist: here it is . Somebody else with real bandwidth grab this; this is one of our research group computers and I'll be truly smitten by my advisor if it gets slashdotted.

    --
    Read Bujold. Free (as in
  17. Hello? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just write smaller. Sheesh, some people have to be told everything.

  18. The cost of free-as-in-beer software by The+Monster · · Score: 5, Insightful
    linux is only free if your time has no value.
    That is precisely why Open Source software is cheapest in the most economically-depressed areas. For the money that would otherwise go to licensing fees, you can hire and train lot of local talent to run things. And becasuse it's OS, they can learn it inside and out, instead of just learning the interface that has been exposed to them.
    --

    [100% ISO 646 Compliant]
    SVM, ERGO MONSTRO.

  19. Re:The desktop-revolution stays where it is by MisterBlister · · Score: 1
    Maintaining XP is much much worse... especially its OEM stripped mode when you have only one big C drive and a backup CD that allow you to only recreate that big C drive...

    People want one big C drive...

    Believe me.

    Personally my C drive isn't all that big, but I never got any complaints.

  20. wrong free OS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Darn, I wish someone had told them about FreeBSD. It's free(er) than *linux and more stable and higher performance and has a better centralized source code control system and a longer history in academia.

    1. Re:wrong free OS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Redmond based intoxication here?
      How in hell a BSD license is more "freer" or more suitable for a educational public institution than the GPL one?
      (A well known company based at Redmon would be much more than glad hearing about BSD choosen on that environments over GPL. That if only, should make people suspicious about how good it can be).

      Leaving apart the license issue, the "somehow cathedral way" can be an acceptable one for the academia. They just need to adopt it if they want.
      They want to control what goes or does not go to that "academic" linux distro? Well then: you just need to use the policy "don't use software but from this pgp/MD5 signed repo", and then configure their apt-sources files accordingly and that's all.

  21. Not good by sanity_slipping · · Score: 2, Funny

    This isn't necessarily a good thing.

    Sure, it may seem like a good thing now, but you just wait five years, when suddenly all of the good Linux jobs will be taken by those darned Spanish!

    --
    I can feel my sanity, beyond my reach and slipping...
    1. Re:Not good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh no need to wait, I;m already making soooo much money than you are :)

      /me spaniard!

    2. Re:Not good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah!!! Mr Torvalds told that all we want is just (secretly) rule the world.

      What even he didn't know is "we" meant WE
      (signed by a caballero español)

      ;^P

      My name is Iñigo Montoya, you killed my father; prepare to die!

  22. What Mexico did wrong. by damu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember back when wired had some stories about the innovative change which Mexico was trying to make, in most schools. To bring Linux to the forefront and allow all school children to have access to a computer running Linux. What happened? After poop management, little to no training at the particular schools, and very little support from the actual implementors, most computers now are running win95 or a derivative there of.


    This, on paper, seems like a great idea, however to actually pull it off it is going to be very difficult, and there needs to be some strong support from the very top people, if not, this move will suffer the same faith which it had in Mexico. Buena suerte mis amigos. dam()

    --


    Useless sig.
  23. Wired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it's getting old hanging around here, being told to go read Wired or WSJ or CNN. I think I'll skip the middleboy and stay with the real news sources for a change.

  24. What's the cost of incessant crashing? by geoffsmith · · Score: 1

    These kids have little enough time as is with a computer, the cost of an less-than-stable OS far outweighs the cost of training the computer teachers in Linux. Also, most computer teachers I know would train themselves in their spare time.

    Note also that this province is *bragging* about their 15:1 computer-to-kid ratio. These student don't have much time on their computers, and if they're anything like the kids I know, they have an intense desire to poke and prod just about everything. Not a good combination with an OS that gives a page fault in Kernel32.dll at a sneeze. I know I would find that discouraging. In fact I did, that's why I run debian myself!

    Websurfing done right! - http://www.stumbleupon.com

  25. Installing apps by Dave_bsr · · Score: 1

    You are correct about that, and it's good to hear someone say it. However, what i find lacking is simple installation tools. People can install Wazoo messenger or Didlybob app, whatever they find/need/want, in windows, with a wizard. Give linux a good wizard install, to $user_account or $all_user_accounts, using a semi-root account as needed, something that can't really harm the system but change user accounts perhaps. Do that and I'll be _happy_.

    Oh yeah, and make KDE faster. with an mp3 player, a movie player, a web browser, an office suite, an IM app, and a file manager, Linux will have itself a viable user operating system. IMO, XMMS, XINE, MOZ etc, OO/abi/Kword, Gaim will handle those. But someone suggest to me a good file manager (I love MC but it isn't quite what i want?)...

    ok i'm rambling now. I think we are just about there. Users will come, commercial applications will follow. Suggestions?

    --


    Who is this Anonymous Coward character, how does he post so much, and why is he always such a whore?
    1. Re:Installing apps by Rhinobird · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Ah, but i LIKE the default linux installation wizard.

      ./configure
      make
      make install

      simple

      --
      If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
    2. Re:Installing apps by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Until you go to uninstall that app. Or maybe you run Red Hat or any FHS compliant Linux, but the app likes to dump things into /usr/local.

      For the first case, try the "checkinstall" utility, it's great, it makes an rpm out of "make install" output, for easy management.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:Installing apps by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      KDE won't be faster unless it is compiled on something that does C++ a lot better than gcc. Even then, it's impossible for C++ to ever be as fast as C.

      Slashdot requires you to wait 2 minutes between
      each successful posting of a comment to allow everyone a fair chance at posting a comment. --lalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalfuckingfilterla lalalalal

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    4. Re:Installing apps by Rhinobird · · Score: 2

      Uninstalling? Uh, I haven't gotten that far yet.

      --
      If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
  26. Ah the old crashing routine... by rebelcool · · Score: 2
    You'd think this would have started dying off after the release of Win2k over 2 years ago.

    Win2k and XP rarely crash. I run 2K..the only time I reboot is when I either apply patches (every couple months), or am replacing faulty hardware.

    Actually my record with crashing has been far worse using KDE or GNOME.

    --

    -

    1. Re:Ah the old crashing routine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd think this would have started dying off after the release of Win2k over 2 years ago.

      It doesn't die off because every release of Windows since 3.1 has had MS and its apologists claiming that they have finally gotten it right. And it always turns out that it isn't quite true. I've given 3.1, 95, 98, 98SE and NT4 sp3 & sp4 chances and I've had enough. Next upgrade, my wife gets a Mac and I'll stick with Debian. There's no more money to keep pouring down the MS rathole.

  27. Umm... sure... whatever... by Danse · · Score: 2

    I learned computers using DOS. I then moved on to Win 3.1. Then to Win95. I learned as I went. Someone could learn Linux or any other Unix-like OS the same way. Start with the basics and move on to the more complicated stuff.

    --
    It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  28. Schools and Linux by MOSFET · · Score: 1

    One of the main problems I have run into with using Linux on various computers is figuring out how to get everything set up for the machine's various hardware quirks.

    One of the main advantages of doing this in a school is that schools tend to have computers that were all ordered in one massive batch so that every classroom , office, etc, has the same machines.

    It should thus be easy for a particular site to customize their own in-house distro to install easily on all their computers.

    A great further advantage in using Linux in schools: More people are going to become familiar with it... and be more likely to set it up at home, etc... reducing the dependency on other, less desirable systems *coughWINDOWScough*.

  29. Which version of Debian? by ukryule · · Score: 2

    Odd timing, given that Debian 3.0 (Woody) is due to be released (fingers crossed) on the 1st May.

    Have they burnt their own (nearly)3.0 or gone back to the old 2.2?

    Of course the neat thing about Debian is that it is possible to create your own pre-3.0 CD, and then it's a one-liner to upgrade to the full release when it appears. However I suspect they've 'played safe' and gone with the old (released in 2000) version.

    1. Re:Which version of Debian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Linex is Woody-based*1. As you suspected they have burnt their own install cd and AFAIK they even have their own repositories out from the major Debian ones (while basically fed from them).

      Being it a private project (in the sense it has been acomplished by a private company for the education ministery) I'd most probably choose not only Woody but Sid for its foundations.

    2. Re:Which version of Debian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is based on Woody.

  30. Linux will win! by Hyperhaplo · · Score: 1
    Windows took over The Desktop because:
    a) It was simple to install
    b) It was all there was (money/OS choice)
    and
    c) Everyone was using it.

    Can you think of a better way to mould a linux distro into these features? Easy! Give a distro to an entire country and learn as you go. After a while you get:
    a) Less installation problems (install something on 1/2 million machines and you find the bugs)
    b) Countries like this can't afford M$ licence prices (then again, who can?)
    and
    c) A definition of 'popular' is Suited to or within the means of ordinary people: popular prices. (Dictionary.com)

    No reason to put people down for attempting to make the best out of a situation.

    --
    You have a sick, twisted mind. Please subscribe me to your newsletter.
  31. Microsoft and Mexico by Meech · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The other day, the NY Times had an article about how Microsoft wanted to help out Mexico get online. I wonder if this had anything to do with it.

    Here is a link, (sorry but there is a registration)
    http://www.nytimes.com/2002/04/17/technology/17MEX I.html

  32. Re:Marijuana, cheap! [fp] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm no stranger to shitty Mexican brick weed. Where do I sign up?

  33. The key is: they know they have to invest by InodoroPereyra · · Score: 1
    From the Article:
    Governments in developing regions worldwide have eagerly embraced the open-source movement as a way to trim fat from their budgets. But free software initiatives fail when officials believe they will no longer have to invest in their IT systems. Take the case of Mexico's Red Escolar, launched in 1998 to install Linux in the country's 126,000 public schools. The government simply shipped CDs to schools without training teachers how to use the operating system or contracting programmers to administer it.
    It is trivial, and it has been said a thousand times, but it seems to be necessary (in view of what happened in Mexico) to emphasize it: you HAVE TO INVEST MONEY if you are going to use free (as in beer) software. Extremadura is going to invest money, it just turns out that it will be much less than what they would need to invest with proprietary software. This is good news both for the Free Software movement and for Extremadura. Best luck folks / buena suerte amigos !!!
  34. It only took one generation... by heretic108 · · Score: 1

    for the phrase "domino effect" to change completely from a powerfully negative meaning to a positive one.

    --
    -- In the beginning was the WORD, and the WORD was UNSIGNED, and the main(){} was without form and void...
  35. Your .sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >--
    >Join the Great Slashdot Blackout April 21-27

    "I hope they've considered all of the (Score:3, Insightful)
    by Slash Veteran (slashvet@hotmail.com) on Sunday April 21, @10:13PM (#3385013)"

    So you've given up, then?

  36. Nope, English by jcsehak · · Score: 2

    Actually, the vast majority of pirates were English-- Henry Morgan, Captain Kidd, Blackbeard (Edward Teach), Black Bart (Bartholemew Roberts), Edward England, Henry Every, etc. Just about all the famous ones. Spain mostly got screwed by the pirates when they were privateers (privateering was the practice of looting ships of an enemy country while at war with them. You got a special commision from the king and plundered away. This was a very cheap way to increase a countries standing navy). Of course, when the warring ended, the privateers had nowhere to go (since there were no unemployment benefits for the equivelant of dot-commers those days) and turned pirate, screwing everybody! Most notably, the East India Company (the closest thing to Microsoft back then). But the public ate it up, since in those days (late 1600's), 75% of Britian's national income went to barely 20% of the population.

    And since I'm now miles off topic (sniff, is that my karma burning?) without a gps or even an astrolabe, I'll also mention that there are no recorded incidents of pirates making anyone walk the plank. Apparently it was made up by storytellers.

    Oh well, just some useless information that might be interesting...

    --

    c-hack.com |
    1. Re:Nope, English by littleRedFriend · · Score: 1

      Just some more details: the East India Company (M$ back than) was Dutch and was called de vereenigde oostindische companie.

      And yes, they had a monopoly. If we could only 'pirate' the M$ offices in Redmond...

      --
      IANAL, but imagine a beowulf cluster of in Soviet Russia all your belong are base to us welcoming the new SCO overlords.
    2. Re:Nope, English by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 1

      There were two such companies, because both organisations were set up as a private-public joint venture (a company with a royal charter, giving powers of monopoly and the ability to defend it with deadly force) for exploitation of the East Indies, in respect of their own countries. Indeed the two companies had some disagreements about who got to exploit what but whilst the British got India, the Dutch got Indonesia and the string of Islands coming down from Asia towards Australia (which they almost got as well).

    3. Re:Nope, English by jcsehak · · Score: 2


      And the pirates got em both! Yarr!

      Seriously, anybody else think that "pirating" is a bit too strong a word for copying virtual information? I mean, sure, it's pretty close to stealing vast sums of gold, merchandise and supplies, torture, murder, rape and making war against your own country's navy, but, I dunno, maybe I'm just looking at it from the inside, but it doesn't seem *quite* as bad to me.

      --

      c-hack.com |
    4. Re:Nope, English by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 1
      Piracy on the High Seas is a wonderfully emotive term regarding an unlawful act of attacking a vessel in international waters. I don't really get the connection with the civil offence of copyright violation. However, it sounds a lot better in court to accuse people of piracy rather than just copyright violation.

      Unfortunately, to a certain extent, they have won and copyright violation is now effectively a criminal offence.

    5. Re:Nope, English by meringuoid · · Score: 1

      Piracy on the High Seas is a wonderfully emotive term regarding an unlawful act of attacking a vessel in international waters. I don't really get the connection with the civil offence of copyright violation. However, it sounds a lot better in court to accuse people of piracy rather than just copyright violation.

      I think it's historical in origin. A pirate, having plundered a merchant ship, would steal the cargo and then go and sell it in some dodgy port. Of course, no questions asked about where the goods had come from. So in later years, the term 'pirate' came to be applied to goods being sold of dubious origin.

      It's a similar thing to what happened to 'bootleg' and illegal records. They haven't been smuggled over the border in someone's shoe, but the idea of the thing is the same.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  37. about extremadura by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The decission was not because the do not have money. extremadura is full of old people (old fascist majority) without any vision for the future.

  38. said Luis Mill�n V�zquez de Miguel, by CySurflex · · Score: 0, Troll

    switched to open source, said Luis Millán Vázquez de Miguel

    My name is Luis Millán Vázquez de Miguel. I have slept with over a thousand women.

    My name is Luis Millán Vázquez de Miguel. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

    1. Re:said Luis Mill�n V�zquez de Miguel, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats Iñigo Montoya not LMVDM :)

    2. Re:said Luis Mill�n V�zquez de Miguel, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... so many "spanishy" comments round there, and the one from the promissed princess I just can stand myself:

      My name is Iñigo Montoya...
      Ah, sí? Pues vente pacá, que me chuparás la polla.

  39. cost advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So in the lack of proper funding, it turned out that MS Windows was a superior choice? Hmm... that's about as convincing an argument against Linux as I can find.

    1. Re:cost advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.
      That only means Microsoft marketing practices (and FUD) is far better (by some measure seized by ligth years) than any other in the world, and the pointy haired-marketroid guys (and potentially "sobornados" politicians... how is it "soborno" told in English?) are the easiest objective for them.

  40. The costs of diverse and incompatible MS documents by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1
    Extremadura is considering some of the real costs like training, but I'll take your point a little further.

    The costs of diverse and incompatible documents (e.g. different versions of MS-Office) is still high even if you're in a shop where the management buys into single platform (e.g. All-Shall-Be-Microsoft) myth. Take MS-Word, the new versions usually have difficulty with the next most recent version until the patch / upgrade is installed. It often takes a bit of gymnastics to make the conversion successfully especially if you're an early adopter. Powerpoint is even worse. Quite often only one or two presentations will fit on a 3.5" floppy, so that means bringing two or three floppies to conferencs to make sure I can use the conference locale's version of PowerPoint.

    Here comes the cost: Imagine nearly everyone in a 120 person organization learning that the hard way, either for their own work or by trying to help some one else. The actual salary is often only 50% of what the employer has to shell out per employee.

    It gets more expensive with e-mail attachements. It used to be whenever I got an MS-Office document as an attachment, it was a virus from a stranger. Everyone I actually knew, back then, used file sharing. Now that most shops don't have file sharing, these must be sorted by hand, at least in a MS-Windows environment.

    And that's just the cost now. 3 or 4 years from now you have the added issue of trying to identify and read the old formats. So in reality the interoperability part the oft-cited cost benefit of running all MS products hasn't been there.

    Two solutions: use more generic file formats (e.g. RTF and Docbook) and stable file sharing that support clients on multiple platforms (e.g. Netware or OpenAFS, to pick two). Operating costs and efficientcy costs are always going to be with any software. The trick is to minimize the work needed and to concentrate any extra effort on as few as possible.
    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  41. ADDENDUM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Unfortunately, the following two clues were accidentally omitted from the above posting:

    Down
    19. Do many eyes make all bugs shallow, or do too many cooks spoil the broth?
    63. Apple stole all their ideas from this research group.
    I sincerely apologise for any inconvenience.

    -S.Trooper

    1. Re:ADDENDUM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1B is missing too - although I worked it out anyway.

      yippykyay fat fucker!

  42. Linux extramadura by pubjames · · Score: 3, Informative

    Appears that these guys actually have their own Linux distribution called Linex. I think this is actually the distribution that will be distributed to schools etc. I expect it is based on Debian.

    If you can read Spanish, there's more discussion about this on the Spanish version of Slashdot, Barrapunto And here's the Extramadura LUG.

    It's great they have their "own" version of Linux - people are more likely to use it because they are proud of their region. Of course because 95% of people are clueless when it comes to computers, they will probably think that it has been invented there, just as many people believe Bill Gates invented "Windows". But in this case it's a good thing if people use it out of pride and it boosts uptake of Linux.

    By the way, Extramadura is I believe the poorest region of Europe, not just Spain. But they have great weather, wine and food there, and the people really know how to have a good time (which could be why it's one of the poorest regions...)

    1. Re:Linux extramadura by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Cool, "barrapunta". I gather that is Spanish for "Slashdot", "punta" has probably the same origin as "punkt" (German for "dot") and "point", a word that would also means "dot".

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    2. Re:Linux extramadura by pubjames · · Score: 2

      That's right:

      barra = slash
      punto = dot

      barrapunto = slashdot

    3. Re:Linux extramadura by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's not barrapunta.. it's barrapunto
      barra= slash (in spain.. not in spanish)
      punto = dot
      punta = peak.

    4. Re:Linux extramadura by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      barra= slash (in spain.. not in spanish)

      What do you mean?
      Well, I think I *know* what you mean.
      But, you know? You chose the wrong language, forastero.

      *If* you mean what I think you mean, you play on the trick of being "español" as sustantivo indistinguishable from "español" as adjective, but English *do* distinguish them.

      There's only *ONE* language to be called Spanish, while there're more than one language talked in Spain (so spaniard is not only español (Spanish language), also known as castellano, but gallego or vascuence too).

    5. Re:Linux extramadura by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the way, Extramadura is I believe the poorest region of Europe, not just Spain.

      You're badly outdated... perhaps in the 40s... not anymore.

      But they have great weather, wine and food there, and the people really know how to have a good time

      Positive!

    6. Re:Linux extramadura by pubjames · · Score: 2

      You're badly outdated... perhaps in the 40s... not anymore.

      It depends what you consider Europe. Of the countries currently in the European Union, then Extramadura is still one of the poorest regions. If you include the countries in Eastern Europe that might enter in the Union in the next round, then you're right.

      Even so, Extramadura has been very poor even until quite recently - certainly much more recently than the 40's. Here's a paper from someone at the Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, which says Extramadura had a GDP 50% lower than the European average in the 1990s. So sorry, it is still a very poor place, even recently. This is just a fact. I have relatives there and can vouch for the fact that there's still a lot of poverty there.

    7. Re:Linux extramadura by pubjames · · Score: 2
  43. Thats why its called Extremadura... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Extremadura, originally Extrema y Dura, Extreme and Hard.

  44. rough mexican rollout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee, I'm surprised. Miguel did a shitty job at something? Thats never happened before!

  45. Best way to get this going in the rest of spain? by shomon2 · · Score: 2

    Hi,

    I can see from the article on mexico, and from my own experience trying to propose a free software alternative to a non profit organisation, that the problem of adopting a completely new or different operating system is not just about the price of the software. So my question to any experts out there is : how do you propose people get this going in other provinces - from getting the proposal out(I live in barcelona - I bet the local catalan linux translation group would help...), lobbying for it, getting political support, and getting the smarts and the time for people to install it, and from there to the point where everyone is actually happily using it and benefiting from it?

    If it can be done, it's probably a great benefit, but I can see how it's just a waste of money if it's not done right, and especially, if it's just not the right time or place to do it...

    Ale

  46. This is a good example to review the /. standpoint by software_non_olet · · Score: 1


    I am astonished about the many postings which consider the problems and negative consequences of that project. I see only positive results, but your mileage may vary.

    I think, there is a strong subconscious fear among the geeks favouring OpenSource now that their own income is at stake in the near future. Just think about the many Linux cracks from Spain in the years to come or the Microsoft guys seeking new jobs in the Linux market .o)

    But that's too late now, the natural development cannot be stopped. A lot of problems teach a lot - we all know that by experience. With Linux the rich countries have finally managed to export a free product, which helps the third world to get profound technical education and in the long run become independant from the monopolies of the northern hemisphere.

    No longer paying pennies for bananas and copper while charging dollars for $oftware and mu$ic. Great! The age of Aquarius is really happening after all. I raise my glass to the dying age of economic slavery - it's nice that you bite the carpet finally!

    And interestingly the leading Linux maintainer, Macello, is of Mexican origin. Can you see the signs on the wall? Freedom through free software is no longer freedom for Americans, no - on the contrary - it's freedom from American software!

  47. Some details are missing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They don't explain how Linux is saving them money, because the PC's that they are using would already have Windows installed.
    In Spain, like most countries, it's not actually possible to buy a PC without Windows... well it is but it costs more with Linux preinstalled and as this is about saving costs...
    Possibly, the cost saving is due to additional software ?

    1. Re:Some details are missing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question is this is *not* being done because of the money savings, while it's fairly difensible there will be in the long run. It is only a political decition (one of those strange cases when politicians and common sense run together).

  48. REAL support and promotion? by roe1352 · · Score: 1

    Is there any Linux group out there that is trying to find out what these people did and how other educators might be able to learn from it? Education seems like an enviroment where Linux has a real chance since schools are on a budget and reletively independent. I think that people should focus on gathering information on this to help other educators do the same rather than bitch and complain about win vs. linux.

    1. Re:REAL support and promotion? by Doug+Loss · · Score: 1

      Yes, there is. Schoolforge is contacting them and trying to bring them into the Schoolforge coalition. If you're interested in using open resources in education, you need to look at Schoolforge and it's member organizations.

  49. Not only free software... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the linex.org page: (free translation)
    "Be legal.. copy LinEx.. and pass it to your friends. [..} Once you shared Linex with all your friends, your CD could be used by persons and colectives from around the world, (specially by Spanish spoken country)[..]"
    They are collecting adresses of NGO to send used CD's. Remember, in some countries either 1$ for a CD is expensive..

  50. It's true... by aquarian · · Score: 2

    Windows is not exactly trouble free or completely user-friendly, even for fairly advanced users. Training is needed no matter what. Eliminate the license fees, and you can invest more in training. Or hardware...

  51. Re:Bored during the blackout? You need this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nearly true.

    PDF has DRM built in. PS doesn't.

  52. Debian is appropriate for this province by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the article:

    ...Largely bypassed by the industrial revolution,...

    Sure sounds like they're ready for Debian!!! It's been largely bypassed by the 2.4 kernel, XFree 4, KDE 3, Mozilla 0.9 etc etc etc

  53. That's NOT true by paugq · · Score: 1

    I live in Spain and I can certainly say that's not true. In fact, when you buy a computer you get it without operating system unless you buy one. Some shops even pre-install Linux for free (for instance. PCBox.

    I have recently bought a new computer and of course I got it without operating system. I didn't need to tell the vendor I didn't want an operating system: he asked me if I wanted Windows (paying 120EUR, of course) and I said I din't. No more questions.

    1. Re:That's NOT true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no doubt that you can buy a PC without OS. The question is if that is the cheapest option. Supposing you want a reasonable spec. PC (1 GhZ+, 128Mb+, 40GB HD) What is the absolute cheapest PC on the market in Spain? Chances are it's something like Dell (with MS Windows, naturally)

  54. Translations by paugq · · Score: 1

    Yep, it's true.

    Computer-related translations to Spanish are usually REALLY BAD. Specially those ones that are made in Mexico or South America. You can not pay the same guy to translate John Grisham and Donald E. Knuth.

    I'm Spanish (although Spanish is not my main language, but Catalan) and I tend to buy the books in English. The only exception is when the translator is Luís Joyanes Aguilar, a really good Computer Science professor.

    1. Re:Translations by opkool · · Score: 2

      Then, maybe you can help the translators, submiting "patches" to the documentation.

      Your help will be probably welcome (and badly needed.)

      Contact LuCAS here: http://lucas.hispalinux.esfor more information

  55. Re: This issue is OLD as well as the answer :) by fferreres · · Score: 2

    If it's a real tech problem you can solve it using ssh shell and motely fixing what is wrong, asuming the support people are talented. If it's a client problem thing unrelated to you (can read friends email), then it's a PR thing. You answer because you care about your ignorant customer, but it's not really your fault, nor Windows nor Linux.

    --
    unfinished: (adj.)
  56. But if you're going to be using 2K or XP... by drsquare · · Score: 1

    ...not only do you have the licence costs to think about, you have the added costs of the hardware upgrades needed to support such slow and bloated OSes. With Linux, you get speed and stability, with Windows you have to pick one.

    Save all the bullshit, just use Linux.

  57. Actually, no by HiThere · · Score: 2

    Windows was viable on the desktop. Then they changed the license.

    I no longer accept that Windows is viable on the desktop. Nor will any system be where you must give someone else the right to "add, remove, alter, or delete" any files that they choose without either asking your consent, or even notifying you.

    Sorry.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  58. Peru have more agressive initiative by Slayer_X · · Score: 1

    Hi, in Peru we have a law project for implementing ONLY free software in all goverment entities ;) want details?? go http://www.gnu.org.pe/ (sorry, is only in spanish)

    Greetings

    --
    - Slayer_X
    http://www.slayerx.org/
    Lima
    1. Re:Peru have more agressive initiative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, the Peruan way is the one to go: the extremenian initiative has all numbers to just being a cool intent (not as clearly fooled as in the Mexican case, but still to poor an intent).

  59. Re:Best way to get this going in the rest of spain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right like some Jordi Pujol spending bazillions of pesetas to see Ms Office translated into catalan just to see how Microsoft asked for a new amount of bazillions of pesetas when next Office version released if he wanted to see it translated too?

    The way to go to the politicians is and always has been playing their own game (the other alternative, civil armored revolt I think its a bit out of question here). Do you want linux in Catalonia? You catalonians have probably the easiest position: just convince old Yoda how catalanistic will be having your own 100% catalanized OS (since its open source is nothing but a question of money... at most!) in an even cheap and well attached way (no company can make you seem like a fool like M$ in the past). Even more: tell him that since the "opressive central government at Madrid" signed with Microsoft any catalonian by that name has to be against it, so Linux is the only truly patriotical solution.

    There, you have it.

    PS: this may, or may not, have been published by the disinformation office at the CIA.

  60. Re:This is a good example to review the /. standpo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marcello Tossatti? Are you sure a guy whose name is Marcello and his surname is Tossatti can be mexican by family origin?
    (if he were Marcello Tzultxapaltepocl, well, I'd think about it, but that's not the case).

    I bet Italian, thanks (while it's possible some generations in the middle are in fact mexican... once again, if some south american ancestors they will be more probably from Argentina -more italians, than from Mexico)

  61. European Scholl OS's by theolein · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure what most European schools use as their OS's but I suppose it would be some version of Windows. Here in Switzerland, although there is a techie elite that is very comfortable with Linux and OSS, it's the case that most people and companies are MS users and have this unfounded feeling that it is the "superior" solution and scoff at suggestions that OSS will bring them anything. the thing is that Switzerland is on the whole a very rich country where the average wage is about $3500/month for the whole country and so most customers (as well as schools) are not inconvenienced by high MS software licences. MS spends a lot of propaganda PR money here to make sure that it stays that way (Product rollouts TV adds etc). The only change that I have noticed is that almost all ISP's now use Linux and the two leading Tech Universities in Zürich and Lausanne have stopped their creep to Windows and have started moving back to a majority of Unix systems, since this is where the most room for development and experimentation is.

    This will probably have an impact on the market sooner or later as most job ads for developers, managers etc require that the students graduated at one of these two Unis.

  62. Volunteers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if they want some voluteeers to help them out?
    Sounds like a worthy cause. Maybe I'll visit there on my next holiday and help them out.
    Do they have a website?
    Are they in touch with the rest of the Linux world?

  63. thus a page was written in the history of software by hey · · Score: 1
    Thanks for the tip. Here's Babblefish translation of the key page. (I love the last paragraph)

    6 de Marzo de 2002, Un dia Trascendental para la Historia del Software en el Peru

    Forum of the Project of Law 1609 on Uso de Software Libre in the Organizations You publish of the Peruvian State

    The Congress of the Republica of Peru fu & eacute the scene, once again, of one of the important events but for the Peruvians, the attendance of p & uacuteblico pleasingly surpassed the espectativas of the tie people to the project. The interest on the subject put in manifesto when filling the hall Raul Porras Barrenechea of the Congress him Republic, to the point that it had to qualify mesanine of the third floor, people continued arriving even though the forum empezo with a little from delay.

    One of ours first pleasing surprises fué without a doubt to listen to the words of Mr. President of the Congress Carlos Ferrero who nonsingle showed interest in the subject, but that demostro to know it and I do not doubt in showing that it was an alternative that without a doubt provocaria an intense debate in the Plenary session.

    Immediately afterwards the words of congressmen Gloria Helfer and Pedro Morales were for showing the situation of lack of means in which this submerged our Country, with an emphasis in which the people are few who have access to the technology. He is asi as we see the Inter & eacutes that the subject in the congress has waked up, since to his turn they respectively touched to the subject from the optica of education and defense of the consumer, commissions that direct at the moment.

    The exhibition of the Dr Edgar Villanueva presented/displayed the project and located to the assistants in the Peruvian computer science reality where the illegality of Software predominates, thus seeing in the project a viable alternative nonsingle the problems of licensing, but deficit of knowledge of tecnologias of end to the at the moment single being Users of Propietary software and erroneamente to adopt the supposed advantages of & eacuteste like estandar of the computer science industry.

    Enrique Chaparro, Consultant the International - GNU, mostro a universal reality of free software. " free software is not free, this is single bonus pack, free software is safe, based on true standards, of high quality and of an impressive versatility, this is the reason for which many many companies that do not have ningun economic problem prefer it, being single cost one but of the advantages that offers ", it expressed.

    To his turn the Dean of the Faculty of Industrial Ingenieria and Systems gives the National University of Ingenieria, emphasized the paper of the universities as centers of professional formation and recognized that the way of the knowledge to the one of users of the knowledge has been turned aside, emphasized the support of his institution to the project.

    The INEI also was present in the day indicating precise that they estan working in a plan of implementation of free software in the state organizations, because they recognize that it is an important subject.

    Finally, Jesus Marquina closed the exhibitions being thankful the concurrence and doing a brief mention to that this project this being supported of independent way by people and organizations, reason why solicitd that the state takes greater interest and him of the corresponding support.

    The ceremony closed with words of gratefulness of congressman Edgar Villanueva and thus a page was written in the history of software in Peru.

  64. Re:Best way to get this going in the rest of spain by opkool · · Score: 2

    Maybe then you should go to http://www.cat-linux.com and join the mailing list. They are probably looking for voluntiers to translate or help with Linux.

  65. cool and amazing about Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux *does* do something cool and amazing: it lets users install it free of cost, and without any licensing hassles.

  66. I love that Monty Python skit by cthulhubob · · Score: 1

    Socialism vs. Marxism, wrapped up in a slice of comedy (and with a guest appearance of monarchy!)

    mmm... political debate...

    --

    In post-9/11 America, the CIA interrogates YOU!
  67. No linux in Mexico, only Gates-ian creations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As far as it goes, the people promoting linux on schools are independent individuals as well as small companies. Eventhough the numbers on savings have been showd to politicians, schools principals, etc, they have not commited to change the computer platform in schools, due to lack of trained people to do so, but most of all because Mexico's president Vicente Fox has signed contracts with Bill Gate to provide millions of licenses of windows to Mexico's computers in government and school. Nobody can fight this resolution when our senate is always looking for the money to come into their pockets and not into public spending and savings.

  68. Re:This is a good example to review the /. standpo by software_non_olet · · Score: 1

    Or was it Brazilian?