Slashdot Mirror


Camera Flashes Kill Nanotubes

Fnordmonger writes "New Scientist is running a story claiming that flash photography can cause nanotubes to explode. Basically , the carbon absorbs heat, which cannot be dissipated. Instead, the energy is released in an explosion. There is a cool video there of the stuff going off."

209 comments

  1. Space Elevator? by Matey-O · · Score: 5, Funny

    So we've build this elevator to space....but nobody can take a picture of it. :P

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    1. Re:Space Elevator? by SanLouBlues · · Score: 2

      Also what are the ramifications of the Power Tower effect on the space elevator?

    2. Re:Space Elevator? by JWhitlock · · Score: 3, Informative
      Well, if you'd read the article, you'd know that it only affects nanotubes with a single atom thickness.

      I agree, if the space elevator is only 1 atom thick, I'm not riding!

    3. Re:Space Elevator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh hell... I'm not gonna ride it even if it doesn't explode on flash if it's one atom think...

    4. Re:Space Elevator? by n9hmg · · Score: 1

      I find it rather comforting to see that everyone immediately thinks of the implications for the space elevator, first thing (including me).
      I'd guess that direct sunlight across vacuum would be bright enough to do it, too. It'll have to have a really failsafe reflective coating.

    5. Re:Space Elevator? by anonymous_wombat · · Score: 1

      One scary thought; builders of bridges, buildings, or whatever could incorporate these, and then have any easy way of commiting terrorist acts in the future. One more happy thought to keep in mind.

    6. Re:Space Elevator? by cei · · Score: 2, Funny

      "You must be THIS thin to ride this ride..."

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
  2. Space Elevator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Well I guess hopes for a space elevator are shot now, since the first time someone took a photo of it would cause the whole thing to explode.

    1. Re:Space Elevator by IMarvinTPA · · Score: 2, Informative

      I thought that too, but fortunately, it only effects monowalled nano-tubes. Other varieties don't go boom. Which means they shouldn't buy monowalled ones for the space elevator.

      IMarvinTPA

    2. Re:Space Elevator by DaneelGiskard · · Score: 2

      They still don't know why they others don't go boom. So there is still hope ;-)

    3. Re:Space Elevator by IMarvinTPA · · Score: 1

      I was one of the first to say it wasn't a problem. Please check your times before modding redundant.
      Grr.

  3. so much for my futuristic rave by Transient0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    how am i supposed to serve MP3s off of my nano-computer with all those strobe lights going all the time?

    dammit!

    Ohhh...

    upon actually reading the article(something i sometimes do before i post...) i see that they are considering taking advantage of this for the construction of uber-cool nono-circuits....

    so maybe my strobe lights can be PART of my MP3 disco computer... cool. it's a great time to be alive!

    1. Re:so much for my futuristic rave by MaxVlast · · Score: 2, Funny

      Use ogg. I hear it doesn't explode. d00d.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    2. Re:so much for my futuristic rave by robolemon · · Score: 0, Redundant
      Just use a Beowulf nano-cluster and you could make the explosions part of the show.

      Just make sure at least one remains at the end...

      "This song's blowing up the charts!"

      --

      I design user interfaces for a free network management application,

    3. Re:so much for my futuristic rave by 1155 · · Score: 1

      Well if you think about it, this would be great for a construction project. Set a flash to go off at a certain time, causes multiple millions of nano tubes to go off all at once. Those would allow for "TNT" (i am not sure what they use anymore) to go off, probably at a lesser cost than what is used now, the almightly plunger.

  4. About Other Nanotech Applications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Can it destroy nanorobots that the government put in my body against my will?

  5. text is here by Carbon+Unit+549 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Nanotubes go flash bang wallop
    19:00 25 April 02 NewScientist.com news service

    Taking a snapshot of carbon nanotubes using an ordinary camera flash can cause them to emit a loud pop and then suddenly burst into flame.

    Scientists say this unique explosive phenomenon may lead to new means of manufacturing nanoscale carbon materials and even remote-control devices for small explosive charges.

    Pulickel Ajayan and his team at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, New York, have been at work since one of his students accidentally sparked a tiny explosion by photographing a bundle of single-walled carbon nanotubes. "It was a complete accident," Ajayan told New Scientist.

    Researchers around the world are exploring the potential that carbon nanotubes could have for a wide range of super-strong materials and nanoscale circuits. Ganapathiraman Ramanath, also at Rensselaer Polytechnic, says that the latest discovery "will serve as a starting point for developing nanotube-based actuators and sensors that rely on remote activation and triggering."

    Ultra-absorbent

    Ajayan says the explosion occurs because the black carbon nanotubes absorb light so efficiently that, when it is converted into heat, the heat cannot dissipate quickly enough across bunched-up tubes. However, only the single-walled variety of nanotubes catch fire. Those with multiple walls do not explode - the researchers are unsure why.

    Video of flashlit nanotube explosion (744kB download)

    The initial popping noise is generated by the heating of the oxygen inside and between the tubes, which causes a shock wave. And when the temperature of carbon reaches between 600C and 700C it oxidises sparking combustion.

    When the researchers tried the experiment in the absence of oxygen they found that the tubes were transformed into different nanoscopic shapes, some reminiscent of cone-shaped "nanohorns".

    "It's a very nice surprise," says Angel Rubio, an expert in carbon nanotubes at the University of the Basque Country in Spain. "Because it's the only carbon material that exhibits this ignition property."

    Journal Reference: Science (vol 296, p 705)

    Will Knight

    --

    nohup rm -rf ~/. >& zen &

  6. new ignition source? by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Funny

    This could be a cool way to make a simple sealed emergency fire starting device for survival equipment companies...

    Think about it.. get a pile of wood and twigs, set device in middle press button, get away..

    Oh wait... a bic lighter might be a better idea...

    nevermind

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:new ignition source? by masterkool · · Score: 0

      This might not be a bad idea. They would burn hot and fast, great for windy weather, the nanotubes are waterproof. Wow, you might be on to something here. Just hope they dont go off in your pocket.

      --
      I once shot a man who posted too many, "Imagine a beowulf cluster of these"
  7. Ouch, hope NASA knows this by Indras · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Last I heard NASA was making serious plans for a space elevator (slashdot story) using nanotubes. That may have to seriously reconsider this if it means tourists with cameras or solar flares can bring the whole thing toppling down.

    I wonder what kind of shielding or heat-dissipation they would need for a 22,000 mile long cable of nanotubes? Might be more effor than it's worth after all.

    --
    The speed of time is one second per second.
    1. Re:Ouch, hope NASA knows this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Read the story: multi-walled tubules are unaffected. It is my understanding that any use of construction would likely make use of multi-walled ones for strength.

    2. Re:Ouch, hope NASA knows this by zephc · · Score: 2, Funny

      hell, in space, ANY direct sunlight will do it. Of course, the trick is to then coat the space elevator with some kind of paint. Perhaps Dorito, Pepsi and Duracell ads painted up and down the sides of the elevator will bring in the needed revenue

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    3. Re:Ouch, hope NASA knows this by cat_jesus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or how about simple everyday lightning?

  8. Not much of a story by johnburton · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    !!! Heat causes chemical reaction!!! --- No doesn't work even with 3 exclaimation marks.

    --
    Sig is taking a break!
    1. Re:Not much of a story by Indras · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, this is quite a story. Here's a quote that might interest you:

      "Because it's the only carbon material that exhibits this ignition property."

      Carbon doesn't normally do this. In the right circumstances, it is flammable, sure, but never explosive.

      --
      The speed of time is one second per second.
    2. Re:Not much of a story by Vinson+Massif · · Score: 1

      Ding! Close but no cigar...

      !!! Light causes chemical reaction !!! It's a burst of intense light energy, absorbed by the tubes, that trips the rapid exothermic reaction (BANG).

      Plus, take a flash picture of coal or graphite; they'll just sit there like a lump.

      --
      "Remember, any tool can be the right tool." -- Red Green
    3. Re:Not much of a story by casio282 · · Score: 3, Funny

      it's true. my walls are covered with studio portraiture of lumps of coal and graphite.

      --

      :wq
  9. What's that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, call me an idiot. I read the article, but I still don't know a nanotube is. Can someone explain it to the uninitiated please?

    Posting Anonymously to protect my ego.

    1. Re:What's that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Didn't know either huh?

    2. Re:What's that? by rusty0101 · · Score: 5, Informative

      A nano-tube is what you get when you start with a bucky ball, split it in half, add carbon atoms between the hemispheres to build a cylinder with a hemisphere at each end. that would be a Bucky-tube. Taking the hemisphere's off then end will make an open Bucky-tube.

      You could also take a one atom thick sheet of carbon atoms (graphite is multiple layers of these sheets) and roll it so that one edge bonds to the other edge. This would give you a tube of arbitrary radius. An open Bucky-tube is a special case.

      Further trivia, a bucky ball is a sphere of 60 carbon atoms formed in a shape similar to a socker ball.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    3. Re:What's that? by moreati · · Score: 5, Informative

      Quick: A Carbon Nanotube is a molecule of Carbon in the shape of a tube, a few nanometrea across and possibly infinitely long.

      Helpful: Carbon Nanotubes are a varient of buckminsterfullerene. Molecules of which are made of 60 carbon atoms in a sephircal arrangement (like a british (soccar) football). Their exetremely tough, and have great potential for drug delivery and lubricant applications. Carbon Nanotubes split the fullerene molecule in half and extend it with a cylinder of carbon atoms. Another way to think of them is by imagining a rolled up sheet of grphite and capping the ends. Some pictures might make things clearer.

      Nano is the next step from micro, current microchips are in the 0.1 micrometre range, this is the same as 100 nanometres. Carbon nanotubes are only a few (ie less than 10) nanometres across.

      The article discusses single walled nanotubes, the other varient is multiwalled nanotubes, which are simply many nanotubes wrpped in layers - like a telescopic radio ariel. The potential of carbon nanotubes lies in making lots of them long and all in the same orientation, then we have a rope stronger than diamond (think space elevator strong). Also they might be used in nano scale electronics.

      Hope that helps

      Alex

    4. Re:What's that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Further trivia, a bucky ball is a sphere of 60 carbon atoms formed in a shape similar to a socker ball.

      Even further trivia: it's spelled soccer.

    5. Re:What's that? by moreati · · Score: 1

      Just a futher thought, the nanotubes in the article explode beacuse they're so effective at absorbing light, and because they have an extremely large surface are to mass ratio. Perhaps coating the tubes in a layer of aluminium a few atoms thick would solve the problem. The tinfoil inductry will be happy.

      Alex

    6. Re:What's that? by pizen · · Score: 1

      Perhaps coating the tubes in a layer of aluminium a few atoms thick would solve the problem. The tinfoil inductry will be happy.

      Just a thought...but why would the Tin Foil industry be excited about the use of aluminium? (I know they are usually made by the same company but that's beside the point)

    7. Re:What's that? by moreati · · Score: 1

      It would probably have been better if I wrote:

      Perhaps coating the tubes in a layer of aluminium a few atoms thick would solve the problem. The tinfoil inductry will be happy :).

      It was only an inane comment :)

      Alex

    8. Re:What's that? by pizen · · Score: 1

      I understand this is silly and no big deal. But wouldn't the aluminium foil industry be happier than the tin foil industry? Just a thought (even thought they are the same industry for all intensive purposes the same product...except for material). Don't take it too seriously.

    9. Re:What's that? by jcoleman · · Score: 2

      Quick: A Carbon Nanotube is a molecule of Carbon in the shape of a tube, a few nanometres across and possibly infinitely long.

      Helpful: Carbon Nanotubes are a variant of buckminsterfullerene. [godunov.com] Molecules of which are made of 60 carbon atoms in a spherical arrangement (like a British (soccer) football). They're extremely tough, and have great potential for drug delivery and lubricant applications. Carbon Nanotubes split the fullerene molecule in half and extend it with a cylinder of carbon atoms. Another way to think of them is by imagining a rolled up sheet of graphite and capping the ends. Some pictures might make things clearer.

      Nano is the next step from micro, current microchips are in the 0.1 micrometre range, this is the same as 100 nanometres.
      Carbon nanotubes are only a few (ie less than 10) nanometres across.

      The article discusses single-walled nanotubes, the other varient is multi-walled nanotubes, which are simply many nanotubes wrapped in layers - like a telescopic radio aerial. The potential of carbon nanotubes lies in making lots of them long and all in the same orientation, then we have a rope stronger than diamond (think space elevator strong). Also they might be used in nano scale electronics.

      Hope that helps your spelling

      John

    10. Re:What's that? by moreati · · Score: 1

      Ah I see the source of the confision now, I didn't mean tin the metal literally. I used tinfoil as a generic term meaning thin-metal-film-widely-used-in-food-preperation-an d-often-made-of-aluminium, it's a UKism I think, or maybe just a alexwillmerism.

      Alex

    11. Re:What's that? by renehollan · · Score: 1
      ...for all intensive purposes...

      Having been caught by the local grammar police more than once in my time, usually for a typo that looked like a grammatical error, I thought I'd post in kind.

      That should read "for all intents and purposes".

      Thus concludes this rare contribution by me to the ranks of the grammar police.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    12. Re:What's that? by moreati · · Score: 1

      Point taken, and in an odd way thankyou. In fairness most of those are typos rather than thinkos, but still '7/10 Let down by spelling' would be appropriate. I hadn't realised that I'd made quite that many mistakes to be honest.

      As my user bio now says:
      Yes my touch typing sucks that bad.

      Please in smeg's name don't correct this post as well, my ego couldn't take it :).

    13. Re:What's that? by pizen · · Score: 1

      I understand what you meant and I know you didn't actually mean the metal tin. I was attempting to be witty. Oh well, work was boring when I initially posted...I blame it on that.

    14. Re:What's that? by pizen · · Score: 1

      That should read "for all intents and purposes"

      Really? Wow. I guess you really do learn something everyday.

    15. Re:What's that? by Niet3sche · · Score: 1

      Further trivia still: the University of Arizona has a tribute to the finding of the Bucky Ball in its Biological Sciences (now named after some guy) building.

  10. Building Materials by yintercept · · Score: 3, Funny

    Researchers around the world are exploring the potential that carbon nanotubes could have for a wide range of super-strong materials and nanoscale circuits.

    I can see the highway dept completing their fancy new bridge across the Tacoma Narrows with super strong carbon nanotubes. A week after opening, Priscilla wants a picture of her two darling munchkins standing with the beautiful black bridge. She snaps a photo...and BAM!!! the whole thing goes up in smoke.

    1. Re:Building Materials by seann · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm reminded of Super Metroid, when your in Maridia and you set a super grenade to explode in the right tube.
      *MEerrrroooeeaaaaaaaaaaa*
      *samus gets up*
      *looks left*
      *looks right*
      *looks up*
      *creek... creeeek.. creek creek creek creek SMASHHHHHH*
      *glass dangles all around and the tube's destroyed*

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    2. Re:Building Materials by (void*) · · Score: 1
      Whereupon the BLFN (Bin Laden Forever Network) claims responsibility for the damage.


      Meanwhile, the FBI arrests Pricilla and her two kids for terrorism. Priscilla refuses to talk citing her right to access to her lawyer. The FBI meanwhile has questioned her two kids and both of them - the brats - say that "they are just one of the tourists".

    3. Re:Building Materials by seigniory · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      that was so not funny

    4. Re:Building Materials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably don't know about the Tacoma Narrows Bridge then.

    5. Re:Building Materials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But this is slashdot, don't we just assume everyone owns and has read a college level physics textbook?

    6. Re:Building Materials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listen here, bud this here is /., and everyone here should at least pretend to own, have read and understand several college level physics textbooks.

      This is obviously not a haven for English majors!

    7. Re:Building Materials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and everyone here should at least pretend to own, have read and understand several college level physics textbooks.

      Or at least enjoy watching pictures of bridges falling down when the wind hits the harmonic frequency of the building material.

    8. Re:Building Materials by LF+Coyote · · Score: 1

      And great that it might... Bastids are going to start charging a toll to cross the stupid bridge. Bad enough those of us stuck on the Olympic Penninsula having to pay buckets to take a ferry to get across Puget sound, now, the last free way to get across wont be free. Thats great when I have to get to work, and dont have cash...

      At least make the Toll booths of nanotubes...

      --
      -- LF Coyote -- Den Mond interessiert nicht, dass der Kojote heult --
  11. So does this mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So does this discovery mean that using your camera with the flash on could put you in violation of the US PATRIOT act? The resulting explosion could have you classified as a terrorist.

  12. Re:my friend zach has a nanotube... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why don't you take a flash photo of it?

  13. Not as bad as it sounds by Athyra · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is a more positive development than the headline implies. First, since double-layer nanotubes won't break, they now know how to keep them working if needed, and second, this now allows them to have a trigger action to set things in motion during complex sequences.

    Personally, I'd like to see Milton Bradley take advantage of this and update Mousetrap. Turning the crank woud now release the ball, causing the little man to land on the flash button, breaking the nanotube and releasing the mousetrap. Of course, setup would just suck. :-)

    1. Re:Not as bad as it sounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Setup of mousetrap always sucks. Deal with it.

  14. Fusion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If the tubes are loaded with deuterium & tritium, of He-3, could this be useful for small scale fusion?

    1. Re:Fusion? by cyclist1200 · · Score: 1

      Probably not. Might make a neat party favor or firecracker though...

    2. Re:Fusion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fission and fusion don't work like that. You need a minimum amount of the material to be able to build up the 'chemical' reaction. The mass in critical mass is just that: so many kilograms of material.

  15. There is Evil afoot by dubiousmike · · Score: 0

    First they make me look 20 pounds heavier than I really am, change my eye color so that I look like the undead and now this?!?

    How much longer are we willing to stand for this?

    I say we get a taxpayer funded task force to oversee the destruction of all evil cameras.

  16. Can't dissipate heat? by zeus_tfc · · Score: 2

    Wait a minute... I thought the carbon nanotube dissipated REALLY well. Wasn't there an article here on Slashdot about them being superconductors? Don't superconductors move heat really easily? I didn't read the article, but this struck me as odd. Does the article explain this?

    Besides, I thought carbon nanotubes were supposed to be even greater than sliced bread, concidering these:
    They work as semiconductors
    They can make a molecular computer
    They can kill friction
    and on and on and on.

    --
    "...At the end of the day"..."when everyone goes home, you're stuck with yourself." RIP Layne Staley
    1. Re:Can't dissipate heat? by babymac · · Score: 1

      You're correct. One of the amazing properties of nanotubes is their thermal conductivity. I'm guessing that somehow a sudden intense flash of light overwhelms the tubes somehow. Can anyone elaborate on this issue?

      --
      "War makes me sad." - Me
    2. Re:Can't dissipate heat? by Bartab · · Score: 1

      Yes, the article in question elaborates on the issue. Specifically, only single walled tubes that are bunched together catch fire. Multiple walled tubes do not.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.
    3. Re:Can't dissipate heat? by MarkusQ · · Score: 5, Informative
      If you heat an issolated something uniformly it doesn't matter how well it conducts heat; heat only flows if there's a gradient (in this case, that implies someplace else (that wasn't flashed) to dump the heat).

      -- MarkusQ

    4. Re:Can't dissipate heat? by chainsaw1 · · Score: 2

      If the nanotubes are capable of picking up that much heat from a flash, it would seem they have a good possibility at being used in a high yield solar furnace or other light to heat exchange material. Just include the medium on to which the heat should be transferred in the system and it shouldn't explode/break down/fold...just create and pass along heat.

      It would also be environmentally friendly...mostly carbon

      --
      - Sig
    5. Re:Can't dissipate heat? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      As long as the nano tubes can transfer the heat to the other material as fast at they absorb the light. I guess so. Otherwise I don't see how that would work.

      BTW. I know nothing about physics so I'm probably wrong.

    6. Re:Can't dissipate heat? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Or should I say: As long as the material can absorb the heat as fast as the nano-tube can absorb the light/dish out the heat.

    7. Re:Can't dissipate heat? by chainsaw1 · · Score: 2

      Well, the rate of absorbtion of heat will be proportional to the surface area of the nanotub exposed to light. The rate of conductive heat transfer will be proportional to the surface area of the tube in contact with whatever medium it is transferring the heat to. Since the total surface area you have to work with is constant, you should be able to adjust what percent is exposed to light vs remaining percent exposed to transfer medium in order to get maximum heat throughput (but not so high as to melt the tube)

      I think...

      --
      - Sig
  17. Obligatory Simpsons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    This isn't news. Bart found this out when he visited Itchy and Scratchy Land and fought robots powered by nanotubes

    1. Re:Obligatory Simpsons by kob43 · · Score: 1

      "Die, bad robots, DIE!"

      --


      Kiss my bass.
    2. Re:Obligatory Simpsons by Openadvocate · · Score: 1

      Ah yes :)
      Bart: [German accent] Hey mouse...say cheese. [snaps picture; an Itchy robot collapses] With a dry, cool wit like that, I could be an action hero. [the family snaps more photos] [Homer emerges from a pile of robots]
      Homer: Die, bad robots, die! [laughs] With a dry, cool wit like that, I could be an action hero. -- Yeah, real dry, "Itchy and Scratchy Land"

      --
      my sig
  18. quantum efficiency by avandesande · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This is significant because most photochemical reactions have poor quantum yield. This may lead to some highly efficient solar cells, photo catylists or sensors.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  19. No more worries about nanoviruses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... if they replicate ... if they go bad,
    we just only have to take pictures of them!

  20. Nanotubes by cigarky · · Score: 3, Funny

    Thank God, the next time Wil Wheaton makes another nano-lifeform there will be a way to defeat it ;)

    --
    You shank my Jengaship!
  21. Don't worry, I'm with the press by return+42 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Overheard as a press photographer prepares to shoot the new, carbon-fiber bridge:

    "This'll make a great blow-up!"

  22. Bad news... by tps12 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...for the nanomodelling industry.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
  23. Alternative uses by sydneyfong · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Imagine the possibilities!!

    Scenario:

    Reporter: Mr. famous_person *camera flashes* would you comment on your relationship *camera flashes* with Miss XXX?

    Mr. famous_person: Sorry but I have no *camera flashes* comment *camera flashes* at this stage. (tries to get away)

    Reporter: Do you believe *camera flashes* that this relationship will have an impact on *camera flashes* your career?

    Mr. famous_person: I have a nanotube in my pocket!!!

    --
    Don't quote me on this.
    1. Re:Alternative uses by docbrown42 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      That's that Miss XXX said! ;)

      --
      Ed Wedig
      Graphic design services
      docbrown.net
    2. Re:Alternative uses by ajrs · · Score: 1

      I thought you were just happy to see me.

  24. Simpsons by Spankophile · · Score: 1

    I guess this is how The Simpsons killed all those robots in the amusement park.

  25. Re:GOATSE.CX DON'T CLICK by viking099 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Beware...
    the above link, in plain text: http://pediatrics.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm ?site=http://goatse.cx

    Warning!

  26. Dexters Labratory by Odinson · · Score: 4, Funny
    "Dee Dee, what did I tell you about comming in here?"

    "Look Dexter, I got a new camera, isn't it cooooool??"

    *-FLASH-*

    "Dee Dee, You are a geeeniuuuuss!"

  27. One more reason... by Nindalf · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...that Disney is destined to rule the stars.

    I mean, look at their progression: Disney Land, Disney World...

    It's pretty clear where they're headed.

    "Please keep all parts of your body inside the vehicle at all times, for your own safety from moving parts and hard vacuum. No flash photography is permitted."

    1. Re:One more reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, look at their progression: Disney Land, Disney World...

      It's pretty clear where they're headed.


      *ahem* -- You forgot Euro Disney.

    2. Re:One more reason... by Noofus · · Score: 1

      A warning like this will never work. Invariably when asked not to use flash phorography, some wiseass sets off his camera. This would normally fall under the category of natural selection, but in this case other, potentially smart, people would be killed. Maybe they would consider a xenon flash bulb a weapon and arrest anyone carrying a camera for being a terrorist?

    3. Re:One more reason... by 56ker · · Score: 2

      That'll be one for the tech support helpline :

      [ring..ring]
      Hello? How can I help you?
      Oh - well it was my birthday and I'd been bought a computer. My friend took a photo and well - the thing blew up! What shall I do?
      Well - I'll just check my troubleshooting script - no - no mention of what to do if it explodes here.
      Which version of Windows were you running? ...

    4. Re:One more reason... by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      You forgot Euro Disney.

      Yeah well, who hasn't?

  28. Space elevators? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, how about this space elevator built by NASA on the endangereded islands of the Maldives? Would this whole thing come crippling down the minute an innocent japanese tourist takes a snap shot?

  29. Space elevator?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Weren't they talking about building the space elevator out of carbon nanotubes? Does that mean it will explode if someone takes flash foto of it?

  30. Circa 2030 by Kibo · · Score: 5, Funny

    AMD's C4 Featuring a new nanotube superconducting core.

    Extream case mods have graduated from hobby to a high risk sport lauded in Mountain Dew commercials.

    --
    --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
  31. You've killed the site! by n-baxley · · Score: 2

    There is a cool video there of the [Nanotube explosion] going off.

    And with those words, you killed the site.

    1. Re:You've killed the site! by ScumBiker · · Score: 2

      Yep, it's dead. I'm currently downloading the video at 271 BYTES per second. If it ever finishes, I'll post a mirror here.

      --
      --- Think of it as evolution in action ---
    2. Re:You've killed the site! by nanojath · · Score: 2

      "There is a cool video there of the stuff going off."

      Yeah, If your idea of "cool" is a little lump of shit material smoking and glowing very slightly with a barely audible pop and then sluggishly, minimally smouldering and expanding like a defective snake firework...

      --

      It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

    3. Re:You've killed the site! by n-baxley · · Score: 2

      True, it cerainly doesn't live up to the "explosion" definition.

    4. Re:You've killed the site! by mallie_mcg · · Score: 1

      Its still there, it has simply been renamed.

      It seems that they just renamed the files

      the movie (which was an mpeg is here)

      http://www.rpi.edu/dept/NewsComm/sub/Pressimgs/n an oflash/flash.save

      --


      Do the following really mean anything? SCSA MCP CCSA CCNA
      --I'm not actually after an answer!
  32. Read the article, thanks! by manual_overide · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Firstly, only the single sided tubes exhibit this behavior. So building things out of multiple sided tubes is still viable. Next, they absorb the light of the flash because they are black, but can't dissipate the heat out fast enough when there are a number of them bunched together because the heat from one nanotube gets absorbed by another, and so on. Think of it like dissipation interference.

    --
    If bad puns were like deli meat, this would be the wurst
    1. Re:Read the article, thanks! by caesar-auf-nihil · · Score: 5, Insightful

      After reading the article, there is still a lot of questions regarding the mechanism of nanotube degradation.

      One question that comes to mind is the wavelength of the light produced by the flash. Some materials are stable to some wavelengths, but fall apart under others. The wavelength of that light may have been just right to exite the electrons in the bonds of the nanotube and cause them to break.

      I think we need to look at the structure of the nanotube itself. The single-wall nanotubes have a huge amount of bond strain, and therefore, are somewhat unstable already. What lends support to the heat dissipation arguement is the structure similiarity between the carbon nanotubes (high strain) and graphite (low-strain). Graphite and carbon nanotubes both conduct electricity well, but both are thermal insulators. Graphite however, has no bond strain or instablity, and glows upon heating (releasing the excess energy as light). What I think happens with the single wall nanotubes is not just heat dissipation.

      Since the nanotubes have a lot of bond strain due to their structure, they have a lot of energy built into the structure. However, those strained bonds can be easily broken by putting in enough energy to break them. Once the bonds break, they release bond strain, and therefore, the energy built into the structure. So, its not just heat dissipation, I think what we're seeing here is that intense light is powerful enough to break the bonds in the carbon nanotube, and once that happens, the bond strain energy is released catastrophically, thus causing the explosion/ignition. So each nanotube explodes at the same time, not one leading to another.

      All that being said, this may be the first example of a light-detonated organic chemical degradation. Most are heat generate or shock generated (kinetic energy). Light is almost unheard of. Very interesting result.

      --
      -When going for broke, go for Ithaca!
    2. Re:Read the article, thanks! by iabervon · · Score: 2

      Right, so you just have to paint each nontube white...

      Actually, it probably just gives another reason you'd want to coat nanotube bundles with something when you're going to use them. Of course, it's always been known that it's important to coat them with something, because they're flamable, being pure carbon.

    3. Re:Read the article, thanks! by darkonc · · Score: 2
      So, its not just heat dissipation, I think what we're seeing here is that intense light is powerful enough to break the bonds in the carbon nanotube, and once that happens, the bond strain energy is released catastrophically, thus causing the explosion/ignition. So each nanotube explodes at the same time, not one leading to another.

      er, um, no. It's a simple burn, not an explosion. The 'pop' sound is apparently from air inside the tubes being indirectly heated by the tubes when the tubes absorb the heat. The combustion of the tubes, however, is relatively slow and progressive in nature. The rest of your explanation, however, seems to make sense.

      My off-the-cuff thought is that - besides the shape-strain, the combustion may have something to do with the heating of the oxygen inside the tubes. If the tubes amplify the captured energy on the inside, the super-heated tube guts may be where the combustion actually begins. This would also explain why only singld-walled tubes exhibit this behaviour: the second wall would act as an insulating layer for the oxygen inside the tube.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    4. Re:Read the article, thanks! by caesar-auf-nihil · · Score: 2

      I don't remember the article saying that there was a slow burn of the material - more of a rapid ignition and pop. There may have been a slow combustion as you describe, but the rapid ignition, and forceful release of the air in the flask described sounds more like an explosion rather than slow combustion. I'd have to observe the phenomena myself to determine if its a classical "explosion" or simply carbon "burning".

      As for oxygen in the carbon nanotube interior - there is no oxygen in the interior, as these were described as closed (capped) carbon nanotubes, which are formed under inert (non-oxygen) atmospheres. Almost all nanotubes to date have been "empty", in that no other molecules are present in them after formation. As with all things in chemistry, there are exceptions, but I'm quite sure that these materials were empty. Therefore, oxygen would have been involved in the oxidative degradation (burning) on the outside of the tubes, not the inside. Even if they were filled, the amount of anything inside the tube would have been picoliters (1.0x10-12) of material, not enough to force an audible "pop". The diameter of a carbon nanotube is quite small (50 nm I think, depending on the carbon nanotube geometry).

      Your comment makes me wonder if the materials would have rapidly decomposed if kept under nitrogen or argon, rather than air, in the flask.

      I guess I'll just have to wait until the full article comes out to get more answers to my questions.

      --
      -When going for broke, go for Ithaca!
    5. Re:Read the article, thanks! by darkonc · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The article claims that the popping sound is the oxygen being forced out of the tubes. To quote: "The initial popping noise is generated by the heating of the oxygen inside and between the tubes, which causes a shock wave.

      As to knowing that it's a slow burn: I watched the video (my new version of mplayer works quite nicely, thank you).

      Given the longer description in the body of the article, I'm not sure where the 'explosion' tag comes from (other than journalistic hyperbole).

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  33. Charlton Heston unveils Nasa "Beanstalk" Space Ele by docbrown42 · · Score: 1

    "...and we present to you: the Beanstalk!" *Flash*pop*flash*pop*crack*boom*CRASH! ... ... YOU MANIACS, YOU BLEW IT UP! YOU BLEW IT ALL UP!"

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
  34. Re:Useful property of such a reaction by cat_jesus · · Score: 1

    Another possible application of this property would be in the field of solar energy. Since the nanotubes absorb light energy more efficiently than they dissipate the heat, it seems like an excellent material for all sorts of solar applications. Remember only the single walled nanotubes explode.

  35. One more use by WetCat · · Score: 1

    To attach small pads with nanotubes in museums where photos with flash is prohibited...

  36. Sounds like something the RIAA or MPAA invented by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    listen/watch the disk once then the player flashes it. :)

  37. Could have used this on the Enterprise by bytor4232 · · Score: 1

    Boy, they could have really used this on the Enterprise when Wesley stupidly let his Nanites get loose in the Evolution Episode.

    --
    -- 4 8 15 16 23 42
  38. Nano tubes vs. Bucky Tubes? by Aiku1337 · · Score: 1

    Everyone's talking about space elevators with the nano tube technology, but, I thought they were supposed to use Bucky Tubes.

    Maybe they're the same thing =\

  39. That must explain the /. effect.... by chopkins1 · · Score: 1

    Web sites are like single-layer nanotubes.

    Whenever the /. editors feel like DDOSing a website they just flash a link to it on the front page. :-P

    Way to go guys. You just blew up New Scientist.

  40. Nano warfare by lute3 · · Score: 2, Funny
    If this becomes the standard behavior for nano machines, then we might not need to build nanos for the purpose of destroying other nanos.. We can just put flash bulbs (conglomeration of LEDs might be even better) near all building entrances and perform a security sweep every X number of hours/days to flush nanos out that might have crept in.. Heck, it might become standard to flash lights all the time. That would be frickin annoying!

    Also, humans might need frequent "decontamination" by flashing lights (LEDs have been used for therapeutic benefit in today's technology--one example) into the body and then re-introducing the "good" nanos through a pill.

    Diamond Age Summary
    Diamond Age Review and audio sample

  41. Best .sig so far by EnglishTim · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    My Other machine is your Linux Box

    Ha ha ha ha

    Much funnier than the comment.

  42. Mirror by ttyp0 · · Score: 3, Informative
    http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns999 92219

    I'm working on getting the MPEG mirrored too.

  43. forgetting... by Caineach · · Score: 2, Interesting

    what you all seem to be forgetting about the article is that is says only single walled nanotubes that are bunched up together will explode. if you take a picture of nanotubes on their own, they wont. so you still can use singlewalled nanotubes in stuff, just not when they're buched up

    1. Re:forgetting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that wouldn't be too useful, would it?

    2. Re:forgetting... by Caineach · · Score: 1

      many people are hoping to use nanotubes for wires, replacing copper in in computer curcuits. why would you want to use a large mass of nanotubes as a wire? you would only take one nanotube at a time in that case, and single walled ones would be fine.

  44. another mirror by ddeboer · · Score: 1

    Probably not very fast, but: another mirror.

  45. Itchy & Scratchy Land by raoulortega · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So that's why you can use flash photography to defeat the bezerk robots.

  46. sooooo... by pyrros · · Score: 1

    That would mean that native americans had invented nanotubes ?

  47. Re:I bet they're blaming it on Bin Laden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Nano-terrorism???

  48. Destroying Evidence by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
    On an upcoming episode of Really Incredibly Difficult Mission:

    "Quick, destroy the evidence!"
    "How?"
    "Take a picture of it!"

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  49. Reminds me of the Treehouse of Horror.... by horati0 · · Score: 1

    ...when aliens kidnapped then-presidential candidates Bill Clinton and Bob Dole and stored them in a cylindrical glass casing.

    "What the hell is this... some kind of nanotube?"

    --
    The neutrality of this sig is disputed.
  50. no, no...don't imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...a beowulf cluster of nano-computers. Oh, the horror!

  51. Just wrap the space elevator cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just remember the nanotubes are there for the tension strength. It does not mean they cannot be coated with an reflective material.

    Besides, I think we are quite far off yet from building this space elevator thing. Now a 'bridge-to-space' is another idea that might work (basically a sky hook that pulls payloads from high altitude to orbit).

  52. A good reason why... by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    This is a good reason why some people should not be allowed in porn films...

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  53. gosh, does this mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... that bringing up a web-page in my browser which uses flash can cause stuff to blow up?

    certainly, this must be old news, flash has caused my gnu/linux web-browser to explode many times over the years.

  54. Nope... maybe a low order fuse though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because, as noted in the article, the temps only get up to 700 degree's or so... you need alot more temp/energy to kick of a fission, let alone fusion reaction.

  55. Don't you think it is flashed only at the surface? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So that there _IS_ a gradient.

    KLM.

  56. Re:Charlton Heston unveils Nasa "Beanstalk" Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MOD YOU! MOD YOU DOWN TO HELL!!!

    (Hmmm... If that doesn't set off the lameness filter, nothing will...)

  57. photovoltaic? by sammy+baby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here's a thought: if the nanotubes are so efficient at absorbing light, is there a way to build them such that the heat could be effeciently drawn out of them in order to provide power for a turbine?

    Or, in English, could you use these things to make ultra-powerful solar panels?

    1. Re:photovoltaic? by bugg · · Score: 4, Informative
      For the sake of being correct, this is nowhere near how photovoltaic cells work. It is based on the photoelectric effect, which states that when an electron of an atom is bombarded with a photon of a certain energy (equal to the atom's work function) the electron becomes free. In solar cells, this same thing happens with two dissimilar semiconducting materials to easily create a usable voltage.

      What's happening here is the energy absorbed by the nanotubes cannot dissipate fast enough and cause an explosion. In a photoelectric/photovoltaic system all heat is definitely wasted. So your answer is no, because carbon is not particularly useful in a photovoltaic cell and carbon nanotubes certainly wouldn't be, because their internal resistance is *way* too high.

      --
      -bugg
    2. Re:photovoltaic? by ForceOfWill · · Score: 1

      Actually, he said solar panels, not necessarily photovoltaics. There are solar panels which collect heat in a glass case and pump it out using a set of pipes (like a radiator, but backwards :).

      I think nanotubes might be useful for this, if only to replace the black paint that goes on the pipes. Just have to be careful about your solar panels exploding when it gets too sunny :)

      --

      --
      Seeing is believing; You wouldn't have seen it if you didn't believe it.
  58. Mirror of the MPEG here by Otto · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mirror of the MPEG is here: flash.mpeg

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Mirror of the MPEG here by Cruciform · · Score: 2

      it would seem they've renamed it as well.
      the new file is called flash.save in the same directory. maybe they should have called it "flash.dotted" instead. :)

    2. Re:Mirror of the MPEG here by Cruciform · · Score: 2

      meant to refer to the original site but i was tired.

  59. Evolution of bangers... by KC7GR · · Score: 1

    First, there was Fire. Later on came gunpowder. Later than that came C4, Gelignite, and all the other Things That Make You Go Boom.

    Now we've got exploding nanotubes. I suppose the next big thing will be BuckyBombs.

    You may now groan, throw rotten veggies, etc.

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

  60. The Video by Sabalon · · Score: 2

    Hmmm...cool I guess...though to me it looks more like someone missed the toilet.

    alt.binaries.fetish.scat.nanotubes?

  61. give this kid a reward! by Banner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Buy trying to take the picture in the lab, this kid found out something more important then all the researchers developing this. And may have saved us from some nasty things.
    Can you imagine if this was found out -after- this stuff was rolled out into general use?

  62. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you confuse Slashdot with SlashHipHop?

  63. No photos, please! by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can see it now...

    "Welcome to the Daytona Airshow! The newest, most advanced fighter in the world, with the first carbon nanotube body!"

    "Wooo! Quick, take a photo!"

    *FLASH*
    *FIZZLE*
    *CRASH*

    "Oh shit..."

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:No photos, please! by Ziviyr · · Score: 2

      Thats what they get for going cheap and using single-walled nanotubes! :-)

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  64. Black Tubes Explode.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..So tint/dye/paint them white somehow.

    anyway, this has many (non-destructive) applications...(i think the title is very misleading)

  65. I'm dumb. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can one of you who are geekier than thou please explain what the hell a nanotube actually is, and why some have more walls than others? Wonder if this was what the army was going to use to make the super soldier out of...

  66. Flash Strobes vaporize fruit flies too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a pro-amatuer photographer, and have found even fairly modest flash equipment puts out a whallop of power, for a very brief 1/50,000th of a second or so.

    I've experimented and found that even 4AA cell bounce flashes can scorch brown and back leather, and ignite small shavings of black construction paper.

    The larger AC fed units pack some truly frightening power. They will ignite dark materials, or explosively vaporize their outer surface, resulting in a neat steam and smoke cloud. My favorite targets however...

    Are fruit flies. Nothing funner than leaving a bananna peel in the trashcan for a week or so, and the fruit flies start swarming and lazily flying around. Hold the flash head right up next to them and fire! PFFFT! you get a little explosive pop of steam as the side of the fruitfly facing the flash superheats and explodes, and the rest of the hapless little insect gets blown in the opposite direction.
    TRES FUN!!!

  67. What about using this for secure documents? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine using nanotubes as the pigment in ink.

    You could print documents that go blank if someone tries to photograph them, or that are -- at least -- "tamper evident".

  68. No more funny business by brer_rabbit · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hey mods: don't you think this article has enough comments marked *funny*? The signal to noise ratio -- even for slashdot -- is in the crapper. Maybe consider not modding stuff down that really isn't funny or better yet find something with real content to mod up.

    1. Re:No more funny business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1 , Dick

      Hows that for modding?

    2. Re:No more funny business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should go with the flow a little, and not let yourself being anal all the time control your life.

      Within yourself being lost addressing the moderation system designed the address the content, you missed the content.

      Control yourself, or be controlled, try being objective instead of subjective.

  69. -1, Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wakey wakey, moderators...

  70. Weapons and more... by crawdaddy · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the energy release is enough for single-sided nanotubes to be used as explosives. If for nothing else, this is definitely a nifty device for a way to ignite a fuse or something.

    --Speed 3: Gone in a Flash--
    Everybody stay calm! There's a bomb on the camera. If the little flash button is held for more than 3 seconds, the bomb is armed. If you take a picture....the bomb will detonate.

    I could also see this (if nanotubed were cheap to come by) as being a good thing for campers. Need to start a fire? Get some kindling, logs, your nanotubes and a flashbulb and you're ready to go!

    Another really neat thing I'd like to see this being used for: Self-destructing computers. When the machine receives the self-destruct command, it flips the switch on the flash and POOF! it's gone.

    1. Re:Weapons and more... by Kailden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I *love* human nature. Every time we make a scientific discovery, the thought process is

      1) Wow. hummph. neat. cool!
      2) I wonder if i can make any money off this.
      3) How could we make this into a weapon?

      aieeee.

      -K.

      --
      I need a TiVo for my car. Pause live traffic now.
  71. DVDCCA wasn't good enough by j-turkey · · Score: 1

    In a related story...

    The MPAA and RIAA are proposing that all hard disk platters be fabricated from carbon nanotubes with an overhead photoflashe builtin -- along with the exclusive right to control over that flash.

    That'll show those damn pirates and "hackers"...

    -Turkey

    --

    -Turkey

    1. Re:DVDCCA wasn't good enough by crawdaddy · · Score: 1

      Of course, the only place they are going to get the right to do this is in the EULA of the latest closed-source media player created by Microsoft. It will be built into the OS and can't be removed. Also, it will have a hidden ditributed computing app bundled with it.

  72. The interesting stuff is almost always by accident by ehud42 · · Score: 1

    Someone once said that great discoveries in science are not followed by an expression of 'Eureka, I found it!', but rather by an expression of 'Hey, that's not supposed to happen.... hmmmm... that is interesting though... I wonder what would happen if....'

    I love these types of discoveries.

    --
    I'm in my right mind and I have the answer to everything!
  73. Re:Charlton Heston unveils Nasa "Beanstalk" Space by Thud457 · · Score: 0

    I like how when JoeBob Briggs showed "Planet of the Apes" on MonsterVision awhile ago, he gives this big long backstory about how Charlton "Moses" Heston fought the keep the line "Damn them, Damn them all to Hell" despite the censor's opinion. That C.H. pointed out that Taylor was not cursing in vain, but actually intended to condem the people who destroyed the Earth to hell for their arrogant foolishness.

    -- Then TNT, in their infinite irony, sanitizes the line when they show the scene soon after JB's clarification.
    And as Paul Harvey woudl say, now you know the rest of the story.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  74. Re:Don't you think it is flashed only at the surfa by MarkusQ · · Score: 2

    Don't you think it is flashed only at the surface? So that there _IS_ a gradient.

    That would be true for the nested tubes (which, as I understand it, don't blow up).

    But for the single layer the "surface" is all there is. They are, after all, only one atom thick. And since atoms are the bottom as far as heat is concerned (or at least, they are about as far down as you can go with the classical concept of heat) their isn't really a difference between the "surface" and the "inside".

    You can't have a carbon atom that's hot on one side and cold on the other, and more than you can have an integer that's even on one side and odd on the other.

    -- MarkusQ

  75. Re:German massacre by doricee · · Score: 1

    I dont normally respond to offtopic comments, but that comment hit on a pet peeve of mine.

    I dont think the military or police should have guns either. I mean here in Seattle the police shoot unarmed black men all the time. Which is a bit disturbing. Also what about oppressive governments? Then again, having guns allows for events like the one you described.

    One shouldnt declare a solution to a complex issue without really thinking about it from all sides. Rarely are social issues that simple.

  76. Hermmph? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Researchers around the world are exploring the potential that carbon nanotubes could have for a wide range of super-strong materials and nanoscale circuits"

    Person: "Look at my amazing mega-strong car. Made out of carbon nanotubes - you can't dent it or anything."

    "Yikes, my car has exploded because I was caught by the speed camera!"

    super-strong(*) material. Do not take pictures of unless you want ultra-weak pile of hot dust.

  77. Nortel DMS-100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was visiting one of the largest Telephone switches in Alberta (A 150,000+ pair DMS-100) that serves the downtown core and those bastards wouldn't let me at least take a picture of it. I mean, I would've not used the camera flash, but at least let me under-expose the bitch. Hrmm.... it wouldn't of looked any worse anyways. I mean half of my pictures that are under-exposed come out with bland green and orange colours. Just like Nortel's!

    I guess thge worst thing that could've happend is the downtown core of Calgary losing all ATM backbone connections. No glass nanotubes there, but a large broad-spectrum RF spike that comes from a camera flash probably isn't too good for any electrical equipment.

    ....must...get...dms...photos.....

    Anonymous Coward? I thought that said Aerospace Cowboy!

  78. Good thing... by BlackGriffen · · Score: 2

    They found out about this before they sold super futuristic clothes out of this. Imagine what would have happened if this hadn't been discovered until someone tried to take a picture of junior! I know, slim chance it would have made it that far without a picture being taken of it, but still...

    Luckily, it's only a specific type of nanotube that's vulnerable. The double walled ones are supposedly not vulnerable to this problem. I would still like them to test it against ultraviolet and infrared flashes, and x-rays (imagine going to the dentist's office and catching fire!).

    BlackGriffen

  79. No no no... by Danse · · Score: 2

    As for oxygen in the carbon nanotube interior - there is no oxygen in the interior, as these were described as closed (capped) carbon nanotubes, which are formed under inert (non-oxygen) atmospheres.

    This is what the article said: (emphasis mine)

    The initial popping noise is generated by the heating of the oxygen inside and between the tubes, which causes a shock wave.

    Then after that it says:

    When the researchers tried the experiment in the absence of oxygen they found that the tubes were transformed into different nanoscopic shapes, some reminiscent of cone-shaped "nanohorns".

    --
    It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    1. Re:No no no... by PeeOnYou2 · · Score: 1

      "History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government." T. Jefferson

      The catholic church gives new meaning to this famous quote.. or have they been hiding this THAT long?

    2. Re:No no no... by caesar-auf-nihil · · Score: 2

      Thanks for pointing that out. Hmmm...I think the researchers are incorrect in saying that there is oxygen inside the tubes, its really too small a cavity to hold enough oxygen to be meaningful in this reaction. Outside the tubes however...well..there may be other things going on.

      However, I missed the part about them trying it in the absence of oxygen. The change of the shape suggests that my idea about bond strain is not so far off. Since oxygen isn't present when the bonds break, the tubes cannot combust/explode. Instead the bonds break and rearrange to move to structures with less bond strain. Still very interesting results either way.

      --
      -When going for broke, go for Ithaca!
  80. The MPEG was renmaed by Leknor · · Score: 1

    They renamed the mpeg file probably to save bandwidth. If you go to:
    http://www.rpi.edu/dept/NewsComm/sub/Pressimg s/nan oflash/
    And download the 5.2 meg file and renamed it you can watch the video. Personally, I found it to be unexciting.

  81. Hey, now I can finally get mah barbecue lit! by NeuroManson · · Score: 2

    Hey maw! Bring out tha Polaroid!

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  82. The web site exploded by Skapare · · Score: 2

    OK, who's the troll that snapped a flash picture of their web site? Seems the thing has exploded and is no longer up.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  83. But, where do you get the paintbrush? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where do you get a paintbrush small enough to paint something a few atoms wide?

    How do you hold it when you're done? Do you train little amoeba painters to do the job for you? How do you get hats and smocks for them to wear? How to you ensure the tiny paint buckets get filled, properly, but don't overflow?

    Sure, painting is a good idea, but how do you work out the logistics? And don't even get me started on those nasty Amoeba Painter's Unions!!!

    A.C.

    1. Re:But, where do you get the paintbrush? by iabervon · · Score: 2

      Not to mention that titanium dioxide (white paint dye) is a lot bigger than carbon. I think it's a better idea to tie a lot of nanotubes together and then paint that, once it's gotten thick enough to deal with directly.

  84. Re:German massacre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a wonderful idea, if we take all the guns away then we don't have to worry about law abiding people using guns to kill people. I'm glad criminals don't break the law, I'd hate to think they would be the only ones with weapons... oh wait, i guess they do break the law.

    That's ok, because I can just call the police... oh wait, they wouldn't have weapons to protect me. Well that's ok because they will take the guns away from criminals... oh damn, they would probably get laughed at while being shot to death. Well maybe police and military should have guns, but not citizens... then if someone tries to kill me i'll just call the police. I'll say wait one sec I gotta call the police BANG oh, maybe that won't work either. Ok, so the police can take all the guns away, just like they've stoped the flow of illegal narcotics, ummm well, I guess that won't work either. Perhaps I'll just buy a weapon and defend myself.

    speaking of oppressive governments. If germany hadn't been disarmed would the Jewish people have fought back? If we don't have weapons will our government eventually become oppresive like hitler, or stalin? Doesn't freedom mean free? To be free shouldn't we be capable of defending freedom, or should we just let the government handle that for us?

    If all the guns were gone would we put aside greed and not stab each other with steak knives or run each other down with cars, or beat each other with bats. Did violence exist before guns? yet more things to think about. I believe the constitution included a right to bear arms for a reason, and no the National guard is not a militia nor does it say only militias can bear arms, it says the people. If we aren't "the people" then who is? Are we not "the people" when the 1st ammendment gives us free speech? why would we not be in regards to the 2nd ammendment?

  85. Modest little buggers... by mithran8 · · Score: 1

    Has it occurred to no one that they may just be very shy and don't like having their picture taken? Maybe it's just blushing that got carried away...

    -------------

    --
    An object at rest cannot be stopped!
  86. Video slashdotted by thebabelfish · · Score: 1
    There is a cool video there of the stuff going off.
    Well there was a cool video of the stuff going off, now it's just a 16K file stating
    Our apologies, but due to the overwhelming popularity of this video, we've had to temporarily remove it, pending accommodations for the traffic we're receiving.
    I guess all the geeks wanted to see the nanotubes burst into flames...
    --
    "I don't trust goats," --To Catch a Spy
  87. Oh boy by sean23007 · · Score: 2

    The next level of pornography: clothing that is invisible when you take a picture of it! Ladies can be walking around normally, and then the paparazzi jump out and disrobe them with an innocent-seeming camera flash, and everything goes downhill from there. Story at eleven.

    --

    Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
  88. Sonic boom? by mattr · · Score: 2
    How quickly do you think the tubes unzip? Was that a sonic boom?

    Must be some use in a nano-size reactor that heats to 700C while shooting its contents and anything on its surface into the air.

    If you have two tubes next to each other unzipping into a hornlike shape simultaneously, you'd think there would be some neat shockwaves happening. Certainly something is forcing air out quickly.