Slashdot Mirror
Gateway as Content Distributor?
crovira writes "CNet has an article about Gateway testing the waters of the music business and using their retail stores as music outlets." crovira excerpts: "So far, Gateway executives have not specified exact plans that the company will pursue, but they have indicated that it could position itself as a conduit for content from established and new artists. Turner also indicated that Gateway is contemplating bypassing the titans of the music industry if necessary. 'We have retail stores that aren't beholden to the music industry,' Turner said. 'There are a lot of artists out there.'" Makes one wonder if the xxAAs will roll-over and take their tithe or if they'll try to find some anti-competitive legal maneuvering leverage to keep Gateway out? And can Apple be far behind with video services out of their own retail outlets?"
Yes, it is a post.
But which post is it ?
The
post. awwwww
death to RIAA! Long live the cow-spotted hardware retailer & bootleg music distributor!!!!
The Pjammer Chronicles --
...given the image of the company, is it all going to be pirated barnyard music?
-- We live in a world where lemonade is artificial and soap has real lemon.
great, so i can pick up a new gateway with a cdr and cd-ripping software, all the while looking around the store for music to remember to go home and download so i can burn it later! awesome!
- Listen to music geared toward the Lowest Common Denominator
- on a machine geared toward the Lowest Common Denominator.
Neat."What is the sound of one belly slapping?"
Kinko's is the most logical content distributor beholden to no media giants. Too bad, as they seem to have lost their adventuresome spirit over the past few years.
see subject
The
Maybe since Gateway is in the tech business, not the record business, they will be able to come up with the business model that can make money for themselves and [their?] artists with new technology.
Error: Success
the great thing is Gateway has enough clout to pull this off. And the more holes Gateway puts in the wall the more cracks smaller guys can squeese through.
If I were only smart enough to accomplish the things I dream about.. Or maybe too dumb to care.
But I am thinking gateway will fall flat on thier face with this one. I don't think people will run to the the Gateway store to buy MP3's of music they never heard of. The RIAA mafia robly be effective in theatening any big-name artists from doing business with gateway. Finally they will get sued, meaning a whole lot of hassle to only serve a few users. Maybe a few small indy artist will end up getting record contracts as they are stolen from Gateway.
Frankly I would rather see them taking the money spent on this taking the RIAA to the supreme court.
Bite down on it!
They had a short bit about this on the show CNN Next. Included were interviews with the president of the RIAA, she was not happy at all. Basically said that Gateway was supporting piracy. Lol, what will they think of next?
i'd much rather have good pirated music, than crappy legal music..... granted people have different tastes in music, but in all seriousness, some musicians just aren't talented, i guess it's really a moot point being as i have 30 gigs of mp3s....
--fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
Bet then perhaps we'd see a rise in people getting computers from little companies no one has ever heard of.
...until RIAA sends Guido over to bust Michael Dell's kneecaps. And if that doesn't convince him to back off, I'm sure the thugs will think of more... creative ways to persuade him. Pain is such a wonderful negotiating tool.
--
Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
I'm not trying to say that Gateway is some sort of Utopian selfless corporation or anything, but I just have to cheer when I see big-name companies taking on the big bullies.
By choosing the path or dirty fightying, by not incorporating new technics and new ways of communicating in they business habits, but instead going the opposite way and fighting every new actor, even the smallest (decss teen sent to court!!!), by trying to steal every new technic or channel from their creator or by trying to prevent them to exist, they made everybody sure that they are the bad guys.
Now everybody, from the smallest to the biggest, feel entitled to try to be a big actor in this area, since the bad guys rule it.
They shot themselves in the face. Now they look ugly.
Will they try to change their ways or will they play even dirtier???
The answer: Next week, same slash hour, same slash channel.
Ted Waitt's brother Norm started Samson Music back in 1997. They signed a bunch of new artists, but then dropped them, changed their name to Gold Circle Records and signed a bunch of 80's leftovers.
"How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
It is hard to see how they could really succeed here. Would they sell CD's? Or would they simply allow MP3 downloads? Or would they do it all online with some Napster-like service?
I'm all for a totally new music distribution system (and who isn't? except for the record companies). The article is a bit light on details. Hopefully there will be more information soon.
Hey maybe one day, you will be able to call up and order you PC and have it shipped to you preloaded with your favorite MP3s!!!
-- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
Great! Gateway took the principles they learned in computing and decided to go into music! They're forgetting one lesson they (hopefully) learned in computing though--they suck. If they have second rate music like they have second rate computers, this could effectively be their own suicide. Go Gateway!
Has a COW over this!
This and the news of their plan to use the cow against the RIAA makes it appear to me that they are gravitating toward and image change to set them apart from the other computer makers. This sort of "anti-establishment" plan could be an attempt to get the attention of all those millions of pirateers the RIAA is so afraid of. Grabbing just a portion of that market would be a signifigant win for Gateway with its recent lackluster business.
It all makes me wonder how long it will be until Gateway sheds it's cowspots in favor of eye patches and parrots. But seriously, I wonder if we will see them installing Kazaa or Morpheus by default before too long.
I bet they are now Rosen's new poster child for the evil empire...
...we are from the government - we are here to help...
IIRC, Apple are legally unable to sell music due to a deal with Apple Music (of Beatles fame) way back when. Not sure if this still applies. IANAL
This is the real reason computer industry opposed the SSSCA(CBT.....). It wasn't really becuase it restrained their buisness model(it didn't all that much),nor out of the goodness of their hearts, but becuase they want to be the ones in control of the content. This applies to all large companys in the tech sector these days, be it microsoft, intel, dell or in this case, gateway. They all want in on the action of media conglomeration!
The RIAA could give a damn; as long as they can figure out a way to get more money for it. They virtually hold artists prisoner and then act in "their" defense. The RIAA has just been lucky enough to buy the right senators. MP3 Article, in there I have a feeling that they are just the RIAA's little fall guy. Just happens to be that they work on digital copyrights.
Why don't the big companies like McDonalds, Wal Mart, etc, etc realize the potential of developing their own Free music label? This would be GREAT advertising on their part. For example, Wal Mart or whoever could release songs in a digital format for Free. Perhaps they could release a special player that would not allow anyone to "share" the song until a specified date. In this respect, people would have to come into the store for downloading the new releases. I'd do this... and hell, I would definitely buy whatever I could along the way.
Life is the leading cause of death in America.
We need this with movie theatres too.. movie theatres on a nationwide level that aren't part of "Hollywood"
Apple Records sued Apple Inc. in 1989 over a secret agreement the two had in 1981. Apple Records allowed Apple Inc. to keep their nifty little apple logo as long as they stayed out of the music industry. This came up again recently with the release of the iPod, although I don't know the outcome of the suit.
With a $3.5 billion drop in net sales in FY2001, and with a stock price under $7 a share, not to mention an increasingly competitive marketplace for OEMs, dontcha think Gateway ought to be focusing on consolidating their business instead of trying wacky new ventures?
"Folks just call him Buckethead." -- Les Claypool
"Too bad, as they seem to have lost their adventuresome spirit over the past few years."
Maybe I didn't notice this the half dozen times I have been there for some reason or another.
The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of a million is a statistic --Joseph Stalin
The big players in the music industry don't have a monopoly on talent. Just look at the crap-slingers on the Billboard Top 40, and tell me nobody else has this type of "star power", and I won't listen to you anymore, because it would waste my precious time.
Now Gateway comes along, trying to salvage getting its butt whooped by Dell in the home pc market, thinking it can capitalize on this fact.
Here's the problem, if you want to make stars (like the music industry most certainly does), than you need to get them exposure. The web isn't bad for distribution, but promotion is tough. The simple reason is there is just too much out there for people to focus in on a group or two and make superstars out of them. In the music business, people are spoon-fed the next big thing; they make a selection from a limited pool of applicants.
Now, if the music industry tells the radio conglomerates not to air artist so-and-so, you can bet your arse you won't be hearing them. If Bobby and Sally Teen USA don't see your awesome band on MTV, then they could only ever be "a great underground band". To Gateway's dismay, great underground bands don't usually make top dollar like the industry puppets do [save your counter-examples, I speak in the general sense].
So, the music industry can easily prevent Gateway from impinging on their turf by leveraging their might concerning radio and television against Gateway. Without these conduits of distribution, Gateway's plan is more hype than hope, I'm afraid.
"Not true Kinko's won't let you copy more than a few pages out of any book for instance. In fact they have all sorts of strange copyright rules. "
I normally do all my own copying. Most people don't bother me.
The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of a million is a statistic --Joseph Stalin
To quote the article:
And can Apple be far behind with video services out of their own retail outlets?
I think anyone who follows Apple knows about the whole Apple Records thing...
But, last I checked, Apple Records didn't have a problem with them distributing video content.
They have already set precedent, because...
We've got QuickTime and all of those related products...
And, we've got Apple Distributing Movie Trailers on their web site...
If they were going to persue Apple on the video front, I'ld figure it would have already been done.
self-aggrandizement
I wonder if the "hidden" message here is that Gateway sees PC sales to continue to be weak and they are desperately looking to do something with all of those retail outlets ...
It says something about their view of the PC business that rolling the dice on some wildly speculative entertainment industry venture seems attractive.
What I'm listening to now on Pandora...
Nine Texas executions set over 31 days April 28, 2002 Posted: 9:37 PM EDT (0137 GMT) HUNTSVILLE, Texas (AP) -- In a spurt of capital punishment that should ensure Texas reclaims the distinction for the year as America's most active execution state, nine condemned killers -- including a Frenchman -- are set to die over a 31-day period starting Tuesday. Among the convicted murderers facing lethal injection is a San Antonio man with one leg who earlier this year was spared from the death chamber by telling authorities he had knowledge of other slayings. Texas, by far the nation's leader in capital punishment with 265 lethal injections since executions resumed in 1982, put 17 prisoners to death in 2001, one fewer than Oklahoma. So far this year, nine of the 22 executions in the United States have been in Texas. Missouri is second with four. If all nine executions are carried out, it would be the most prolific series of punishment in Texas since 12 inmates were put to death over a 29-day period in May and June 1997. "Any date is serious," says Brian Davis, condemned for a Harris County slaying. "I don't want to die. But the way I look at it is, if you ask most people, they'd like to die in their sleep. I'm going to die like most people want to die. I know when, and I know how." Other than their fate and the fact that their appeals are running out, the inmates share little in common. Two are white, four black and three Hispanic. Three had been to prison before. Seven were born in Texas, one in Nevada and one in Paris, France. They are among at least 15 prisoners with death dates pending in Texas. Another four are scheduled for June and two more have August execution dates in what could be a year that exceeds the record 40 lethal injections administered in Texas in 2000. The timing of the punishments is coincidental. Dates are set by local trial court judges. The inmates facing death over the next 4.5 weeks are: Rodolfo Hernandez, 52, makes his second trip to the death house Tuesday. He was spared March 21 moments before he was to have been executed for his role in the 1985 robbery and fatal shooting of an undocumented immigrant in Comal County. The reprieve came from Gov. Rick Perry after Hernandez told San Antonio police earlier that week he had information about other killings in his native city. Hernandez, 52, lost a leg to diabetes and prison officials have said a recurring infection has prevented him from getting his wish: an artificial leg so he can walk to the death chamber. Stanley Baker, 35, born in Paris, France, faces injection May 30 for the September 1994 robbery and shooting death of a clerk at a College Station adult video store. Curtis Moore, 34, faces death Wednesday for the November 1995 abduction and shooting deaths of three people in two separate killing sprees. In one of the cases, a shooting victim who had been doused with gasoline and set afire survived to testify against his attacker. Davis, 33, is set to die May 7 for the fatal stabbing of a mentally retarded man he and his girlfriend picked up at a Houston bar in August 1991. The victim told Davis he would provide gas money for a trip home. When he said later he had no money, he was stabbed 11 times and had a swastika carved into his abdomen. Reginald Reeves, 28, faces a May 9 execution date for the September 1993 rape-strangulation of a 14-year-old girl who had run away from a group home in Paris, Texas. Her body was found at a vacant house. Reeves was 19 at the time. Henry Dunn, 27, has a May 14 death date for the abduction and fatal shooting in November 1993 of a Tyler man. Dunn also was 19 at the time of the slaying. Prosecutors said he justified the murder because the victim was gay. Ronford Styron, 32, faces execution May 16 for the beating death of his 11-month-old son in October 1993. He told police he did not believe the child was his own offspring and took out his anger on the infant. Johnny Martinez, 29, has a May 22 execution date for the July 1993 fatal stabbing of a Corpus Christi convenience store clerk during a robbery. Napoleon Beazley, 25, set to die May 28 for the 1994 shooting death of a Tyler businessman during a carjacking outside the victim's home. Beazley was 17 when he killed 63-year-old John Luttig, father of a federal appeals court judge in Virginia. Death penalty opponents worldwide have rallied behind Beazley, contending it would be cruel to execute him because he was a child when the crime occurred.
they are the same as the RIAA/MPAA they just don't have the $$ yet to buy the political muscle. Look at their PC agreements. Open the box void the warranty, it MUST be serviced at Gateway.
I would not buy a computer from them what makes you think I'd buy music from them ? Just because someone is competing with the Music Behemoths does not make them our friend, probably the exact opposite.
Stand up for yourselves, you are NOT consumers, you are CUSTOMERS, and need to be treated with some respect.
errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
nt
The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of a million is a statistic --Joseph Stalin
Wil Wheaton: This Is Your Life
Wheaton in that Stand By Me movie with Steven King.
I was looking at my Swiss Chronomoter in the corner of my system tray and I saw by double-clicking this magnificent precision timepiece that it has been calendar WEEKS since we've mentioned Wil Wheaton on this site. How this ghastly oversight was allowed to happen I don't know, but heads will roll and I sure hope they are hack writer Scotty D's!!! Fear not gentle reader, I am about to correct this grievous error in judgement by devoting the entirety of today's update to none other than the biggest star of the web log scene; our lord and master and two ton disaster, WIL WHEATON!!
Wil's formative years are shrouded in mystery, concealed from the public by a skein of lies and deceptions so complex that it has taken more than a decade for Wheaton researchers to unravel. Initially believed to be the son of some horrible mating of the "Hints from Heloise" shebeast and that green alien that ruined the Flintstones, Wheaton is actually born to relatively normal parents. Jane Wheaton was a failed hand-model whose hands were used in close-ups of Gregory Peck's hands in the 1982 miniseries "The Blue and the Gray" in which he played Abe Lincoln. Due to time constraints these close-ups of her hands signing the emancipation proclamation were edited out and she soon spiraled into depression and suicide attempts.
Wil's father was the scientist who developed the process for human hair transplantation. He was shot and killed in 1985 by the owner of the Hair Club for Men, although the case was never taken to court. Growing up fatherless was not easy for Wil but he quickly took to acting and at the tender age of 9 received his first major role in the movie "Stand By Me" which also starred Steven King and that guy from Sliders as the fat kid. Wheaton went on to star in "Never Ending Story" and "Never Ending Story 2" before he landed a role on the TV series Lost in Space.
Thus began his enduring career as "Space Nerd Wil Wheaton". As the whiney and juvenile Wilson Crusher, Wheaton quickly became hated by the viewers of the show. During one particularly hated episode Wilson Crusher and Dr. Zachary Smith accidentally unleash the spirit of a mummy into their robot companion and are forced to hide in a cave to escape its rampage. Finally Wheaton's character was killed off in the episode where the Klingons land on the planet and kidnap the monkey with big fake ears. Wilson and the robot try to rescue it from their clutches but end up being killed when Dr. Smith ejects them into space to keep them from telling the Klingons about his collection of photos he took of Wilson naked with the monkey.
After a stint starring in various Z-grade indy dramas about love triangles and two girls who kiss and maybe suicides or something, Wheaton hit rock bottom and appeared unbilled in a gay porn film. It was on the set of Anal Rodeo 7 that Wheaton met his post-op transsexual wife Dana. Dana had two children from a previous marriage (before she became a woman) but Wheaton was not going to let that stand in the way of their budding romance. Soon they were engaged and making the best love that a 200 dollar backstreet surgeon's vagina would allow. While their marriage would not be recognized in most states of the union, Wheaton proceeded against all of his family's wishes. He also found finally a role that suited him very well; the role of loving father to a transsexual wife's children.
Peter and Grunner were ages 5 and 8 when Dana Blajkowski finally became Dana Wheaton in 1998. By then Wil had taken a new bold career direction; the information super highway. Choosing to eschew traditional career tangents, Wheaton creates an online journal in which he details his life, trials, and tribulations. In the course of the journal you can find such interesting topics as:
Wheaton in some supporting role in a movie about two girls who drink wine and talk about art theory.
Who Wheaton's favorite entertainers are (Incubus is awesome and Enterprise is the best Star Track show since Lost in Space).
Generic and overly saccharine parenting anecdotes (alright, we get it already; you love your tranny kids).
Self-pitying introspective rants about negative attention (boohoo how can people call me a has-been?!).
Manic and annoyingly cheery rants about projects or events (I'm going to be on Weakest Link and Slashdot wrote a three-sentence blurb about my horrible Pong channel!!!!!1).
Pandering and insipid fan reach-arounds (Que-T in the soapbox really knows what she's talking about GUH-HAW GUH-HAW GUH-HAW WINK!).
Mind-bendingly inane daily occurrences. (Today I stopped at White Castle. Every time I eat a slider it reminds me of that fat kid from Stand By Me and how he still has a career even though he was in Tomcats and I don't have a career).
Poorly thought out or derivative opinion piece (usually something that deserves a "thanks captain obvious" award, i.e. racism is bad).
Wheaton continues to defy expectations and grows in online popularity even as his career tanks - or perhaps because his career is tanking. Readers identify with a failure, but more than that, even while wishing him well the would indeed damn him for "selling out". What most readers at his popular blog probably don't realize is that if Wheaton succeeded as they all seem to wish that would be the last they would hear from him unless he hired a personal assistant to update his site for him. If that day ever comes many of Wheaton's newfound Internet fans will turn their back on him, they love him because he seems real, they love him because he is not a big ego star.
Or is he?
Writing for Something Awful I could never get away with the type of updates he pulls. If I don't pour every grain of comedy ability I have into an update I'll get twenty e-mails telling me I'm a dumbass or that I deserve to be shot and then brought back to life through voodoo and shot again. Hell, sometimes I get that when I've practically cut open my heart and shot comedy blood out of it until I passed out. If I'm going to relate a personal anecdote it either better be damn interesting and funny or just a segue or intro into a more conventional comedy piece.
The idea of a web log isn't new, and more often than not they are only successful in the hands of pretty girls who can attach their cutesy smiles and almost-nude webcam to their dull words. Wheaton breaks this boundary by not shaking his girlish ass on a webcam and not degrading himself with porn links and gross-out pictures. He seems humble, self-effacing even, but if he's expecting to entertain people with melodramatic opinion pieces and anecdotes from his personal life then he obviously feels that it's important enough to share.
This "I'm still trying to be an actor" shtick is only going to hold reader interest for so much longer, Wil needs to really kick things up a notch and take a look at where he's going with his career. Might I suggest:
Career as a Vietnam War Veteran who constantly recounts stories about buddies dying facedown in the muck and talks about freaking out in the grocery story when the Asian butcher was "swinging that knife."
Sell streaming medical videos of his wife's artificial vagina and how it works with great anecdotes like "sometimes her urethra closes up and I have to catheterize her".
Take creepy sexualized beauty pageant pictures of his kids in bathing suits and with too much make-up. Oh wait, that only works for little girls. I was going to link to one of those sites here but I can't stomach it and I don't want to send traffic to them.
Somehow launch himself into space for real with a handheld camera and film the first ever science fiction show shot entirely in space. The plot can be about how much he misses going to White Castle, the fact that the satellite phone he has to use costs 50 dollars a minute, and recollections about all the times he talked with his son about how much Linkin Park rules.
Travel around the country visiting his old actor and actress friends and carry a camera. Take pictures when they refuse to open the door or slam the door in his face and make a coffee table book entitled "Hollywood Outsider".
Wil seems to be a super creative guy, I'm sure he'll have no problem coming up with some more ideas on what to do with his burgeoning multimedia empire. If you need any help Wil, feel free to drop me a line, because yo, this where the mad bank is!
The xxAA's onky exist because of inertia. And they are the heaviest contributors to this inertia.
They have fought (and lost) against EVERY technological device since the invention of the player piano. They have NEVER won. Not even ONCE.
And the people who were supposed to benefit from this went around them and founded entire industries around the products that were supposed to bring doom and desolation to the industries they were alleging to protect.
The industries who need protection need protection from the xxAAs not the technology. That technology has in EVERY case turned into a profit center for somebody in the industry.
I suspect that the fight will now be brought back home to the xxAAs since they have NEVER won a case but instead have stood at every turn between people and profits.
The xxAAs are about as useful as a dose of clap and about as pleasant. Cover Jack Valente with Piperazine and he'd wither away like a slug covered with salt.
The xxAAs put music and ads in elevators. But its such an abomination that its called "Muzak." Muzak is to music as a can of dog food is to a steak.
Some people prefer chicken. FINE... But THEY get to make the choice of their meal.
Most music is of the Muzak variety. If bought by people who don't like it and don't listen to it but have been sold on structured noise as a background. Its part of an architectural motif on par with the plastic chairs in airport lounges and its about as comfortable to be around.
Personally, I prefer silence. And its FREE!
MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
Makes one wonder if the xxAAs will roll-over and take their tithe
That's the stupidest analogy/expression I've seen in some time. A tithe is an offering (traditionally 10%, given to god). So taking an offering would generally be a pleasure for someone to do. I don't think you meant "take their offering". Maybe "give their offering", but then, who's the god figure they're tithing to? Certainly not some new player on the block like Gateway. And not the artists, since they've been traditionally screwed and aren't exactly the omnipotent god figure.
Even "roll over and play dead" or "lie down and take their medicine" would be better. Anyways, stick to programming or whatever you do, and leave the the literary creations to others.
It seemed vaugly similar to a line from eXistenZ.
If it was more along the lines of, "Death to the Demoness Hilary Rosen...." Well then it be pretty damn similar.
--Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
Ahh content, the last resort of the doomed hardware manufacturer.
The Internet is generally stupid
That's not nice. You should apologise.
If tits were wings it'd be flying around.
Content is NOT a commodity. And the sooner you realize that, the sooner you'll realize how important it is to stay out of the music business.
Second, we have FuckedCompany. With all the casualties in the online music space, Gateway better have one hell of a secret weapon. Great customer service and brick-and-mortar stores full of low-tech heads-of-households looking to invest in a computer will not help them sell records.
Gateway is a crumbling company. A look at recent news shows that they are clearly in a state of panic. Last I remember reading was that they were closing European operations and trying to get into IT consulting. I repeat: state of panic.
In the wisest of possible strategies, this music ploy is just a publicity stunt to earn credibility with "all those crazy kids." In their more probable strategy, it is simply bad management making a poor investment outside of their core competencies.
On a positive note, any money they throw at this project will be applied to a full frontal attack of the entertainment media establishment (xxAA's), which in a moral sense may be an ideal use of funds. In an economic sense, it is a waste of precious resources.
Yeah, good for Wal-Mart, bad for just about everyone else. The thought of Wal-Mart running their own music label is truly frightening. They would institute a brand of censorship over their artists...the likes of which the world has never seen.
No, Wal-Mart should stick to selling shotguns and fishing rods.
In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
If Gateway were to distribute music online the question is whose? The major labels aren't going to license their hoard to Gateway. The artists might, but most of the major names are tied by exclusive contract to their label. So Gateway is going to release music by unknowns? Without some major artists providing music the idea would be doomed.
"Oh crap! We're a computer-company and we're
not making any money selling computers! What
do we do now?"
Why should I go to a store to buy a computer,
much less music? I just signed up for emusic.com
because it is almost exactly what I think music
distribution should be like, and I'm really
enjoying it.
Why not, compusa is now selling tv and VHS players.
Bestbuy sells music, computer and home entertainment.
These guys are burning bridges with the zeal of a pyromaniac. First they Actually had the stones to go public about Micro$oft's policies towards OEM's. Now they're basically toilet papering the RIAA's front yard. I'm no Gateway supporter. Like mentioned in an earlier post, they cater to the lowest common denominator. But I haven't seen Dell or Compact saying anything publicly about the way MS bullies the OEM's. Maybe they'll start doing commercials that show the Gateway cow taking a dump on the Dell-dudes front yard (Dude, what's that smell?!) or commercials having some fun with the internal pissing match at Compaq/HP. If these guys want to have even a chance of surviving past this year, they need to be socking the other companies in right in the chops every time they get a chance, because I don't know of too many success stories providing content like they're planning to.
Picture their attempt... beit an online service ala napster, or physical locations /w kiosks ala gateway's retail outlets.... either way you're looking at an online portal crammed so full of junk adds and bullshit that it wont be worth you're time (if I have to stare at a purple fucking ape in a pop-up window while my 64 Mb album downloads at 5.7 KB/sec. I swear to god i'll end my life), or their kiosk will be an experiment in futility where it takes an hour of 50 cents a minute browsing to find 12 tracks you could possible want on a CD...)... it'll be so corporate and full of junk, that not even 13 year old girls who think the corporate marketing gimmicks for their backstreet bands are the way good bands actually advertise... fuck... i dunno what i was writing about anymore... 1 things for sure: prolly no one who visits slashdot will appreciate this service if it ever comes to fruition... we'll prefer clean open sourced p2p client interfaces w/o spyware for download hard to find illegal music for free. honestly... jebus.
dmarien
Let's say a customer lives near a Gateway Country Store, and doesn't have broadband Internet access. Said customer could use MP3.com to mix-and-match an album, then pick an option to have it burned to CD at the Gateway store. Assuming that each Gateway store has a pipe with halfway-decent bandwidth, and assuming that some of their demo models have CD burners, the disk can be waiting for the customer by the time they drive to the store.
If Gateway allows users to surf to the site from the stores' demo machines, then Gateway can even generate impulse-driven sales. The "netCDs" at MP3.com are $4-6 each, Gateway would buy blank CD-R in bulk (less than $1 per), toss in one dollar for bandwidth/employees/profits, and Gateway can charge $6-8 per CD, undercutting MP3.com (because there's no shipping) and RIAA (because their not evil, price-gouging control freaks).
What do you think?
They have plenty of other choices. There are literally thousands of labels out there. There is no reason an artist has to sign with the five biggest labels. The most common reason is that they're greedy, and signing with the absolute biggest labels in the industry is the quickest way to try to get rich.
If they'd be willing to settle for something less than "get rich quick" they could sign to any number of medium-sized labels.
10 PRINT CHR$(205.5+RND(1)); : GOTO 10
i think you confuse offering with requirement to avoid eternal torture in the flaming pits of hell
Do remember that Gateway is a company that at least used to have a license that said installing Linux voided the warranty.
Don't assume that because they go against other companies that they will do so in a way that benefits you (or customers in general). They may. But you sure can't count on it.
I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
Fry's Electronics sells audio and video content, but more as a traffic builder to get people into the store than as a major money-maker. Gateway may be thinking in that direction.
Fuck you you cujm guzzling queenie fag. You like splitting wheatons manpussy, fucktard?
How about giving that sand nigger Arafat soem analingus , you can clean out his sandy dingleberries.
Whill WHeeton should see the chair, SI IS A FAYG0T. FAGGGORTSANDS!
READ JEEFY K FAGOTS YOU FUCKERS FUCKHEADS DIE
GUESS WHAT FLOKS?! GIEV UP?!
I have updaeted my home paeg once again for all of yuo nerds out there! Feast your eyes on thsi morsall:
JE FF K's AUTHORINTATITIVE REVIEW OF TOMORRWOIND!!!!!!! BY JEFFK!!!!!!!!!!!111111
WELL WELL WELL
LOOKS LIEK SOMEBODY (ME) HAS UPDATED HIS PAGE OF INTARNATE KNOWLIDGE ONCEMOER!!!! I HAEV WRITTAN AN ARTICAL ENTITELED:
JEFF K"S"S GUIDE TO TEH USEING TEH INTARNET!!! 2-25-2002
YUO bettar reads it now or else I will go on a hungar strike and taht means Jerry will eat my food for me adn JERRY CANT AFFORD TOO DO THIES!!! HE SI A FAT LITTAL BOY AND IT"D BE BIG TROUBAL IF THES WHERE TOO HAPPAN SO HURRY UP!!!
2-8-2002: TEH SON WHALE COME UP TOMMORROWWWIND!
IOH SHEESH IT HAS BEEN A LONG TIME SENCE I LAST UPDATED THSI PAGE FOR YUO JERKS!!!1 ALL OF THE LETTERS ARE INQUWARING WHEN I AM GOING TO UPADATE IT!! TEH TIME HAS COME AT LAST!!!!!!!!!!111111111 I TALKED TO PETAR HEINZ AND TODD HOWARD FROM BETASDA SOFTWROKS ABOUT THERE NEW GAME FOR MMMORPG FANS TOMMORROWWWIND!!!1
TAKE SOME TIME OUT OF YOUR BUZZY SCHEDULES AND GO TO TEH LAND OF RELAXATION WHERE TEH INTARVIEWS
GROW GREENEST!!!!!! 9-27-2001: WELL WELL WELL
I HAEV UPDATED ONCE AGAIN! SORREY I HAVE NOT UPDATE LATTELY BUT I LOST MY PAGE AND IT FELL OUT OF TEH COMPUTAR MACHENE AND I JUST FOUND IT!!!! I AMUSING FTP IN THIS CASE
SO PLEAS GO READ MY FIVE NEW "WACKY FUN COMPUTAR COMIC JOKES" OR ELSE YOULL BE SORREY BCUSAE I WILL KILL YOU! IN QUAEK 3!!!! AHAHHAHAHAHAHHA
AHAHHF 5-9-2001
hey yuo morons I haev updated my siet again with an artical about E3 THIS YEAR!!! ME AND JERRY are going too e3 again and will intarview famos celebridies liek I dont know somebodey!!! but until then I wrote a E3 PREVIEW for anticicpatian of thes exciting event and teh games there and READ IT READ IT NOW DUMBSHOES!!! READ IT! GO 4-17-2001
HEY LOOK I HAEV UPDATED MY "ASK JEFF K" COLAMN WERE YUO ASK ME QUAESTIANS AND I ANSWAR THEM!!! SO READ IT OR BEAD IT, BABEY!!! HHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHA!!!T
4-02-2001 I HAEV UPDATED MY PAEG WITH A NEW ARTICAL COMPARING TEH UPCOMING CONSOULES AND TELLING YUO WAHT TO BUYS! GO READ IT NOW, ITS SNOY PLAYSTATIAN 2 VS NINTENTNDO GASMECUBE VS. MICORSOFT EX-BOX READ IT NOW!!!!
READ IT NOW, CAKEASS!!! 2-23-2001: evarybodey who works at FRY"S ELECTROANICS SI A MORRON!!!!!!!!!!!! taht's all!
2-21-2001: I BAUGHT A BIGGAR HARD DRIVE tooday SO I CAN STORE QUALIETY EPIC ENTARTAINMENT GAMES ON IT LIEK UNRALE TORNAMINT AND UNREALE!!!
I STORE THEM IN TEH RECYCLING BIN!!! HAHAHAHahhahahahHAHAHAHAHahahahha aLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO/ ROFFLE~
it si a MAXSTORE and is qualiety!12-19-2001: UPDAET #2::
OH NO I GOT AN ENGARY EMAEL FROM A MAD AOL USAR BECAUSE HE'S MAD HES SO DUMB AND I PRINTED HIS LETTAR IN TEH X-E ETNERTANMINT ARTICAL:
FROM: Inan6281@aol.com Subject: website
You never requested permission to use the submitted letters on your website, let alone inclue the names of persons who had addressed these letters to you. If they are not taken off within 48 hours legal consequences will follow. Federal Law Freedom of Information - Protection Clause. ver. 27. dated, 1998 (Par. 17 - Freedom of Information Act, 1998 - Whereign the use ofperson or persons names, contact information and/or image directly or indirectly exclosed to the public without written or documented approval is strictly prohibitted. Federal Archives. Case No. 3017 The United States of America v. Henderson.)
OH NO!!! AOL LAWYAR ATTACK!!! AAAGGGGGGH oh pleas saev me JESUS and buzz off yuo slobbargoat!!! hahahahahahhahaha fagot1 ~
2-19.2101 - I haev proofen my skills and HAX0RED XE ENTARTANMINT!!!
hear si what how I haXored it (CLICK HEAR)
and oh look , they sents me angry emales! OH HO WHAT UNHAPPEY CAMPARS!!! click hear to reads teh emales they sends me and all teh AOL they use hahahahahahah AOL@
2-13.2001 - I haev added two new comics too my comec strip, "BETTAR THAN PENNEY ARACADE!" GO READS THEM NOWWWWWWWWW I MEAN NOWWW1
BIG FATE NEWS?! 02-06.2101 - I gots back from being in bigs tourbal with teh govarnmint and they saids I was in troubal becuase I was writeing many pro-haX0ring updaets and news postes too help RIP TEH SYSTAM!!! so they made me go up too Washington and said if I dont go too jail I dont go too jail if I change my page and (my hoempage) and write about HELPING PEOPAL not HAX0RING!!!
So I cant write about HAX)RING anymore!!! now I haev to do "commulity service" and write too helps peopal liek fagot AOL usars and peopal who think they use Lunix on washing macheienes!!!!1 but I dont want too go to jail so I Will!
I haev writtan a comic strip called "HELPFUL COMPUTAR HINTS AND HELP WHICH HELPS YUO" and I drew it all by myself and wrote it myslef for commulity servicce! Since its a comic strip for peopal who dont know computars much good, I made it a comic charactar named "DOCTOR HARD DISK" who guides new computar peopal! Go reads it now and its counts as 4 hours for my commulity service and I only have 116 more too go!!!!!
Yet another crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered Gateway community when InfoWorld confirmed that Gateway market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all PCs. Coming on the heels of a recent Computerworld survey which plainly states that Gateway has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. Gateway is collapsing in complete disarray.
Gateway's sundown ad is great. Where can I find the Whip It ad that the articles keep mentioning?
The shareholder is always right.
every morning in the shower.
I don't have many feelings (positive or negative) for Gateway's products, but I must say I've been rather impressed with Gateway's rebellion against some big players.
...) have been very effective, and flushed with this victory they became refractory, and tried to finish "conquering the virtual world" with legally-mandated hardware misfeatures that would totally destroy the hardware market and licencing requirements that would totally destroy webcasting.
The RIAA/MPAA picked this fight: by trying to shut down computer-based content distribution. This hits the market for tech big-time, and Gateway's products are dead-center on ground zero.
Which makes their reaction no less impressive. Unlike (or at least ahead of) everyone else in the industry, they recognized it. And they are now staging a big-time counter-offensive, with style and effectiveness.
Computer-based content distribution IS the next thing, both for computers and for content. Rahter than accommodating it the RIAA/MPAA have declared war on it, in the courts and the legislature. Their blitzkrieg-style first strikes (media taxes, Napster takedown, DCMA,
If the hardware sellers don't want their future destroyed they MUST now either bring the RIAA/MPAA to heel or break their monopoly on content and content-licencing terms. Given their orgin in organized crime and their recent success with intimidation, it's unlikely they'll domesticate gracefully.
Gateway has recognized this, and taken on the battle with guts and style. Kudos to them.
Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
That as I read this article, I was staring at a huge advertisement for Dell.
MGM had the roaring lion in the logo. Then MTM (Mary Tyler Moore) did the takeoff with the pussycat. Now Gateway with the cow...
Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
You miss-spelled "make their time"
Rich
Here's the problem, if you want to make stars (like the music industry most certainly does), than you need to get them exposure. The web isn't bad for distribution, but promotion is tough.
Now, if the music industry tells the radio conglomerates not to air artist so-and-so, you can bet your arse you won't be hearing them. If Bobby and Sally Teen USA don't see your awesome band on MTV, then they could only ever be "a great underground band".
That's the way it WAS.
But we're on the Internet now.
The Mainstream Media is getting CREAMED by the Internet, in one venue after another: news, content, and and exposure to name just three.
To paraphraise the way my wife puts it:
"Word of Mouth" takes on a whole new meaning when you can get on your computer and recommend an artist you like to "a couple million of your closest friends".
Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
Mainstream Media is getting CREAMED by the Internet
In terms of people looking for *free* music. Gateway aims to make money though.
In their more probable strategy, it is simply bad management making a poor investment outside of their core competencies.
I think you are giving them more credit than is due. I don't think Gateway even has a core competency.
Lies about crimes
Epitaph (Bad Religion, NOFX, Rancid), Metropolis (KMFDM, VNV Nation, Front Line Assembly, Apoptygma Berzerk), Nitro (TSOL, The Vandals, AFI until recently), etc. Many of the "heavyweights" of the both the punk rock and industrial/synth genres aren't affiliated with the "big five" (and in fact Metropolis is the single biggest US label for EBM/synth/goth/etc. and it's independent). I'm not very familiar with other genres, but I'd imagine these aren't the only two...
10 PRINT CHR$(205.5+RND(1)); : GOTO 10
I know that, you know that, he knows that. Everyone knows about "there" "their" "they're."
It's a typo, slashdot rewards early posting and doesn't let you correct typos, so shit happens.
You want everyone to waste three times as long on every 10 second post just to be sure there isn't a letter out of place? Don't be such a fucktard.
Remember when you went into Best Buy and saw that they started putting up their stupid magazine rack that had a lot of titles that had nothing to do with computers and stereo stuff? I smelled death. My sister is in the book selling business. She tells me how cutthroat magazines are. Magazines in Best Buy are very similar to Gateway tryng to make albums.
See, in a retail sense, magazines racks are the first hallmark of death. Magazines are cheap, high volume, and handled by "rack-jobbers" out of house. When you put in shelf space for primarily someone else's profits? Well then, you are in trouble. Gateway getting into music? It is a magazine rack to them... a quick buck.
It smells like Enron when Gateway wants to get into music. Enron was into the whole elctricity and gas business (which you can always make a buck in when you have the price regulators in your back pocket) then they decided that utility profits weren't good enough. Then they started screwing their core business because they put it all in risky stock crap in a market that was paying out like a casino. When it didn't pay out, then they started screwing people over, big time.
Apparently Gateway is trying to diversify... but the truth of the matter is that it stinks of death all over it. Smells like a magazine rack.
If they are doing this to tag some artist to get someone in a Gateway Country store or promote proprietary Gateway stuff, well, look out. That business model makes no sense. Besides, record producers wait years at a time for a hit. How much patience do you think a product producing company has about profits? ABOUT THREE MONTHS until the quarterly statements are due, then they pull the project because it didn't pan out in three months.
I would be scared. Heads might roll any day now.